 Enter Reader Mode

Choose Language

7.4: Correlation
Last updated: Feb 15, 2021
 Downloads Submit Adoption Report Peer Review Donate

Chris Johnson, Matthew D. Affolter, Paul Inkenbrandt, & Cam Mosher

Correlation is the process of establishing which sedimentary strata are of the same age but geographically separated. Correlation can be determined by using
magnetic polarity reversals (Chapter 2), rock types, unique rock sequences, or index fossils. There are four main types of correlation: stratigraphic,
lithostratigraphic, chronostratigraphic, and biostratigraphic.

Contents

Figure 7.4.1: Image showing fossils that connect the continents of Gondwana (the southern continents of Pangea). Wegener used correlation to help develop the idea of
continental drift.

Stratigraphic Correlation
Stratigraphic correlation is the process of establishing which sedimentary strata are the same age at distant geographical areas by means of their stratigraphic
relationship. Geologists construct geologic histories of areas by mapping and making stratigraphic columns-a detailed description of the strata from bottom to
top. An example of stratigraphic relationships and correlation between Canyonlands National Park and Zion National Park in Utah. At Canyonlands, the Navajo
Sandstone overlies the Kayenta Formation which overlies the cliff-forming Wingate Formation. In Zion, the Navajo Sandstone overlies the Kayenta formation
which overlies the cliff-forming Moenave Formation. Based on the stratigraphic relationship, the Wingate and Moenave Formations correlate. These two
formations have unique names because their composition and outcrop pattern is slightly different. Other strata in the Colorado Plateau and their sequence can be
recognized and correlated over thousands of square miles.

Figure 7.4.1: Correlation of Paleozoic and Mesozoic strata along the Grand Staircase from the Grand Canyon to Zion Canyon, Bryce Canyon, and Cedar Breaks. (Source:
National Park Service)

Lithostratigraphic Correlation

Figure 7.4.1: View of Navajo Sandstone from Angel’s Landing in Zion National Park
 Lithostratigraphic correlation establishes a similar age of strata based on lithology, which is the composition and physical properties of that strata. Lithos is
Greek for stone and -logy comes from the Greek word for doctrine or science. Lithostratigraphic correlation can be used to correlate whole formations long
distances or can be used to correlate smaller strata within formations to trace their extent and regional depositional environments.

Figure 7.4.1: Stevens Arch in the Navajo Sandstone at Coyote Gulch some 125 miles away from Zion National Park

For example, the Navajo Sandstone, which makes up the prominent walls of Zion National Park, is the same Navajo Sandstone in Canyonlands because the
lithology of the two are identical even though they are hundreds of miles apart. Extensions of the same Navajo Sandstone formation are found miles away in
other parts of southern Utah, including Capitol Reef and Arches National Parks. Further, this same formation is called the Aztec Sandstone in Nevada and Nugget
Sandstone near Salt Lake City because they are lithologically distinct enough to warrant new names.

Chronostratigraphic Correlation
Chronostratigraphic correlation matches rocks of the same age, even though they are made of different lithologies. Different lithologies of sedimentary rocks
can form at the same time at different geographic locations because depositional environments vary geographically. For example, at any one time in a marine
setting, there could be this sequence of depositional environments from the beach to deep marine: beach, nearshore area, shallow marine lagoon, reef, slope, and
Readabilit deep marine. Each depositional environment will have a unique sedimentary rock formation. On the figure of the Permian Capitan Reef at Guadalupe National
Monument in West Texas, the red line shows a chronostratigraphic timeline that represents a snapshot in time. Shallow-water marine lagoon/back reef area is
light blue, the main Capitan reef is dark blue, and deep-water marine siltstone is yellow. All three of these unique lithologies were forming at the same time in
Permian along this red timeline.

Figure 7.4.1: Cross-section of the Permian El Capitan Reef at Guadalupe National Monument, Texas. The red line shows a chronostratigraphic timeline that represents a
snapshot in time in which the shallow marine lagoon/back reef area (light blue), main Capitan reef (dark blue), and deep marine siltstones (yellow) were all being
deposited at the same time.

Figure 7.4.1: The rising sea levels of transgressions create onlapping sediments, regressions create off-lapping. Ocean water is shown in blue so the timeline is on the
surface below the water. At the same time sandstone (buff color), limestone (gray), and shale (mustard color) are all forming at different depths of water.

Biostratigraphic Correlation

Figure 7.4.1: Conodonts

Biostratigraphic correlation uses index fossils to determine strata ages. Index fossils represent assemblages or groups of organisms that were uniquely
present during specific intervals of geologic time. Assemblages refer a group of fossils. Fossils allow geologists to assign a formation to an absolute date range,
such as the Jurassic Period (199 to 145 million years ago), rather than a relative time scale. In fact, most of the geologic time ranges are mapped to fossil
assemblages. The most useful index fossils come from lifeforms that were geographically widespread and had a species lifespan that was limited to a narrow time
interval. In other words, index fossils can be found in many places around the world, but only during a narrow time frame. Some of the best fossils for
biostratigraphic correlation are microfossils, most of which came from single-celled organisms. As with microscopic organisms today, they were widely distributed
across many environments throughout the world. Some of these microscopic organisms had hard parts, such as exoskeletons or outer shells, making them better
candidates for preservation. Foraminifera, single-celled organisms with calcareous shells, are an example of an especially useful index fossil for the Cretaceous
Period and Cenozoic Era [37].

