Labour Law 2 Unit 1 & 2
Labour Law 2 Unit 1 & 2
> According to the Fair Wage Committee, and Hydro (Engineers) P. Ltd v. Workmen. AIR 1969 SCI82.
The minimum wage was 'to ensure not merely the bare sustenance of life but the preservation ofthe efficiency
of the worker by providing sonme measure of education, medical requirements and amenities.
Further said that the wage should cover five categories of needs considered essential for the worker's well
being, viz. food, clothing, housing, light & fuel and miscellancous.
Salient Features of the Act
Extend to the whole of India
This Act applied to certain employments and it empower both Central and State government to fix
amount of wage for their respective areas.
" Minimum wage means all remuneration should be paid in cash.
Fixing of Minimum wages on the basis of:
The significance of the Minimum Wages Act, 1948 in the context of conditions in India has been explained by
the Supreme Court in
> Unichoyi x State of Kerala
"What the Minimum Wages Act lay to achieve is to prevent exploitation of labour and for that purpose
empowers the appropriate Government to take steps to prescribe minimum rates of wages the scheduled
industries.
In an underdeveloped country like India, which is facing the unemployment crises on a very large scale, it is
not surprising to see that labour is forced to work even on starvation wages for their survival.
The policy of the Act is to prevent the cmployment of such sweated minimum rates, the capacity of the
employer need not to be considered. What is being prescribed is minimum wage rates which a welfare State
assumes every employer must pay before the employs labour."
According to the Preamble of the Minimum Wages Act, 1948,this is an Act to provide for fixing of minimum
rates of wages in certain employments specified in Part I or Part II of the Schedule of the Act.
Edward Mlls co.Ltd, vs State ofAjmer
It was decided that the object of the Minimum wages Act as, "The object of this Act is to prevent exploitation
of the workers and for this purpose, it aims at the fixation of minimum wages which the employer must pay"
Constitutional Validity of the Minimum Wages Act 1948
The Minimum Wages Act, 1948, gives both the Central government and State government jurisdiction in
fixing wages. The act is legally non-binding but statutory. If the Wage amount is paid less than the fixed
minimum wage rate amount to forced labour. Constitute the Wage Board for analysing the capacity of
employers to pay and fix such amount of wage that they at least cover a family's basic need.
But on some grounds, the constitutional validity of this Act was challenged. It was said that as the above Act
violates Article 14 and 19(1)(g) of the Indian Constitution.
The constitutional validity of this Act was challenged in the following cases:
Bijay Cotton Mills Ltd The State of Ajmer
Facts:
There was an industrial dispute between the appellate company and its workmen regarding enhancement of
wages and the dispute was referred by the Govt of Ajmer to an Industrial Tribunal.
The tribunal held that the capacity of the mill prevents the award of higher rates of wages and higher dearness
allowance.
In the meantime, the Appellate Tribunal sent back the case to the Industrial tribunal for further investigation
Later rejected the basis upon which the minimum rates of wages of Rs. 56 were fixed by the State and fixed
the minimum rates of wages including the dearness allowance at Rs. 35 only.
The Company in its petition stated that the minimum wages fixed by the State is prohibitory and it is not at all
possible for the company to carry on its business on payment of such wages and, therefore, closed its mills.
An interesting feature, in this case, was that all the workers working in the mills approached the Company and
expressed their willingness to work at a lower rate of wages than the rates prescribed under the Act.
Despite the willingness of the workers the company was unable to open the mills by reason of the fact that the
Act makes it a criminal offence for not paying the wages fixed under the Act.
Issue:
It violates the guarantee of freedom of trade and profession under Article 19(1Xg).
Held:
It was held that the restrictions imposed upon the freedom of contract by the fixation of minimum rates of
wages though they interfere with this Article19(1 X(g) to some extent BUT this is not unreasonable.
It is imposed in the interest of the general public and with a vicew to carrying out one of the Directive Principle
of State Policy asimbodied in Article 43 which talks about living wages in the Constitution are protected by
the terms of clause (6) of Article 19.
Another important judgment that favors and supports the constitutionality of the Minimum Wages Act, 1948
IS.
Facts:
The government of Kerala appointed a committee in the exercise of its power conferred by clause (a) (1) of
Section 5 of the Minimum Wages Act to hold an inquiry and advise the government to fix the minimum rate of
wages in respect of employment in the tile industry.
After reviewing the report, The Government of Kerala issued a notification prescribing the minimum rate of
wages.
