Suicidio, Sel Compassion
Suicidio, Sel Compassion
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-021-01815-1
ORIGINAL PAPER
Abstract
Objectives  While extant research indicates an inverse association between self-compassion and mindfulness with non-
suicidal self-injury (NSSI) and suicidal thoughts and behaviors (STBs), estimates of magnitude remain unknown. The
present systematic review and meta-analysis aim to quantify the relationship between self-compassion and mindfulness
with engagement in NSSI and STBs.
Methods  Literature searches in four electronic databases (PsycINFO, MEDLINE, Scopus, ProQuest Dissertations, and The-
ses Global) were conducted. Effect sizes were estimated using pooled correlation coefficients and a random effects model.
Meta-regressions with mixed-effect models were used to determine the moderators of the associations.
Results  Sixty-eight independent samples from 62 different articles (N = 53,797) met inclusion criteria. Analyses yielded
a medium negative correlation between self-compassion and mindfulness with both NSSI and STBs. Among mindfulness
facets, the nonjudging, acting with awareness, and describing facets demonstrated the largest significant correlations with
both STBs and NSSI. The self-coldness dimension (vs self-warmth dimension) of self-compassion demonstrated the largest
correlation to STBs. There was a stronger negative correlation between self-compassion and mindfulness with engagement
in NSSI and STBs in adolescent samples (than in clinical and college student samples) and with STBs’ recency (reported
within the past 12 months vs lifetime). Associations between NSSI and STBs with self-compassion and mindfulness were
greater in lower-quality studies and studies with younger or male samples, although effect sizes remained modest.
Conclusions  Findings suggest that self-compassion and mindfulness may buffer against NSSI and STBs. Future study
regarding the efficacy and effectiveness of self-compassion and mindfulness-based interventions among NSSI and STB
populations is warranted.
Meta‑analysis registration  PROSPERO CRD42020167823.
Keywords  Suicide · Non-suicidal self-injury · Self-harm · Self-compassion · Mindfulness · Suicidal ideation · Suicide
attempt
Suicide and related behaviors are serious and often over-                    Age-adjusted suicide mortality has increased nearly 33%
looked worldwide public health problems (Bertolote &                         since 2000 (Hedegaard & Warner, 2021) and is projected
Fleischmann, 2002; World Health Organization, 2017).                         to rise between 3 and 9% in the coming years (McIntyre &
Annual suicide mortality exceeds 800,000 (World Health                       Lee, 2020a, 2020b). Suicide has remained among the top
Organization, 2018)—an alarming rate that grossly                            ten leading causes of death in North America for over three
underestimates the true death toll (Tøllefsen et al., 2012).                 decades, with rates occurring over 2.5 times that of homi-
                                                                             cide (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2018).
                                                                             For every completed suicide, approximately 140 people
*	 Megan Per
	megan.per@mail.mcgill.ca                                                    contemplate and 25–30 attempt to take their life (Centers
                                                                             for Disease Control and Prevention, 2021; Weissman et al.,
1
    	    Department of Educational and Counselling Psychology,               1999). Suicide-related behaviors are associated with signifi-
         McGill University, Education Building, 3700 McTavish St             cant morbidity and health care costs (adjusted annual US
         (Room 614), QC H3A 1Y2 Montreal, Canada
                                                                             rates of $93.5 billion; Shepard et al., 2016). Accurate suicide
2
	        The Family Institute, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL,        prediction and prevention have been limited by challenges
         USA
                                                                                                                                 13
                                                                                                                            Vol.:(0123456789)
	Mindfulness
within spanning methodology (Carpenter & Law, 2021),               2019), optimism and hope (Chang et al., 2017), treatment
decades of inconsistent nomenclature (Goodfellow et al.,           compliance, and mental health service utilization (Rufino
2020; Silverman et al., 2007), and an over-focus on psycho-        et al., 2021)—has been mixed. Recent investigations suggest
pathology (e.g., mental illness, loneliness, hopelessness).        that cultural factors (e.g., cultural sanctions, cultural idioms
Indeed, over 50 years of focused prevention efforts have           related to distress) may play an extensive role in predicting
negligibly impacted suicide rates, and significant knowledge       NSSI and STBs (Tang et al., 2018) over and above tradition-
gaps remain regarding underlying mechanisms and pathways           ally studied protective factors (e.g., reasons for living; Chu
to suicide (Franklin et al., 2017).                                et al., 2019).
    Non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI), defined as the deliberate        Mindfulness and self-compassion, two related culturally
and intentional destruction of one’s own bodily tissue with-       adapted practices, have received increasing attention over
out suicidal intent and for reasons not socially sanctioned        the past two decades for their potential to buffer against
(e.g., tattoos, body piercings; International Society for the      NSSI and STBs (e.g., Bentley et al., 2017; Schmelefske
Study of Self-Injury, 2007), is distinct from but closely          et al., 2020; Van Vliet & Kalnins, 2011). Within a Western
associated with suicide. Those engaging in NSSI are at sig-        context, mindfulness is operationalized as the deliberate,
nificantly increased risk for suicidal thoughts and behav-         non-judgmental awareness of the present moment (Kabat-
iors (STBs; Baer et al., 2020; Kiekens et al., 2018; Ribeiro       Zinn, 2003). Employed widely in third wave therapies (e.g.,
et al., 2016). NSSI—a frequent precursor to STBs and co-           Dialectical Behavior Therapy, and Acceptance and Commit-
occurring behavior (Hamza et al., 2012; Klonsky et al.,            ment Therapy) and as standalone approaches (e.g., Mindful-
2013)—is arguably the most robust predictor of attempted           ness-Based Stress Reduction, Mindfulness-Based Cognitive
suicide (Taliaferro & Muehlenkamp, 2014; Victor & Klon-            Therapy), mindfulness-based interventions perform as well
sky, 2014). A large, multi-site study conducted over 10 years      as other evidence-based treatments for psychiatric condi-
found that individuals who self-injure were between 30 and         tions (i.e., depression, substance use disorders) associated
100 times more likely to die by suicide than the general pop-      with NSSI and STBs (Goldberg et al., 2018; Khoury et al.,
ulation (Hawton et al., 2015). NSSI may increase acquired          2013a).
capacity for suicide via irreversible changes in habituation          In a related area, an overlapping but distinct construct to
to physiological pain and fear of death (Bender et al., 2012).     mindfulness is self-compassion. While different definitions
Researchers have called for greater study and understanding        of self-compassion exist in the current literature (see review
of risk and resilience factors uniquely associated with NSSI       by Gilbert, 2017; Khoury, 2019; Strauss et al., 2016), self-
and STBs to better target prevention and intervention efforts      compassion is broadly considered to be theoretically adja-
(Franklin et al., 2017; Hasking et al., 2019).                     cent to mindfulness (Khoury, 2019). A common operation-
    Predominant NSSI and suicide risk models (for reviews,         alization based on the Self-Compassion Scale (SCS; Neff,
see Fox et al., 2015; Klonsky et al., 2018) have failed to         2003b) involves three interconnected dimensions: holding
translate into efficacious prevention and intervention initia-     painful thoughts in mindful awareness, showing kindness
tives (Fox et al., 2020; Nielssen et al., 2017), in part due to    towards oneself in the face of distress, and understand-
a narrow over-focus on pathology that overlooks resilience         ing difficulties as part of a larger human experience (Neff,
and other protective factors as critical moderators of the         2003a). Alternative conceptualizations of self-compassion
risk-outcome relationship. Resilience is a multidimensional        include Gu et al., (2020) five-dimensional model (recogniz-
process involving transactions between intra- and interper-        ing suffering; understanding the universality of suffering;
sonal resources that increase adaptive coping capacity in the      feeling for the person suffering; tolerating uncomfortable
face of adversity (Gallagher & Miller, 2018; Luthar & Cic-         feelings; and motivation to act/alleviate suffering), and Gil-
chetti, 2000). Incorporating resilience into suicide research      bert’s dual component framework combining sensitivity to
is critical for contextualizing dynamics that underlie suicidal    one’s own suffering (compassionate engagement) with a
phenomena and outcomes (Shahram et al., 2021). Resilience          commitment to alleviate and prevent it (or compassionate
serves as a crucial barrier to suicidality (Brailovskaia et al.,   action; Gilbert & Mascaro, 2017; Gilbert et al., 2017).
2019; Sher, 2019), and preliminary evidence suggests it               Substantial evidence links mindfulness and self-com-
accounts for greater variance in predicting STB remission          passion to psychological health and well-being, suggest-
than do risk factors (Teismann et al., 2016).                      ing an inverse correlation with psychological distress and
    Holistic consideration of relationships between NSSI           psychopathology. Posited factors underlying these rela-
and STB risk and resilience factors add much-needed incre-         tionships include facilitative effects of mindfulness and
mental validity in understanding these complex phenomena           self-compassion on autonomic regulation (e.g., decreas-
(Muehlenkamp & Brausch, 2019). Research on the rela-               ing sympathetic hyperarousal and dorsal vagal activation),
tionship between NSSI and STBs and traditional resilience          emotion-focused coping (e.g., promoting awareness and
proxies—i.e., life satisfaction (Muehlenkamp & Brausch,            identification of affective states), and distress tolerance (e.g.,
13
Mindfulness	
emotional acceptance; Basharpoor et al., 2021; Finlay-Jones       and/or self-compassion; (2) assessed for NSSI and/or
et al., 2015; Inwood & Ferrari, 2018; Ogden et al., 2006).        STBs; (3) included original data; (4) reported correla-
We know that there is a large body of electrophysiological,       tion coefficients (or other statistics when correlation
neurobiological, and psychological evidence which indicates       coefficients were not available, e.g., t-scores) between
that mindfulness and self-compassion affect mental health         mindfulness or self-compassion and NSSI (defined as
outcomes by enhancing emotion regulation capacity (Inwood         a deliberate non-suicidal act involving actual or poten-
& Ferrari, 2018; Lin et al., 2016; Lutz et al., 2014). We also    tial tissue damage without suicidal intent) or suicidal
know NSSI and STBs are linked to emotion dysregulation            outcomes; (5) were available in English or French; and
(Rajappa et al., 2012; You et al., 2018) and may function as      (6) were published in a peer-reviewed journal article or
attempts to regulate and manage distressing affective expe-       dissertation. Dissertations were included in an effort to
riences. Indeed, for some, NSSI and STBs (Angelakis &             reduce publication bias by potentially including stud-
Gooding, 2020, 2021; Brereton & McGlinchey, 2020; Ellis           ies with null or negative results, which provides a more
& Rufino, 2016) provide means of experiential avoidance—          comprehensive picture of the available research (Paez,
i.e., escape behaviors aimed to attenuate the form, frequency,    2017). When information was missing, authors were
and/or contexts associated with contacting/being present          contacted, and the study was included only if the neces-
with aversive internal experiences (e.g., physiological sen-      sary data were obtained. Studies not explicitly differ-
sations, emotions, thoughts, memories, action urges; Hayes        entiating between self-injury with and without suicidal
et al., 1996, p. 1154). Thus, experiential avoidance can be       intent were excluded. There were no restrictions on
understood as an emotion regulation strategy—one way to           study design or date; however, only baseline data were
manage emotions is to avoid them.                                 used in the analyses.
