co» United States Patent
DeLong et al.
 
 
[US008202379B1
(10) Patent No.:
(45) Date of Patent:
US 8,202,379 BI
Jun. 19, 2012
 
(sa)
os
oO
en
@
on,
(2)
(58)
 
NATURAL FIBER WELDING
Inventors: Hugh C. DeLong, Waldorf, MD (US)
Paul C. Tralove. Annapolis, MD (US)
Luke M. Haverhals, Annapolis, MD
(US), William M. Reiehert, Annapolis,
 
 
 
MDS)
Assignoe: The United States of America as
represented by the Seeretary of the Air
Force, Washington, DC (US)
Notive: Subject o any disclaimer, the tem ofthis
patent is extended or adjusted under 35
USC 15405) by 232 days
Appl. No: 121629,918
Filed: Dee. 3, 2009
Int.
Dod 1100 (200601)
coos 5700 (200501)
us.cl 15608; 156/206; 156305
Field of Classification Search 1561296,
1560305, $3
See application file for complete search history
References Cited
US. PATENT DOCUMENTS,
1/2008. Mpftymaki ct
12009 Champ et
e216
44423
FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS
Wo 2007x2022 + y2007
wo
* cited by examiner
Primary Examiner — Katarzyna Wyrozebski Lee
Assisian Examiner —Soott W Dodds
4) Attorney, Agent, or Firm —AFMCLOAAZ: Bart
Hers
on ABSTRACT
Natural fiber welding is process by which individual bers
fre swollen by an appropriate inc igui-hased solvent sy
tem fo form a congedled network, Manipulated fibrous mate
Fials may be either composed of natal polymers such os
cellulose, hemicellulose, silk, etcetera, or synthetic poy
‘mers, oF mixed materials. The process is principally con
twolled by the composition of the solvent system which
‘includes an ionic liquid solvent pus additives such as water,
riethano, et cetera, Other conditions sve as the amouat and
placement of solvent, as wel os time, temperate, and pre
Sure contro the extent to which neighboring fibers are fsed
(aly the material atthe cuter surface of fibers need be sul
cieatly mobile tomenge withthat of neighboring fibers. Mate
rial inthe fiber cone may be leftin the native sate By conto
Ting process variables, Fiber form acongealed network upon
removal of the ionic liguid-based solvent.
 
 
10 Claims, 9 Drawing SheetsUS. Patent Jun. 19,2012 Sheet 1 of 9 US 8,202,379 B1US. Patent Jun. 19,2012 Sheet 2 of 9 US 8,202,379 B1US. Patent Jun. 19,2012 Sheet 3 of 9 US 8,202,379 B1
or
osUS. Patent Jun, 19, 2012 Sheet 4 of 9 US 8,202,379 BI
1
|
4000
  
  
Intensity (Counts)
20 25 30 35
20 (Degrees) Fig. 5
D.
\
 
37503500 3250 3000 4500 1250 1000 750 500
Wave Number (cm) Fig. 6US. Patent Jun. 19,2012 Sheet 5 of 9 US 8,202,379 B1
LarnerUS. Patent Jun. 19,2012 Sheet 6 of 9 US 8,202,379 B1US. Patent Jun. 19,2012 Sheet 7 of 9 US 8,202,379 B1
 
Fig. 10
 
Fig. 1US. Patent Jun. 19,2012 Sheet 8 of 9 US 8,202,379 B1
ee i ee Aaa ee)
eae TE Ze ))US. Patent Jun. 19,2012 Sheet 9 of 9 US 8,202,379 B1US 8,202,379 BI
1
NATURAL FIBER WELDING
RIGHTS OF THE GOVERNMENT
The invention described herein may be manufactur and
used by or for the Government of the United States forall
‘governmental purposes without the payment of any royalty
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The invention relates tothe partial dissolution of nator
fibers forthe purposes of structural and chemieal mexiiea-
Synthetic polymers such as polystyrene are routinely
welled using solvents suchas dichloromethane. Natural fiber
‘welding isa process by which biopolymer fibers are fused in
manner roughly analogous to traditional plastic welding.
Prior io the discovery that ioe igus Ge, I-ethy1--melh-
‘ylimidazolium acetate) ean dissolve biopolymers (i.e celhi-
 
