FULLTEXT01
FULLTEXT01
3, 2009 207
Abbas Keramati*
Industrial Engineering Department,
University of Tehran,
P.O. Box 11155-4563, Tehran, Iran
E-mail: keramati@ut.ac.ir
*Corresponding author
J. Toufighi Zavareh
Marketing Group, School of Management,
University of Bath,
Bath, BA2 7AY, UK
E-mail: toufighiz@gmail.com
Reference to this paper should be made as follows: Keramati, A., Farshid, M.,
Salehi-Sangari, E. and Toufighi Zavareh, J. (2009) ‘Customer relationship
management activities in e-banking: the case of Iranian banks’, Int. J.
Electronic Customer Relationship Management, Vol. 3, No. 3, pp.207–235.
1 Introduction
ones, to foster customers’ full profit potential (Rowley, 2002). Corporate success depends
on an organisation’s ability to build and maintain loyal and valued customer
relationships. Therefore, it is essential to build refined strategies for customers based on
their value.
Banking has traditionally operated in a relatively stable environment for decades.
However, today the industry is facing a dramatically aggressive competition in a new
deregulated environment. The net result of the recent competition and legislation is that
traditional banks have lost a substantial proportion of their domestic business to
essentially non-bank competition. Competition will undoubtedly continue to be a more
significant factor while many banks have found themselves in this position with many of
their customers (Zineldin, 1996). Unlike manufacturing and some service industries,
bankers are not only selling products and services. First and foremost, they are selling
their organisation reputation with every ‘customer relationship’. A bank has to create
customer relationships that deliver value beyond the provided by the core product. This
involves added tangible and intangible elements to the core products thus creating and
enhancing the ‘product surrounding’ (Zineldin, 1996).
The focus of CRM helped banks to understand the customers’ current needs, what
they have done in the past and what they plan to do in the future to meet their own goals
(Xu and Walton, 2005; Keramati et al., 2008). The intelligent use of information about
customer needs will create long-term, two-way relationship with customers. CRM
enables banks to setup such strategies by managing individual customer relationships.
From the service oriented industry perspective, customer satisfaction and retention is
ensured by solving customer problems quickly. Customer satisfaction is made certain by
allocating, scheduling and dispatching the right people, with right parts, at the right time
(Xu and Walton, 2005).
In this internet age, when the customer is having access to a variety of products and
services it is becoming very difficult for banks to survive. When customer inquiries are
not met easily or transactions are complicated, the customer will ask for new levels
services and only chose those institutions who are making a real effort to provide a high
level of quality, fast and efficient service through all the banks’ touch points such as call
centres, automatic teller machine (ATMs), voice response systems, internet and branches.
This is a difficult situation which CRM is an opportunity that banks can avail to rise
above minor advantages by developing actual relationship with their customers.
Company committed to CRM must continuously invest in its relationship with its
customers, because it is the only competitive advantage remaining to an organisation
(Xu and Walton, 2005).
Different CRM activities are already being used in Iranian banks. Some of them are
using communicational CRM while others are using operational CRM. Some of these
activities are just for view, such as check balances, statements/accounts and historical
records. Others are for account controls, which include customer service and support
(CSS) activities of operational CRM such as amending accounts, ordering checkbooks,
transferring funds, paying bills to third parties, printing statements or standing orders,
sending messages and paying credit-card bills.
The aim of this research is to investigate the CRM activities that already exist in
e-banking activities in Iranian banks. Iranian banks are already adopted themselves
through this mindset. Iranian banks proceed to this important issue differently with
various rates of success in customer satisfaction and CRM. Therefore, with a comparative
210 A. Keramati et al.
approach their attitudes toward CRM will reveal and embrace their success and failure
factors. In the similar approaches that researchers have done in the case of Pakistan, UK
and Ireland, the touch points and services that connect the banks to their customers were
investigated. Considering the above-mentioned description, no prior research has been
done in this research area in Iranian context. Based upon this discussion, the problem area
has formed as: ‘How can CRM activities in Iranian banks be described?’
The other purpose of the research will be some comparative studies between private
and public banks in Iran. The study will not only compare public and private banks, it
will also investigate their relationships with each other and draw some comparisons
within the banks.
The research questions will be formulated according to research problem. Hence, the
research questions will be as follows:
• How Iranian banks can manage the analytical CRM? What they will do and what are
the strategies?
• How Iranian banks can manage the operational CRM? What they will do and what
are the strategies?
• How Iranian banks are managing their communicational CRM? What they will do
and what are the strategies?
