Nike Project
Nike Project
Nike
Strategic plan
Prepared by
1- Maged Magdy Metwally 21120893
2- Yomna Mohamed Mahmod 21121020
3- Mohr sha Ishak Elashmawy 21121389
4- Nevine Gerges Zaki 21120892
5- Farah Joseph habib 19221141
6- Akram Ahmed Bashir 21124071
Topic : Nike in Egypt Page 1 of 47
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
OF CONTENTS
1. Introduction.............................................................................................................3
2. External Analysis ..................................................................................................4
2.1 PESTEL Analysis “External Macro Environmental Analysis” .................................. 4
2.1.1 Political, Governmental forces .................................................................. 4
2.1.1.1 Stability of Government…………………………………………………………..4
2.1.1.2 Global Warming Legislation………………………………………………………4
2.1.1.3 Trade regulations, tariffs, labor laws, and political stability…………………….5
2.1.1.4 Lobbies ……………………………………………………………………………6
2.1.2 Economic forces………………………………………………………………….7
2.1.2.1 GDP…………………………………………………………………………………7
2.1.2.2 Inflation rate……………………………………………………………………….7
2.1.2.3 Egypt Interest rate…………………………………………………………………8
2.1.2.4 Egypt Unemployment rate………………………………………………………...8
2.1.2.5 Currency devaluation ……………………………………………………………..9
2.1.3 Social forces……………………………………………………………………….9
2.1.3.1 Life Style ……………………………………………………………………………9
2.1.3.2 Culture ……………………………………………………………………………...9
2.1.4 Technological forces…………………………………………………………….10
2.1.5 Ecological forces…………………………………………………………….......11
2.1.6 Legal forces……………………………………………………………………….12
TABLE
OF CONTENTS
- Porter’s 5 Forces Issue Priority Matrix………………………………………………………..18
2.3 External Factors Analysis Summary (EFAS)…………………………………..19
2.4 Competitive Profile Matrix ( CPM )………………………………………………..21
3. Internal Analysis…………………………………………………………………………..22
3.1 Value Chain Analysis…………………………………………………………………22
3.2 Internal Assessment – Internal Factor Evaluation Matrix ( IFAS) ……….24
3.3 VRIO Model ………………………………………………………………………………25
3.4 BCG Matrix ………………………………………………………………………………26
3.5 Financial Parameters………………………………………………………………….28
4. Strategy Formulation ……………………………………………………………….......29
4.1 SWOT Analysis………………………………………………………………………….29
4.2 SFAS……………………………………………………………………………………….30
4.3 TWOS………………………………………………………………………………………31
4.4 IE Matrix…………………………………………………………………………………..32
4.5 QSPM………………………………………………………………………………………33
4.6 Vision , Mission and Values………………………………………………………...34
5. Strategic Implementation……………………………………………………………....40
6. Strategic Evaluation & Control ……………………………………………………...41
7. Conclusion…………………………………………………………………………………...45
8. Recommendations…………………………………………………………….46
9. References…………………………………………………………………………………...47
TABLE
A PESTEL analysis is a framework that helps to evaluate the external factors that affect a
company’s performance and strategies. It stands for Political, Economic, Social, Technological,
Environmental, and Legal factors. Here is a brief PESTEL analysis of Nike in Egypt 2023 based
on the web search results:
- Description: The stability of the government in a country plays a crucial role in determining
the business environment. Egypt has experienced significant political changes in the past
decade, including the Arab Spring in 2011 and subsequent events. These political shifts can
have direct implications for multinational corporations operating in the country.
- Threat: Given the historical political changes and the potential for future shifts, Nike might
face uncertainties in its operations in Egypt. Political instability can lead to abrupt changes in
trade and business regulations, affecting Nike's operations. Additionally, periods of unrest or
security concerns can lead to reduced footfall in retail outlets and potential disruptions in
operations.
- In light of the recent political history of Egypt, Nike needs to be cautious and adaptive in its
approach. It's essential for the company to have contingency plans in place and stay updated
with the latest political developments to navigate potential challenges effectively.
• The political situation in Egypt is expected to remain stable and supportive of economic development, as
President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi secured a second term in 2018 and is likely to run for a third term in 2022.
• Egypt has signed several free trade agreements with various countries and regions, such as the European
Union, the United States, the Arab League, and the African Continental Free Trade Area, which could
facilitate Nike’s market access and reduce trade barriers.
• Egypt has enacted several labor laws and regulations to protect workers’ rights and ensure fair working
conditions, such as the Labor Law No. 12 of 2003, the Social Insurance Law No. 148 of 2019, and the
Unified Labor Contract Law No. 206 of 2020 .Nike must comply with these laws and regulations to
avoid legal issues and reputational risks.
• Egypt maintains a balanced relationship with neighboring countries and has many trade agreements with
them, which enhances Egypt's position as a trading center in the MENA Region and Africa.
(Opportunity).
• Nike & BRICS :
- The BRICS is a group of five emerging economies that have been cooperating since 2009 to
foster trade, investment, and development among themselves and with other developing
countries. Egypt is not a member of the BRICS, but it has been invited to attend some of their
summits as a guest country. In 2023, Egyptian Prime Minister Mostafa Madbouly participated in
the 15th BRICS summit in Johannesburg, South Africa.
