1 Stability
1 Stability
Keywords
1. Introduction
The term "current" in current good manufacturing practises (cGMP) refers to the current
good manufacturing practises regulations, not the previous or following regulations. From a
regulatory standpoint, a product may be considered adulterated if the production conditions
were less stringent than those that are currently acknowledged and widely followed by the
industry. cGMP requirements refer to the circumstances in which the product is made, not to
the state in which it is delivered. If products are not made in accordance with cGMP, they
1
may be considered adulterated. Therefore, stability study is a cGMP tool that indirectly links
high-quality products to a company's reputation on the world market.[2]
The safety of patients is ensured by drug quality stability testing. It guarantees the security of
pharmaceutical dose forms with regard to the sick patients. Developmental stability studies
offer a data base that may be helpful in choosing an appropriate formulation to estimate shelf
life, container closure mechanism, and storage conditions for new product development.
Stability tests are crucial for determining the calibre of a modified or repackaged drug
product since they assess the appearance and physical characteristics (such as colour, caking,
hardness, phase separation, and re-suspendability), potency, and purity of a drug product over
its specified shelf-life.
2
To assure that optimally stable molecules and products are manufactured, distributed and
given to the patients, the regulatory authorities in several countries have made provisions in
the drug regulations for the submission of stability data by the manufacturers. Its basic
purpose was to bring in uniformity in testing from manufacturer to manufacturer. These
guidelines include basic issues related to stability, the stability data requirements for
application dossier and the steps for their execution. Such guidelines were initially issued in
1980s. These were later harmonized (made uniform) in the International Conference on
Harmonization (ICH) in order to overcome the bottleneck to market and register the products
in other countries. The ICH was a consortium formed with inputs from both regulatory and
industry from European commission, Japan and USA. The World Health Organization
(WHO), in 1996, modified the guidelines because the ICH guidelines did not address the
extreme climatic conditions found in many countries and it only covered new drug substances
and products and not the already established products that were in circulation in the WHO
umbrella countries. In June 1997, US FDA also issued a guidance document entitled
‘Expiration dating of solid oral dosage form containing Iron. WHO, in 2004, also released
guidelines for stability studies in global environment (WHO, 2004). ICH guidelines were also
extended later for veterinary products. A technical monograph on stability testing of drug
substances and products existing in India has also been released by India Drug Manufacturers
Association. Further, different test condition and requirements have been given in the
guidance documents for active pharmaceutical ingredients, drug products or formulations and
excipient. The codes and titles covered under ICH guidance have been outlined in the table
[3]
3
acceleration levels to reduce prediction error. Increasing the number of levels is a good
strategy for reducing error. [1]
2. 5. Photostability Testing
Photostability testing should be conducted on at least one primary batch of the drug product if
appropriate. Proof that the products do not or not significantly change within a certain period
of use must, among other things, is provided through the photo-stability test with light. For
this purpose, binder offers the complete solution on the market - the KBF with standard
equipment of ICH-conforming lighting. The special international ICH guideline Q1B was
created for proving photo-stability. Since the fulfillment of this guideline must now
mandatorily be documented by the authorities without exception, pharmaceutical companies
are faced by new challenges in this regard in their test practices. For the new photo-stability
tests, samples must be exposed to a light amount of 1.2 million Lux x hours, as well as UV
radiation of 200 Watt x hours /m2 , in climatic chambers with ICH lighting. But what is the
most objective method of proving these light values? The fundamental prerequisite for
reliable recording is the integration and display of the light values on the regulator, as in the
binder KBF series with ICH lighting. This includes the automatic shutoff of the lamps (VIS
and UV separately) when the freely selectable dosage values are reached. Reliable recording
4
of the light amounts is provided at binder with Light Quantum Control, two spherical light
sensors which, due to their direction-independent characteristics, function more precisely
than planar sensors.[1][6]
Characterization
Quantification:
Toxicological Evaluation:
Source Identification
Risk Assessment
Control Strategies
Regulatory Compliance
Stability Studies
Continued Monitoring
As per ICH
5
2. To identify structure and toxicity and to set up specification of degradants or
impurities.
3. To propose shelf life of the product without real-time stability information.
4. To optimize formulations and to select placebos for drug product to avoid
interference.
5. To justify impurities that are process related or degradation products.
6. To support identification of root cause during out-of-specification (OOS)/lab
investigations.
