See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/326447126

The "Lava Jato" Network: Corruption and Money Laundering in Brazil

Technical Report · April 2018

DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.18911.15523

CITATION READS
1 1,511

7 authors, including:

Guillermo Lorenzo Macias Fernandez Nathalia Guerra Villamizar

5 PUBLICATIONS 2 CITATIONS
Vortex Foundation
3 PUBLICATIONS 2 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
SEE PROFILE

Laura Rojas Diana M. Santos Cubides

Universidad del Rosario VORTEX FOUNDATION
3 PUBLICATIONS 2 CITATIONS 12 PUBLICATIONS 2 CITATIONS

SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE

Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:

Transnational Criminal Networks View project

Transnational Trafficking of Organs View project

All content following this page was uploaded by Eduardo Salcedo-Albarán on 17 July 2018.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

The Global Observatory of Transnational Criminal Networks

The “Lava Jato” Network:

Corruption and Money
Laundering in Brazil

Eduardo Salcedo-Albarán
Luis Jorge Garay Salamanca
Diana Santos
Guillermo Macías
Nathalia Guerra
(Authors and Researchers)

Laura Rojas
Ernesto Navarro
(Data Processing)
This research was elaborated through protocols and technologies developed by
Vortex Foundation
(http://www.scivortex.org)

Humanitas360 supported and funded this research as part of a project aimed to

analyze macro-corruption schemes in Latin America
The Global Observatory of Transnational Criminal Networks – Working Paper No. 29.
VORTEX Working Paper No. 43.

The “Lava Jato” Network: Corruption and Money Laundering in Brazil

© Eduardo Salcedo-Albarán, 2017, 2018.

© Luis Jorge Garay, 2017, 2018.
© Diana Santos, 2017, 2018.
© Guillermo Macías, 2017, 2018.
© Nathalia Guerra, 2017, 2018.

Scientific Director: Luis Jorge Garay

Text, audio and video included in this publication are protected by copyright laws.
Reproduction is permitted if the author and the editor are referenced and quoted.

Opinions and ideas expressed by the authors do not reflect the opinions of Humanitas360 or
Vortex Foundation.

© Vortex Foundation, 2017, 2018. Copyright.

© Humanitas360, 2017, 2018. Copyright.

First edition, 2017.

Second edition, April, 2018.

Electronic Edition, Bogotá, Colombia/Sao Paulo, Brazil.

 Disclaimer

The facts and the analysis presented herein are sustained in documents and interviews exposed
in mass media and judicial records related to the criminal networks analyzed. No primary
information uncovering facts has been gathered, which means that only secondary sources
were consulted, from legal to media documents. In the case of the names mentioned, quoted
or referenced on indictments —with the exception of those specifically mentioned, quoted or
referenced in the text as definitively condemned—, the presumption of innocence, in
observance of individual rights is always preserved.

The judicial truth shall be subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts, which by law will
decide whether the defendants are innocent or guilty. It is stated that belonging to, participating
in, being connected to, or appearing on a network, as analyzed herein, does not imply having
committed a criminal act or being engaged in a criminal enterprise. It is always possible to
belong, participate, be connected, or appear on a network as an agent promoting interests that
are socially and institutionally beneficial, or as a result of coercion, among other reasons
unrelated to criminal acts committed by the agent.
Table of Contents

Introduction ..............................................................................................................6
1. Methodology and basic concepts .......................................................................7
Social Network Analysis ........................................................................................ 7
The Graph............................................................................................................. 8
Indicators of Direct Centrality and Betweenness .................................................... 9
Figure 0. A graph with 5 nodes/agents interacting.................................................. 9
2. The Case.......................................................................................................11
“Lava Jato”: Political protection, money laundering and millionaire contracts ........ 11
Odebrecht .......................................................................................................... 14
Lava Jato's Substructures ................................................................................... 15
Analyzed Sources .............................................................................................. 17
3. The Network ..................................................................................................18
Nodes/agents...................................................................................................... 18
Figure 1. Nodes/Agents of the “Lava Jato” Criminal Network. .............................. 18
The private players .......................................................................................... 19
The public players ............................................................................................ 21
The Criminals ................................................................................................... 22
Other players ................................................................................................... 23
Interactions ......................................................................................................... 24
Figure 2. Interactions of the “Lava Jato” Criminal Network ................................... 24
Betweenness indicator ........................................................................................ 31
Direct Centrality .................................................................................................. 33
“Lava Jato”: A Macro-corrupt Network ...................................................................35
Bibliography ...........................................................................................................39
Annex ....................................................................................................................40
Introduction
The “Lava Jato” Operation is an on-going Federal Police investigation executed for
dismantling corruption and money laundering schemes that involved Petrobras, the
Brazilian State-managed oil company, Electrobras, the Brazilian state-managed nuclear
company, among other Brazilian public institutions. From 2014 to mid-2017, this
operation has developed 41 phases of investigation involving various public and private
companies, politicians, businesspersons, doleiros, and drug traffickers, among other
types of agents.

Since the initial complaint filed by Hermes Freitas Magnus, who owned the Brazilian
company “Dunel”, along with Maria Teodora Silva, a series of investigations began,
which allowed identifying four large criminal groups led by the currency exchange
operators Carlos Habib Chater, Alberto Youssef, Nelma Mitsue Penasso Kodama and
Raul Henrique Srour. As a result of these investigations, Brazilian officials discovered
that those four criminal organizations operated together between 2005 and 2014 to
launder money through alliances between companies and to obtain contracts with
Petrobras through bribe payments to public officers of the company, and politicians with
the power of keeping the officials on their positions.

The evidence gathered and analyzed for this report revealed a major scheme of
corruption and money laundering in Brazil, involving more than 220 Brazilian and foreign
companies, 170 businesspersons, and 100 public servants. Considering the
institutional impact of the criminal scheme installed initially at Petrobras, and how it
engaged on corruption across Latin America and money laundering across the Western
Hemisphere and beyond, this document is the centralized analysis of this complex
criminal structure, according to the sources listed below.

This document has five sections. The first part is this introduction; the second is a
description of the methodology and the concepts related to Social Network Analysis
and additional protocols of analysis, which is the methodological approach herein
applied; the third is a brief presentation of the criminal structure referenced here as
“Petrobras Criminal Network”, as well as the sources gathered and processed to model
the structure; the fourth is an analysis of the characteristics of the criminal structure,
which includes a description of the types of nodes/agents, the types of interactions
established, and the nodes/agents concentrating direct interactions and the capacity
to arbitrate resources across the network; and the fifth part includes conclusions related
to the characteristics of the analyzed network.

1. Methodology and basic concepts

Social Network Analysis
Social Network Analysis (SNA) is a collection of procedures that facilitates an
understanding of interactions among individuals or groups. In this paper, SNA is
complemented with protocols developed by Vortex Foundation to illustrate how social
agents interacted over a period of time to accomplish criminal objectives.

The social agents participating in the present network were classified under categories
explained in the following sections, generated according to the analyzed sources. The
interactions established by those social agents were also classified under three main
categories or dimensions: (i) Economic interactions, which groups subcategories
consisting of the physical movement of money and financial transactions, (ii) political
interactions, which groups interactions established with and among political leaders,
candidates, and some officials, and (iii) violent and coercive interactions. Although
interactions can be usually classified under any of these categories, there are cases in
which additional categories, explained below, were applied.

Through algorithms, SNA allows identifying the relevant agents intervening in the
network, the sub-networks, the emerging structures, the types of social agents and the
types of relationships to be identified and highlighted. In the present analysis, the
“relevant” social agents are (i) the ‘hub’ of the network, on which direct interactions are
concentrated, and (ii) the structural bridge with the highest capacity to arbitrate among
the flows of resources such as money and information. Due to the possibilities of
analysis and visualization, SNA has been used to analyze the structure and
characteristics of illicit networks (Morselli, 2008; Garay, Salcedo-Albaran et al., 2012;
Johnson, Reitzel, Norwood, McCoy, Cummings, & Tate, 2013; Radil, Flint, & Tita,
2010).

The Graph
The criminal structure analyzed in this paper requires several interactions of
collaboration or confrontation; therefore, the situation can be analyzed as a social
network: “Social networks can be defined as ‘a group of collaborating (and/or
competing) entities that are related to each other” (den Bossche & Segers, 2013, p.
39). Social networks are analyzed through nodes that represent individuals and lines or
arcs that represent the interactions or ties. Therefore, “(…) a network is defined as a
set of nodes connected by ties” (Worrell, Wasko, & Johnstn, 2013, p. 128).

The Lava Jato Network was modeled through a technology of analysis and graphing
developed by Scientific Vortex Incorporated. The technology, consisting of protocols for
processing, categorizing and analyzing information, generates a database of nodes and
interactions that allows subsequently analyzing information and characteristics related
to specific nodes or interactions.

The first protocol for analyzing the sources of information consists of identifying
“relationships” or “interactions” between two agents, according to the following
grammar structure:

[[Name Actor 1[Description Actor 1]][interaction[verb word  action word]] [[Name Actor 2[Description
Actor 2]]]

Each syntactic section of this grammar structure is included and processed in the
system, through specific protocols that consolidate the mentioned database. The
database is then analyzed through additional protocols to generate SNA graphs such
as those presented in the following sections, and to calculate and identify the centrality
of each node.
In this analysis, each node represents a social agent; therefore, the concept of
“node/agent” is used to identify each individual or corporation participating in the
network. Then, each line connecting two nodes represents a social interaction, while
the arrow in the line represents the specific direction of that interaction: “For instance,
if the node/agent X interacts with/to node/agent Z, then there is an arrow from a node
representing X to a node representing Z.” (Salcedo-Albaran, Goga, & Goredema,
2014).

Indicators of Direct Centrality and Betweenness

It is important to differentiate two meanings of centrality: First, the most connected
node/agent and, second, the node/agent with the highest capacity to intervene or
arbitrate among the routes of the network.

The direct centrality indicator allows identifying the amount of direct interactions
established by each node/agent. For instance, in the figure 0 the node/agent 1 has 4
direct interactions, while the nodes 2, 3, 4 and 5 only have one direct interaction with
the node 1. Since there is a total of 8 unidirectional interactions, the node/agent 1
concentrates 50% (4) of the total direct interactions, while each of the nodes/agents 2,
3 and 4 concentrates 12,5%. In this social situation, the node/agent 1 is the hub of
figure 0 because it registers the highest direct centrality indicator.

Figure 0. A graph with 5 nodes/agents interacting

The second meaning of “centrality” allows identifying the node/agent with the highest
capacity to arbitrate or intervene in the geodesic routes of the network, known as “the
structural bridge”. While in figure 0 there are only 4 direct interactions, there is a higher
number of geodesic routes, which are the paths that indirectly connect all the
nodes/agents. For instance, there is a geodesic route connecting nodes 2 and 3
through the node 1, and there is another geodesic route connecting nodes 2 and 4 also
through node 1, etc. Those geodesic routes, therefore, represent the paths of
information and other resources that flow and are indirectly distributed across the
network.

After calculating the total amount of geodesic routes connecting the nodes/agents of
the network, the betweenness indicator allows identifying the node/agent with the
highest capacity to intervene in those geodesic routes. As observed in figure 0, the
node 1 intervenes in every route of the network because there is not a single path
connecting nodes 2, 3, 4 and 5 that doesn’t pass through node 1; therefore, node 1
registers a betweenness indicator of 100% which means that it has the highest capacity
to intervene in the resources flowing across the network. In this case, node 1 has the
greatest capacity to decide, for instance, what pieces of information will be
communicated between the other nodes.
 2. The Case

“Lava Jato”: Political protection, money laundering and millionaire

contracts

According to the judicial sources listed in Annex 1, this investigation began on March
17th, 2014, following a complaint filed by Hermes Freitas Magnus, who owned the
company “Dunel” along with Maria Teodora Silva. In 2008, the owners of “Dunel”
searched investors to capitalize their company, which lead former deputy José Janene
to invest in the company and be included in its executive board. The former deputy took
advantage of his position as investor to launder money from corruption at Petrobras.
Hermes Freitas and Maria Teodora Silva informed to authorities the suspicious
operations taking place in their company, as well as their unjustified exclusion from
Dunel’s board due to their inconformity with the scheme.

This illicit structure, initially uncovered by the investigation against José Janene and
Alberto Youssef, revealed a corrupt system to hire services at Petrobras, characterized
by bribe payments from a group of companies referenced in the judicial sources as "The
Club".

“The Club” was a cartel conformed by several companies that coordinated their own
participation in Petrobras projects, setting prices of services and bribes. At the time of
the meetings, the involved companies coordinated which one would get a contract with
Petrobras, manipulating some of the requirements during the public tender.

For instance, the construction company “Constructora Camargo Correa”, directed by

Dalton dos Santos, won one of the Petrobras biddings, after paying 1% of the contract
to Paulo Roberto Costa, the former Director of Supplies of Petrobras. Both parties
simulated contracts to transfer money through the company “Costa Global”, controlled
by Paulo Roberto Costa. Additionally, “Constructora Camargo Correa” made
agreements on its own with the companies “Sanko Sider” and “Sanko Servicos”, which
were presented as suppliers in its financial notes. The receipts and documents that
were managed among the three companies presented overpriced supplies, a common
strategy used to hide irregular payments.

In general, to obtain contracts and stablish agreements, “The Club” paid between 1%
and 3% of every contract to Petrobras officials such as (i) Paulo Roberto Costa, former
director of supplies; (ii) Renato de Souza Duque, former director of engineering
directorate and (iii) Pedro José Barusco, former services manager at Petrobras. Bribes
were also intended for political parties or agents, herein categorized as politicians, who
in turn provided political support for nominating and keeping aforementioned directors
in their positions. For instance, the supplies directorate at Petrobras was controlled by
the Partido Progressista Brasileiro, PPB [Brazilian Progress Party]; the engineering
board, by the Partido dos Trabalhadores, PT [Workers Party]; and the international
board, by the Partido do Movimento Democrático Brasileiro, PMDB [Brazilian
Democratic Movement]. Some bribes were paid directly to members of the parties or
to the party itself through offshore accounts, front companies or just delivering in cash.

Another strategy to deliver the money of bribes consisted on funding political campaigns
of politicians and public servants. For instance, senators Jorge Afonso Argello, from the
Brazilian Labor Party, PTB, requested undue payments from various companies
involved in the illicit scheme of Petrobras and in exchange offered to protect those
companies during investigations. The payments of those bribes were registered as
electoral donations to the São Pedro Parish, in Tabatinga/DF. Later, the same Parish
requested a payment of R$ 350,000 to the President of the Brazilian company OAS,
José Adelmário Pinheiro Filho, who was told that Jorge Afonso Argello had a strong
bond with that parish and that "it was -politically- fundamental for him [Pinheiro Filho] to
give that donation". The payments delivered by the OAS Company total five million reais,
approximately USD$ 1,495,573.
To conceal and manage big amounts of money without legal restrictions, Fernando
Soares, Nestor Cerveró, Paulo Roberto Costa, Pedro José Barusco, Renato Duque,
and Jorge Luiz Zelada, second director of Petrobras International Department, opened
offshore accounts in Swiss banks and, from there, executed frequent financial
transferences. The money resulting of those illicit transactions was transferred to
accounts in Hong Kong, Virgin Islands, Mainland China, and Monaco, among other
countries, in different currency. The illicit scheme developed the strategy known as
"dollar-cape", which consists on purchasing and selling foreign currencies through a
compensation system: foreign currency is delivered through a foreign deposit to a buyer
in Brazil. This transaction implies an international transfer of money, similar to the one
carried out by the banks, but through an informal system, unregulated by the law. The
operations in the black currencies market were executed by "doleiros" that had an
essential role in money laundering, evading taxes related to currencies and delivering
bribes.

Another strategy for laundering money consisted on transferring bribes through

commodities and goods such as luxury apartments, cars and paintings instead of
money, to avoid tracking the sources and movements of the money. Additionally,
node/agents involved in the illicit network created and managed front companies that
existed only in paper, without facilities or without providing real services or products.
Third parties that stablished fraudulent contracts, owned those front companies to
“legally” transfer massive amounts of money that weren’t usually tracked by authorities.
The other strategy to pay bribes consisted on stablishing fraudulent debt agreements
and loans between legal, front and offshore companies and financial institutions.

Some of the companies participating in “The Club” were: Construction company

Camargo Correa, RNEST Refinery, Getúlio Vargas REPAR Refinery, Galvão
Engenharia, Engevix, OAS, Odebrecht, Andrade, UTC, Queiroz Galvão, Promon, MPE,
Techinit, GDCAR, and Mendes Júnior, among others. So far, in the context of the “Lava
Jato” operation about 260 people have been accused under 56 criminal charges, while
130 individuals, including prominent politicians and businessmen, have been sentenced
to jail in 29 judicial sentences.

Odebrecht

The cases of corruption that involve the company Odebrecht have been perhaps the
most covered by media outlets the Lava Jato case. By November 2014, when “The
Club" illicit structure was unveiled by the Federal Police of Brazil, Odebrecht had 19
contracts with Petrobras, for approximately R$ 17 billion (USD$ 5,084,949). In June
2015, Marcelo Odebrecht, legal owner of the company was arrested and sentenced to
19 years in prison by the Judge Sergio Moro under charges of corruption, money
laundering and criminal conspiracy. In March 2016 it was revealed that Odebrecht
replicated a similar money laundering and corruption scheme that established with
Petrobras, in other Brazilian state companies such as Electrobras, and public
institutions such as the government of Rio de Janeiro. Additionally, their operations also
replicated in ten Latin American and two Africans countries, with an amount of USD$
785 million in bribes paid since 2001.

According to data revealed by the Paraná prosecutor's office in charge of the main
“Lava Jato” investigations, in southern Brazil, the amount of bribes registered until the
moment of the investigations reached USD $2 billion, approximately $6.4 billion reais.
It is estimated, however, that the total damages to Petrobras for diversion of funds and
overprices could exceed USD$13 billion.
Lava Jato's Substructures

As previously stated, cases of corruption related to Odebrecht have been extensively

covered by Latin American media. However, other firms, and therefore other illicit
substructures analyzed below, were also part of the entire Lava Jato structure.

Electronuclear

Dalton Avancini, former president of Camargo Correa S.A., revealed on his

collaborative agreement the existence of an illicit structure operating within the state
company Electrobras Termonuclear S/A - Electronuclear. That illicit structure had the
same modus operandi identified in Petrobras: alliances between companies to obtain
undue advantages at State companies, payment of bribes to public officers, and money
laundering. Due to the rupture in bank secrecy of companies Andrade Gutierrez and
Engevix (also involved in the Petrobras scandal), authorities identified transferences to
the former president of Eletronuclear, Othon Luiz, for works at ANGRA 3. According to
the indictment, the representatives of Engevix, José Antunes and Cristiano Kok,
execute 29 transferences to Othon Luiz.

The illicit scheme of money laundering operated through the financial movement
resulting from contracts signed between Andrade Gutierrez and CG Impex. Other 5
contracts were simulated to transfer the money to Othon Luiz, established between CG
IMPEX and ARATEC. The approximate value transferred through fraudulent contracts
was of USD 628,979.51 (R $ 2,045,001.53), through 38 transactions.

