Aviation Archives N°34
Aviation Archives N°34
DING
INCLU
Me 262
Meteor
Airacomet
Horten flying wing www.keypublishing.com
ISSUE 34 £7.95
FREE APP
In app issue £6.99
2 Months £5.99
Annual £29.99
Read on your iPhone & iPad Android PC & Mac Blackberry kindle fire Windows 10
SEARCH SEARCH
ALSO FLYPAST
FREE APP
AEROPLANE
How it Works.
Simply download the Aviation Archive app. Once you have the app, you will be able to download new
or back issues for less than newsstand price!
Don’t forget to register for your Pocketmags account. This will protect your purchase in the event of a damaged or lost device.
It will also allow you to view your purchases on multiple platforms.
6 HEINKEL He 178
10 HEINKEL He 280
12 MESSERSCHMITT Me 163
18 MESSERSCHMITT Me 262
28 ARADO Ar 234
34 MESSERSCHMITT Me 328
35 JUNKERS Ju 287
36 HORTEN Ho 229
37 FIESELER Fi 103R
38 HEINKEL He 162
44 BACHEM Ba 349 NATTER
46 HENSCHEL He 132
47 MESSERSCHMITT Me P1101
ITALY
JAPAN
UNITED KINGDOM
54 GLOSTER E.28/39
58 GLOSTER METEOR
66 DE HAVILLAND VAMPIRE
UNITED STATES
USSR
96 BEREZNYAK-ISAYEV BI-1
CONTENTS 5
World War 2
6 GERMANY
Heinkel He 178
F
or such a small unassuming aircraft, the developed a test engine to demonstrate his that he pressed for an accelerated flight engine
historical significance of the Heinkel ideas. He asked Ernst Heinkel, for support programme. Von Ohain’s team developed the
He 178 is immense. As the world’s first rather than approach the German engine He S-3 and this became the engine that would
aircraft to fly under the power of a jet engine, industry. Heinkel saw the promise in von power the He 178, a single-seat, single-engine
it pioneered one of the greatest technological Ohain’s invention and by the end of February aircraft designed specifically for testing the
revolutions known to mankind… and yet to 1937, the He S-1 turbojet engine with hydrogen turbojet flight concept.
this day it remains largely unheralded. fuel was tested and produced a thrust of Despite its ground-breaking nature,
Famed German aircraft designer Professor 250lb at 10,000rpm. Although the German air the He 178 airframe was pretty much of
Ernst Heinkel was passionate about high-speed ministry (Reichsluftfahrtministerium – RLM) conventional design. The fuselage was
flight and was keen on exploring alternative respected Heinkel for his aircraft visions, it tubular and contoured for maximum airflow.
forms of aircraft propulsion. It was in 1936, that was not particularly interested in developing The wooden wings were high-mounted and
a young engineer named Hans von Ohain took unproven technology at a time when the fitted aft of the cockpit, which lay at the
out a patent on using the exhaust from a gas German nation was gearing up for total war extreme front end of the fuselage. The tail
turbine as a means of propulsion. Hans von in Europe. Therefore, Heinkel continued his jet was of traditional configuration, featuring a
Ohain had started development of the turbojet engine initiative as a company private venture. single vertical tail fin and a pair of horizontal
engine in the early 1930s and by 1935 he had Heinkel was so impressed with the engine tests, tailplanes. All wing surfaces were straight in
HEINKEL He 178 7
their design and curved at their tips – save for 24 August, the aircraft became briefly airborne. engine. The watching crowd were unimpressed
the second prototype which, though never However, history records that the first proper and decided against diverting valuable
flown under power, showcased clipped wing flight took place on 27 August 1939 when test resources to the project. However, what
tips. The undercarriage was a typical ‘tail pilot Erich Warsitz took He 178 into the air, Heinkel did not realise was that the RLM was
dragger’ arrangement. The main landing gear thus heralding the age of jet-powered flight. developing its own jet engines. In 1939, BMW
was intended to be retractable into wells in the Although the take-off was textbook, it was an was building its 003 and Junkers was working
fuselage, but in the event remained fixed in the eventful first flight. Firstly, the undercarriage on its Jumo 004 turbojet engines. These were
‘down’ position throughout the flight trials. The refused to retract and during the second circuit axial-flow turbojets and not centrifugal-flow
engine itself was buried deep in the fuselage, of the airfield a bird was sucked into the intake turbojets. Axial-flow turbojets promised much
being fed by a nose-mounted intake to which causing the engine to cut out. Fortunately, higher flight speeds unlike centrifugal-flow
ductwork managed airflow to the engine. The Warsitz made a safe power-off landing, thereby turbojets being developed at Heinkel and by
engine exhausted through a circular nozzle at saving the machine. Frank Whittle in England.
the extreme aft of the fuselage. Now that Heinkel had proven the concept of In the event, the He 178 proved its worth as
The first tests took place at the beginning of jet aircraft, he approached the RLM for support. a technology demonstrator intended to test
August 1939 and consisted of a series of taxiing Reluctantly the RLM agreed to a demonstration the viability of the new propulsion method and
trials at Rostock. During one of these tests on flight on 1 November 1939, watched by Ernst lay the foundation for a new breed of aircraft
Udet, Erhard Milch and engineer Helmut designs still to come. Only two of its kind were
Below: A simple design, the technological
Schelp. Although the aircraft was projected produced and both were lost to separate Allied
advances of the Heinkel He 178 all lay under the
skin. Despite its revolutionary powerplant, the to have a top speed of 435mph, during the bombing raids – the first in 1943 while under
German Air Ministry was not impressed by the demonstration it did not break 200mph, owing the care of the Berlin Air Museum and the
aircraft’s performance. to the basic design and limited power of its second, while in storage at Rostock, in 1945.
8 GERMANY
Heinkel He 178 V5
Engine: 1 x Heinkel HeS 3
turbojet
Power: 990lb thrust
Crew: 1
Wingspan: 23ft 3in (7.2m)
Length: 24ft 6in (7.48m)
Height: 6ft 10in (2.1m)
Loaded weight: 3,572lb (1,620kg)
Max Speed: 380mph (598km/h)
Range: 125 miles (200km)
Armament: None
HEINKEL He 178 9
Heinkel He 280
Heinkel He 280 V5
Engine: 2 x Heinkel HeS 8A
turbojets
Power: 1,650lb thrust each
Crew: 1
Wingspan: 40ft (12.2m)
Length: 34ft 1in (10.4m)
T
Height: 10ft 0in (3.04m)
he story of the futuristic Heinkel ambitious Heinkel He 280, the first jet–powered Loaded weight: 9,482lb (4,301kg)
He 280 could so easily have been aircraft to be developed as a fighter. Max Speed: 559mph (900km/h) for
different. Had its potential been The He 280 was a single-seat, twin-engine, 30 seconds, 510mph
realised from the start, it may well have all-metal, turbojet-powered aircraft, credited (821km/h) maintained
become one of the most significant weapons with speeds in excess of 550mph. Its twin HeS 8 speed
of World War 2. Although circumstances turbojets were mounted beneath each wing, Service Ceiling: 37,720ft (11,497m)
meant that it never entered operational the latter being attached mid-fuselage and estimated
service, it has the distinction of being the first featuring straight leading edges but curved Range: 404 miles (650km)
turbojet-powered fighter aircraft in the world. trailing edges. The armament was housed Armament: 3 x MG 151 20mm cannon
Despite failing to impress the German air in the nose and was designed to comprise
ministry (Reichsluftfahrtministerium, RLM) with an array of six MG 151 20mm cannons, elevator. The He 280 offered a compressed-air
his first jet aircraft, Heinkel’s faith in the concept though only three were ever installed in the powered ejection seat, the world’s first aircraft
never wavered. Eventually this vision was prototypes. The pilot sat just ahead of the main to be so equipped.
matched by the RLM following the appointment wing roots with good visibility forward, above The first flight of the Heinkel He 280 V1
of a young forward-looking engineer Helmut and to the sides. A powered-tricycle landing (DL+AS) was on 2 September 1940 as a glider,
Schelp. Motivated by the threat of war and gear was one of its notable design features, as but owing to engine delays it was not fitted
possibility of conflict with Britain, he pushed was the tail unit which comprised of two fins with its HeS 8 powerplants, which produced
Heinkel into continuing development of the and rudders mounted either side of a single around 1,000lb of thrust each, until March 1941.
HEINKEL He 280 11
Top: The Heinkel He 280 on its maiden flight, with test pilot Fritz Schäfer at the controls. Note the
absence of engine cowlings, that were not fitted owing to excessive fuel leak.
Above: The third Heinkel 208 prototype , V3 GJ+CB, was destroyed in a crash landing. A total of nine
prototypes were produced, each with varying powerplant configurations as needed. He 280 V1 became
the first aircraft to feature a live ejection when the pilot had to abandon the aircraft after the controls
froze up. He 280 V4 saw the system fitted with six pulsejets whilst He 280 V5 and He 280 V6 became the
first aircraft in the series fitted with three 20mm cannon armament. The He 280 V7 prototype would
later become a glider for high-speed aerodynamic research and He 280 V8 was designed with a ‘V’ type
tail unit instead of the twin fin set up.
Left: A case of what might have been. An artist’s impression of the Heinkel He 280 streaking through
the clouds, cannons blazing. Had the aircraft not suffered such problems with its powerplant, it could
well have become the scourge of Allied bombers.
Then, on 2 April it became the world’s first Over the next year, progress was slow due 22 December, a mock dogfight was staged for
purpose-built jet fighter when it took to the to tail flutter and ongoing engine problems, RLM officials in which the He 280 was matched
air for the first time, in the hands of test pilot the latter resulting in the crash landing of the against an Fw 190. Here, the jet demonstrated
Fritz Schäfer. It was a private event carried out third prototype which destroyed the airframe. its vastly superior speed, completing four laps
at under 1,000ft and with the engine cowlings Eventually the RLM ordered Heinkel to abandon of an oval course before the Fw 190 could
removed as the powerplants had a tendency the HeS 8 and HeS 30 to focus all development complete three. At last, the RLM became
to leak fuel. Schäfer reportedly told Heinkel on a follow-on engine, the HeS 011, a more interested and placed an order for 20 pre-
that the He 280 was a little difficult to control advanced but problematic design. Meanwhile, production test aircraft, to be followed by 300
in turns, but that an experienced pilot should the first He 280 prototype was re-equipped production machines.
be able to fly it easily. He also reported the with pulsejets and towed aloft to test them. However, by this time, the aircraft was
He 280 to be a little sluggish on landing but Bad weather caused the aircraft to ice up, and competing with the Messerschmitt Me 262, an
said that otherwise it handled well. Three days before the jets could be tested, pilot Helmut aircraft that had longer range, was more heavily
later, the first official flight took place in front Schenk became the first person to put an equipped and was a sturdier design, though
of a distinguished crowd of RLM officials and ejection seat to use. The seat worked perfectly, reportedly was not as agile as the Heinkel.
