Carbonatites Krishnamurthy
Carbonatites Krishnamurthy
Carbonatites of India
P. Krishnamurthy
Formerly Atomic Minerals Directorate for Exploration and Research (AMD), Department of Atomic Energy, Begumpet,
Hyderabad - 500 016, India
E-mail: krisviji @gmail.com
INTRODUCTION Eastern Ghat Mobile belt (EGMB) and the Southern Granulite
The Amba Dongar, carbonatite-nephelinite association, as part Terrain (SGT) and the Carbonatites of Andhra Pradesh (AP),
of the Upper Cretaceous, Deccan Volcanic Province (DVP), was Northern Tamil Nadu (NTN), and Kerala.
the first carbonatite complex discovered in India by Sukheswala and The EGMB trends NE-SW along the eastern India coast in AP
Udas (1963). This discovery came as a sequel to AMD’s detailed and Odhisa (see Figure 2 inset) and swerves to ENE-WSW in NTN.
They contain the high-grade granulite facies rocks comprising of the the migmatites and charnockites along the break-in slope that
charnockite series, the khondalites and granite gneisses. They occur follows the Kerala-Tamil Nadu border, hosts the Munnar
to the south and southeast of the charnockite-noncharnockite boundary and Khambamettu alkaline carbonatite complex (KAC) which occur
of Fermor (1936), later recognised as the Dharwar craton-charnockite at the intersection of NNW-SSE (Achankoil shear) and NE-SW
mobile belt boundary (CCMB) in southern India (Ramakrishnan and structures (and includes four separate intrusive phases, namely:
Vaidyanadhan, 2008). The boundary between the belt has been 1. Syenite-quartz-monzonite as the first phase, 2. Pyroxenite
established as a broad zone of intense faulting, shearing and thrusting 3. carbonatite and 4. Syenite, the final phase. Among the felsic units,
in which the charnockite terrain had been uplifted and over-thrusted medium to very coarse grained, pinkish, quartz monzonite is the
on to the craton (Radhakrishna, 1968). This zone, along with the dominant rock unit (Renjit et al., 2016 and references therein).
Narmada-Son belt, has also been recognised recently as an important
Proterozoic orogen in the Indian sub-continent with numerous Narmada-Son Rift Zone
occurrences of syenite and carbonatite-alkaline rock complexes The E-W to ENE-WSW trending Narmada–Son suture or rift
(Leelanandam et al. 2006; Chetty, 2017; see Figure 1). It can be seen zone has been recognised as a major tectonic lineament of great
that the belt of syenite dominated carbonatite complexes in NTN (Nos. significance in Indian geology (Crawford, 1978; Murthy and Mishra,
1-6) and in AP (Nos. 8-12) are confined to this belt. Based on DSS 1981; Naidu, 2012 and references therein). The Amba Dongar and the
and reflections in the zone between 34-46 km below the craton, the Siriwasan carbonatite complexes occur about 5-8 km to the north of
boundary between these two provinces has been considered as a the Narmada rift. The eastern continuity of the NSRZ continues to
suture/ volcanic arc involving subduction of the northern, cratonic the ENE and splays in to the NSNF zone and the NSSF zone, the
plate dipping to south (Vijaya Rao et al., 2016). latter forming the southern boundary of the Chhota Nagpur gneissic
complex. Along this or in close proximity to its south the Beldhi
Western Ghat Faults carbonatite is located besides Kutni and others. This structure seems
The NNW-trending faults in the Khambametu foot hills, within to continue further east across the Bengal basin and join the major
CARBONATITE TYPES
Petrological Associations and Grouping of Carbonatites
of India
Based on the field relations and associated rock types,
the carbonatite-alkaline rock complexes of India can be
classified into two major groups, namely subvolcanic-
volcanic and plutonic types (see Table 1). The rare, kimberlite-
lamproite-carbonatite association and the lamprophyre-
carbonatite association are also included in these groups.
Some potential areas, based on existing data, for locating
possible carbonatite bodies (both surface and sub-
surface) are also indicated in the Figure 1 and listed in the
Table 1.
Fig.2. Structural relations of the carbonatites of Tamil Nadu along the Koratti
fault zone indicating the syenite and dunite plugs with spatially related carbonatites Classification and Nomenclature of Carbonatite Types
(after Borodin et al., 1971 and Grady, 1971). The Udaiyapatti carbonatite is located Carbonatites are defined in the IUGS system of
c. 10 km from Salem. The inset indicates the the Eastern Ghat mobile belt (EGMB) classification as igneous rocks composed of more than 50
and the alkaline complexes in them as also in the Southern Granulite Terrain modal per cent primary carbonate (sensu lato) and less than
20 wt.% SiO2 (Le Maître, 2002). Based on the CaO - MgO -
(SGT). F-F as in Figure 1. EDC – Eastern Dharwar Craton. (Modified after
(FeO + Fe2O3 + MnO) plot, three main types, namely calcio-
Krishnamurthy, 1988, Fig. 12).
(sovite), magnesio-(beforsite) and ferro- have also been
recognised. The relative abundances of the three main types
faults along the southern Meghalaya plateau and continues further of carbonatites from the different complexes of India are shown in
in to Assam. Figure 3.
