Scribd
Upload
3K views1 page

Micro Teaching Evaluation Format

This document is a microteaching evaluation form used to assess nursing students' teaching performance at Pushpanjali College of Nursing in Agra, Uttar Pradesh, India. The form evaluates students on their subject matter knowledge, presentation skills, and ability to manage the classroom. Students are rated on a scale of 1 to 5 based on criteria such as knowledge of the topic, use of examples, encouraging participation, and controlling the classroom environment. Total scores between 10-20 are considered poor, 21-35 average, 35-45 good, and 45-50 excellent.

Uploaded by

prabhujohn
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
3K views1 page

Micro Teaching Evaluation Format

This document is a microteaching evaluation form used to assess nursing students' teaching performance at Pushpanjali College of Nursing in Agra, Uttar Pradesh, India. The form evaluates students on their subject matter knowledge, presentation skills, and ability to manage the classroom. Students are rated on a scale of 1 to 5 based on criteria such as knowledge of the topic, use of examples, encouraging participation, and controlling the classroom environment. Total scores between 10-20 are considered poor, 21-35 average, 35-45 good, and 45-50 excellent.

Uploaded by

prabhujohn
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

PUSHPANJALI COLLEGE OF NURSING, AGRA, UP

MICRO TEACHING EVALUATION FORM

Course/Year/Semester……………………………………………BATCH………………………

Name of Student: _____________________________________________________________

Subject:………………………………………………Topic:…………………………………

Date of Presentation:……………………………

Evaluate the following aspects of the presentation in terms capacity to teach by marking “√” in the
box of corresponding column according to the scale given:
5–Strongly agree; 4–Agree; 3–Neutral; 2–Disagree; 1–Strongly disagree;

Aspects related to Teaching Performance Scale


5 4 3 2 1
A: Subject Matter Knowledge
1. Have sound and updated knowledge on subject

2. Gives adequate information considering students level &


references of both books, journals and online materials
3. Makes topics easily understandable

4. Gives appropriate and lively examples from real life situation to


motivate the students for learning
5. Timely submission of lesson plan/content matter

B: Presentation and Management


1. Has clear and audible voice
2. Keeps class lively using wit (humor) & body language

3. Encourages students‟ participation (question-answer)

4. Controls and maintain conducive environment for learning

5. Provide and maintain lesson plan

Maximum score-50 & Minimum score-10


Score between- 10 to 20 Presentation is Poor, 21 to 35 Presentation is
average, 35 - 45 presentation is good, 45 – 50 presentation is excellent.

Sign of evaluator/faculty
Date:

Sign of student

You might also like