Luftwaffe officers, including Ernst Udet. Once but the aircraft was lost and never found. With Nevertheless, on 27 March 1943, Erhard Milch
again interest was not overwhelming, but the HeS 011 not expected for some time, by cancelled the project and Heinkel was ordered
officials did agree that work on the jet engine the end of 1943 Heinkel opted for the rival to abandon the He 280 to focus attention on
should be intensified BMW 003 to power prototypes 5 and 6. On bomber development and construction.
12 GERMANY
Messerschmitt Me 163
T
he skies over Nazi Germany, summer a volley of 30mm cannon fire, breaking peroxide, and Z-Stoff, based on a solution of
1944. The Luftwaffe has detected an through the ranks of lumbering bombers… calcium permanganate in water), were sprayed
incoming formation of US Army Air The futuristic interceptor in this scenario was using compressed air. This in turn drove a
Force ‘heavies’. Some 30,000ft below the the Messerschmitt Me163 and was arguably turbine, which powered a pump to deliver
gleaming bare-metal B-17s, a diminutive the most radical fighter to be put into service T-Stoff to the combustion chamber. Such was
swept-wing, tailless fighter ignites its during World War 2. the volatile nature of the rocket fuels that the
volatile rocket engine and with a terrifying The chief designer of the Messerschmitt pilot was outfitted in a special flying suit made
roar streaks down the runway. Once airborne Me 163, Dr Alexander Lippisch, had of asbestos-Mipolamfibre.
it points its nose to the heavens and zoom- accumulated many years of experience in Lippisch and his design team were brought
climbs high above the bomber stream. With the design of tailless sailplanes, and it was within the fold of Messerschmitt in January
the rocket motor now nearing the end of its from this peaceful background that he drew 1939 and began work on an existing tailless
fuel, the pilot scans ahead to ascertain the the inspiration for something altogether research glider, to receive the rocket propulsion.
position of his target, and then launches different… a rocket-propelled fighter. In In this configuration, the aircraft was flown in
into a steep dive. Tearing down through 1937 the research section of the German air summer 1940. After completing a successful
the enemy formation, the pilot unleashes ministry (Reichsluftfahrtministerium, RLM) test campaign an order was received for six
commissioned Lippisch to draft a design for an prototypes of an aircraft to be designated
Messerschmitt Me 163B-1a
aircraft that would serve as a testbed for a new Me 163A. By this time a new motor was
type of rocket engine, the Walter R I-203 with a available, the improved Walter II-203b. The
Engine: 1 x Walter HWK 509A-2 rating of 400kg thrust. This engine worked on
Below: The diminutive size of the Messerschmitt
Power: 3,800lb thrust the principle of a steam generator into which Me 163 is apparent in this view of BV45,
Length: 19ft 1in (5.84m) the two different fuel types (T-Stoff, which C1+05 with Eprobungskommando 16, at Bad
Height: 9ft 1in (2.77m) consisted mainly of concentrated hydrogen Zwischenahn, July 1944.
Wingspan: 30ft 7in (9.32m)
Max T/O weight: 9,061lb (4,110kg)
Max speed: 596mph (960km/h)
Service ceiling: 39,700ft (12,100m)
Endurance: 7min 30sec
Armament: 2 x MK 108 cannon
MESSERSCHMITT Me 163 13
After the experience gained with the six methyl alcohol. That the new fuel was no less Above: Rudolf Opitz being assisted into his
Me 163A prototypes, Messerschmitt was hazardous than its predecessor was made clear Komet at Bad Zwischenahn. His one-piece flying
suit and overboots were made from a special
authorised to complete an initial pre- when two engines exploded during testing,
acid resistant material, which was supposed to
production run of 10 Me 163A-0 fighters, destroying the entire building in which they protect the occupant from the corrosive T-Stoff
with manufacture being undertaken under were contained. in the far from likely event of a rough landing -
subcontract by Wolf Hirth Segelflugzeugbau. Dubbed Komet (comet), the first of the pre- assuming his aircraft did not explode.
These did not yet represent the definitive production Me 163Bs was flown in summer
operational configuration, and were instead 1942 and by early 1943 flight testing had Below: Although a relatively tight fit for a well-
proportioned pilot, the cockpit was nevertheless
intended for use as pilot trainers, to allow the progressed to a stage whereby it was decided
reasonably comfortable. A hinged window was
Luftwaffe to gain experience on what was an that a test squadron could be established provided on the port side of the cockpit canopy,
entirely new type of interceptor. within the Luftwaffe. The unit was to be based with an additional air inlet on the underside of
After a significant redesign, six pre- at Peenemünde, the nascent home of German the nose. However, there was no provision for
production prototypes were ordered for the rocket developments. pressurisation. The canopy itself was a less-than-
robust Plexiglas moulding. Although he was not
Me 163B production fighter, to be followed The Luftwaffe harboured ambitious plans of
provided with an ejection seat, the pilot was
by the first batch of 70 series-built aircraft of developing a network of interconnected fighter afforded some protection in combat by front and
the same variant. The first 70 B-models were stations equipped with Komets, that could back armour.
completed at Regensburg and were used tackle enemy bomber streams approaching
to iron out the last remaining technical and from any direction. The concept involved
operational problems. The production aircraft airfields located around 100km apart, forming a
were differentiated from the half-dozen protective ring, and allowing recovering Me 163s
prototypes by their Me 163B-1a designation. to glide back to different bases if required. In
Among the modifications was a revised the event, only a single unit would be equipped
wing, designed to combat the threat of an with Me 163s in any meaningful numbers.
uncontrolled spin, although the threat of It was the summer of 1944 before the Me 163
stall remained ever-present. The definitive finally entered combat. Based at Brandis, near
rocket motor was the II-211, which was fully Leipzig, I./Jagdgeschwader 400 was created in
controllable and which now used C-Stoff in May 1944, and began to receive aircraft from
place of the previous Z-Stoff. The new chemical late July. On the 28th of that month the Komet
was based on hydrazine hydrate solution in saw action for the first time, in the first-ever
operational use of a rocket-powered manned
Left: A direct comparison between the Me163 A
and B. The photograph was taken soon after the fighter. On that occasion five Me 163s were
first of the Klemm-built aircraft were delivered to launched against a formation of B-17s . It
Bad Zwischenahn in January 1944. was an inauspicious debut. The Komet pilots
16 GERMANY
very quickly became aware of the inherent combat, the pilot airfield could translate into spinal damage
difficulties in engaging the enemy in such a of the Komet now faced the challenging task transmitted via the skid, and also ran the risk
fast-flying fighter. While the American ‘heavies’ of getting his mount back on terra firma. The of shaking up the propellants and creating a
were far from fast, combined with the speed undercarriage of the Me 163 was a hangover devastating explosion.
of the Me 163 in its attacking dive the pilots from its sailplane origins, and was poorly suited In the event, the Me 163 accounted for
had to get the target in the crosshairs at a to a rocket-propelled fighter. After take-off the just a handful of the daylight raiders, while
closing velocity of some 800mph (1,300km/h)! pilot jettisoned the wheeled dolly, which meant sustaining heavy attrition among its own ranks.
The window of opportunity in which to press that landing had to be achieved using a sprung Ultimately, the two operational squadrons of
home an attack with any chance of success was skid. For a successful recovery, the Komet Me 163s claimed just nine bomber kills, while
just three seconds. After having broken from had to be dead into wind. If not, the aircraft 14 of their own number fell to enemy fighters
Below: A member of the groundcrew of Me 163 would slew violently, and the pilot ran the risk and bombers. However, these combat losses
BV47, PK+QR, C1+06, is seen here refuelling the of overturning, since the rudder provided no represented a relatively moderate toll of just
tank with C-Stoff propellant. control at slow speeds. The bumps of an uneven 5 per cent, and a staggering 80 per cent of
attrition was as a result of take-off or landing
accidents, often in association with the unstable
rocket fuels.
While its ensuing combat record was less
than stellar, the Me 163 was nonetheless a
milestone in aviation history. A small aircraft
with a big impact. Ultimately, the Me 163
represented a daring gamble on behalf of
Germany’s wartime aviation industry. Never
before had attempts been made to conceive a
fighter that offered such levels of straight-line
speed and high-altitude performance. Had the
gamble paid off, the rocket fighter could have
presented the Allies with an insoluble problem.
By the time production of the Komet was wound
up in February 1945, almost 400 examples of all
versions had been completed, perhaps 300 of
which made it as far as front-line service.
MESSERSCHMITT Me 163 17
Above: Produced by the Hellmuth Walter Werke, the HWK 509A was
originally known by the designation II-211. It was a notably compact
engine, with a weight of just over 220lb (100kg) and a length of 7ft (2.13m).
Left: With its engine ignited, Me 163B White 4 begins its take-off run.
Below: This Messerschmitt Me 163B, was brought to the UK after the war and
given the number VF241 at the Royal Aircraft Establishment, Farnborough,
and put on public display.