Arvalli Rift and Related Structures in Rajasthan Silico-carbonatites vs. Siliceous Carbonatites
In the north-western part of India, in Rajasthan, several major The term silico-carbonatite was coined by Brogger (1921) for
lineaments and fault/shear zone have been recognised (Chetty, 2017 carbonatites that contain silicate minerals such as phlogopite,
and references therein). These include, from NW to SE, the EPSZ, pyroxene, ampbhibole and others. The term, however, has been used
PSZ, KSZ and the DSZ (see Figure 1) and the carbonatites (Nos.2, 10 by Srivastava (1997, 1998), especially for the SiO2-rich samples of
and 11) appear to be related to them. The NW-SE trending Jaisalmer - carbonatites from both the Samalpatti and Amba Dongar carbonatite
Barwani Lineament also appears to be related the Sarnu-Dandali- complex. The Amba Dongar samples, especially the brecciated and
Kamthai carbonatite bodies. tuffaceous types, termed as silico-carbonatites by Srivastava (1997)
appear to be silicified by hydrothermal solutions carrying Si, F, Ba
Assam-Meghalaya Plateau and others. They contain anhedral quartz (greater than 10% and
The Assam–Meghalaya plateau is considered to be an uplifted other rock fragments) including cherty silica (c.f. Srivastava, 1997;
horst-like structure bordered by the Dauki fault to the south and the Figure 5a and Table 2). In all probability they are members of the
Brahmaputra trough zone to the north. The development of these silicified carbonatite suite. Recent studies on the carbonatites of
structures was largely related to the northward migration of India after Samalpatti area had also indicated that these anomalous, SiO2-rich
the fragmentation of the Gondwana land and its subsequent collision carbonatite types with very low abundances of REE, Y, Ba, Sr, Nb
with the Asian continent during Jurassic-Cretaceous and the Cenozoic and P have been explained as contaminated types from crustal
period (Evans, 1964; Desikachar, 1974; Balakrishnan et al., 2009). sources including siliceous skarns (Schleicher et al., 1998; Vladykin
The Sung Valley, Swangkre, Samchampi and the Barpung alkaline et al., 2008; Ackerman et al., 2017). Thus this aspect of silico- and
complexes, with carbonatites (except Barpung) occur spatially close silicified- carbonatites must be made clear in carbonatite complexes
to large number of lineaments and fractures either along them or at of India.
the intersection of such lineaments (see Figure 1). There is also a
suggestion from the spatial disposition of the carbonatites of Meghalaya PETROGRAPHY AND MINERALOGY
and Assam that they are also in structural continuity of the major Petrographic and mineralogical studies constitute an important
Narmda-Son lineament and its easterly extension. aspect in understanding the evolution of the different carbonatite types
from a given complex and also help in elucidating their genetic relation
Central Indian Suture (CIS) and the North Singhbhum Mobile to the associated alkaline-silicate rocks (Heinrich, 1966; Kapustin,
Belt (NSMB) 1980). Recent studies have further emphasized the need to study in
The central Indian suture (CIS) along the northern boundary of detail the petrographic and mineralogical aspects since they have an
the Dongargarh Supergroup and its easterly continuity in the NSMB important bearing on understanding the mineralisations that are
Carbonatite complex and age** Associated rock types and emplacement sequence References
1. Amba Dongar, Baroda Dt., Gujarat Nephelinite-phonolite; earliest phase of nephelinite and phonolite Sukheswala and Udas, 1963; Viladkar, 1981,;
(Figure 1.1) plugs followed by carbonatite breccia, intruded in turn by the 1986, 2012, 2018; Viladkar and Dulski, 1986;
65.0±0.3 40Ar-39Ar sovite ring-dyke. Ankeritic carb. plugs intrude the sovite ring; Srivastava, 1997; Gwalani et al. 1993;
(Ray and Pande, 1999) K-, Na-K & Na-fenite well developed in the nephelinite and Simmoneti et al., 1995; Doroshkevich et al.,
sandstone xenoliths. Hydrothermal fluorite and silicification 2009; Ray and Shukla, 2004;
1a. Siriwasan- Nakal, Baroda Dt., 11 km long sill of carbonatite breccia (intruding the Bagh Sukheswala and Avasia, 1972; Sukheswala and
Gujarat (Figure 1.1a) sandstone) with pockets of aegirine sovite; tinguaite, Borges, 1975; Sethna and Borges, 1980; Viladkar
70±Ma ; Pb-Pb (Veena Krishna, 2000) trachyte; sodic fenites and Avasia, 1995; Viladkar and Gittins, 2016;
10. Mer-Mundwara, Sirohi Dt., Rajasthan. Theralite, melteigite, pyroxenite, syenite with veins of Subramaniam and Rao, 1972; 1977; Chakraborty
68.53±0.16 40Ar-39Ar (Basu et al., 1993) carbonatite (sovite) in pyroxenite and gabbro and Bose, 1978; Narayan Das et al., 1982;
80-84 Ma and 102 - 110 Ma from associated rocks
(Pandey et al., 2016)
11. Sarnu-Dandali- Kamthai, Barmer Dt., Melanephelinite-alkali pyroxenite-melteigite-ijolite-teschenite, Narayan Das et al., 1978; Chandrasekaran et al.,
Rajasthan. tinguaite and phonolite dykes along with carbonatite dykes 1990; Chandrasekaran and Srivaastava, 1992;
68.57±0.08 40Ar-39Ar (Basu et al., 1993) (alvikites and ferrocarbonatite) and veins. Bhushan and Chandrasekaran, 2002;
66.3±0.4 Ma (Sheth et al., 2017)
15. Swangre- Jasra, West Khasi Hills, Dt., Veins of carbonatite in gabbro and granite Nambiar and Golani, 1985;
Meghalaya.
