Précis
The official name of our species is homo sapiens; but there are many
anthropologists who prefer to think of man as homo Fabcr-thc smith, the
maker of tools It would be possible. I think, to reconcile these two
definitions in a third. If man is a knower and an efficient doer, it is only
because he is also a talker In order to be Faber and Sapiens, Homo must
first be loquax, the loquacious one. Without language we should merely
be hairless chimpanzees. Indeed \vc should be some thing much worse.
Possessed of a high IQ but no language, we should be like the Yahoos of
Gulliver's Travels- Creatures too clever to be guided by instinct, too
Self-centered to live in a state of animal grace, and therefore condemned
forever, frustrated and malignant, between contented apehood and
aspiring'humanity. It was language that made possible the accumulation
of knowledge and the broadcasting of information. It was language that
permitted the expression of religious insight, the formulation of ethical
ideals, the codification to laws, It was language, in a word, that turned us
into human beings and gave birth to civilization.