The Determinants of Dietary Diversity and Nutrition: Ethnonutrition Knowledge of Local People in The East Usambara Mountains, Tanzania
The Determinants of Dietary Diversity and Nutrition: Ethnonutrition Knowledge of Local People in The East Usambara Mountains, Tanzania
  Abstract
  Background: Diet and nutrition-related behaviours are embedded in cultural and environmental contexts: adoption
  of new knowledge depends on how easily it can be integrated into existing knowledge systems. As dietary
  diversity promotion becomes an increasingly common component of nutrition education, understanding local
  nutrition knowledge systems and local concepts about dietary diversity is essential to formulate efficient messages.
  Methods: This paper draws on in-depth qualitative ethnographic research conducted in small-scale agricultural
  communities in Tanzania. Data were collected using interviews, focus group discussions and participant observation
  in the East Usambara Mountains, an area that is home primarily to the Shambaa and Bondei ethnic groups, but has a
  long history of ethnic diversity and ethnic intermixing.
  Results: The data showed a high degree of consensus among participants who reported that dietary diversity is
  important because it maintains and enhances appetite across days, months and seasons. Local people reported that
  sufficient cash resources, agrobiodiversity, heterogeneity within the landscape, and livelihood diversity all supported
  their ability to consume a varied diet and achieve good nutritional status. Other variables affecting diet and dietary
  diversity included seasonality, household size, and gender.
  Conclusions: The results suggest that dietary diversity was perceived as something all people, both rich and poor,
  could achieve. There was significant overlap between local and scientific understandings of dietary diversity,
  suggesting that novel information on the importance of dietary diversity promoted through education will likely
  be easily integrated into the existing knowledge systems.
  Keywords: Agrobiodiversity, Local knowledge, Dietary behaviour, Dietary diversity, Landscape diversity
                                      © The Author(s). 2017 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0
                                      International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and
                                      reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to
                                      the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver
                                      (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
Powell et al. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine (2017) 13:23                                                    Page 2 of 12
Krumeich et al. [11] note that health decisions are often              if they see them as meeting their own needs and aspira-
shaped by factors such as social and cultural context, that            tions [35]. Examining variations in local knowledge allows
are beyond the control of the individual, and that healthful           for an understanding of the degree of consensus between
behaviour change is not simply a matter of convincing                  people from the same cultural group [28], and facilitates
people to act in a more rational manner.                               the examination of which forms of existing local
   While traditional diets are often quite healthy [12], so-           knowledge are better aligned with scientific ideas of
cial, cultural and economic change in many places has                  health-positive behaviour. In anthropological literature,
led to dietary transitions associated with decreasing                  knowledge of a culture or society is often referred to as
quality of diets [13]. In most contexts, intervention helps            emic and outside or scientific knowledge as etic. Herein
to reverse, mitigate or prevent the negative impact of                 local knowledge is defined as that held by local people (this
nutrition transitions and the impact of outside drivers of             term is synonymous with traditional knowledge, which we
dietary quality. The capacity of a nutrition education                 have chosen not to use because of the implied dichotomy
program is dependent on the quality of the education                   between traditional and modern) [36].
program, the acceptability of the message, and local                      To our knowledge there have been very few efforts
understandings of a particular issue [14]. Important                   anywhere to examine local knowledge of dietary diversity
innovation and progress in nutrition education has                     and nutrition [37]. This research therefore examines
drawn on psychology and behaviour change theories                      local (ethno-) nutrition knowledge in the East Usambara
[15], as well as social marketing and innovative ap-                   Mountains, Tanzania. The material presented focuses on
proaches such as inter-generational education [16–21];                 dietary diversity, including local perceptions about its
however, there is still much room for improvement.                     role in health and nutrition as well as factors that
   In the face of the underperformance of nutrition                    mediate local people’s ability to achieve and maintain a
education programs, anthropological and ethnomedical                   diverse diet. This research represents an important first
perspectives on knowledge systems and learning (also                   effort to understand if and how nutrition education
called knowledge exchange or knowledge transmission)                   messages promoting dietary diversity are aligned with
may offer novel insight to achieve more efficient exchange             existing knowledge schemes. The results have important
and transmission of health and nutrition-related know-                 implications for understanding if, why, and how
ledge. This is likely to be particularly true in developing            efficiently, dietary diversification messages promoted
countries and other settings where the knowledge systems               through nutrition education can support good dietary
of local peoples may be significantly different from                   behaviour.
scientific knowledge systems.
   Anthropological studies of local knowledge systems                  Methods
emphasize the dynamic nature of knowledge and focus on                 Study site: the East Usambara Mountains, Tanzania
syncretic combinations of local knowledge and other types              The East Usambara Mountains lie 40 km inland from the
of knowledge, as well as acknowledging areas of conten-                port city of Tanga. Human population density in the
tion [22, 23]. Anthropologists insist that knowledge is                region is now 61.3 people per square kilometre, with an
fluid; they seek to understand how knowledge changes                   annual growth rate of 2.4% [38]. The mountains are the
and what factors mediate that process [24, 25]. When cul-              home of the Shambaa and Bondei, and the surrounding
ture is defined as ‘shared knowledge’ [26–30], knowledge,              lowlands are home to the Zigua ethnic group. The area
like culture, can be viewed as adaptive: “It seems likely              was historically culturally diverse, even before immigra-
that the range of diversity in individual versions of the              tion to the area for wage labour opportunities in the tea
‘common’ culture is not simply a social imperfection, but              and timber industries [39, 40]. The political history of
an adaptive necessity: a crucial resource that can be drawn            Tanzania has ensured that more than 90% of Tanzanians
on and selected from in cultural change” [31], p.88). These            speak Swahili, the national language. In addition to being
approaches to knowledge would suggest that local know-                 the lingua franca, Swahili is increasingly used in the home,
ledge is often highly functional, ensuring individual and              especially in culturally diverse areas such as this site.
