Unit 2: Linguistic Principles
Dr. Ark Verma
Outline
• Identify elementary properties of language.
• Visiting Basic Linguistic Concepts
• Overview important theoretical positions about
syntax/grammar.
• Develop an understanding about how these concepts
might relate to psychological variables.
“I don’t want to talk grammar. I want to talk like a lady
in a flower shop.”-Eliza Doolittle/Bernard Shaw.
Why Is grammar important?
• Grammar consists of the rules of a language.
• Grammar lets one understand the properties of
language.
• It is matter of controversy whether rules of grammar
are psychological real or they just serve as descriptive
properties of languages.
Basic Grammatical Concepts: Word Order
Is “I see what I eat” the same as “I eat what I see”???
Word order
• Order of words in the sentences of the language
might have an impact on word meaning.
• Syntactic rules of the language determine the word
order. For e.g. word order is:
– Subject-verb-object (SVO) in English.
• The boy chased the girl.
• The girl chased the boy.
– Subject-object-verb (SOV) in Japanese/Hindi.
• Taro to hanako that book gave.
• Ram ne Sita ko kitaab di.
• However, not all languages are strict about word
order.
– For e.g.: Russian permits a variety of possibilities.
• Viktor celeut Lenu.
• Viktor Lenu celeut.
• celeut Viktor Lenu.
• Lenu celeut Viktor.
• These languages may make use of affixes for
conveying specific meanings (suffixes & prefixes).
– Trip, tripped, tripping etc.
– In Turkish:
• gel: come, gelemedim: I could’nt come etc.
Basic Properties: Duality of Patterning
• Unique to human languages.
• Why dual?:
– At one level, a large number of meaningful elements,
or words.
– At another, a relatively small number of meaningless
elements (like phones) that combine to form words.
– In spoken languages these meaningless elements are
individual speech sounds.
• Universal property of languages.
– All languages have duality: a basic level of
meaningless elements and a level where these combine
to form meaningful elements.
– All languages have a defined set of rules which govern
the combination of these basic elements to more
sophisticated elements.
• For e.g. port, plort & pbort.
• Which means:
– /p/ cannot be followed by /b/ at the beginning of the
word. Or
– A word cannot begin with two stop consonants.
Basic Properties: Phonology
• Acoustics: study of physical properties of sounds.
– For e.g. using a sound spectrogram.
• Phonetics: the physical properties of speech sounds,
manner & place of articulation.
• Phonology: the sound categories each language uses
to divide up the space of possible sounds.
– E.g. pin (aspirated) vs. spin (unaspirated).
• Phoneme: basic unit of sound in a particular language.
– Changing phonemes might affect the meaning of the word:
• In Thai, “paa” (unaspirated) = “forest” while “paa”
(aspirated) = “to split”.
• Hence they are different phonemes.
• Aspirated: sound produced with an audible breath.
• Unaspirated: sound produced without… .
• Allophones: different forms of the same phoneme.
– Pin & spin.
• Minimal pairs: two sounds in a word differing by just
one sound.
– For e.g.: “dog”, “log”, “cog” etc.
• Sound is produced by moving parts of the vocal tract,
i.e. lips, teeth, tongue, mouth and larynx.
• They are categorized on the basis of their source.
• Larynx modifies the flow of air from the lungs and
produces a range of higher frequencies.
• Vowels: sounds made with a relatively free flow of
air, the vocal tract remains more or less open. E.g. a,
e, i, o, u.
• Dipthongs: a type of vowel which is a combination of
two vowel sounds. E.g. boy, wow, cow, my etc.
• Consonants: sounds made by closing or restricting
some part of the vocal tract as the air flows through it.
E.g. p, b, t, d, k, g.
• Place of articulation: part of the vocal tract that is
closed or constricted during articulation.
– E.g.
• dentals: sounds formed by putting the tongue tip behind
the upper front teeth. As Ɵ (theta).
• labiodentals: sounds formed by putting the lower lip to
the upper teeth.
• Manner of articulation: Way of modifying airflow in
turn affecting the sound produced.
– E.g.
• stops: when the airflow is completely restricted, as in
/p/, /b/, /t/ etc.
• fricatives: formed by constricting airstream making
hissing sound, as in /f/, /v/, /s/ etc.
• Syllables: rythmic units that form words. Smallest
note in a word.
– Syl-la-ble (3 syllables), matter (2 syllables), Cat (1
syllable).
• Syllables are formed from:
– Onset + Rime;
• onset: initial consonant or cluster. E.g. /c/ in cat or /cl/ in
cloud.
• rime: nucleus + coda
– nucleus: central vowel. /ou/ in “cloud”.
– coda: final consonant or cluster. /d/ in “cloud”.
Basic Properties: Morphology
– Morphology: governs system of rules for word
formation. describes smallest grammatical units which
form words, i.e. morphemes. e.g. Simplest example of
morphemes is:
• Play + er = Player, where Play is a free morpheme (that can
stand alone) and ‘er’ is a bound morpheme that cannot stand
alone.
• Free morphemes can also be called lexical morphemes, i.e.
units that can stand alone as nouns, verbs etc. they do no alter
the meaning of words.
• Bound morphemes are also called grammatical morphemes,
they are tiny markers as (er, ed, ness) which can be added to
words and affect their meaning.
Basic Properties: Phrase Structure
• Sentences can be divided into smaller constituents
called ‘phrases’.
• Phrases can be understood as combination of a
critical word (noun or verb) with other words,
expressing a single idea.
– The young swimmer accepted the silver medal.
– (the young swimmer) (accepted the silver medal)
– (the young swimmer) (accepted [the silver medal])
• Phrase-structure rules: syntactic rules that specify the
permissible sequences of constituents in a language.
• The central idea is that sentences are built up
hierarchically from smaller units using rewrite rules.