7. To accompany drug master file and ANDA/NDA and IND submissions to the FDA.
[10]
Case Studies A lean stability strategy can take many forms. It should be product specific, dependent
on the stage of development and reflect the product knowledge available at the time. In the clinical
development phase, while development is under way and changes and improvements are constant,
this may take the form of utilizing predictive tools and/or confirmatory studies to demonstrate a
change does not impact stability rather than reinitiating a long-term stability protocol, to justify re-
test period or shelf-life, or to identify which tests are stability indicating. In the registration phase, a
6
lean strategy may leverage the cumulative clinical and registration stability data to justify reducing
the tests, time points and/or storage conditions that are necessary to monitor stability on an annual
basis. In the postapproval phase, product knowledge and stability understanding are highest and
there are many opportunities to leverage lean strategies to support a change. Following are
examples of case studies collected during each phase of development.
clinical development
Case Study 1
In this case study, the drug substance stability data were used to support drug in capsule
(DiC) product. The scope of the project spanned across 5 small molecules with drug in
capsule formulations. The FDA Guidance for Industry, cGMP for Phase 1 Investigational Drugs
(U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 2008) allows representative samples of phase 1
investigational drugs to be used to monitor stability and quality
Case Study 2
In this case study, accelerated short-term stability comparison studies were leveraged for
subsequent drug substance campaigns with minimal synthetic route changes. An internal risk
assessment was performed to determine the potential impact of the synthetic route
changes. This assessment was then used to inform the comparative stability study. The study
design consisted of a short term, typically 2 weeks to 1 month, accelerated stability study to
establish comparability of a new batch of drug substance back to the original drug substance
batch.
Case Study 3
An approach used to support many drug substance in bottle regulatory filings is provision of
3 weeks of drug substance stability data at 70 °C/75%RH in the initial clinical submission to
justify a 15-month drug substance retest period.
Case Study 4
Exclusion of assay testing has been routinely proposed in CTAs in situations where the drug
substance stability batch is the same as the reference standard batch
registration,
Case Study 5
A registration strategy for drug product primary stability was developed to support seven
different dosage strengths (compositionally proportional) where each dosage had two
packaging configurations. An ICH Q1D bracketing design was proposed to support the NDA
submission and was agreed to during a pre-NDA type C meeting with US FDA.
Case Study 6
7
A proposal to use a bracketing design according to ICH Q1D for an NDA submission was
agreed to by US FDA at an End of Phase 2 type B meeting. This program had five different
dosage strengths with the same (compositionally proportional) formulation and packaging
configuration
Case Study 7
An NDA was submitted for a complex modified release (MR) product with multiple strengths
in capsules manufactured from common pellets. The primary stability data supported an
initial shelf life of 36 months. The NDA did not include a protocol commitment to confirm
expiry, since the primary stability batches were manufactured at the commercial site and
commercial scale.
Case Study 8
A stable, well-understood drug product (IR (Immediate Release) capsule) was filed with a
standard primary stability protocol and data to support the initial shelf-life claim. An
alternate proposal was made for the post-approval stability protocol. To limit wasted supplies
for a low-volume commercial program, the applicant proposed to utilize non-printed
capsules for 2 of the 3 lots for 2 of the 3 strengths.
post-approval.
Case Study 9
In this case study, a lean stability strategy was applied for post approval/annual stability
batches of a small molecule oral drug substance and drug product. Only the long-term
storage condition was required, and no data was proposed to be collected for the
accelerated storage condition.
Case Study 10
This case study relates to a large product family in semipermeable containers, spanning
multiple US regulatory filings, separated into multiple categories based on formulation,
container type and filling volume.
Case Study 11
1 This case study covers the submission of a registration stability package for a biologic in
accordance with the recommended batch enrollment and timepoint frequency prescribed by
ICH Q5C [18] and ICH Q1D [2].
Case Study 12
A science- and risk-based stability strategy was developed to support a drug substance
manufacturing site change for a marketed small molecule solid oral dosage form product.
8
There were no changes to the drug substance manufacturing process associated with the site
change, and there were no proposed changes to the drug product. [12]
3.1.Complexity of Formulations
When the units of the population are not in homogeneous, the sampling technique will be
unscientific. In sampling, though the number of cases is small, it is not always easy to stick to
the, selected cases. The units of sample may be widely dispersed.
Some of the cases of sample may not cooperate with the researcher and some others may be
inaccessible. Because of these problems, all the cases may not be taken up. The selected cases
may have to be replaced by other cases. Changeability of units stands in the way of results of
the study
9
The design and execution of formal stability studies should follow the principles outlined in the parent
guideline. The purpose of a stability study is to establish, based on testing a minimum of three batches
of the drug substance or the veterinary medicinal product, a retest period or shelf life and label storage
instructions applicable to all future batches manufactured and packaged under similar circumstances.
