Project Audit Report
Project Audit Report
AUDIT REPORT
For construction works of
Mesle/Musle-Kora/kori-Teru Road Project
Contract-2:km84+200-156+589(72.389km)
1.INTRODUCTION...........................................................................................................5
2.CONTRACT MANAGEMENT.....................................................................................8
LIST OF TABLES
Table 2- 1 : Financial Plan.................................................................................................6
Table 2- 2 : Summary of 2015 fiscal year’s plan /accomplishment...................................7
Table 2- 3 :Summary of the land acquisition requests....................................................10
Table 2- 4 : Summary of EOT Claim Status....................................................................11
Table 2- 5 : Summary of Cost Claim status.....................................................................11
Table 3- 1: Summary of Cost Claim status......................................................................20
Table 4- 1 : Status of clearing and grabbing work...........................................................54
Table 5- 1: Status Pipe Culvert Works............................................................................55
Table 5- 2: Status of Slab Culvert works.........................................................................56
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The objective of this audit was to determine whether contract management functions for
this contract were administered in accordance with applicable requirements.
The scope of this audit covered the post-award contract lifecycle management process
related to this construction contract with China State Construction Engineering
Corporation and ABM Engineers Engineering Consultants, which the Employer awarded
in October 2018 and January 2019 respectively.
The audit methodology included collecting and reviewing the former Engineers
recording Contractual documentation; reviewing and testing the contractor payments;
reviewing the contract monitoring processes and documentation; reviewing contract
requirements and related deliverables; and performing selected tests and other
procedures for the contract audited.
To assess data reliability, we relied on previous official communications, and the data
included in the exit report was also used to determine the sufficiency and reliability of
the data for the purpose of this audit report.
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1 Introduction and Purpose
The Government of the Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia has allocated a budget
towards the cost of the Mesle/Musle – Kora/Kori - Teru Road Project; Contract II: Km
84.2 -Teru (Km 156+589) (72.389 Km) and intends to apply part of the proceeds to
eligible payments for the Contract.
The Mesle/Musle – Kora/Kori -Teru Road Project; Contract II: Km 84.2 -Teru (Km
156+589) (72.389 Km) is located in Afar regional state, Northeast direction 700Km away
from Addis Ababa. The road connects two major Woredas and more than six kebeles.
The two woredas to be connected along the Mesel/Mesi – Kora/Kori – Teru is Kori and
Teru Woredas. The road starts from Musle junction on the main road toward Afdera and
passes through different kebeles before reaching Teru. The existing road (Which runs
only for about 70 km from Musle junction, while the remaining 80 km is inaccessible by
the non-existing road before) is dominated by the very hot weather condition, which
reaches up to 43 degrees Celsius. The Total Length of the road is approximately 72.389
km.
The project road under contract II follows an entirely new alignment and there is no
existing road. The project route corridor exists inside the great east African rift valley.
There are a number of cross-drainage structures to be constructed. In this regard, as
per the Engineering review report produced by the Supervision Consultant for the
subject contract-2 project, there are 167 Slab Culverts and 27 Box Culverts in the
project
The work under this contract consists of the construction of a road with a total length of
about 72.389km to DC4 road class (ERA's Geometric Design Manual-2013) with Double
Bituminous Surface Treatment (DBST) Surfacing. The work also includes the
construction of minor and major drainage structures.
1
in JV with Sound Engineering Solution Plc with a commencement date on February 27,
2023, with a project completion period of 36 months plus 24 months’ defects liability
period. The 36 months’ construction contract duration is including one (1) month of
mobilization period.
The continuation Consultant shall perform all necessary services and activities to fulfill
the objectives, whether or not a specific activity is stated in the Scope of Services in the
Terms of Reference.
The purpose of this Project Audit Report is to examine and analyze the project issues
concerns, challenges, and opportunities and their reasons, and to develop
recommendations about how to address the problems and keep the project successful.
The ultimate goal of the audit process is to maximize the success of a project. The
process is intended to complete the following general objectives:
Ensure that project decision-making is effective (every decision made produces a
desired outcome)
Project activities are adequately performed and managed
Project governance and risk management meet contract requirements
2
of the Client)
Project Period : 36 months plus 24 months defects liability period
Consultancy Contract : December 30, 2022
Signed On
Commencement Date : February 27, 2022
Project Cost :
Works Contract Amount : 1,502,371,329.85
Amount of Advance 20% of the Contract Amount had been paid following
Payment the submission of unconditional Advance Payment
From Dashen Bank with Reference No.
DB/AG/010/19 Dated 02/04/2019
3
A well-managed project is a project that is performed in line with the constraints of Time,
Cost, and Quality. A project reaches success if there is an effective audit process
applied to project activities and tasks.
All these objectives are often managed under a project audit program, which defines
and runs the audit process. Such a program is a detailed plan that represents step-by-
step procedures to be followed by auditors in carrying out the process.
The scope of this Performance Audit report includes the following:
Ensure that project decision-making is effective (every decision made produces a
desired outcome)
Project activities are adequately performed and managed
Project governance and risk management meet the contract requirement
2. CONTRACT MANAGEMENT
With the contracts exchanged and signed, the last of the three phases of contract
management moves into performance monitoring, pre-award, award, and post-award.
A signature does not signal the end of compliance's involvement in contract
management; a contract must be continuously evaluated for risk and performance. In
this case, the compliance team, and the Engineer must ensure that contractual terms
and conditions are being met, that both parties are aware of expectations and
maintaining communications, and that the contract performance is of the expected
quality.
It's important to note that a signed contract does not mean the end of negotiation; often,
contracts will need to go through a change management process if, say, unforeseen
circumstances mean additional work must be undertaken, or the shape of the final
deliverable or deadline changes in some way. This is where contract management must
be kept straight and narrow; changes must be strictly documented and version control is
paramount. Having a central repository for all contract documentation can help ensure
the change management process is as painless as possible.
All contracts shall have a review or end date built in, and that is the final process in the
post-award phase of contract management. If there is a strict end date, then the
Engineer must verify that all requirements of the contract are satisfied and all
unresolved matters are settled, and the contract is then reconciled to make the final
payment.
2.1 Commentary on the issuance of the commencement date
The concluded works contract was signed on October 31, 2018, between the Ethiopian
Roads Authority now renamed Ethiopian Roads Administration, and China State
4
Construction Engineering Corporation with a commencement date of 11th of February
2019.
Pursuant to Sub-Clause 41.1 of the Appendix to Tender of the Contract, the time for
issuance of the commencement letter is within Forty-Two days of the receipt of the letter
of acceptance. However, the letter of acceptance was issued on October 24, 2018, 68
days overdue.
2.2 Commentary on the Mobilization Period and the mobilization status
As per Sub-Clause 43.1 (Time for completion) of the Appendix to Tender the Contract,
the mobilization period is 120 days.
However, as can be traced back from the communications made between the
contracting parties, the Employer expressed dissatisfaction regarding the late
mobilization of the Contractor through letter E/R/A516/14/234-14 dated April 22, 2019.
In the letter, even though 70 dates are elapsed since the project was commenced, the
Contractor’s failure to:
This and the various records demonstrate the late mobilization of resources which in
turn affects the entire project progress. One such communication is the letter issued
on July 03, 2019, whereby the Employer conveyed his concern regarding the poor
mobilization status and commencement of permanent works.
Further to this, as it had been discussed in the minutes of the tripartite meeting
which was held on May 20, 2019, the contractor shall finalize mobilization within
three weeks’ time as of May 21, 2019. The action plan to commence permanent
works had also been promised to be submitted on May 23, 2019.