    Taken together, these findings suggest that mindfulness
and self-compassion may target underlying functions of
NSSI and STBs. Mindfulness and self-compassion are likely         Search Strategy
to increase psychological flexibility and expand coping rep-
ertoires in ways that reduce reliance on escape via self-injury   Articles were identified for inclusion via searches through
and STBs. Supporting this notion, a recent meta-analysis          four electronic databases (PsycINFO, MEDLINE, Scopus,
found that mindfulness-based interventions led to moderate        and ProQuest Dissertations, and Theses Global). The ini-
reductions in suicidal ideation (Schmelefske et al., 2020)        tial search was conducted in PsycINFO (Ovid, 1806 to pre-
and other psychological outcomes associated with suicide          sent) and was peer-reviewed by Dr. Alberto Chiesa, Uni-
(e.g., depression).                                               versity of Bologna. The search combined keywords and
    Despite growing interest in the clinical application and      Boolean operators related to NSSI or suicide and mindful-
utility of mindfulness and self-compassion on NSSI and            ness or self-compassion. Several studies made use of the
STBs, the relationships between these constructs remain           same dataset and data was extracted when they reported
unclear. Recently, there has been a systematic review on          complementary data (e.g.,Watson-Singleton et al., 2018;
self-harm, suicidal ideation, and self-compassion (Cleare         Wu et al., 2019). See Fig. 1 for a flow diagram of search
et al., 2019). While laudable, this review did not quantify       results.
these relationships, and examined suicidal ideation with-            Data assessing (1) NSSI and STBs and (2) mindful-
out accounting for key-related constructs such as NSSI and        ness and self-compassion outcomes were extracted. STBs
STBs. The present study addresses these important gaps and        and NSSI were measured continuously (e.g., frequency
adds to the literature by aiming to (1) quantify the corre-       of thoughts and behaviors) and/or categorically (e.g.,
lations between mindfulness, self-compassion, NSSI, and           endorsement of specific thoughts and behaviors) across
STBs; (2) examine the impact of specific moderators (age,         studies. Demographic information from included studies
gender, and study quality) on these relationships; and (3)        was extracted and reported, and comprised of (a) publi-
compare the mean correlations between subgroups (popula-          cation characteristics (e.g., year of publication and name
tion type, recency of STBs and NSSI).                             of authors); (b) study characteristics (e.g., sample size,
                                                                  sample type, geographic region); and (c) participant char-
                                                                  acteristics (e.g., mean age, percentage of female partici-
Methods                                                           pants, percentage of caucasian participants). Continuous
                                                                  moderators (i.e., age, percentage of female and study qual-
Eligibility Criteria                                              ity) were examined with meta-regressions with the goal
                                                                  of investigating how outcomes were affected by the mod-
Studies were eligible for inclusion in the review if they         erators. Subgroup analyses were conducted to compare
(1) reported data on completed measures of mindfulness
                                                                                                                  13
	Mindfulness
                                   Identification
                                                                Records idenfied through database
                                                                             searching
                                                                            (n = 1,296)
                                   Screening
                                                                        Records screened                      Records excluded
                                                                            (n = 841)                             (n = 641)
                                                                        Studies included in
                                   Included
13
Mindfulness	
                                                                                                                   13
     Table 1  Characteristics of included studies
     Study             Study design       Publication type Participants (N)    Country   Mean age (SD)   % female   % Caucasian   Study quality Outcomes        Measures
13
     Aalsma et al.,    Pilot study        Journal article   10th–12th grade    USA       15.2 (1.3)      79.1       37.2          13           Mindfulness      MAAS-A and
      (2020)a                                                 adolescents                                                                       and suicidal     SIQ
                                                              (18)                                                                              ideation (SI)
                                                            8th–9th grade
                                                              adolescents
                                                              (25)
     Ali (2014)        Cross-sectional    Dissertation      Students with      USA       16 (1.28)       50         66.7          13           Self-compas-     SCS and subset
                                                              a behavioral                                                                      sion (SC) and    questions from
                                                              or emotional                                                                      suicidality      the YRBSS
                                                              disorder (12)
     Anastasiades      Cross-sectional    Journal article   Female under-      USA       19.92 (1.58)    100        76.7          12           Mindfulness      MAAS and BSS
      et al., (2017)                                          graduate                                                                          and SI
                                                              students (928)
     Argento et al.,   Brief mindful-  Journal article      University stu-    Canada    20.17 (1.98)    100        54.9          13           Mindfulness      SMS and ISAS
      (2020)            ness induction                        dents (144)                                                                       and NSSI
     Basharpoor        Cross-sectional Journal article      University stu-    Iran      21.25 (2.76)    57.33      N/A           8            SC and SI        SCS and BSS
      et al., (2016)                                          dents (150)
     Bock et al.,      Cross-sectional    Journal article   University stu-    USA       20.26 (2.55)    76.4       61.9          11           Mindfulness      FFMQ and DSHI
      (2021)                                                  dents (339)                                                                       and NSSI
     Bravo et al.,     Cross-sectional    Journal article   Military person-   USA       32.74 (7.5)     44.5       62.4          12           Mindfulness      FFMQ and IDAS:
      (2018)a                                                 nel (407)                                                                         and suicidality suicidality
                                                            College students             24.46 (8.66)    41.30      47.8                                         subscale
                                                              (310)
     Brooks et al.,    Cross-sectional    Journal article   Black college      USA       22.4 (5.6)      79.2       0             13           Mindfulness,     FFMQ, BSS and
      (2021)                                                  students (307)                                                                    suicidality      SBQ-R
                                                                                                                                                and SI
     Buitron et al.,   Cross-sectional    Journal article   Undergraduates     USA       20.81 (3.96)    78.00      63.8          11           Mindfulness      FFMQ and ASIQ
      (2017)                                                  with moder-                                                                       and SI
                                                              ate to severe
                                                              depressive
                                                              symptoms
                                                              (218)
     Chassagne et al., Cross-sectional    Journal article   Students (1034)    France    Females: 20.1   79.11      N/A           9            Mindfulness      French version of
      (2020)                                                                              (2)                                                   and SI           the FFMQ and
                                                                                         Males: 20.6                                                             3 items assess-
                                                                                          (2.2)                                                                  ing suicide
                                                                                                                                                                 ideation
     Cheng et al.,     Cross-sectional    Journal article   Psychiatric      USA         33.3 (11)       42.9       44.5          12           Mindfulness,     FFMQ, BSS and
      (2018)                                                 inpatients with                                                                    SI, and sui-     medical records
                                                             a history of                                                                       cide attempts    assessing
                                                             trauma expo-                                                                       (SA)             previous suicide
                                                             sure (119)                                                                                          attempts
                                                                                                                                                                                    	Mindfulness
     Table 1  (continued)
     Study             Study design      Publication type Participants (N)     Country         Mean age (SD)   % female   % Caucasian   Study quality Outcomes        Measures
                                                                                                                                                                                          Mindfulness	
     Chesin et al.,    A quasi-exper-    Journal article   High–suicide        USA             41.7 (16.3)     80         N/A           11           Mindfulness,     FFMQ, SCS-SF
      (2016)            imental pre–                        risk outpa-                                                                               SC, and suici-   and LEIDS-R:
                        post study                          tients (10)                                                                               dality           hopelessness/
                                                                                                                                                                       suicidality
                                                                                                                                                                       subscale
     Chesin and Cas- Cross-sectional     Journal article   Undergraduate       USA             19.7 (2.9)      63.5       42.8          12           Mindfulness,     MAAS, BSS and
      cardi (2019)                                          students (780)                                                                            SI, and SA       1 item assessing
                                                                                                                                                                       previous suicide
                                                                                                                                                                       attempts
     Cladder-Micus     Intervention      Journal article   Patients with       The Netherlands 47.53 (11.67)   70.4       N/A           13           Mindfulness      KIMS and
      et al., (2018)                                         three or more                                                                            and suicidality LEIDS-R:
                                                             previous                                                                                                  hopelessness/
                                                             depressive epi-                                                                                           suicidality
                                                             sodes (115)                                                                                               subscale
     Cleare (2019)a    Cross-sectional   Dissertation      Community (61)      Scotland        28.4 (9.5)      49.2       80.3          13           Mindfulness,     SCS, FFMQ-SF,
                       Longitudinal                        University stu-                     22.9 (5.76)     75.7       93            13            SC, and SI       and BPMS
                        survey study                         dents (514)
                       Exploratory/                        Individuals with                    Range = 20–40   50         100           12
                        pilot qualita-                       and without
                        tive research                        a history of
                                                             NSSI
     Collett et al.,   Cross-sectional   Journal article   Patients with       UK              45.6 (12.1)     52         N/A           12           SC and SI        SCS and BSS
      (2016)                                                 persecutory
                                                             beliefs (21)
     Collins et al.,   Cross-sectional   Journal article   University stu-     Australia       25.98 (10.47)   69.96      77            11           Mindfulness,     MAAS, SITBI
      (2018)                                                 dents (233)                                                                              SI, and sui-     and 1 item
                                                                                                                                                      cidal intention  assessing sui-
                                                                                                                                                                       cidal intention
     Dixon-Gordon      Pilot study       Journal article   Women with      North America       34.47 (11.83)   100        63.2          13           Mindfulness      FFMQ and DSHI
      et al., (2015)                                        BPD (19)                                                                                  and NSSI
     Dobbins (2014)    Cross-sectional   Dissertation      Older adoles-   USA                 18.41 (.50)     59.6       57            13           Mindfulness      FFMQ and DSHI
                                                            cents (111)                                                                               and NSSI
     Fang et al.,      Cross-sectional   Journal article   Undergraduate China                 N/A             60.9       N/A           15           Mindfulness      MAAS and
      (2019)                                                medical stu-                                                                              and suicidality SBQ-R
                                                            dents (2633)
     Fang (2020)       Cross-sectional   Dissertation      Undergraduate USA                   19.37 (2.41)    76         88            14           SC and SI        SCS and ASIQ
                                                            students (417)
     Forkus et al.,    Cross-sectional   Journal article   Military veter- N/A                 35.08           22.7       70.4          10           SC and NSSI      SCS and DSHI
      (2019)                                                ans (203)
13
     Table 1  (continued)
     Study             Study design      Publication type Participants (N)    Country         Mean age (SD)   % female   % Caucasian       Study quality Outcomes        Measures
13
     Garisch and    Longitudinal         Journal Article   Secondary stu-     New Zealand     16.35 (0.62)    43         71.1 identified   13           Mindfulness      CAMS-R and
      Wilson (2015)  survey                                 dents (1162)                                                  as NZ Euro-                    and NSSI         DSHI
                                                                                                                          pean
     Hashemi et al.,   Cross-sectional   Journal article   Cardiovascular     Iran            46.62 (15.45)   42.2       N/A               9            Mindfulness      FFMQ and 3
      (2018)                                                patients (110)                                                                               and SI           items assessing
                                                                                                                                                                          suicide ideation
     Hasking et al.,   Cross-sectional   Journal article   Undergraduate      Australia       20.99 (5.33)    76.8       N/A               11           SC, NSSI, and    SCS-SF, ISAS
      (2019)                                                psychology                                                                                   SI               and 2 items
                                                            students (415)                                                                                                assessing sui-
                                                                                                                                                                          cidal ideation
     Hatchel et al.,   Cross-sectional   Journal article   LGBTQ youth        USA             15.91 (1.18)    70.2       74.3              12           SC and SI        SCS-SF and 2
      (2019)                                                (934)                                                                                                         items assessing
                                                                                                                                                                          suicidal ideation
     Jiang et al.,     Cross-sectional   Journal article   High school        China           13.58 (1.04)    40.1       N/A               12           SC and NSSI      SCS and 1 item
       (2017)                                               students (658)                                                                                                assessing NSSI
     Kaniuka et al.,   Cross-sectional   Journal article   Undergraduate      USA             21.81 (5.33)    67         87                9            SC and suici-    SCS and SBQ-R
       (2020b)                                              students (338)                                                                               dality
     Kaniuka et al.,   Cross-sectional   Journal article   Sexual minority    North America   26.25 (7.73)    46.2       79.6              13           SC and SI        SCS-SF and
       (2020a, b)                                           adults (651)                                                                                                  SIDAS
     Kelley et al.,    Cross-sectional   Journal article   Military veter-    USA             43.14 (12.23)   3.2        74.1              11           SC and suici-    SCS-SF and
       (2019)                                               ans (189)                                                                                    dality           IDAS: suicidal-
                                                                                                                                                                          ity subscale
     Kelliher-Rabon    Cross-sectional   Journal article   Community          USA             35.91 (11.77)   52         79.5              11           SC and suici-    SCS and SBQ-R
      et al. (2021)a                                        (623)                                                                                        dality
                                                           Persons with                       47.66 (13.19)   95.7       91.7              12
                                                            fibromyalgia
                                                            (419)
                                                           Persons with                       61.28 (27.63)   64.3       91.9              12
                                                            or recovering
                                                            from cancer
                                                            (235)
     Lamis and      Cross-sectional      Journal article   Undergraduate      USA             19.85 (1.66)    77.2       79.2              9            Mindfulness      MAAS and
      Dvorak (2014)                                         students (552)                                                                               and SI           SAEI-28
     Liu et al.,    Cross-sectional      Journal article   Adolescents’       China           14.94 (1.58)    52.9       0                 14           SC and suicide   SCS and Chinese
      (2020)                                                post-earth-                                                                                  risk             version of the
                                                            quake (499)                                                                                                   YRBSQ
     Lu et al., (2019) RCT              Journal article   Left behind pri-   China           11.86 (.71)     22.45      N/A               13           Mindfulness      MAAS and
