Breadfruit Flour Is A Healthy Option For Modern Foods and Food Security
Breadfruit Flour Is A Healthy Option For Modern Foods and Food Security
RESEARCH ARTICLE
* susan.murch@ubc.ca
a1111111111
a1111111111
a1111111111                                            Abstract
a1111111111
                                                       Breadfruit is a traditional staple crop from Pacific islands with the potential to improve world-
a1111111111
                                                       wide food security and mitigate diabetes. Flour produced from breadfruit is a gluten-free,
                                                       low glycemic index, nutrient dense and complete protein option for modern foods but basic
                                                       scientific knowledge of health impacts of a breadfruit-based diet in animals and humans was
                                                       lacking. We designed a series of studies to provide basic and fundamental data on impacts
    OPEN ACCESS
                                                       of a breadfruit-based diet through an in vitro and in vivo model. Cooked breadfruit flour was
Citation: Liu Y, Brown PN, Ragone D, Gibson DL,
                                                       digested through a multi-stage enzyme digestion model to estimate protein digestibility in
Murch SJ (2020) Breadfruit flour is a healthy
option for modern foods and food security. PLoS        comparison to wheat flour. Breadfruit protein was found to be easier to digest than wheat
ONE 15(7): e0236300. https://doi.org/10.1371/          protein in the enzyme digestion model. The flour digestions were applied to Caco-2 cells to
journal.pone.0236300                                   test the cytotoxicity and to measure the immunogenicity through cytokine expression. No
Editor: Edy de Brito, Embrapa Agroindústria           significant differences were observed for immune factors and cytokines (IL-4, IL-10, IL-8,
Tropical, BRAZIL                                       TNF-α, IFN-γ) on Caco-2 cells between the breadfruit and wheat groups. A breadfruit-based
Received: April 21, 2020                               rodent chow was formulated by substitution of all of the wheat in the standard formulation
Accepted: July 1, 2020                                 with breadfruit. The diets were isocaloric, nutrient equivalent and used to feed male and
                                                       female C57BL/6 mice for 21 days. No sign of malnutrition, discomfort, illness or death was
Published: July 23, 2020
                                                       observed among the mice because of the diet. The histology and the cytokine expression of
Copyright: © 2020 Liu et al. This is an open access
                                                       the mice ileum from both groups were analyzed and showed similar results. The expression
article distributed under the terms of the Creative
Commons Attribution License, which permits             of major bacteria was measured in the colon and showed similar results. Mice fed the bread-
unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in    fruit diet had a significantly higher growth rate and body weight than standard diet fed mice.
any medium, provided the original author and           No negative health outcomes were observed in studies with in vitro or in vivo models and
source are credited.
                                                       breadfruit flour is a healthy alternative to other starches for modern foods.
Data Availability Statement: All relevant data are
within the manuscript and its Supporting
Information files.
Tropical Botanical Garden for funding for this   undernourished populations in tropical areas for cultivation as a staple [6, 7]. It is often used
program.                                         as a potato substitute in dishes as the fresh fruit can be baked, steamed, boiled, fried, micro-
Competing interests: The authors have declared   waved, grilled, and barbecued [1, 2]. Our previous studies demonstrated that breadfruit pro-
that no competing interests exist.               tein contains all of the essential amino acids and is especially rich in phenylalanine, leucine,
                                                 isoleucine and valine [7]. The most cultivar “Ma’afala” has been planted in nearly 50 countries
                                                 in the last decade and is an excellent food resource with higher total essential amino acid con-
                                                 tent than other staples including wheat, corn, rice, potato, soybean and yellow pea [1, 7].
                                                 Research on breadfruit starch has revealed its advantages over wheat flour on water and oil
                                                 holding capacity, swelling power, and viscosity [8, 9]. Moreover, cooking process was found to
                                                 cause little alteration in the bioactive compounds of breadfruit and water was the best extractor
                                                 compared to organic solvent, making it a promising functional ingredient and a great substi-
                                                 tute for wheat in the processed food products [10].
                                                     Although breadfruit has been consumed by humans for thousands of years, detailed and
                                                 systematic studies of the health impacts of a breadfruit diet have not previously been con-
                                                 ducted. Human studies related to breadfruit in the diet have mainly focused on the glycemic
                                                 index (GI) measurement. Several researchers [11–13], indicated that breadfruit had a low gly-
                                                 cemic index as compared to many common staples such as wheat, cassava, yam and potatoes.