There is no recorded evidence of the exact date of the commencement of the
permanent activity. However, as can be referred from the succeeding minutes of
meetings the permanent work had been commenced before August 2019.
5
2.2.1.1 What was the Impact of the late mobilization on the entire project’s
progress?
As can be traced back from the project history the Contractor failed to mobilize the
mandatory resources and manpower as per the contract. As a result, the project had
more than 70% total slippage. The overall project progress was 27.47% against the
elapsed contract time of 97.49% (revised contract duration).
Even though it is difficult to proportionate the percentage of contribution of the delay the
late mobilization has an impact on the overall slippage of more than 70%.
2.3 Work Program and Revised Schedules
The Draft Work Program was submitted on December 02, 2019, with the following basic
assumptions: Total effective working days of 584 days, with 0 rainy days. Although
repetitive revisions to the work program had been made, records show that the
Contractor was unable to curb the exhibited delay.
In addition to the Work Program, the Contractor submitted a yearly action plan for the
Ethiopian fiscal years 2013, 2014, and 2015.
The summary of the Works Program Submission is as follows:
Table 2- 1 : Financial Plan
The summary of the physical plan and physical progress up to June 30,2023 is as
follows:
6
To date actual progress of the work, with 105.54% of the revised contract period
elapsed is 30.98 % (23.08 km) compared with the planned progress 100.00 %
(74.50 km) according to the submitted work programme.
For the Quarter period April, 2023 – May, 2023, the actual and planned
progresses are 0.25% (0.18 km) and 6.23% (4.64km) respectively
For the physical year July, 2022 – June, 2023, the actual and planned
progresses are 13.87% (10.33 km) and 73.66% (54.88km) respectively
For the month of June, 2023, the actual and planned progresses are 0.18% (0.13
km) and 2.11% (1.57km) respectively
To date slippage is 74.62 % and 69.03 % against elapsed time and planned
progress respectively
For the month of July, 2023, the slippage is 1.93% against planned
accomplishment
The progress slippage is due to delay in mobilization of machines, equipment,
personnel & materials.
The project lacks experienced personnel like absence of Construction Engineer (Chief
Engineer), senior Surveyors, Human Resources Administrator, Environmentalist,
Accident Prevention Officer (Safety officer).
The main works of the Engineer’s Camp, Contractor’s Office & Housing construction is
substantially completed but some minor works still remain. Still Surveying equipment
are not provided to the Engineer, computers to office is not supplied, out of 10
Engineer’s Vehicles 6 are provided (supply date of the remaining vehicles is unknown).
The water well drilling work at Km 138 is at a standstill. Health, safety & environmental
issues implementation is delayed (only the STD/HIV prevention subcontractor
commenced service since September 2020).
As whole, the project’s to-date performance is unsatisfactory characterized by a very
slow progress with a gross slippage from the contractor’s plan & from the elapsed time.
The projects to date slow rate accomplishment has become a bothersome to the
consultant & the client. The same is notified to the contractor on multiple
correspondences & meetings.
In addition to the work program the contractor submitted an Action plan for the physical
year 2015. The summary of the plan and accomplishment is summarized as below: -
Table 2- 2 : Summary of 2015 fiscal year’s plan /accomplishment
Physical Accomplishment
Up to previous This Month This Cumulative Total to date
7
Quarter This F.Y. To
month
(4th) date
% km % km % km % km % km
10 73.66 10
Plan 2.1 6.2
0.00 74.50 1.57 4.64 % 54.88 0.00 74.50
1 3
3 13.87 3
Actual 0.1 0.2
0.80 22.95 0.13 0.18 % 10.33 0.98 23.08
8 5
Actual/
Plan %
30.80 8.51 3.95 18.82 30.98
Financial Accomplishment('000)
This Cumulative
Up to previous
This Month Quarter This F.Y. To Total to date
month
(4th) date
% ETB % ETB % ETB % ETB % ETB
2
10 1,04 73.66 76 10 1,04
Plan 2.1 1,98 6.2 64,8
0.00 0,887 % 6,738 0.00 0,887
1 3 3 67
3 32 13.87 14 3 32
Actual 0.1 1,87 0.2 2,56
0.80 0,644 % 4,320 0.98 2,514
80 0 5 4
Actual/
Plan %
30.80 8.51 3.95 18.82 30.98
8
Guarantee Share 0 Appendix to (renewed)
Compan bid
y
1.3 Retention - - Sub clause -
Guarantee 60.5 of the
Appendix to
bid
2 Insurances
2.1 Insurance Clause 21 of Expired
for works the as of
and Conditions of Novembe
Contractor’s Contract r 07, 2023
Equipment
The Contractor shall give to the Engineer with a copy to the Employer, not less than four
months’ notice of his requirement for road reserve in rural section, detour, and borrow
pits, quarry, stockpiling area and six months for road reserve in urban (town) section.
9
The Contractor shall prepare his work program prioritizing the available free sections as
much as possible, and thus town sections shall be planned to be executed at later
stages and handing over date of town sections shall be specified. Also, the contractor
shall accurately identify the obstructions to be removed/or utilities to be relocated
therein so that the employer can proceed with the estimation and subsequent removal
or relocation of the ROW obstructions.
10
road from 138+660
Further approval for one subcontracting agreement for HIV/STD prevention
subcontractor named Resilience Social Affairs Consultancy has been approved and the
subcontractor has commenced the service as of September 1st, 2020. The sub-
contractor engaged in:
11
activities, & Delay due to
shortage of Cement and
Structure Works
12
Sub clauses 44.2 and 53.1 Damage
Resulted from Local People Interruption
2.7 DISPUTE
There has been no dispute recorded to date.
13
3. CONSTRUCTION TOLERANCES
3.1 SUB BASE
The completed sub-base shall conform to the dimensional tolerances stated below:
(a) Levels
The lot shall be deemed to comply with the requirements specified for surface levels if,
before
Any repair work is undertaken, at least 90% of the level measurements are within + 25
mm of
The specified levels.
Isolated spots, where the surface levels deviate by more than 33 mm of the specified
levels
Shall be repaired to bring the deviation to within the + 25 mm tolerance.
(b) Width
The average width of the sub-base shall not be less than the specified width and
nowhere shall
The outer edge of the sub-base be more than 75 mm inside the lines shown on the
Drawings.
(c) Thickness
The lot will be considered to comply with the requirements for layer thicknesses if:
At least 90 % of all the thickness measurements taken before any thickness repairs are
made
Is equal to or greater than the specified thickness minus 27 mm; and
The mean layer thickness of the lot is not less than the specified thickness minus 5 mm
Isolated spots where the actual thickness is less than the specified thickness less 35
mm shall
Be repaired so as to fall within the 27 mm tolerance.
(d) Cross Section
At any transverse section, the difference in level between any two points shall not vary
by
More than 20 mm from their difference in level as computed from the cross sections as
shown
On the Drawings.
APPLICATION OF THE PRIME COAT
The actual spray rates shall not deviate from the required spray rate as specified or
ordered
by the Engineer by more than 0.05 liter/m2. No payment shall be made for any material
Sprayed in excess of 0.05 liter/m2 more than the required spray rate.
APPLICATION OF THE TACK COAT
The actual spray rates shall not deviate from the required spray rate as specified or
ordered
By the Engineer by more than 0.05 liter/m2. No payment shall be made for any material
Sprayed in excess of 0.05 liter/m2 more than the required spray rate.
14
6413 CONSTRUCTION TOLERANCES
The completed sections of asphaltic base and surfacing shall comply with the
requirements
for grade, width, thickness, cross-section, and smoothness stated below.