J&F Group
The scheme of bribery and money laundering carried out by the “J&F Group” and its
subsidiaries (JBS, Eldorado, Florestal and Vigor) operated for over 13 years, from 2003
to 2017. This illicit scheme illegitimately obtained public funds from the state bank
“Banco Nacional de Desenvolvimiento Economico e Social”, the “Caixa Econômica
Federal” (CEF), the “Fundação dos Economiários Federais” (FUNCEF) and the
“Fundação Petrobras de Seguridade Social” (PETROS), by supporting political
campaigns and paying bribes to strategic political actors.

According to the investigation the “J&F Group”, owned by Joesley Mendoça Batista
and Wesley Mendoça Batista, supported the campaigns of candidates running for
positions at the Chamber of Representatives, the Brazilian Senate, the Directorate of
public institutions, among others. In fact, the Group funded the campaigns of Governors
of 4 States during 16 periods, and the presidency campaign of Dilma Rousseff and
Michel Temer.

According to prosecution authorities of Brazil, the total amount of bribes reaches a total
of USD 184,541,574 (R $600,000,000.00), paid to 1829 political actors ascribed to 28
political parties. The transactions were executed through fraudulent invoices between
the company JBS and other companies such as Grafica e Editora Alvorada Ltda, ST
Pesquisa de Mercado Ltda EPP, Instituto Icone de Ensino Jurídico Ltda, IBOPE
Inteligência Pesquisa e Consultoria Ltda, Bartz Propaganda Ltda, among several
others.

Sergio Cabral

The Operations Calicute and Eficiencia uncovered an illicit structure commanded by

former governor Sergio Cabral, involved in activities of corruption and money laundering
of more than USD 100 million, through transfers of assets abroad. It is known from the
research that Sergio Cabral demanded a bribe rate of 5% of all administrative contracts
with the State since he took office as chief executive of the state of Rio de Janeiro on
January 1, 2007.
To manage the bribery scheme, Sergio Cabral hired Renato Chebar, a financial market
operator, to hide on his behalf the bribes he received in foreign bank accounts through
dollar-cable. He also hired Carlos Bezerra to register all the bribery incomes. From the
accounting made by operator Carlos Bezerra, it was identified that Marco Antonio de
Luca, one of the active members of the scheme and manager of the company Masan
Servicios Especializados Ltda, contributed at least with an amount equivalent to R$
12,595,700.00 (approximately USD$ 3,701,778) for briberies in kind, in favor of the
company ORCRIM, controlled by Sergio Cabral, related to contracts signed with the
State of Rio de Janeiro.

The complaint submitted by the Public Prosecutor’s Office under the framework of
Calicute Operation identified active and passive corruption and subsequent asset
laundering around contracts stablished between the Rio de Janeiro government and
Andrade Gutierrez, Delta, Carioca Engenharia, Oas, Queiroz Galvao, Camargo Correa,
Camter, Eit and Odebrecht. Two events were particularly prominent of this illicit scheme
leaded by Sergio Cabral: the fraud in public tender and the promised restoration for the
Maracaná Stadium and the fraud in tenders for Cap Favelas works, both between 2007
and 2009.

Analyzed Sources

In order to elaborate the models herein discussed in the first stage of analysis, court
decisions extracted from four police operations of the first instance of investigation were
processed through the methodology and protocols previously described: Lava Jato,
Dolce Vita, Bidone and Casablanca, each one focused on an illicit organization run by
the defendants Carlos Habib Chater, Alberto Youseff, Nelma Kodama and Henrique
Srour. The decisions were executed by the Federal Police on March 17th and 24th,
2014. Then, in a second stage of analysis, 29 sentences of the first and second
instances of investigation of the Lava Jato Operation were processed (2014-2016).1

Sentences were gathered and analyzed instead of complaints, since the information
collected at the beginning of the investigation was confirmed or denied during the
prosecution process, therefore the sentences convey more reliable information. During
the third state of analysis, the information of the sentences was complemented with
data based on court decisions and annexes of judicial processes extracted from the
websites https://jota.info/lavajota/ and http://lavajato.mpf.mp.br/atuacao-na-1a-
instancia/denuncias-do-mpf. Those annexes were also useful to detail the
substructures of the Lava Jato Operation.

3. The Network

Nodes/agents

After processing the sources above mentioned, a total of 906 nodes/agents were
identified, categorized as Private (65%), Public (19%), Criminal (11%), and Other (5%).

Figure 1. Nodes/Agents of the “Lava Jato” Criminal Network.

1
 Other
5%
Criminal
11%

Public
19%

Private
65%

The private players

The most relevant type of nodes/agents identified in this case groups the members of
the private sector: 65% out of the total number of nodes/agents (Table 1). Most
nodes/agents grouped under this category are Brazilian companies (252) and
businesspersons (170) involved on the scheme, paying bribes to obtain undue
privileges to stablish contracts with the State. This category also includes the offshore
companies (109) used by the participants of the illicit network to establish fraudulent
contracts and, through those agreements, pay bribes to public servants, politicians and
political parties.

A total of 21 Brazilian Consortiums created by legit and façade companies to achieve

undue advantages in State contracts were also grouped under this category, with 15
offshore accounts, usually under the name of third parties, that were essential to
execute fraudulent transactions, keeping untraceable the origin and destination of the
money, since Brazilian authorities lacked jurisdiction to track the movements of the
accounts.
“Construtora Norberto Odebrecht” was one of the Brazilian companies most involved
in the illicit scheme. In order to pay bribes between December 2006 and June 2014,
the company executed financial transferences abroad through offshore companies
such as “Smith & Nash Enginnering Company”, “Arcadex Corporation” and “Havinsur
S/A”, to pay bribes to Petrobras officials in accounts such as: “Sagar Holdings” and
“Quinus Service”, both controlled by Paulo Roberto Costa “Milzart Overseas”,
controlled by Renato Duque, and “Pexo Corporation”, controlled by Pedro Barusco.

Table 1. Node/Agents classified as Private. “Lava Jato” Criminal Network.

Private - Brazilian Company 252

Private - Businessperson 170

Private - Offshore Company 109

Private - Brazilian Consortium 21

Private - offshore account 15

Private - Facade Company 12

Private - Lawyer 10

Private - Money Carrier 7

Private - Pension Fund 4

Private - Brazilian Institution 2

Private - Advertising agent 2

Private - Civil Association 1

Private - Advertiser 1

Private - Journalist 1

Private - Political adviser 1

Total 608

The “Private” category also includes 12 front companies that were exclusively created
to legalize financial transactions. For instance, “MO Consultoria” was a company
created and controlled by Alberto Yousseff, that did not offer real products or services
but that was used to sign several fraudulent contracts with the companies Petrobras,
“Sanko Sider e Sanko Servicios”, “Consórcio Rnest –Conest”, Galvão Engenharia S/A”,
“Consórcio SEHAB Ltda.”, “OAS Ltda.”, among other companies. These companies
transfer to “MO Consultoria” approximately USD$ 795,233 between 2009 and 2013,
aimed to the payment of bribes.

The remaining “Private” node/agents include various professionals who provided legal
or political advice, paid bribes, served as third parties to conceal the source of the
bribes, hid evidence or participated in meetings to decide what company should receive
a public contract.

The public players

The “Public agents” category (19%), which distribution is represented in table 2, groups
100 civil servants, and 24 former members of the Chamber of Deputies with political
influence to nominate delegates for Petrobras’ directories. Some of them also
coordinated underground meetings with investigated companies that were favored with
public contracts.

This category also groups 16 Brazilian politicians such as José Dirceu de Oliveira e Silva
and João Luiz Argolo, both of them charged under passive corruption; 13 political
parties such as Partido da Mobilização Nacional, PMN, Partido dos Trabalhadores, and
Partido da República, among others; 9 “Electronuclear” officials; 8 Government
institutions involved in corruption; and 7 Petrobras officials mainly in charge of acquiring
supplies, coordinating engineering services and arranging international hiring of other
companies, such as Paulo Roberto Costa, Pedro Barusco and Celso Araripe de
Oliveira.

Table 2. Nodes/agents classified as Public servants. “Lava Jato” Criminal Network

 Public - Civil servant 100

Public - Federal Deputy 24

Public - Brazilian Politician 16

Public - Political Party 13

Public - Electronuclear functionary 9

Public - Government institution 8

Public - Petrobras functionary 7

Public - Petrobras Area 3

Public - Brazilian Energy Company 2

Public - Former President of Brazil 2

Public - Public trust 2

Public - Brazilian Ministry 2

Public - Federal Government 1

Public - Ministers 1

Public - Federal Prosecutor 1

Public - President of Brazil 1

Public - Brazilian refinery 1

Total 193

The public officers involved in the scheme received bribe payments of 1% or 2% of the
value of each contract that was unfairly assigned to a certain company. Additionally,
60% of the paid bribes were used to fund political parties and specific political
campaigns. Although most of node/agents in this illicit network are not public officers,
their involvement was critical to sustain the corruption scheme.

The Criminals

The category “criminal” (11%) groups the node/agents carrying out the illicit operations
of the scheme. Although not all of them can be labeled as dark-agents or “full-time”
criminals, their role in the structure can be defined as illegal. This category specifically
includes 47 third parties who provided their representation of accounts and companies
to protect the real beneficiaries of transactions; 19 doleiros or intermediaries, such as
Alberto Youssef and Nelma Kodama, who arranged meetings between companies,
advised business associated to persons and officials on the creation of offshore
companies, and controlled front companies to legalize payments, among other tasks
related to currencies black market. Additionally, to the doleiros operating transactions,
9 bribe operators oversaw bribe payments among the participants of the illicit network.

The “criminals” category also includes 8 drug traffickers who laundered their profits
through the network, 7 accomplices of money laundering, 5 money launderers, and 3
illicit associations between legal companies and consortiums, such as “The Club”,
established to obtain undue advantages or to commit fraud through financial crimes
and corruption.

Table 3. Nodes/agents classified as “Criminal”. “Lava Jato” Criminal Network.

Third party 47

Doleiro - Intermediary 19

Bribe operator 9

Criminal - Drug Trafficker 8

Accomplice of money laundering 7

Criminal - Money Launderer 5

Cartel - Illicit association between

3
companies

Total 98

Other players

The category “Other” groups: (i) banks, where financial transactions were carried (ii)
an unknown depositor of one of the offshore accounts; (iii) an investment fund and (iv)
a financial institution, both used to transfer a loan agreement to launder money and pay
bribes; and (v) an art collector.

Table 4. Nodes/agents classified as “Other”. “Lava Jato” Criminal Network.

Other Node/Agents

Bank 3

Unknown Depositor 1

Investment Fund 1

Financial institution 1

Art collections 1

Total 7

Interactions
A total of 2.693 interactions were registered and modeled, distributed under the
following 5 categories: economic (48%), logistic (34%), other (11%) and political (7%).

The category consisting of “Economic” interactions (Table 5) groups 48% of all the
interactions. Some of the main subcategories within the “economic interactions” are: (i)
“making financial transactions”, with 676 interactions; (ii) “paying bribes or undue
commissions”, with 330 interactions; (iii) “money laundering”, with 107 cases, and (iv)
105 “simulation of contracts”. These interactions refer to the main financial operations
needed to sustain the corruption scheme.

Figure 2. Interactions of the “Lava Jato” Criminal Network

 Political
7%

Other
11%

Logistic
34%

Economic
48%

Table 5. “Economic” Interactions. “Lava Jato” Criminal Network.

Economic Inteactions

Economic - Financial transactions to 676

Economic - Bribe payment to 330

Economic - Money laundering through 107

Economic - Simulating contracts with 105

Economic - Being business partners with 41

Economic - Paying an undue commission to stablish

22
contract with

Economic - Open and controlling offshore accounts on

13
behalf of

Economic - capital investment in 10

Economic - Misappropriation of funds of 7

 Economic - Fraudulent Currency Exchange Operation
6
through

Economic - Engaging in a Debt Agreement with 6

Economic - Paying debt with paintings to 1

Economic - Purchasing Paintings from 1

Total 1325

Among the main sub-categories other economic interactions were: (v) “being business
partners”, with 41 interactions, (vi) “paying an undue commission to stablish
contracts”, with 22 interactions; (vii) “opening and controlling accounts of front
companies”, with 13 interactions, (viii) “capital investment in”, with 10 interactions, (iv)
“misappropriation of funds of”, with 7 interactions that illustrate the illicit appropriation
of money from companies or public funds, that then was invested to create front
companies and to pay bribes, such as the case in which the firm “Sete Brasil” was
constituted in part with the investment of misappropriated Petrobras funds and pension
funds such as Petros, Previ, Funcef and Valia.

Other “Economic” interactions include “fraudulent currency exchange operations”, with

6 cases of “dollar-cape” operations in which currencies are exchanged through informal
channels to launder money, evade taxes, and keep the money untraceable. Another
sub-category was “engaging in a debt agreement”, with 6 cases that exposed
strategies used to deliver money through an apparently legal procedure. For instance,
Salim Taufic Schahin, Milton Taufic Schahin and Fernando Schahin, owners and
executives of the Schahin Group, delivered a bribe destined to Eduardo Musa and the
Workers Party, PT, paid by the concession, renewal and fraudulent discharge of a loan
legally granted to José Carlos Bumlai, third party of the real beneficiaries.

Table 6. “Logistic” interactions. “Lava Jato” Criminal Network.

Logistic Interactions

Logistic - Participating the (administrative, finances, chair, among 158

other positions) manager of

Logistic - Being part of 152

 Logistic - Serving as third party to 132

Logistic - Decision-making and leadership (de facto) of 118

Logistic - Modification of a stablished contract with 67

Logistic- Planning financial distribution with 43

Logistic - Being the representative of 39

Logistic - Supporting fraudulent accounting 37

Logistic - Serving as intermediary of 35

Logistic - Had a business meeting with 32

Logistic - Legal Ownership of Company 32

Logistic - using companies to commit fraud 30

Logistic - Delivering money to 26

Logistic - Interfere with the course of justice for 18

Logistic - Influence on 16

Logistic - Providing legal advice to 8

Logistic - being a subsidiary company of 8

Logistic - Criminal - Dealt a drug delivery 5

Logistic - Acquiring names and personal information of third

3
actors (used for fraudulent exchange operations) for

Logistic - Excluded illicitly from company 2

Logistic - Forgiving loan agreement to 1

Logistic - Transposing loan agreement to 1

The category “Logistic” (Table 6) groups 964 logistic interactions that guaranteed the
stability of the illicit network during its operation, between 2009 and 2014. Some of the
most relevant logistic sub-categories were: (i) "participating in the administrative board
of a company”, with 158 interactions; (ii) “being part of”, with 75 interactions that refer
to those cases in which contracts with Brazilian state companies were established
through consortiums; (iii) “serving as third party to”, with 132 interactions grouping all
the individuals that agreed to open an account or appear as legal representative of a
company to hide its true beneficiaries, (iv) “decision-making and leadership (de facto)
of”, with 118 interactions that revealed the true beneficiaries of the accounts,
companies and properties that had an undefined or false titular; (v) “modification of an
stablished contract”, with 67 interactions that also revealed strategies of companies to
push an unjustifiable increase of the costs and timeframe of infrastructure works initially
established in contracts; (vi) “planning financial distribution”, with 43 interactions of
specific meetings in which it was decided the distribution of money among the
participants of the corrupt scheme.

Other relevant logistic subcategories are: (vii) “being the representative of”, with 39
cases in which businesspersons represented cartelized companies during arranged
meetings; (viii) “supporting fraudulent accounting”, with 37 interactions, revealing the
accounting arrangements made to hide irregular money incomes and justify artificial
expenses. Legal ownership of company (32); Serving as intermediary of (35), and
describing the situation of a person asking for a bribe payment or an irregular donation
to a campaign in behalf of someone else, among other listed in table 6.

As stated above, the “Lava Jato” criminal network operated though cartelized
companies that obtained public contracts through undue advantage, paying 1% or 2%
of the value of the contract to officials and political parties. To complete the payments
of bribes, the main companies used small, façade and offshore companies, as well as
offshore accounts. To carry the operations, launder money and hide evidence of the
structure, bribe operators, doleiros, third parties, intermediaries, and money carriers
were hired.

The third category of interactions is “other” (11%), which includes subcategories such
as (i) the “establishment of contracts with State companies or institutions”, with 124
cases, (ii) “networking”, with 68 interactions that describe informal links with key nodes
of the network, (iii) “being a family member”, with 28 interactions that describe family
ties within the network, and (iv) “executing threads and pressure to commit financial
crimes”, with 4 interactions that describe coercion usually perpetrated by intermediaries
or “doleiros” against other nodes.
Table 7. “Other” Interactions. “Lava Jato” Criminal Network.

State- Stablishing contracts with 124

 Networking 68

Family - Being a family member of 28

Violence - Threats and pressure to commit financial crimes 4

The fourth category of interactions groups the “political” operations (Table 8) that
groups subcategories such as (i) “benefiting particular interests of”, with 76 cases in
which a political player benefits a node/agent through a particular decision or
investment, (ii) 34 interactions consisting of “irregular donations to” political campaigns,
(iii) 25 cases of “official donations to” fund political campaigns, (iv) 13 interactions
“providing political favors to” specific nodes/agents through, (v) “nominate for public
office”, with 5 interactions, and (vi) “providing political advice to”, with 2 cases.

Table 8. “Political” Interactions. Lava Jato/Petrobras Criminal Network.

Political - Benefiting particular interest of 76

Political - Irregular donations (political campaign) to 34

Political - Official donations (political campaign) to 25

Political - Financing political campaign of 25

Political - Providing political favors to 13

Political - Nominate for public office 5

Political - Providing political advice to 2

Total 180

As it was explained on the description of the case, political parties and public servers
received undue commissions paid by businesspersons to nominate Petrobras officials
or to keep the ones involved in the illicit network on their positions. Paulo Roberto Costa,
for instance, declared on trial that when he was appointed as Director of Supplies at
Petrobras, he met with José Janene, the former deputy responsible of his nomination,
who requested Paulo Roberto Costa to use his influence to provide an undue advantage
to “The Club” members on obtaining contracts with Petrobras. In fact, José Janene
convinced Paulo Roberto Costa that he had to pay those bribes as a political favor to
the political party, as a result the party would support him and therefore Paulo Roberto
Costa would be able to remain his position at the company.
Betweenness indicator

As stated in the methodological description, the betweenness indicator informs about

the nodes/agents with the highest capacity to intervene in the indirect routes of the
network. In this case, the nodes/agents with the highest betweenness indicators are (i)
Alberto Yousseff with 9,4%, (ii) the Petrobras company itself, intervening in 9,4% of the
geodesic routes, (iii) Paulo Roberto Costa, a Petrobras official, with an indicator of 4,9%
and (iv) the company JBS, with 3,7%.

The four nodes/agents with the highest betweenness indicators intervene in 27,4% of
the geodesic routes –or indirect paths of the network–, which means that this group of
individuals and firms had the greatest capacity to arbitrate and distribute resources
such as information and money among the participants. Removing some of those
node/agents would alter the structure of the network, since Petrobras, for instance, was
the main company where the corruption took place, and for hence most of economic
and logistic interactions involved this firm.

