Programming
Programming
net/publication/346875388
CITATIONS READS
0 38,580
2 authors:
All content following this page was uploaded by Kristine Carla PASCUAL Mahaguay on 10 October 2021.
Abstract:
        This paper aims to determine the difficulties encountered by the students in their work immersion
concerning family support, supervisory support, work habit, and competence. The research was conducted during
the academic year 2018-2019 in Vicente Madrigal National High School. Descriptive research is employed since its
purpose is to determine the difficulties encountered by the students in their work immersion. The study employed
the learning theory of Thorndike on the Law of Exercise and Law of Effects. There are 50 respondents further,
questionnaire checklist is the instrument used while data were treated using percentage, rank, weighted mean, and
two-way ANOVA. The study revealed that the difficulties encountered by work immersion students with work
immersion supervisors have no relationship with their sex, while work habit and competence were significant. In
terms of monthly family income, there was no significant difference in the different aspects. The study concluded
that the majority of the respondents were male and belonged to 9,000-below family income. Work immersion
students received financial and emotional support from the family; work immersion supervisors guided the students
in accomplishing tasks. However, visitation on the venue is limited and tasks given were not all strand related. The
value of volunteerism is not very evident from the respondents as well as the knowledge on basic troubleshooting
of hardware and software, monthly family income and sex were not a determining factor of difficulties.
Introduction
         Education has been given great value and                embraced the big changes in Philippine education,
acknowledgment all over the world. It is regarded as a           replacing 10-year basic education to K-12 Curriculum.
pillar of all national growth and development and at the         The new curriculum required kindergarten as pre-
same time a panacea to uncountable problems every                requisite to elementary and an additional two years for
country is facing. This becomes an instrument in                 high school.
improving the welfare and alleviating the well-known                      This ensured a lengthy stay in school; however,
problems of poverty. Education is seen to have great             this paradigm shift opens an opportunity for students
benefits to a country towards enhancing the skills of its        who do not plan to go to college to be well equipped
citizen and eventually improving the quality of human            and be employed in a blue-collar job.
capital and social mobility. Mahaguay (2018)                     In connection to this, the new curriculum served as a
claimed that the greatest challenge of every                     perfect vehicle in real experiences in the real world of
educational thinker is to look for an educational                works.
principle which will bring development to the                        According to DepEd Order 30, s. 2017, Section 1
country and its citizen. The Philippine Govertment
                                                                                 “One of the goals of the K to 12 Basic
on the otherhand is always trying new system of
                                                                         Education Program is to develop in learners
education that will make Filipino students globally
                                                                         the competencies, work ethic, and values
competent. Since 2011, the Department of Education
                                                                         relevant to pursuing further education and/or
                                                            37
                                       | ISSN: 2094-0556 | ursprj@gmail.com
                       The URSP Research Journal | Volume 6, No. 1 | JUNE 2020
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
        joining the world of work. To achieve greater              enjoy the learning experiences in the work venue that
        congruence between basic education and the                 made them worthy resulting in the opportunity of seeing
        nation’s development targets, Work Immersion,              their career path ahead.
        a required subject has been incorporated into                       Further, Lozada (2017) stated that work
        the curriculum. This subject will provide                  immersion must be viewed as a vital point of providing
        learners with opportunities:”                              students a place to improve through simulation thus
        1. to become familiar with the workplace;                  giving them knowledge and experiences to grow as
        2. for employment simulation; and                          professionals. She highlighted the value of experience
        3. to apply their competencies in areas of                 as the greatest teacher hence inspiration can be drawn as
        specialization/applied subjects in authentic               students gain proficiency in their specific fields.
        work environments.                                                  Rex Bookstore (2018) mentioned that as one of
                                                                   the leading learning solutions providers in the
         Meaning, work immersion can be the best                   Philippines, they have always aimed to be at the
avenue in honing and developing skills of the students.            forefront of supporting and leading initiatives. People
This practice exposes students to different fields and             believe that work immersion is important to the holistic
authentic operations of companies, institutions, and               growth of each learner. This is through creating learning
businesses. Likewise, this will serve as their stepping            materials that are aligned with the K to 12 curriculum
stone in gaining new knowledge on their specialization             and by providing educators an avenue to continually
and later be of great assistance in their chosen                   learn and excel in their fields. All these are done for
curriculum exits.                                                  their shored vision, to help build the nation through
         On the other hand, student's work immersion is            engaging and enhancing partners in education.Upon
not seamless, complications may arise in many forms                realizing the importance of the Senior High School
such as work attitude, family support, competence, and             Work Immersion Initiative not just to the academe
the like. These problems may greatly contribute to their           industry but to the future of the country as well, Rex
performances both positive and negative.                           Book Store recently have been collaborating with
In this line of thinking, the researcher would like to             different schools and industries to create better and
determine difficulties students may encounter during               more meaningful experiences for students undergoing
work immersion to look at ways and address the                     the program.