Due to the structure of this research, first and foremost, literature review will be
discussed, then research methodology employed to address the research problem and
questions will be discussed. Next a comparison will be presented between the banks in
two segments of private and public banks and CRM activities in each bank. Finally,
conclusions drawn from the study will be presented and implications for management and
suggestions for further research and limitations will be discussed.
2 Literature review
which can then be used by the ‘back office’ for better marketing and peripheral services
(e.g., the presence of a particular employee to serve a particular customer and for
cross-selling) (Lindgreen and Antioco, 2005).
There are various definitions of CRM in the literature. According to Chalmeta (2006),
CRM is a ‘customer-focused business strategy that dynamically integrates sales,
marketing and customer care service in order to create and add value for the company
and its customers through increased satisfaction and loyalty’.
Tan et al. (2003) suggests that ‘the expression ‘e-banking services’ refers to the set of
processes and mechanisms that a virtual agent-based banking institution offers to agents
intending to engage in commerce activities in an agent environment’. Continuing
technological innovation and competition among existing banking organisations and new
entrants have allowed for a much wider array of banking products and services to become
accessible and delivered to retail and wholesale customers through an electronic
distribution channel collectively referred to as e-banking.
The e-banking services consist of two sub-services: electronic payment service for
enabling agents to make and receive payments; and account management service for
creating, maintaining and closing bank accounts.
According to Jayawardhena and Foley (2000), customer expectations from electronic
banking can be categorised under four different functions, namely, view-only functions to
have bank balances in check, action/account control functions to provide customers with
the broadest range of access and control over their accounts, applying for new banking
services to be able to make applications for core banking services and open new accounts
(savings accounts, loans, etc.) and integration reconciliation functions to manage their
finances with software packages (Jayawardhena and Foley, 2000).
A well-designed CRM shares the characteristics as:
1 Communicational/collaborative CRM for building online communities, personalising
services, developing business-to-business customer exchanges, etc. (Rollins and
Halinen, 2005). It makes interactions between a business, its channels and its
customers possible. It provides the means for the customer to contact the company
and enables collaboration between suppliers, partners and customers.
2 Operational CRM for improving customer service, online marketing, automating
sales force, etc. (Rollins and Halinen, 2005). It is the automation of customer-facing
processes. It handles the customer contact and processing. It manages and
synchronises customer interactions in marketing, sales and service.
The functions include sales force automation (SFA), automatically tracking a client’s
account history for repeated transactions. The goal of SFA is to allow the sales force
to concentrate more on selling and less on administrative tasks (Injazz and Karen,
2003). Enterprise marketing automation (EMA) for evaluating valuable customers
and segmentations for some strategic marketing, and CSS for delivering personalised
and efficient services to the customers.
3 Analytical CRM for building data warehouses, analysing data, improving
relationships, etc. It uses customer data to create a mutually beneficial relationship
between a business and its customers (Rollins and Halinen, 2005). This analysis,
modelling and evaluation help to optimise information sources for a better
212 A. Keramati et al.
Figure 1 The emerged framework investigation of CRM activities in Iranian banking industry
Hence, banks can improve customer retention and loyalty; customers stay longer, buy
more often and increased long-term value; higher customer profitability because of lower
costs of recruiting customers and no need to recruit so many customers to maintain a
214 A. Keramati et al.
steady volume of business; reduced cost of sales, as existing customer are usually more
responsive (Stone et al., 2002).
An essential part of the information is gathered from the customers through
different channels. It is important for these channels to be integrated and gathered in a
single database. The analytical part of the CRM should be able to create a variety
of customer segments considering customer feedbacks from the database. These
segments will be used to design decision making algorithms by the operational part
and then will be presented to the customers. Unless the above-mentioned steps are
conducted one after another in a chain format, the process will not be performed
successfully.
As a result of the literature review, Figure 1 is presented which shows the emerged
investigation of CRM activities in banking industry. The introduced framework in
Figure 1 would be the basis of the current investigation on banking activities of four
public and private Iranian banks.
3 Research methodology
Research problem:
“How can CRM activities in Iranian banks be described and compared between private
and public banks?”
Quality issues
Quality of data (reliability, validity), quality of Instrument, validity of results
Customer relationship management activities in e-banking 215
Instrument
The instrument is interview guide which is conducted based on frame of reference of the
literature review and also some information and knowledge from pilot survey. The
interviews are conducted in semi-structured form.
Quality of instrument
In the spite of preparing the interview guide with open ended questions, was pre-tested by
a number of researchers from CRM, management and banking fields and also by industry
representatives. Additionally, the instrument was also reviewed by a number of
researchers, thus, higher level of validity and reliability could be achieved. Suggestions
from this group resulted in an additional modification of the interview guide.