community well-being [32, 33]. In his review ‘An Anthro-                 Local livelihoods are based on small-scale farming,
pology of Knowledge,’ Barth [29] noted: “We all live lives             supplemented with cash crops, wage labour, small busi-
full of raw and unexpected events, and we can grasp them               ness and animal husbandry. Local diets in the East
only if we can interpret them—cast them in terms of our                Usambaras are based mainly on maize (Zea mays L.)
knowledge”.                                                            (most commonly prepared as ugali, maize flour cooked
   Worsley [34] noted the need to pay careful attention to             into a hard porridge), banana (Musa spp.), cassava
how knowledge frameworks are built and the ways nutri-                 (Manihot esculenta Crantz.), beans (Phaseolus vulgaris
tion knowledge is learnt. People are more likely to main-              L. and others) and dry fish (such as dagaa, small dried
tain healthy behaviours or adopt new ideas or behaviours               fresh water fish, including Rastrineobola argentea).
Powell et al. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine (2017) 13:23                                                    Page 3 of 12
Malnutrition, especially micronutrient deficiencies (e.g.,                Text analysis and coding were conducted manually by
vitamin A and iron), remains a problem in the East                     BP following methods laid out by Bernard [45]. The final
Usambaras and in Tanzania in general [41].                             transcribed and translated text, including the English
   The East Usambara Mountains were chosen as the field                and Swahili, was just under 200,000 words. BP read the
site for this research because the area is known for its high          text multiple times to identify and code descriptions of
dietary diversity, largely obtained through subsistence ac-            why dietary diversity was “important” and “drivers (what
tivities [39, 42–44]. This area also provides an interesting           a household needs to ensure/support)” of dietary diver-
setting for the study of local food and nutrition knowledge            sity. An initial exhaustive list of codes for “importance”
because the high cultural diversity, combined with long                and “drivers” was compiled so that all relevant material
history of a shared language use, create the possibility for           was included under at least one code. Codes were then
both high and low cultural consensus.                                  grouped into categories. Finally, the all of the text for
                                                                       each category was collected into one place for final
                                                                       analysis of the relative importance (how frequently a
Data collection and analysis                                           given topic was discussed/percent of households in
Qualitative data collection took place between September               which it was discussed) and identification of themes
2008 and November 2009 and included focus groups and                   (what Saldaña calls Pattern and Focused coding [50]).
one-on-one discussions with over 120 people in six villages               The results from the quantitative research and a draft of
(Kiwanda, Tongwe, Bombani, Kwatango, Shambangeda and                   this paper have been returned to the communities and
Misalai) [45]. The majority of material herein comes from              local government officials (two info briefs in Swahili,
15 case study households (N = 28 people) that were selected            Additional files 1 and 2). Participants cited herein have
for in-depth qualitative work from a larger sample of 275              had a chance to review the paper (in English, with a trans-
households who participated in a household survey to as-               lator present to answer questions) and their quotations (in
sess diet in relation to biodiversity [46–48]. These 15 case           Swahili) and provide comments and corrections. None of
study households were purposefully selected to achieve a               the informants requested changes.
range from those with poor diets to those with good diets
(including high and low dietary diversity), as well as house-          Results
holds with varying livelihood strategies and socioeconomic             Local knowledge on the importance of dietary diversity
status. In each household, ethnographic work was sup-                  Local people were very comfortable with the concept of
ported with participant observation, in-depth interviews               dietary diversity: “eating different types of food” or
and life histories of adult members. Data collection was               “changing the diet/foods” (described in Swahili as “kuba-
framed within an EcoHealth framework [49] aimed at un-                 dilisha mlo/vyakula” or “kukula aina aina ya vyakula
derstanding people’s perceptions of their diets, the environ-          mbalimbali”, among others). Although dietary diversity
mental constraints on their diets, and the social and                  was one of the focus topics of the research, it frequently
cultural variables that mediate their ability to maintain their        came up spontaneously, even before exposure to the re-
preferred diet.                                                        search questions. For example, in group discussions on
   Research underwent ethics approval at McGill Univer-                diet, nutrition and well-being in the communities, in
sity (IRB #916-0708) and the National Ethics Board in                  which village leaders were asked to rank the households
Tanzania (COSTECH) and research agreements were                        of the village in terms of diet quality, nutrition and
signed with village governments. Informed consent was                  health, dietary diversity was an important aspect of how
obtained verbally from adults and guardians of children,               the diets and health of villagers was assessed. Arguments
was recorded by an enumerator, and, confirmed by the                   that a household belonged in a higher or lower group,
lead researcher (BP) prior to participation in the study.              because they had higher or lower dietary diversity, were
No payment was offered to the 15 case study households                 presented in multiple villages.
for their participation in the qualitative work. During                   Virtually all participants reported that dietary diversity
consent, all participants requested that they be identified            is important because it maintains and enhances appetite.