18 GERMANY
Messerschmitt Me 262
F
rom nowhere they came, falling upon in a primitive state, and the turbine engines within the weapons bay. Armament included:
the masses of US bombers. Sleek, intended for the sleek fighter were not ready. four 30mm MK108 cannon (A-2a variant had
fast and powerful, the world’s first As the aircraft’s future looked promising, the two cannon); 24 2.2in (55mm) R4M air-to-air
operational jet fighters easily evaded the German Air Ministry (Reichsluftfahrtministerium rockets; two 551lb (250kg) bombs or two
defending fighters and pulverised the – RLM) ordered more prototypes. Finally, 1,102lb (500kg) bombs (A-2a only).
lumbering bombers with lethal cannon fire. Me 262 V1 was fitted with two BMW 003 The Me 262 became a ray of hope in
The revolutionary Messerschmitt Me 262 turbojets as well as the standard prop in the the increasingly dark skies of the German
had been unleashed. Nicknamed ‘Schwalbe’ nose as the engines were still unreliable, a wise Luftwaffe. However, its future was threatened
(Swallow), with its swept wings and shark- move as both jets failed on its maiden flight. by a number of influential figures who
like appearance the Me 262, represented The Jumo 004 was a more promising turbojet, favoured the advancement of proven piston
an aviation marvel. However, the Allies’ and on 18 July 1942 the Me 262 became a true aircraft. But by 1943 an order was placed
continuous bombardment of Germany’s jet when it took to the air in the hands of test for 100 jet fighters. Even then, the Me 262
factories ensured that the world’s first pilot Fritz Wendel. was plagued by bureaucratic obstacles
operational jet fighter could never meet its The new fighter had turbojets in nacelles when Hitler demanded that the fighter be
potential. But in its brief yet brilliant career, under the middle of the wings. The converted into a ‘Jabo’ (bomber). For Erhard
the Me 262 changed air warfare and dictated characteristic swept-back design was the result Milch, the German Field Marshal who oversaw
fighter design to this day. of a need to place the centre of gravity aft to the development of the Luftwaffe, the idea of
The iconic Messerschmitt Me 262 was born compensate for heavier-than-expected robbing the Me 262 of its superior speed was
from German turbojet engine development engines. It was only later that the benefits of unacceptable. So, with the Führer believing
in the mid-1930s, conceived by engineer swept wings were appreciated. Also, to that the Me 262 was in production as a
Hans-Joachim Pabst von Ohain. By 1938, a improve low-speed handling, slats were bomber, work continued on its development
Messerschmitt design team had drawn up incorporated to the front of the outer wings in the fighter role. On learning that his order
concepts for an interceptor fighter with two that extended automatically. has been ignored, Hitler was furious and
jet engines as ‘Project 1065’. Conceived in The pilot sat high in a canopy offering all- Messerschmitt engineers feverishly converted
1938, the Me 262 was designed by a team led round visibility that tilted open to the right. the fighters to carry two 550lb (250kg) bombs.
by Dr Waldemar Voigt. It went through a long The front window glass was bullet-proofed
gestation period, not making its first flight until and the seat (non ejection) was armoured. Below: The menacing shark-like shape of the
Me 262 terrorised Allied bomber crews in the
18 April 1941, and then only under the power Also referred to as the ‘weapons pod’, the
latter stages of World War 2. This airframe was
of a Junkers Jumo 210G piston engine of about nose section housed the armament and non- the first Me 262 to come into Allied hands when
700hp. Jet engine development, although more steerable nosewheel assembly, which, when its German test pilot defected on 31 March 1945.
advanced in Germany than elsewhere, was still retracted, protruded into a raised channel The aircraft was then shipped to the US for testing.
MESSERSCHMITT Me 262 19
The ‘Jabo’ version achieved little in France and when marauding P-51s braved the airfield by February 1945, delivering concentrated
Hitler reluctantly reversed his order to return defences and swooped down on his Me 262 attacks on heavy bomber streams and being
production to the fighter variant. during landing. Disbanded shortly afterwards, instrumental in establishing how the jet was to
The first experimental fighter unit to receive Kommando Nowotny claimed 22 kills for the be implemented in the anti-bomber role.
the Me 262 was Erprobungskommando 262, loss of 26 Me 262s. As the Me 262 was so advanced and untested
and the jet was bloodied on 26 July 1944 when The legendary JG 7 was formed in August in war, there was much debate from senior
a Mosquito was shot down. The first active 1944 from the remnants of Kommando JG 7 pilots on how to employ tactics against
unit to fly the Me 262 in anger was Kommando Nowotny, KG 1 and JG 3. Much training the heavies. Piston fighters enjoyed head-on
Nowotny, formed by Maj Walter Nowotny in followed, but the unit suffered from an attacks, but the high speed of the Me 262
September 1944, and its first confirmed kill inadequate supply of replacement parts and made this impossible. Therefore, a traditional
was a B-24. However, the unit suffered a mortal fuel, 10 Me 262s being lost due to mechanical rear attack was employed, the jets using their
blow when Nowotny was shot down and killed failure. However, the unit had improved incredible speed and cannons to devastating
24 GERMANY
effect. This, of course, meant that the Me 262 was greatly feared and a single hit could rip a Adolf Galland under the direct order of Hitler.
had to withstand concentrated gunfire from bomber apart. In the frantic engagement, 12 Despite its late entry into the war and facing
the bombers. bombers and a fighter were shot down for the radically superior numbers, JV 44 went on to
Whatever the tactics used, the sheer number loss of three jets. Even on their biggest day, claim 56 kills before Germany surrendered.
of Allied aircraft made the jet attacks almost when JG 7 flew 38 sorties and knocked down The vastly superior performance of the
irrelevant. On 18 March 1945, 37 Me 262s 14 bombers and two fighters for the loss of four Me 262 gave confidence to the fortunate pilots
engaged 1,221 American bombers and 636 Me 262s, the Luftwaffe ‘Wolf Packs’ could only who flew it, but the Allied dominance of the
escorting fighters. It was also on this day shoot down enough aircraft to represent a one air was so complete that the Schwalbe never
that the new R4M 4kg air-to-air rocket was per cent loss for the Allies. reached its full potential. The airfields from
introduced. Nicknamed the ‘Hurricane’ due Perhaps the most famous of Me 262 units, which it flew were under constant attack, and in
to its distinctive smoke trail when fired, the JV 44, ‘the squadron of experts’, was established the last days of the war, the remaining Me 262
R4M, armed with a potent Hexogen warhead, on 5 February 1945 and was commanded by units were forced to operate from makeshift
bases constructed along Germany’s famous
autobahns. Although 1,443 Me 262s were
completed, it is estimated that only about 300
saw combat.
Me 262 A-1a
Engine: 2 x Junkers Jumo 004 B-1
turbojets
Power: 1,980lb each
Length: 34ft 9in (10.60m)
Wingspan: 41ft 6in (12.60m)
Height: 11ft 6in (3.50m)
Empty weight: 8,366lb (3,795kg)
Loaded weight: 14,272lb (6,473kg)
Max T/O weight: 15,720lb (7,130kg)
Maximum speed: 559mph (900km/h)
Range: 652nm (1,050km)
Service ceiling: 37,565ft (11,450m)
Below: The Me262 was to mutate into the world’s fastest and deadliest killing machine. The
Me 262A‑1a/U4 ‘Pulkzerstörer’ packed a 50mm cannon and was the ultimate bomber killer. In the
event only two (some sources quote three) prototypes of this version were completed. V083 is pictured
in its post USAAF capture guise as Wilma Jeanne, named after the wife of Col Harold Watson, who was
dispatched to oversee the retrieval of advanced technology and its transport back to the states.
Later renamed Happy Hunter II, V083 was lost during a ferry flight to Cherbourg when a turbine
blade failed.
Bottom right: A line of wrecked Me 262s discovered by advancing Allied troops in a field in Germany.
MESSERSCHMITT Me 262 27
28 GERMANY
Arado Ar 234
N
ot only did Germany field the first build a high-speed, high-flying reconnaissance with a conventional landing gear in favour
operational jet fighter, but it also aircraft propelled by the turbojet engines then of retractable skids mounted beneath the
flew the first operational jet bomber, under development by BMW and Junkers. fuselage and nacelles. The aircraft would taxi
the appropriately-named Arado Ar 234B Rüdiger Kosin led the design team that and take off atop a wheeled trolley that the
Blitz (Lightning). Propelled by two Junkers produced one of the most recognisable of all pilot jettisoned as the jet left the runway.
Jumo 004 B turbojets, this graceful aircraft of the wartime jet designs. The fuselage was Engine problems repeatedly delayed the
had a top speed of 456mph (735km/h), pencil-like in its approach with a rounded nose flight testing of the first Ar 234. BMW and
making it virtually immune to attacks from cone and well-tapered rear. The entire nose Junkers both experienced trouble building jet
piston-engined Allied fighters. The relatively was made up of the single-seat cockpit which engines in quantities sufficient for both the
few Ar 234s that reached Luftwaffe units provided excellent visibility of the oncoming Me 262 and Ar 234 programmes. Although
before the end of the German surrender action with only light framing being involved. Arado completed the Ar 234 V1 airframe in late
provided excellent (if futile) service, The rounded fuselage incorporated slab sides 1942, the Messerschmitt aircraft took priority
particularly as reconnaissance aircraft. for a deep approach required of the internal and claimed the trickle of flight-ready engines
Development of the Ar 234 began fuel stores, avionics and cockpit. Engines were that Junkers managed to turn out. Thus, the
in 1940 when the German air ministry held in streamlined nacelles, hung under first Ar 234 turbojet-powered prototype finally
(Reichsluftfahrtministerium – RLM) issued an the straight high-mounted wing. To reduce achieved its first flight on 30 July 1943 from
order to Dr Walter Blume, technical director of weight and free space for larger fuselage fuel Rheine Airfield and the five other prototype
the state-owned Arado concern, to design and tanks, the initial prototype series dispensed aircraft soon followed the initial V1. The
second prototype, Arado Ar 234 V2, crashed on
2 October 1943 at Rheine near Münster
Below: The sleek lines of the world’s first operational jet bomber, the Arado Ar 234. In the definitive
B-models, the undercarriage was wholly-retractable and arranged in a tricycle format with two main after suffering a fire in its port wing,
landing gear legs and a nose leg. All three positions held a large ‘donut-style’ landing wheel of low failure of both engines and various
pressure, intended to counter the rather narrow undercarriage track. instrumentation failures. The aircraft
ARADO Ar 234 29
Arado Ar 234B-2
Engine: 2 × Junkers Jumo
004B-1 axial flow
turbojet engines
Power: 1,990lb thrust each
Crew: 1
Wingspan: 47ft 3in (14.4m)
Length: 41ft 6in (12.64m)
Height: 14ft 1in (4.29m)
Loaded weight: 21,605lb (9,800kg)
Max Speed: 461mph (742km/h)
Service ceiling: 33,000ft (10,000m)
Range: 967 miles (1,556km)
Payload: Up to 3,309lb (1,500kg)
of bombs on external
racks
30 GERMANY
was capable of 3,300lb (1,497kg) of stores and Above: Rocket-Assisted Take-Off (RATO)
entered operation in late 1944, remaining active comprising two Walter HWK 109-500A-1
Starthilfe jettisonable rocket pods could be
into 1945. The design proved aerodynamically
used to project faster take-off times and shorter
efficient and relatively stable with little in the runway distances as well as a spectacular (and
way of engineering corrections required. noisy) initial rate-of-climb.