problems concerning work immersion of TVL-ICT                               The aforementioned studies and literature
Computer Programming.                                              revealed the importance of work immersion and its
                                                                   essential benefits, thus, in the same way, difficulties
Review of Related Literature                                       encountered by the students in work immersion must be
         Visioning the success of Senior High School               given attention and be given solution to ensure that
students after their chosen curriculum exit is something           students will have worthwhile real work experiences
worth to think of. This vision is a great challenge for the        that will help them acquire a job after graduation.
Department of Education and teachers due to the
continuous and prompt changes the world is facing,                 Scope and Limitation
thus, preparing them in the actual world is to uncover                      This study is limited in determining the extent
them in the real world of works through work                       of difficulties encountered by the TVL-ICT Computer
immersion.According to Victory Christian International             Programming 12-Alcantara of Vicente Madrigal
School (2016), work immersion programs concretize                  National High School in their work immersion for the
the ideas, lessons, and opinions learned in school,                academic year 2018-2019. The study covered one
consequently, these involvements can turn into real                hundred percent of the total population of 12-Alcantara.
work experiences and apprehensions that last a                     It includes 18 female and 32 male with a total of 50.
lifetime.                                                          The analysis of this study concentrated on using the
        Moreover, the study of Guimba (2018) revealed              researcher-made-questionnaire in gathering the data
that when respondents have a high level of self-efficacy           which are focused on the following variables: sex,
their confidence was developed thus, they become                   monthly family income, with respect to family support,
aware of their duties and responsibilities that are                supervisory support, work habit, and competence.
expected on them. Additionally, the high level of work
immersion satisfaction implies that the respondents                Theoretical Framework
                                                              38
                                        | ISSN: 2094-0556 | ursprj@gmail.com
                       The URSP Research Journal | Volume 6, No. 1 | JUNE 2020
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
         The study is anchored on the theory of the Law                   The study used the purposive sampling
of Exercise and Law of Effect by Thorndike. The Law               technique since TVL-ICT Computer Programming 12-
of Exercise stated that behavior is powerfully proven             Alcantara is the researchers’ advisory class thus, the
through recurrent connections of stimulus and response.           researcher served as the Work Immersion teacher of
This implies that learning takes place when done with             these students. One hundred percent of the population
repetition. Meanwhile, the Law of Effect stated that              was covered, having 18 female and 32 boys for a total
responses that produce a rewarding effect tend to be              of 50 students enrolled in the academic year 2018-
done or occur again in the same situation, and responses          2019.
that give unsatisfying effects are likely to be stopped.              a. Data Collection
This means that once learner's actions or behavior                            The researcher’s made questionnaire was
received positive feedback, they feel motivated to do it              the main instrument in gathering the needed
again, and if not they were discouraged to do it. In this             information coupled with an unstructured interview.
line of thought, teachers and supervisors of work                     b. Ethical Issues
immersion students should create environment and                              The researcher followed the process of
experiences that are pleasant and rewarding so work                   submitting a proposal and waiting for the approval
immersion students would be motivated to                              of the office of the principal before the study was
learn. Further, since work immersion is designed for                  conducted. Similarly, the respondents were
them to be aware of the real world of works, it is                    informed that they will be part of the research.
necessary that they will learn by doing coupled with
repetition to developed mastery of competencies                   Findings
needed.
                                                                          The following are the results gathered from the
Methodology                                                       analysis of the data through the questionnaire checklist
         This research is descriptive since its purpose is        administered to the respondents. It specifically shows
to determine the difficulties encountered by the students         the interpretation and analysis from the application of
in their work immersion focusing on various variables.            various statistical treatments.
Thus, a questionnaire checklist was developed focusing
on two parts. The first part covered the profile of the           The Profile of the Respondents in Terms of Sex and
respondents which is composed of sex and monthly                  Monthly Family Income
family income. Meanwhile, the second part focused on
the difficulties encountered by the TVL-ICT Computer              The table presents the frequency, percentage, and rank
Programming 12-Alcantara students in their work                   distribution of the respondents’ profile.
immersion with the following variables: family support,
supervisory support, work habit, and competence.                                                    Table 1
         After the development of the questionnaire, it            Frequencey, Percentage and Rank Distribution of the Respondents’ Profile
was validated by five (5) experts to ensure its validity.
