INDEX [A1]
Two lane town section
INDEX [A2]
Four lane town section
Index [B1]
Index [B2]
INDEX [B3]
ROAD CROSS SECTION ELEMENTS
Right of way=50m
Road way width = 10m
Carraige way width
Shoulder width =1.5m Lane width =3.5m Lane width =3.5m Shoulder width =1.5m
2.5%
2.5%
4%
4% center line
INDEX [ A3]
INDEX [C1]
1.55m
1.15m
0.6m
INDEX [C2] fig of trapezoidal x-section
Item Material Unit Unit Cost of each charts
rate
chart 2 chart 4 chart chart 6 chart 7
5
1 Double Surface dressing m2 1690 1690 - - - -
2 50mm thick Flexible bituminous m2 3465 - 173.25 - - 173.25
surface
3 125mm thick bituminous m3 1520 - - 190 190 -
surface (base course/ Wearing
course)
4 150mm thick granular road m3 940 141 141 - 141 -
base,GB1-GB3
5 Ditto but 225mm thick m3 940 - - 211.5 -
06 175mm thick bituminous road m3 1755 - - - - 307.125
base , RB
7 125mm thick cement or lime- m3 1235 154.375 - - - -
stabilized road base 1,CB1
8 Ditto but 150mm thick m3 1235 - 185.25 - - -
9 150mm thick cement or lime- m3 1365 204.5 - - - -
stabilized road base 2,CB2
10 Ditto but 125mm thick m3 1365 - 170.625 - - -
11 Ditto but 200mm thick m3 1365 - - - 273 -
12 250mm thick Granular sub base, m3 340 - - 85 - -
GS
13 Ditto but 200mm thick m3 340 - - - - 68
14 150mm thick selected sub grade m3 340 51 51 - - -
fill, GC
15 Ditto but 125mm thick m3 340 - - - 42.5 -
16 Ditto but 75mm thick m3 340 - - - - 25.5
Total cost 2,036 721 487 646.50 574
INDEX [B4] Table Cost estimation of each chart options 1
Ite Material Un Unit Quantity of each charts
m it rate
2 4 5 6 7
1 Surface dressing m2 1690 1690 - - - -
2 50mm thick Flexible bituminous m2 3465 - 173.25 - - 173.25
surface
3 125mm thick bituminous surface m3 1520 - - 190 190 -
(base course/ Wearing course)
4 150mm thick granular road m3 940 141 141 - 141 -
base,GB1-GB3
5 Ditto but 225mm thick m3 940 - - 211. -
5
6 Ditto but 125mm thick m3 1755 - - - - -
7 175mm thick bituminous road m3 1235 - - - - 211.5
base , RB
8 125mm thick cement or lime- m3 1235 154.37 - - -
stabilized road base 1,CB1 5 154.37
5
9 150mm thick cement or lime- m3 1365 - 204 - - -
stabilized road base 2,CB2
10 Ditto but 175mm thick m3 1365 238.87 - - - -
5
11 Ditto but 200mm thick m3 1365 - - - 273 -
12 175mm thick Granular sub base, m3 340 - - 59.5 - -
GS
13 Ditto but 200mm thick m3 340 - - - - 68
14 150mm thick selected sub grade m3 340 - - - - -
fill, GC
15 Ditto but 125mm thick m3 340 - - - - -
16 Ditto but 75mm thick m3 340 - - - - -
Total cost 2,224 673 461 604 453
INDEX [B5] Table Shows Cost estimation of each chart option 2
1.6
1.4
1.2
Critical Depth-dc (Meters)
0.8
0.6
dc CANNOT EXCEED TOP OF PIPE
0.4
0.2
0
0 1 2 Q/B 3 4 5 6
5
4.5
Critical Depth-dc (Meters)
3.5
2.5
dc CANNOT EXCEED TOP OF PIPE
1.5
1
5 10 15 20 25 30 35
Q/B
INDEX [C3] Chart 7-7
INDEX [C4]
INDEX [D1] Tabulated results of sieve analysis test
Sieve Weig weight of Weight of % Cumulative % %final
openin ht Sieve + soil retained retained
g of Soil(gm) retained(
(mm) sieve( gm)
gm)
19 735 735 0 0 0 100
1 2 .5 6 2 8 .5 632 3 .5 0 .4 3 0 .4 3 9 9 .5 7
9 .5 6 2 2 .5 6 2 8 .5 6 0 .7 3 1 .1 6 9 8 .8 4
4 .7 5 4 1 6 .5 4 5 8 .5 42 5 .1 1 6 .2 7 9 3 .7 3
