Common Clarifications
FY Divisions A,C,E and F
Moot Court Proposition for Moot Court Clinical
1. The tickets are booked from which website?
Response: From the official website of Safe Travel.
2. ‘Safe Travel offers were rather lustrous’ - is this a claim or general facts of the
case?
Response: General Facts of the case
3. Does browse wrap include web wrap as well?
Response: No Clarification required.
4. Do ‘operational reasons’ mean the effect of cyclone only or even strike of staff
members of Fair India is included?
Response: No Clarification required.
5. What is the scope of ‘lacked merit’?
Response: In legal terms, it means that the District Commission clearly felt that
Mr. Peter Khanna has failed to bring a proper case, in terms of cause of action and
damages.
6. What is the scope of Force Majeure? Does it include operational reasons too?
Response: No Clarification required.
7. The date of the event mentioned states that both events were on a Saturday,
however there is only a two day gap between the events?
Response: CORRECTION: The second event is to be held on 24th January, 2023,
Monday, hence the first event is on Saturday, 22nd January, 2023 as mentioned
in Para 4.
8. Whether Peter Khanna filed a lawsuit in the District Commission or a consumer
complaint?
Response: CORRECTION: It is a consumer complaint only.
9. In Para 15, What is the interpretation of this - it is mentioned that there was a
delay due to operational reasons which had a negative impact on ‘smooth
operation’?
Response: No Clarification required.
10. What time did the cyclone struck the locality and when were the flights given the
permission to proceed with the flights?
Response: Irrelevant Clarification
11. In para 6 of the moot proposition, it has been stated on the insurance site as " no
questions asked " which is a vague statement".
Response: No Clarification required.
12. In para 15 of the moot proposition, how much could have the minor negative
impact result in delay of flight due to operational reasons.
Response: No Clarification required.
13. Were there any other cases against Fair India or Safe Travel and their services?
Response: Irrelevant Clarification
14. Whether the contract of both places (i.e. of Bengaluru and Delhi) would be
terminated by style glaze with Peter Khanna?
Response: Yes
15. Para 7 mentions that the payment page only accepts payment through net
banking and then it goes on to say that Mr. Khanna went ahead and entered his
debit card details, as per our research a net banking paywall doesn't contain any
option to pay with a debit card.
Response: A debit card can be used for any kind of online payment. The net
banking system is not only dependent on the NEFT format of transactions, the
OTP system through debit card is also faster.
16. As mentioned in Para 16, Since Mr. Khanna failed to reach on time for the first
event, does the termination of the time bound contract extend to the 2nd event of
Style Gaze as well?
Response: No Clarification required.
17. Para 21 & 22 which is the appropriate appellate authority – high court or state
consumer dispute redressal commission
Response: No Clarification required.
18. The team would like to get the written submissions of the Consumer Dispute
Resolution made by both the parties
Response:
Sure, and I need a reboot of the American TV Series Supernatural 🙂 and by the
way it is Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission.
(P.S. - The last response is just for fun to showcase what kind of clarifications
should never be asked)