Bukor Identity
Bukor Identity
Emese Bukor
To cite this article: Emese Bukor (2015) Exploring teacher identity from a holistic perspective:
reconstructing and reconnecting personal and professional selves, Teachers and Teaching, 21:3,
305-327, DOI: 10.1080/13540602.2014.953818
*Email: emese_bukor@carleton.ca
†Present Address: School of Linguistics and Language Studies, Carleton University, Ottawa,
Canada.
aspects of teacher identity from diverse viewpoints (e.g. Andrzejewski, 2008; Clarke,
2008; Meijer, Korthagen, & Vasalos, 2009; Søreide, 2006; Watson, 2006). Through-
out, it is argued that there are close relationships among professional identity,
classroom practice, teacher knowledge, beliefs, and attitudes. This makes studying
the origins of ‘teacher identity’ important to discerning ways in which to support
teachers’ professional development.
This article explores teacher identity among three language teachers. In particular,
it employs a holistic perspective to investigate the interplay between these teachers’
personal and professional life experiences by exploring the complex relationships
between beliefs, assumptions, perceptions, and those educational, professional, and
personal experiences that shaped the development of their teacher identity. This
investigation is presented in the context of a larger study (Bukor, 2011). Here, I use
the concept of ‘holistic perspective’ defined as (i) the interconnectedness of personal
and professional experiences and (ii) the use of conscious/rational and intuitive/tacit
thought processes. ‘Personal experiences’ are understood as the participants’ personal
life experiences (e.g. childhood, family, friends, and significant other people), their
schooling, and professional education. ‘Professional experiences’ refer to the
participants’ teaching practice.
myself, the experience of love and suffering – and much, much more. In the midst of
that complex field, identity is a moving intersection of the inner and outer forces that
make who I am, converging in the irreducible mystery of being human. (p. 13)
This definition includes one’s personal experiences, family background, sociocultural
contexts, influential people, and the psychological, emotional, and intellectual fea-
tures. Palmer (1998) also highlights the integrity between the intellectual, emotional,
and spiritual aspects of teacher identity that can lead to a new ‘wholeness,’ i.e.
‘becoming more real by acknowledging the whole of who I am’ (p. 13). Due to its
inclusive and holistic nature, Palmer’s definition of identity became the working
definition in my research.
Professional development
A number of authors (e.g. Borko, 2004; Clarke & Hollingsworth, 2002; Crasborn,
Hennissen, Brouwer, Korthagen, & Bergen, 2010; Freeman & Johnson, 2005; Gao,
2012; Lunenberg & Korthagen, 2009; Tarone & Allwright, 2005) have emphasized
the importance of the exploration of teachers’ professional selves as an integral part
of ongoing professional development. Kincheloe (2003) argues that the way one tea-
ches ‘is tied to the ways teachers see themselves’ (p. 47). Teachers are actively
engaged in the process of creating themselves as teachers during their entire careers
(Coldron & Smith, 1999). According to Williams (2007), researching the concepts
308 E. Bukor
of teacher identity can lead researchers to gain a deeper understanding of the factors
that influence a teacher’s decisions and attitude in teaching.
In second language education, the relationship between professional development
and teacher identity has been scrutinized by exploring teachers’ personal experiences
(e.g. Bailey, Curtis, & Nunan, 2001; Palmer & Christison, 2007). The emphasis in
this research is on the importance of using personal experiences as a source of
continuing professional development, and self-awareness, self-observation, and
reflective teaching are viewed as important cornerstones of professional
development.
Teacher emotions
An emerging field of research investigates the role of emotions in teaching and tea-
cher identity (e.g. Day & Kington, 2008; Day & Leitch, 2001; Hargreaves, 1998,
2000, 2001; Kelchtermans, 2005; O’Connor, 2008; Sutton & Wheatley, 2003;
Zembylas, 2003, 2005, 2010). It is important to define what we mean by ‘emotions’
before discussing the role they play in teaching and the development of teacher
identity. Damasio (1994, 2003) argues that emotions are indispensable to rational
decision-making and that emotion and cognition are inextricably intertwined and
affected by personal biography, social context, and external factors. Goleman (2005)
claims that ‘we have two minds, one that thinks and one that feels’ (p. 8). The emo-
tional mind is far quicker than the rational mind; it takes its beliefs to be absolutely
true and discounts any evidence to the contrary. On the other hand, the rational mind
takes its beliefs tentatively; new evidence can disconfirm one belief and replace it
with a new one. Hence, emotional intelligence is at the heart of good professional
practice (Goleman, 2005). These interpretations of emotions supported my rationale
for the inclusion of both conscious/rational and intuitive/tacit thought processes for
the participants to explore their life experiences.