Then, it was distributed and retrieved for tallying and               Variables     Frequency         Percentage      Rank
data analysis. Moreover, to analyze and interpret the                 Sex
gathered information, the following statistical                       Male               32                64%               1
treatments were utilized. In order to determine the                   Female             18                36%               2
profile of the respondents, percentage and rank                       Monthly
distribution were used while weighted mean and rank
                                                                      Family Income
distribution were employed in determining the extent of
difficulties encountered by the TVL-ICT Computer                      20,000-above        5                10%               4
Programming 12-Alcantara students in terms of sex,                    15,000-19,000       9                18%               3
and monthly family income. Lastly, F-test (two way                    10,000-14,000      10                20%               2
ANOVA) was utilized to determine the significant                      9,000-below        26                52%               1
difference in the difficulties encountered by the
students.                                                                 The table shows that out of 50 respondents, 32
                                                                  or 64 percent are male and first in rank. Next in rank is
Sampling                                                          18 or 36 percent are female respondents.
                                                             39
                                        | ISSN: 2094-0556 | ursprj@gmail.com
                        The URSP Research Journal | Volume 6, No. 1 | JUNE 2020
 __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
       In terms of monthly family income, 9,000- below                               Last is item number 5 “My parents/family asked about
rank first having a frequency of 26 with a percentage of                             my days’ accomplishment in my work immersion”,
52. This was followed by 10,000-14,000 having a                                      with obtained computed mean of 3.68 and verbally
frequency of 10 with a percentage of 20.                                             interpreted as “Often”.
Next is 15,000-19,000 having a frequency of 9 with a                                          The result shows that the respondents’ family
percentage of 18. Last is 20,000- above having a                                     supported them to comply with the requirement of work
frequency of 5 or 10 percent.                                                        immersion. The parents do their best to provide
        This means that majority of the respondents are                              financial needs as well as showing great concern with
male and belonged to 9,000 and below monthly family                                  the safety of their children by scrutinizing the content of
income.                                                                              parental consent. This just established that the
                                                                                     respondents were supported by their family. Parents did
The Extent of the Difficulties Encountered by TVL-ICT                                their responsibility in providing for their children to
Computer Programming Students in Work Immersion                                      accomplish work immersion as their children’s
by TVL-ICT Computer Programming Students in Work                                     requirement before graduation. The findings of the
Immersion                                                                            study revealed that parents’ contribution to their
         Table 2 presents the computed mean on the                                   children's education has a consistent and positive effect
difficulties encountered by TVL-ICT Computer                                         on academic achievement and the self-concept.
Programming students in their Work Immersion with                                             Chohan & Khan (2010) asserted that the
Respect to Family Support.                                                           parent’s contribution to their children’s education has a
                                        Table 2                                      consistent and positive effect on academic achievement
                                                                                     and the self-concept.
   Computed Mean on Difficulties Encountered by the Respondents with Respect
                                of Family Support                                             Table 3 presents the computed mean on the
            Family Support                  Mea    SD        VI     R       R        difficulties encountered by the respondents with respect
                                             n                                       to Supervisory Support from the Work Immersion
                                                                                     Teacher.
   1. My      parents/family     attended   4.32   1.03    Always       3   3
      conferences in school with regard
      to work immersion.
   2. My parents/family provided my         4.50   1.11    Always       1   1
      financial needs so I can attend in
      my work immersion, pay insurance
      and accomplish my portfolio.
   3. My parents/family prepared meals      3.84   1.23     Often       4   4
      for me so I have food while
      attending my work immersion.
   4. My parents/family was very much       4.44   1.03    Always       2   2
      concern about content of the parent
      consent before signing it.
   5. My parents/family asked about my      3.68   1.12     Often       5   5
      days’ accomplishment in my work
      immersion.
