TH 211 Module 2022
TH 211 Module 2022
OUTLINE
The Messianic Expectation, Early Stage, and the Beginning of Jesus' Ministry
A. The Messianic Expectation
B. The Early Stage of Jesus' Life
C. The Beginning of Jesus' Ministry
Part 3 Jesus and His Mission of Salvation in the Miracles and Parables
A. Miracles of Jesus as the Kingdom of God
B. The Kingdom of God in the Parables of Jesus
C. Jesus and His Mission of Future Salvation
D. The Law in the Ministry of Jesus
Gospel and Law Aspects of the Biblical Religion
The Ministry of Jesus: A concretization of the Heart of the Law.
E. The Conflict Established by the Ministry of Jesus
Conclusion
3
TH 211
JESUS, THE ULTIMATE BRINGER OF HUMAN AND CHRISTIC PEACE
Who is Jesus?
2nd part: ch. 40–55: The prophet anticipates the exile of the children of Israel.
13
Israel no longer has prophets or temples. No mention of the house of David; only in chapter
55, which is a transition chapter, is the New Covenant, i.e., the "everlasting covenant . . . my
faithful love promised to David" is announced (Isaiah 55:3; cf. 37:35).
But according to the prophet's perspective, the events described in these chapters are still
to come. Israel is called "Jacob's servant" or simply "servant."
As in chapters 1–39, the coming King is in contrast with the King of Jerusalem (Juda), so in
chapters 40–55, we are presented with the children of Israel as a servant in exile – because
of their Sin – in contrast to another servant, namely "the servant of the Lord," that is the
Messiah, who, as we know, is without Sin (Isaiah 53:9; cf. 2Corinthians 5:21). It is simply
incorrect to identify the servant in all these passages as Israel. In this second part, the
theme is not only Cyrus as the chosen deliverer but also the Servant of Yahweh as the
Redeemer. Let us analyze the section Isaiah 42:1-17: On him rests the Spirit of Yahweh;
called him to bring justice to the nations and to be a light for them. It undoubtedly alludes to
Christ's first coming and not to the people of Israel (compare Isaiah 42:1-4 with Matthew
12:18-21).
The Servant of Yahweh here cannot possibly be Israel because he brings Israel back to
Yahweh (cf. Isaiah 49:5-6)!9 As well as this, Israel can hardly be the mediator of the new
covenant (Isaiah 42:6; 49:8); this applies much more to the incarnate Son of God (cf. the
New Testament: 1Timothy 2:5; Hebrews 9:15; 12:24; see also Matthew 26:28; Luke 22:20).
He shall bring light to the nations (Isaiah 42:6).
The Servant of Yahweh, the Messiah, who was is and remains without Sin (Isa 53:9-12; cf.
John 8:46; 2Corinthians 5:21; Hebrews 4:15; 7:26; 1Peter 1:19; 2:22- 5 25; 3:18), died for
our sins, which demand our punishment (that is our death) (cf. Isaiah 53:11: "and he will
bear their iniquities"). Compare this with Isaiah 26:21a (visitation and punishment of the
inhabitants of the earth for their sins) and Isa 27:9 (Jacob's guilt), also Isaiah 64:9 (that
Yahweh should not remember the sins of his people forever).
The Servant of Yahweh comes to wipe out this guilt and dies as a substitute. Transgression
weighs so heavily upon the earth that it falls, unable to get up (Isaiah 24:20). The
transgressors must perish (Isaiah 1:2.28; 50:1; 66:24), but the Servant of Yahweh comes to
wipe out their sins (cf. Isaiah 43:1.25; 44:22) in that he takes them on himself (Isaiah
53:5.8.12).
3rd part: chapters. 56–66: All who repent may participate in the feast on mount Zion.
The prophet already sees Yahweh with his people and all those who have turned to him
from the nations on the mountain (of Zion). With whom is the Lord in this third part of the
book contrasted? Why is it that in this part of the book, the root letters (Malak = King, to be
King, rule) are not used for Yahweh (but only for the kings of the nations!)?
Why is David's Name not mentioned in it? Why don't we find in this section the phrases the
shoot of Jesse, the root, Immanuel, the Servant of Jacob?
Here, where it is about the mediator, the expression "Servant" is no longer used (cf. Isaiah
59:15-17; 63:5-7). He is called Yahweh.
14
Why? Because the prophet does not have to contrast the Lord with another person here
(whoever it may be) whom he will replace (the King of Judah or Israel in chapters 1–39) or
represent as a substitute for (like the Servant of Yahweh for the servant of Jacob in chapters
40–55) as is the case in the first two parts of the book. There is no mention of a king of
Israel (or Judah).
Also, the Lord himself no longer has the title of "King" in this book's third part. It is no longer
necessary to say that the King has begun to reign because the theocracy is (finally) a fact.
Yahweh is both King and High Priest. His house, his house of prayer, his temple, is there,
and some priests perform their ministry. As in Ezekiel 40–48 (this passage also, without
doubt, refers to the Messianic kingdom), no mention of a high priest.
Then in this temple, the crucified and risen Christ will be Prophet, High Priest, and King.
Prophet, because from him the Word, righteousness, and the law will go out (cf. Isaiah 2:3-
4; Micah 4:2). High Priest, because he has paid the price for his people through his sacrifice
(cf. Isa 53), and 5 when he returns (Isaiah 59:20-21; cf. Zechariah 14:3-5), he comes as the
one whom men have pierced (Isaiah 53:5; cf. Zechariah 12:10; Revelation 1:7). When men
looked upon him when hung on the cross (John 19:37), he accepted the position of a
servant. At his return, however, when men will again see him whom they have pierced
(Revelation 1:7), he will hold the position of Lord of Lords and King of Kings (cf. Revelation
19:16). In other words, he left glory (cf. Isaiah 9:5; John 17:5), came to this earth and was
obedient unto death (Isaiah 53:5-12; Philippians 2:6ff; 2Corinthains 8:9). Then the Father
exalted him above all things (cf. Isaiah 52:13; Philippians 2:9).
The Son is Messiah and Lord simultaneously (cf. Acts 2:34-36). He will return to finally take
place destined for him among men through all eternity (the meaning of the Name Immanuel
= God with us). These two parallels are right through all three parts of the book of Isaiah:
From glory and exaltation to humiliation and back to exaltation! The lines of the people and
their Lord run parallel, but there is a significant difference: Israel and their King (and finally
all humankind with them: cf. Genesis 3:1-6; 11:1ff; Romans 5:12; Isaiah 24:5-6.20) have
become apostate; they have turned away from Yahweh, the covenant God because they
want to exalt themselves. For this reason, Yahweh had to humble and humiliate them by
sending them into exile so that there, if possible, they might come to their senses, repent
and humble themselves so that Yahweh could again receive and restore them.
The line of man in the book of Isaiah is as follows: SELF EXALTATION (1–39)
EXALTATION BY YAHWEH (56-66) HUMILIATION (40–55)
This re-acceptance and exaltation of man is only possible thanks to the works of the Lord,
who, according to the message of the prophet Isaiah, as the royal child (Isa 7:14; 9:5;
11:2.10) came from eternity into the world (Isaiah 9:5; cf. Micah 5:1 and in the N.T.: John
1:1; 17:5.24; Hebrews 7:1-3) and lived as a servant. The people were exiled because of
their Sins and received blows on their backs (Isa 51:23).
The Servant of Yahweh comes to take these blows on his own (Isa 50:6) to deliver the
people. Through freeing those enslaved by Sin, the Servant of Yahweh humbles himself,
takes the guilt of humankind on himself, and is willing to die for them, although he is without
blame. Then he lives again, sees his descendants, and will reign (compare the words "he
will raise and lift up and highly exalted" in Isa 52:13-15 with "For this is what the high and
15
lofty One says – he who lives forever whose name is holy" in Isaiah 57:15). The book
structured in this way: In the first part of the book (chapters 1–39), the Messiah is the
coming King who will strike the tyrants with the rod of his mouth (Isaiah 11:4); in the second
part (chapters. 40–55), the prophet announces the humiliation and shame of the Servant of
Yahweh, how he offered his back to those who beat him (Isaiah 45 50:6) as a substitute for
the sins of others (Isaiah 53:5). In the book of Isaiah, the line of the Son of God, the
Messiah, is as follows:
EXALTATION (1–39) RE-EXALTATION (56-66) SELF-HUMILIATION (40–55)
Paul's admonition in Philippians is in this way. Just as Jesus was ready to relinquish all his
privileges and glory (with his Father) in that he humbled himself and exalted by his Father;
we humble ourselves. The Holy Scripture says that there is nothing that God hates as much
as pride in man: Jam 4:6, but he gives us more grace. That is why the Scripture says: God
opposes the proud but gives grace to the humble.1Pe 5:5-6. All of you clothe yourselves
with humility towards one another because God opposes the proud but gives grace to the
humble. Therefore, humble yourselves under God's mighty hand so he may lift you in time.
At the same time, some of the names of God (Yahweh and combinations of Yahweh) also
refer to Jesus Christ.
1. His appearances
The Old Testament reports appearances of Jesus Christ (called "Christophanies"), which
confirm his preexistence. Only a real being can appear to someone else!
Genesis 3:8 Then the man and his wife heard the sound of the Lord God [Yahweh] as he
was walking in the garden in the cool of the day, and they hid from the Lord God among the
garden's trees.
18
Genesis 18:1 The Lord appeared to Abraham near the great trees of Mamre while he was
sitting at the entrance to his tent in the heat of the day. Evangelicals agree that the Lord
here was the pre-existent Christ because no man has seen the Father (except Jesus Christ:
cf. John 1:18; 1 Timothy 1:16).
Yahweh, the pre-existent Christ, appeared to Abraham in the company of two angels (cf.
also Genesis 18:22).
Genesis 19:24 in the Hebrew text speaks of "two Yahwehs": first, the Yahweh standing
directly beside Abraham and then the Yahweh in heaven.
The first of these rained down, burning Sulphur on Sodom and Gomorrah. The one who
stood beside Abraham was the pre-existent Christ, and the other in heaven, God the Father.
Exodus 3:4 When the Lord [Yahweh] saw that he had gone over to look, God called him
from within the bush and said, "Moses! Moses!" And Moses said, "Here I am."
In Exodus 3:3, the same person who appeared to Moses in the burning bush is identified as
the Angel of the Lord. In effect, apart from the passage in Haggai 1:13 (where the
expression Angel of the Lord is applied to the prophet Haggai himself), it always means the
Son of God before his incarnation.
Here are some passages where the Angel of the Lord is mentioned: Judges 13:3 The Angel
of the Lord appeared to her [Samson's mother] and said, "You are sterile and childless, but
you are going to conceive and have a son."
Zechariah 1:11 And they reported to the Angel of the Lord, standing among the myrtle trees,
"We have gone throughout the earth, and found the whole world at rest and in peace."
2. Symbols
Jesus, who was to come when the time was fulfilled (cf. Galatians 4:4), is described as a
"shadow" in the Old Testament. Where there is a shadow, however, there must be a body!
These shadows are known as symbols or types. The signs refer to his person as well as his
work.
There are many examples of this; I want to mention a few of them, namely those which are
confirmed through the New Testament:
“My Father was a wandering Aramean, he went down to Egypt and lived there as an alien, few in
number and there he became a nation, great, mighty and numerous. But the Egyptians maltreated
us, afflicted us, imposed forced labor upon us and reduced us to slaves. Then we cried out to the
Lord, the God of our fathers, and the Lord heard our voice and looked on our affliction and our labor
and pains. So the Lord brought us out of Egypt with mighty hand and outstretched arms, and with
great terror and with signs and wonders, He brought us to this place and has given us this land, “ a
land flowing with milk and honey.”
This passage from Deuteronomy is in Psalms 105 and 106. These are brief
BIBLICAL FORMULATIONS of the Basic Faith statement containing the substance of the
Israelites' Act of Faith based on their historical events. This faith declaration expresses that
the significant events in their people's history, particularly those associated with the founding
of their people, their nation, and their Religion, are part of the Israelites' Faith Statement or
Creed.
To get a hold of the foundation of the Faith in Jesus Christ, one may go through the
pages of the history of the Israelites. One of the best routes is to sketch in board
brushstrokes the five significant events in the history of the Israelite people. If God wished to
reveal himself, that is, to communicate his life and love to humanity, He had to start
somewhere with a substantial group of people at a definite time. The starting point for God's
marvelous intervention in human history was with a wanderer.
Yahweh's creation of the 12 Tribes into one Community: the Israelites, His
sustenance to them by protection, care, and love, and the Israelites' responses to Yahweh's
loving intervention in their history are the features of a unique covenantal relationship with
them. Joshua dramatically led the Israelites into the land of Canaanites. Together with the
23
Tribal Chiefs or the charismatic leaders, the Judges, the Israelites settled in the
mountainsides with their cattle, sheep, and goats. From these locations, they gradually
captured Canaan villages and absorbed the people residing in Canaan. In Canaan,
Israelites could experience the fullness of the covenantal promises of Yahweh: land,
descendants, self-rule, and self-identity. The one Community (Qahal Yahweh)
experienced the abundance of the blessings of life. They considered this as the spirit of
Yahweh present in the Community.
But if the Community has two strong Pillars: belief in Yahweh and subscription to
Yahwism, then Kingdom has three pillars: Wealth, Power, and Fame. Opposite a
community, the structure of the Kingdom is a habitat of idolatry and injustices. The kings
were men of God and led the people on behalf of God. However, kings ended their reigns,
sinning people and God. Saul sinned, and David also followed his steps. Solomon was not
able to manage his power and wealth and was not able to maintain the Golden Age of
Israelites' might and power. Solomon imposed higher taxes because of his infrastructure
project, the building of the Temple.
The people intensely felt oppression
The Division of the Kingdom of Israel and injustice at the hands of the King. The
people of Israel reflected in faith that Yahweh
did not will the putting up of the Kingdom. Instead, it violates the covenant they entered with
Yahweh in the Desert. However, some Israelites were not able to realize this reflection. After
Solomon's death, conflicts confused the leadership, and the political power of the Israelites
slid downhill. Some believe that kings should not replace God in their hearts. The Northern
Kingdom, Israel, and the Southern Kingdom were called Judah in the divided Kingdom. The
might and glory of the once united nation vanished.
The Fall of the Norhern Kingdom to the Assyrians ( C. 722 B.C. E.)
Israel and Judah weakened because of the separation. These two tiny nations
became the prey of the superpower nation of those days, Assyria and Babylon. Assyria, in
about 722 B.C.E., captured the Northern Kingdom. Most of its people settled in
Mesopotamia, where the Assyrians absorbed them. The disabled, the blind, the sick, the
elderly, and a few who could hide were left. From Assyria came migrants who mingled with
those left behind in the North. In time, these groups intermarriage, and their descendants
became known as the Impure Jews (in the Gospels, they are the SAMARITANS). These
descendants settled in their chief city of the region known as Samaria in the New
Testament.
Yahweh sent messengers to interpret the event for the despairing Israelites in faith
during this strife and dissolution. The prophets appeared in the Ministry as voices of hope to
the dispersed Israelites. The prophets' message condemned the twin sins of society:
Idolatry and Injustice.
What happened to the North, Israel, and the South, Judah? At about 587 – B.C.E.
The other superpower nation, Babylon, led by Nebuchadnezzar, captured Judah and
deported most people as captives of war to Babylon. The Israelites were allowed to maintain
their Religion and keep a separate ethnic identity as Israelites. Despite the difficulties, the
fifty-long years as captives of war in Babylon were just a brief period of a profound
encounter with God. The prophets continued to give them hope that Yahweh would gather
the scattered people of Israel. They shaped among the hearts of the Israelites the moment
of restoration, the moment of God. Biblical authors interpreted this event as a great spiritual
retreat.
King
Cyrus of Persia took over Babylon around 538 B.C. E. Cyrus allowed the captured people
to return to their homelands to reconstruct and develop their land in favor of the might of
Persia. The Israelites who maintained love and fidelity for their homeland returned and were
called the "Rest of Israel" or the Jews. Those who returned to their land found Palestine
empty, devastated, and alien land. Yet their deep faith in Yahweh and adherence to one
Religion had given them renewed life. It gave them the courage they needed to rebuild their
country, and they did it.
However, many probably remained near Tigris and Euphrates rivers because the soil
was more fertile there. Today, they are the "DIASPORA," or the wandering Jews. Under the
leadership of Zerubbabel and the prophets: Haggai and Zechariah rebuilt the Temple in
Jerusalem, but their city was still in ruins. Nehemiah rebuilt the city. Priests, scribes, and
Ezra restored the renewal of ancient Religion. There was relative peace in Palestine under
the rule of Persians, which lasted a couple of hundred years.
The country was captured again by the fast-growing superpower from the west,
Greece. The dashing Alexander the Great conquered Palestine. In a short period, Alexander
the Great brought Greek culture and thought to Palestine.
The Jews experienced the cruelest occupations by foreign nations. Alexander the
Great's successors, the Ptolemies, exiled many Jews to Egypt. The Greeks tried to replace
the solid Jewish belief in one God with their museum of gods and goddesses. Antiochus IV
was the worst of these rulers, who came to hate the Jews as dangerous enemies. He
attacked Jerusalem on the Sabbath; he ordered the worship of the Greek gods and
goddesses. It was prohibited for Jews to keep the Sabbath. They forbid the practice of
circumcision (the covenant signed with Abraham). The Hebrew Bible was off-limits to them.
In December of 163 B.C.E, they performed sinful heathen rites in the Temple courts, and
worst of all, from the Jewish standpoint, they sacrificed pigs on the altar.
Roman Rule
Jewish self-rule did not mature. It ended when Roman General Pompey captured
Jerusalem in 63 B.C.E. The Romans controlled the area of Palestine for centuries after
Pompey's victory. Many Jewish leaders were happy to be rid of the pangs of the cruel
Greeks. They welcomed the Romans and tried to get as many privileges as possible by
collaborating with the occupying power. The typical Jewish masses suffered much because
of the high taxes imposed by the Romans and the corrupt Jewish collaborators.
The people experienced intense difficulties from one oppressor to another. Evil
abounded, strife and dissolution hovered in every corner of life, and terror and wailing
lacerated women's and children's throats. Leaders became bloodthirsty like a lion searching
for someone to devour. The people and the land shout, "Lord, when will Your Kingdom
come?" Now is the time for a significant restoration of Yahweh's covenantal promises.
During this socio-political and cultural milieu, Jesus Christ was born.
Jesus challenged this world's social and religious values, as in his parables. But it would be
a mistake to assume that his critique was social rather than religious.
First, such distinctions would not have occurred to someone in his time. Modern
commentators can separate social issues, but for those in Jesus' time, social issues were
seen within a pervasively religious culture.
Second, Jesus cannot be understood apart from the religious tradition that formed his
culture and shaped his spiritual imagination. We can take it for granted that he was a
profoundly religious person. As a Jew, he was a member of a people whose history was the
story of their relationship with the God whose name they declined even to pronounce out of
reverence. Jesus' education was primarily religious, learning the stories and traditions
contained in the Jewish Scriptures, certainly in his home and from elders in the synagogue
school in Nazareth. His public life begins as a result of a profoundly religious experience, his
baptism at the hands of John.
Finally, the religious climate of his time was one of anticipation. The sacred texts of Jesus'
people rehearsed a tragic history of covenantal infidelity, social tensions, failed kings, lost
sovereignty, religious persecution, exile, and martyrdom, and an effort to come to terms with
the mystery of suffering, injustice, and death in theological terms. Through it, the hope
remained that the God who promised not to abandon his people would again be shown to
be gracious to them.
The traditions that emerged through the people's suffering were still influential in Jesus' time
and were used by the early Christians to interpret the story of Jesus. Three stand out: the
messianic tradition, the sapiential or wisdom tradition, and the relatively late apocalyptic
tradition.
The messianic tradition has its roots in the Israelite Monarchy, particularly in the person of
King David, who remains the ideal Israelite King.
The Wisdom Tradition, the post-exilic period which took shape in Israel, is a tradition
focused on the "good" life, a life from the Jewish perspective that necessarily involves one's
relationship to God. Dealing with Divine wisdom, the mystery of suffering and death, and the
plight of the just man (woman), this Wisdom tradition is both existential and speculative. It is
very concerned with the individual's everyday life but reflects God's wisdom.
Anyone who begins to search out the Historical Jesus will soon discover the buffing
traces of another world. Jesus was not a third-millennium person but a Jew of the first
century. The Gospel story contains strange people and parties, unfamiliar lands and places,
conflict, and debate whose points and emotions have been tempered over centuries. The
27
more we want to know about Jesus, the more we should know about his country and its
social realities.
Jesus, like his fellow countrymen and women, had lived under foreign occupation for
some five hundred years since they returned from Babylon. By 63 B.C.E., Roman general
Pompey incorporated Palestine into the Roman Province of Syria. The 63 until 67 B.C.E.
saw the definitive establishment of Roman Power in Palestine. And so, Jesus was born in
Palestine when it was under the rule of the Roman Empire.
M
Harper's Bible Dictionary described Palestine as the small land in Southwest Asia
E
immediately behind the Sidon Southeastern seaboard of the Mediterranean, where the significant
D
Biblical period occurred from Joshua to Herod and on through the Apostolic Age. Palestine
I
is the late name given to the place known as Israel in Biblical history, whose ancient name
T
was Canaan. The name PALESTINE is derived initially from Israel's arch-enemies, the
E
Philistines. It is from the Hebrew word "PELISTHIM," meaning "the land of Philistines."
R
Eventually, Greeks and Romans named the areas as SYRIA PALESTINA since they
R
belonged to the Province of Syria. Capernaum
A Tetrarchy of Philip
Cana
N Genesareth
a. Natural Borders :
E
A Magdala Sea of
On the west of Palestine is the Mediterranean or the Great Sea as the Jews referred
N Tiberias
Galilee
to it, the Egyptian Desert on the South, the Syrian Desert on the east, and the mountain
Sepphoris
DECAPOLIS
area of Hermon on the North. The New Jerome Bible Handbook describes the size of
S Nazareth
Palestine as a small region with a total area of 10,000 square miles. The length from Dan to
E Ceasarea
Beersheba is only 150 miles, and the width J from the Mediterranean to the Jordan Valley
A Gerasa
would be only some 30 miles in the North and o 50 miles at the level of the Dead Sea.
Gadara
r
b. Physical Features of Palestine : d
Aenon a
Sebaste n
Palestine has valleys, mountains, plains, and bodies of water. Of particular note are
Shechem
the two bodies of water where Jesus spent some of his time. The first, Lake Genesareth
(also called the Sea of Galilee or Lake Tiberias), is 13 miles long and 7 miles wide.
Capernaum, Arimathea
one of Jesus' favorite towns, is situated on its shores. The Dead Sea is the
second (also known as the Salt Sea). It is 10 miles broad and 47 miles long. The depth of
the seaJoppa Emmaus
is 1,292 feet. All land deposits found their home in the depths of this sea. Some
Ephraim Jericho PEREA
archaeologists believe that the cities of Sodom and Gomorrah were submerged under its
waters.
LyddaJohn the Baptist preached in this area. Jesus walked along its shores.
Its most important river, the Jordan, flows from the North to the South, cutting the
Qumran
The Jordan is an outlet of LakeBetharam
country into two.Jerusalem Genesareth and empties into the Dead
Sea.
Bethany
Bethlehem Dead
Gaza Sea
Masada
Hebron
Figure No. 2
28
Tyre
Ceasarea Philippi
Gualanites
Bethsaida
Cana
Nain
c. Climate :
The climate of Palestine varies according to the main natural features of the land: the
coast, the mountains, and the Rift of Jordan valley. Jesus experienced two seasons: the
hot, dry summer and the cool, wet winter. The summer season brings hot sunny days and
cool nights. On days when the burning desert wind (sirocco or Khamsin) sweeps from
Arabia, the heat is intense and will cause drought, "El Niño." It is very comfortable when the
wind blows from the seacoast, reaching cities like Jerusalem. The winter is wet, especially
during October, November, March, and April. The rest eight months of the year are the
summer season, and is a tremendous loss of rain in June, July, August, and September, but
there is sufficient water.
29
d. Provinces of Palestine :
d. 1 Judea: (Judaea)
d. 2. Samaria :
Samaria derived its name from the capital city or the geographical center of Palestine
during the olden times. In Jesus' time, Samaria was one of the political divisions of Palestine
that Herod the Great's will had partitioned. Archelaus ruled over it after Herod's death.
Augustus Caesar made Archelaus a tetrarch of Palestine until he should become worthy of
the Royal Title. Still, the nation's political unrest deposed Archelaus and Augustus and gave
Samaria into the custody of the Roman Procurator.
d. 3 Galilee:
Galilee is the Province in the North of Palestine. With the fertile land, so many
villages and towns rose in Galilee. It is called the "Flower Garden of Palestine," and one
might apply to it the description from Canticles of Canticles … "a paradise of pomegranates
with one fruit of the Orchards, expresses with spike head and saffron." (4:13-15)
The people were like the earth, rough and uncultured, and less educated in the
written Law but relied so much on the Oral Law and less rigid in its observance. They are
sturdy, open and friendly, and fundamentally free-loving. For these reasons, Galileans were
the object of jest in Judea. They mocked them because of their provincial origin and accent.
In this region, Jesus spent a significant part of His Ministry; he drew almost all His disciples
and performed many miracles.
In society, realities are entangled with each other there is no demarcation line to
segregate aspects of social realities from each other. In her pamphlet, Palestine During the
30
Times of Jesus, Myrna Arceo presented Palestine's social facts as intertwined. Figure no.
The three below illustrate how central the economic system is in people's life in society.
Figure No. 3
Jerusalem was the capital city of Palestine, its Temple was the center of its people's
religious and business life, and the essential residents, the big landlords, tax leaders, and
retired state officials spent their lives in the city. But how did people survive? How did they
live, and what was the flow of their economy? Like any other country in the world, Palestine
has enough resources to sustain the people's living.
Agriculture and associated pursuits were significant to Jewish people. The agricultural
sector dominated Palestine's economy. The land's resources sustained people. The fruits of
the land were essential to the people's way of life. In outlying areas, the economy was
largely self-sufficient and independent. However, the heavy taxation of both the Jewish
State and the Roman Empire made a miserable life for the people.
a. Agriculture. The country of Jesus depended on the products which the land could
give and considered it the base-level economy. The property was in the abstract. It
means that land was collectively owned but worked by individuals and could be inherited.
The ground outside the village was communal. The peasants in the village communities
were all landowners and had to pay tribute to the State. There was an extensive
production area in the form of large estates (significant lands). These were worked either
by hired day-workers or by enslaved people. The stewards or managers often organized
the work for the owner who lived in the city or even a tenant farmer. Wheat and other
grains were grown in big and small lands. Galilee, Samaria, and Trans-Jordan were
known agricultural areas of Palestine. Most of the significant lands were also found in
these areas. The methods of cultivation were empirical (wheel-less plows, scythes.)