To increase the validity and reliability of the research instrument, used to collect data,
the interview guide was evaluated by attendees from banks participating in the pilot study
so that it can provide a comprehensive view, the interviewees were contacted in advance
about the matters were going to be discussed and also to assure that they are qualified for
our interviews. Some suggestions resulted in modification of the interview guide.
Unit of analysis
Considering the fact that the research problem deals with competencies between Iranian
banks, CRM is an opportunity that banks can avail to rise above minor advantages by
developing actual relationship with their customers, the unit of analysis is the whole bank
(marketing, CRM, public affair, credit and facilities, decision making and also IT
departments).
216 A. Keramati et al.
Quality of data
Yin (2003) states that the process of data gathering is complex in case studies and the
case study researchers, therefore, must have ‘a methodological versatility’ and need to
‘follow certain formal procedures to ensure quality control during the data collection
process’. The main method of data collection selected for this study was personal
interviews, as this method is insightful (Yin, 2003) and makes it possible to gather large
amounts of data quickly, with a potential for immediate follow ups and clarifications
(Marshall and Rossman, 1999). In addition to personal interviews, documentation, mainly
containing bank information (annual reports, organisational charts, brochures, web pages)
has been used as a means to confirm and strengthen evidence from other sources. The
focused interview allows an informal conversation, though it is partly structured:
‘following a certain set of questions derived from the case study protocol’. Finally, the
structured interview is guided by a thorough set of pre-designed questions and, thus,
resembles a formal survey.
Furthermore, Yin (2003) states that reliability aims at minimising errors and biases in
a study. In this study, attempts to reduce the biases have been made by carefully
describing the data collection method and through extensive and thorough documentation
of each bank. In order to increase the reliability of this research, the researchers will try to
avoid leading, subjective questions and will take notes during the interviews.
Customer relationship management activities in e-banking 217
Furthermore, the interviews were recorded by a voice recorder. The data validity was
ensured through multiple sources of evidence (multiple interviewees and document
analyses) and by the interviewees reviewing the case interpretations.
Validity of results
The final emerged theory would be once again validated by interviewing a sufficient
number of experts in each case, using the feedback method which means that after
analysing the data which were gathered the results were shared with experts in each bank
and checked them all. In this way, the participants were given an opportunity to
corroborate or disagree with the main findings of the study.
4 Findings
Miles and Huberman (1994) further point out that there are two types of data analysis:
within-case analysis and cross-case analysis. The within-case analysis is carried out when
collected data in a single case will be compared with the theory included in the frame of
reference to identify the differences and similarities. In the cross-case analysis, where
several cases are involved, the objective is not only to compare those cases with each
other but also to be able to increase generalisability.
Figure 3 Three steps of data analysis: case analysis (Step 1); cross-case analysis: within segment
comparison (Step 2); and between segment comparison (Step 3)
In this section, the empirical data collected from documents and interviews of four
selected banks which are named PR1, PR2, PU1 and PU2 banks. They are separated into
two groups based on the public (PU) and private (PR) sections. The data is collected and
analysed based on our frame of reference (Figure 1) and the interview guides (Appendix)
which are going to describe above. The data has been analysed in two levels of analysis.
At the first level, results obtained from each case is reported separately and analysed
based on theoretical framework presented in Figure 1. At the second level of analysis, a
218 A. Keramati et al.
cross-case approach for data analysis is applied. Figure 3 summarises cross-case analysis
method which includes within segment and between segments analysis. Within segment
analysis is devoted to comparing private and public banks (PR1 vs. PR2 and PU1 vs.
PU2) and between segment analysis includes comparison between public banks and
private banks (PR vs. PU).
Communicational
PR1 PR2 PU1 PU2
CRM
Automated teller 3 3 3 3
machine
Branch 3 One-to-one 3 Customer 3 Customer 3 Customer data
experience feedback identification,
service quality
for staff
Call centre 3 CRM 3 Feedback 3 (1,556/smart
communication, customer
financial advice communication)
– feedback
information
E-mail 3 Information 3
management and tracking)
Help desk 3 (in progress)
Internet banking 3 (e-payment) 3 3 3 (check balance,
transferring funds,
paying bills,
customer contact)
Mobile banking 3 (pilot) 3 (offline/just 3
for view)
Pin pad 3
POS 3 3 3 (online) 3
Special customer
portals
Telephone 3 3 3 (offline/just 3
banking for view)
Broadly speaking, PR1 Bank provides its services in two ways for serving the customers:
1 Via branches and traditional banking system: Increasing the number of branches
from 24 to 156 during two years with the purpose of extending services.