9 Petitioners who represent 6 tiles factories in filed the petition w/article 32, challenging the validity of the Act
as well as the validity of the notification issued by the government of Kerala.
Issues:
I. The notification which was fixed minimum rate of wages did not take into account the employer's capacity
to pay, so the notification is ultra vires and inoperative.
Held:
The court rejected all the contentions of the petitioner and upheld the validity of the minimum wages act
under Aticle 19 () (g) and observed that the wage structure_prescribed by the notification cannot be
considered as the court for closure of the factories.
The cause for closure of the factory may either be because the factories found it difficult to pay the wage
structure or may be for reasons other than industrial.
The act aims to provide at least the minimum wages and social justice to the workers, Even in the preamble of
the act, it is said to provide for fixing the minimum rate of wages in certain employment.
Therefore, the provisions of the act and notification of the government pertaining to the fixation of the
minimum wages fall within the restriction of fundamental rights in the constitution and are hence
constitutionally valid.
> Chandra Bhavan v. State of Mysore
Facts:
The petitioners challenged the validity of the notification of the Mysore government which was notified to
direct all residential hotels and cating houses tofix a minimum wage for employces belonging to different
categories and also ghallenged the provisions of the minimum wages to act.
But the Mysore High Court rejected all the contention of the petitioner and later the petitioners approach to
the Supreme Court.
Held:
The Supreme Court observed that government can fix different minimum wages depending upon the
cconomic condition, cost ofliving, nature of work, category ofemployment, etc.
Further held that the provision of the act and notification of the government does not violate Article 14 and
19 (1) (g) of the Constitution.
The owner of the Bidi factory filed writ petition under Article 226 before the Bombay High Court declaring:
ssues:
1. Without a delegation of authority by the president under Art 239 of COI, the chief commissioner of Ajmer
was not competent to function as the "appropriate govt" for purposes of Minimum Wages Act.
Held:
The Court rejected the contention which was raised by the counsel and observed that legislature intended to
apply the act to those industries only where by reason of unorganized labour or want of proper management
for effective regulation of wages or for other causes the wages for labourers in a particular industry was very
low.
Classification of Wages:
The Supreme Court has classified " Wages" into three categories. They are:
The Act does not define the expression "minimum wage" but it defines the word" wages" in Section 2(h)
according to which:
Any other service excluded by general or special order of the appropriate government;
Any contribution paid by the employer to any person be it provident fund or scheme of social
insurance:
"Fair wage is the wage which is above the minimum wage but below the living wage.
The lower limit of the fair wage is obviously the minimum wage: the upper limit is to be set by the capacity of
the industry to pay. "
Fair wage must be paid according to the financial positions of the employer and efficiency of the worker and
his fair needs of his family, shall also be taken into consideration.
To Deternmine fair wage, the following factors are taken into Consideration -
Living Wage
A living wage is one which enables the earner to provide for himself and his family not only the bare
essentials of food, clothing, and shelter but a measure of comfort including education for his children,
protection against ill-health, requirements of essential social needs, and a measure of insurance against the
more important misfortunes including old age."
Thus, the attainment of living wage is the ultimate objective of every civilized society.
The term Living Wages has been defined in -The Fair Wage Committee Report and Article 43 of the
Constitution of India.
Distinction between the Minimunm Wage, Fair Wage, and Living Wage
The Supreme Court, in the case of Kamani Metals and Alloys v. Their Workmen distinguished between the
minimum wage, fair wage and living wage.
'Broadly speaking the first principle is that there is a minimum wage which, in any event, must be paid,
irespective of profits, the financial condition of the establishment or the availability of workmen on lower
wages., This minimum wage is independent of the kind of industry and applies to all alike big or small. It sets
the lowest limit below which wages cannot be allowed to sink in all humanity.
The second principle is that wages must be fair, that is to say, sufficiently high to provide a standard family
with food, shelter, clothing, medical care and education of children appropriate to the workman but not at a
rate exceeding his wage carning capacity in the class of establishment to which he belongs. A fair wage is thus
related to the carning capacity and the workload.
It must, however, be realised that 'fair wage' is not 'living wage' by which is meant a wage which is sufficient
to provide not only the essentials above-mentioned but a fair measure of economical comfort with an ability to
provide for old age and evil days. Fair wage lies between the minimum wage, which must be paid in any
event, and the living wage, which is the goal of every civilized society.'
