Violence in The Workplace
Violence in The Workplace
Table of Contents
Abstract…………………………………………………………………………………………....3
Introduction………………………………………………………………………………………..4
Overview of Community and Need….……………………………………………………………4
Communication with the Agency…………………….…………………………………………...5
Gathering Community Information – Methodology ......……………………………………….....5
Literature Review ………………………………………………………………………………....6
Need Analysis…………..………………………………………………………………………..10
Findings and Recommendations…………………………………………………………………11
Statement of Need…………..……………………………………………….…………...11
Program Recommendations….……………………………………………….………….11
Goals and Objectives…………………………………………………………….……....17
Staffing/Administration/Resources Needed………………………………………….…..18
Program Evaluation Plan………………………………………………………………...18
References………………………………………………………………………………………..20
Appendix A (Logic Model)……………………………………………………………………...22
Appendix B (Implementation Plan)……………………………………………………………...23
2
Abstract
Workplace violence is a growing concern for businesses of all sizes across the country.
Employers have a legal and moral obligation to keep their employees safe but other
consequences include loss of productivity, decreased morale, costs incurred from replacing staff,
and increased insurance premiums. While there are multiple types of workplace violence
and what resources business organizations need to prevent these violent incidents. An
organizational culture where violence is not tolerated was found to be the most important factor
workplace violence prevention program and associated policies with a focus on encouraging a
alike. There are several different types of workplace violence and demographics that are more at
risk of becoming a victim of workplace violence. In this paper, I will explore the reasons why
workplace violence occurs and what corporate security departments can do to prevent it.
dedicated to the physical security of that business’ employees, assets, and customers. While not a
traditional public law enforcement organization, corporate security programs must be content
with criminal acts and how they impact their business. While corporate security teams do not
have any law enforcement responsibilities, they are responsible for the safety and well-being of
their employees and customers. After speaking with a Chief Security Officer for a large business
the problem identified is one that corporate security programs across the country contend with,
workplace violence. The Bureau of Labor Statistics found that 20,790 workers in the private
sector experienced trauma from nonfatal workplace violence in 2018. These incidents required
workers to take days away from work to recover. (Occupational Violence, 2020) While not all
businesses are large enough to have a dedicated corporate security team, all businesses are
responsible for the well-being of their employees and customers. This makes the community
subject to this problem the entire population of working adults in the United States. The Bureau
of Labor and Statistics identified approximately 147,795,000 people aged 16 years or older
working as of 2021. (Demographic Characteristics, 2021) This community spans across every
identified as one of the largest and most pressing concerns for corporate security professionals
today. In her organization the CSO has partnered with HR and executive teams to develop
training for employees that helps them to identify and learn how to respond to workplace
violence incidents. The CSO stated that workplace violence includes four categories involving
different perpetrators, reasons for occurring, and methods of preventing it. These four categories
are:
The causes of workplace violence are diverse and varied; each of the four categories of
workplace violence mentioned previously have its own unique set of contributing factors. The
scope of this paper does not allow for a detailed analysis of each type, as such the focus of this
paper and the identified need will be Employee vs. Employee workplace violence.
identified community need. The research method was chosen to accommodate a limited period to
conduct, compile and submit the research as well as having limited access to public statistical
data.
5
First, a search of the Southern New Hampshire University’s Shapiro Library Databases
EBSCO, McGraw Hill, Proquest, and SAGE was utilized using the search terms “workplace
violence, workplace violence demographics, department of labor statistics.” The database search
was limited in content to academic journals, reports, primary source documents, and electronic
sources.
Second, the Internet was searched for websites that end in .gov, .org, and .edu relating to
the identified need. Search terms used included: theories of behavior, biological, sociological, or
psychological factors, ethical dilemmas, ethical strategies, criminal laws, scientific method,
globalization.
Third, to ensure all data is current with local trends and statistics, all reviewed literature
that was retrieved through the Internet was included if it was published in or after 2007 and had a
.gov, .org, or .edu URL. All reviewed literature that was retrieved through SNHU’s Shapiro
Library Database was included if the publication date was on or after 2007. Literature that was
rejected included only foreign publications concerning other countries and publications before
2007.