(i) Level and grade
The level tolerances referred to in clauses 10205 and 10305 shall be as follows:
H90 ................................................. + / - 15 mm
H max .......................................................................+ / - 20 mm
Deviation from the specified longitudinal grade due to deviations from the specified
levels
shall not exceed the values given below:
(ii) Width
The average width of both asphalt base and surfacing shall be at least equal to that
shown on
the drawings and nowhere shall the outer edge of the layer be inside the lines shown on
the
drawings by more than 15 mm in the case of both asphaltic base and asphaltic
surfacing.
(iii) Thickness
The thickness tolerances referred to in clauses 8205 and 8305 shall be as follows:
Base Surfacing
D90............................15 mm.............................................. 5 mm
Dmax..........................20 mm.............................................. 8 mm
Dave.............................5 mm.............................................. 2 mm
Thickness shall be determined from carefully controlled levels taken before and after
Construction in exactly the same position and/or from cores drilled from the completed
layer.
(iv) Cross section
When tested with a 3 m straightedge laid at right angles to the road center line the
surface
shall not deviate from the bottom of the straight-edge by more than 6 mm for freeways
and
by more than 10 mm for other roads.
At any transverse section the difference in level between any two points shall not vary
from
their difference in level computed from the cross section shown on the drawings by
more
than 15 mm for freeways and 20 mm for other roads.
15
CONSTRUCTION TOLERANCES FOR
STRUCTURES
The tolerances given below shall be the maximum permissible deviations from the
specified dimensions, levels, alignment, positions, etc. as shown on the Drawings of the
structures or structural elements.
(a) Foundations
(i) Piles:
Item Tolerance
1. Position 0.167 times the diameter of the pipe, or 100mm,
whichever is greater
2. External
dimensions
2.1 Prefabricated + 25mm/ - 5 mm
piles + not specified/ - 0 mm
2.2 Cast in situ piles
3. Pile head level:
3.1 Average of
level
trimmed/cut pile + 25 mm/ - 25 mm
head 1.5 %
3.2 Verticality or
rake
4. Straightness: For the precast piles the permissible maximum
deviation from straight is 5 mm for piles up to 3 m
long and 1 mm more for each additional meter of pile
length.
(ii) Caissons:
Item Tolerance
1. Position of top of caisson 150 mm
2. Verticality 1.5 %
3. Dimensions :
3.1 Wall thickness + 25 mm/ - 5 mm
3.2 Outer dimension of circular, rectangular, or square cross- + 25 mm/- 25 mm
section
4. Level: Upper level of trimmed/cut caisson head levels
4.1 Maximum deviation of average level + 25 mm/ - 25 mm
16
4.2 Maximum deviation of any individual level + 50 mm/ - 50 mm
5. Foundation fill :
5.1 Average level top of the fill + 25 mm/ - 25 mm
(b) Footings, pile capping slabs, caisson cover slabs, etc.
Item Tolerance
1. Position 15 mm
2. Alignment :
2.1 Alignment of individual elements 5 ° 1
2.2 Alignment of elements as they collectively minute
determine the alignment of structure as a whole
3. Dimensions:
3.1 Leading dimensions in the plan +25mm/ - 25 mm
3.2 Thickness +25mm/ - 15 mm
4. Level: Average level of slabs, footings, etc. + 25 mm/ - 25 mm
(c) Columns, walls, pier, abutments, etc.
Item Tolerance
1. Position 10 mm
2. Alignment:
2.1 Alignment of walls, piers, abutments and of
column
groups 2 minute
3. Dimensions:
3.1 Leading dimensions walls, piers and +25mm/ - 25 mm
abutments + 25mm/ - 3% of the
3.2 Thickness of walls, piers and abutments and specified dimensions
cross sectional dimensions of columns: within
the range 5 mm to 25 mm
4. Levels: Average levels of finished or + 10 mm/ - 10 mm
trimmed/cut columns, piers, walls, abutments etc
5 .Verticality :
5.1Using ordinary formwork 1 in 400: Maximum 25 mm
5.2 Using sliding formwork 1 in 200: Maximum 50
mm.
6. Surface regularity:
6.1Using ordinary formwork 3 mm
17
6.2 Using sliding formwork 6 mm
(d) Bridge And Culvert Superstructure
Item Tolerance
1. Position 10 mm
2 .Alignment :
2.1 Alignment Superstructure as a whole 1 minute
3. Dimensions:
3.1 Leading dimension in plan +25mm/ - 25 mm
3.2Thickness of slabs, width and depth of + 15mm/ - 3% of the specified
beams dimensions within the range 5 mm to
15 mm
4. Surface regularity: 3 mm
(all elements other than upper surface of
deck)
(e) Precast Beams
The following tolerances shall apply to pre-cast beams in addition to the requirements
stated in Sub-clause T8003 (d) above for superstructure.
The width of the gap between contiguous beams shall not exceed twice the specified
nominal gap shown on the Drawings or the nominal gap plus 40 mm, whichever is the
lesser, and the overall width between the outermost beams on the bridge deck shall be
within 40 mm of the specified width.
Item Tolerance
1. Straightness or bow: The deviation from
the intended line measured on the overall
length of the beam or part thereof shall not
exceed the following:
1.1 In the horizontal plane 0.5 mm per meter length of the beam
within the tolerance range of 6 mm to
15 mm.
1.2 In the vertical plane
1.2.a I-beams 2 mm per meter length of the beam
within the tolerance range of 6 mm to
1.2.b Other beams 20 mm. 1 mm per meter length of the
beam within the tolerance range of 3
mm to 20 mm.
2. Camber:
2.1 The soffits of adjacent beams when Shall not at any place differ by more
18
placed side by side on the bridge deck: than 2 mm per meter length of the
beam within the tolerance range of 6
2.2 The lengths of precast beams before mm to 20 mm. Shall be: + 0.1% of the
stressing total length within the tolerance range
of: + 5 mm to: + 20 mm.