by name when their stories and words were published.                   In Tongwe village, Beatrice Akida, who is a single
Interviews were conducted in Swahili by BP, with sup-                  mother and a kindergarten teacher explained:
port from a translator (Shundi Ndoe). The life story and
history of the adults in each household were collected                   “The benefit [of changing your diet] is that food
and research topics discussed through in-depth inter-                    should not bore you so that you don’t lose your
views drawing on an interview schedule. Interviews were                  appetite for eating. Because with one food, many
transcribed and then translated from Swahili to English                  people lose their appetite. That’s why human beings
by a different research assistant (Ruth Adeka and                        need to change food. Children get an appetite if today
Sylvester Aura), after removal of in-text English.                       you have cooked cassava ugali, tomorrow let it be
Powell et al. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine (2017) 13:23                                                     Page 4 of 12
  cassava ugali with good mlenda (Corchorus spp.). So                  value..... Every food crop has got its own value. We eat
  tomorrow if you change to ugali [of maize] and beans                 fruits because every fruit like pineapple (Ananas
  it will be better than eating ugali and beans [for many              comosus L) helps the blood (inasaida damu).”
  days in a row]. [If you do not change] you will                        Mention of vitamins or nutrients as a benefit of dietary
  discover the children saying that they are not going to              diversity was uncommon and only occurred with more
  eat, they go to play outside, yet they are hungry.”                  educated participants. In virtually all interviews, the
                                                                       concept that vitamins are one of the benefits of dietary
 Similarly, Saidi Kombo, a well-educated government                    diversity was mentioned only after their importance for
employee in Misalai village told us:                                   appetite had been discussed. Indeed, many participants
                                                                       did not report dietary diversity as having any benefit be-
  “If you eat dagaa (small dried whitebait fish) today,                yond its value for enhanced appetite, and those who did
  tomorrow dagaa, yes you eat, but you are tired, you                  gave vague descriptions of additional benefits.
  think: ‘Now this is how it will be every day? eating
  dagaa?’....it will become boring. You won’t get any                  Factors enhancing and limiting dietary diversity
  pleasure [from eating], you won’t have any appetite.                 Agriculture and agrobiodiversity
  That is why you need to frequently change. You eat                   When discussing factors needed to achieve and maintain
  mchicha (Amaranthus spp.) today, tomorrow you eat                    a diverse diet, agrobiodiversity,1 as well as engaging in
  kishone nguo (Bidens pilosa L.) the day after maybe                  agricultural activities in general (maintaining agricultural
  you eat mchunga (Launaea cornuta (Hochst. ex Oliv.                   activities even when there is an alternative source of in-
  & Hiern) C.Jeffrey)… But if you eat only one vegetable               come), were some of the most commonly mentioned fac-
  (or side dish) every day and ugali (stiff porridge) as               tors. Links between dietary diversity and agrobiodiversity
  your staple food every day, if you eat like this, only               came out as a clear category or theme in 13 out of the 15
  ugali and mchicha every day, you won’t have any                      case study households. Although local people tended to
  appetite to eat… If a mama cooks the same vegetable                  blur the line between factors affecting dietary diversity
  all the time [her family] won’t eat enough. Because                  and those related to having (enough) food in general,
  children will eat only a little bit and leave the rest.”             agrobiodiversity seemed to be especially important for en-
                                                                       suring diversity of vegetables and fruit. Zaina Housseni in
  Of course on the other hand, preference for diverse foods            Tongwe village explained that her family’s diet was better
could motivate people to seek out a more diversified diet.             than her neighbours “because, I don’t know, here in the
  The importance of a varied diet for improved appetite                village [other people’s] side dish is dagaa unless you have
held across various timeframes: from meal to meal, day                 your own garden. I have my own garden with mchicha
to day and season to season. The importance of dietary                 (Amaranthus spp.).”
diversity pertained not only to the diet in general, but                  Wealth and available cash were reported to increase
also across food groups, including carbohydrate staples,               dietary diversity directly, as well as indirectly through an
side dishes and fruit (i.e., one should consume different              influence on agrobiodiversity. Engaging in agriculture
types of vegetables or staples). The importance of                     (even when pursuing other sources of income) and
diversity for appetite and adequate intake also applied to             maintenance of agrobiodiversity were seen as an impor-
varieties of a single crop – an indication that local                  tant strategy for overcoming seasonal variation and food
people perceived dietary diversity as intimately linked to             insecurity/hunger, as well as maintaining dietary diver-
agrobiodiversity (cf. “Factors Enhancing and Limiting                  sity on both a short- and a long-term basis. Benjamin
Dietary Diversity” section, below).                                    Njiku, in Shambangeda village noted:
  Virtually all participants across a range in gender, age,
social and economic status were comfortable discussing                   “[Having many varieties of banana] helps us because
the concept of dietary diversity. This suggests that this                each variety has a different taste. Also they ripen [at
concept was a salient part of local nutrition knowledge,                 different times].... it allows me to have bananas all the
and, more importantly, that there was a high degree of                   time, each time a different variety. If one variety fails,
consensus among individuals across different groups.                     there is another variety that continues to grow. Also…
Although appetite was overwhelmingly the first, most                     the time to cook [some varieties] is short, and this is
important benefit of dietary diversity discussed by local                helpful. You can cook quickly, eat quickly. Other
people, the importance of having different foods in the                  [varieties] are a little bit hard and they need a little bit
diet was also linked to the fact that “every food has its                longer.”