- One of the possible effects of Egypt's involvement with the BRICS is on its trade relations with
China, which is the largest exporter of athletic footwear in the world. China is also a major
supplier of Nike shoes to Egypt, as well as other countries in Africa and the Middle East.
According to a case study by MIT, Nike has been outsourcing most of its production to
independent contractors in Asia, especially China, since the 1980s. Nike does not own or operate
any of these factories, but it sets the standards and specifications for its products and monitors
their quality and compliance.
Opportunities:
1. Reduced Costs: Strengthened ties with China might lead to reduced tariffs or preferential access for
products manufactured in China. Given that Nike outsources a significant portion of its production to
China, this could mean lower costs for importing Nike products into Egypt.
2. Increased Market Access: As ties strengthen, the Egyptian market could become more accessible to
brands like Nike. As the economic conditions in Egypt improve through partnerships and
investments, the purchasing power of the Egyptian consumer might also rise, leading to a higher
demand for brands like Nike.
3. Supply Chain Enhancement: Strengthened ties with China can potentially streamline Nike's supply
chain processes, especially if logistical and transportation infrastructures between Egypt and China
are developed further.
4. Local Collaborations: Opportunities might arise for local businesses in Egypt to collaborate with Nike
or its Chinese suppliers, whether in distribution, marketing, or other ventures.
1. Political Pressure: As mentioned, Egypt might face pressure from Western countries, particularly the
US (where Nike originates), if it aligns more closely with BRICS policies or interests. This could
place Nike in a difficult position, potentially having to navigate between its home country's stance
and its operational interests in Egypt.
2. Increased Competition: As Egypt strengthens its ties with BRICS nations, other international brands,
potentially even from BRICS countries, might see Egypt as a favorable market, thereby increasing
competition for Nike.
3. Environmental and Social Concerns: Increased production or trading activities can exacerbate
environmental issues such as pollution and waste. Given Nike's past controversies related to labor
rights, there could also be heightened scrutiny over the conditions in factories that produce Nike
products. This is especially important if production scales up to meet increasing demand.
4. Cultural Dynamics: While not mentioned explicitly, cultural dynamics play a role in international
trade and business. Nike will need to be sensitive to the cultural nuances of the Egyptian market,
ensuring that its marketing and product offerings respect local customs and sentiments.
5. Over-reliance on Chinese Production: Over-dependency on production from one source, especially
from a geopolitical powerhouse like China, might pose supply chain risks in the future, especially if
geopolitical tensions rise or if there are disruptions in China's production capacities.
2.1.1.4 Lobbies
Where Nike is adopting the environmental sustainability polices, Nike can use the support of the
Environmental protection associations to improve the company image inside the Egyptian market.
There is a good chance to gain the support of pressure group inside Egypt (Opportunity)
2.1.2.1 GDP
The Gross Domes�c Product (GDP) in Egypt was experienced upward trend from 2017 with GDP value of
248 UD dollar to 477 billion US dollars in 2022, represen�ng 0.21 percent of the world economy.
Due to increasing the infla�on rate, the purchasing power of Egyp�ans will reduce that will nega�vely
affect the investment opportunity. ( threats )
The increase in the interest rate forms an obstacle for businessmen to develop their businesses ( threats )
Unemployment Rate in Egypt decreased to 7 percent in the 2023 from 7.40 percent in the 2022. source:
CAPMAS, Egypt ( Opportunities )
Egypt is facing difficult economic condi�ons as a result of the ongoing instability in the Middle East, as well
as the effects of the climate change and the water crisis that put pressure on the local currency, the Egyp�an
Pound, which has slid by more than 20 percent against the United States’ Dollar as of Thursday 14,
September, reaching an all-�me low at EGP 30.95 for every USD 1. Egypt experienced another devalua�on in
2016 that decreased NIKE sales in the Egyp�an market by 30 percent to 200 million in 2017, which reinforces
the expecta�on that NIKE will be exposed to sales reduc�on inside the Egyp�an market in 2023. According
to Sta�sta, NIKE’s global revenue amounted to about 51.22 billion U.S. dollars in 2023, which is an increase
of approximately 4.5 billion compared to the previous financial year.However, this growth was mainly driven
by other regions such as North America, Greater China and Europe, while the Middle East and Africa region
saw a decline of 7 percent on a currency-neutral basis.NIKE’s strategy to cope with the currency devalua�on
and the economic challenges in Egypt is to focus on its digital leadership and innova�on, as well as to leverage
its strong brand recogni�on and loyal customer base. NIKE also plans to op�mize its pricing and product mix,
as well as to reduce its opera�ng costs and inventory levels in order to improve its profitability and cash flow
in the Egyp�an market. ( threats )
Comments:
The Egyp�an life style is suppor�ng the sportswear industry and business (Opportunity)
2.1.3.2 Culture
- Ethnic
Generally, Egypt is quite a homogeneous society, with 99.6% being ethnically Egyptian.
- Language
Arabic is the official language, and the main foreign languages taught in schools, by order of
popularity, are English, French, German and Italian.
- Religion
Egypt is a predominantly Sunni Muslim country with Islam as its state religion. An estimated 85–
90% are identified as Muslim, 10–15% as Coptic Christians, and 1% as other Christian
denominations
The majority of the Egyptian people still adhere to the customs and values derived from the
NIKE STRATEGIC PLAN FINAL PROJECT
Topic : Nike in Egypt Page 10 of 47
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
teachings of the heavenly religions such as
o Maintaining family relationships and respecting elders
o The majority of the Egyptian people are conservative; they do not allow sexual relations beyond
the scope of legal marriage.
o Homosexuals are not recognized and have no rights in Egypt.