3. Surface regularity: 3 mm
(f) Precast Beams and Panels
Item Tolerance
1. Cross-section
1.1 overall dimensions - less than 600 mm; 003 mm
1.2 not less than 600 mm, but less than 150 mm; 006 mm
1.3 not less than 1500 mm + 10 mm, -6 mm
2. Cross-section, dimension of sections such as
webs, ribs and flanges:
2.1 less than 1500 mm; 006 mm
2.2 not less than 1500 mm + 10 mm, -6 mm
19
3.2 SUB BASE ASBUILT SHEET
Table 3- 1: Summary of Cost Claim status
width (mm) Cross fall (%) Off Set Differenc
F. Reduced Design
Station B.S H.I I.S e Remark
spec in-built spec in-built S Level Elevation
(+)
BM125 0.57 637.3 625.775
123+000 (-)50 (+)150 2.5 -5.020 0.586 636.759 636.756 0.003
(-)50 (+)450 2.5 -3.250 0.485 636.860 636.884 -0.024
(-)50 (+)132 2.5 0.000 0.435 636.910 636.902 0.008
(-)50 (+)1220 2.5 3.250 0.535 636.810 636.822 -0.012
(-)50 (+)180 2.5 5.020 0.633 636.712 636.742 -0.030
20
width (mm) Cross fall (%) Off Set F. Reduced Design Differenc
Station B.S H.I I.S e Remark
spec in-built spec in-built S Level Elevation
(-)50 (+)150 2.5 0.000 1.72 635.625 635.617 (+)
0.008
(-)50 (+)450 2.5 3.250 1.79 635.555 635.567 -0.012
(-)50 (+)132 2.5 5.020 1.914 635.431 635.461 -0.030
21
width (mm) Cross fall (%) Off Set F. Reduced Design Differenc
Station B.S H.I I.S e Remark
spec in-built spec in-built S Level Elevation
(-)50 (+)132 2.5 0.000 1.67 610.168 610.167 (+)
-0.001
(-)50 (+)1220 2.5 3.550 1.78 610.058 610.057 -0.001
(-)50 (+)180 2.5 5.180 1.89 609.948 609.965 0.017
22
width (mm) Cross fall (%) Off Set F. Reduced Design Differenc
Station B.S H.I I.S e Remark
spec in-built spec in-built S Level Elevation
(-)50 (+)150 2.5 -3.550 2.42 606.739 606.736 (+)
-0.003
(-)50 (+)450 2.5 0.000 2.33 606.829 606.828 -0.001
(-)50 (+)450 2.5 3.550 2.431 606.728 606.727 -0.001
(-)50 (+)450 2.5 5.180 2.541 606.618 606.635 0.017
23
width (mm) Cross fall (%) Off Set F. Reduced Design Differenc
Station B.S H.I I.S e Remark
spec in-built spec in-built S Level Elevation
124+660 (-)50 (+)1220 2.5 -4.880 2.346 605.82 605.803 (+)
-0.017
(-)50 (+)180 2.5 -3.250 2.246 605.92 605.917 -0.003
(-)50 (+)150 2.5 0.000 2.106 606.06 606.059 -0.001
(-)50 (+)450 2.5 3.550 2.246 605.92 605.919 -0.001
(-)50 (+)132 2.5 4.880 2.306 605.86 605.877 0.017
24
width (mm) Cross fall (%) Off Set F. Reduced Design Differenc
Station B.S H.I I.S e Remark
spec in-built spec in-built S Level Elevation
(+)
127+660 (-)50 (+)1220 2.5 -5.020 2.156 550.268 550.273 -0.005 REMARK 2
(-)50 (+)180 2.5 -3.250 2.055 550.369 550.381 -0.012 Tolerance of
(-)50 (+)150 2.5 0.000 1.959 550.465 550.474 -0.009 Sub base
(-)50 (+)450 2.5 3.250 2.064 550.36 550.368 -0.008 thickness + or -
25
width (mm) Cross fall (%) Off Set F. Reduced Design Differenc
Station B.S H.I I.S e Remark
spec in-built spec in-built S Level Elevation
(-)50 (+)132 2.5 5.020 2.158 550.266 550.273 (+)
-0.007
26
width (mm) Cross fall (%) Off Set F. Reduced Design Differenc
Station B.S H.I I.S e Remark
spec in-built spec in-built S Level Elevation
(-)50 (+)180 2.5 5.020 2.21 509.413 509.405 (+)
0.008
27
width (mm) Cross fall (%) Off Set F. Reduced Design Differenc
Station B.S H.I I.S e Remark
spec in-built spec in-built S Level Elevation
(-)50 (+)450 2.5 3.250 1.313 468.273 468.271 (+)
0.002
(-)50 (+)450 2.5 5.020 1.406 468.18 468.172 0.008
28
Cross fall OFFSE
width (mm) Reduce Design Differenc
(%) B. T
Station H.I F.S I.S d Elevatio e Remark
spe spe in- S
in-built Level n (+)
c c built
(-)5 0.62 or - 25mm
(+)132 2.5
0 0.000 7 611.575 611.594 0.019 (2.5cm) and
(-)5 (+)122 0.72 All width in-
2.5
0 0 3.250 1 611.481 611.496 0.015 built are the
(-)5 0.83 average of
(+)180 2.5 minimum
0 5.530 8 611.364 611.359 -0.005
and
124+40 (-)5 (+)122 1.36 maximum
2.5 value
0 0 0 -5.550 2 610.84 610.811 -0.029
(-)5 1.25
(+)180 2.5
0 -3.250 5 610.947 610.931 -0.016
(-)5
(+)150 2.5
0 0.000 1.15 611.052 611.038 -0.014
(-)5
(+)450 2.5
0 3.250 1.25 610.952 610.931 -0.021
(-)5 1.36
(+)132 2.5
0 5.550 2 610.84 610.811 -0.029
29
Cross fall OFFSE
width (mm) Reduce Design Differenc
(%) B. T
Station H.I F.S I.S d Elevatio e Remark
spe spe in- S
in-built Level n (+)
c c built
124+44 (-)5
(+)150 2.5
0 0 -5.550 2.48 609.722 609.7 -0.022
(-)5
(+)450 2.5
0 -3.250 2.36 609.842 609.82 -0.022
(-)5 2.24
(+)132 2.5
0 0.000 9 609.953 609.927 -0.026
(-)5 (+)122
2.5
0 0 3.250 2.37 609.832 609.82 -0.012
(-)5
(+)180 2.5
0 5.550 2.46 609.742 609.7 -0.042
30
Cross fall OFFSE
width (mm) Reduce Design Differenc
(%) B. T
Station H.I F.S I.S d Elevatio e Remark
spe spe in- S
in-built Level n (+)
c c built
0
(-)5
(+)450 2.5
0 3.250 3.49 608.712 608.709 -0.003
(-)5
(+)450 2.5
0 5.550 3.62 608.582 608.589 0.007
124+50 (-)5
(+)150 2.5
0 0 -5.550 0.72 608.063 608.033 -0.030
(-)5 0.62
(+)450 2.5
0 -3.250 5 608.158 608.153 -0.005
(-)5
(+)132 2.5
0 0.000 0.56 608.223 608.229 0.006
(-)5 (+)122
2.5
0 0 3.250 0.61 608.173 608.153 -0.020
(-)5
(+)180 2.5
0 5.550 0.7 608.083 608.033 -0.050
31
Cross fall OFFSE
width (mm) Reduce Design Differenc
(%) B. T
Station H.I F.S I.S d Elevatio e Remark
spe spe in- S
in-built Level n (+)
c c built
124+54 (-)5 (+)122 1.90
2.5
0 0 0 -5.550 2 606.881 606.922 0.041
(-)5
(+)150 2.5
0 -3.250 1.78 607.003 607.042 0.039
(-)5
(+)450 2.5
0 0.000 1.66 607.123 607.148 0.025
(-)5 1.72
(+)450 2.5
0 3.250 2 607.061 607.042 -0.019
(-)5 1.88
(+)450 2.5
0 5.550 1 606.902 606.922 0.020
124+56 (-)5
(+)150 2.5
0 0 -5.550 2.44 606.343 606.366 0.023
(-)5
(+)450 2.5
0 -3.250 2.32 606.463 606.486 0.023
(-)5
(+)132 2.5
0 0.000 2.23 606.553 606.592 0.039
(-)5 (+)122
2.5
0 0 3.250 2.33 606.453 606.486 0.033
(-)5
(+)180 2.5
0 5.550 2.45 606.333 606.366 0.033
32
Cross fall OFFSE