                                                            mary school                                                                                  and SI risk      PANSI
                                                            students (49)
                                                                                                                                                                                              	Mindfulness
     Table 1  (continued)
     Study             Study design       Publication type Participants (N)      Country   Mean age (SD)   % female   % Caucasian   Study quality Outcomes       Measures
                                                                                                                                                                                    Mindfulness	
     MacIsaac          Cross-sectional    Dissertation      No history of        Canada    No NSSI: 21.61 No NSSI:    No NSSI: 52.06 12          Mindfulness,    MAAS, DSHI,
      (2019)                                                 NSSI (194)                     (5.85)         82.47      NSSI-Distal:                SC, and NSSI    ISAS and SCS-
                                                            History NSSI                   NSSI-Distal    NSSI-        63.63                                      SF
                                                             (83)                           20.43 (1.89)   Distal:    NSSI-Proximal:
                                                                                           NSSI-Proximal:  86.36       82.05
                                                                                            20.92 (2.91)  NSSI-
                                                                                                           Prox-
                                                                                                           imal:
                                                                                                           94.87
     McMain et al.,    Randomized         Journal article   High suicide         Canada    29.67 (8.62)   66          N/A           14           Mindfulness,    KIMS, DSHI and
      (2017) b          trial                                 risk in patients                                                                    NSSI and SA     LSASI
                                                              with BPD (84)
     Mohammad-         Cross-sectional    Journal article   Males with sub-      Iran      N/A             0          0             6            Mindfulness     MAAS and SPS
      khani et al.,                                           stance abuse                                                                        and suicide
      (2015)                                                  or dependence                                                                       risk
                                                              in outpatient
                                                              setting and
                                                              prison (348)
     Nagy (2017)       Experimental       Dissertation      Undergraduate        USA       19.37 (2.12)    74.2       73.8          14           SC and NSSI     SCS and ISAS
                                                              psychology
                                                              students (233)
     Paulus et al.,    Cross-sectional    Journal article   Latinos attend-      USA       38.8 (11.4)     86.7       0             10           Mindfulness      MAAS and
      (2018)                                                  ing commu-                                                                          and suicidality IDAS: suicidal-
                                                              nity-based                                                                                           ity subscale
                                                              primary health
                                                              care clinic
                                                              (391)
     Per et al., (2021) Cross-sectional   Journal article   University           Canada    23.98 (7.44)    82.2       49.01         13           SC, mindful-    SCS, FFMQ, and
                                                              students and                                                                        ness, and       DSHI
                                                              community                                                                           NSSI fre-
                                                              (343)                                                                               quency
     Possemato et al., RCT               Journal article   Veterans with        USA       46.4 (16.3)     12.9       82.3          15           Mindfulness     MAAS and
      (2016)                                                  PTSD in                                                                             and SI          PHQ-9
                                                              primary care
                                                              (62)
     Rabon et al.,     Cross-sectional    Journal article   Military veter-      USA       49.9 (16.78)    30.9       85.2          13           SC and suici-   SCS-SF and
      (2019)                                                  ans (541)                                                                           dality          SBQ-R
     Riquino (2019)    Performance-       Dissertation      Individuals with     USA       20.83 (2.07)    63.3       73.3          12           Mindfulness,    FFMQ and SITBI
                        based task                            a history of                                                                        SI, SA, and
                                                              engaging in                                                                         frequency of
                                                              NSSI (30)                                                                           NSSI
13
     Table 1  (continued)
     Study             Study design      Publication type Participants (N)     Country       Mean age (SD)   % female   % Caucasian   Study quality Outcomes        Measures
13
     Roush et al.,     Cross-sectional   Journal article   Psychiatric         USA           36.17 (15.3)    46.6       80.5          14           Mindfulness      FFMQ and BSS
      (2018)                                                 inpatients                                                                             and SI
                                                             (118)
     Serrano et al.,   Cross-sectional   Journal article   Firefighters        USA           38.5 (8.55)     5.3        75.1          12           Mindfulness      FFMQ and
      (2020)                                                 (865)                                                                                  and suicidality SBQ-R
     Servaty-Seib      Cross-sectional   Journal article   First-year          USA           18.47 (.5)      63.9       72.2          11           SC, SI, and sui- SCS-SF and SIS
      et al., (2021)                                         university stu-                                                                        cide actions
                                                             dents (665)
     Shorey et al.,    Cross-sectional   Journal article   Women in a          USA           32.3 (13.95)    100        96.3          13           Mindfulness      MAAS and PAI
      (2016)                                                 substance                                                                              and SI
                                                             use treatment
                                                             facility (81)
     Song and Bae      Cross-sectional   Journal article   Korean college      Korea         21.59 (2.07)    55.8       0             12           Mindfulness,     Korean version of
      (2020)                                                 students (355)                                                                         SA and SI        the FFMQ and
                                                                                                                                                                     SSI
     Stanley et al.,   Cross-sectional   Journal article   Firefighters        USA           38.37 (8.53)    5.5        75.2          11           Mindfulness      FFMQ and
       (2019)                                                (831)                                                                                  and suicidality SBQ-R
     Tanaka et al.,    Cross-sectional   Journal article   Adolescents         Canada        18.1 (1)        N/A        27            13           SC and SA        SCS and 1 item
       (2011)                                                receiving child                                                                                         assessing sui-
                                                             protection ser-                                                                                         cide attempts
                                                             vices (117)
     Tucker et al.,    Cross-sectional   Journal article   Undergraduate       USA           19.34           64.8       81            7            Mindfulness      FFMQ and
      (2014)                                                 psychology                                                                             and SI           HDSQ-SS
                                                             students (315)
     Tuna and Gen-     Multi-method,     Journal article   Undergraduate       Turkey        21.07 (1.58)    60.0       0             10           SC and NSSI      SCS (Turkish
      çöz (2021)        laboratory-                          students with                                                                                           translation) and
                        based design                         and without                                                                                             ISAS
                                                             a history of
                                                             NSSI (70)
     Umphrey et al.,   Cross-sectional   Dissertation      College students    USA           29              71         60.7          10           SC and SI        SCS and CHRTS
      (2021)                                                 (481)
     Vigna (2016)      Cross-sectional   Dissertation      High school stu-    USA           N/A             50.1       68.9          8            SC, SI, SA, and SCS-SF, 3
                                                             dents (1,882)                                                                          NSSI            items assess-
                                                                                                                                                                    ing suicide
                                                                                                                                                                    ideation, suicide
                                                                                                                                                                    attempts, and
                                                                                                                                                                    NSSI
     Wang et al.,      Cross-sectional   Journal article   Gay men (445)       Switzerland   N/A             0          N/A           13           Mindfulness,    MAAS and PSS
      (2018)                                                                                                                                        SI, suicide     (3-items)
                                                                                                                                                    plans, and SA
                                                                                                                                                                                        	Mindfulness
     Table 1  (continued)
     Study                Study design      Publication type Participants (N)     Country     Mean age (SD)    % female     % Caucasian      Study quality Outcomes           Measures
                                                                                                                                                                                                   Mindfulness	
     Warner (2015)        Cross-sectional   Dissertation         College students USA         25.5 (7.8)       62.8         69.9             14             Mindfulness       CAMS-R and 1
                                                                  (26,292)                                                                                   and NSSI          item assessing
                                                                                                                                                                               NSSI
     Watson-Sin-          Analyzing scale Journal article        African Ameri-   USA         37.24 (12.24)    52           0                14             SC, mindful-      SCS, FFMQ BSS
      gleton et al.,       psychometric                           can clinical                                                                               ness, and SI
      (2018)b              properties,                            sample (283)
                           cross-sectional
     Wu et al.,           Longitudinal     Journal article       Secondary        China       13.15 (1.1)      43.29        N/A              11             SC, NSSI, SI,     SCS, 12 items
      (2019)b              survey                                 school stu-                                                                                and SA            assessing
                                                                  dents (813)                                                                                                  NSSI and 2
                                                                                                                                                                               items assessing
                                                                                                                                                                               suicide ideation
                                                                                                                                                                               and attempt
     Xavier et al.,       Cross-sectional   Journal article      Adolescents      Portugal    15.24 (1.64)     51.6         N/A              12             SC and NSSI       SCS and RTSHIA
      (2016)                                                      (643)                                                                                                        (excluded
                                                                                                                                                                               suicidal intent
                                                                                                                                                                               responses)
     Zeifman et al.,      Cross-sectional   Journal article      Ethnically       Canada      21.04 (6.3)      83.1         36.9             13             SC and suici-     SCS and SBQ-R
      (2021)                                                       diverse                                                                                   dality
                                                                   undergraduate
                                                                   students (130)
     Zeng et al.,         Cross-sectional   Journal article      Older adults     China       51.72 (2.73)     46           0                8              Mindfulness       MAAS and
      (2017)                                                       (213)                                                                                     and SI            SBQ-R
     Zhang et al.,        Cross-sectional   Journal article      Students grade China         13.34 (.95)      47.8         0                11             SC and SI         SCS and short
      (2021)                                                       7–9 (1,167)                                                                                                 Chinese version
                                                                                                                                                                               of the ASIQ
     a
      Separate samples reported in one study
     b
          Data received from two articles with the same sample
     Abbreviations: ASIQ The Adult Suicide Ideation Questionnaire, BPMS The British Psychiatric Morbidity Survey, BSS Beck Suicide Ideation Scale, CAMS-R Cognitive and Affective Mindful-
     ness Scale–Revised, CHRTS Concise Health Risk Tracking Scale, DSHI Deliberate Self-Harm Inventory, FFMQ Five Facet Mindfulness Scale, FASM The Functional Assessment of Self-
     Mutilation Scale, HDSQ-SS Hopelessness Depression Symptom Questionnaire–Suicidality Subscale, IDAS Inventory of Depression and Anxiety Symptoms, ISAS Inventory of Statements about
     Self-Injury, KIMS The Kentucky Inventory of Mindfulness Skills, LEIDS-R Leiden Index of Depression Sensitivity-Revised, LSASI Lifetime Suicide Attempt Self-Injury Interview, L-SASII
     Lifetime Parasuicide Count, MAAS The Mindfulness Attention Awareness Scale, MAAS-A The Mindfulness Attention Awareness Scale-Adolescents, PAI The Personality Assessment Inventory,
     PANSI The Positive and Negative Suicide Ideation, PSS Paykel Suicide Scale, RTSHIA Risk-Taking and Self-harm Inventory for Adolescents, SAEI-28 The Suicide Anger Expression Inven-
     tory-28, SBQ-R Suicidal Behaviors Questionnaire-Revised, SCS Self-Compassion Scale, SHI Self-harm Inventory, SIDAS The Suicidal Ideation Attributes Scale, SIQ Suicide Ideation Question-
     naire, SIQ-JR Suicide Ideation Questionnaire-Junior High School Version, SIS Suicidal Ideation Scale, SMS State Mindfulness Scale, SPS Suicide Probability Scale, SSI The Scale for Suicide
     Ideation, YRBSQ Youth Risk Behavior Survey Questionnaire, YRBSS Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance Survey
13
13
     Table 2  Effect sizes for the relationship between mindfulness and self-compassion with suicide and NSSI outcomes
                                       Mindfulness                                                                       Self-compassion
                                                                                                              2
                                       k        r         Z             95% C.I.             Q            I              k      r          Z            95% C.I.            Q             I2
     Combined suicide outcomes         35       −.230*    −12.708       [−.264, −.196]       121.149      71.935         25     −.323*     −10.794      [−.376, −.267]      175.726       86.342
     Suicide ideation                  23       −.255*    −7.230        [−.320, −.188]       188.980      88.359         15     −.364*     −8.036       [−.442, −.281]      154.326       90.928
     Suicide attempts                  6        −.201*    −10.835       [−.236, −.165]       5.410        7.584          4      −.223*     −8.986       [−.269, −.175]      1.659         0.000
     Combined NSSI outcomesa          11       −.228*    −4.399        [−.324, −.128]       184.981      94.594         9      −.369*     −5.254       [−.487, −.238]      140.012       94.286
     Table 3  Effect sizes for the relationship between mindfulness facets and self-compassion dimensions with suicide and NSSI outcomes
                                   Suicide outcomes                                                                      NSSI outcomes
                                                                                                          2
                                   k        r              Z            95% C.I.            Q             I              k       r             Z         95% C.I.            Q            I2
     FFMQ
         Acting with awareness     11       −.277***       −9.713       [−.329, −.223]      25.756        61.173         4       −.347**       −2.793    [−.548, −.108]      30.163       90.054
         Describing                11       −.137***       −4.631       [−.194, −.080]      26.828        62.725         4       −.250*        −2.166    [−.451, −.024]      24.696       87.852
         Nonjudging                11       −.270***       −8.759       [−.327, −.212]      30.072        66.747         4       −.399*        −2.556    [−.633, −.098]      50.384       94.046
         Non-reacting              11       −.050          −1.115       [−.138, .038]       62.493        83.998         4       −.285         −1.410    [−.605, .114]       81.942       96.339
         Observing                 11       −.006          −.090        [−.131, .119]       130.045       92.310         4       −.026         −.236     [−.235, .186]       20.924       85.662
     SCS
     Self-warmth                   8        −.166***       −.166        [−.237, −.093]      15.679        55.353
     Self-coldness                 7        .239*          −2.247       [−.427, −.031]      89.743        93.314
     The self-warmth and self-coldness dimension of the SCS were not analyzed as only two studies reported subscales with NSSI outcomes
     FFMQ Five Facet Mindfulness Scale, SCS Self-Compassion Scale
     ***p > .001; **p >.01; *p >.05
                                                                                                                                                                                                    	Mindfulness
Mindfulness	
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    94.067
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    87.761
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    82.367
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    80.178
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    94.087
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    11.811
heterogeneity. Combined NSSI outcomes in community
                                                                                                                                                                                                                         I2
samples had a medium negative correlation (r = −.336)
with self-compassion and mindfulness combined (k = 3;
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    117.980
95% CI [−.594, −.016], p = .04), with high heterogeneity.
