CHPATER ONE

INTRODUCTION
1.1 INTRODUCTION
In the ever-evolving landscape of telecommunications and optical networks, the seamless
transmission of data, whether over long-haul fiber-optic cables or within the confines of data
centers, is a mission-critical endeavor. The infrastructure that underpins the modern information
age relies on a sophisticated interplay of optical components and devices that ensure the efficient
and reliable flow of data. Four such key elements at the heart of this intricate web are connectors,
couplers, isolators, and polarization controllers. These components, while often inconspicuous, are
indispensable in shaping the present and future of telecommunications and optical technology.

The importance of connectors cannot be overstated. These small, yet crucial components serve as
the linchpin that binds optical fibers together, ensuring the seamless transfer of data. Whether it's
for splicing long-distance fiber cables, terminating fibers at customer premises, or enabling
network expansion, connectors provide the foundation upon which telecommunication networks
are built. Their role extends beyond mere physical connections; they facilitate the adaptability and
scalability of optical networks.

Couplers, on the other hand, embody the art of signal distribution. In scenarios where optical
signals must be split, combined, or evenly divided among multiple paths, couplers step in as the
unsung heroes. They play a pivotal role in passive optical networks (PONs), making high-speed
internet, television, and telephone services accessible to a multitude of subscribers. By effortlessly
dividing optical signals, couplers underpin the very concept of network sharing, opening doors to
a multitude of applications and services.

Noise reduction is the silent promise of isolators. These components function as gatekeepers,
safeguarding the integrity and reliability of optical signals by preventing unwanted reflections
from backscattering into the network. Noise, whether it emanates from external sources or internal
imperfections, can disrupt signal quality and stability. Isolators act as the silent sentinels, ensuring
that the data transmitted remains undisturbed and uncorrupted, ultimately enhancing the
performance and quality of telecommunication networks.

1
The world of polarization is one of precision and control, and polarization controllers are the
maestros that orchestrate the symphony of optical signals. By manipulating the orientation of the
electric field vector in an electromagnetic wave, polarization controllers bring order to a realm
where chaos can reign. They play a vital role in compensating for polarization mode dispersion
(PMD), optimizing the performance of optical networks, and ensuring the faithful reception and
transmission of data in polarization-sensitive systems.

The world of connectors, couplers, isolators, and polarization controllers is a testament to the
intricacies of optical technology. While these components may occupy the backstage of optical
networks, their role is pivotal in defining the quality, efficiency, and reliability of the services
we've come to depend on. As we delve deeper into the realm of these optical elements, we discover
a world of innovation, precision engineering, and the relentless pursuit of a connected future. In
this exploration, we will unveil the significance of these unassuming heroes and their contribution
to the ever-expanding horizons of telecommunications and optical technology.

2
 CHAPTER TWO
OPTICAL CONNECTORS
2.1 OPTICAL CONNECTORS
Optical connectors are devices designed to join or mate optical fibers or cables to create a
continuous and reliable optical signal path for the transmission of light signals in optical
communication and data transmission systems (Shah, 2012). These connectors are essential
components in various industries, including telecommunications, data centers, healthcare, and
more, where high-speed data transfer and low signal loss are crucial (Leal Junior et al., 2019;
Mane, 2023).

Optical connectors ensure that the optical fibers are aligned correctly, minimizing signal loss and
maintaining the integrity of the optical signal. Optical connectors simplify the process of
connecting and disconnecting optical fibers, making it easier to install, repair, and maintain optical
systems. They provide protection to the fiber ends from dirt, dust, and damage, ensuring that the
optical signal quality is preserved. Standardized optical connectors ensure compatibility between
different components and systems, allowing for flexibility in designing and upgrading optical
networks. Optical connectors play a crucial role in enabling high speed data transmission in optical
communication systems, where the accuracy and quality of optical connections directly impact
network performance and reliability (Ab Rahman et al., 2012).

2.2 TYPES OF OPTICAL CONNECTORS

The types of optical connectors we have are;
1. LC (Lucent Connector)
2. SC (Subscriber Connector)
3. ST (Straight Tip)
4. MTP/MPO (Multi-Fiber Push-On/Pull-Off)
5. MU (Miniature Unit)
6. DIN (Deutsches Institut fur Normung)
7. E2000 (known as the LSH connector)

3
1. Lucent Connector

An LC connector is a small form factor Fiber optic connector. It uses a 1.25mm ceramic Ferrule
with quality performance and is favored for single mode options. The LC connector is popular and
widely used optical fiber connector in fiber optic communication systems. It has the following
features;

(i.) Small form factor

(ii.) Push-pull latching mechanism
(iii.) Duplex configuration
(iv.) Single-mode and multimode versions
(v.) Low insertion loss
(vi.) Dust caps (Connector Supplier, 2023)
2. Subscriber Connector
A subscriber connector is a fiber optic cable connector that uses a push-pull latching mechanism
similar to common audio and video cables. For bi-directional transmission, two fiber cables and
two SC connectors (Dual SC) are used
The following are some features of SC connector;
(i.) Push-pull mechanism
(ii.) Single-mode and multimode options
(iii.) Rectangular shape
(iv.) Durability
(v.) Simplex and duplex versions
(vi.) Low insertion loss
(vii.) Popular in data centers
(viii.) Color-coded boots (Encyclopedia, 2023)
3. ST (Straight Tip)

Straight Tip connector is a fiber-optic cable connector that uses a bayonet plug and socket. It was
the first de facto standard connector for most commercial wiring. For bi-directional transmission,
two fiber cables and two ST connectors are used. ST is specified by the TIA as FOCIS-2. The
following are the features of the ST connector;

(i.) Bayonet coupling mechanism

4
(ii.) Fiber types
(iii.) Simplicity and durability
(iv.) Physical dimensions
(v.) Typical applications
(vi.) Loss and performance
(vii.) Cap and keying (PCMag, 2023)
4. MTP/MPO (Multi-Fiber Push-On/Pull-Off)
The MTP®/MPO is a low-loss multifiber connector with a maximum of up to 72 fibers, based on
n x 12 fiber MT ferrules, with cable ports and kink protection for round cables. Multimode
MTP®/MPO connectors are cut according to the global standard PC 0ᵒ, while singlemode
connectors are cut to the habitual market value of APC 8ᵒ in order to achieve a higher return loss
(Rosenberger, 2023).
5. MU Connector

MU connectors and adapters were developed by NTT, and have push-pull function. The connectors
are composed of plastic housing and Ø 1.25mm Zirconia Ferrules. These products, called as “mini
SC.” have reliability same with SC connectors and adapters. MU connectors are the optical
connectors which miniaturized and were advanced the density application and performance
(Orbay, 2023).

6. DIN Connector

The DN connector is a small multi-pin regulator connector which was developed to support the
miniaturization of electronic devices, and thinner devices in particular. The terminal wire
connector is arrayed in a 2.54 mm grid that makes it easy to design circuits on a printed circuit
board. The structure of the terminal is based on the manufacturer’s SM series (D-sub connectors).
This gives the terminal dependable quality (Misumi, 2023).

