ZSociology IA
ZSociology IA
EXAMINATION
SOCIOLOGY INTERNAL ASSESSMENT
The researcher will like to graciously extend feelings of gratitude to the following person.
The almighty God for instilling in the researcher the wisdom and understanding necessary to
complete this Internal Assessment. Mr. P. Campbell for giving the researcher the wonderful
opportunity to an education and financial needs for this IA. Mrs. Leveridge, for helping the
researcher to understand sociological concepts so the researcher could apply them throughout
this IA as well as for reviewing this IA. Their help is highly appreciated and the researcher
SECTION 1
Background 1
SECTION 2
Sample Selection 10
SECTION 3
Presentation of Findings 12 - 27
Analysis of Findings 28 - 32
SECTION 4
Discussion of Findings 33 - 37
Conclusion 38
Bibliography 39 - 41
BACKGROUND
Merl Grove High School once called “Little Red House” is a secondary educational
institution located at 77-79 Constant Spring Road, Jamaica. It was founded in 1920 by Nathaniel
Speid. According to Miriam Speid, Nathaniel Speid’s daughter and former principal of this
institution, the school was given its name by her mother Virginia. Virginia had five children with
which she used to form the name of the school – “M” for Miriam, “E” for Effery, “R” for
Reginald and Ruth and “L” for Lucille to form MERL. The area around had a lot of different
Over the years Merl Grove High School had gain excellent principals who all put their
best foot forward to make the school better. The current principal of the school is Dr. Marjorie
Fullerton who gained her position on April 1, 2016. Her love for the student body and staff has
paved the way to a “MUST go to” traditional high school for girls. However, over the years this
prestigious high school has had issues with behavior policies in regards to bullying.
I became interested in this issue because throughout high school I had been a victim of
bullying and I know how it feels to be bullied. Therefore, I am interested in knowing what my
school, Merl Grove High School, is doing about bullying and what are the major causes of
This Internal Assessment is based on empirical research done at the Merl Grove High
website managed by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, “Bullying is unwanted,
aggressive behavior among school aged children that involves a real or perceived power
imbalance”. At the Merl Grove High School bullying is a constant issue, for students believe that
they must overpower each other or treat others unfairly. In most cases this is because of the
social backgrounds, appearances and academics of students attending the school. Bullying is a
vicious act which may lead to serious consequences such as suicide and must be stopped before
it reaches thus far. In this Internal Assessment the issue of bullying and how it affects students
will be discussed; as well as the sanctions/techniques used by the school that have been
Aim
● To investigate ways in which the disciplinary body of Merl Grove High School governs the issue
of bullying within the school's environment and how students are affected by acts of bullying.
Objectives:
Bullying”, “bullying is a distinctive pattern of harming and humiliating others, specifically those
who are in some way smaller, weaker, and younger or in any way more vulnerable than the
bully”. The act of bullying is very devious and is a developing behavior of children with bad
backgrounds who feels they have to empower the vulnerable. There are various types of bullying
such as physical bullying, verbal bullying, rational aggression, cyberbullying, sexual bullying
According to an article from The Gleaner, by Andrea Martin Swaby, cyberbullying has
become the most dominant form of bullying in Jamaica. Cyberbullying is the use of electronic
threatening nature. Andrea goes on to say that, “Online bullying is not very distinct from the
traditional form of bullying in school. In fact, it is a mutated form. Both include nagging,
humiliation, forms of intimidation, aggression, teasing and overall aggression. What poses a real
cause for concern for cyberbullying is that in this set-up, unlike its historical version, the
aided in the development of bullies within schools. “Jamaica has earned itself a long history of
struggle with violence which sadly, our children have not been immune to experiencing either as
a victim or a perpetrator. The Child Development Agency (CDA) unearthed some worrying
information on the status of bullying in Jamaican schools. The study concluded that 70% of the
1,876 students surveyed said they were bullied over the 2013-2014 school year. Regarding the
types of bullying these children were experiencing, 57.6% said they being teased or called
names; 31.5% cited being hit, kicked or shoved; 28.6% said they have had lies told on them and
Consequently, being bullied can lead to psychological effects such as low self-esteem,
bad moods, isolation, depression, substance abuse and the most dangerous of them all, self-harm.