105.2±0.5 Ma U-Pb, (Heaman et al., 2002)
20. Chhaktalo, Jabua Dt., Madhya Pradesh. Carbonate-rich rocksat Chaktalo occur as E-W trending dyke- Hari et al., 1998; Khandelwal et al., 1997;
Khatarkehda and Bakhatgargh are localities in like bodies within the Deccan ‘basalts and show a structurally Note: Trace element concentrations are low
adjoining areas of Jabua and Dhar Dts., of controlled mode of emplacement. Modal composition shows compared to average carbonatites (see Table 4).
Madhya Pradesh. calcite as the dominant mineral ( c. 90%). Ankerite, apatite, Some of the δ13C - 1.74 to -2.8 ‰) and δ18O
altered olivine, augite and opaques account for the remaining (+ 12.75 to + 13.35‰) fall within the “igneous
percentage. carbonatites”. Xenoliths of ‘basaltic andesite’ in
which the andesine is altered to calcite (c.f. Hari
et al., 1998, p.591)
21. Mahdawa and others, south of Narmada, E-W to ENE-WSW trending (c. 10 to 100 m thick) dykes of Sant et al., 1991
Dhulia Dt., Maharashtra alvikitic carbonatites, variably silicified and ferruginated with
xenoliths of fine-grained porphyritic nepbelinite and basalt.
22. Hingoria, Baroda Dt., Gujarat Calcite-ankerite-fluorite veins within basalts. Also calcite–dykes Udas and Krishnamurthy, 1968;
trending ENE-WSW as part of a potassic alkali suite of Rajpipla. Krishnamurthy and Cox, 1980;
Lacks the diagnostic suite of carbonatite-type trace elements.
Carbonatite complex and age** Associated rock types and emplacement sequence References
12. Sung Valley, Jaintia Hills Dt., Meghalaya. Alkali pyroxenite, peridotite, dunite, ijolite./mellilotite, Chattopadhyay and Hashmi, 1984; Krishnamurthy,
(Figure 1.12) ne-syenite and cone-sheet/or dyke- like bodies of carbonatite 1985;Viladkar et al., 1994; Sheik Yusuf and
(a) 107.2 ±0.8/ 40Ar-39Ar (phlogopite from within pyroxente. Apatite-magnetite bands or pockets along Saraswat, 1977; Srivastava et al., 2005; 2019;
carbonatite and a WR pyroxenite) (Ray et al., 1999) with Na and K fenites after pyroxenites. Complex emplaced Melluso et al., 2005; Sadiq et al. 2014;
(b) 106±11 / Rb-Sr isochron (carbonatite and into the Proterozoic quartizes and gneisses of Shillong
pyroxenite WR and phlogopite from carbonatite) Series
(Ray et al., 2000)
18. Samchampi, Karbi-Anglong Dt., Assam. Syenite and syenitic fenite in the core of the complex Dhrendra Kumar et al. 1989; Nag etal. 1993;
~105 K-Ar of lamprophyres (Sarkar et al., 1996) (c. 60% ) into which, perovskite and Ti-magnetite-bearing Saha et al. 2010; Saha et al., 2017; Hoda and
bodies have been emplaced. Ijolite-melteigite-pyroxenite in Krishnamurthy, 2014, 20162017;
the northern part as incomplete arcuate ring? Secondary
phosphatic rock bodies along the SE and E periphery of the
complex. Carbonatites of varied dimensions.
17. Udaiyapatti-Chhinnagoundan Palayam, Calcite-ankerite-benstonite bearing carbonatite veins within Senthil Kumar et al., 2001, 2003;
Salem Dt., Tamil Nadu charnockites and gneisses
19. Beldih (Purulia carbonatite), Purulia Dt., Subsurface veins of carbonatite from bore holes at Kutni Basu, 1993; Chakrabarty and Sen, 2010;
Paschim Bengal. and Medinitanr Basu and Bhattacharya, 2014;
748±24 Ma from pyrochlore in a Ne-syenite by Carbonatite, alkali pyroxenite- apatite-magnetite rock within Singh et al., 1977;
EPMA (Basu and Bhattacharya, 2014) phyllites and schists. Apatite rich -carbonatite (sovite) bodies
emplaced amidst the above rocks. Sushina alkali syenite
gneiss occurs spatially close by.