own importance”. For example Mathias Martin of
Kwatango village noted: “The benefit [of having many                     The importance of agrobiodiversity included not only
different foods] is because everything has got its own                 the diversity of crops in the field, but also access to
Powell et al. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine (2017) 13:23                                                     Page 5 of 12
different types of fields and fields in diverse locations              some places or at some times. Even if one has enough
with different ecological characteristics (i.e., land-use              money, if a food item is not available, it cannot contri-
diversity or landscape heterogeneity). Although not well               bute to dietary diversity. However, seasonal variation is
articulated by many, local farmers alluded to the fact                 perceived to affect long-term dietary diversity. Additionally,
that maintaining multiple land uses on their farms helps               the varying availability of foods from the farm can be miti-
ensure their food security and dietary diversity. By main-             gated by purchasing foods when they are not available from
taining different land use types, farmers reported they                the farm. For example, Rehema Amiri a single mother
were able to increase their crop diversity (and therefore              and successful business-woman in Shambangeda vil-
their dietary diversity and food security). Kiango Singoti,            lage explained:
Bombani village said: “Because different types of fruits
need different types of fields, it has forced me to culti-               “I have avocado (Persea americana Mill.), guavas
vate multiple plots [in multiple locations]”. Similarly,                 (Psidium guajava L.) and pineapples (Ananas comosus
Benjamin Njiku explained: “I plant some trees and some                   L), everything is there [in the farm]. There are many
other food crops so it is like a forest but not an ordinary              guavas, we just pick them, and the children eat
forest. Because maybe this area once had trees, but not                  them.... They [fruits] go with their own seasons. There
when I came, so I decided to plant sugarcane (Sac-                       are seasons you will get many fruits, and then there
charum spp.) and it helps me. But I have planted trees                   are many seasons when you will get a few fruits. In
in other areas… in other areas I plant food crops which                  that season when fruit are scarce you will buy a few,
do not resemble forest.”                                                 like pineapple that is normally available in the field,
   The few participants who did not link diet and dietary                when it is not there, before it is ripe [you must buy it]
diversity to agriculture and agrobiodiversity were among                 or oranges (Citrus sinensis L.) and bring them home.”
the most disadvantaged of the respondents; they also
struggled to articulate all aspects of their life, diet, nutri-
tion and health. For example, Tabea and Dominic John                   Income, cash availability and socio-economic status
of Misalai village were not cultivating their farm: they               Wealth or income was reported as an important
explained it was “too difficult”, although both appeared               determinant of diet and dietary diversity. It was
to be young and healthy (as an explanation, Dominic                    perceived to affect dietary diversity both directly
said “it’s easier to plant after hoeing (tilling), but hoeing          (through purchasing power), as well as indirectly by
is what impedes me”). They were living almost entirely                 modifying agrobiodiversity: wealthier people could afford
off the small earnings Tabea made from the restaurant                  to purchase more types of seeds and other agricultural
attached to their house where she sold tea and mandazi                 inputs, could afford to hire help with agricultural labour,
(fried sweet dough) and very small amounts of cash from                and usually had access to more land, all of which in-
Dominic’s occasional business endeavours. While it was                 crease their ability to grow a greater variety of crops.
unclear why exactly the family was so adverse to farming               Both wealthy and poor participants identified wealth or
(perhaps social or psychological reasons), it was clear                poverty as a factor limiting some people’s access to food
that there were obstacles other than physical ability                  and dietary diversity. For example, Tumaini and Kibua
preventing them from farming (Tabea regularly carried                  Daudi (recently returned to the area, making a success-
very heavy loads of firewood needed cook mandazi): em-                 ful living by small business, Bombani village) and Anna
phasizing the benefits of farming would have just made                 and Ernest Singano (poor, renting their home from the
them feel worse about the fact that they were not en-                  tea plantation for which Ernest works, farming with the
gaged in farming. Likewise, Mary Mathayo (a single                     goal of leaving the tea estate, Shambangeda village)
mother, the poorest of the 15 case study households, in                talked about their lack of access to land/land tenure
Kiwanda village) did not discuss a link between agricul-               affecting their agrobiodiversity, food security and dietary
ture and dietary diversity. She cultivated only maize and              diversity. Trade-offs between obtaining food by way of
cassava and lived off the sale of sugarcane alcohol. The               agriculture and by purchasing it were frequently
concerns and efforts of both these households were                     discussed. While lack of money could be made up for by
focused on small business enterprises, which produced                  successful agricultural endeavours, wealth gave a
small amounts of cash with which they purchased very                   household choice and lack of wealth required the
basic food items.                                                      household to balance more activities. Local people not
                                                                       only drew connections between greater wealth and
Spatial and temporal availability of diverse foods                     higher agrobiodiversity supporting high dietary diversity,
Availability of different foods (both seasonally and                   they also identified lack of wealth and lack of crop
geographically) in general was reported as a limitation to             diversity as decreasing their ability to maintain their
dietary diversity; some foods simply were not available in             dietary diversity.