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    89.877
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    17.014
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    35.314
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    33.823
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    2.268
College samples had a small-to-medium negative correla-
                                                                                                                                                                                                                         Q
tion (r = −.220; k = 8; 95% CI [−.287, −.151], p < .001)
and adolescent samples had a medium negative correlation
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    [−.352, −.156]
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    [−.350, −.165]
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    [−.397, −.262]
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    [−.287, −.151]
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    [−.594, −.016]
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    [−.231, .168]
(r = −.331; k = 4; 95% CI [−.397, −.262], p < .001), with
self-compassion and mindfulness combined, both with high
                                                                                                                                                                                                                         95% C.I.
heterogeneity. Combined NSSI outcomes within clinical
samples were non-significant. See Table 4.
Moderation Analyses
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    −4.877
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    −5.240
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    −8.929
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    −6.120
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    −2.052
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    −.314
                                                                                                                                                                                                                         Z
The relationship between STBs and mindfulness and self-
                                                                 Table 4  Sub-group analysis for sample type and recency of suicide and NSSI outcomes with mindfulness and self-compassion combined
compassion were negatively and weakly moderated by par-
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    −.257**
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    −.260**
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    −.331**
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    −.220**
                                                                                                                                                                                                      NSSI outcomes
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    −.336*
ticipants’ mean age (k = 48; β = −.009, SE = 0.0009, p <
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    −.032
.001), gender (percentage of females in the sample; k = 51; β
                                                                                                                                                                                                                         r
= −.004, SE = 0.0003, p < .001), and study quality (k = 55;
β = −.024, SE = 0.002, p < .001). The relationship between
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    12
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    8
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    4
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    8
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    3
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    3
                                                                                                                                                                                                                         k
NSSI outcomes and mindfulness and self-compassion was
negatively moderated by mean age (k = 17; β = −.011, SE =
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    81.282
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    86.649
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    16.489
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    88.502
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    83.094
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    68.297
0.002, p < .001), gender (k = 17; β = −.004, SE = 0.0007, p
< .001), and study quality (k = 18; β = −.022, SE = 0.004,
                                                                                                                                                                                                                         2
                                                                                                                                                                                                                         I
p < .001).
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    160.275
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    149.805
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    173.951
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    70.982
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    31.543
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    8.382
Publication Bias Analysis
                                                                                                                                                                                                                         Q
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    [−.320, −.235]
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    [−.312, −.198]
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    [−.370, −.300]
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    [−.337, −.235]
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    [−.293, −.171]
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    [−.350, −.139]
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    −12.111
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    −17.238
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    −8.358
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    −7.238
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    −4.407
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    −.335**
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    −.287**
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    −.233**
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    −.247**
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    −.278*
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    −.256*
                                                                                                                                                                                                                         r
Discussion
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    31
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    21
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    21
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    13
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    11
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    8
                                                                                                                                                                                                                         k
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            13
	Mindfulness
and STBs. As expected, we found a negative association             behaviors (Karyadi et al., 2014), and neuroticism (Hanley
between NSSI (r = −.267) and STB (r = −.269) out-                  & Garland, 2017).
comes with mindfulness and self-compassion combined.                  In terms of self-compassion, weighted mean correlations
These results parallel findings from recent meta-analyses          on SCS dimensions revealed that greater self-coldness (r =
on experiential avoidance (Angelakis & Gooding, 2021)              .239) and lower levels of self-warmth (r = −.166) were sig-
and self-criticism (Zelkowitz & Cole, 2019)—constructs             nificantly linked to STBs. An insufficient number of studies
often operationalized as inverse to mindfulness and self-          reporting subscale data (i.e., two) prevented us from ana-
compassion. Both studies found positive relationships and          lyzing self-warmth and self-coldness dimensions for NSSI
effect size estimates between experiential avoidance with          outcomes; this paucity highlights an important avenue for
STBs (moderate to large effect) and NSSI (small effect)            future research. Given the mixed evidence pertaining to the
and self-criticism with NSSI (moderate-to-large effect),           validity of the SCS total score (Brenner et al., 2017; Brenner
providing convergent validation that mindfulness and self-         et al., 2018; Muris & Otgaar, 2020), our dimension-specific
compassion may serve key functions in the etiology and             investigation provides a crucial and nuanced picture regard-
maintenance of suicide and engagement in NSSI.                     ing the relationship between orthogonal dimensions of self-
   Importantly, the significant negative relationships emerg-      compassion important for suicide outcomes. The particularly
ing between mindfulness and self-compassion with suicide           robust relationship between self-coldness and STBs suggests
attempt history (r = −.209) and ideation (r = −.302) in the        that those reporting high levels of self-criticism, feelings of
present study align with previous research demonstrating           isolation, and identification with negatively labeled emotions
that mindfulness and self-compassion significantly lower           (self-coldness) may be especially susceptible to STBs.
the risk of STBs (Chesin & Jeglic, 2016; Lamis & Dvorak,              A third objective of this meta-analysis was to examine
2014). Indeed, frequency of NSSI engagement (i.e., how             personal and temporal moderators by comparing mean
often individuals report engaging in NSSI) had a medium            correlations between sample characteristics and outcome
negative effect (r = −.285) on mindfulness and self-com-           recency, given evidence linking these with depressive symp-
passion. This finding suggests that those reporting NSSI his-      toms and suicide (Kelliher-Rabon et al., 2018). Results from
tories tend to be less mindful and self-compassionate than         the subgroup analyses revealed that individuals with a recent
those with no history. Similarly, NSSI versatility (i.e., how      history (i.e., within the past 12 months) of STBs (r = −.278)
many methods one uses to engage in NSSI) had a small               scored slightly lower on measures of mindfulness and self-
(r = −.176), negative relationship with mindfulness and            compassion than those with any STBs’ lifetime history (r =
self-compassion combined, denoting that those employing            −.256). These findings may indicate that levels of mindful-
a greater diversity of NSSI methods endorse lower levels           ness and self-compassion may be lower among those cur-
of mindfulness and self-compassion than those using fewer          rently experiencing STBs. Surprisingly, NSSI lifetime (r =
methods. While the importance of assessing NSSI frequency          −.260) and within 12 months (r = −.257) revealed mini-
and methods has been well-documented (given their asso-            mal differences among the correlations. Additional work is
ciation with suicide risk; see Paul et al., 2015; Turner et al.,   needed to establish causal relationships between mindful-
2013), relationships between NSSI frequency and versatility        ness and self-compassion on STBs and NSSI onset, mainte-
have been largely ignored in meta-analyses (e.g., Batejan          nance, and recovery.
et al., 2015) prior to this study.                                    Regarding cohort age, both NSSI (r = −.331) and STBs
   We also sought to systematically quantify the relation-         (r = −.335) were negatively associated with self-compas-
ship between mindfulness facets and STBs. Nonjudging (r            sion and mindfulness in studies utilizing adolescent sam-
= −.270), acting with awareness (r = −.277), and describ-          ples. Adolescence, a stressful developmental stage associ-
ing (r = −.137) were significantly negatively correlated           ated with notable increases in NSSI and STBs prevalence
with STBs, while observing and non-reacting facets were            (Andover et al., 2012; Brown & Plener, 2017), has been
unrelated. Results between mindfulness facets and NSSI             understudied within literature on NSSI/suicide and mind-
outcomes paralleled suicide findings, showing significant          fulness/self-compassion to date. Reflecting this dearth of
negative associations between NSSI and nonjudging (r =             research, only 16.18% (k = 11) of studies in our meta-analy-
−.399), acting with awareness (r = −.347), and describing          sis included adolescent samples. Nevertheless, our results—
(r = −.250). Together, these results align with research to        the observed medium effect size among younger samples
date demonstrating that, of the mindfulness facets, levels         and meta-regression on age—align with established links
of non-judging and acting with awareness tend to be sig-           between both self-compassion and mindfulness with risk
nificantly lower among those with histories of self-injurious      (mental illness, depression) and protective (secure attach-
and STBs. These two facets have strong, negative associa-          ment, connectedness) factors for NSSI and STBs in adoles-
tions with other psychological health indicators, including        cents (Bluth & Blanton, 2014, 2015; Cunha et al., 2014; Neff
affective symptoms (Carpenter et al., 2019), substance use         & McGehee, 2010). We obtained similar results for STBs (r
13
Mindfulness	
= −.287) and NSSI (r = −.220) outcomes for studies using        while other researchers report negligible gender differences
college student samples. The college transition, marked by      (e.g., Garisch & Wilson, 2015; Heath et al., 2008; Serras
a unique confluence of academic, social, developmental          et al., 2010). Despite the mixed evidence regarding gender
stressors (Bewick et al., 2010; Morgan, 2017), is a time of     differences in prevalence, research has suggested gender
heightened risk for STBs and NSSI (for review, see Swan-        differences may be found among the methods used and fre-
nell et al., 2014). Our findings supplement existing research   quency of engagement in NSSI. There is evidence suggest-
indicating that mindfulness and self-compassion may serve       ing that women engage in NSSI more frequently (Garisch
as adaptive emotion regulation skills that help buffer col-     & Wilson, 2015; Hawton & Harriss, 2008) and are more
lege students from STBs and NSSI (John & Gross, 2004;           likely to cut, whereas men are more likely to burn or self-
Vujanovic et al., 2010).                                        hit (Kuentzel et al., 2012). Gender differences have been
   Negative correlations between mindfulness and self-          identified in STBs, with females exhibiting higher rates of
compassion with NSSI (r = −.336) and STBs (r = −.233)           suicidal ideation and attempts than their male peers, who are
emerged for studies on community samples. Among clini-          more than twice as likely to die by suicide (Cha et al., 2018;
cal samples, we only found a similar inverse relationship (r    May & Klonsky, 2016; Miranda-Mendizabal et al., 2019).
= −.247) between mindfulness/self-compassion and STB            Recent evidence, however, indicates that the gender dispar-
outcomes. Notably, the three included studies examining         ity in suicide mortality has narrowed over the past 40 years,
NSSI in clinical samples only assessed mindfulness (i.e.,       especially among younger age groups (Ruch et al., 2019).
not self-compassion) and were nonsignificant. These find-       Given the established gender differences for specific STBs
ings—particularly the magnitude of effect for our pooled        and NSSI outcomes, our gender moderator may reflect meta-
clinical sample—were surprising for several reasons. STBs       analysis pooling outcomes (i.e., pooling NSSI frequency,
and NSSI are more prevalent in clinical populations (Fox        NSSI as a dichotomous outcome, and NSSI versatility). It
et al., 2015; Franklin et al., 2017; Horváth et al., 2020).     would be interesting to look at the extent to which gender
Data suggest that those receiving mental health treatment       influences the relationship between mindfulness and self-
experience more complex fears, blocks, and resistances to       compassion with specific suicidal (i.e., ideation, attempts)
self-compassion than their non-treated peers (Gilbert &         and non-suicidal outcomes (frequency, methods used).