Group 2. Plutonic: Carbonatites as Minor Veins and Dykes within Syenite/Ne-syenite /Alkali Granite Complexes
8. Elchuru,* Prakasam Dt., Andhra Pradesh. Alkali granite, syenite and veins of carbonatite Rao, 1976; Bose et al., 1976; Ratnakar and
Leelanandam, 1989;
9. Kunavaram,* Khammam Dt., Andhra Pradesh Nepheline syenite, syenite with veins of carbonatite Sharma et al., 1971; Bose et al., 1976
13. Munnar,* Central Kerala Alkali granite and syenite with veins and patches of carbonatite? Nair et al., 1984; Santhos et al., 1987;
14. Khambamettu,* Madurai Dt., Tamil Nadu; Carbonatite, qz-monzonite, syenite, pyroxenite Balakrishnan et al., 1985; Burtseva et al., 2013;
2410 Ma; (Renjith et al. 2016) Renjith et al., 2016;
Carbonatite-Kimberlite-Lamproite Association
7. Khaderpet pipe, Anumpalle cluster of the A an unusual diamondiferous carbonatite-kimberlite clan rock Smith et al. 2013;
Wajrakarur kimberlite field, Cuddapah Dt., (clast-supported lithic breccia and crystal lithic tuff/ alnoite
Andhra Pradesh. or aillikite -like.). The sovite phase has up to 95% calcite, with
mineralogical gradations from an olivine-rich ultramafic to a
calcite-dominant rock resembling pure carbonatite. Diamonds
recovered from both the carbonatite and kimberlite phases after
caustic fusion have similar morphology.
24. Chitrangi Region, Mahakoshal Carbonate ocellae in aillikite Srivastava, 2013;
Supracrustal belt, Uttar Pradesh
23. Pachcham Islands, Northern Kutch, Camptonite dyke contains kaersutite phenocrysts that contain Ray et al. 2014;
Gujarat immiscible melt/glass phases as melt inclusions of two types –
calciocarbonatite and alkaline silicate melts.
25. Ariyalur, Tiruchirapalli Dt., Tamil Nadu Suspected, based on higher abundances of Ba, F, Sr in the Grady, 1971;
soils of phosphatic nodules
26. Murud-Janjira, Ratnagiri Dt., Maharashtra N-S trending (c.1 km x c.100 – 200 m ) dyke/stock-like body Sethna and Christopher D’sa. 1991;
of ijolite, (grading at places to melteigite to pyroxenite in local
patches) with veinlets of calcite ( < 1 cm in thickness) which
in thin sections show distinct association of calcite with augite.
Accessory amounts of perovskite (?), pyrochlore (?) occur as
tiny inclusions in grains of pyroxene. Iron oxide is fairly
ubiquitous. A nepheline syenite dyke ‘occurs close to the
northern portion of the ijolite
*Numbers refer to the localities shown in Figure 1. **Age data from Ray and Ramesh (2006, Table 1, p.20) and others as indicated.
associated with carbonatite complexes, especially those related to the Mineral orientation due to flowage is another important feature
main phase as also during fenitisation and the later hydrothermal shown by several Indian carbonatites, both at the outcrop and in thin
stage (Elliot et al., 2018 and references therein). sections, especially Amba Dongar, Sevathur, Sung Valley and others
(Viladkar, 1981; Krishnamurthy, 1977; 1985; 1988; Sesha Sai and
Petrography and Structures Sengupta, 2017)
Heterogeneity is one of the main petrographic features of the
carbonatites, both in terms of flow structure, texture and modal Mineralogy
mineralogy. Usually, several thin sections have to be studied for Reviews on the mineralogy of carbonatites have been provided by
discerning the accessory or minor minerals. Mineral banding and Heinrich (1966) and Kapustin (1980). The mineralogy of the different
clustering are common features, usually resulting from the distribution carbonatites of India are summarised in Table 2. It can be seen that
of apatite, magnetite, phlogopite, aegirine-augite, pyrochlore either the group as a whole shows the maximum diversity in terms of
alone or in combination of size and quantity. minerals contained in a single igneous rock type.
Fig.1.1. Geological map of Amba Dongar carbonatite complex. (Viladkar, Fig.1.2. Geological map of Newania carbonatite complex (after
1981, modified after Udas, 1965). Viladkar, 1981).
Fig.1.12. Geological map of the Sung Valley ultramafic–alkaline–carbonatite complex
(Srivatava et al., 2005 after Krishnamurthy, 1985). Nepheline syenite and melilitolites dykes
exposed around the villages Sung and Maskut are very small, hence not indicated in the
map.
Fig.1.4. Geological map of Samalpatti
Carbonates 1 3 4 5 16 2 10 12 14 19 11 15 18 13 20 9
Calcite E E E E E M E E E E E E E E E E
Dolomite M E E M E M E M M M
Siderite E M M E
Ankerite E E M M E M E
Benstonite M M-R E
Rhodochrosite M
Strontianite Tr M M
Magnesite
Oxides
Magnetite M M M M M M M M M M M M M
Hematite M M M M
Ilmenite M M M M
Rutile S
Ilmeno-rutile M M
Goethite M
Spinel S M
Perovskite R R
Silcates
Olivine M M M M M
Diopside M M M M M M
Aegirine-augite M M M M M M M
Acmite M
Arfvedsonite M M
Riebeckite M M M M
Ritcherite M M
Eckermanite M
Phlogopite M M M M M M M M M M M M
Biotite M M M M M M M M M M M
Muscovite M
Vermiculite M M
Sphene S S M M M A M M
Zircon S S M M
Zirconalite M
Allanite M M M
Albite R
Orthoclase M M R
Epidote M
Chlorite A
Ti-clinohumite M M
Humite M
Phosphates
Apatite M M M M M M M M M M M R M R M
Monazite M M M M M A M
Halides/Sulphates
Fluorite E
Barite E M M M E M M
Celestite M M
Anhydrite M
Cerite R?