31
As part of Agriculture, Wood, and Fruits are significant livelihood products. Judea was
less favorable to large scale-cultivation, and the farmers went in for wine, fruits, olives,
vegetables, and cereals. Some parts of the area were wooded. Hence lumber industry
flourished to a sore extent.
b. Fishing. Galilee was noted for its industry. Fishing also took place along the Jordan
River. Fish were dried and packed for export throughout the Roman Empire. The most
popular method was using large nets of about 500 meters long involving several boats
and terms of 6-8 fishermen.
c. Animal raising. Extensive stock – farms for cattle – raising were located in Galilee
and Transjordan. Goats and sheep were raised in Judea. The peasants in the village
presented a few animals around their houses, while extensive stock – farm owners hired
shepherds to take care of their vast flocks.
e. Trade. The artisans manufactured wares and products such as clothing (wood, flux);
food (cheese and baked products); luxury items and souvenirs, carpentry products;
pottery; and tents. Small merchants distributed these goods, or the wholesalers
transacted grains, gold, silver, metal, and enslaved people. In the rural areas, the
economic transaction was mixed; barter and cash. In urban areas, business transactions
involve money.
f. Temple (Financial Center). The Temple was the economic and financial center of
Palestine. Vast of their income was generated from: gifts from Diaspora Jews, taxes
assigned by the Law (double-drachma), trade in sacrificial victims, fulfillment of vows,
deliveries of wood, and revenues from the actual State. They spent the amount on the
rebuilding of the Temple, salaries of the high priest and Chief Priests, and wages of
lower echelons of priests who served as temple staff.
g. Roman Taxes. Taxes collected by Roman occupiers were draining off a good deal
of Jewish surplus to the profit of Rome. Judea had to pay 600 talents per year to Rome
600 talents = 6 million denarii.
Types of taxes that the Romans collected.
a. Tribute = a land tax or personal tax.
b. Annona = tax on the yearly produce (taxes to sustain the Roman
Garrison)
c. Public tax = duties and indirect tariffs on goods
Generally, though independent, people live on the brink of poverty. The imposition of
heavy taxes by the occupational forces left very little to sustain people's lives. Thus, it was
inevitable that the Jews detected the socio-economic difficulties caused by oppression.
The formation of different social classes can detect the economic system of a nation.
Social Stratification results from the design of the distribution of the nation's wealth. When
32
there is an almost equal distribution of resources, at least the people will enjoy equity and
equality of living.
Social stratification in Palestine results from this kind of imbalance distribution of the
resources of the land. It is tangible in the economic situation that the most significant portion
of the nation's wealth is shared among the chosen few, called the elite group. The most
crucial percentage of the total population is sharing among themselves the minor portion of
the resources of the land. It caused them to suffer economic deprivation, called poverty.
Figure 4 shows the unjust distribution of the nation's wealth to its citizen.
Wealth distribution:
Chief Priests, Big
Merchants, High Officials,
,Big Landlord
People
Small Peasants, shepherds,
workers, Small Fishermen,
beggars, Slaves
The society of Palestine during the time of our Lord Jesus Christ experienced an
unjust economic system. What follows are the different social strata present when Jesus did
the Ministry. Myrna Arceo went further and carefully outlined the people belonging to the
various strata of society when Jesus appeared in history.
The Elite group of Jesus' society comes from a tiny percentage of the total
population. They had access to and control over the wealth of this society. The wealthy
sector is composed of the following:
a. The Chief Priests. The Chief Priests were composed primarily of four (Annas,
Boethus, Phiabi, and Kameth) from whom the Procurator chooses the High Priest. They
shared large incomes from the various sacrifices (ex., Animal hides were valuable). They
received salaries from the Temple Treasury. They profited from trading and commerce
connected with the Temple, thus partnerships with merchants and traders. They
allocated prime commercial space in the Temple to their relatives. They also owned
extensive lands.
33
b. Big Merchant. They engaged in wholesale trading (ex., Grains, enslaved people,
gold, and silver). Though they lived in the city, they often also owned extensive estates in
rural areas.
c. High Officials. They were salaried officials of the State, like prominent tax collectors.
d. Big Landlords. They were the owners of sizable estates in Palestine's farming
areas. In these vast lands, the work was organized by stewards or managers. Either
wealthy clergy families or powerful merchants were the landowners.
B. MIDDLE SECTOR:
They were those people who had almost enough subsistence of life and fell between
the wealthy and poor. Middle class because they earn enough to survive. They also
consisted of a small percentage of the total population. They possessed only a minimal
degree of economic security. They were the following:
a. Small Merchants. Most of the artisans sold their products. Thus, they were, at the
same time, small merchants themselves. Most of them were engaged in miniature
trading and retail. In the rural areas, they bartered goods. In the urban areas, they
used cash.
b. Scribes/Priests/Levites. They were priests in the lower echelons who carried out
the day-to-day work in the Temple. They received some portions of the tithes for
their pay.
c. Artisans. They were self-employed handicraft workers. Most dealt with clothing,
food production, and construction (ex., carpentry and smithing jobs). They were
primarily concentrated in urban areas, although some artisans did simple crafts in
rural areas. Many of the Pharisees were artisans. Examples of artisans were potters,
water carriers, ointment makers, spices, perfumes, luxury items, goldsmiths, seal
makers, and copyists.
C. THE POOR:
The poor sector composed a large percentage of Jesus' society. They lived on the
brink of poverty. The inferior classes were the following:
a. Small Peasants. They owned parcels of land that were unprofitable. They paid
taxes to the Temple, Romans, and Herodian King. They lived on the edge of
poverty.
b. Shepherds. They tended the flocks of sheep of the big stock-farm owners. They
owned a few animals around their houses. They were poor.
c. Small Fisherman. Most of the small fishers were from Galilee. They were engaged
in simple fishing methods, with the catch equally shared.
34
d. Workers. Receive one denarius a day. In the rural areas, they were agricultural
workers. In the city, they worked in construction. There were 18,000 workers in
Jerusalem in 60 A.D.
e. Enslaved people. Slavery, in a strict sense, did not exist in Judea and Galilee but
was a form of adventured servitude embraced voluntarily by individuals. Jews who
had no means of paying off their debts frequently sold themselves to persons of
wealth, paid off what they owned through labor in fields, service households, etc.,
and was an attractive alternative to a life of deprivation.
f. Beggars. The people who lived off begging. The presence of beggars in a nation
indicates economic struggles among the populace. It became a significant number
in the government under imperialist rule because the increased taxation had
drained the meager income of low-income people.
The outcasts and marginalized society caused racial discrimination, religious taboos,
strict observance of the Law, and gender issues inherited during the clanic period. They are
the following:
b. Impure Jews: Illegitimate Jews also fell under this category. The purity assured the
character of the legitimacy of race. Thus they were classified as 75% or 50% Jew. Those
with solid illegitimacy (impurity) were excluded from all social participation. Most of them
were in Galilee and Samaria.
c. Women, Widows, and Orphans: They held subordinate positions in the family
and public life. Their husbands and dads had legal authority over them. They had no
legal claim to their spouses' filing for divorce. They were unable to remarry.
Jesus was born in a Religio – Cultural and political milieu confronted with issues deeply
rooted in their history. As part of the journey of His people, Jesus faced the situation with the
great conviction of God's intervention in their lives as people.
35
A. THE POLITICAL SITUATION
Like the economic system, Palestine's political situation can be best understood if
one knows what is happening in the international relationship, especially with the Roman
Empire's dominating power.
The total area of Syria from the Euphrates down to Egypt was incorporated into the
Roman Empire. Some countries within the region, especially Palestine, resisted the Roman
occupation because colonization meant paying for foreign domination through MONEY
(through ever-increasing taxes) and LIVES (through forced military service). The Roman
colonial government was an absolute military dictatorship (Martial Law).
Because of the resistance of the Jewish majority, the Romans exercised absolute
military dictatorship or Martial Law tightly in the land. It caused the rise of people's
movements to fight against the Roman government's violation of human rights, oppression,
and injustices. Among the Jewish masses was hatred and rebellion against the abusive
and cruel Roman leaders, mainly Roman general Pompey.
1. Herod Antipater:
Roman colonial oppression worsened due to the civil war between Pompey and Julius
Caesar around 49 B.C.E. The taxes were increased incessantly to finance the war. Herod
Antipater, the leader in Palestine at the time, supported Julius Caesar and his Army in Egypt
because they knew that Pompey had weakened his control and power over the people due
to the cruelty they experienced with him. Julius Ceasar won the fight in Egypt. In exchange
for Jewish support, Julius Caesar granted the following privileges to the Jews:
1. The Jews were allowed their court, called the Sanhedrin.
2. No Roman soldiers were stationed in Palestine.
3. Jews were exempted from conscription into the Roman Army.
4. Some important places, such as Joppe, were returned to Jews (territorial
expansion).
Herod the Great was the victorious King of the Jewish nation during the Roman
period. He ruled the country in the name of the Roman Empire and was highly regarded by
the Romans but hated most by His people. Around 40 B.C.E., his father, Antipater,
appointed Herod the Great as Governor of Galilee, only 25 years of age. The first thing he
did was to rid Galilee of its many bandits who were freedom fighters and human rights
36
defenders of the masses supported by the people. This act of Herod was pleasing to the
eyes of the Romans. Herod the Great continued to pursue any suspicious movements that
would rather be an opposing force against Roman national stability and taxation.
In that same year, 40 B.C.E., Herod the Great was appointed King over Judea,
Galilee, and Perea. Why? He killed his father, Antipater. As King, His first concern was to
eliminate all his opponents in the Jewish political structure and anybody who would threaten
his interest and power. Herod the Great killed his two Sons, his brother-in-law, his wife's
mother, his wife Marianne, his wife's brother, and the new high priest he didn't like.
When the time came for Herod the Great to die (due to serious illness), he ordered
that the most critical Jews (45 of the most important members of the Sanhedrin) be brought
to Ceshrea and imprisoned. He ordered that all these 45 members of Sanhedrin in prison be
put to death immediately after his death so that "some tear will be shed in Palestine." He
knew that the people hated him so much. He was right, no one mourned his death, but the
whole nation of Palestine wailed because their leaders, husbands, and fathers were
slaughtered after his death. As recorded in the Gospel, the killing of innocent children in
Bethlehem should be viewed from such a context.
Having killed such a number, Herod was supposedly a criminal and a threat to all. In
contrast, he was highly favored and well-praised by his friends and followers, who were
influential in the political system.
3. Sons of Herod :
After Herod's death, a few years after the Birth of Christ, Palestine's unity collapsed;
Emperor Augustus divided the Kingdom and appointed the sons of Herod as rulers.
Herod Archelaus was appointed ruler of Judea, Idumean, on Samaria. He was
expected to be heir to his father's kingship when he was worthy of it. Archelaus failed as
ruler of Judea due to the political unrest during his leadership. He could not please Rome,
so the Roman Procurator replaced him.
Herod Philip (Phillipus) was appointed ruler of the Trackonites, Gaulanites, and
Perea.
Herod Antipas was appointed ruler of Galilee and Perea even at the early age of 17
at the time of his appointment. It was he who ruled Galilee during Jesus' stay on earth. It
was also he who, believing his wife's malicious gossip, had John, the Baptist beheaded.
Herod Antipas used the Pharisees to create and spread the negative word about Jesus to
eliminate Him. Christ called him a "fox" (Lk. 13:22).
The people were divided in their attitude toward the Roman occupation. Some were
opportunistic and did not hesitate to collaborate – mainly from the upper class. Some
continued to resist – specifically the lower class.
a.) He could appoint and depose the High Priest of the Sanhedrin as he pleased
among the chief priests.
b.) He could confiscate land ownership as he will; that is why the big landowners and
elders depended on him.
c.) He alone could pass the death penalty.
Despite the internal autonomy of the Jewish apparatus and reservation of decisive
functions to local officials, the Roman Procurator had the only power to pass capital
punishment, and it must be in the Roman form: CRUCIFIXION.
5. Roman Soldiers:
There were 3,000 soldiers stationed in Samaria. They were recruited in Syria and
Palestine from the non-Jewish population. Only one garrison composed of a handful of
soldiers was assigned to Jerusalem. They were directly under the control of the Procurator.
Jewish society had no separation between the Church and the State. Jewish Law
governed goods' production, distribution, and consumption in the economic, political, and
ideological spheres.
a) The Temple:
The Temple served as the Religious Center of Judea and for the Jews everywhere. It
served as the center of religious ambition. However, it was much more. It served as the
center of nationalist fervor. It served as the nation's and religion's emblem. So central was
the Temple that when the Romans destroyed it in 70 A.D., the Jewish State rose again until
1947.
The Temple was the seat of government. It stayed in 6 B.C. when Judea became a
Roman province ruled by a Procurator. The Temple also served as the apparatus of the
State for the whole of Judea. Its political and religious influence extended to the Jews
outside Palestine – to the Diaspora. In Jerusalem, purification rites and worship (sacrifice)
was performed in the Temple. The priests (high and low clergy) had a monopoly on the ritual
language officiated in the Temple. The priest may define dominance in this institution as the
dominance over the masses' mentality/consciousness through the purification rites in the
Temple. In other words, the Temple was the center of Jewish political activity, including the
sessions of the Sanhedrin and collecting taxes. It was also the chief source of income,
38
usually employing: 1,000 priests and religious functionaries and 10,000 – 18,000
construction.
In addition to tax gathering and employment, the Temple was a bank "where Jews,
both rich and poor," kept their money on deposit. (Neil Hamilton) It is where possibly a place
where people could secure loans. The Temple authorities also controlled a lucrative
enterprise: the trade of animals for sacrifice. As privileged treasury guardians, Temple
priests supported and allied with Rome. The Sadducees monopolized the authority in the
Temple. They have dominance over religious and civil matters all over Palestine.
HIGH PRIEST
Temple Commanders
b) The Sanhedrin:
The Sanhedrin was the highest court and council of the ancient Jewish nation. It was
the most important council of Elders. The high priest presided over it with elders, lawyers,
and prominent business people. As the supreme tribunal, the Sanhedrin dealt with criminal,
political, and religious matters. All Jews in and outside of Palestine recognized the authority
of the Temple. It was the highest spiritual body in the country and, therefore, to a certain
extent, stood as an opposing force to the political power of the Romans. The Sanhedrin
was composed of 71 members:
1. THE HIGH PRIEST was the head convener of the Sanhedrin. The Roman Procurator
appoints him from among the Chief Priests. He took over the role of the King when the
Monarchy fell and was destroyed after their return from exile; hence he was the most
powerful in the Jewish Political structure of Palestine. The High Priest was the center of
the whole system. He served as the head of the political and religious institution.
2. THE CHIEF PRIESTS are people next to the High Priest in rank. They were powerful
too. Only the families of Annas, Boethus, Phiabi, and Kamith can become Chief Priests.
The Sadducees, who served as the permanent Staff of the Temple, composed them.
They received a significant income for their functions: Supreme Police, Commander of
39
the Temple, and Treasurers. Table 3 below presents the different roles and functions
performed by the Chief Priests in the Temple.
3. THE SCRIBES were experts of the Law and the official interpreters. They were the
language specialists and custodians of the texts. Most were from the Pharisees group,
representing the people against the priestly aristocracy in the religious and social sphere.
Although bringing the people's voice, the Pharisees had limited influence in the Council.
4. THE ELDERS were the heads of the patrician families in Jerusalem who were primarily
owners of extensive stocks of lands and farms and hired stewards to take care of their
property. They were heads of the tribes and were called the lay aristocracy.
The SANHEDRIN had legislative and judicial authority over religious or secular matters. The
members of the Sanhedrin were very conservative on spiritual issues and were inclined to
political compromise to safeguard their positions.
c) The Synagogue:
In villages and towns, ordinary Jews gathered on the Sabbath day in the Synagogue,
where the ancient writings were read and commented on or interpreted. The Scribes who
were experts in the written text dominated the Synagogue or may be defined as the
dominance over masses mentally/consciously through the reading interpretation of written
texts, namely TORAH, WISDOM, AND PROPHETS. The Apocalyptic beliefs:
(Resurrection from the dead, Kingdom of God, End of the World, Judgment Day, Coming of
the Messiah) were dominant among Jewish people in the synagogue during this time,
except for the Sadducees in the Temple. Sadducees did not accept Apocalyptic Beliefs such
as the establishment of God's kingdom end of the world, the day of Judgment, the coming of
the Messiah, and the Resurrection of the Dead.
The Pharisees ranked as the lower echelon who shared the apocalyptic beliefs among
the masses but possessed a pessimistic view of humanity, the world, and a history marching
to its doom, typical of a politically distressed class.
40
Despite the fundamental religious belief in One, True and Living God and Jewish
adherence to One Religion, the Jewish people's thoughts and convictions vary according to
their life orientation. This religious division is based on the point of view or where they are in
the economic standing of life, Historical origin, Religious discipline and principles, and their
response to the socio-political situation. As they grouped themselves, they created a political
and cultural influence among the masses and established a response system to Roman
exploitation. Arceo, Myrna (1995) presented, in her booklet on Palestine in the Time of
Jesus, the different religious groups tracing their class and historical origin, political and
cultural influence, beliefs, and response to the Roman occupation. Lode Wostyn (2002)
described who are these religious groups. Table 4 below presents a schema of the religious
group present in Palestine during the time of Jesus.
Figure 5 below is an attempt to sketch the Religio-Political Structure that ran through the
Society of Palestine when Jesus appeared and performed the Ministry for the poor and
oppressed (Anawim or Aniyim). These economic, political, and Religio-Cultural realities
wrapped the whole system of Palestine. This economic, political, and Religio-Cultural
situation moved Jesus to search for the accurate and authentic system that His Father
initially designed. Thus, as a whole, we can sketch the Religio-Political Structure of
Palestine when Jesus did His Ministry.
43
THE
Roman JEWS Other
Empero
Group
r
s
Sanhedri
Herod n Samarita
ns
Herodian Publica
n High Essenes
Priest
Roman
Businessm
Gentiles
an
Tax
Council
Collecto
of
r Zealot
Elders
s
Pharisees
Sadducee
s
Scribes
Temple
Temple
Tax
Police
Collector
ANAWIM
(POOR AND OPPRESSED)
In the structure, we can find the division among the Jewish people. Some collaborated with
Roman Power and Herodians. The Temple remained to be the domain of the High Priests.
44
When intense difficulties come, any person's most essential natural reaction is to
overcome those difficulties and hope for somebody to liberate them from difficult situations.
This reality of human life is similar to the Israelite people's experience. Please take a closer
look at the intensifying difficulties experienced by the Israelites in their history. The
intensified difficult situations such as the different foreign domination, the devastation of their
once fertile land where honey and milk flowed, the division and the dispersion of the once
united community of Yahweh, the loss of their identity as people and a race, and heavy
taxation and military servitude to the dominating power were perceived as consequences of
their decision to break God’s covenant with them. They struggled to overcome the results of
their decision could only be restored when Yahweh sent the Anointed to usher salvation in
their midst.
The inter-testamental period is a period between the Old and the New Testaments.
Vitaliano Gorospe (2000, pp. 91 and 111), in his book “Forming the Filipino Social
Conscience,” described the Inter-Testamental period as the period between the Old and the
New Testaments around 400-200 BCE. He further notes that it may be intensifying about
150 or 200 years of the Old Testament era and the beginning of the New Testament era
(about 4 B.C.E.).
In this period, the life of the Jews and the teachings of Jewish teachers, especially
the apocalyptic writers, provide the bridge between the Old Testament and the New
Testament. The inter-testamental life was characterized by intense difficulties and suffering,
leading to the excellent expectancy for total liberation. Understanding inter-testamental life
and writing is necessary for understanding the New Testament and Jesus.
A new tradition was developed within this period as the people intensely hoped for
the Anointed One of Yahweh. This tradition is known as the Apocalyptic Tradition, which
influenced the people's religiosity. The Apocalyptic Tradition is a tradition that grew out of
the everyday inspiration of the Divine Spirit and the belief in the ultimate reign of God. It
upheld the conviction that all tribulations, miseries, and difficulties would end when God
reigns among the people. It shaped the five apocalyptic beliefs, namely:
a. the judgment day
b. the End of the world
c. the Coming of the Messiah,
d. the Resurrection from the dead.
e. The establishment of the Kingdom of God,
It is the tone of the prophetic message of Jeremiah, Ezekiel, Joel, Zechariah, and Isaiah.
45
The period after their return from Exile in Babylon was marked with a sincere hope for
restoring the covenantal promises of Yahweh: land, descendants, self-rule, and self-identity.
The prophetic message puts more significant stress on the hope for future salvation. This
message signaled intensive waiting for somebody sent by Yahweh, the Anointed One, and
the Messiah, who alone can restore the original shape of the Qahal Yahweh.
The prophetic message brought an apparent reason why Jewish has to hope for the
coming of final and definitive salvation:
a. The heads of noble families and the princes amassed wealth by looting the fields of
people with low incomes and stock in their mansions with the produce from the labor of
people experiencing poverty. (Isa. 3:14)
b. The rich confiscated lands of the indebted poor and thus multiplied their mansions and
grounds until the whole countryside was alone. (Isa. 5:8)
c. the leaders made unjust laws and issued oppressive decrees which robbed people with
low incomes of justice.
d. Courts and judges were corrupt.
e. The rights of the weak and defenseless people were trampled upon and not defended.
f. Idolatry and injustices hovered upon society.
The prophets exposed the injustices. They accused the rich and the powerful of the
perpetrator of injustices and oppression. They critiqued, condemned, and reminded
pronounced woes; they threatened punishment and destruction and finally shaped a hope
for final and definitive salvation to be brought by the Anointed One of Yahweh, the Messiah.
This conviction helps them firmly ground themselves to the covenant of Yahweh that
the prophets proclaimed to their fathers of old. God’s promise of land (property),
descendants (posterity), self-rule(prosperity), and self-identity (popularity) kept ringing
into their faith, tradition, and culture. The presence of the prophets of their times
continuously anchors the people to this bond with their God, who chose them to be His own.
Since the experiences of oppression were so intense, there was fierce waiting for somebody
to rescue them. It was made clear in the trends of the faith interpretation. However, it
became more vital as their experience of oppression and suffering became unbearable.
C. Messianism
Messianism refers to the faith conviction that the restoration will happen at the initiative of
Yahweh God by sending the Messiah. Ian Knox (2003), in his book, “Theology for Teachers”
p. 114, explained Messianism in the culture of the Jewish people. The word “Messiah”
means “anointed,” “specially chosen,” and “specially designated.” Anointed means
anointed with oil. Anointing with oil is a ceremony for kings' crowning and the high priest's
installation. The named person is “set apart,” viewed as specially designated by God. The
Greek form of the Hebrew word “Messiah” is “Christos,” from which we get the English
“Christ.”
The prophets' coming of a Messiah was a deep and constant theme. These prophecies
are of great importance because our Christian faith proclaimed that Jesus is the promised
Messiah of God – God's special chosen one (CCC # 840). At the time of Jesus, the hope for
the Messiah who would deliver the people from the misery of colonial and pagan exploitation
46
was strong. In a sense, one may say that the Old Testament is messianic in that it looks
forward to the coming of Christ (CCC 711-716).
As perceived by the biblical writers, the history of Israel revolves around the theme of
Israel as a kingdom. God was King over all nations, and His kingship will never end. The
kings, specifically King David, were God’s instrument for fulfilling his promises to make
Israel a great nation. Out of the history and experience of kingship arose the motion of the
messianic kingdom. It would be a kingdom that God would use to accomplish his promises:
land, descendants, self-rule, and self-identity. Such a kingdom would be one of peace
and prosperity, a kingdom in which God’s law would be respected and followed, a kingdom
in which the covenant would be faithfully kept; all enmity would disappear, and all living
things would dwell in perfect harmony on earth. In Isaiah 11:6-9, one can find an idyllic view
of this kingdom.
“Then the wolf shall be a guest of the lamb, and the leopard shall lie down with the
kid; the calf and the young lion shall browse together, with a little child to guide
them. The cow and the bear shall be neighbors; together, their young shall rest; the
lion shall eat hay like the ox. The baby shall play by the cobra’s den, and the child
shall lay his hand on the adder’s lair. There shall be no harm or ruin on my holy
mountain; for the earth shall be filled with the knowledge of the Lord as the water
covers the sea.”
Indeed, the messianic hope is the hope for restoring the covenantal relationship with
God. The realization of the promises of Yahweh is the experience of the final and definitive
Salvation. As the people of Israel continuously experienced too many tribulations,
oppressions, and sufferings, they also intensely experienced the loving presence of God in
their history. Despite this miserable situation, Israelites anchored their strong faith in the
God of History, the God of Salvation, and the God of Justice. They believe that one day, the
moment of God (kairos) will be experienced.
Israelites continued faith in the Messianic Kingdom despite their clashing beliefs and
experiences. Foreign dominion over the Chosen People persisted across the years and
centuries. Over time, the belief in a personal messiah began to take on political overtones.
The Messiah came to be understood as some militaristic political leader who would restore
the fortunes of Israel, much as they have known in the time of David and Solomon. This
attitude made it difficult for the Jewish leaders to believe Jesus was God's promised
Messiah.
The authors of the New Testament Faith Proclamation clearly understood Jesus to be
the Messiah of God, and that also is our faith. In Jesus, all the Messianic prophesies are
fulfilled. It is in Jesus that all the Old Testament hopes to found a home. In this, we believe
that:
1. Jesus comes from the Davidic line.
2. Jesus admits that he is a king.
(Though not a political king, Jesus is a king over the hearts and minds of those
who believe and
accept him as Savior.)
3. Jesus brought “peace that the world cannot give.”
47
4. Jesus is the fulfillment of the Old Testament prophecies.
5. Jesus made it possible for the Reign of God to extend over all the earth.
(The Church continues following the mandate to “go into the world and proclaim
the good news to the whole creation.)
6. Jesus has restored the covenantal promises: Land, descendants, self-rule, and
self-identity in the context of a new Kingdom, the Kingdom of God.
7. Jesus has established the kingdom of God, a renewal of the covenant today and
in the future.
One may wonder if Jesus was the Messiah who established God’s kingdom, “Why
does the Messianic age still seem far away?” Then it is essential to ponder the words of an
Englishman, G. K. Chesterton: “Christianity has not failed; it has just not been tried.”
For a thousand years, prophets announced the coming of the Anointed One of
Yahweh or Messiah, who would realize the restoration of the covenantal promises of
Yahweh. Initially vague and tied to the nation’s monarchy, the announcement gained
momentum as the Israelites experienced difficulties beyond their strength to deal with. The
prophets offered glimpses of what God had revealed in history that had already appeared;
however, they all faded into the oblivion of history.
