CHANAKYA NATIONAL LAW UNIVERSITY,

NAYAYA NAGAR, MITHAPUR,

PATNA-800001

A Final draft submitted in partial fulfilment of the course

Investment and Securities Law

Semester — IX,

During the Academic Year 2022 —23.

Submitted by- Amit Dipankar,

20181609

B.B.A.L.L.B

Submitted to - Abhishek Kumar

Faculty of Investment and Securities Law

Powers and Functions of SEBI

 TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. INTRODUCTION
2. ESTABLISHMENT OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA
3. FUNCTIONS OF THE BOARD
4. POWERS OF THE SEBI BOARD
5. CONCLUSION

BIBLIOGRAPHY
INTRODUCTION

The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) was constituted on 12 April 1988 as a non
statutory body through an administrative Resolution of the Government for dealing with all
matters relating to development and regulation of the Securities market and investor protection
and to advise the government on all these matters. SEBI was given statutory status and powers
through and ordinance promulgated on January 30, 1992. SEBI was established as a statutory
body on 21 February 1992. The ordinance was replaced by an Act of Parliament as 4th April
1992. The Preamble of SEBI Act, 1992 enshrines the objectives of SEBI - to protect the interest
of investor in securities market and to promote the development of and to regulate the
securities market. The statutory powers and functions of SEBI were strengthened through the
promulgation of the Securities Laws (Amendment) Ordinance on 25th January 1995, which
was subsequently replaced by an Act of Parliament.

Before SEBI Act, 1992, the three principal Acts governing the securities market were: (a) the
Capital Issues (Control) Act, 1947, which restricted issuer's access to the securities market and
controlled the pricing of issues; (b) the Companies Act, 1956, which sets out the code of
conduct for the corporate sector in relation to issue, allotment and transfer of securities, and
disclosures to be made in public issues; and (c) the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956,
which provides for regulation of transactions in securities through control over stock exchanges.
The Capital Issues (Control) Act, 1947 had its origin during the war in 1943 when the objective
was to channel resources to support the war effort. The Act was retained with some
modifications as a means of controlling the raising of capital by companies and to ensure that
national resources were channeled into proper lines, i.e.,for desirable purposes to serve goals
and priorities of the government, and to protect the interests of investors. Under the Act, any
firm wishing to issue securities had to obtain approval from the Central Government, which
also determined the amount, type and price of the issue.

Major part of the liberalisation process was the repeal of the Capital Issues (Control) Act, 1947
in May 1992. With this, Government's control over issue of capital, pricing of the issues, fixing
of premia and rates of interest on debentures etc. ceased. The office which administered the
Act was abolished and the market was allowed to allocate resources to competing uses.
However to ensure effective regulation of the market, SEBI Act, 1992 was enacted to empower
SEBI with statutory powers for (a) protecting the interests of investors in securities, (b)
promoting the development of the securities market, and (c) regulating the securities market.
Its regulatory jurisdiction extends over corporate in the issuance of capital and transfer of
securities, in addition to all intermediaries and persons associated with securities market. SEBI
can specify the matters to be disclosed and the standards of disclosure required for the
protection of investors in respect of issues; can issue directions to all intermediaries and other
persons associated with the securities market in the interest of investors or of orderly
development for securities market; and can conduct inquiries, audits and inspection of all
concerned and adjudicate offenses under the Act. In short, it has been given necessary
autonomy and authority to regulate and develop an orderly securities market.
ESTABLISHMENT OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD
OF INDIA

Establishment and incorporation of Board1:-

 With effect from such date as the Central Government may, by notification, appoint, there
shall be established, for the purposes of this Act, a Board by the name of the Securities and
Exchange Board of India.
 The Board shall be a body corporate by the name aforesaid, having perpetual succession
and a common seal, with power subject to the provisions of this Act, to acquire, hold and
dispose of property, both movable and immovable, and to contract, and shall, by the said
name, sue or be sued.
 The head office of the Board shall be at Mumbai, Maharashtra.
 The Board may establish offices at other places in India.

Management of the Board2:-

 The Board shall consist of the following members, namely:-
 a Chairman;
 two members from among-st the officials of the [Ministry] of the Central Government
dealing with Finance [and administration of the Companies Act, 1956(1 of 1956)];
 one member from among-st the officials of [the Reserve Bank];
 five other members of whom at least three shall be the whole-time members] to be
appointed by the central Government.

 The general superintendence, direction and management of the affairs of the Board shall
vest in a Board of members, which may exercise all powers and do all acts and things
which may be exercised or done by the Board.
 Save as otherwise determined by regulations, the Chairman shall also have powers of
general superintendence and direction of the affairs of the Board and may also exercise all
powers and do all acts and things which may be exercised or done by that Board.

1
Section 3 of SEBI Act, 1992.
2
Section 4 of SEBI Act, 1992.
 The Chairman and members referred to in clauses (a) and (d) of sub-section (1) shall be
appointed by the Central Government and the members referred to in clauses (b) and (c)
of that sub-section shall be nominated by the Central Government and the [Reserve Bank]
respectively.
 The Chairman and the other members referred to in clauses (a) and (d) of sub-section (1)
shall be persons of ability, integrity and standing who have shown capacity in dealing with
problems relating to securities market or have special knowledge or experience of law,
finance, economics, accountancy, administration or in any other discipline which, in the
opinion of the Central Government, shall be useful to the Board.