jose and silk) without derivatization, there were no analogous. 2
solvents for natural materials In ddition tothe wilizaton of
an ionic liquid, control over the presence and amount of
molecular additives (ie, Water, methanol, et etera)is essen-
til to controlling solvent ellicae. The demonsiration of pro-
‘ess contro] by careful manipulation of molecular additives is
‘fundamental feature that set this vention apart from pre
vious work. (Previous disclosures and patents exclusively
invoke the utilization of neat or pure” fone Higuids and do
not recognize the vital importance of molecular additive con-
trol)
“There are many examples in both literature and patents of
biopolymer solutions tit ae east inlo molds 1 create a
desired shape, In al ofthese cases, the biopolymer is com=
pletely dissolved so thatthe orginal structure is fully dis-
rupted. With fiber welding, the fiber interior is intentionally
Teft in its native state. This is potentially advantagoous
beau the final stractre retains some of te orginal mate=
Fial properties and is significant for creating materials from
biopolymers such as silk and cellulose
Traditional methods of east molding biopolymer solutions
are also disadvantaged in that there is a piysical limit to how
‘uch polymer can be dissolved in solution, Typically, soln-
tions that are 10% by mas biopolymer (80% by mass ionie
liquid solvent) are generally quite viscous and difficult to
handle, even at elevated temperatures. The fiber welding pro-
‘ess allows (dry) fiber bundles to be manipulated into the
‘desired shape before welding commences. Te use and han
‘ding of native fibers often grants contol aver the engineering
‘of the final product that is not posible for solution based
technologies
 
 
 
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The invention is @ process by which individual natural
fibers such as cellulose, chitin, chitosan, collagen, hemicel-
lulose, lignin, silk et cetera are swollen by an appropriate
ionie liquid-based solvent system, and then revonsiuted 0
form a congealed network. A cartoon of the fiber welding
process is shown in FIG. 1. During welding, fiber bundles are
swelled and mobilized by an appropriate inie liquid-based
solvent system, for example, l-ethy13-methylimidazolium
(4) acetate (~, abbreviated [EMI] [Ac], with molecular add-
tives (aot shown), Nove that only the polymer atthe outer
surface need be sifficently mobile to merge with that of
neighboring fibers; materia in the fiber eore may be Fein its
native state, The depth of solvent penetration and the degree
to which fibers are welded together is controled by the nature
2
(composition) and amount of solvent, temperature, pressure,
spacing ofthe fibers, t cetera Solventremoval leaves welded
fibers. In ation to polymer movement, chemical deivati-
ation may also be underiakea ding this process. In general,
the process increases the material density and decreases the
surface area ofa bundle of fibers, The mobilized fer sheath
may be modified with materials such as clay, carbon nano-
tubes, ron oxide, titanium dioxide, etcetera, aft elec-
‘onic, spectroscopic, thermal conductivity, magnetism, and
antibacterial properties, Inadition to repiospecii alteration
of the physical properties, spatial eontol of chemical prop-
tees is also possible. Chemical properties (e. hydropho-
reactivity) atthe fiber surface may be ether similar,
‘or significantly different from the eore (ative fiber) depend.
ing on choice of derivatization.
 
 
 
[BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS:
FIG. 1s carton of the fiber welding process.
FIG. 2 shows images of cotton eylinders before and after
fiber welding with an [EMI] [Ac]-based solvent system,
FIG. 3 shows SEM images of intersecting cotton thread at
IG. 4 shows SEM images of intersecting cotton thread at
various teatment times.
FIG. is aplot of powder XRD data for native and treated
cotton cloth,
FIG. 6is a plot of FTIR spectra data for native and treated
cotton cloth
FIG. 7 shows SEM images of untreated and treated silk
fibers.
IG. 8 shows SEM images of untreated and treated cotton
fibers,
FIG.9 shows images of silk belore and after fiber welding
‘with an [EMI] [Ac]-based solvent system.
IG. 10 shows a spring made of hemp.
FIG. 1 shows examples of “alucless sewing”.
FIG. 12 shows SEM images of filler paper treated to
‘manipulate the pote size.
FIG. 13 shows SEM images of cotton cloth modified with
1 surface cot of clay
 