Powell et al. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine (2017) 13:23                                                    Page 6 of 12
households that still managed to maintain good dietary                 study that describes the importance of landscape hetero-
diversity) tried to explain why other households might not             geneity for dietary diversity, a factor that has never
have the same quality and diversity in their diets. Some               previously been described as a potential driver of dietary
participants simply said that people “don’t like to/don’t              diversity and should be further investigated.
want to” pursue various activities needed to ensure dietary               Many of the relationships between dietary diversity and
diversity. “Each person has their own thoughts or ideas or             health, and dietary diversity and environment reported by
plans” was another very common explanation. An indivi-                 local people in this study parallel those reported in other
dual’s knowledge, determination, drive, dedication, effort             studies, both quantitative and qualitative (including the
and motivation were often cited as aspects of personality,             quantitative results from the same research project).
which can support improved dietary diversity. For                      Table 1 summarizes relationships between dietary diver-
example: “You can get many types of vegetables, but it all             sity and health from the general scientific literature, quan-
depends on the effort/determination (juhudi) of the                    titative research from the same communities included in
mother of the house… to struggle to find them. Because                 this study, alongside a summary of the local knowledge
there are many mothers who don’t want to go to the bush                presented herein. The same three sources of information
to look for vegetables, they get money and buy dagaa.                  on the drivers of dietary diversity are also presented.
Others are determined to look for vegetables.” explained                  Local knowledge about the importance of dietary
Saidi Kombo.... “[I am more able/determined than other                 diversity recorded is well-aligned with scientific findings:
women] because I really like leafy vegetables.” continued              participants’ emphasis of the role of dietary diversity for
Amina, his wife.                                                       appetite, over its importance for vitamin and mineral in-
   Other participants linked a person’s choices and habits             take or other nutrition-related health outcomes, was likely
to their family’s traditions and commitment to culturally              due to the fact that vitamins and minerals are concepts
held food preferences and taboos. While in some set-                   that are not well integrated into existing local knowledge
tings, cultural taboos are universally held and adhered                systems. Older nutrition and nutritional anthropology re-
to, in the East Usambara Mountains many food taboos                    search has similarly reported that diets that lack diversity
varied from one family to another. Only a few taboos,                  induce boredom and undereating, especially in children
like those against eating snails and monkeys, were held                [51]. The fact that many participants talked about dietary
by the majority of people.                                             diversity and having (enough) food in general somewhat
   Rarely did people say that others lacked dietary diversity          interchangeably, suggests not only that food security is
because they were in some way poorer or disadvantaged,                 important to people, but that it is associated with dietary
suggesting that dietary diversity was perceived as some-               diversity (as in the scientific literature).
thing all people in their community (rich and poor) can                   Scientific evidence of the drivers of dietary diversity
achieve.                                                               vary between sites and studies (first column Table 1).
                                                                       Local knowledge in this study suggests that land use
Discussion                                                             diversity and landscape heterogeneity are important for
These data demonstrate that dietary diversity is perceived             dietary diversity; factors which have not, to date, ever been
as important for appetite and overall food consumption.                examined using dietary survey data [52]. Local knowledge
There was a high degree of agreement among participants                that crop diversity is important for food security and re-
from a range of backgrounds about the concept of dietary               silience has been previously described: farmers around the
diversity and its benefits for enhancing appetite. These               world report that crop diversity and agrobiodiversity
findings suggest that the concept is a salient part of local           provide them with security in the face of environmental,
nutrition knowledge. These results also contribute to the              climate, economic and social change (e.g., in Nepal [53]).
growing understanding of how dietary diversity is asso-                One recent research project has also looked at local know-
ciated with biodiversity. Agriculture, agrobiodiversity and            ledge of the importance of agrobiodiversity in Rwanda,
landscape heterogeneity, along with wealth were some of                with remarkably similar results to this study [37]. The re-
the most commonly reported determinants of dietary                     search in Rwanda reported that local people identified
diversity. Household size, livelihood diversity, and gender            dietary diversity as one of the two most important reasons
were also perceived to affect dietary diversity.                       they valued agrobiodiversity (along with income gene-
   Figure 1 represent our effort to visualize the reported             ration), and dietary diversity was perceived as important
determinants of dietary diversity and their interactions.              for health and nutrition: “farmers said they liked to grow
The figure highlights our interpretation, based on the                 diverse crops because they wanted to eat different foods,
results presented herein and our wider understanding of                that eating the same food caused health problems, and di-
the field site, of how the drivers of dietary diversity are            verse foods are important for nutrition” [37]. For example,
situated and interact within the larger complex social-                one of the farmers interviewed by Isaac et al. [37] stated:
ecological system. To our knowledge this is the first                  ‘If you have production from all of these [crops] there’s no
Powell et al. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine (2017) 13:23                                                                       Page 8 of 12
  Fig. 1 Diagram of the most salient relationships between determinants and outcomes of dietary diversity, showing an interpretation of how they
  interact within the social-ecological system (arrows indicate associations that can be either positive or negative, they are not meant to
  indicate causation)
Table 1 Summary of knowledge about the importance and drivers of dietary diversity (DD) from three different sources
(local knowledge, scientific knowledge/quantitative results from same study, scientific knowledge/quantitative results from
other studies)
Scientific literature                                 Quantitative data from the study communities       Qualitative data from local people in this study
Importance of Dietary Diversity
• DD associated with overall food consumption,        • DD associated with overall energy intake [46]    • DD important for appetite and enjoyment
  energy intake and satiety [51, 64–69]               • DD associated with intake of most nutrients        of food
• DD associated with dietary quality, nutrient          and nutrient adequacy (Mean Adequacy Ratio,      • DD important because “each food has its
  intake, nutrient density (likely explaining links     MAR) [46]                                          own value”
  to child growth and other anthropometric and        • After controlling for energy intake, DD no
  biochemical markers of nutrition) [68–71]             longer associated with intake of most
                                                        nutrients [46]
Drivers of Dietary Diversity
• DD linked to agrobiodiversity in at least           • DD associated with agrobiodiversity (crop        • Agriculture, agrobiodiversity
  seven studies [46, 52, 72–78],                        diversity) [46]                                  • Land use diversity/landscape heterogeneity
• DD associated with forest cover in three            • DD associated with forest cover [46, 47].        • Different foods eaten seasonally
  studies [47, 52, 79, 80].                           • No differences in DD between wet and dry         • Wealth, available cash, land tenure
• DD linked to vegetable production [81]                season, but difference in sources of             • Livelihood diversity
• DD linked to home gardens [52, 82]                    foods [46, 48]                                   • Family size
• Season may increase/decrease                        • DD associated with wealth and market access      • Gender
  DD [83, 84]                                           but not with sex or education of the head of     • Personality, family tradition, taboos
• Wild food use associated with higher                  the household (unpublished data from the
  DD [54]                                               study) [46]
• DD also associated with wealth, household
  size, education and other economic and
  demographic variables
Powell et al. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine (2017) 13:23                                                   Page 9 of 12
hunger. And to change the food – today if we eat squash                the primary school science curriculum and participants
and beans the next day we can eat something else…Life is               reported school as a source of information. Compared
strong – there’s no disease in the body and children don’t             to scientific approaches to many health issues (which
get sick because they change the food every day’ [37].                 often focus on causes and treatment of disease or defi-
   Interestingly, despite wild food being widely consumed              ciency), scientific discourse about dietary diversity focus
in the study site [48], and having been shown to be                    more on health (and how to maintain it) [55]. Similarly,
associated with greater dietary diversity [54], there was              the local knowledge examined in this research tended to
limited mention of wild foods by local people in their                 focus on the health-giving components of diet and food.