Strengite M
Sulphides
Pyrite R R R R
Pyrrhotite R R R R M
Chalcopyrite R R R M R
Galena R R R R
Molybdenite
1. Amba Dongar and Siriwasan. 2. Newania. 3. Sevathur. 4. Samalpatti . 5. Pakkanadu. 9. Kunavaram. 10. Mer-Mundwara. 11. Sarnu-Dandali-Kamthai. 12. Sung Valley. 13. Munnar
14. Khambamettu. 15. Swangre. 16. Kollegal. 18. Samchampi-Samteran. 19. Beldih-Kutni. 20. Udaiyapatti-Chhinnagoundan Palayam. Samalpatti has in addition vesuvianite, wollostonite,
quartz and ort - orthoclase. Newania has tremolite and graphite. Samchampi has calzirtite, jirkelite and baddeleyite in minor to trace amounts (Viladkar et al., 2009). E - Essential, M -
Minor, A - Accessory, R - Rare and Tr - Traces
Fenites and Fenitisation features of fenitisation that can guide exploration for rare earths and
The term fenite was first introduced by Brögger (1921) to Nb, akin to those found as wall-rock alterations around deposits of
describe the leucocratic syenitic rocks of metasomatic origin Cu, Pb, Zn and others.
comprising 70-90% alkali feldspar, 15-25% aegirine and calcite, A striking feature that has been brought out by Elliot et al. (2018),
with accessory sphene and apatite, found around the Fen carbonatite is the extensive zone of fenitization (1-2 km wide) in meltiegite-
alkalic complex (Anderson, 1989). The term also includes, the ijolite-carbonatite complexes (e.g. Fen, Sokoli, and others)
metasomatism, on the older members of the carbonatite-alkaline compared to the narrow and thin (c. 100 m) zones in the
complex themselves (internal fenites) by the younger members of agpaitic, peralkaline, syenite and nepheline syenite complexes (e.g.
the complex that may include the different types of carbonatites. as Khibiny and Lovozero, Kola Peninsula, and Ilímaussaq, Greenland).
Mobilised (rheomorphic) and transported hybrid rocks were excluded Thus the dimensions of the fenitised or metasomatised zones, in
from this definition by Heinrich (1985) who provided a review on the alkaline rock complexes, in the absence of an exposed carbonatite
extremely diverse fenite types and metasomatism around alkline body, may indicate their genetic link to possible carbonatite-
complexes including carbonatites. Major reviews on fenites include related complexes compared to those agpaitic, syentic complexes that
those of Le Bas (2008) and the most recent one being by Elliot et al., lack carbonatites. Different types of fenites that have been studied
(2018; and references therein) wherein an attempt has been made to from carbonatite-alkaline rock complexes of India are given in
evaluate the nature of fenites and their genesis, so as identify specific Table 3.
Fig.4. Sr vs. Ba variations in some of the major carbonatite bodies of India (see Table 1 for sources of data for the different complexes).
Complex Country Rocks External fenites and fenites Internal fenites and types References
Amba Dongar Sandstones Sandstones to: Nephelinites (xenoliths in Dean et al. (1972); Sukheswala and
Basalts i. Microperthite+aegirine- augite (high temp. sovites) subjected to Viladkar (1981); Udas, 1970;
Dolerites deeper levels; sodic and sodic potassic types ). phlogopitisation Viladkar (1986); Viladkar (2015);
ii. Orthoclase(Or>90+ aegirine); low temp., Palmer and Jones, 1996;
shallow levels; potassic
iii. Mild nephelinisation of xenoliths of
diverse rocks.
Dolerites to:
i. basanitoids
Siriwasan-Nakal Sandstone Sandstone to albite and aegirine-bearing types; Sukheswala and Borges (1975)
Dominantly sodic Sethna and Borges (1981)
Sevathur Granite gneiss and i. Granitic gneiss to syenitic fenite (both sodic i. Pyroxenite to: Borodin et al. (1971)
charnockite and potassic types). a. pyroxene-biotite rock Krishnamurthy (1977)
with or without amphibole.
ii. Charnockite Group to: b. pyroxene-phlogopite- Sugavanam et al. (1976)
epidotised hornblende gneiss with riebeckite apatite-magnetite rock;
and arfvedsonite (epidote-amphibolite facies); ii.Development of vermiculite
sodic in pyroxenite
Samalpatti Hornblende gneiss Albitite and riebeckite veins; sodic types; i. Pyroxenites to: Subramanian et al. (1978)
may be reomorphic; aegirine-augite bearing types Viladkar and Subramanian (1995)
ii. Syenites albitised
Pakkanadu Migmatites i. Pyroxenites to aegirine- Rao et al. (1978)
augite bearing types;
Hogenakal Charnockitic gneiss Not noticed Pyroxenites to: Srinivasan (1977)
and granitoids i. pyroxene-biotite rock
ii. Pyroxene-phlogopite-
magnetite rock;
In carbonatites:
i. diopside and augite to
alkali ambhibole.
ii. Aegirine rim around biotite
Newania Granite gneiss Granite gneiss to: Viladkar (1981a)
i. repeated syenitic fenite with arfvedsonite?
