Scribd
Upload
1K views2 pages

Application311 CRPC

The document details an application under Section 311 of the Criminal Procedure Code on behalf of the accused Sanjay Kumar in a case between Niraj Singh and Sanjay Kumar pending before the court. The application requests recalling witness number 2 for cross-examination as the initial cross-examination was insufficient and recalling is important for a just decision in the case.

Uploaded by

Athrv Sharma
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
1K views2 pages

Application311 CRPC

The document details an application under Section 311 of the Criminal Procedure Code on behalf of the accused Sanjay Kumar in a case between Niraj Singh and Sanjay Kumar pending before the court. The application requests recalling witness number 2 for cross-examination as the initial cross-examination was insufficient and recalling is important for a just decision in the case.

Uploaded by

Athrv Sharma
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

IN THE COURT OF MS ADITI RAO, LD.

MM SOUTH NI
ACT, SAKET
In Ref with:
CC No. 14689/2019
Niraj Singh VERSUS Sanjay
Kumar

APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 311 Cr.P.C ON BEHALF


OF APPLICANT/ACCUSED SANJAY KUMAR.

MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH:

1. That the above said matter is pending before the Hon’ble Court
and fixed for order.
2. That the applicant/accused is innocent person he has not taken
loan from the complainant. But complainant planned a
conspiracy against the applicant/accused along with the
witnesses. And also some forged document has been prepared
by the complainant.
3. That the complainant produce witness No 2 ex secretary of
Saket Bar Association, New Delhi under the pressure of the
counsel of the applicant not feeling normal so he was unable to
cross examine. Therefore counsel of the applicant/accused
person didn’t put any single question to witness No. 2 in cross
examination, Counsel of the applicant/accused only gave few
suggestions to the witness no. 2.
4. That the cross examination of the witness no. 2 is very essential
for just decision.
5. That the counsel of the applicant/accused didn’t suggest for any
other witness who knows the true facts of the story.

PRAYER

It is therefore most respectfully prayed that this Hon’ble Court


may kindly be pleased to recall the witness no. 2 for cross-
examination in the interest of just decision.

Through

Counsel

PANKAJ KUMAR. SHARMA


CH. NO. 456 LAWYERS BLOCK
Date:- DISTT. COURT COMPLEX
Place:- Delhi SAKET,NEW DELHI-110017

You might also like