Sutton and Wheatley’s (2003) empirical research shows that emotions may influ-
ence teacher cognition, motivation, memory, categorization, and problem-solving
abilities. Their findings suggest that students are aware of and influenced by teach-
ers’ emotions: teachers’ negative emotions (e.g. anger) result in lower student moti-
vation, whereas teachers’ positive emotions (e.g. caring) seem to have positive
effects on students by raising the level of student motivation and engagement. Nias
(1996) holds that teaching has an emotional dimension because teachers invest their
‘selves’ in it. Hargreaves, Earl, Moore, and Manning (2001) state that teachers
become who they are ‘by the emotional experiences they have developed within
their culture, through their upbringing, and in their relationships’ (p. 137). Day and
Leitch (2001) argue that emotion and cognition are inextricably intertwined. They
maintain that (i) emotional intelligence is vital for good professional practice; (ii)
emotions are essential for rational decision-making; and (iii) emotional and cognitive
health are affected by personal biography, social context, and external (policy)
factors.
In summary, the research literature seems to emphasize that identity is a complex
notion made up of several interconnected parts – knowledge, beliefs, emotions, or
professional development – each affecting in various ways the overall understanding
of teacher identity. I argue that all the above-described components should be con-
sidered together through the individual teacher’s meaning-making process in order
Teachers and Teaching: theory and practice 309
(1) How do language teachers experience and interpret the influence of impor-
tant personal, educational, and professional experiences on their perceptions,
assumptions, and beliefs about their teacher identity?
(2) How do language teachers experience and interpret the changes in their per-
ceptions and understandings of their teacher identity as they reinterpret and
integrate the relationships between their experiences and their teacher iden-
tity?
resistant to change (Kelly, 1955). A person’s construct system represents the truth as
they understand and experience it, therefore construct systems are idiosyncratic.
This point reminded me of the importance of respecting my participants’
idiosyncratic interpretative processes.
Kelly’s view of the universe helped me to explore and understand my partici-
pants’ ‘universes’: (i) the universe is real; (ii) everything is interlocked; and (iii)
everything is measured along the dimension of time. An individual’s life can make
(more) sense if put in a larger perspective of time (i.e. life span). Sequencing one’s
life events chronologically allows us to seek connections among them and doing this
facilitates reflection and interpretation. In this light, time is an important factor in
reconstructing one’s life and identity. Kelly’s view of the universe offered an
important conceptual basis for my research design.
According to Kelly (1963), the notion of ‘psychological re-construction of life’
refers to the assumption that ‘all of our present interpretations of the universe are
subject to revision or replacement’ (p. 15); such revision can result in personal
growth, provided an individual can replace a dysfunctional, conflicting aspect of his
construct system through the successive reconstruction of what happens. This theory
provided me with a conceptual foundation for understanding how my participants
make sense of their experiences.
Perspective transformation
The last concept of my theoretical orientation was ‘perspective transformation’
developed by Mezirow (1978, 1981). A ‘meaning perspective’ is a personal para-
digm for understanding ourselves and our relationships. A transformation of this
perspective occurs when an old perspective can no longer successfully cope with
problems and issues in a new situation (Mezirow, 1978), hence the term ‘perspective
transformation.’
The maturation process in adulthood is viewed as a ‘trans-formative’ process
‘involving alienation from those roles [in childhood], reframing new perspectives,
and rearranging life with a greater degree of self-determination’ (Mezirow, 2000).
Thus, the first vital step in transforming our meaning perspectives about ourselves is
‘that we become critically aware of the fact that we are caught in our own history
and are reliving it’ (Mezirow, 1978, p. 109, emphasis added). Gaining awareness of
our life history is, then, an important first step in personal and professional develop-
ment. Furthermore, ‘time’ also plays a central role in perspective transformation in
two ways. First, time provides an overall interpretive framework and continuity
within which one’s life experiences can be viewed. Second, time is also necessary
for in-depth introspection and reflection to happen and for the re-construction and
emergence of a new perspective of oneself to occur. One of my research purposes
was to facilitate the emergence of a re-constructed teacher identity that could lead to
the participants’ personal and professional growth.