discussion of the drivers of dietary diversity.                        Compared to other forms of nutrition knowledge which
   Discrepancies between scientific knowledge and local                are often heavily nutritionalized and medicalized [59],
knowledge of dietary diversity presented herein should                 dietary diversity presents an ideal starting place and
not in any way reduce the validity of local knowledge.                 foundation for education about healthy diets.
The assessment of local knowledge against “scientific
truths” perpetuates a dichotomy, in which local                        Conclusions
knowledge is qualified relative to a ‘superior’ knowledge;             Shell-Duncan and McDade [60] highlight the import-
dichotomies which maintain colonial cultural suprema-                  ance of ethnographic data on health and nutrition know-
cies and perpetuate hegemony [55, 56]. In this case, the               ledge for interpretation of nutrition survey results: they
discrepancies between local knowledge and the other re-                describe higher rates of inadequate iron intake among
search findings from this study could easily be a result               girls than boys in a Rendille community in northern
of the well-known imperfections in dietary data collec-                Kenya and link this to cultural classifications of ‘soft’
tion tools [46]. In fact, this qualitative research may have           foods (including rice, maize porridge, and tea), import-
identified drivers of dietary diversity that have simply               ant for girls, and ‘hard’ foods (including meat, blood,
not been identified or tested yet using quantitative                   and beans) important for boys. Worsley [34] points out
methods (e.g., land-use diversity).                                    that “…‘messages’ are often accepted or rejected accord-
   At the same time, we acknowledge the subjective nature              ing to their consonance with prior beliefs”. The gap be-
of qualitative analysis, the possibility that other themes/            tween scientific and local knowledge systems remains a
categories could be apparent to other researchers or that              major, and rarely addressed, issue in nutrition interven-
the relative importance of themes/categories could be                  tions with education or behaviour change components.
judged differently. The fact that the first author intro-              Unlike Shell-Duncan and McDade [60], which describes
duced herself as a nutrition researcher, could have led par-           local nutrition knowledge that is quite different from sci-
ticipants to give responses which they perceived to align              entific knowledge, in this study, local knowledge of diet-
with the scientific knowledge system. However, she was                 ary diversity was well aligned with scientific knowledge.
able to elicit a diverse range of responses from local                    The universal use of the Swahili language and primary
people, including many that were not close to scientific               school education are legacies of Tanzania’s socialist era
concepts (and was able to do this when Tanzanian                       [61, 62], and have likely been a driving force behind the
members of the team with university degrees in science                 creation of consensus among local people on nutrition
often were not able to) suggesting that this aspect of                 knowledge. These are strengths that future public health
researcher bias was largely overcome.                                  policy and programs should seek to build on. There is
   The fact that “personality” emerged as an explanation               room to incorporate ethnonutritional concepts in the
given as to why some members of the community were un-                 National Primary School science curriculum, and to adapt
able to maintain a diverse diet highlights one of the limita-          the curriculum to local contexts. In the face of changing
tions of drawing on local perceptions of determinants of               dietary patterns and nutrition burdens across Africa, at-
health: poor people are often blamed for making bad deci-              tention to the diet and nutrition information in school
sions, or being lazy, when in reality there are structural bar-        curriculums should be prioritized.
riers, including social, cultural and environmental barriers,             The qualitative approach to ethnonutrition used in this
that prevent them from making healthy choices [57, 58].                research has revealed that local people perceive a strong
   In the face of changing food systems and dietary pat-               link between agriculture and agrobiodiversity (and by ex-
terns [13], public health nutrition policy and programs                tension environmental health in general) and human diet
will need to find messages that support cultural dietary               and nutrition. Landscape heterogeneity was reported as
traditions, promote healthy dietary behaviour and are                  important for dietary diversity. Maintenance of agricul-
easily integrated into existing knowledge systems. The                 ture when households shift to other sources of income
Tanzanian primary school curriculum has been an effi-                  was also reported as important. Crop varietal diversity
cient means for promoting healthy diets in this site.                  was reported as important for maintaining dietary diver-
Many of the concepts seen in this research also seen in                sity across seasons. Income, livelihood diversity and
Powell et al. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine (2017) 13:23                                                                             Page 10 of 12
7.    Francis J, O’Connor D, Curran J. Theories of behaviour change synthesised             31. Keesing RM. Theories of culture. An Rev Anthropol. 1974;3:73–97.
      into a set of theoretical groupings: Introducing a thematic series on the             32. Berkes F, Turner N. Knowledge, learning and the evolution of conservation
      theoretical domains framework. Implement Sci. 2012;7(1):1–9.                              practice for social-ecological system resilience. Hum Ecol. 2006;34(4):479–94.
