NBA Criteria 5
Prepared by
Prof. Vijetha Vardhan R N
5.1 Student to Teacher Ratio (STR) (20)
Institute Marks 20
• STR is to be 15 or superior
• Assessment = ; subject to
maximum of 20
• STR =
Where x = Number of students in the second year programme.
y = Number of students in the third year programme.
Z = Number of students in the fourth year programme.
Year X Yof faculty
N1 = Total number Z N1 membersX+Y+Z STR Assessment
in the programme (by considering
fractional load)
2012-2013 73 46 12 119 09.91 20
2013-2014 71 75 45 17 191 11.23 20
2014-2015 71 65 71 16 207 12.94 20
5.2 Faculty 5.3 Faculty
Cadre Ratio Qualifications
(20) (30)
Institute Marks 7.07 Institute Marks 22.78
Assessment = 20 * CRI Assessment = 3 * FQI
Where, CRI = Cadre Ratio Index = ; subject to Where, FQI = Faculty Qualification Index = such that
max CRI = 1.0 ; and
Where, A = Number of professors in the Where, x = Number of faculty members with
programme PhD
y = Number of faculty members with
B = number of associate professors in the
M.E./M.Tech
programme.
Year A B N CRI Assessment Year z = Number
X Yof faculty
Z N2 members
FQI Assessment
with
B.E./B.Tech
2012-2013 1 0 12 0.375 7.5 2012-2013 1 09 2 09 7.56 22.67
2013-2014 1 0 17 0.265 5.29 2013-2014 1 14 2 13 7.54 22.62
2014-2015 1 1 16 0.422 8.44 2014-2015 1 15 0 13 7.69 23.07
5.4. Faculty Competencies correlation
to Programme
Manufacturing Stream Specific Criteria (15)
1. Institute Marks 10
Dr. K Narasimha Murthy
2. Prof. K Shashidhara Thermal Stream
Sastry 1. Prof. Vijetha Vardhan R
3. Prof. Bindu H C N
2. Prof. V Sushanth Kumar
3. Prof. Ravichandra Koti
Design Stream
4. Prof. Vijaya B V CIM Stream
5. Prof. Rajaneesh M K 4. Prof. Jayasimha S L N
6. Prof. Arjun S 5. Prof. Praveen Kumar K
7. Prof. Santosh S G 6. Prof. Rajshekar H
8. Prof. Hemanth Kumar
Aero Stream
7. Prof. Bhaskar Raju S A
Mechatronics
8. Prof. Mohan Kumar O
5.5. Faculty as participants/resource persons
in faculty development/training activities (15)
Institute Marks 1.03
ipant/resource person in two week developmefaculty nt programme: 05 points
ipant/resource person in two weefaculty k development programme: 03 points
Sum 0 8 09
N 12 17 16
Assessment = 0.00 1.41 1.69
5.6. Faculty retention (15)
Assessment = Institute Marks 3.46
Where RPI = Retention Point Index = Points assigned to all faculty members
Where points assigned to a faculty member = 1 point for each year of experience at the institute but not exceeding 5.
Item 2012- 2013- 2014-
2013 2014 2015
Number of faculty members with experience of less 08 05 04
than 1 year (x0)
Number of faculty members with 1 to 2 years 02 08 06
experience (x1)
Number of faculty members with 2 to 3 years 00 02 03
experience (x2)
Number of faculty members with 3 to 4 years 01 00 01
experience (x3)
Number of faculty members with 4 to 5 years 01 01 00
experience (x4)
Number of faculty members with more than 5 years 00 01 02
experience (x5)
N 12 17 16
RPI = x1 + 2x2 + 3x3 + 4x4 + 5x5 09 21 25
5.7. Faculty Research Publications (FRP) (20)
Institute Marks 0.98
Sum 0 5 7
N 9 17 16
Assessment = 0 1.18 1.7
5
5.8 Faculty Intellectual Property Rights (FIPR) (10)
Institute Marks 0.00
Sum 0 0 0
N 9 1 1
7 6
Assessment = 0 0 0
5.9 Funded R&D Projects and Consultancy (FRDC) Work (20)
Institute Marks 0.33
Sum 0 0 4
N 9 1 16
7
Assessment = 0 1.0
5.10 Faculty Interaction with Outside
0 World (10)
Institute Marks 0.00
Sum 0 0 0
N 9 1 1
7 6
Assessment = 0 0 0