Fourth, the literature was collected and organized in different folders about the specific
sections of the literature review. Next, relevant information and data were highlighted and
Literature Review
Application of Criminological Theories
In the journal article Workplace violence: Impact, causes, and prevention Bobbie Dillon
identifies two main causes for workplace violence, the first being regular negative external
attribution by the perpetrator of the violence, and the second being the lack of organizational
6
response to the violence. “Negative external attribution” is described by Dillon as either a single
event or a string of events over time in the workplace that the perpetrator perceives as an
the larger organization. Working in tandem with this type of aggressor a workplace that tolerates
poor management and has a general lack of response to workplace violence allows an
environment to exist where the aggressor can act out violently. Dillon makes the distinction that
while no amount of mismanagement excuses violence, employers can take steps to prevent this
violence from fomenting and take countermeasures to prevent aggressors from acting out in the
applying relevant criminological theories can shed some light on the psychology behind these
behaviors and open additional avenues for research and analysis. For the perpetrator’s habit of
negative externalized attribution, the obvious parallel with established criminological theories is
relationships with others: relationships in which the individual is not treated how he or she wants
to be treated. Strain theory has typically focused on relationships in which others prevent the
individual from achieving positively valued goals.” (Friel, n.d.) An aggressor who feels like they
have been wronged at work frequently, perhaps passed over on promotions by their supervision,
or feel that they work harder than their peers, may feel like they are not able to reach their goals
because of these negative relationships with co-workers. Those individuals experiencing these
negative relationships and who are not able or are not emotionally equipped to deal with them
Ethical Impact
An ethical dilemma is presented in Dillon’s posited primary causes for workplace
violence. With the secondary reason being an environment in which the organization does not
actively try to detect and discourage workplace violence, the ethical obligation of an employer to
provide a safe working environment is also thrust into the spotlight. While the law surrounding
violence in the workplace is important to provide criminal consequences for violence, the ethical
requirements an organization must protect its employees is also an important factor in both
believe Helen LaVan also presents an ethical framework that could be adapted to address the
early behaviors that may signal the potential for workplace violence. In the process-oriented
approach suggested by LaVan workplace management has a role in identifying the triggers or
causes of the behavior, describing the behavior itself, and then determining the consequences or
response needed. This type of process-oriented approach codified into a workplace violence
procedure allows an organization to respond to early aggressive behaviors. (La Van and Martin,
2008)
Organizational Culture
The culture in the business organization, as already described, is an important factor in
discouraging workplace violence. According to the Society for Human Resource Management,
preparing for workplace violence is important. Creating a workplace violence prevention plan
these plans, and reaching employees to know and understand the indicators of potential
workplace violence helps build an organizational culture where violence is not tolerated.
Technology Impacts
Technologies and software are becoming available that could assist an organization in
organization will depend largely on their size, some smaller organizations may not be able to
dedicate the resources required to acquire some of these technologies and instead may need to
focus on procedural changes and training. One technology becoming available to law
enforcement agencies and private sector organizations is ShotSpotter. This product and others
like it provide gunshot detection which can pinpoint the location of gunfire and integrate with
other security systems like CCTV and physical access control systems instantly securing the
facility, moving a PTZ camera to the location the shot was detected, and alerting local security
documenting security incidents HR and corporate security teams may be able to detect warning
signs that an employee is exhibiting. Software like Resolver uses AI analytics to detect when
individuals are routinely exhibiting warning signs or are linked to multiple incidents.
template that will fit an organization of any size or type. Each organization will need a plan that
is designed for its set of circumstances, employee demographic, culture, and available resources.
assignments, the physical layout of the workplace, and whether they can control access to the
Globalization
Many businesses have become transnational organizations with offices and employees
spanning across the globe. While the focus of this paper is within the U.S. some organizations
will have to combat workplace violence any place they have people employed. When developing
organizations will need to consider the culture and demographics that make up each of their
Needs Analysis
On average 2 million workers in the US report being victims of workplace violence
according to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). (Workplace Violence,
n.d.) While SHRM reports that 19 percent of HR professionals are unsure or do not know what
professionals are unsure if they have a workplace violence prevention program at their
organization. (Understanding Workplace Violence Prevention and Response, 2021) While some
technology solutions like ShotSpotter exist it focuses on a particular type of workplace violence
(active shooters) and may be out of reach for many smaller organizations that do not have the
resources necessary for such a system. Corporate security teams need technology solutions when
resources permit, help, and buy-in from human resources and executive teams to implement
workplace violence plans. Corporate security teams also need to be able to create an
organizational culture where workplace violence is not tolerated, and employees know how to
Statement of Need
Every year millions of workers in the US report being victims of workplace violence.
Along with the safety and psychological impacts to those involved these incidents have monetary
costs for businesses as well. While some industries are more prone to these incidents than others
Program Recommendation
As previously discussed in the literature review the two theorized causes of workplace
violence are the lack of organizational response to the violence, and the negative external
attribution by the perpetrator. (Dillon, 2012) To prevent workplace violence these two causes
By implementing a policy and educating employees that violence in the workplace is not
tolerated a workplace can have a prepared organizational response to violence and even take a
before one happening an organization will be able to spot potential threat actors more easily and
defuse dangerous situations before violence develops. According to Workplace Violence: Issues
In Response, a guide developed by the Federal Bureau of Investigation, there are several
The plan must have support from the organization’s top leadership, otherwise it is
The plan should be tailored to the specific needs and resources of the organization and
The plan should consider workplace culture concerns that may indicate toxic workplace
environments like tolerance of bullying, high levels of stress or frustration, lack of trust
Managers should have an active role in communicating the workplace violence policy
Surveys of the workplace to identify physical security gaps and identifying potential
countermeasures.