                                                 However, the literature is somewhat complicated by a study in 1995 that reported the death of
                                                 four male Hooded Lister rats after consumption of breadfruit seed extracts [14] that led to the
                                                 classification of breadfruit as a “hazardous plant” by the United States Food and Drug Admin-
                                                 istration (FDA). The study indicated that the seeds were obtained from an Artocarpus altilis
                                                 tree at the Mayaguez Institute of Tropical Agriculture (Puerto Rico) but the records indicated
                                                 that the varieties of breadfruit at the institute were mostly seedless [15] suggesting that the spe-
                                                 cies was likely misidentified. Aka et al [16] reported that a raw and partially raw breadfruit diet
                                                 induced severe weight loss in male rats but cooked breadfruit resulted in weight gain. Unfortu-
                                                 nately, the reported methods were not clear with respect to the incorporation of breadfruit
                                                 either as a supplement along with the control diet or processed into the diet and the diet com-
                                                 position was not analyzed, making it difficult to understand exactly what the mice were con-
                                                 suming [16]. Adepeju et al., [17] also report weight loss in albino weanling rats fed diets with
                                                 various ratios of breadfruit, soy and groundnuts but the methods of preparing the diets were
                                                 not described and the nutrient composition was not reported.
                                                     The objective of the current study was to determine whether a diet containing breadfruit
                                                 flour poses any serious health concerns. The specific objectives were (a) to determine the
                                                 digestibility of protein in breadfruit flour, (b) to determine the impacts of digested breadfruit
                                                 flour on the health and viability of Caco-2 cells; which serves as a model of human intestinal
                                                 barrier and (c) to assess the overall growth and health of C57BL/6 mice fed a well-formulated
                                                 and -characterized standard diet that substituted breadfruit for wheat. These studies provide
                                                 the basic understanding of a breadfruit-based diet for human health.
                                                     (Bunn, Illinois, USA) controlling for excess heat. Wheat flour (all purpose, Robin Hood™) was
                                                     purchased from a local supermarket.
                                            then mixed with 12 mL pepsin solution. The pH of the mixture was adjusted to 2–4 with HCl
                                            (6N). The mixture was incubated at 37˚C and shaken consistently at 300 RPM for 2 hours. The
                                            intestinal digestion was performed by adjusting the solution pH to 7.5 with NaOH (1N) and
                                            then mixing the solution with 12 mL of pancreatic solution and 6 mL of bile solution. The
                                            solution was incubated at 37˚C and shaken consistently at 300 RPM for 2 hours. The composi-
                                            tions of saliva, pepsin solution, pancreatic solution and bile solution are listed in supplemen-
                                            tary material. The digestion samples were adjusted to pH 7.5. The digestion extracts were
                                            stored at -80˚C before analysis. A set of digestion reactions was conducted following the same
                                            digestion process (Fig 1) in absence of flour samples to obtain a digestive enzyme solution that
                                            contains all the enzymes and buffers used in the process.
                                            Table 1. Experimental design for testing effects of digestion extracts combined with LPS and/or IL1β stimulation
                                            on Caco-2 cells (n = 3) after 24 hours.
                                                   Block                             Stimulation                              Digestion extract
                                                     1                             Non stimulated                                   None
                                                                                                                        1% Digestive enzyme solution
                                                                                                                             1% Wheat digestion
                                                                                                                           1% Breadfruit digestion
                                                     2                             1000 ng/mL LPS                                   None
                                                                                                                        1% Digestive enzyme solution
                                                                                                                             1% Wheat digestion
                                                                                                                           1% Breadfruit digestion
                                                     3                             100 ng/mL IL 1β                                  None
                                                                                                                        1% Digestive enzyme solution
                                                                                                                             1% Wheat digestion
                                                                                                                           1% Breadfruit digestion
                                                     4                   1000 ng/mL LPS+ 100 ng/mL IL 1β                            None
                                                                                                                        1% Digestive enzyme solution
                                                                                                                             1% Wheat digestion
                                                                                                                           1% Breadfruit digestion
                                            https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236300.t001
                                            SsofastTM EvaGreen Supermix was used to prepare RT-qPCR (real time quantitative polymer-
                                            ase chain reaction) mixture. The reference gene was 18S rRNA. Gene expression of TNF-α
                                            (tumor necrosis factor-α), IFN-γ (interferon-γ), MCP-1 (monocyte chemoattractant protein-
                                            1), IL-10, IL-6, iNOS (inducible nitric oxide synthase), IL-8 and IL-4 were examined. All the
                                            primers were synthesized by Integrated DNA Technology (Coralville, USA) (S2 Table). Primer
                                            efficiencies were verified according to the Minimum Information for Publication of Quantita-
                                            tive Real-Time PCR Experiments guidelines [23]. Calculations of the expression value were
                                            performed in the Bio-Rad CFX manager 3.1 (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Ontario, Canada) using
                                            the ΔΔCt method.