1 .1 8 4 5 4 .5 638 1 8 3 .5 2 2 .3 3 2 8 .6 7 1 .4
3 0 0 mi 396 6 7 6 .5 2 8 0 .5 3 4 .1 4 6 2 .7 4 3 7 .2 6
c
1 5 0 mi 3 8 1 .5 489 1 0 7 .5 1 3 .0 8 7 5 .8 2 2 4 .1 8
c
75mic 3 6 0 .5 468 1 0 7 .5 1 3 .0 8 8 8 .9 1 1 .1
Pan 5 5 3 .5 6 4 4 .5 91 1 1 .1 100 0
Total 8 2 1 .5
weight=
INDEX [D2} Tabulated results of Liquid Limit test
Trial Number 1 2 3 4
Can Number A3 G6 G10 G2
A. Weight of Wet Soil + Can 50g 6 5 .5 g 6 0 .5 g 5 6 .5 g
B. Weight of Dry Soil + Can 4 5 .5 g 6 0 .5 g 5 5 .5 g 5 2 .5 g
C. Weight of Water(A-B) 5 .5 g 5 .2 g 5g 4 .5 g
D. Weight of Can 2 0 .5 g 32g 3 1 .5 g 3 1 .5 g
E. Weight of Dry Soil(B-D) 25g 2 8 .5 g 24g 2 0 .5 g
Water Content %(C/E x 100) 16 18 21 22
Number of Blows 24 22 19 15
Liquid Limit %
16
INDEX [D3] Tabulated Results of Plastic limit test
Trial Number 1 2 3
Can Number T3,Top T3,Mid G2
A. Weight of Wet Soil + Can 5 5 .5 g 5 1 .5 g 5 1 .5 g
B. Weight of Dry Soil + Can 5 4 .5 g 51g 5 0 .5 g
C. Weight of Water(A-B) 1 .0 g 1 .5 g 1 .0 g
D. Weight of Can 3 4 .5 g 3 3 .5 g 3 1 .5 g
E. Weight of Dry Soil(B-D) 20g 1 8 .5 g 19g
Water Content %(C/E x 100) 5 8 .1 5 .2 6
INDEX [D4] Table of MC&D.D by compaction test Tabulated results for sample one
Determination Obeservation.1 Obeservation.2 Obeservation.3 Obeservation.4
n o.
Wt. Of mould+ 4945 5116 5337 5 2 6 2 .5
base+
Compacted
Soil(g)
Wt of mould 3532 3532 3532 3532
+base plate(g)
Wt of 1413 1583 1805 1 7 3 0 .5
compacted
Soil(g)
Wet density 1 .4 9 1 ,6 8 1 .9 1 1 .8 3
(g/cm3)
1 .3 3 1 .2 7 1 .5 4 1 .6 6
Dr y
density
(g/cm3)
Water content 100 200 300 400
(ml)
GTZ1 Z40 D1 A3
Can number
19 3 1 .5 20 3 3 .5
Wt. Of can (g)
102 102 85 1 2 5 .5
Wt. Of Can+ wet
soil(g)
85 7 2 .5 117
Wt. Can + 93
dry soil
(g)
9 17 1 2 .5 8 .5
Wt. Of water
(g)
74 5 3 .5 5 2 .5 8 3 .5
Wt. Of dry
soil(g)
Moisture 1 2 .1 6 3 1 .7 7 2 3 .8 1 1 0 .1 8
content %
INDEX [D5] Compaction test data sheet table
Determination number CBR 1 CBR2
Weight of mould+ base+ 1 1 8 0 8 .5 1 1 7 6 8 .5
compacted soil(g)
Weight of mould+ base(g) 7924 8000
Weight of compacted soil (g) 3885 3 7 6 8 .5
Wet density 4 .1 1 3 .9 9
Dry density 3 .5 3 .2 3
Water content(ml) 750 750
Can number C23 B2
Weight of can, g 15 15
Weight of can + wet of 103 125
soil(g)
Penetration Penetration bottom
depth (mm) on
Dial (div) Piston Penetration CBR%
load(KN) stress(KN/m2)
0 0 0 0
0 .6 4 13 o .1 0 9 2 5 5 .6 2 9
1 .2 7 20 0 .1 6 8 0 8 5 .5 8 3
1 .9 1 25 0 .2 1 0 1 0 6 .9 7 9
2 .5 4 29 0 .2 4 3 6 1 2 4 .0 9 6 1 .7 9
3 .1 8 36 0 .3 0 2 4 1 5 4 .0 4 9
3 .8 1 43 0 .3 6 1 2 1 8 4 .0 0 4
4 .4 5 49 0 .4 1 1 6 2 0 9 .6 7 9
5 .0 8 53 0 .2 5 4 4 1 2 9 .5 9 7 1 .2 6
INDEX [D6] Table of Reading from CBR test for sample one
Penetration Penetration on bottom
depth (mm)
Dial (div) Piston load (KN) Penetration CBR (%)
stress(K/M2)
0 0 0 0
0 .6 4 30 o .2 5 2 1 2 8 .3 7 5
1 .2 7 41 0 .3 4 4 4 1 7 5 .4 4 6
1 .9 1 51 0 .4 2 8 4 2 1 8 .2 3 7
2 .5 4 61 0 .5 1 2 4 2 6 1 .0 3 3 .7 8
3 .1 8 70 0 .5 8 8 2 9 9 .5 4 1 5
3 .8 1 79 0 .6 6 3 6 3 3 8 .0 5 3 9
4 .4 5 86 0 .7 2 2 4 3 6 8 .0 0 8
5 .0 8 90 0 .7 5 6 3 8 5 .1 2 4 8 3 .7 3 9
INDEX [7] Table of Reading from CBR test for sample two