Over the past years, Egypt has witnessed an increase in divorce rates, Divorce cases reached 245,777 in 2021
compared to 222,036 cer�ficates in 2020, recording an increase of 14.7 percent.
Nike’s technological innovation and competitiveness are determined by the technological advancements and
disruptions in its industry and markets. Some of the technological factors that may affect Nike in Egypt 2023
are:
1. Egypt has invested heavily in developing its information and communication technology (ICT)
infrastructure and capabilities, such as launching the first Egyptian-made satellite in 2019, expanding its
fiber-optic network coverage, and establishing several technology parks and innovation hubs. These
developments could enhance Nike’s operational efficiency and digital transformation in Egypt.
2. Egypt has also witnessed a surge in e-commerce activity and online retailing amid the COVID-19
pandemic, as more consumers shifted to online shopping for convenience and safety reasons. This trend
could benefit Nike’s e-commerce strategy and online sales in Egypt.
3. Egypt has adopted various laws and regulations to regulate the technological sector and protect
intellectual property rights (IPR), such as the Cybercrime Law No. 175 of 2018, the Data Protection
Law No. 151 of 2020, and the Intellectual Property Rights Law No. 82 of 2002. Nike must adhere to
these laws and regulations to avoid legal disputes and safeguard its technological assets.
4. The ministry also launched in 2020 “Our Digital Opportunity” initiate to engage with SMEs in the
digital transformation process. The ministry’s Digital Egypt Project aims to supply all government
entities with fiber-optic cable connections. This process has been completed in 5,300 government
buildings across Egypt, and when completed will connect some 32,000 buildings at a total cost of 6
billion Egyptian Pounds (approximately $375 million).
5. The New Administrative Capital (NAC), 30 miles east of central Cairo, is expected to eventually house
most central government offices, with a target move-in date of mid-2021. The government is planning
for the NAC to be a “Smart City,” and is investing heavily in the new city’s telecommunications and
ICT infrastructure. The first phase of “Knowledge City,” which will be located inside the NAC, is
completed. It will include applied research centers for technology to facilitate technical training,
software and applications development, and data design. The Knowledge City is estimated to cost a total
of 12 billion Egyptian Pounds ($750 million). Within the city, they are planning to establish Creative
Innovation Hubs that will provide technical assistance to promote innovation and entrepreneurship.
The Ministry is also working on developing six technology parks in the cities of Minya, Menoufiya,
Mansoura, Sohag, Qena and Aswan. These parks are aimed at supporting entrepreneurship and
innovation and will consist of hardware design labs, startup incubators and training institutions and
Comment:
The improvement of the ICT sector supports the online purchasing and facilitate the business process
(Opportunity)
• Over the past years, Egypt has been suffering from an increase in pollution, which prompted the
government to take a package of measures to prevent the crisis from worsening and preserve the
environment.
• According to World Bank estimates, the environmental degradation resulting from air pollution costs Egypt
about 5% of the annual GNP, or about $2.4bn annually.
• However, there is interest from the government in environmental affairs, hosting COP 27 conference and
developing laws to protect the environment, at the popular level we find that environmental awareness is
low and there is not enough interest from citizens in environmental problems.
Where NIKE’s sustainability policy matching with the goals of the Egyp�an government toward the environment,
there will be an opportunity for NIKE to gain the government support for any business development inside Egypt.
(Opportunity)
Despite the availability of many professional law firms that can provide the consultancy service, we have to be
aware of the four Main Lows that important for our business are Contract law, Customer protec�on law,
Compe��on law and Patency law.
• Egyptian law is obligated to protect the contractual rights of individuals or entities in accordance with the
signed contracts, unless it violates any of the country’s laws.
• However, Contract enforcement is not very efficient in Egypt. The issue still stands out in all major business
environment appraisal reports as one of Egypt’s main obstacles. In the World Bank’s 2010 Doing Business
Report, Egypt is ranked 148th in enforcing contracts, with no particular improvement over the past three
years. This measurement, which factors in how many days and procedures it takes to enforce a
presumptive contractual right, and what cost, shows that Egypt is seriously lagging behind some of its peers
in the MENA region.
• For example, it takes 41 different procedural steps and 1010 days for a contractual party to enforce its legal
right in Egypt, while in Morocco (ranked 108th in enforcing contracts) 40 steps and 615 days are required.
• The Law on Protection of Competition and Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices in Egypt was promulgated
by Law No. 3 of 2005 and its Executive Regulation. The aim of the law is to ensure economic activity does
not prevent, restrict or damage the freedom of competition. The law sets out a number of rules that
regulates the economic activity of persons dealing in the relevant market.
• Patents are protected by Law no. 82/2002, it takes approximately 3 years for either approving or rejecting
the request.
1. Taxation.
Medium
1- GDP.
Probability
1- Competition Law.
Low
2- Consumer 1- Political
protection Instability.
Law.