                                            Experimental animals
                                            The animal experiments were performed by the staff at Jackson Laboratories, California, USA
                                            according to standard operating protocols. The animal protocol was approved by the Univer-
                                            sity of California San Diego Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) to ensure
                                            the highest quality animal use and care. Mice (C57BL/6, Jackson Labs) were 7-weeks-old at the
                                            beginning of the experiment and were housed for 3 weeks in positively ventilated polycarbon-
                                            ate cages with HEPA-filtered air at a density of four mice per cage. The mice were ear-notched
                                            for identification. The light source was provided by using artificial fluorescent lighting, creat-
                                            ing a 12 hour light/dark cycle. The room temperature was controlled at 22±4˚C with 50±15%
                                            humidity. A total of 32 mixed sex (half male and half female) mice were randomly assigned
                                            into two groups. Each group had an equal number of female (8) and male (8) mice. Mice were
                                            housed in individually and positively ventilated polycarbonate cages with HEPA filtered air at
                                            a density of 4 mice per cage. The animal room was lighted entirely with artificial fluorescent
                                            lighting, with a controlled 12 h light/dark cycle (6 am to 6 pm light). The normal temperature
                                            and relative humidity ranges in the animal rooms were 22 ± 4˚C and 50 ± 15%, respectively.
                                            The animal rooms were set to have 15 air exchanges per hour. Filtered tap water, acidified to a
                                            pH of 2.5 to 3.0 and standard rodent chow (5LG4) or experimental BF diet were provided ad
                                            libitum. Problems with the breadfruit diet crumbling in the cages meant that it was not possi-
                                            ble to accurately determine food intake or absolute amount of food consumed.
                                            Tissue collection
                                            The organs were weighed individually and sent as snap-frozen tissue to the UBC Okanagan.
                                            Feces were collected on days 3, 7, 14, and 21 from each cage, frozen in liquid nitrogen and
                                            then sent to the UBC Okanagan campus. One-third of the ileum sections of the mice were
                                            stored in RNAlater1, an RNA stabilization reagent (Qiagen1), and shipped frozen to the UBC
                                            Okanagan campus. A 3- to 5-mm section of the ileum was fixed in 10% buffered neutral for-
                                            malin with paraffin, sectioned following standard histological methods and then stained by
                                            H&E method. The frozen tissues, feces and RNA later ileum section were stored in -80˚ before
                                            analysis.
                                            Feces protein, total mineral analysis, and fecal occult blood detection
                                            Feces from the same cage and the same day were homogenized and mixed using a CoorsTM
                                            porcelain mortar and pestle (Sigma, USA). The protein was extracted in the protein extraction
                                            buffer before BCA analysis. The mineral content of the feces was calculated by the difference
                                            of weight of the feces before and after incineration at 600˚C for 2 h in an Isotemp programma-
                                            ble muffle furnace (Fisher Scientific, Ottawa, ON), according to AACC 08-03.The fecal occult
                                            blood was detected using a Hemoccult Sensa1 kit (Beckman Coulter, USA) following the
                                            manufacturer’s protocol.
                                            Statistical analysis
                                            All statistical analysis was conducted using JMP1 10.0.0 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC) and Graph-
                                            Pad Prism 5.0 software (GraphPad Software Inc., La Jolla, CA). A series of independent two
                                            sample t-tests or two-way ANOVA analyses were conducted to determine if there were signifi-
                                            cant differences between treatments with a type 1 error rate of 0.05. Graphs were created using
                                            GraphPad Prism 5.0 software (Microsoft Corporation, Santa Rosa, CA).
                                            Results
                                            Protein digestibility
                                            To eliminate the possibility of inaccuracies in the measurement of protein content in the
                                            flour and digestions, two orthogonal protein measures were made at each step. The absolute
                                            values of protein were different between the two methods, but the overall trends were con-
                                            sistent. Overall, about 87% (modified Lowry assay) or 89% (BCA assay) of the breadfruit
                                            protein was fully digested in the in vitro digestion model while 79% (modified Lowry assay)
                                            or 71% (BCA assay) of the wheat protein was fully digested (Fig 2A). After the digestion
                                            reactions, there was significantly more intact protein in the wheat digestion extract than the
                                            breadfruit confirming that more of the breadfruit protein could be digested (Fig 2A). Both
                                            breadfruit and wheat digestions had significantly higher protein than the digestive juice
                                            based on BCA assay; however, this difference was not significant using modified Lowry
                                            assay (Fig 2B).
                                                     Fig 2. Protein content measured by BCA and modified Lowry assays. (A) Wheat and breadfruit flour before and
                                                     after digestion. (B) Digestion extracts. N = 3. � represents significant difference at α = 0.05, �� represents significant
                                                     difference at α = 0.01, ��� represents significant difference at α = 0.001, using two sample t-test or one-way ANOVA
                                                     with Tukey-Kramer Honest Significant Difference (HSD) test. Bar represents the standard error of 6 replicates within
                                                     each treatment.
                                                     https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236300.g002
                                                     significantly higher cell viability than cells exposed to the digestive enzyme solution alone.
                                                     Increasing the amount of any of the dilution extracts significantly reduced the absolute num-
                                                     ber of viable cells and the 1% digestion extracts was most suitable for comparative studies.
 Fig 3. Effects of digestion extracts of wheat and breadfruit on cell viability. (A) 1% digestion extracts. (B) 5% digestion extracts. (C) 10% digestion extract. (D) 50%
 digestion extracts. Error bars represent the standard error of 3 replicates within each treatment. � represents significant difference at α = 0.05, �� represents significant
 difference at α = 0.01, ��� represents significant difference at α = 0.001, using one-way ANOVA with Tukey-Kramer Honest Significant Difference (HSD) test.