Methodology
My methodology was ‘heuristic research’ (Moustakas, 1990, 1994) – a form of phe-
nomenological inquiry – defined as ‘a search for the discovery of meaning and
essence in significant human experience’ (Douglass & Moustakas, 1985, p. 40, ital-
ics added). There is in this research method a strong emphasis on self-discovery and
self-search of both the researcher and the participants. Put differently, heuristic
research focuses on the person having an experience (i.e. ‘How do you make sense
of your experience?’) and it is about self-understanding through the study of rela-
tionships, connections, and influences on the person’s way of thinking. This method-
ology focuses, then, exclusively on the participants’ sense-making of their life
experiences. However, it is acknowledged that external factors, social contexts, and
social interactions with others do play a crucial role in how individuals make sense
of the world around them. Yet, they are considered through the individual’s interpre-
tive framework. An important criterion of using this methodology is that the
researcher must have a concrete personal experience with the topic of investigation.
Thus, my prior professional autobiography and ongoing self-discovery process satis-
fied this criterion.
The heuristic research process entails several important concepts and processes,
such as identifying with the focus of inquiry, self-dialog (of the researcher), tacit
knowing (Polanyi, 1969a), intuition, indwelling (i.e. focused inward attention to
seek deeper understanding of human experience), focusing (i.e. sustained attention
to seeing something as is), and the internal frame of reference (of the person who
has had the experience), that help illuminate the meaning of experience (Moustakas,
1990).
312 E. Bukor
Data analysis
Data analysis and interpretation occurred in three phases (description, analysis, and
interpretation) and at three distinct levels (the participants’, the researcher’s, and the
group’s perspective). The first phase (i.e. description) involved creating each partici-
pant’s narrative portrayal based on her interview transcripts and journal entries
(Moustakas, 1990). Using ‘content analysis’ (Patton, 2002), I reduced the data and
identified emerging themes and patterns (e.g. beliefs, assumptions, insights, signs of
perspective transformation) by reading one interview transcript several times (see
Table 1). Each narrative portrayal was intended to represent ‘thick description’
(Geertz, 1983): in each, I tried to retain the participants’ voice as I presented the par-
ticipants’ professional, personal, and intuitive selves, their re-constructed teacher
identity, and drew on their final comments on their overall experience. During this
lengthy process, it was essential to keep the participant’s perspective in the portray-
als so as to capture their sense-making of the connections between their life experi-
ences and the changes in their perspectives over time. Then, the portrayals were
returned to the participants to validate accuracy and comprehensiveness; based on
their feedback, minor revisions were made. I also had short corroboration interviews
Teachers and Teaching: theory and practice 313
(Continued)
314 E. Bukor
Table 1. (Continued).
Cassie Karen Mary
! It’s hard to change the ! The best teachers ! I think warmth and
way you think, it’s believe in you normalness are just my
really hard to do ! I never wanted to be a strengths
! The problem is teacher. I don’t know ! I think consciousness-
definitely here in my how I got to ESL raising and awareness-
head, I know that ! The first time I had to raising is very
! I’m definitely more teach it was horrible important
open to following up ! Strengths and ! My late awakening is
on suggestions weaknesses change very much what I try to
! I’m more open now to ! Teaching in the have happen in my
listening to my own military was life- classroom
intuition changing to me. It ! It’s a matter of self-
! I want to deal with my taught me thick skin discovery. If you
self-perception ! The acting background recognize yourself,
! I’m questioning the helped me then you want to do
basis of my thoughts ! When you act, you well
! It’s a tough thing to be become somebody ! I teach really with all
honest completely different my heart
! It’s important to ! Teaching is successful ! My mother was like the
understand yourself when there is a enemy, although we
! I don’t want to feel connection never thought of her
this void for the rest of ! You need to have that that way. She was
my life trust factor never really a friend.
She was certainly never
a confidante
with all participants so that we had a face-to-face opportunity to discuss their feed-
back regarding the portrayals.
The second phase included the thorough and time-consuming analysis of each
portrayal separately by completing a rigorous data analysis from the researcher’s
perspective (Moustakas, 1990). I used additional qualitative research principles and
procedures that put an emphasis on data analysis and interpretation (Patton, 2002;
Wolcott, 1994) to supplement my methodology, which focused on descriptive repre-
sentation of data (Moustakas, 1990). As a result, an ‘analytical summary’ written
from the researcher’s perspective was added to each portrayal (see a synopsis in
Tables 2 and 3). This phase involved the following steps:
The third, final phase included the interpretation of the results representative of
the whole group. It entailed (i) an in-depth group analysis of all participants’ por-
trayals and (ii) the interpretation of the emerging influences on the development of
teacher identity from each individual’s ‘analytical summary.’ My rationale for
including an analytical and an interpretative phase rested on my preference for a
healthy balance between description, analysis, and interpretation as opposed to rely-
ing heavily on description, as would be expected in heuristic research (Moustakas,
1990).
for Cassie at university. This is an expression of her unconscious desire for accep-
tance and appreciation by the external world because she was unable to see this in
herself, which supports Jung’s views (1959).