Average                                     4.16            Often
                                                                                40
                                                          | ISSN: 2094-0556 | ursprj@gmail.com
                       The URSP Research Journal | Volume 6, No. 1 | JUNE 2020
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
of 3.96 which is first in rank, followed by item number                             commended and praised us for a job well done” got a
2 “My work immersion teacher helped me find a good                                  mean of 4.12 both are verbally interpreted as “Always”.
working venue for my work immersion” got a mean of                                  Last in rank is item 2, “My working supervisor gave us
3.76 both are verbally interpreted as “Often”. Last in                              activities related to our strand/track”, obtained a mean
rank is item number 3 “My work immersion teacher                                    of 3.82 with a verbal interpretation of “Often”.
visited us in our venue in order to know the difficulties                                         It means that the respondents working
or problems we experienced with our working                                         supervisors are very accommodating and knew the
supervisor” having a mean of 2.40 verbally interpreted                              value and effect of appreciating one's good work. This
as “Sometimes”.                                                                     also further strengthens the idea that the school has sent
            It means that the work immersion teacher                                work immersion students to good partner industries.
properly guided students on what to do in work                                      Further, the annual Immersion Summit of the school to
immersion through orientation. Further, the immersion                               partner industries can be the reason for this. However,
teacher also assisted students in finding a good working                            based on the informal interview conducted by the
venue for them, considering the distance and ability of                             researcher, the task provided for them are not all related
the students. However, the table also showed that                                   to their track, it only focuses on typing, encoding, and
visitation in the work immersion venue is only limited.                             photocopying of documents. This may be due to the
This may be due to the large number of students                                     seriousness and confidentially of information. Another
dispersed in different places here in Rizal.                                        reason may be due to a limited number of industries
        Ariani (2015) revealed in her study that a decent                           catering computer-related tasks.
working relationship would direct an individual to feel
that the other members of the organization provide                                           Table 5 presents the computed mean on the
responsiveness to them upkeep them and contribute to                                difficulties encountered by the respondents with respect
them.                                                                               to Work Habit.
         Table 4 presents the computed mean on the
difficulties encountered by the respondents with respect                                                                     Table 5
to Supervisory Support from the Working Supervisors.                                    Computed Mean on the Difficulties Encountered by the Respondents with
                                                                                                              Respect to Work Habit
                                        Table 4
                                                                                      Work Habit                                    Mean SD       VI          R
  Computed Mean on the Difficulties Encountered by the Respondents with
                                                                                         1. I tried not to be absent or late in     3.98   1.02   Often       4
        Respect to Supervisory Support from Working Supervisor
                                                                                            my work immersion venue.
                                                                                         2. I took initiative to do tasks even if   3.04   1.14   Sometimes   5
Supervisory Support                             Mean SD        VI          R                my working supervisor did not ask
  Working Supervisor                                                                        us to do so.
   1. My working supervisor was friendly        4.24   1.25    Always      3             3. I was polite to the people around       4.30   1.17   Always      1
                                                                                            me (working venue)
      and accommodating.
                                                                                         4. I was open minded to the                4.14   1.04   Always      3
   2. My working supervisor gave us             3.82   1.10    Always      1                suggestions and ideas of my
      activities related to our strand/track.                                               working supervisor.
   3. My working supervisor tend not to         4.00   1.31    Often       4             5. I made sure that I accomplished         4.36   1.20   Always      2
      give negative words if I did the                                                      the task given to me correctly,
      given task incorrectly.                                                               neatly and on time.
   4. My working supervisor avoided             3.96   1.18    Always      2          Average                                       3.96          Often
      favoritism among his/her work                                                                                 It can be seen from the
      immersion mentee.                                                             table that the computed average mean of the difficulties
   5. My working supervisor commended           4.12   1.10    Sometimes   5        encountered by the respondents in terms of work habit
      and praised us for a job well done
Average                                         4.03           Often                is 3.96 verbally interpreted as “Often”.
        It can be seen from the table that the                                               The table revealed that item number 5 “I made
                                                                                    sure that I accomplished the task given to me correctly,
supervisory support from working supervisors has the
                                                                                    neatly and on time”, obtained a computed mean of 4.36
computed average mean of 4.03 verbally interpreted as
                                                                                    followed by item number 3 “I was polite to the people
“Often”.
                                                                                    around me (working venue)”, with a computed mean of
        The table shows that item number 1, “My
working supervisor was friendly and accommodating”                                  4.30, both are verbally interpreted as “Always”. Last in
                                                                                    rank is item number 2 “I took initiative to do tasks even
with a computed mean of 4.24 ranked first, meanwhile
next in rank is item number 5 “My working supervisor
                                                                               41
                                                              | ISSN: 2094-0556 | ursprj@gmail.com
                          The URSP Research Journal | Volume 6, No. 1 | JUNE 2020
   __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
   if my working supervisor did not ask us to do so” with a                       computer”, with a mean of 3.24 verbally interpreted as
   mean of 3.04 verbally interpreted as “Sometimes”.                              “Sometimes”.