 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236300.g003
 Fig 4. Cytokine responses of Caco-2 cells towards digestion treatments under different stimulations. (A) non stimulated. (B) LPS stimulated (C) IL-1 beta
 stimulated (D) LPS plus IL 1 beta. Error bars represent the standard error of 3 replicates within each treatment. � represents significant difference at α = 0.05, ��
 represents significant difference at α = 0.01, ��� represents significant difference at α = 0.001, using one-way ANOVA with Tukey-Kramer Honest Significant Difference
 (HSD) test.
 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236300.g004
                                              with 1% digestion extracts, cells exposed to the breadfruit digestive extract had a higher iNOS
                                              expression than other groups (Fig 4B). When IL-1β stimulation was applied, the 1% wheat
                                              digestion extract stimulated a significant higher IL-6 response than the breadfruit group (Fig
                                              4C). When the LPS and IL-1β stimulations were combined, the expression of IL-6 was signifi-
                                              cantly higher in wheat treated cells than breadfruit treated cells (Fig 4D).
                              Fig 5. Comparison of growth parameters on mice fed on breadfruit (BF) and 5LG4 diets. (A) Daily body weight. (B) Growth rate.
                              (C) Daily water consumption. (D) Average daily water consumption. Bars represents the standard error of the measurement among
                              eight mice from the same group. � represents significant difference at α = 0.05, �� represents significant difference at α = 0.01, ���
                              represents significant difference at α = 0.001.
                              https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236300.g005
Table 2. Differences in body composition and tissue weight between the breadfruit-fed (BF-fed) mice and 5LG4-fed mice.
       Sex              5LG4 diet          BF diet                   Male mice                           Female mice                                p
       Diet                                                 5LG4 diet            BF diet          5LG4 Diet          BF Diet          Diet       Gender       Diet� Gender
                                                                      a                    b
 Body weight (g)         21.0±0.7         22.2±0.7          23.7±0.4           24.7±0.3            18.4±0.3          19.7±0.6        0.0042     <0.0001           0.629
        Fat            17.1%±0.7%       15.7%±1.0%        15.0%±0.5%a         12.8%±0.6%b        19.1%±0.7%        18.5%±1.2%        0.0924     <0.0001           0.321
       Lean            73.4%±0.9%       72.9%±0.9%         75.4%±1.1%         74.7%±0.7%         71.5%±0.9%        71.1%±1.5%        0.631       0.0016           0.908
    Free water         0.5%±0.1%         0.5%±0.1%          0.5%±0.1%          0.4%±0.0%         0.4%±0.1%         0.6%±0.1%         0.741        0.664           0.0692
   Total water         60.7%±0.7%       60.4%±0.8%         62.3%±0.9%         62.0%±0.5%         59.0%±0.8%        58.9%±1.3%        0.817       0.0013           0.926
     Brain (g)         0.45±0.004        0.44±0.007         0.46±0.003         0.45±0.006         0.44±0.006       0.43±0.013        0.195       0.0461           0.661
    Heart (g)          0.12±0.003        0.12±0.005         0.13±0.004         0.13±0.006         0.11±0.004       0.11±0.005        0.580       0.0002           0.662
    Kidney (g)         0.25±0.009        0.26±0.008         0.28±0.009         0.29±0.006         0.22±0.008       0.24±0.008        0.232      <0.0001           0.736
    Lungs (g)          0.23±0.010        0.22±0.010         0.24±0.011         0.22±0.010         0.21±0.014       0.21±0.018        0.397        0.003           0.0795
     Liver (g)         0.94±0.052        0.88±0.066         1.12±0.033         0.93±0.126         0.76±0.033       0.83±0.047        0.505        0.194           0.589
     Skin (g)          0.009±0.003       0.007±0.001       0.013±0.006        0.008±0.001        0.005±0.000       0.006±0.001       0.576       0.0134           0.371
Values highlighted in bold and with a superscript letter in each section are significant difference at alpha = 0.05, using 2 sample t test. p value was calculated using two-
way ANOVA analysis
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236300.t002
                                                      between diet and gender. Both the growth rate and daily water intake were very significantly
                                                      impacted by diets.
                                                         At the end of the three-week-trial, the body composition was similar between BF- and
                                                      5LG4-diet-fed mice (Table 2; S4 Table). Male mice consuming the BF diet had significantly
                                                      higher body weight (4% higher) and lower fat (2.2% less) than male mice consuming the 5LG4
                                                      diet (Table 2). There were few significant differences in the weights of various tissues and
                                                      organs in response to the diet. Female BF-fed mice had significantly larger duodena and male
                                                      BF-fed mice had significantly heavier femurs (S4 Table), while all the other organs, including
                                                      the brain, heart, liver, kidney, and skin were not significantly different in weight (Table 2).