I was brought up to believe that grades and success are very important. My biggest fear
is being dumb. I excel in the school system. Getting good marks doesn’t mean that I’m
smart. It means that I’m a hard worker. Intelligence is so important to me. Being per-
ceived as not intelligent scares the hell out of me. It’s perception that scares me more
than actually not being intelligent. But, what if your self-perception is not accurate of
yourself?
Karen’s relationship with her mother influenced her experiences of school and
learning. She hated going to school. This resulted in poor academic achievement
and her inhibition to show her abilities at school. The lack of love and caring at
home made an impact on her school behavior. Karen’s school experiences reveal
insecurity, inability to establish contact with people and to speak in front of others,
and reluctance to acknowledge her identity.
As a child, I was quiet, shy, and sick. I hated grade 6 with passion. I felt like a big fail-
ure because I was supposed to be so smart and I wasn’t getting the grades. Grade 6
teacher was horrible, he was mean. I was so shy and we had to do book reports in front
of so many people. I could not do it. I stood up and I could not say a word. I got zero.
Karen gained confidence as a result of her teacher’s acknowledgment, positive
reinforcement, and appraisal of her good work. This suggests that she needed exter-
nal validation and acknowledgment of her accomplishments because of her insecu-
rity. In response to the challenging family situation, she developed eating disorders.
However, her participation in acting at high school compensated for the lack of love
and caring at home and helped her improve her academic standing. The expression
of her artistic side brought her greater peace of mind, better grades at school, and
improved communication skills with others.
I wrote a dialogue all by myself. When I performed it, the class loved it. I felt good
and strong. I was competent. I discovered I could act. It was much easier to act than to
be myself in front of other people. I think they saw a side of me that they’d never seen
before. Not just the quiet girl there, but something of substance.
I started to believe in myself, and my marks improved. I got rewarded on an assign-
ment and I realized that I should respond naturally, honestly.
That was the year when I became anorexic. My brother was in an explosion, my Mom
got cancer, my Dad had surgery, and my sister moved away. My life was out of control
and food was the only thing I could control. I felt like a loser; smart but unable to
achieve. I hated going home. There was a lot of tension between my Mom and myself.
Mary grew up in a big family that made an impact on her sense of self, ‘I was
just one of many.’ Conformity was encouraged and as a result she learned to keep a
low profile. She did not like being at home; thus, school was a place of refuge.
Doing well at school was expected. We didn’t get praised. We weren’t allowed to fail.
I remember winning a piano competition when I was in grade 5. It just wasn’t a big
deal. It was expected. There was no opportunity for the development of a sense of self
at home.
Mary’s university studies were the first opportunity for her to develop a sense of
identify after having been deprived of it in childhood. All forms of self-expression
(playing the piano, reading books, university studies) were disapproved by her
Teachers and Teaching: theory and practice 319
husband – however, they tested her own self-determination and commitment to stand
up for herself. At university, she learned to value herself and be proud of her
accomplishments.
When I was writing the final exam, I loved it. For the first time in my life I was having
someone acknowledge my thoughts, my ideas, and my effort in a tangible way, with a
grade. I was experiencing the potential acknowledgment for nothing more than ME.
Not someone’s eldest daughter, not someone’s wife or not even someone’s mother.
THIS was just ME. That was a profound experience for me. One of my lessons was
that if I work hard at something, regardless of the result, it has value. These experi-
ences influenced my views on teaching and learning profoundly.
Karen realized that (i) her career choice might be connected to her looking for
love from students, which was also evident in her family relationships, ‘I’ve
always been looking for my Mom’s love’; (ii) that it was important to develop her
own teaching style and not to follow other people’s paths; and (iii) that teaching is
a lot more than she expected it to be, ‘You are a lot more than an instructor. You
have more than just one role as a language teacher.’ Looking for love due to the
perceived lack thereof in her family affected her self-esteem negatively and that, in
turn, also influenced her professional life by her constantly questioning her own
expertise.
Mary’s decision was made quite late in her life as a result of her graduate stud-
ies, after having established a family and raising three kids and later becoming a sin-
gle mom. Mary’s first language teaching experience was volunteering in English
conversation classes, which suggests a close connection with her childhood experi-
ences at home (i.e. giving herself freely, helping out, and caring for others). Her stu-
dents’ acknowledgment and appreciation for her efforts touched her deeply because
this compensated for the lack of appreciation and affirmation in her family as she
was growing up. For Mary, self-discovery and awareness-raising are important traits
that she tries to pass on to her students. Mary’s case is an excellent example of the
impact of personal experiences on professional matters.