Term of office and conditions of service of Chairman and members of the Board3:-
 The term of office and other conditions of service of the Chairman and the members
referred to in clause (d) of sub- section (1) of section 4 shall be such as may be prescribed.
 Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (1), the Central Government shall have
the right to terminate the services of the Chairman or a member appointed under clause (d)
of sub-section (1) of section 4, at any time before the expiry of the period prescribed under
sub-section (1), by giving him notice of not less than three months in writing or three
months’ salary and allowances in lieu thereof, and the Chairman or a member, as the case
may be, shall also have the right to relinquish his office, at any time before the expiry of
the period prescribed under sub-section (1), by giving to the Central Government notice of
not less than three months in writing.

Removal of member from office4:-

The Central Government shall remove a member from office if he –
 is, or at any time has been, adjudicated as insolvent;
 is of unsound mind and stands so declared by a competent court;
 has been convicted of an offence which, in the opinion of the Central Government,
involves a moral turpitude;
 has, in the opinion of the Central Government, so abused his position as to render his
continuation in office detrimental to the public interest:

3
Section 5 of SEBI Act, 1992.
4
Section 6 of SEBI Act, 1992.
  Provided that no member shall be removed under this clause unless he has been given a
reasonable opportunity of being heard in the matter.

Meetings5:-
 The Board shall meet at such times and places, and shall observe such rules of procedure
in regard to the transaction of business at its meetings (including quorum at such meetings)
as may be provided by regulations.
 The Chairman or, if for any reason, he is unable to attend a meeting of the Board, any other
member chosen by the members present from among-st themselves at the meeting shall
preside at the meeting.
 All questions which come up before any meeting of the Board shall be decided by a
majority votes of the members present and voting, and, in the event of an equality of votes,
the Chairman, or in his absence, the person presiding, shall have a second or casting vote.

Member not to participate in meetings in certain cases6:-

Any member, who is a director of a company and who as such director has any direct or indirect
pecuniary interest in any matter coming up for consideration at a meeting of the Board, shall, as
soon as possible after relevant circumstances have come to his knowledge, disclose the nature
of his interest at such meeting and such disclosure shall be recorded in the proceedings of the
Board, and the member shall not take any part in any deliberation or decision of the Board with
respect to that matter”.

Vacancies etc., not to invalidate proceedings of Board7:-

No act or proceeding of the Board shall be invalid merely by reason of –
 any vacancy in, or any defect in the constitution of, the Board; or
 any defect in the appointment of a person acting as a member of the Board; or
 any irregularity in the procedure of the Board not affecting the merits of the case.

Officers and employees of the Board8:-

5
Section 7 of SEBI Act, 1992.
6
Section 7A of SEBI Act, 1992.
7
Section 8 of SEBI Act, 1992.
8
Section 9 of SEBI Act, 1992.
 The Board may appoint such other officers and employees as it considers necessary for the
efficient discharge of its functions under this Act.
 The term and other conditions of service of officers and employees of the Board appointed
under sub- section (1) shall be such as may be determined by regulations.

FUNCTIONS OF THE BOARD

The power and functions of the board as per act are very wide and effective, which can deal
the securities market in very effective manner to protect the interest of investors and
shareholders. They are as follows:

Functions of Board9- it shall be the duty of the Board to protect the interests of investors in
securities and to promote the development of, and to regulate the securities market, by such
measures as it thinks fit. These measures include:

a. regulating the business in stock exchanges and any other securities markets;

b. registering and regulating the working of stock brokers, sub-brokers, share transfer agents,
bankers to an issue, trustees of trust deeds, registrars to an issue, merchant bankers,
underwriters, portfolio managers, investment advisers and such other intermediaries who
may be associated with securities markets in any manner;

c. registering and regulating the working of the depositories, participants, custodians of

securities, foreign institutional investors, credit rating agencies and such other
intermediaries as the Board may, by notification, specify in this behalf;

d. registering and regulating the working of venture capital funds and collective investment
schemes],including mutual funds;

e. promoting and regulating self-regulatory organizations;

f. promoting investors’ education and training of intermediaries of securities markets;

g. prohibiting insider trading in securities;

9
Section 11 of the SEBI act, 1992.
h. regulating substantial acquisition of shares and take-over of companies in the securities
market;

i. calling for calling for information from, undertaking inspection, conducting inquiries and
audits of the 16[stock exchanges, mutual funds, other persons associated with the securities
market] intermediaries and self-regulatory organisations information and record from any
bank or any other authority or board or corporation established or constituted by or under
any Central, State or Provincial Act in respect of any transaction in securities which is
under investigation or inquiry by the Board;

j. performing such functions and exercising such powers under the provisions of the
Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956 as may be delegated to it by the Central
Government;

k. levying fees or other charges for carrying out the purposes of this section;

l. conducting research for the above purposes;

m. calling from or furnishing to any such agencies, as may be specified by the Board, such
information as may be considered necessary by it for the efficient discharge of its functions;

n. Performing such other functions as may be prescribed.

o. the Board may take measures to undertake inspection of any book, or register, or other
document or record of any listed public company or a public company (not being
intermediaries referred to in section 12 of the act) which intends to get its securities listed
on any recognised stock exchange where the Board has reasonable grounds to believe that
such company has been indulging in insider trading or fraudulent and unfair trade practices
relating to securities market.