Bullying”, self- harm can take the forms such as cutting, persistent scratching, skin picking,
choking oneself, burning oneself, substance abuse, reckless behavior, eating disorders and
possible suicide. Children and adolescents will use self-harm as a mean of communicating
distress. In addition to the physical short-term effects, the individual will experience symptoms
related to depression. The most relevant will include suicidal ideation, depressed mood, fatigue
and a change in sleep patterns. If the issue of self-harm is not addressed the child is at risk of
DeLisi, an ISU associate professor of sociology and director of the criminal justice program,
believes that bullies are more antisocial. They’re engaged in problem behaviors that over time,
add up. His studies compares numbers of different kinds of antisocial behaviors with adults who
had a history of bullying and those who did not have a history of bullying. According to the
study, adults with a history of bullying were 10 times more likely to lie than those with no
bullying history. They were also six times more likely to get in a fight and two-and-a-half times
more likely to harass or threaten someone than those with no bullying history. Therefore, the
actions and behaviors portrayed by adults can afftect their children’s behaviours.
RESEARCH DESIGN
Research design is a detailed outline of how an investigation will take place. According
to the Business Dictionary, This involves how the data is to be collected, the instruments
employed, how the instruments will be used and the intend means for analyzing data collected.
In this research two types of data sources were used; primary and secondary sources. The
primary sources used were questionnaires and interviews. The secondary sources used were
textbooks, articles and websites. Also, in this research both quantitative and qualitative methods
of data collection was collected and utilized.in addition, questionnaires and interviews were used
for the purposes of a survey or statistical study. It is a cheap, quick and efficient way of acquiring
information from a numerous amount of persons. In the questionnaire there were two types of
questions asked; these are open and closed questions. Closed questions structure the answer by
only allowing one to choose from pre-decided options. For example; ‘yes’ or ‘no’, or ‘male’ or
‘female’. Closed questions can be advantageous as they provide information that can be easily be
transformed into quantitative data and providing one with statistical data analysis. However they
lack details since the information given is fixed. On the other hand Open questions allows
respondents to use their own words and give explanation in a more detailed manner. For
examples, “what are your views on bullying?” this is advantageous as qualitative information is
acquired as the respondent gives a more detailed point of view. However, it may be time
statements are elicited from another. Interviews is a form a qualitative data collection which
makes the research being carried out somewhat logical. Interviews can be conducted either face-
to-face or over the telephone. Questions asked are open ended which allows the respondent to
give a more personal and detailed response. Interviews can be very advantageous as it gives the
researcher the opportunity to collect personal opinions, values, and beliefs and ask further
may give bias information which may not be beneficial to the research.
random persons of grades 7, 8, 9, 10 and 11 each. It is issued this way to give variation to the
research being conducted and protect the respondent’s confidentiality. Randomization is efficient
as it provides variation since each respondent has had their different experiences with the issue
of bullying. In addition an interview was conducted between the researcher the guidance
counsellor. This was done so that the researcher could acquire information on the point of view
of the guidance counsellor since she is responsible for bullying. Also, another interview was
conducted between the researcher and the Dean of Discipline so the researcher could acquire
information on the penalties allocated for matters concerning the bullying of students.
Therefore, primary and secondary data collection sources were used in order to
effectively carry out this research. These sources include questionnaires, interviews, articles,
textbooks and websites respectively. As a result this researcher was well carried out and contain
that helps to explain how something works and each theory has its particular way of viewing
reality.1 There are six major types of sociological perspectives; Marxism, Functionalism,
theory). However, only positivism and interpretivism constructed the study of sociology.
suggests that the scientific study of humans is possible using the methods and procedures of
natural science such as observation, multivariate analysis and correlation.2 Comte and other
scientist believed that it was possible to create a ‘science of society’ based on the same principles
of natural science. Functionalist in particular have a penchant for positivist methods since they
believe that social structure was objective.3 Positivism employs methods that are very scientific
and provides a form of quantitative research. For example; Emile Durkheim’s classic study
Suicide (1970, first published 1897) is often seen as a model of positivist research and it does
On the hand, interpretivism was brought forward by Max Weber, who was opposed to the
idea that human behavior was quantifiable. He proposed instead that there were aspects of
human behavior that could not be measured because they were concerned with emotions and
1 Chinapoo, Carlton, et al. “Cape Sociology Units 1 & 2”. London, UK; Hodder Education. 2015. Pg. 23
2 Mustapha, Nasser. “Sociology for Caribbean Students”. Jamaica; Ian Randle Publishers. 2013. Pg. 41
3 Chinapoo, Carlton, et al. “Cape Sociology Units 1 & 2”. London, UK; Hodder Education. 2015. Pg. 47
4 Haralambos, Holborn. “Sociology Themes and Perspectives”. United Kingdom; Collins Educational. 2000. Pg. 966
feelings.5 This approached was adopted by a number of American sociologists such as G.H.
Mead, E. Goffman and H. Garfinkel that employed subjective approaches in their researches.