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
 
[Natural fiber welding isa processing technique by which
natural fibers areswollen by an appropriate onic Higuid-based
solvent system for the purpose of subsequent physical or
chemical manipulation. The solvent system must be capable
of interrupting intermolecular bonding (atleast patil) 10
‘pea and mobilize (solvate) the polymer far modification
Molecular additives such as water, methanol, et ceter are
meticulously controlled to modify the solvent eiaey. Add
tionally, the amount of solvent (relative to polymer) is often
intentionally Kept low to Tmitthe degree to which materials
‘are modi, Theonic iquid-based solvent may be removed
tither by a second solvent system or by evaporation if the
Welding solvent is sufficiuy volatile. (The evaporation rate
‘nay be increased significantly by placing the sample under
vacuum.)
Asused herein the term “ionic liquid” refers to aliquid that
is comprised of anions and cations. lonic liquids areattractive
solvents s they re non-volatile, non-flammable, havea high
‘hermal stability, are relatively inexpensive to manufacture,
are environmentally friendly, and can be used to provide
treater control and flexibility inthe overall processing meth-
‘odology. Ionic liquids of interest exist as Fguids well below
‘oom temperature up toa temperature a high s 200°C. US.US 8,202,379 BI
patent application Ser. No, 11/326,678, filed on Dee, 29,
2005, and incorporated herein by reference, contains mumer-
‘ous examples of suitable joni figuid solvents for use inthe
present invention. Preferably the sone liquid solvents have
‘melling points below 150° C.- more preferably, below about
10"
As used herein the term “ionic liquid-based solvent” refers
to aliquid containing anionic liquid mixed with at least one
‘other molseular component. Molecular components can be
solvents such as water, methanol, etcetera that ean strongly
interact withthe cations andor anions ofthe fone liquid.
The method for natural fer welding comprises partially
lissolving either biopolymers or synthedc polymers with a
molten ionic liguid-based solvent wherein Said ionic lg
solvent component is comprised of cations andanionsandhas
‘smelting point below 150° C, Theionieliquid-based solvents
utilized eontain molecular species that modify solvent
‘cacy (with respect to dissolution of polymers), Whereas pre
Vous work (patents) teach and detail the use of neat (pure)
joie liquids, the present disclosure details the uilization of
systems that are fone Tiquid(s) with a lest one molecular
‘component, The addition molecular components allow pro
‘cessing to be accomplished with much improved levels of
‘contol and are essential to the reation of advanced compos=
ite materials. Additionally, ionic liquids may be diluted by a
molecular solvent (generally @ non-solvent forthe partially
«dissolved polymer materials such thatthe partial dissolution
process of the biopolymers or synthetic polymer materials
‘Commences pon removal ofthe diluent by heating o simple
‘evaporation. The diluent may be a molecular solvent such as
Water, alcohols, or kotones (or mixture ofthese). The solvent
system partially dissolves biopolymer or synthetic polymer
materials o fom a congealed network, Removal ofthe ini
Tiquid-based solvents generally accomplished by combining
‘hemixturewith lage excess of non-solveat forth partially
dissolved polymer materials that lecches the tonic liquid nto
‘a pase separate Fom the solidified materials. This washing
method removes any excess ionic liquid-based solvents from
the fiber surface as well as dialyzing away the solvent system
from the congested fiber network. Solvents used to remove
theionie liquid) from treated materials are generally similar
to those previously mentioned as potential molecular diluents
(Ge, water, meianol),
“The Fiber welding process facilitates the eretion of func-
tional sractures from the controlled fusion of brous threads,
woven materials, or fbsous mats. The physical and chemical
properties of said material are reproducibly manipulated by
rigorous conteol ofthe amount a fone liguid-based solvent
applied, the duration of exposure to ionic liquid temperature,
the temperature and pressure applied during the treatment
“Materials may be joined to ereate laminate stroctres with
proper contol of process variables. The surface of these
materials may be preferentially modified while leaving some
‘of the material in the native state. Surface modifiations ray
include manipulation of Uke material surface chemistry
sliretlyorindiretly by theadditionof particles to impart the
‘desired physical or chemical properties.
‘An example of the fiber welding process is detailed in FIG.
2 and includes images of cotton eylinders before (A), and
after (B,C, and D) fiber welding with a solvent system con-
taining I-chyl-3-methylimidvolium acetate ([EMI] [Ac]
and water. Cotton thread (Wellington 3 Tb Twisted Cotton
Post Tivine) was coiled around atest ube (A) and was soaked
ina batho the joni liqnid-hased solvent for several minttes
Cotton coils were removed from ba, excess solvent was
ently brushed away, and Were placed in an oven at 6 C. for
‘one, two, and three days, respectively. Coils were then
 