5
7. E2000 Connector

E2000 fiber optic connector has a push-pull coupling mechanism, with an automatic metal shutter
in the connector and adapter as dust and laser beam protection. One-piece design for easy and
quick termination, used for high safety and high power applications (LxTelecom, 2023).

2.3 CONNECTOR CLEANING AND MAINTENANCE

Connector cleaning and maintenance are essential practices in fiber optic communication systems
to ensure optimal performance and reliability. Contaminated connectors can lead to signal loss,
increased reflection, and system downtime (Berdinskikh et al., 2002).. Dust, dirt, oil, and other
particulate matter can accumulate on connector endfaces, leading to signal degradation. Dirty
connectors can result in increased insertion loss and reflectance, affecting signal quality and
system performance (Z. He et al., 2005). Regular cleaning helps maintain a reliable and consistent
optical connection, reducing the risk of signal interruptions.

Fiber-optic connectors are usually cleaned with dedicated tools which contain lint-free wipes,
cleaning solutions, swabs and inspection tools. Alcohol-based solutions such as Isopropyl alcohol
(at least 95%) is commonly used as a cleaning solution. Specialized optical grade cleaning
solutions are also used. Cleaning sticks with lint-free tips or foam swabs are also effective for
cleaning connector endfaces (Pérez et al., 2003).

2.3.2 PROPER CLEANING PROCEDURE USED

1. Inspection of the connector is carried out
2. It should be ensured that the system is powered off and that one is following proper safety
standards
3. The connector endface is cleaned gently by wiping it with a lint-free wipe or swab soaked in
the cleaning solution
4. Cleaning is done in one way only
5. After cleaning, the endfaces are dried with a clean dry wipe or swab

It is necessary to keep the dust caps of the connectors covered to prevent contamination when not
in use. It is also necessary to periodically inspect connectors and repeat cleaning as needed,
especially in harsh environments or where connectors are frequently connected and disconnected.
It is essential to ensure good air quality and ventilation to reduce the presence of airborne particles.

6
A fiber optic inspection microscope should be used to inspect connector endfaces. It helps identify
defects, scratches and contaminants. A visual fault locator (VFL) is used to locate breaks or faults
in the fiber optic cable. Documentation is important to maintain records of connector cleaning and
inspection schedules to track maintenance and identify any trends or recurring issues (Pérez et al.,
2003).

2.4 CONNECTOR FERRULES AND ALIGNMENT

Connector ferrules are small cylindrical components used in fiber optic connectors to hold and
precisely align the ends of optical fibers. These ferrules are typically made of materials such as
ceramic, metal or plastic and are designed with high precision to ensure alignment of fiber cores
(Nagase et al., 1997). Proper alignment is crucial in fiber optic communication systems to
minimize signal loss and maintain efficient data transmission. The end faces of the optical fibers
are polished and fit into the ferrule, which serves as a critical part of the connector to achieve low
insertion loss and reliable optical connections (Haque et al., 2023).

2.4.1 FERRULE DESIGN AND GEOMETRY

In the design of ferrules and ferrule geometry, important considerations must be made to ensure
the precise alignment of optical fibers. Accurate alignment is crucial for minimizing signal loss
and ensuring the efficient transmission of data and signals in fiber optic communications systems.
The following parameters are taken into consideration in the design of ferrules;

1. Shape and size

2. End-face Geometry
3. Concentricity
4. Tolerances and standards
5. Material selection
6. Polishing
7. Features for dust caps and adapters
8. Keyed and non-keyed ferrules
9. Ferrule assemblies
10. Customized ferrules (Jotkowitz & Samet, 2010; Khabadze et al., 2019; Juloski et al., 2012).

7
2.4.1.1 STRUCTURE OF A FERRULE
Figures 2.1, 2.2 and 2.3 show the structure of a ferrule.

Figure 2.1 Basic Ferrule Connector Design (Source: Edmundoptics, 2023)

Figure 2.2 Plug-adapter-plug configuration (Source: EdmundOptics, 2023)

8
Figure 2.3 A ceramic capillary set within a metal ferrule (Source: Edmundoptics, 2023)

2.5 INSERTION LOSS AND TESTING LOSS-

In optical and RF (radio frequency) systems, insertion loss and return loss are key parameters used
to assess the performance of components, connectors, and networks. They help ensure the
efficiency and reliability of signal transmission and reception. Here's an explanation of these
measurements:

Insertion loss (IL) is a measure of the reduction in signal power caused by the insertion of a
component or the connection of two optical or RF devices. It quantifies the attenuation or signal
loss between the input and output of the device under test (DUT). It is typically expressed in
decibels (dB).

To measure insertion loss, the power level of the input signal (P_in) is compared to the power level
of the signal after passing through the DUT (P_out). The insertion loss (IL) is calculated as follows:

𝑃𝑖𝑛
𝐼𝐿 = 10 ∗ log10 ( )
𝑃𝑜𝑢𝑡

9
A lower IL indicates better performance, as it means less signal loss when the signal passes through
the component or connection.

Insertion loss measurements are crucial in optical communication systems, RF networks, and any
system involving multiple interconnected components. It ensures that signal levels remain within
acceptable limits, preventing excessive signal degradation and maintaining the quality of the
transmitted or received signals.

Return loss (RL), also known as reflection loss, is a measure of the power reflected back towards
the source due to impedance mismatches or discontinuities in the transmission path. It quantifies
the level of signal reflection at a connection point or component. Return loss is also expressed in
decibels (dB).

To measure return loss, the power of the reflected signal (P_reflected) is compared to the incident
power (P_incident) at a connection or component. The return loss (RL) is calculated as follows:

𝑃𝑟𝑒𝑓𝑙𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑒𝑑
𝑅𝐿 = 10 ∗ log10 ( )
𝑃𝑖𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑡

A higher RL value indicates better performance, as it means less signal is reflected back towards
the source, indicating a closer match between the impedances of the connected components.

Return loss measurements are critical in RF systems, optical systems, and high-frequency
communication networks. High return loss values are indicative of well-maintained connections
and components, minimizing signal reflections that can cause signal distortion and interference.

In summary, insertion loss and return loss measurements are fundamental for assessing the
performance of optical and RF systems. They help maintain signal quality, troubleshoot network
issues, and ensure the efficient transmission and reception of signals in various applications.

10
 CHAPTER THREE
FIBER COUPLERS
3.1 FIBER COUPLERS
Fiber couplers, also known as optical couplers or fiber optic couplers are essential components in
optical communication systems. A fiber coupler is an optical device that allows multiple optical
fibers to share or distribute optical signals. It can be passive (non-amplifying) or active
(amplifying), depending on its application (Karioja et al., 2000).