Now there seemed to be a new ground for hope. The moment of God has come, the
moment of Salvation has arrived, and the “KAIROS” has happened. Somehow, a savior
would come as God had promised through the prophets of the Old. This new hope of peace
seemed the ideal time for it. Expectancy of the Messiah electrified the air of the Jewish faith
and culture. Let us begin with the essential documents that talk about the early stages of
Jesus’ life as well as His entrance into History:
The Gospels of Matthew and Luke give us an account of the early stage of Jesus’ life.
The opening chapters of Matthew and Luke announce the Good News that Jesus was that
long-awaited Messiah that would restore the covenantal promises of the God of History,
Justice, and Salvation. The Gospels then consider the factors that enhance this Person's
Birth: Mary, Joseph, and Bethlehem. Thus, after the Birth of the Son of God, the two
Gospels further shape up and prepare the Child Jesus for the Mission intended for Him to
perform.
The Catechism of the Catholic Church (CCC) echoed that “the coming of the Son of
God to earth is an event of such immensity that God willed to prepare for it over centuries.
He makes everything converge on Christ: all rituals, sacrifices, figures, and symbols of the
“First Covenant.” He announces him through the mouths of the prophets who succeeded
one another in Israel. Moreover, he awakens in the hearts of the pagans a dim expectation
of the coming of the Messiah.” (CCC # 522)
John, the Baptist, is the Lord’s immediate precursor or forerunner sent to prepare
his way. The “Prophet of the Highest” was the title given to John, which made him surpass
all the old prophets, of whom he is the last. John inaugurates the Gospel, already from his
mother’s womb, welcomes the coming of the Christ.” (CCC # 523)
Secondly, they say that although the power conceived Jesus of God, God’s presence was
concealed in weakness – a swaddled (diapered) baby hunted by murderers from his first
day.
Thirdly, they say that this “Young God” did not force worship like the emperors of Rome;
instead, he allowed people to respond freely. Those who accepted him – the humble Jews
and the searching Gentiles- broke into song at their discovery. Those who rejected him –
Israel, Herod, and the Chief Priests – were destined for destruction.
49
Above all, the Christmas story teaches us that God’s love is more significant than human
rejection. According to His Father's plan, Jesus was a suffering Savior who willed to give
his life, even for his enemies. The infancy narratives are actual –mini versions of the
Gospel.
Three important symbols are used in the Gospel narrative of Jesus’ Birth, Mary,
Joseph, and Bethlehem, to wrap the surroundings with wonder and awe. Mary is the most
critical person in the Gospel narratives of Jesus’ Birth. Mary, a young Jewish daughter of
Joachim and Anne, became the vessel of the realization of God’s promise. She is a woman
who survived a patriarchal culture. She is the first and the best disciple of the Kingdom of
God of her authentic faith and obedience. When Mary surrendered to God’s mysterious
Word in the annunciation, she was filled with God’s power and presence.
The Birth of Jesus was realized in Bethlehem, which means “House of Bread,” a little
town long ago threatened by fears of the occupying power. It was a farmland that became a
killing field of Absolute Military Dictatorship. On its dark street, once threatened by the
cruelty of the absolute military dictatorship of Rome, shone the light of the world, Jesus.
So quietly, so silently did the great mystery of Incarnation take place that many of those who
had waited missed the entrance of the Messiah.
2. Infancy of Jesus
The Infancy of Jesus was wrapped with symbols as the Gospel writers unveiled the
entrance of the Anointed One of Yahweh into the life of humanity, the world, and history as
the fulfillment of the promise.
Jesus’ circumcision, on the eighth day after his birth, is the sign of his incorporation
into Abraham's descendants and the people of the covenant. It is a sign of his submission to
the Law and his deputation to Israel’s worship, in which he will participate throughout his life.
The Epiphany is the manifestation of Jesus by the wise men (magi) from the East. The
magi’s coming to Jerusalem to pay homage to the king of the Jews shows that they seek the
one who will be king of all nations in Israel.
The presentation of Jesus in the Temple shows him to be the firstborn who
belongs to the Lord. Simeon and Anna symbolize the whole of Israel waiting for the
encounter with the Savior. Jesus is recognized as the long-awaited Messiah, the light to the
nations” and the glory of Israel.
50
The flight to Egypt and the massacre of innocents manifest the darkness's
opposition to the light. God in Jesus came in his own home plundered by evil, and his people
received him not. Jesus has His share of the sins reigning in their history. (CCC # 527-30)
If this were how the authors interpreted the infancy of Jesus in faith, did they wish to
communicate that Jesus, as a child knows He is the Messiah? How did Jesus know that he
was called to preach the kingdom? We have no detailed account of his
years at Nazareth, but we know that his vocation came about as a
gradual and natural revelation. Gradual and natural revelation is on
the levels of spiritual maturity vis-à-vis the social realities.
But he didn’t impress others as unusual during all those years in his Father’s worship.
Later, when he began his mission, his Galilean neighbors were the first to reject him. They
had watched him grow up and thought of him as no more than the carpenter’s son. Jesus
said, “No prophet without honor except in his native place, among his kindred, and his own
house.”
Jesus also loved the Scripture from his boyhood. Although after twelve, the Gospel
became silent about the life He had gone through. But it is well-emphasized that Jesus
became so involved in discussing the Law with the Doctors in the Temple that Jesus let his
parents leave for home without him at twelve. By the time he reached adulthood, the
Scriptures were not just part of his thinking but made the whole of His being. With the
Pharisees, He showed that He understood even the fine points of the Torah, which could
only have been the result of long years of daily meditation. From Luke’s description of the
incident in the synagogue in Galilee, we know that, like other men, Jesus took His turn at
reading the Scriptures.
The decisive impulse he felt publicly to make known his Father’s ways must have
begun while he was still in Nazareth. The urgency of this need kept mounting until one day,
when he was about thirty in the fiftieth year of the reign of Emperor Tiberius, Jesus set out for
his ministry.
The Son of God worked with human hands; he thought with a human mind. He acted with a
human will and with a human heart he loved. He has been made one of us born of the Virgin
Mary, like to us in all things except sin.
Christ's soul and his human knowledge
Apollinarius of Laodicea asserted that the divine Word had replaced the soul or spirit
in Christ. Against this error, the Church confessed that the eternal Son also assumed a
rational, human soul.
This human soul that the Son of God assumed is endowed with actual human
knowledge. As such, this knowledge could not in itself be unlimited: it was exercised in the
historical conditions of his existence in space and time. It is why the Son of God could when
he became man, "increase in wisdom and stature, and favor with God and man" and even
have to inquire for himself about what one in the human condition can learn only from
experience. It corresponded to the reality of his voluntary emptying of himself, taking "the
form of a slave."
But at the same time, this truly human knowledge of God's Son expressed the divine
life of his person. "The human nature of God's Son, not by itself but by its union with the
Word, knew and showed forth everything that pertains to God." Such is the case with the
intimate and immediate knowledge that the Son of God made man has of his Father. In his
human understanding, the Son also showed his divine penetration into the secret thoughts
of human hearts.
By its union with the divine wisdom in the person of the Word incarnate, Christ
enjoyed in his human knowledge the fullness of understanding of the eternal plans he had
come to reveal. He declared himself not sent to tell what he admitted to not knowing in this
area.
Christ's human will
Similarly, at the sixth ecumenical council, Constantinople III, in 681, the Church
confessed that Christ possesses two wills and two natural operations, divine and human.
They are not opposed to each other but cooperate in such a way that the Word made flesh
willed humanly in obedience to his Father all that he had decided divinely with the Father
and the Holy Spirit for our salvation. Christ's human will "does not resist or oppose but rather
submits to his divine and almighty will."
Christ's true body
Since the Word became flesh in assuming true humanity, Christ's body was finite.
Therefore the human face of Jesus can be portrayed; at the seventh ecumenical council
(Nicaea II in 787), the Church recognized its representation in holy images as legitimate.
At the same time, the Church has always acknowledged that in the body of Jesus,
"we see our God made visibly and so are caught up in the love of the God we cannot see."
The individual characteristics of Christ's body express the divine person of God's Son. He
53
has made the features of his human body his own, to the point that they can be venerated
when portrayed in a divine image, for the believer "who venerates the icon is venerating in it
the person of the one depicted."
The Heart of the Incarnate Word
Jesus knew and loved us each and all during his life, his agony and his Passion, and
gave himself up for each one of us: "The Son of God. . . loved me and gave himself for me."
He has loved us all with a human heart. For this reason, the Sacred Heart of Jesus, pierced
by our sins and for our salvation, "is quite rightly considered the chief sign and symbol of
that. . . love with which the divine Redeemer continually loves the eternal Father and all
human beings" without exception.
The Gospel story presents a figure of the Messiah according to the preaching of
John the Baptist, “One more powerful who is to come.” The Baptism given by John prepares
for the purifying action in the Holy Spirit and fire, which Jesus will effect. The Synoptic
Gospels concentrate on the baptism of Jesus, while the fourth Gospels are concerned with
the Baptizer's role in identifying Jesus as the One who is to come.
Matthew 3:13-17
According to
the earliest
tradition,
when Jesus
approached
to be
baptized,
John
recognized
him and asked instead to be baptized by Jesus.
Again, the Gospel writers use symbols to convey meaning in this story: = Jesus’ actions:
a) submitting to John’s baptism, Jesus did two things, He identified Himself with our sinful
human race, and He formally accepted His vocation – the Mission of being the Messiah, the
one who would conquer evil by willingly submitting Himself to it for love of the Father and the
whole human race.
b) submerging underwater signifies Jesus’ willingness to accept the consequences
of His decision to fulfill God’s promise for salvation.
By the symbols of the heavenly voice and the dove, the evangelists expressed what they
had learned after the resurrection: that God at this time anointed Jesus for his role as the
Savior.
= The dove is the symbol of the Holy Spirit (Mk. 1:10), derived perhaps from the image
of the creative spirit of God hovering over the waters. Jesus is the possessor of the
54
Holy Spirit. He is the creator of the new people of God.
= The Voice from Heaven, “You are my well-beloved Son. The world’s salvation
was
now underway.” symbolizes the event of the Baptism of Jesus as a response to
the prayer in Isaiah 64:1 for the heavens to open and rain down messianic
salvation. The designation of Jesus as God’s Son reflects the early Christian
Faith image fulfilled in Jesus.
After the other people had been baptized, Jesus himself was baptized; while he was
praying, He saw the sky rent in two and the Spirit descending on him like a dove. Then a
voice came from heaven: “You are my well-beloved Son. The world’s salvation was now
underway.”
Jesus, the possessor of the Spirit, is directed irresistibly to confrontation with Satan
over forty days. Following the lead of this spirit within, Jesus went
into the desert after His baptism. Both angels and wild beasts are
present. Though the sense of imagery is uncertain, some
evidence in the New Testament time shows demons symbolized
by fantastic beasts.
The Gospel, according to Luke 4:1-13, Mark 1:12-13, and Mt. 4:1-
11 accounted that after the Baptism of Jesus, He went to the
desert and was tempted by the devil.
A desert is a desolate, lonely place with nothing but brown land and blue sky. The
Scripture uses the desert as a symbol of a “space” in which we are to meet God. A desert is
any experience where we directly confront God and ourselves, Jesus.
One of the greatest mysteries surrounding Jesus’ early career was that the devil
tempted him on a high mountain after forty (40) days and nights of fasting. This event
recalls the test of Israelites in the desert after their release from Egypt. Unlike the Chosen
People, who had proved to be faithful to idols, Jesus, the New Israel, came through his test
firmly faithful to God his Father.
The Temptation of Jesus (Matthew 4:1-11: Mark 1:12, Luke 4:1-13) is an example of
the effort of Satan to mar the personality or the Being of Jesus at the opening of his ministry.
The nature of Jesus is unique, and he cannot be tempted like ordinary men. Jesus'
wilderness temptation is an assault on his role as the Son of God and Savior of humanity,
the world, and history. Jesus was tempted by the devil “to make desert stone to bread, to
cast Himself down from the tower of the Temple area.” Together with these temptations, the
proffered bribe of “all the kingdom of the world and all their glory will be yours.” If you would
fall and worship Satan, you resemble the so-called pillars of Evil in society: wealth, power,
and fame. All these are to be destroyed by the Anointed One of Yahweh to usher life's
blessings for all humanity.
55
In the story of the temptation, the evangelists summarize the entire Gospel: Jesus,
the all-holy one, was sent to confront the evil one and, after a struggle, was victorious. He
rejected Satan’s kingdom in favor of his ministry with a clear understanding of his goals. He
spoke and acted within a great reservoir of inner strength, the Spirit of the Father. The story
of Jesus in the desert teaches the following important lessons:
1. Jesus gives us an example of the need to go apart to consult God’s will before the
significant enterprise of life – to distance ourselves from the clamor of daily
pressures to hear God's tiny voice.
2. Jesus’ struggle with Satan teaches that the devil is alive and active in the world, a
force to be reckoned with.
I. Introduction:
Jesus’ baptism was the beginning of Jesus’ public ministry. When his forty-day fast
was completed, Jesus began his work. Instead of going to the area where John had
preached, on the lower Jordan, Jesus made his headquarters in Galilee, in the North. There
the things he said sent waves of excitement throughout the countryside.
One vital remark before we set out in our study of the historical Jesus is that our task
is to know Jesus beyond our mind. Thus it is to be in touch with Jesus Christ, who lives
within us, without words and thoughts. It is the silent way of “knowing without knowing.” It
means that as we study, we allow the indwelling Spirit within us to soothe and permeate our
being. It is not our effort to know Jesus, but it is of the Spirit. The knowing of Jesus becomes
beyond our knowledge, but this knowledge would become part of our being. There is no
authentic knowing of Jesus without it.
Jesus' message was similar to John's – the need for an immediate change of heart:
“Reform your lives and believe in the Gospel.”(Mk. 1:15) However, to those who listened
closely, the keywords were not “prepare the way of the Lord” but rather, “The Kingdom of
God has already come to you.” It is here now.” One Sabbath, Jesus went as usual to the
synagogue at Nazareth. But on this occasion, the Scriptures he reads from the prophet
Isaiah seem to have special significance.
“The Spirit of the Lord is upon me; therefore, he has anointed me. He has sent me to
bring glad tidings to the poor, proclaim liberty to the captives, recover sight to the
blind, release prisoners, and announce a year of favor from the Lord.” (Luke
4:18)
When he had finished reading, “he rolled up the scroll, gave it back to the assistant,
and sat down.” All the people in the synagogue had their eyes fixed on him. Then Jesus
said to them, “Today, this passage is fulfilled in your hearing.” Then Jesus traveled the
countryside fulfilling what he had read – teaching the Good News of Salvation, healing the
sick, and freeing those suffering from guilt and oppression of sin.
As the most important event happened in history, the story of the Messiah does not
cover only His appearance with the disciples. It covers the totality of His life on earth as well
as the preparation of His coming and reverberation of the phenomenon of His existence.
57
Resurrection
Resurrection
Ministry Death Coming Again
The responsible study of Jesus and Salvation should cover the His whole story. The
story of Jesus is complete, or at least the core of it. The entire story of Jesus includes
(1) Ministry: the proclamation of the Kingdom throughout His lifetime
(2) Death: Jesus died for the Kingdom and the atonement of sins, which is a
Kingdom blessing,
(3) Resurrection: a vindication of His life and death for the Kingdom. As Risen one,
He is the first fruit of the Kingdom and the indwelling spirit that compels and moves us
towards our future resurrection.
(4) Coming Again: the bringing about the final and definitive Kingdom at its
consummation in the end.
All the events in the life of Jesus shed light on each other to that the believers could
comprehend and embrace the commitment and life purpose of this Man, Jesus.
Jesus’ phenomenon was felt when He went into the Ministry. The sight of the
Messiah among the oppressed people came with the announcement of the Good News. The
focal point of the entire narrative was thought to be Jesus' ministry. As a Savior, Jesus
made an appearance during his ministry. This Ministry of the Reign-Kingdom of God has
fulfilled God’s work of Salvation. “The Time is fulfilled.” The moment of God for restoration
has been launched in the Ministry of Jesus. “Yes! Salvation is at hand.” As the core
message of the Biblical Faith, JESUS and SALVATION is the focus of this Christology. To
understand the Person of Jesus is to embrace the authentic picture of Salvation brought by
this Man.
The Catechism for Filipino Catholics (CFC# 475) states that the irreplaceable starting
point for knowing Christ is the historical Jesus. How this historical Jesus understood His
ministry and the essence of His being are necessary for embracing His mission and person.
Jesus and Salvation are the oldest and most fundamental insights of the New
Testament writers; though different in points of view, yet sharing one common Faith. As the
Acts of the Apostles pointed out, “Surely, we cannot help speaking of what we have seen
and heard.” (Acts 4:10-12). “There is no salvation in anyone else; for there is no other name
in the world given to men by whom we are saved (Acts 4: 18-20). It is only in Jesus that we
find Salvation.
Whenever we speak of Mission, we do not simply mean what a person does or says,
but we are referring to what the person is here for, what the person is committed to, and
what the purpose of the person’s life is. In other words, this refers to a life commitment to
which the person devotes the entire life until the last drop of their blood.
In our search for the Mission of Jesus, we not only limit ourselves to what Jesus said
or did in His ministry but, in full faith, we tried to search for the overarching purpose of his
life when He appeared in the history of humanity. What is Jesus here for? In other words,
in all that Jesus did and said, what was he committed to?
Of course, we believe that the Purpose of the Life of Jesus was indeed the
SALVATION, the Salvation of all humanity, all history, and the total universe. In what way
does Jesus understand His Mission? Did His understanding of Salvation the same as what
we have today? In what terms did He use the word of Salvation? The New Testament can
lead us to understand Jesus’ understanding of Salvation better.
Our first step towards understanding the meaning of “Jesus and His work of
Salvation” is to ask, what was the Mission of Jesus? The basic answer is, “He came to
bring Salvation to all humanity.” Salvation is a derivative English word from “Salve, " a
kind of cream or lotion used to heal sores or wounds. As Greco-Roman Christianity
influenced, Salvation is commonly understood as “Salvation of Soul from sin so that after
death the soul will go to heaven.” In turn, this shaped mainly our most basic and standard
view of Jesus’ Mission. Jesus’ mission was to die on the cross in atonement for our sins .
Thus to describe Jesus’ mission in terms of his death on the cross, his atonement for our
sins, our redemption from sin, spiritual grace for the soul now, and beatific contemplation of
God in heaven hereafter.
Does this view on Jesus’ mission correct and Biblical? Yes, this standard view is
right and Biblical. Romans 5:6-10, John 3:16, 1 John 4:10, Mt. 1:21, Mk. 10:45, 1 Cor. 15:3
following, we can find this being recorded. However, this prevalent view on Salvation is
incomplete and inadequate understanding. The Biblical Religion embraces a more
complete, correct, Biblical, and adequate knowledge of Salvation as Jesus and His mission
embrace it.
59
Jesus, like His Jewish contemporaries, understood Salvation as TOTAL SALVATION.
It means it is salvation not just of the soul but the totality of the whole person,
humanity, and peoples of the whole-created universe. It is a salvation not just from sin
(although sin remains the most important of all human evils to be liberated from) but from
all human evils such as disease, hunger, poverty, death, corruption, wars,
oppression, weeping, and mourning. Salvation does not just mean a soul going to
heaven. It is instead a world to come, a transformed universe in the future at the end of
history, a new heaven and new earth, where there will be no more mourning, no more
tears, no more pain, no more death, and where all things will have been made new. In
Jesus, Salvation is Total Salvation, which means life, peace, health, joy, justice, the
Spirit of God in and among people, resurrection, glory, a re-born and transformed
cosmos, and God all in all.
In Jesus, Salvation is experienced in two realities: Present Reality and Future Reality.
SALVATION IN JESUS
(is Total Salvation)
As Present Reality, this is the Salvation As Future Reality, this is Salvation in the
today in this life which takes its form in life here-after that would be in the form of
the concrete life-giving blessings we the blessings of the life-here-after like
people experience today in this life like resurrection, glory, rebirth of the universe,
land, health, food, shelter, joy, justice, the transformation of the world into a New
. Spirit of God in and among people and the Haven and New Earth where new
like. Jesus has ushered this reality of Humanity lives in a new history, in other
Salvation in His Ministry words, God will be all in all.
The society where Jesus belongs had long been embracing a faith that the Reign of
God would be established in their times to plunder the Reign of Satan, causing miseries,
afflictions, and suffering in their midst. It is the belief that shaped their culture and ran
through the veins of their society. They called this culture the Reign of God Culture or the
Kingdom of God Culture. The Kingdom of God or Reign of God took its root from the
Hebrew word “Malkuth,” which has two meanings: Reign (Paghahari) and Kingdom
(kaharian). The Kingdom of God and Reign of God are similar terms, equivalent to
Salvation, in our language today.
In the synagogues where the familiar Jews gathered and expressed their faith and
communal life, they sang the plaintive plea: “May your Kingdom be established soon in our
60
day.” Its appeal was lodged in the hearts of the first-century Jews who sincerely hoped for
the Messiah. To this plea, Jesus responded as He began His ministry, “The time has fulfilled
the Reign of God/Kingdom of God is at Hand!” (Mk.1:14-15) What is the meaning of this?
Incidentally, for Jesus and this Jewish culture, the final and definitive salvation is launched.
The coming of the Reign-Kingdom of God is now underway.
As a general term for Salvation in the Gospel, "Reign of God or Kingdom of God"
is used. In Jesus' day, it was the most beautiful sound that anyone could hear. “Kingdom of
God” is a Good News. Jesus’ basic image as Savior in the New Testament is “SAVIOR”
because He brought “SALVATION.” Jesus is the proclaimer of Salvation, the proclaimer of
the Kingdom of God.
The New Testament tradition can speak about an earlier phase in the Mission of
Jesus to understand Jesus' mission adequately. Jesus entered the stage of human history,
and his initial task was the coming of the final-and-definitive salvation. Initially and
originally, before Jesus died on the cross at the beginning of His ministry, Jesus proclaimed
the Reign-Kingdom of God.
In exploring this initial and original mission of Jesus, we can identify two phases of
Jesus’ Mission:
Ministry
Cross
JERUSALEM
GALILEE
Phase 1:
Phase II: To die for our sins
To proclaim Salvation in terms of
the Reign-Kingdom of God
Succinctly, the life purpose of Jesus, as it is unfolded on our planet, is this: on the
cross, His mission was to die in expiation for sin, but before that, originally and initially, His
mission was the proclamation of the Kingdom of God. Jesus did not just appear in human
history to die but to usher Salvation, and because of this, He died on the cross.
The whole life and mission of the pre-crucifixion Jesus can be put in this one
sentence from Mark 1:14-15. “Jesus came into Galilee, proclaiming the Gospel of God and
saying; the time is fulfilled, the kingdom of God is at hand.” This sentence is expressed the
whole historical message f Jesus and His original Mission. The single focus was the Reign-
Kingdom of God, the announcement of Salvation, and the generic Biblical term for the work
61
of the Messiah. “Reform your lives and believe the Gospel” is a moral responsibility of the
hearer or the believer's action. Thus, it is not the term Salvation in the Gospel.
[The Book of Isaiah is split into two or three separate sections. Each section was
authored by a different author living in another century. It is according to modern
scholarship (roughly the 8th to 6th century BCE).
Since we are only interested in Isaiah as Jesus read it, there was no distinction
between these sections during Jesus' time.
From the Isaianic prophecies, especially those found in Isaiah 40 until 66 (please refer to
your Bible at this point), there emerged a picture of a future Salvation in the following terms:
When leaders of a group or nation wish to start their leadership, they ought to set a
plan for their leadership. It is to let the group or nation know their leadership platform. So
was with Jesus when He started the Ministry. He unfolded the medium of His Ministry in the
Beatitudes as recorded in Matthew 5:3-12 and Luke 6:20-22. The Beatitude is the blazing
introduction of His Sermon on the Mount in chapters five until 7 of Matthew.
The Beatitudes are not an appeal to virtue and morality, advice toward a certain way
of living, recommendations for particular virtues, or conditions for entry into the Kingdom.
Like “Blessed are you poor, so be Poor,” or Blessed are you who are Hungry, so be hungry.”
In other words, the Beatitudes do not tell us how to live or be. What do the Beatitudes tell
us if this is not the case?
Abesamis cited that the Beatitudes can be compared to a gold mine. It is a mine for it
is a wealth of Christian Religion and gold for its inspiration to nourish the Christian Faith.
However, a believer must take extra care in reading the Beatitudes, for it might not be gold
to dig but dirt to scramble in our faith life. It would happen when we treat Beatitudes as
endorsing virtues or imperatives for meritorious moral behavior.
In using the Beatitudes to discover how Jesus understood the blessings of Salvation
and the Kingdom of God, one must consider that there are two parts to the Beatitudes.
The First Part of the Beatitudes The Second Part of the Beatitudes
It contains the recipients or persons It is where we search the Biblical Terms or
who will receive salvation; thus, they blessings for Salvation since it describes the
are the Recipients of Salvation different faces of salvation or blessings of salvation.
brought by Jesus. These are the specific aspects of the Kingdom of God.
Ex. “Blessed are you poor (in Spirit).” Ex. “For yours is the Kingdom of God.”
To know what the kingdom of God and Salvation meant for Jesus, one must look for
it in the second part of each beatitude. The assertions in the second portion of each
beatitude are nothing but different ways of talking above the kingdom and its Salvific
Blessings. It can be outlined in the following manner: the first part contains the beneficiaries
of Salvation, and the second part of the Beatitudes has a specific aspect or blessing or
description of the Reign-Kingdom of God.
(Matthew and Luke)
First Part: RECIPIENTS Second Part: Blessings of the Kingdom
1. Blessed are You Poor (in Spirit) for yours is the kingdom of God/Heaven
-
2. Blessed are the Hungry (and the thirsty) for they shall be filled
-
3. Blessed are those who mourn/weep for you will laugh/will be comforted
-
4. Blessed are the Meek for they will inherit the earth
-
5. Blessed are the Merciful for they will receive the mercy
-
6. Blessed are the pure in heart for they shall see God
-
7. Blessed are the peacemakers for they shall be called children of God
-
8. Blessed are the persecuted for theirs is the kingdom of Heaven
-
Let us look closely at the Beatitudes Matthew and Luke recorded. Our task is evident.
We will understand the way Jesus understood them in His ministry.
We can encounter two differences in the Gospel of Luke and Matthew regarding the
first Beatitude. First are the POOR and POOR in SPIRIT, and second is the Kingdom of
God and Heaven.
Poor and Poor in spirit are the recipients of Salvation in the first Beatitudes. There
is no doubt; that Luke recorded what Jesus meant by being poor. He referred to the really
poor, the sociologically, economically, and materially. They are the POOR suffering
from poverty brought on by injustices and oppression. It seems to be the tone of Jesus
throughout the Gospel when He referred to the Poor (Anawim or aniyim).