(sodic and potassic)
Sung valley Quartzite Quartzites to: Pyroxenite to: Chattopadhyay and Hashmi (1984)
i. granitic and syenetic types i. aegirine-augite and potash Krishnamurthy (1985)
(sodic potassic and potassic) feldspar bearing types
ii. Pure potash feldspar veins with or ii. Extensive phlogopitisation
without aegirine
iii. Wollostonite-rich rocks with aegirine
augite and andradite
Samchampi Granite gneiss Granitic gneiss to: Pyroxenites to: Dhirendra Kumar et al. (1989);
i. syenitic types i. ijolitic types Hoda (2002)
Table 4. Representative analyses of carbonatites from different complexes of India (See Table 1 for location and references)
ADC-3 ADF-9 Siri.-2 Siri.-8 Sev-2 Sev-4 Sev-174 ICOFS1 Joggi191 H-46 Pak-204 KMB-2 KC-30 SD-1 M-18 Newa.2 Newa.4 Kamthai C/254 Mund.-9 SV Bheldi-5 LV30 TH-2
SiO2 7.82 9.14 7.32 5.07 1.49 3.66 0.01 5.13 0.07 0.2 8.03 8.27 0.57 0.18 9.99 1 0.2 1.47 3 1.5 0.46 2.14 4 10.3
TiO2 0.09 0.1 0.07 0.53 0.01 0.06 0.11 0.03 0.22 0.08 0.01 0.22 0.11 0.08 0 0.04 0.15 n.d 0.13 0.14 0.2 0.1
Al2O3 0.24 0.31 0.55 0.16 1.45 0.75 0.03 2.03 0.02 0.35 3.01 3.2 0.09 2.18 2.55 1.2 0 0.45 0.72 n.d 0.19 0.07 0.9 0.8
Fe2O3 2.92 8.04 3.56 11 1.8 12.79 0.99 0.18 5.66 Tr 2.62 5.84 1.77 13.78 0.08 3.3 12.3* 3.22 6.71 0.74 2.22 1.95 6.4 6.6
MnO 0.37 1.64 1.66 0.59 0.2 1.12 0.37 0.02 0.72 Tr 0.18 0.14 0.19 0.18 0.03 1.2 1.8 2.41 0.72 0.42 0.18 0.29 0.3 0.4
MgO 0.34 12.6 1.81 4.32 2.94 12.9 4.03 3.03 14.55 1.2 0.94 6.88 4.48 0.72 0.8 16.5 12.3 0.26 0.81 1.2 2.64 1.13 3.6 13.2
CaO 50.81 28.2 45.78 43.66 50.23 28.04 49.34 50.02 36.37 54.28 43.69 38.07 52.22 42.28 49.28 30.33 31 26.37 46.03 53.8 50.85 49.1 47.1 36.2
Na2O bd bd 0.05 0.24 0.3 1.31 0.06 0.22 0.13 0.14 0.68 0.02 0.08 0.02 0.5 0.09 0 0.18 0.84 0.2 0.04 0.21 0.3 0.3
K2O bd bd 0.02 0.07 0.21 0.19 0.39 0.01 0.11 1 1.32 0.01 0.02 0.58 0 0 0.17 0.8 0.2 0.12 0.01 0.1 0.2
P2O5 1.53 0.11 2.15 2.55 2.65 1.09 0.22 0.04 9.51 0.11 1.16 5.28 2.18 0.04 0.09 3.7 2.5 0.4 0.6 0.04 2.15 2.96 1.8 6.2
CO2 36.25 36.66 42.95 36.67 34.91 42.57 32.48 29.6 38.6 39.5 35.5 39.84
LOI 33.71 39.1 35.78 31.9 27.87 39.63 41.28 34.2 24.7
H2O+/- 0.32 0.56 0.5 0.04
Total 100 100.4 98.75 100.09 97.85 98.57 97.99 99 101.9 99.79 94.01 99.5 61.6 59.62 90.71 96.00 99.60 34.61 98.52 101.08 97.91 99.28 99 99
Nd 1110 1065 224 6.2 587 1802 390 592 57 455 21800 172 374 54 10
Sm 150 123 89 22.4 45.7 1.3 95.8 290 43.1 120 105 13 8.5 52.3 8.7 29 48
Eu 39 28 23 5.2 14.2 0.28 23.8 60.42 10.2 2.78 26 4.3 28.4 4.2 9 15 13
Gd 102 105 1.2 188.3 66 3085 22 34 32 20
Tb 14 8.8 10.6 2.3 5 0.17 7.1 16.97 2.2 9.2 7 1.2 1.1 5.7 0.7 3 4.5
Dy 67 34 0.87 72.27 30 2.2 13 19 13 2
Ho 12 5.5 0.2 8.24 5 2.1 3.81
Er 29 17 0.52 34.14 9 5.17 7.87
Tm 4 1.7 0.07 1.68 0.9 0.52 0.93
Yb 19 10 13.1 5 6.6 0.49 3.39 9 1.94 6.2 4.6 0.5 1.5 2.6 0.64 3.37 5.39 3 2
Lu 2.3 1.3 1.2 0.5 0.84 0.08 0.43 1.25 0.25 0.9 0.57 0.5 0.6 0.44 0.11 0.41 0.68
ΣREE 6227 9199 33.2 2475 2694 1030 815.6 1742 1573 744
Y 453 160 125 150 <5 25 96 5.5 97 202.3 32 119 17 10 10 105 50 53 54 88 58 34
Sc 13 15 11 23.5 1.8 9 11.71 0.53 11.7 16 1.79
JOUR.GEOL.SOC.INDIA, VOL.94, AUGUST 2019 Table 4. Contd...