 Fig 6. Representative histopathology of the ileum tissues stained with haematoxylin and eosin (H&E). (A) 5LG4-fed male mice. (B) BF-fed male mice. (C) 5LG4-fed
 female mice. (D) BF-fed female mice. Scale bar is 50 μm.
 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236300.g006
                                                     (male 5LG4-fed mice: 0.61±0.17, male BF-fed mice: 0.20±0.05, female 5LG4-fed mice: 0.45
                                                     ±0.12, female BF-fed mice: 0.30±0.13) (Fig 8). Other bacteria groups studied were not signifi-
                                                     cant between the diet groups.
 Fig 7. Comparison of iNOS expression between ileums of breadfruit (BF)-and 5LG4-fed mice. � represents a significant difference between the two groups using 2
 sample t-test at alpha level 0.05. Middle line denotes media, whiskers are determined by Tukey method, which represent largest value below 75th percentile plus 1.5 times
 interquartile distance IQR or lowest value above 25th percentile minus 1.5 times IQR.
 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236300.g007
                                                     Discussion
                                                     The motivation of this project was to contribute to the development of breadfruit as a sustain-
                                                     able, environmentally friendly, and high-production crop in developing countries and tropical
                                                     areas to feed and support peoples indigenous to these areas. Fundamental understanding of
                                                     the health impact of breadfruit digestion and breadfruit diets is necessary and imperative to
                                                     establishment of breadfruit as staple or as a functional food in the future.
                                                        As the first complete, fully-designed breadfruit diet study, our data showed that breadfruit
                                                     diet does not impose any toxic impact on Caco-2 cells or mice. We did not identify any factors
                                                     that might indicate potential for allergic or adverse reactions in either humans or animals.
                                                     There was no reported death, sickness, or malnutrition of the mice after consuming a bread-
                                                     fruit diet for 3 weeks. Similar to our findings, human studies related to breadfruit have not
                                                     reported any discomfort or death after consuming breadfruit [11–13, 27]. This is also
 Fig 8. The comparison of bacteria expression between ileums of breadfruit diet and 5LG4 diet fed mice. (A) Bacterioidetes. (B) Firmicutes. � , �� , ��� represents
 significant difference between the two groups using 2 sample t-test at alpha level 0.05, 0.01, 0.001, respectively. Middle line denotes media, whiskers are determined by
 Tukey method, which represent largest value below 75th percentile plus 1.5 times interquartile distance (IQR) or lowest value above 25th percentile minus 1.5 times IQR.
 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236300.g008
                                                     supported by the long history of breadfruit consumption by Pacific Island populations [1, 28].
                                                     Unfortunately, the breadfruit chow crumbled making it difficult to estimate the loss during
                                                     feeding and food intake. It is possible the mice consumed less/equal amount of breadfruit diet
                                                     but end up with better growth compared to wheat diet feed mice. Also possible those bread-
                                                     fruit diet mice grew better simply because they ate more. Reformulation of the chow to avoid
                                                     crumbling would require additional ingredients that may also have an effect. Therefore, a dif-
                                                     ferent approach is needed to determine whether breadfruit in the diet increases mouse growth.
                                                         Breadfruit digestion induced a higher (~1 fold) iNOS gene expression on Caco-2 cells than
                                                     the wheat digestion under LPS stimulation. This finding was observed in the in vivo study as
                                                     well. There was a slightly higher expression of iNOS (<0.5 fold) in the ileum of mice fed on the
                                                     breadfruit diet. LPS is an endotoxin found in Gram-negative bacteria, which are found to be
                                                     resident in the intestinal tracts of both humans and rodents [29]. iNOS is a pro-inflammatory
                                                     cytokine that can produce nitric oxide, which acts as a cytotoxic agent in the pathological pro-
                                                     cess, and can regulate mucosal barrier function [30, 31]. The production of iNOS in normal
                                                     mice ileum mucosa has been well demonstrated by Hoffman et al. [31], in which they
                                                     explained that normal mice ileum mucosa express iNOS due to the numbers of bacteria pres-
                                                     ent and this expression can vary depending on the bacterial state in the ileum. In this study,
                                                     only the gene expression of the cytokines was investigated using qPCR and the absolute
                                                     amounts of cytokines were not determined. In some cases, the RNA values do not accurately
                                                     reflect protein levels [32] but the method is generally considered effective for determination of
                                                     the relative differences between samples and treatments [32]
                                                         In a preliminary investigation of the microbiome, we examined the major bacterial groups
                                                     in the colon, which are closely correlated with the bacterial groups in the ileum. The composi-
                                                     tion of the gut microbiota has been previously found to be influenced by diets [33, 34]; there-
                                                     fore, it is not surprising that the gut microbe populations in the phyla Bacteroidetes and
                                                     Firmicutes were significantly higher in mice fed the breadfruit diet. This finding further sup-
                                                     ports the hypothesis that the iNOS expression difference in the breadfruit diet mice and con-
                                                     trol mice is a natural consequence of different bacterial populations in the ileum mucosa but
 Fig 9. Comparison of fecal protein and total mineral content between breadfruit and 5LG4 diet fed mice. (A) Fecal protein content in male mice. (B) Fecal protein
 content in female mice. (C) Fecal total mineral content in male mice. (D) Fecal total mineral content in female mice. Measurements were taken at Day 4, Day 7, Day 14,
 and Day 21. � , �� , ��� represent a significant difference between the two groups using 2 sample t-test at alpha level 0.05, 0.01, 0.001, respectively. Bars represent the
 standard error of the measurement among eight mice from the same group.