In the case of Virendra Bansal Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of India & Another10
The Hon’ble High court of Gujarat has held that as a cumulative effect of the aforesaid facts
and circumstances of the case and the judicial pronouncements, the Scheme floated by SEBI
viz. SEBI (Interest Liability and Regularization) Scheme 2004 is absolutely true, correct and
legal in consonance with the Act, 1992. Likewise, the calculation of registration fees, adopted

10
Special Civil Application No. 1396/04, 14328/04, 14328/04, 14351/04, 14355/04, 14650/04, 14641/04,
14631/04, 1518.
by SEBI in absence of break up turnover and in absence of Auditor’s report before the cut off
date, is true, correct, legal and in consonance with the Act, 1992 and Regulations, 1992. The
Court cannot extend the benefit of the Scheme after the cut off date, especially in the facts of
the present case, when enough extensions have been given by SEBI and whereby a large
number of stock-brokers of Ahmedabad Stock Exchange have already availed the benefit of
the Scheme. The cut off date is a integral part of the benefit under the Scheme. Cut off date, in
facts of this case is not an arbitrary. The concession and conditions of the regularization Scheme
cannot be segregated. It is a matter of Government policy that what to give as a concession for,
what is to be achieved promptly, without keeping the open ended policy. The Scheme is
optional. It is in consonance with the Act, 1992 and Regulations, 1992. For the reasons stated
herein above, the petitions fail. In all the Special Civil Applications Rule is discharged with no
order as to costs. Interim relief grated, earlier, is vacated.
POWERS OF THE SEBI BOARD

The board has been assigned with following power:

Power of Civil court11

For carrying out the duties assigned to it under the act, the SEBI has been vested with the
powers as are available to a Civil Court under the Code of Civil Procedure Code, 1908 for
trying a suit in respect of following matters:

i. the discovery and production of books of account and other documents, at such place and
such time as may be specified by the Board;

ii. summoning and enforcing the attendance of persons and examining them on oath;

iii. inspection of any books, registers and other documents of any person referred to in section
12, at any place;

iv. inspection of any book, or register, or other document or record of the company ;

v. Issuing commissions for the examination of witnesses or documents.

Powers to suspend and restrain12

The Board may, by an order, for reasons to be recorded in writing, in the interests of investors
or securities market, take any of the following measures, either pending investigation or inquiry
or on completion of such investigation or inquiry13, namely:-

i. suspend the trading of any security in a recognised stock exchange;

ii. restrain persons from accessing the securities market and prohibit any person associated
with securities market to buy, sell or deal in securities;

11
Section 11 (3) of the SEBI Act, 1992
12
Section 11(4) of the SEBI Act, 1992
13
Substituted for clause (i) of sub section (2) by the SEBI (Amendment) Act, 2002, w.e.f. 29- 10-2002
iii. suspend any office-bearer of any stock exchange or self- regulatory organisation from
holding such position;

iv. impound and retain the proceeds or securities in respect of any transaction which is under
investigation;

v. attach, after passing of an order on an application made for approval by he Judicial

Magistrate of the first class having jurisdiction, for a period not exceeding one month, one
or more bank account or accounts of any intermediary or any person associated with the
securities market in any manner involved in violation of any of the provisions of this Act,
or the rules or the regulations made thereunder: However, only the bank account or
accounts or any transaction entered therein, so far as it relates to the proceeds actually
involved in violation of any of the provisions of this Act, or the rules or the regulations
made thereunder shall be allowed to be attached;

vi. Direct any intermediary or any person associated with the securities market in any manner
not to dispose of or alienate an asset forming part of any transaction which is under
investigation.

The board may, take any of the measures specified in clause (iv) or clause (v) or clause (vi), in
respect of any listed public company or a public company14 which intends to get its securities
listed on any recognised stock exchange where the Board has reasonable grounds to believe
that such company has been indulging in insider trading or fraudulent and unfair trade practices
relating to securities market. Furthermore the Board shall, either before or after passing such
orders, give an opportunity of hearing to such intermediaries or persons concerned.

Powers to regulate or prohibit issue of prospectus, offer document or advertisement

soliciting money for issue of securities15

The Board may for the protection of investors for (i) the matters relating to issue of capital,
transfer of securities and other matters incidental thereto; and (ii) the manner in which such
matters shall be disclosed by the companies. The Board may by general or special orders
prohibit any company from issuing prospectus, any offer document, or advertisement soliciting
money from the public for the issue of securities. The board may also specify the conditions

14
not being intermediaries referred to in section 12.
15
Section 11A (1) of the SEBI Act, 1992
subject to which the prospectus, such offer document or advertisement, if not prohibited, may
be issued. It may specify the requirements for listing and transfer of securities and other matters
incidental thereto.

Power to issue directions16

If after making enquiry, the Board is satisfied that it is necessary in the interest of investors, or
orderly development of securities market. Or to prevent the affairs of any intermediary or other
persons referred to in section 12 (stock broker, sub broker, share transfer agents etc.) being
conducted in a manner detrimental to the interest of investors or securities market. Or to secure
the proper management of any such intermediary or person. It may issue such directions-

i. to any person or class of persons referred to in section 12, or associated with the securities
market; or

ii. to any company in respect of matters specified in section 11A, as may be appropriate in
the interests of investors in securities and the securities market.