Fiber couplers perform various functions, such as signal splitting (1x2, 1x4, etc.), signal combining
(2x1, 4x1, etc.), and signal tapping, wavelength division (WDM), and polarization control. They
can also be used in applications like optical amplifiers and isolators. They therefor find
applications in telecommunications, data centers and the likes. They facilitate efficient light
transmission and enable complex network architectures (Agrawal, 2008).

Important characteristics of fiber couplers include insertion loss (the loss of signal power when the
signal passes through the coupler), uniformly (how evenly signals are distributed), wavelength-
dependent behavior (important in wavelength division multiplexing), and polarization-dependent
loss (PDL) (Tehranchi & Seraji, 2005; Sulaiman et al., 2013; Biswas et al., 2003).

Fiber couplers offers several advantages including low insertion loss, compact size, reliability and
the ability to handle various signal types and wavelengths (Agrawal, 2008).

Challenges in fiber coupler design and use include achieving low insertion loss, maintaining
uniformity, and dealing with PDL. Additionally, handling high power levels can pose challenges
in some applications (Sun et al., 2019; Kahl, 2015; Rashidi et al., 2015).

11
3.2 STRUCTURE OF A FIBER COUPLER

Figure 3.1 Basic structure of a coupler (Source: Tpub, 2023)

Figure 3.1 above shows the structure of a fiber coupler, a fiber coupler is a combination of two or
more couplers, which combines signals from multiple fibers and allow them to pass through a
single fiber as shown above.

3.3 FIBER COUPLING TECHNIQUES

Fiber coupling techniques are methods used to efficiently and precisely couple optical signals into
and out of optical fibers. The following are a list of some of the most common fiber coupling
techniques;

1. Lens Coupling
Lens coupling involves the use of lenses to focus and collimate light into or out of optical fibers.
The lens can be placed in front of the fiber’s end face to manipulate the beam’s size and direction
for optimal coupling (Nicia, 1981).
2. Grating Coupling
Fiber grating couplers employ optical gratings to couple light into or out of optical fibers. The
grating structure is designed to diffract specific wavelengths efficiently, making it useful in
applications such as wavelength division multiplexing (WDM) (Cheng et al., 2020).
3. Fused Taper Coupling
Fused taper coupling, also known as fused biconical taper (FBT) coupling, involves tapering and
fusing two optical fibers together to achieve efficient signal transfer between them. Fused taper
couplers are commonly used in fiber optic splitters and couplers (Shuai et al., 2007).

12
4. Waveguide Coupling
In this technique, optical waveguides (e.g planar lightwave circuits or photonic integrated circuits
are used to couple light into and out of optical fibers. These waveguides are designed to match the
modes and guide the light effectively (Berger et al., 1991).
5. Micro-Optics Coupling
Micro-optics, such as micro lenses, micro mirror, and beam splitters, are used to couple light into
and out of optical fibers. These components are typically small and lightweight, making them
suitable for compact optical systems (Soskind et al., 2003).

3.4 FIBER COUPLER TYPES

Fiber couplers come in various types including:

1. Fused Biconical Taper (FBT) couplers

These couplers are made by tapering and fusing together two or more optical fibers, allowing for
signal splitting or combining.
2. Fused Wavelength Division Multiplexing (FWDM) Couplers
These are used to multiplex and de-multiplex signals for different wavelengths.
3. Fiber Grating Couplers
These use fiber gratings to couple light into and out of optical fibers.
4. Planar Lightwave Circuit (PLC) Couplers
PLC technology uses waveguides etched onto a substrate, enabling compact, low-loss and reliable
couplers.
5. Star Couplers
These are used for splitting optical signals into multiple output ports, often in a star configuration.
6. Y-Branch Couplers

Y-branch couplers split optical signals into two output ports.

7. Optical Splitters and Combiners

These are used in passive optical networks (PONs) to distribute signals from a central source to
multiple subscribers (Shaim et al., 2019; Tangonan, 1981).

13
3.5 APPLICATIONS OF FIBER COUPLERS
In FTTH networks, optic fiber couplers are used to split optical signals from a single fiber into
multiple fibers, allowing for the distribution of high-speed internet, TV, and phone services to
individual homes or businesses (Kanamori, 2011). In WDM systems, fiber couplers are used to
combine or separate different wavelengths of light on a single optical fiber. This technology is
essential for increasing the data-carrying capacity of optical networks (Tan et al., 2010). Fiber
couplers are used to split an incoming optical signal into two or more output signals. This is
valuable in applications such as optical sensing, where multiple sensors can be interrogated using
a single source (Chang & Liu, 2012). Fiber couplers are employed in various biomedical and
sensing applications, such as optical coherence tomography (OCT), where they help split and
combine light for imaging and diagnostic purposes (Guay-Lord et al., 2016).

3.6 COUPLERS IN WAVELENGTH DIVISION MULTIPLEXING (WDM) SYSTEMS

In a WDM system, multiple optical signals carrying data at different wavelengths need to be
combined into a single optical fiber for transmission. Couplers, specifically wavelength-division
multiplexers (WDMs), play a crucial role in combining these wavelengths into a single optical
signal. This allows for efficient use of the optical spectrum and maximizes the data-carrying
capacity of the optical fiber.

Couplers can function both as combiners and splitters in WDM systems. They can couple multiple
wavelengths into a single fiber for transmission, as well as split a single optical signal into its
individual wavelength components for routing to different destinations. This flexibility is essential
in network design and maintenance.

Couplers are used for multiplexing (combining) and de-multiplexing (splitting) optical signals
based on their wavelengths. Multiplexers combine signals from different sources into a single
optical fiber, and de-multiplexers separate incoming signals back into their individual wavelengths
for further processing.

One of the significant advantages of couplers in WDM systems is their passive operation. They do
not require electrical power or active electronic components. Passive couplers are reliable, durable,
and cost-effective. This is essential in data center and long-haul communication networks where
maintenance and operational costs are critical.

14
High-quality couplers are designed to introduce minimal insertion loss when combining or
splitting optical signals. This means that a vast majority of the signal power is transmitted or
received effectively without significant loss, which is vital for maintaining signal quality and
network efficiency.

Couplers are used in various WDM applications, including coarse WDM (CWDM) and dense
WDM (DWDM) systems. These technologies enable network operators to adapt and expand their
optical networks by adding or dropping wavelengths as needed. Couplers are instrumental in
achieving this flexibility.

15
 CHAPTER FOUR

ISOLATORS

4.1 OPTICAL ISOLATORS

Isolators are passive optical devices used to control the direction of light propagation within an
optical fiber. They are designed to allow light to travel in one direction while significantly
attenuating or blocking light in the reverse direction. Optical isolators are essential components in
various applications, particularly in laser systems and optical communication networks. They are
used to protect sensitive optical components, such as laser diodes, from potential damage due to
back-reflected light. The primary function of an optical isolator is to allow light to travel from the
input port (usually the source or transmitter side) to the output port while preventing light from
traveling in the reverse direction (Jalas et al., 2013).