Components/ Constituents of To Determine fair wage, the following To determine living wage,
Minimum Wages - factors are taken into Consideration - the earner to provide for
himself and his family not
(i) a basic rate of wages and a specialI) The Productivity of Labour only the bare essentials of
allowance a rate to be adjusted at food, clothing, and shelter
such intervals and in such manner as 2) The Prevailing rates of wages in the but a measure of comfort
the appropriate government may direct same industry for similar occupation including
to accord as nearly as practicable with in the same neighboring locality
the variation in the cost of living index I)education for his children.
number applicable to such workers 3) the Level of national income and its
(hereinafter referred to as the "cost of distribution; and
living allowance"); or 2)protection against ill
4) The place of Industry in the health. requirements of
(ii) a basic rate of wages with or economny of the Countr essential social needs
without the cost of living allowance
and the cash value of the concessions 3) a mneasure of insurance
in respect of suppliers of essential against the more important
commodities at concession rates
where so authorized; or
misfortunes including old
age.
(iii) an all-inclusive rate allowing for
the basic rate the cost of living
allowance and the cash value of the
concessions if any.
(Section 4 of Minimum Wages Act)
The Minimum Wage must, therefore, The Concept of fair wages involves a Attainment ofliving wage is
provide not merely for the bare rate sufficiently high to enable the the ultimate objective of
substance of life but also for the worker to provide a standard family every civilized society.
preservation of the efficiency of a with food, shelter, clothing, medical
worker. For this purpose. the care.
minimum wage must also provide for
the same measure of education,
medical requirement, and amenities.
The responsibility for fixing the minimum rates of wages that the appropriate Government. Section3
provides that the appropriate Government
Section 3 (1)(a) fix the minimum ratesof wages payable to employees in an employment specified in Part I
and Part Il of the Schedule, and in employment added to either part by notification under Section 27.
In the case of employment specified in Part I, the minimum rates of wages must be fixed for the entire State,
no parts of the State bcing omitted
In case of the employments specified in Part II of the Schedule, the minimum rates of wages may not be fixed
for the entire State. Parts of the State may be left out altogether.
However, Appropriate Government" may not fix minimum rates of wages in respect of any scheduled
employment in which less than 1000 employees in the whole State are engaged but when it comes the
knowledge it shall fix the minimum wage rate.
Section (1)(b) shall conduct areview within the span of 5 years and revise the same, if necessary.
Section 3(2) talks about the manner of fixation by the Appropriate Government may fix the minimum rate of
wages for:
fixing minimum rates of wages in respect of any scheduled employment for the first time or in revising
minimum rates of wages, the appropriate Government can follow either of the two methods described below:
Committee Method
Notification Method
It is defined under section 5 (1\a) of the It is defined under section 5 (1(b) of the
Minimum wages Act, 1948. Minimum wages Act, 1948.
Appropriate government constitute committees Appropriate Government shall by notification, in
or sub-committees for the purpose to hold the Oficial Gazette publish its proposals for the
inquiries and advise it in respect of such fixation information of persons likely to be affected
or revision, or. thereby Specify a date not less than 2 months
from the date of notification, on which the
proposals will be taken into consideration.
After considering the advice of the committee. The representations received will be considered
the appropriate Government shall. by by the appropriate Government.
notification in the Official Gazette fix or revise It will also consult the Advisory Board
the minimum rates of wages. constituted under Section 7 of the Act.
The wage rates shall come into force from such The wage rates shall come into force from such
date as may be specified in the notification. date as may be specified in the notification.
If no date is specified, wage rates shall come However, if no date is specified, the notification
into force on the expiry of 3 months from the shall come into force on expiry of 3months from
date of issue the notification. the date of its issue of notification.
CASE
Edward mills v. State of Ajmer
It was held that Committee appointed under Section 5 is only an advisory body and that Government is not
bound to accept its recommendations.
advising the appropriate Government, generally in the matter of fixing and revising minimum rates of
wages,
Section 20 deals with the provisions relating to the appointment of authorities to decide claims arising out of this
Act. Under this section, appropriate Government has the power to appoint by way of notification in the official
Gazette, the authority to hear and decide claims for any specified area. This section can be divided into two
parts. First part relates to the persons who can be appointed as the authority to decide claims arising out of the
Act. The second part of it deals with the claims which shall be decided by the authority appointed for the
purpose
any officer of the State Government not below the rank of Labour Commissioner.
any other officer with experience as ajudge of aCivil Court or asa stipendiary Magistrate
Under sub-section (2), lays down the list of persons who can make an application to the authority for a
direction.