Mary’s relationship with her mother and her perceptions of family life are
reflected in the following issues: non-existent self in childhood; caring for others in
the family; lack of explicit praise and love received from the mother; fear-based atti-
tude toward everything; and striving to fulfill her mother’s needs. For several dec-
ades, Mary struggled with self-acceptance. The fear-based attitude stemming from
the home environment appeared in the lack of trust and confidence in herself and
others at school. Mary strove to fulfill her mother’s needs in order to gain her love
and acknowledgment. As a result of her late awakening and personal transformation,
Mary was able to turn the negative childhood experiences into positive ones as a
mature adult. These positive traits are observable in her teaching philosophy and her
instructional practice.
The most important thing for me in teaching is getting to know what it is about each
individual person, how I can – as a teacher – inspire them to do their best whatever
they’re learning. It’s a matter of self-discovery. If you recognize yourself, then you
want to do well. I teach with all my heart.
The implicit or indirect driving force for each participant to become a teacher
clearly originated in their family relationships, e.g. in Cassie’s case, the lack of hav-
ing a mother; in Karen’s case, the insufficient expression of love and caring
expressed by the mother; and in Mary’s case, the lack of praise and acknowledgment
from her mother.
The participants concluded that the research experience was ‘insightful,’ ‘eye-
opening,’ and ‘confirmatory, assuring, and clarifying.’ They found that all in all it
was a ‘healing experience’ even though it was a ‘struggle’ at times. Cassie claimed
that ‘I have become more reflective in my professional role.’ Karen acknowledged,
‘I’m stronger than I thought I was. There is more to me. I’m surprised at the connec-
tions.’ Mary added, ‘this experience was like putting on a pair of glasses and things
came better into focus.’
Teachers and Teaching: theory and practice 321
Discussion
The analysis of the participants’ portrayals (Bukor, 2011) and the selected findings
above suggest an intricate relationship between family, schooling, and career choice
(see Figure 1). The findings reveal an overarching structure that extends over each
participant’s life span to the date of the research. My participants developed some
personality traits as a result of (i) their beliefs and perceptions of their relationship
with the mother, and (ii) their perceived deprivation of love, praise, acknowledg-
ment, and acceptance by the mother, or (iii) by the loss of the mother. These traits,
in turn, strongly influenced both the participants’ perceptions of the family relation-
ships and their school experiences; they demonstrate interplay between belief sys-
tems and perceptions (Kelly, 1955, 1963). Roberts (1994) claims that the accepted
beliefs from parents serve as a framework within which a child grows and ‘this pro-
vides a leeway until the conscious mind is able to reason for itself and provide its
own value judgments’ (p. 57). Roberts (1994) argues that ‘you create your experi-
ence through your beliefs about yourself and the nature of reality’ (p. 11) adding
that ‘your beliefs can be like fences that surround you’ (p. 20, emphasis in the origi-
nal). Lipton (2008) refers to this relationship as the belief effect ‘to stress that our
perceptions, whether they are accurate or inaccurate, equally impact our behavior
and our bodies’ (p. 107).
The school environment seems to have provided the participants with a possibil-
ity to make up for the perceived lacking or insufficient emotional and psychological
support in the family environment. The participants developed various compensating
strategies to offset the missing love, praise, and acknowledgment at home, e.g. focus
on grades, academic success, and intelligence; and the importance of getting
acknowledgment and praise from teachers. In my interpretation, schooling was a
period of compensating, reclaiming, and developing one’s sense of self that had been
wounded in the family due to unreflectively accepted beliefs and perceptions that
had been influenced or ‘assigned by important others’ (Bergner & Holmes, 2000).
These results shed light on the role of the school environment in the participants’
life from a fresh viewpoint – in addition to the frequently mentioned academic one
(Borko, 2004; Connelly & Clandinin, 1999; Lortie, 1975; Smith, 2007). Others (e.g.
322 E. Bukor
Malderez et al., 2007; Olsen, 2008b, 2010; Trent, 2011) have also highlighted the
importance of the relationship between teacher identity and prior personal experi-
ences in pre-service teacher education.
The role of the school, uncovered in this research, shows ‘personal,’
‘emotional,’ and ‘psychological’ aspects that are rooted in beliefs, perceptions,
assumptions, and interpretations nurtured in the family environment prior to
schooling. The school experiences are viewed here through the lenses of the
participants’ ‘internal frame of reference’ (Moustakas, 1990) or their ‘personal
interpretive framework’ (Kelchtermans, 2009) that facilitated the process of
‘teachers’ self-understanding’ (Kelchtermans, 2009), as well as the process of
‘perspective transformation’ (Mezirow, 1978, 1981).