Customer relationship management activities in e-banking 219
2 Via expanding e-banking: Considering the priority of electronic banking, during the
last two years PR1 Bank provides several services employing various mechanisms
with the purpose of providing customers at their home or work. This approach
includes marketing activities in following areas: electronic card services: perusing
public and private organisations to use such cards for paying salaries or bounces,
extending the use of ATMs and point of sale (POSs), expanding the internet payment
method identifying and contracting one-by-one with the websites offering e-selling
services [smoothing the e-payment processes, telephone banking, short message
service (SMS) banking and ATMs for its customers by the permission of the
responsible ministry and contracting with telephone, electricity and other supplier
companies] and also telephone bank, SMS bank and internet bank (Table 1).
About PR1 Bank, in order to make good decisions and strategies, it requires controlling
its relationship with its customers in order to mitigate and manage the risks. Currently,
integrated CRM, management information system (MIS) and risk management systems
are being implemented.
PR1 Bank started its career with a limited and special set of customers requiring few
branches and no need for CRM system. But when the so-called paradigm shift occurred,
it required attracting customers and offering competitive benefits. Actually marketing and
CRM office slowly formed. Then PR1 defined subsets; hence, valuing the customers who
are appropriately served which leads them to regular contact with the bank, offering them
all they need. PR1 tried to establish a creative relation with customers leading to added
value for them. Moreover, PR1 realised that all valuable data can be extracted from CRM
so they could create reports regularly.
PR1 considers CRM as a benefit to control their subsidiary companies and supply
their information by measuring their performance. At the beginning this was very
premature but slowly this new CRM was established with some cultural efforts.
E-banking services were setup because they wanted to be in regular contact with its
customers. Another approach is to increase the branches along with ATM and POS
services which demand CRM systems.
The private banks in this study are members of Tehran Stock Exchange. Their big
customers have considerable turnovers and bank activities which influence the EPS and
stocks’ price. Hence, it is apparent that PR1 needs to be well involved with their
customers. In the case of analytical CRM, as shown in Tables 3(a) and 3(b), PR1 Bank,
collects data via its website, call centre and branches which further provides information
resulted in customer satisfaction and core banking data, then combining them with the
events occurring in the society makes decisions in line with system integration, product
innovation and redundant competency. Customer profile generation is not done uniformly
yet here, nor is customer behavioural patterns detected. Marketing application
development promotion is not done clearly from the knowledge.
In the case of operational CRM, PR1 Bank has managed to serve its customer and
trace their requests using call centre (Table 2). Valuable customers are detected by the
traditional way in the branches or following a request from the database. In order to
communicate with its customers, PR1 has increased the number of branches and the
serving hours. In the branches PR1 establishes special relationship with its customers in a
traditional way. In the call centre, PR1 serving customers 24 hours a day/seven days a
week/365 days of year.
220 A. Keramati et al.
Operational CRM
PR1 PR2 PU1 PU2
activities
ATM monitoring 3
with remote access
Branch 3
(traditionally)
Call centre 3 3
Contact 3
management
(smart customer
communication)
Credit card 3 (pilot) 3
CSS
Electronic cards 3
Field service 3 (information 3 (special
automation for tracking the customer
process in portals)
foreign exchange (in progress)
department)
Help desk 3
International 3(cards)
service
Queue system 3
from branches
Mass marketing, 3 (SMS, ads.) 3 Traditionally 3 Public
advertising, affair
marketing
EMA
(special
customers/facilities
office)
PU1
In the case of PU1 Bank, there is no such system as CRM. There are divisions which are
doing this in the traditional way. Public Affairs Department does the customer support
and advertising like informing people what services are offered. They have built a call
centre which is going to become a contact centre. Except for phone, other services like
SMS or internet are pretty new here. They are responsive but the backing tree of
knowledge is flawed. There is no CRM system for the customer. There is an activity
cycle with some parts manual, some parts are batched and some parts are automated or
online. PU1 Bank is now maintaining 2,010 branches throughout the country. PU1
Bank’s ultimate goal is to meet their shareholders expectations. Considering their only
shareholder is the state, PU1 should do as to satisfy the state’s expectations.
