Research Report
Local Sensation Changes and Altered Hip Muscle
Function Following Severe Ankle Sprain
 Background and Purpose. Changes in sensory information have been shown                                     Joanne E
 to influence muscle function locally. Some clinicians, however, believe that the                             Bullock=Saxton
 influem?may be m r e wemennve.     To investigate this clinical concept, subjects with
 severe ankle sprain were assesed for local sensation changes and p m ' m a l hipl
 back muscle function. Subjects. Of a total of 361 potential subjects whose medi-
 cal histolies were assessed, 20 men (age 18-35years) who had previously sus-
 tained a severe unilateral ankle sprain and 11 matched "control" subjects with
 no preuiaus lower-limb injury participated in the study. Metboth. Using this ex-
perimental model, tests of vibration sensation in the ankle (indicating sensation
 changes) as well as surface electromyograpby of muscle recruitment patterns for
 hip extension (indicating muscle function proximally) of the bicepsfemoris, glu-
 teus m - i m u s ,and lumbar erector spinae muscles were made on both sides of the
 unilaterally injured and matched control subjects. Results. Signflcant decreases
 in vibrafionperception and signflcant delays in gluteus marimus muscle recruit-
 ment during hip extension were found in the injured group. Conclusion and
 Discusdon. The author concludes that both local sensory a n d p m ' m a l muscle
function changes are amciated with unilateral severe ankle sprain. [Bullock-
 Saxton JE, Local sensation changes and altered hip muscle function following
 severe ankle sprain. Pbys Ther. 1994;74:17-31.1
Key Words: Ankle; Electromyograpby; Hip; Muscle pe@ormance, lower extremity;
Sensation; Sprains and strains.
The existence of a complicated feed-               input from the ankle joint and its              gated the response to various articular
back system between muscles and                    influence on the postural control of            stimuli of decerebrate and, in some
joints anti the central nervous system             the muscles.                                    instances, spinalized cats. They found
is well recognized. Interference with                                                              that increasing the articular pressure
sensory feedback may affect a per-                 This relationship between joint recep-          in the knee joint, as well as pinching
son's ability to monitor movements o r             tor information and muscle function             its capsule, led to decreased quadri-
to make appropriate adaptations and                has interested researchers for some             ceps femoris muscle (ie, extensor)
adjustments to movement. For exam-                 years, and the relationships between            activity, whereas pinching the knee
ple, a change in postural stability                stimulation of joint afferents and mus-         capsule elicited an increased response
when a person stands on one leg                    cle activity have been demonstrated in          from the knee flexors (biceps femoris
following ankle sprain was attributed              both animal and human studies.2-5               muscles). In their study of human
by Freerr1an1 to altered proprioceptive            For example, Ekholm et alz investi-             subjects, Stokes and Young3 consid-
                                                                                                   ered that joint injury can decrease the
                                                                                                   activity of muscles, leading to weak-
                                                                                                   ness and wasting. They measured the
JE Bullock-Saxton, PhD, BPhty(Hons), is Lecturer, Department of Physiotherapy, The University of
Queenslanti, St Lucia, 4072, Queensland, Australia.                                                rectified integrated electromyographic
                                                                                                   (EMG) activity of both quadriceps
This study was approved by The University of Queensland Ethics Committee and the Australian
Armed Foxes Ethics Committee.
                                                                                                   femoris muscles of patients who had
                                                                                                   a meniscectomy or an arthrotomy and
Thls article was submitted August 12, 1992, and was accepted July 30, 1993.
Physical Therapy /Volume 74, Number ldanuary 1994
recorded large decreases (80%) in           influence the muscle function about             the motor regulation of body posture.
quadriceps femoris muscle activity on       that joint. However, a more complex             In their experimental study of pos-
the side of surgety. This effect per-       relationship than this has also been            tural stability following ankle sprain,
sisted for up to 15 days postopera-         proposed. This proposed relationship            Tropp et al" found a significant de-
tively (30%-40%), despite the lack of       is that altered sensation in one joint          crease in postural stability when com-
pain at that time.                          could lead to muscle function                   pared with noninjured subjects, thus
                                            changes in another more proximal                confirming Wykes'9 observations.
A possible mechanism for this de-           joint. This concept has been the basis          Recent experiments by Gauffin and
creased activity might be the excita-       of teaching by Lewit7 and Jandas for            colleagues12 have indicated that pa-
tion of joint afferents in the capsule      several decades. Some experimental              tients with unilateral anterior cruciate
because of pressure caused by joint         data on cats d o exist demonstrating            ligament injury demonstrated bilateral
infusion. Indeed, in 1965, De Andrade       that the motor system has a tendency            alterations in their postural control
et a14 showed that in healthy human         to extend dysfunction into a larger             when compared with uninjured sub-
subjects and in those with pathology,       area.9                                          jects. They postulated that these alter-
infusion of saline into the knee joint                                                      ations may be due to "central adjust-
was responsible for decreased activity      Although m a l t to extrapolate re-             ments of motor control." The
of the quadriceps femoris muscles.          sults from animal studies to human              postulation that changes in sensory
Results of recent studies by Iles et al5    behavior, Wyke9 observed that in the            input could cause alterations in the
have indicated that as the volume of        cat, an injury of the joint capsule or          function of muscles in a joint remote
saline infused into the human knee          ligaments influences muscle activity            from the injury seems to be well
joint is increased, the amplitude of        not only in muscles that cross the              justified, although no direct experi-
the H-reflex is decreased and that          injured joint, but also in remote mus-          mental evidence of this in humans
even apparently imperceptible vol-          cles. Wyke stated that                          has yet been reported.
umes of saline could decrease quadri-          . . . interruption of the flow of impulses
ceps femoris muscle activity. In these         from the mechano-receptors in a joint        This study was conducted, therefore,
studies, the decrease of extensor              capsule into the central nervous system      to investigate whether a localized
activity following afferent stimulation        should result in clinically evident dis-     lesion at a peripheral joint such as the
was highlighted.                               turbances of perception of joint posi-       ankle influenced the sensation in that
                                               tion and movement and of the reflexes        area as well as the muscle function in
The relationship between ankle artic-          concerned with posture and gak9W)            more proximal regions such as the
ular mechanoreceptor function and                                                           hip and pelvis and, if so, whether
the reflex activity in the limb of the      Thus, the arthrokinetic reflex might            such changes were interrelated. The
cat was also investigated by Freeman        be considered as a triggering factor            sensory and muscle function in both
and Wyke.6 Establishing the normal          that would initiate a whole chain of            limbs of subjects who had previously
reflex muscular response of the tibia-      adaptation reactions, eventually result-        sustained a severe unilateral ankle
lis anterior and gastrocnemius mus-         ing in a changed movement pattern.              sprain was compared with that in
cles, these researchers decreased the       The possibility that sensory deficits           both limbs of noninjured ("control")
afferent information from the joint by      associated with localized injury in one         subjects.