These interpretations, perceptions, and beliefs of schooling experiences also
influenced my participants’ career choice, instructional practice, teaching philosophy,
and the development of teacher identity. Thus, the choice in adulthood of teaching
as a profession allowed for the potential enactment of one’s reconstructed identity in
terms of providing a place for the self-acceptance, self-expression, enhanced self-
love, and self-confidence that they were all deprived of in their family environments
as they were growing up. Put simply, teaching offered them a possibility for
self-development and self-growth.
The analysis highlighted the impact of the participants’ perceptions, assumptions,
beliefs, and interpretations on their personal, educational, and professional experi-
ences, and the complex interplay among them. The family environment – the first
fundamental socializing milieu – stands out as the cradle of an individual’s personal-
ity traits, core beliefs, perceptions, and interpretations, which make a lasting impact
on self-development. Since my research approached teacher identity from a holistic
perspective3 with an emphasis on the participants’ beliefs, assumptions, perceptions,
and interpretations, the internal personal frame of interpretations is prioritized over
social factors or external interpretive viewpoints. The ‘individual’s internal frame of
reference’ (Moustakas, 1990) played an important role in the analysis in explaining
the relationships between the internal and external world. In concert with my theo-
retical orientation (Jung, 1959; Kelly, 1955, 1963; Mezirow, 1978, 1981), everything
– that is, all external and internal things – is interpreted through an individual’s
belief system. Therefore, this personal angle, I suggest, can provide a broader inter-
pretive framework than the strictly professional one derived from an outsider per-
spective (e.g. Beijaard et al., 2004; Ben-Peretz et al., 2003; Coldron & Smith, 1999;
Ronfeldt & Grossman, 2008). It may help to shed light on the intricate interconnec-
tedness between life events and teacher identity. I argue that the impact of schooling
experiences on teacher development may be better understood when embedded in
the context of teachers’ lives and examined from an individual’s internal frame of
reference rather than from a conventional observer/researcher perspective.
In conclusion, the overall impact of the research process can be summed up in
the following propositions:
Notes
1. ESLA = English as a Second Language for Academic Purposes.
2. The source of several personality traits as discussed in the previous section.
3. Holistic perspective refers to (i) the interconnectedness of personal and professional
experiences and (ii) the use of conscious/rational and intuitive/tacit thought processes.
References
Alsup, J. (2003). English education students and professional identity development: Using
narrative and metaphor to challenge preexisting ideologies. Pedagogy: Critical
Approaches to Teaching Literature, Language, Composition, and Culture, 3, 277–292.
Alsup, J. (2006). Teacher identity discourses: Negotiating personal and professional spaces.
Mahway, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Andrzejewski, C. E. (2008). A holistic investigation of teacher identity, knowledge, and
practice (Unpublished PhD dissertation). Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
324 E. Bukor
Anspal, T., Eisenschmidt, E., & Löfström, E. (2012). Finding myself as a teacher: Exploring
the shaping of teacher identities through student teachers’ narratives. Teachers and
Teaching: Theory and Practice, 18, 197–216.
Arnheim, R. (1985). The double-edged mind: Intuition and the intellect. In E. W. Eisner
(Ed.), Learning and teaching: The ways of knowing (pp. 77–96). Chicago, IL: National
Society for the Study of Education.
Atay, D., & Ece, A. (2009). Multiple identities as reflected in English-language education:
The Turkish perspective. Journal of Language, Identity, and Education, 8, 21–34.
Bailey, K. M., Curtis, A., & Nunan, D. (2001). Pursuing professional development: The self
as source. Boston, MA: Heinle and Heinle.
Bastick, T. (1982). Intuition: How we think and act. Chichester: Wiley.
Beauchamp, C., & Thomas, L. (2009). Understanding teacher identity: An overview of issues
in the literature and implications for teacher education. Cambridge Journal of Education,
39, 175–189.
Beijaard, D., Meijer, P. M., & Verloop, N. (2004). Reconsidering research on teachers’
professional identity. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20, 107–128.
Beijaard, D., Verloop, N., & Vermunt, J. D. (2000). Teachers’ perceptions of professional
identity: An exploratory study from a personal knowledge perspective. Teaching and
Teacher Education, 16, 749–764.
Ben-Peretz, M., Mendelson, N., & Kron, F. W. (2003). How teachers in different educational
contexts view their roles. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19, 277–290.
Bergner, R. M., & Holmes, J. R. (2000). Self-concepts and self-concept change: A status
dynamic approach. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 37, 36–44.