Plans called for more advanced versions of
the Arado jet, including the Ar 234C powered Right: The finest role of the Ar 234 was in
by four BMW 003 A-1 engines. However, only reconnaissance, where, fitted with drop tanks on
the wings to extend their range, they could easily
14 Ar 234Cs left the Arado factory before
fly a 450 mile mission. The quality of its cameras
Soviet forces overran the area. The four-engine brought the Germans a wealth of intelligence,
Ar 234 was, however, the fastest jet aircraft of though little good news!
World War 2.
Only one Luftwaffe unit, KG 76 coupled with shortages of fuel and spare
(Kampfgeschwader or Bomber Wing 76), parts, prevented KG 76 from flying more than
was equipped with Ar 234 bombers before a handful of sorties from late March to the end
Germany’s surrender. The unit flew its first of the war. The unit conducted its last missions
operations during December 1944 in support against Soviet forces encircling Berlin during
of the Ardennes Offensive. Typical missions the final days of April. During the first week of
consisted of pinprick attacks conducted by less May the unit’s few surviving aircraft were either
than 20 aircraft, each carrying a single 1,100lb dispersed to airfields still in German hands or
(500kg) bomb. The deteriorating war situation, destroyed to prevent their capture.
ARADO Ar 234 31
32 GERMANY
Messerschmitt Me 328
O
riginally conceived in 1941 as a
parasite fighter to protect German
bomber formations, the small
Me 328 was powered by a pair of pulsejets,
but the unsuitability of these engines
effectively doomed it from the start.
The Me 328 began life as project P.1073, a
cheap and simple escort fighter to either be
towed aloft by a Heinkel He 177 or Junkers
Ju 388, or carried on a Me 264 in a ‘Mistel’-
type configuration. To keep production costs
down, the design was to be constructed of
wood wherever possible. The Me 328 was of a
standard mid-wing configuration with a circular Above: The Messerschmitt Me 328 parasite fighter namely, excessive vibration – made the aircraft
on the back of a Dornier Do 217. almost impossible to fly and the manned flight
sectioned fuselage. The cockpit was raised with
the rear of the canopy moulding into the fairing programme was suspended in mid-1944, after
that tapered back to the tail section. The initial at altitudes of 9,800-19,700ft (3,000-6,000m). only a few test flights had been made.
design placed the engines either side of the rear Ground launches, using both cable-type Work still progressed to a limited extent.
fuselage behind the cockpit with the tailpipes catapults and rocket-assisted carriages on rails A four-engine, pulsejet-powered bomber
extending beyond the tail, but on production were also successful. variant was proposed but, like the parasite
aircraft it was decided to mount them below Progress was deemed promising and seven fighter before it, never realised. Other roles
the wings. The single fin of the tailplane fitted prototypes were each fitted with a pair of Argus envisaged included that of a navalised fighter
halfway up. The undercarriage consisted of a As 014 series pulsejet engines. However, during being launched by a U-Boat submarine, as a
retractable skid, to which a dolly could be fixed static testing it soon became apparent that defence interceptor and ground attack fighter.
for take-off. Armament was to be in the form the same problems which were to plague the None materialised. In a final roll of the dice,
of two 20mm MG 151/20 cannon, which in the early development of the V-1 flying bomb – moves were made to revive the Me 328 in
event was never fitted. Three major base forms 1944 as a suicide flying bomb based on the
Messerschmitt Me 328
were conceived with the first expected to be a Me 328B, fitted with 2,000lb (900kg) of
powerless glider. The second was to feature a explosives, but it was dropped in favour of the
pair of pulsejet engines for its propulsion, while Engine: 2 x Argus As 014 Fieseler Fi 103R (Reichenberg).
the third proposed the use of Junkers Jumo 004 pulse-jets Ultimately, the pulse engine technology
series turbojet engines. Power: 800lb thrust each was never fully capable for the particular
Famed pilot Hanna Reitsch carried out a Length: 23ft 6in (7.17m) Me 328 airframe,
test programme on the two prototypes of the Wingspan: 22ft 8in (6.9m) while the parasite
glider version, releasing from its carrier aircraft Height: 5ft 3in (1.6m) concept proved too
Empty weight: 3,527lb (1,600kg) complicated to
Below: The Me 328 was first produced as a glider ever become
Max speed: 500mph (805km/h)
to test its aerodynamics. operational.
JUNKERS Ju 287 35
Junkers Ju 287
Left: The swept-forward wing was suggested by
the project’s head designer, Dr Hans Wocke, as a
way of providing extra lift at low airspeeds, then
necessary because of the poor responsiveness of
early turbojets at the vulnerable times of take-off
and landing.
W
hen Junkers was tasked with from a Ju 352 transport aircraft and even a came to a halt in July 1944, but Junkers was
producing a fast jet bomber nose wheel from an American B-24 Liberator. allowed to go forward with the flight testing
for the Luftwaffe, one thing its The revolutionary wings would be the only regime on the V1 prototype. The wing section
engineers could not be accused of was lack major new component. Two Jumo 004 engines for the V2 had been completed by that time.
of forward thinking. The result was one of were hung in nacelles under the wings, with Seventeen test flights were undertaken in total,
the strangest and most revolutionary aircraft the other two mounted to the sides of the which passed without notable incident.
to take to the skies during World War 2. forward fuselage. In March 1945, as the Allies closed in on
German aircraft engineer Hans Wocke worked This remarkable aircraft made its maiden Germany, the Ju 287 was belatedly ordered
for Junkers and in 1943, proposed a swept- flight from Brandis airfield on 16 August 1944 into production. However, within a month the
forward wing concept for a fast jet bomber in the hands of Siegfried Holzbaur. Initial flight Junkers factory building the V2 and V3 was
capable of outrunning any known enemy air tests were generally successful, although the overrun by the Red Army; at that time, the V2
defences. During World War 2 it had become forward-swept wing caused problems under was 80% complete, and construction of the V3
apparent that aircraft with straight wings had a some flight conditions. The most notable of had just begun.
built-in speed limit, imposed by air compression
at the leading edge. It was known that a swept
back wing would reduce compressibility, but
Junkers Ju 287V1
Dr Wocke believed that a swept-forward wing Engine: 4 x Junkers Jumo 004B-1
would have even more advantages. In most turbojets
circumstances, it would increase stability in Power: 1,984lb thrust each
flight, especially at low speeds. It would also Length: 60ft 0in (18.3m)
mean that the central part of the wings would Wingspan: 66ft 0in (20.11m)
stall first, so the controls on the outer part of Height: 5ft 5in (4.7m)
the wings would remain effective for longer. As Empty weight: 27,558lb (12,500kg)
a side benefit the design also gave more room Max speed: 347mph (558km/h)
for the internal bomb bay.
In March 1944 Junkers was given a contract Right: The Ju 287 was intended to provide the
to produce a prototype of the new bomber. Luftwaffe with a bomber that could avoid
The first aircraft, Ju 287 V1, was to be a flying interception by outrunning enemy fighters. The
unfinished second and third prototypes, which
test bed produced from as many existing
far more accurately reflected the design of the
components as possible. The resulting hybrid eventual production bomber, were captured by
aircraft used the fuselage from an He 177A, the the Soviet Union in the closing stages of World
tail from a Junkers Ju 388, the main wheels War 2.
36 GERMANY
D
esigned and built by the Horton all of the goals and put forward their private of the first powered wing, the Ho 229 V2.
brothers in 1943, the Ho 229 was project, the H.IX. Horten first selected the BMW 003 jet engine,
unlike anything in military aviation The H.IX was of mixed construction, with the but owing to delivery delays switched to
at the time. Although the jet-propelled centre pod made from welded steel tubing and the Junkers 004. To accommodate the larger
flying wing crashed during its third test wing spars built from wood. Designer Reimar engine, elements of the wing had to be
flight, it remains one of the most unusual swept each half of the wing 32 degrees in an redesigned delaying the first flight until mid–
and futuristic combat aircraft tested during unbroken line from the nose to the start of each December 1944.
World War 2. wingtip, where he turned the leading edge By this time, the design had been taken from
In 1943, Hermann Göring issued a to meet the wing trailing edge in a graceful the Horten brothers and given to Gothaer
requirement for a ‘3 ×1000’ light bomber, and gradually tightening curve. There was no Waggonfabrik, and a production order for 40
ie one that could carry 1,000kg (2,200lb) of fuselage, no vertical or horizontal tail, and with aircraft placed. Finally, the first powered flight
bombs a distance of 1,000km (620 miles) with landing gear stowed, the upper and lower was made in Oranienburg on 2 February 1945
a speed of 1,000km/h (620mph). The Horten surface of the wing stretched smooth from with test pilot Lt Erwin Ziller at the controls.
brothers, Walter and Reimar, concluded that wingtip to wingtip. Horten mounted elevons The aircraft reportedly displayed very good
their low-drag flying wing design could meet (control surfaces that combined the actions of handling qualities, with only moderate lateral
instability. While the second flight was equally
Top and below: The third prototype of Horten’s flying wing jet bomber was captured by the Americans successful, the undercarriage was damaged
and shipped to the US for evaluation.
by a heavy landing. There are unsubstantiated
reports that during one of these test flights,
the V2 undertook a simulated ‘dog-fight’ with a
Messerschmitt Me 262, and outperformed it.
However, on 18 February 1945, disaster
struck during the third test flight. After about
45 minutes, one of the Jumo 004 turbojet
engines developed a problem, caught fire and
stopped. Ziller was seen to put the aircraft
into a dive and pull up several times in an
attempt to restart the engine and save the
precious prototype. It is believed Ziller became
unconscious from the fumes from the burning
engine and the aircraft crashed just outside the
boundary of the airfield. Ziller was thrown from
the aircraft on impact and died from his injuries
two weeks later. The aircraft was destroyed.
Development continued with a series of
larger prototypes, but none flew before the end
of the war.