local anesthesia and by electrocoagu-       part of the body influence muscle
lation of the articular tissues. Both       function in another and may ulti-               For this study, appropriate tests of
procedures caused an abolition of the       mately lead to pain has considerable            sensory and muscle function needed
normal reflex muscular response to          implications for the physical therapist,        to be selected. Freeman et all3 theo-
movement, indicating the importance         influencing both the preventive and             rized that ankle instability following
of articular information to regulation      therapeutic approaches to patient               injury develops primarily due to le-
of muscle activity. Freeman and Wyke6       care.                                           sions of mechanoreceptors in the
believe that muscle activity is regu-                                                       joint capsule and ligaments. This insta-
lated through the contribution of the       Wyke9 also argued that articular sen-           bility impairs both the static position
articular impulses to a facilitatory bias   sory information is vital to normal             and joint movement sense. This the-
to the gamma motoneurons of the             postural reflexes. He cited observa-            ory was not supported by Gross,l4
muscle spindles. If such an influence       tions of impaired postural reflex activ-        who compared active and passive
exists, then their early assertion that     ity of muscles following severe ankle           joint position sense in both injured
articular afferents influence local mus-    sprain of humans and proposed that              and uninjured subjects and found no
cle activity is correct and has been        this might be a reflection of the im-           significant difference between them.
supported by the later research of Iles     paired proprioceptive information               However, the method of testing used
et a1.5                                     from the damaged mechanoreceptors.              for assessing joint position sense
                                            As afferent impulses travel to cerebel-         involved strapping the foot to a mov-
This experimental evidence supports         lar and cortical centers,1° the im-             able footplate with firm pressure. It is
the clinical observation that a joint       paired afferent information from the            possible that mechanoreceptors on
injury involving sensory receptors can      ankle joint may be sufficient to impair         both plantar and dorsal surfaces of
                                                                          Physical Therapy/Volume 74, Number 1,January 1994
the foot, which were not compro-            provide information on the integrity      onstrated in the uninjured control
mised by the lateral ligament ankle         of sensory receptors possibly dam-        group.
injury, were able to provide sufficient     aged due to ankle ligamentous injury.
cues for the subject to determine           This assessment of sensation is capa-     Method and Materials
ankle joint position. Barrack and col-      ble of a high degree of control in
leagues's appear to have developed a        comparison with current tests used        Subjects
successful measurement procedure            for assessing tactile, two-point dis-
for eliminating pressure cues during        crimination or joint movement sense       Two groups of subjects were studied:
testing of joint position sense of the      around the ankle. For these reasons,      an "injured" group, who had previ-
knee following anterior cruciate liga-      vibration perception was chosen as        ously sustained a severe unilateral
ment injury. These researchers found        the variable for assessment of sensory    ankle sprain, and a matched "control"
significant deficits in joint position      function in this study.                   group, who had no previous lower-
sense of' the knee.                                                                   limb injury. To control variables be-
                                            Muscle function in each limb was          tween the two groups of subjects, a
If damage to sensory receptors from         investigated in terms of the temporal     suitable population of sufficient size
severe ankle joint sprain is to be          sequence of activation (as illustrated    was sought. The armed forces pro-
accurately measured, a test that is         in EMG signals) of the gluteus maxi-      vided such a source. The Australian
sensitive to changes in sensory recep-      mus, hamstring, and ipsilateral and       Defence Force (Army) gave permis-
tor function is needed. Two factors         contralateral lumbar erector spinae       sion for their soldiers and officers to
were considered in this regard: (1)         muscles during the movement of hip        volunteer to be subjects for this study.
the influence of joint stress on dis-       extension from a prone-lying position.
charge rates of mechanoreceptors and        JandaI7has claimed that the determi-      For the injured group, subjects were
(2) the effects of age on sensation.        nation of the order of activation of      included if they had previously sus-
Wyke? in his description of three           muscles performing a simple move-         tained a grade 11+ or 111 (severe or
types of articular nerves, outlined         ment is important for the understand-     unstablela) lateral ankle sprain that
how the frequently occurring group I1       ing of the methods used by patients       was significant enough to have caused
nerve fibers terminated onto both           to move their body and that this          marked swelling at the time of injury
low-threshold,slowly adapting mecha-        knowledge helps to reveal the area of     and discomfort while walking. Treat-
noreceptors (type I) and low-               impairment. Hip extension was se-         ment must have included a period of
threshold, rapidly adapting mechan-         lected for this study, not only because   immobilization.The subjects' right
oreceptors (type II). The type I            the studied muscles were separated        side must also have been the pre-
mechanoreceptors, found in clusters         from the site of injury but also be-      ferred (or "skill") side. Subjects were
around the joint capsule, where the         cause of its functional importance in     excluded if they had had a significant
greatest degrees of stress during           stance and locomotion. Due to the         injury to any other lower-limb joint or
moveme:nt are likely to occur, are          complexities of the gait process, it      a significant injury to either leg. Of
sensitive to changes in joint pressure      was considered advisable to isolate       particular concern was the need to
and position. Their rate of discharge       the hip extension motion rather than      exclude subjects who may have had a
adapts ~ipidlyto the degree of joint        to study muscle function during gait.     history of incoordination or clumsi-
stress. It is likely that capsular tears,   Much greater control could be im-         ness (operationally defined as a his-
rupture of small nerve fibers, and          posed experimentally by assessing         tory of sensory and/or motor dysfunc-
joint edema following ankle sprain          muscle activation during hip exten-       tion not related to injury, in the
could cause alterations of discharge        sion from a prone-lying position than     absence of intellectual impairment). It
from these receptors, as indicated by       would be possible during locomotion.      was essential to ensure that an exist-
Freeman et ale13                                                                      ing neurological deficit was not a
                                            In my study, the effects of ankle         predisposing cause of the ankle
In persons without joint injuries,          sprain (the independent variable) on      sprain, because the finding of differ-
perception of some superficial and          vibration perception at the ankle and     ences in localized sensory function in
deep sensations decreases with age.         the pattern of activation of specified    the control group could then be said
These sensations include tactile, two-      muscles around the hip and low back       to be a cause, rather than an afteref-
point discrimination;vibration per-         (the dependant variables) were mea-       fect, of the injury.