8.    Contento IR, Randell JS, Basch CE. Review and analysis of evaluation                  33. Boyd R, Richerson PJ. Why is culture adaptive? Quart Rev Biol. 1983;58(2):209–14.
      measures used in nutrition education intervention research. J Nutr Edu                34. Worsley A. Nutrition knowledge and food consumption: can nutrition knowledge
      Behav. 2002;34:2–25.                                                                      change food behaviour? Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2002;11(suppl):S579–85.
9.    Köster EP. Diversity in the determinants of food choice: a psychological              35. Allen LH, Gillespie S. What works? A review of the efficacy and effectiveness
      perspective. Food Qual Pref. 2009;20(2):70–82.                                            of nutrition interventions. Geneva: Asian Development Bank with the UN
10.   Marteau TM, Hollands GJ, Fletcher PC. Changing human behavior to                          ACC Sub-Committee on Nutrition, c/o World Health Organization; 2001.
      prevent disease: the importance of targeting automatic processes. Science.            36. Berkes F, Colding J, Folke C. Rediscovery of traditional ecological knowledge
      2012;337(6101):1492–5.                                                                    as adaptive management. Ecol App. 2000;10(5):1251–62.
11.   Krumeich A, Weijts W, Reddy P, Meijer-Weitz A. The benefits of                        37. Isaacs KB, Snapp SS, Chung K, Waldman KB. Assessing the value of diverse
      anthropological approaches for health promotion research and practice.                    cropping systems under a new agricultural policy environment in Rwanda.
      Health Edu Res. 2001;16(2):121–30.                                                        Food Sec. 2016;8(3):491–506.
12.   Kuhnlein H. Introduction: why are indigenous Peoples’ food systems important          38. Tanzania, Government of the United Republic of. Census. Dar es Salam,
      and why do they need documentation? In: Kuhnlein HV, Erasmus B, Spigelski D,              Tanzania: National Bureau of Statistics; 2002.
      editors. Indigenous peoples’ food systems: the many dimensions of culture,            39. Feierman S. The shambaa kingdom. Madison: The University of Wisconson
      diversity and environment for nutrition and health. Rome, Italy and Montreal:             Press; 1974.
      Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and the Centre for            40. Willis J. The makings of a tribe: Bondei identities and histories. J African
      Indigenous Peoples’ Nutrition and Environment; 2009.                                      History. 1992;33(2):191–208.
13.   Popkin B. The nutrition transition: an overview of world patterns of change.          41. GotURo Tanzania. Tanzania demographic and health survey 2010:
      Nutr Rev. 2004;62:S140–3.                                                                 preliminary report. Dar es Salaam: National Bureau of Statistics; 2010.
14.   Hotz C, Gibson RS. Participatory nutrition education and adoption of new              42. Vainio-Mattila K. Wild vegetables used by the sambaa in the East Usambara
      feeding practices are associated with improved adequacy of                                Mountains, NE Tanzania. Ann Bot Fenn. 2000;37:57–67.
      complementary diets among rural Malawian children: a pilot study.                     43. Weinberger K, Swai I. Consumption of traditional vegetables in central and
      European J of Clin Nutr. 2005;59(2):226–37.                                               northeastern Tanzania. Ecol Food Nutr. 2006;45(2):87–103.
15.   Heimendinger J, Van Duyn MA. Dietary behavior change: the challenge of                44. Keding G, Weinberger K, Swai I, Mndinga H. Diversity, traits and use of
      recasting the role of fruit and vegetables in the American diet. Am J Clin                traditional vegetables in Tanzania, Technical bulletin no. 40. Shanhua:
      Nutr. 1995;61(6):1397S–401.                                                               AVRDC, The World Vegetable Center; 2007.
16.   Aubel J. The role and influence of grandmothers on child nutrition: culturally        45. Bernard RH. Research methods in anthropology: qualitative and quantitative
      designated advisors and caregivers. Mat Child Nutr. 2012;8(1):19–35.                      approaches. Walnut Creek: Altamira Press; 2002.
17.   Aubel J, Toure I, Diagne M. Senegalese grandmothers promote improved                  46. Powell, B. Biodiversity and human nutrition in a landscape mosaic of farms
      maternal and child nutrition practices: the guardians of tradition are not                and forests in the East Usambara Mountains, Tanzania. PhD Thesis, McGill
      averse to change. Soc Sci Med. 2004;59:945–59.                                            University, Montreal, Canada. 2012.
18.   Bezner Kerr R, Dakishoni L, Shumba L, Msachi R, Chirwa M. “We                         47. Powell, B, J Hall, and T Johns. Forest cover, use and dietary intake in the
      grandmothers know plenty”: breastfeeding, complementary feeding and                       East Usambara Mountains, Tanzania. International Forestry Review, 2011;
      the multifaceted role of grandmothers in Malawi. Soc Sci Med. 2008;                       13(3): online.