In the same sense, Alberto Youssef was a key player on stabilizing the illicit network,
since he was in charge of advising businessmen and public servants about the
necessary operations to keep the network on track, while coordinating with other
intermediaries and doleiros the strategies to launder money and to deliver bribe
payments. However, the operations and strategies of the network, such as establishing
alliances between businesspersons and public servants with political power, creating
and handling offshore accounts or companies to conduct illicit financial transactions, or
taking advantage of the currencies black market to evade taxes, could be relatively
replicated, despite some of the specific nodes/agents involved.

The medium to high concentration of the betweenness indicator would imply that the
network has a relatively low level of resilience, since isolating or removing those four
nodes/agents, in the case of Petrobras (utilized as a State institution to pursue illicit
purposes by some of their directors), that represent just the 0,44% of the total amount
of nodes/agents, would drastically affect the network’s structure.
Figure 2. Betweenness indicator. Size and location of the nodes/agents represent the indicator of
betweenness (capacity to arbitrate resources across the network). Red lines represent “Violence”
interactions. Blue lines represent “Logistics” interactions. Light Green lines represent “Family”
interactions. Dark Green lines represent “Economic” interactions.
Direct Centrality

The four nodes/agents with the highest degree of “direct individual centrality” are: (i)
Alberto Youssef, with an indicator of 3,4%, acting as operator in the financial “black
market” and coordinating financial operations of the criminal network, (iii) Paulo Roberto
Costa, with an indicator of 2,6%, as the Petrobras official with a vast amount of direct
interactions registered that mainly consisted of paying bribes, (ii) Petrobras, as the hub
company where the corruption scheme is focused, with an indicator of 2,2%, and (iv)
JBS, with an indicator of 1,9%, as the company involved in several licit and illicit
transactions such as simulated contracts.

Other nodes/agents with a high direct centrality of the network are: (v) Joesley
Mendonca Batista, one of the administrative managers of JBS, with an indicator of
1,8%, (vi) “The Clube” as a cliqué of firms with a high capacity of interaction to obtain
advantages on Petrobras’ contracts, with an indicator of 1,7%, (vii) Constructora
Norberto Odebrecht, the company that replicated the Petrobras criminal scheme and
paid of bribes to high rank officials in 12 countries, with an indicator of 1,1%, and (viii)
Jose Janene, a former federal deputy in charge of controlling an important part of the
bribery scheme of the criminal network, who registered an indicator of 1,1%.

The first eight nodes/agents with the highest indicators of direct centrality, which
represents the 0,88% of the total amount of nodes/agents, concentrate 29,4% of the
total direct interactions of the network. Also, the remaining nodes/agents present a
Direct Centrality indicator from 0,1% to 1,1%.

This concentration of direct interactions in just eight nodes/agents reflects an illicit

structure with a relatively low to moderate level of resilience regarding direct
interactions. However, in practice the level of resilience would be lower than suggested
by indicators due to central role played by Petrobras, utilized to pursue illicit purposes
by some of their directors, in the illicit/criminal network.
Figure 3. Direct Centrality. Size and location of the nodes represent the indicator of direct centrality.
“Lava Jato”: A Macro-Corrupt Network

The illicit network analyzed herein illustrates a highly effective collaboration between the
private and public sectors to sustain a situation of systemic and massive corruption in
Brazil, an effective collaboration that was also replicated across Latin America, for
instance by the firm Odebrecht. Considering the amount of resources compromised by
this criminal scheme, this can be interpreted as a case of macro-criminality and grand
corruption; in fact, due to the size and complexity of the network, as well as its
institutional effects at economic, social and political instances, this is one of the most
comprehensive cases of grand corruption to date. However, the public sector not only
includes public servants with power to influence public tender decisions, but also
political operators with power to nominate and appoint those public servants.

Public agents, such as former legislative deputies, congressmen and department

coordinators at Petrobras were also vital to sustain the corruption scheme. Those
agents used their political power and decision capacity as political leaders and officials
to ally with powerful private agents who supported and funded political campaigns and
paid bribes to obtain favors and advantages in contracts with Petrobras.

The participation of nodes/agents operating within lawful private institutions, such as

real and front companies, was critical to articulate the network, since 72% of the
nodes/agents identified in this analysis were private players, who used their companies
and economic power to commit fraud and hide irregular transactions with Petrobras.
Additionally, the most powerful companies involved established a cartel known as “The
Club” to coordinate their proposals and participation in tender processes.

Most of the interactions of the network were grouped under the category “Economic”,
since most of the operations of the “Lava Jato” Criminal Network involved financial
transactions. However, logistic interactions were also highly important due to the need
of coordinating companies, public agents and businesspersons for executing financial
operations through third parties such as legal representatives of façade companies and
transferring money. For example, Nobu Su, former director of “Vantage Drilling
Corporation” and legal representative of “Taiwan Maritime Transportation Ltda, paid an
undue commission through “Oresta Associated S/A” to Hamylthon Padilha, who
simultaneously paid to Eduardo Musa and Jorge Luiz Zelade a bribe to facilitate the
engagement of “Vantage Drilling Corporation”, specifically accessing a contract for
using the Titanium Explorer –a drill rig ship property of Vantage Deepwater Company.
As It can be inferred, the hidden transfer and movement of large amounts of money
involving these simultaneous bribes required logistic skills.

This analysis revealed intricate mechanisms and processes used by the companies
involved, and by public officials who participated in the criminal structure, to divert,
conceal, transfer, and launder money related to illicit acts. For instance, it was possible
to identify that a first layer of bidding companies created a second layer of front
companies to transfer money to a third layer of companies established abroad,
especially to companies that belonged to public officials who participated in the
network. Then, the third layer companies that initially received the money, transferred
the money to other offshore accounts that belonged to officials. As a result, the money
was transferred among three layers of companies as a mechanism to hinder the
possibilities of tracking the sources or the real beneficiaries of the money.

In other cases, officials created front companies through which they diverted money
with bogus bids and these, in turn, transferred money to companies abroad. It is
important to note that in most of the accounts used to conceal and save money, the
owners were sometimes moral persons constituted in other countries, as well as
companies constituted in Brazil by front men, which allowed hiding the source and
target of assets; however, in a few cases, the public officials themselves appeared as
owners of the companies. An example of this scheme is Paulo Roberto Costa, former
Supply Director of Petrobras, who held approximate USD$ 23 million in accounts in
Switzerland under names of companies such as “Aquila Holdings Ltd.”, “Elba Services
Ltd.”, “Glacier Finance Inc.”, “International Team Enterprise Ltd.”, “Larose Holding SA”,
“Omega Partners SA”, “Quinus Services SA”, “Rock Canyon Invest SA”, “Sagar
Holding SA”, “Santa Clara Private Equity”, “Santa Tereza Services Ltd.”, “Sygnus
Assets SA”, and “BS Consulting”.

According to the evidence analyzed herein, Bernardo Freiburghaus opened several

accounts so that Odebrecht could make multiple deposits abroad directly to Paulo
Roberto Costa without paying undue percentage to some Political Party, by opening
accounts in Swiss banks where money was transferred every 2 or 3 months. As a result,
there is evidence of large amounts of money paid by Odebrecht to “Diagonal
Investimentos”, owned by Bernardo Freiburghaus, and from the latter to accounts
opened in Swiss banks under the name of companies such as “Sygnus Assets SA”,
“Quinus Services SA” and “Sagor Holdings SA”. In fact, Bernardo Freiburghaus also
transferred money between these accounts to ensure that there were no traces that
would allow authorities to identify illicit assets in foreign accounts; once the funds were
transferred between accounts, the account transferring the money was canceled. For
example, the “Quinus Services SA” account at the HSBC Bank was canceled when the
assets were transferred to accounts in the Royal Bank of Canada SA, “Banque Cramer
& Cia SA”, “Banquet Pictet & Cia SA”, and “Pkb Private Bank SA”.

Alberto Youssef, Petrobras and Paulo Roberto Acosta are the nodes/agents with the
highest indicator of direct interactions in the network. They are also the nodes/agents
with the highest capacity for intervening and arbitrating resources across the network.
These nodes/agents had a critical role in the stabilization of the network.

From rampant corruption committed through payment of traditional bribes, to

sophisticated exchange transactions to launder money and the use of several layers of
companies, this case reveals various innovative characteristics that should inform
stakeholders and enforcement agencies in charge of investigating, prosecuting and
sanctioning corruption. Among all the inputs resulting from this analysis, the most
important lesson relates to the type of resources required for understanding and
investigating an illicit scheme with the complexity of the one analyzed herein. Analysis
like the one conducted in this paper must be expanded to provide the right
understanding about the domestic and transnational dimensions, operation and scope
of networks of grand corruption; otherwise, investigative and enforcement agencies will
face these complex illicit structures as mere domestic schemes of traditional corruption
and, therefore, the judicial actions will be naïve and useless for confronting the
complexity of this type of structures.

Specifically, the complexity that results of the amount and diversity of types of
nodes/agents and interactions involved and the transnational nature of the operation
demand a high level of technical capacities that are often absent at Attorney General
Offices and investigative agencies that traditionally face cases of domestic corruption.
Investigating, prosecuting and sanctioning a network of grand corruption like the “Lava
Jato” Criminal Network requires a level of transnational articulation and technical
capacities that usually do not exist among agencies of Latin American countries where
this kind of Network mostly operate.
Bibliography

Worrell, J., Wasko, M., & Johnstn, A. (2013). Social Network Analysis in Accounting
Information Systems Research. International Journal of Accounting Information
Systems (14), 127-137.

den Bossche, P. V., & Segers, M. (2013). Transfer of Training: Adding Insight Through
Social Network Analysis. Educational Research Review (8), 34-47.

Garay, L. J., Salcedo-Albarán, E. et al (2012). Narcotráfico, corrupción y Estados.

Cómo las redes ilícitas han reconfigurado las instituciones en Colombia, Guatemala y
México. Debate. Random House. Mexico D.F.

Johnson, J. A., Reitzel, J. D., Norwood, B. F., McCoy, D. M., Cummings, B., & Tate, R.
R. (2013 Mar.). FBI Law Enforcement Bulleting. Retrieved 2013,15-Jun. from Social
Network Analysis: A Systematic Approach for Investigating: http://www.fbi.gov/stats-
services/publications/law-enforcement-bulletin/2013/March/social-network-analysis

Morselli, C. (2008). Inside Criminal Networks. Montreal, Canada: Springer.

Salcedo-Albaran, E., Goga, K., & Goredema, K. (2014). Cape Town’s underworld
Mapping a protection racket in the central business district. Institute for Security
Studies. Pretoria: Institute for Security Studies.

Radil, S. M., Flint, C., & Tita, G. E. (2010). Spatializing Social Networks: Using Social
Network Analysis to Investigate Geographies of Gang Rivalry, Territoriality, and
Violence in Los Angeles. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 100 (2),
307-326.
Annex
Sources and information gathering procedures

First four police operations (court decisions) of the first instance of investigation: Lava
Jato, Dolce Vita, Bidone and Casablanca, each one focused on a criminal
organization run by defendants: Carlos Habib Chater, Alberto Youseff, Nelma Kodama
and Henrique Srour.
Sources:
117/2/2014 - Operação Lava Jato. PEDIDO DE BUSCA E APREENSÃO CRIMINAL
Nº 5001438¬85.2014.404.7000/PR
217/2/2014 - Operação Dolce Vita. PEDIDO DE BUSCA E APREENSÃO CRIMINAL
Nº 5001461¬31.2014.404.7000/PR
24/2/2014 - Operação Bidone PEDIDO DE BUSCA E APREENSÃO CRIMINAL Nº
5001438¬85.2014.404.7000/PR

25/2/2014 - Operação Casa Blanca PEDIDO DE BUSCA E APREENSÃO CRIMINAL

Nº 5001443¬10.2014.404.7000/PR

Extracted from: http://lavajato.mpf.mp.br/atuacao-na-1a-instancia/decisoes-da-justica

Sentences of the first and second instances of investigation of Lava Jato Operation:
Sentences were processed instead of Complaints, since information collected at the
beginning of the investigation, as well as the information provided by the witnesses, was
later confirmed or denied during the prosecution process; therefore, the final sentences
provide more reliable information through the “judicial truth”.

First Stage

AÇÃO PENAL Nº 5025687-03.2014.404.7000/PR

AÇÃO PENAL Nº 502569225.2014.4.04.7000/PR

AÇÃO PENAL Nº 502621282.2014.4.04.7000/PR

AÇÃO PENAL Nº 502624305.2014.404.7000/PR

AÇÃO PENAL Nº 5035707-53.2014.404.7000/PR

AÇÃO PENAL Nº 5047229-77.2014.4.04.7000/PR

Second Stage

AÇÃO PENAL Nº 508337605.2014.4.04.7000/PR

AÇÃO PENAL Nº 508336051.2014.4.04.7000/PR

AÇÃO PENAL Nº 508335189.2014.4.04.7000/PR

AÇÃO PENAL Nº 508340118.2014.4.04.7000/PR

AÇÃO PENAL Nº 508325829.2014.4.04.7000/PR

AÇÃO PENAL Nº 502742237.2015.4.04.7000/PR

AÇÃO PENAL Nº 508383859.2014.4.04.7000/PR

AÇÃO PENAL Nº 500732698.2015.4.04.7000/PR

AÇÃO PENAL Nº 501233104.2015.4.04.7000/PR

AÇÃO PENAL Nº 502312147.2015.4.04.7000/PR

PROCESSO Nº 5023162-14.2015.4.04.7000

AÇÃO PENAL Nº 5023135-31.2015.4.04.7000/PR

AÇÃO PENAL Nº 503652823.2015.4.04.7000/PR

AÇÃO PENAL Nº 503947550.2015.4.04.7000/PR

AÇÃO PENAL Nº 504524184.2015.4.04.7000/PR

AÇÃO PENAL Nº 506157851.2015.4.04.7000/PR

AÇÃO PENAL Nº 5029737¬38.2015.4.04.7000/PR

AÇÃO PENAL Nº 501340559.2016.4.04.7000/PR

AÇÃO PENAL Nº 502217978.2016.4.04.7000/PR

AÇÃO PENAL Nº 503042478.2016.4.04.7000/PR

AÇÃO PENAL Nº 5051606¬23.2016.4.04.7000/PR

AÇÃO PENAL Nº 5030883¬80.2016.4.04.7000/PR

AÇÃO PENAL Nº 5022182¬33.2016.4.04.7000/PR

Sentences were extracted from http://lavajato.mpf.mp.br/atuacao-na-1a-

instancia/denuncias-do-mpf.

Court decisions and annexes of judicial processes, to describe the

operations of each node/agent.

Autos N° 2009.70.00.019131-5 AÇÃO PENAL

PEDIDO DE BUSCA E APREENSÃO CRIMINAL Nº 5073475 13.2014.4.04.7000/PR
AUTOS DE AÇÃO PENAL nº 5025699-17.2014.404.7000
Contrarrazões, JOÃO LUIZ CORREIA ARGÔLO DOS SANTOS, SIDNEY ROCHA
PEIXOTO – OAB/AL 6217
PEDIDO DE PRISÃO PREVENTIVA Nº 5011708-37.2015.4.04.7000/PR
TERMO DE COLABORAÇÃO Nº 1 que presta JULIO GERIN DE ALMEIDA
CAMARGO
EXTRATO DETALHADO - CASO 001-MPF-001360-10
AUTOS Nº: 5023162-14.2015.4.04.7000
PEDIDO DE QUEBRA DE SIGILO DE DADOS E/OU TELEFÔNIC Nº 5031505-
33.2014.404.7000/PR
AÇÃO PENAL Nº 5013405-59.2016.4.04.7000/PR
AUTOS Nº: 5025692-25.2014.404.7000
AUTOS nº 5083401-18.2014.404.7000
APELAÇÃO CRIMINAL Nº 5026212-82.2014.4.04.7000/PR
Ofício n.º 8243851 AÇÃO PENAL Nº 5025699-17.2014.404.7000/PR
ANEXO 5 – LEGEND
Processo Administrativo nº 13896.721116/2015-85. TERMO DE VERIFICAÇÃO
FISCAL
Autos originários nº 5073475-13.2014.404.7000 IPL nº 5071698-90.2014.404.7000
(CAMARGO CORREA) IPL nº 5053836-09.2014.404.7000 (UTC)
Ofício n.º 8244356 AÇÃO PENAL Nº 5025699-17.2014.404.7000/PR
Autos nº: 5023121-47.2015.404.7000
Devolução de carta precatória devidamente cumprida. 40120162095521, 8664-
37.2016_31-8.pdf 15/08/2016 14:43:06
AUTOS nº: 5083351-89.2014.4.04.7000
Autos nº 5053845-68.2014.404.7000 e 5044866-20.2014.404.7000 (IPL referente à
ENGEVIX), 5049557-14.2013.404.7000 (IPL originário), 5073475-13.2014.404.7000
(Buscas e Apreensões) e conexos
Distribuição por dependência aos autos nº 5049557-14.2013.404.7000 (IPL
originário), 5004996-31.2015.404.7000 (IPL referente a Mario Goes), 5085114-
28.2014.404.7000 (Busca e Apreensão RIOMARINE) e conexos.
RELATÓRIO DE ANÁLISE DE POLÍCIA JUDICIÁRIA nº 124/2016
Autos nº 50001965720154047000
INFORMAÇÃO Nº 036/2015-DELEFIN/DRCOR/SR/DPF/PR
Processo nº 5027422-37.2015.4.04.7000
Processo-crime de autos nº 5037800-18.2016.404.7000
TERMO DE DEPOIMENTO DE MARCOS PEREIRA BERTI
Denúncia no Inquérito nº 2245
Ofício n.º 8284027 AÇÃO PENAL Nº 5026243-05.2014.404.7000/PR
QUESTÃO DE ORDEM NA AÇÃO PENAL 871 PARANÁ
Autos de AÇÃO PENAL nº 5047229-77.2014.404.7000
PEDIDO DE PRISÃO PREVENTIVA Nº 5012323-27.2015.4.04.7000/PR
TERMO DE AUDIÊNCIA Ação Penal n°5037800-18.2016.404.7000
OFÍCIO Nº 700000522775 AÇÃO PENAL Nº 5012331-04.2015.4.04.7000/PR
Contrarrazões ao recurso de apelação MATEUS COUTINHO DE SÁ OLIVEIRA e
JOSÉ RICARDO NOGUEIRA BREGHIROLLI
PEDIDO DE PRISÃO PREVENTIVA Nº 5004872-14.2016.4.04.7000/PR
TEXTO COM REDAÇÃO FINAL. CONSELHO DE ÉTICA E DECORO PARLAMENTAR.
REUNIÃO Nº: 979/2014 DATA: 13/8/2014
TERMO DE DECLARAÇÕES que presta MEIRE BONFIM DA SILVA POZA
AUTO DE QUALIFICAÇÃO INTERROGATÓRIO De: LUIZ CLÁUDIO MACHADO
RIBEIRO
REFERÊNCIA: AÇÃO PENAL Nº 5026663-10.2014.404.7000, CARLOS HABIB
CHATER ABDOGADO
PEDIDO DE BUSCA E APREENSÃO CRIMINAL Nº 5004257-58.2015.4.04.7000/PR
AÇÃO PENAL Nº 5061578-51.2015.4.04.7000/PR. OFÍCIO Nº 700001435567.
PEDIDO DE BUSCA E APREENSÃO CRIMINAL Nº 5014497-09.2015.4.04.7000/PR
PEDIDO DE QUEBRA DE SIGILO DE DADOS E/OU TELEFÔNIC Nº 5026387-
13.2013.404.7000/PR
PEDIDO DE QUEBRA DE SIGILO DE DADOS E/OU TELEFÔNIC Nº 5073645-
82.2014.404.7000/PR
Autos nº 5003682-16.2016.404.7000
EXCEÇÃO DE INCOMPETÊNCIA CRIMINAL Nº 5022869-44.2015.4.04.7000/PR
APELAÇÃO CRIMINAL Nº 5023162-14.2015.4.04.7000/PR
21/06/2016 SEGUNDA TURMA INQUÉRITO 3.997 DISTRITO FEDERAL
REGISTROS 0088693 NESTOR CUNAT CERVERO
SOLICITAÇÃO DE ASSISTÊNCIA JURÍDICA EM MATÉRIA PENAL - SAJ Nº
700000454378
AÇÃO PENAL Nº 5083351-89.2014.4.04.7000/PR OFÍCIO Nº 700000424021
Para distribuição por dependência aos autos nº 5046019-54.2015.4.04.7000
(Representação Criminal), nº 5047925-79.2015.404.7000 (Inquérito Policial) e nº
5049557-14.2013.404.7000 (Inquérito Bidone).
IPL 0014808-07.2013.403.6120
Ação Penal nº 5045241-84.2015.4.04.7000
Autos nº 50001965720154047000
PEDIDO DE BUSCA E APREENSÃO CRIMINAL Nº 5012298-77.2016.4.04.7000/PR
SERVIÇO PUBLICO FEDERAL MJ - POLÍCIA FEDERAL - SEDE TERMO DE
DECLARAÇÕES DE PAULO CÉSAR ROXO RAMOS
RESPOSTA À ACUSAÇÃO AÇÃO PENAL nº 5013405-59.2016.4.04.7000
AÇÃO PENAL 470 MINAS GERAIS
RELATÓRIO DE POLÍCIA JUDICIÁRIA Nº 010/16 ANÁLISE DE MÍDIA APREENDIDA
Referência: ofício no 4001 -201s DpF - lpl 131 stzo14-4 sR/DpF/pR
Autos nº 5012331-04.2015.404.7000
PEDIDO DE BUSCA E APREENSÃO CRIMINAL Nº 5073475-13.2014.404.7000/PR
Os pedidos de prisão e condução coercitiva Folhapress
PEDIDO DE BUSCA E APREENSÃO CRIMINAL Nº 5014455-57.2015.4.04.7000/PR
Translation Leonardo Meirelles e-mail
Comptes bancaires utilisés dans la dernière couche des opérations de blanchiment.
Ministère Public Fédéral.
AÇÃO PENAL Nº 5049898-06.2014.404.7000/PR
PEDIDO DE BUSCA E APREENSÃO CRIMINAL Nº 5085114-28.2014.404.7000/PR
Autos nº 5053744-31.2014.404.7000 (IPL referente à Mendes Júnior), 5073475-
13.2014.404.7000 (buscas e apreensões), 5049557-14.2013.404.7000 (autos
originais) e conexos.
PEDIDO DE QUEBRA DE SIGILO DE DADOS E/OU TELEFÔNIC Nº 5009225-
34.2015.4.04.7000/PR
Documento Interno do Sistema Petrobras – DIP
TERMO DE DEPOIMENTO DE MARCOS PEREIRA BERTI
PEDIDO DE QUEBRA DE SIGILO DE DADOS E/OU TELEFÔNIC Nº 5029786-
79.2015.4.04.7000/PR
Habeas Corpus n.º 5029560-25.2015.404.0000
INFORMAÇÃO Nº 96/2014 QUALIFICAÇÃO – CONTATOS YOUSSEF –
UTC/CONSTRAN Data: 15/10/2014
Autos nº: 5014455-57.2015.404.7000
Autos n° 5039475-50.2015.4.04.7000
EXCEÇÃO DE LITISPENDÊNCIA Nº 5052022-59.2014.404.7000/PR
TERMO DE TRANSCRIÇÃO Audiência do dia 19/02/2004
Autos nº 5036518-76.2015.4.04.7000/PR
PEDIDO DE BUSCA E APREENSÃO CRIMINAL Nº 5055178-
21.2015.4.04.7000/PR
 Exmo. Sr. Dr. SÉRGIO FERNANDO MORO
ANEXO 05) Termo de transcrição dos interrogatórios dos coacusados na Ação
Penal no 502569917.2014.404.7000