Access and contact methods for outside resources like professionals that specialize in
threat assessment.
The second of the causes proposed by Dillon is negative external attribution by the
perpetrator, which occurs when a potential perpetrator perceives some sort of injustice from
12
management or co-worker. A workplace violence prevention program should include the use of a
threat assessment that can be conducted when an employee displays warning signs that they may
become violent. These are some questions that could be asked that would help the organization
asses the risk the employee may pose and inform their actions:
What has been said to others (friends, colleagues, coworkers, etc.) regarding what is
troubling them?
Have they identified a specific target or communicated with others their thoughts or
By answering some of these questions the organization can assess the risk that the employee may
become violent and with this information, they can begin to develop a plan to intervene.
13
organization’s legal requirement to keep their employees safe comes from the Occupational
Safety and Health Act’s “General Duty Clause” to have a workplace “free from recognized
hazards.” (Workplace Violence Enforcement, n.d.) However, the law also provides employees
other rights and due process that can conflict with the employer’s duty to maintain a safe
workplace at times. For instance, privacy laws may limit an employer’s ability to learn about the
termination lawsuit making them hesitant or slow to terminate an employee even when there is
sufficient evidence to show that they are a threat. Additionally, employers concerned with
liability for defamation or privacy infringements may be unwilling to share information about a
violent past or present employee with other organizations. While truthful information can
generally be disclosed without much legal risk employers often err on the side of caution by
Once a workplace violence prevention program has been implemented in the organization
it is important to continue to collect data on the frequency and types of workplace violence
incidents that occur. By including an after-action step in any incident response an organization
can develop a method for maintaining this data and preserving reports detailing the incident and
its disposition. Using this data, the organization will be able to determine if its policies and
program is effective at lowering the frequency of incidents. This data can also be useful in
identifying if interdictions before an incident are helping prevent violence from occurring in the
first place. The organization can also utilize data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics to compare
14
the rate of workplace violence incidents that result in hospitalization in their organization versus
the rest of the country. This data is useful in providing a frame of reference for how well the
employee workplace violence occurring. As mentioned previously one of the main causes for
workplace violence is an organizational culture that tolerates or does not attempt to prevent
violence. It is important that as part of the program employees are educated on the workplace
violence policy and understand how to report incidents to management. Management needs to be
educated on warning signs that an individual may become violent so that a threat assessment can
be conducted. Buy-in for the program from the executive leadership of the organization is
important to make sure it is properly implemented; however, the entire employee base needs to
buy in as well so that it creates a culture where violence is not tolerated by anyone in the
workplace.
Current Technologies
Individuals that may lash out violently frequently have warning signs that could alert an
organization to the potential of a workplace violence incident. Some of these warning flags
include:
proportion.
While any person may have a bad day someone who shows many of these warning signs or is
consistently behaving in these ways may be more likely to commit an act of violence in the
employee’s behavior and detect unusual changes in that could be warning signs. Larger
organizations however may have a harder time doing this, behavior may go unnoticed by
method of documenting these actions. There is software available today that helps
organizations manage risks and detect patterns of behavior that warrant additional
Resolver is a software solution that offers an investigation and case management product.
This product could be used by security or HR employees that allows them to track details of
also has a data visualization tool that makes it easier to detect when one individual has been
involved with a lot of investigations. This type of software could be invaluable for
investigators who may otherwise be unfamiliar with the employee because of the
organization’s size. This software can also be used to help those responsible for performing
threat assessments by stepping them through the necessary questions and calculating a threat
16
“score” that the employee poses. This type of standardized process helps eliminate the
appearance of mistreatment or unfairness towards the employee and ensures that the
assessment is completed properly and documented in a way that can be referenced in the
future.
Impact of Globalization
Workplaces across the world experience issues with workplace violence. While
syndicates globalization still has an impact on this type of crime. Large international companies
with a global presence will have a difficult task to take on in trying to reduce instances of
workplace violence and keep their employees safe. As referenced in the organizational culture
section each workplace culture is unique and will need a workplace violence prevention program
tailored for their nuances and culture. An organization with an office in New York City may
need a policy and program that is slightly different from one in Tokyo. It’s important that as
these policies and prevention programs are put into place stakeholders from that region are
involved so that they can influence the policies and parts of the program that work for their area.