Impact
Nike: is examined in this Five Forces analysis (Porter’s model), in terms of the intensity of compe��ve
rivalry, customers’ bargaining power, suppliers’ bargaining power, the threat of subs�tu�on, and the
threat of new entry in the industry environment. These five forces are compe��ve forces based on
external factors that shape the spor�ng goods company’s strategies. Strong compe��on affects the
atainment of Nike’s corporate mission statement and corporate vision statement. This Five Forces
analysis reflects external trends impac�ng the growth of the sports shoes and equipment business
organiza�on. Such trends relate to the PESTEL/PESTLE analysis of Nike Inc. For instance, economic
trends influence compe��on among manufacturers and sellers of sportswear.
Nike’s market position as a leading global business depends on strategic effectiveness in addressing
the five forces affecting the industry environment. The external forces of competitors, buyers,
suppliers, substitutes, and new entrants challenge the athletic shoes and apparel company. The
business strengths enumerated in the SWOT analysis of Nike Inc. help overcome such challenges
noted in this Five Forces analysis.
The intensities of the five forces indicate a competitive market, with rivalry among incumbent
companies, like Nike Inc., strongly influencing the industry. This competitive analysis shows that the
sporting goods company must prioritize competition and place the least priority on the bargaining
power of suppliers, although all five forces are significant in strategic planning. For example, to
address competitive rivalry, Nike’s generic strategy for competitive advantage and strategies for
intensive growth can focus on product development to integrate the latest technologies and advances
in materials, such as rubber and textiles. This approach can increase the desirability and profitability
of the company’s sportswear and equipment. Moreover, Nike’s organizational culture or corporate
culture can enhance service quality at company-owned Nike Town stores, as part of strategies to
attract and retain more customers. This Five Forces analysis describes competitive challenges,
although the industry remains attractive, especially for innovative sporting goods businesses.
Competition among sportswear firms determines market share. This element of the Five Forces
analysis shows how competition influences the industry environment and the performance of athletic
shoes and equipment businesses. The following external factors create the strong force of
competitive rivalry in Nike’s case:
Nike faces the aggressive marketing strategies of competitors, such as Puma, Adidas, Under Armour,
ASICS, New Balance, and Lululemon. Many large, medium, and small companies saturate the athletic
shoes, apparel, and equipment market. In Michael Porter’s Five Forces analysis model, this external
factor imposes a strong force on Nike Inc. Furthermore, the low market growth rate linked to market
saturation makes the sporting goods industry a strategically challenging business environment. Nike’s
marketing mix or 4P counteracts the strong force of competitive rivalry resulting from the above-
mentioned external factors.
Customers affect Nike’s sales performance. This element of the Five Forces analysis shows how
buyers or consumers influence business competitiveness in the industry environment. The following
external factors contribute to the moderate bargaining power of customers on Nike:
Low to moderate switching costs make it easy for customers to buy from Nike’s competitors. The
moderate availability of substitutes also enables customers to buy alternative products, such as non-
athletic footwear, instead of buying from the company. In the Five Forces analysis framework, this
external factor equates to the moderate bargaining power of buyers on Nike’s business. Easy access
to brick-and-mortar and e-commerce businesses adds to the strength of customers’ power. However,
the low buyer concentration reflects the small size of individual buyers and their sportswear
purchases, which weakens buyers’ influence on Nike and leads to the overall moderate force of
customers’ bargaining power in this Five Forces analysis.
Suppliers affect sportswear companies’ access to materials. This element of the Five Forces analysis
tackles suppliers’ influence on sporting goods firms. In Nike’s case, the following external factors
create the weak bargaining power of suppliers:
High availability of supply weakens the bargaining power of suppliers on the company’s access to
materials. Also, the low to moderate supplier concentration means that many suppliers are relatively
small in comparison to the sporting goods giant’s supply chain. The Five Forces analysis model relates
these external factors to the weak force of suppliers on Nike’s business environment. On the other
hand, the moderate number of suppliers equates to their moderate bargaining power over sporting
goods businesses. The combination of these factors leads to the weak bargaining power of Nike’s
suppliers.
This element of the Five Forces analysis shows that suppliers’ power is a low-priority issue for the
sports shoes and clothing company. Nike’s organizational structure or corporate structure affects
supply chain management and how suppliers use their bargaining power on the company. In relation,
improving Nike’s corporate citizenship status may enhance relations with suppliers, who may want to
improve their own corporate social responsibility statuses in collaboration with the company.
Substitutes can reduce Nike’s market share. The Five Forces analysis model considers substitution as a
contributor to the weakening of firms in the sporting goods industry environment. The following
external factors contribute to the moderate force of the threat of substitution against Nike:
New entrants or firms disrupt Nike’s industry environment. This element of the Five Forces analysis
identifies the extent of new entrants’ competitive influence in the sports shoes, apparel, and
equipment market. The following external factors create the moderate threat of new entry against
Nike Inc.:
Strong brands, like Nike, are costly to develop, with brand development efforts often involving
advertising and sponsorship. Also, high economies of scale in manufacturing sporting goods challenge
the growth of new entrants. In the Five Forces analysis model, these two external factors are barriers
that weaken the threat of new entry against Nike and its competitors. However, new entrants can
access advertising and distribution channels for their athletic products. For example, new firms can
distribute their products through Amazon, Costco, Walmart, Home Depot, Target, and eBay; reach
target customers through apps on Apple’s App Store and Google Play; and advertise on Facebook,
Google, and other networks. The combination of the external factors in this element of the Five
Forces analysis leads to the moderate threat of new entry against Nike Inc.
High
or competition.
4-Threats of substitutes or
Medium
substitution
Probability
3- Bargaining
Low
power of suppliers.