On the other hand, Matthew recorded “POOR in Spirit” in chapter 5, verse 3. It is the
only passage that qualifies people with low incomes. Matthew possibly means:
a) Poor in Spirit refers to inwardly poor people, in our terms: HUMBLE. Thus, this
means rich or poor can be deficient in Spirit. It is the adoption or modification of
Matthew for the original statement of Jesus to tell the Poor.
b) The poor in Matthew's spirit may also refer to the concrete-sociologically
poor who, in their economic poverty, are religiously (in nature) HUMBLE and
OPEN to God’s Salvation. In this meaning, the Poor in the Spirit of Matthew is still
the ECONOMICALLY POOR, but Matthew gives the Religious dimension of being
poor.
In the ministry of Jesus, what He referred to are the poor such as the beggars (Mk.
10:46), casual workers (Mt. 20: 1-9), tenants (Mt. 21:33), enslaved people (Mt. 8:6), debtors
(Luke 16:5), the poor of the Land (Jn. 7:49). The most accurate expression in the Bible is
the “POOR and OPPRESSED” based on the underlying Hebrew word “ANAWIM” or
“ANIYIM” which means people who were oppressed due to economic poverty. In the
Jewish-Roman Structure, these are the poor masses who suffered intense economic and
sociological poverty:
65
Payment of taxes and tribute (both the Temple and Rome)
Breakdown of traditional village-based social structure
Absence of political participation
Reduction into debt-slaves
Indebtedness
Loss of Land
In other words, the Poor and Oppressed, or ANAWIM suffered the effects of social
injustices from the oppressive social structures. They fall victim to injustices and oppression.
The Kingdom of God or Salvation is what they most need. They are the settlers, sporadic
employees, tenants, enslaved people, small-scale fishers, borrowers, or the underprivileged
in the country.
It means that the first Beatitude is addressed mainly to people suffering from and
victims of a social illness called poverty. Note that we can discern three different kinds of
poverty in the New Testament. Let us be sure not to mix them up while we journey with
Jesus as He did the ministry. When mixed up, our understanding of Salvation will be far
from how Jesus perceived His mission.
1. Poverty of destitution
This kind of poverty is a poverty that can kill and can cause people to lose dignity
as humans because it is a dehumanizing situation or condition of life. It is not a
blessing but an evil that attacks the life of humans. The God of History wanted His
people to be liberated from it. It is the kind of poverty that most of the world’s
population, including most indigenous people, suffers; this is the kind of poverty
that is life-threatening.
2. Poverty in Spirit
It is what Matthew 5:3 emphasizes. It most likely meant humility for both the rich
and the
poor. In later times, it got to tell detachment from possessions.
3. Evangelical poverty.
It is poverty referred to by religious circles. It is the practice of leaving home,
family, and possessions in the following of Jesus. Thus, the first followers of
Jesus left their boats, nets, parents, and servants to follow Him (Mk. 1:16-20);
Levi left the tax collection office and did the same.
The tone of the first Beatitudes is to arrest the massive and dehumanizing Poverty
that proliferates in the land of Jesus, the Poverty of destitution.
The second difference in Matthew and Luke’s accounts of the first Beatitude is on the
Blessing of Salvation: for Luke is the Kingdom of God, while for Matthew, it is the Kingdom
of Heaven. For sure, we are sufficiently familiar with the Kingdom of God, but what is the
Kingdom of Heaven? It adds that the Kingdom of Heaven and Heaven are two different
things.
66
Term: Heaven as an entity
In Biblical culture, heaven is commonly understood as a “place” above where God
ordinarily resides. Typically, the word heaven designates the entity, the blue roof or layers
of roof believed to be the residence of Yahweh.
But there are times when the word Heaven does not refer to the entity: heaven. It
happens when the word ‘Heaven’ substitutes for the word ‘God.’ To show reverence for the
Sacred Names of God, the Jews avoided pronouncing “God,” and instead of the word “God,”
they used other words, such as “the Glory, the Power, the Almighty, and of course,
“Heaven” cf. Luke 15:18.
In the phrase “Kingdom of Heaven,” the word ‘Heaven’ here does not mean entity but
a substitute for the word “God.” Therefore, the kingdom of Heaven and God mean precisely
one thing: the term for Salvation, as Jesus and His contemporaries understood. None of
them refers to the entity or place, heaven. It refers mainly to Salvation.
Let us return to our original quest, what is the meaning of salvation as the
Kingdom of God in this Beatitude: Blessed are you poor, for yours is the Kingdom of
God? What does the second part of the first Beatitudes imply? What is the proclamation of
Salvation intended for the poor and oppressed (Anawim)? Or What is the image or blessing
of Salvation in the first Beatitude? It is termed the Kingdom of God. Kingdom of
God/Heaven is a generic name used by Jesus in the Ministry to mean SALVATION. It is
from the word “Malkuth.” The answer to this question will lead us to discover one underlying
meaning of salvation.
The first Beatitude wished to arrest the Poverty of Destitution, making people’s lives
miserable and destitute. It is the kind of poverty that results from injustices and oppression
in the socio-political and economic sphere. Poverty is a condition or quality of being
poor. It is not merely the absence of wealth but a condition where wealth or resources have
not been distributed justly. (Harper’s Bible Dictionary). Faith taught us that God willed that
all people should have access to the works of God’s hands (the blessings of life) and that all
people will live in harmony and solidarity with the people and the earth. If this is what God
will do, why is there poverty? Why are people living in squalor and misery? A multi-Billion
question from which the people of Jesus were not exempted. Jesus' society had suffered
the bitterness of full-grown poverty due to the unjust social structure under foreign (Roman)
domination. Poverty is where there is no absence of wealth, but there was enough wealth,
only it was not distributed justly.
b.1 Kingdom of God as Deliverance from Poverty and Oppression (Justice and
Liberation)
The Salvation that this beatitude proclaimed to the poor and the oppressed
includes their deliverance from poverty and oppression that made their lives so
miserable and humiliating.
This deliverance from poverty and oppression is what our modern times call
JUSTICE and LIBERATION. It is a goldmine to the ears of the poor and oppressed
to hear that the Biblical God wants Liberation and Justice for them.
67
Jesus does not say in this Beatitude, “Blessed are poor because you will
become wealthy,” nor does He suggest that wealth is an antithesis of poverty. Jesus
meant that the POOR must live a life worthy of a human being. That is what we
call Humane Life to be experienced by people with low incomes.
Why did Jesus seem to favor people with low incomes in this beatitude? Are
people with low incomes excellent and holy? No, Jesus here does not refer to the
poor's moral standing, uprightness, or virtuousness. But Jesus favored people with
low incomes because of this miserable economic condition, the deprivation, the
needs, and the oppression that destroyed their life and dignity as persons. The
simplicity, openness, purity or giftedness, and other noble qualities of people with low
incomes are outside the point of Jesus in this beatitude. However, this does not deny
the moral demands of the poor and oppressed. The message of Salvation that Jesus
wants the poor to taste is living a humane life which means Justice and Liberation for
the poor and oppressed, the ANAWIM.
There are many kinds of Good News. There is good news for mothers,
business people, and low-income people. Is Jesus’ Sermon on the Mount good news
to people with low incomes in Matthew 5-7? No. That is not precisely good news for
the poor only, but that is good news for everyone. What about the dogmatic truths in
Christian Faith packaged in Homilies and Catechisms? Not so, either. But it is good
news for all Christians.
Outside the Good News to the Poor, what is other good news? Of course,
there is good news for the outcasts (tax collectors, lepers, children, women,
possessed, sinners, and sick) suffering from cultural, psychological, and religious
marginalizations. Jesus was favoring someone who is deprived of the blessings of
life. Since women were deprived of their rights, Jesus proclaimed the good news for
them. It is the tone in John 8:1-11, Mt. 15:21-28, Luke 7:36-50, and others.
The Gospels stood for the centrality of Good News to the Poor in the Ministry of
Jesus. However, there are misleading platitudes that detour our understanding today.
In other words, Good News to the Poor is JUSTICE and LIBERATION from
poverty and oppression. There are many other blessings for the poor, including
moral and religious. These are present in the making of the Gospel for the Poor, but
it cannot be a Gospel without justice and liberation for them. Thus, proclaiming the
good news to the poor is to proclaim liberty and justice for the Poor and oppressed.
d. GNP: central in Jesus' Actions among the Sick, Possessed, Multitudes, Sinners
69
Mission statements are just mere words unless deeds or actions back them
up. How central is the Good News to the Poor in Jesus’ actions and teachings? In
Mark 3:7-12, we read that Jesus is stretching his healing hand over the sick, the
possessed, the multitudes, and the sinners (included). It is what Jesus had been
busied with. His three-year Ministry in Palestine was devoted to this work.
Whenever we encounter the word SINNERS in the Gospel, they refer to the
Uninstructed POOR, transgressors of the Law. Jesus was so concerned for the Good
News intended for them.
e. GNP in Jesus' teaching on Property and Possessions:
As we turn to Jesus’ teachings, we discover that he was not just a healer but
also a prophet-teacher. Did Jesus’ healing touch alleviate the poverty of the poor? It
would seem not, but at least not directly. If He was a prophet-teacher, how did Jesus
teach property and possessions? Read Mark 10:21, Luke 12:33, Luke 6:21, and 24.
Luke 16:19-23, Mt. 6:24, Luke 12:15, Luke 12:16-21, Mk. 10:23-25. What is Jesus’
stand on property, possessions, assets, goods, and wealth? For Jesus, wealth and
control must be shared with the poor. Jesus taught how to have a sense of
sufficiency, “sapat,” so as not to crave more, which causes the few to accumulate the
things meant for others. Thus, Jesus wants social justice to reign over humanity.
Did Jesus not come for the Rich and Poor alike? Yes, He did. Why is it all so heavily
in favor of the poor? Did Jesus favor the poor because they were subjectively good,
simple, holy, or for any moral qualification? No. Jesus proclaimed the good news to
the poor primarily because they were POOR and had been deprived of life's
blessings. Note Jesus’ remarks in Luke 16:190-31, Luke 6:20, Mk. 10:21 were not
the poor's goodness but the POOR's poverty. We have to realize that we cannot
invent the Gospel story. His favor for the poor allows us to peep into the heart of
70
Jesus. We further ask, “How did Jesus view the rich or the non-poor? How did he
relate to them? What is the Kingdom of God for the Rich? The rich in Jesus’ life
seems to be the following:
We must hold on to our conviction that Jesus died for the rich and poor. Jesus
brought salvation to the rich and poor. But consider that while Jesus lived, he stood for
justice and liberation for the poor. It means that His stand for the “Anawim” had something
to do with his death at the hands of the oppressive rich, the powerful, and the wealthy in his
time.
Briefly, we look at the first part of this second Beatitude in which Matthew and Luke
differ again. Luke talks about the people with empty stomachs who hunger for food, while
Matthew refers to people who desire moral uprightness and holiness.
Again: Luke refers to Hunger - as concrete – sociological hunger
(no food in one’s stomach)
Matthew refers to Hunger – as religious – moral hunger
(thirst for righteousness)
Our concern is to closely hear the word that came from the lips of Jesus. Luke had
no moralizing tendency because of the context of his writing, unlike Matthew, whose
audience was Jews. However, we would not think that this moralizing tendency of Matthew
emphasizes the spiritual aspects. Still, the underlying truth is that he was referring to
naturally hungry persons.
Satisfaction means to fill in a specific basic need for survival. Who needs to be
satisfied? The people with no food in their stomachs yearned earnestly for the satisfaction of
their hunger. The hungry would be happy if given any food that would nourish their thin
body. But the people who are not hungry would not be satisfied even with how delicious
and nutritious is the food on the table.
FOOD for the Hungry Poor is in Jesus’ message. However, note that Jesus is not
talking about food in general. He is, in particular, talking about food and feasting for the
hungry of the earth. Recall that the Beatitude about food was to the hungry.
What truly makes this image significant and striking is the frequency with which
FOOD-and-KINGDOM is in the New Testament Faith Proclamation. Note that the New
Testament writers generally take for granted to give meaning, explanation, or description of
the Kingdom of God because they addressed first-generation readers. Yet, in the scarcity of
reason, the most frequent blessing associated with the kingdom of God that Jesus imparted
is FOOD. Here is one of the happy surprises that Jesus as a Messiah proclaims the Reign-
kingdom of God as sitting at the table, FOOD, drinking, absence of hunger, meal, feast, and
banquet.
Undoubtedly, the FOOD discussed here refers to God's future and definitive salvation
or final Kingdom. However, let us consider that one main petition of the ‘Lord’s Prayer is:
“Give us this day our daily Bread” (Mt. 6:11)
Daily = comes from the original Greek word, “EPIOUSION,” which has several
possible meanings:
1.) Epiousion – can refer to “daily” or from day to day. In other words, it can refer to
the usual food we ordinarily eat daily. Thus, it may refer to “Fish or earth and a
good meal.” We usually and regularly need fish, rice, and pan de sal daily.
2.) ‘Epiousion’ - can also have other meanings, tomorrow or future. It comes from the
mouth of Jesus to refer to the food of God's coming Kingdom at the end of time.
Thus, it could mean FOOD for the future. It refers to the banquet people will enjoy
in the new world/earth at the final and definitive Kingdom's end of our present
history.
Thus, Food as the Kingdom of God can refer to the food that we enjoy today that
sustains our life and to the barrio fiesta of the final Kingdom of God. It is, therefore, a
parallel to “May your kingdom come.”
Jesus, who is talking to the hungry poor, cannot dare to use figurative or
metaphorical language, but speaking about the concrete relief from hunger, REAL FOOD
and not SYMBOLIC. It is the tone of our petition to the Father, “Give us today our daily
bread.” We ask for real FOOD, the Bread, and the Kingdom of Real Bread.
A whole parable in Mt. 22:1-10 and Luke 14:16-24 describes the kingdom as a
banquet or a marriage feast. Luke describes it as a banquet for the poor. Many of those
invited gave excuses, “I cannot come.”
73
So from out of the streets and alleys were invited the poor, the disabled, the blind,
and the lame. Some were too busy with their business and affairs and were not hungry.
They could not appreciate the food as God’s blessing or Kingdom. But food is gold to the
unclouded eyes of the poor/hungry who spend their lives searching for food. FOOD as a
Kingdom is for the malnourished poor of the land. Therefore, it is for the lame, blind,
crippled, and hungry for food.
It is a remarkable statement to say that Jesus was probably very much happy
with our fiesta where (Lechon, Kare-Kare, panga, adobo, embutido, potsero, kinilaw, Leche
flan, matamis na makapuno, ube, Suman sa latik, beer, tuba, soft drinks) all kinds of Foods
are on their array on the table. For his blessed idea of the kingdom of God – and that of
many other Jews – is a BANQUET.
While we celebrate our fiestas today, we know that poverty and hunger will mark our
tomorrow. Let us expand to millions of others who can do no more than hallucinating about
barrio fiestas. Many of our people coax their sustenance out of garbage heaps and
restaurant leftovers.
How do we deal with “food for the hungry today”? A love that puts a kilo of rice into a
beggar's cupped hands remains a way of feeding the hungry, but this remains a band-aid
solution and will not do in the long run. A precise diagnosis of hunger and surgery is
needed.
What causes massive hunger? Do not say, “They’re lazy,” nor say, “It is the will of
God.” But say, “It is the social system.” Thus you are challenged to:
1. Dismantle the unjust social structure that causes hunger among the many.
2. Rebuild a more humane and just society as a follower of Jesus.
It is a proper time to be concerned with the wasted “butil ng palay” from our table and
contemplate the needed food for the malnourished poor.
Why are people crying? What made them so sorrowful and mournful? Indeed, we will
answer because of pain. Our natural knowledge would tell us that the poor took no proper
nutrition. Thus, they are prone to sickness. The first three recipients of Salvation are the
same group of people in society: the Poor, the Hungry, and the sorrowing. They refer to one
group of people, the Poor and the Oppressed (Anawim), who are always hungry and
become ill because of oppression and hunger. They are crying because of the pain of
sickness, the pain of inhuman treatment, the violation of human rights, and the loss of
integrity. Therefore, they need liberation.
74
b) The Kingdom of God or Salvation: Comfort, Joy, Laughter
The Salvation or Kingdom of God in this Beatitude means joy, comfort, and
laughter for those crying. There will be no place for tears of sadness in the Kingdom of
God. What is the full-throated bliss of flesh and blood, people? The unrehearsed joy
smiles, and laughter of our openhearted fellowmen and fellow women are perhaps an
anticipation of the eternal happiness we will share in our final destiny with God. People
laugh and are joyful because they are unburdened by wealth and worries. They can wear a
smile, not of resignation but hope in the struggle amidst difficulties.
Who are the Meek? Who are the humble? The meek refers to the humble person
sociologically and economically. They are the people who have no choice because of
poverty. They have to bear the difficulties, sufferings, and miseries of life with humility,
opposite to the rich, who are wicked.
These humbled poor and oppressed have been dislocated and lost their land
because of indebtedness and poverty. For ordinary people, LAND is LIFE, and LAND is
SECURITY. If one has no land, they are prey to injustices and oppression. To whom would
the God of Justice assign the Earth? Of course, those who have not savored or been
deprived of the Earth's resources. EARTH or LAND is SALVATION
Psalm 37:11 reads, “The ‘anawim’ shall inherit the land and delight themselves in
abundant prosperity,” And if we continue, we can find that the “anawim” is counter-posed
with the WICKED, which refers to the oppressors who possessed the wealth and the power
of the land.
Earth is God’s. It is His gift to people to sustain the life He gave to us. It is the
conviction of the Biblical Religion, the religion of Jesus. Land! Inheriting Land! Possessing
Land is the Kingdom of God! It is a salvation for those who do not have land. To the ears of
the Israelites, “POSSESSING THE LAND” is a broken but most welcome refrain of their faith
relationship with Yahweh. Yahweh promised and gave land to their ancestors and them as
a people. The land is a gift from Yahweh; indeed, they were just stewards of the land and
ought not to enjoy the resources alone but with the whole community. This land/earth for
Jesus is the Real Earth, natural land to live and not be oppressed again.
Salvation here in this Beatitude is not heaven but earth. The Final Salvation viewed
in this passage is the possession of the transformed Earth, the New Earth that is the final
destiny of everything: Thus, the Kingdom of God is inheriting the Earth.
Note that the first three recipients of the Kingdom of God are the POOR, the hungry,
the sorrowing, and the afflicted. They refer to one group of people in society, the Anawim,
75
the poor, and the oppressed. They are not, therefore, three different sets of people. They
are the anawim, who are poor, deprived of resources, have no food in their stomach, and
are profoundly crying for the equal distribution of resources; therefore, they were afflicted.
The salvation Jesus wants for them is (1) LIBERATION, (2) FOOD, (3) LAUGHTER, and (4)
LAND.
Of course, He does. This particular group of people was the one to whom Jesus addressed.
Jesus cares for the poor, their misery, and their right to freedom and justice. In response to
the HUNGRY and their STARVATION, Jesus requests food. Jesus wants to provide joy and
healing to those who are SICK, OPPRESSED, suffering from suffering, and experiencing
human rights violations. Jesus' request is a land in response to MEEK and their humiliation.
Jesus is a problem-oriented God; he doesn't avoid responsibility or preaches irrationally.
Jesus, however, wants the underprivileged to encounter the virtue of heart in the fifth
Beatitude.
Who are the Merciful? The merciful are those who are merciful. People who have
demonstrated moral or ethical virtue in their daily interactions with others are said to be
compassionate. They are those who practice social responsibility, fairness, and compassion
toward one another. Just work, and lovable kindness of character is related to empathy.
Mercy, in this Beatitude, does not refer indiscriminately to any compassionate act.
The underlying Hebrew word is “checed.” It relates to compassion that goes hand in hand
with justice. It is the feeling partner of justice (Mishpat). Together, checed and mishpat
forge a fellowship with what can be called social justice with a heart.
The sense of our Beatitude then is; “Blessed are those who have a compassionate
heart do the works of social justice, for the Kingdom of God for them will likewise be the
experience of mercy and compassion.” “The Mercy of God shall be theirs” means that the
justice of God shall be upon them. It is a Salvation. It is the Kingdom of God.
Who is the Pure in Heart? It is the Person whose eyes are not clouded with the
comforts and conveniences of life. They are the people who do not enthrone money,
wealth, power, and fame as gods in their hearts. People with pure hearts can better
appreciate the preciousness of the Kingdom's blessing. They are the people who are more
in touch with the primordial or essentials of the Earth. They have the taste of the essence-to-
essence experience of God’s presence in the concrete life-giving blessings.
Seeing God does not mean having an eye-to-eye encounter with him. The presence
of God in the concrete works of His hands. In the culture of Jesus, to see God’s face brings
death. But in this Beatitude, Jesus meant that human life reaches its absolute fulfillment
when they can see God face to face.
“Seeing God” is one of the several blessings of God’s Kingdom or Salvation that is
more than an eyeball-to-eyeball vision of God. It is an “Essence-to-Essence experience” of
God. The essence of a human being experiences the nature of the Divine. It happens only
to the “pure-hearted,” who have no other wish but to experience the real God. Their eyes
can find the face of God in the simple blessings of life, in the land, in the food, in their good
health, in their strength, and the like. Their eyes are not blinded by profit, over-accumulation
of properties, and excessive wealth possessions.
In real-life conditions, the poor better appreciate life's simple blessings and consider
them kingdom blessings. The poor are in touch with the earth's primordial, like food, land,
home, and health, and not with the superficialities of life. They are contented with what the
world is giving them and respect the earth's capacity. They are connected not only with the
rocks and trees but also with the luminous silence of the outer and inner worlds. Beneath
the earth is the experience of the God who loves them and is designed for their liberation
and humane life.
The God who wished for the Poor and oppressed salvation
wanted to find the poor to be agents of peace.
Who are the Peacemakers, and where are they now? Amidst the intense
misunderstanding, chaos, conflicts, and troubles in the world, there is a cry for the
makers of peace. Who are they? What are they doing? Are they around? We are
confronted with words, peacemakers, and peacekeepers. Peacemaking is undoubtedly
different from peacekeeping. Peace-making would exhaust all the means to achieve the
destined peace for all, but peacekeeping would try all angles to keep peace from
reigning in our midst. In other words, peacemakers are not afraid, to tell the truth or to
77
achieve the desire for peace. They seek the truth and proclaim it so that darkness will
be overcome.
Divine Filiations have several levels of meaning in Biblical culture, but the bottom
line – is becoming sons and daughters of God - a special relationship with God. In
this Beatitude, Jesus wants to tell His people that we savor the quality of the blessing of
Divine Filiations: special children of God. It strikes the beating of His “Abba” experience,
“Our Father,” ‘My Father, “your Father.” In this Beatitude, we can feel the tune echo the
Kingdom blessing, experiencing the Parenthood of God – in the fullest, most exhaustive,
and most absolute way.
This eighth feature of Salvation, or the Kingdom of God, has the same tone as the
first Beatitude. For those who are persecuted for the cause of justice, then JUSTICE AND
LIBERATION are intended for them. It is their Salvation; this is their Kingdom of God.
Let's bring these Beatitudes into the context of concrete life situations today. We find
that the Salvation experience is a blessing of life or life-giving benefits in our language
today.
The Meek SHALL INHERIT THE The Earth, Land for the Humbled Poor
EARTH (Meek).
ThePeacemakers SHALL BE
CALLED SONS AND Children of God
DAUGHTERS OF
GOD
The CFC # 745 emphatically confirms, “The blessings of the Kingdom are promised to the
poor and the powerless; to the gentle and the afflicted; to those who seek eagerly for
righteousness beyond external observance; to the compassionate and the pure-hearted; to
those who turn from violence and seek reconciliation. To these, Jesus promises a unique
type of happiness: to inherit God’s Kingdom, to possess the earth, to be a child of God, to
receive mercy, to see God.”
The Total Salvation brought by Jesus has two realities, the salvation of the here and
now (present) and the salvation of the life hereafter (future). As a present reality, it is an
79
experience of the concrete blessing of the life of a substantial human being. As a future, it is
the final destiny of all things, the final destiny of humanity, the world, and history, wherein
God will be all in all.
Luke 7:22-23 recounts what Jesus had done in his ministry when John’s disciples
asked about the Messiah.
“Go and report to John what you have seen and heard. The blind recover their sight,
the crippled walk, the lepers are cured, the deaf hears, the dead men are raised to
life, and the poor have the poor news preached to them.”
Jesus as the agent of Salvation or Kingdom of God, did not affirm that He was the
Messiah; instead, He enumerated indicators of the presence of the Messiah in the midst.
The tone of Luke’s Gospel aired out the concrete blessings of the concrete life of the person
ushered by the Anointed One, therefore an experience of the present reality of Salvation. It
is the spirit of the Miracles performed by Jesus is the Ministry.
Ordinary people, when asked about what miracles are, would surely think of something
extraordinary event
A. Meaning of Miracles
The miracle comes to us through the Latin word “Miraculum.” which means
something to be marveled at. As a word, “Miraculum” is a weak translation of the Greek
words: Dynamis, Simeon, and Ergon.
“DYNAMIS” means force, energy, the act of power or
“Simeon,” which implies a Sign or
“Ergon,” which means activity or work. (Harper’s Bible Dictionary)
Why weak translation? It is because the meaning “something to be marveled at” as
“miraculum” would mean we need to look for something we can marvel at before we
consider it a Miracle. The standard and ordinary phenomenon cannot be a miracle in that
sense. But if we go back to the Greek translation, “Dynamis, ergon, Simeon,” we are given
the idea that any force, act of power, sign, activity, or work is a miracle. To wake up in the
morning, bath ourselves, prepare food and take it into our body, go to work, and the rest of
our activities are works that need force and energy. Therefore, they are miracles.
The Greek Bible used “Dynamis,” Simeon, or Ergon as the works of Jesus in His
Ministry. It brings us to the idea that our Miracle in English would mean jobs and signs of
God’s power, force, and energy. Miracles are beautiful signs of the power or strength
that God exercises in less obvious ways. It showed more clearly God’s control over this
world, history, and humanity which is ruled over by injustices, violence in all forms, and
senseless suffering rampant across the globe. How can we honestly acclaim the power,
force, and energy of God to reign over and eradicate evils in the world to allow us to acclaim
that Jesus is a Savior? In what way did He perform his saving energy and power in history?
Fundamentally, the Catechism for Filipino Catholics (CFC # 495-499) upheld that
Jesus exercised his force, power, and energy by saving us from
1. the cosmic demonic powers of evil. (Catechism for Filipino Catholic #495)
2. the enslaving, oppressive forces in the socio-economic and political areas. (CFC
#496-98)
80
3. the absurdity and meaningless of life. (CFC # 499)
To be relieved from this coil of evil is to experience liberation from this bad situation is a
Reign-Kingdom of God and, therefore, salvation.