            This only means that work immersion students                                  This means that the respondents are
   are equipped with good work habit before going out to                          knowledgeable about the basic use of Microsoft Office
   different partner industries. On the other hand, the value                     which is expected on them since they are ICT-
   of volunteerism must be given importance for them to                           Computer Programming students. In addition, they also
   take initiative.                                                               have good skills in comprehending instructions both
            Henderson & Mapp (2002) reported evidence                             verbal and written words. However, attention must be
   that volunteers can be noteworthy possession in creating                       focused on the basics of troubleshooting the software
   a compassionate and hospitable atmosphere in a school                          and hardware of computer since it is the last in rank.
   setting. It helps facilitates students’ conduct and                                    Table 7 presents the composite table on the
   performance.                                                                   extent of difficulties encountered by the respondents in
                                                                                  work immersion with respect to the different aspects.
            Table 6 presents the computed mean on the                                                               Table 7
   difficulties encountered by the respondents with respect                         Composite Table on the Extent of Difficulties Encountered by the TVL-ICT
   to Competence.                                                                   Computer Programming Students in Work Immersion with Respect to the
                                                                                                              Different Aspects
                                 Table 6
 Computed Mean on the Difficulties Encountered by the Respondents with                    Factors                    Mean              Verbal Interpretation
                       Respect to Competence                                         A. Family Support               4.10                      Often
                                                                                     B. Supervisory                  3.38                      Often
Competence                                   Mean SD        VI           R              Support from Work
                                                                                        Immersion Teacher
   1. As a Computer ICT student, I am        4.00   1.08    Always       1           C. Supervisory                  4.03                      Often
      knowledgeable about basic use of                                                  Support from
      Microsoft office like excel, word,                                                Working
      PowerPoint, and the like.                                                         Supervisor
   2. As a Computer ICT student, I am        3.24   1.16    Sometimes    5           D. Work Habit                   3.96                      Often
      knowledgeable how to troubleshoot                                              E. Competence                   3.64                      Often
      some problems in the hardware and                                           Average Mean                       3.82                      Often
      software of the computer.
   3. I was able to communicate well to      3.48   1.17    Often        4
      the people in my work immersion
      venue using both English and
                                                                                           It can be viewed from the table that the extent
      Tagalog words.                                                              of difficulties encountered by the respondents in their
   4. I can easily understand instructions   3.76   0.92    Often        2
      given to me by my working
                                                                                  work immersion with respect to different aspects
      supervisor both verbal and written.                                         obtained a computed average mean of 3. 82 verbally
   5. I can navigate different commands
      in the computer.
                                             3.72   1.15    Often        3
                                                                                  interpreted as “Often”. Specifically, family support and
Average                                      3.64           Often                 supervisory support from working supervisors have the
                                                                                  mean of 4.10, and 4.03 while work habit got 3.96,
                                                                                  followed by competence with a mean of 3.64 and lastly,
           The table revealed the computed average mean                           supervisory support from work immersion teacher
   of the difficulties encountered by the respondents with                        obtained a mean of 3.38. All are verbally interpreted as
   respect to competence is 3.64 verbally interpreted as                          “Often”.
   “Often”.                                                                               It only implies that the family of the respondents
           It can also be gleaned from the table that item                        and the partner industries are indeed in honing and
   number 1 “As a Computer ICT student, I am                                      helping the respondents in accomplishing the
   knowledgeable about basic use of Microsoft office like                         requirement for work immersion. Further, the
   excel, word, PowerPoint, and the like”, obtained a mean                        competence of the students in their major subjects
   of 4.00 ranked first with a verbal interpretation of                           particularly learning the basics of troubleshooting of
   “Always”. It was followed by item number 4 “I can                              hardware and software must be strengthened even more.
   easily understand instructions given to me by my                               The same is true with the supervisory support from
   working supervisor both verbal and written” with a                             work immersion teacher.
   mean of 3.76 verbally interpreted as “Often”. Last in
   rank is item number 2 “As a Computer ICT student, I                                    Table 8 presents the Computed F-value on the
   am knowledgeable on how to troubleshoot some                                   extent of difficulties encountered by the respondents in
   problems in the hardware and software of the
                                                                             42
                                                           | ISSN: 2094-0556 | ursprj@gmail.com
                       The URSP Research Journal | Volume 6, No. 1 | JUNE 2020
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
their work immersion with respect to the different                               attitude and the way the working supervisor treated
aspects in terms of sex.                                                         them also differ.