The degree of variability of individual batches affects the confidence that a future production batch
will remain within acceptance criteria throughout its retest period or shelf life. Although normal
manufacturing and analytical variations are to be expected, it is important that the veterinary
medicinal product be formulated with the intent to provide 100 percent of the labeled amount of the
drug substance at the time of batch release. If the assay values of the batches used to support the
registration application are higher than 100 percent of label claim at the time of batch release, after
taking into account manufacturing and analytical variations, the shelf life proposed in the application
can be overestimated. On the other hand, if the assay value of a batch is lower than 100 percent of
label claim at the time of batch release, it might fall below the lower acceptance criterion before the
end of the proposed shelf life.[12]
Predictive modelling can be used alongside shelf-life testing of real-life samples, for example
using challenge testing. Challenge testing involves deliberately inoculating a product with
relevant microorganisms and assessing their growth over time. This approach considers all
factors that may influence growth. Predictive modelling, however, will usually only consider
three factors – pH, aw and temperature.
There are several statements about the elements of QbD, the most widely accepted is that,
QbD consists of the following parameters
Quality Target Product Profile (QTPP): including dosage form, delivery systems, dosage
strength(s), etc. It is a prospective summary of quality characteristics of a drug product to be
10
achieved, taking into account dosage strength(s) and container closure system of the drug
product, together with the attributes affecting pharmacokinetic characteristics (e.g.,
dissolution, aerodynamic performance) and drug product quality criteria (e.g., sterility, purity,
stability and drug release) appropriate for the intended marketed product.
Critical Process Parameters (CPPs): parameters monitored before or in process that influence
the appearance, impurity, and yield of final product significantly. [15]
Automated Testing
Predictive Maintenance
Quality Control
AI is also being used in quality control to identify defects in products. With AI-powered
tools, businesses can analyze data from product inspections and detect defects that would
11
otherwise go unnoticed. AI-powered quality control systems can also provide insights into the
root cause of defects, enabling businesses to make the necessary changes to prevent them
from happening again.
AI-powered image and speech recognition technologies are also being used in quality
assurance. For example, image recognition can be used to identify defects in products by
analyzing images of the products. Similarly, speech recognition can be used to analyze
customer feedback and identify areas where improvements can be made.
Fraud Detection
Finally, AI is being used in quality assurance to detect fraud. AI-powered fraud detection
systems can analyze large volumes of data and identify patterns that indicate fraudulent
activity. This helps businesses to prevent fraudulent transactions and maintain the integrity of
their products and services. [16]
Mass Spectrometry (MS): Coupling HPLC with Mass Spectrometry allows for the
identification and structural characterization of drug compounds and degradation products.
MS is highly sensitive and provides information on molecular weight and fragmentation
patterns.
Gas Chromatography (GC): GC is used for the analysis of volatile compounds and can be
valuable in stability testing for certain drug formulations.
12
Raman Spectroscopy: Raman spectroscopy is a non-destructive technique that can provide
information about molecular vibrations, offering insights into the stability of drug
formulations.
X-ray Diffraction (XRD): XRD is used to study the crystallinity of drug substances and
formulations, which can impact stability.
Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC): DSC measures the heat flow associated with
thermal transitions, aiding in the detection of phase changes and drug degradation.
Dynamic Light Scattering (DLS): DLS is utilized to determine the particle size distribution of
drug formulations, which can influence stability.
Stability-Indicating Assays: These assays are designed to detect and quantify specific
degradation products, ensuring that the analytical method used is selective and capable of
accurately assessing drug stability.
Accelerated Stability Studies: Advanced mathematical modeling and statistical methods are
used to extrapolate stability data obtained from accelerated conditions to predict long-term
stability.
Multivariate Data Analysis: This technique allows for the simultaneous analysis of multiple
parameters, making it possible to identify patterns and correlations that may impact drug
stability.
Stability in terms of nanoparticle morphology can be assessed from changes in atomic crystal
lattice and surface facets. These are most often monitored using X-ray diffraction99 or high-
resolution transmission electron microscopy (HR-TEM) [17]
Stability testing for biologics involves monitoring the drug product's physical, chemical, and
biological properties over time to assess its degradation pathways and determine the
appropriate storage conditions.
Accelerated stability studies, where the drug is subjected to elevated temperature, humidity,
and light, are commonly used to predict long-term stability.
Biosimilars are biologic drugs that are highly similar to an already approved reference
biologic (the originator) but are not identical due to their inherent complexity.
Stability testing for biosimilars is critical to demonstrate that they maintain similar quality
and efficacy to the reference biologic over time.
