Writing 5 – Final Test
WORKS CITED
TOPIC 3 Many people say that Chat GPT (a new online app) should be used by
students so as to replace teachers’s lectures. To what extent do you agree or disagree
with the given statement? Use scholarly support to back up your points.
- “Chat GPT sometimes writes plausible-sounding but incorrect or nonsensical
answers.” Several examples show glaring mistakes that it can make, including
referencing a scientific study that does not exist. (H. HOLDEN THORP, VALDA VINSON)
(trang 1)
- It did well finding factual answers, but the scholarly writing still has a long way to go.
If anything, the implications for education may push academics to rethink their
courses in innovative ways and give assignments that aren’t easily solved by AI.(H.
HOLDEN THORP, VALDA VINSON)
(TRANG 1)
Thorp, H. H. (2023). ChatGPT is fun, but not an author. Science, 379(6630), 313-313.
- ChatGPT may be more likely to give higher grades to students who write in a style that it
is more familiar with, potentially leading to unfair grading practices. Additionally, if
ChatGPT is used to replace human instructors, it could perpetuate existing inequalities in
the education system, such as the under-representation of certain demographics in certain
fields of study.
- ChatGPT could be a useful tool for creating authentic assessments, but it would still be up
to the instructor to design and implement the assessment in a way that is meaningful and
relevant for their students
- As educators, we can even use ChatGPT directly to help us develop such assessments. So,
rather than posing the question that generated the start of this article, I could instead present
students with ChatGPT’s response alongside some marking instructions, and ask them to
provide a critique on what grade the automated response deserves and why. (Sam Illingworth)
Illingworth, S. (2023). ChatGPT: students could use AI to cheat, but it’sa chance to rethink
assessment altogether.
- ChatGPT can be used by college students for a variety of tasks, such as research and
writing assignments, summarizing and paraphrasing text, and even generating creative
writing prompts. Educators can use ChatGPT to create interactive quizzes, lesson
plans, and educational materials. Professionals can use ChatGPT for tasks such as
writing reports, creating presentations, and summarizing large amounts of data.
(Trang 16)
- The possibilities and potential of ChatGPT are indeed truly exciting, and by
responsibly integrating it into your work, you can open up new opportunities for
creativity, efficiency, and innovation.
(trang 17)
- The model has the potential to change the way we learn and teach. It can be used for a
wide range of applications, including brainstorming/writing, professional
communication and individualized learning.
(Trang 17)
- Another use of ChatGPT in higher education is for individualized learning.
(Trang 18)
- For example, a student can use ChatGPT to generate flashcards that are tailored to
their learning needs.
(trang 18)
- While ChatGPT has great potential, it also has limitations. The model is only as good
as the data it's trained on, so it may not be able to understand or respond to certain
types of input or may produce biased or inaccurate responses.
(trang 18)
Atlas, S. (2023). ChatGPT for higher education and professional development: A guide to
conversational AI.
- when individuals click on the option "Explain quantum computing in simple terms",
the individual is immediately directed to the following webpage, and the answer to the
question is formed within 60 seconds.
(trang 7)
- In an attempt to investigate the AI's capability, we asked, “Explain mean, standard
deviation and z-scores”. The AI could offer a clear and sensible explanation of the
statistical concepts within 60 seconds. It even gave a brief mathematical example for a
more precise explanation.
(trang 7)
- From the interaction, the AI could communicate and answer queries like a human, and
the answers presented were sound and performed within 60-120 seconds. However,
there are also limitations, such as limited word characters, the inability to draw
diagrams (histogram, scatterplot), and consistent network error prompts when using
ChatGPT.
(trang 7)
- The AI-powered applications may also enable teachers to gather insight into their
students’ learning progress in order to provide additional guidance and support as
needed.
(trang 10)
- there is another growing subfield in this area of research in which AI-powered
applications are used to support students in the acquisition of writing skills.
(trang 10)
Rudolph, J., Tan, S., & Tan, S. (2023). ChatGPT: Bullshit spewer or the end of traditional
assessments in higher education?. Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, 6(1).
- It is important to note that even though ChatGPT presents several opportunities for
improvement in educational settings, it is not intended to take the place of actual
instructors. The human connection that exists between an instructor and a student can
never be replaced by ChatGPT.
- Teachers can create connections with their pupils and gain an understanding of the
student's particular requirements, as well as their strengths and weaknesses (Kim 2020,
Attard & Holmes 2020, Alam 2022)
Mhlanga, D. (2023). Open AI in education, the responsible and ethical use of ChatGPT
towards lifelong learning. Education, the Responsible and Ethical Use of ChatGPT Towards
Lifelong Learning (February 11, 2023).
Ý thêm tham khảo nha không có nguồn
- With ChatGPT, students can explore a subject fun and engagingly. Think of it as a
personal tutor who understands your unique learning style and personalizes the
content just for you, according to your interests.
- ChatGPT, it can be a fun game - a puzzle, a treasure hunt, or anything you want.
ChatGPT can generate unexpected or thought-provoking content, promoting critical
thinking and innovation. It's like having a personal game designer who can create
challenges that keep you engaged and excited to learn.
- In a math problem, ChatGPT can create a scenario that involves unique problem-
solving techniques.
- a form of plagiarism and is not only unethical but can also have serious consequences
for students.
- Since it runs on data only up to 2021, it may not provide the best answers or fully
understand the query. And even in case it has the data, it might not understand your
context and give you wrong answers.
- It may not have the most up-to-date information on the new plant species, leading
you to include outdated or incorrect information in your paper.