In the matter of Securities and Exchange Board of India Vs. Ajay Agarwal17 , there was
alleged misstatement of facts in prospectus of company and misguiding investors. Restraint
order from accessing securities market (Power of SEBI to issue directions — Section 11B of
the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 ) While using powers the SEBI restrained
Director of Company from accessing securities market on prima facie case that facts were
misstated in the prospectus of the company during public issue of shares and therefore,
investors were misguided. The Appellate Board ruled in favour of Respondent on ground that
provision of Section 11B cannot be invoked in respect of the alleged misconduct which took
place at a point of time when Section 11B was not on the statute book. The issue was whether
Section 11B of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 could be invoked by the
Chairman of the in conjunction with Sections 4(3) and 11 for restraining the Respondent. The
Supreme Court has held that Provisions of Section 11B being procedural in nature can be
applied retrospectively. Even if the law applies prospectively, the Board cannot be prevented
from acting in terms of the law which exists on the day the Board passed its order.

16
Section 11(B) of the SEBI Act, 1992
17
MANU/SC/0137/ 2010
The High Court of Bombay has decided in favour of powers exercised by board under SEBI
Act, in the matter of Banhem Securities Pvt. Ltd Vs National Stock Exchange & ors18. The
brief facts of the matter are:- The challenge in this petition is to the circular issued by the SEBI
Board dated 9.7.1999, the relevant portion of which reads thus :“The Stock Exchange should
on receipt of the arbitration award, debit the amount of the arbitration award from the security
deposit or any other monies of the member (against whom an award has been passed) and keep
the amount in a separate account. Thereafter, a confirmation may be obtained from the
concerned member that he has not filed any appeal within the stipulated time under section 34
of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, and only then the payment may be made to the awardee.
If an appeal is filed and the same is pending in a Court of law, the amount so kept in the separate
account be paid to the awardee in accordance with the court orders.

At the time of debiting the amount, the Stock Exchange may if so desire inform him that the
Exchange will not be liable for loss of interest, business etc in case the award is modified by
the Court. The Exchange may also indicate that if any amount of interest is still payable to the
awardee e.g. from the date of debiting the member’s account till the date of payment of the
award amount to the awardee, the same be recoverable from the concerned member and the
Stock Exchange shall not be liable in this regard.”

The validity of the circular is assailed mainly on the ground that it is contrary to the provisions
of section 36 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Section 36 lays down that where
time prescribed under section 34 to set aside the award has expired and no application is made
therefrom or if it is made, it has been refused, then the award would become enforceable as a
decree under the provisions of the C.P.C. It further provides that if application is made, then
till the application is refused the award does not become enforceable as a decree and such
enforceability is postponed till the application for setting aside the award under section 34 is
decided. The contention is that if the award is not enforceable under the provisions of the said
Act, it cannot be made executable by virtue of the administrative instructions issued by the
SEBI. It is also contended that the impugned circular makes provision for deposit only in the
case where the award is passed in favour of the constituent and against a broker but does not
make any provision where the award is passed in favour of a broker and against the constituent.
Therefore it is contended that the circular is violative of Article 14 of the Constitution. It is

18
The Writ Petition Lodging No. 168 of 2002, dated 23.1.2002
contended that in any event once award is set aside then the amount with accrued interest is
liable to be refunded. The circular, however, provides only for refund of the principal amount.

The Hon’ble High court held that - In our opinion the challenge to the impugned circular is
without any substance. The circular has been issued by the SEBI Board in exercise of powers
under section 11 and 11B of the SEBI Act in order to protect interest of the investors. It has
been brought to the notice of the SEBI Board that arbitration awards passed in favour of the
clients / investors are not implemented and the Stock Exchanges are unable to take appropriate
action in order to ensure implementation of the awards. In our opinion the decision taken by
the SEBI is in the right direction. It helps to protect the investors. The circular issued by the
SEBI is confined to members / brokers of the Stock Exchanges and there is no question of the
circular being contrary to the provisions of section 36 or any other provisions of the Arbitration
and Conciliation Act, 1996. We do not find any illegality or arbitrariness in the circular.
Petition is dismissed.

The High court of Calcutta has also given order in the case of in the matter of Raj Kumar
Kishorepuri Vs General Manager, Securities & Exchange Board of India & Ors.19The
brief facts of the matter - The petitioner in this writ petition is aggrieved by the notice issued
by the General Manager, Securities and Exchange Board of India dated August 26th, 2004. By
the notice he was asked to show cause why proceedings should not be initiated against him
under the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992, s.11B, read with the Securities
and Exchange Board of India (Prohibition of Fraudulent and Unfair Trade Practices relating to
Securities Market) Regulations, 1995, regn.12, and the Securities and Exchange Board of India
(Prohibition of Fraudulent and Unfair Trade Practices relating to Securities Market)
Regulations, 2003, regn.11, for the role he played in the process of irregular allotment of
preferential shares by a Padmini Technologies Ltd. in the year 1999.