Regulatory authorities require extensive comparative stability data between the biosimilar
and the reference product to establish similarity.
Studies may involve head-to-head comparisons, forced degradation studies, and stress testing
to evaluate the biosimilar's stability and degradation pathways. [18]
Vaccine stability testing assesses the physical, chemical, and biological properties of vaccines
over time to determine their shelf life and storage conditions.It ensures that vaccines maintain
their potency and effectiveness, as the loss of efficacy can lead to inadequate protection
against diseases.
14
2. Parameters Evaluated in Vaccine Stability Testing:
Potency
Physical Properties.
Chemical Stability
Temperature Sensitivity
Packaging Compatibility
4. Regulatory Guidelines
Regulatory agencies, such as the World Health Organization (WHO), the U.S. Food and Drug
Administration (FDA), and the European Medicines Agency (EMA), provide guidelines for
vaccine stability testing.
After a vaccine is approved and marketed, manufacturers continue to monitor its stability in
real-world storage and distribution conditions through post-marketing surveillance.
Maintaining a proper cold chain is crucial for vaccines that are sensitive to temperature. This
involves careful storage, transportation, and handling to preserve vaccine stability. [19]
Labelling
Impact on generics
15
Justification recommendation
Harmonization Efforts: The International Council for Harmonisation (ICH) continues to work
on global harmonization of regulatory requirements to facilitate drug development and
registration.
ICH Q12: The development of the ICH Q12 guideline aims to promote a flexible approach to
managing post-approval changes in pharmaceutical product lifecycle.
ICH Q3D: Implementation of the ICH Q3D guideline on Elemental Impurities sets limits for
toxic elements in drug products to ensure patient safety.
ICH Q8-Q12 Implementation: Various ICH guidelines, such as Q8, Q9, Q10, and Q11, are
established to enhance pharmaceutical development and manufacturing practices.
Real-World Evidence (RWE): Regulatory agencies explore the use of real-world evidence to
support drug approvals and post-approval decision-making. [21]
Accelerated Approval: Used by the FDA in the U.S. and similar pathways in other regions.
Based on surrogate endpoints or reasonably likely clinical benefits. Conditional approval with
post-approval confirmatory trials.
Conditional Marketing Authorization: Used in the European Union by the EMA. Applicable
for life-threatening or seriously debilitating diseases without satisfactory treatments. Based
on preliminary data with ongoing data submission requirements for full authorization [22]
Pfizer's Prevnar 13® vaccine is used to prevent pneumococcal disease in children and adults.
Stability testing played a critical role in the approval and commercial success of the vaccine.
Through extensive stability studies, Pfizer demonstrated that the vaccine remained stable and
16
maintained its efficacy throughout its shelf life, ensuring its safety and effectiveness for
patients. [23]
Pfizer withdrew its pain reliever, Bextra, from the market due to concerns about
cardiovascular risks and adverse skin reactions. The withdrawal was followed by FDA
warnings and legal actions.
Lesson Learned: Comprehensive stability testing should include ongoing safety evaluations
and assessments of potential risks to identify and mitigate adverse effects early on in a drug's
lifecycle.[24]
Temperature:
High Temperatures: Elevated temperatures can accelerate chemical reactions, leading to the
degradation of drug molecules. This degradation can result in the formation of impurities,
loss of potency, or changes in drug composition.
Low Temperatures: Extremely low temperatures, such as freezing, can cause physical
changes in drug formulations, like crystallization or phase separation, affecting the product's
appearance and stability.
Humidity:
Humidity, or the moisture content in the environment, can accelerate chemical reactions,
promote microbial growth, and cause physical changes in drug formulations. Moisture-
sensitive drugs may undergo hydrolysis, where the water molecules break down the drug's
active ingredient. High humidity levels can also cause tablets or capsules to soften, dissolve,
or become moldy, compromising their stability and safety [25]
17
Light Exposure:
Visible Light: Visible light can induce photochemical reactions in drug molecules, leading to
the formation of reactive intermediates and degradation products. This can result in a
decrease in drug potency and changes in the drug's chemical structure.
UV Light: Ultraviolet (UV) light, especially in the UV-C and UV-B ranges, can be highly
damaging to drug compounds. UV light can break chemical bonds, leading to significant
degradation and loss of therapeutic activity.
Fluorescent Light: Fluorescent light sources, commonly found in indoor environments, can
emit UV radiation that may cause drug degradation over time.
Photostability Testing:
Photostability testing is a crucial aspect of stability testing for drugs, particularly for light-
sensitive compounds.