ception; and joint movement sense.l3        sured. A matched control group was
Such an age-related decline suggests        used for comparison. Only subjects        I assessed the medical histories of 361
that these sensory modalities are           who had sustained a unilateral ankle      potential subjects; 80 subjects (22%)
vulnerable to change. Vibration per-        sprain were included in the injured       were found to have sustained an
ception requires information from           group, so that side-to-side differences   ankle sprain on both sides, and 233
both superficial and deep mechanore-        between their injured and uninjured       subjects (65%) either had injuries in
ceptors ;B well as a functional cortical    sides could be compared with the          other joints or were unavailable to
sensory association area.16Testing          normal side-to-side differences dem-      participate in the study. Sixty-four
vibration perception, therefore, would                                                men (18%) underwent the detailed
Physical Therapy/Volume 74, Number
-
Table 1. Distribution of 4ge, Height, and Weight VariablesBetween Injured
(n=20)and Control (n=I I) Groups (Percentages)
Group
                        Age (Y)
                        18-20                   21-25                  25-30                31-35
                                                                                                       the criteria were found. Table 1 illus-
                                                                                                       trates the distribution of relevant
                                                                                                       variables between the two groups.
                                                                                                       Measurements
                                                                                                        VlbmNon perception. Dyck et all9
                                                                                                       have discussed the problems associ-
                                                                                                       ated with the measurement of the
Injured                 10                                                                             threshold of vibration perception and
Control                    9                                                                           the inadequacy of current clinical
                                                                                                       methods (such as the use of tuning
                  Helght (cm)                                                                          forks) in providing reliable, repeat-
                  170-174            175-1 79              180-1 84        185-1 89          1@0+      able results. For my measurements of
                                                                                                       vibration sensitivity, it was desirable
                                                                                                       to ensure that frequency and ampli-
Injured           20                 15                    45              15                5         tude of vibration could be varied, a
Control            0                  9                    64              18                9         consistent pressure of application
                                                                                                       could be maintained, and the subject
                    Welght (kg)                                                                        could remain alert and cooperative.
                    70-74              75-79                80-64              85-89             90+
                                                                                                       To meet the first of these criteria, a
                                                                                                       mechanical oscillator* connected to a
                                                                                                       Power oscillatort was used. This in-
Injured             5                  15                   20                 30                30    strument allowed variation of both
Control             9                  27                   27                 18                18    frequency and voltage and provided
                                                                                                       measures of output voltage directly
                  Physlcal Actlvlty Durlng Occupatlon                                                  related to acceleration (force inten-
                                                                                                       sity) of the oscillator head at each of
                  Sedentary                                      Actlve
                                                                                                       the chosen frequencies. To ensure a
                                                                 Llght Fleld           Heavy Fleld     constant pressure of this device on
                  Drlver            Admlnlstratlon               Work*                 Workb           the skin, the oscillator was suspended
                                                                                                       from one end of a system of pulleys
Injured           15                30                                                                 and a mass of equal weight was sus-
Control           18                18                                                                 pended from the other end as a
                                                                                                       counterbalance.
            Physlcal Actlvlty Durlng Sports
                                                                                                       The subject was positioned side lying
            Dally Physlcal                                       Welght                                with the leg to be tested uppermost
            Therapy                 Football      Runnlng        Llttlng   Cycling      Swlmmlng       and secured in a lower-leg rigid sup-
                                                                                                       port (back slab) to control the degree
lnjured      90                                                                                        of ankle dorsiflexion, and supported
Control     100                                                                                        on a highdensity foam cushion (Fig.
                                                                                                       1). The oscillator was positioned per-
"Includes signal operators, medical units, survey units.                                               pendicular to and just touching a point
                                                                                                       on the inferior fibular head, and the
b~ncludesinfantry, bombardiers.
                                                                                                       weight on the counterbalance was
                                                                                                       reduced by 50 g. The head of the
screening process, but only 20 (6%)                  weight, and lwel of physical activity
                                                                                                       oscillator, therefore, made contact with
of these subjects met all inclusion                  (eg, during sports and work). Subjects
                                                                                                       the fibular head with a gravity-applied
criteria.                                            for the control group, who matched
                                                                                                       force of 50 g. The voltmeter, which
                                                     subjects in the injured group in these
                                                                                                       reflected the amplitude of oscillation
Variables measured were age, physical                characteristics, were sought from the
                                                                                                       of the vibrator, indicated both when
characteristics such as height and                   same army units. Eleven men fitting
                                                                                                       vibration was occurring and when it
                                                                                                       had ceased.
'Derriton p 2 ) Mechanical Oscillator, Derriton Electronics Ltd, Sedlescombe Rd N, St Leonards-        Because there appears to have been
on-Sea, Sussex, United Kingdom.                                                                        little research into the perception of
+Goodman'sPower Oscillator 09,   Goodman Industries Ltd, Vibration Division, Axion Works,              vibration at different frequencies, a
Wembley, Middlesex, United Kingdom.                                                                    range of frequencies (ie, 100, 150,
26 120                                                                                 Physical TherapyIVolume 74, Number loanuary 1994
                                                                                        confidence interval limits of the
                                                                                        means (mean kt x standard error) and
                                                                                        their standard deviations of the
                                                                                        "within-subject-between-replication"
                                                                                        variation (derived from a suitable
                                                                                        analysis of variance) for each fre-
                                                                                        quency were comparable for each
                                                                                        group and are listed in Table 2. These
                                                                                        results indicated that for uninjured
                                                                                        subjects and for those with previous
                                                                                        ankle injury, the threshold of vibra-
                                                                                        tion perception at each frequency was
                                                                                        repeatable on the one day.
                                                                                        Muscle actlvatlon. Surface EMG
                                                                                        was used to provide information
                                                                                        regarding the activation of the speci-
                                                                                        fied muscles during hip extension,
                                                                                        utilizing bipolar surface electrodes
                                                                                        (silver-silver chloride) on each of the
                                                                                        ipsilateral and contralateral lumbar
                                                                                        erector spinae, gluteus maximus, and
                                                                                        hamstring muscles of both limbs.