 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236300.g009
                                                     further research is required to understand the full impacts of breadfruit consumption on the
                                                     microbiome.
                                                        Overall, these studies support the use of breadfruit as part of a healthy, nutritionally bal-
                                                     anced diet. The average consumption of grain in the US is 189 g (6.67 ounce) per day [35].
                                                     Consuming 189 g cooked breadfruit can meet up to near 57% of fiber, over 34% protein, vita-
                                                     min C and copper, about 28% potassium and manganese, and 5.75–11.5% of iron, calcium
                                                     and phosphorus of the daily recommended dietary allowances (RDA) [6, 7].
                                                     Supporting information
                                                     S1 Table. Composition of saliva, gastric solution, duodenal solution, and bile solution
                                                     used in the in vitro digestion model to mimic human digestion.
                                                     (DOCX)
                                                     S2 Table. RNA sequence, best annealing temperature and primer efficiency for the primers
                                                     used in the breadfruit in vitro cell model study.
                                                     (DOCX)
                                            S3 Table. Comparison of nutritional value between the breadfruit (BF) diet and 5LG4 diet.
                                            (DOCX)
                                            S4 Table. Comparison of average body composition and tissue weight between the BF-fed
                                            (breadfruit-fed) mice and 5LG4-fed mice.
                                            (DOCX)
                                            S5 Table. Histological examination of ileum morphology.
                                            (DOCX)
                                            S1 Fig. Comparison of scavenging activity percentage at 15 minutes between breadfruit
                                            diet and 5LG4 diet using DPPH methods. Bars represents standard error calculated from the
                                            three replicates.
                                            (DOCX)
                                            S2 Fig. Effect of digestive enzyme solution, wheat digestion and breadfruit digestion on
                                            cytokine mRNA expression in Caco-2 cells without further stimulation for 24 hours. (A)
                                            IL-10. (B). IL 8. (C) TNF-α. (D) IFN-γ. (E). IL-4. (F) iNOS. (G) IL-6.
                                            (DOCX)
                                            S3 Fig. Effect of digestive enzyme solution, wheat digestion and breadfruit digestion on
                                            cytokine mRNA expression in Caco-2 cells with LPS stimulation for 24 hours. (A) IL-10.
                                            (B). IL 8. (C) TNF-α. (D) IFN-γ. (E). IL-4. (F) MCP-1. (G) IL-6.
                                            (DOCX)
                                            S4 Fig. Effect of digestive enzyme solution, wheat digestion and breadfruit digestion on
                                            cytokine mRNA expression in Caco-2 cells with IL-1β stimulation for 24 hours. (A) IL-10.
                                            (B). IL 8. (C) TNF-α. (D) IFN-γ. (E). IL-4. (F) MCP-1. (G) iNOS.
                                            (DOCX)
                                            S5 Fig. Effect of digestive enzyme solution, wheat digestion and breadfruit digestion on
                                            cytokine mRNA expression in Caco-2 cells with LPS and IL-1β stimulation for 24 hours.
                                            (A) IL-10. (B). IL 8. (C) TNF-α. (D) IFN-γ. (E). IL-4. (F) iNOS. (G) MCP-1.
                                            (DOCX)
                                            S6 Fig. Comparison of cytokine expression between ileums of breadfruit (BF)-and
                                            5LG4-fed mice. (A) TNF-α. (B) IL-6. (C) IFN-γ. (D) IL-10.
                                            (DOCX)
                                            S7 Fig. The comparison of bacteria expression between ileums of breadfruit diet and 5LG4
                                            diet fed mice. (A) Enterobacteriacae. (B) Lactobacillus spp. (C) Bifidobacterium spp.
                                            (DOCX)
                                            Author Contributions
                                            Conceptualization: Ying Liu, Diane Ragone, Susan J. Murch.
                                            Data curation: Ying Liu, Susan J. Murch.
                                            Funding acquisition: Diane Ragone, Susan J. Murch.
                                            Investigation: Ying Liu, Deanna L. Gibson.
                                            Methodology: Ying Liu, Paula N. Brown, Deanna L. Gibson, Susan J. Murch.
                                            Project administration: Deanna L. Gibson, Susan J. Murch.
                                            References
                                             1.   Lincoln NK, Ragone D, Zerega NJC, Roberts-Nkrumah LB, Merlin M, Jones AMP. Grow us our daily
                                                  bread: A review of breadfruit cultivation in traditional and contemporary systems. In: Warrington I, editor.