The interpretivist approach involved a systematic analysis of socially meaningful actions through
the direct, detailed observation of people in natural settings in order to arrive at understandings
and interpretations of how people create and maintain their social worlds.6 Interpretivism
employs methods that provides qualitative research. For example; Max Weber’s study in the
Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism (1958), one of his main concerns was to interpret
5 Mustapha, Nasser. “Sociology for Caribbean Students”. Jamaica; Ian Randle Publishers. 2013. Pg. 41
6 Chinapoo, Carlton, et al. “Cape Sociology Units 1 & 2”. London, UK; Hodder Education. 2015. Pg. 51
7 Haralambos, Holborn. “Sociology Themes and Perspectives”. United Kingdom; Collins Educational. 2000. Pg. 972
SAMPLE SELECTION
and time consuming to study a whole population. Therefore, the most suitable sample is selected
to represent that population, making it possible to make observations or draw valid conclusions.
A sampling frame was selected in order to effectively represent the population. A sampling
frame is a list of persons drawn from the population.9 The sampling method of stratified random
sampling was chosen. The sample units was organized based on their grades and then the
questionnaires was randomly distributed to 5 individual per grade. The sample was entirely
females from the Merl Grove High School ranging from ages 12–18. A total of 25 questionnaire
were issued and retrieved. This method was effective because it created variation in the sampling
as different individuals of different age, background and experiences were able to participate in
this research.
8 Chinapoo, Carlton, et al. “Cape Sociology Units 1 & 2”. London, UK; Hodder Education. 2015. Pg. 63
9 Mustapha, Nasser. “Sociology for Caribbean Students”. Jamaica; Ian Randle Publishers. 2013. Pg. 74
DATA COLLECTION TOOLS/RESEARCH
TECHNIQUES
Both primary and secondary sources were used in order to gather effective information
for this research. The primary sources used were questionnaires and interviews which are both
quantitative and qualitative data collection methods respectively. Questionnaires provided this
research with data that could be easily tabulated, measured and analyze through the use of
statistics. It was advantageous as it was not costly and saved the researcher time. Structured
Interviews provided this research with professional and detailed information. It was
advantageous because misunderstood questions were clarified and the researcher was able to
detect lies, bias and inconsistencies in the interviews’ account by observing facial expressions,
phonetics (tones) and body language. The secondary sources used in this research are textbooks,
websites and articles. This aided in giving the research additional information the phenomenon
being studied and other perspectives as well as research on the matter. All these aided in making
permission to conduct my research on the topic which would be entitled, “The Issue of Bullying
within Merl Grove High” at your institution. I would like to issue some questionnaires and
interview the Dean of Discipline and Guidance Counsellor at your school as a part of my data
collection. I hope that you will therefore grant me the permission necessary to conduct my
Yours Sincerely,
Patrece Campbell.
QUESTIONAIRE
This questionnaire is solely used for the purpose of gathering information for an Internal
Assessment. The information given will be kept confidential, thus, you are not required to write
your name. Please answer ALL questions below as honestly as possible. Select ONLY ONE
answer per question. Thank you for your participation.
1. What age group do you belong to?
• 11 - 14
• 15 -18
• Male
• Female
• 7
• 8
• 9
• 10
• 11
• No
• No
6. If yes what factors motivated you to bully others? (If no proceed to next question).
____________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________
• Beating a person up
• Laughing at a person
• Provocation
11. What sanctions do you know are given to bullies at your school?
• Order Marks
• Detention
• Suspensions
• Expulsion
• No
13. How does your school make it known to the school population that bullying is wrong?
Through the use of:
• Posters
• Signs
• Guidance Class
• Cyberbullying
• Verbal Bullying
• Physical Bullying
• Sexual Bullying
• None
• Every day
• Once a week
• Not so regular
• Not at all
16. Have u ever felt suicidal or like you would hurt yourself after being bullied?
• Yes
• No
• Good
• Bad
• Powerful
• Normal
18. On a scale of 1 to 5 how much do you tolerate the act of bullying? __________________
(1 being no toleration and 5 being high toleration)
19. If you were ever bullied did you speak up for yourself?
• Yes
• No
INTERVIEW #1
Dean of Discipline
2. What do you think motivates students to bully each other at school? (E.g. peer pressure,
background, etc.)
Answer: Bullying within our current reality stems from sensationalism. The strong influence of hype and likes on
social media give some students the drive to want to bully. Students patronize and model behavior so social class,
background and peer groups are some of the myriad of factors which stem to bullying in school. Connections with
internal and external gang sometimes contribute to school bullying.
4. What are the most common types of bullying reports you get? (E.g. Cyberbullying, etc.)
Answer: Gang bullying and cyber bullying.