Customer relationship management activities in e-banking 221
Analytical CRM
PR1 PR2 PU1 PU2
activities
ATM 3
monitoring with
remote access
Branch 3 Customer 3 (customer 3 (feedback) 3 (customer
satisfaction, feedback, satisfaction,
core banking behaviour) customer loyalty
(Negin) behaviour)
Call centre 3 3 (feedback of
ads., queue
technique,
timing)
Core banking 3
Data collection
(SGB)
Exit interview 3
Focus group 3
Queue system 3
from branches
Secondary data 3
of socially
SHETAB 3
(ATM
operations in
contrast of
competitors)
Website 3 3 (tracing
customer
navigation and
such)
Databases 3 (not 3 Separate 3 (offline) 3 Different
Data warehousing
As illustrated in Tables 3(a) and 3(b), in analytical CRM, data analysed by the decision
making unit but information like customer feedbacks from the branches or contact centre
are not used in the way of strategy planning. Due to some infrastructural issues, data are
not available in real-time and online. Database is designed in a way capable of providing
some specific statistics and data but it is not possible to identify a unique customer in
different branches. Results of focus groups and exit interviews are used to take better
strategies. Risk management is precisely done here using the gathered data from the
database. As the bank managers mentioned in the interviews, this bank buys some
secondary data of society from data seller companies. They actually use this for market
analysing which is done traditionally but by managers who are very experienced. This
bank controls their competitor’s card transactions in their ATMs in order to compare it
with their own and planning strategies in this part.
Due to the lack of information about customer’s behaviours and subsequently lack of
segmentation, it is not possible to decide for advertising purposes and other services. As
regards with communicational CRM (Table 1), PU1 hold focus groups in which
managers directly get feedback from customers, gathering their suggestions and views.
PU1 believes that this improves their relation with customers and makes them feel a
sense of loyalty and closeness to the bank.
PR2
PR2 Bank started its business in 2002 upon concurrent inauguration of four branches.
The special object is to improve economical affairs by developing industrial activities by
supplying facilities and expanding new finance tools and also financially supporting
construction, trading and consumption industries. CRM is done inside the banking system
without any specialised sub system.
IT manager said that:
“CRM is possible when accompanied by strategic management and planning. If
the customer knows that the system is operating according to the current needs,
he will keep his connection with the bank continuously (mutual relationship).
The only way to see and keep the customer’s needs close is to store them
uniformly in a database.”
Some strategies like CRM see major modifications when high-ranking managers change.
Some are under the influence of environmental and social effects. These should be
adaptable and updated accordingly. PR2 Bank tries to discover customer’s demands by
studying their way of living and priorities in their requests and then they design new
services and tools [Tables 3(a) and 3(b)]. This is yet immature and is not performed
amply. PR2 believes that environmental and economical fluctuations have a huge impact
on the bank. CRM vision in PR2 bank is to manage service cycle by focusing on
beneficent customers directing them towards up-selling and cross-selling. Keeping the
customer is vital for them and they perform all these various customer-related programs
in order to raise the profit and decrease the costs. They try to offer high quality services,
thus keeping the customer permanent and satisfied leading to more income. In order to be
capable of serving CRM demands, data uniformity and integrity are necessary all over the
bank. Data mining is done in planning and development unit for plan to identify branches
to install TV sets, banners and a trained employee explaining services to customers in a
cosy environment [Tables 3(a) and 3(b)].
Customer relationship management activities in e-banking 223
Focus group 3
Manually data 3
mining
Market analysis 3
Product innovation 3
Public affairs 3
(feedback)
Redundant 3
competency
Risk management 3 3
Secondary data of 3
society
System integration 3
Balance score card 3
(BSC) (in progress)
Decision making 3 3
Decision making
Master plan 3
(in progress)
MIS 3 (in progress) 3
Risk management 3 (in progress)
Web-based 3
management
application
As shown in Table 2, in the operational CRM section, PR2 bank has initiated a call centre
performing some help desk activities without any data output and analysis. Regarding
SFA which is all about ability to tracking the customer’s account, a suitable service is
available for foreign exchange department. This service is being promoted and upgraded.
Personalised marketing is done by the human connections. Bank has performed many
activities regarding e-banking and various services which is one of the improvements of
the country’s banking system. But information acquired from these touch points are not
224 A. Keramati et al.
gathered and analysed properly; hence, no feedback exists for advertising planning and
marketing.
PU2
About PU2 Bank, they tended to have infrastructure for implementing the workflow
management to integrate the different CRM activities through the banking network such
as special services of tele-banking, SMS and internet banking and various cards such as
electronic wallet (Table 1).
In the past, heads of the branches used to know their customers in their minds but as
customers increased, this approach proves useless. Therefore, they had to segment them
and finally automate this process and add some mechanisms to it. Hence, they find
themselves in the need of controlling and managing their relationship with their
customers through their branches and other touch points. There are different sections
which are not integrated yet. They are in the contact management phase at the moment
and have not step into analysis yet. At the back of the CRM is the core banking project
which is going to provide a complete information flow of the banking data. Upon request
data are fetched from database, but back office should have the request of the front office
to provide such information. Complaints are gathered from the system and then being
taken care of at the supervision division. This would be the most important benefit of
managing customer relationship from their viewpoint.