FIESELER Fi 103R 37
Fieseler Fi 103R
W
ith the tide of war flowing
inextricably against it, Germany
became increasingly desperate in
its response. Out of this desperation came
the Fieseler Fi 103R, a piloted version of
the V-1 flying bomb, that was code-named
Reichenberg. Its pilot was given a slim
chance of survival, but in essence, these
were suicide missions.
SS officer Otto Skorzeny is credited with
the idea of a piloted version of the V-1 flying
bomb able to make precision attacks. The
operational model became the Reichenberg
IV and its conversion from the standard V-1
flying bomb was extremely simple. Protected
by an armoured glass windscreen, the pilot
sat on a pywood bucket seat in a small cockpit
in front of the engine. The instrument panel
comprised of an arming switch, a clock, an
air speed indicator, altimeter and a turn and
bank indicator. Flight controls were of the
conventional stick and rudder bar type. The
power of the Fi 103R came from the 770lb
Above: Test pilot Hana Reitsch was deeply
Fieseler Fi 103R-IV
thrust pulsejet engine mounted in the upper
involved in the Reichenberg programme
rear of the fuselage. A powerful 1,870lb (850kg)
following her early testing of the aerodynamics
warhead was packed into the nose assembly, of the V-1 flying bomb. Engine: 1 x Argus As 014 pulse jet
making for one inexpensive and easy-to- Power: 770lb thrust
produce terror weapon. He 111 bomber. After launch, the pilot was to Length: 26ft 3in (8m)
The first powered test flight was performed aim his aircraft at the intended target and then Wingspan: 18ft 9in (5.72m)
in September 1944, though it crashed after the jettison the cockpit canopy and bale out, but it Height: 6ft 6in (2m)
pilot lost control. Subsequent test flights were was calculated that his chance of survival was Loaded weight: 4,960lb (2,250kg)
carried out by test pilots Heinz Kensche and less than 1 per cent. Consequently, the 100 Max speed: 500mph (800km/h)
Hanna Reitsch. Reitsch herself experienced a volunteers who signed up to fly the bombs in dive
number of crashes from which she amazingly were known unofficially as ‘Selbstopfermaenner’
survived unscathed. or ‘Self-sacrifice Men’. Although about 70
Unlike the similar Japanese ‘Ohka’, the Reichenberg IVs were built for use by special
Reichenberg IV was not intended as a suicide unit KG 200, none were used
weapon, though in practice the distinction operationally and
would have been blurred. It was intended to development ended
be carried to the operational area beneath an in October 1944.
Heinkel He 162
G
ermany 1944 and with World of at least 466mph (750km/h), an endurance section was circular, and the nose was a
War 2 drawing to its irrevocable of 30 minutes at sea level, and a take-off run of separate component made from moulded
conclusion, the Nazi leadership no more than 1,640ft (500m)… and the fighter plywood. The single-piece wing was fabricated
turned in desperation to so-called ‘wonder was to be taken into combat by Hitler Youth! primarily from wood, with a plywood skin,
weapons’. With the first jet engines now Heinkel’s designers worked around the clock in although it was fitted with flaps of light
available, a new fighter was to be prepared order to adapt its own lightweight jet fighter to alloy and the detachable tips were made of
for the Luftwaffe – cheap to build, available meet the official requirement. metal. The pilot of the He 162 was seated
in quantity, and able to be flown by even On 30 September 1944 the German air beneath an upward-hinging blown canopy
novice pilots. The result was the Heinkel ministry (Reichsluftfahrtministerium – RLM) that provided an excellent view forward.
He 162, better known as the Volksjäger, or announced that the Heinkel Project 1073 had
Heinkel He 162A-2
‘people’s fighter’. won the order. At this stage, the fighter carried
As early as spring 1944 there were calls the designation He 500. Eager to confound
for a new jet fighter, one that could be built Allied Intelligence, this was soon switched to Engine: 1 x BMW 003E-1
rapidly and in quantity, using cheap materials He 162, ‘reusing’ a designation once applied to a Power: 1,760lb thrust
and unskilled labour. The proposal caught Messerschmitt bomber project. Length: 29ft 8in (9.05m)
the attention of an increasingly desperate In keeping with the frantic nature of the Height: 8ft 7in (2.60m)
Führer, and in June 1944 an Emergency ‘people’s fighter’ project, by the end of 1944 the Wingspan: 23ft 8in (7.20m)
Fighter Programme (Jäger-Notprogramm) was first prototypes were nearing assembly in the Weight (loaded): 6,184lb (2,805kg)
outlined, which was to yield no fewer than Schwechat factory. Cover names assigned early Max speed 490mph (790km/h)
5,000 fighter aircraft each month. An official on in the project included Schildkröte (tortoise) Range: 385 miles (620km)
requirement was subsequently drafted and and Salamander (as it often called today), Armament: 2 x MG151 cannon
was issued to a number of manufacturers, although the company referred to the He 162
including Heinkel. The specification included internally as the Spatz (sparrow).
Below and top right: The first prototype He 162 V1,
a single BMW 003 turbojet engine, a loaded The He 162’s sleek, streamlined fuselage W.Nr. 200 001, VI+IA in its bare metal finish. The
weight of no more than 4,400lb (2,000kg), employed light-alloy materials and a semi- aircraft was completed and ready for take-off at
30mm cannon armament, a maximum speed monocoque structure. The fuselage cross- Heidfeld on 1 December 1944.
HEINKEL He 162 39
Henschel Hs 132
D
eveloped during World War 2 as a unit. The mid-fuselage mounted wings were Above: Although some references refer to this
replacement for the outdated Stuka, mostly of wooden construction, and had a picture as a photo of the completed Hs 132 V1,
it is actually an artist’s composite impression.
the Henschel dive-bomber was of slight taper on the leading and trailing edges.
The design in terms of engine mounting and
unorthodox design and featured a top- A tricycle landing gear was to be used, with the tailplane bore a very strong resemblance to the
mounted jet engine and the pilot in a prone nose wheel revolving 90 degrees to lie under contemporary Heinkel He 162 Spatz.
position. The first prototype was close to the cockpit when retracted. The extensively
flight testing when the factory was overrun glazed bullet-shaped cockpit was completely
by Soviet forces. faired in with the rest of the fuselage, and the Henschel Hs 132
The genesis for the Hs 132 was an 18 February pilot was in a prone position, to withstand the Engine: 1 x BMW 003A turbojet
1943 specification published by the German intense G-forces of the fast, steep dive during
Power: 1,760lb thrust
air ministry (Reichsluftfahrtministerium – RLM) the bomb run. The Hs 132 was designed to
Length: 29ft 2in (8.9m)
calling for a single-seat shipping attack aircraft. begin its attack in a shallow dive, and after
Wingspan: 23ft 7in (7.2m)
A piston-engined configuration was originally reaching a speed of 570mph (910km/h), the
Height: 9ft 10in (3m)
specified, but the performance requirements pilot would ‘toss’ the bomb at the target using a
Max T/O weight: 7,496lb (3,400kg)
soon led to a switch to the emerging availability simple computerised sight, and then climb back
of jet power. The fuselage was of a circular out of range. Max speed: 485mph (780km/h)
cross-section, and constructed entirely of metal. A contract for six prototypes was approved
The single BMW 003 jet engine was mounted in May 1944, and construction was begun 1945 and it was close to completion (with
on the fuselage top, as per the Heinkel He 162. in March 1945. Four versions of the Hs 132 the fuselage finished at Henschel’s Berlin-
Due to the position of the engine, a twin fin and were proposed, including the Hs 132D, which Schönefeld facility and the wings being finished
rudder configuration was chosen, to allow the was to have an enlarged wing. The Hs 132V1 at Henschel’s French subsidiary), when Russian
jet to exhaust without interfering with the tail was scheduled to make its first flight in June forces captured the intact fuselage in May 1945.
MESSERSCHMITT Me P1101 47
Messerschmitt Me P1101
W
hen American tanks rolled into ministry (Reichsluftfahrtministerium – RLM), have been powerfully armed with four Mk 108
Oberammergau in Bavaria on Messerschmitt was instructed to carry out 30mm cannons.
29 April 1945, the soldiers had experimental flights, testing the swept back Robert J. Woods, Bell Aircraft Corporation’s
no idea that they’d found a top secret air wing at anticipated speeds up to Mach 1. The chief design engineer and a key figure in the
test facility that was unknown to Allied worsening war situation led to the building exploitation of German technology, became
intelligence and had never been bombed. of a full-scale prototype utilising existing interested in the P1101’s variable-sweep wing
Little attention was paid to the skeletal components such as the wings (Me 262), and tried to have the prototype completed
metal frame of an aircraft that was 80 percent landing gear (extended Bf 109), and flight in Germany under US supervision. With the
completed but had never taken to the air. It was components where possible. Production of the French withholding documents and pieces
the Messerschmitt P1101, possibly the most V1 prototype was begun at Messerschmitt’s of the prototype removed by soldiers as
advanced piece of German hardware ever to fall Bavarian Oberammergau Complex with a souvenirs, the idea of flying the P1101 at
into Allied hands. projected first flight in June 1945. Oberammergau failed to materialise. The
The Messerschmitt P1101 was a single-seat, The P1101 V1 prototype was of duralumin prototype was later shipped to the US, but
swept-wing jet fighter developed in response to fuselage construction. The fuselage-mounted damage ruled out any possibility for repair.
the 15 July 1944 Emergency Fighter Programme tandem intakes of preliminary designs were However many of the Me P1101’s design
which sought the second generation of jet replaced by a single nose intake, and the features influenced the Bell X-5, which was
fighters for the Third Reich. Although the Focke- revised bubble canopy afforded better all- the first aircraft capable of varying its wing
Wulf Ta 183 was preferred by the German air round vision. An operational version would geometry while in flight.