6. How does the school advice other students on the act of bullying?
Answer: There are constant educational campaign being done by the Dean's office and the Guidance Counsel
Department to treat with such abnormal behavior. Signs are placed at strategic location which depicts: stop bullying.
They are constant been reminded that bullying especially cyber bullying is a criminal offence which is punishable by
law. Students sometimes are called upon to do skips and other presentations relating to the issue of bullying in
school and its ripple effect on the school and the wider society.
INTERVIEW #2
Guidance Counsellor
1. How does bullying affect students of the Merl Grove High School? (e.g.: do they become deviant.
Lower their academics etc.)
Answer: the students that I have interacted with within my seven years who have been victims of bullying are
usually depressed, they hate coming to school, they sometimes can't focus on their academics, sometimes they
become angry and very aggressive and there are times when they become withdrawn.
2. How does bullying affects students' social behavior at school? (E.g. Isolation from other student,
no participation in class, etc.)
Answer: I suppose my previous answer would answered this question.
3. What do you think motivates students to bully each other at school? (E.g. peer pressure,
background, etc.)
Answer: low self-esteem is always the number one thing. Students who bully other students generally doesn't have a
good perception of themselves. They want everyone to know that they are tough and that nobody should mess with
them. Sometimes it’s wrapped up in jealousy. They sometimes wish they had the support or the material things that
the other student had. As you stated sometimes its peer pressure, maybe their friends are encouraging them to say or
do something naughty and they feel they must respond in order to get their friends respect.
6. How to parents react when they hear of their child/children being bullied?
Answer: Generally parents are angry when they get this information. They also tend to be afraid depending on the
nature of the bullying.
PRESENTATION OF FINDINGS
QUESTION 1
tally table showing the age groups of the 25
students
11-14 ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥
15-18 ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥
Key
♥ - number of students = 1
Figure 1: A Tally Table representing the 25 students’ responses to question 1, “What age group
do you belong to”. The table shows that 13 students are from age 11-14 and 12 are from age 15-
18. From the diagram it is safe to say that majority of the students who participated in this
diagram are from the lower school of grade 7-9 as the age range for these students are ages 11-
14.
QUESTION 7
BARGRAPH SHOWING THE NUMBER OF STUDENTS
WHO WERE ACTUAL BULLIES
25
20
20
NUMBER OF STUDENTS
15
10
5
5
0
YES NO
RESPONSE TO EVER BEING A BULLY
NUMBER OF STUDENTS
Figure 2: A Vertical Bar Graph showing the 25 students’ response to question number 7, “Were
you ever a bully”. 5 students responded saying ‘Yes I was once a bully’ and 20 responded saying
QUESTION 10
PIE CHART SHOWING THE COMMON
ELEMENTS OF BULLYING
12; 48%
Figure 3: A Pie Chart showing the 25 students’ response to question number 10, “What do you
think are the common elements of bullying”.12 students agreed that it was saying harsh words
which represents 48% of the sample. 6 students agreed that it was provocation which represents
24% of the sample. 5 students agreed that it was laughing at a person representing 20% of the
sample. 0 students said it was stealing of lunch money which represents 0% of the sample.
Therefore, it can be concluded that the major element of bullying the students experienced at
Merl Grove High School is the saying of harsh words and the least is the stealing of one’s lunch
money.
QUESTION 11
BARGRAPH SHOWING THE SANCTIONS FOR BUL-
LYING AT MERL GROVE HIGH SCHOOL
Expulsion 4
Suspension 11
SANCTIONS
Detention 2
Order Mark 8
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
NUMBER OF STUDENTS
Number of Students
Figure 4: Horizontal Bar Graph unveiling the students’ response to question number 11, “What
sanctions do you know are given to bullies at your school”? The graph unveils that 8 students
responded that the school gives order marks as sanctions for bullying. 2 student responded that
the school gives detention as a sanction. 11 students responded that the school gives suspension
as sanction for the act of bullying. 4 students said that the school gives expulsion as a sanction
for bullying at Merl Grove High School. Therefore, according the majority of the students, to
their knowledge the school gives mostly suspension for the act of bullying at Merl Grove High
School.
QUESTION 13
5; 20% Posters
Signs
Presentations in Assembly
Guidance Class
11; 44%
4; 16% Visitor Speeches
Figure 5: Doughnut Chart showing the students’ response to question number 13, “How does
your school make it known to the school population that bullying is wrong”. This diagram
reveals that 11 students agreed that Guidance class is aid in making the school population
knowledgeable about bully being wrong which represents 44% of the sample. 5 students agreed
that Signs aided in making the school population knowledgeable about bullying being wrong
which represents 20% of the sample. 4 students agreed that presentations in the assembly aided
in making the school population knowledgeable about bullying being wrong which represents
16% of the sample. 3 students agreed that speeches from visitors aided in making the school
population knowledgeable about bullying being wrong which represents 12% of the sample. 2
students agreed that posters aided in making the school population knowledgeable about bullying
being wrong which represents 8% of the sample. Therefore, it can be concluded that guidance
classes is what mainly aided in the students becoming knowledgeable about bullying being
wrong.