                                                  Horticultural review. John Wiley & Sons; 2019. pp. 380–384.
                                             2.   Jones AMP, Ragone D, Aiona K, Lane WA, Murch SJ. Nutritional and morphological diversity of bread-
                                                  fruit (Artocarpus, Moraceae): Identification of elite cultivars for food security. J Food Compos Anal.
                                                  2011; 24: 1091–1102.
                                             3.   Liu Y, Jones AMP, Murch SJ, Ragone D. Crop productivity, yield and seasonality of Breadfruit (Artocar-
                                                  pus spp., Moraceae). Fruits. 2014; 69: 345–361.
                                             4.   Murch SJ, Ragone D, Shi WL, Alan AR, Saxena PK. In vitro conservation and sustained production of
                                                  breadfruit (Artocarpus altilis, Moraceae): modern technologies for a traditional tropical crop. Naturwis-
                                                  senschaften. 2008; 95:99–107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-007-0295-2 PMID: 17710379
                                             5.   Shi WL, Saxena PK, Ragone D, Murch SJ. Mass-propagation and bioreactor-based technologies for
                                                  germplasm conservation, evaluation and international distribution of breadfruit. Acta Horti. 2007;
                                                  757:169–176
                                             6.   Turi CE, Liu Y, Ragone D, Murch SJ. Breadfruit (Artocarpus spp.): A Traditional Crop with the Potential
                                                  to Prevent Hunger and Mitigate Diabetes in the Tropics. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2015; 45(2): 264–
                                                  272.
                                             7.   Liu Y, Ragone D, Murch S. Breadfruit (Artocarpus altilis): A source of high quality protein for food secu-
                                                  rity and novel food products. Amino Acids. 2015; 47: 847–856. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00726-015-
                                                  1914-4 PMID: 25588988
                                             8.   Huang S, Martinez M, Bohrer B. The compositional and functional attributes of commercial flours from
                                                  tropical fruits (breadfruit and banana). Foods; 2019; 8: 586.
                                             9.   Andrade IHP, Otoni CG, Amorim TS, Camilloto GP, Cruz RS. Ultrasound-assisted extraction of starch
                                                  nanoparticles from breadfruit (Artocarpus altilis (Parkinson) Fosberg). Colloids and Surfaces A. 2020;
                                                  586: 123277.
                                            10.   Do Nascimento T, Santos M, de Abreu J, de Almeida I, Da Silva Feijó M, Teodoro A, et al. Effects of
                                                  cooking on the phytochemical profile of breadfruit as revealed by higher solution UPLC–MS. J Sci Food
                                                  Agric. 2020; 100: 1962–1970. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.10209 PMID: 31846074
                                            11.   Bahado-Singh PS, Wheatley AO, Ahmad MH, Morrisson EYStA, Asemota HN. Food processing meth-
                                                  ods influence the glycaemic indices of some commonly eaten West Indian carbohydrate-rich foods. Br J
                                                  Nutr. 2016; 96: 476–481.
                                            12.   Ramdath DD, Issacs CLR, Teelucksingh S, Wolever SMT. Glycaemic index of selected staples com-
                                                  monly eaten in the Caribbean and the effects of boiling v. crushing. Br J Nutr 2004; 91: 971–977. https://
                                                  doi.org/10.1079/bjn20041125 PMID: 15182400
                                            13.   Widanagamage RD, Ekanayake S, Welihinda J. Carbohydrate-rich foods: glycaemic indices and the
                                                  effect of constituent macronutrients. Int J Food Sci Nutr 2009; 60: 215–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/
                                                  09637480902849195 PMID: 19418327
                                            14.   Grant G, More LJ, Mckenzie NH, Dorward PM, Buchan WC, Telek L, Pusztai A. Nutritional and hae-
                                                  magglutination properties of several tropical seeds. J Agric Sci. 1995; 124: 437–445.
                                            15.   USDA, Germplasm Resources Information Network (GRIN); 2020 [cited 2020 Apr 13]. Database: GRIN
                                                  [Internet]. Available from https://www.arsgrin.gov/Pages/Collections#bkmk-ds
                                            16.   Aka LO, Obidike LO, Igokwe IR, Ezema WS. The effect of feeding differently prepared breadfruit (Arto-
                                                  carpus altilis) on the hematology, serum biochemistry, live and relative organ weight in albino rats. Nige-
                                                  rian Veterinary Journal. 2009; 30: 26–34.
                                            17.   Adepeju BA, Gbadamosi SO, Omobuwajo TO, Abiodum OA. Effect of breadfruit based complementary
                                                  food on weight and haematological parameters in albino rats. Food Science and Quality Management.
                                                  2014; 28:78–82.
                                            18.   Kiers LJ, Nout MJR, Rombouts MF. In vitro digestibility of processed and fermented soya bean, cowpea
                                                  and maize. J Sci Food Agri. 2000; 80: 1325–1331.