None of the bankers currently offer any special kind of services to their special and
core customers. They basically do what others do more quickly or with extra features to
some owners of the current accounts that they refer to them as special customers. Bank’s
viewpoint is that customer is customer, yet some special customers may have the same
services in other ways. These services may vary according to branch managers’
knowledge about the customer.
In case of customer relation, focus should be shifted towards the contact centre
(Table 1). This centre should be capable of handling all the communications and gates to
the customers like fax, e-mail, telephone and other channels. It should have a smart
tracing system. Queue technique, timing for the operators, managing internal group and
reporting are some of the other highlights. Customer information is registered in the
system as transactions. Each part of customer information is gathered in new services.
Researches then use this data. There is no such a system to take customers data as input
and then performs analysis and segmentation on them in order to do marketing or attract
new customers. Older systems do the statistics manually and somehow data mining. New
systems ask for customer’s national code and a few more items but these are not entered
into customer’s account, even if they do, there is no centralisation and uniformity.
In the operational CRM section, (Table 2), a websites is designed to serve valuable
customers. In the primary steps, SFA is done which leads to saving time and energy of
both customer and bank. The goal is to serve the customers better. Hence, the output of
systems is analysed. Electronic banking is done very well here comparing to either public
or private banks but it is not known due to the lack of adequate publicity.
Different approaches and various ways are used to communicate with the customers
but due to being big organisation and relatively large number of branches, branches
require a long time in order to collect customer information in a data-warehouse. From
their point of view, first special customer services should be initiated and then steps
should be taken towards integration [Tables 3(a) and 3(b)].
Customer relationship management activities in e-banking 225
Private banks
Comparison of PR1 and PR2 Bank will be discussed in this section. CRM is done inside
the banking system without any specialised subsystem. The only reason to have CRM is
the competition to keep the customer satisfied and absorb new customers because it is the
customer who keeps the bank running. High competition exists among the banks and
particularly among the banks in the private sector. Growing branches, lack of qualified
personnel, the necessity for providing precise and whole services demands CRM systems.
In private sector, it is necessity to attract the customers due to not having any support or
sponsor such as public banks to count on. The private banks believe in offering high
quality, new e-banking services and since they are in the embryonic stage of their
experience, thus focusing on expansion and they think at the next stage they are going to
improve the quality of their services. As it mentioned before, PR1 Bank have done some
communicational CRM through the call centre which makes is more powerful in
collecting information and managing customer relationship. Both of them are trying to
cover the different e-banking services and support their systems with various facilities
and have competition with each other on this case. Both private banks work with queue
system from branches but PR2 Bank has much more control on the information gathered
from this service for proving the quality of its services in branches and does some
analysis through serving customers. Furthermore, they have some problems with their
core banking systems which is very important for having the customer’s transactional
information for different purposes such as segmentation, customer life time value,
customer churn, etc.
them. They are after customer’s behavioural patterns and their loyalties. The growth trend
of PU1 Bank, in contrast with PU2 Bank, goes somehow at the slower pace in case of
electronic-based services and infrastructures because of their experience in the traditional
CRM through the years of serving the customers, they have such valuable processes and
knowledge but they don’t have the facilities to improve the waste operations through the
market.
outcomes and what perspectives are important towards achieving the outcomes. The
outcome of the analysis is evaluated to identify the effectiveness of CRM. This
assessment gives further insights into the CRM strategy and helps the marketer to
determine the strategy of CRM (Kim et al., 2003). These banks have to create a
vision based on customer, identifying customer-based processes, recognising
available and required resources for extending CRM and prioritising CRM
development possibilities.
7 Transforming the customer data into knowledge: Using that knowledge which
transformed from data to build relationship with their customers due to create
customer retention and loyalty, higher customer profitability, creation value for the
customer, customisation of products and services, lower process, higher quality
products and services, having integrated single view of customers, by using
analytical tools (Greenberg, 2001; Newell, 2000), managing customer relationship in
a single way regardless of the communicational channels, improving the
effectiveness and efficiency of the processes involved in customer relationship,
select and then manage the right client set, determine which service should be sold to
which client, profitability and then help the bank implement this sales plan and also
ability to coordinate the multi-product, multi-country relationship in real time. The
above-mentioned are some of many potential benefits which are provided by CRM
(Jutla et al., 2001; Foss, 2002).
Managing customer relationships effectively and efficiently boosts customer
satisfaction and retention rates (Reichheld and Sasser, 1990). CRM applications help
organisations assess customer loyalty and profitability on measures such as repeat
purchases, dollars spent and longevity.