Under sub-section (3), When an application under sub-section (2) is entertained, the Authority shall
hear the applicant and the employer or give them an opportunity of being heard, and after such further
inquiry, if any, as it may consider necessary, may, without prejudice to any other penalty to which the
employer may be liable under this Act.
Under sub-section (4), If the Authority hearing any application is satisfied that it was either malicious
or vexatious, it may direct that a penalty not exceeding fifty rupees be paid to the employer by the
person presenting the application.
Under sub-section (7), Every Authority appointed under sub-section (1) shall have all the powers of a
Civil Court under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 for the purpose of taking evidence and of
enforcing the attendance of witnesses and compelling the production of documents, and every such
Authority shall be deemed to be a Civil Court for all the purposes of section 195 and Chapter XXXV
of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898.
PIECE-RATE SYSTEM:
This is that system of wage payment in which the workers are paid on the basis of the units of output
produced. This system does not consider the time spent by the workers. Piece rate system is the method of
remunerating the workers according to the number of unit produced or job completed. IL is also known as
payment by result or output. Piece rate system pays wages at a fixed piece rate for cach unit of output
produced.
Time rate system is a method of wage payment to Piece rate system is a method of wage payment to
workers based on time spent by them for the workers based on the quantity of output they have
production of output. produced.
Time rate system pays the workers according to the Piece rate system pays the workers according to the
time spent in the factory. units of output produced.
Time rate system emphasis on better quality of Piece rate system gives emphasis on larger quantity
output. of output.
Time rate system does not discriminate the workers Piece rate system discriminates the workers and
and pays the same wages to efficient and inefficient pays more wages to efficient and skilled workers.
workers.
There is lack of incentive for efficient workers. It motivates the workers to produce more and earn
more.
Under this system, generally the employment is Under this system, generally the employment is
stable. unstable.
The Act is considered to be an important social security step towards the welfare of the working class in order
to remedy mischiefs played by the employers.
Before the codification of Payment of Wages Act there were several unfair labour practices pertaining to the
payment of wages.
The employers did not make payment of wages in definite form. That is sometimes they made
payment of wages in cash and sometimes in kind.
The wages were paid after much delay which resulted into poverty and growing indebtedness.
Another practice followed in some mills was the deduction of two days pay for one day's absence.
The payment of wages was considerably uncertain in regard to time and amount.
The Royal Commission on Labour was appointed in 1929 to enquire into and report on the conditions of
labour in industrial establishments and plantations in India.
The investigation revealed that there were several malpractices in the wage distribution. Unjustifiable
deductions were being made from wages.
Therefore, the Payment of Wages Act 1936 was passed to regulate payment of wages to certain classes of
persons employed in certain industry.
The Payment of Wages Act was enacted for the purpose of safeguardingthe wages of the employees under
certain conditions laid down in the Act.
An act is intended to regulate the Payment of wages to certain classes of persons employed in industries and
object to provide foraspeedy and effective remedy to the employees in respect of their claims arising out of
illegal deductions made in paying the wages to them.
The Act aims at payment of wages:
Without delays, and
Without unauthorised deductions.
Definitions
Factory: Clause
"factory" means a factory as defined in clause (m) of section 2 of the Factories Act, 1948
Wages: Section 2 (vi)
According to Section2 (vi) of the Pyament of Wages Act, 1936,
wages" means all remuneration (whether by way of salary, allowances, or otherwise) expressed in terms of
money or capable of being so expressed which would if the terms of employment, express or implied, were
fulfilled, be payable to a person employed in respect of his employment or of work done in such employment,
and includes
(a) any remuneration payable under any award or settlement between the parties or order of a Court;
(b) any remuneration to which the person employed is entitled in respect of overtime work or holidays or
any leave period;
(c) any additional remuneration payable under the ternms of employment (whether calleda bonus or by any
other name):
(d) any sum which by reason of the termination of employment of the person employed is payable under
any law, contract or instrument which provides for the payment of such sum, whether with or without
deductions, but does not provide for the time within which the payment is to be made;
(e) any sum to which the person employed is entitled under any scheme framed under any law for the time
being in force.
Section 3 of the Payment of Wages Act makes provisions in imperative terms for responsibility for payment
of wages.
It provides that every employer shall be responsible for the payment to persons employed by him of all wages
required to be paid by him under the Act.
In case of persons employed:
(a) in factories- the manager of the factory:
(b) in industrial or any other establishment- supervisor of the industry:
(c) railways- the person nominated by the railway administration;
(d) contractor- designated person by such contractor:
(e) any other case- a person is designated by the employer.