    
 
 
 
 
 
 
»
4
Jmmersed in double disiled water for shout 12 hours upon
removal from theoven (endo treatment). Water in the cog
Jatin bath was replaced several times to fully remove the
‘nie liquid. Upon remeval of the ionic liquid, the coils were
placed in an oven at 80° C. While drying, the coils were
‘observed to contract and densify to create solid cylinders,
Image B shows throe cylinders after processing. Cylinder BI
has boon exposed to the solvent system for | day ylinder 2
or 2 days, and eylinder B3 for 3 days. Note that the contra
tion ofthe eylinerength is greater for longerexposures. Dry
cplinders were observe to bestrong and stiff. Pancls Cad D
show Seanning Elzetron Microscopy (SEM) images of the
«eross-section of several threads from one ofthe welded ey
Inder (eylinder B3)- Image shows thatthe outer portion of
tech thread has been fised to its neighbors. Image D shows
that individual fibers that make up each thread arealso welded
together and contribute to te treated coils enanood cigiity
1. Important Fiber Welding Variables
Inaditiontothe choice of solvent andthe typeof material
‘eeated, three process variables principally determine the out-
comcof the welding process time (of treatment) temperatire
(oftreatment, and the concentration of solvent eatin of sol-
vent t© treated material). The impact of each variable is
described in the examples that follow,
1A Treatment Time
FIG. 3 shows SEM images of the intersection of cotton
threads (cellulose) welded together by exposure to an [EMI]
[Acl-based solvent system, Junctions wer exposed 1950.
‘of[EMI] [Ac] after which the solvent is removed by immer
sion in water Image A shows a native (untreated) cotton
thread junetion, Image B shows a similar juetion after five
minutes of treatment followed by a thorough ine in water
remove the ionic Higuid-base solvent Images Cand D show
junetions after treatments of twenty and eighty minutes,
respectively, As evident inthe images, threads are progres-
sively joined with inereasing exposure time to the solvent
system. FIG, 4 shows SEM images fora similar experiment
with hemp fibers. (Hemp differs from eotton in the composi-
tion of cellulose, hemicelluloses, and Hignin.) Panel A shows
the native intersection while panels B,C, and D show june-
‘ions treated with ~$0 pL of [EMI] [Ac] at 60° C. for five,
twenty, and eighty minutes, respectively. As with cotton,
hemp fibers fuse more completely asthe exposure time to
[EMI] [Ac] increases
1B, Tresiment Temperature
Imaddition to treatment time, temperature i also extremely
Jmportant in determining the extent to whieh fibers are modi-
fied during the welding process. X-Ray Didimction (XRD)
(FIG. 8 and Table D, Fourier Transform Infrared Spectros-
copy (FTIR) (FIG. 6), and tensile testing (Table TT) data
comparing welded cotton cloth aid to quantify the effect of
temperature and time on the welding process.
The model system studied was Regency 22 eount cotton
loth processed with 1.3 g [FMI] [Ac]-based solvent (with
‘addvional water and aoetie aeid 0 congo! solvent system
elicaey) applied per em? of cloth for five, ten, and thirty
‘ines at room temperature and 80° C., respectively. Note
that the applied rate of ionic liquid is similar to the cotton
cloths density and thatthe cloth was stretched and pinned
‘over a rigid polystyrene plate during processing to prevent
Significant contaction of tated samples, The ionic Tiguid-
based solvent was removed by immersion in water. small
pieee of cloth was also completely dissolved (in [EMI] [Ac]-
based solvent) and then reconstituted in water for compar
tive purposes.US 8,202,379 BI
5
Powder XRD data (FIG, 5 and Table 1) show structural
‘changes occurring with time and temperature of treatment.
Plot designations in FIG. § are as follows: A~native cloth,
B-welded 30 min at 20° C,, C-welded 5 min at 80° C,
D=cloth that was completely dissolved and then reconst
tuted. The patter for native cotton (curve A) is typical for