Impact
From the above Porter’s 5 Forces IPM, the most important factor which should be
taken into considera�on is the rivalry power of compe�tors.
Weighted
# Factors Weight Rating
score
Comment
Opportunity
1 Relationship with neighboring countries 0.05 4 0.2 O5
2 Lobbies Support 0.02 3 0.06
3 NIKE’s sustainability policy 0.11 4 0.44 Q3
4 life style is supporting the sportswear industry 0.015 3 0.045
5 Technological factors - Growth in ICT sector 0.02 4 0.08 O4
Legal factors – Customer Protection Law- It has been established
7 0.01 3 0.03
and effectively applied in 2006
Competition Law - the law is to ensure economic activity
8 0.01 4 0.04
does not prevent, or restrict the freedom of competition
Low bargaining power of supplier O1
9 0.08 4 0.32
Threat
14 Political Factors – Corruption 0.05 1.5 0.075 T5
15 Government instability 0.01 3 0.03
Economic Factors – High inflation rate reduce the purchasing
16 0.075 2 0.15
power inside the Egyptian market
Economic Factors – High interest rate form an obstacle for
17 0.075 1.5 0.1125 T4
business development
Economic Factors – currency devaluation will reduce the
18 0.1 2.5 0.25 T3
purchasing power inside the Egyptian market
Economic Factors - implementing some polices & procedures
19 0.11 1 0.11 T1
hinder the import of Final-made products
20 Porter’s 5 Forces analysis – High risk of New Entrant 0.1 1.5 0.15 T2
21 High risk of Competitive Rivalry 0.04 3.5 0.14
22 Legal factors – Contract Law is not very efficient in Egypt 0.05 2.5 0.125
Legal factors – Patency Law – it takes approximately 3 years for
23 0.02 1.5 0.02
either approving or rejecting the request
Moderate bargaining power of Buyer
25 0.015 3 0.045
Based on the total EFAS score of 2.56 and the typical Thomas Rating interpretation, here are some strategic
suggestions for Nike:
Risk Mitigation
If there are external threats identified in the EFAS table (not displayed but usually part of
an EFAS), it would be advisable for Nike to develop risk mitigation plans for those
threats.
Diversification
Given the score, diversifying into different markets or product lines could be a good way
to mitigate risks and take advantage of untapped opportunities.
Market Research
Conduct more market research to better understand customer needs, preferences, and
pain points in different geographical or demographic segments. This will help in tailoring
products and marketing strategies more effectively.
Digital Transformation
Embrace technological solutions for better customer experiences, supply chain
management, and data-driven decision-making.
Continuous Monitoring
Periodically review the EFAS table to update it with new data and insights. This will help
Nike adapt its strategies to a changing external environment.
By taking a multi-faceted approach to improvement, Nike has the potential to increase its total EFAS score and
improve its strategic position in the external environment.
Score Weighted Score Weighted Score Weighted Score Weighted Score Weighted
score score Score score score
Price competitiveness 0.25 2.1 0.525 2 0.5 2 0.50 3 0.75 3.5 0.875
Customer Loyalty 0.12 3.5 0.42 3.6 0.432 3 0.36 2.5 0.30 1 0.12
Advertising 0.18 4 0.72 3 0.54 3 0.54 3 0.54 3 0.54
Product Quality 0.2 3 0.6 3.1 0.62 2.5 0.5 2.6 0.52 2.4 0.48
Brand Image (Reputation) 0.15 2.7 0.405 3.5 0.525 3.2 0.48 3 0.45 3.5 0.525
Portfolio diversification 0.1 2 0.2 2 0.2 1.8 0.18 1 0.1 1 0.1
Global Expansion 0.1 2 0.2 2 0.2 2 0.20 1.5 0.15 1.5 0.15
Market Share 0.09 2 0.18 2 0.18 1.9 0.171 1 0.09 1 0.09
Financial Position 0.09 3.5 0.315 3.4 0.306 3.3 0.297 2 0.18 3 0.27
Total Score 3.685 3.503 3.228 3.08 3.045
# Activity S/W
1 Strong Logistic network over worldwide S
3.1.1.2 Operations
# Activity S/W
1 Low Manufacturing Cost S
# Activity S/W
1 Strong Brand Awareness and Brand Value S
2 Huge Customer base S
3 Superior Marketing Capabilities S
4 High Market Share S
Dependency on US Market – Even after having established itself globally, Nike still relies on
5 W
the U.S Market in terms of sales and revenue.
# Activity S/W
1 Aimed For Sustainability S
2 Lack of Diversification: Nike’s over-dependence on sporting apparel W
# Activity S/W
1 Highly qualified In-house Professionals S
2 Poor Labor Conditions in Foreign Countries W
3 Lawsuits W
3.1.2.3 Procurement
# Activity S/W
1 Use recycled material that will reduce the dependence on suppliers S
Weighted
Internal Factors Weight Rating
Score
Comments
Strengths
1- Strong brand name. 0.07 4 0.28
2- Nike is the world's largest supplier and
manufacturer of athletic shoes and apparel,
0.03 4 0.12
as well as a major supplier of sports
equipment.
3- Innovative products as they have strong
0.07 4 0.28
R&D.
4- Mass production associated with low
0.02 3 0.06
manufacturing costs.
5- Nike has different products from
0.04 4 0.16
footwear, apparel & accessories.