Flgu~e1. Placement of the mechanovibrator over the lateral malleolus of the sup-        With subjects positioned prone lying,
ported ankle.                                                                           EMG sites were identified, and elec-
                                                                                        trodes were placed 10 mm (0.39 in)
200, ancl 250 Hz) was assessed. For         sides was randomized. One re-               apart on each prepared site. The elec-
each frequency, the oscillator ampli-       searcher (JEB-S) tested all subjects.       trodes were positioned parallel to the
tude (which could be termed "vibra-                                                     line of the muscle bellies and over
tion strength") was slowly increased       To determine the consistency of sub-         the area of greatest muscle bulk, de-
until the subject stated that he per-      ject threshold to vibration perception,      termined after a resisted contraction
ceived v.ibration. This voltage was        a repeatability test was carried out         of the specific muscle. Lumbar erector
recorded as the threshold. Two mea-        prior to the major study. Ten repeti-        spinae muscles were monitored adja-
suremerits at each frequency were          tions at each frequency on one limb          cent to the intervertebral level of L2-3,
taken on one limb to provide an            were chosen randomly from a subset           the upper fibers of the gluteus maxi-
                                                                                        mus muscle were monitored, and
-
estimate of measurement error, be-         of the sample composed of five in-
fore commencing the series on the          jured group subjects and five control        electrodes were placed on the ham-
second limb. The order of presenta-        group subjects. The repetitions of           string muscles over the biceps femo-
tion of the series of frequencies to       each frequency were taken within a           ris muscle. For each hip extension
each subject and between subject           1-hour time span with a 30-second            motion, signals from the four muscle
                                           interval between repetitions. The            groups were preamplfied using a
Table 2. Conjidence Interval and Standard Deviation for Repeatabilily Test of Vibration Perception (in Meters per Square
Second) r'n=20)
                 Frequency (Hz)
x9,.05=201.
'C =control group (n =5)
'I=injured group (n=5).
Physical Therapy /Volume 74, Number ldanuary 1994
Medelec PA65 preamplifiers before                 relation to the target line. By connect-     subjects of the relative behavior of
passing to a Medelec AAM63 amplifi-               ing the inclinometer to the chart            muscles contributing to a group
er/filter.* The signals were sampled at           recorder and computer, the position          activity.
a rate of 2,500 Hz, were bandpass                 of the limb was recorded at rest and
filtered at a lower frequency of 0.8 Hz           during movement.                             Because one o r more muscles might
and a higher frequency of 800 Hz,                                                              contract prior to the commencement
and were recorded on an eight-                    Speed of motion was controlled by            of hip extension and the starting
channel ink jet chart recorders for               the subject moving the limb through          point of individual muscle contrac-
monitoring of the signal during data              the 15degree range of motion at a            tions relative to hip motion might
collection. The EMG signals were also             rate equal to three beats of a metro-        vary, a consistent reference point for
passed to an analogue-to-digital con-             nome set at 72 beats per minute. That        comparison purposes was needed.
verter in a computer and stored for               is, the limb moved through a                 Therefore, the commencement of hip
analysis.                                         6degree arc of motion per second,            movement (H) was taken as a refer-
                                                  which was considered to be approxi-          ence. The temporal measure used to
The starting position of each leg was             mately equal to a slow walking speed.        recognize this was the time span (in
traced onto a sheet of paper placed                                                            seconds) between onset of individual
over the base of the test bed to en-              Subjects were encouraged to relax            muscle activity (0)and commence-
sure a consistency of position. A feed-           prior to the hip extension, the chart        ment of hip movement (H), as deter-
back system was devised to assist the             recording indicating whether the             mined by the inclinometer (ie, 0-H).
subject in controlling his own range              muscles were at rest. Only then was
of motion. An inclinometed' provided              the trial commenced, with EMG sig-           Calculation of the time span between
a recording of the motion of the limb             nals being recorded for a count of           points of onset of the first and fourth
during hip extension. The inclinome-              three beats of the metronome prior           muscles provided a second quantita-
ter was connected to an oscilloscope              to the request to extend the hip. This       tive measure in relation to muscle
positioned below a face hole in the               initial "at rest" recording not only         activation, allowing a determination of
test bed to be monitored by the sub-              provided a base line signal prior to         whether injury influenced the time
ject. The inclinometer produced an                hip extension, but also allowed the          taken for activation of all four mus-
output in the form of a moving line               EMG recording of any activity within         cles. The second temporal measure
on the oscilloscope, and an initial               the muscle as the subject prepared to        used, therefore, was the time span (in
zero "base" line (representing the                move into hip extension. An initial          seconds) for the sequence of activa-
limb in neutral) and a "target" line              training period ensured that the sub-        tion of the first (MI) and fourth (MJ
 (representing the designated 15"                 ject understood what was required of         muscles ( 0 , MI-MJ. The incorpo-
range of hip extension) were marked.              him. For each subject, a 10-second           ration of a time reference into the
Thus, the subject had feedback for the            recording of EMG and inclinometer            sampling procedure and the com-
position of his limb as he moved the              signals was made during each of the          puter acquisition of EMG and limb-
limb through the range of motion.                 six tests on each side. A 10-minute          position data allowed for a determina-
                                                  interval separated the tests on the two      tion of these temporal measures.
The inclinometer, fixed to a curved               sides to allow recovery from any
metal plate, was strapped to the lat-             possible fatigue. The same researcher        The EMG signals collected from the
eral side of the thigh on a line be-              carried out all testing.                     four monitored muscles during hip
tween the greater trochanter and the                                                           extension were submitted to com-
lateral femoral condyle with the fe-              For analysis of EMG data, the order of       puter analysis to determine these
mur in a horizontal position, so lead-            muscle activation represents the se-         measures for each of the two limbs
ing to zero output of the inclinometer            quence of each muscle's entry into a         during the six trials for each subject.