Section 30 of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 empowered the board to
make regulations for carrying out the purposes of the Act. In exercise of such power it first
made the 1995 regulations, which were repealed by the 2003 regulations (now in force),
providing by their regn. 13 that notwithstanding the repeal violations of provisions of the
repealed regulations shall be investigated and proceeded against, and any investigation pending,

19
W. P. No. 1933 of 2004, Judgment on : March 23rd, 2005 ( www.sebi.gov.in)
at the date of their commencement, shall be continued and disposed of, according to the
procedure laid down in them.

Counsel for the petitioner argued that provisions of regn. 12 of the repealed regulations and
regulation 11 of the new regulations, both being substantive provisions of law, as opposed to
procedural ones, while, in view of provisions of regn.13 of the new regulations, the board is
empowered to follow the procedural provisions of the new regulations for concluding the
pending investigations, it does not possess the power to take any action against or punish the
petitioner under regn. 11 of the new regulations, though, if occasion arises, it can do so under
regn. 12 of the repealed regulations.

Counsel for the respondents argued that since sub-regns. 2 & 3 of regn. 13 begin with non
obstante clauses, even for the violations of provisions of the repealed regulations by the
petitioner, the board would be empowered to take action in terms of regn. 11 of the new
regulations. She refered to passages from treatise and the decisions in : Union of India & Anr.
v. G. M. Kokil & Ors20, Chandavarkar Sita Ratna Rao v. Ashalata S. Guram21, Narcotics
Control Bureau v. Kishan Lal and Ors.22, and M/s. Orient Paper & Industries Ltd. &
Anr. v. State of Orissa & Ors.23

It is apparent from the impugned post investigation show cause notice that the board
contemplated actions against the petitioner under s.11B, which empowers it to issue all or any
of the directions specified in regn.11 of the new regulations. Sec. 11B confers power on the
board to issue such directions as may be appropriate in the interests of investors in securities
and securities market. Therefore, in any case, the petitioner cannot say that the measures
mentioned in regn.11 cannot be taken against him, if there are good and sufficient reasons for
taking any of them. For these reasons it was concluded that there being no merit in the sole
contention raised to challenge the show cause notice, the writ petition is liable to be dismissed.

20
AIR 1984 SC 1022
21
AIR 1987 SC 117
22
AIR 1991 SC 558
23
AIR 1991 SC 672
Power to investigate24

Where the Board has reasonable ground to believe that the transactions in securities are being
dealt with in a manner detrimental to the investors or the securities market or any intermediary
or any person associated with the securities market has violated any of the provisions of this
Act or the rules or the regulations made or directions issued by the Board, it may, at any time
by order in writing, direct any person25 specified in the order to investigate the affairs of such
intermediary or persons associated with the securities market and to report thereon to the Board.

It shall be the duty of every manager, managing director, officer and other employee of the
company and every intermediary referred to in section 12 or every person associated with the
securities market to preserve and to produce to the Investigating Authority or any person
authorised by it in this behalf, all the books, registers, other documents and record of, or relating
to, the company or, as the case may be, of or relating to, the intermediary or such person, which
are in their custody or power.

The Investigating Authority may require any intermediary or any person associated with
securities market in any manner to furnish such information to, or produce such books, or
registers, or other documents, or record before it or any person authorised by it in this behalf
as it may consider necessary if the furnishing of such information or the production of such
books, or registers, or other documents, or record is relevant or necessary for the purposes of
its investigation.

The Investigating Authority may keep in its custody any books, registers, other documents and
record produced for six months and thereafter shall return the same to any intermediary or any
person associated with securities market by whom or on whose behalf the books, registers,
other documents and record are produced, provided that the Investigating Authority may call
for any book, register, other document and record if they are needed again. If the person on
whose behalf the books, registers, other documents and record are produced requires certified
copies of the books, registers, other documents and record produced before the Investigating
Authority, it shall give certified copies of such books, registers, other documents and record to
such person or on whose behalf the books, registers, other documents and record were produced.

24
Section 11 (C) of the SEBI Act, 1992
25
Investigating authority
Any person, directed to make an investigation may examine on oath, any manager, managing
director, officer and other employee of any intermediary or any person associated with
securities market in any manner, in relation to the affairs of his business and may administer
an oath accordingly and for that purpose may require any of those persons to appear before it
personally.

If any person fails without reasonable cause or refuses to produce to the Investigating Authority
or any person authorised by it in this behalf any book, register, other document and record
which is his duty to produce or to furnish any information which is his duty to furnish or to
appear before the Investigating authority personally when required to do so or to answer any
question which is put to him by the Investigating Authority or to sign the notes of any
examination , he shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which may extend to one
year, or with fine, which may extend to one crore rupees, or with both, and also with a further
fine which may extend to five lakh rupees for every day after the first during which the failure
or refusal continues. Notes of any examination shall be taken down in writing and shall be read
over to, or by, and signed by, the person examined, and may thereafter be used in evidence
against him.