Conodonts are another example of microfossils useful for biostratigraphic correlation of the Cambrian through Triassic Periods. Conodonts are tooth-like
phosphatic structures of an eel-like multi-celled organism that had no other preservable hard parts. The conodont-bearing creatures lived in shallow marine
environments all over the world. Upon death, the phosphatic hard parts were scattered into the rest of the marine sediments. These distinctive tooth-like
structures are easily collected and separated from limestone in the laboratory.
Resources

Figure 7.4.1: Index fossils used for biostratigraphic correlation

Figure 7.4.1: Foraminifera, microscopic creatures with hard shells

Figure 7.4.1: Artist reconstruction of the conodont animal (right) alongside its teeth

Because the conodont creatures were so widely abundant, rapidly evolving, and readily preserved in sediments, their fossils are especially useful for correlating
strata, even though knowledge of the actual animal possessing them is sparse. Scientists in the 1960s carried out a fundamental biostratigraphic correlation that
tied Triassic conodont zonation into ammonoids, which are extinct ancient cousins of the pearly nautilus. Up to that point, ammonoids were the only standard for
Triassic correlation, so cross-referencing micro- and macro-index fossils enhanced the reliability of biostratigraphic correlation for either type [38]. That conodont
study went on to establish the use of conodonts to internationally correlate Triassic strata located in Europe, Western North America, and the Arctic Islands of
Canada [39].

Geologic Time Scale

Figure 7.4.1: Geologic time on Earth, represented circularly, to show the individual time divisions and important events. Ga=billion years ago, Ma=million years ago.

Geologic time has been subdivided into a series of divisions by geologists. Eon is the largest division of time, followed by era, period, epoch, and age. The
partitions of the geologic time scale are the same everywhere on Earth; however, rocks may or may not be present at a given location depending on the geologic
activity going on during a particular period of time. Thus, we have the concept of time vs. rock, in which time is an unbroken continuum but rocks may be
missing and/or unavailable for study. The figure of the geologic time scale represents time flowing continuously from the beginning of the Earth, with the time
 units presented in an unbroken sequence. But that does not mean there are rocks available for study for all of these time units.

Libraries

Figure 7.4.1: Geologic Time Scale with ages shown in millions of years ago (Ma).

Figure 7.4.1: Names from the Geologic Time Scale applied to strata in a region

The geologic time scale was developed during the 19th century using the principles of stratigraphy. The relative order of the time units was determined before
geologists had the tools to assign numerical ages to periods and events. Biostratigraphic correlation using fossils to assign era and period names to sedimentary
rocks on a worldwide scale [40]. With the expansion of science and technology, some geologists think the influence of humanity on natural processes has
become so great they are suggesting a new geologic time period, known as the Anthropocene. [39; 41].

References
37. Wade, B. S., Pearson, P. N., Berggren, W. A. & Pälike, H. Review and revision of Cenozoic tropical planktonic foraminiferal biostratigraphy and calibration to the
geomagnetic polarity and astronomical time scale. Earth-Sci. Rev. 104, 111–142 (2011).

Tools 38. Mosher, L. C. Triassic conodonts from Western North America and Europe and Their Correlation. J. Paleontol. 42, 895–946 (1968).

39. Mosher, L. C. Triassic conodonts from British Columbia and the northern Arctic Islands. Bull. Geol. Surv. Can. 222, 141–193 (1973).

40. Berry, W. B. N. Growth of a Prehistoric Time Scale: Based on Organic Evolution (San Francisco, USA, and Folkestone, Kent, England. (WH Freeman and Co,
1968).

41. Zalasiewicz, J. et al. Are we now living in the Anthropocene? GSA Today 18, 4 (2008).
This page titled 7.4: Correlation is shared under a CC BY-NC-SA license and was authored, remixed, and/or curated by Chris Johnson, Matthew D. Affolter, Paul
Inkenbrandt, & Cam Mosher (OpenGeology) .

Back to top

Was this article helpful?  Yes  No

The LibreTexts libraries are Powered by NICE CXone Expert and are supported by the Department of Education Open Textbook Pilot Project, the UC Davis Office of the Provost, the
UC Davis Library, the California State University Affordable Learning Solutions Program, and Merlot. We also acknowledge previous National Science Foundation support under grant
numbers 1246120, 1525057, and 1413739. Legal. Accessibility Statement For more information contact us at info@libretexts.org or check out our status page at
https://status.libretexts.org.