Optical isolators use various techniques to isolate the transmitted light from any reflected or back
scattered light. They achieve this by introducing an on-reciprocal optical elements, such as
magneto-optical materials or Faraday rotators.

16
Figure 4.1 Faraday Effect (Source: Wikipedia, 2023)

Figure 4.2 Faraday isolator allows the transmission of light in only one direction. It is made of three parts, an input
polarizer, a Faraday rotator and an analyzer (Source: Wikipedia, 2023)

17
4.2 OPERATING PRINCIPLES OF OPTICAL ISOLATORS

Optical isolators operate based on the principles of non-reciprocal optical transmission,

polarization rotation, and the Faraday Effect. These principles allow optical isolators to transmit
light in one direction while blocking or attenuating light traveling in the reverse direction.

The following are the principles of optical isolators:

1. Polarization of Input Light

Optical isolators begin by polarizing the incoming light. Typically, the input light is linearly
polarized using a polarizer located at the input port of the isolator. The linear polarization helps
set the direction of light propagation (Tsermaa et al., 2006).

2. Faraday Rotation

The heart of an optical isolator is a Faraday rotator. This component is typically made from a
magneto-optical material, such as terbium-doped glass or yttrium iron garnet (YIG).When exposed
to a magnetic field, magneto-optical materials exhibit the Faraday Effect, which causes them to
rotate the polarization of incident light (Berent et al., 2013).

3. Rotating Polarization

The linearly polarized input light passes through the Faraday rotator. Due to the Faraday Effect,
𝜋
the rotator rotates the polarization of the light by 45 degrees ( 4 radians) in a non-reciprocal manner.

The direction of rotation is determined by the magnetic field applied to the magneto-optical
material (Satirachat et al., 2011).

4. Polarization Beam Splitter

After the Faraday rotator, the rotated linearly polarized light reaches a polarization beam splitter
(PDS). The PBS reflects light with the original polarization (i.e., light that is not rotated by the
Faraday Effect) and transmits light with the rotated polarization (S. He et al., 2019).

18
5. Forward Transmission

Light with the rotated polarization is transmitted through the FBS to the output port of the optical
isolator. This is the direction in which the isolator allows the light to pass, so it is considered the
forward transmission direction (Yan et al., 2021).

6. Reflecting Back-Reflected-Light

Any back-reflected light or light with the original polarization (unrotated) is reflected by the PBS.
This prevents such light from reaching the input port of the isolator. Since the polarization of the
reflected light remains unchanged, it is blocked by the polarizer at the input port (Ye et al., 2007;
Zhou et al., 2017).

4.3 APPLICATIONS IN OPTICAL COMMUNICATION

Optical isolators find applications in various fields, including:

1. Laser Systems

They are used to protect laser sources by preventing back-reflected light from reaching and
potentially damaging the laser diode (Mironov et al., 2023).

2. Optical Communication Networks

In optical transmitters, isolators prevent reflections that can degrade signal quality. They are often
employed in fiber optic links (Fischer S., 1987).

3. Biomedical Instruments

Optical isolators are used in medical and laboratory instruments to protect light sources, such as
laser diodes, and improve measurement accuracy (Hu et al., 2021).

19
 CHAPTER FIVE
POLARIZATION CONTROLLERS

5.1 POLARIZATION CONTROLLERS

Polarization controllers are optical devices designed to control and manipulate the polarization
state of light in optical fiber systems. They play a crucial role in ensuring that light remains
properly polarized to match the requirements of various optical components and systems.
Polarization controllers are commonly used in telecommunications, fiber optic sensing, and
research applications (Tentori et al., 2021).
5.2 TYPES OF POLARIZATION CONTROLLERS

The following are some common types of polarization controllers

1. Waveplate-Based Polarization Controllers

These use waveplates (retarders) to adjust the polarization state of light. Common types include
quarter-wave plates and half-wave plates (X. Wang et al., 2021).

2. Liquid Crystal Polarization Controllers

These controllers use liquid crystal cells to electronically control the polarization state. They are
highly adaptable and can change polarization rapidly (Pitilakis et al., 2011).

3. Fiber-Based Polarization Controllers

These devices use optical fibers with specific birefringent (double refraction) properties to control
polarization. Examples include fiber-based polarization controllers and fiber squeezers (Muga et
al., 2006).

4. Semiconductor-Based Polarization Controllers

Some semiconductor devices, like electro-optic modulators and polarization beam splitters, can be
used to control polarization (Wu et al., 2023).

20
5.3 OPERATION OF POLARIZATION CONTROLLERS

Polarization controllers are optical devices used to control and manipulate the polarization state of
light. They are typically used in optical communication systems, polarization-sensitive
measurements, and various other applications where controlling the polarization of light is
essential (X. Wang et al., 2021).

Listed below are the principles of operation of the polarization controllers;

1. Adjusting the polarization state

2. Polarization Analysis

3. Polarization Adjustment Elements

4. Feedback Control

5. Calibration

1. Adjusting the Polarization State

The primary function of a polarization controller is to adjust the polarization state of incident light.
Light can have different polarization states, such as linear, circular, or elliptical polarization. The
goal is to transform the incoming light to the desired polarization state (Negara, 2016).

2. Polarization Analysis

Many polarization controllers include polarization analyzers that can measure the current
polarization state of the input light. This information is essential for determining the required
adjustment (Pinnegar, 2006).

3. Polarization Adjustment Elements

Polarization controllers typically use various optical elements to change the polarization state.
These elements can include:

A. Waveplates

Quarter-wave and half-wave plates are common components used to change the polarization
state. By rotating these waveplates, the polarization can be adjusted (Zambrana-Puyalto, 2020).

21
 B. Liquid Crystals
Some controllers use liquid crystal devices that can electronically change the orientation of the
liquid crystal molecules to modify the polarization state (Gevorgyan et al., 2017).

C. Polarizers

Polarizers can be used in combination with other elements to block unwanted polarization
components and selectively transmit light with the desired polarization (Zhang et al., 2020).

4. Feedback Control
In advanced polarization controllers, feedback control systems can be used to continuously
monitor the polarization state and make real-time adjustments to maintain a specific polarization
state or optimize it for the desired application (Felici et al., 2010).

5. Calibration

Polarization controllers may need to be calibrated to ensure accurate manipulation of the

polarization state. This calibration process involves setting reference points for the desired
polarization states (Romijn et al., 2018).

This section will discuss the structure of a polarization controller taking the waveplate or retarder
as a case study.

A waveplate or retarder is an optical device that alters the polarization state of a light wave
travelling through it. Two common types of waveplates are the half-wave plate, which shifts the
polarization direction of linearly polarized light, and the quarter-wave plate, which converts
linearly polarized light into circularly polarized light and vice versa (Zambrana-Puyalto, 2020).