These studies are designed to evaluate the drug's susceptibility to photodegradation under
specific light conditions, simulating the light exposure that the drug may encounter during
storage, transportation, or use
Oxidation:
Oxidation of Alcohols: Alcohols present in drug molecules can undergo oxidation to form
aldehydes or ketones.
Refrence
1. Parkar bhagyashree, et al., 2015 Recent trends in stability testing of pharmaceutical
products a review RJPBS 6 (1) 1557-1569
2. The GCC Guidelines for Stability Testing of Drug Substance and pharmaceutical
products edition 2 1428H 2007 G
3. Ajay Malik ,Vipin Kumar,Renu,Sunil,Tarun Kumar. J Chem Pharm Res
2011;3(2):892-898.
4. Agraval Vipul, Sharma Devesh. J Pharm Sci Innov 2012;1(2); 18-23
5. Sanjay Bajaj. J App Pharm Sci 2012;2(3):129-138
6. Asean Guideline on stability study of drug,Version 6.0,Update Version May 2013
18
7. Dr. Venkat Shinde, https://veeprho.com/author/venkatshinde/
8. Maninderjit Kaur, Gurpreet Kaur, Harpreet Kaur,Saurav Sharma, Overview on
stability studies Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, District . Jalandhar, Punjab,
India
9. Singh, Anita & Afreen, Sadaf & Dhirendra, Pratap & Singh, & Kumar, Rajeev.
(2017). A REVIEW ON PHARMACEUTICAL IMPURITIES AND THEIR
IMPORTANCE *Corresponding Author. WORLD JOURNAL OF PHARMACY
AND PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES. 6647. 1337-1354. 10.20959/wjpps201710-
10280.
10. An Introduction To Forced Degradation Studies For Drug Substance & Drug Product
By Vinubhai N. Patolia January 9, 2020
11. https://www.melbecmicrobiology.co.uk/services/stability-compatibility-testing/
12. Carstensen, J.T., “Stability and Dating of Solid Dosage Forms” Pharmaceutics of
Solids and Solid Dosage Forms, Wiley-Interscience, 182-185, 1977
13. E book of https://www.campdenbri.co.uk/blogs/predictive-modelling.php
14. Rasane, P., Jha, A., & Sharma, N. (2015). Predictive modelling for shelf life
determination of nutricereal based fermented baby food. Journal of food science and
technology, 52(8), 5003–5011. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-014-1545-x
15. Lan zhang, shirui mao (2017) Application of quality by design in the current drug
development AJPS 12, 1 ; 1-8
16. https://www.aeologic.com/blog/the-use-of-artificial-intelligence-in-quality-assurance/
17. Phan, H. T., & Haes, A. J. (2019). What Does Nanoparticle Stability Mean?. The
journal of physical chemistry. C, Nanomaterials and interfaces, 123(27), 16495–
16507. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b00913
18. QUALITY OF BIOTECHNOLOGICAL PRODUCTS: STABILITY TESTING OF
BIOTECHNOLOGICAL/BIOLOGICAL PRODUCTS Annex to the ICH Harmonised
Tripartite Guideline for the Stability Testing of New Drug Substances and Products.
1996 , 1-9
19. Stability testing of biotechnological /biological veterinary medicinal products the
eropean agency for the evalvation of medicinal products veterinary medicines and
information technology unit 2001, 1-10
20. Mahesh Ramanadham, Pharm.D./M.B.A., USPHS Deputy Director, Global Regulatory
Harmonization Challenges and Opportunities: FDA Perspective (ramanadham-slides)
21. Danielle J. Beetler, Damian N. Di Florio, Ethan W. Law, Chris M. Groen, Anthony J.
Windebank, Quinn P. Peterson, DeLisa Fairweather, The evolving regulatory
landscape in regenerative medicine, Molecular Aspects of Medicine, Volume 91,2023.
22. Vokinger, K. N., Kesselheim, A. S., Glaus, C. E. G., & Hwang, T. J. (2022).
Therapeutic Value of Drugs Granted Accelerated Approval or Conditional Marketing
Authorization in the US and Europe From 2007 to 2021. JAMA health forum, 3(8),
e222685. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamahealthforum.2022.2685
23. https://www.theguardian.com/business/2005/apr/08/health.society
24. https://www.pfizer.com/news/press-release/press-release-detail/
pfizer_receives_fda_approval_for_prevnar_13_in_adults_age_18_through_49
25. Bobbili naga pavani 2023 Factors Influencing Drug Stability and Degradation - A
Comprehensive Overview
19
https://www.icliniq.com/articles/drug-and-supplements/factors-influencing-drug-
stability-and-degradation
20