Documents were extracted from https://jota.info/lavajota/ and

http://lavajato.mpf.mp.br/atuacao-na-1a-instancia/ .

Subestructures of “Lava Jato” criminal network

DISTRIBUÇAO POR DEPENDÊNCIA AOS AUTOS N° 0506973-80.2016.4.02.5101 –

QUEBRA DE SIGILOS BANCÁRIO E FISCAL
N° 108397/2017 – GTLJ-PGR INQUÉRITO N° 3995/DF
Processo a ser distribuido por dependencia aos autos n° 0501018-
34.2017.4.02.5101
DISTRIBUÇAO POR DEPENDÊNCIA:
Autos n°053012-97-2017.4.02.5101 – homologacao de colaboracao premiada
Autos n°0503104-75.2017.4.02.5101 – prisao preventiva
Autos n°0502479-41.2017.4.02.5101 – quebra telemática
Autos n°0502500-17.2017.4.02.5101 – quebra de sigilos bancário/fiscal
Autos n°0503213-89.2017.4.02.5101 – quebra datos telefónicos
Autos n°0503229-43.2017.4.02.5101 – interceptacao
Autos n°0503211-22.2017.4.02.5101 – medida cautelar de sequestro
Autos n°0503212-07.2017.4.02.5101 – busca e apreensao
Autos n°0503371-47.2017.4.02.5101 – busca e apreensao complementar
Autos n° 0503435-57.2017.4.02.5101 – inquerito policial (IPL 37/2017)
Processo a ser distribuído por dependencia aos autos n°0503012-97.2017.4.02.5101
Processo n° 0503104-75.2017.4.02.5101
Processo n° 0502834-85.2016.4.02.5101
Distribucao por dependencia: Processo n° 0210926-86.2015.4.02.5101
Processo de autos n°0504048-77.2017.4.02.5101
Processo a ser distribuido por dependencia aos autos n° 0503012-
97.2017.4.02.2101
Processo de autos n° 0504048-77.2017.4.02.5101
Processo a ser distribuido por dependencia aos autos n° 0503012-97.2017.02.5110
Distribucao por dependencia aos autos n° 5006617-29.2016.4.04.7000/PR Ref.
Inquérito Policial n°5006597-38.2016.4.04.7000
ACAO PENAL N° 5046512-94.2016.4.04.7000/PR
PROCESSO N° 12393-69.2017.4.01.3500
PROCESSO N°12393-69.2017.4.01.3500
CASO “DE VOLTA AOS TRILHOS” IPL n° 0533/2013-4 SR/DPF/GO
IPL 0017513-21.2014.4.02.5101 DISTRIBUZAO POR DEPENDENCIA: AUTOS
N°0057817-33.2012.4.02.5101 (OPERACAO SAQUEADOR) E 0509503-
57.2016.4.02.5101 (OPERACIÓN CALICUTE)
PROCESSO N° 0017513.21.2014.4.02.5101 (2014.51.01.017513-9)