22
Figure 5.1. Quarter Wave Retarder (Source: Edmundoptics, 2023)

Figure 5.2 Half Wave Retarder (Source: Edmundoptics, 2023)

23
Figure 4.3 Liquid Crystal Polarization Rotator (Source: PhotonicsLaser, 2023)

5.4 GENERAL STRUCTURE OF A POLARIZATION CONTROLLER

The general structure of a polarization controller may include the following components:

1. Polarization-Maintaining Fiber (PMF)

2. Waveplates
3. Polarization Beam Splitter (PBS)
4. Electro-Optic Modulators (EOMs)
5. Feedback Mechanism
6. Control Electronics

1. Polarization-Maintaining Fiber
PMF is a type of optical fiber designed to maintain the polarization of light propagating through
it. This fiber is used to introduce controlled birefringence, which allows for polarization
manipulation (Noda et al., 1986).
2. Waveplates
Waveplates are optical components used to change the polarization state of light. Different
types of waveplates, such as quarter-wave and half-wave plates are used in polarization
controllers to adjust the polarization of the incoming light (Alawsi, 2018).
3. Polarization Beam Splitter
A PBS is an optical device that separates incident light into its two orthogonal polarization
components. It can be used to separate them before manipulations and then recombine them
after adjustment (Azzam, 2011).

24
4. Electro-Optic Modulators
Electro-optic modulators can change the refractive index of the medium by applying an electric
field, allowing precise control of polarization (Sinatkas et al., 2021).
5. Feedback Mechanism
Some polarization controllers may incorporate feedback mechanisms, such as polarimeters or
polarimetry-based control systems, to continuously monitor and adjust the polarization state to
meet specific requirements (Rong & Dupont, 2006).

25
6. Control Electronics
Polarization controllers often include control electronics to adjust the various optical
components and ensure the desired polarization state is achieved (Tentori et al., 2021).
5.4 USE OF POLARIZATION CONTROLLERS IN OPTICAL SYSTEMS
Polarization controllers are vital components in optical systems, serving several important
functions related to the control and management of the polarization state of light. Their use is
essential in a variety of applications where precise polarization control is required. Here are some
common uses of polarization controllers in optical systems.

1. Optical Communication Systems

In optical communication systems, maintaining the correct polarization state of light is crucial to
ensure efficient data transmission. Polarization controllers are used to align the polarization of
incoming signals with the transmission axis of optical components, such as optical fibers,
waveguides, and photodetectors. This helps maximize the signal quality and minimize signal
degradation due to polarization fluctuations (Martinelli et al., 2006).

2. Polarization-Multiplexed Systems
Some advanced optical communication systems use polarization multiplexing, where two
orthogonal polarizations are utilized to transmit separate data channels. Polarization controllers
help ensure that both polarizations are properly aligned and maintained throughout the optical
network (Martelli et al., 2007).

26
3. Polarization Diversity Receivers
Polarization diversity receivers are used in optical communication systems to capture signals in
two orthogonal polarization states, improving signal reception under varying polarization
conditions. Polarization controllers are used to optimize the receiver's sensitivity by adjusting the
polarization state to maximize the received signal power (Pfau et al., 2008).

4. Optical Fiber Sensors

Fiber-optic sensors often rely on specific polarization states to measure physical parameters like
temperature, strain, or pressure. Polarization controllers are used to set the input polarization state
or adjust it to optimize sensor performance (Werneck & Allil, 2011).

5. Interferometry
In interferometric systems, such as Michelson or Mach-Zehnder interferometers, polarization
controllers are used to adjust the polarization states of the input light, ensuring constructive
interference and accurate measurements (Chuss et al., 2006).

6. Optical Imaging Systems

Optical imaging techniques, including polarimetry and ellipsometry, rely on the controlled
manipulation of light polarization for material characterization and biomedical imaging.
Polarization controllers help optimize the polarization state of incident light for these applications
(Moscoso et al., 2009).

7. Fiber Laser Systems

Fiber lasers often require specific polarization states for stable operation. Polarization controllers
are used to adjust and maintain the polarization state within the laser cavity, ensuring optimal laser
performance (Zhao et al., 2023).

Polarization controllers are versatile tools for managing polarization in optical systems, and their
use is widespread across various fields. They ensure that optical signals remain in the desired
polarization state, enhancing system performance, signal quality, and the reliability of optical
communication and measurement systems.

27
5.6 POLARIZATION SCRAMBLERS AND STABILIZERS
Polarization scramblers and stabilizers are optical devices used to manipulate and control the
polarization state of light in optical systems. They serve different purposes and find applications
in various fields, including optical communications, polarization-sensitive measurements, and
laser systems.

5.6.1 POLARIZATION SCRAMBLERS

A polarization scrambler is an optical device designed to randomize the polarization state of

incident light. It essentially introduces controlled fluctuations in the polarization, effectively
scrambling the polarization state over time. The goal is to create a more uniform and non-polarized
output.

Polarization scramblers are used in optical systems where maintaining a consistent and stable
polarization state is not critical. They are beneficial in mitigating polarization-dependent effects
and ensuring that polarization does not affect system performance adversely. Applications include
free-space optical communications, where atmospheric turbulence can introduce polarization
variations, and fiber-optic systems that require randomizing polarization-induced impairments.

By introducing randomness into the polarization state, polarization scramblers help mitigate
polarization-dependent impairments, such as polarization-mode dispersion (PMD) in optical fiber,
and reduce the impact of polarization-induced fading in free-space optical links (Xu et al., 2021).

28
5.6.2 POLARIZATION STABILIZERS
A polarization stabilizer, on the other hand, is an optical device used to maintain and control a
stable and consistent polarization state of light. It actively aligns the polarization state of incoming
light, ensuring it remains constant over time. Polarization stabilizers are critical in applications
where maintaining polarization is essential.

Polarization stabilizers are used in optical communication systems, particularly coherent optical
communication, where precise control of the polarization state is required for coherent detection.
They are also employed in quantum optics experiments, quantum key distribution systems, and
applications where maintaining specific polarization states is critical, such as ellipsometry and
polarimetry.

Polarization stabilizers help ensure that optical signals maintain their polarization states with high
fidelity, reducing polarization-induced signal fluctuations and enabling accurate measurements
and coherent signal processing. In quantum optics, they play a crucial role in preserving the
quantum states of photons (Martinelli et al., 2006).

29
 CHAPTER SIX
OPTICAL CONNECTORS IN DATA CENTERS
6.1 CONNECTOR SOLUTIONS FOR DATA CENTER CONNECTIVITY
Data centers are the central nervous system of the modern digital world, housing and managing
vast amounts of information critical to businesses, organizations, and individuals. Efficient and
reliable data transmission within these centers is essential, and optical connectors play a pivotal
role in making it possible. These connectors are the unsung heroes behind the seamless flow of
data within data center networks, ensuring high-speed connectivity, scalability, and minimal
latency. Here's an in-depth look at optical connectors in data centers (Hamza et al., 2016).