Messerschmitt Me P1101
Engine: 1 x Heinkel HeS 011A
turbojet
Power: 2,866lb thrust
Length: 29ft 2in (9m)
Wingspan: 27ft 1in (8.2m)
Height: 9ft 2in (2.8m)
Max T/O weight: 9,900lb (4,500kg)
Max speed: 612mph (985km/h)
estimated
weeks with the MXY-7 Ohka 11. Essentially a Naval Air Arsenal. It is believed that seven Other unbuilt planned variants were the
2,646lb (1,200kg) bomb with wooden wings, US ships were damaged or sunk by Ohkas Model 43A with folding wings, to be launched
powered by three Type 4 Model 1 Mark 20 solid- throughout the war, the USS Mannert L. Abel from submarines, and the Model 43B, a
fuel rocket motors, the single-seat Model 11 being the first victim near Okinawa on catapult/rocket assisted version, also with
achieved great speed, but with limited range. It 12 April 1945. Meanwhile, Kugisho developed folding wings so that it could be hidden in
was carried within striking distance of its target a new model and boosted its range to about caves. Had the proposed Allied invasion of
under the belly of a twin-engine Mitsubishi G4M 81 miles (130km). The new version, designated Kyushu Island taken place, the Japanese would
‘Betty’ bomber. However, the Ohka’s limited the Ohka Model 22, was modified in two likely have employed many hundreds of Ohka
range meant that the G4Ms could not make the significant ways. Kugisho halved the size of aircraft against the attack.
launch point before they encountered US Navy the warhead to 1,323lb (600kg), then installed
combat air patrols. Thus the Ohka’s combat
debut on 21 March 1945 ended disastrously,
a new Campini-type hybrid motor-jet engine
built by Hitachi called the Tsu-11. Kugisho
Yokosuka MXY-7 Ohka
when Grumman F6F Hellcats intercepted all 16 finished 50 Model 22s while production shifted Model 11
‘Bettys’ carrying Ohkas and the entire group to underground factories. Only three Tsu-11 Engine: 3 x Type 4 Mk1 Model
was shot down. The Model 11 was the only engines were built, so most of the airframes 20 rocket motors
variant which saw service and 155 were built at remained incomplete and the war ended before Power: 587lb thrust each
Yokosuka, and another 600 at the Kasumigaura any Ohka 22s saw active combat. Length: 19ft 11in (6.06m)
Wingspan: 16ft 10in (5.12m)
Height: 3ft 9in (1.16m)
Max speed: 576mph (804km/h)
in dive
Armament: 2,646lb (1,200kg)
warhead
52 JAPAN
Gloster E.28/39
W
hen a diminutive aircraft roared Britain’s first jet aircraft, the experimental engine from Power Jets, let alone an aircraft for
into the sky over RAF Cranwell Gloster E.28/39, was designed to provide a it to go in. It was September 1939 before the Air
on 15 May 1941, Frank Whittle platform for the flight testing of the new Whittle Ministry finally issued a specification to Gloster
had every reason to feel vindicated. As jet engines and to investigate their potential for for an aircraft to test one of Frank Whittle’s
inventor of the gas turbine engine, he had use in fighter aircraft. In the absence of official turbojet designs in flight. The resulting E.28/39
been battling officialdom to support his support, Whittle and his colleagues at Power designation originates from the aircraft having
revolutionary ideas and now here was proof Jets had been forced to carry out development been developed in conformance with the 28th
that his concept of jet-powered aircraft as a private venture. On 28 April 1939, Whittle ‘Experimental’ specification issued by the Air
worked. However, it will not have been lost made a visit to the premises of the Gloster Ministry in 1939. George Carter worked closely
on him that Germany had already wrested Aircraft Company, where he met chief designer with Whittle, and laid out a small aircraft of
the lead in this vital technology away from George Carter. Carter took a keen interest in conventional configuration. Sometimes referred
Britain and was closer to deploying it in an Whittle’s project and quickly made several to as the Gloster Whittle or the Gloster Pioneer,
operational fighter. rough proposals of various aircraft designs the aircraft was a low-wing monoplane design
powered by the engine. Meanwhile, it appeared with tricycle undercarriage and a slightly rotund
Gloster Meteor
T
he Gloster Meteor may have appeared relationship with Whittle and Power Jets, the revealed major shortcomings regarding lack of
too late to play a major role in World Gloster Aircraft Company became the obvious power. Accordingly Gerry Sayer recommended
War 2, but as the Royal Air Force’s, choice to build such a machine. Specification that the first flight should be postponed
and indeed the Allies’, first operational jet F9/40 was written by the Air Ministry around until units with a thrust of at least 1,200lb
fighter, it trailblazed its way into aviation Gloster’s proposals, and an official order for were available. So it was that the Halford H-1,
history. As one of the first of its kind, it was a first production batch of 300 examples of delivering some 2,300lb of thrust, assumed
rapidly overtaken by sleek new designs, but the new fighter was placed on 8 August 1941. early prominence in the F9/40 programme. In
its robustness and versatility meant that it By then, work was under way on an initial 12 so doing, it staved off the project’s complete
would remain in service for over 40 years, a development aircraft contracted for at the start cancellation even though it would play little
stunning achievement for one of aviation’s of the year, even before the diminutive E.28/39 part in the Meteor’s success. Thus engined, the
great pioneers. test bed had got air under its wheels. But it was fifth F9/40 aircraft, serial DG206, turned out
Like its German counterpart, the British Air never going to be an easy journey. to be the first to fly. It finally took to the air at
Ministry was initially reluctant to divert valuable Perhaps inevitably it was with the engines Cranwell on 5 March 1943, with Michael Daunt
resources to unproven jet engine technology that the problems occurred. The first F9/40 at the controls. The next two examples to join
during World War 2. However, when Germany prototype was due to use two Power Jets W2Bs, the flight test programme, DG205 and then
eventually forged ahead with development, built by Rover, but they were significantly DG202, were both fitted with the originally
it was recognised that Britain could not afford delayed by technical maladies. Rolls-Royce took intended powerplants in 1,600lb W2B/23
to get left behind in this potentially game- on the W2B development programme, and form when they got airborne in June and July.
changing race. work on alternative powerplants was set in Despite the superiority of both the H-1 and the
With the concept of jet-powered flight train by Frank Halford and Metropolitan Vickers. Metrovick F2, the Whittle engine, now known
finally becoming a reality, the next step was to On 5 July 1942, the first F9/40, serial DG202, as the Rolls-Royce Welland, was selected for
develop an operational fighter. Given its close was delivered in great secrecy to the chosen production Meteor Is.
testing airfield at RAF Newmarket Heath. Throughout its life, the Meteor remained
De Havilland Vampire
D
e Havilland’s DH100 Vampire has on gas turbines; for the projected jet-powered Above: Blood brothers. The historic sight of six
the distinction of being the second fighter, Halford decided to proceed with the Vampire F1s of the RAF’s first DH100 unit,
No 247 Squadron. Leading the flight is TG/311,
design of jet fighter to enter service design of a ‘straight through’ centrifugal engine
coded ZY-O. Initially No 247 Squadron was
with the Royal Air Force. Developed during capable of generating 3,000lb of thrust, which based at Chilbolton, but later moved to RAF
the war years, its distinctive shape appeared was considered to be high at the time. Halford’s Odiham to become part of the three-squadron
in the skies just too late to see action, with engine was developed, and emerged as the Vampire Wing. Early examples featured a fixed
only a few examples delivered by May 1945. Halford H1 (later to be named Goblin I). cockpit fairing at the rear, which restricted ‘over
The DH100 Vampire has its origins in Air Led by Sir Geoffrey de Havilland, the design the shoulder’ vision. During the production run of
the F1, a one-piece sliding hood was introduced.
Ministry specification E6/41 that defined a that emerged at Hatfield was conventional in
single-engined jet fighter suitable for operation construction but unconventional in layout,
at great heights, fitted with a pressure cabin for with pilot, guns and jet engine all crammed and below the tailplane. Armament comprised
the pilot, and armed with four Hispano 20mm into a rather small, egg-shaped fuselage, four 20mm Hispano Mk V cannon located
cannon. The requirement went on to state behind which was a twin tail boom. By now underneath the nose.
that the aircraft should be as small as possible designated the DH100, the design was primarily The first prototype, LZ548/G (where the ‘G’
– jet engines were still in their infancy and composed of plywood for the forward section signified the need for an armed guard), was
certainly not producing huge power outputs and aluminium throughout the aft section. The designed and constructed by the company in
– and employ basic constructional techniques. pilot was positioned ahead of the wing, giving little over a year and made its first flight from
Most importantly, it stated that a de Havilland a good all-round field of vision. Air intakes Hatfield on 20 September 1943. Completing the
Halford jet engine would be installed. The aero- were in the wing roots, with ducting to the ‘family firm’ image of the aircraft, the pilot was
engine designer Major Frank Halford had been compressor of the Halford H1 turbojet, whose Geoffrey de Havilland Jr. After just a few flights,
given access to Frank Whittle’s pioneering work exhaust pipe sat neatly in between the booms it was achieving 480mph.
DE HAVILLAND VAMPIRE 67
It being wartime, development of the Above: A low wing loading ensured the Vampire English Electric at Preston, to allow de Havilland
Vampire proceeded rapidly. While the first exhibited excellent manoeuvrability. Because to continue its all-important wartime work of
early jet engines were incapable of giving high
and second prototypes had been primarily producing the Mosquito.
thrust levels, the Vampire was intentionally kept
involved in proving the new type’s flying small, such that the 3,000lb thrust of the engine It may have missed the war, but the Vampire
qualities and were gunless, the third prototype, was adequate to propel the egg-shaped fighter entered service with No 247 Squadron in March
MP838/G, mounted the intended armament to speeds edging 550mph in level flight. 1946, in time for nine aircraft to take part in the
of four 20mm Hispano cannon. MP838 was victory celebrations over central London on
then sent to the Royal Aircraft Establishment of service pilots. As first flown in prototype 8 June that year.
at Farnborough in March 1944 for official form, the Vampire did not exhibit a level of Ultimately, the Vampire was one of those
evaluation and to be flown by a number performance that substantially exceeded that aircraft that just ‘worked’. It was highly
of the best piston-engined fighters of the manoeuvrable, its pilots found it fun to fly and
Below: The first prototype of the DH100 Vampire. time. Nevertheless, flight testing threw up it sold supremely well. Over the next couple
With no need for propeller clearance, the short no great problems and an initial order was of decades, the type would go on to have a
undercarriage gave the aircraft a very squat
placed in May 1944 for 120 Vampire F1 fighters. successful career with the RAF, the Swiss Air
appearance on the ground. The Vampire was
built too late to see action in World War 2, but its Compared with the prototypes, these would Force (with which it served until 1990) and
excellent flying qualities gave it a longevity that have shorter, squatter fin/rudder assembles. numerous other countries. Over 4,000 would
its designers could never have imagined. Production, though, was to be undertaken by be produced.