QUESTION 14
Sexual Bullying
Physical Bullying
Verbal Bullying
Cyberbullying
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Number of Students
Figure 6: Horizontal Bar Graph showing the students’ response to question number 14, “What
was the type of bullying you received”. This graph is a representation of the 15 students who said
they were bullied as only these students were able to answer this question. According to the
graph, 6 students said that they received verbal bullying. 5 students said they received
cyberbullying, 4 students said they received physical bullying and 0 students said they received
sexual bullying. Therefore, it is safe to say that the students of Merl Grove High School mostly
2; 8%
9; 36%
10; 40%
2; 8% 2; 8%
Every Day Every Other Day Once A Week Not At All Not So Regular
Figure 7: A Pie Chart revealing the students’ response to question number 15, “How often were
you bullied”? The chart unveils that 10 students weren’t bullied at all. These are the 10 student
who said that they were never bullied before which represents 40% of the sample. 9 students said
that they were everyday which represents 36% of the sample. 2 students said they were bullied
not so regular, another 2 said they were bullied every other day and another 2 said they were
bullied once a week. This represent 8% of the sample for each of these response.
QUESTION 17
1; 20%
2; 40%
2; 40%
Figure 8: A Doughnut Chart representing the students’ response to question number 17, “How
did bullying someone make you feel”. This question was answered by the 5 students who
indicated that they have been antagonizers sometime in the past. 2 students said that they felt
good after bullying a person and another said they felt powerful. This represent 40% each of the
5 students from the sample. 1 student said they felt normal after bullying a person which
represents 20% of the sample. 0 students said they felt bad after bullying which represent 0% of
the sample. As a result, it can be concluded that after bullying most antagonizer feel powerful
4 4
2
0
1 2 3 4 5
Toleration Rate
Rates
Figure 9: A Line Graph show the students’ response to question number 8, “On a scale of 1 to 5
how much do you tolerate the act of bullying (1 being no toleration and 5 being high toleration)”.
With reference to the graph 15 students responded with 1 saying that they had an extremely low
tolerance for bullying. 4 students responded with 2 saying they had a low toleration for bullying.
Another 4 students responded saying that they had an averaged toleration for bullying. 2 students
responded with 4 saying that they tolerated bullying; while 0 students responded with 5 saying
that they sought no problem with bullying. Therefore, it can be concluded that majority of the
students who participated in this research had a low tolerance for bullying.
QUESTION 19
PIE CHART SHOWING THE NUMBER OF STUDENT
WHO SPOKE UP ABOUT BEING BULLIED
Figure 10: A Pie Chart representing the students’ response to question 19, “If you were ever
bullied did you speak up for yourself”. This question was answered by the 15 students who
indicated that they have been bullied before. According to the chart, 9 students said ‘Yes’ they
spoke up for themselves; this represents 60% of the sample. 6 students said ‘No’ they did not
speak up for themselves; this represents 40% of the sample. Thus, it can be conclude that over a
half of the students from the sample spoke up for themselves about being bullied.
ANALYSIS OF DATA
Merl Grove High School is a prominent secondary educational institution that has a
reoccurring issues with bullying. Bullying is a distinctive pattern of harming and humiliating
others, specifically those who are in some way smaller, weaker, and younger or in any way more
vulnerable than the bully This research was heavily dependent on primary resource such as
Questionnaires and Interviews, as well as secondary sources such as websites, books and article.
This was done in order to achieve the aim of this research which is to investigate ways in which the
disciplinary body of Merl Grove High School controls the issue of bullying within the school's
environment and how students are affected by acts of bullying. Therefore, the data derived from these
From the data collected, it is evident that majority of the student who participated in this
researcher is of the lower school of grade 7-9 as the age range for these students are ages 11-14.
In Figure 1, the table shows that 13 students are from age 11-14 and 12 are from age 15-18.
While the minority is from the upper school of grades 10-11 as the age range for these students
are ages 15 -18. However, there is just a slight differentiation as the lower school is only one
individual above the upper school. Though persons of the lower school might be beyond the age
of 14 it would still have the majority of the representation as 3 out the 5 grades belonged to the
lower school, which means that their number of representative would be above the upper school.