Jesus worked miracles of all kinds, including exorcisms, healing the sick, mastery
over nature, and power over death. All evangelists present Jesus as a person who
demonstrated extraordinary powers. In Mark, Jesus started His ministry in Capharnaum
with a great shower of miracles. Matthew nearly clusters ten miracles and reports the outset
of Jesus' ministry when the people of Galilee and all the surrounding areas “carried to him
all those affected with various diseases and rocked with pain.” Jesus cured them all. (CFC
# 492-93)
John’s gospel contains only seven great miracles, but each was carefully chosen to
illustrate a different part of Jesus’ Mission. The Acts of the Apostles also mention a gift.
Finally, the Gospel of Luke introduces the public ministry of Jesus by reading Isaiah’s
description of a Messiah as one who would perform works of mercy. It somehow serves as
Jesus’ Mission Statement that weaves the Accounts of Jesus’ miracles to show Jesus
fulfilling that prophecy and concretizing his Mission agenda.
Why must Jesus perform Miracles? Does Miracle a need? These are some of the
fundamental questions one faces when dealing with Miracles. If Jesus performed Miracles
during His ministry, He had the holy intention in line with God’s wanting always to save.
Jesus was a task to be a restorer of the promises of Yahweh for His people Israel, therefore
to exercise powers, force, and energy that is part of the fulfillment of the promise of God.
The most common thing that would come to our mind is that this is part of His confrontation
with the power of Evil that plundered the beauty and goodness of the House of God. In her
book, “The Mystery of Jesus of Nazareth,” Agnes Pastva (1982) explains the outcome of
Christological studies providing us some fundamental reasons why Jesus must perform
miracles as follows:
"Action speaks louder than words" is a classic adage. Jesus made effective use of the
"show and told" technique. The disciples took their lessons in empathy and tolerance from
Jesus. By not brushing aside the children and the pressing crowd, Jesus taught that, in a
loving heart, there is always room for one more. As they watched Jesus sympathize with
parents and enslavers and those who mourned their dead, the Apostles entered more
deeply into the sufferings of others. Observing Jesus’ tenderness, the Apostles become
tendered; in experiencing Jesus' sensitivity, the Apostles become more sensitive. The
personal service of Jesus to the poor and the miserable has invited millions of Christians to
do the same. True enough, millions have imitated Jesus’ works.
The relationship of the Son to the Father is indeed unquestionable. Jesus is very close to
the Father, saying, “The Son and the Father are one, Anyone who has seen the Son has
81
seen the Father.” On a deeper level, Jesus’ miracles were the natural outflow of his close
relationship with God. In his prayer and meditation on the Scripture, He had profoundly
experienced his Father as a God of mercy and compassion. Jesus lavished His Father’s
love on others. It would also have been contrary to what he knew of his Father’s way.
As he preached God’s mercy by word, his deed showed that God’s love extends to the
neediest people in society. It has reached beyond our imagination.
Jesus is not just a social worker or a physician. The Gospel describes Jesus’ miracles
not as kindness but as signs and power. Jesus’ miracles are signs of God's power versus
Satan's power. And so, the key to understanding why the early Church made the miracles
of Jesus so prominent in the Gospel is the Kingdom. As Jesus’ teachings centered on this
basic theme, his miracles showed that God’s kingdom was to destroy the world's evil. The
four types of miracles that Jesus performed light up different aspects of the mystery of that
kingdom: exorcisms of demons, physical cures, power over nature, power over death
Jesus’ miracles symbolize the very meaning of his life: he is a great forgiver. In calling
forth faith, they open the way for God to heal all creation through Christ.
Jesus’ main intention in working on cures was not to do away with suffering. After all, the
people he helped would possibly get sick again, and all would die, even those he had raised
from the dead. The miracles were ultimately meant to stir up faith. A miracle may be
defined as a visible sign of God’s power that brings about the invisible sign of God’s
power, the miracles of faith in Jesus as the one sent by God.
The people responded to the miracles with varying degrees of faith. Some, like
Caiaphas refused to believe. Some followed Jesus for the sake of material benefits, but,
like the multitudes at the multiplication of the loaves, many turned from him when their faith
was tested. Some, like the Apostles, wavered in their faith but gave Jesus their un-
vanishing fidelity. The miracles they saw with their eyes helped their faith. At the end of the
last Gospel, praises are given to those who do not see and believe.
Jesus continues to work through the Spirit. Just as he shared the life of his Father with
the people of his day, he now makes it mysteriously possible for us to experience his
miracles and to do the work of God in Scripture; Jesus gives us the eye to see him in the
sacraments, He uses us to bring consolation and healing to others. To believe that he is
present in ordinary events is to accept Jesus as the Son of God, the One who still does the
works of God. To say yes to this mystery is to live the petition of the Lord’s Prayer – “Your
kingdom comes on earth as it is in heaven.”
Miracles remain mysterious even after two thousand years. Today, they are still
part of our world. Just as Jesus’ deeds in his own time were a promise of God’s final
victory, each “miracle” in our day brings that victory closer. “This is how we win the victory,”
says St. John, “with our Faith,” Jesus’ miracles are a call to us to believe, to be healed, and
to be Christ’s instrument for the healing of others.
1. Healing Miracles:
For Jesus, Salvation consists in making whole both
humans and nature. Jesus was so busy healing the wounds of humankind, the gaping
wounds that separate him from God and his fellow humans. He was even penetrating the
festering psychological and spiritual sores that cause people to hate and reject themselves
and the physical suffering due to illness, congenital disabilities, old age, and the like.
Sickness is the domination of the “flesh-eating evil,” if not a “flesh-destructive evil,” over the
person's body. Believers of God see sickness as a sign of the oppressive presence of evil in
the person's physical body. (CFC p. 528)
“Wherever the unclean spirits saw him, they fell before him and shouted, “You are the
Son of God.” (Mk. 3:11)
Jesus saw the cases of epilepsy, mental illness, and possession as works of Satan,
and exorcising them was a destruction of the Reign of Satan. Satan exercised his way:
a) over individuals, causing physical or mental affliction
b) over nature, causing calamities,
c) over history and world, engineering the inhumanity of the Imperialist Rome.
The Kingdom of God is far from our reach as long as there are people who
produce guns, warplanes, war tanks, and biological weapons of mass destruction. The
production of these instruments of war is itself against life and, therefore, a work of Satan in
the guise of defense. In reality, this arms industry is a multi-billion business that serves as
the life-blood of superpower countries. It is multi-billion dollar businesses that create the
family of the super-rich existing on the same planet as their destitute brother and sisters do.
The mentality of war peddling is one of the evils that need to be cast out of our system. The
same is true for the production of prohibited drugs, the circulation of bold films, pornographic
materials, food poisoning, medicines with side effects, hacking away the remaining forest
cover, opening large-scale pit mining, and all the rest.
It was never in the Plan of the Source of Life and the Owner of the universe that
these powers would destroy life on earth. Exorcising them today needs the bottomless
energy from the poor and victims of injustices. It is drawn from silence to allow the healing
energies of the universe to radiate similar power to those released from Jesus when he
dethroned the forces of Satan.
It is easy to see how healing miracles and exorcisms become images or features of the
kingdom or salvation, but how do acts of power over the forces of Nature fit in with the
Reign-kingdom of God?
3. Power over Nature:
In the Jewish Scriptures, Yahweh is pictured as the Master of
Nature. He brings rains and storms and sends winds to dry the
flood. In fact, in Psalm 89:9, immediately following the statement
that the Lord God Almighty “rules over the surging of the sea” and
“stills the dwelling of its waves,” there follows this line. “You have crushed Rahab with a
mortal blow” Rahab was a legendary sea monster representing the forces of chaos and evil.
So when Jesus calms the storm, like Yahweh, He “treads upon the crests of the sea.” He is
exhibiting the power of Yahweh himself in controlling nature. Genesis says that God
became hostile to humanity due to the sin of Adam. Jesus is the restorer of the original
order of the universe.
Jesus was not the first person in Israel’s history to exhibit divine power over
nature. The feeding of the multitude echoes the miraculous manna in the desert and the
prophet Elisha feeding a hundred men with twenty loaves of barley. The early Christians,
who were very familiar with the Old Testament, saw continuity and fulfillment of God’s
actions in Jesus.
Texts on:
Nature Miracles John Luke Mark Matthew
Miracle at Cana 2:1-11 - - -
First Miraculous Catch - 5:1-11 - -
Calming of the Tempest - 8:22-25 4:35-44 8:23-37
Jesus Walks on the Water 6:16-25 - 6:45-52 14:23-33
First Multiplication of the Bread 4:1-15 9:10-17 6:30-44 14:13-23
Second Multiplication of the Bread - - 8:1-10 -
The Kingdom of God is beyond our reach if there exist people who still produce
chemicals that would surely devastate our earth and continue to use the earth's resources
for their profit. The continued destruction of our forest cover needed for our existence in
favor of industrialization through developmental aggression indicates that we hailed nature
to be dominated by evil forces. Overpowering them today means the restoration of the real
essence of the earth and the primordial sense of Justice, thus transforming the world for
our benefit as its dependents. Restoration of nature is a kingdom Blessing.
Jesus’ miracles show that he was so close to God that God’s creative life flowed out
to heal and liberate those who came in contact with him. His success in molting sickness
and possession and nature and death reveals his vocation to destroy Satan’s hold over
humanity and re-establish God’s life.
Very well enough that we supplied the Kingdom of God as a present reality, but it is
also essential to be curious about its fullness. A dull formula goes this way: “the Kingdom
of God is already here but not yet.” Jesus, as a Prophet, also taught us about the Reign-
Kingdom of God as a future reality. It is the tone that dominates his Teachings, his
conviction about life after death, the end of history, and the new heaven and new earth. But
how did Jesus teach? Did He bluntly declare the immense Truth about the Kingdom of God?
Did Jesus tell His people the TRUTH about God’s enormous love for them? No!
God, the owner of all things in the universe, has entrusted all things to Jesus. Jesus
cannot just tell it directly to the people; they might not be able to contain the outburst of the
Divine truth due to the clouds of struggle and suffering brought about by idolatry and social
injustices of their times. He has to make the bulk of the excellent news simple and
acceptable to the intellectual capacity of the people. Jesus has to use literary styles
common to His time to tell about the nature of God’s Reign over the world. Throughout the
four Gospels, we may find Jesus using different teaching methods home to His audiences,
like proverbs, pronouncements, prophetic statements, and apocalyptic images. The most
common is the use of PARABLES. Jesus taught the kingdom of God experience in the form
of a PARABLE. The Parables occupy a good part of the Gospel.
1. Meaning of a PARABLE
The word PARABLE comes to us from the Latin “Parabola,” which means
“comparison.” This parabola is also from the Greek word “parabole,” which means “placing
beside a comparison.” It was from the Hebrew word “MASHAL,” which means “to set side
by side.” (Harper’s Bible Dictionary). The parable invites us to compare a story drawn from
ordinary everyday life and some other less evident, perhaps hidden reality. (Ian Knox (2003)
Theology for Teachers).
The parable is a kind of storytelling. Storytelling is a powerful means of teaching. The
story is a good way of conveying profound truths that are difficult to describe directly. Stories
86
should never be too obvious. It must leave the listener to imagine the beyond of what was
told. As a literary style, a parable is a fictitious short story based on a familiar
experience and has an application to spiritual life. It was a “throwing alongside” with a
pity old definition of “an earthly saying with a heavenly meaning.” The parable has to be
distinguished from
a) fable, a short story not based on facts
b) allegory, a symbolical narrative,
c) myth, an invented legend or story to tell the truth.
The parables are not factual. They are simple, true-to-life stories that teach religious
truth through comparison. There are more than thirty-five parables in the Gospel; if simple
comparisons are included, there are nearly seventy.
Let us now turn to the pages of the Bible and explore the different parables that
Jesus taught:
The Parables of Jesus represent the highest development of this narrative form as
they appear in the three Synoptic Gospels. In the Parables, Jesus focused on the ordinary
life of listeners and drew them into recognizing God’s presence therein. Jesus taught the
people that God was their Father, not in competition with them. Then he was not calling
them out of their humanity but making their creative human efforts possible through his
divine presence. (CFC # 482)
2. Why must Jesus use parables? (Pastva. The mystery of Jesus Nazareth. Pp. 147-
150)
In her book, the Mystery of Jesus of Nazareth pp. 147-150, Agnes Pastva (19 )
designed reasons why Jesus must use parables in His teaching. She emphasized that, like
any first-century Jew, Jesus is a person who will tell something by starting with “let me tell
88
you a story.” Since that was the culture, but why in a parable? We can surface some
reasons.
The Kingdom is invisible and mysterious, “You cannot tell by careful watching when
the reign of God will come.” Jesus told some Pharisees who asked him when the kingdom
would arrive. “Neither is it a matter of reporting that it is here or there. The Reign of God is
something in the future – like a seed still growing. The Kingdom is the coming of the final
blessings of the last and definitive salvation for the New World and human history. The
Kingdom of God begins secretly in each heart, as noiselessly as a mustard seed dropping
into the ground.
This kingdom grows mysteriously, takes root, and develops into a great tree where
many birds make their nests. This kingdom of love is not all at once but in stages. Jesus
launched it through his presence and preaching, but its power has not become noticeable
until Jesus passed through his hour of darkness. This kingdom calls on us today to change
our hearts and bear and keep God's Word. Only we, in the secret of our mind, can respond
to Jesus and the Father in love and trust.
Jesus’ total salvation taught His believers two realities of the reign-kingdom of God,
the present and the future realities. It is time to look at saving as an experience of the future.
In the New Testament, we can identify keywords indicating a feature of the Reign-
Kingdom of God as Resurrection from the Dead. The keywords that describe a component
of the Reign-Kingdom of God that will happen in the end time, as Jesus taught, are:
These descriptions of the above readings point to a feature of the Reign-Kingdom of God
that we Christians preciously uphold in faith, that is, the Resurrection.
1. What is Resurrection?
Resurrection (from Latin “Reusrrectio”) means the return to the dead person's life or
the raising from the dead again. It, therefore, means more than simple resuscitation, for
resuscitation implies that the person was only, apparently, not dead. Resuscitation (from
Latin Resuscitate, to raise or revive) is the revival of the life of someone who is only
apparently dead and becomes conscious again. The resurrection is an experience of victory
over death wherein the whole person or the total person will live again.
Death is an enemy of life. It is the cessation of life, an enemy that overcame. The
Biblical religion asserts that all oppositions of life will be defeated: hunger, sickness,
oppression, tears, and pain, including sin and death. And death will be destroyed on the last
day, the last enemy of life. In the new history (Age-to-come) and the new world (kingdom),
LIFE, not death, WILL TRIUMPH.
The ultimate destiny of our newborn child is not shriveled old age or corruption, but
the infant child who sleeps in death reawakened unto life. God is the Source of Life.
Therefore, Life returns to God. It is a feature of the final and definitive Salvation that the
Christians strongly upheld. Resurrection from the dead is the making of a New Person, a
New Being in a New Dimension. The Human Being transforms where there will be no more
power of evil that can infringe on this life. There will be no more hatred, fear and ignorance,
sickness, or pain that may overpower this New Person. In the New World (kingdom of God),
life will reign, and the dead will rise to new life.
In what manner will this vanquishing of death happen? What is the form or shape of
the risen person? These are the usual questions that a believer in Jesus will face. The
third-millennium person confronted the problems brought by Greek culture, the culture of
European Christianity. The Semitic culture, the culture of Jesus and the Biblical people, is
sometimes, if not most of the time, overridden by the Greek influence. Our average
knowledge about death is that the soul will live an eternal life, and the body will corrupt and
turn to dust.
We, Filipino Christians, are formed mainly by Greek philosophy. Still, in our desire to
enter into the inside philosophy of Jesus and to understand the Kingdom of God or Salvation
that came out from the lips of our Lord Jesus, we have to trace some essential points.
In the Semitic view, the human person is always a unity of one, a mono-entity. The
human person is not a composite, compound, but aggregate- no matter how blended the
elements are. In every stage of existence, our newborn child, the HUMAN BEING, is one: in
life, after death, at the Resurrection.
Our Biblical God, Jesus, is not afraid to be physical.
Therefore, the religion that believes in him is not afraid to be
Life so. Christianity holds that individually and collectively,
humankind will experience a bodily resurrection. How is it
shared? Jesus’ culture does not explain but views the person
after death as one and whole entity in “another mode” of
death existing, “another mode” of being.
Thus, Jesus taught that the human person is ONE in this life. After death, the human
person is ONE. At the resurrection, the human person is ONE. It is just one way of saying
92
that the Jesus who taught us about resurrection possessed a concretist culture, not
metaphysical, as the Greeks do.
Being one of the five apocalyptic trends, Resurrection from the dead is evident
among the Biblical people. It is one of the features of the final and definitive Salvation.
Therefore Resurrection happens only on the Last Day. Resurrection does happen right after
a person dies; it happens on final and absolute Salvation. “This is the will of the Father that
whoever sees the Son and believes in Him shall live with eternal life, and I will raise him on
the last day.” (John 6:40). “I know that he will rise in the resurrection, at the last day.”
(John11:24).
If resurrection happens only on the last day, what happens to the person right after
death? Where will the person go? These questions commonly lodge in the minds of the
believers and non-believers of the Resurrection. The Gospels attest that those who lie in the
sleep of death will one day resurrect. The person lies for the rest of death in the “bosom of
the earth” and will joyfully wait for the final day of the resurrection.
The keywords that might be helpful for us are the words: NEW HEAVEN AND NEW EARTH.
There is a need to be clarified with how the Biblical writers view this on Heaven and earth.
1. The essential features of the universe, according to a pre-scientific view, are these:
“Heaven” – is the blue roof above. It is an entity that we discuss in the previous
lesson. It is not a space. But like a dome or inverted bowl, it is solid.
Sometimes this roof is seen as having not one but several layers. Onto the
downside of this roof, as on a ceiling, are attached the ornaments. These
are the stars, moon, and sunset like jewels in the sky.
- It is to be Yahweh’s dwelling place (or, more accurately, above the
heaven(s).)
SCIENTIFIC VIEW PRE-SCIENTIFIC VIEW
We modern scientific people discovered and The Biblical people, including Jesus’
studied the basic features of the universe. The were pre-scientific. They simply view the
universe is limitless space wherein the sun is universe as the floor and the roof. They looked
positioned at the center and everything revolves around and saw the trees, the birds, the rocks,
around it. The earth is round and engulfed with the oceans, and the people and then looked up
gravitational forces and the sky is the limitless and see the heavenly bodies: the sun, the moon
space we perceive here on earth. and the galaxies. For them, this is the universe
and they termed it as: HEAVEN AND EARTH.
The HEAVEN AND EARTH is a Biblical formula used to refer to the world or the
universe in the language of the scientific people today. In the keyword, NEW HEAVEN AND
NEW EARTH are also equivalent to NEW WORLD OR NEW UNIVERSE or the
Transformed Earth in the end time.
94
The Semitic culture in Jesus’ time envisaged God as a NEW WORLD. Many New
Testament writers held this view. How about Jesus Himself? Of course, Jesus shared this
view, as it is self-evident in his ministry. How could he be intelligible among his people if he
did not share the people’s outlook?
a.) Profiles of the New Heaven and New Earth or New World
What would be the profile of this New World, a new universe, a new creation? It is the
fundamental question asked by a person who hopes for the transformation and liberation of
a BLIGHTED UNIVERSE wrought with wrongdoings, pains, and death in all forms. Let us
carefully design the same broad strokes to have a picture of this.
Prophet Isaiah 65:17-25 would beautifully describe this new universe, garnering
JUSTICE as the ultimate destiny of all things in this New World. An evident tone expressed
in a simple and concrete experience:
“… they shall build houses and inhabit them.”
“… they shall plant vineyards and eat their fruits.”
In a casual and self-evident tone, 2 Peter 3:13 directly expresses, “But following his
promise, we wait for new heavens and new earth where “justice” dwells. The Biblical people
never thought of fleeing away for this “valley of tears” and go up to heaven. Instead, this
same world cleanses all social injustices. Thus, from eliminating ecological degradation to
restoring the natural potential of the entire universe, we move from the ills underlying
unequal employee salaries to agrarian reforms for peasants.
1. New Heaven and New Earth: A world where ALL THINGS NEW:
Those with some detailed specifics about the new heaven and earth will find it in
Revelation 21:1-5 (Please read). With the writer, you have a vision of an old universe fading
away and giving way to the new one. People who love water will be disappointed that “the
sea will be no more.” But we have to understand in that culture; the sea was a place of
storms, shipwrecks, and disasters. There will be a new capital city, radiant as a bride. One
thing that should not go unnoticed about this city is coming down to earth! And on this new
earth, God will dwell. And God will have a special place with his people. God himself will
wipe away every trace of suffering, pain, and death, “Behold, I make all things new!” Thus,
the chemical and moral smog will dissipate, and the galaxies will smile and breathe again
with relief.
Yes, Revelation seems to speak in symbols. However, we have also to view that not
everything therein is purely symbolic; some paintings convey reality. Thus, a new heaven
and earth where all things become new points to a New World where everything becomes
new.
The New World envisioned and taught to us by Jesus is a world that will be born
again. There are two noteworthy passages of this profile: Mt. 19:28 and Luke 22:24-30,
95
which speak of the New World. Once more, justice is a tribute. (Please, reread the
passage).
Note that these two statements are two slightly different versions of the same saying
of Jesus. What Luke calls ‘KINGDOM’ is the same as Matthew’s ‘new world’ or transformed
Creation. Again, God's Kingdom is not about heaven but an altered Creation. Matthew’s
“New World” takes root in the original Greek “PALIGGENESIA.” Paliggenesia comes from
the words PALIN (again) and GENESIA (begin) to start again. It refers to a colorful world, a
descriptive term for re-birth and transformation of the whole-created universe. The sky and
the earth, the whole of nature and human beings, this world of hunger, disease, and decay,
all will be into a New World and new history, there the King of justice will reign.
Jesus appeared in history as a restorer of the original shape of the world. Another
profile of this New World is the restoration of all things. It is evident in Acts 3:21. There is
the scenario: Jesus ascends into heaven. The apostles looked to heaven but returned to
their everyday lives. They said that God would eventually send Jesus back to earth as
Christ. In the meantime, heaven will keep Jesus “until the universal restoration” comes. All
reality will be remade, rehabilitated, and rejuvenated in this universal restoration. It is a new
universe at the end of history. It is a New World. And there is an even lovelier Davao,
lovelier Mindanao, and more beautiful Philippines. All its mountain ranges, thick forest
covers where streams, springs, and rivers flow out, bringing life to lands, and the beautiful
shapes of the shores where mangroves have fully grown to cuddle young sea creatures and
all marine life and protect the lives of the earth as well.
One can almost hear the songs and dances and the re-assembly of planets in the
universe. One can dance together with the jubilation of this exciting restoration of all things.
4. New Heaven and New Earth: Unity of All Things in heaven on earth
God willed for the living in this world the harmony of all peoples and all creation. It is
a similar panorama presented by Ephesians 1:1-10. That plan and the purpose of God,
when history has reached its culmination, is to draw all things together into one unity, things
in heaven and things on earth. The roof and floor – everything in them will be one through
the action of Christ.
It simply represents the unity experience by all things when God created the world;
when the world powerfully began, there was harmony in all things, and the fullness of life
was experienced. Thus, the whole universe permeates by the Divine Energy; Divine Energy
permeates all of existence and binds all reality together (cf. I Cor: 15:24-28).
All of us have witnessed, if not have been, victims of the demonic powers or evils
experienced by the cosmic world. In Jesus, the concern of the human person should also
be a concern of this person's home. The creation must be set free from everything that
imprisons it.
Romans 8:19-23, though couched in language that needs to be clarified, is precious.
It is saying that human persons are heading toward a new creation. It is also explaining its
96
experience in Total Salvation. It is not only humans who had the privilege to be saved but
also the mountains, the forests, the rivers, the trees, the birds, the bio-diversity—the whole
creation, human and nature – long for total Salvation.
We, humans, who already possess the first fruits of the Spirit, groan inwardly, longing
for our bodily resurrection and to become children of God. But not just we humans long for
it, NATURE too. Nature has experienced meaninglessness, mistreatment, suffering,
disease, and even death. Jesus' act of complete Salvation must not ignore this.
Furthermore, this must be a Christian truth. “Creation itself will be set free from its
enslavement to decay, and it will also obtain the glorious liberty that we humans will enjoy
as children of God.”
Meanwhile, the whole creation has been groaning like a woman in the birth pangs of
labor. Both nature and humans long for liberation. If humans long for Resurrection, then
Creation waits for its transformation. It is the foundation of our Ecological Theology.
Romans 8:19-23, we find a firm foundation for our ecological concerns today. Nature and all
creation: forests, rivers, seas, environment – are our brothers and sisters and longing for
liberation. It would be a challenge for us:
* What have we done to liberate the whole of creation and ourselves?
* What have we contributed to solving the threatening Global Earth warming
problem?
* How have you been of help to the local problem of ecological imbalances?
One longs for salvation in the story of humanity. So replete with wars, violence,
disease, pain, and sorrow. All forms of evils that threatened the life of persons and the life of
nature today characterize history. Still, this alternative history would be an experience of life
and personality without threats. For Biblical people, Salvation is to experience another kind
of history, a different account. It is an alternative history. It is a new history that is different
from our history today.
It is the presently on-going history of Israel It is the future history that would come in the
and humanity. It is a history characterized by end. It is a history when there will be no more
pain, suffering, wars, sin, hunger, sorrows, pains, no more sickness, no more hatred, no more
oppression, and death. A history governed by sorrows and no more death. This is a history
evil. when Life triumphs and God is all in all.
Searching for Salvation, the Jews looked forward to the end of this ongoing history
and to entering into a different and new record in the future, an age-to-come. This age-to-
come is a history where justice, peace, life, health, and joy reign. Salvation for the Jews
97
means experiencing a new account, era, epoch, and age. Of course, it will be a history of or
on this earth. This age-to-come is synonymous with the Kingdom of God.
This biblical idea of an age-to-come is one of the new and refreshing bits of learning
we can embrace in our search for the actual image of Jesus and his work of Salvation which
he called the Reign-Kingdom of God. It provides a whole new dimension to the
understanding of ultimate salvation. It teaches us that the total salvation, which Jesus
started in his ministry, will finally and definitively culminates in a new and different history for
nature and humankind, collectively and individually.
The Gospel of Mark 10:17-30 offers fascinating and pertinent words about this
dimension of this new history like:
a.)inherit eternal life (vv. 17,30)
a.)enter the Kingdom of God (vv. 23, 24, 25)
b.)to be saved (v. 26)
c.)age-to-come (v. 30)
None of these four expressions means going to heaven after death; instead, from the
context, it is clear that these four expressions are suitable synonyms and refer to a new
world, a new history for a new community. It would be the age when people will participate
and experience justice, compassion, truth, and peace. In particular:
Thus, the Reign-Kingdom of God as a new and different History is the same as
Salvation, the fullness of life in the age-to-come, where you and every human being, having
defeated death, will participate in a new history of life-giving justice, peace, harmony, unity,
joy and the like.