The goal of the program is to reduce the number of instances of workplace violence that
occur overall. If not already tracked the program will track the frequency of violent incidents that
occur, the number of injuries that result from the incidents, and the frequency of intervention
before an incident of violence. The program should also increase employee confidence that they
have a safe workplace, that the organization cares about their safety, and that a culture of anti-
Staffing and resource needs will vary depending on what needs to be implemented as part
of the workplace violence prevention program and what types of resources are available to the
organization. At a minimum, the organization’s leadership and stakeholders from the HR and
security departments will need to dedicate time to the creation and regular review of the program
and its associated policies. If it is a larger organization funding and IT infrastructure will be
Program Evaluation
Both qualitative and quantitative data will be utilized in the program evaluation. Routine
review and evaluation of the effectiveness of the workplace violence prevention program should
be written into the program itself. Quantitative data on the frequency of incidents and their
dispositions should be kept as part of the program requirements. Additionally, surveys should be
conducted with existing and exit interviews with employees to determine their feelings on the
safety of the workplace for qualitative data. Using this data to determine the effectiveness of the
program can help the stakeholders determine if changes need to be made to improve its
effectiveness and can help show if any recent changes are better than previously used methods.
Conclusion
Workplace violence is an issue that employers cannot ignore. Employers have both an
ethical and legal obligation to provide for their employee’s safety and well-being while at the
work site. Organizations must take a proactive approach to workplace violence and begin
planning and writing relevant policies before it is an issue in the workplace. Research has shown
that when an organization cultivates a culture that does not tolerate violence and a robust
workplace violence prevention policy in place the number of incidents that occur can be reduced.
18
Ultimately an organization’s employees, management, and executive leadership must all work
References
Assault Fourth Leading Cause of Workplace Deaths. National Safety Council. (n.d.).
https://www.nsc.org/workplace/safety-topics/workplace-violence
Ceplenski, C. (2016, March 07). 4 types of Workplace Violence. Retrieved May 16, 2021, from
https://hrdailyadvisor.blr.com/2013/12/27/4-types-of-workplace-violence/
Cobb, M. (2021, April 13). What is physical security? Retrieved May 16, 2021, from
https://searchsecurity.techtarget.com/definition/physical-security
Demographic Characteristics. (2021, April 14). Retrieved May 16, 2021, from
https://www.bls.gov/cps/demographics.html
Dillon, B. L. (2012). Workplace violence: Impact, causes, and prevention. Journal of Prevention,
Assessment & Rehabilitation, 42(1), 15-20. Retrieved May 23, 2021, from
https://ezproxy.snhu.edu/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?
direct=true&db=psyh&AN=2012-14773-005&site=eds-live&scope=site
Friel, J. D. (n.d.). An examination of Robert Agnew's general Strain Theory. Retrieved May 23,
2021, from https://faculty.wcu.edu/studentanthology/writing-across-western/criminology-
and-criminal-justice/47-2/
Isaacs, A. R. (n.d.). Workplace Violence: Issues In Response. (E. A. Rugala, Ed.). Federal
Bureau of Investigation. https://www.fbi.gov/file-repository/stats-services-publications-
workplace-violence-workplace-violence/view
LaVan, H., & Martin, W. M. (2008). Bullying in the U.S. workplace: Normative and process-
oriented ethical approaches. Journal of Business Ethics, 83(2), 147-165. Retrieved May 23,
2021, from https://www.jstor.org/stable/25482363
Occupational violence - fast facts. (2020, September 22). Retrieved May 16, 2021, from
https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/topics/violence/fastfacts.html
Prichard, K. (2021, January 4). 13 Warning Signs That May Lead to Workplace Violence.
OMAG. https://www.omag.org/news/2021/1/1/13-warning-signs-that-may-lead-to-
workplace-violence
Understanding workplace Violence prevention and response. (2021, March 19). Retrieved May
23, 2021, from https://www.shrm.org/resourcesandtools/tools-and-samples/toolkits/
pages/workplace-violence-prevention-and-response.aspx
20
APPENDIX A
Logic Model
Appendix B
Sample Implementation Plan
Tasks and activities Plans for Complete Tasks and Activities (i.e., the Staff responsible for tasks Timeline for
steps my organization needs to take) and activities completion of
tasks and
activities
Determine members of the
project team (executive leaders,
departmental leaders, HR, legal,
etc.)
Determine the scope, and needs
for the organization’s
workplace violence prevention
program.
Plan for data and report
collection and storage.
Review available resources and
develop a budget.
Finalize workplace violence
prevention program and
relevant policies.
Develop a communication plan
to educate and socialize
programs and new policies to
employees.
Train management and
employees on programs and
methods of reporting.
Create a program evaluation
plan utilizing collected data.
Implement evaluation plan,
adjusting the program as needed
FINAL CAPSTONE PROJECT 23
in response to findings.
FINAL CAPSTONE PROJECT 24