Where in the course of investigation, the Investigating Authority has reasonable ground to
believe that the books, registers, other documents and record of, or relating to, any intermediary
or any person associated with securities market in any manner, may be destroyed, mutilated,
altered, falsified or secreted, the Investigating Authority may make an application to the
Judicial Magistrate of the first class having jurisdiction for an order for the seizure of such
books, registers, other documents and record. After considering the application and hearing the
Investigating Authority, if necessary, the Magistrate may, by order, authorise the Investigating
Authority to enter, with such assistance, as may be required, the place or places where such
books, registers, other documents and record are kept to search that place or those places in the
manner specified in the order and to seize books, registers, other documents and record, it
considers necessary for the purposes of the investigation. However, the Magistrate shall not
authorise seizure of books, registers, other documents and record, of any listed public company
or a public company 26 which intends to get its securities listed on any recognised stock
exchange unless such company indulges in insider trading or market manipulation.

26
not being the intermediaries specified under section 12 of the SEBI Act, 1992.
The Investigating Authority shall keep in its custody the books, registers, other documents and
record seized under this section for such period not later than the conclusion of the investigation
as it considers necessary and thereafter shall return the same to the company or the other body
corporate, or, as the case may be, to the managing director or the manager or any other person,
from whose custody or power they were seized and inform the Magistrate of such return:
Provided that the Investigating Authority may, before returning such books, registers, other
documents and record as aforesaid, place identification marks on them or any part thereof.
Every search or seizure made under this section shall be carried out in accordance with the
provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, relating to searches or seizures made
under that Code.

In the case of K. Venkateswarlu Vs The Regional Manager, SEBI & Anr27. The Hon’ble
High court of Delhi has decided the matter to issue writ of mandamus or not to SEBI to take
action on the complaint of customer and writ petition is in the nature of PIL- Brief facts of the
matter- This Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by the
Petitioner making following prayers:

a. issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ directing the Respondent no. 1 to
conduct an enquiry regarding the Price manipulation/insider trading of the Respondent No.
2 scrip during the said period.

b. direct the Respondent No. 1 to file a report on the subject in this Hon'ble Court for further
directions.

c. pass such any other or further order/direction as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and
proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.

The Petitioner has stated that he was a small investor in the shares and the price of scrip of
Respondent No. 2 company fluctuated vigorously first upward and then downward. The
Petitioner had purchased 3000 shares of respondent no. 2 company @ Rs.476.34 and had to
sell it @ Rs.454.52 thus incurring a loss of Rs.65,451.20. He made complaint to SEBI
(Respondent No. 1) bringing it to the notice of SEBI that there was 'inside trading' and

27
Date of Order: 25.2.2008 W.P.(Crl.) No. 324/2007, 25.2.2008 (www.sebi.gov.in)
manipulation of price of scrip of Respondent No. 2 company but SEBI took no action and
hence this Writ Petition.

The Court observed as under: Those, who deal in stock market and purchase shares as a mode
of investment, know very well that stock market is sometime in the grip of bulls and sometime
in the grip of bears. Recent trend in the stock market has shown that the stock prices do not
reflect the real value of the share and hike and fall in the price of the share takes place due to
several factors like sudden interest of the foreign investors into Indian Stock Market or sudden
fall in the stock market world over. SEBI is a specialized body constituted under the Act, which
takes care of different regulations meant for stock market. SEBI is supposed to know when and
where the investigation is to be done by it. This Court on the prayer of individual shareholder
because of fall in price of his shares cannot give directions to SEBI to conduct investigations
either itself or through CBI. It is surprising that the petitioner had come when share price of
his share has fallen. He must be earning profits when share prices went up by the same process
which the petitioner is alleging was responsible for fall in the share price and petitioner did not
approach the Court at that time, although, petitioner is stated to be dealing in shares for the last
ten years. When you suffer losses you suddenly feel that there is some manipulation and when
you gain profits, the same feeling is not there. Moreover this petition is in the nature of PIL.
This Court cannot entertain PILs.

Power to issue Cease and desists proceeding28

If the Board finds, after causing an inquiry to be made, that any person has violated, or is likely
to violate, any provisions of this Act, or any rules or regulations made thereunder, it may pass
an order requiring such person to cease and desist from committing or causing such violation:
Provided that the Board shall not pass such order in respect of any listed public company or a
public company which intends to get its securities listed on any recognised stock exchange
unless the Board has reasonable grounds to believe that such company has indulged in insider
trading or market manipulation.

Regulation of Intermediaries29

28
Section 11 D of the SEBI Act, 1992
29
Chapter V registration certificate : the SEBI Act, 1992
Registration of Stock Broker, Sub Broker, Share Transfer Agents. There are number of
intermediaries which are associated with securities market in buying, selling and otherwise
dealing in securities such as :-

(i) stock-broker,

(ii) sub- broker,

(iii) share transfer agent,

(iv) banker to an issue,

(v) trustee of trust deed,

(vi) registrar to an issue,

(vii) merchant banker,

(viii) underwriter,

(ix) portfolio manager,

(x) investment adviser. Etc.

As per section 12 (1) of the act :- No stock-broker, sub- broker, share transfer agent, banker to
an issue, trustee of trust deed, registrar to an issue, merchant banker, underwriter, portfolio
manager, investment adviser and such other intermediary who may be associated with
securities market shall buy, sell or deal in securities except under, and in accordance with, the
conditions of a certificate of registration obtained from the Board in accordance with the
regulations made under this Act: Provided that a person buying or selling securities or
otherwise dealing with the securities market as a stock- broker, sub-broker, share transfer agent,
banker to an issue, trustee of trust deed, registrar to an issue, merchant banker, underwriter,
portfolio manager, investment adviser and such other intermediary who may be associated with
securities market immediately before the establishment of the Board for which no registration
certificate was necessary prior to such establishment, may continue to do so for a period of
three months from such establishment or, if he has made an application for such registration
within the said period of three months, till the disposal of such application.