(giving the base line). Passive limb              coordinated muscle activity. Visual          A special-purpose computer program
movement to the edge of a 15-degree               observation is the method usually            (language C) was written, in which
template allowed the l5degree target              used by researchers for this deterrni-       the 2,500 samples of data per second
line trace to be recorded on the oscil-           nation. For this study, however, it was      for each muscle for the 10-second
loscope. When the subject moved his               important for statistical purposes to        recording period could be analyzed.
limb, a third (moving) line provided              find a quantitative measure that would       Data used for this program related to
feedback of the limb's position in                allow comparison between groups of           the raw EMG signals, the EMG gain
                                                                                               used to acquire data, the period for
                                                                                               which the data were recorded, the
                                                                                               number of channels used, and the
* ~ e d e l e Ltd,
              c Old Working Rd, Surrey, United Kingdom.                                        data rate. The number of data points
#SimensAG Minograph Chart Recorder, ZW22, Postgach 101212, D-8000, Muchen 1, Federal Repub-    was calculated and then read in bi-
lic of Germany.                                                                                nary format. The data were stored
Il~chaevitz(A411-0001) Accelerometer, Applied Measurement, Baltec Systems, 26 Mayneview St,    after multiplication by 100 to enable
Milton, 4064, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.                                                 the program to use integer arithmetic
28 / 22                                                                          Physical Therapy /Volume 74, Number 1Januar-y 1994
Table 3. ConfidenceIntervals and Standard Deviations for Repeatabilig Test of Muscle Activation Relative to H@ Extensim (in
Seconds) (n =lo)
                               -                                                    --
Control Group (n=5)
            Muscle Group
                                                                                                                                    -   -
            Left Lumbar Erector Splnae    Rlght Lumbar Erector Splnae   Glulws Maximus                 Hamatring
SWlrSlc     Left           Right          Left          Right           Left             RbM           La             Rlght
injured Group (n=5)
            Muscle ~ r o u p
            Left Lumbar Erector Spinae    Rlght Lumbar Erector Splnae   Gluteus Maxlmur                Hamstring
SWllc       Uninjured          Injured    Unlnjured     Injured         Unlnjured        Injured       Uninjured      Inlured
where possible in the analysis. The         was activated in each case. From this,         24 values were rejected for this rea-
mean of' the first 500 points was cal-      the 0, MI-M, calculation was made. It          son, as reflected in the n values pre-
culated and subtracted from the raw         also provided the incidence of each            sented in Tables 3 and 4.
data to enable the data to be centered      muscle occurring in each ranked
on zero. The data were then rectified       position.                                      To determine the repeatability of the
about this mean value and smoothed                                                         time of onset relative to hip motion, a
(four passes, 100-point bandwidth) to       As a preliminary investigation of onset        study was carried out using the analy-
remove the high-frequency compo-            times, prior to adopting the use of the        sis of six movement repetitions for
nents of the bursts yet still leave the     computer analysis, an independent              each subject. An analysis of variance
main burst shape. The filtering pro-        "blind" visual observation of the EMG          was applied to determine the mean
cess was carried out by using a filter      signals on an IBM-compatible per-              confidence interval and its standard
subroutine that used a rectangular          sonal computer screen for a random             deviation and the "within-
filter (the data were linearly averaged     selection of subjects, trials, and mus-        subject-between-replication" variabil-
over the bandwidth of the filter) and       cles was performed to compare the              ity for each of the four muscles. Re-
that allowed multiple passes over the       accuracy of the computer analysis              sults demonstrated an acceptable level
data.                                       with human inspection. For the glu-            of repeatability of the measurement
                                            teus maximus and hamstring muscles,            (Tab 3).
The me;m of the first 500 points was        the computer analysis was found to
again calculated and subtracted from        give comparable results to those ob-           Data Anelysls
the data to ensure that the mean            tained through manual inspection of
value of the initial region was zero.       the computer-displayed signal, suit-           Data acquired for muscle activation
The location of the peak data point         ably magnified. Onset data for the             during hip extension and for vibra-
was identified, and from this data          lumbar erector spinae muscles were             tion perception for both limbs were
point, the times at which the signal        scrutinized visually to determine              analyzed to investigate any differences
reached specified percentages of            those trials in which the proximity of         between the injured and control
maximum could be determined. For            the heart beat signal to the signal of         groups in muscle or sensory function
the purposes of this analysis, 5% of        muscle activity made computer dis-             in each limb. The general linear
the maximum weak value) EMG                 crimination of the onset of muscle             model (GLM) of analysis of variance
signal was regarded as the onset of         activity impossible. In such cases, the        for unequal numbers was selected as
muscle activity. A second computer          onset data were removed from the               the most appropriate form of analysis
program was used to rank the order          data set. Of the 372 possible values           for these data. This model is used to
in which each of the four muscles           for muscle onset in the entire sample,         reveal the influence of any indepen-
Physical Therapy/Volume 74, Number loanuary 1994
                                                                                                there were significant differences
                                                                                                between left and right sides at only
 Table 4. Side-to-Side Comparisons of "~reshold"
                                               Vibration Percephon (in Meters
   quar
-per- re second)a
                                                                                                one of the four frequencies (200 Hz)
                                                                                                for the control group, there were
                                                                                                significant differences between in-
Control Group (n=ll)                                                                            jured and uninjured sides at three of
 Frequency                                                                  Mean Difference     the frequencies (150, 200, and 250
 (Hz)                 Mean of Left Slde (L)        Mean of Rlght Slde (R)   L-R                 Hz) for the injured group (Tab. 4).
                                                                                               Comparison of the mean values for
                                                                                               each side of the injured group sub-
                                                                                               jects with those of each side of the
                                                                                               control group subjects showed that a
                                                                                               greater strength of vibration was nec-
                                                                                               essary to reach threshold perception
Inlured Group (n=20)
                                                                      --     -
                                                                             -         -
                                                                                               on both the injured and uninjured
FrssUenW                                                                    Mean DMbmnce       sides of the injured group subjects
(Hz)              Mean of Injured Slde (I)    Mean of Uninjured Slds (U)    I-U                than on either the left or right side of
                                                                                               the control group subjects. To deter-
                                                                                               mine whether the threshold percep-
                                                                                               tion values for the uninjured side of
                                                                                               the injured group subjects contrib-
                                                                                               uted to these group differences, Stu-
                                                                                               dent's t tests were applied to the
                                                                                               uninjured side of the injured group
"Two repetitions for each side.                                                                subjects versus each side of the con-
' ~ o tsignificantly different.                                                                trol group subjects. Significant differ-
CSignificantlydiierent at P< ,001.                                                             ences were found to exist at all fre-
                                                                                               quencies (P< .05) (Tab. 5).
dent variable on the dependent vari-                 Secondly, to determine whether vibra-
able and demonstrates whether there                  tion perception or muscle activation      Electmmyographlc Analysls
is any significant difference between                in the injured or uninjured limb was
two groups of unequal numbers. The                   significantly different from that on      Separate statistical analyses were per-
statistical package used was the SAS                 either side of the control group sub-     formed on data for each temporal
for Personal computers.#                             jects, further analyses were under-       variable (ie, 0-H; 0,MI-MJ. To deter-
                                                     taken comparing the side-to-side dif-     mine whether there were sigmficant
 Initially, to determine any group dif-              ferences between groups.                  differences between the injured and
ferences in vibration perception, com-                                                         control groups, a GLM analysis was
 parisons of the vibration strength                  Results                                   performed.