6.2 IMPORTANCE OF LOW LOSS IN DATA CENTER CONNECTORS

Low loss play a critical role in ensuring the efficiency, reliability and overall performance of data
center infrastructure. The following are the reasons why low loss is vital in data center connectors:

1. Data Throughput and Speed

Data centers are tasked with handling vast amounts of data, and data transmission speed is crucial.
Low loss connectors help maximize the efficiency of data transmission by minimizing signal
attenuation (Jaganathan et al., 2010).

2. Signal Integrity
Maintaining signal integrity is essential to prevent data corruption or the need for retransmission.
Low loss connectors ensure that data is transmitted accurately and without distortion, reducing the
risk of data errors and packet loss (Z. Wang et al., 2019).

3. Reduced Latency
Low loss connectors help to reduce latency in data center networks. Lower signal loss means faster
data transmission and reduced delays, which is critical for applications that require real-time data
processing, such as financial trading and cloud-based services (Abdelmoneim et al., 2020).

4. Energy Efficiency

Low loss connectors help reduce latency in data center networks. Lower signal loss means faster
data transmission and reduced delays, which is critical for applications that require real-time data
processing, such as financial trading and cloud-based services (Shuja et al., 2012).

30
5. Cost Savings

Minimizing signal loss with low loss connectors can result in cost savings. Data centers cam
achieve the same level of performance with fewer active components and less frequent signal (Guo
& Fang, 2013).

6. Quality of Service

Low loss connectors contribute to the delivery of high-quality service by ensuring that data is
transmitted without significant degradation. This is important in data centers that host applications
and services with stringent QoS requirements (Gupta et al., 2022).

31
REFERENCES

A ceramic capillary set within a metal ferrule [Diagram], (2023, November 3).
http://www.tpub.com/neets/tm/108-9.htm
Abdelmoneim, A., Susanto, H., & Bensaou, B. (2020). Reducing Latency in Multi-Tenant Data
Centers via Cautious Congestion Watch. https://doi.org/10.1145/3404397.3404447
Agrawal, G. P. B. T.-A. of N. F. O. (Second E. (Ed.). (2008). Chapter 2 - Fiber Couplers (pp.
54–99). Academic Press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012374302-2.50003-6
Alawsi, T. (2018). Wave Plate. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.10012.80004
Azzam, R. (2011). Simplified design of thin-film polarizing beam splitter using embedded
symmetric trilayer stack. Applied Optics, 50, 3316–3320. https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.50.003316
Basic Ferrule Connector Design [Diagram], (2023, November 3).
http://www.tpub.com/neets/tm/108-9.htm
Basic structure of a coupler [Diagram], (2023, November 3) http://www.tpub.com/neets/tm/108-
9.htm
Berdinskikh, T., Bragg, J., Tse, E., Daniel, J., Arrowsmith, P., Fisenko, A., & Mahmoud, S.
(2002). The contamination of fiber optics connectors and their effect on optical performance
(Vol. 70). https://doi.org/10.1109/OFC.2002.1036600
Berent, M., Rangelov, A., & Vitanov, N. (2013). Broadband Faraday isolator. Journal of the
Optical Society of America A, 30, 149. https://doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.30.000149
Berger, P. R., Bhattacharya, P. K., & Gupta, S. (1991). A Waveguide Directional Coupler With a
Nonlinear Coupling Medium. IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics, 27(3), 788–795.
https://doi.org/10.1109/3.81390
Biswas, A., Mathew, M., Shenoy, M., & Pal, B. (2003). Polarization Dependent Loss (PDL) in
Optical Fiber Couplers.
Chang, S.-J., & Liu, K.-W. (2012). Design and analysis of optical coupler with a stable splitting
ratio based on cascaded multistage directional couplers. Optical Engineering, 51, 4603.
https://doi.org/10.1117/1.OE.51.9.094603
Cheng, L., Mao, S., Li, Z., Han, Y., & FU, H. Y. (2020). Grating Couplers on Silicon Photonics:
Design Principles, Emerging Trends and Practical Issues. Micromachines, 11, 666.
https://doi.org/10.3390/mi11070666
Chuss, D., Wollack, E., Moseley, S., & Novak, G. (2006). Interferometric polarization control.
Applied Optics, 45, 5107–5117. https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.45.005107
Connector Supplier. (2022). What is a LC Connector? Retrieved 6, November, 2023, from
https://connectorsupplier.com/what-are-lc-connectors/

32
Faraday Effect [Diagram], (2023, November 3). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Optical_isolator
Faraday isolator allows the transmission of light in only one direction. It is made of three parts,
an input polarizer, a Faraday rotator and an analyzer [Diagram], (2023, November 3).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Optical_isolator
Felici, F., Shimozuma, T., Kubo, S., Yoshimura, Y., Sauter, O., Goodman, T., & Group, L. H. D.
(2010). Feedback control of ECRH polarization on LHD. Nuclear Fusion, 50.
https://doi.org/10.1088/0029-5515/50/10/105003
PCMag. (2023). SC Connector. Retrieved 30, October, 2023, from
Fischer S. (1987). The Faraday Optical Isolator. 8(1), 18–21.
https://doi.org/doi:10.1515/JOC.1987.8.1.18
Gevorgyan, A., Harutyunyan, M. Z., Oganesyan, K., Ayryan, E., Hnatic, M., Rafayelyan, M.,
Rostovtsev, Y., & Kurizki, G. (2017). Polarization Properties of the Cholesteric Liquid Crystals.
Guay-Lord, R., Attendu, X., Lurie, K., Majeau, L., Godbout, N., Ellerbee, A., Strupler, M., &
Boudoux, C. (2016). Combined optical coherence tomography and hyperspectral imaging using a
double-clad fiber coupler. Journal of Biomedical Optics, 21, 116008.
https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.21.11.116008
Guo, Y., & Fang, Y. (2013). Electricity Cost Saving Strategy in Data Centers by Using Energy
Storage. Parallel and Distributed Systems, IEEE Transactions On, 24, 1149–1160.
https://doi.org/10.1109/TPDS.2012.201
Gupta, R., Aggarwal, M., & Ahuja, S. (2022). A novel strategy to enhance the quality of service
(QoS) for data center traffic in elastic optical networks. Journal of Optical Communications.
https://doi.org/10.1515/joc-2021-0183
Half Wave Retarder [Diagram], (2023, November 9)
https://www.edmundoptics.com/knowledge-center/application-notes/optics/understanding-
waveplates/
Hamza, A., Deogun, J., & Alexander, D. (2016). Wireless Communication in Data Centers: A
Survey. IEEE Communications Surveys &amp Tutorials, 18, 1572–1595.
https://doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2016.2521678
Haque, M., Zakariya, M., Singh, N., Paul, L., & Ishraque, M. (2023). Investigation of coupling
loss caused by misalignment in optical fiber. Bulletin of Electrical Engineering and Informatics,
12, 1560–1569. https://doi.org/10.11591/eei.v12i3.4552
He, S., Chen, K., & Yu, K. (2019). High Performance Polarization Beam Splitter Based on
Cascaded Directional Couplers Assisted by Effectively Anisotropic Structures. IEEE Photonics
Journal, PP, 1. https://doi.org/10.1109/JPHOT.2019.2950065