Björklund, L. (2008). Från novis till expert: Förtrogenhetskunskap i kognitiv och didaktisk
belysning [From novice to expert: Practical wisdom, implication for education from a
cognitive perspective] (Unpublished PhD dissertation). Linköping University, Linköping.
Borg, S. (2003). Teacher cognition in language teaching: A review of research on what lan-
guage teachers think, know, believe, and do. Language Teaching, 36, 81–109.
Borg, S. (2006). Teacher cognition and language education: Research and practice. London:
Continuum.
Borko, H. (2004). Professional development and teacher learning: Mapping the terrain.
Educational Researcher, 33, 3–15.
Brookfield, S. D. (1995). Becoming a critically reflective teacher. San Francisco, CA:
Jossey-Bass.
Bruner, J. (1986). Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Bukor, E. (2011). Exploring teacher identity: Teachers’ transformative experiences of re-con-
structing and re-connecting personal and professional selves (Unpublished PhD disserta-
tion). University of Toronto, Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, Toronto.
Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/1807/31700
Calderhead, J., & Robson, M. (1991). Images of teaching: Students’ early conceptions of
classroom practice. Teaching & Teacher Education, 7(1), 1–8.
Clandinin, J. D. (2000). Learning to teach: A question of knowledge. Education Canada, 40,
28–30.
Clarke, D., & Hollingsworth, H. (2002). Elaborating a model of teacher professional growth.
Teaching and Teacher Education, 18, 947–967.
Clarke, M. (2008). Language teacher identities: Co-constructing discourse and community.
Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Coldron, J., & Smith, R. (1999). Active location in teachers’ construction of their
professional identities. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 31, 711–726.
Cole, A. L., & Knowles, J. G. (2000). Researching teaching: Exploring teacher development
through reflexive inquiry. Needham Heights: Allyn & Bacon.
Connelly, F. M., & Clandinin, D. J. (1999). Shaping a professional identity: Stories of educa-
tional practice. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Cooper, K., & Olson, M. R. (1996). The multiple ‘I’s’ of teacher identity. In M. Kompf, W.
R. Bond, D. Dworet, & R. T. Boak (Eds.), Changing research and practice: Teachers’
professionalism, identities and knowledge (pp. 78–89). London: The Falmer Press.
Teachers and Teaching: theory and practice 325
Crasborn, F., Hennissen, P., Brouwer, N., Korthagen, F., & Bergen, T. (2010). Capturing
mentor teachers’ reflective moments during mentoring dialogues. Teachers and Teaching:
Theory and Practice, 16, 7–29.
Damasio, A. (1994). Descartes’ error: Emotion, reason and the human brain. New York,
NY: Grosset/Pulman.
Damasio, A. (2003). Looking for Spinoza: Joy, sorrow, and the feeling brain. Orlando, FL:
Harcourt.
Day, C., & Kington, A. (2008). Identity, well-being and effectiveness: The emotional
contexts of teaching. Pedagogy, Culture, and Society, 16, 7–23.
Day, C., & Leitch, R. (2001). Teachers’ and teacher educators’ lives: The role of emotion.
Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 403–415.
Day, R. R. (1991). Models and the knowledge base of second language teacher education. In
E. Sadtono (Ed.), Issues in language teacher education (pp. 38–48). Singapore:
SEAMEO Regional Language Centre.
Douglass, B. G., & Moustakas, C. (1985). Heuristic inquiry: The internal search to know.
Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 25, 39–55.
Freeman, D., & Johnson, K. E. (2005). Toward linking teacher knowledge and student learn-
ing. In D. J. Tedick (Ed.), Second language teacher education: International perspectives
(pp. 73–95). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Gao, F. (2012). Teacher identity, teaching vision, and Chinese language education for South
Asian students in Hong Kong. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 18, 89–99.
Geertz, C. (1983). Local knowledge: Further essays in interpretive anthropology. New York,
NY: Basic Books.
Goleman, D. (2005). Emotional intelligence: Why it can matter more than IQ. New York,
NY: Bantam Books.
Hargreaves, A. (1998). The emotional practice of teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education,
14, 835–854.
Hargreaves, A. (2000). Mixed emotions: Teachers’ perceptions of their interactions with
students. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16, 811–826.
Hargreaves, A. (2001). Emotional geographies of teaching. Teachers College Record, 103,
1056–1080.
Hargreaves, A., Earl, L., Moore, S., & Manning, S. (2001). Learning to change: Teaching
beyond subjects and standards. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Hogarth, R. M. (2001). Educating intuition. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Johnson, K. E., & Golombek, P. R. (Eds.). (2002). Teachers’ narrative inquiry as
professional development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Johnston, B., Pawan, F., & Mahan-Taylor, R. (2005). The professional development of
working ESL/EFL teachers: A pilot study. In D. J. Tedick (Ed.), Second language teacher
education: International perspectives (pp. 53–73). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
Associates.