Mascaro, 2017; Kirby & Gilbert, 2019). Individuals with
several psychiatric diagnoses also have lower levels of self-   Limitations and Future Research
compassion compared with community samples (Castilho
et al., 2015; MacBeth & Gumley, 2012). Similarly, mind-         Important limitations must be considered when examining
fulness is inversely related to psychopathology, including      the results of this meta-analysis. While correlational research
depression (Tomlinson et al., 2018). Future studies should      is an important first step in understanding the intersection
continue to investigate the potential differences between       of mindfulness and self-compassion with NSSI and STBs,
mindfulness and self-compassion with NSSI within clini-         replication, experimental study, and longitudinal research
cal and community samples given that mindfulness and            are needed to establish causality. Another major limitation
compassion-based interventions are administered differ-         of this meta-analysis pertains to the broad outcomes. For
ently between these clinical vs non-clinical groups (Kirby      example, suicidal phenomena encompass a wide range of
& Gilbert, 2019).                                               behaviors, from passive ideation, planning, and intent, to
   We identified two additional moderating variables: study     (fatal and non-fatal) attempts. Given a high degree of vari-
quality and gender. Study quality score negatively moderated    ability in measures used, we pooled outcomes. Such hetero-
outcomes, with lower quality studies showing higher effect      geneity among measures has been highlighted in prior NSSI
sizes (although this effect was weak). This methodologi-        and STB reviews (Turner et al., 2014; Van Geel et al., 2014).
cal caveat limits interpretations of the relationship between       A majority of the studies (64.71%) included in this meta-
mindfulness and self-compassion with STBs and NSSI and          analysis were conducted in North America, female (58.09%),
signals a need for higher quality, more rigorously designed     and utilized Caucasian samples (58.93%) which limits the
investigations. For gender, there was a more robust relation-   generalizability of our findings to other countries, ethnic
ship between mindfulness and self-compassion with STB           groups, and gender identities. Important differences in NSSI
and NSSI outcomes for males. Males tend to show mar-            and STBs have been documented for different countries and
ginally higher levels of self-compassion than females, an       regions, racial/ethnic populations (Nock et al., 2008), and
effect qualified by ethnicity and gender role orientation       gender identities (Di Giacomo et al., 2018; Liu et al., 2019).
(Yarnell et al., 2019). The evidence regarding gender dif-      This review underscores the overrepresentation of white,
ferences in NSSI prevalence is mixed. Some researchers          CIS-gendered, North American participants in the current
have found that females are more likely to engage in NSSI       literature. We encourage research in non-Western countries
than males (e.g., Cheng et al., 2010; Whitlock et al., 2006),   and among other underrepresented minority groups.
                                                                                                                    13
	Mindfulness
13
Mindfulness	
      Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 85(6), 632.                     Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ). Clinical Psychology
      https://doi.org/10.1037/ccp0000205                                       Review, 74, 101785. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/edawp
Bertolote, J. M., & Fleischmann, A. (2002). A global perspective in           Castilho, P., Pinto-Gouveia, J., & Duarte, J. (2015). Evaluating the
      the epidemiology of suicide. Suicidologi, 7(2). https://doi.org/            multifactor structure of the long and short versions of the self-
      10.5617/suicidologi.2330                                                   compassion scale in a clinical sample. Journal of Clinical Psy-
Bewick, B., Koutsopoulou, G., Miles, J., Slaa, E., & Barkham,                        chology, 71(9), 856–870. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.22187
      M. (2010). Changes in undergraduate students’ psychologi-               Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (2018) Suicide
      cal well-being as they progress through university. Studies in                 rates rising across the US. https://www.cdc.gov/media/releases/
      Higher Education, 35(6), 633–645. https://doi.org/10.1080/                2018/p0607-suicide-prevention.html
      03075070903216643                                                    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (2021) Facts about
Bluth, K., & Blanton, P. W. (2014). Mindfulness and self-compas-                     Suicide. https://www.cdc.gov/suicide/facts/index.html
      sion: Exploring pathways to adolescent emotional well-being.            Cha, C. B., Franz, P. J., Guzmán, M. E., Glenn, C. R., Kleiman, E. M.,
      Journal of Child and Family studies, 23(7), 1298–1309. https://               & Nock, M. K. (2018). Annual research review: Suicide among
      doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2007.00537.x                                youth–epidemiology, (potential) etiology, and treatment. Journal
Bluth, K., & Blanton, P. W. (2015). The influence of self-compassion                 of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 59(4), 460–482. https://d oi.
      on emotional well-being among early and older adolescent                       org/10.1111/jcpp.12831
      males and females. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 10(3),           Chang, E. C., Martos, T., Sallay, V., Chang, O. D., Wright, K. M.,
      219–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2014.936967                  Najarian, A. S.-M., & Lee, J. (2017). Examining optimism and
*
  Bock, R. C., Berghoff, C. R., Baker, L. D., Tull, M. T., & Gratz, K.               hope as protective factors of suicide risk in Hungarian college
      L. (2021). The relation of anxiety to nonsuicidal self injury is               students: Is risk highest among those lacking positive psycho-
      indirect through mindfulness. Mindfulness, 1-12. https://doi.                logical protection? Cognitive Therapy and Research, 41(2),
      org/10.1007/s12671-021-01660-2                                            278–288. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-016-9810-0
                                                                              *
Borenstein, M., & Rothstein, H. (1999). Comprehensive meta-anal-               Chassagne, J., Bronchain, J., Raynal, P., & Chabrol, H. (2020). L’effet
      ysis. Biostat.                                                                 modérateur de la pleine conscience dispositionnelle dans la
Brailovskaia, J., Forkmann, T., Glaesmer, H., Paashaus, L., Rath, D.,                relation entre symptomatologie dépressive, troubles de la per-
      Schönfelder, A., Juckel, G., & Teismann, T. (2019). Positive                   sonnalité limite et idéations suicidaires chez le jeune adulte.
      mental health moderates the association between suicide idea-                  L'Encéphale, 46(2), 110-114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.encep.
      tion and suicide attempts. Journal of Affective Disorders, 245,                2019.11.002
      246–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2018.11.005              Cheng, H.-L., Mallinckrodt, B., Soet, J., & Sevig, T. (2010). Develop-
*
  Bravo, A. J., Pearson, M. R., & Kelley, M. L. (2018). Mindfulness                  ing a screening instrument and at-risk profile for nonsuicidal self-
      and psychological health outcomes: A latent profile analysis                   injurious behavior in college women and men. Journal of Coun-
      among military personnel and college students. Mindfulness,                    seling Psychology, 57(1), 128. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018206
                                                                              *
      9(1), 258-270. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-017-0771-5           Cheng, S., Banks, K., Bartlett, B. A., San Miguel, G., & Vujanovic,
Brenner, R. E., Heath, P. J., Vogel, D. L., & Credé, M. (2017). Two                  A. A. (2018). Posttraumatic stress and mindfulness facets in
      is more valid than one: Examining the factor structure of the                  relation to suicidal ideation severity among psychiatric inpa-
      Self-Compassion Scale (SCS). Journal of Counseling Psychol-                    tients. Mindfulness, 9(3), 761-772. https://doi.org/10.1007/
      ogy, 64(6), 696. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000211                      s12671-017-0814-y
                                                                              *
Brenner, R. E., Vogel, D. L., Lannin, D. G., Engel, K. E., Seidman,             Chesin, M. S., & Cascardi, M. (2019). Cognitive-affective corre-
      A. J., & Heath, P. J. (2018). Do self-compassion and self-cold-                lates of suicide ideation and attempt: Mindfulness is negatively
      ness distinctly relate to distress and well-being? A theoreti-                 associated with suicide attempt history but not state suicidality.
      cal model of self-relating. Journal of Counseling Psychology,                  Archives of Suicide Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/13811118.
      65(3), 346. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000257                           2018.1480984
Brereton, A., & McGlinchey, E. (2020). Self-harm, emotion regula-             Chesin, M. S., & Jeglic, E. L. (2016). Factors associated with recurrent
      tion, and experiential avoidance: A systematic review. Archives                suicidal ideation among racially and ethnically diverse college
      of Suicide Research, 24(sup1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/             students with a history of suicide attempt: The role of mindful-
      13811118.2018.1563575                                                      ness. Archives of Suicide Research, 20(1), 29–44. https://d oi.o rg/
*
  Brooks, J. R., Lebeaut, A., Zegel, M., Walker, R. L., & Vujanovic,                 10.1080/13811118.2015.1004488
                                                                              *
      A. A. (2021). Anxiety sensitivity and suicide risk: Mindfulness           Chesin, M. S., Benjamin-Phillips, C. A., Keilp, J., Fertuck, E. A.,
      as a psychological buffer for Black adults. Journal of Affective               Brodsky, B. S., & Stanley, B. (2016). Improvements in execu-
      Disorders, 289, 74-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2021.04.          tive attention, rumination, cognitive reactivity, and mindful-
      012                                                                            ness among high–suicide risk patients participating in adjunct
Brown, R. C., & Plener, P. L. (2017). Non-suicidal self-injury in ado-               mindfulness-based cognitive therapy: Preliminary findings. The
      lescence. Current Psychiatry Reports, 19(3), 20. https://doi.org/           Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, 22(8), 642-
      10.1007/s11920-017-0767-9                                                  649. https://doi.org/10.1089/acm.2015.0351
*
 Buitron, V., Hill, R. M., & Pettit, J. W. (2017). Mindfulness moderates      Chu, J., Robinett, E. N., Ma, J. K., Shadish, K. Y., Goldblum, P., &
      the association between perceived burdensomeness and suicide                   Bongar, B. (2019). Cultural versus classic risk and protective
      ideation in adults with elevated depressive symptoms. Suicide                  factors for suicide. Death Studies, 43(1), 56–61. https://doi.org/
      and Life-Threatening Behavior, 47(5), 580-588. https://doi.org/             10.1080/07481187.2018.1430085
                                                                              *
      10.1111/sltb.12314                                                     Cladder-Micus, M., van Aalderen, J., Donders, A., Spijker, J., Vri-
Carpenter, T. P., & Law, K. C. (2021). Optimizing the scientific study               jsen, J., & Speckens, A. (2018). Cognitive reactivity as outcome
      of suicide with open and transparent research practices. Suicide               and working mechanism of mindfulness-based cognitive therapy
      and Life-Threatening Behavior, 51(1), 36–46. https://doi.org/10.           for recurrently depressed patients in remission. Cognition and
      31234/osf.io/edawp                                                          Emotion, 32(2), 371-378. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.
Carpenter, J. K., Conroy, K., Gomez, A. F., Curren, L. C., & Hof-                    2017.1285753
                                                                              *
      mann, S. G. (2019). The relationship between trait mindful-               Cleare, S. (2019). Exploring the role of self-compassion in self-harm
      ness and affective symptoms: A meta-analysis of the Five Facet                 and suicidal ideation. Dissertation: University of Glasgow.
                                                                                                                                              13
	Mindfulness
Cleare, S., Gumley, A., & O'Connor, R. C. (2019). Self-compassion,                    Franklin, J. C., Ribeiro, J. D., Fox, K. R., Bentley, K. H., Kleiman, E.
       self-forgiveness, suicidal ideation, and self-harm: A systematic                      M., Huang, X., Musacchio, K. M., Jaroszewski, A. C., Chang,
       review. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 26(5), 511–530.                          B. P., & Nock, M. K. (2017). Risk factors for suicidal thoughts
       https://doi.org/10.1002/cpp.2372                                                and behaviors: A meta-analysis of 50 years of research. Psy-
*
  Collett, N., Pugh, K., Waite, F., & Freeman, D. (2016). Negative                           chological Bulletin, 143(2), 187. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul00
       cognitions about the self in patients with persecutory delusions:                     00084
       An empirical study of self-compassion, self-stigma, schematic                  Gallagher, M. L., & Miller, A. B. (2018). Suicidal thoughts and behav-
       beliefs, self-esteem, fear of madness, and suicidal ideation. Psy-                    ior in children and adolescents: An ecological model of resil-
       chiatry Research, 239, 79-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.              ience. Adolescent Research Review, 3(2), 123–154. https://doi.