ANNEX 2

id Bet

ALBERTO YOUSEFF 9,4

PETROLEO BRASILEIRO SA -PETROBRAS 9,4

PAULO ROBERTO COSTA 4,9

JBS 3,7

JOESLEY MENDONCA BATISTA 3,3

THE CLUBE 3,3

JULIO GERIN DE ALMEIDA CAMARGO 3,1

PEDRO BARUSCOÂ 3

ENGEVIX ENGENHARIA SA 2,2

JOAO VACCARI 2

EDUARDO COSENTINO CUNHA 1,9

NELMA KODAMA PENASSO 1,9

CONSTRUTORA NORBERTO ODEBRECHT 1,8

JOSE JANENE 1,8

ANDRADE GUTIERREZ 1,7

OAS LTDA 1,6

MITSUI TOYO 1,5

RENATO DE SOUZA DUQUE 1,3

GRUPO QUEIROZ GALVAO 1,2

MO CONSULTORIA 1,2

FUNDACAO PETROBRAS DE SEGURIDADE SOCIAL -

1,1
PETROS

SHELLBILL FINANCE S.A 1,1

MENDES JUNIOR 1

PARTIDO PROGRESSISTA BRASILEIRO (PPB) 1

BRASKEM 0,8

FUNDACAO DOS ECONOMIARIOS FEDERAIS - FUNCEF 0,8

GFD INVESTIMENTOS 0,8

LUIZ INACIO LULA DA SILVA 0,8

PARTIDO DOS TRABALHADORES 0,8

RAUL HENRIQUE SROUR 0,8

JORGE LUIZ ZELADA 0,7

LUIZ SOARES 0,7

PEDRO DA SILVA CORREA 0,7

GALVAO ENGENHARIA SA 0,5

KLIENFELD SERVICES 0,5

RICARDO OURIQUES MARQUES 0,5

SAMSUNG HEAVY INDUSTRIES CO 0,5

SANKO SIDER E SANKO SERVICIOS 0,5

SERGIO CABRAL 0,5

SETAL OLEO E GAS S/A 0,5

UTC ENGENHARIA S/A 0,5

VANTAGE DRILLING INTERNATIONA CORPORATION 0,5

ADIR ASSAD 0,4

ANTONIO PALOCCI FILHO 0,4

BORGHI LOWE PROPAGANDA E MARKETING LTDA 0,4

CONSORCIO INTERPAR 0,4

COSTA GLOBAL 0,4

EDUARDO COSTA VAZ MUSA 0,4

ELIA SANTOS DA HORA 0,4

INDUSTRIA LABOGEN 0,4

IT7 SISTEMAS LTDA 0,4

LEGEND ENGENHEIROS ASSOCIADOS 0,4

MPE MONTAGENS E PROJETOS ESPECIAIS 0,4

RICARDO RIBEIRO PESSOA 0,4

ROBERTO TEIXEIRA 0,4

ROGERIO CUNHA DE OLIVEIRA 0,4

ANGEL SERVICOS TERCEIRIZADOS LTDA 0,3

ARBOR CONSULTORIA AND ASSESSORIA CONTABIL 0,3

CARLOS ALBERTO PEREIRA 0,3

CONSORCIO NACIONAL CAMARGO CORREA Â-CNCC 0,3

CONSORCIO OCCH 0,3

DELTA CONSTRUCTIONS 0,3

FUNDOS DE GOVERNO E LOTERIAS DA CAIXA ECONOMICA

0,3
FEDERAL

J&F GROUP 0,3

JOAO AUGUSTO REZENDE HENRIQUES 0,3

MARCO ANTONIO DE LUCA 0,3

MARICE CORREA DE LIMA 0,3

MARIO FREDERICO GOES 0,3

OTHON LUIZ PINHEIRO 0,3

PARTIDO DEL MOVIMIENTO DEMOCRATICO BRASILENO 0,3

PIROQUIMICA COMERCIAL LTDA 0,3

POSTO DA TORRE LTDA 0,3

RENE LUIZ PEREIRA 0,3

ACONA INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENTS LTD 0,2

ANDRE GUSTAVO VIEIRA DA SILVA 0,2

ANIBAL FERREIRA GOMES 0,2

BANCO SCHAHIN 0,2

CARLOS HABIB CHATER 0,2

COMPAGNIES BENINOISE DES HYDROCARBURES SAUL -

0,2
CBH

CONSORCIO CMMS 0,2

CONSORCIO NOVOS TEMPOS 0,2

CSA PROJECT FINANCE LTDA 0,2

ELDORADO 0,2

FERNANDO SOARES AKA FERNANDO BAIANO 0,2

FLAVIO BARRA 0,2

FLEXSYSTEM ENGENHARIA 0,2

GUSTAVO SOUZA 0,2

HAMYLTON PINHEIRO PADILHA JUNIOR 0,2

IESA 0,2

JAMP ENGENHEIROS ASSOCIADOS 0,2

JOAO CERQUEIRA DE SANTANA 0,2

JOAO CLAUDIO GENU 0,2

JONAS LEITE SUASSUNA FILHO 0,2

JOSE ANTUNES SOBRINHO 0,2

JOSE DIRCEU DE OLIVEIRA E SILVA 0,2

JOSE RICARDO BREGHIROLLI 0,2

LEON DENIS VARGAS ILARIO 0,2

LUISITANIA PETROLEUM (BC) LIMITED 0,2

MARCELO ANANIAS NOTARO 0,2

MARIA CRISTINA IBRAIM JABUR 0,2

QUATTOR 0,2

RFY IMPORT & EXPORT LTDA. 0,2

RICARDO HOFFMANN 0,2

SARGENT MARINE 0,2

SETE BRASIL PARTICIPACOES S/AÂ 0,2

SUL BRASIL CONSTRUCOES LTDA. 0,2

TOYO SETAL PARTICIPAÇÕES E INVESTIMENTOS 0,2

WILLER TOMAZ 0,2

AGROCAIERAS 0,1

ALBERTO QUINTAES 0,1

ANDRE LUIS VARGAS ILARIO 0,1

APOLO TUBULARS 0,1

AUGURI EMPREENDIMENTOS LTDA 0,1

BNDES 0,1

CARIOCA ENGENHARIA 0,1

CLAUDIO LIMA 0,1

CLUBE DO PEGAO INTERNACIONAL 0,1

CONSORCIO ANDRADE GUTIERREZ MENDES JUNIOR E

0,1
KTY

CONSORCIO FSTP PTE LTD 0,1

CONSORCIO MACARANA RIO 2014 0,1

CONSORCIO TUC 0,1

CONSTRUCTORA CAMARGO CORREA 0,1

CONSTRUCTORA INTERNATIONAL DEL SUR 0,1

CREDENCIAL CONSTRUTORA EMPREENDIMENTOS E

0,1
REPRESENTACOES LTDA

DIRETORIA DE ABASTECIMENTO DA PETROBRAS 0,1

EDUARDO CAMPOS 0,1

EIT 0,1

ELECTROBRAS TERMONUCLEAR S/A - ELECTRONUCLEAR 0,1

EMPREITEIRA RIGIDEZ 0,1

ESTADO DO RIO DE JANEIRO 0,1

FABIO CLETO 0,1

FABIO LUIS LULA DA SILVA 0,1

FERNANDO ANTONIO GUIMARAES HOURNEAUX DE MOURA 0,1

FERNANDO BITTAR 0,1

FERNANDO CARVALHO 0,1

FLORISVALDO DE SOUZA 0,1

FRANCISCO DE ASSIS E SILVA 0,1

FUNDO FIP-FORESTAL 0,1

GDK 0,1

GIOVANNI 0,1

GUIDO MONTEGA 0,1

ICARO MORENO JUNIOR 0,1

IDELFONSO COLARES 0,1

JARAGUA EQUIPO INDUSTRIAL 0,1

JORGE LUZ 0,1

JOSE ADOLFO PASCOWITCH 0,1

JOSE CARLOS COSTA MARQUES BUMLAI 0,1

KEPPEL FELS 0,1

LEANDRO MEIRELLES 0,1

LINDBERG FARIAS 0,1

LUCIANO COUNTINHO 0,1

LUCIO BOLONHA FUNARO 0,1

LUIZ MESSIAS 0,1

MARCELO BAHIA ODEBRECHT 0,1

MARCOS VALERIO 0,1

MÔNICA REGINA CUNHA MOURA 0,1

NESTOR CUNAT CERVERO 0,1

NEY GEBRAN PEREIRA 0,1

PARTIDO SOCIALISTA BRASILEÑO (PSB) 0,1

PIEMONTE EMPREENDIMENTOS LTDA 0,1

RHEA COMERCIAL INC 0,1

RICARDO SAUD 0,1

SERVENG CIVILSAN SA 0,1

SKANSA BRASIL LTDA. 0,1

SONIA MARIZA BRANCO 0,1

SYGNUS ASSETS S/A 0,1

TAIWAN MARITIME TRANSPORTATION CO. 0,1

TECHINT ENGENHARIA E CONSTRUCAO S/A 0,1

TERMORIO 0,1
TOME ENGENHARIA 0,1

VAGNER PINHEIRO 0,1

VANTAGE DEEPWATER COMPANY 0,1

VICTOR GARCIA SANDRI 0,1

"MARTINELLE" 0

"OSMAR" 0

2S PARTICIPACOES LTDA 0

ABERDEEN MONEY MARKET FUND 0

ABREU E LIMA CNCC- CAMARGO CORREA 0

ACUVE INTERNATIONAL CORP 0

ADARICO NEGROMONTE 0

AECIO NEVES DA CUNHA 0

AELTON JOSE DE FREITAS 0

AF CONSULT LTDA 0

AGA MED 0

AGENOR FRANKLIN MAGALHAES MEDEIROS 0

AGNALDO RIBEIRO 0

AGROPECUARIA ALTO DO TURIACU LTDA 0

AGROPECUARIA DUAS IRMAS LTDA. 0

AGROPECUARIA MARANHENSE SA AGROMASA 0

AGUINALDO RIBEIRO 0

AJJP SERVICOS ADMINISTRATIVOS E EDUCACIONAL LTDA 0

AKA CABALLERO 0

AKA FLOR 0

AKA MAINHA 0

AKA TRADE 0

ALBERTO ELISIO VILACA GOMES 0

ALBERTO SILVEIRA CONDE 0

ALCEU MOREIRA 0

ALEXANDRE JOSE DOS SANTOS 0

ALEXANDRINO DE SALLES RAMOS DE ALENCAR 0

ALINE CORREA 0
ALINE LEMOS DE OLIVEIRA 0

ALUISIO LUNDGREN CORREA REGIS 0

ALUSA 0

AMAPIL TAXI AEREO LTDA. 0

AMIGOS DA TERRA 0

AMTM PRODUCOES JORNALISTICAS LTDA. 0

ANA CRISTINA DA SILVA TONIOLO 0

ANA LUIZA BOLOGNANI 0

ANA MELIA 0

ANDRE CATAO DE MIRANDA 0

ANDRE LUIZ CANCE 0

ANDRE PUCCINELLI 0

ANDREA NEVES DA CUNHA 0

ANGELA MARIA ARARIPE D OLIVEIRA SOUTO 0

ANGELA MARIA MACHADO NEVES 0

ANGELO ALVES MENDES 0

ANGELO GOULART VILLELA 0

ANTONIO ALMEIDA SILVA 0

ANTONIO BALHMANN CARDOSO NUNES FILHO 0

ANTONIO CARLOS BRASIL FIORAVANTE PIERUCCINI 0

ANTONIO CARLOS FERREIRA 0

APPM ANALISTA E PESQUISA 0

AQUARIUS PARTNERS INC 0

AQUILA HOLDING LTD 0

AQUILES E MOURA COMERCIO DE IMAGENS LTDA 0

ARARAS EMPREENDIMENTOS CONSULTORIA E SERVICOS

0
LTDA – EPP

ARAREMA PRODUCAO ARTISTICA E EDITORIACAO 0

ARATEC ENGENHARIA CONSULTORIA &

0
REPRESENTAÇÕES LTDA

ARCADEX CORPORATION 0

ARCOS PROPAGANDA LTDA 0

ARIALDO PINHO 0
ARLINGTON MANAGEMENT CORPORATION 0

ARTHUR DE LIRA 0

ASSAD JANNANI 0

ASSESSORIA DE CREDITO E COBRANCA LTDA 0

ASSOCIACAO DOS CRIADORES REGIONAIS ENTRE RIOS 0

ATAN DE AZEVEDO BARBOSA 0

ATLAS ASSET SA 0

AUGUSTO RIBEIRO DE MENDONCA NETO 0

AUJE IND. ELETRONICA LTDA 0

AURELIO OLIVERA TELLES 0

BARTZ PROPAGANDA LTDA 0

BEACON HILL SERVICE CORPORATION 0

BENEDICTO BARBOSA JUNIOR 0

BENEDITO LIRA 0

BERKELEY CONSULTING INC 0

BERNARDO FREIBURGHAUS 0

BERTIN LTDA 0

BLACK GOLD DRILLING 0

BOA AQUICULTURA E ORGANICOS LTDA 0

BOMBAIM AGROPECUARIA LTDA 0

BONUS BANVAL 0

BR DISTRIBUIDORA 0

BR4 EMPREENDIMENTOS E PARTICIPACOES LTDA 0

BRADESCO 0

BRIZOLA NETO 0

BRUNO ARAUJO 0

BRUNO GONCALVES LUZ 0

BURUTI COMERCIO DE CARNES 0

BV SCHEEPSWERF DAMEN GORINCHEM 0

CABUC SERVICIOS DE COMPUTACAO GRAFICA 0

CAENGE 0
CAIO INDUSCAR INDUSTRIA ECOMERCIO DE
0
CARROCERIAS LTDA

CAIXA DE PREVIDENCIA DOS FUNCIONARIOS DO BANCO

0
DO BRASIL PREVI

CAIXA ECONOMICA FEDERAL 0

CAMARA VASCONCELOS 0

CAMILO SOBREIRA DE SANTANA 0

CAMTER 0

CANDIDO VACAREZZA 0

CANKUN COMUNICACAO INSTITUCIONAL 0

CARLINHOS 0

CARLOS ALBERTO MONTENEGRO GALLO 0

CARLOS ALBERTO MURARI 0

CARLOS CASE 0

CARLOS COSTA 0

CARLOS EDUARDO DE SA BAPTISTA 0

CARLOS EDUARDO STRAUCH ALBERO 0

CARLOS FONTANA 0

CARLOS KOLRAUSH 0

CARLOS MAGNO 0

CARLOS MILA AGROPECUARIA LTDA 0

CARLOS MIRANDA 0

CARLOS PACHECO ASSES CINEMATROGRAFICA 0

CARLOS PEREIRA COSTA 0

CARLOS PIRES 0

CARLOS ROCHA 0

CARLOS VALENTE 0

CARLOSÂ ALEXANDRE DEÂ SOUZAÂ ROCHA 0

CASABELLA 0

CASABLANCA INTERNATIONAL HOLDING 0

CELSO ARARIPE DE OLIVEIRA 0

CENTRAL BANK OF BRAZIL 0

CENTRAL MEDICA 0
CESAR LUIZ DE GODOY PEREIRA 0

CESAR ROBERTO SANTOS 0

CESAR ROCHA 0

CG IMPEX 0

CHELLO SOCIEDAD ANONIMA 0

CIC CONSORTIUM OF INTERNATIONAL CONSULTANTS 0

CID GOMES 0

CINTIA 0

CIRO NOGUEIRA 0

CITIBANK INTERNATIONAL 0

CLAUDIA CORDEIRO DA CRUZ 0

CLAUDIO MENTE 0

CLEVERSON DE OLIVEIRA COELHO 0

CLORIVALDO BISINOTO 0

CLOVIS RENATO NUMA PEIXOTO PRIMO 0

CNEC 0

COESO ENGENHARIA LTDA 0

COLUMBUS INVEST TRADE LTD 0

COMERCIAL MEDICA 0

COMERCIAL MILANO BRASIL LTDA 0

COMERCIO DE MAQUINAS E EQUIPAMENTOS LTDA 0

CONCORVADO COMUNICACOES LTDA. 0

CONCREMAT ENGENHARIA E TECNOLOGIA SA 0

CONSELHO CURADOR DO FGTS 0

CONSORCIO CONPAR 0

CONSORCIO GASAM 0

CONSORCIO MANGUINHOS 0

CONSORCIO PIPE RACK 0

CONSORCIO PPR 0

CONSORCIO RNEST - CONEST 0

CONSORCIO SEHAB LTDA 0

CONSORCIO VIARIO SAO BERNARDO 0

CONSORSIO RIO MELHOR 0

CONSPIRACAO FILMES SA 0

CONSTRAN 0

CONSTRUCAP 0

CONSTRUTORA OAS LTDA PELA TAG TRANSPORTADORA

0
ASSOCIADA DE GAS SA

CONSTRUTORA SAB LTDA 0

CONVORVADO COMUNICACOES LTDA 0

CRG SERVICOS 0

CRISTALES COMERCIO LTDA 0

CRISTIANE 0

CROWN INTERNATIONAL LTD 0

DA VINCI CONFECCOES LTD 0

DAHER DESIGN ENGENHARIA E CONTRUCOES 0

DALTON DOS SANTOS AVANCINI 0

DANIELA LEOPOLDO 0

DANIELLE KEMMER JANENE 0

DBS3 COMERCUAL CIENTIFICA 0

DEBASE ASSETS 0

DEEP BLACK DRILLING 0

DEEP SEA OIL CORPORATION 0

DELMO PEREIRA VIEIRA 0

DELUBIO SOARES DE CASTRO 0

DEMA PARTICIPACOES E EMPREENDIMENTOS LTDA. 0

DEMILTON 0

DEMOCRATAS / DEM 0

DERZIE 0

DEUTSCHEBRAS 0

DEVONSHIRE GLOBAL FUND 0

DEVONSHIRE LATAM INVESTMENTS 0

DGX IMP EXPO LTDA 0

DILCEU SPERAFICO 0
DILMA ROUSSEFF 0

DILSON DE CERQUEIRA PAIVA FILHO 0

DIRETORIA DE SERVICOS DA PETROBRAS 0

DISLUB EQUADOR/VENDRAS MARITIMA LTDA. 0

DISTRIBUIDORA EQUADOR DE PRODUTOS DE PETROLEO L

0
TDA

DISTRICASH DISTRIBUIDORA DE TITULOS E VALORES

0
MOBILIARIOS

DIXTAL 0

DLIF DRILLING 0

DOLE TECH 0

DRAGER INDUSTRIA E COMERCIO LTDA 0

DUDU DA FONTE 0

DUNEL INDUSTRIA 0

EASTERN PETROLEUM 0

EDIEL VIANA FILHO 0

EDINHO SILVA 0

EDISON LOBAO 0

EDIVALDO PEREIRA VIERA 0

EDNO NEGRINI 0

EDSON LOBAO 0

EDUARDO APARECIDO DE MEIRA 0

EDUARDO DA FONTE 0

EDUARDO FONTE 0

EDUARDO FREITAS FILHO 0

EDUARDO HERMELINO LEITE 0

EDUARDO KENZI ANTONINI 0

EDUARDO SCIARA 0

EDUARDO SOARES 0

ELBA SERVICES 0

ELCINHO 0

ELETRONUCLEAR 0

ELITE DAY 0
ELMIO ROSA 0

EMILIO AULER NETO 0

EMPRESA DE VIACAO ANGRENSE 0

EMPRESA METROPOLITANA DE OBRAS PUBLICAS (EMOP) 0

ENGESA 0

ENIVALDO QUADRADO 0

ENOISE ESTUDIOS DE PRODUCAO 0

ENTRERPRISE TECH INDUSTRIES INC 0

EQUADOR LOG SA 0

ERTON MEDEIROS FONSECA 0

ESTALEIRO BRASFELS 0

ESTALEIROS DO BRASIL 0

ESTRE AMBIENTAL S.A 0

EXPRESSO NOVA SANTO ANDRE 0

FABIANA ESTAIANO 0

FABIANA LINS CONDE 0

FABIO CORREA 0

FABIO HORI YONAMINE 0

FAICAL MOHAMED NACIRDINE 0

FERNANDO AUGUSTO STREMEL DE ANDRADE 0

FERNANDO BEZERRA 0

FERNANDO CAVENDISH 0

FERNANDO DE CASTRO SA 0

FERNANDO PIMENTEL 0

FERNANDO SCHAHIN 0

FERRAMENTAS GERAIS 0

FI-FGTS 0

FIDENS 0

FLAVIO DERNS 0

FLAVIO HENRIQUE DE OLIVEIRA 0

FLAVIO WERNECK 0

FLORA SA 0
FLORESTAL 0

FRANCISCO JOSE PINHEIRO 0

FRANCISCO MATHEUS 0

FRANCO CLEMENTE PINTO 0

FRANK MARKETING LTD 0

FRECATO 0

FREDERICO PACHECO DE MEDEIROS 0

FUNDACAO VALE DO RIO DOCE DE SEGURIDADE SOCIAL

0
(VALIA)

FUNDO VISANET CONTROLADO PELO BANCO DO BRASIL 0

FURQUIM 0

FW EMPREENDIMENTOS IMOBILIARIOS LTDA 0

FW ENGENHARIA 0

G4 ENTRETENIMENTO E TECNOLOGIA DIGITAL LTDA 0

GABRIEL GUIMARES 0

GABRIEL NUNES PIRES NETO 0

GASODUTO URUCU-COARI-MANAUS 0

GDCAR 0

GEDDEL VIEIRA LIMA 0

GELSON FERRAZ DE MADEIROS 0

GEORGIQS KONTRONAKIS 0

GEP ADMINISTRAZAO PATRIMO 0

GERALDO DE ARAGAO BULCAO 0

GERALDO NONINO 0

GERALDO TOLEDO ARRUDA JUNIOR 0

GERSON DE MELLO ALMADA 0

GILBERTO RAMOS 0

GILMARCY 0

GILSON M FERREIRA TRANSPORTE ME 0

GLACIER FINANCE LTDA. 0

GLADISON CAMEL 0

GLASSTON INVESTORS SA 0
GLEISI HOFFMAN 0

GLOBAL TREND INVESTMENT LCC 0

GOLAC PROJECT 0

GONCALO SA 0

GOVERNMENT OF MATO GROSSO DO SUL 0

GRAFICA E EDITORA ALVORADA LTDA 0

GRAFICA JAFAR LTDA. 0

GRETA COMERCIO DE CONFECCOES LTDA 0

GRUPO DE TRABALHO DO EDITAL DE LICITACAO 0

GUAVA INTERNATIONAL LTD 0

GUILHERME LACERDA 0

GUSTAVO BOTELHO 0

GUSTAVO ESTRELLITA 0

HAGESHIRO FINANCIAL LTD 0

HALEMBECK ENGENHARIA LTDA 0

HAMILTON PAES 0

HATLEY TRADING ASSETS CORPORATION 0

HAVINSUR SA 0

HAWK EYES ADMINISTRACAO DE BENS LTDA 0

HEATHERLEY BUSINESS LTD 0

HEDGE ASSESSORIA E CONSULTORIA EMPRESARIA 0

HELGI THOR PRODUCAO E EDICAO LTDA. 0

HELO MED 0

HELTON RODRIGO GOMES DOS SANTOS 0

HENRY HOYER DE CARVALHO 0

HERMES FREITAS MAGNUM 0

HERMES ME 0

HIGH LEVEL FINANCIAL CORP 0

HIGHTEX GROUP PCL 0

HMAR 0

HMJ CONSULTORIA 0

HOCHTIEF DO BRASIL 0
HSIN CHI SU NOBU SU 0

HUDSON BRAGA 0

HUMBERTO 0

HUMBERTO AMARAL 0

HUMBERTO COSTA 0

HYDROPOWER ENTERPRISE LIMITED 0

IARA GALDINO DA SILVA 0

IBOPE INTELIGENCIA PESQUISA E CONSULTORIA LTDA. 0

ICS LIMITED 0

IDALECIO DE CARRO RODRIGUES DE OLIVEIRA 0

IMAGIO DIAGNOSTICO AVANCA 0

IMPERIO IMPORT ASSESSORIA E CONSULTORIA EM

0
IMPORTACAO E EXPORTACAO LTDA

INDUMED 0

INDUMEX SA 0

INNOVATION RESEARCH ENGINEERING A DEVELOPMENT

0
LTD

INSTITUTO ICONE DE ENSINO JURIDICO LTDA. 0

INSTITUTO LUIZ INACIO LULA DA SILVA 0

INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE TRAUMATOLOGIA E ORTOPEDIA 0