                                            19.   Tenore CG, Campiglia P, Ritieni A, Novellino E. In vitro bioaccessibility, bioavailability and plasma pro-
                                                  tein interaction of polyphenols from Annurca apple (M. pumila Miller cv Annurca). Food Chem. 2013;
                                                  141: 3519–3524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.06.051 PMID: 23993515
                                            20.   Raiola A, Meca G, Mãnes J, Ritieni A. Bioaccessiblity of deoxynivalenol and its natural co-occurrence
                                                  with ochratoxin A and aflatoxin B in Italian commercial pasta. Food Chem Toxico. 2012; 50: 280–287.
                                            21.   Baker J, Brown K, Rajendiran E, Yip A, DeCoffe D, Dai C, et al. Medicinal lavender modulates the
                                                  enteric microbiota to protect against Citrobacter rodentium-induced colitis. Am J Physiol Gastrointest
                                                  Liver Physiol. 2012; 303: G825–G836. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpgi.00327.2011 PMID: 22821949
                                            22.   Strober W. Trypan blue exclusion test of cell viability. Curr Protoc Immunol. 2015; A3B1.
                                            23.   Bustin SA, Benes V, Garson JA, Hellemans J, Huggett J, Kubista M, et al. The MIQE Guidelines: Mini-
                                                  mum Information for Publication of Quantitative Real-Time PCR Experiments. Clin Chem. 2015; 55,
                                                  2009, 611–622.
                                            24.   Turi CE, Murch SJ. Targeted and untargeted phytochemistry of Ligusticum canbyi: indoleamines,
                                                  phthalides, antioxidant potential, and use of metabolomics as a hypothesis-generating technique for
                                                  compound discovery. Planta Medica. 2013; 79, 1370–1379. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0033-1350618
                                                  PMID: 23877920
                                            25.   Generoso Sde V, Rodrigues NM, Trindade LM, Paiva NC, Cardoso VN, Carneiro CM, et al. Dietary sup-
                                                  plementation with omega-3 fatty acid attenuates 5-fluorouracil induced mucositis in mice. Lipids Health
                                                  Dis. 2015; 14: 54. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12944-015-0052-z PMID: 26063053
                                            26.   Ghosh S, Decoffe D, Brown K, Rajendiran E, Estaki M, Dai C, et al. Fish oil attenuates omega-6 polyun-
                                                  saturated Fatty Acid-induced dysbiosis and infectious colitis but impairs LPS-dephosphorylation activity
                                                  causing sepsis. PLoS One. 2013; 8: e55468. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0055468 PMID:
                                                  23405155
                                            27.   Ragone D, Cavaletto CG. Sensory evaluation of fruit quality and nutritional composition of 20 breadfruit
                                                  (Artocarpus, Moraceae) cultivars. Economic Botany. 2006; 60: 335–346.
                                            28.   Ragone D. Breadfruit, Artocarpus altilis (Parkinson) Fosberg. Rome: International Plant Genetic
                                                  Resources Institute; 1997.
                                            29.   van der Waaij LA, Harmsen HJ, Madjipour M, Kroese FG, Zwiers M, van Dullemen HM, et al. Bacterial
                                                  population analysis of human colon and terminal ileum biopsies with 16S rRNA-based fluorescent
                                                  probes: commensal bacteria live in suspension and have no direct contact with epithelial cells. Inflamm
                                                  Bowel Dis. 2005; 11: 865–871. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mib.0000179212.80778.d3 PMID: 16189415
                                            30.   Aktan F. iNOS-mediated nitric oxide production and its regulation. Life Sci. 2004; 75: 639–653. https://
                                                  doi.org/10.1016/j.lfs.2003.10.042 PMID: 15172174
                                            31.   Hoffman RA, Zhang G, Nüssler NC, Gleixner SL, Ford HR, Simmons RL, et al. Constitutive expression
                                                  of inducible nitric oxide synthase in the mouse ileal mucosa. Am J Physiol. 1997; 272: 383–392.
                                            32.   Amesn D, de Visser K, Town T. Approaches to determine expression of inflammatory cytokine. Meth-
                                                  ods Mol Biol. 2009; 511: 107–142. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-447-6_5 PMID: 19347295
                                            33.   Brown K, DeCoffe D, Molcan E, Gibson DL. Diet-induced dysboisis of the intestinal microbiota and the
                                                  effects on immunity and disease. Nutrients 2012; 4(8):1095–1119. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu4081095
                                                  PMID: 23016134
                                            34.   Chan KY, Estaki M, Gibson DL. Clinical consequences of diet-induced dysbiosis. Ann Nutr Metab 2013:
                                                  63: 28–40. https://doi.org/10.1159/000354902 PMID: 24217034
                                            35.   USDA. What We Eat in America, NHANES 2015–2016, individuals 2 years and over (excluding breast-
                                                  fed children), day 1 dietary intake data, weighted; 2017. Database: Food Patterns Equivalents Data-
                                                  base (FPED) 2015–2016. [Internet]. Available from: www.ars.usda.gov/nea/bhnrc/fsrg