If any certificate of registration, obtained immediately before the commencement of the

Securities Laws (Amendment) Act, 1995, shall be deemed to have been obtained from the
Board in accordance with the regulations providing for such registration.
 Section 12 (1A) of the act prescribes that no depository, participant30 , custodian of securities,
foreign institutional investor, credit rating agency or any other intermediary associated with the
securities market as the Board may by notification in this behalf specify, shall buy or sell or
deal in securities except under and in accordance with the conditions of a certificate of
registration obtained from the Board in accordance with the regulations made under this Act.
If a person buying or selling securities or otherwise dealing with the securities market as a
depository, participant, custodian of securities, foreign institutional investor or credit rating
agency immediately before the commencement of the Securities Laws (Amendment) Act, 1995,
for which no certificate of registration was required prior to such commencement, may
continue to buy or sell securities or otherwise deal with the securities market until such time
regulations are made under clause (d) of sub-section (2) of section 30.

Section 12 (1B) prescribe that No person shall sponsor or cause to be sponsored or carry on or
cause to be carried on any venture capital funds or collective investment schemes including
mutual funds, unless he obtains a certificate of registration from the Board in accordance with
the regulations. If any person sponsoring or causing to be sponsored, carrying on or causing to
be carried on any venture capital funds or collective investment schemes operating in the
securities market immediately before the commencement of the Securities Laws (Amendment)
Act, 1995, for which no certificate of registration was required prior to such commencement,
may continue to operate till such time regulations are made under clause (d) of sub-section (2)
of section 30. Every application for registration shall be in such manner and on payment of
such fees as may be determined by regulations31.

Power to Cancel Certificate32

The Board may, by order, suspend or cancel a certificate of registration in such manner as may
be determined by regulations. However as per proviso of this section, no order under this sub-
section shall be made unless the person concerned has been given a reasonable opportunity of
being heard.

30
Inserted by Depositories Act, 1996, w.e.f. 20-09-1995
31
Section 12 (2) of the SEBI Act, 1992
32
Section 12 (3) of the SEBI Act, 1992
According to this section SEBI is empowered to suspend or cancel a certificate of registration
granted by it. However, this should be done as per principle of natural justice and requires a
reasonable opportunity of being heard to such person. Moreover, any order passed by SEBI
under this sub section would affect vital rights of the concerned person, so, the order must be
a speaking or reasoned order notwithstanding the fact that the SEBI is not a judicial or a quasi
Judicial body. In S N Mukherjee Vs Union of India,33 the Supreme Court has held that in
view of the expanding horizon of the principle of natural justice, the requirement to record
reasons can be regarded as one of the principle of natural justice which governs exercise of
power by administrative authorities.

In another case, in The Securties Exchange Board of India Vs Saikala Associaties Ltd.,34
the apex court was considering an appeal filed by SEBI challenging the order passed by the
Tribunal overturning the order earlier passed by SEBI against broker for violation of the
provisions of section 12(1) read with rule 3, the 1992 rules. After considering the rival
submissions, the only question before the apex court was, Whether Tribunal has power to
modify the penalty imposed by SEBI? The Supreme court observed that , the position of Broker
/ sub broker in case of violation was statutorily provided under section 12 of the Act, which
has to be read with rule 3 of the rules. The apex court further observed that , no power has been
conferred on the Tribunal to travel beyond the areas covered by section 12 ad rule 3 ad
concluded that when something was to be done statutorily in a particular way, it can be done
only in that way and there was no scope for taking shelter under a discretionary power.
Accordingly, the order of the Tribunal was set aside and the order passed by SEBI was restored.

Hence the Supreme Court has settled the issue that in case where even the manner of statutory
penalty is provided by law then the tribunal has no option but to follow the law and it cannot
change the penalty by taking recourse to the plea that it has discretionary power under the act.

Powers to Prohibit the Manipulative and Deceptive Devices, Insider Trading and
Substantial Acquisition of Securities or Control35

According to Section 12 A of the act, no person shall directly or indirectly –

33
AIR 1990 SC 1984
34
(2009) 91SCL 443 (SC)
35
Chapter VA of the SEBI Act, 1992
i. use or employ, in connection with the issue, purchase or sale of any securities listed or
proposed to be listed on a recognition stock exchange, any manipulative or deceptive
device or contrivance in contravention of the provisions of this Act or the rules or the
regulations made there under;

ii. employ any device, scheme or artifice to defraud in connection with issue or dealing in
securities which are listed or proposed to be listed on a recognised stock exchange;

iii. engage in any act, practice, course of business which operates or would operate as fraud
or deceit upon any person, in connection with the issue, dealing in securities which are
listed or proposed to be listed on a recognised stock exchange, in contravention of the
provisions of this Act or the rules or the regulations made thereunder;

iv. engage in insider trading;

v. deal in securities while in possession of material or non-public information or

communicate such material or non-public information to any other person, in a manner
which is in contravention of the provisions of this Act or the rules or the regulations made
thereunder;

vi. acquire control of any company or securities more than the percentage of equity share
capital of a company whose securities are listed or proposed to be listed on a recognised
stock exchange in contravention of the regulations made under this Act.