INTERCORP LOGISTIC 0

INVESTMINAS PARTICIPACOES SA 0

IPIRANGA 0

IPOJUCA INTERLlGACOES 0

IRENEU BERANDI MEIRELES 0

ISKIN & ISKIN 0

ISPAR ISKIN PARTICIPACOES 0

ITAÚ 0

IVAN VERNON 0

IVANILDO MIRANDA 0

JAIME "CARECA" 0

JAIR VINICIUS RAMOS DE VEIGA 0

JAYMEÂ ALVESÂ DEÂ OLIVEIRAÂ FILHO 0

JD ASSESSORIA E CONSULTORIA LTDA 0

JERONIMO GOERGEN 0

JN RENT A CAR 0

JNOBRE ENGENHARIA 0

JOAO ALBERTO LAZZARI 0

JOAO BACELAR 0

JOAO BEARTS 0

JOAO BOSCO 0

JOAO CARLOS DE MEDEIROS FERRAZ 0

JOAO GENU 0

JOAO LEA 0

JOAO LUIZ ARGOLO 0

JOAO PIZZOLATTI 0

JOAO PROCOPIO JUNQUEIRA PACHECO DE ALMEIDA

0
PRADO

JOAO RICARDO AULER 0

JOHN HUANG 0

JOLMEY SA 0

JONAS AURELIO 0

JORGE AFONSO ARGELLO 0

JORGE GONZALO MARTINEZ ESCOBAR 0

JOSE ADELMARIO PINHEIRO FILHO 0

JOSE ANTONIO SILVA PARENTE 0

JOSE CAMILO TEIXERA CARVALHO 0

JOSE EDUARDO COSTA MATTOS 0

JOSE HUMBERTO CRUVINEL RESENDE 0

JOSE LINHARES 0

JOSE MARIA RIBAS MULLER 0

JOSE MENTOR GUILHERME DE MELLO NETTO 0

JOSE MIGUEL PINOTTI 0

JOSE OCTAVIO 0

JOSE SERRA 0
JOSEPH ESTEVAN 0

JOSUE AUGUSTO NOBRE 0

JR TRASNPORTES LTDA 0

JSM ENGENHARIA E TERRAPLANAGEM 0

JUAREZ MIRANDA JUNIOR 0

JULIA D OLIVEIRA SOUTO 0

JULIANA CORDEIRO DE MOURA 0

JULIANO COSTA CUOTO 0

JULIO GONCALVES 0

JULIO LOPES 0

JUNE INTERNATIONAL CORP 0

JUNIOR 0

KEPPEL SHIPYARD LIMITED 0

KFC HIDROSSEMEADURA 0

KISTREY TRADING LTD 0

KLT AGENCIA DE VIAGENS LTDA 0

KONSTANTINOS KONTRONAKISK 0

KOPEK 0

KTY CONSULTORIA 0

L.I.L.S PALESTRAS, EVENTOS E PUBLICACOES LIMITADA 0

LABOGEN QUIMICA 0

LARRON OFFSHORE LIMITED 0

LAUDOS ESTATISTICOS 0

LAURO TIRADENTES 0

LAZARO BOTELHO 0

LEONARDO FERNANDES MAYRINK 0

LEONARDO MEIRELLES 0

LEVFORT COMERCIO E TECNOLOGIA 0

LIDER MIDIA EXTERIOR LTDA 0

LIMIAR CONSULTORIA E ASSESSORIA EM COMUNICACAO 0

LINK PROJETOS E PATICIPACOES S/A 0

LOTTE MANAGEMENT LTD 0

LOUZIVAL LUIZ LAGO MASCARENHAS JUNIOR 0

LRC EVENTOS E PROMOCOES 0

LSI SOLUCAO EM SERVICOS EMPRESARIAIS LTDA. 0

LUCASÂ AMORIM ALVES 0

LUCCAS PACE JUNIOR 0

LUDMILA MARILIA BELLA PACHECO 0

LUIS CARLOS AFONSO 0

LUIS CARLOS HEINZE 0

LUIS FERNANDO RAMOS FARIA 0

LUIS NASCIMENTO 0

LUIZ CARLOS BECERRA 0

LUIZ EDUARDO DE OLIVEIRA E SILVA 0

LUIZ FERNANDEZ 0

LUIZ FERNANDO FARIA 0

LUIZ FERNANDO SOBRINHO 0

LUIZ PORTELA PRODUCOES 0

LUIZ ROBERTO PEREIRA 0

LYNMAR ASSETS CORPORATION 0

M&M LOPES 0

M&M PRODUCOES ARTISTICAS LTDA. 0

M.D INTERNATIONAL 0

MACROMED 0

MALAGUETA CINEMA E VIDEO LTDA. 0

MANOEL 0

MAQUET DO BRASIL EQUIPAMENTOS MEDICOS 0

MARANELLE INVESTIMENTS INC 0

MARAVILLE INTERTRADE CORPORATION 0

MARCELO OLIVEIRA MELLO 0

MARCELO SIMOES 0

MARCHE MARKETING LTDA. EPP 0

MARCIA DANZI RUSSO CORREA 0

MARCIO 0
MARCIO BONILHO 0

MARCIO FARIA 0

MARCO ANTONIO BORGHI 0

MARCO ANTONIO LADEIRA OLIVEIRA 0

MARCO AURELIO BARRETO PEREIRA LEITE 0

MARCO AURELIO SPALL MAIA 0

MARCOS BERTIÂ 0

MARCOS MONTES CORDEIRO 0

MARCOS PEREIRA 0

MARCOS TEIXERA 0

MARCOS VIDIGAL 0

MARIA CELIA DA SILVA 0

MARIA DE FATIMA STOCKER 0

MARIA DIRCE PENASSO 0

MARIA JOSILENE COSTA 0

MARIA LUCIA CARDENA 0

MARIA MADALENA RODRIGUES MELO ARARIPE 0

MARIA TEODORA SILVA 0

MARIO BELTRAO 0

MARIO LUCIO 0

MARIO NEGROMONTE 0

MARLEI GABRIEL PEREIRA 0

MARTA SUPLICY 0

MASAN SERVICOS ESPECIALIZADOS LTDA 0

MASCARENHAS MATERIAIS DE CONSTRUCAO LTDA 0

MATEUS COUTINHO 0

MATTHEW S PACINELLI 0

MAURICIO GODOY 0

MAURICIO RIZZO 0

MAURO EDUARDO UEMURA 0

MAURY CAMPO DOTO 0

MB PRODUCOES CINEMATOGRAFICAS LTDA. 0

MDL PARTICIPACOES E NEGOCIOS EIRELI 0

MEIRE BONFIM DA SILVA POZA 0

MERCEDES BENZ DO BRASIL LTDA 0

METALIS ALUMINUN CURITIBA IND E 0

MEZUMA TRES IRMAS DISTRIBUIDORA DE PRODUTOS

0
ALIMENTICIOS LTDA

MGT CONSORTIUM 0

MICHEL TEMER 0

MIGUEL ISKIN 0

MIGUEL LESSA 0

MIK PRESTACAO DE SERVICIOS 0

MILTITEC 0

MILTON ORTOLAN 0

MILTON PASCOWITCH 0

MILTON TAUFIC SCHAHIN 0

MILTRO RODRIGUEZ PEREIRA 0

MILZART OVERSEAS DOLDINGS INC 0

MINISTERIO DA SAUDE 0

MINISTERIO PUBLICO FEDERALÂ 0

MIRNA ZANETTI FILHO 0

MISSIONARIO JOSE OLIMPIO 0

MITUTOYO SUL AMERICANA 0

MORONI BING TORGAN 0

MPC MARKETING PROPAGANDA 0

MULTIMED COMERCIO DE MATERIAIS MEDICOS 0

MULTITEC 0

N.T. RIBEIRO NETO ME 0

NADIA 0

NBC CONSULTORIA 0

NEABADON HOLDINGS INC 0

NELSON CINTRA RIBEIRO 0

NELSON MEURER 0
NETHERTON INVESTMENTS PTE LTD 0

NEW HOPE TRADING INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION 0

NEW SERVICE 0

NEWTON LIMA 0

NEWTON PRADO JUNIOR 0

OCARI MOREIRA 0

ODOIA EDITORACOES LTDA. 0

OLAVINHO FERREIRA MENDEZ 0

OLAVO MOURA 0

ONYX LORENZONI 0

OPINGTON CORPORATION 0

OPONIAO COMUNICACAO 0

ORCRIM 0

ORESTA ASSOCIATED SA 0

ORION SP 0

ORST ENTERPRISES 0

OSCAR ALGORTA RAQUETTI 0

OSCAR ISKIN & CIA LTDA. 0

OSCO ENERGY 0

OSVANE APARECIDO RAMOS 0

OSWALDO RODRIGUES VIEIRA FILHO 0

OTAVIO MARQUES DE AZEVEDO 0

PARTIDO DA MOBILIZACAO NACIONAL -PMN 0

PARTIDO DA REPUBLICA -PR 0

PARTIDO DA SOCIAL DEMOCRACIA BRASILEIRA 0

PARTIDO DEMOCRATICO TRABALHISTA 0

PARTIDO RENOVADOR TRABALHISTA -PRT 0

PARTIDO RENOVADOR TRABALHISTA BRASILERO 0

PARTIDO REPUBLICANO DA ORDEN SOCIAL (PROS) 0

PARTIDO TRABALHISTA BRASILERO 0

PAUL BRAGG 0

PAULO BOGHOSSIAN 0
PAULO CAMARA 0

PAULO CESAR ALMEIDA CABRAL 0

PAULO CESAR PEIXOTO 0

PAULO DALMAZO 0

PAULO FERREIRA 0

PAULO MERIADE DUARTE 0

PAULO ROBERTO SANTOS 0

PAULO ROBERTO VALENTE GORDILHO 0

PAULO TARCISO OKAMOTO 0

PAULO TWIASCHOR 0

PEDRO ARGESE 0

PEDRO HENRY 0

PEDRO MOROLLO JUNIOR 0

PEDRO NADAF 0

PEDRO PAULO LEONI 0

PEG PRESTACAO DE SERVICOS 0

PEM ENGENHARIA 0

PEQUENA NOTAVEL EMPREENDIMENTOS ARTISTICOS

0
LTDA

PER PRIMA COMERCIO E REPRESENTAÇOES 0

PERSIO JORDANI 0

PETER ARGESE JUNIOR 0

PETROBRAS VENEZUELA INVESTMENTS & SERVICES

0
BV

PEXO CORPORATION 0

PHAD CORPORATION 0

PHILIPS MEDICAL SYSTEMS NETHERLAND B.V. 0

PIEMONT INVESTMENT CORP 0

PILAR IPOJUCA 0

PIRELLI 0

PNGS PROSPER PARTICIPACOES LTDA 0

POLAR CAPITAL INVESTMENT LTD 0

POLIS PROPAGANDA E MARKETING LTDA 0

POWER TO TEN ENGENHARIA LTDA 0

PPI PROJETO DE PLANTAS INDUSTRIAIS LTDA 0

PROJETEC PROJETOS E TECNOLOGIA LTDA 0

PROL RIO IMAGEN LTDA. 0

PROMON ENGENHARIA LTDA 0

PROSERV ASSESSORIA EMPRESARIAL SC LTDA 0

PROTECO CONSTRUCOES LTDA. 0

PRS 0

QUINUS SERVICE S/A 0

RAFAEL ANGULO LOPEZ 0

RAFAEL HENRIQUE SROUR 0

RAFAEL PINHEIRO DO CARMO 0

RAIMUNDO GOMES DE MATOS 0

RANBY INTERNATIONAL CORP 0

RAUL SCHMIDT FELIPPE JÚNIOR 0

RCI 0

RCI SOTFWARE E HARDWARE LTDA. 0

REFINERIA PRESIDENTE GETULIO VARGAS REPAR 0

REGIS FISCHNER 0

REINALDO AZAMBUJA 0

REINASCI CAMBUI DE SOUZA 0

REMAR AGENCIAMENTO E ASSESSORIA LTDA. 0

RENAN CALHEIROS 0

RENATO MOLLING 0

RENATO TIRABOSCHI 0

RENATOO ABREU 0

RHR PUBLICIDADE E REPRESENTACOES LTDA. 0

RICARDO ABI RAMIA DA SILVA 0

RICARDO AUGUSTO SOARES LEITE 0

RICARDO PERNAMBUCO 0

RICARDO SEMLER RODRIGUES 0

RICHARD ANDREW DE MOL VAN OTTERLOO 0

RINALDO GONCALVES DE CARVALHO 0

RIOMARINE OIL & GAS - ENGENHARIA E

0
EMPRENDIMIENTO LTDA.

RIZZI COMERCIO E REPRESENTAÇOES LTDA 0

ROBERTO BALESTRA 0

ROBERTO BRITTO 0

ROBERTO GONCALVES 0

ROBERTO MOREIRA FERREIRA 0

ROBERTO ZARDI FERREIRA 0

ROCK STAR MARKETING LTDA. 0

ROCKFIELD INTERNATIONAL S.A. 0

ROCKOIL 0

RODIRA HOLDINGS LTDA 0

RODRIGO FIGUEIREDO 0

RODRIGO HENRIQUE GOMES DE OLIVEIRA SROUR 0

RODRIGO ROCHA LOURES 0

ROGERIO NORA 0

ROGÉRIO AURÉLIO PIMENTEL 0

ROGÉRIO SANTOS DE ARAÚJO 0

ROMERO JUCA 0

RONALDO MANCHADO MARTINES 0

RONAN MARIA PINTO 0

ROSEANE SARNEY 0

RUBENS DE ANDRADE FILHO 0

SAGAR HOLDINGS 0

SAGAZ DIGITAL PRODUCOES DE VIDEOS E FILMES E ZULU

0
FILMES LTDA.

SALIM TAUFIC SCHAHIN 0

SANDES JUNIOR 0

SANDFIELD 0

SANTA BARBARA 0

SANTA TEREZA 0
SANTANA E ASSOCIADOS MARKETING E PROPAGANDA
0
LTDA

SCHAHIN SECURITIZADORA DE CREDITO FINANCIEROS S/A 0

SECRETARIA DE ESTADO DE OBRAS 0

SECRETARIA ESTADUAL DA SAUDE 0

SERGIO CORTES 0

SERGIO CUNHA MENDES 0

SERGIO FONTOURA MARDER 0

SERGIO GABRIELLI 0

SERGIO GUERRA 0

SERGIO MACHADO 0

SERIGY ESTRUCTURAS AMP EVENTOS LTDA 0

SETAL CONSTRUCOES 0

SETEC TECNOLOGIA S/A 0

SHANDONG WHEIHAT Group 0

SHERIF SERVICIOS E PARTICIPACOES 0

SHERKSON INTERNATIONAL 0

SIEMENS 0

SILVAL BARBOSA 0

SILVANA LAGNADO HUCKE 0

SIMAO SESSIM 0

SINTESE PESQUISA E ANALISE LTDA 0

SLANEY TRADING LIMITED 0

SLEIMAN NASSIM EL KOBROSSY SOLOMAO 0

SM TERRAPLANAGEM LTDA. 0

SMITH & NASH ENGINNERING COMPANY INC. 0

SOAR FREE LTDA. 0

SOERENSEN GARCIA ADVOGADOS ASS 0

SOLANGE VIANA SROUR 0

SOLVER LOGISTICA E SERVICIOS LTDA. 0

SOTERRA TERRAPLANAGEM E LOCACAO DE

0
EQUIPAMENTOS LTDA.

SOUFLE E IMAGEM E ASSUNTO LTDA. 0

SPLENDID CORE LIMITED 0

ST PESQUISA DE MERCADO LTDA EPP 0

STINGADALE 0

STRYKER DO BRASIL LTDA 0

STUDIO HP DE PRODUCAO E CREACAO PUBLICITARIA 0

SUPER NE PTE LTD 0

SURIA SANTANA 0

SURVEY MAR E SERVIÇOS LTDA 0

SUSANA NIEVES CABRAL 0

SUZANO PETROQUIMICA 0

SYATA ENTERPRISER 0

TACY VENTURE GROUP INC. 0

TECHNIP BRASIL ENGENHARIA INSTALACOES E APOIO

0
MARITIMO LTDA.

TECHNIS PLANEAJAMENTO E GESTAO EM NEGOCIOS

0
LTDA.

TENASSE 0

THE ADVISER INVESTMENTS LIMITED 0

THIAGO DAHER LOPES 0

TIAO VIANA 0

TIPUANA PARTICIPACOES 0

TITANIUM EXPLORER 0

TMA CONSTRUTORA LTDA ME 0

TORRE DE COMERCIO DE ALIMENTOS LTDA. 0

TOSHIBA 0

TOYO ENGINEERING CORPORATION 0

TOYO SETAL ENGENHARIA 0

TRANSPORTADORA BRASILEIRA GASODUCTO BOLIVI -

0
BRASIL (TBG)

TREVISO DE BRASIL EMPREENDIMENTOS LTDA 0

TRIDENT (INTERNATIONAL) TRADING LTD. 0

TRIMEC 0

TRIUMPH SP 0
TUDOR ADVISORY INC. 0

TVP SOLAR 0

ULTRA IMAGEM 0

UNIPAR 0

UNIÃO BRASIL TRANSPORTES E SERVIÇOS LTDA 0

UTC DEFENSA 0

UTC DESENVOLVIMIENTO IMOBILIARIO 0

UTC INVESTIMENTOS 0

UTC OLEO E GAS 0

UTC PARTICIPAÇOES 0

VALDEMAR DA COSTA NETO 0

VALDIR APARECIDO 0

VALDIR RAUPP 0

VALE 0

VALENCIA DRILLING CORPORATION 0

VALENSIA FINANCE LIMITED 0

VALMIR JOSE DE FRANCA 0

VANILTON BEZERRA PINTO 0

VARA FEDERAL EM BRASILIA 0

VERA LÚCIA LEITE SOUZA SHIBA 0

VERONICA HARTMANN 0

VIAMAR E PUBLICIDADE E PRODUCAO DIGITAL 0

VICTOR SERGIO COLAVITTI 0

VIGOR 0

VILSON COVATTI 0

VLADIMIR CARREIRO 0

VW REFRIGERAÇÃO 0

WAGNER ROSSI 0

WALDIR LIMA CARREIRO 0

WALDIR MARANHAO 0

WALDOMIRO DE OLIVEIRA 0

WALMIR PINHEIRO SANTANA 0

WELL EASE INDUSTRIES LIMITED 0

WESLEY MENDONCA BATISTA 0

WICKDELL INTERNATIONAL INCORPORATED COMPANY 0

WILSON CARLOS 0

WILSON QUINTELA 0

X 0

ZE SILVA 0

ZECA 0

ZELITO ALVES RIBEIRO 0

ZWI SKORNICKI 0
Annex 2

id Deg

ALBERTO YOUSEFF 3,4

PAULO ROBERTO COSTA 2,6

PETROLEO BRASILEIRO SA -PETROBRAS 2,2

JBS 1,9

JOESLEY MENDONCA BATISTA 1,8

THE CLUBE 1,7

CONSTRUTORA NORBERTO ODEBRECHT 1,1

JOSE JANENE 1,1

ANDRADE GUTIERREZ 1

OAS LTDA 1

PARTIDO DOS TRABALHADORES 0,9

ENGEVIX ENGENHARIA SA 0,8

JULIO GERIN DE ALMEIDA CAMARGO 0,8

PARTIDO PROGRESSISTA BRASILEIRO (PPB) 0,8

MO CONSULTORIA 0,7

NELMA KODAMA PENASSO 0,7

PEDRO BARUSCOÂ 0,7

CLUBE DO PEGAO INTERNACIONAL 0,6

CONSORCIO NACIONAL CAMARGO CORREA Â-CNCC 0,6

GFD INVESTIMENTOS 0,6

GRUPO QUEIROZ GALVAO 0,6

RENATO DE SOUZA DUQUE 0,6

SERGIO CABRAL 0,6

SHELLBILL FINANCE S.A 0,6

SYGNUS ASSETS S/A 0,6

UTC ENGENHARIA S/A 0,6

CID GOMES 0,5

RAUL HENRIQUE SROUR 0,5

SETAL OLEO E GAS S/A 0,5

EDUARDO COSENTINO CUNHA 0,4

EDUARDO COSTA VAZ MUSA 0,4

EMPREITEIRA RIGIDEZ 0,4

JOAO VACCARI 0,4

JORGE LUIZ ZELADA 0,4

LUIZ INACIO LULA DA SILVA 0,4

MENDES JUNIOR 0,4

OTHON LUIZ PINHEIRO 0,4

PEDRO DA SILVA CORREA 0,4

RENE LUIZ PEREIRA 0,4

ADIR ASSAD 0,3

BANCO SCHAHIN 0,3

BORGHI LOWE PROPAGANDA E MARKETING LTDA 0,3

BRASKEM 0,3

CARLOS HABIB CHATER 0,3

CONSORCIO CMMS 0,3

CONSORCIO INTERPAR 0,3

CONSTRUCTORA CAMARGO CORREA 0,3

CONSTRUCTORA INTERNATIONAL DEL SUR 0,3

DELTA CONSTRUCTIONS 0,3

DIRETORIA DE ABASTECIMENTO DA PETROBRAS 0,3

EMPRESA DE VIACAO ANGRENSE 0,3

ESTADO DO RIO DE JANEIRO 0,3

FERNANDO CARVALHO 0,3

FERNANDO SOARES AKA FERNANDO BAIANO 0,3

FLEXSYSTEM ENGENHARIA 0,3

GALVAO ENGENHARIA SA 0,3

GRUPO DE TRABALHO DO EDITAL DE LICITACAO 0,3

GUSTAVO ESTRELLITA 0,3

HAMYLTON PINHEIRO PADILHA JUNIOR 0,3

JOAO CLAUDIO GENU 0,3

JOAO LUIZ ARGOLO 0,3

JOSE CARLOS COSTA MARQUES BUMLAI 0,3

KLIENFELD SERVICES 0,3

LEONARDO MEIRELLES 0,3

LUIZ SOARES 0,3

MARCO ANTONIO DE LUCA 0,3

MITSUI TOYO 0,3

MPE MONTAGENS E PROJETOS ESPECIAIS 0,3

RICARDO RIBEIRO PESSOA 0,3

SANKO SIDER E SANKO SERVICIOS 0,3

SETEC TECNOLOGIA S/A 0,3

VANTAGE DRILLING INTERNATIONA CORPORATION 0,3

VW REFRIGERAÇÃO 0,3

WALDOMIRO DE OLIVEIRA 0,3

ABREU E LIMA CNCC- CAMARGO CORREA 0,2

ACONA INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENTS LTD 0,2

ALEXANDRINO DE SALLES RAMOS DE ALENCAR 0,2

ANDRE GUSTAVO VIEIRA DA SILVA 0,2

ANDRE PUCCINELLI 0,2

ANGEL SERVICOS TERCEIRIZADOS LTDA 0,2

ARATEC ENGENHARIA CONSULTORIA &

0,2
REPRESENTAÇÕES LTDA
ARBOR CONSULTORIA AND ASSESSORIA CONTABIL 0,2

ARTHUR DE LIRA 0,2

AUGURI EMPREENDIMENTOS LTDA 0,2

CARIOCA ENGENHARIA 0,2

CELSO ARARIPE DE OLIVEIRA 0,2

CLAUDIO LIMA 0,2

CLOVIS RENATO NUMA PEIXOTO PRIMO 0,2

CONSORCIO CONPAR 0,2

CONSORCIO MACARANA RIO 2014 0,2

CONSORCIO MANGUINHOS 0,2

CONSORCIO RNEST - CONEST 0,2

CONSORCIO TUC 0,2

COSTA GLOBAL 0,2

CREDENCIAL CONSTRUTORA EMPREENDIMENTOS E

0,2
REPRESENTACOES LTDA

CSA PROJECT FINANCE LTDA 0,2

DEVONSHIRE GLOBAL FUND 0,2

DGX IMP EXPO LTDA 0,2

DIRETORIA DE SERVICOS DA PETROBRAS 0,2

DUNEL INDUSTRIA 0,2

EDUARDO HERMELINO LEITE 0,2

ELECTROBRAS TERMONUCLEAR S/A - ELECTRONUCLEAR 0,2

ELIA SANTOS DA HORA 0,2

FERRAMENTAS GERAIS 0,2

FLAVIO BARRA 0,2

FUNDACAO PETROBRAS DE SEGURIDADE SOCIAL -

0,2
PETROS

FUNDOS DE GOVERNO E LOTERIAS DA CAIXA ECONOMICA

0,2
FEDERAL

GASODUTO URUCU-COARI-MANAUS 0,2

GUSTAVO BOTELHO 0,2

HSIN CHI SU NOBU SU 0,2

IESA 0,2
INDUSTRIA LABOGEN 0,2

INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE TRAUMATOLOGIA E ORTOPEDIA 0,2

