Chapter 5
CONCLUSIONS
SUSTAINABLE TOURISM OF BORACAY, AKLAN, PHILIPPINES
It can be concluded that Boracay has arrived at a relatively advanced stage of
evolution as a beach resort and its geography will prevent it from ever becoming a
tourism metropolis of a sort predicted in certain theories. Nevertheless, it seems to be at a
critical juncture, which might be labelled a period of transition prior to a state of greater
or lesser sustainability. Whichever of these is attained will be determined by assorted
environmental, political, economic and socio-cultural factors and their interplay. The
process of destination development is unlikely to end there and notions of an ultimate
fixed stage may be misleading given the degree of fluidity and
flux prevailing.
Each resort also follows its own particular course and momentum, which can best
be understood within the frame of wider national and local conditions. These can
facilitate or hinder tourism and features of the Philippines at large tend to temper
optimism about its immediate future and that of destinations such as Boracay, although
prospects are a matter for speculation.
Nevertheless, it is unlikely that Boracay’s development will be entirely consistent
with the BRM and such divergences suggest the difficulties of capturing the complexities
and dynamism of resort development in static models, which additionally do not always
give due regard to local and national specifics and their effects. The absence of an exact
match is also reflective of the fact that growth on small islands overall is constrained by
land available. Locations such as Boracay cannot support urbanization of a type
stipulated in the closing stages of the BRM.
The model therefore requires revising with reference to more mature island
destinations, and island resort might be a more apt description of the eighth stage than
city resort. Given the preceding account of Boracay’s prospects, there is also some doubt
about the ending of the process and the organic nature of resorts implies the likelihood of
further changes and stages beyond those postulated. However, it will be necessary to
repeat the exercise in other island locations before formulating a new model or
confirming amendments to the original, and such case studies are material for other
papers.
At the same time, the resort model is valuable in anticipating the difficulties and
opportunities that accompany change and in the preparing of plans directed at sustainable
development to help resolve the former and capitalize on the latter. The case of Boracay
demonstrates the vital need for planning as well as some of the key attributes of resort
development and its management, but the subject is one for ongoing analysis. Such will
further illuminate the development patterns of maturing island resorts and allow
insightful comparative studies of experiences worldwide, as well as contribute to the
devising and testing of new theories and models aligned with tourism in the 21st century.
Everyone in Boracay wants a piece of it, but no one wants responsibility over it.
That is pretty much the story of the island. Now, even the social demographics have
changed considerably. From a pristine and serene beach destination that has been hailed
as one of the best by various international travel and tourism groups and publications
with vibrant marine life it could boast of, it is now a mass tourism destination known to
the young travelers as the best white sand beach party destination.
It is obvious that the people of the Island, both from the public and the private
sectors, were not prepared for the rapid urban and mass tourism development. The
island’s resources were not managed properly. Manifesting in the degradation of the
island’s natural resources and its natural ecosystem which various scientific groups have
already studied and researched on, the relentless growth of tourism operations on the
island is taking its toll on the environment. Even nature cannot stop these inexorable
business operations.
What could have been kept as an island nature trip became a destination marred
by concrete structures, obstinate beach vendors, and inconsiderate transport operators –
all year round. But all is not lost.
However, following the lifecycle of a tourist destination, Boracay is hopefully
moving towards to Rejuvenation. With improved infrastructure and more controlled and
monitored developments on the island, the possibility of rejuvenation becomes greater.
New buildings and new property developments are still ongoing. Infrastructure
developments are underway.
Expansion of road networks, enhanced water pipeline systems, improvement of
the sewage treatment facility and service, are some of the ongoing infrastructure activities
on the island. For social services, there is a proposal to build a world class hospital with a
well-equipped trauma center and well trained emergency response teams. A second-point
of entry – a jetty port – is underway to ease the vehicular traffic on the main road and
establishing an alternative entry point to ensure safety during the rainy season. All these
services, except for road expansion, are spearheaded by the private sector, corporations
and private stakeholders based on the island.
It is at this point of the so-called Rejuvenation stage that Boracay can instill the
principles of sustainable tourism development. Is eco-tourism a future option for the
island? "Philippine society is largely maintained by the astute manipulation of strategic
ties along the basis of kinship, locality or personal connection." In a culture of conflicting
interests, with a government characterized by personalism, individuals engage in practical
tactics for success.