width (mm) Reduce Design Differenc
(%) B. T
Station H.I F.S I.S d Elevatio e Remark
spe spe in- S
in-built Level n (+)
c c built
(-)5
(+)450 2.5
0 3.250 2.88 605.903 605.93 0.027
(-)5
(+)132 2.5
0 5.550 3.01 605.773 605.81 0.037
33
Cross fall OFFSE
width (mm) Reduce Design Differenc
(%) B. T
Station H.I F.S I.S d Elevatio e Remark
spe spe in- S
in-built Level n (+)
c c built
0 0 0 with the
(-)5 0.91 respect to
(+)180 2.5
0 -3.250 2 604.28 604.272 -0.008 thickness of
(-)5 the layer
(+)150 2.5
0 0.000 0.82 604.372 604.37 -0.002
(-)5
(+)450 2.5
0 3.250 0.91 604.282 604.272 -0.010
(-)5 1.02
(+)132 2.5
0 5.250 5 604.167 604.152 -0.015
34
Cross fall OFFSE
width (mm) Reduce Design Differenc
(%) B. T
Station H.I F.S I.S d Elevatio e Remark
spe spe in- S
in-built Level n (+)
c c built
0 0
(-)5
(+)180 2.5
0 5.250 2.2 602.992 603.024 0.032
35
Cross fall OFFSE
width (mm) Reduce Design Differenc
(%) B. T
Station H.I F.S I.S d Elevatio e Remark
spe spe in- S
in-built Level n (+)
c c built
(-)5
(+)450 2.5
0 -3.250 3.69 601.502 601.497 -0.005
(-)5
(+)132 2.5
0 0.000 3.6 601.592 601.594 0.002
(-)5 (+)122 3.70
2.5
0 0 3.250 1 601.491 601.497 0.006
(-)5
(+)180 2.5
0 5.530 3.81 601.382 601.36 -0.022
36
Cross fall OFFSE
width (mm) Reduce Design Differenc
(%) B. T
Station H.I F.S I.S d Elevatio e Remark
spe spe in- S
in-built Level n (+)
c c built
(-)5 1.49
(+)180 2.5
0 5.530 6 600.22 600.263 0.043
37
Cross fall OFFSE
width (mm) Reduce Design Differenc
(%) B. T
Station H.I F.S I.S d Elevatio e Remark
spe spe in- S
in-built Level n (+)
c c built
0 6
(-)5 2.81
(+)450 2.5
0 0.000 6 598.9 598.875 -0.025
(-)5 2.91
(+)450 2.5
0 3.250 6 598.8 598.778 -0.022
(-)5 3.10
(+)450 2.5
0 5.530 6 598.61 598.641 0.031
38
Cross fall OFFSE
width (mm) Reduce Design Differenc
(%) B. T
Station H.I F.S I.S d Elevatio e Remark
spe spe in- S
in-built Level n (+)
c c built
0 6
39
Cross fall OFFSE
width (mm) Reduce Design Differenc
(%) B. T
Station H.I F.S I.S d Elevatio e Remark
spe spe in- S
in-built Level n (+)
c c built
(-)5 3.17
(+)450 2.5
0 0.000 5 593.6 593.557 -0.043
(-)5 3.29
(+)450 2.5
0 3.250 5 593.48 593.51 0.030
(-)5 3.37
(+)450 2.5
0 5.530 5 593.4 593.373 -0.027
40
Cross fall OFFSE
width (mm) Reduce Design Differenc
(%) B. T
Station H.I F.S I.S d Elevatio e Remark
spe spe in- S
in-built Level n (+)
c c built
41
Cross fall OFFSE
width (mm) Reduce Design Differenc
(%) B. T
Station H.I F.S I.S d Elevatio e Remark
spe spe in- S
in-built Level n (+)
c c built
0 9
(-)5 (+)122 2.28
2.5
0 0 3.250 9 591 591.027 0.027
(-)5 2.41
(+)180 2.5
0 5.550 5 590.874 590.907 0.033
42
Cross fall OFFSE
width (mm) Reduce Design Differenc
(%) B. T
Station H.I F.S I.S d Elevatio e Remark
spe spe in- S
in-built Level n (+)
c c built
126+56 (-)5 2.41
(+)150 2.5
0 0 -5.550 3 552.961 552.98 0.019
(-)5 2.29
(+)450 2.5
0 -3.250 7 553.077 553.1 0.023
(-)5
(+)132 2.5
0 0.000 2.19 553.184 553.206 0.022
(-)5 (+)122 2.28
2.5
0 0 3.250 4 553.09 553.1 0.010
(-)5 2.41
(+)180 2.5
0 5.550 8 552.956 552.98 0.024
43
Cross fall OFFSE
width (mm) Reduce Design Differenc
(%) B. T
Station H.I F.S I.S d Elevatio e Remark
spe spe in- S
in-built Level n (+)
c c built
(-)5 (+)122 1.98
2.5
0 0 3.250 4 553.39 553.36 -0.030
(-)5 2.17
(+)180 2.5
0 5.530 4 553.2 553.223 0.023
44
Cross fall OFFSE
width (mm) Reduce Design Differenc
(%) B. T
Station H.I F.S I.S d Elevatio e Remark
spe spe in- S
in-built Level n (+)
c c built
0 0 0 4
(-)5 1.61
(+)150 2.5
0 -3.250 4 553.76 553.738 -0.022
(-)5 1.50
(+)450 2.5
0 0.000 4 553.87 553.836 -0.034
(-)5 1.66
(+)450 2.5
0 3.250 4 553.71 553.738 0.028
(-)5 1.75
(+)450 2.5
0 5.530 4 553.62 553.601 -0.019
45
Cross fall OFFSE
width (mm) Reduce Design Differenc
(%) B. T
Station H.I F.S I.S d Elevatio e Remark
spe spe in- S
in-built Level n (+)
c c built
0 4
(-)5 1.53
(+)132 2.5
0 5.530 4 553.84 553.853 0.013
47
Cross fall OFFSE
width (mm) Reduce Design Differenc
(%) B. T
Station H.I F.S I.S d Elevatio e Remark
spe spe in- S
in-built Level n (+)
c c built
(-)5 (+)122 1.56
2.5
0 0 3.250 2 630.43 630.448 0.018
(-)5 1.70
(+)180 2.5
0 5.530 4 630.288 630.311 0.023
48
Cross fall OFFSE
width (mm) Reduce Design Differenc
(%) B. T
Station H.I F.S I.S d Elevatio e Remark
spe spe in- S
in-built Level n (+)
c c built
123+58 (-)5
(+)150 2.5
0 0 -5.530 2.36 629.632 629.647 0.015
(-)5
(+)450 2.5
0 -3.250 2.23 629.762 629.784 0.022
(-)5
(+)132 2.5
0 0.000 2.14 629.852 629.882 0.030
(-)5 (+)122
2.5
0 0 3.250 2.22 629.772 629.784 0.012
(-)5
(+)180 2.5
0 5.530 2.34 629.652 629.647 -0.005
49
Cross fall OFFSE
width (mm) Reduce Design Differenc
(%) B. T
Station H.I F.S I.S d Elevatio e Remark
spe spe in- S
in-built Level n (+)
c c built
(-)5
(+)450 2.5
0 0.000 1.76 629.422 629.429 0.007
(-)5 1.82
(+)450 2.5
0 3.250 5 629.357 629.375 0.018
(-)5
(+)450 2.5
0 5.530 1.97 629.212 629.238 0.026
123+64 (-)5
(+)150 2.5
0 0 -5.530 2.21 628.972 628.983 0.011
(-)5
(+)450 2.5
0 -3.250 2.09 629.092 629.12 0.028
(-)5
(+)132 2.5
0 0.000 1.97 629.212 629.218 0.006
(-)5 (+)122
2.5
0 0 3.250 1.98 629.202 629.212 0.010
(-)5
(+)180 2.5
0 5.530 2.11 629.072 629.075 0.003
50
Cross fall OFFSE
width (mm) Reduce Design Differenc
(%) B. T
Station H.I F.S I.S d Elevatio e Remark
spe spe in- S
in-built Level n (+)
c c built
(-)5
(+)132 2.5
0 5.530 2.24 628.942 628.913 -0.029
51
Cross fall OFFSE
width (mm) Reduce Design Differenc
(%) B. T
Station H.I F.S I.S d Elevatio e Remark
spe spe in- S
in-built Level n (+)
c c built
0 the layer
(-)5
(+)150 2.5
0 0.000 1.18 628.372 628.332 -0.040
(-)5
(+)450 2.5
0 3.250 1.12 628.432 628.43 -0.002
(-)5
(+)132 2.5
0 5.530 1.22 628.332 628.305 -0.027
52
Cross fall OFFSE
width (mm) Reduce Design Differenc