This new and different history would only be possible when the believers of Jesus are
ready to take on the task. If our ardent wish is to change the earth's contour and reshape
the course of history, then the commission has to start in this history today. Two existing
groups are ready to take on the task. They are the Women and the Nature Carers
a. Women of today have united to work to end the millennia of patriarchy and to re-
create a history of gender equality. Women should assert what is right for them
and not allow this history of abuses to prolong.
b. Nature carers work to end the brutal shape of Mother Nature, and they help us to
see the trees, the birds, and the water as our brothers and sisters to rediscover
our bondedness with them.
Working for eternal life is not just bringing souls to an everlasting life of heaven but
includes working towards the fullness of life for each human being, for all humanity, and for
Mother Nature, as we journey towards the final and definitive Age-to-come. The Second
Plenary Council of the Philippines (PCP II) is outstanding in this consciousness. Our
participation in ongoing history today will not be a matter of occasional rallies but a part of
habitual Christian consciousness and action. Shaping history toward the kingdom of God
becomes an everyday chore in the household of God.
99
I – Introduction
In actual life, parents work hard to make their children happy and to provide for their
needs, especially for food, shelter, clothing, education, and the like. When they give these
incredible things, parents expect that their children must do well in their life. As a family, we
celebrate the goodness and blessings of life together. The children must see that they are
taking good care of their life, corresponding to their parents' love for them. It feels good to
please our parents with our full volition and free will. Jesus is the same as our parents; he
wanted us to be virtuous and worthy of the unconditional love of the Father for us.
The Biblical Religion is a Religion that upholds the experience of God’s Goodness
with responsibilities. When God created humans, He gave blessings: Land, Freedom, and
Justice are responsibilities. Whenever Yahweh God gave gifts, there was a corresponding
demand, “God planted a garden in Eden in the East, and there he placed the man whom he
had created to till it and to take care of it.” (Gen. 2:8, 15)
There are two aspects of Biblical religion: the Gospel and Law. The God of Salvation
is overflowing with Goodness, and He wanted us to be responsible and worthy of that
goodness from Him.
The Gospel aspect refers to the announcement of the Good News of Salvation. This
aspect relates to the experience of goodness and the blessings of life in God. It means the
joyful proclamation of the establishment of the Reign of God or Kingdom of God, the
kerygma, or positive restoration of the covenantal promises of Yahweh when the Messiah
comes.
The Law Aspect of the Biblical Faith refers to the precepts as the implication of the
announced goods. The tenets are sets of guidelines, ethical demands or requirements,
recommendations of virtues, and Paraenesis (Exhortation to virtue and Morality) so that one
can participate in the work of salvation. The Biblical Faith does not mean salvation when
one obeys the law. It guides us to savor the experience of the Kingdom of God.
100
Consider this in the essential faith records in the Old and New Testaments:
GOSPEL LAW
Ex. 20:1-17 – “I am Yahweh -Do not have other gods before me.
your God who -Do not make yourselves image and bow down to them
brought you out of and serve them.
the land of Egypt, -Do not take the name of Yahweh, your God, in vain
out of the house - Remember the Sabbath day and keep it holy
of slavery. - Honor your father and your mother
- Do not kill
Mark 1:14-15- “Jesus came - Do not commit adultery
into Galilee - Do not steal
proclaiming the - Do not give false witnesses against your neighbor
Gospel of God - Do not covet your neighbor’s house, wife, servant,
and saying, ‘The or anything that is his.
time has fulfilled - Repent and believe the Gospel
the Kingdom of
God is at hand.”
The believers of God do not have only to consider the Bible simply as Good News but to be
always conscious of the moral obligation natural to God’s blessings. We must receive life-
giving gifts, but we also have to accept the corresponding responsibility worthy of being an
image of God. When God laid down the foundation of His work of Salvation, He saw to it
that it must be participated by all of His Creation.
The Salvation offered by our God is both a TASK and a GOAL. It is the way the Biblical
Religion painted an image of Salvation. As a Task, Salvation is something that a believer
should be busy with; It means that the followers of Jesus have to work to generate life-giving
blessings for the household of both humans and nature. This study on Christology exert
much effort to unfold different features, images, or models of Jesus’ works of Salvation. The
work Jesus had busied about in the Ministry. Every believer must have a full grasp of this
101
task, for, in the great and final day, judgment is according to what we do to the least of our
brethren, as Matthew 25:31-46 recorded.
Could there be another way of comprehending these ways of acting and being? Are
they perhaps natural raindrops when the cloud is full? Are they not the most spontaneous
drizzles, the outpours of a cloud seeding with the Spirit of God? Is this not what one would
instinctively do and say if in touch with the source?
Indeed, as we read the Bible's pages, we found and felt the precepts were irrational
and impossible. But we must reckon with the author of this ethics. And perhaps he
expected his followers to be the same. Is this our excuse for falling? Because Jesus was
divine, and we are not? Let us try this: Jesus was in touch; we are no less in touch. Our
cloud is less seeded.
Just remember a cloud in silence. The rains may come down hard and strong and
loud, but the cloud is always still. Jesus’ Ethics or code is the kind of moral demand you
need not try hard to follow by doing; it is more the kind of ethic that happens to you by just
being in touch. The best type of spirituality is one that happens to you rather than one that
you make happen. Be in touch, and there are no longer precepts – only the spontaneous
dance movements of the heart.
1. Name a person who has enfleshed the precepts of Jesus in their life.
2. Make personal prayers: How will you observe the Law of Jesus as life?
In our quest to understand Jesus and His work of salvation, we commit to searching
for the meaning of the Kingdom of God or Reign of God since this is also how Jesus’
contemporaries understood what salvation is.
We hinted at the difficulty of following the precepts of Jesus but relieved with the
concept that is simply doing does not fulfill these precepts but is fulfilled by merely being.
Let us go deeper to excavate the hardcore or the most basic principles of Jesus. Huddling
many barriers to following the Law, we discovered one fundamental requirement:
Conversion. A conversion is a joyful event of transformation of one’s heart, mind, and will.
We share at this point the original Greek word, “Metanoia,” which means turning
around. This Metanoia is a translation from Hebrew “Shub,” an excellent word to mean
‘self-transformation’ ‘total change of life’ ‘basic reorientation of one’s life – values,’
and ‘radical sharing of one’s wealth. Metanoia and Shub both mean a new basic attitude
of unconditionally accepting God’s will in one’s life. As we look back in the history of
Christianity, this total conversion or Metanoia is poorly translated as ‘Repentance’ or
becoming sorry for one’s sins as we hear it only during Advent and Lenten seasons.
Jesus was once asked by the Rich Young Man in the Gospel, “What must I do to
enter eternal life? Jesus politely answered, “You shall love the Lord your God with all your
heart, with all your soul, with all your strength, and love your neighbor as you love yourself.”
We are constantly confronted with the question, “What is the greatest
Commandment?” Without hesitation, we responded, “Love of God and Love of Neighbor.”
Biblical Literature may well attest to this. But we are probably puzzled by self-evident
observation after more than 2000 years of Christian love; among the most loveless and
exploitative societies are Christian societies. (Take an essential look at our Philippines, the
only Christian country in Asia, and picture what is happening in political, economic, and
religio-cultural areas.)
Is the ‘law of love’ the only premier commandment for Jesus? No. In response to
Jesus, the Rich man then said, “I have done all these since I was young. . .” Then Jesus
pained the man, saying, “Go, sell your possessions, give them to the poor, then follow me.”
Love is only half of the correct answer to the question. For Jesus, in addition to a love of
God and love of neighbor, are “tzedakah, mishpat, checed, and emet or SOCIAL JUSTICE,
" which constitute the weightier matters of Biblical Religion. (Please refer to Mark 12:28-34
and Mt. 23:33) JUSTICE, MERCY, AND FAITHFULNESS are heavier than giving one-tenth
of your livelihood for religious purposes. Thus for Jesus, SOCIAL JUSTICE is also the
greatest commandment that corresponds to the law “law of love.”
Of course, many would argue and justify that the “Law of love” embraces the “Law
of Justice” or justice is a fruit of love. “When you love, you do justice.” The Filipino
people are not philosophers and are not wanting to reduce Biblical Moral demands to
syllogisms. Perhaps, our Filipino believers are comfortable talking about the truth of history
and the truth of reality, which are in their concrete experiences. We can trace the history of
living “Christian love” We see this embarrassing picture after more than two thousand years
of love. In Christian societies, you have the Rich Man’s mansion and the Bishop’s palace
rubbing walls with the hovel of the poor. What an awful situation of Christian love! Jesus
wants to say, “Give justice a chance in Christian love.”
Take a unique look at Matthew 25:31-48, which is about the last judgment;
Matthew had been straightforward and clear: Open your heart and hand to another
human in need. If you do, you are the sheep that will possess the Kingdom. You are the
goats that will wind up elsewhere if you don't. So radical and explicit in spelling our criteria
for belonging or not belonging. Social responsibility and social justice cannot be
misconstrued as implied when you love, but this must be taken as the fundamental
essence of God.
104
3. Moral Conversion is Not the Kingdom of God
As a generic name for Salvation in the New Testament, the Reign-Kingdom of God
cannot be reduced simply to Moral Conversion or Metanoia. Repentance or conversion is a
response, a requirement for a believer to enter the goal, the kingdom of God. Total Change
of heart is not yet the Salvation or kingdom of God itself. The kingdom of God is new
humanity living in the New World and experiencing a unique history. Conversion is a
precept, while the kingdom of God is a proclamation.
Mark 1:14-15 recorded, “the kingdom of God is at hand… repent and believe in the
Gospel” should not be taken as one single precept but should be understood as both the
Gospel and the law.
Below are two columns. One of them is the kingdom of God, and the other, strictly
speaking, is not:
A (Life-giving Blessing) B (Moral Acts and Virtues)
Food, land, good health, education, jobs, Kindness, humility, simplicity, truth, faith,
wages, decent housing, security, hope, charity, goodwill, loyalty, compassion,
contentment, resurrection, total liberation, conversion, courage, prayerfulness,
just socio-economic system, would order, selflessness, zeal, openness, generosity,
gender, equality, healthy environment, blue love, dedication, temperance, patience,
skies, clean rivers, divine filiation, the vision perseverance, cheerfulness, honestly,
of God, etc. uprightness, honor, purity, etc.
They reiterate once more that the kingdom of God is not moral
acts or virtues. It is a life-giving Blessing. Of course, moral
demands and life-blessings of the Kingdom are closely related.
In actual life, the Kingdom's blessings are usually realized
through the concrete practice of moral virtues. Yet, they are not
the same.
We had cited that Jesus was a concretist and actualizer. He stood firmly on
the very heart of the law: Justice, Mercy, and Faithfulness in His words and actions.
Jesus was so radical and specific to relieving a person's life from the pangs of oppressive
law and tradition. He exposed the violations of the authorities of the law as far as the Torah
is concerned.
Jesus demanded locating the law in the heart, not merely an exterior appearance.
He desired that those who follow him should love God and His neighbor and concretize the
work of justice in life.
105
If Jesus were walking on this earth today, He would probably demand the same
as what he did for his people in his time. He would have required you to work for the
following:
1. authentic land distribution
2. a viable alternative to globalization
3. self-determination for the powerless
4. rights for women and children
5. the well-being of Mother Earth
God dares us to invent a just and humane global order. For the kingdom of God
for our time is just that: A PLANET WHICH WE ANTICIPATE TO EXPERIENCE of the New
Heaven and the New Earth in which justice dwells: In what way are you going to help this
justice to live in our land, the Philippines. Mindanao, particularly Davao.
106
At this point of our study, we might have been overwhelmed by the grandiose purview
of the features of the future Reign-Kingdom of God or final and definitive Salvation. We
want to return our memories to the underlying dynamic that runs through the Society of
Jesus. A society where Jesus urges us to undergo a total transformation, reorientation if not
an entire paradigm shift to give way to Metanoia is a society where grown-up idolatry and
injustices reigned over the social structure, culture, people, and the shape of history.
The Kingdom works or saving deeds of Jesus established conflicts. The life purpose
of Jesus built up an opposing force against the existing rich and powerful of the nation. Let
us beneficially recall the social situation of Jesus’ society.
Two-fold domination suffered by common people:
I- THE CONFLICT WITH THE PHARISEES, SCRIBES, CHIEF PRIESTS, AND ELDERS
The Palestine of Jesus’ time was a Palestine of a big gap, the economic, political,
and cultural elite on the one hand and the impoverished and voiceless ordinary people. The
primary sources of wealth were land and commerce. Access to political power was through
political office, family lineage, wars of conquests, social connections and manipulation, and
economic standing. Moreover, social privilege was determined by blood: Jew or non-Jew,
noble or common, pure or impure. People recognized the authority to interpret traditions
primarily shaped by the dominant culture, customs, values, and meaning based on the
Torah.
107
The Pharisees, Scribes, Elders, and the Chief Priests
Let us locate the role of Pharisees, Scribes, Elders, and the Chief Priests in the
Society where Jesus belongs.
The ELDERS and the CHIEF PRIESTS belonged 2. The SCRIBES and PHARISEES, and also the
to the economic elite of Palestine. They were the simple poor priests in the synagogue wielded
landed gentry and big traders whose base was religio-cultural power. They were the molders
land and commerce. The elite, most by the priestly of the system of values and meanings or
class, had religious association, the Sadducees. ideology that is anti-poor and anti-outcasts.
This was an aristocratic and wealthy group, They, however, gained sympathy and loyalty
conservative and fundamentalist. They accepted among the common people.
only the written tradition and not open to new
beliefs. Majority of them was members of the The Scribes in particular, were the scholars or
highest authoritative body in Palestine, the intellectuals, experts of the TORAH. The
Sandherin. produced oral interpretations, commentaries,
(Ever since the Persian colonial period, 500 rules and regulations for contemporary life
years B.C. when instead of kings, high priests, based on their point of view of the TORAH.
under various imperial powers, became the Thus, they provided the values and meanings
heads-of-state, the high priestly class enjoyed that governed Jewish life. They were
supreme social, political and economic power.) commonly called “RABBIS” in the Gospels.
Due to their wealth, position, purity of blood, and knowledge, the Elders, Chief
Priests, and Scribes combined constituted the socio-political elite. Together with the
Herodians, they wielded political power and influence in the society of Palestine. The
Scribes, Pharisees, and the simple poor priests in the synagogue wielded Religio-cultural
authority and power. This group of people molded the system of values and meanings
(Religio-cultural ideology) against the poor and the outcast.
The religio-cultural ideology wielded by the Elders, Chief Priests, Scribes and
Pharisees characterized an ANTI-POOR and ANTI-OUTCAST ideology. This ideology had
influenced the mind and lifestyles of the masses that lost their almost lost self-worth. We can
find in the Gospel, according to John, a net message of these people to the groups:
“You do not know the Torah. You do not obey the Torah. You do not observe the
purification Laws. You do not follow Tradition. You are adulterers, murderers, and
thieves. You are sinners. You are the accused masses.” (Jn. 7:49)
The religio-cultural ideology taught by the Scribes, Pharisees, Elders, and Scribes to
the poor and the outcasts made the society's least become the least. It taught them to
despise themselves, to reject completely their almost lost self-esteem and human self-worth.
It gave way for them to accept the prevailing system of the institution (Jewish-Roman Order)
as GOOD and WILLED by Yahweh, where in fact, it had lost the life-giving Spirit of the Plan
of Yahweh and the Ancient Law (Torah). At least tacitly, the ideology blessed the
domination of the Romans and the local Jewish elite with power, privilege, and authority. It
was indeed an OPPRESSIVE and REPRESSIVE IDEOLOGY.
108
We hinted at the conflictive works of Jesus in his Ministry with the existing social
strata, structure, and ideology. Naturally, liberation results threaten an oppressive social
system, especially those who maintain the status quo in society.
The Gospels, according to Mark 3:1-6, Mt. 23:29-33, Mk. 12:1-10 have
expounded this assertion. These faith records of Jesus traced pictures or images of
conflicting issues between the socio-political and religio-cultural leaders and Jesus.
As courageous and prophetic groups, the Pharisees and Scribes were colored by
negative spirits. They considered Law as imperative to Salvation. To observe the Torah
means a person is saved. However, we must note that not all the Pharisees and Scribes
were “bad” and that many viewed things similar to Jesus. But a majority of Pharisees and
Scribes, especially those who wanted to gain much power, had conflicted with Jesus,
particularly in issues dealing with the observance of the Law or Torah just as the following
points:
1. Jesus put more value on “tao” or life than on the Sabbath, the law, or the
tradition.
He wants the people to be liberated from the oppressive observance of the law,
Sabbath, and tradition. He wants to show that rules and practices are formed to
enhance life, not to kill life.
2. Jesus critiqued the religious establishment for neglecting the Torah's heart,
justice, mercy, and faithfulness.
He wants to put in place the observance of the Torah and surface the acts of justice,
mercy, and faithfulness that the religio-political leaders had neglected.
3. Jesus put more value on compassion for the poor and the outcasts than on the
worship of God.
A society that upheld the anti-poor and anti-outcast ideology surely would hate them
and not accept them in the worship of Yahweh. Jesus places the poor and outcast as
a priority over the worship of Yahweh. Thus, he concretized His love for them.
4. Jesus critiqued the establishment for locating Religion in the exterior show
than in the heart.
The integration of their religious faith into life had been lost. Jesus wanted to restore
the authentic faith of Yahweh, not only an exterior show.
b) Conflict of Jesus' Ministry with the Elders and the Chief Priests and Scribes
If we have embraced what Jesus truly meant about Salvation in his ministry, then we
are pretty sure to see the natural conflict established by his works and message. What
would Jesus say about political and social leadership? Was he in an intense conflict with the
Elders, Chief Priest? Yes! Jesus could not take their oppressive union to oppress the people
continuously.
109
We may find in Mark 12:1-20 a Parable of the Vineyard. This parable tells us of a
very concrete situation of His conflict with the Elders, Chief Priests, and Scribes.
Think of the symbols in the Parable of the Vineyard (Mark 12:1-20):
Owner of the Vineyard = Yahweh God
Vineyard = Nation of Israel
Tenants or Caretakers = Chief Priests, Elders, Scribes
Servants or messengers = Prophets
Son = JESUS
Jesus would have addressed this to them:
“Yahweh entrusted you with the care of the Israelite people he loved very
much. From time to time, Yahweh sent prophets to show his concern. You had
nothing to show. Instead, you tortured and murdered the prophets. And now he sends
his son, thinking you would respect him. But no, you will conspire to kill him and will
kill him. Yahweh will come to destroy you.”
Jesus addressed this Parable to the religio-political leaders and called them
MURDERERS OF THE PROPHETS. They were worthless leaders of God’s people, and
God will destroy them. In other words, the whole life and work of Jesus and what he stood
for was to do good and to save the total person and life. As a result of this stand, “the
Pharisees went out and held counsels with Herodian against him, how to destroy him.”
Indeed, a conscientious person must go against the current despite how strong the
current is. If you are a conscientious Christian, you also stand for what Jesus defended.
Many issues confront today’s Christians: the evil behind globalization, the threats brought by
global political and economic interests, and many others.
110
II - THE JEWISH CONFLICT WITH TEMPLE AND ROME
Establishments are not usually perceived as working for destruction, just as we don’t
consider the malls, cinemas, beer houses, and the like have done something terrible. But at
this point of our study, we cannot but perceive the institution, Temple, and Rome as having
done the growing reasons for Jesus’ death. We have already seen the conflictive actions
and words of Jesus with the people in authority. Now, we have turned our attention to the
establishment focusing directly on the Temple
The Temple in Jesus’ Time The Empire of Rome in Jesus’ Time
We may be wondered why this faithful Jew, Jesus, is staging an assault against this
holy place of the Jews, the Temple. The passages from Mark 11:15-19 and Mark 15:2-3, 6-
15, 22-27 would help us excavate the conflictive actions of Jesus with the fundamental role
played by the Temple.
But why must Jesus attack the Temple?
As a significant religious institution, the Temple is an institution where authentic prayer and
worship be celebrated. It is a place where the poor should seek help and is served faithfully
by the authorities. In other words, the Temple should be where the poor and oppressed find
hope and maintain their dignity and integrity as believers of Yahweh. The TEMPLE should
be an INSTITUTION that would promote life. It must be an agent of the Reign-Kingdom of
God or SALVATION.
111
A faithful Jew was a failure of what the Temple was doing to the people. Conversely, the
Temple was a means of robbing the poor of their meager income. It no longer became life-
giving but a death-prone institution for the poor and oppressed (Anawim).
In Mark 11:15-19, Jesus complained clearly about all the goings that restyled the Temple
from a place of prayer into commerce. As we look closer, we notice Jesus singled out
related to robbing the Poor: money changing and sale of doves. For the poor, currency
exchange was difficult. The impoverished offered doves as sacrifices. These issues relating
to their religious practices received specific attention from Jesus. The Temple, which was
supposed to serve the poor, considered to be where the poor would seek help and where
the poor find strength and make themselves whole, had become a means of oppressing
them and losing their almost lost self-worth. Jesus described this as making the Temple
a “den of thieves,” where the poor and the oppressed (Anawim) had been robbed of their
meager income to express their faith in Yahweh.
Jesus drove out Jesus overturned Jesus did not let Jesus began to
all those who the tables of the anyone carry teach in the
are buying money anything Temple
and selling in the changers and those in the temple
open space. who sold pigeons. courtyards.
b.) Jesus’ Verbal Attack on the Temple
With His action attack, Jesus also pronounced threatening words against the Temple.
“Does not God say in the Scriptures: ‘My house will be called a House of Prayer for
all the nations?’ But you have turned it into a den of thieves.” (Mark 11:17)
This statement might be politely said, but any faithful Jew would have understood the
underlying tone of Jesus’ condemnation of the people running the operation of the Temple.
By this statement, Jesus wanted to pave the way for restoring the original purpose of why
the Temple was built. But since Jesus found the mess that Temple had made to the people
loved by Yahweh, he then pronounced an attack against the Temple.
“As Jesus came out of the Temple, one of his disciples said, ‘Look, Teacher, what
large stones and what large building! Then Jesus Asked Him, ‘Do you see these
great buildings? Not one stone will be left upon another; all will be thrown down.”
(Mark 13:1-2)
You would probably imagine a Cathedral today, massive and towering, threatened
with utter destruction. What would the hierarchy do? Jesus’ threat to the Temple was
112
consequential enough to constitute one of the charges against him during his trial, as
mentioned in Mark 14:58 and Mark 15:29-30. This oft-repeated mention of Jesus’ verbal
attack makes it one of the few historical facts about Jesus. It paved much of the way to the
cross.
Was Jesus anti-Roman? There is not enough evidence about Jesus’ stance toward
Rome. Jesus said, “Give Ceasar the things that are Ceasars.” Usually, this statement
leads to a notion that money is of Ceasar’s because it is his face inscribed in cash.
However, this statement cannot guarantee that Jesus endorsed Rome. If it is the face of
Ceasar marked in money, Jesus wishes to emphasize what is inscribed in the being of each
person. Isn’t it that human beings are created in God's image and likeness? So then, it is the
image and likeness of God that is inscribed in our being. The statement could mean, “give
to Ceasar what belongs to him” Does Ceasar has the right to own anything? If Ceasar
has owned something over the Jew. Like any ordinary Jew, Jesus knew that nothing
belonged to Ceasar. All things in heaven, earth, and under the world belong to
Yahweh alone. What is clear is his repudiation of imperial values. (Mk. 10:42-45)
However, this statement cannot be good data to say that Jesus was against Rome.
There is enough data that can provide about Rome’s attitude toward Jesus. The conflict of
Jesus with Rome must be perceived from the Romans' point of view, not clearly from Jesus
Himself. The following are some of the indicators:
From the point of view of the Romans, Jesus was a Rebel against Rome. At that
time, there were certain Jews who led protest movements against Rome and were regarded
as Jewish kings. These persons organized peasantry, fisher folks, poor masses, or
outcasts. The “King of the Jews” title was attached to a leader of protest movements against
Rome. Jesus was given the title “King of the Jews.” Let us note the initials on the cross of
Jesus, “I.N.R.I, which means Ieasus, Nazarenus, Rex Ieuderum, or Jesus of Nazareth,
King of the Jews.” A soldier placed this inscription on the cross of Jesus with mockery.
Crucifixion is a Roman capital punishment meted out to the rebels against Rome. It is
a shameful death given to those threatening Roman stability in Palestine, including the
criminals and robbers. Crucified people were daily sightings in place of Golgotha. Take note
that the Sanhedrin had no power over the death penalty. Only the Roman procurator could
pass the death penalty. If the Romans did not see Jesus as a threat to them, why must he
be put to death in that Roman capital punishment?
Jesus was crucified together with two thieves/robbers or, better, bandits. Rome
associated Jesus as one of them. Social bandits were present when there was a violation of
human rights. Roman domination abused so much the human rights of people. The rise of
113
social bandits was rooted excessively in the oppressive imperial regime. The social bandits
were considered “Robin Hoods” of the peasantry. Barabbas might have been a social
bandit.
The Conflict between Temple and Rome made the Story Complete:
Without the conflict in Jesus’ ministry, there is no Jesus' story to tell. We will go back
to the belief that Jesus was immune to human struggle because he was God. We have to
stand on a position that Jesus’ Kingdom practice included the strong counter positions
regarding the Sabbath, purification laws, justice, poverty-riches, and especially the temple,
which would lead us to a deeper understanding of his life and death.
Most Christians have to lie in bed and wait for the claw of death to take back their
breath. Why was Jesus’ death different from most of us Christians? Is it because his life
was different from that of most of us? Usually, people would not be killed for wanting to save
only their souls. But people could want to kill you for proclaiming an alternative world,
demanding just wages, claiming domains of the land, and many others that concretize
justice in all affairs. Such were the people who had shed blood and spared others' lives to
come up with an alternative world, to name some of them
114
I. INTRODUCTION:
At last, it is time to let Jesus die. They hoped that we are now embracing how
important his pre-crucifixion mission was and that we realized His Kingdom works became
conflictive with the existing social structure, ideology, and philosophy of His society. We
have now realized that the ministry of Jesus was conflictive with the Jewish-Roman order;
the rich and the powerful have now to end Jesus’ life. But if in the case of your study, you
have not realized this, do not allow Jesus to die; go back to the essence of his
proclamation of the Reign-Kingdom of God.
What is a PASCHAL MSYTERY? Paschal comes from the word “PASCH,” which
means pass over. The key to the experience of the Israelites was when the Angel of death
“passed” over the houses of the Israelites while the firstborn of the Egyptians were dead. A
mystery is not something we cannot understand; it is a truth that can be understood but
whose essence cannot be exhausted by our human mind. As a truth, our full faith as
believers must embrace Jesus’ passion, death, and resurrection from the shadow of his
most original mission concerning his coming again with commitment. The Paschal Mystery
of Jesus must connect with the Reign-kingdom of God's proclamation in His Ministry.