Clause (2) provides that it shall be the responsibility of the employer to make payment of all wages required to
be made under this Act, in case the contractor or the person designated by the employer fails make such
payment.
|Sec 5 (3))- With the consultation of the central government, state government having power and can change
the person responsible for the payment of the wages in Railways, or person responsible to daily-rated workers
in the Public Works Department of the Central Government or the State Government.
Section 5 (2), Where the employment of any person is terminated by the employer, the wages of that
employee shall be paid before the expiry of the 2days from the day he was removed or terminated.
illustration: if the employee was terminated or removed from the employment by the employer on 10th of
this month, his wage should be paid within 2 days from the day on which he was removed or terminated, i.e.
his/her wage should be paid by 12th date of this month and this date should not exceed.
Exemption for daily-rated workers ( Section 5(3)
The appropriate Government may, by general or special order, exempt, to such extent that, the person
responsible for the payment of wages to persons employed upon any railway or to persons employed as daily
rated workers in the Public Works Department of the appropriate Government from the operation of this
section in respect of the wages of any such persons or class of such persons:
Provided that in the case of persons employed as daily-rated workers as aforesaid, no such order shall be made
except in consultation with the Central Government.
Section 5 (4), wages shall be made on a working day.
Provided that the employer can pay the wages via a cheque or a direct deposit to the bank account of the
employee after taking a written authorization from him.
llustration- X, an employee gets paid Rs.3000 every month by his employer A. In January, X is given 300 kg
of sugarcane instead of his wages of Rs. 1500. This form of wages is prohibited by the Act.
For example, Deduction of Rs. 300 from the wages of an employee for buying the supply of raw materials for
the factory is an unlawful deduction, since it is the duty of the employer to provide the materials required by
the employees to carry on their work.
The following are not called as the deduction:
Stoppage of the increment of employe.
Stoppage of the promotion of the employee.
Stoppage of the incentive lack of performance by employee.
Demotion of the employee
" Suspension of the employee
The following are said to be the deductions and which are acceptable according to this act.
Fines,
Deductions for damage to or loss of goods made by the employee due to his negligence,
Deductions of income-tax payable by the employed person,
Deductions by order of a court,
Deduction for payment of provident fund,
Deductions for absence from duty,
Notice board of fines on employee should be displayed in the work premises and it should contain
activities that should not be made by employee:
Fine should not be imposed on the employee until he gives the explanation and cause for the act;
Total amount of fine should not exceed 3% of his wage;
Fine should not be imposed on any employee who is under the age of 15 years.
Fine should be imposed for one time only on the wage of the employee for the act or omission he
made.
Fines should not be recovered in the way of installments from the employee.
Fine should be recovered within 60 days from the date on which fine were imposed.
Fine should be imposed on day act or omission made by the employee.
All fines collected from the employee should be credited to common fund and utilize for the
benefit of the employees.
The Payment of Wages Act, 1936 provides for the appointment of:
Authority (Section 15)
" Appellate Authority (Section 17)
Authority: Section 15
To hear and decide all claims arising out of deductions from the wages, or delay in payment of the wages, of
persons employed or paid, including all matters, incidental to such claims, there will be a oficer mentioned
below appointed by the appropriate government.
(a) any Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation; or
(b) any officer of the Central Government exercising functions as,
(i) Regional Labour Commissioner: or
(ii) Assistant Labour Commissioner with at least two years' experience; or
(c) any officer of the State Government not below the rank of Assistant Labour Commissioner with at least
two years' experience; or
(d) a presiding officer of any Labour Court or Industrial Tribunal,
(e) any other officer with experience as a Judge of a Civil Court or a Judicial Magistrate,
Maliclous /Vexatious Claim: Section 1S(4)
If the authority hearing an application under this section is satisfied that the application was either malicious
or vexatious, the authority may direct that a penalty not exceeding three hundred seventy five rupees be paid
to the employer or other person responsible for the payment of wages by the person presenting the application
On the off chance that the application was rejected by the above authorities
Employer forced with remuneration surpassing or exceeding 300/- rupees by the authorities.
On the off chance that the sum surpassing 25/ rupees retained by the employer to the single
unpaid worker. 50/- if there should be an occurrence of numerous unpaid workers.
Whoever is required to nominate or designate a person under section 3 fails to do so, such person shall be
punishable with fine which may extend Rs 3000/-.