required for subject perception at
each frequency were made between                     Vlbratlon Perception                       0-H. Reflecting the preparatory acti-
the injured and control groups by                                                              vation of the muscles prior to the
consolidating the data for the two                   Analysis of data for vibration percep-    limb motion in hip extension, the
limbs in each case. Accordingly,                     tion at each frequency demonstrated a     onset times for each of the four mus-
"group" was included as an indepen-                  significant difference between the        cles in almost all instances preceded
dent variable in the GLM analysis.                   injured and control groups (PC ,001).     the time of commencement of the
Similar comparisons were made be-                    As Figure 2 demonstrates, vibration       reference activity (ie, hip motion),
tween groups for each of the two                     strength needed to be greater for the     giving a negative value for 0-H. The
EMG measures. These analyses of the                  injured group than for the control        greater the negative time span, the
data do not reveal whether differ-                   group in order for the subjects to        earlier the onset of activity of that
ences exist in one side or the other,                perceive the stimulus.                    muscle prior to hip extension motion,
or in both, but only that overall some                                                         whereas the smaller the negative time
alterations in vibration perception or              A comparison of side-to-side differ-       span, the later the onset. The results
in muscle activation may be associ-                  ences between groups (uninjured           of analyses of this variable need to be
ated with injury.                                    versus injured) showed that whereas       interpreted with this in mind. Figure
                                                                                               3 represents typical EMG recordings
                                                                                               of a control group subject and an
                                                                                               injured group subject.
*SAS Institute Inc, PO Box 8000, Cary, NC 27511.
30 / 24                                                                          Physical Therapy/Volume 74, Number l/January 1994
                                                                                                 The analysis of side-to-side differences
                                                                                                 for the gluteus maximus and ham-
                                                                                                 string muscles revealed that for the
                                                                                                 control group, the time span (O-H)
                                                                                                 was significantly greater on the left
           A
                      5.                                                                          (stance) side than on the right @re-
                                                                                                 ferred or skill) side (P<.05), indicat-
                                                                                     Injured     ing an earlier onset of gluteus maxi-
                                                                                                 mus and hamstring muscle activity on
                                                                                                 the left side for uninjured subjects
                                                                                                 (Tab. 6). The side-to-side differences
                                                                                                 (injured versus uninjured sides) in
                                                                                                 the injured group did not reach sig-
                                                                                                 nificance for either of these muscle
                                                                                                 groups. The significantly later time of
                                                                                     Contml      onset of gluteus maximus muscle
                                                                                                 activity for the injured group com-
                                                                                                 pared with that of the control group
                        A
                                                               -   --                            (ie, with data for two sides consolidat-
                              I&               150 2d0 2 h
                                                                                                 ed), however, suggested a delay in
                                                                                                 gluteus maximus muscle activation on
                                               Frequency [Hz)                                    both sides of the injured group sub-
                                                                                                 jects. Examination of the data in Table
-                                                                                                6 demonstrates that this was so. A
Flgum 2. Vibration perception threshold of injured versw conhwl group subjects.                  Student's t test applied to the gluteus
Note that the greater the strength of vibration, tbe poorer the subjects' perception of          maximus muscle activity onset data
vibration.                                                                                       for the uninjured side of the injured
                                                                                                 group versus each side of the control
With the: data for the two sides con-                     than for the control group. That is,   group highlighted the               dif-
solidated, the GLM analysis showed                        for the injured group subjects, an     ference that existed (P<.0005). No
that for the gluteus maximus mus-                         overall delay in activation of the     significant side-to-side differences
cle, highly significant differences                       gluteus maximus muscle was evi-        were found to exist for either the left
-
existed between the injured group                         dent. For the hamstring and the left   or right lumbar errnor spinae
(mean =:-0.092) and the control                           and right lumbar erector spinae        muscles.
group (.mean= -0.349) (PC .001),                          muscles, results of the GLM analysis
the time of onset of gluteus maxi-                        showed that the group differences      0, MI-M,. Analyses of the consoli-
mus muscle activity being signifi-                        were not significant.                  dated data relating to the time span
cantly later for the injured group                                                               between the onset of activity of the
Table 5. Comparison of Mean Valuesfor Visual Perception (in Meters per Square Second.)for Injured and Uninjured Sides of the
Injured Group With the Left and Right Sides of the Control Group
Frequency                               Dliference                      Dliference               Difference
(Hz)            II.          CLb        II-CL        II                 II-CR        IUd   CL    IU-CL        IU
                        --
"II=injurt:d group injured side.
bC~=controlgroup left side.
"CR=control group right side.
d ~ ~ = ~ n j u rgroup
                  e d uninjured side.
eP< .05.
Physical Therapy /Volume 74, Number l/Januax-y1994
                                                                                        level and the timing of onset of glu-
                                                                                        teus maximus muscle activity relative
                                                                                        to hip extension (0-H). ~esultsdem-
              a                                                                         onstrated that a positive correlation
                                                                                        existed for the injured group between
                                                                                        threshold vibration perception and
                                                                                        gluteus maximus muscle activation for
                                                                                        the 250-Hz frequency (PC.05). That is,
                                                           inclinometer                 the less sensitive the subjects were to
                                                                                        vibration at 250 Hz, the longer the
                                                           Right Lumbar                 delay in recruitment of the gluteus
                                                           Erector Spinae
                                                                                        maximus muscle for hip extension.
                  3.                                           Y
                                                           Lett Lumbar
                                                           Erector Spinae
                                                                                        Significant differences in the sensory
                                                                                        and muscle function of subjects with
                                                                                        severe ankle sprain were shown to
                  1.                                                                    exist when compared with that of
                                                           Biceps Femorls               uninjured subjects. The decreased
                                                                                        ability to perceive vibration appears to
                                                                                        confirm the views of Freeman1 and
                                                                                        Wyke9 that a ligarnentous/capsular
                                                                                        injury influences the integrity of local
                                                                                        sensory receptors on the side of in-
                                                                                        jury, presumably through direct
                                                                                        damage.