70 UNITED KINGDOM
DE HAVILLAND VAMPIRE 71
Vampire F1
Engine: de Havilland Goblin
Power: 2,700lb thrust (in
prototype, 3,100lb in
production aircraft)
Length: 30ft 9in (9.37m)
Wingspan: 40ft 0in (12.19m)
Height: 8ft 10in (2.69m)
Service ceiling: 40,000ft (12,200m)
Max T/O weight: 10,300lb (4,670kg)
Maximum speed: 540mph (870kph)
Range: 730 miles (1,175km)
Armament: 4 x Hispano
20mm cannon
XP-59 broke little ground in terms of fighter flow jet engines drove the unrefined XP-59A P-59 slipped into aviation history – none were
design. Essentially, it was as basic as possible to airframe to a disappointing maximum speed of flying by 1950. Those that were not scrapped
house the engines and fly within the specified just 390mph (628km/h), slower than existing or run into the ground during testing became
amount of time. Axis and Allied piston-engined fighters. museum showpieces.
Thus, on 19 September 1942 Bell shipped However, in March 1942, the Bell Company While the P-59 was not a great success, the
the first XP-59A to a remote base in California, received a follow-on contract for 13 YP-59A type did give the USAAF experience with the
Muroc Dry Lake, for the initial flight trials. To test and evaluation aircraft. More powerful operation of jet aircraft, in preparation for
maintain secrecy, Bell mounted a dummy General Electric I-16 (J31) turbojet engines the more advanced types that would shortly
propeller on the nose and threw a tarpaulin powered these and all subsequent production become available.
over the fuselage to give the illusion that the Airacomets. The first of 13 YP-59As arrived
Right: Tests on the three XP-59As revealed a
Airacomet was just another piston fighter. for flight-testing at Muroc in June 1943. One multitude of problems including poor engine
On 1 October 1942, Bell test pilot Robert M. of these aircraft set a new unofficial altitude response and reliability (common shortcomings
Stanley took the XP-59A into the air for the first record of 47,600ft (14,512m), but the type was of all early turbojets), insufficient lateral
time. Two General Electric Type I-A centrifugal- still outclassed by contemporary piston fighters. stability, and performance that was far below
The third YP-59A (42-22611) was supplied expectations. Chuck Yeager flew the aircraft and
was dissatisfied with its speed, but was amazed
Bell P-59B Airacomet to the RAF (receiving British serial RG362/G),
in exchange for the first production Gloster
at its smooth flying characteristics.
Engine: 2 x General Electric Meteor I, EE210/G. British pilots found that the Bottom right: Bell XP-59A Airacomet and test
J31-GE-5 turbojets aircraft compared very unfavourably with the pilot Robert M. Stanley. The aircraft first became
jets that they were already flying. airborne during high-speed taxiing tests on
Power: 2,000lb thrust each
1 October 1942 with Stanley at the controls,
Length: 38ft 10in (11.84m) Although Bell proposed that the USAAF
although the first official flight was made by
Wingspan: 45ft 6in (13.87m) should acquire 300 P-59 Airacomets, an order Col Laurence Craigie the next day.
Height: 12ft 4in (3.76m) was placed for 100. Eventually, Bell completed
Loaded weight: 11,040lb (6,214kg) just 50 production Airacomets, 20 P-59As Below: Apart from its engine installation, the
and 30 P-59Bs, with the latter being assigned basic airframe of the XP-59 was of largely
Speed: 413mph (665km/h) conventional design. In fact, it owed its origins
to the 412th Fighter Group. Each was armed
Max range: 375 miles (604km) to an original prop-driven, twin-boom design
with one 37mm M-4 cannon and three 0.50in relying on a ‘pusher’ arrangement that company
Armament: 1 x 37mm M-4 cannon;
3 x 0.50in machine guns machine guns. After the 412th Fighter Group’s engineers had been working on before the jet-
training squadron was disbanded in 1946, the powered XP-59 programme was envisioned.
BELL P-59 AIRACOMET 75
76 UNITED STATES
Above: An XP-59A Airacomet during a test mission and wearing the short-lived red-outlined National
markings, which dates this image as between June to September 1943.
Right: Bell YP-59A in flight. X and Y prefixed aircraft had rounded vertical stabilizers and wingtips
while the production A and B models had squared surfaces. The YP-59A can be distinguished from the
XP-59A because Ys had nose armament.
Below: Test pilot Jack Woolams prepares for another test flight in the YP-59A Airacomet. The 13
service test YP-59As had a more powerful engine than their predecessors, but the improvement in
performance was negligible, with top speed increased by only 5mph and a reduction in the time they
could be used before an overhaul was needed. Two YP-59A Airacomets (42-108778 and 42-100779)
were also delivered to the US Navy where they were evaluated as the ‘YF2L-1’ but were quickly found
completely unsuitable for carrier operations.
BELL P-59 AIRACOMET 77
78 UNITED STATES
began to enter service in late 1944 with 12 Right: Left to right: Designer Clarence ‘Kelly’
pre-production YP-80As. Four were sent to Johnson, test pilot Tony LeVier, and an
unidentified man with the Lockheed XP-80A
Europe for operational testing, two to England
prototype ‘Gray Ghost’. This aircraft was lost
and two to the 1st Fighter Group at Lesina on a test flight on 20 March 1945, although
Airfield, Italy, where they saw limited service Tony LeVier escaped. Newly promoted to chief
flying reconnaissance missions. However, engineering test pilot to replace Burcham, LeVier
when test pilot Maj Frederic Borsodi was bailed out when one of the engine’s turbine
killed demonstrating YP-80A 44-83026 at RAF blades broke, causing structural failure in the
aircraft’s tail. LeVier landed hard and broke his
Burtonwood on 28 January 1945, the YP-80A
back, but returned to the test programme after
was temporarily grounded. six months of recovery.
Eventually, an initial production order was
placed for 344 P-80As and a total of 83 had Below: The straight-wing design of the P-80
been delivered by the time World War 2 came meant that it was quickly superseded in front-
line service by swept-wing jets, but not before
to an end, most assigned to the 412th Fighter
it had played a major role in introducing jet
Group at Muroc Army Air Field. Production operations to the pilots of the USAF.
continued after the war, although wartime
plans for 5,000 were quickly reduced to 2,000.
A total of 1,714 single-seat F-80A, F-80B, F-80C,
and RF-80s were manufactured by the end of
production in 1950.
Although the P-80 did not see air-to-air
combat in World War 2, the timely arrival of the
Shooting Star by Lockheed set the stage for the
aircraft’s early dominance during the Korean
War as America’s front-line fighter. A highlight
of the type’s service record occurred on
8 November 1950, when Lt Russ Brown, flying
an F-80C of the 16th Fighter Interceptor
Squadron, shot down a North Korean MiG-15
in the first all-jet air-to-air combat. While the
Shooting Star helped usher in the ‘jet age’ in the
USAF, it was soon outclassed by the appearance
of the ‘next-generation’ of swept-wing transonic
aircraft. But the story of this ground-breaking
jet did not end there… the two-seat TF-80C,
first flown on 22 March 1948, became the basis
for the T-33 trainer, of which a staggering 6,557
were produced.
Lockheed P-80
Shooting Star
Engine:
1 x General Electric
J33-GE-11 turbojet
Power: 3,850lb thrust
Length: 34ft 6in (10.5m)
Wingspan: 38ft 10in (11.83m)
Height: 11ft 4in (3.45m)
Loaded weight: 14,000lb (6,350kg)
Speed: 558mph (898km/h)
Max range: 1,440 miles (2,317km)
Armament: 6 x 0.50in machine guns
McDonnell FD Phantom
T
he McDonnell FD Phantom was the On New Year’s Eve 1942, the US Navy Bureau a company that had only been founded in
first all-jet aircraft to operate from the of Aeronautics called James S. McDonnell, July 1939 and which had little experience of
deck of a US aircraft carrier, and the founder of McDonnell Aircraft Corp, offering the working with the US Navy. The aircraft’s concept
first jet fighter to serve with both the Navy company a contract to design and build the first was conservative, featuring a straight wing, a
and Marines. With a top speed of 500mph, American jet fighter capable of taking off from tailplane with dihedral mounted high to clear
according to James S. McDonnell it would and landing on an aircraft carrier. The US Navy the engine exhaust and two Westinghouse
‘appear and disappear like an apparition’. wanted a single-seat, jet-propelled, low-wing turbojets giving just 1,160lb thrust each.
He was not entirely wrong, though not monoplane. The resulting FD Phantom was Just over two years later, on 26 January 1945,
necessarily for the reasons he hoped. very much a ‘clean sheet’ design by McDonnell, Woodward ‘Woody’ Burke piloted the XFD-1
MCDONNELL FD PHANTOM 85
FD-1 Phantom
Engine: 2 x Westinghouse J30
Power: 1,600lb thrust each
Wingspan: 40ft 9in (12.42m)
Length: 38ft 9in (11.81m)
Height: 14ft 2in (4.31m)
prototype on its first flight at Lambert Field in St Above: The first of a dynasty. The McDonnell Max T/O weight: 12,030lb (5,460kg)
Louis, MO. The XFD-1 was still in development XFD-1 Phantom fighter during early flight trials. Ceiling: 43,000ft (13,100m)
when World War 2 ended, but the US Navy Max. speed: 480mph (770km/h) at
pressed forward with the programme. The XFD-1, later redesignated the FH-1 sea level
The aircraft’s greatest moment of fame Phantom, ushered in a new era of naval Armament: 4 x 0.50in machine guns
occurred on the morning of 21 July 1946, when in nose
aviation. McDonnell Aircraft produced 62
the XFD-1 Phantom roared 400ft (120m) down FH-1s powered by two Westinghouse J30s
the deck of the USS Franklin D. Roosevelt, a then- offering 1,600lb. VF-17A was chosen as the be the only US Navy operator of the type,
recently commissioned US Navy aircraft carrier. first Phantom squadron, and received aircraft although USMC squadron VMF-122 received the
The Phantom’s pilot, Lt Cdr James T. Davidson, from the McDonnell line from July 1947. Phantom from 1947.
climbed quickly port side, circled the carrier When it completed carrier qualification trials The Phantom proved the concept and
and then landed. It marked the first take-off and aboard USS Saipan in May 1948, VF-17A was developed techniques that would be employed
landing of a jet-powered aircraft from the deck unquestionably the first jet fighter-equipped by later US Navy fighter types, but was quickly
of a US aircraft carrier. carrier-based squadron in the world. It would superseded by newer types.