33
He, Z., Mahmood, W., Sahinci, E., Ahmad, N., & Pradieu, Y. (2005). Analysis on the Effects of
Fiber End Face Scratches on Return Loss Performance of Optical Fiber Connectors. Lightwave
Technology, Journal Of, 22, 2749–2754. https://doi.org/10.1109/JLT.2004.834485
Hu, Y., Liu, L., Zhang, S., Li, X., Qian, J., Lin, G., Niu, Y., & Gong, S. (2021). Low insertion
loss optical isolator with widely tunable frequency. Optics Communications, 489, 126861.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optcom.2021.126861
Rosenberger. (2023). MTP/MPO. Retrieved 30, October, 2023, from
Jaganathan, S., Arulanandam, S., & Damodaram, A. (2010). Performance Analysis of Various
High Speed Data Transfer Protocols for Streaming Data in Long Fat Networks.
https://doi.org/10.1109/ITC.2010.64
Jalas, D., Petrov, A., Eich, M., Freude, W., Fan, S., Yu, Z., Baets, R., Popović, M., Melloni, A.,
Joannopoulos, J. D., Vanwolleghem, M., Doerr, C. R., & Renner, H. (2013). What is-and what is
not-an optical isolator. Nature Photonics, 7(8), 579–582.
https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2013.185
Jotkowitz, A., & Samet, N. (2010). Rethinking ferrule - A new approach to an old dilemma.
British Dental Journal, 209, 25–33. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2010.580
Juloski, J., Radovic, I., Goracci, C., Vulicevic, Z. R., & Ferrari, M. (2012). Ferrule Effect: A
Literature Review. Journal of Endodontics, 38(1), 11–19.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2011.09.024
Kahl, G. (2015). Coupling efficiency. The Dictionary of Genomics, Transcriptomics and
Proteomics, 1–1. https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527678679.dg02495
Kanamori, H. (2011). Passive optical components and their applications to FTTH networks. 14–
21.
Karioja, P., Ollila, J., Putila, V.-P., Keränen, K., Häkkilä, J., & Kopola, H. (2000). Comparison
of active and passive fiber alignment techniques for multimode laser pigtailing.
https://doi.org/10.1109/ECTC.2000.853157
Khabadze, Z., Mordanov, O., Taraki, F., Magomedov, O., Kuznetsova, A., Solimanov, S.,
Nazhmudinov, S., Bokova, R., Adzhieva, A., & Bakaev, Y. (2019). Effects of the Ferrule Design
on Fracture Resistance to Endodontically-Treated Teeth Restored with Fiber Posts: A Systematic
Review. The Open Dentistry Journal, 13, 493–498.
https://doi.org/10.2174/1874210601913010493
Leal Junior, A., Diaz, C., Avellar, L., Pontes, M., Marques, C. A. F., & Frizera, A. (2019).
Polymer Optical Fiber Sensors in Healthcare Applications: A Comprehensive Review. Sensors,
19, 3156. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19143156
Liquid Crystal Polarization Rotator [Diagram], (2023, November 9)
https://photonics.laser2000.co.uk/products/light-delivery-and-control/polarisation-phase-
control/polarisation-components/waveplates-and-retarders/liquid-crystal-polarisation-rotator/

34
Mane, S. (2023). Fiber Optics in Communication Networks: Trends, Challenges, and Future
Directions.
Orbray. (2023). MU Connector Adapter. Retrieved 30, October, 2023, from
Martelli, P., Boffi, P., Ferrario, M., Marazzi, L., Parolari, P., Pietralunga, S., Siano, R., Righetti,
A., & Martinelli, M. (2007). Polarization Stabilizer for Polarization-Division Multiplexed
Optical Systems. In 2007 33rd European Conference and Exhibition of Optical Communication,
ECOC 2007. https://doi.org/10.1049/ic:20070246
Martinelli, M., Martelli, P., & Pietralunga, S. (2006). Polarization Stabilization in Optical
Communications Systems. Lightwave Technology, Journal Of, 24, 4172–4183.
https://doi.org/10.1109/JLT.2006.884228
Mironov, E., Snetkov, I., Starobor, A., & Palashov, O. (2023). A perspective on Faraday
isolators for advanced lasers. Applied Physics Letters, 122, 100502.
https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0138031
Misumi. (2023). DIN Connector. Retrieved 30, October, 2023, from
Moscoso, M., Carpio, A., Dorn, O., Natterer, F., Papanicolaou, G., Rapun, M.-L., & Teta, A.
(2009). Polarization-Based Optical Imaging (pp. 67–83). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-
78547-7_4
Muga, N., Pinto, A., Ferreira, M., & Rocha, J. F. (2006). Uniform Polarization Scattering With
Fiber-Coil-Based Polarization Controllers. Lightwave Technology, Journal Of, 24, 3932–3943.
https://doi.org/10.1109/JLT.2006.883642
Nagase, R., Takeuchi, Y., & Mitachi, S. (1997). Optical connector with glass-ceramic ferrule.
Electronics Letters, 33, 1243–1244. https://doi.org/10.1049/el:19970835
Negara, C. (2016). Fast Polarization State Detection by Division-of-Amplitude in a Simple
Configuration Setup.
Nicia, A. (1981). Lens coupling in fiber-optic devices: efficiency limits. Applied Optics, 20(18),
3136–3145. https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.20.003136
Noda, J., Okamoto, K., & Sasaki, Y. (1986). Polarization-maintaining fibers and their
applications. Journal of Lightwave Technology, 4(8), 1071–1089.
https://doi.org/10.1109/JLT.1986.1074847
PCMag. (2023). ST Connector. Retrieved 30 October, 2023, from
https://www.pcmag.com/encyclopedia/term/st-connector
Pérez, G., Faye, D., Baradat, B., Ollé, M., & Noyes, C. (2003). Detection and cleaning of flux
residue inside connectors.
Plug-adapter-plug configuration [Diagram], (2023, November 3).
http://www.tpub.com/neets/tm/108-9.htm