        2.                                                                              The significant delay in activation of
                                                                                        the gluteus maximus muscle in the
                                                                                        injured group subjects and the posi-
        3.                                                                              tive correlation between a poorer
                                                                                        perception of vibration at 250 Hz and
        4.                                                                              gluteal muscle delay suggests that
                                                                                        joint injury involving sensory recep-
         1.                                                                             tors could influence the function of
                                                              Biceps F e m o h          muscles pmximal to and removed
                                                                                        from the injury side. Even though this
                                                                                        study could not determine cause and
Figure 3. Graphic illustration of an electromyographic recording of a typical re-       effect, this association provides sup-
cruitment pattern of (a) a control group subject and @) an injured group subject.       port for the idea of a reflex chain of
(Arrows indicate onset of activation; numbers indicate the sequence of activation.)     events that occurs following injury, as
                                                                                        pmposed by Lewit7 and Janda?
first and fourth muscles (0, MI-MJ to       gluteus maximus muscle was almost
be recruited revealed a highly signifi-     always the fourth muscle to be acti-        The normal activation behavior of the
cant difference (PC .001) between the       vated. This delayed activation was          hamstring and lumbar erector spinae
injured and control groups. As Table        therefore responsible for the greater       muscles in the injured group can be
7 demonstrates, although the mean           0,MI-M4 time span found in the              viewed together with the delay in
time span for the control group was         injured group.                              activation of gluteus maximus muscle.
0.306 second, it was 0.527 second for                                                   A change in activation of all muscles
the injured group, or 72% longer            The delayed activation in the gluteus       could have led to the assertion that all
than for the control group.                 maximus muscle was used as the              subjects in the injured group had a
                                            variable for a correlation analysis of      motor regulation problem, as has
The GLM analysis showed that there          muscle and sensory function. A Pear-        been intimated by previous stud-
was no significant difference between       son Product-Moment Correlation              ies.llJ2 The finding of significant acti-
sides in the 0,MI-M4 time span for          Coefficient analysis was applied to         vation changes in the gluteus maxi-
either group. Examination of the            data for both groups relating to vibra-     mus muscle, however, only points to
ranking incidence indicated that the        tion strength at threshold perception       the possibility that such a change is
                                                                                        associated with the ankle injury. Be-
                                                                          Physical Therapy /Volume 74, Number ldanuary 1994
                                                                                           tempt was made to ensure that in-
D                                                                                          jured subjects included in this study
Table 6. Comparison of Time Spans Between Onset of Muscle Activity and                     had no history of incoordination. As
Commencement of Hip Movement for Groups (in Seconds)
                                                                                           has been shown by this study, the
                                                                                           injured group subjects did, however,
Control Grow In= 11l                                                                       have a sensory deficit compared with
                                  Slde                                       Dlfference
                                                                                           the control group subjects. Although
Muscle Group                           (L)               Rlght (R)           L-R           it has been assumed that any differ-
                                                                                           ences from normal in the injured
                                                                                           group occurred as a result of injury,
Gluteus rrlaximus                  -0.451                -0.249              -0.202a       in a retrospective study the origin of
Hamstring                          -0.562                -0.448              -0.1 14a      the differences cannot be determined.
Left lumbar erector spinae         -0.530                -0.450                O.08Ob      From the point of view of the man-
Right lumbar erector spinae        -0.504                -0.464              -0.040"       agement of patients following ankle
                                                                                           sprain, however, the origin of the
Injured Group (n=20)
                                                                                           deficit does not affect the need for the
                                                                                           physical therapist to pay due attention
                                  Slde
                                                                             Dlfference    to the need to improve sensoty and
Muscle Group                      Unlnjured (U)          Injured (I)         U-l           motor function.20
   -
Gluteus maximus                    -0.086                -0.098              -0.012@       This study has a number of implica-
                                   -0.486                -0.51 1               0.025~
                                                                                           tions for the physical therapist. In
Hamstring
                                                                                           view of the likelihood that a deficit in
Left lumbar erector spinae         -0.486                -0.432              -0.054'
                                                                                           sensory function is associated with
Right lumbar erector spinae        -0.440                -0.463                0.023b
                                                                                           decreased muscle activity around
                                                                                           other joints, a rehabilitation program
"PC.05.                                                                                    should include a focus on improving
 not significant.                                                                          sensory function. Because muscles
                                                                                           respond in different ways to periph-
cause cause and effect were not the          implications for influences on the            eral injury, the results of this study
focus of this study, further research is     uninjured side.                               suggest that the effects need to be
warranted to help clarify these                                                            sought in areas remote from the site
interrelationships.                          These results suggest that as a result        of injury. This study has examined
                                             of injury to the ankle joint, the activity    only some of the muscles around the
Differences in vibration perception          of the hip extensors on both sides of         hip. Further investigations could re-
and activation of the gluteus maximus        the body is diminished. Whereas               veal whether muscle function changes
muscle on the uninjured side as well         Stokes and Young3 and Iles et a15 have        also occur in other joints following
as the injured side of the injured           demonstrated decreased extensor               ankle injury (eg, in the knee o r verte
group subjects when compared with            activity at the site of injury, the results   bra1 joints), o r indeed, whether they
-
the control group subjects support           of this study suggest that there could        might occur as a result of the effects
the concept of central adjustment of         be a direct relationship of decreased         of gluteal muscle delay.
motor control following injury. This         activity of the extensors of the lower
finding suggests that a reflex chain of      limb, involving muscles not only re-          The differences in sensory function
events is not limited to the side of         mote from the site of injury but also         and in the function of some muscles
injury, but that there could also b e        o n the opposite side of the body. It is      on the uninjured side are also impor-
                                             also possible that even after pain            tant in treatment. Whether such differ-
                                             following the ankle injury had ceased,        ences are due to dysregulation at the
                                             the function of the gluteus maximus           cortical level or at a spinal level has
                                             muscle in extending the hip was               still to be determined. Nevertheless,
Table 7. Comparison of Mean Time
Span Between Onset of Activity of First      compromised due, perhaps, to an               the existence of differences highlights
and Fourth Muscles                           alteration in gait pattern established        the need to examine both sides of the
                                             during the period of injury. Such             body in assessment. These results
                                             possibilities are the subject of further      emphasize the importance of the
Group                   N           (8)      research.                                     physical therapist paying attention to
                                                                                           motor control and to the function of
Control (r1=11)         120       0.306a     The question could be asked whether           muscles around joints separated from
Injured (r1=20)         229       0.527a     subjects in the injured group had a           the site of injury.