Together with it was the conflict that rose with his statement of Salvation.
The story of Jesus has not yet ended. Jesus was arrested, put on trial, and
executed. The disciples, except for a few women of Jerusalem, abandoned him: upon his
arrest, “all deserted him and fled.” (Mt. 14:50), yet there is a remarkable turnabout. A few
days later, these same disciples proclaimed Jesus as being “no longer held by death” (Acts.
2:24). These last events of the story from the Core of the Oldest Faith Proclamation, “I
delivered to you as of first importance what I received, that Christ died following the
Scriptures, that he was buried, that he was raised on the third day following the scriptures
and that he appeared…” (1 Cor. 15:3-5)
In this module, we are dealing with this Paschal Mystery: Suffering, Death,
Resurrection, and the coming again of Jesus, considering the life of the Spirit among the
community.
It mentioned that Jesus’ mission on earth has two phases. These are the first
phase: TO PROCLAIM SALVATION IN TERMS OF THE BLESSINGS OF LIFE TODAY
(Reign-Kingdom of God), and the second phase: TO DIE ON THE CROSS FOR OUR SINS.
This second phase of Jesus' mission was misconstrued as the only mission of Jesus’
coming to earth. Note that Jesus had hardly settled in on the crib when he was sent off to
his passion and death.
115
Take a simple look at considering our official creed formulated in the 4 th century.
It could have lost the touch of the first phase of Jesus’ Mission from “being born of the Virgin
Mary…” to …suffered-crucified… died and was buried.” It escaped from the most dangerous
life Jesus lived, which painted a torturous death that Jesus must offer. It is now the time
that we restore in our faith the actual score behind the death of Jesus.
When believers want to speak about the death of Jesus, the usual trend is to
answer the question, “Why did Jesus die?” to which comes the typical answer: “to
redeem us from sin.” While it is true that Jesus died to save us from sin, it is also a
demand to answer the other question, “Why was Jesus killed?” Thus, the latter would
allow us to excavate the solid grounds for Jesus’ death or the actual motive for killing Him.
One, who has a grip on the real reason he was killed, has a solid ground for the faith
meaning of Jesus being put to death. In other words, Jesus’ death has two aspects, the
historical reasons and the theological aspect or Faith Meaning. The Historical element of
Jesus’ death refers to the historical causes of Jesus' death. The Theological Aspect refers to
the faith explanation or faith meaning of His death on the Cross. As our priority, we must
deal with the first aspect and move to the second, as our quest for faith means historical
reality.
In talking about the person's death, we need to be clarified between motives and
allegations. It is essential to answer the question, Why was Jesus killed? Why should they
(the rich and powerful) take Jesus’ life?” How heinous was the crime Jesus committed
that He should pay His life for? It is a reality that many Christians dared not to excavate
the answer to it because it is difficult to identify the exact historical causes of Jesus’ death.
But with bits of pieces from the Gospels, we could gather some thorny issues as bases for
his enemies to kill him:
We may gather in the Gospel passages bits of information about some thorny
motives for why they murdered Jesus.
a. Jesus prioritized the human being and human life over and against the
accepted tradition and law.
Jesus violated the Law of the Sabbath by healing people and letting the hungry
pluck corn. For Jesus, tax collectors, the poor, outcasts, and sinners were human
beings worthy of respect with human dignity in His eyes. (Mk. 3:1-6, 2:15-17, 23:28).
The Pharisees considered Him as a person who did not help the implementation of
the Law on the Sabbath. He was under the surveillance of the Pharisees.
116
b. Jesus was a rebel against Tradition.
In the eyes of the institution, Jesus was not only a conformist but also a heretic, an
apostate. (Mk. 2:22, Mk 7). From the perspective of the Scribes, Jesus is creating His
own. He is a rebel against the Jewish holy Tradition.
e. Jesus exposed authority’s hypocrisy and love for externals. (Mt. 23)
The Sanhedrin considered Jesus the destroyer of the comfort and convenience
(status quo) they enjoyed in their position. Jesus was killed; he did not just die. He
was executed. Why? The thorny issues about Jesus’ death above are hardly seen
to point out the causes that Jesus was crucified. After all, he wanted to save souls
because His Father in heaven wanted him dead and because he disappointed
people’s hope of a political or military Messiah. No, these are not the real reasons
for Jesus’ execution. But this is because Jesus revealed the inconsistencies,
hypocrisy, and love of externals of the authorities. From the authorities' point of view,
enough is enough for persons like Jesus. Leaders had to get rid of him.
Jesus’ condemnation by the Romans is no problem at all. A faithful Jew cannot just
submit somebody to an unjust and oppressive socio-political structure. But why did the
Sanhedrin decide to hand a compatriot, Jesus of Nazareth, to the so much hated Romans?
To understand this, we must stand on Jesus as a prophetic figure. Jesus did not just
announce the Good News as a prophet, but He radically denounced evil idolatry and
injustices that the Sanhedrin had tenderly taken care of. The Jesus prophet had been a
threat to the political power of Israel’s rulers. Hence, we need not de-politicize Jesus’ death,
and we need not insist that Jesus was only condemned for religious reasons. He was a
117
victim of a death-prone religio-political structure. He was executed as a political rebel of
Rome.
A dangerous life courts a scary death. Jesus stood squarely FOR LIFE, for THE
HUMAN BEING, for the POOR, and JUSTICE. Jesus was confronting a TRADITION, a
LAW, and an AUTHORITY that had become meaningless and destructive to people’s
lives. It is the stance that our LORD, JESUS, stood for that ends his life in death. Do you
want to follow Him? A true believer in Him should pattern this kind of life. Jesus works and
contemplates. If you wish to read Jesus’ life well, you are reading life of action and
contemplation, but that action led him to his being killed.
The Gospel accounts also mention other possible causes or motives for Jesus’ death.
However, it is difficult to tell the real motives and false charges. Other possible reasons
would include:
1. Jesus claimed to be the Messiah and Son of God (Mt. 26:63-64)
2. Jesus uttered blasphemy (Mt. 26:65)
3. The Jewish authorities delivered Jesus out of envy (Mt. 27:18)
4. Jesus performed many signs (Jn. 11:47-48)
5. Jesus was perverting the nation and forbidding it to give taxes (Luke 23:2)
6. Jesus was agitating the people throughout the land (Luke 23:5)
These charges might be so shallow to be paid with the precious life of Jesus, who restored
the life of many. It would be fine if we stand on the grounds opposing the system, ideology,
structure, and conviction which triggered the status quo of the authorities and powerful as
the fundamental reason for the killing of Jesus.
On the questions: “How did Jesus face his on-coming death on the cross? Did Jesus
fight; did He go through a real human fear of death? How did He stand in the face of death? ”
believers would like to view this as a heroic act always and nothing else but we should
accept views that would guide us into correct perspective.
The fact was that Jesus went through a real human struggle to accept this death on
the cross. The death on the Cross was a shameful death to bear. It is time now that this
118
man, who values a person's life and makes it a priority to nourish this life in his Ministry, is
be taken away from his own life. Jesus was struggling to face this death at the hands of
Israel's oppressors and unjust rulers. We may follow Jesus’ real human struggle of his on-
coming death on the cross.
We can discover that he employed the economy of death through the New
Testament. Unlike John the Baptist, Jesus did not launch His ministry in Jerusalem.
Galilee, the typical destination of the oppressed and underprivileged, became His
station and base of operations. Galilee symbolizes acceptance and living a simple
lifestyle so that others may have a lease on life. In Galilee, one is with dignity and
integrity.
Mark, on his part, never allowed Jesus to enter Jerusalem until chapter 10, and after
this chapter, Mark did not authorize or like Jesus to stay in the city, at least at
nighttime. Jerusalem represents rejection. The enemies of life are present here. It is a
shelter for those whose only goals in life are to maintain their wealth, status, and
notoriety. While Jesus worked for the restoration of life in Galilee, in Jerusalem,
Jesus’ life was being taken away from Him. And as His enemies increased, His
friends deserted Him.
When Jesus entered Jerusalem, He did not just go and sleep anywhere in the
nighttime. The Gospels can trace facts that Jesus avoided places of danger at night.
He took refuge in safe places, if not his hiding places, like Bethany and Ephraim,
Gethsemane. These are forested, hilly, and stony places away from and overlooking
Jerusalem. The twelve apostles only know these places. They knew where the
Master should spend the night. That is why it took Judas Iscariot to betray Him, for
the arresting soldier did not know this forested, hilly, and stony place of Bethany,
Ephraim, and Gethsemane.
Amid hosannas and leafy branches, Jesus entered Jerusalem. (Mk. 11:7-10) Danger
ahead! He is entering the heart of the enemy zone. The Sanhedrin was there. The
Jewish military was there. The unique Jesus Rally of Palm Sunday probably alerted
his enemies. He went around only with His close and trusted friends.
Jesus entered the Temple. Here, he was going to stage a raid on the morrow. So
what did Jesus do? He did a preliminary survey in the Temple, “He looked around at
everything” This was in preparation for the assault. (Mk. 11:11) As it was late in the
day, he left. Was he avoiding the city? Yes! It was the territory of His enemy. It was
not safe even during the day, less so at night. In addition to the Jewish police, there
was the Roman garrison overlooking the Temple. He slipped away, of course, from
His trusted friends, the Twelve. If a man would think of submitting him to the
authorities, he must be from His trusted friends.
Jesus fought. Jesus resisted as long as he could hold out. Let us follow him for a
short while before he is killed. The event follows in quick succession: on the following
day, Jesus attacked the Temple. Then, He engaged in verbal tussles with his
enemies. Then, He ate the Passover Meal with his disciples. All the while, his
enemies were busy plotting his death. Did Jesus go to his death like a lamb being
led to the slaughter? Of course, Jesus did not! Not until after the anguished
semicolon in his life passed.
In Gethsemane, his whole being was shaken. He was terribly in trouble. His deepest
self was in distress, agitation, and grief. He resisted and warded off his mortal fate.
“Take this cup from me.” (Luke 22:42). It is a pivotal event. It is the great divide of
his life. So painful, so heartbreaking. Before this, He was fighting, resisting, and
refusing, but He came to the end of this human struggle. The time has come that
he was able to accept, “yet, not my will but Your will.” (Read Mark 14:32-26)
h. The so-called God’s Will in Jesus' death:
Almost drowned in agony, Jesus cries, “Abba, Father… not my will but yours be done”
(Lk. 22:42). Did God plan that Jesus be killed in that manner? Is anyone here, the worst
Father, who dreamed of having his noble Son be put to death? A foolish Father! The
Father of Jesus is a Loving Father. You will perhaps notice that Jesus hardly spoke of
“God’s will.” He usually talked about His Father’s will, My Father, Your Father (Mt. 7:21,
10:29, 12:50).
If Jesus spoke of “God’s will,” He was not referring to “doing God’s will,” for it
evokes the image of God, who is iron-fisted, arbitrary, inflexible, insensitive, and distant. The
worst father who would design a plan for the cruel death of His only begotten Son. However,
Jesus mentioned longing, desire, seclusion, and a parent's will. He's talking about a life flow
here. Like a river, it is. Some areas, like serene lagoons, are calm and peaceful. There are
turbulent parts where the river crashes against crags and boulders, flaring up into
smithereens of pain. Here crises, their questionings, here abandonment, their despair.
These turbulent parts may not, will not, and cannot have answers. But the whole life flow of
the river does. The river as a whole knows the entire adventure and understands the
absolute certainty that it is going to one place, the great ocean.
Same with what Jesus is referring to as the will of God for his death: the life flow must be
obeyed and done. The conflict of His life is already growing; crises, questionings,
abandonment, and despair are already present. He may not understand what it means right
then, but the whole flow of life may explain it well.
(In Silence, let us pause for a moment and keep in touch with the violent death of the
proclaimer of the Kingdom of God.)
And so they killed Jesus on the Hill of the Skull (Mt. 27:33). It is one of the
cruelest and most painful deaths invented by men. The Authorities crucified the JUST MAN
who brought Salvation into the world. The authorities never realized that Jesus had
launched the Reign-Kingdom of God, but now they tried to tear it off from the life of the
people. The Gospels recorded this dramatic picture of the killing of Jesus.
120
We are moving towards the meaning of this human death of Jesus. Of course, we have
high regard for a meaningful death. That of Jesus is undoubtedly one of the most, if not the
most significant in human history. The stakes Jesus played for the sake of human life, the
poor, and justice would have been given enough meaning to his death. His being killed
must also be perceived as a sacrificial aspect. Thus, the next lesson follows the theological
part of Jesus' death.
Let us pause for a while here. Say nothing, Do nothing, just be in touch with the flow
of life that exudes from the core of the Crucified Jesus. Feel the energy shared with us by
this unusual Jesus. Allow the last breath of Jesus to become life-giving rivulets to us and
the rest of all creation.
(Short Silence)
Jesus of Nazareth is now hanging on the cross. What do you expect a recipient of the
Kingdom of God proclamation would say in front of the dead Jesus? How would a
beneficiary of salvation explain that painful death? Indeed the believer of Jesus lamented
the most beautiful meaning attached to the end of this holy man who did noble works for the
poor and the oppressed.
We have hinted that Jesus' followers have high regard for the most meaningful death
in human history. When a person dies, almost everything about that person has been given
meaning. Virtually all these meanings are good to mean that this person who is dead now
has lived a good life. Good things in the person's life will be recounted much when the
person dies.
Yes, we have followed Jesus in His struggle to accept His death. His fight indeed was
not able to stop His death. Why did He not come to the point of finally escaping His
death? Why did He allow it to happen?
2. JESUS IS DEAD
“… Then Jesus uttering a loud cry, breathed his last.” (Mark 15:3). Jesus is now dead,
no more life. Their life has been torn away from his body. At this point, we can ask, “Why
was Jesus killed? It was not the only quest, significant though it was. Another appropriate
question is also: “Why must Jesus die?” In other words, Jesus can not die. Just as he
can stop the flow of the river and not go through the turbulent flow, he can also have a
detour of the river to a place where there are no crises and the test.
We then said that Jesus felt the greatest fear of death and the most profound anguish
of his life. He experienced the great divide of His very self. But why did Jesus able to accept
121
His death on the Cross? He was innocent. Jesus did not do wrong. He just followed the plan
of God for all humanity. He was just doing what is just.
However, in His profound encounter with the Father “Abba” in prayer, He shook off
the shades of fear. The great divide between His being and His doing has taken its beautiful
shape. Yes, cruel people may take all that Jesus has done in His Ministry. They may
lacerate from Jesus the good things He has offered those in need of His time. But they
cannot tear off the very being, the very self, the integrity of the “nephesh” within Him. They
cannot take away the image and likeness of God inscribed in the person of Jesus. It is in
this manner that this Gethsemane experience became a pivotal moment of acceptance of
this painful death. Jesus reached the rock bottom of his very self. He was in the authentic
confrontation of the human self. He was able to confront His human struggle, fears,
apprehension, and anxieties.
In the Garden of Gethsemane experience, Jesus was in the deep composition of His
self. He was able to burn fears out and reached the point of saying, “NO FEAR” (as we read
stickers around). He felt no more struggles to face this dangerous death as the most
meaningful one. While Jesus became brave enough, it was during this time that Judas
Iscariot was negotiating with the authorities. When Judas brought the captors, it was no
longer a fearful Jesus who faced the captors. The powerful and brave Jesus was held in
custody by the Temple police. What helped Jesus eradicate this fear? What made Him
firmly ground his shaken self to face the pangs of death? There are some Religio-cultural
supports for His acceptance.
Jesus was helped to accept His death. The Early Christians discerned
the insights into the sacrificial meaning of Jesus’ death, who eventually
understood Jesus’ death in the light of the suffering servant of Isaiah 52:13-
53:12 (Please take time to read this text .) However, we must note that this faith
meaning can also originate from Jesus when all the arrows of death were
pointing upon and closing in on him later in his life. It was indeed part of their
religio-cultural belief that death at the hands of the unjust and oppressive
structure can have a beautiful meaning as follows:
1) A Martyr can offer his death for the sins of others
The Jews believed an innocent man was martyred for other people's sins. It had
been developed in their culture since they were under the foreign domain.
Martyrdom had been so familiar. Just as the Crucifixion during the time of the
Romans was a typical daily sighting on the skull hill, A Jew can be put to death to
save others.
“Why must Jesus die?” evokes a different faith meaning of Jesus’ death. The
faith-meaning is also known as the sacrificial aspect or Theological explanation given
to Jesus’ death. Jesus’ death was a sacrificial offering for the atonement of the world's sin.
He has given his life for the forgiveness of our sins. We can refer it to 1Cor. 15:3-4, Rom.
3:21-25, Eph. 5:2, Jn. 1:29. Paul and John are now trying to correspond to what the
Synoptic Gospels have recorded. Jesus died for our sins; His death was a fragrant sacrifice
for the evil encroaching on humanity, history, and the world.
At this point of our study, we have to deal with the faith interpretation of Jesus’ death
not as a theological doctrine to be memorized but as a faith experience, the fruit of mystical
seeing and experiencing the such event of faith. Our pathway to it is likewise mystical
insights and experiences. Here “mystical” could mean everyone’s right to make their
analysis. How can touching or drinking directly from the source be a privilege or a monopoly
of the chosen few? This faith meaning must be a birthright for all the believers of Jesus.
We have the fundamental right to get in touch with the mystical insights and experiences like
that of the trusted friends of Jesus, the Apostles. Who was with Him during his pre-
crucifixion activity, which became His eyewitnesses? “Who had heard and seen” what He
did and who proclaimed this to the world.”
The atoning death of Jesus is a sure constituent or tenet of our faith life. It is a
precious possession, especially to those for whom it is not just a doctrine to be believed but
an open side from whose juices we slake our thirst. As a specific tenet of our faith, Jesus’
death on the cross serves as a stronghold to give the most meaningful death for a most
meaningful life. This faith interpretation of his death had become so colorful because his life
was so colorful.
Jesus’ death was a sacrificial death for the forgiveness of the sins of the world. It is
the theological significance of faith meaning discerned by Jesus when the forces of
opposition and death were closing in on him and by the early Christians when they felt what
Jesus felt. They were facing persecution because of the steps of Jesus they followed.
Great conflict in the societal, political, cultural, and religious structure; thus pushing Jesus to
the wall of death he could accept after human struggles, he offered himself as a sacrificial
victim for the salvation of many. He laid down his life, and His blood was shed for the
salvation of all.
Watching over the dead Jesus, who now is taken from the cross in the lap of his
Mother, Mary, a believer cannot help but rewind their memory of what meaningful life this
person had lived, how dangerous was way he had taken, and how precarious was the death
he suffered.
Flashing back from the beginning of his mission before the Cross, Jesus proclaimed
and actualized the final-and-definitive salvation he termed the Reign-Kingdom of God:
healing, exorcisms, liberation, and justice to the poor and oppressed. (Mk. 1:14-15, Mt.
11:12-16, Luke 6:20). This proclamation, concretization, and actualization of the final-and-
definitive salvation established a conflict whose end product was His death on the Cross.
As has been said numerous times, the purpose of Jesus' death in the traditional
interpretation of the Christian religion was to atone for sin. It has grounded its view on the
Jewish heritage. Through the long tradition of persecution and suffering, they handed over
the acceptance of becoming a martyr. Every faithful Jew was willing to be tortured (esp. the
Zealots) rather than submit to an oppressive social structure.
Thus the Church has taught us this for a long century: (again, do not forget the historical
facts):
a.) Jesus’ suffering and death were closely associated with the coming of the
kingdom (Mt. 5:3-12)
b.) Jesus was determined to destroy suffering. Destroying the sufferings of the poor
and oppressed would mean their justice and liberation.
124
c.) Jesus’ suffering and death were not for personal fame but the salvation of all
people.
d.) Jesus’ suffering and death are a service.
125
k. Readings on Jesus' Passion and Death in the Bible:
We come now to ourselves and keep in touch with the suffering and death of Jesus
until the time when he breathed his last. The readings below would mean that you refer to
your daily struggles with the opposing current with the forces of death that Jesus must face:
Our planet earth, the stars, the galaxies, the supernovas – these make up the
universe. And where is the center? Based on the past Newtonian physics, there is no one
physical center. Instead, each of us is The Center; each of us is also the bosom of the
universe. There, according to our Faith, is also where the Spirit of the RISEN LORD. There
is the indwelling Spirit of our Lord.
After a brief while, this Jesus who died was experienced as alive again by his close
followers. He had defeated death! God had raised Him from the dead! He was risen and
exalted at the right hand of the Father. Yahweh had thus vindicated this innocent and
just man, this Servant of the Lord. There are testimonies of the resurrection of Jesus.
And the testimonies are simple, straightforward, almost a matter of fact: He has Risen. He
is not here. He was raised on the third day. (Please read Mk. 16:5-6, 1 Cor. 15:3-5, and
Luke 24:32). The testimony can also be very personal, deep, and mystical. “It is no longer I
who live, but it is Christ who lives in me.” (Gal. 2:20)
127
The central doctrine of Christianity is the Resurrection of Jesus. The apostle Paul
put it succinctly in his First Letter to the Corinthians, “If Christ has not been raised, our
preaching is void of content, and your faith is empty too” (1 Cor. 15:14).
There were several meanings attached to the coming back to the life of Jesus
himself. These are nourished and nurtured by His early believers, especially those who
experienced the Resurrection event.
a.) The Risen Jesus as God’s Vindication
God’s way of giving justice differs from how humans claim justice. One meaning of
Jesus’ Resurrection embraced by early Christians was that Jesus’ resurrection was God’s
vindication and approval of Jesus and his concretization, actualization, and proclamation of
the Reign-Kingdom of God, his innocent death on the Cross. This first meaning entails the
adversative “You killed Him; God raised him.”
For the first Christians, the Father’s act of raising Jesus from the dead was an act of
giving justice to the innocent victim of violent death. It is the Father’s yes to the stances and
workings of this extraordinary person. Above all, it is the OK seal that validates the death
of Jesus and invalidates the death-prone-social structure, the ideology, and the
machinations of the people who killed Jesus. We can find this in Acts 10:39-41 and Phil.
128
2:8-9 that the innocent man has been raised and no more power of evil can overtake Him.
Yahweh has exalted this man who has been humbled by the rich and the powerful. This
INNOCENT, JUST MAN, SERVANT OF THE LORD is now alive, and death has no power
anymore.
b.) The Risen Jesus as the first fruit of the New World
Another meaning attached to the Resurrection of Jesus was this; Jesus is the first
fruit or the firstborn of the New World of life and resurrection. How beautiful it is to be in this
New World where evil has no trace, death has no power, and God will be all in all. This
second meaning stimulates images and hopes of people who are victims of the Evil world.
They are hope images of Jesus and a deathless and ever youthful world in which
Jesus is the first.
Here is a replay: Is there not a future where each day will rouse us to a new world
where the last enemy, death, will be destroyed? Is not the Kingdom of God a new world
where those who once slept, in the end, would rise to new life? WELL, JESUS IS THE
FIRSTBORN OF THAT NEW WORLD! Is not the Kingdom of God like a harvest? (Mt.
13:20) WELL, JESUS IS THE FIRST FRUIT. (Please read 1 Cor. 15:20 and Colossians
1:18)
Another ancient meaning attached to Jesus' Resurrection is that: the Risen Jesus is
the Spirit, present in the community and the hearts of its members. He is the one that
sanctifies Christians, makes them children of God, and will one day raise us also from the
dead.
The Risen Jesus is the life energy that dwells in our deepest selves. Please read,
once again, Galatians. 4:6, 2 Cor. 3:18, Eph. 3:17, Rm. 8:9-11, Phil. 1:19 and Cor. 15:45.
Jesus no longer has to play by the rules and regulations of our kind of materiality. He frees
us from all limitations of our type of flesh-and-blood existence. Thus unfettered, Jesus can
be the most intimate guest of our hearts. He is the indwelling Spirit. He is the divine element
that works the Alchemy of our divine sonship and daughter ship. And cradled in our once-
based hearts, we can utter the simple cry: “Abba, daughters” that the Cry is worth
infinitely more than all the valued metals in the universe. As if we let him, he can break
through our opaqueness and impermeability and change us “in his likeness from one degree
of glory to another.” And if we are thus rooted in Christ, our loving is not an exertion but a
natural fruit, a spontaneous happening in our lives. And finally, when our days have grown
older, we too will have tasted death. “He who raised Christ Jesus from the dead will also
give life to your mortal bodies through his Spirit who dwells in you.”
d.) The Risen Jesus is Keeping intact the Kingdom Perspective
The fourth meaning given to the resurrection of Jesus is the reality that Jesus' death
and resurrection constitute one salvific act . Jesus has obtained atonement for sin
through his death and resurrection and has given humanity the Spirit. The Cross-and-
resurrection of Jesus has been called the Paschal Mystery. Just as the paschal lamb and its
blood on the doorposts saved the ancient Hebrews from Pharoah’s terror during their march
out of Egyptian Slavery (Ex. 12:11-13), the Sacrificial Blood of Jesus brings salvation from
sin. The Salvation that Jesus has wrought consists in:
129
1. the atonement for sin
2. the outpouring of the Spirit
3. the consequent attainment of eternal life and Salvation
The center of Christian doctrine is the Cross and Resurrection of Christ. Its centrality
is rooted in very ancient tradition. Even before Paul, we already had a formulation of faith,
of which Paul reminded the Corinthian community. (1 Cor. 15:3-4). We also find it in Paul’s
very ancient hymn, expressing belief in Jesus’ obedience unto the cross and his exaltation
by God in Phil. 2:6 ff. Before considering Cross and Resurrection as a Paschal Mystery, we
have also to think that there was a Kingdom-focus associated with this Cross and
Resurrection. The heart of Jesus’ pre-crucifixion mission and the message was the
Kingdom, the new world where God, justice, peace, joy, and whole life reign.