        The table showed that in terms of sex with                                       Further, work habit has a significant difference
respect to family support and supervisory support from                           with regard to sex since boys and girls are somewhat
work immersion teacher, it obtained p-values of .77 and                          contrasted when it comes to routine and
0.64 which are greater than the .05 level of significance,                       practice. Nasser (2016) concluded that Modern
thus the study failed to reject the null hypothesis and                          neuroscience and brain research has visibly confirmed
therefore found not significant.                                                 that male and female brains are dissimilar in structure,
                                                                                 and thus are bound differently. Girls are good in the
                                    Table 8
                                                                                 verbal-emotive part, while boys are motivated in
    Computed F-Value on the Extent of Difficulties Encountered by the
                                                                                 kinesthetic and visual-spatial activities.
 Respondents in their Work Immersion with Respect to Different Aspects in
                              terms of Sex
                                                                                            The same idea applies with regard to the
                   Sum of      Df         Mean         F           Sig.
                                                                                 competence of boys and girls. A study conducted by M.
                   Squares               Square                                  Samuelsson & J. Samuelsson (2016) revealed that girls
  A. Family
     Support                                                                     have difficulties in decision making while found it hard
                       .084          1         .084         .081     .777
     Between
     Groups
                                                                                 to work individually. This only strengthens the notion
  Within Groups     258.316     248           1.042                              that boys and girls have different strengths, needs, and
  Total             258.400     249
  B.Supervisory                                                                  weaknesses concerning competence.
  Support from
  Work Immersion
                     3.620           1        3.620        3.458     .064
  Teacher
  Between
                                                                                 Table 9 presents the Multivariate Analysis Between
  Groups                                                                         Monthly Income and the Difficulties Encountered by
  Within Groups    259.616      248           1.047
  Total            263.236      249                                              the TVL-ICT Students in Work Immersion in terms of
  C.Supervisory
  Support from
                                                                                 the Different Aspects
  Immediate
                     8.342           1        8.342        8.773     .003
  Supervisor
                                                                                                                        Table 9
  Between
  Groups
                                                                                   Multivariate Analysis Between Monthly Income and the Difficulties
   Within Groups   235.822      248            .951                               Encountered by the TVL-ICT Students in Work Immersion in terms of
  Total            244.164      249                                                                         the Different Aspects
  D. Work habit                                                                  Effect                         Value       F     Hypothesi Error  Sig.
  Between             3.461          1        3.461        5.447     .020
  Groups
                                                                                                                                    s df     df
  Within Groups     157.583     248            .635                                                                      3214.99            12.00
                                                                                              Pillai's Trace       .999              5.000          .000
  Total             161.044     249                                                                                            9b                0
  E.Competence
  Between            14.440          1    14.440       21.741        .000
                                                                                                                         3214.99            12.00
                                                                                              Wilks' Lambda        .001              5.000          .000
  Groups                                                                                                                       9b                0
                                                                                 Intercept
  Within Groups     164.716     248            .664                                           Hotelling's       1339.5 3214.99              12.00
  Total             179.156     249                                                                                                  5.000          .000
                                                                                              Trace                  83        9b                0
                                                                                              Roy's Largest     1339.5 3214.99              12.00
                                                                                                                                     5.000          .000
                                                                                              Root                   83        9b                0
         This means that sex has nothing to do with                                                                                         42.00
                                                                                              Pillai's Trace     1.157     1.757    15.000          .076
whether the parent will support or not their children.                                                                                           0
                                                                                                                                            33.52
Regardless of sex, parents of the respondents are                                             Wilks' Lambda        .134    2.396    15.000
                                                                                                                                                 8
                                                                                                                                                    .018
                                                                                 MonthlyInco
supportive. The same is true with work immersion                                 me           Hotelling's                                   32.00
                                                                                                                 4.388     3.120    15.000          .003
teacher who supported the students irrespective of the                                        Trace                                              0
respondents’ sex. It follows that there is gender fairness                                    Roy's Largest
                                                                                                                 3.879 10.860c       5.000
                                                                                                                                            14.00
                                                                                                                                                    .000
                                                                                              Root                                               0
in the treatment of both parents and the work immersion
teacher.                                                                                  The table revealed the comparison of the mean
         Moreover, supervisory support from the                                  of the responses based on the family monthly income
working supervisor, work habit, and competence                                   for the four aspects of difficulty encountered by the
obtained p-values of .003, .020, and, .000                                       students, namely: family support, supervisory support
respectively. These are all less than the .05 level of                           from work immersion teacher and work immersion
significance, thus the study accepted the null hypothesis                        supervisor, work habit, and competence.