Joram, E., & Gabriele, A. J. (1998). Preservice teachers’ prior beliefs: Transforming obstacles
into opportunities. Teaching and Teacher Education, 14, 175–191.
Jung, C. G. (1958). The undiscovered self. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Jung, C. G. (1959). The basic writings of C.G. Jung. (Edited with an introduction by V.
Staub de Laszlo). New York, NY: Modern Library.
Kagan, D. M. (1992). Implications of research on teacher belief. Educational Psychologist,
27, 65–90.
Kelchtermans, G. (2005). Teachers’ emotions in educational reforms: Self-understanding, vul-
nerable commitment and micropolitical literacy. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21,
995–1006.
Kelchtermans, G. (2009). Who I am in how I teach is the message: Self-understanding,
vulnerability and reflection. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 15, 257–272.
Kelly, G. A. (1955). The psychology of personal constructs (Vol. 1). New York, NY: W. W.
Norton & Company.
Kelly, G. A. (1963). A theory of personality: The psychology of personal constructs. New
York, NY: W.W. Norton & Company.
Kincheloe, J. L. (2003). Critical ontology: Vision of selfhood and curriculum. Journal of
Curriculum Theorizing, 19, 47–64.
326 E. Bukor
Richards, J. C., & Lockhart, C. (1994). Reflective teaching in second language classrooms.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Richardson, V. (1996). The role of attitudes and beliefs in learning to teach. In J. Sikula
(Ed.), Handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 102–119). New York, NY:
Macmillan Library References USA & Simon & Schuster Macmillan.
Roberts, J. (1994). The nature of personal reality: Specific practical techniques for solving
everyday problems and enriching the life you know. San Rafael, CA: Amber-Allen
Publishing and New World Library.
Ronfeldt, M., & Grossman, P. (2008). Becoming a professional: Experimenting with possible
selves in professional preparation. Teacher Education Quarterly, 35, 41–60.
Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational
Researcher, 15, 4–14.
Simon-Maeda, A. (2004). The complex construction of professional identities: Female EFL
educators in Japan speak out. TESOL Quarterly, 38, 405–436.
Smith, R. G. (2007). Developing professional identities and knowledge: Becoming primary
teachers. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 13, 377–397.
Søreide, G. E. (2006). Narrative construction of teacher identity: Positioning and negotiation.
Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 12, 527–547.
Sutton, R. E., & Wheatley, K. F. (2003). Teachers’ emotions and teaching: A review of the
literature and directions for future research. Educational Psychology Review, 15,
327–358.
Tarone, E., & Allwright, D. (2005). Second language teacher learning and student second
language learning: Shaping the knowledge base. In D. J. Tedick (Ed.), Second language
teacher education: International perspectives (pp. 5–24). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence
Erlbaum Associates.
Trent, J. (2011). ‘Four years on, I’m ready to teach’: Teacher education and the construction
of teacher identities. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 17, 529–543.
Varghese, M., Morgan, B., Johnston, B., & Johnson, K. A. (2005). Theorizing language tea-
cher identity: Three perspectives and beyond. Journal of Language, Identity, and
Education, 4, 21–44.
Watson, C. (2006). Narratives of practice and the construction of identity in teaching. Teach-
ers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 12, 509–526.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. New York,
NY: Cambridge University Press.
Williams, G. (2007). Investigating the influences on the teaching identity of international
teaching assistants. In M. Mantero (Ed.), Identity and second language learning: Culture,
inquiry and dialogic activity in education contexts (pp. 305–328). Charlotte, NC:
Information Age.
Wolcott, H. F. (1994). Transforming qualitative data: Description, analysis, and interpreta-
tion. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Woods, D. (1996). Teacher cognition in language teaching: Beliefs, decision-making and
classroom practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Woods, D. (2003). The social construction of beliefs in the language classroom. In P. Kalaja
& A. Barcelos (Eds.), New approaches to research on beliefs about SLA (pp. 201–229).
Amsterdam: Kluwer.
Zembylas, M. (2003). Interrogating “teacher identity”: Emotion, resistance, and
self-formation. Educational Theory, 53, 107–127.
Zembylas, M. (2005). Teaching with emotion: A postmodern enactment. Greenwich, CT:
Information Age.
Zembylas, M. (2010). Teachers’ emotional experiences of growing diversity and multicultur-
alism in schools and the prospects of an ethic of discomfort. Teachers and Teaching:
Theory and Practice, 16, 703–716.