86 UNITED STATES
Bell XP-83
Engine: 2 x General Electric
J33-GE-5 turbojets
Bell XP-83
W
Power: 4,000lb thrust each
ith the war in Europe signalling requested Bell to design a long-range fighter
Length: 44ft 10in (13.67m)
the need for long-range escort and formally awarded a contract for two
Wingspan: 53ft 0in (16.15m)
fighters, the USAAF tasked Bell to prototypes on 31 July 1944. Bell had been
Height: 15ft 3in (4.65m)
build a larger, longer-legged jet fighter. The working on its ‘Model 40’ interceptor design
Loaded weight: 24,090lb (10,930kg)
result was the Bell XP-83, a bulky machine since 1943 and engineer Charles Rhodes was
Speed: 522mph (840km/h)
that first flew during World War 2, but did not tasked with redesigning it as a long-range
Max range: 2,050 miles (3,300km)
proceed beyond prototype development. escort fighter. Retaining the general layout of
with drop tanks
Owing to their high fuel consumption, early the earlier P-59 Airacomet, the two General
Armament: 6 x 0.6in (15.2mm)
machine guns jet fighters suffered from a short range and Electric J33-GE-5 turbojet engines were located
endurance. In March 1944, the USAAF in each wing root, which left the large fuselage
BELL XP-83 87
free for fuel tanks and armament. The fuselage based on anticipated firepower needs for the Above: The Bell XP-83 was a prototype escort
was of all-metal semi-monocoque design. The planned invasion of Japan. Modified tailpipes, fighter designed by Bell Aircraft during World
War 2. It first flew in 1945 but it was soon eclipsed
armament was to be six 0.5in machine guns in angled outwards, resolved the heat/buckling
by more advanced designs.
the nose. problem and a revised tailfin was fitted to
Making its maiden flight on 25 February improve stability. One unique characteristic
1945, the first XP-83 proved underpowered was the XP-83’s refusal to ‘slow down’ due to newly independent USAF turned to the North
and suffered from directional instability. The its aerodynamic shape and lack of air brakes; American F-82 Twin Mustang and the XP-83
proximity of the two low-slung powerplants test pilots were forced to fly very long and flat project was cancelled. The redesignated XF-83
caused hot exhaust gases to buckle the tail- landing approaches. soldiered on as a flying testbed for new
plane unless, during run-ups, fire trucks were Except with respect to range, which was technology. The first machine was assigned to a
used to play streams of water over the rear a formidable 2,050 miles (3,300km) with ramjet engine test programme. On 4 September
fuselage! The second XP-83 was completed underwing drop-tanks, the Bell XP-83 offered 1947 a ramjet caught fire and flames spread
with a slightly different bubble canopy and no improvement over the Lockheed F-80 to the wing. Pilot Chalmers ‘Slick’ Goodlin and
extended nose to accommodate six 15.2mm Shooting Star then already in production. engineer Charles Fay, bailed out safely but the
guns, the increase in barrel diameter being For the post-war fighter-escort role, the Bell XF-83 had made its last flight.
88 UNITED STATES
Northrop XP-79B
A
rguably the most innovative, but proposed a rocket-powered flying wing with first two XP-79s that were to be powered by
deeply flawed, jet aircraft built a span of only 32ft. The pilot was to fly it in a them. The USAAF did, however, consent to
during World War 2 did not originate prone position, the rationale being that such completion of the third prototype, which used
in Germany, but the US. Jack Northrop had a posture would make him less vulnerable two Westinghouse 19B axial-flow jet engines
a penchant for flying wings and when he to G-forces and raise his ‘blackout threshold’ with 1,345lb thrust. Like its rocket-powered
decided to pair his designs with rocket and beyond normal limits. Although the resulting precursor, the jet-powered version, designated
then jet technology, the result was always MX-334 was eventually viewed as a dead end, XP-79B, was essentially a wing, with the pilot
going to be radical. But even more radical, much research data had been culled from it, lying on his stomach between the two jet
was a proposed method for it to down evolving into the far more feasible XP-79. engines. His head protruded into an acrylic-
enemy aircraft. The clue was in its nickname, In January 1943, a contract for three plastic windshield fitted with an armour glass
the ‘Flying Ram’. prototypes was issued by the USAAF, each of section. An overhead hatch gave him entry to
The fighter that eventually became the which was to be powered by an Aerojet rocket and, if necessary, a hasty exit from, the cabin.
Northrop XP-79B had an astonishing parallel engine with 2,000lb of thrust. Developmental As radical as the XP-79’s all-wing configuration
development to the Me 163. It began in 1942 problems with the proposed Aerojet engine, looked, its structure was equally unusual.
when Northrop convinced the US Army Air and the unlikelihood of its being able to keep The airframe was made of heavy-gauge
Force (USAAF) that he could build a fighter the aircraft airborne for more than 30 minutes, magnesium. The leading-edge skin was 0.75in
that could approach the speed of sound. He led to the cancellation of the rockets and the thick; reinforcing steel armour plate of 0.25in
NORTHROP XP-79B 89
packs. Reaching an altitude of 40,000ft, the stipulated that the fighter should accommodate suddenly went wrong during one such turn,
‘Flying Ram’ would then dive into the formation four 0.50in Browning machine guns outboard and degenerated into a nose-down spin. Crosby
of enemy aircraft at an estimated speed of up of the jet engines. Neither the guns nor the finally judged it impossible to regain control
to 547mph and clip their wing or tail surfaces cockpit pressurisation system were destined to of the aircraft and after jettisoning the escape
with its own reinforced wings. Common sense be installed in the prototype. hatch tried to leap clear, only to be struck by the
finally prevailed when the XP-79B order also Painted white overall and given the serial wildly gyrating wing. Crosby fell to his death, his
number 43-32437, the prototype XP-79B was parachute unopened. The XP-79B slammed into
Below: Test pilot Harry Crosby demonstrates the small size and two escape hatches of the MX-334.
92 UNITED STATES
Above: The prototype of the XB-43. A first flight running caused damage to the airframe that
was finally recorded on 17 May 1946, but by put off the first flight by another seven months.
this time it became one of many promising
The first XB-43 (44-61508) finally took off on its
programmes that fell under the axe of the
massive military drawdown that followed the maiden flight on 17 May 1946, with test pilot
end of World War 2. Bob Brush and engineer Russell Thaw in the
cockpit. Performance was generally satisfactory,
Left: The honour of being America’s first jet but the aircraft was somewhat underpowered.
bomber fell to the Douglas XB-43 Jetmaster, However, by this time, the USAAF had already
a rather awkward aircraft that looked like the
decided against ordering the B-43 into
compromise that it was. Circumstances meant
that it never progressed beyond prototype stage. production as it now favoured a four-engined
rather than a twin-engined configuration for
while the dorsal fin was enlarged), retractable its future jet bombers. The XB-43 programme
tricycle undercarriage, and two-man cockpit would still continue, but now it would be
arrangement. Two versions were planned, a relegated to the status of a flying testbed. The
bomber version with a transparent nose and a first prototype was eventually cannibalised
maximum bombload of 8,000lb and an attack for its useful parts to serve the second (s/n
version with 16 forward-firing 0.50in machine 44-61509), which managed a successful test life
guns and 35 5in rockets. Both versions were to until December of 1953.
be fitted with a remotely-controlled, radar-
Above: The Jetmaster featured an unusual twin cockpit arrangement giving it a bug-eyed appearance.
A single canopy was planned for production models, but orders were not forthcoming and the
programme cancelled.
Right: The second XB-43 prototype had a relatively successful career as an engine testbed and was not
retired until 1953. It was kept airworthy by cannibalising the first XB-43, which had been damaged in
an accident on 1 February 1951.
Below: During flight trials, the Plexiglas nose cracked due to temperature changes, and had to be
replaced by a plywood cone.
96 USSR
Bereznyak-Isayev BI-1
D
uring World War 2, the Soviet Air initials of its designers. Although the resulting The undercarriage was of the ‘tail-dragger’
Force was concerned that it was aircraft was of rather compact proportions, it arrangement and retractable under the aircraft.
lagging behind in the development was to be armed with a battery of four 14.5mm As progress on the Dushkin D-1A-1100
of rocket and jet powered aircraft. Therefore, heavy machine guns. Its fuselage would be liquid-fuelled rocket motor was slow, prototype
in July 1940, work was begun on a high- streamlined and well-rounded for aerodynamic BI-1 first flew as a glider to test its aerodynamic
speed fighter benefitting from rocket or efficiency. The cockpit was fitted forward efficiency, to help prove that the airframe
ramjet propulsion. Following the German of amidships and the nose section covered design was sound and to improve on some of
invasion in June of 1941, the design team, over in a pointed nose assembly. The rocket its inherent weaknesses.
headed by engineers Alexander Bereznyak propulsion system would sit in the aft section During October 1941, the development
and Aleksei Isayev, was given just 35 days of the fuselage which forced a raised fuselage facility was evacuated to the Ural mountains
to come up with a viable platform. Thus was spine. As the propulsion system utilised a and it was not until April 1942 that BI-1 was
born the the Bereznyak-Isayev BI, a rocket- liquid propellant, no air intake was required.
Below: The bullet-shaped Bereznyak-Isayev BI
propelled, short-range defence fighter. The tail rudder extended over and under the
was the Soviet Union’s first rocket-powered
The new design was designated ‘BI’ for aft fuselage with the usual horizontal stabiliser aircraft. For testing during the winter period, the
Blizhnii Istrebitel (close-range fighter), but mid-mounted. This tailplane also fitted a smaller standard undercarriage was removed and it was
as luck would have it, this also matched the set of vertical planes at its outboard ends. fitted with skids.
BEREZNYAK-ISAYEV BI-1 97
SUBSCRIBE
AND SAVE
www.aeroplanemonthly.com
FREE GIFT CARD
WITH EVERY SUBSCRIPTION
E • SUBSCRIBE AND SAVE • SUBSCRIBE AND SAVE •
GREAT SUBSCRIPT ION OFFERS FROM
www.flypast.com www.aviation-news.co.uk
1061/17
2 E A S Y W AY S T O PAY
1062/17