The implications for management of using analytical CRM lay not so much with
improving operational efficiency as with other CRM systems, but rather with the
empowerment of management in the strategic decision-making process. Such
empowerment is achieved through customer knowledge acquisition and knowledge
sharing, thus enabling the business to become a knowledge-driven organisation. To
achieve this, senior management need to raise their awareness of analytical CRM and
the potential benefits based on which to develop a vision focusing on gaining
customer knowledge and articulating the vision throughout the organisation, whilst
also being supportive to the development of such systems (Xu and Walton, 2005).
The biggest threat to CRM, as suggested by Bose (2002), is managements’ focus on
short-run profits rather than long-term vision. The organisational strategy, structure
and process may need to be transformed due to the application of analytical CRM
(Xu and Walton, 2005).
6 Conclusions
We have investigated CRM activities in e-banking of Iranian private and public banks.
Based on their organisational point of view, we proposed a framework of their CRM
activities in e-banking. Consisting of three phases: first, in the communicational CRM
which is the touch points of customer with bank, where the organisation recognises
230 A. Keramati et al.
7 Further researches
Based on conclusions and a number of issues that rose during the research process, some
topics can be considered as future opportunities to be explored by interested researchers.
Due to the fact that cases of this research study some CRM activities in private and public
Iranian banks and how they made some core competencies for themselves. Further
investigation can be performed to explore how each of these banks’ CRM systems and
specifically their analytical CRM, operational CRM or communicational CRM can adopt
the best possible actions in each branch or the other touch points with a questionnaire and
survey and as its instrument and expend measuring the objectives.
8 Limitations
Due to the fact that CRM systems are relatively broad topic considering limited
timeframe for this study, it was impossible to cover thoroughly all the aspects of the
above-mentioned subject. Therefore, the topic was narrowed down to the current one in
the context of e-banking services.
This research was conducted on just four banks comprising two private banks and
two public banks. As mentioned above, due to limited access to the four banks on which
the current research was conducted, the interview time and number of people to interview
was difficult to arrange and gain access to.
References
Bolton, M. (2004) ‘Customer centric business processing’, International Journal of Productivity
and Performance Management, Vol. 53, No. 1, pp.44–51.
Bose, R. (2002) ‘Customer relationship management: key components for IT success’, Industrial
Management and Data Systems, Vol. 102, No. 2, pp.89–97.
Chalmeta, R. (2006) ‘Methodology for customer relationship management’, Journal of Systems and
Software, Vol. 79, No. 7, pp.1015–1024.
Durkin, M. (2004) ‘In search of the internet-banking customer’, The International Journal of Bank
Marketing, Vol. 22, No. 7, pp.484–503.
Dyche, J. (2001) The CRM Handbook: A Business Guide to Customer Relationship Management,
Addison-Wesley, Boston, MA.
Eckerson, W. and Watson, H. (2001) ‘Harnessing customer information for strategic advantage:
technical challenges and business solutions’, Industry Study, p.6, The Data Warehousing
Institute, Seattle, WA.
Fickel, L. (1999) ‘Know your customer’, CIO Magazine, Vol. 12, No. 21, pp.62–72.
Foss, B. (2002) CRM in Financial Services: A Practical Guide to Making Customer Relationship
Management Work, Milford, CT.
Goldenberg, B. (2000) ‘What is CRM? What is an e-customer? Why you need them now’,
Proceedings of DCI Customer Relationship Management Conference, 27–29 June, Boston,
MA.
Greenberg, P. (2001) CRM at the Speed of Light: Capturing and Keeping Customers in Internet
Real Time, McGraw-Hill Osborne Media.
Injazz, D. and Karen, P. (2003) ‘Understanding customer relationship management (CRM)’,
Business Process Management Journal, Vol. 9, No. 5, pp.672–688.
232 A. Keramati et al.
Jayawardhena, C. and Foley, P. (2000) ‘Changes in the banking sector – the case of internet
banking in the UK’, Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications and Policy,
Vol. 10, No. 1, pp.19–30, available at http://www.emerald-library.com.
Jutla, D., Craig, J. and Bodorik, P. (2001) ‘Enabling and measuring electronic customer
relationship management readiness’, Proceedings of the 34th Annual Hawaii International
Conference on System Sciences Organizational Systems and Technologies Track, pp.1–10.
Keramati, A., Toufighi Zavareh, J., Ellioon, A., Moshki, H. and Sajjadiani, S. (2008) ‘The adoption
of customer relationship management (CRM): an empirical study on Iranian firms’,
International Journal of Electronic Customer Relationship Management (IJECRM), Vol. 1,
No. 4, pp.354–373.