therefore found it significant. This implies that since                                   This shows that there was no statistically
the respondents were sent to different partner industries,                       significant difference in the different aspects of
they have a different working supervisor. Consequently,                          difficulty encountered by the respondents as a group
                                                                                 based on their family monthly income as revealed by
                                                                            43
                                                      | ISSN: 2094-0556 | ursprj@gmail.com
                       The URSP Research Journal | Volume 6, No. 1 | JUNE 2020
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
the Pillai’s Trace having a p-value of .076 which is                             2.5. With respect to competence, the
greater than 0.05 level of significance thus it failed to               computed average weighted mean is 3.64 with a
reject the hypothesis.                                                  verbal interpretation of Often.
         This gives the notion that the monthly family              3. On the Significant Difference on the Extent of
income of the respondents has nothing to do with the                Difficulties Encountered by the TVL-ICT students
respondents’ family support, supervisory support from               in Work Immersion with Respect to the Different
work immersion teacher and working supervisor, work                 Aspects in terms of their Profile.
habit, and competence. Despite the fact, that majority of                         3.1 In terms of sex, the computed p-
the respondents came from monthly family income                         values obtained in family support and
belonging to 9,000- below family still manage to                        supervisory support from work immersion
support their children both in financial and emotional                  teacher were .77 and .064 which are greater
aspects. Furthermore, the support coming from work                      than 0.05 level of significance, thus the
immersion teacher and working supervisors do not vary                   hypothesis failed to reject and therefore it was
regardless of the family income, still, they manage to                  found not significant. Further, supervisory
help and assist the respondents. Additionally, the work                 support from working supervisors, work habit,
habit and the competence of the respondents are not                     and competence got .003, .020, and .000
influenced by the income they received monthly.                         respectively. These are all less than 0.05 level
                                                                        of significance and therefore it rejected the null
Summary of Findings                                                     hypothesis thus, were found significant.
       From the analysis and interpretation of data, the                         3.2 In terms of monthly family
following were summarized.                                               income,
    1. The Profile of the Respondents                                   it shows that there was no statistically
                 1.1 In terms of sex out of 50, 32 or 64%               significant difference in the different aspects of
        are male and 18 or 32% are female.                              difficulty encountered by the respondents as a
                 1.2 In terms of monthly family income                  group based on their family monthly income as
        out of 50, 26 or 52% belongs to 9,000-below,                    revealed by the Pillai’s Trace having a p-value
        10 or 20% to 10,000-14,000, 9 or 18% to                         of .076 which is greater than 0.05 level of
        15,000-19,000 and 5 or 10% were from 20,000-                    significance thus it failed to reject the
        above bracket.                                                  hypothesis.
    2. On the Extent of Difficulties Encountered by
        the TVL-ICT Computer Programming Students                Conclusions. Based on the summary of findings, the
        in Work Immersion with Respect to Family                 following conclusions were drawn.
        Support, Supervisory Support from Work                       1. The majority of the respondents were male and
        Immersion teacher and working supervisors,                       belonged to a 9,000-below monthly family
        work habit and competence.                                       income bracket.
                 2.1 With respect to family support, the             2. The work immersion students received support
        computed average weighted mean is 4.10 with a                    from the family both financial and emotional.
        verbal interpretation of Often.                                  Furthermore, the work immersion teacher and
                 2.2. With respect to supervisory support                working supervisors guided and assisted the
        from work immersion teacher, it obtained a                       students in accomplishing tasks. However,
        computed average weighted mean of 3.48 with                      visitation to work immersion venue of work
        a verbal interpretation of Often.                                immersion teacher is limited, further, tasks
                 2.3. With respect to supervisory support                given to students were not all related to their
        from working supervisors, it obtained a                          strand as ICT-Computer Programming students.
        computed average weighted mean of 4.03                           In addition, work immersion students’ work
        verbally interpreted as Often.                                   habits are good but the value of volunteerism
                 2.4 With respect to work habit, the                     should be honed. Similarly, with regard to
        computed average weighted mean is 3.96 with a                    competence students found difficulties in
        verbal interpretation of 3.96 verbally                           troubleshooting software and hardware of
        interpreted as Often.                                            computers.