In Boracay, "socially responsible" civil society groups themselves are often
members of the local elite. Despite being underpinned by strong personal religious
values, Philippine society is often controlled by a powerful elite that furthers its interests
– which may run contrary to environmental and social interests. The progress of tourism
development in Boracay has changed the island people’s lifestyle significantly. Locals were originally
involved in subsistence agriculture and fishing activities. However, those who lived in the coastal
regions had to move inland to allow for tourism activities on these coastal regions.
With tourism development, changes are evident in Boracay Island in terms of sand erosion,
coastal pollution, and environmental changes such as the sporadic felling of timber. A wastewater
treatment facility was built with a joint venture with Japan, and this facility is to keep pace with waste
disposed from various tourism operations. However, wastewater is not properly treated and evidence
of sulfide spills over to the shorelines. This has resulted in the sand having a strange smell and
implications for the future remain negative.
This scenario is actually a stumbling block for a movement to bring Boracay back
to its original state. As an ecological experiment that went wrong, Boracay Island became
a victim of rapid, unplanned and ungoverned mass tourism development taking toll on its
environment.
Properly managing the marine protected areas (marine parks) and the
rehabilitation of the mangrove systems on the island are initiatives that pave the way for
re-establishing Boracay Island as an eco-tourism destination, with responsible tourism
industry players initiating the move towards a sustainable development through the
support of integrated laws and policies.
The adverse effects of unplanned mass tourism development – with the factor of
small-scale overdevelopment – have been plaguing the stakeholders of Boracay Island.
Mismanagement, lack of political will, conflicting personal business interests, politicking
among the stakeholders, and the complacency of the residents and local communities are
among the main causes of the decline of Boracay Island from what used to be a nature-
destination and became an island metropolis that resembles a mini urbanized city.
This experience is not unique to Boracay. But if one studies the laws and the
policies that have been set in place to regulate activities and to mitigate impacts of
development, Boracay would have been a very good example of a sustainable tourism
success story. Sadly, this is not the case.
The Tourism Act of 2009 that governs the Tourism Infrastructure and Enterprise
Authority and the Tourism Enterprise Zones, the Proclamation 1064 vis-à-vis the
Guidelines for the Forest Land Use Agreement for Tourism Purposes, the Boracay
Environmental Master Plan, the Comprehensive Land Use Plan, the local ordinances
declaring Marine Parks, and the rules and regulations being implemented by the various
enforcement groups on Boracay Island should be integrated before any implementation
mechanisms are drafted.
The sophisticated legal structures and mandates that have always supported
sustainable development on the island since the late 70s have the potential to create
further confusion that may ultimately lead to non-implementation of the policies that
should have been fundamental in the protection and preservation of Boracay Island.
The awareness and the realization by those who have allowed the
overdevelopment and mismanagement of the island of the grave implications of such
have triggered some action and community support to confront the problem that the
Island and its people are facing. Personal differences and political maneuverings are still
playing big roles in journey towards change.
But it is through proactive management and initiatives of the private sector,
providing the proficiency in the tourism industry to the relatively young and less tourism-
oriented local government of Malay, and the integration of the national laws and policies
and local governance tools that Boracay Island can maintain and enhance its environment
for the tourism industry and for the future generations to enjoy.
SUSTAINABLE TOURISM OF THE CHOCOLATE HILLS, BOHOL,
PHILIPPINES
Unplanned development often results in a plague of social and environmental
problems even amidst a seeming economic boom. In the context of tourism, communities
can become alienated and dispossessed as non-residents buy up land and develop an
industry for which residents do not have the requisite skills to be employed, often with
the locals turning instead to crime and prostitution. Also, the industry that develops often
copies ideas from somewhere else, echoing a different environmental context. This can
lead to practices that exceed the local ecology’s carrying capacity and destroy the
uniqueness of the landscape.
The Chocolate Hills presents the opportunity to build its immense tourism
potential and allow the community to benefit while averting a social and environmental
crisis. It is essential that the entire area, despite overlapping jurisdictions and mandates,
be treated as one landscape where all stakeholders are engaged in planning,
implementation, and enforcement. I believe that there is a sense of awareness of the area
as landscape, and that this can be a foundation of new policies.
A set of policies that encourages and reassures a shift to higher value agricultural
activities that can allow the community to remain true to its relationship to the land and
preserve the landscape, while allowing the people to benefit to tourism. Awareness on
our environment, as well as preservation of it will while emancipating its true beauty
could surely avert future endeavours by seizing the opportunities open offered by the
present.