Written Tasks G12: Inquiries, Investigations, and Immersion
Part 1. Complete the research agenda. Explain each area of interest in 1 or 2
paragraphs.
Criteria:
Organization of ideas - 25 pts
Relevance of content to research - 25 pts
Grammar - 10 pts
Total: 60 pts
Areas of Interest Research Agenda
Topic/Issue
Possible Title of the Study
Problem to be studied or discussed
Possible Respondents/Participants
Type of Research
Research Method/Design
Source: Retrieved from:
https://www.coursehero.com/tutors-problems/English/28499933-Given-below-is-a-
sample-table-of-a-research-agenda-to-formally-start-a/
Part II. Choose one research topic in the given list. Create a title and a research
introduction from your chosen topic. (5-6 paragraphs). Align your output in
your strand. Use Font style Arial and Font size 11.
The impact of social media on mental health and well-being
Gender inequality in the workplace: Causes and solutions.
1.
2.
The development and implementation of renewable energy sources
3.
4.
The effects of climate change on vulnerable communities
5.
6.
The portrayal of women in the media: Examining stereotypes and their
consequences
7.
8.
The history and impact of colonialism in a specific country or region
9.
10.
The impact of climate change on biodiversity and ecosystems
11.
12.
The potential benefits and risks of gene editing technologies
13.
Criteria for Research Title
Clarity (5 points): The title should clearly and accurately convey the main focus or
objective of the research.
Conciseness (5 points): The title should be brief and to the point, avoiding
unnecessary words or phrases.
Relevance (7 points): The title should indicate the subject or topic being studied,
ensuring it is directly related to the research.
Specificity (6 points): The title should be specific, providing a clear indication of the
scope or extent of the research.
Engaging (7 points): The title should be catchy and intriguing to capture readers'
attention, making them interested in the research.
Total: 30 points
Criteria for Research Introduction:
Background information (10 points): The introduction should provide a brief
overview and context of the research topic, highlighting its importance and relevance.
Research problem or question (10 points): The introduction should clearly state
the research problem or question the study aims to address.
Purpose and objectives (10 points): The introduction should outline the purpose of
the research and the specific objectives or goals that will be achieved.
Significance of the study (15 points): The introduction should explain why the
research is important, its potential impact, and how it contributes to existing
knowledge or fills a gap in the literature.
Structure of the paper (5 points): The introduction should briefly outline how the
research will be presented.
Total: 50 points
Part III.
Search for a sample research paper aligned with your strand. Attach the abstract part
ONLY in your submission. Extract and discuss what the research gap is in the study.
(2-3 paragraphs).
1. Introduction (5 points):
- Does the introduction effectively engage the reader and provide necessary
background information?
- Does the introduction clearly state the purpose of the critique essay?
- Does the introduction provide a concise overview of the topic or work being
critiqued?
2. Analysis and Evaluation (20 points):
- Does the essay provide a thorough analysis of the strengths and weaknesses of
the work being critiqued?
- Are the arguments and claims made in the critique well-supported with evidence
and examples?
- Does the essay evaluate the effectiveness and validity of the work being critiqued
based on established criteria or standards?
3. Organization and Structure (10 points):
- Is the essay well-organized and structured in a logical manner?
- Are the main points and arguments presented in a clear and coherent sequence?
- Does the essay use appropriate headings, subheadings, and transitions to guide
the reader through the critique?
4. Use of Evidence (10 points):
- Does the essay incorporate relevant and credible evidence to support the
critique?
- Are the sources of evidence properly cited and referenced?
- Does the essay use a variety of evidence types (e.g., empirical data, expert
opinions, examples) to strengthen the critique?
5. Critical Thinking (10 points):
- Does the essay demonstrate critical thinking skills by questioning assumptions,
identifying biases, and analyzing underlying assumptions?
- Does the essay present alternative perspectives or counterarguments to the work
being critiqued?
- Does the essay provide well-reasoned arguments and logical conclusions?
6. Conclusion (5 points):
- Does the conclusion effectively summarize the main points of the critique essay?
- Does the conclusion provide a clear overall assessment or judgment of the work
being critiqued?
- Does the conclusion offer insights or recommendations for further improvement or
future work?
7. Writing Style and Clarity (10 points):
- Is the essay written in a clear, concise, and coherent manner?
- Is the language appropriate for the intended audience and purpose?
- Are grammar, spelling, and punctuation used correctly?
8. Originality and Creativity (5 points):
- Does the essay demonstrate originality in the critique and analysis?
- Does the essay offer unique perspectives or insights on the work being critiqued?
- Does the essay engage the reader through creative and compelling arguments?
Total Points: 75