6- High distinctive quality products. 0.06 4 0.24
7- In-house Professionals. 0.05 4 0.20
8- High Market Share approximately 39% ofthe
global athletic footwear market 0.03 3 0.09
and 13% of global athletic apparel market.
9- Move to zero & forward initiatives 0.06 4 0.24
10- Well stablished company. 0.02 3 0.06
11- Strong reputation. 0.05 4 0.2
Weaknesses
1- Expensive products. 0.15 2 0.3
2- Major focus on footwear only. 0.12 2 0.24
3- Though the company provides a world-
wide service, the company largely depends 0.1 2 0.2
on the North American market.
4- Nike has no online shopping in Egypt. 0.13 2 0.26
Total 1
Total Weighted Score 2.93
A score of 2.93 suggests that Nike is in a relatively strong position but has room for
improvement, especially in addressing its weaknesses.
Recommenda�ons
• Nike should look into diversifying its product range and reduce dependency on the North
American market.
Impact on
Resource Valuable Rare Inimitable Organization Competitive
Advantage
Strong POP
Global Yes Yes No Yes Competitive
Presence Advantage
Temporary
Strong R&D Yes Yes No Yes Competitive
Advantage
POP
High Quality
Yes No No Yes Competitive
Products
Advantage
Distinctive
Distinctive
innovative
Products like Yes Yes Yes Yes Competitive
“Air Jordan” Advantage
POP
Customer
Yes No No Yes Competitive
loyalty
Advantage
Temporary
Sustainability Yes Yes No Yes Competitive
advantage
POP
Brand Image Yes Yes No Yes Competitive
Advantage
So, it is noticed from the VRIO Model that Nike has a distinctive advantage
which is Distinctive innovative Products & two temporary competitive
advantages which are strong R&D, new sustainable recycled products & move to
zero & renewable energy initiatives.
NIKE STRATEGIC PLAN FINAL PROJECT
Topic : Nike in Egypt Page 26 of 47
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3.4 BCG Matrix
Nike is a global leader in athle�c footwear, apparel, and equipment, and has different product
segments that can be classified according to the BCG matrix. Here is a summary of what I
found:
Nike’s cash cows are its hardware, equipment, and apparel products, which have high
market share but low market growth. These products generate more revenue than they
consume and provide cash for inves�ng in other products.
3.4.2 Stars
Nike’s stars are its footwear products, which have high market share and high market
growth. These products generate the highest amount of cash and require constant
innova�on to maintain their posi�on.
Nike’s ques�on marks are its brands Converse, Jordan, and Hurley, which have low
market share but high market growth. These products have the poten�al to become
cash cows or stars if they can increase their market share.
3.4.4 Dogs
Nike’s dogs are its golf products, which have low market share and low market growth.
These products do not generate much cash and may be divested or discon�nued.
Nike has a strong compe��ve advantage in the athle�c apparel industry through product
differen�a�on and brand recogni�on. Nike’s value crea�on is based on offering premium
products at a higher-end price and crea�ng an emo�onal connec�on with its customers.
Nike has also expanded its presence in emerging markets, such as China and India, where it
has more room to grow. Nike’s main challenges are the increasing compe��on from rivals
like Adidas and Under Armour, the changing consumer preferences and trends, and the
environmental and social issues related to its supply chain.
Parameter
Comments
May- May-20 May- May- Industry
Parameters
19 21 22 Average
Current Ratio Although the results show a downward trend in 2022, after
(Current Assets/ Current 2.001 2.481 2.717 2.629 1.72 three yearsof continuous ascent, it still remains higher than
Liabilities ) industry average values, this indicated that the firm has a lot of
money tied up in non- productive assets (Shareholders point of
Quick Ratio view). Creditors point of view,highlights firm ability to cover
1.39 1.59 2.01 1.85 0.79
(Current Assets – short term obligations
Inventory)
/ Current Liabilities
Debt Ratio 61.7% from the company asset are financed by debt and the
(Total Liabilities (Debt) 0.384 1.198 0.737 0.617 - other 38.3% from asset are financed by Equity
/Total
assets)
Gross Margin 44.671 43.421 44.82 45.983 - Since 2020 the gross margin is in increasing trend that confirm
(Gross Profit /Total Sales) Efficient performance of production & logistics
EBIT Margin 12.199 8.328 15.575 14.29 Since 2020 the EBIT margin is in increasing trend that confirm
(EBIT / Total Sales) the efficient operation management performance.
Net Profit Margin 10.299 6.788 12.858 12.943 High combined performance of liquidity, assets and debt
Net Income / Total Sales management on operating results
ROE The ROE is in increasing trend since 2020 and higher that
(Net Profit (Income) / 44.56 31.52 44.857 39.565 31.46 theindustry average confirming high performance
Total
Equity
The ROA is in increasing trend since 2020 and higher that the
ROA 16.987 8.101 15.174 14.994 12.54
(Net Profit (Income) / industry average confirming high performance in
Total managingAssets that facilitates planning for expansion.
Assets
Book Value per Share 5.765 5.17 8.09 9.726 Both Book value per stock and EPS are in increasing trend
since2020 confirming the good performance of the company
Earnings per Share - EPS 2.49 1.06 3.56 3.75
Source Macrotrend
The financial ratios showing a very strong financial position for NIKE
Internal Factors
Strengths Weaknesses
1. Strong brand name. 1. Expensive products.
2. Nike is the world's largest supplier and 2. Major focus on footwear only.
manufacturer of athletic shoes andapparel, as 3. Though the company provides a world- wide
well as a major supplier of sports equipment. service, the company largely depends on the
3. Innovative products as they have strong R&D. North American market.
4. Mass production associated with low 4. Nike has no online shopping in Egypt.
manufacturing costs.