                                             basic neurological deficit that led to
                                             their initial ankle sprain. Every at-
Physical Therapy/Volume 74, Number ldanuary 1994
CO~C~US~O~                                           4 De Andrade JR, Grant C, Dixon A. Joint dis-       1 3 Freeman MA, Dean MR, Hanham WF. The
                                                      tension and reflex inhibition in the knee.         aetiology and prevention of functional instabil-
                                                     J Bone Joint Susg [Am]. 1965;47:313-322.            ity of the foot.J Bone Joint Susg [Br]. 1965;46:
The             this study have shown                 5 Iles JF, Stokes M, Young A. Reflex actions of    678-685.
that both local sensory and proximal                 knee joint afferents during contractions of the      14 Gross MT. Effects of recurrent lateral ankle
muscle function changes are associ-                  human quadriceps. Clin physiol. 1990;10:489-        sprains on active and passive judgments of
                                                      500.                                               joint position. Phys Ther. 1987;67:1505-1509.
ated with unilateral severe ankle
                                                     6 Freeman MAR, Wyke B. Articular contdbu-            15 Barrack FU,Skinner HB, Buckley SL. Pro-
sprain and that when some aspects of                 tions to limb muscle reflexes. Br J Susg. 1966;     prioception in the anterior cruciate deficient
sensory and motor function deficits                  53:61-63.                                           knee. Am J Sports Med. 1989;17:14.
are considered, there is a positive                   7 Lewit K. Manipulative Therapy in Rehabilita-      16 Schmitz TJ. Sensory assessment. In: O'Sulli-
correlation between the two. If com-                 tion of the Motor System. London, England:          van SB, Schmitz TJ. Physical Rehabilitation:
                                                     Buttemonh & Co (Publishers) Ltd; 1985.              Assessment and Treatment. 2nd ed. Philadel-
prehensive and effective management                  8 Janda V. Muscles, motor regulation and back       phia, Pa: FA Davis Co; 1988: chap 6.
of injury is to be ensured, a holistic               problems. In: Korr IM, ed. The Neurologic           17 Jan& V. Muscle Function Testing. Boston,
approach to assessment is essential.                 Mechanisms in Mantpulative Tberapy. New             Mass: Buttemonh; 1983.
                                                     York, NK Plenum Publishing Corp; 1978:27-           18 Roy S, Irvin R. Sports Medicine: Prevention,
                                                     41.                                                 Evaluation, Manugement, and Treatment.
                                                     9 Wyke B. The neurology of joints. Ann R Coll       New York, NY:Prentice-Hall Press; 1983.
                                                     Susg Engl. 1967;41:25-50.                            19 Dyck PJ, Karnes J, O'Brien PC, Zimmerman
                                                      10 Chusid JG. Correlative Neuroanatomy and         IR Detection Thresholds of Cutaneous Sensa-
 1 Freeman MA. Instability of the foot after an-     Functional Neurology. 16th ed. Los Altos, Cal-      tion in Humam 2nd ed. In: Dyck PJ, Thomas
 kle injuries to the lateral ligament of the ankle   if: Lange Medical Publications; 1976.               PK, Lambert EH, eds. Sydney, Australia: WB
J Bone Joint Susg [BY].1965;47:669-677.                                                                  Saunders Co; 1984:1103-1 138.
                                                      11 Tropp H, Odenrick P, Gillquist J. Stabilom-
2 Ekholm J , Eklund G, Skoglund S. On the            etry recordings in functional and mechanical        20 Bullock-Saxton JE, Jan& V, Bullock M. Re-
reflex effect from the knee joint of the cat.        instability of the ankle joint. Int J Sports Med.   flex activation of gluteal muscles in walking
Acta Pkysiol &and. 1960;50:167-174.                  1985;6:180-182.                                     with balance shoes: an approach to restoration
3 Stokes M, Young A. The contribution of re-          12 Gaufin H, Pettersson Y, Tegner Y, Tropp         of muscle function for chronic low back pain
flex inhibition to anhrogenous muscle weak-          H. Function testing in patients with old rup-       patients. Spine. 1993;18:704-708.
ness. Clin Sci. 1984;67:7-14.                        ture of the anterior cruciate ligament. Int J
                                                     Sports Med. 1990;11:73-77.
Invited Commentary
Dr Bullock-Saxton's article examines                 Scientists, such as Goldberger,' Hul-               has the same stylistic appearance,
theoretical concepts of neural adapta-               liger,z and Pearson: have shown the                 regardless whether we write it bill-
tion and motor control changes fol-                  importance of aferent information to                board or microchip size.
lowing soft tissue injury. Equally as                motor control. Similar to Dr Bullock-
important, the author poses the clini-               Saxton's findings in the lower extrem-              The author of this report has taken on
cal question, Should motor planning                  ity, Smith and Brunolli4 have reported              a complex task. It should not be sur-
learning rehabilitation be an integral               proprioceptive deficits in the upper                prising, therefore, that certain vulnera-
part of treatment protocols following                extremity following soft tissue disrup-             bilities exist regarding methodology
orthopedic-type injuries? These issues               tion. In my laboratory, we have col-                and data interpretation. Because ques-
are ripe for investigation, and, as a                lected preliminary data indicating                  tions regarding methodology tend to
neuroscientist and a physical therapist,             change in muscle afferent activity can              be of interest mainly to other investi-
I was very pleased to be invited to                  actually alter neural responses to                  gators, I will only briefly mention a
provide this commentary.                             muscle fatigue.5 The possibility that               few concerns. I would have found it
                                                     sensory changes in one joint may                    useful to know the average amount of
First and foremost, I would like to                  cause alterations at sites distant to it is         time, and ranges, that had elapsed
commend the author for tackling a                    also consistent with recent computa-                between subjects' ankle sprain and
technically, and theoretically difficult,            tional models of human movement.617                 testing. Given time, some injured
problem. The hypothesis that changes                 The nervous system appears to con-                  peripheral sensory fibers will regen-
within articular sensory receptors-as                trol movement by comparing degrees                  erate. Relating time course of recov-
a result of soft tissue injury-alter                 of freedom at each joint. If joint A                ery to vibratory sensory perception to
postural reflexes, has a strong theoret-             moves x degrees, then other joints                  vibration would have been a correla-
ical rationale. The Bobaths and Signe                will alter their movement trajectories              tion of interest. The type of physical
Brunnstrom were among the first to                   accordingly in order to attain the                  therapy intervention and the length of
make clinical use of the importance                  desired end point of movement. Pre-                 time each subject was immobilized
of sensory input to motor control.                   sumably, this is why our handwriting                following ankle sprain would also
                                                                                      Physical Therapy /Volume 74, Number loanuary 1994