• Phrase structure grammar: a set of rewrite rules.
• E.g.:
– (1), S-> NP + VP
– (2), NP-> DET + N
– (3), NP-> N
– (4), VP-> V + NP
– (5), VP-> V
– (6), N-> vlad, boris, vampire, ghost…
– (7), V-> loves, hates, likes, bites…
– (8), DET-> a, an, the..
• Phrase-structure ambiguity: p-s rules might also lead
to a degree of ambiguity. E.g. :
– They are eating apples.
– S: (NP)They (VP)are eating apples.
(NP) They (VP) are eating (NP) apples.
– S: (NP) They (V) are (NP) eating apples.
(NP) They (V) are (adj) eating (N) apples.
Basic Properties: Linguistic Productivity
• Our ability to create and comprehend novel
utterances.
• Given the infinite amount of possible utterances, we
must be storing rules (finite) for creating sentences.
E.g. by embedding one sentence into other.
– VP-> V + S
– (V) The child thinks (S) the man left.
• Another possibility:
– S-> NP + V + S
• Such a rule, which refers to itself is called a recursive
rule.
• It is resilient property of human language, even used
by children.
• We can coin new words when needed, also use
existing ones in new combinations.
• However, not all aspects of language are productive.
BREAK!!!
Linguistic approaches to syntax.
• We will visit a few theories pertaining to
syntax/grammar.
• Special focus on the work of Noam Chomsky.
• Revisit the relevance of syntax to psychological
variables.
• American linguist, had a profound Noam Chomsky
impact on linguistic thought.
(1928-present)
• Two ideas:
– Relation between language & brain
and child language acquisition.
– Technical description of the structure
of language.
• Acc to him:
– Language is innate, biologically
programmed, species specific.
– Independent of other cognitive
structures.
Chomsky…
• Distinguished between:
– Linguistic competence: our abstract knowledge of the
language. E.g. intuitions about grammatically
acceptable samples.
– Linguistic performance: our actual language
production, limited by our cognitive capacity. E.g.
simple grammatical utterances, speech errors etc.
Chomsky…
• Also specified:
– Externalized Language (E-Language): the language
we use. Samples & properties of real utterances.
Linguistics should be concerned with describing the
regularities of real language via grammar.
– Internalized Language (I-Language): the knowledge
of language. The mental phenomena that precede &
follow performance.
Relation between Language & Grammar.
• Language: infinite set of well-formed sentences.
• Grammar: formal device with a finite set of rules, that
can generate all possible sentences in a language &
no bad sentences. Hence, generative grammar.
• Theories of language, composed of more specific
hypotheses about the structure or organization of
language.
Evaluating Grammars…Chomsky!
• Observational adequacy: a grammar must be able to
generate all the acceptable but none of the
unacceptable sentences.
• Descriptive adequacy: must be able to describe the
relationships between utterances that are similar or
not similar. E.g. syntactic differences.
• Explanatory adequacy: involve s the ability to
explain the role of linguistic universals in language
acquisition. E.g. how children choose from samples
& deduce correct rules.
Transformational grammar
• Acc to Chomsky, phrase-structure rules do not
capture linguistic competence fully.
• These relations can be captured by a set of rewrite
rules, called transformational rules.
• Transformational rule: a grammatical rule for
converting one syntactic structure to another.
• Transformational grammar: based on transformations.
• Examples:
– Particle movement transformation:
• John phoned up the woman. (VP-> V + part + NP)
• John phoned the woman up. (VP-> V + NP + part)
– Passivization transformation:
• The vampire chases the ghost.
• The ghost was chased by the vampire.
Some more from Chomsky…
• Distinguished between:
– Surface structure: refers to the superficial
arrangement of constituents, and reflects the order in
which the words are pronounced.
– Deep structure: refers to the underlying structure of a
sentence that conveys the meaning.
• Lets elaborate:
– Flying planes can be dangerous.
– (deep structure ambiguity: single surface structure,
two possible deep structures).
– (a) John is easy to please.
– (b) John is eager to please.
– John is object in (a) while subject in (b).
– Arlene played the tuba.
– The tuba was played by Arlene.
– Same deep structure, different surface structure.
Much ado about gramamar…
• There might still be problems:
– Most grammars still cannot fully account for all the
linguistic utterances.
– They also do not take into account cognitive
processing considerations.
– Also they lack the details as far as smaller constituents
may be concerned.
Two alternatives…
• Lexical-functional grammar/psychologically
realistic grammar (Bresnan, 1978, 2001): takes into
account properties of individual lexical items, i.e.
words.
• Lexical entries include the various forms of the word
(e.g. kiss, kissed, kissing) and the types of compatible
sentences.
– Mary kissed John.
– John was kissed by Mary.
– kiss: (agent= subject, patient = object) &
– (be) kiss: (agent= object, patient = subject).
• Advantages:
– Helps simplify the explanatory burden to lexicon.
– Seems a more economical/plausible way of explaining
effortless comprehension of sentences.
– Take into account the consideration that working
through syntactic rules might be more difficult than
retrieving from the mental lexicon.
• Views of Ray Jackendoff (2002):
– Rejects the view that syntax is the core of our
linguistic knowledge.
– Rejects that linguistic productivity is solely due to
syntactic rules.
– Suggests that grammars have multiple formation rules
(syntax, semantics, phonology) which operate in
parallel to facilitate simplified language processing.
– Grammars must study these interfaces.
• E.g.
– It’s only a parent, not a teacher.
– It’s only apparent, not real.
Conclusions…
• It is important to know the linguistic rules to have a
deep understanding of any language.
• Deep understanding of properties of languages may
help in studying language processing.
• However, linguistic rules/syntax are not paramount
and alternative views must also be considered.
Thank You!!!