       2016.02.043                                                                         org/10.1007/s40894-017-0066-z
*                                                                                     *
  Collins, K. R., Stritzke, W. G., Page, A. C., Brown, J. D., & Wylde, T.               Garisch, J. A., & Wilson, M. S. (2015). Prevalence, correlates, and
       J. (2018). Mind full of life: Does mindfulness confer resilience to                   prospective predictors of non-suicidal self-injury among New
       suicide by increasing zest for life? Journal of Affective Disorders,                  Zealand adolescents: Cross-sectional and longitudinal survey
       226, 100-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2017.09.043                       data. Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health, 9(1),
Cunha, M., Martinho, M. I., Xavier, A. M., & Espirito-Santo, H.                              1-11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13034-015-0055-6
       (2014). Early memories of positive emotions and its relation-                  Gilbert, P. (2017). Definitions and controversies. In P. Gilbert (Ed.),
       ships to attachment styles, self-compassion and psychopathology                       Compassion: Concepts, Research and Applications (pp. 3–15).
       in adolescence. European Psychiatry, 28, 76444–76447. https://                       Taylor and Francis.
       doi.org/10.1016/s0924-9338(13)76444-7                                    Gilbert, P., & Mascaro, J. (2017). Compassion: Fears, blocks, and
Di Giacomo, E., Krausz, M., Colmegna, F., Aspesi, F., & Clerici, M.                          resistances: An evolutionary investigation. The Oxford handbook
       (2018). Estimating the risk of attempted suicide among sexual                         of compassion science. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/97801
       minority youths: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA                          90464684.013.29
       Pediatrics, 172(12), 1145–1152. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamap            Gilbert, P., Catarino, F., Duarte, C., Matos, M., Kolts, R., Stubbs, J.,
       ediatrics.2018.2731                                                                Ceresatto, L., Duarte, J., Pinto-Gouveia, J., & Basran, J. (2017).
*
  Dixon-Gordon, K. L., Chapman, A. L., & Turner, B. J. (2015). A                             The development of compassionate engagement and action scales
       preliminary pilot study comparing dialectical behavior therapy                        for self and others. Journal of Compassionate Health Care, 4(1),
       emotion regulation skills with interpersonal effectiveness skills                     1–24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40639-017-0033-3
       and a control group treatment. Journal of Experimental Psycho-                 Goldberg, S. B., Tucker, R. P., Greene, P. A., Davidson, R. J., Wam-
       pathology, 6(4), 369-388. https://doi.org/10.5127/jep.041714                    pold, B. E., Kearney, D. J., & Simpson, T. L. (2018). Mind-
*
  Dobbins, P. J. (2014). Five facets of mindfulness and deliberate self-                     fulness-based interventions for psychiatric disorders: A system-
       harm in older adolescents. Dissertation: Fielding Graduate                            atic review and meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 59,
       University                                                                            52–60. https://doi.org/10.31231/osf.io/etghn
Downes, M. J., Brennan, M. L., Williams, H. C., & Dean, R. S. (2016).                 Goodfellow, B., Kõlves, K., & De Leo, D. (2020). Contemporary clas-
       Development of a critical appraisal tool to assess the quality                        sifications of suicidal behaviors: A systematic literature review.
       of cross-sectional studies (AXIS). BMJ Open, 6(12), e011458.                          Crisis: The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Preven-
       https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011458                                   tion, 41(3), 179. https://doi.org/10.1111/sltb.12457
Ellis, T. E., & Rufino, K. A. (2016). Change in experiential avoidance                Gu, J., Baer, R., Cavanagh, K., Kuyken, W., & Strauss, C. (2020).
       is associated with reduced suicidal ideation over the course of                       Development and psychometric properties of the Sussex-Oxford
       psychiatric hospitalization. Archives of Suicide Research, 20(3),                     compassion scales (SOCS). Assessment, 27(1), 3–20. https://d oi.
       426–437. https://doi.org/10.1080/13811118.2015.1093983                       org/10.1177/1073191119860911
*
  Fang, J. (2020). Interpersonal needs and suicidal ideation: Moderat-                Hamza, C. A., Stewart, S. L., & Willoughby, T. (2012). Examining
       ing effects of self-compassion. Dissertation: University of South                     the link between nonsuicidal self-injury and suicidal behavior:
       Dakota                                                                                A review of the literature and an integrated model. Clinical Psy-
*
  Fang, Y., Zeng, B., Chen, P., Mai, Y., Teng, S., Zhang, M., Zhao, J.,                      chology Review, 32(6), 482–495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.
       Yang, X., & Zhao, J. (2019). Mindfulness and suicide risk in                          2012.05.003
       undergraduates: Exploring the mediating effect of alexithymia.                 Hanley, A. W., & Garland, E. L. (2017). The mindful personality: A
       Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2106. https://d oi.o rg/1 0.3 389/f psyg.          meta-analysis from a cybernetic perspective. Mindfulness, 8(6),
       2019.02106                                                                           1456–1470. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-017-0736-8
                                                                                      *
Finlay-Jones, A. L., Rees, C. S., & Kane, R. T. (2015). Self-compas-                    Hashemi, R., Moustafa, A. A., Rahmati Kankat, L., & Valikhani, A.
       sion, emotion regulation and stress among Australian psycholo-                        (2018). Mindfulness and suicide ideation in Iranian cardiovascu-
       gists: Testing an emotion regulation model of self-compassion                         lar patients: Testing the mediating role of patience. Psychologi-
       using structural equation modeling. PloS one, 10(7), e0133481.                        cal Reports, 121(6), 1037-1052. https://doi.org/10.1177/00332
       https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0133481                                 94117746990
*                                                                                     *
  Forkus, S. R., Breines, J. G., & Weiss, N. H. (2019). Morally injuri-                 Hasking, P., Boyes, M. E., Finlay-Jones, A., McEvoy, P. M., & Rees,
       ous experiences and mental health: The moderating role of self-                       C. S. (2019). Common pathways to NSSI and suicide ideation:
       compassion. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice,                         The roles of rumination and self-compassion. Archives of Sui-
       and Policy, 11(6), 630. https://doi.org/10.1037/tra0000446                      cide Research, 23(2), 247-260. https://doi.org/10.1080/13811
Fox, K. R., Franklin, J. C., Ribeiro, J. D., Kleiman, E. M., Bentley, K.                     118.2018.1468836
                                                                                      *
       H., & Nock, M. K. (2015). Meta-analysis of risk factors for non-                 Hatchel, T., Merrin, G. J., Espelage, & Dorothy. (2019). Peer vic-
       suicidal self-injury. Clinical Psychology Review, 42, 156–167.                        timization and suicidality among LGBTQ youth: The roles of
       https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2015.09.002                                     school belonging, self-compassion, and parental support. Journal
Fox, K. R., Huang, X., Guzmán, E. M., Funsch, K. M., Cha, C. B.,                             of LGBT Youth, 16(2), 134-156. https://doi.org/10.1080/19361
       Ribeiro, J. D., & Franklin, J. C. (2020). Interventions for suicide                   653.2018.1543036
       and self-injury: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled tri-                 Hawton, K., & Harriss, L. (2008). The changing gender ratio in occur-
       als across nearly 50 years of research. Psychological Bulletin,                       rence of deliberate self-harm across the lifecycle. Crisis, 29(1),
       146(2), 117–1145. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000305                            4–10. https://doi.org/10.1027/0227-5910.29.1.4
13
Mindfulness	
                                                                                    *
Hawton, K., Bergen, H., Cooper, J., Turnbull, P., Waters, K., Ness,                  Kelliher-Rabon, J., Sirois, F. M., Barton, A. L., & Hirsch, J. K. (2021).
       J., & Kapur, N. (2015). Suicide following self-harm: Findings                       Self-compassion and suicidal behavior: Indirect effects of depres-
       from the multicentre study of self-harm in England, 2000–2012.                      sion, anxiety, and hopelessness across increasingly vulnerable
       Journal of Affective Disorders, 175, 147–151. https://doi.org/10.               samples. Self and Identity, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298
       1016/j.jad.2014.12.062                                                          868.2021.1884592
Hayes, S. C., Wilson, K. G., Gifford, E. V., Follette, V. M., & Strosahl,           Khoury, B. (2019). Compassion: Embodied and embedded.
       K. (1996). Experiential avoidance and behavioral disorders: A                       Mindfulness, 10(11), 2363–2374. https://  d oi.  o rg/  1 0.  1 007/
       functional dimensional approach to diagnosis and treatment.                         s12671-019-01211-w
       Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 64(6), 1152.                  Khoury, B., Lecomte, T., Fortin, G., Masse, M., Therien, P., Bouchard,
       https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006x.64.6.1152                                 V., Chapleau, M.-A., Paquin, K., & Hofmann, S. G. (2013a).
Heath, N., Toste, J., Nedecheva, T., & Charlebois, A. (2008). An                           Mindfulness-based therapy: A comprehensive meta-analysis.
       examination of nonsuicidal self-injury among college students.                      Clinical Psychology Review, 33(6), 763–771. https://doi.org/10.
       Journal of Mental Health Counseling, 30(2), 137–156. https://                      1016/j.cpr.2013.05.005
       doi.org/10.17744/mehc.30.2.8p879p3443514678                          Khoury, B., Lecomte, T., Gaudiano, B. A., & Paquin, K. (2013b).
Hedegaard, H., & Warner, M. (2021). Suicide mortality in the United                        Mindfulness interventions for psychosis: A meta-analysis. Schiz-
       States, 1999-2019. 10.15620/cdc:101761                                              ophrenia Research, 150(1), 176–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (2014). Statistical methods for meta-analysis.                  schres.2013.07.055
       Academic press.                                                              Kiekens, G., Hasking, P., Boyes, M., Claes, L., Mortier, P., Auerbach,
Horváth, L. O., Győri, D., Komáromy, D., Mészáros, G., Szentiványi,                        R. P., Kessler, R. C., Myin-Germeys, I., Nock, M. K., & Bruf-
       D., & Balázs, J. (2020). Nonsuicidal self-injury and suicide:                       faerts, R. (2018). The associations between non-suicidal self-
       The role of life events in clinical and non-clinical populations of                 injury and first onset suicidal thoughts and behaviors. Journal
       adolescents. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 11, 370. https://doi.org/10.              of Affective Disorders, 239, 171–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
       3389/fpsyt.2020.00370                                                            jad.2018.06.033
International Society for the Study of Self-Injury (ISSS) (2007). Defi-             Kirby, J. N., & Gilbert, P. (2019). Commentary regarding Wilson
       nitional issues surrounding our understanding of self-injury.                       et al.(2018) “effectiveness of ‘self-compassion’ related thera-
       Conference proceedings from the annual meeting.                                     pies: A systematic review and meta-analysis.” All is not as it
Inwood, E., & Ferrari, M. (2018). Mechanisms of change in the rela-                        seems. Mindfulness, 10(6), 1006–1016. https://doi.org/10.1007/
       tionship between self-compassion, emotion regulation, and men-                      s12671-018-1088-8
       tal health: A systematic review. Applied Psychology: Health and              Klonsky, E. D., May, A. M., & Glenn, C. R. (2013). The relationship
       Well-Being, 10(2), 215–235. https://d oi.o rg/1 0.1 111/a phw.1 2127          between nonsuicidal self-injury and attempted suicide: converg-
*
  Jiang, Y., You, J., Zheng, X., & Lin, M.-P. (2017). The qualities of                     ing evidence from four samples. Journal of Abnormal Psychol-
       attachment with significant others and self-compassion protect                      ogy, 122(1), 231. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030278
       adolescents from non suicidal self-injury. School Psychology                 Klonsky, E. D., Saffer, B. Y., & Bryan, C. J. (2018). Ideation-to-action
       Quarterly, 32(2), 143. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000187                     theories of suicide: a conceptual and empirical update. Current
John, O. P., & Gross, J. J. (2004). Healthy and unhealthy emotion regu-                    Opinion in Psychology, 22, 38–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
       lation: Personality processes, individual differences, and life span                copsyc.2017.07.020
       development. Journal of Personality, 72(6), 1301–1334. https://             Kuentzel, J. G., Arble, E., Boutros, N., Chugani, D., & Barnett, D.
       doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2004.00298.x                                     (2012). Nonsuicidal self-injury in an ethnically diverse col-
Kabat-Zinn, J. (2003). Mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR).                          lege sample. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 82(3), 291.