35
Pfau, T., Peveling, R., Hauden, J., Grossard, N., Porte, H., Achiam, Y., Hoffmann, S., Ibrahim,
S., Adamczyk, O., Bhandare, S., Sandel, D., & Porrmann, M. (2008). Coherent Digital
Polarization Diversity Receiver for Real-Time Polarization-Multiplexed QPSK Transmission at
2.8 Gb/s. Photonics Technology Letters, IEEE, 19, 1988–1990.
https://doi.org/10.1109/LPT.2007.909897
Pinnegar, R. (2006). Polarization analysis and polarization filtering of three-component signals
with the time-frequency S transform. Geophysical Journal International, 165, 596–606.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2006.02937.x
Pitilakis, A., Zografopoulos, D., & Kriezis, E. (2011). In-Line Polarization Controller Based on
Liquid-Crystal Photonic Crystal Fibers. Journal of Lightwave Technology, 29, 2560–2569.
https://doi.org/10.1109/JLT.2011.2160523
Quarter Wave Retarder [Diagram], (2023, November 9)
https://www.edmundoptics.com/knowledge-center/application-notes/optics/understanding-
waveplates/
Rashidi, A., Gharavi, R., & Gharavi, A. (2015). Fiber to polymer-waveguide coupling with low
insertion loss. Journal of Optics, 17. https://doi.org/10.1088/2040-8978/17/4/045801
Romijn, E., Finnøy, A., Kumar, R., & Lilledahl, M. (2018). Automated calibration and control
for polarization-resolved second harmonic generation on commercial microscopes. PLOS ONE,
13, e0195027. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195027
Rong, W., & Dupont, L. (2006). A feedback algorithm for polarization control using two
rotatable wave plates with variable birefringence. Optics Communications, 259(2), 603–611.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optcom.2005.09.032
Satirachat, S., Boonrod, P., Kerdsang, W., Haisirikul, N., & Suchat, S. (2011). Polarization state
control by using rotating quarter wave plate for the measurement by light. Procedia Engineering,
8, 243–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2011.03.045
Shah, F. (2012). Fiber connectors.
Shaim, A., Rezaul, M., & Khan, H. (2019). Design and Simulation of a Low Loss Optical Fiber
Coupler. International Journal of Electronics and Communication Engineering, 4(5), 473–482.
http://www.irphouse.com
Shuai, C., Duan, J., & Zhong, J. (2007). Experimental measurement and numerical analysis of
fused taper shape for optical fiber coupler. Journal of Central South University of Technology
(English Edition), 14, 251–254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-007-0050-z
LxTelecom. (2023). E2000 Connector. Retrieved 30, October, 2023, from
Shuja, J., Madani, S., Bilal, K., Hayat, K., Khan, S., & Sarwar, D. S. (2012). Energy-efficient
data centers. Computing, 94, 973–994. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00607-012-0211-2

36
Sinatkas, G., Christopoulos, T., Tsilipakos, O., & Kriezis, E. (2021). Electro-optic modulation in
integrated photonics. Journal of Applied Physics, 130, 10901. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0048712
Soskind, Y., Itzler, M., & Ranes, B. (2003). Micro-optics coupling for 10Gb/s avalanche
photodiodes. Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering, 4989.
https://doi.org/10.1117/12.474814
Sulaiman, M., Arsad, N., Ramza, H., Harun, M. H., Guna, H., Nasimi, F., & Ab-Rahman, M. S.
(2013). Wavelength Division Multiplexing Network over Polymer Optical Fiber Using
Fabricated Couplers for Informatics Communications. Procedia Technology, 11, 1211–1217.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.protcy.2013.12.315
Sun, C., Zhao, J., Wang, Z., Du, L., & Huang, W. (2019). Broadband and high uniformity Y
junction optical beam splitter with multimode tapered branch. Optik, 180, 866–872.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2018.12.013
Tan, D., Ikeda, K., Zamek, S., Mizrahi, A., Nezhad, M., & Fainman, Y. (2010). Wavelength
selective coupler on silicon for applications in wavelength division multiplexing.
https://doi.org/10.1109/PHOSST.2010.5553685
Tangonan, G. (1981). Fiber Optic Couplers. 70.
Tehranchi, A. H., & Seraji, F. (2005). Exact measurement of insertion loss for optical fiber
components. https://doi.org/10.1109/CAOL.2005.1553966
Tentori, D., Herrera, M., & Rojas-Sanchez, A. (2021). Polarization control for fiber systems and
devices. Suplemento de La Revista Mexicana de Física, 2, 26.
https://doi.org/10.31349/SuplRevMexFis.2.1.26
Tsermaa, B., Kwan, B., & Kim, J. (2006). Construction of a Broad-Band Optical Isolator by
Using an Achromatic Circular Polarizer. Journal- Korean Physical Society, 48, 892–896.
Ab Rahman, M. S., Mastang, M., & Jumari, K. (2012). The Influences of Connectors and
Adaptors to Fiber-To-The-Home Network Performance. American Journal of Applied Sciences,
9, 186–195.
Wang, X., Zeng, Y., Liao, R., Shen, L., Zhao, C., Wu, H., & Tang, M. (2021). Half-Wave-Plate
based Adaptive Polarization Controller. https://doi.org/10.1364/CLEO_AT.2021.JW1A.49
Wang, Z., Gao, J., Flowers, G., Bi, L., Xie, G., & Zhou, Y. (2019). Investigation of the
Improvement of Signal Integrity in Electrical Circuits with Degraded Contacts Using Differential
Transmission. IET Circuits, Devices & Systems, 13. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-cds.2018.5178
Werneck, M., & Allil, R. (2011). Optical Fiber Sensors. https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.2013.2801
Wu, J., Fang, G., Zhang, Y., Biswas, N., Ji, Y., Xu, W., Dong, B., & Liu, N. (2023).
Semiconductor nanomaterial-based polarized light emission: From materials to light emitting
diodes. Science China Materials, 66, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40843-022-2313-1

37
Xu, D., Lopez, O., Amy-Klein, A., & Pottie, P.-E. (2021). Polarization Scramblers to Solve
Practical Limitations of Frequency Transfer. Journal of Lightwave Technology, PP, 1.
https://doi.org/10.1109/JLT.2021.3057804
Yan, Y., Zheng, H., Zhao, Z., Guo, C., Wu, X., Hu, J., Lau, A. P. T., & Lu, C. (2021).
Distributed Optical Fiber Sensing Assisted by Optical Communication Techniques. Journal of
Lightwave Technology, PP, 1. https://doi.org/10.1109/JLT.2021.3057670
Ye, X., Li, J., Huang, X., Zhang, M., & Ye, P. (2007). A bulk optical isolator with high optical
performance. Optics Communications, 275(1), 65–70.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optcom.2007.03.030
Zambrana-Puyalto, X. (2020). WAVEPLATES: Physical principles, uses and purchase tips.
Photoniques, 104, 53–57. https://doi.org/10.1051/photon/202010453
Zhang, S., Li, Z., & Xing, F. (2020). Review of Polarization Optical Devices Based on Graphene
Materials. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 21, 1608.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21051608
Zhao, S., Wang, S., Gu, B., Yan, C., Wang, S., Deng, G., & Zhou, S. (2023). Controllable mode
emission from all-fiber laser based on polarization rotation technology and its application in
bending sensing. Optics Communications, 528, 129007.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optcom.2022.129007
Zhou, X., Wang, Y., Leykam, D., & Chong, Y. (2017). Optical isolation with nonlinear
topological photonics. Optics InfoBase Conference Papers, Part F66-F.
https://doi.org/10.1364/FIO.2017.FTu4D.5

38