(%) B. T
Station H.I F.S I.S d Elevatio e Remark
spe spe in- S
in-built Level n (+)
c c built
0
53
Cross fall OFFSE
width (mm) Reduce Design Differenc
(%) B. T
Station H.I F.S I.S d Elevatio e Remark
spe spe in- S
in-built Level n (+)
c c built
(-)5
(+)132 2.5
0 0.000 0.96 627.05 627.044 -0.006
(-)5 (+)122
2.5
0 0 3.250 0.86 627.15 627.142 -0.008
(-)5
(+)180 2.5
0 5.530 1 627.01 627.017 0.007
123+86 (-)5
(+)150 2.5
0 0 -5.530 2 626.01 626.008 -0.002
(-)5
(+)450 2.5
0 -3.250 1.83 626.18 626.145 -0.035
(-)5
(+)132 2.5
0 0.000 1.74 626.27 626.242 -0.028
(-)5 (+)122
2.5
0 0 3.250 1.7 626.31 626.34 0.030
(-)5
(+)180 2.5
0 5.530 1.77 626.24 626.215 -0.025
54
Cross fall OFFSE
width (mm) Reduce Design Differenc
(%) B. T
Station H.I F.S I.S d Elevatio e Remark
spe spe in- S
in-built Level n (+)
c c built
55
Cross fall OFFSE
width (mm) Reduce Design Differenc
(%) B. T
Station H.I F.S I.S d Elevatio e Remark
spe spe in- S
in-built Level n (+)
c c built
0 1
(-)5 1.01
(+)450 2.5
0 3.250 1 624.81 624.779 -0.031
(-)5 1.14
(+)450 2.5
0 5.530 1 624.68 624.655 -0.025
56
Cross fall OFFSE
width (mm) Reduce Design Differenc
(%) B. T
Station H.I F.S I.S d Elevatio e Remark
spe spe in- S
in-built Level n (+)
c c built
123+98 (-)5 (+)122
2.5
0 0 0 -5.530 3.11 622.711 622.706 -0.005
(-)5
(+)150 2.5
0 -3.250 3 622.821 622.843 0.022
(-)5
(+)450 2.5
0 0.000 2.88 622.941 622.94 -0.001
(-)5
(+)450 2.5
0 3.250 2.82 623.001 623.038 0.037
(-)5 2.96
(+)450 2.5
0 5.530 6 622.855 622.879 0.024
124+00 (-)5
(+)150 2.5
0 0 -5.530 3.68 622.141 622.125 -0.016
(-)5
(+)450 2.5
0 -3.250 3.58 622.241 622.262 0.021
(-)5 3.47
(+)132 2.5
0 0.000 5 622.346 622.359 0.013
(-)5 (+)122
2.5
0 0 3.250 3.4 622.421 622.457 0.036
(-)5
(+)180 2.5
0 5.530 3.51 622.311 622.332 0.021
57
Cross fall OFFSE
width (mm) Reduce Design Differenc
(%) B. T
Station H.I F.S I.S d Elevatio e Remark
spe spe in- S
in-built Level n (+)
c c built
(-)5 3.92
(+)450 2.5
0 3.250 1 621.9 621.876 -0.024
(-)5 4.10
(+)450 2.5
0 5.530 1 621.72 621.752 0.032
59
Cross fall OFFSE
width (mm) Reduce Design Differenc
(%) B. T
Station H.I F.S I.S d Elevatio e Remark
spe spe in- S
in-built Level n (+)
c c built
0 0 7
(-)5 2.74
(+)180 2.5 5.530
0 7 618.84 618.871 0.031
60
Cross fall OFFSE
width (mm) Reduce Design Differenc
(%) B. T
Station H.I F.S I.S d Elevatio e Remark
spe spe in- S
in-built Level n (+)
c c built
(-)5 1.82
(+)450 2.5 -3.250
0 7 617.04 617.074 0.034
(-)5 1.67
(+)132 2.5 0.000
0 7 617.19 617.171 -0.019
(-)5 (+)122 1.62
2.5 3.250
0 0 7 617.24 617.269 0.029
(-)5 1.75
(+)180 2.5 5.530
0 7 617.11 617.144 0.034
61
Cross fall OFFSE
width (mm) Reduce Design Differenc
(%) B. T
Station H.I F.S I.S d Elevatio e Remark
spe spe in- S
in-built Level n (+)
c c built
(-)5 0.96
(+)180 2.5
0 5.534 5 616.579 616.579 0.000
62
Cross fall OFFSE
width (mm) Reduce Design Differenc
(%) B. T
Station H.I F.S I.S d Elevatio e Remark
spe spe in- S
in-built Level n (+)
c c built
0 4
(-)5 2.64
(+)450 2.5
0 0.000 4 614.9 614.928 0.028
(-)5 2.54
(+)450 2.5
0 3.250 4 615 615.025 0.025
(-)5 2.67
(+)450 2.5
0 5.530 4 614.87 614.901 0.031
63
Cross fall OFFSE
width (mm) Reduce Design Differenc
(%) B. T
Station H.I F.S I.S d Elevatio e Remark
spe spe in- S
in-built Level n (+)
c c built
0 9
64
Cross fall OFFSE
width (mm) Reduce Design Differenc
(%) B. T
Station H.I F.S I.S d Elevatio e Remark
spe spe in- S
in-built Level n (+)
c c built
(-)5 4.03
(+)150 2.5
0 0.000 9 612.13 612.149 0.019
(-)5 4.14
(+)450 2.5
0 3.250 7 612.022 612.052 0.030
(-)5 3.27
(+)132 2.5
0 5.180 9 612.89 612.915 0.025
65
Cross fall OFFSE
width (mm) Reduce Design Differenc
(%) B. T
Station H.I F.S I.S d Elevatio e Remark
spe spe in- S
in-built Level n (+)
c c built
66
Cross fall OFFSE
width (mm) Reduce Design Differenc
(%) B. T
Station H.I F.S I.S d Elevatio e Remark
spe spe in- S
in-built Level n (+)
c c built
0 6
(-)5 (+)122 0.85
2.5
0 0 3.250 6 592.2 592.241 0.041
(-)5 0.94
(+)180 2.5
0 5.230 2 592.114 592.134 0.020
67
Cross fall OFFSE
width (mm) Reduce Design Differenc
(%) B. T
Station H.I F.S I.S d Elevatio e Remark
spe spe in- S
in-built Level n (+)
c c built
125+16 (-)5 2.63
(+)150 2.5
0 0 -5.179 6 590.42 590.403 -0.017
(-)5 2.54
(+)450 2.5
0 -3.250 5 590.511 590.501 -0.010
(-)5 2.45
(+)132 2.5
0 0.000 6 590.6 590.629 0.029
(-)5 (+)122 2.30
2.5
0 0 3.250 6 590.75 590.756 0.006
(-)5 2.37
(+)180 2.5
0 5.179 6 590.68 590.685 0.005
68
Cross fall OFFSE
width (mm) Reduce Design Differenc
(%) B. T
Station H.I F.S I.S d Elevatio e Remark
spe spe in- S
in-built Level n (+)
c c built
(-)5 1.09
(+)450 2.5
0 3.250 6 589.67 589.693 0.023
(-)5 1.17
(+)450 2.5
0 5.530 4 589.592 589.622 0.030
69
Cross fall OFFSE
width (mm) Reduce Design Differenc
(%) B. T
Station H.I F.S I.S d Elevatio e Remark
spe spe in- S
in-built Level n (+)
c c built
0 0 0 6
(-)5 2.95
(+)150 2.5
0 -3.250 6 587.81 587.787 -0.023
(-)5 2.86
(+)450 2.5
0 0.000 6 587.9 587.914 0.014
(-)5 2.75
(+)450 2.5
0 3.250 6 588.01 588.042 0.032
(-)5 2.77
(+)450 2.5
0 5.180 6 587.99 587.971 -0.019
70
Cross fall OFFSE
width (mm) Reduce Design Differenc
(%) B. T
Station H.I F.S I.S d Elevatio e Remark
spe spe in- S
in-built Level n (+)
c c built
0 5
(-)5 0.16
(+)132 2.5
0 5.180 3 586.814 586.83 0.016
71
Cross fall OFFSE
width (mm) Reduce Design Differenc
(%) B. T
Station H.I F.S I.S d Elevatio e Remark
spe spe in- S
in-built Level n (+)
c c built
(-)5 1.86
(+)150 2.5
0 -3.250 7 585.11 585.086 -0.024
(-)5 1.94
(+)450 2.5
0 0.000 7 585.03 585 -0.030
(-)5 2.03
(+)450 2.5
0 3.250 7 584.94 584.914 -0.026
(-)5 2.13
(+)450 2.5
0 4.880 7 584.84 584.817 -0.023
72
Cross fall OFFSE
width (mm) Reduce Design Differenc