5. Nike has different products from footwear,
apparel & accessories.
6. High distinctive quality products.
7. In-house Professionals.
8. High Market Share approximately 39% ofthe
global athletic footwear market and 13% of
global athleticapparel market.
9. Move to zero & forward initiatives.
10. Well stablished company.
11. Strong reputation.
External Factors
Opportunities Threats
1. Relationship with neighboring countries. 1. Political factor – Corruption
2. Nike’s sustainability policy. 2. Government instability
3. Life style supporting the sportswear industry. 3. Economic factor – High inflation rate reduce
4. Technological factor – Growth in ICT sector. The purchasing power inside the Egyptian
5. Legal Factor – Customer protection Law market.
6. Low Bargaining power of supplier 4. Economic factor – High interest rate form a
obstacle for business development.
5. High risk of Competitive Rivalry.
6. High Force of new entrant.
7. Moderate risk of substitute product
8. Economic Factor – currency devaluation will
reduce the purchasing power inside
Egyptian market.
Weighted
Strategic Factors Weight Rating Duration
Score
Opportunities short med long
Relationship with neighboring countries 0.05 4 0.2 x x
(EFAS)
Where IF and EF score are 2.93 & 2.56 respectively which means that the point will fall in V
square that mean we should Hold and maintain that limiting the strategies to Market
penetration and Product development.
4.5 QSPM
Retrenchment-
Market Market Product
Acquisition Turnaround
# Factors Weight Penetration development development
strategy
Weighted Weighted Weighted Weighted Weighted
Rate Rate Rate Rate Rate
Score Score Score Score Score
Opportunity
O1 Relationship with neighboring countries 0.05 4 0.2 4 0.2 1 0.05 4 0.2 4 0.2
O2 Nike’s sustainability policy 0.02 4 0.08 4 0.08 2 0.04 4 0.08 4 0.08
O3 Technological factors - Growth in ICT sector in Egypt 0.1 4 0.4 4 0.4 3 0.3 3 0.3 4 0.4
O4 Low Burgeoning power of supplier 0.08 2 0.16 2 0.16 1 0.08 4 0.32 4 0.32
Threat
Political Factors – Corruption
T1 0.05 1.5 0.075 2 0.1 4 0.2 2 0.1 2 0.1
T2 Economic Factors – Hight inflation rate 0.08 2 0.16 2.5 0.2 3 0.24 1.5 0.12 3 0.24
Economic Factors – currency devaluation will reducethe
T3 0.1 2 0.2 2 0.2 3 0.3 2.5 0.25 3 0.3
purchasing power inside the Egyptian market
Economic Factors – implementation policies & procedures
T4 0.07 1.5 0.105 1 0.07 3 0.21 1 0.07 2 0.14
T5 Porter’s 5 Forces analysis – High risk of New Entrant 0.1 2 0.2 1 0.1 2 0.2 1 0.1 2 0.2
Strength
S1 Strong Brand Awareness and Brand Value 0.05 4 0.2 3 0.15 1 0.05 4 0.2 4 0.2
S2 Nike as the world’s largest supplier and manufacturer 0.03 4 0.12 2 0.06 1 0.03 4 0.12 4 0.12
S3 Innovative products with strong R&D 0.02 4 0.08 2.5 0.05 1 0.02 4 0.08 4 0.08
Mass production with low manufacturing costs
S4 0.02 3 0.06 2 0.04 1 0.02 2.5 0.05 4 0.08
A company's vision statement indicates how the founders foresee the company to be in
the distant future. It presents a future image of the company upon the realiza�on of its
long-term goals. The Nike vision statement is “to remain the most authen�c, connected,
and dis�nc�ve brand.”
Take note of the explicit use of the term “remain” in the Nike vision statement. This
indicates the company's self-recogni�on that it has already achieved the status of being
the most authen�c, connected, and dis�nc�ve brand in the global spor�ng goods industry
and that its goal is to stay at this spot. No one would dare ques�on this claim as any
market data clearly verifies that Nike is indeed the top-performing company in the
industry today. Thus, the Nike vision statement is targeted to keep the company in this
top posi�on.
4.2.1.1 Authenticity
Over the years, Nike has proven its authen�city in terms of product lines and services.
Nike has always created products that deliver superior performance and exceed the
customer's expecta�ons. It do not simply sell products to generate revenue, but it exert
insurmountable efforts to expand human poten�al at every possible opportunity.
4.2.1.2 Connectivity
The marke�ng strategies of Nike are geared towards crea�ng and maintaining a strong
personal connec�on between each of its consumers. Since the beginning, Nike
Corpora�on has always been people-oriented and focused on the improvement of
people's lives. Nike has several programs that support different sectors of society, making
the company very relatable and keeping Nike posi�vely connected to the market.
A company's mission statement represents its short-term goals and draws aten�on to
what it intends to deliver in order to achieve these goals. The Nike mission statement
is “to bring inspira�on and innova�on to every athlete in the world.”