                                                            44
                                       | ISSN: 2094-0556 | ursprj@gmail.com
                                    The URSP Research Journal | Volume 6, No. 1 | JUNE 2020
             __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
                         3. Monthly family income was not a determining          Guimba, G. (2018). Work-related self-efficacy and
                            factor in the difficulties encountered by the                work immersion satisfaction among grade 12
                            students in work immersion. The same is true                 general academic students. Retrieved Aug. 1,
                            with sex which was found not significant to                  2018, from https://www.sciencedirect.com/
                            family support and supervisory support from                  science/article/pii/S1877042811029119
                            work immersion teacher. However, there is a          Henderson, A.& Mapp, K. (2002). A new wave of
                            significant relationship between sex to                      evidence: The impact of school, family, and
                            supervisory support from working supervisors,                community        connections      on       student
                            work habit, and competence.                                  achievement. Retrieve March 17, 2019,
                                                                                         from http://www.sedl.org/connections/resouces/
            Recommendations                                                              evidence.pdf
                     Based on the summary of findings and                        Kavalkovich, S. (2017). The Law of Exercise and
            conclusions the following recommendations were                               Readiness in Teaching. Retrieved from March
            offered.                                                                     12,     2018,     from      https://solvibrations-
                1. Administrators should set a standard number of                        org.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/solvibrations.org/la
                     visitations in monitoring work immersion                            w-exercise-readiness-teaching-revised-version
                     students which is achievable in the part of the             Lozada, M. (2016). Work Immersion in Senior High
                     work immersion teacher.                                             School Panay News. Retrieved from July 18,
                2. Rigid sourcing of partner industries that offer                       2018) from https://www.pressreader.com/philip
                     tasks that are in congruence to the strand taken                    pines/panay-news/20171116/281547996182512
                     by the work immersion students.                             Mcleod, S. (2018). Edward Thorndike: The Law of
                3. Teachers should conduct orientation on work                           Effect. Retrieved from March 12, 2018,
                     ethics particularly the value of volunteerism.                      from https://www.simplypsychology.org/edwar
                4. At least train ICT-Computer Programming                               d-thorndike.html
                     students with the basics of troubleshooting of              Mahaguay, Jerwin. “Ang Pilosopiya ng Edukasyon ni
                     hardware and software of computers.                                 Emerita      S.     Quito”.   Malay       Journal.
            References                                                                   Pamantasang De La Salle: Pilipinas. 2018: 1-
            Ariani, D. (2015). Relationship with Supervisor and Co-                      19. Print
                     Workers, Psychological Condition, and                       Nasser (2016). The Difference Between Girls and Boys
                     Employee Engagement in the Workplace.                               in Learning. Retrieved March 12, 2018,
                     Journal of Business and Management, Volume                          from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/
                     4, Issue 3 (2015) 34-47, Retrieved March 15,                        311855897_The_Difference_Between_Girls_an
                     2019,from https://www.researchgate.net/public                       d_Boys_in_Learning
                     ation/283619173_Relationship_with_Superviso                 Rexbookstore (2018). Beyond Work Immersion: BPS
                     r_and_CoWorkers_Psychological_Condition_a                           SHS Work Simulation Program. Retrieved July
                     nd_Employee_Engagement_in_the_Workplace                             18, 2018, from http://www.rexpublishing.
            Chohan & Khan (2016). Impact of Parental Support on                          com.ph/articles/2018/09/beyond-work-
                     the Academic Performance and Self Concept of                        immersion-bps-shs-work-simulation-program/
                     the Student. Journal of Research Reflections in             Samuelsson M. & Samuelsson J. (2016). Gender
                     Education, Volume 4, No. 1 pp. 14-26.                               Differences in boys’ and girls’ Perception of
                     Retrieved       March      12,     2019,     from                   Teaching and Learning Mathematics. Retrieve
                     http://www.ue.edu.pk/jjre                                           March 16, 2019, from https://doi.org/
            Do.30, s. 2017 Guidelines for Work Immersion.                                10.1080/23265507.2015.1127770
                     Retrieved July 17, 2018, from www.deped.gov.                Victory Christian International School (2016).
                     ph.                                                                 Immersion: Exposing students to the real work
            Gross, G. (2014). How Boys and Girls Learn                                   of world. Retrieved June 28, 2018,
                     Differently.     March      17,     2019     from                   from http://vcis.edu.ph/index.php/studentnews/
                     https://www.huffpost.com/entry/how-boys-and-
                     girls-learn differently_n_5339567
                                                                            45
                                                        | ISSN: 2094-0556 | ursprj@gmail.com