       Constructivism in the Human Sciences, 8(2), 73.                                     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-0025.2012.01167.x
*                                                                                   *
  Kaniuka, A. R., Job, S. A., Brooks, B. D., & Williams, S. L. (2020a).               Lamis, D. A., & Dvorak, R. D. (2014). Mindfulness, nonattachment,
       Gratitude and lower suicidal ideation among sexual minority                         and suicide rumination in college students: The mediating role
       individuals: Theoretical mechanisms of the protective role of                       of depressive symptoms. Mindfulness, 5(5), 487-496. https://d oi.
       attention to the positive. The Journal of Positive Psychology,                      org/10.1007/s12671-013-0203-0
       1-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2020.1818814                 Lin, Y., Fisher, M. E., Roberts, S. M., & Moser, J. S. (2016). Decon-
*
  Kaniuka, A. R., Kelliher-Rabon, J., Chang, E. C., Sirois, F. M., &                       structing the emotion regulatory properties of mindfulness: an
       Hirsch, J. K. (2020b). Symptoms of anxiety and depression and                       electrophysiological investigation. Frontiers in Human Neurosci-
       suicidal behavior in college students: Conditional indirect effects                 ence, 10, 451. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00451
       of non-suicidal self-injury and self-compassion. Journal of Col-             Liu, R. T., Sheehan, A. E., Walsh, R. F., Sanzari, C. M., Cheek, S. M.,
       lege Student Psychotherapy, 34(4), 316-338. https://doi.org/10.                 & Hernandez, E. M. (2019). Prevalence and correlates of non-
       1080/87568225.2019.1601048                                                     suicidal self-injury among lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender
Karyadi, K. A., VanderVeen, J. D., & Cyders, M. A. (2014). A meta-                         individuals: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical Psy-
       analysis of the relationship between trait mindfulness and sub-                     chology Review, 74, 101783. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2019.
       stance use behaviors. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 143, 1–10.                       101783
                                                                                    *
       https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2014.07.014                      Liu, A., Wang, W., & Wu, X. (2020). Understanding the relation
*
  Kelley, M. L., Bravo, A. J., Davies, R. L., Hamrick, H. C., Vinci, C.,                   between self-compassion and suicide risk among adolescents in
       & Redman, J. C. (2019). Moral injury and suicidality among                          a post-disaster context: Mediating roles of gratitude and posttrau-
       combat-wounded veterans: The moderating effects of social con-                      matic stress disorder. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1541. https://
       nectedness and self-compassion. Psychological Trauma: Theory,                       doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01541
                                                                                    *
       Research, Practice, and Policy, 11(6), 621. https://doi.org/10.            Lu, R., Zhou, Y., Wu, Q., Peng, X., Dong, J., Zhu, Z., & Xu, W.
       1037/tra0000447                                                                   (2019). The effects of mindfulness training on suicide ideation
Kelliher-Rabon, J., Sirois, F. M., & Hirsch, J. K. (2018). Self-com-                       among left-behind children in China: A randomized controlled
       passion and suicidal behavior in college students: Serial indi-                     trial. Child: Care, Health and Development, 45(3), 371-379.
       rect effects via depression and wellness behaviors. Journal of                      https://doi.org/10.1111/cch.12650
       American College Health, 66(2), 114–122. https://doi.org/10.             Luthar, S. S., & Cicchetti, D. (2000). The construct of resilience: Impli-
       1080/07448481.2017.1382498                                                     cations for interventions and social policies. Development and
                                                                                                                                                     13
	Mindfulness
      Psychopathology, 12(4), 857–885. https://d oi.o rg/1 0.1 017/s 0954   Neff, K. D. (2003b). The development and validation of a scale to
      579400004156                                                                     measure self-compassion. Self and Identity, 2(3), 223–250.
Lutz, J., Herwig, U., Opialla, S., Hittmeyer, A., Jäncke, L., Rufer, M.,                 https://doi.org/10.1080/15298860309027
      et al. (2014). Mindfulness and emotion regulation—An fMRI                   Neff, K. D., & McGehee, P. (2010). Self-compassion and psychological
      study. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 9(6), 776–                     resilience among adolescents and young adults. Self and Identity,
      785. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nst043                                     9(3), 225–240. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298860902979307
MacBeth, A., & Gumley, A. (2012). Exploring compassion: A meta-                   Nielssen, O., Wallace, D., & Large, M. (2017). Pokorny's complaint:
      analysis of the association between self-compassion and psycho-                    The insoluble problem of the overwhelming number of false
      pathology. Clinical Psychology Review, 32(6), 545–552. https://                   positives generated by suicide risk assessment. BJPsych Bulletin,
      doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2012.06.003                                           41(1), 18–20. https://doi.org/10.1192/pb.bp.115.053017
*
  MacIsaac, J. (2019). Group separation and classification of non-sui-            Nock, M. K., Borges, G., Bromet, E. J., Cha, C. B., Kessler, R. C.,
      cidal self-injury in a university student population. Dissertation:                & Lee, S. (2008). Suicide and suicidal behavior. Epidemiologic
      University of Windsor (Canada)                                                     Reviews, 30(1), 133–154. https://d oi.o rg/1 0.1 093/e pirev/m    xn002
May, A. M., & Klonsky, E. D. (2016). What distinguishes suicide                   Ogden, P., Minton, K., & Pain, C. (2006). Trauma and the body: A
      attempters from suicide ideators? A meta-analysis of potential                     sensorimotor approach to psychotherapy (norton series on inter-
      factors. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 23(1), 5.                      personal neurobiology). WW Norton & Company.
      https://doi.org/10.1037/h0101735                                      Ouzzani, M., Hammady, H., Fedorowicz, Z., & Elmagarmid, A.
McIntyre, R. S., & Lee, Y. (2020a). Preventing suicide in the context of                 (2016). Rayyan—A web and mobile app for systematic
      the COVID-19 pandemic. World Psychiatry, 19(2), 250. https://                     reviews. Systematic Reviews, 5(1), 210. https://doi.org/10.1186/
      doi.org/10.1002/wps.20767                                                     s13643-016-0384-4
McIntyre, R. S., & Lee, Y. (2020b). Projected increases in suicide in             Paez, A. (2017). Gray literature: An important resource in systematic
      Canada as a consequence of COVID-19. Psychiatry Research,                          reviews. Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 10(3), 233–240.
      290, 113104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113492                https://doi.org/10.1111/jebm.12266
*
  McMain, S. F., Guimond, T., Barnhart, R., Habinski, L., & Streiner,             Paul, E., Tsypes, A., Eidlitz, L., Ernhout, C., & Whitlock, J. (2015).
      D. L. (2017). A randomized trial of brief dialectical behaviour                    Frequency and functions of non-suicidal self-injury: Associa-
      therapy skills training in suicidal patients suffering from border-                tions with suicidal thoughts and behaviors. Psychiatry Research,
      line disorder. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 135(2), 138-148.                    225(3), 276–282. https://d oi.o rg/1 0.1 016/j.p sychr es.2 014.1 2.0 26
                                                                                  *
      https://doi.org/10.1111/acps.12664                                      Paulus, D. J., Kauffman, B. Y., Garey, L., Jardin, C., Manning, K.,
Miranda-Mendizabal, A., Castellví, P., Parés-Badell, O., Alayo, I.,                      Bakhshaie, J., Garza, M., Ochoa-Perez, M., Lemaire, C., & Zvo-
      Almenara, J., Alonso, I., Blasco, M. J., Cebrià, A., Gabilondo,                    lensky, M. J. (2018). Examining the synergistic effects of two
      A., Gili, M., Lagares, C., Piqueras, J. A., Rodríguez-Jiménez,                     transdiagnostic vulnerability factors in relation to anxiety and
      T., Rodríguez-Marín, J., Roca, M., Soto-Sanz, V., Vilagut, G., &                   depressive symptoms and disorders among Latinos in a commu-
      Alonso, J. (2019). Gender differences in suicidal behavior in ado-                 nity health care setting. Behavior Modification, 42(5), 661-683.
      lescents and young adults: Systematic review and meta-analysis                     https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445517725867
                                                                                  *
      of longitudinal studies. International Journal of Public Health,              Per, M., Simundic, A., Argento, A., Khoury, B., & Heath, N. (2021).
      64(2), 265–283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-018-1196-1                   Examining the relationship between mindfulness, self-compas-
*
  Mohammadkhani, P., Khanipour, H., Azadmehr, H., Mobramm, A.,                           sion, and emotion regulation in self-injury. Archives of Suicide
      & Naseri, E. (2015). Trait mindfulness, reasons for living and                     Research, 1-16. https://d oi.o rg/1 0.1 080/1 38111 18.2 021.1 88553 4
                                                                                  *
      general symptom severity as predictors of suicide probability in              Possemato, K., Bergen-Cico, D., Treatman, S., Allen, C., Wade, M.,
      males with substance abuse or dependence. Iranian Journal of                       & Pigeon, W. (2016). A randomized clinical trial of primary
      Psychiatry, 10(1), 56.                                                             care brief mindfulness training for veterans with PTSD. Journal
Morgan, B. M. (2017). Stress management for college students: An                         of Clinical Psychology, 72(3), 179-193. https://doi.org/10.1002/
      experiential multi-modal approach. Journal of Creativity in Men-                   jclp.22241
                                                                                  *
      tal Health, 12(3), 276–288. https://doi.org/10.1080/15401383.          Rabon, J. K., Hirsch, J. K., Kaniuka, A. R., Sirois, F., Brooks, B. D.,
      2016.1245642                                                                     & Neff, K. (2019). Self-compassion and suicide risk in veterans:
Muehlenkamp, J. J., & Brausch, A. M. (2019). Protective factors do not                   When the going gets tough, do the tough benefit more from self-
      moderate risk for past-year suicide attempts conferred by recent                   compassion? Mindfulness, 10(12), 2544-2554. https://d oi.o rg/1 0.
      NSSI. Journal of Affective Disorders, 245, 321–324. https://doi.                 1007/s12671-019-01221-8
      org/10.1016/j.jad.2018.11.013                                         Rajappa, K., Gallagher, M., & Miranda, R. (2012). Emotion dysregula-
Muris, P., & Otgaar, H. (2020). The process of science: A critical evalu-                tion and vulnerability to suicidal ideation and attempts. Cognitive
      ation of more than 15 years of research on self-compassion with                    Therapy and Research, 36(6), 833–839. https://doi.org/10.1007/
      the Self-Compassion Scale. Mindfulness, 11(6), 1469–1482.                          s10608-011-9419-2
      https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-020-01363-0                           Ribeiro, J., Franklin, J., Fox, K. R., Bentley, K., Kleiman, E. M.,
Muris, P., van den Broek, M., Otgaar, H., Oudenhoven, I., & Lennartz,                    Chang, B., & Nock, M. K. (2016). Self-injurious thoughts and
      J. (2018). Good and bad sides of self-compassion: A face validity                  behaviors as risk factors for future suicide ideation, attempts, and
      check of the Self-Compassion Scale and an investigation of its                     death: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Psychological
      relations to coping and emotional symptoms in non-clinical ado-                    Medicine, 46(2), 225–236. https://doi.org/10.1017/s003329171
      lescents. Journal of Child and Family studies, 27(8), 2411–2421.                   5001804
                                                                                  *
      https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-018-1099-z                             Riquino, M. R. (2019). A mixed methods investigation of attention and
*
  Nagy, L. M. (2017). An experimental investigation of the effects of                    mindfulness among young adults with a history of nonsuicidal
      self-compassion and self-criticism on implicit associations with                   self-injury. Dissertation: The University of Utah
      non-suicidal self-injury. Dissertation: University of Kentucky              Rosenthal, R., & Rubin, D. B. (1988). [Selection models and the file
Neff, K. (2003a). Self-compassion: An alternative conceptualization of                   drawer problem]: comment: assumptions and procedures in the
      a healthy attitude toward oneself. Self and Identity, 2(2), 85–101.                file drawer problem. Statistical Science, 3(1), 120–125. https://
      https://doi.org/10.1080/15298860309032                                      doi.org/10.1214/ss/1177013014
13
Mindfulness	
*
 Roush, J. F., Mitchell, S. M., Brown, S. L., & Cukrowicz, K. C. (2018).                    firefighters. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 75(4), 696-709.
       Thwarted interpersonal needs mediate the relation between facets                     https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.22748
       of mindfulness and suicide ideation among psychiatric inpatients.              Strauss, C., Taylor, B. L., Gu, J., Kuyken, W., Baer, R., Jones, F.,
       Psychiatry Research, 265, 167-173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.                   & Cavanagh, K. (2016). What is compassion and how can we
       psychres.2018.04.026                                                             measure it? A review of definitions and measures. Clinical
Ruch, D. A., Sheftall, A. H., Schlagbaum, P., Rausch, J., Campo, J. V.,                     Psychology Review, 47, 15–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.
       & Bridge, J. A. (2019). Trends in suicide among youth aged 10                        2016.05.004
       to 19 years in the United States, 1975 to 2016. JAMA network                   Swannell, S. V., Martin, G. E., Page, A., Hasking, P., & St John, N.
       open, 2(5), e193886–e193886. https://doi.org/10.1001/jaman                     J. (2014). Prevalence of nonsuicidal self-injury in nonclinical
       etworkopen.2019.3886                                                              samples: Systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regres-
Rufino, N. C., Fidalgo, T. M., Dos Santos, J. P., Tardelli, V. S., Lima,                    sion. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior, 44(3), 273–303.