In Figure 2, the diagrams illustrates the students’ responses to whether they were ever a
bully or not. 5 students responded saying ‘Yes I was once a bully’ and 20 responded saying ‘No I
was never a bully’. It is highly recommendable that 5 person out the 25 persons used as sample
honestly confessed that they were once bullies a point in their lives. That is 1/5 of the whole
sample that participated in this research. The other 20 of the respondents said they were never
bullies which represents 4/5 of the sample population. Maybe, this is because a bully can have
many victims and the population is filled with person who were being bullied than actual bullies
themselves. It is however notable, that the respondents may lie to this questions due to personal
biasness or guilt.
In figure 3, it is evident that majority of the students of Merl Grove High has experienced
some form of bullying as Figure 6 shows that the most common form of bullying the students
experienced are Verbal bullying, Cyberbullying and Physical bulling. According to the graph, 6
students said that they received verbal bullying which represent 25% of the school’s population.
5 students said they received cyberbullying which represents 20% of the school population. 4
students said they received physical bullying which represents 16% of the school population. 0
students said they received sexual bullying which proves that the rate of sexual bullying at Merl
Grove High School is extremely low. This maybe as a result of the lack of masculine figures at
the school as the school is an all-girls institution. Therefore, it is safe to say that 61% and 39%
have not. Hence, it is safe to say that bullying is one of the most common issues at Merl Grove
High School.
In Figure 4, majority of the students said that suspension was the most frequently used
method of punishing bullies. The minority of the students said that detention was used as a
punishment for bullying. The graph unveils that 8 students responded that the school gives order
marks as sanctions for bullying. 2 student responded that the school gives detention as a
sanction. 11 students responded that the school gives suspension as sanction for the act of
bullying. 4 students said that the school gives expulsion as a sanction for bullying at Merl Grove
High School. Therefore, according the majority of the students, to their knowledge the school
gives mostly suspension for the act of bullying at Merl Grove High School.
In Figure 5, the students responded to the means by which Merl Grove High school
makes the student knowledgeable about bullying being wrong. Based on the graph, majority of
the students agreed that guidance classed is the most frequently used method of educating
students on bullying being wrong. Minority of the sample agreed that posters are the most
frequently used method of educating students on bullying being wrong. The diagram reveals that
11 students agreed that Guidance class is aid in making the school population knowledgeable
about bully being wrong which represents 44% of the sample. 5 students agreed that Signs aided
in making the school population knowledgeable about bullying being wrong which represents
20% of the sample. 4 students agreed that presentations in the assembly aided in making the
school population knowledgeable about bullying being wrong which represents 16% of the
sample. 3 students agreed that speeches from visitors aided in making the school population
knowledgeable about bullying being wrong which represents 12% of the sample. 2 students
agreed that posters aided in making the school population knowledgeable about bullying being
wrong which represents 8% of the sample. This may be because the posters are recognizable
In Figure 6, the students indicated the type of bullying that encountered varying from
cyberbullying, verbal bullying, physical bullying and sexual bullying. Majority of the respondent
agreed that verbal bullying was the most common bullying they received. Minority of student
agreed that physical bullying was the most common type of bullying they received. Fortunately
no student indicated that they were sexually bullied. The graph is a representation of the 15
students who said they were bullied as only these students were able to answer this question.
According to the graph, 6 students said that they received verbal bullying. 5 students said they
received cyberbullying, 4 students said they received physical bullying and 0 students said they
In Figure 7, the students indicated how often they were bullied. Majority of the students
said not at all. This is probably due to the fact that 10 students had indicated that they were never
bullied in question number 4, “Have you ever been bullied?” which represents 40% of the
sample. Minority of the students indicated that they were bullied not so regularly and every other
day as these two options received the same amount of responses.9 students said that they were
everyday which represents 36% of the sample. 2 students said they were bullied not so regular,
another 2 said they were bullied every other day and another 2 said they were bullied once a
In Figure 8, the students indicated how bullying someone made them feel. This question
was answered by the 5 students who indicated that they have been antagonizers sometime in the
past. Majority of the students said that they felt powerful and good; while the minority said they
felt normal. 2 students said that they felt good after bullying a person and another 2 said they felt
powerful. This represent 40% each of the 5 students from the sample. 1 student said they felt
normal after bullying a person which represents 20% of the sample. 0 students said they felt bad
after bullying which represent 0% of the sample. As a result, it can be concluded that after
bullying most antagonizer feel powerful and good about their actions.
In Figure 9, the students gave their rates to their tolerance to bullying. Majority of the
students had a low tolerance for bullying; while the minority had a high tolerance for bullying.