The Risen Jesus has shaken off the shackles of mortality. The Pauline epistles
unveil another profile of the Risen Jesus. The Risen Jesus, now having ascended back to
the bosom of the Godhead, is the Cosmic Christ. Based on the Greek word for the
universe, “cosmos,” we speak of the Risen Christ filling the entire universe as the Cosmic
Christ. It is the fifth meaning of Jesus’ resurrection. Jesus seals, animate, and binds all
things in heaven, earth, and under the world. Thus, the letter to the Ephesians:
“He who descended is the same one who ascended far above all the Heavens so that
he might fill all things. (Eph. 4:10)” “Which is his body, the fullness of him who fills all
in all. (Eph. 1:23)
Having broken loose from limitations our flesh is heir to, Jesus has passed on to
another dimension. There he has become divine energy that permeates and penetrates all
of reality, just as a room saturates with sounds or presence. What Yahweh said is now
spoken of Christ, “Do I not fill heaven and earth?’ said Yahweh (Jer. 23:4). “One God and
Father of us all, who is above all and through all and in all.) (Eph. 4:6)
Jesus that came back to life is the Energy that fills all in all. The universe breathes;
the universe is alive. The Early Christian hymns celebrated the Cosmic Christ as the
cohesive energy like the gravitational force that holds things together, without which all
things in the universe are scattered and cannot stand. “Jesus is before all things; in him,
all things hold together. (Col. 1:17)” “He is the reflection of God’s glory and the exact
imprint of God’s very being, and he sustains all things by his powerful word. When
he had made purification for sins, he sat down at the right hand of the Majesty on
high.”
1.) One Ocean of Energy:
At least three significant groups celebrate a beautiful reading of life in our vast
universe. So attest to the eastern religions, the indigenous religions, and
contemporary physics. They say that all things in heaven and earth are one ocean of
energy. The universe is alive. The Religion of the Early Christians and Jesus join this
chorus. For Christians, one name for the sea is either God Himself or the Cosmic
Christ. It is the Spirit Lord that binds us together with the rest of creation. The Risen
Jesus holds together “all things in heaven and on earth and under the earth.”
Contemporary science, with telescopes, looks up and sees the energies of our
present universe in uninterrupted communion with the points of reality. Viewing it
130
from the current homo sapiens- back to the first animals to the first living cells, the
first single element, the birth of the sun, the delivery of the milky way, the galaxies –
to the initial burst of stupendous billion years ago found out; connect us. The exact
contemporary science with a microscope looked down and found the microscopic
world invisible to the eye. It discovers not lifeless bits of matter but living energies,
the universe is made up of relationships of powers, forming one continuous
communion of points, and we are connected.
Not only is the universe animated and upheld by the Cosmic Christ, but it reconciles
through him. Jesus’ saving death not only brings about salvation and reconciliation
between God and humans (Rom. 5:10-11, 2 Cor. 5:18-19) and among humans,
making Jew and non-Jews into one body (Col. 3:11, Gal. 3:27-29, Eph. 2:13-16). It
also brings about harmony and reconciliation to the rest of creation. The blessings of
Salvation and well-being are meant not only for humans but also for our mother, the
earth, our ancestors, our relatives, and the mammals.
The harmony in nature probably correlates with the defeat of evil powers, which
Biblical Religion discusses. It is tempting to find the incarnation of these evil powers
in our time. We can refer perhaps to the neo-liberal ideology of globalization and its
minions.
Before the final and complete root of those principalities and powers, the created
universe is groaning in labor pains until it is set free from bondage to decay and
obtains the freedom of the glory of the Children of God. Many indigenous people
hear the voices of the mountains; Eastern Religions listen to the sound in their
communication with universal unity.
Thus, the cosmic Christ, who presently animates, upholds, and reconciles the
universe has a past or future. In the past, he had a hand in the birthing of the
universe. In the end, he will bring the universe to its final consummation. At the
climax and closure of human history, God's grand plan will come to pass, sum up all
things in the heavens and on earth in Christ, with the Cosmic Christ as head of all
creation.
Our best teachers on these purviews of the Resurrection are the unassimilated
indigenous people, the Lumads. They must have heard the groaning, the wailing of the
131
mountains when geothermal power plant diggings are going on. Is not the Risen Christ
growing too?
The familiar feelings associated with the Coming Again of Jesus are fear instead of
hope, sadness instead of joyfulness, and shaking instead of excitement. Different sects
have their faith interpretations of this event in Jesus’ life. There is a need to return to the
hopes, joys, excitements, and expectations of the Core community of Jesus, the ancient
core of their belief that the Messiah would come again.
Perhaps we have been overwhelmed with the deep faith meaning of Jesus’
resurrection as upheld by his contemporaries as we bring it to the clasp of the hand of the
universal realities. All of us realized that all stories have closure. Jesus’ story has. For
Jesus’ contemporaries, this closure did not happen in his death, Crucifixion, or in his coming
back to life, Resurrection. This closure of Jesus’ story occurs at the ‘COMING AGAIN’ of
Jesus. The Kingdom of God inaugurated in Jesus’ Ministry will be consummated at his
arrival or the Parousia.
Parousia is a Greek word that means “ “being by” or “being near,” hence
“appearance.” Its standard reference is to the Coming again of Christ, understood as His
return to earth to set up God's final and definitive Kingdom. The coming of the last and
absolute Salvation marks the end of the Life-Story of Jesus.
Why? Where did Jesus go, that he has to come again? Isn’t it that He is the
Indwelling Spirit in us and among us, but why need to go again if He is just around? We
would probably encounter these questions in this faith event in Jesus’ life story.
It is but timely to talk here about the ascension of Jesus before touching the Parousia
Ascension constitutes an integral part of Christ’s paschal mystery. The Risen Jesus, as
experienced by his trusted friends, is now “lifted.” “So then, after speaking to them, the Lord
Jesus was taken up into heaven.” (Mark 16:19). Ascension refers to the final post-
Resurrection manifestation of Jesus to His followers. This memorable disappearance of the
Risen Christ impressed the Twelve after the forty-day special moment of encounter with
Him.
The Acts of the Apostles reports that Jesus appeared to his disciples “over forty
days.” (Forty days is a symbolic number in the Bible that indicates an especially sacred time
of history, a moment with God). Jesus stated that the Apostles would soon experience the
baptism of the Holy Spirit. "He was before their eyes in a cloud which took him for their
sight," St. Luke continues. (CFC #648-49)
“Jesus ascended into heaven.” Heaven here is not an entity but a substitute for
“God.” The time has come that the Risen Jesus entered into “Heaven, " meaning Christ
entered God's nature. Having experienced the new dimension of life in the Resurrection,
Jesus is now with God, and no human eyes can see Him. In this ascension event, Jesus is
ending His “physical appearance” in the sight of His trusted friends and entering His Glory
as God.
132
“And I, when lifted from the earth, will draw men all to myself.” (Jn. 12:32). The lifting
up of Jesus on the cross signifies and announces his lifting up by his Ascension into
heaven, and indeed begins it. Jesus Christ, the one priest of the new and eternal Covenant,
“entered, not into a sanctuary made by human hands… but into heaven itself, now to appear
in the presence of God on our behalf.” (Heb. 9:24). There, the Christ permanently
exercises his priesthood, for he always lives to make intercession for those who draw near
to God through him. As a high priest of the good things to come, he is the center and the
principal actor of the future world. (CCC # 662)
The raising of “The Christ” did not end with his coming back to life but stretches to the
Gospel Testimonies of His ascension until the coming again of that Risen Christ. At this
stage, the Coming Again of the Christ was hardly part of our religious consciousness. With
the fast-growing technological development and the excitement of downloading the Internet,
it is hard to think that this important historical figure that made a vibrant change two
thousand years ago is coming again (cf. CFC #653). It was something serious to think of
today’s believers as we made passing reference when we recited the Apostles Creed:
“he ascended to heaven, sits at the right hand of the Father, from there, he
shall come to judge the living and the dead.”
We hardly understood anything about that coming of Jesus event, except that it was
something to be faced. Are we ready to meet our Judge? Are we prepared to accurately
account for every thought, word, and deed during this life? It is a favorite way of teaching the
essence of the Second Coming of Jesus. So follows are the fearful teachings of the
Parousia. (cf. A Third Look at Jesus pp. 215)
Paul writes to his Thessalonians community: “God calls us to his glorious kingdom.”
In the meantime, we lead our lives in anticipation of the coming again of our Lord Jesus.
When He does come, in apocalyptic glory or not, we look up because our final redemption
will have arrived.
As a final saving event, what really would happen in the Parousia? Bits of pieces in
the Bible narrative can give us images of this great event in the life of our religion.
A closer look at the Bible reveals the privileged place that Jesus’ coming again had
occupied in the awareness of the early Christians. Luke 21:25-28 is a clear
description of the Coming of the Son of Man. While St. Paul, in his first letter to the
Thessalonians, urges the community to live a life worthy when Jesus would come
again. It will be a great event of Salvation.
Throughout the 100 years or so of the New Testament era (30-120 C.E.) and even
later, the Parousia of Jesus was an important event in Christian consciousness.
Why? Because that is Victory-day, the day of the coming of the Kingdom! When
Jesus ‘COMES AGAIN’ then will also dawn that New World. A world where
humankind will know no more mourning, pain, suffering, or death – because all these
things will have been new! It is an excellent event for our SALVATION! “Salvation
has come.”
133
b.) A Joyful Pledge for a New World
What a vibrant joy of biblical people that people of today have not considered a
significant event of Salvation is the coming again of Jesus. Fear, rather than
anticipation and joy, used to be our feelings towards the Parousia. After centuries of
those fears, the 21st generation refreshes in an ancient consciousness of Parousia.
At last, in modern perspective grounded in the old conviction of the friends of Jesus,
we shouted, “Wait in joyful hope for the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ.” By this, we
are proclaiming the faith of the contemporaries of Jesus and the certainty of the New
World of the Future.
The coming again of Jesus is the dawn of the New Word. It is a world where the New
Life is bursting forth free from all forms of evil, including sin. It is a world where there
will be no more suffering, no more pains, no more sickness, no more death. All
things, all humans, the whole world, the universe, the humanity, the history will be
God’s. “God will be all in all.”
“Then they will see the Son of Man coming in a cloud with power and great
glory.
When these things begin, stand up and raise your heads.” (Luke 23:27-28).
This passage from Luke is an interesting phrase that mirrors the early Christians'
deep consciousness about Jesus’ coming again. Our traditional knowledge
associates the word ‘REDEMPTION’ with Jesus’ death or resurrection or any other
event except the Parousia. But the tone of St. Luke is the great glory of the
consummation of the Reign-Kingdom of God. The Christ who allowed the earth to
breathe and to undergo rebirthing will now end this era to a new era, the Era of our
Redemption. (cf. A Third Look at Jesus, p. 216)
134
3. At the Closure with Mary, the Mother of Jesus
The Catholic tradition upheld the vital role of Mary in the life of Jesus, the Christ.
Why could Jesus withstand the opposing current in the River of his life? Why was Jesus
able to strengthen his deep commitment to the poor and oppressed? It
cannot be attributed to the Spirit of the Father only, but of course, the
mother's love must also be a significant factor. (Filipino culture speaks
--- to this impression)
As the Corinthians lived out their days and celebrated the Lord’s death in the
Eucharist, their eyes were focused on the Parousia and the Kingdom, as if to say, “Come
soon, and let the Kingdom and its blessings break into our lives today!” Their prayer was,
‘Maranatha, come, Lord Jesus! Hurry up! (1 Cor. 16:22b)
The apocalyptic imagery – coming in a cloud (Luke 21:27) sound of God’s trumpet (1
Thess. 4:16) need not be literal. Nor do we know exactly the shape and form of this
“coming,” No one could tell us about this, but the hope is there. What was said is that God
or His Christ will put closure to our history.
There is restoring imagery of the apocalyptic hope for the Eucharist and the
Parousia in the early Church. The Catechism for Filipino Catholics (CFC) has emphasized
the Eucharist as a pledge for future glory. What is essential for us today, as we await in
joyful hope for the coming of our Lord, Jesus Christ, is that we have actively participated in
making the Parousia of Jesus. We cannot just passively wait, not just contemplate or pray
for Jesus’ coming and the coming of the final and definitive Salvation. In his first coming, he
gave a mandate to his followers:
“As you go, proclaim the good news, the kingdom of heaven has come near,
cure the sick, raise the dead, cleanse the lepers, cast out demons.” (Mt. 10:1-
8).
135
With these words ringing in our ears, the Parousia and the future Kingdom take on
the guise of a finish line which summons us to take our action today, DO OUR SOCIAL
RESPONSIBILITY as the true essence of Christianity.
It is not “to-just-wait” but must be something to do. There is a task given to the
believers of Jesus. Do it now. We hear the sound of God’s trumpet in the voices of the
mountains whose terrain refreshed the songs of the clear rivers and animating trees.
According to the transparent cloud of hope for humanity, the entire planet, and history,
which sounded by the melodic whisper of the cool air and the moistness of the morning dew.
Do the kingdom works today while waiting for the time Christ comes in His glory?
Abesamis cited that when Jesus appeared in human history, He tried to shy away
from titles and honorifics. He must not be given a brand with his works as much as
possible. Yes, we can find in the Gospel that He intensely warned those who had beautiful
experiences with Him not to say to anybody. However, something became more apparent
to His followers after His death and resurrection. First, Jesus is the Agent of God’s final
and definitive Salvation, whom the people of old waited for hundreds of years. Secondly,
Jesus dies for our sins, and Jesus belongs to the Divine sphere. In this topic, we
consider the Titles given to Jesus either used by himself or the Early Christians. These titles
of Jesus reflected how the early believers experienced Jesus’ phenomenon in our human
history.
The early Church reflected the actual happening of Jesus' life. Having embraced the
commitment and conviction of this moral man, the early Church carved and molded in their
hearts the faith images in Jesus.
As we already know, Christ is not the surname of Jesus. It is one of the essential Titles
the early Christians gave to Jesus. It is the most familiar Title attributed to Jesus that it
becomes the personal name of Jesus for us Christians: Jesus Christ or simply CHRIST.
In Biblical history, the specially set apart and specially commissioned people, such as
kings, priests, and prophets, were anointed with oil. This title was most likely seen as apt for
Jesus because He was from King David’s genealogical line, which according to ancient
oracles, was the provenance of king-saviors. Of course, Jesus was not a king according to
monarchial standards, but He was a Savior who concretized God’s reign and died for casing
evils and forgiveness of sins. In Luke 4:18, Jesus asserts to be the anointed one not to die
but to proclaim Good News to the Poor. Similarly, Acts 10:38 associates God’s anointing of
Jesus with “going about doing GOOD and HEALING all that were oppressed by the devil, for
God was with Him. (cf. A Third Look at Jesus, p. 223 and Jesus and You, p. 95)
The Title Suffering Servant finds its roots in the writing of Second Isaiah, especially in
the four Servant songs, Isaiah 53:4-5, 12:13:
- he shall divide and spoil the strong
- who suffered pain for our transgressions
- who sustained injuries as a result of our sins
- upon Him was the chastisement that made us whole
- because he poured out his soul to death and tore the sin of many
In this original Isaianic context, the Servant is most likely referred not to as an individual
personal savior figure but to the ISRAELITE PEOPLE. For centuries, the Israelites suffered
137
the cruel hands of mighty empires like Assyrians, Babylonians, and Romans. Israel is
bearing the sins of many, so they were the Suffering Servants.
However, the third-millennium believers of Jesus take a look in Isaiah 42 at another image
of a suffering servant. A servant is one who -
- He is the chosen one
- Will bring forth justice to the nations,
- he will faithfully bring forth justice to all,
- he will not fail or be discouraged until he establishes justice on earth.
- It unfolded Yahweh’s salvation in him
- of his bringing forth justice and liberation for the poor and the oppressed.
This servant figure now sharply points to the exact characteristics of the Anointed One of
Yahweh, the Messiah, who came to restore the covenantal promises of Yahweh. In Jesus is
the imagery of a faithful suffering servant. He is the new Israel who suffered and died for the
salvation of the many.
Lord was the earliest title used by the early Christians after the Resurrection to
designate the Divinity of Jesus. It is one of the more notable titles attributed to Jesus.
During His ministry, various people called Jesus LORD. This usage meant something
equivalent to our “Sir or Master,” or in the colloquial term we used, “Boss.” It was a title of
address that denotes respect.
Lord, this address also meant ruler or owner of Land, something like the Medieval prince
in the European countries, particularly in the feudal landholding system. It points to the
great Truth of our faith that Jesus is Lord and the Ruler of the Universe. Only GOD is the
Lord of all creation, in heaven, on earth, and under the world. If God is the Ruler of the
Universe, no other has the power to rule over it, of course, not the superpowers we have
today and in the future. To call Jesus Lord is to affirm His Divine origin; he is from God,
God Himself, the Great Ruler of all Creation.
Jesus referred to Himself as the SON OF MAN throughout the Gospels. It is how Jesus
fondly called Himself. It is the Title that only Jesus uses and no one else in His lifetime. In
Jesus’ culture, the phrase SON OF MAN simply meant, “Someone who represents what it
is to human.”
In the book of Daniel, the Son of Man is a symbolic representation for the people of
Israel, who are contrasted with four beasts and give victory and glory to the Son of Man. It
might be the best background for the New Testament use. Son of Man is the title of the prize
in Daniel. In some if not most of the sayings of Jesus, the Son of Man is with His suffering,
Death, and Resurrection, and His coming again in the final and definitive Salvation.
Jesus, the Word of God, was one of the loftiest titles given by Jesus by the early Church,
as highlighted by the Gospel according to John (1:1-4). It is a meditative Title that suggests
a rich reflection on the nature of Jesus. In Greek, Jesus is the LOGOS or the WORD OF
GOD.
This title of Jesus means Jesus is God’s perfect Word. He is the fullest expression of
God in the Created Reality. Jesus is the way to get to God; Jesus is the Mediator, the
perfect mirror-image of how people are to relate to the Almighty God. He is the God-made
flesh, the God Presented to us in a form that we can see, hear, touch, and tangible to our
sense. As the Word of God, we must guard our faith and not reduce Jesus as a mere copy
of the Bible. But in a deep understanding of trust, let us hold on to the belief that Jesus is
the Word who is Visible to represent the Invisible God. (cf. Jesus and You, pp. 104-105)
These are very traditional titles attributed to Jesus in faith. These titles as King,
Prophet, and Priest only identify who Jesus is, but they speak of his function. His role for
humanity. Prophet emphasized Jesus’ role as Testifier of the Truth of God’s Reign-Kingdom
or Salvation. The priest is Mediator between God and humanity. Jesus made us one with
God; He has atoned for our sins by His sacrifice. He brought the world, society, history, and
universe to the right hand of the Father. These refer to the threefold functions of Jesus we
have shared upon receiving our Baptism. (PCP #116-121)
Thus, as a Prophet, Jesus opens our eyes to the Truth of the design of God’s will. God
designed a plan that
a) all people will share the earth's wealth equitably, and no one should be deprived of
the blessings of life from God Himself.
b) All people will live in harmony with one another and the whole of creation.
In unfolding the Truth, Jesus lives as a prophet in word, deed, and fate.
As King, Jesus united us to fight against evils that would destroy God’s Plan for all.
Jesus leads us on the way to liberating people from idolatry and injustices. He carefully
showed us what a believer of God must do in a bad situation. Jesus brought all evils into
damnation as a Priest by His casting them out and sacrificing Himself on the Cross. It is
challenging for all when we claim to be Jesus’ disciples.
How does the Filipino perceive Jesus? The rich and colorful religious experience
among Filipinos from the Pre-Christian era down to the centuries when we became
Christians until the third millennium has built a unique way of perceiving Jesus based on our
139
culture. The Catechism for Filipino Catholics (CFC) spelled out what the Second Plenary
Council (PCP II) firmly declared: the 21 st century marks the 500th year since we first
accepted Faith in Jesus. This acceptance made the Philippines the only Christian nation in
Asia (CFC #28). PCP II insisted on the mutual interaction between Christian Faith and
Filipino culture.
But how do we, Filipinos, perceive Jesus, then? This question can be answered by
looking at who the Christian Filipinos are, which the CFC carefully outlines. Here are some
of the predominant Filipino characteristics viewed in the five essential traits of Jesus:
As we follow through the entire life story of Jesus, we enjoyed the Good News He
announced. We also hoped that it would happen to us today. We understood why He has to
be strong amidst the opposing current dealing with the oppressive social structure. But we
trembled with fears and felt the pains and the struggles against death. But finally, we
smelled the aroma of the newness of life in His Resurrection. And now, we joined in faith
that we would actively and joyfully prepare ourselves, our world, and our history for the final
and definitive salvation.
1. A Call to Discipleship
There is an excellent call to discipleship. There is a great demand to live the life of
the Jesus of history.
Based on a faith experience that sees Jesus still present in history, humanity, the
world, and even in a particular actual situation, the Christian affirms Jesus as the Christ, the
ultimate source of Salvation. Christianity is a way of life, the way of life lived by Jesus, the
Christ. It is a conviction, a commitment. When we declare ourselves Christian in today’s
world, we do it because we still experience Jesus as the Christ in our midst, as an offer for
salvation, liberation, and wholeness. If not, why should one be a Christian? (De Mesa,
Doing Christology p. 340)
b. Who is a disciple?
Being a disciple means allowing God's self to permeate every aspect of who we
are—including our lives and selves—rather than just imitating Christ. Every Disciple
has the imprint of God's personality.
It demands a lot of concretizing the works of Jesus and openness to worship the
Spirit in our lives. Jesus lived in and from the grace of the Father. His whole life is an
expression of the will of God. His Disciples expected it. (de Mesa. Doing Christology p.
312)
The specified source of inspiration must shape our life; the “Spirit” received from
Jesus: God’s Reign among us. Aemonn Bredin, in his book, “Rediscovering Jesus,”
emphasized that “It is the Spirit of this Jesus that is given to His disciples to strengthen
them, animate them and make them true witness. This is “a spirit of sonship, not a spirit of
fear, which makes us cry like Jesus, “Abba.” Thus Jesus’ work is a task and goal for all
disciples. Jose de Mesa, in his book, “Doing Christology,” describes the disciple further as:
a) Somebody who confesses in Faith that the Kingdom of God has come…
one who dares to follow Jesus in His commitment to a life free from all forms of
evil,
b) Somebody who runs the risk of being opposed and rejected by the world for
the cause of injustice, compassion, and faithfulness but finally has the
conviction that they will accept by the Father through Jesus (de Mesa,
Doing Christology, p. 313)
141
The PCP II strongly stressed that the call to discipleship is for every Christian and the
call to all of us from that Missionary Community of Disciples, which is the Church. (PCP
II. 345)
What form or shape should our works of salvation take today as Disciples of Jesus?
Our works of salvation cannot be a photocopy of Jesus’ in His time, nor can they be precisely
the same as Jesus’ Kingdom works or Kingdom practice. Why not? Because we live in a
different historical context from Jesus, we also have various historical challenges and
ecological threats. But one thing we do have in common with that of Jesus is a concern for
the entire life and well-being of humans and all creation. (cf. Abesamis, A Third Look at
Jesus pp. 126-127)
There is a need to seriously scrutinize the signs of times (cf. Mt. 16:3). The world,
humans, and history, according to the contemporary tool, social analysis, are seriously ill.
The diagnosis is a worldwide disease called “globalization” (Abesamis, A Third Look at
Jesus, p. 127). Pope John Paul II, in his visit to Mexico, addressed this illness by saying,
“attacked free market policies for their neglect of the poor under the purely economic
conception of Man.” It is the principle behind the political and economic interest of
globalization. He blamed globalization for the growing gap between the rich and the poor.
(New York Time, January 27, 1999). This evil of today’s world garnered a decorative, if not
gold plated plaque. Globalization is a full-grown adherence to the basic principle: profit must
be pursued even at the expense of the life of the people and nature.
Carlos Abesamis, in his book, “A Third Look at Jesus,” outlined the visible effects of
globalization on human beings and nature. Abesamis further showed how these effects of
globalization threatened the life of the earth's inhabitants and the earth itself as humanity's
home. (Abesamis, A Third Look at Jesus, p. 128). Today, the Philippine society is facing no
longer a crisis but a tragic economic, ecological, cultural, and political disaster. It seems that
Christian Filipinos stood helpless amidst disastrous unjust social realities. This helplessness
of the Christian Filipinos affirmed the idea that Christianity has not failed; it has not tried.
Disciples are not only to believe the truth but to live Jesus’ Mission of Salvation
amidst the opposing current of modern society. It is a challenge for all the believers of
Jesus. It is a great moment to imbibe the Missionary zeal, principles, commitment, and
conviction of Jesus, the proclaimer of the Reign-Kingdom of God. We shared this mission
with our Baptism. We, too, are proclaimers of the Reign-Kingdom of God by being a faithful
members of the Church. As a Prophet, a Priest, a King, we can make Jesus alive again,
working for Salvation and Liberation today in our midst.
I. References
A. Books
144
Ref. 1 Abesamis, C., S.J. (1999). The Third Look At Jesus, Quezon City: Claretian
Publications.
Ref. 2 Bredin, E., (1986). Rediscovering Jesus. Mystic: Twenty-Third Publications.
Ref. 3 Cunningham, D., (1988). God’s Order vs. The Jewish/Roman Social Order.
Manila: SPI Publications.
Ref. 4 De Mesa, J. and Wostyn, L., (2005). Doing Christology: The Re-appropriation of a
Tradition.Quezon City: Claretian Publications.
Ref. 5 Duquesne, J., (1998). Jesus; An Unconditional Biography. United Kingdom:
Liguori/Triumph.
Ref. 6 Finley, J. and Pennock, M., (1977). Jesus and You. Indiana: Ave Maria Press.
Ref. 7 Kleger, Roland. Christology and Soteriology, engl.7.2015.
Ref. 8 Loewe, W., (1997). Introduction to Christology. Quezon City: Claretian
Publication.
Ref. 9 Mercado, L, SVD. (1982). Christ in the Philippines.Tacloban: Divine Word
University Publications.
Ref. 10 Pastva, A., (1982). The Mystery of Jesus of Nazareth.Glencos Publishing Co.:
California.
Ref. 11 Perkins, P., (2010). Reading the New Testament. USA: Paulist Press.
Ref. 12 Rahner, K., (2004).Encyclopedia of Theology: A Concise Sacramentum
Mundi. India: St. Pauls.
Ref. 13 Rausch, T., (2005). Who is Jesus? An Introduction to Christology.Claretian
Publications.
Ref. 14 Senior, D., (1975). A Gospel Portrait: Jesus. Ohio: Pflaum Publishing.
B. Others
Ref. 15 Catholic Bishop’s Conference of the Philippines. (1991). Acts and Decrees of the
Second Plenary Council of the Philippines. Philippines:
PaulinesPublishing House.
Ref. 16 Catholic Bishop’s Conference of the Philippines (1994).Catechism for Filipino
Catholics. Manila: Word and Life Publications.
Ref. 17 Catholic Bishop’s Conference of the Philippines (2005). Compendium of the
Catechism of the Catholic Church. Manila: Word and Life Publications.
Ref. 18 Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace, (2004).Compendium of the Social
Doctrine of the Church. Manila: Word and Life Publications.
Ref. 19 Pope John Paul II.(1976). RedemptorHominis (Mystery of Redemption and
Dignity of Man). Pasay City: St. Paul Publications.
Ref. 20 ReEd Program Faculty. (1995). Compiled Materials for ReEd 2. Holy Cross of
Davao College: Davao City.
Ref. 21 The New American Bible and the Christian Community Bible.