(%) B. T
Station H.I F.S I.S d Elevatio e Remark
spe spe in- S
in-built Level n (+)
c c built
(-)5 3.37
(+)132 2.5
0 5.020 3 583.604 583.579 -0.025
73
Cross fall OFFSE
width (mm) Reduce Design Differenc
(%) B. T
Station H.I F.S I.S d Elevatio e Remark
spe spe in- S
in-built Level n (+)
c c built
0
(-)5 1.39
(+)132 2.5
0 0.000 5 553.829 553.809 -0.020
(-)5 (+)122
2.5
0 0 3.250 1.49 553.734 553.711 -0.023
(-)5 1.60
(+)180 2.5
0 5.020 1 553.623 553.605 -0.018
74
Cross fall OFFSE
width (mm) Reduce Design Differenc
(%) B. T
Station H.I F.S I.S d Elevatio e Remark
spe spe in- S
in-built Level n (+)
c c built
0
126+72 (-)5
(+)150 2.5
0 0 -5.020 0.98 554.244 554.235 -0.009
(-)5
(+)450 2.5
0 -3.250 0.87 554.354 554.341 -0.013
75
Cross fall OFFSE
width (mm) Reduce Design Differenc
(%) B. T
Station H.I F.S I.S d Elevatio e Remark
spe spe in- S
in-built Level n (+)
c c built
(-)5
(+)132 2.5
0 0.000 0.76 554.464 554.438 -0.026
(-)5 (+)122 0.86
2.5
0 0 3.250 4 554.36 554.341 -0.019
(-)5 1.01
(+)180 2.5
0 5.020 4 554.21 554.235 0.025
76
17 km117+360 - km117+480 Not done
18 km117+480 - km120+660 completed
19 km120+660 - km120+880 Not done
20 km120+880 - km138+340 completed
21 km138+340 - km138+660 Not done
22 km138+660 - km155+700 completed
5. STATUS OF THE DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DURING SITE TAKING OVER FROM THE FORMER CONSULTANT
The status of drainage structures during site hand over is tabulated hereunder
Table 5- 1: Status Pipe Culvert Works
To
From
K Status
KM
M Material Advice
SN Description Defect Remark
quality Given
inlet/outlet
or At KM Backfill Masonry pointing check dam side
protection
Pipe Not
1 culvert 120+884 Completed _ _ _ Executed Qualified Executed
77
To
From
K Status
KM
M Material Advice
SN Description Defect Remark
quality Given
inlet/outlet
or At KM Backfill Masonry pointing check dam side
protection
culvert Executed
78
6. STATUS OF EARTH WORK
6.1 Summary of cut to fill is presented hereunder
No. Station Status
1 km104+240 - km104+300 on progress
2 km106+160 - km106+400 on progress
3 km106+540 - km107+000 on progress
4 km107+000 - km108+320 completed
5 km110+600 -km110+760 on progress
6 km111+260 - km111+500 on progress
7 km112+240 - km113+780 on progress
8 km113+860 - km114+020 on progress
9 km114+060 - km114+280 on progress
10 km114+420 - km114+540 completed
11 km115+080 - km115+600 on progress
12 km117+040 - km117+860 on progress
13 km118+300 - km118+800 on progress
14 km119+120 - km119+180 on progress
15 km119+280 - km119+400 on progress
16 km119+600 - km120+340 on progress
17 km120+600 - km120+660 on progress
18 km121+340 - km121+580 completed
19 km122+140 - km122+400 on progress
20 km122+480 - km122+900 on progress
21 km124+760 - km125+000 on progress
22 km125+440 - km125+540 on progress
23 km125+600 - km125+740 on progress
24 km125+900 - km126+200 completed
26 km127+680 - km127+880 completed
27 km128+140 - km128+420 completed
29 km128+800 - km128+960 on progress
30 km129+120 - km129+400 on progress
31 km129+400 - km129+560 completed
32 km130+240 - km130+440 completed
33 km131+700 - km131+900 on progress
34 km132+300 - km132+660 on progress
35 km132+720 - km132+800 on progress
36 km133+400 - km133+660 completed
37 km134+820 - km134+940 completed
38 km135+160 - km135+360(Back) completed
39 km135+480(Back) - km135+960(Back) on progress
40 km135+700(Ahead) - km136+460(Ahead) on progress
41 km136+460 - km136+720 on progress
42 km137+240 - km137+700 on progress
43 km138+640 - km138+820 on progress
79
No. Station Status
44 km139+940 - km140+040 on progress
45 km140+380 - km140+700 completed
46 km141+300 - km141+400 on progress
47 km142+240 - km142+940 on progress
80
No. Station Embankment Fill Subgrade Remark
Approve
21 km129+060 - km129+120 1st layer embankment fill
d
SUBGRAD Approve
22 km129+400 - km129+740
E d
Approve
23 km129+740 - km129+780 20th layer embankment fill
d
SUBGRAD Approve
24 km129+780 - km130+400
E d
SUBGRAD Approve
25 km130+460 - km130+740
E d
Approve
26 km130+780 - km130+820 12th layer embankment fill
d
SUBGRAD Approve
27 km130+820 - km131+160
E d
SUBGRAD Approve
28 km131+200 - km131+560
E d
SUBGRAD Approve
29 km131+560 - km131+680
E d
SUBGRAD Approve
30 km131+680 - km132+240
E d
Approve
31 km132+960 - km133+020 5th layer embankment fill
d
SUBGRAD Approve
32 km133+060 - km135+480(Back)
E d
km135+920(Back) - Approve
33 1st layer embankment fill
km135+980(Back) d
km135+980(Back) - SUBGRAD Approve
34
km135+620(Ahead) E d
Approve
35 km138+860 - km138+900 17th layer embankment fill
d
Approve
36 km138+900 - km139+000 8th layer embankment fill
d
Approve
37 km139+000 - km139+140 6th layer embankment fill
d
Approve
38 km139+140 - km139+300 5th layer embankment fill
d
Approve
39 km139+300 - km139+500 6th layer embankment fill
d
Approve
40 km139+500 - km139+720 9th layer embankment fill
d
Approve
41 km139+720 - km139+940 2nd layer embankment fill
d
Approve
42 km146+600 - km147+000 7th layer embankment fill
d
Approve
43 km147+000 - km147+260 6th layer embankment fill
d
Approve
44 km147+260 - km147+440 7th layer embankment fill
d
45 km147+440 - km147+740 6th layer embankment fill Approve
81
No. Station Embankment Fill Subgrade Remark
d
Approve
46 km147+740 - km148+000 6th layer embankment fill
d
Approve
47 km148+000 - km148+300 2nd layer embankment fill
d
Approve
48 km148+300 - km148+600 3rd layer embankment fill
d
Approve
49 km148+600 - km149+000 1st layer embankment fill
d
Approve
50 km149+000 - km149+500 3rd layer embankment fill
d
Approve
51 km149+500 - km149+560 4th layer embankment fill
d
Approve
52 km149+560 - km150+080 5th layer embankment fill
d
Approve