If we break this statement down, it is easy to see that the company's mission has three
core components: bringing inspira�on, crea�ng innova�on, and suppor�ng every athlete
in the world. To beter comprehend the Nike mission statement, let us discuss what each
of these components signifies.
Nike's slogan “Just Do It” embodies this component perfectly. With this very simple
catchphrase, the company is able to inspire and mo�vate athletes of all levels to push
themselves beyond their limits and achieve their bodies' maximum poten�al. The
company also has a very efficient marke�ng strategy of using well-known role models in
the sports community to empower the ordinary person, par�cularly the youth, inspiring
them to go into sports and break outside their personal boundaries.
One of Nike's founders, Bill Bowerman, had released a statement saying that “if you have
a body, you are an athlete.” This is an accurate reflec�on of the company's point of view
that every single person is an athlete, not just professional players or those that have a
natural talent for sports. With this in mind, Nike manufactures sports apparel, shoes, and
equipment meant for a diverse market. The company embraces universality and
provides a wide range of products to athletes of all skill levels, body types, and personal
goals.
4.2.3.1 Community
Just like a team in any sport, Nike believes in the spirit of unity and community. Each
member of the company is equally valuable, and individual contribu�ons are always
appreciated as everyone works together to achieve a common goal.
4.2.3.2 Sustainability
Not many people realize it, but Nike is heavily invested in environmental endeavors, like
its extraordinary efforts in recycling plas�c botles to create sustainable footwear in the
form of its Flyknit technology.
4.2.3.3 Diversity
Nike Corpora�on has built a very diverse and crea�ve interna�onal team that has been
very effec�ve in making the company's compelling presence felt all over the world.
Because of its impressive diversifica�on strategies, Nike products appeal to people of all
ages, races, walks of life, and athle�c backgrounds.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
6.Strategic Evaluation & Control
6.1 Balance scorecard:
6.1.1 Why are the above objectives appropriate for the project?
Nike's strategic financial manager seeks to identify the most effective strategies to
maximize the organization's market value. Additionally, it makes sure the
organization's plans are accomplished efficiently so it can achieve short-term and
long-term goals and maximize shareholder value. It aims to achieve the business
goals of the organization by managing financial resources.
For the business strategy to succeed, employees need to have the necessary
knowledge and skills. Positions that are critical for strategy execution should be filled
with the best people. In other words, these positions should have no skills gap. It
may be necessary to employ training, valid selection procedures, and effective
succession planning to achieve this goal.
The strategy is carried out using information systems, networks, and infrastructure.
To achieve the strategy's objectives, IT should be aligned properly with technology.
Managing change effectively across the organization is essential for delivering the
strategy. Leadership teams need to assess their company culture regularly to make
sure it aligns with the company's. Otherwise, you might need to adjust how
employees are rewarded and supported to align their actions with the company's
mission, values, vision, and strategy. Also, the company may need to change the type
of candidates it recruits and selects and alter its training program.
As for the timeline, the companies usually have financial periods that end after one
year, which are subdivided into quarters. Therefore, it is only appropriate to measure
progress after one year when the financial period comes to an end. The other reason
why one year is an appropriate timeline is that the budget is allocated for various
company activities each year. So, if the resources were not enough for a given goal,
more can be reallocated to that activity. The measures are appropriate for one
reason. They are realistic and not very ambitious. The maximum measure has been
5%. This is a very good move.
The Knowledge City initiative in Egypt represents a significant investment in the nation's
telecommunications and ICT infrastructure. It is designed to foster innovation and
entrepreneurship, providing a supportive environment through Creative Innovation
Hubs. This development could potentially offer opportunities for companies like Nike to
leverage advanced technologies and a more innovative environment in Egypt.
Nike holds a robust market position, with different product segments showing varying
levels of market share and growth. While its footwear segment is thriving with high
market share and growth, other brands under Nike have potential for growth. Nike faces
challenges like stiff competition and changing consumer preferences, necessitating
continuous innovation and adaptation to maintain its market lead.
Although specific financial ratios are not provided, the document suggests that Nike is in
a strong financial position. This financial stability is crucial for driving innovation,
expanding market presence, and navigating through competitive and market challenges.
Nike should leverage the opportunities arising from the Knowledge City initiative
in Egypt by possibly investing in innovation hubs or collaborating with local
entities engaged in technology and innovation.
To enhance its market position, Nike should strategically invest in its 'Question
Marks' brands to increase their market share. Continuous innovation and
attention to consumer preferences are vital to maintaining the market share of its
'Stars' segment, particularly the footwear products.
1. researchandmarkets.com
2. studocu.com
3. panmore.com
4. nike.com
5. about.nike.com
6. thomasnet.com
7. sis.gov.eg
8. https://ijarlg.journals.ekb.eg/article_306477_557688dd14068896cfb01bf630baf
9. exchange-rates.org
10. bcgmatrixanalysis.com
11. iknowfirst.com
12. Niven, P. R. (2018). Balanced scorecard step-by-step for government and
nonprofit agencies. Hoboken, N.J: J. Wiley & Sons.
13. Bright, D. S., Cortes, A. H., Hartmann, E., Parboteeah, P., Pierce, J. L., Reece,
M., Shah, A., ... OpenStax (Nonprofit organization),. (2019). Principles of
management.
14. Due tomorrow: nike project plan powerpoint presentation - risks and |
Management homework help (sweetstudy.com)
15. pestleanalysis.com
16. www.globaldata.com