With reference to the graph 15 students responded with 1 saying that they had an extremely low
tolerance for bullying. 4 students responded with 2 saying they had a low toleration for bullying.
Another 4 students responded saying that they had an averaged toleration for bullying. 2 students
responded with 4 saying that they tolerated bullying; while 0 students responded with 5 saying
that they sought no problem with bullying. Therefore, it can be concluded that majority of the
students who participated in this research had a low tolerance for bullying.
In Figure 10, the students gave their responses to whether or not they spoke up about
being bullied. This question was answered by the 15 students who indicated that they have been
bullied before. Majority of the students indicated that they did; while the minority indicated that
they did not. According to the chart, 9 students said ‘Yes’ they spoke up for themselves; this
represents 60% of the sample. 6 students said ‘No’ they did not speak up for themselves; this
represents 40% of the sample. Thus, it can be conclude that over a half of the students from the
Bullying”, “bullying is a distinctive pattern of harming and humiliating others, specifically those
who are in some way smaller, weaker, and younger or in any way more vulnerable than the
bully”. Bullying has become a prevailing issue in secondary schools as the year passes; one such
school is the Merl Grove High School located on constant spring road. Merl Grove High School
is a prestigious institution which offers many educational experiences for secondary school
student in Jamaica. However, over the years it has been struggling with bullying as technology
and society continues to improve. Thus, a well-coordinated research was done to investigate this
matter. During the research many conclusions were made and the topic being studied proved the
evidence of bullying in Merl Grove High school. Therefore, the nature of bullying, the different
sanctions available for an antagonizer; as well as how bullying affects students' social behavior;
and what motivates students to bully each other at Merl Grove High School will be discussed
Based on the data retrieved, Merl Grove High school employs a numerous amount of
sanctions. According to Mr. Miller, the Dean of Discipline, “The topic sanctions varies: an
aggressor based on the severity of her case may be dragged to the board and then immediate
expulsion. Aggressors in the form of cyber bullying they are referred to the School Resource
Officer who will bring the matter to the attention of the cyber-crime unit of the JCF, which will
adjudicate over the matter according to find where any breach may arise. Order Marks are given
which are placed on the files of the students which are not expunged. Suspension for a maximum
of nine days; in class suspension, community service, Behavioral Modification Camps inter
alia.” However with reference to Figure 4, it can be concluded that the most common sanction
used is suspension. 11 students said that the most common form of sanction was suspension
which represents 44%, almost a half the sample population. It is quite evident that Merl Grove
High School is effective in sanctioning students for deviant acts such as bullying. However, it is
questionable to why is the school having a reoccurring issues with bullying. The answer lies
Modern societies are nothing like traditional societies as there are various types of
violence occurring over the past years. These violence may contribute to students becoming
bullies. According to an article by the gleaner, the violence in communities as aided in the
development of bullies within schools. “Jamaica has earned itself a long history of struggle with
violence which sadly, our children have not been immune to experiencing either as a victim or a
perpetrator”. These violence range from domestic violence which occurs in the home and gang
Domestic violence may be harmful to a child as the child may be victim of abuse. It is not
physical violence alone. According to the Merriam Webster Dictionary, domestic violence is
defined as any behavior the purpose of which is to gain power and control over a spouse, partner,
girl/boyfriend or intimate family member. For instance, a child seeing his father hit his mother
might see this as right and as a result starts to bully students at school in the same manner he saw
his dad treating his mother. This is a factor of poor parenting as one of a child’s learning
platform is the home. Many sociologists believes that bullying is tied to the parents’ anti-social
behavior as the actions and behaviors portrayed by adults can affect their children’s behaviors.
According to Matt DeLisi, an ISU associate professor of sociology and director of the criminal
justice program, “bullies engaged in problem behaviors that over time, add up. His studies
compares numbers of different kinds of antisocial behaviors with adults who had a history of
In addition, gang violence may also cause a child to become a bully at school, especially
if this child is a part of a community gang. According to the US Legal Dictionary, gang violence
means criminal and non-political acts of violence committed by a group of people who regularly
engage in criminal activity against innocent people. This may affect a child in the sense that the
child may bring what he was thought in the gang (harming innocent persons) to school and
majority of the respondents in Figure 8, bullying makes them feel powerful and good. This is
because this was the way they were grown by society, this is what they know.