Powers to impose Penalties and Adjudication

Chapter VI of the SEBI Act, 1992 contains Section 15A to Section 15 JA which deals with
penalties which can be imposed under the Act for various failures, defaulters, non disclosures
and other offences.

Power to Adjudicate36

For the purpose of adjudging under sections 15A, 15B, 15C, 15D, 15E, 15F, 15G, 15H, 15HA
and 15HB, the Board shall appoint any of its officers not below the rank of a Division Chief to
be an adjudicating officer for holding an inquiry in the prescribed manner after giving any
person concerned a reasonable opportunity of being heard for the purpose of imposing any
penalty.

36
Section 15 I of the SEBI Act, 1992
While holding an inquiry, the adjudicating officer shall have power to summon and enforce the
attendance of any person acquainted with the facts and circumstances of the case to give
evidence or to produce any document which in the opinion of the adjudicating officer, may be
useful for or relevant to the subject matter of the inquiry and if, on such inquiry, he is satisfied
that the person has failed to comply with the provisions of any of the sections , he may impose
such penalty as he thinks fit in accordance with the provisions of any of those sections.

During adjudging quantum of penalty mentioned as above, the adjudicating officer shall have
due regard to the following factors, namely:

i. the amount of disproportionate gain or unfair advantage, wherever quantifiable, made as a

result of the default;

ii. the mount of loss caused to an investor or group of investors as a result of the default;

iii. the repetitive nature of the default. All sums realised by way of penalties under this Act
shall be credited to the Consolidated Fund of India.37

Power To Make Regulations38

Section 30 of the act empowers the SEBI to make regulations 39 to carry out the purposes of
the act and every regulation must be made and published as a notification in the Gazette. Such
regulations may provide for all or any of the following matters, namely:-

i. the times and places of meetings of the Board and the procedure to be followed at such
meetings including quorum necessary for the transaction of business;

ii. the terms and other conditions of service of officers and employees of the Board;

iii. the matters relating to issue of capital, transfer of securities and other matters incidental
thereto and the manner in which such matters shall be disclosed by the companies under
section 11A;

iv. the conditions subject to which certificate of registration is to be issued, the amount of fee
to be paid for certificate of registration and the manner of suspension or cancellation of

Section 15JA of the SEBI Act, 1992, (substituted for “by the SEBI (Amendment) Act, 2002 w.e.f. 29-10-
37

2002”
38
Section 30 of the SEBI Act, 1992
“with the previous approval of the Central Government” omitted by Securities Laws (Amendment) Act, 1995
39

w.e.f.25-01-1995)
 certificate of registration under section 12. Every rule and regulation made under this act
shall be laid before each House of Parliament. If houses modified in rule and regulation,
that should be modified accordingly.40

40
Section 31 of the SEBI Act, 1992
CONCLUSION

All modern economies, therefore, recognise the need for sound regulation of securities markets.
This is needed not just for proper functioning of these markets, but also for their very survival.
It is good regulation that will ensure that markets are safe and perceived to be safe by the public
at large. It is good regulation that will ensure that necessary information is available to the
public so that they can take informed decisions about investments. It is good regulation that
will further ensure that while engines of growth are allowed to move at full speed, there is no
space for manipulators in the system. Today securities market regulation has evolved to include
three principal objectives: (a) Fair, efficient and transparent markets; (b) Investor protection;
(c) Reduction of systemic risk. I am happy to say that SEBI is 138 shouldering the
responsibility in all these three areas with great deal of efficiency and commitment.

Thus the SEBI has issued various regulations in respect of each of the intermediaries such as
stock brokers and sub broker, share transfer agents and registrars to an issue, banker to an issue,
debenture trustees, merchants bankers, underwriters portfolio manager, depositories ,
participants, custodian of securities, foreign institutional investors, credit rating agencies,
venture capital funds, collective investment schemes including mutual funds, etc to regulate
and ensure fair play by these intermediaries. SEBI has also issued regulations to prohibit insider
trading and to regulate substantial acquisition of shares and take over of companies. All these
rules and regulations, circulars and guidelines serve the objective of affording necessary
protection to the investors. Over and above this, various penalties and adjudications which
could be imposed on persons including the various intermediaries who are held to have
contravened provisions of the enactment and committed defaults. The Act thus provides
sufficient deterrents to those who may indulge in defaults and illegalities and malpractices on
the market to the detriment of the investors.
BIBLIOGRAPHY

Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 [As amended by the Securities
Laws(Amendment)Act,2014]
https://www.sebi.gov.in/sebi_data/attachdocs/1456380272563.pdf

THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA

http://shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/7800/9/09_chapter%203.pdf

SEBI: Powers and Functions to regulate Security Market in India

https://www.jagranjosh.com/general-knowledge/powers-and-functions-of-sebi-to-regulate-
security-market-in-india-1490954754-1

Securities And Exchange Board Of India - SEBI

https://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/sebi.asp

SEBI: What is SEBI, Powers, Role and Functions of SEBI

https://www.samco.in/knowledge-center/articles/what-is-sebi-powers-role-and-functions-of-
sebi/