Countervailing
Countervailing
- total capital invested, production and sales The requirement of the dumping bond shall be
volume, and aggregate production capacity of the made not sooner than sixty (60) days from the date
domestic industry; of initiation of the investigation. The date of the
initiation of the investigation shall be the date the
- effect of the price of the allegedly subsidized Secretary publishes such notice in two (2)
product on the price of the like product in the newspapers of general circulation.
domestic market; and
The provisional countervailing duty may be
- consequent impact of the importation of the imposed for a period not exceeding four (4)
allegedly subsidized product on the domestic months.
industry as demonstrated by relevant factors and
indices having a bearing on the state of the The Secretary of DTI or DA shall immediately
domestic industry as enumerated in Section 12 of terminate the countervailing investigation upon
the IRR. finding that:
> prices at which the product is sold in the - the amount of subsidy is de minimis or where
domestic market of the exporting country and the volume of the subsidized product, or the injury
export prices; is negligible; or
> injury and causality; - the volume of imports from a particular country
is less than three percent (3%) of all imports of like
> volume of subsidized imports; and product. However, this rule does not apply when
> adverse effects of such imports on countries with individual shares of less than 3%
domestic prices and on domestic industries. collectively account for more than 7% of imports of
the product under investigation (in the case of
Upon acceptance of a properly documented developing countries the subsidized imports are
application and before initiating an investigation, less than 4% of total imports of the importing
the Secretary of DTI or DA shall notify the country). However, this rule does not apply when
government of the country of export or origin about developing countries with individual shares of less
the impending countervailing investigation and than 4% collectively account for more than 9% of
provide it a copy of the non-confidential summary of total imports); or
the application.
- the injury is negligible.
Upon notification, the government of the country of
export or origin shall also be invited for consultation
with the objective of clarifying the situation as to * Final Determination
matters referred to in the application and arriving at
a mutually agreed solution. In the conduct of its final determination, the Tariff
Commission notifies all interested parties, receives
representations and/or other submissions, and
* Preliminary Determination holds preliminary conference and public
consultations. Investigators conduct ocular plant
inspection and examination of books of accounts of * the nature of the subsidy in question and the trade
all concerned parties domestically and in the effects likely to arise therefrom;
exporting countries.
* a significant rate of increase in the importation of
The Tariff Commission has 120 days from receipt of the subsidized product into the domestic market
the advice from the Secretary of DTI/DA to indicating the likelihood of substantially increased
complete its own inquiry and submit its report of importations;
findings to either Secretary.
* sufficient freely disposable, or an imminent,
substantial increase in, production capacity of the
foreign exporter indicating the likelihood of
* Issuance of Department Order
substantially increased subsidized exports in the
The DTI or DA Secretary shall, within ten (10) days domestic market, taking into account the availability
from receipt of the affirmative final determination by of other export markets to absorb any additional
the Commission, issue a Department Order exports;
imposing a definitive countervailing duty on the
* whether such subsidized products are entering at
subsidized product, unless he has earlier accepted
prices that will have a significantly depressing or
a price undertaking from the foreign exporter,
suppressing effect on domestic prices, and will
producer or government of the country of export or
likely increase demand for further importation of the
origin.
subsidized products; and
In case of a negative finding by the Commission,
* inventories of the product being investigated.
and after the lapse of the period for the petitioner to
appeal to the Court of Tax Appeals, the Secretary
shall issue, through the Secretary of Finance, an
What factors other than subsidized imports would
Order for the Commissioner of Customs to
cause the non-levy of countervailing duties?
immediately release the cash bond to the importer.
All the parties concerned shall also be duly notified * contraction in demand or changes in the patterns
of the dismissal of the case. of consumption;
* trade restrictive practices of, and competition
between, foreign and domestic producers;
What are the economic factors to be taken into
account in determining material injury to the * developments in technology and export
domestic industry? performance; and
* actual or potential decline in output, sales, market * productivity of the domestic industry.
share, profits, productivity, return on investments,
or utilization of capacity;
What can the investigating authorities do if the
exporting enterprises refuse to cooperate during
* effects on domestic prices; and the investigation?
* actual or potential effects on cash flow, The authorities can decide on the basis of the best
inventories, employment, wages, growth, and ability information available.
to raise capital or investments.
An additional factor to be taken into account is
whether there has been an increased burden on What is meant by "disclosure of essential facts"?
government support programs. Before making the final determination, the
Commission is required to disclose to the interested
parties (e.g. exporters or producers, their
In determining the existence of a threat of material governments, and importers) the essential facts on
injury, what factors does the Commission consider? which the decision to apply the duty is to be made.
The parties are given five (5) days from the date of
receipt of the essential facts to defend their countervailing duty imposition would lead to a
interests in writing. continuation or recurrence of subsidization and
injury.
E. MEASURES
What is an interim review?
What are the remedies/measures imposed against
subsidization? It is a review conducted by the Commission, motu
proprio, or upon the direction of the Secretary or
upon petition of any interested party to determine
* Provisional Measure - takes the form of a whether:
provisional duty in the form of a cash bond, in
* the imposition of the countervailing duty is no
addition to any other duties, taxes and charges
longer necessary to offset subsidization, taking into
imposed by law on the allegedly subsidized
consideration the need to protect the existing
product. It is applied only after the DTI-BIS or DA
domestic industry against dumping.
has made a preliminary affirmative determination
and no sooner than 60 days from the initiation of * the existing duty is not sufficient to counteract the
the case. subsidization which is causing injury.
* Definitive Duty - final countervailing duty imposed, At least one (1) year should have elapsed since the
in addition to the regular duty and other charges, on imposition of the countervailing duty before an
a protested product imported from a specific interim review can be initiated.
exporter, following an affirmative final
determination.
