The Moral Agent (ETHICS)                         The Fundamental Option
Man as a Moral Agent                                 The fundamental option is "the stance or
                                                     position I decide to take vis-a-vis the
   "Moral" comes from the Latin "mores"
                                                     Absolute Value (God) which then
   referring to society's patterns,
                                                     influences ultimately all my other
   standards, rules of doing things.
                                                     individual actions and decisions."
   "Agent" comes from the Latin "agere",
                                                     One that proceeds to the end expected
   to do, act.
                                                     of men, the determination to abide by
   A moral agent is "a being who is
                                                     such end; a free choice to say "yes", like
   capable of those actions that have
                                                     a "yes" to God, an affirmative response
   moral quality and which can be
                                                     to God's invitation to follow His way.
   properly denominated good or evil in
   a moral sense."                               No Pre-fixed Plan for Man "There are no
                                                 signs in the heavens"
   What is a sufficient condition for
                                                 According to some 20th Century thinkers
   moral agency? - It will suffice if the
                                                 there are no pre-existing directions.
   agent has the capacity to conform to
   some of the external requirements of          To the process philosophers like Teilhard de
   morality. according to the Kantian            Chardin (1948) and Alfred North Whitehead,
   version, it is also essential that the        (1996) whatever a human person is or will
   agents should have the capacity to rise       be a result of a creative process.
   above their feelings and passions and
   act for the same of the moral law.               A human person has to create his/her
                                                     end, purpose , or directions.
The Purpose -driven Moral Agent                     He/she will be totally responsible for
-Where do you go (quo vadis), moral agent?           what he/she will be.
   REV. CHARLES COLLENS, S.J.                    The existentialists and process philosophers
                                                 do not want any other being to be co-
It is based on the principles laid down by St.   responsible with them for what they decide
Thomas Aquinas. "Every human act is              to do. In other words, the fundamental
directed toward an end".                         option for theses thinkers is to remain open
                                                 to what they are able to create, discover, or
   ST. THOMAS AQUINAS
                                                 invent which will guide them to the next
The highest good or end is happiness but         chapter of their lives, to choose whatever
the absolutely final end is God.                 their self -invention leads them to, which of
                                                 course, is difficult to imagine.
   ARISTOTLE
                                                 But other groups, like Martin Heidegger,
End which is sought for its own sake, that is,   Gabriel Marcel and Martin Buber see
it is no longer sought for the sake of another   themselves as being-with-others,
end, is the summum bonum, the highest            inseparably related to their fellow man.
good.
                                                       "Let us learn to live together"
Thomistic Principles by Alfredo Panizo;
  regarding the end or purpose of the            Together we through life, designing our end
             moral agent.                        and purposes, guided by messages
                                                 unveiled in a life of dialogue with ourselves,
1) Every agent that performs an action acts      with other selves, and with the world.
   for the sake of the end or purpose to be
   attained.                                     Consequently, the end purpose, or direction
2) Every agent acts for an ultimate end.         of being-with-others, is what they discover
3) Every agent has the power of moving for       as they learn to live together.
   an end which is suitable or good for him
"From the Christian point of view, a human
person's destiny in the world is not only to
achieve cultural and moral perfection, but to
attain the eternal happiness of the soul after
death of the body. To know, to love, and to
serve God is our present duty. To see God
himself, Uncreated Splendor, face to face,
to be united to Him by an unbroken and
everlasting operation of the mind, shall be
our eternal destiny.”
The Development of Moral Character of
the Moral Agent
Share an experience that shaped your
values and moral formation. It may be a
conversation that determined your career,
an event that changed the course of your
life or anything else that you believe has
determined what you have become.
DEFINING MOMENT IN ONE'S LIFE
DEFINING MOMENT- refers to a significant
life-changing event or moment that
reverberates throughout your career and
personal life and so changes everything.
"You make thousands of decisions every
day. Each choice shapes what is to come in
some small way, but occasionally, a
decision has the magnitude to be life-
changing."
This kind of moment can change who we
are and what we value, with reverberations
throughout our careers and personal lives.
  Relationship Between Moral Acts and
               Character
This essay examined the question of
whether moral character is necessary for
moral behavior. I argued that moral
character is relevant to moral behavior in
two important ways. First, given that I am
already aware of what I ought to do (i.e. of
what the "moral" action is), moral character
does moral actions more readily- more
easily and more willingly that one who does
not. I also argued that moral character
matters in a second, much more
fundamental way: the person who has
moral character is able to recognize what is
moral and occasions for moral behavior in a
way that those who lack moral character
cannot. Those who lack moral character
often fail to act morally because they simply
fail, in many instances, to recognize the
morally relevant aspects of the situations
they find themselves in.