53 km150+080 - km150+280 6th layer embankment fill
d
Approve
54 km150+280 - km150+600 7th layer embankment fill
d
Approve
55 km150+600 - km150+860 8th layer embankment fill
d
Approve
56 km150+860 - km151+340 7th layer embankment fill
d
Approve
57 km151+340 - km152+000 8th layer embankment fill
d
Approve
58 km152+000 - km152+260 7th layer embankment fill
d
Approve
59 km152+260 - km152+980 subgrade
d
Approve
60 km152+980 - km153+660 4th layer embankment fill
d
Approve
61 km153+660 - km155+000 subgrade
d
Approve
62 km155+000 - km155+700 5th layer embankment fill
d
82
Station
No. From To Layer Remark
9 94+980(LHS) 95+000(LHS) 1st Approved as embankment
10 95+000 96+160 1st Approved as embankment
11 96+280 96+580 1st Approved as embankment
12 96+640 96+660 1st Approved as embankment
13 96+820 96+880 1st Approved as embankment
14 96+920 96+960 1st Approved as embankment
15 97+000 97+380 1st Approved as embankment
16 97+480 97+580 1st Approved as embankment
17 97+700 97+720 1st Approved as embankment
18 97+780 97+820 1st Approved as embankment
19 97+820 98+000 1st-2nd Approved as embankment
20 98+000 98+300 1st-3rd Approved as embankment
21 98+300 98+680 1st-3rd Approved as embankment
22 99+680 99+720 1st Approved as embankment
23 99+800 100+000 1st Approved as embankment
24 100+000 100+020 1st-4th Approved as embankment
25 100+020 100+180 1st-5th Approved as embankment
26 100+180 100+220 1st-6th Approved as embankment
27 100+220 100+360 1st-4th Approved as embankment
28 100+360 100+380 1st-6th Approved as embankment
29 100+380 100+440 1st-4th Approved as embankment
30 100+440 101+580 1st Approved as embankment
31 101+600 101+640 1st-2nd Approved as embankment
32 101+640 101+700 1st Approved as embankment
33 102+460 102+840 1st Approved as embankment
34 102+980 103+000 1st Approved as embankment
35 103+000 103+060 1st-6th Approved as embankment
36 103+060 103+440 1st-5th Approved as embankment
37 103+440 103+660 1st Approved as embankment
38 103+660 103+700 1st-2nd Approved as embankment
39 103+700 103+920 1st-2nd Approved as embankment
40 103+920 104+020 1st-4th Approved as embankment
41 104+300 104+320 1st Approved as embankment
42 104+400 104+540 1st-2nd Approved as embankment
43 104+540 104+640 1st-4th Approved as embankment
44 105+420 105+620 1st-5th Approved as embankment
45 105+620 105+660 1st Approved as embankment
46 106+260 106+280 1st-5th Approved as embankment
47 106+420 106+520 1st-6th Approved as embankment
48 106+680 106+700 1st-2nd Approved as embankment
49 106+920 106+940 1st-9th Approved as embankment
50 107+320 107+420 1st Approved as embankment
51 108+320 108+340 1st-2nd Approved as embankment
52 108+340 109+080 1st-2nd Approved
83
Station
No. From To Layer Remark
53 109+080 109+120 1st-2nd Approved as embankment
54 109+200 109+920 1st-2nd Approved as embankment
55 109+920 110+140 1st-5th Approved as embankment
56 110+140 110+260 1st-2nd Approved as embankment
57 110+260 110+320 1st-2nd Approved as embankment
58 110+320 110+400 1s Approved as embankment
59 110+400 110+480 1st-2nd Approved as embankment
60 112+100 112+240 1st Approved as embankment
61 113+780 113+860 1st-4th Approved as embankment
62 114+020 114+060 1st-3rd Approved as embankment
63 114+540 114+600 1st-2nd Approved as embankment
64 114+600 115+080 1st-2nd Approved as embankment
65 115+920 116+080 1st Approved as embankment
66 117+940 118+220 1st-4th Approved as embankment
67 118+820 118+840 1st-3rd Approved as embankment
68 118+840 118+900 1st -4th Approved as embankment
69 118+900 118+940 1st-3rd Approved as embankment
70 118+940 118+960 1st-4th Approved as embankment
71 118+960 119+000 1st -3rd Approved as embankment
72 119+000 119+080 1st Approved as embankment
73 119+200 119+280 1st Approved as embankment
74 119+420 119+460 1st-3rd Approved as embankment
75 119+460 119+560 1st-2nd Approved as embankment
76 120+880 121+040 1st Approved as embankment
77 121+080 121+340 1st Approved as embankment
78 121+580 122+100 1st Approved as embankment
79 122+920 123+340 1st Approved as embankment
80 124+300 124+380 1st Approved as embankment
81 124+440 124+560 1st-2nd Approved as embankment
82 124+560 124+740 1st Approved as embankment
83 125+120 125+220 1st-4th Approved as embankment
84 125+220 125+380 1st-2nd Approved as embankment
85 125+540 125+600 1st-4th Approved as embankment
86 132+680 132+720 1st Approved as embankment
87 133+760 133+840 1st-2nd Approved as embankment
88 135+980(Back) 136+060(Back) 1st-3rd Approved as embankment
89 136+060(Back) 136+140(Back) 1st Approved as embankment
90 136+140(Back) 136+180(Back) 1st-2nd Approved as embankment
91 136+180(Back) 136+220(Back) 1st-4th Approved as embankment
92 136+220(Back) 136+280(Back) 1st-3rd Approved as embankment
135+180(Ahea
93 136+280(back) 1st-2nd Approved as embankment
d)
135+180(Ahea 135+240(Ahea
94 1st Approved as embankment
d) d)
95 135+280(Ahea 135+600(Ahea 1st-2nd Approved as embankment
84
Station
No. From To Layer Remark
d) d)
96 136+880 136+980 1st-2nd Approved as embankment
97 136+980 137+080 1st-4th Approved as embankment
98 140+040 140+060 1st Approved as embankment
99 140+060 140+120 1st-4th Approved as embankment
100 140+120 140+320 1st-3rd Approved as embankment
101 140+320 140+380 1st-2nd Approved as embankment
102 140+880 141+240 1st Approved as embankment
103 142+000 142+240 1st Approved as embankment
104 143+060 146+600 1st-2nd Approved
85
7. PROJECT MATERIAL QUALITY TEST REQUIREMENT
The Material Quality Test Requirement of the project is enclosed at the end of this
report as Annex I.
The Summary of Tests Undertaken so far is presented as Annex II of this report.
86