G. JUDICIAL REVIEW
What are the actions available to the aggrieved
What is the "lesser duty rule"?
and/or interested party?
After it had been established that subsidized
Within 30 days from receipt of notice of the final
imports are causing injury to the domestic industry,
ruling, a petition for review of such ruling may be
the decision on whether the amount of duty should
filed with the Court of Tax Appeals by any party in a
be the full amount of subsidy or less is made by the
countervailing investigation who is adversely
authorities. If a lesser duty is adequate to remove
affected by the final ruling on the imposition of a
the injury to the domestic industry, such duty should
countervailing duty.
be levied.
The filing of such petition for review shall not in any
way stop or suspend the imposition and collection
F. DURATION OF MEASURES of the countervailing duty.
What is the lifetime of each countervailing
measure?
H. PHILIPPINE COMMITMENTS VIS-À-VIS THE
Provisional countervailing duty – four (4) months WTO AGREEMENT ON SUBSIDIES AND
COUNTERVAILING MEASURES
Definitive countervailing duty – five (5) years from
imposition What previously WTO-inconsistent provisions in the
old countervailing law (Section 302) have been
amended/revised by the new law to align these with
What is meant by "sunset review"? the WTO Agreement?
It is a review that may be initiated by any interested * lack of provisions for notification of/consultation
party or upon own motion of the Commission with the government of the exporting country;
before the “sunset date”, i.e., the 5th year, to
determine whether the expiry of the duration of the
* withholding of the release of questioned governments are non-transparent and therefore
importation pending the determination of a prima should be monitored closely.
facie case of subsidization;
In view, however, of the inherent nature of
* imposition of provisional measure immediately subsidization (i.e., a grant by a government), the
upon the finding of a prima facie case, effective up Philippines, in pursuing a countervailing case,
to the final determination of subsidization; necessarily pits herself against the protested
foreign government, thereby opening the possibility
* indeterminate period of the imposition of the
of a diplomatic row.
countervailing bond;
Further improvements have been introduced in the
* inclusion of substitutes in the definition of “like
procedural aspects of investigation to expedite the
products”; and
resolution of countervailing cases. Accordingly, the
* country-specific application of the countervailing Commission has adopted the following procedures:
duty.
* verification/ocular inspection is immediately
conducted upon receipt of the case from DTI or DA;
I. STRENGTHENING OF THE COUNTERVAILING * preparation of the staff report within fifty (50) days
MECHANISM from receipt of the case;
What provisions in the new countervailing duty law * designation of an alternate counsel so that in the
strengthen the mechanism against subsidized event that the lead counsel is not available, motion
imports? for resetting of hearings will no longer be
necessary;
* proactive implementation by concerned
authorities, including commercial and agricultural * conduct of summary proceedings, similar to
attaches; regular court procedures. Rather than hearing the
testimony of witnesses, their affidavits are
* prescription of a statutory period of 120 days for submitted to the opposing party at least three (3)
the Commission to complete its formal investigation days before the scheduled hearing to afford the
and submit its report of findings to the Secretary of opposing party time to study said affidavits and
DTI/DA; formulate clarificatory questions to be asked during
* creation of a Special Unit within the implementing the hearing;
agencies to undertake the tasks mandated under * conduct of 5-day marathon hearings; and
the Countervailing Duty Act of 1999; and
* disallowance of dilatory tactics or
* earmarking of the countervailing duty collected for unnecessary/unjustified delays.
the capacity building/strengthening of the
implementing agencies.
K. BUSINESS IMPLICATIONS
J. EFFECTIVENESS OF THE COUNTERVAILING What are the implications for business of RA 8751?
DUTY LAW
For business persons, knowledge of the complex
How effective is the implementation of the new rules on the levy of countervailing duty is essential
countervailing duty law perceived? in their capacities as domestic producers whose
interests may be adversely affected by the
Strengthened might be the countervailing duty law, subsidization of foreign producers and exporters by
it can only be as effective as the implementing their respective governments.
authorities are. Trade, agriculture or finance
attaches and other consular officials need to be Since 1969, only three (3) countervailing cases
very proactive and vigilant in detecting/monitoring have been successfully pursued by the national
subsidization by foreign governments. It must be authorities involving: wheat flour from France and
recognized that subsidies extended by Germany, spanners and wrenches from India and
transmission and conveyor belts from India. The
dearth of countervailing cases filed against
subsidized imports could be attributed to the
extreme difficulty of proving subsidization by foreign
governments and the possible straining of intra-
state relations that may arise from the filing of a
countervailing case.
On the other hand, Philippine exporters are finding
out that as their exports of manufactured products
rise, there are mounting pressures from industries
in the importing countries for the levy of
countervailing duty on the ground that the goods
are being subsidized. One such instance happened
in August 1995 when Philippine desiccated coconut
was imposed a 121.5% countervailing duty by
Brazil. The Philippines complained that the
imposition of the countervailing duty violated Article
VI of the GATT 1994, charging that there was no
basis for Brazil’s action because instead of
subsidies granted to desiccated coconut
processing, development assistance was provided
to coconut farmers through a levy collected from
those farmers.
Under such circumstances, it has become essential
for enterprises to be familiar with the rules
applicable in this area. An understanding of the
rules of the WTO Agreement on Subsidies and
Countervailing Measures could, for instance,
enable an exporting enterprise to take
precautionary steps to avoid countervailing actions
in foreign markets where there are increasing
pressures from industrial and other groups for such
actions. It would be in the interest of the local
exporting enterprise not to allow its exports to rise
in a market where it is apprehensive of a petition for
countervailing action. Instead, where possible, it
should diversify its trade to other markets.