      66(5):1095–105.                                                                       48. Powell B, Maundu P, Kuhnlein HV, Johns T. Wild foods from farm and forest in
19.   Satzinger F, Bezner Kerr R, Shumba L. Intergenerational participatory                     the East Usambara Mountains, Tanzania. Ecol Food Nutr. 2013;52(6):451–78.
      discussion groups foster knowledge exchange to improve child nutrition                49. Lebel J. Health: an ecosystem approach. In focus collection. Ottawa:
      and food security in northern Malawi. Ecol Food Nutr. 2009;48(5):369–82.                  International Development Research Centre (IDRC); 2003.
20.   Kanal K, Busch-Hallen J, Cavalli-Sforza T, Crape B, Smitasiri S. Weekly               50. Saldaña J. The coding manual for qualitative researchers. London: Sage; 2015.
      iron-folic acid supplements to prevent anemia among Cambodian women                   51. Messer E. Methods for studying determinants of food intake. In: Pelto GH,
      in three settings: process and outcomes of social marketing and                           Pelto PJ, Messer E, editors. Research methods in nutritional anthropology.
      community mobilization. Nutr Rev. 2005;63:S126–33.                                        Tokyo: United Nations University Press; 1989.
21.   Khan NC, Thanh HTK, Berger J, Hoa PT, Quang ND, Smitasiri S, Cavalli-Sforza T.        52. Powell B, Thilsted S, Ickowitz A, Termote C, Sunderland T, Herforth A.
      Community mobilization and social marketing to promote weekly iron-folic                  Improving diets with wild and cultivated biodiversity from across the
      acid supplementation: a new approach toward controlling anemia among                      landscape. Food Sec. 2015;7(3):535–54.
      women of reproductive age in Vietnam. Nutr Rev. 2005;63:S87–94.                       53. Sthapit B, Subedi A. Participatory approaches to plant breeding: Experiences
22.   Sikstrom L, Bezner Kerr R, Dakishoni L. Fluid boundaries: multiple meanings               and insights of an NGO in Nepal. In: Almekinders C, DeBoef W, editors.
      of the illness ‘moto’ in northern Malawi. In: Liamputtong P, editor. Infant               Encouraging diversity: the conservation and development of plant genetic
      feeding practices. New York: Springer; 2011. p. 211–27.                                   resources. London: Intermediate Technology Publications; 2000.
23.   Tapias M. ‘Always ready and always clean’?: Competing discourses of                   54. Boedecker J, Termote C, Assogbadjo A, Van Damme P, Termote C, Lachat C.
      breast-feeding, infant illness and the politics of mother-blame in Bolivia.               Dietary contribution of wild edible plants to women’s diets in Benin – an
      Body Soc. 2006;12(2):83–108.                                                              underutilized potential. Food Sec. 2014;6(6):833–49.
24.   Ellen R, Parkes P, Bicker A, editors. Indigenous knowledge and its transformations:   55. TenFingers K. Rejecting, revitalizing and reclaiming. Canadian J Public
      critical anthropological perspectives. Amsterdam: Harwood; 2000.                          Health. 2005;96 Suppl 1:S60–3.
25.   Ellen, RF. On the concept of cultural transmission: Presidential address for the      56. Brook RK, McLachlan SM. On using expert-based science to “test” local
      Royal Anthropological Institute. The Annual Conference of the Association of              ecological knowledge. Ecol Soc. 2005;10(2):r3–5.
      Social Anthropologists, Queens University, Belfast, Ireland. 2010.                    57. Glanz K, Sallis JF, Saelens BE, Frank LD. Healthy nutrition environments:
26.   Romney AK, Boyd JP, Moore CC, Batchelder WH, Brazill TJ. Culture as shared                concepts and measures. Am J Health Prom. 2005;19(5):330–3.
      cognitive representations. PANS. 1996;93(10):4699–705.                                58. Glanz K. Measuring food environments: a historical perspective. Am J Prev
27.   Reyes-Garcia V, Byron E, Vadez V, Godoy R, Apaza L, Limache EP, Leonard RP,               Med. 2009;36 Suppl 4:S93–8.
      Wilkie D. Measuring culture as shared knowledge: Do data collection formats           59. Turton CLR. Ways of knowing about health: an aboriginal perspective. Adv
      matter? cultural knowledge of plant use among Tsimane’ Amerindians, Bolivia.              Nurs Sci. 1997;19(3):28–36.
      Field Methods. 2004;16:135–56.                                                        60. Scrinis, G. Nutritionism: The science and politics of dietary advice. New York:
28.   D’Andrade RG. Modal responses and cultural expertise. Am Behav Sci. 1987;                 Columbia University Press; 2013.
      31(2):194–202.                                                                        61. Shell-Duncan B, McDade T. Cultural and environmental barriers to
29.   Barth F. An anthropology of knowledge. Curr Anthropol. 2002;43(1):18.                     adequate iron intake among northern Kenyan schoolchildren. Food
30.   Crick MR. Anthropology of knowledge. An Rev Anthropol.                                    Nutr Bul. 2005;26(1):39–49.
      1982;11:287–313.                                                                      62. Yeager R. Tanzania, an African experiment. Boulder: Westview Press; 1989.
Powell et al. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine (2017) 13:23                                                                             Page 12 of 12