       M. G., Frick, L. P., Mirkovic, B., da Silveira, D. X., & Cohen,                      https://doi.org/10.1111/sltb.12070
       D. (2021). Treatment compliance and risk and protective fac-                   Taliaferro, L. A., & Muehlenkamp, J. J. (2014). Risk and protective
       tors for suicide ideation to completed suicide in adolescents: A                     factors that distinguish adolescents who attempt suicide from
       systematic review. Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry. https://doi.                   those who only consider suicide in the past year. Suicide and
       org/10.1590/1516-4446-2020-1026                                                Life-Threatening Behavior, 44(1), 6–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/
Schmelefske, E., Per, M., Khoury, B., & Heath, N. (2020). The effects                       sltb.12046
                                                                                      *
       of mindfulness-based interventions on suicide outcomes: A                        Tanaka, M., Wekerle, C., Schmuck, M. L., Paglia-Boak, A., & Team,
       meta-analysis. Archives of Suicide Research, 1-18. https://doi.                    M. R. (2011). The linkages among childhood maltreatment,
       org/10.1080/13811118.2020.1833796                                             adolescent mental health, and self-compassion in child welfare
*
 Serrano, D. M., Rufino, K. A., Tran, J. K., & Vujanovic, A. A. (2020).                     adolescents. Child Abuse & Neglect, 35(10), 887-898. https://d oi.
       Association between sleep disturbances and suicide risk among                        org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2011.07.003
       firefighters: The moderating role of mindfulness. Mindfulness,                 Tang, J., Li, G., Chen, B., Huang, Z., Zhang, Y., Chang, H., Wu, C.,
       11(12), 2793-2803. https://d oi.o rg/1 0.1 007/s 12671-0 20-0 1491-7          Ma, X., Wang, J., & Yu, Y. (2018). Prevalence of and risk fac-
Serras, A., Saules, K. K., Cranford, J. A., & Eisenberg, D. (2010).                         tors for non-suicidal self-injury in rural China: Results from a
       Self-injury, substance use, and associated risk factors in a multi-                  nationwide survey in China. Journal of Affective Disorders, 226,
       campus probability sample of college students. Psychology of                         188–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2017.09.051
       Addictive Behaviors, 24(1), 119. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017           Teismann, T., Forkmann, T., Glaesmer, H., Egeri, L., & Margraf, J.
       210                                                                                  (2016). Remission of suicidal thoughts: Findings from a longitu-
*
 Servaty-Seib, H. L., Williams, P., & Liew, C. H. (2021). Interpersonal                     dinal epidemiological study. Journal of Affective Disorders, 190,
       and intrapersonal predictors of suicidal thoughts and actions in                     723–725. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2015.09.066
       first-year college students. Journal of American College Health,               Tøllefsen, I. M., Hem, E., & Ekeberg, Ø. (2012). The reliability of
       1-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/07448481.2021.1904950                         suicide statistics: a systematic review. BMC Psychiatry, 12(1),
Shahram, S. Z., Smith, M. L., Ben-David, S., Feddersen, M., Kemp, T.                        1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-244x-12-9
       E., & Plamondon, K. (2021). Promoting “zest for life”: A system-               Tomlinson, E. R., Yousaf, O., Vittersø, A. D., & Jones, L. (2018).
       atic literature review of resiliency factors to prevent youth Ssui-                  Dispositional mindfulness and psychological health: A system-
       cide. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 31(1), 4–24. https://                     atic review. Mindfulness, 9(1), 23–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/
       doi.org/10.1111/jora.12588                                                      s12671-017-0762-6
                                                                                      *
Shepard, D. S., Gurewich, D., Lwin, A. K., Reed Jr., G. A., & Silver-                   Tucker, R. P., O’Keefe, V. M., Cole, A. B., Rhoades-Kerswill, S.,
       man, M. M. (2016). Suicide and suicidal attempts in the United                       Hollingsworth, D. W., Helle, A. C., DeShong, H. L., Mullins-
       States: Costs and policy implications. Suicide and Life-Threaten-                    Sweatt, S. N., & Wingate, L. R. (2014). Mindfulness tempers
       ing Behavior, 46(3), 352–362. https://d oi.o rg/1 0.1 111/s ltb.1 2225         the impact of personality on suicidal ideation. Personality and
Sher, L. (2019). Resilience as a focus of suicide research and preven-                      Individual Differences, 68, 229-233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
       tion. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 140(2), 169–180. https://                     paid.2014.05.001
                                                                                      *
       doi.org/10.1111/acps.13059                                                  Tuna, E., & Gençöz, T. (2021). Pain perception, distress tolerance
*
  Shorey, R. C., Elmquist, J., Wolford-Clevenger, C., Gawrysiak, M. J.,                     and self-compassion in Turkish young adults with and without
       Anderson, S., & Stuart, G. L. (2016). The relationship between                       a history of non-suicidal self-injury. Current Psychology, 40(8),
       dispositional mindfulness, borderline personality features, and                      4143-4155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-00634-2
       suicidal ideation in a sample of women in residential substance                Turner, B. J., Layden, B. K., Butler, S. M., & Chapman, A. L. (2013).
       use treatment. Psychiatry Research, 238, 122-128. https://doi.                     How often, or how many ways: Xlarifying the relationship
       org/10.1016/j.psychres.2016.02.040                                            between non-suicidal self-injury and suicidality. Archives of
Silverman, M. M., Berman, A. L., Sanddal, N. D., O'carroll, P. W., &                        Suicide Research, 17(4), 397–415. https://d oi.o rg/1 0.1 080/1 3811
       Joiner Jr., T. E. (2007). Rebuilding the tower of Babel: a revised                   118.2013.802660
       nomenclature for the study of suicide and suicidal behaviors. Part             Turner, B. J., Austin, S. B., & Chapman, A. L. (2014). Treating nonsui-
       2: Suicide-related ideations, communications, and behaviors.                         cidal self-injury: A systematic review of psychological and phar-
       Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior, 37(3), 264–277. https://                     macological interventions. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry,
       doi.org/10.1521/suli.2007.37.3.264                                            59(11), 576–585. https://doi.org/10.1177/070674371405901103
*                                                                                     *
 Song, H. S., & Bae, S. M. (2020). The moderating effects of the facets                 Umphrey, L. R., Sherblom, J. C., & Swiatkowski, P. (2021). Rela-
       of mindfulness on the relationship between daily life stress and                     tionship of self-compassion, hope, and emotional control to per-
       suicidal ideation among Korean college students. International                       ceived burdensomeness, thwarted belongingness, and suicidal
       Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 1-16. https://doi.org/                    ideation. Crisis: The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide
       10.1007/s11469-020-00345-6                                                       Prevention, 42(2), 121. https://d oi.o rg/1 0.1 027/0 227-5 910/a 0006
*
  Stanley, I. H., Boffa, J. W., Tran, J. K., Schmidt, N. B., Joiner, T. E.,                 97
       & Vujanovic, A. A. (2019). Posttraumatic stress disorder symp-                 Van Geel, M., Vedder, P., & Tanilon, J. (2014). Relationship between
       toms and mindfulness facets in relation to suicide risk among                        peer victimization, cyberbullying, and suicide in children and
                                                                                                                                                           13
	Mindfulness
      adolescents: A meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatrics, 168(5), 435–                     World Health Organization. (2018). National suicide prevention strat-
      442. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.4143                        egies: Progress, examples and indicators. https://apps.who.int/
Van Vliet, K., & Kalnins, G. (2011). A compassion-focused approach                          iris/handle/10665/279765.
                                                                                      *
      to nonsuicidal self-injury. Journal of Mental Health Counseling,                 Wu, N., Hou, Y., Chen, P., & You, J. (2019). Peer acceptance and non-
      33(4), 295–311. https://d oi.o rg/1 0.1 7744/m
                                                        ehc.3 3.4.j 75403 38q2         suicidal self-injury among Chinese adolescents: A longitudinal
      23t417                                                                                moderated mediation model. Journal of Youth and Adolescence,
Victor, S. E., & Klonsky, E. D. (2014). Correlates of suicide attempts                      48(9), 1806-1817. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-019-01093-0
                                                                                      *
      among self-injurers: A meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology                        Xavier, A., Pinto-Gouveia, J., & Cunha, M. (2016). The protective role
      Review, 34(4), 282–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2014.03.                of self-compassion on risk factors for non-suicidal self-injury in
      005                                                                                   adolescence. School Mental Health, 8(4), 476-485. https://doi.
*
  Vigna, A. (2016). Self-compassion as a resilience factor in gender                        org/10.1007/s12310-016-9197-9
      and sexual minority youth. Dissertation: The University of                      Yarnell, L. M., Neff, K. D., Davidson, O. A., & Mullarkey, M. (2019).
      Wisconsin-Madison                                                                     Gender differences in self-compassion: Examining the role of
Vujanovic, A. A., Bonn-Miller, M. O., Bernstein, A., McKee, L. G.,                          gender role orientation. Mindfulness, 10(6), 1136–1152. https://
      & Zvolensky, M. J. (2010). Incremental validity of mindfulness                        doi.org/10.1007/s12671-018-1066-1
      skills in relation to emotional dysregulation among a young adult               You, J., Ren, Y., Zhang, X., Wu, Z., Xu, S., & Lin, M.-P. (2018). Emo-
      community sample. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, 39(3), 203–                            tional dysregulation and nonsuicidal self-injury: A meta-analytic
      213. https://doi.org/10.1080/16506070903441630                                review. Neuropsychiatry, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.4172/neuro
*
  Wang, J., Häusermann, M., & Ambresin, A.-E. (2018). Mindfulness                           psychiatry.1000399
                                                                                      *
      and other psycho-social resources protective against mental ill-                  Zeifman, R. J., Ip, J., Antony, M. M., & Kuo, J. R. (2021). On lov-
      ness and suicidality among gay men. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 9,                       ing thyself: Exploring the association between self-compassion,
      361. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00361                                  self-reported suicidal behaviors, and implicit suicidality among
*
 Warner, A. (2015). Mindfulness as a protective factor for the relation-                    college students. Journal of American college health, 69(4), 396-
      ship between self-injury and suicide. Dissertation: The Florida                       403. https://doi.org/10.1080/07448481.2019.1679154
      State University                                                                Zelkowitz, R. L., & Cole, D. A. (2019). Self-criticism as a transdiag-
*
  Watson-Singleton, N. N., Walker, J. H., LoParo, D., Mack, S. A.,                          nostic process in nonsuicidal self-injury and disordered eating:
      & Kaslow, N. J. (2018). Psychometric evaluation of the Five                           Systematic review and meta-analysis. Suicide and Life-Threaten-
      Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire in a clinical sample of African                       ing Behavior, 49(1), 310–327. https://d oi.o rg/1 0.1 111/s ltb.1 2436
                                                                                      *
      Americans. Mindfulness, 9(1), 312-324. https://doi.org/10.1007/              Zeng, W., Ma, Z., & Li, H. (2017). Mindfulness and suicidal idea-
      s12671-017-0776-0                                                                   tion in Chinese older adults: Perceived stress as mediator. Social
Weissman, M. M., Bland, R. C., Canino, G. J., Greenwald, S., Hwu,                           Behavior and Personality: an international journal, 45(5), 733-
      H.-G., Joyce, P. R., Karam, E. G., Lee, C.-K., Lellouch, J.,                          740. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.5807
                                                                                      *
      Lepine, J.-P., Newman, S. C., Rubio-Stipec, M., Wells, J. E.,                     Zhang, H., Liu, M., & Long, H. (2021). Child maltreatment and sui-
      Wickramaratne, P. J., Wittchen, H.-U., & Yeh, E.-K. (1999).                           cide ideation in rural China: The roles of self-compassion and
      Prevalence of suicide ideation and suicide attempts in nine coun-                     school belonging. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal,
      tries. Psychological Medicine, 29(1), 9–17. https://doi.org/10.                   38(3), 325-335. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10560-020-00679-z
      1017/s0033291798007867
Whitlock, J., Eckenrode, J., & Silverman, D. (2006). Self-injurious                   Publisher’s Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to
      behaviors in a college population. Pediatrics, 117(6), 1939–1948.               jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
      https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2005-2543
World Health Organization (2017). Preventing suicide: A resource
      for media professionals. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/
      258814
13