Kim, J., Suh, E. and Hwang, H. (2003) ‘A model for evaluating the effectiveness of CRM using the
balanced scorecard’, Journal of Interactive Marketing, Vol. 17, No. 2, pp.5–19.
Kotorov, R. (2002) ‘Ubiquitous organization: organizational design for e-CRM’, Business Process
Management Journal, Vol. 8, No. 3, pp.218–232.
Lindgreen, A. and Antioco, M. (2005) ‘Customer relationship management: the case of a European
bank’, Marketing Intelligence & Planning, Vol. 23, No. 2, pp.136–154.
Machauer, A. and Morgner, S. (2001) ‘Segmentation of bank customers by expected benefits and
attitudes’, International Journal of Bank Marketing, Vol. 19, No. 1, pp.6–17.
Marshall, C. and Rossman, G.B. (1999) Designing Qualitative Research, 3rd ed., Thousand Oaks:
Sage.
Miles, M.B. and Huberman, A.M. (1994) ‘Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook’,
Sage, Thousand Oaks, USA.
Newell, F. (2000) Loyalty.com: Customer Relationship Management in the new era of Internet
Marketing, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.
Park, R. (1999) ‘The global transformation of financial services’, European Business Journal,
Vol. 11, No. 1, pp.7–16.
Pepper, D., Rogers, M. and Dorf, B. (1999) ‘Is your company ready for one-to-one marketing’,
Harvard Business Review, Vol. 77, No. 1, pp.151–160.
Reichheld, F.F. and Sasser, W.E. Jr. (1990) ‘Zero defections: quality comes to services’, Harvard
Business Review, September/October, pp.105–111.
Reynolds, J. (2002) Practical Guide to CRM: Building More Profitable Customer Relationships,
CMP Books, Gilroy, CA, USA.
Rollins, M. and Halinen, A. (2005) ‘Customer knowledge management competence: towards a
theoretical framework’, in Spraque, R.H. (Ed.): IEEE – Proceedings of the 38th Annual
Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 3–6 January, Hawaii, IEEE Computer
Society, Los Alamitos, CA, pp.240–250.
Rowley, J. (2002) ‘Eight questions for customer knowledge management in e-business’, Journal of
Knowledge Management, Vol. 6, No. 5, pp.500–511.
Stone, M., Starkey, M. and Williams, D. (2002) ‘The state of customer management performance
in Malaysia’, Marketing Intelligence & Planning, Vol. 20, No. 6, pp.378–385.
Tan, J.J., Titkov, L. and Poslad, S. (2003) ‘Securing agent-based e-banking services’, Lecture Notes
in Computer Science, Vol. 2631, pp.247–258.
Wells, J.D., Fuerst, W.L. and Choobineh, J. (1999) ‘Managing information technology (IT) for
one-to-one customer interaction’, Information and Management, Vol. 35, pp.53–62.
Xu, M. and Walton, J. (2005) ‘Gaining customer knowledge through analytical CRM’, Industrial
Management & Data Systems, Vol. 105, No. 7, pp.955–971.
Yin, R.K. (2003) Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 3rd ed., Sage Publications, Thousand
Oaks, CA.
Zineldin, M. (1996) ‘Bank strategic positioning and some determinants of bank selection’,
International Journal of Bank Marketing, Vol. 14, No. 6, pp.12–22.
Customer relationship management activities in e-banking 233
Appendix
Interview guide
• Name of the bank:
• Number of employees:
• Name of the respondent:
• The respondent’s position:
• The first year of deploying CRM:
1 What were the initial reasons to deploy CRM systems?
2 How does the CRM help you establishing long-term relationship with your
customers?
3 Can you provide some information about your CRM systems?
4 What is the role of data and database in your CRM system?
5 Regarding customer data and information: Do you collect:
6 Personal and transactional information; if yes, how; if no, why?
7 Product, service and organisational information; if yes, how; if no, why?
8 Non-transactional customer feedback information; if yes, how; if no, why?
9 How do you use the CRM? (E-commerce, e-service, self-service, multi-channel
customer management)
10 How do you reach your customers (CRM touch points)? (marketing, service,
advertising, sales, branches, telephone, e-commerce and m-commerce)
11 What applications do you use to analyse customers data? How do you manage
customer data which in non-technological (e.g., face-to-face interaction)?
12 How do you strategically categorise your customers?
13 High lifetime value customers.
14 Early adopters of new products.
15 Customer with new ideas who find ways to improve quality or reduce cost.
16 Customers with high volume of fixed costs which enable smaller customers to
become profitable.
17 How do you group your customers on the basis of historical records and other related
details (i.e., customer profitability, retention, satisfaction and loyalty)? How this
grouping improves bank’s performance?
234 A. Keramati et al.