IT7 SISTEMAS LTDA 0,2

J&F GROUP 0,2

JAMP ENGENHEIROS ASSOCIADOS 0,2

JOAO CERQUEIRA DE SANTANA 0,2

JORGE AFONSO ARGELLO 0,2

JOSE DIRCEU DE OLIVEIRA E SILVA 0,2

JOSE RICARDO BREGHIROLLI 0,2

KEPPEL FELS 0,2

L.I.L.S PALESTRAS, EVENTOS E PUBLICACOES LIMITADA 0,2

LAURO TIRADENTES 0,2

LEANDRO MEIRELLES 0,2

LEGEND ENGENHEIROS ASSOCIADOS 0,2

LIMIAR CONSULTORIA E ASSESSORIA EM COMUNICACAO 0,2

LSI SOLUCAO EM SERVICOS EMPRESARIAIS LTDA. 0,2

LUIZ MESSIAS 0,2

LYNMAR ASSETS CORPORATION 0,2

MARANELLE INVESTIMENTS INC 0,2

MARCELO BAHIA ODEBRECHT 0,2

MARCIO FARIA 0,2

MARIO FREDERICO GOES 0,2

MAURICIO GODOY 0,2

MEIRE BONFIM DA SILVA POZA 0,2

MIGUEL ISKIN 0,2

MILTON PASCOWITCH 0,2

MILZART OVERSEAS DOLDINGS INC 0,2

NESTOR CUNAT CERVERO 0,2

PARTIDO DEL MOVIMIENTO DEMOCRATICO BRASILENO 0,2

PIEMONTE EMPREENDIMENTOS LTDA 0,2

PIROQUIMICA COMERCIAL LTDA 0,2

POSTO DA TORRE LTDA 0,2

QUATTOR 0,2

RAFAEL ANGULO LOPEZ 0,2

RCI SOTFWARE E HARDWARE LTDA. 0,2

REGIS FISCHNER 0,2

REINALDO AZAMBUJA 0,2

REMAR AGENCIAMENTO E ASSESSORIA LTDA. 0,2

RFY IMPORT & EXPORT LTDA. 0,2

RICARDO HOFFMANN 0,2

RICARDO OURIQUES MARQUES 0,2

ROBERTO TEIXEIRA 0,2

ROGERIO NORA 0,2

SAMSUNG HEAVY INDUSTRIES CO 0,2

SETE BRASIL PARTICIPACOES S/AÂ 0,2

SKANSA BRASIL LTDA. 0,2

SM TERRAPLANAGEM LTDA. 0,2

SONIA MARIZA BRANCO 0,2

SUL BRASIL CONSTRUCOES LTDA. 0,2

SURVEY MAR E SERVIÇOS LTDA 0,2

TAIWAN MARITIME TRANSPORTATION CO. 0,2

TOME ENGENHARIA 0,2

TOYO SETAL PARTICIPAÇÕES E INVESTIMENTOS 0,2

TREVISO DE BRASIL EMPREENDIMENTOS LTDA 0,2

UTC PARTICIPAÇOES 0,2

2S PARTICIPACOES LTDA 0,1

AECIO NEVES DA CUNHA 0,1

AGENOR FRANKLIN MAGALHAES MEDEIROS 0,1

AGNALDO RIBEIRO 0,1

AGROCAIERAS 0,1

AGROPECUARIA DUAS IRMAS LTDA. 0,1

AJJP SERVICOS ADMINISTRATIVOS E EDUCACIONAL LTDA 0,1

ALBERTO QUINTAES 0,1

ALBERTO SILVEIRA CONDE 0,1

ALINE LEMOS DE OLIVEIRA 0,1

ALUSA 0,1

AMAPIL TAXI AEREO LTDA. 0,1

AMTM PRODUCOES JORNALISTICAS LTDA. 0,1

ANA CRISTINA DA SILVA TONIOLO 0,1

ANA LUIZA BOLOGNANI 0,1

ANDRE CATAO DE MIRANDA 0,1

ANDRE LUIS VARGAS ILARIO 0,1

ANGELA MARIA ARARIPE D OLIVEIRA SOUTO 0,1

ANGELA MARIA MACHADO NEVES 0,1

ANGELO ALVES MENDES 0,1

ANIBAL FERREIRA GOMES 0,1

ANTONIO ALMEIDA SILVA 0,1

ANTONIO BALHMANN CARDOSO NUNES FILHO 0,1

ANTONIO CARLOS BRASIL FIORAVANTE PIERUCCINI 0,1

ANTONIO PALOCCI FILHO 0,1

APOLO TUBULARS 0,1

ARARAS EMPREENDIMENTOS CONSULTORIA E SERVICOS

0,1
LTDA – EPP

ARAREMA PRODUCAO ARTISTICA E EDITORIACAO 0,1

ARCADEX CORPORATION 0,1

ARCOS PROPAGANDA LTDA 0,1

ATAN DE AZEVEDO BARBOSA 0,1

ATLAS ASSET SA 0,1

AUGUSTO RIBEIRO DE MENDONCA NETO 0,1

BARTZ PROPAGANDA LTDA 0,1

BENEDITO LIRA 0,1

BERKELEY CONSULTING INC 0,1

BERNARDO FREIBURGHAUS 0,1

BERTIN LTDA 0,1

BNDES 0,1
BOMBAIM AGROPECUARIA LTDA 0,1

BONUS BANVAL 0,1

BR DISTRIBUIDORA 0,1

BR4 EMPREENDIMENTOS E PARTICIPACOES LTDA 0,1

BRUNO GONCALVES LUZ 0,1

BURUTI COMERCIO DE CARNES 0,1

CABUC SERVICIOS DE COMPUTACAO GRAFICA 0,1

CAENGE 0,1

CAIXA ECONOMICA FEDERAL 0,1

CAMTER 0,1

CANKUN COMUNICACAO INSTITUCIONAL 0,1

CARLOS ALBERTO MURARI 0,1

CARLOS ALBERTO PEREIRA 0,1

CARLOS CASE 0,1

CARLOS COSTA 0,1

CARLOS EDUARDO DE SA BAPTISTA 0,1

CARLOS EDUARDO STRAUCH ALBERO 0,1

CARLOS KOLRAUSH 0,1

CARLOS MILA AGROPECUARIA LTDA 0,1

CARLOS MIRANDA 0,1

CARLOS PACHECO ASSES CINEMATROGRAFICA 0,1

CARLOS PEREIRA COSTA 0,1

CARLOS PIRES 0,1

CARLOS ROCHA 0,1

CARLOSÂ ALEXANDRE DEÂ SOUZAÂ ROCHA 0,1

CASABELLA 0,1

CASABLANCA INTERNATIONAL HOLDING 0,1

CESAR LUIZ DE GODOY PEREIRA 0,1

CG IMPEX 0,1

CHELLO SOCIEDAD ANONIMA 0,1

CIRO NOGUEIRA 0,1

CLAUDIA CORDEIRO DA CRUZ 0,1

CLAUDIO MENTE 0,1

CLORIVALDO BISINOTO 0,1

COESO ENGENHARIA LTDA 0,1

COMPAGNIES BENINOISE DES HYDROCARBURES SAUL -

0,1
CBH

CONSORCIO ANDRADE GUTIERREZ MENDES JUNIOR E

0,1
KTY

CONSORCIO FSTP PTE LTD 0,1

CONSORCIO GASAM 0,1

CONSORCIO NOVOS TEMPOS 0,1

CONSORCIO OCCH 0,1

CONSORCIO PIPE RACK 0,1

CONSORCIO PPR 0,1

CONSORCIO SEHAB LTDA 0,1

CONSORCIO VIARIO SAO BERNARDO 0,1

CONSORSIO RIO MELHOR 0,1

CONSPIRACAO FILMES SA 0,1

CONSTRUCAP 0,1

CONSTRUTORA OAS LTDA PELA TAG TRANSPORTADORA

0,1
ASSOCIADA DE GAS SA

CONSTRUTORA SAB LTDA 0,1

DA VINCI CONFECCOES LTD 0,1

DALTON DOS SANTOS AVANCINI 0,1

DEBASE ASSETS 0,1

DEEP BLACK DRILLING 0,1

DEEP SEA OIL CORPORATION 0,1

DELUBIO SOARES DE CASTRO 0,1

DEMA PARTICIPACOES E EMPREENDIMENTOS LTDA. 0,1

DEMILTON 0,1

DERZIE 0,1

DEUTSCHEBRAS 0,1

DEVONSHIRE LATAM INVESTMENTS 0,1

DILMA ROUSSEFF 0,1

DILSON DE CERQUEIRA PAIVA FILHO 0,1

DISLUB EQUADOR/VENDRAS MARITIMA LTDA. 0,1

DISTRIBUIDORA EQUADOR DE PRODUTOS DE PETROLEO

0,1
L TDA

DISTRICASH DISTRIBUIDORA DE TITULOS E VALORES

0,1
MOBILIARIOS

DOLE TECH 0,1

DUDU DA FONTE 0,1

EDIEL VIANA FILHO 0,1

EDINHO SILVA 0,1

EDNO NEGRINI 0,1

EDUARDO APARECIDO DE MEIRA 0,1

EDUARDO CAMPOS 0,1

EDUARDO FREITAS FILHO 0,1

EDUARDO SOARES 0,1

EIT 0,1

ELBA SERVICES 0,1

ELCINHO 0,1

ELDORADO 0,1

ELITE DAY 0,1

ELMIO ROSA 0,1

ENGESA 0,1

ENIVALDO QUADRADO 0,1

ENOISE ESTUDIOS DE PRODUCAO 0,1

EQUADOR LOG SA 0,1

ERTON MEDEIROS FONSECA 0,1

ESTALEIROS DO BRASIL 0,1

ESTRE AMBIENTAL S.A 0,1

EXPRESSO NOVA SANTO ANDRE 0,1

FABIANA LINS CONDE 0,1

FABIO CLETO 0,1

FABIO CORREA 0,1

FABIO LUIS LULA DA SILVA 0,1

FERNANDO ANTONIO GUIMARAES HOURNEAUX DE
0,1
MOURA

FERNANDO AUGUSTO STREMEL DE ANDRADE 0,1

FERNANDO BEZERRA 0,1

FERNANDO BITTAR 0,1

FERNANDO SCHAHIN 0,1

FIDENS 0,1

FLAVIO HENRIQUE DE OLIVEIRA 0,1

FLORA SA 0,1

FLORESTAL 0,1

FLORISVALDO DE SOUZA 0,1

FRANCISCO DE ASSIS E SILVA 0,1

FRANCISCO MATHEUS 0,1

FRANK MARKETING LTD 0,1

FREDERICO PACHECO DE MEDEIROS 0,1

FUNDACAO DOS ECONOMIARIOS FEDERAIS - FUNCEF 0,1

FUNDO FIP-FORESTAL 0,1

FW EMPREENDIMENTOS IMOBILIARIOS LTDA 0,1

G4 ENTRETENIMENTO E TECNOLOGIA DIGITAL LTDA 0,1

GABRIEL NUNES PIRES NETO 0,1

GDK 0,1

GEDDEL VIEIRA LIMA 0,1

GEORGIQS KONTRONAKIS 0,1

GERSON DE MELLO ALMADA 0,1

GIOVANNI 0,1

GLEISI HOFFMAN 0,1

GOLAC PROJECT 0,1

GONCALO SA 0,1

GOVERNMENT OF MATO GROSSO DO SUL 0,1

GRAFICA E EDITORA ALVORADA LTDA 0,1

GRAFICA JAFAR LTDA. 0,1

GUIDO MONTEGA 0,1

GUILHERME LACERDA 0,1

GUSTAVO SOUZA 0,1

HAGESHIRO FINANCIAL LTD 0,1

HALEMBECK ENGENHARIA LTDA 0,1

HAMILTON PAES 0,1

HAVINSUR SA 0,1

HAWK EYES ADMINISTRACAO DE BENS LTDA 0,1

HEATHERLEY BUSINESS LTD 0,1

HELGI THOR PRODUCAO E EDICAO LTDA. 0,1

HELTON RODRIGO GOMES DOS SANTOS 0,1

HENRY HOYER DE CARVALHO 0,1

HERMES FREITAS MAGNUM 0,1

HMJ CONSULTORIA 0,1

HUDSON BRAGA 0,1

HUMBERTO AMARAL 0,1

HUMBERTO COSTA 0,1

IARA GALDINO DA SILVA 0,1

IBOPE INTELIGENCIA PESQUISA E CONSULTORIA LTDA. 0,1

ICARO MORENO JUNIOR 0,1

IDELFONSO COLARES 0,1

INNOVATION RESEARCH ENGINEERING A DEVELOPMENT

0,1
LTD

INSTITUTO ICONE DE ENSINO JURIDICO LTDA. 0,1

INSTITUTO LUIZ INACIO LULA DA SILVA 0,1

INTERCORP LOGISTIC 0,1

IPOJUCA INTERLlGACOES 0,1

IRENEU BERANDI MEIRELES 0,1

IVAN VERNON 0,1

IVANILDO MIRANDA 0,1

JAIR VINICIUS RAMOS DE VEIGA 0,1

JARAGUA EQUIPO INDUSTRIAL 0,1

JAYMEÂ ALVESÂ DEÂ OLIVEIRAÂ FILHO 0,1

JD ASSESSORIA E CONSULTORIA LTDA 0,1

JERONIMO GOERGEN 0,1

JN RENT A CAR 0,1

JNOBRE ENGENHARIA 0,1

JOAO AUGUSTO REZENDE HENRIQUES 0,1

JOAO BACELAR 0,1

JOAO BEARTS 0,1

JOAO CARLOS DE MEDEIROS FERRAZ 0,1

JOAO GENU 0,1

JOAO PIZZOLATTI 0,1

JOAO PROCOPIO JUNQUEIRA PACHECO DE ALMEIDA

0,1
PRADO

JOAO RICARDO AULER 0,1

JOLMEY SA 0,1

JONAS AURELIO 0,1

JONAS LEITE SUASSUNA FILHO 0,1

JORGE LUZ 0,1

JOSE ADELMARIO PINHEIRO FILHO 0,1

JOSE ADOLFO PASCOWITCH 0,1

JOSE ANTUNES SOBRINHO 0,1

JOSE CAMILO TEIXERA CARVALHO 0,1

JOSE MARIA RIBAS MULLER 0,1

JOSE OCTAVIO 0,1

JULIA D OLIVEIRA SOUTO 0,1

JULIANO COSTA CUOTO 0,1

JULIO GONCALVES 0,1

JUNIOR 0,1

KEPPEL SHIPYARD LIMITED 0,1

KFC HIDROSSEMEADURA 0,1

KLT AGENCIA DE VIAGENS LTDA 0,1

KONSTANTINOS KONTRONAKISK 0,1

KOPEK 0,1
LABOGEN QUIMICA 0,1

LEON DENIS VARGAS ILARIO 0,1

LINDBERG FARIAS 0,1

LINK PROJETOS E PATICIPACOES S/A 0,1

LOUZIVAL LUIZ LAGO MASCARENHAS JUNIOR 0,1

LUCIANO COUNTINHO 0,1

LUCIO BOLONHA FUNARO 0,1

LUDMILA MARILIA BELLA PACHECO 0,1

LUIS NASCIMENTO 0,1

LUISITANIA PETROLEUM (BC) LIMITED 0,1

LUIZ CARLOS BECERRA 0,1

LUIZ FERNANDO SOBRINHO 0,1

LUIZ PORTELA PRODUCOES 0,1

LUIZ ROBERTO PEREIRA 0,1

M&M PRODUCOES ARTISTICAS LTDA. 0,1

MALAGUETA CINEMA E VIDEO LTDA. 0,1

MANOEL 0,1

MARCELO ANANIAS NOTARO 0,1

MARCHE MARKETING LTDA. EPP 0,1

MARCIA DANZI RUSSO CORREA 0,1

MARCIO 0,1

MARCIO BONILHO 0,1

MARCO ANTONIO LADEIRA OLIVEIRA 0,1

MARCO AURELIO SPALL MAIA 0,1

MARCOS TEIXERA 0,1

MARCOS VALERIO 0,1

MARIA CELIA DA SILVA 0,1

MARIA CRISTINA IBRAIM JABUR 0,1

MARIA DE FATIMA STOCKER 0,1

MARIA JOSILENE COSTA 0,1

MARIA MADALENA RODRIGUES MELO ARARIPE 0,1

MARIA TEODORA SILVA 0,1

MARICE CORREA DE LIMA 0,1

MARIO BELTRAO 0,1

MARIO NEGROMONTE 0,1

MARTA SUPLICY 0,1

MASAN SERVICOS ESPECIALIZADOS LTDA 0,1

MATEUS COUTINHO 0,1

MATTHEW S PACINELLI 0,1

MB PRODUCOES CINEMATOGRAFICAS LTDA. 0,1

MICHEL TEMER 0,1

MILTON TAUFIC SCHAHIN 0,1

MILTRO RODRIGUEZ PEREIRA 0,1

MINISTERIO DA SAUDE 0,1

MPC MARKETING PROPAGANDA 0,1

MULTIMED COMERCIO DE MATERIAIS MEDICOS 0,1

MÔNICA REGINA CUNHA MOURA 0,1

N.T. RIBEIRO NETO ME 0,1

NBC CONSULTORIA 0,1

NELSON CINTRA RIBEIRO 0,1

NELSON MEURER 0,1

NETHERTON INVESTMENTS PTE LTD 0,1

NEWTON PRADO JUNIOR 0,1

NEY GEBRAN PEREIRA 0,1

ODOIA EDITORACOES LTDA. 0,1

OPONIAO COMUNICACAO 0,1

ORCRIM 0,1

ORESTA ASSOCIATED SA 0,1

ORION SP 0,1

OSCAR ALGORTA RAQUETTI 0,1

OSCAR ISKIN & CIA LTDA. 0,1

OSVANE APARECIDO RAMOS 0,1

OTAVIO MARQUES DE AZEVEDO 0,1

PARTIDO DA REPUBLICA -PR 0,1

PARTIDO RENOVADOR TRABALHISTA -PRT 0,1

PARTIDO SOCIALISTA BRASILEÑO (PSB) 0,1

PARTIDO TRABALHISTA BRASILERO 0,1

PAUL BRAGG 0,1

PAULO BOGHOSSIAN 0,1

PAULO CAMARA 0,1

PAULO CESAR PEIXOTO 0,1

PAULO DALMAZO 0,1

PAULO FERREIRA 0,1

PAULO MERIADE DUARTE 0,1

PAULO TWIASCHOR 0,1

PEDRO HENRY 0,1

PEDRO NADAF 0,1

PEDRO PAULO LEONI 0,1

PEG PRESTACAO DE SERVICOS 0,1

PEM ENGENHARIA 0,1

PERSIO JORDANI 0,1

PETER ARGESE JUNIOR 0,1

PEXO CORPORATION 0,1

PIEMONT INVESTMENT CORP 0,1

PIRELLI 0,1

PNGS PROSPER PARTICIPACOES LTDA 0,1

POLAR CAPITAL INVESTMENT LTD 0,1

POLIS PROPAGANDA E MARKETING LTDA 0,1

POWER TO TEN ENGENHARIA LTDA 0,1

PPI PROJETO DE PLANTAS INDUSTRIAIS LTDA 0,1

PROJETEC PROJETOS E TECNOLOGIA LTDA 0,1

PROMON ENGENHARIA LTDA 0,1

PROTECO CONSTRUCOES LTDA. 0,1

QUINUS SERVICE S/A 0,1

RAFAEL HENRIQUE SROUR 0,1

RAFAEL PINHEIRO DO CARMO 0,1

RAUL SCHMIDT FELIPPE JÚNIOR 0,1

REFINERIA PRESIDENTE GETULIO VARGAS REPAR 0,1

REINASCI CAMBUI DE SOUZA 0,1

RENAN CALHEIROS 0,1

RENATO TIRABOSCHI 0,1

RENATOO ABREU 0,1

RHEA COMERCIAL INC 0,1

RICARDO AUGUSTO SOARES LEITE 0,1

RICARDO SAUD 0,1

RINALDO GONCALVES DE CARVALHO 0,1

RIOMARINE OIL & GAS - ENGENHARIA E

0,1
EMPRENDIMIENTO LTDA.