Another common contributor to bullying is the rise in the use of the internet and social
media in modern society. According to an article from The Gleaner, by Andrea Martin Swaby,
“cyberbullying has become the most dominant form of bullying in Jamaica”. Cyberbullying is
intimidating or threatening nature. Students now a day are using the internet to target other
students instead of studying and doing homework or projects. Through social media a numerous
amount of students are trolled, called dirty or bad names and have sexual contents of themselves
being exposed to the public. This form of bullying is nothing like the traditional form of bullying
and pose a real cause of concern, as sometimes these bullies are hard to trace as they might use
fake social media accounts to bully another. With reference to Figure 6, 5 students said that they
were cyberbullied. This is 33.3% of the sample which is way too high, as it can be concluded
that 33.3% or even more of the school population receive this form for bullying. Cyberbullying
is one of the worse form of bullying as it becomes a viral or public offence. This means that
thousands of persons could be involved in making a child’s life miserable by circulating the bias
or unwanted content of another student or even making harsh comment about that student.
Peer pressure is another common factor which contributes to students becoming bullies.
According to Mr. Miller, the Dean of Discipline at Merl Grove High School, “Students patronize
and model behavior or social class, background and peer groups are some of the myriad of
factors which stem to bullying in school”. Peer pressure is a feeling that one must do the same
things as other people of one's age and social group in order to be liked or respected by them.
Students may believe that becoming a “class clown” or a person who humiliates the vulnerable
may get the majority of his peers to like him. This is also bullying as the perpetrator in this case
is making another person’s life miserable by verbally bullying for the entertainment of others. In
fact with reference to Figure 6, verbal bullying is the most common form of bullying present at
Merl Grove High School as 6 students said they were verbally bullied which is 40% of the
sample. Thus it can be concluded that verbal bullying is the most common form of bullying at
the individual. Being bullied can hold a psychological toll on students which results in isolation,
low self-esteem, bad moods, depression, substance abuse, and self-arm. According to an article
from nobullying.com, entitled “Discover the Psychological Effects of Bullying”, self- harm can
take the forms such as cutting, persistent scratching, skin picking, choking oneself, burning
oneself, substance abuse, reckless behavior, eating disorders and possible suicide. This can be
deemed as unbearable for family members and create a shock in society to know that bullying
can cause one to do such grievous acts to themselves. After being bullied students feel
unimportant, unwanted, humiliated, embarrassed, disrespected and depressed. Bullying may
cause students to become socially unstable, having no friends, not participating in class activities
etc. According to Mrs. Hunter, the guidance counsellor of Merl Grove High School, “the
students that I have interacted with within my seven years who have been victims of bullying are
usually depressed, they hate coming to school, they sometimes can't focus on their academics,
sometimes they become angry and very aggressive and there are times when they become
withdrawn.” Therefore, bullying may change a child’s life drastically especially if the bullying is
prolonged.
CONCLUSION
specifically those who are in some way smaller, weaker, and younger or in any way more
vulnerable than the bully”. Based on the data collected, it is safe to say that the sanctions used by
Merl Grove High School is efficient for the deviant action of bullying. However, the data proved
that they are not deterring the students from bullying as it is a matter of society, the internet and
peer pressure that are influencing students to bully. Merl Grove High School employs sanctions
such as order marks, detention, community services, suspension and expulsion. However
expulsion is rarely used. Therefore it can be concluded that Merl Grove High School needs to get
rid of bullies by implementing stricter sanctions such as expulsion on a regular bases in order to
reduce the issue of bullying within the school environment. As bullying is a deviant act which
may change a student’s life forever and needs to be stopped before it is too late.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
BOOKS
1. Chinapoo, Carlton, et al. “Cape Sociology Units 1 & 2”. London, UK; Hodder Education.
2015.
Educational. 2000.
3. Mustapha, Nasser. “Sociology for Caribbean Students”. Jamaica; Ian Randle Publishers.
2013.
ARTICLES
1. “Andrea Martin-Swaby | Cyberbullying A Growing Threat”. The Gleaner. June 25, 2016.
http://jamaica-gleaner.com/article/commentary/20160625/andrea-martin-swaby-cyber-bullying-
growing-threat
2. “Discover the Psychological Effects of Bullying. NoBullying.com. May 21, 2015. Web.
12 February, 2018.
https://nobullying.com/psychological-effects-of-bullying/
3. Nelson, Rayon. “Letter of the Day | Bullying Has Longer-Term Effects on Our Children”.
http://jamaica-gleaner.com/article/letters/20160630/letter-day-bullying-has-long-term-effects-
our-children
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/10/101006144505.htm
WEBSITES
http://www.acesdv.org/domestic-violence-graphics/
2. “Gang Violence Law and Legal Definition”. US Legal. Web. 10 March, 2018.
https://definitions.uslegal.com/g/gang-violence/
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/peer%20pressure
https://www.stopbullying.gov/what-is-bullying/index.html
http://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/research-design.html
6. “Understanding Bullying”. Psychology Today. Web. 10 February, 2018.
https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/basics/bullying