ROBERTO ZARDI FERREIRA 0,1

ROCK STAR MARKETING LTDA. 0,1

ROCKFIELD INTERNATIONAL S.A. 0,1

RODRIGO FIGUEIREDO 0,1

RODRIGO HENRIQUE GOMES DE OLIVEIRA SROUR 0,1

RODRIGO ROCHA LOURES 0,1

ROGERIO CUNHA DE OLIVEIRA 0,1

ROGÉRIO SANTOS DE ARAÚJO 0,1

RONAN MARIA PINTO 0,1

ROSEANE SARNEY 0,1

RUBENS DE ANDRADE FILHO 0,1

SAGAR HOLDINGS 0,1

SAGAZ DIGITAL PRODUCOES DE VIDEOS E FILMES E ZULU

0,1
FILMES LTDA.

SALIM TAUFIC SCHAHIN 0,1

SANTANA E ASSOCIADOS MARKETING E PROPAGANDA

0,1
LTDA

SARGENT MARINE 0,1

SCHAHIN SECURITIZADORA DE CREDITO FINANCIEROS

0,1
S/A

SECRETARIA ESTADUAL DA SAUDE 0,1

SERGIO CORTES 0,1

SERGIO CUNHA MENDES 0,1

SERGIO GABRIELLI 0,1

SERGIO MACHADO 0,1

SERVENG CIVILSAN SA 0,1

SHERIF SERVICIOS E PARTICIPACOES 0,1

SHERKSON INTERNATIONAL 0,1

SILVAL BARBOSA 0,1

SIMAO SESSIM 0,1

SINTESE PESQUISA E ANALISE LTDA 0,1

SLANEY TRADING LIMITED 0,1

SLEIMAN NASSIM EL KOBROSSY SOLOMAO 0,1

SMITH & NASH ENGINNERING COMPANY INC. 0,1

SOLANGE VIANA SROUR 0,1

SOLVER LOGISTICA E SERVICIOS LTDA. 0,1

SOTERRA TERRAPLANAGEM E LOCACAO DE

0,1
EQUIPAMENTOS LTDA.

SOUFLE E IMAGEM E ASSUNTO LTDA. 0,1

ST PESQUISA DE MERCADO LTDA EPP 0,1

STUDIO HP DE PRODUCAO E CREACAO PUBLICITARIA 0,1

SURIA SANTANA 0,1

SUSANA NIEVES CABRAL 0,1

TECHINT ENGENHARIA E CONSTRUCAO S/A 0,1

TECHNIS PLANEAJAMENTO E GESTAO EM NEGOCIOS

0,1
LTDA.

TERMORIO 0,1

TIAO VIANA 0,1

TIPUANA PARTICIPACOES 0,1

TITANIUM EXPLORER 0,1

TORRE DE COMERCIO DE ALIMENTOS LTDA. 0,1

TOSHIBA 0,1

TOYO ENGINEERING CORPORATION 0,1

TOYO SETAL ENGENHARIA 0,1

TRANSPORTADORA BRASILEIRA GASODUCTO BOLIVI -
0,1
BRASIL (TBG)

TRIDENT (INTERNATIONAL) TRADING LTD. 0,1

TRIMEC 0,1

TUDOR ADVISORY INC. 0,1

TVP SOLAR 0,1

UNIÃO BRASIL TRANSPORTES E SERVIÇOS LTDA 0,1

VAGNER PINHEIRO 0,1

VALDIR APARECIDO 0,1

VALDIR RAUPP 0,1

VALE 0,1

VALENCIA DRILLING CORPORATION 0,1

VALMIR JOSE DE FRANCA 0,1

VANILTON BEZERRA PINTO 0,1

VANTAGE DEEPWATER COMPANY 0,1

VERA LÚCIA LEITE SOUZA SHIBA 0,1

VIAMAR E PUBLICIDADE E PRODUCAO DIGITAL 0,1

VICTOR GARCIA SANDRI 0,1

VICTOR SERGIO COLAVITTI 0,1

VIGOR 0,1

VLADIMIR CARREIRO 0,1

WAGNER ROSSI 0,1

WALDIR LIMA CARREIRO 0,1

WALMIR PINHEIRO SANTANA 0,1

WELL EASE INDUSTRIES LIMITED 0,1

WESLEY MENDONCA BATISTA 0,1

WILLER TOMAZ 0,1

WILSON CARLOS 0,1

WILSON QUINTELA 0,1

ZECA 0,1

ZELITO ALVES RIBEIRO 0,1

ZWI SKORNICKI 0,1

"MARTINELLE" 0

"OSMAR" 0

ABERDEEN MONEY MARKET FUND 0

ACUVE INTERNATIONAL CORP 0

ADARICO NEGROMONTE 0

AELTON JOSE DE FREITAS 0

AF CONSULT LTDA 0

AGA MED 0

AGROPECUARIA ALTO DO TURIACU LTDA 0

AGROPECUARIA MARANHENSE SA AGROMASA 0

AGUINALDO RIBEIRO 0

AKA CABALLERO 0

AKA FLOR 0

AKA MAINHA 0

AKA TRADE 0

ALBERTO ELISIO VILACA GOMES 0

ALCEU MOREIRA 0

ALEXANDRE JOSE DOS SANTOS 0

ALINE CORREA 0

ALUISIO LUNDGREN CORREA REGIS 0

AMIGOS DA TERRA 0

ANA MELIA 0

ANDRE LUIZ CANCE 0

ANDREA NEVES DA CUNHA 0

ANGELO GOULART VILLELA 0

ANTONIO CARLOS FERREIRA 0

APPM ANALISTA E PESQUISA 0

AQUARIUS PARTNERS INC 0

AQUILA HOLDING LTD 0

AQUILES E MOURA COMERCIO DE IMAGENS LTDA 0

ARIALDO PINHO 0

ARLINGTON MANAGEMENT CORPORATION 0

ASSAD JANNANI 0

ASSESSORIA DE CREDITO E COBRANCA LTDA 0

ASSOCIACAO DOS CRIADORES REGIONAIS ENTRE RIOS 0

AUJE IND. ELETRONICA LTDA 0

AURELIO OLIVERA TELLES 0

BEACON HILL SERVICE CORPORATION 0

BENEDICTO BARBOSA JUNIOR 0

BLACK GOLD DRILLING 0

BOA AQUICULTURA E ORGANICOS LTDA 0

BRADESCO 0

BRIZOLA NETO 0

BRUNO ARAUJO 0

BV SCHEEPSWERF DAMEN GORINCHEM 0

CAIO INDUSCAR INDUSTRIA ECOMERCIO DE

0
CARROCERIAS LTDA

CAIXA DE PREVIDENCIA DOS FUNCIONARIOS DO BANCO

0
DO BRASIL PREVI

CAMARA VASCONCELOS 0

CAMILO SOBREIRA DE SANTANA 0

CANDIDO VACAREZZA 0

CARLINHOS 0

CARLOS ALBERTO MONTENEGRO GALLO 0

CARLOS FONTANA 0

CARLOS MAGNO 0

CARLOS VALENTE 0

CENTRAL BANK OF BRAZIL 0

CENTRAL MEDICA 0

CESAR ROBERTO SANTOS 0

CESAR ROCHA 0

CIC CONSORTIUM OF INTERNATIONAL CONSULTANTS 0

CINTIA 0

CITIBANK INTERNATIONAL 0

CLEVERSON DE OLIVEIRA COELHO 0

CNEC 0

COLUMBUS INVEST TRADE LTD 0

COMERCIAL MEDICA 0

COMERCIAL MILANO BRASIL LTDA 0

COMERCIO DE MAQUINAS E EQUIPAMENTOS LTDA 0

CONCORVADO COMUNICACOES LTDA. 0

CONCREMAT ENGENHARIA E TECNOLOGIA SA 0

CONSELHO CURADOR DO FGTS 0

CONSTRAN 0

CONVORVADO COMUNICACOES LTDA 0

CRG SERVICOS 0

CRISTALES COMERCIO LTDA 0

CRISTIANE 0

CROWN INTERNATIONAL LTD 0

DAHER DESIGN ENGENHARIA E CONTRUCOES 0

DANIELA LEOPOLDO 0

DANIELLE KEMMER JANENE 0

DBS3 COMERCUAL CIENTIFICA 0

DELMO PEREIRA VIEIRA 0

DEMOCRATAS / DEM 0

DILCEU SPERAFICO 0

DIXTAL 0

DLIF DRILLING 0

DRAGER INDUSTRIA E COMERCIO LTDA 0

EASTERN PETROLEUM 0

EDISON LOBAO 0

EDIVALDO PEREIRA VIERA 0

EDSON LOBAO 0

EDUARDO DA FONTE 0

EDUARDO FONTE 0

EDUARDO KENZI ANTONINI 0

EDUARDO SCIARA 0
ELETRONUCLEAR 0

EMILIO AULER NETO 0

EMPRESA METROPOLITANA DE OBRAS PUBLICAS (EMOP) 0

ENTRERPRISE TECH INDUSTRIES INC 0

ESTALEIRO BRASFELS 0

FABIANA ESTAIANO 0

FABIO HORI YONAMINE 0

FAICAL MOHAMED NACIRDINE 0

FERNANDO CAVENDISH 0

FERNANDO DE CASTRO SA 0

FERNANDO PIMENTEL 0

FI-FGTS 0

FLAVIO DERNS 0

FLAVIO WERNECK 0

FRANCISCO JOSE PINHEIRO 0

FRANCO CLEMENTE PINTO 0

FRECATO 0

FUNDACAO VALE DO RIO DOCE DE SEGURIDADE SOCIAL

0
(VALIA)

FUNDO VISANET CONTROLADO PELO BANCO DO BRASIL 0

FURQUIM 0

FW ENGENHARIA 0

GABRIEL GUIMARES 0

GDCAR 0

GELSON FERRAZ DE MADEIROS 0

GEP ADMINISTRAZAO PATRIMO 0

GERALDO DE ARAGAO BULCAO 0

GERALDO NONINO 0

GERALDO TOLEDO ARRUDA JUNIOR 0

GILBERTO RAMOS 0

GILMARCY 0

GILSON M FERREIRA TRANSPORTE ME 0

GLACIER FINANCE LTDA. 0

GLADISON CAMEL 0

GLASSTON INVESTORS SA 0

GLOBAL TREND INVESTMENT LCC 0

GRETA COMERCIO DE CONFECCOES LTDA 0

GUAVA INTERNATIONAL LTD 0

HATLEY TRADING ASSETS CORPORATION 0

HEDGE ASSESSORIA E CONSULTORIA EMPRESARIA 0

HELO MED 0

HERMES ME 0

HIGH LEVEL FINANCIAL CORP 0

HIGHTEX GROUP PCL 0

HMAR 0

HOCHTIEF DO BRASIL 0

HUMBERTO 0

HYDROPOWER ENTERPRISE LIMITED 0

ICS LIMITED 0

IDALECIO DE CARRO RODRIGUES DE OLIVEIRA 0

IMAGIO DIAGNOSTICO AVANCA 0

IMPERIO IMPORT ASSESSORIA E CONSULTORIA EM

0
IMPORTACAO E EXPORTACAO LTDA

INDUMED 0

INDUMEX SA 0

INVESTMINAS PARTICIPACOES SA 0

IPIRANGA 0

ISKIN & ISKIN 0

ISPAR ISKIN PARTICIPACOES 0

ITAÚ 0

JAIME "CARECA" 0

JOAO ALBERTO LAZZARI 0

JOAO BOSCO 0

JOAO LEA 0
JOHN HUANG 0

JORGE GONZALO MARTINEZ ESCOBAR 0

JOSE ANTONIO SILVA PARENTE 0

JOSE EDUARDO COSTA MATTOS 0

JOSE HUMBERTO CRUVINEL RESENDE 0

JOSE LINHARES 0

JOSE MENTOR GUILHERME DE MELLO NETTO 0

JOSE MIGUEL PINOTTI 0

JOSE SERRA 0

JOSEPH ESTEVAN 0

JOSUE AUGUSTO NOBRE 0

JR TRASNPORTES LTDA 0

JSM ENGENHARIA E TERRAPLANAGEM 0

JUAREZ MIRANDA JUNIOR 0

JULIANA CORDEIRO DE MOURA 0

JULIO LOPES 0

JUNE INTERNATIONAL CORP 0

KISTREY TRADING LTD 0

KTY CONSULTORIA 0

LARRON OFFSHORE LIMITED 0

LAUDOS ESTATISTICOS 0

LAZARO BOTELHO 0

LEONARDO FERNANDES MAYRINK 0

LEVFORT COMERCIO E TECNOLOGIA 0

LIDER MIDIA EXTERIOR LTDA 0

LOTTE MANAGEMENT LTD 0

LRC EVENTOS E PROMOCOES 0

LUCASÂ AMORIM ALVES 0

LUCCAS PACE JUNIOR 0

LUIS CARLOS AFONSO 0

LUIS CARLOS HEINZE 0

LUIS FERNANDO RAMOS FARIA 0

LUIZ EDUARDO DE OLIVEIRA E SILVA 0

LUIZ FERNANDEZ 0

LUIZ FERNANDO FARIA 0

M&M LOPES 0

M.D INTERNATIONAL 0

MACROMED 0

MAQUET DO BRASIL EQUIPAMENTOS MEDICOS 0

MARAVILLE INTERTRADE CORPORATION 0

MARCELO OLIVEIRA MELLO 0

MARCELO SIMOES 0

MARCO ANTONIO BORGHI 0

MARCO AURELIO BARRETO PEREIRA LEITE 0

MARCOS BERTIÂ 0

MARCOS MONTES CORDEIRO 0

MARCOS PEREIRA 0

MARCOS VIDIGAL 0

MARIA DIRCE PENASSO 0

MARIA LUCIA CARDENA 0

MARIO LUCIO 0

MARLEI GABRIEL PEREIRA 0

MASCARENHAS MATERIAIS DE CONSTRUCAO LTDA 0

MAURICIO RIZZO 0

MAURO EDUARDO UEMURA 0

MAURY CAMPO DOTO 0

MDL PARTICIPACOES E NEGOCIOS EIRELI 0

MERCEDES BENZ DO BRASIL LTDA 0

METALIS ALUMINUN CURITIBA IND E 0

MEZUMA TRES IRMAS DISTRIBUIDORA DE PRODUTOS

0
ALIMENTICIOS LTDA

MGT CONSORTIUM 0

MIGUEL LESSA 0

MIK PRESTACAO DE SERVICIOS 0

MILTITEC 0

MILTON ORTOLAN 0

MINISTERIO PUBLICO FEDERALÂ 0

MIRNA ZANETTI FILHO 0

MISSIONARIO JOSE OLIMPIO 0

MITUTOYO SUL AMERICANA 0

MORONI BING TORGAN 0

MULTITEC 0

NADIA 0

NEABADON HOLDINGS INC 0

NEW HOPE TRADING INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION 0

NEW SERVICE 0

NEWTON LIMA 0

OCARI MOREIRA 0

OLAVINHO FERREIRA MENDEZ 0

OLAVO MOURA 0

ONYX LORENZONI 0

OPINGTON CORPORATION 0

ORST ENTERPRISES 0

OSCO ENERGY 0

OSWALDO RODRIGUES VIEIRA FILHO 0

PARTIDO DA MOBILIZACAO NACIONAL -PMN 0

PARTIDO DA SOCIAL DEMOCRACIA BRASILEIRA 0

PARTIDO DEMOCRATICO TRABALHISTA 0

PARTIDO RENOVADOR TRABALHISTA BRASILERO 0

PARTIDO REPUBLICANO DA ORDEN SOCIAL (PROS) 0

PAULO CESAR ALMEIDA CABRAL 0

PAULO ROBERTO SANTOS 0

PAULO ROBERTO VALENTE GORDILHO 0

PAULO TARCISO OKAMOTO 0

PEDRO ARGESE 0

PEDRO MOROLLO JUNIOR 0

PEQUENA NOTAVEL EMPREENDIMENTOS ARTISTICOS
0
LTDA

PER PRIMA COMERCIO E REPRESENTAÇOES 0

PETROBRAS VENEZUELA INVESTMENTS & SERVICES

0
BV

PHAD CORPORATION 0

PHILIPS MEDICAL SYSTEMS NETHERLAND B.V. 0

PILAR IPOJUCA 0

PROL RIO IMAGEN LTDA. 0

PROSERV ASSESSORIA EMPRESARIAL SC LTDA 0

PRS 0

RAIMUNDO GOMES DE MATOS 0

RANBY INTERNATIONAL CORP 0

RCI 0

RENATO MOLLING 0

RHR PUBLICIDADE E REPRESENTACOES LTDA. 0

RICARDO ABI RAMIA DA SILVA 0

RICARDO PERNAMBUCO 0

RICARDO SEMLER RODRIGUES 0

RICHARD ANDREW DE MOL VAN OTTERLOO 0

RIZZI COMERCIO E REPRESENTAÇOES LTDA 0

ROBERTO BALESTRA 0

ROBERTO BRITTO 0

ROBERTO GONCALVES 0

ROBERTO MOREIRA FERREIRA 0

ROCKOIL 0

RODIRA HOLDINGS LTDA 0

ROGÉRIO AURÉLIO PIMENTEL 0

ROMERO JUCA 0

RONALDO MANCHADO MARTINES 0

SANDES JUNIOR 0

SANDFIELD 0

SANTA BARBARA 0
SANTA TEREZA 0

SECRETARIA DE ESTADO DE OBRAS 0

SERGIO FONTOURA MARDER 0

SERGIO GUERRA 0

SERIGY ESTRUCTURAS AMP EVENTOS LTDA 0

SETAL CONSTRUCOES 0

SHANDONG WHEIHAT Group 0

SIEMENS 0

SILVANA LAGNADO HUCKE 0

SOAR FREE LTDA. 0

SOERENSEN GARCIA ADVOGADOS ASS 0

SPLENDID CORE LIMITED 0

STINGADALE 0

STRYKER DO BRASIL LTDA 0

SUPER NE PTE LTD 0

SUZANO PETROQUIMICA 0

SYATA ENTERPRISER 0

TACY VENTURE GROUP INC. 0

TECHNIP BRASIL ENGENHARIA INSTALACOES E APOIO

0
MARITIMO LTDA.

TENASSE 0

THE ADVISER INVESTMENTS LIMITED 0

THIAGO DAHER LOPES 0

TMA CONSTRUTORA LTDA ME 0

TRIUMPH SP 0

ULTRA IMAGEM 0

UNIPAR 0

UTC DEFENSA 0

UTC DESENVOLVIMIENTO IMOBILIARIO 0

UTC INVESTIMENTOS 0

UTC OLEO E GAS 0

VALDEMAR DA COSTA NETO 0

 VALENSIA FINANCE LIMITED 0

VARA FEDERAL EM BRASILIA 0

VERONICA HARTMANN 0

VILSON COVATTI 0

WALDIR MARANHAO 0

WICKDELL INTERNATIONAL INCORPORATED COMPANY 0

X 0

ZE SILVA 0

View publication stats