Khader.538 MPC-42 Katarkh. Av Calcio-Carb. Av. Magnesio. Carb. Av. Ferro.-carb. Av. Samailov
Wt.%
SiO2 7.23 16.1 8.03 0—8.93 (116) 2.72 0.6—9.40 (50) 3.63 0.36—9 (57) 4.7
TiO2 0.03 0.38 0.22 0—1.09 (115) 0.15 0—1.98 (49) 0.33 0—2.3 (57) 0.42
Al2O3 0.36 2.1 1.12 0—6.89 (116) 1.06 0—4.41 (53) 0.99 0.01—5.6 (53) 1.46
Fe2O3 < 0.20 4.6 2.64 0—9.28 (97)** 2.25** 0—9.57 (48) 2.41** 0.46—17.84 (50) 7.44**
MnO 0.17 0.21 0.24 0—2.57 (119) 0.52 0.02—5.47 (54) 0.96 0.23—5.53 (57) 1.65
MgO 0.11 3.2 2.81 0—8.11 (122) 1.8 9.25—24.82 (54) 15.06 0.10—14.50 (58) 6.05
CaO 49.9 50.6 42.98 39.24—55.40 (118) 49.12 20.8—47 (53) 30.12 9.20—46.43 (58) 32.77
Na2O < 0.01 3.2 2.81 0—1.73 (102) 0.29 0—2.23 (44) 0.29 0.0—1.52 (46) 0.39
K2O 0.01 0.04 0.07 0—1.47 (105) 0.26 0—1.89 (44) 0.28 0.0—2.80 (51) 0.39
P2O5 1.15 0.05 4.48 0—10.41 (119) 2.1 0—11.3 (51) 1.9 0.0—11.56 (54) 1.97
CO2 37.4 21.58 35.24 11.02—47.83 (104) 36.64 16.93—47.88 (49) 36.81 20.56—41.81 (53) 30.74
LOI 38.1
H2O+/- 0—4.49 (78) 0.76 0.08—9.61 (36) 1.2 0.04—4.52 (35) 1.25
Total 97.02 99.25 100.64
ppm
Rb 0.64 4—35 (6) 14 2—80 (4) 31 Not given
Sr 873 69 94 0—5 (74)* 0.86% 0.06—1.50 (29) 0.69% 0.1—5.95 (34) 0.88% > 700
Ba 0.55% 78 0—3.29 (66) 0.34% 0.01—4.3 (32) 0.64% 0.02—20.6 (38) 3.25% > 250
Nb 66.5 < 20 < 20 1—15000 (43) 1204 10—3000 (18) 5691 10—5033 (17) 1292
Zr 20 179 61 4—2320 (33) 189 0—550 (14) 165 0—900 (13) 127
Hf 0.2
V 68 61 1548 0—300 (31) 80 7—280 (9) 89 56—340 (16) 191 > 20
Cr 20 84 51 2—479 (10) 13 2—175 (9) 55 15—135 (8) 62
Ni 20 72 20 5—30 (11) 18 21—60 (5) 35 10—63 (7) 26
Co 1 31 29 2—26 (12) 11 4—39 (9) 17 11—54 (7) 26
Zn 6 89 188 15—851 (10) 251 35—1800 (9) 606
Ta 0.3 0—0 (1) 5 4—34 (6) 21 1 0.09
Pb 163 121 < 10 30—108 (6) 56 30—244 (7) 89 46—400 (4) 217
Th 75 5—168 (13) 52 4—315 (11) 93 100—723 (13) 276
U 32.6 0.3—29 (10) 8.7 1—42 (13) 13 1—20 (16) 7.2
La 1350 29 < 100 90—1600 (31) 608 95—3655 (19) 764 95—16583 (15) 2666
Ce 2060 670 37 74—4152 (18) 1687 147—8905 (14) 2183 1091—19457 (8) 5125
Pr 168 50—389 (2) 219 1 560 141—1324 (4) 550
Nd 490 190—1550 (8) 883 222—1755 (6) 634 437—3430 (4) 1618
Sm 49.4 95—164 (2) 130 33—75 (6) 45 30—233 (4) 128
Eu 10.8 29—48 (2) 39 3—20 (6) 12 11—78 (4) 34
Gd 26.8 91—119 (2) 105 31—226 (4) 130
Tb 2.48 9—10 (2) 9 0.9—8 (6) 4.5 4—36 (4) 16
Dy 10.2 22—46 (2) 34 11—105 (4) 52
Ho 1.54 3—9 (2) 6 1—9 (4) 6
Er 2.4 1 4 3—35 (4) 17
Tm 2.65 1 1 1—52 (10) 0.03—3 (4) 1.8
Yb 1.5—12 (10) 5 1 9.5 1—16 (4) 15.5
Lu 0.38 1 0.7 0.08
REE 4473.53 > 500
Y 43.5 < 20 10 25—346 (16) 119 5—120 (13) 61 28—535 (9) 204
Sc 2 0.6—18 (7) 7 10—17 (3) 14 9—14 (2) 10
Note: Sr and Ba values in % denotes oxides; ** Values of FeO not given here. Index to analyses: Amba Dongar: ADC-3 & ADF-9, Chandra et al. (2017), Table 1; Siriwasan: Siri-2 & 8, Viladkar and Gittins (2016), Table 1;
Sevathur: Sev-2 & Sev-4: Krishnamurthy (1977), Table 1; Sev-174, Schleicher et al. (1998) Table 1; Samalpatti: ICOSF 1, Ackermann et al. 2(017), Table 1; Joggipatti: Jogi-191, Schleicher et al. (1998), Table 1; Hogenakal:
H-46, Pandit et al. (2002); Table 1b; Pakkanadu: Pak-204, Schleicher et al. (1998), Table 1; Khambamettu: KMB-2, Burtseva et al. (2013), Table 1; KC - 30, Renjith et al. (2016), Table 1; Udaiyapatti: SD - 1, Senthilkumar
et al. (2000), Table 6; Munnar: M-18, Santosh et al. (1987), Table 1; Newania: Newa - 2 & -4; Viladkar (1998), Table 6; Kamthai: No. 5, alvikite dyke, Viladkar (1998), Table 6; C/254, alvikite, Chandrasekaran and
Srivastava, (1992), Table 1; Mundwara: Mund-9, Subramaiam and Rao, 1977; Sung Valley: SV, average of 7, Srivastava et al. (2005), Table 3; Beldih: 5, Chakraborty and Sen (2010), Table 2; Samchampi: LV-30 & TH-2,
Hoda and Krishnamurthy (2017), Table 2; Khaderpet: 538, Smith et al. (2013), Table 1; MPC-42, carbonatite?, Hari et al. (1998), Table 1; Katarkh. Av. Khandelwal et al. (1997), Table 3. Range and Average of Calcio-,
127
Magnesio- and Ferro-carbonatites from Woolley and Kempe, 1989, Table 1.1 and 1.2. Typical values of Sr, Ba, V and REE from Samailov (1991, p.252).
Fig,5. REE variations in some of the major carbonatites of India. (see Table 1 for sources). ADCC = Amba Dongar calico-carbonatite and ADFC
= Ferro-carbonatite. Others, as indicated in the diagram.
from the lower Ba/La and Nb/Th ratios found in the carbonatites suites, namely the carbonatite (sovite-ferro-carbonatite) and the
(Chakmouradian et al., 2008). nephelinite – phonolite. Based on high LREE/HREE fractionation
Burtseva et al., (2013) based on mineral thermometer of dolomite, (average (La/Yb)N = 175 in carbonatites and 50 in nephelinites), a
olivine, spinel, phlogopite and Mg-rich ilmenite (790°-980°C), inferred very low degree of melting (<1%) has been envisaged. In a recent
a primary status for the Khambamettu carbonatite. study of noble gases from Amba Dongar pyroxene and calcite
separates, Hopp and Viladkar (2018) had shown plume-neon
Fractionation of Alkali Carbonate Magma and Liquid contributions ranging up to the Réunion hotspot reference line. A
Immiscibility of Mantle Melts pyroxene separate from the Siriwasan carbonatite even showed a
‘Loihi-type’ neon composition. Thus, they conclude that both upper
Amba Dongar and Siriwasan
mantle and mantle plume sources apparently contributed in different
Trace element modelling by Chandra et al., (2017) led to postulate ways to the formation of these two carbonatite complexes.
that the primary carbonatite melt was generated from a subcontinental
lithospheric mantle (SCLM) that was metasomatised by the CO2-rich Sarnu-Dandali-Kamthai carbonatites
fluids and provided thermal energy from the Deccan plume (Reunion). The Sarnu-Dandali-Kamthai carbonatite complex exhibits a
Melting of this SCLM generated a ‘carbonated silicate magma’ continuous gradation from alkali pyroxenite to feldspathic ijolite
that underwent liquid immiscibility at crustal depths, forming the two through micro-melteigite and ijolite with foidal syenite and phonolite
1. Amba Dongar 1
Calcio – carbonatites 0.70549 -70579 (4) +15.1 to +19.0 0.51248 -0.51252 –0.8 to –1.6 19.05 – 19.09 15.72 – 15.74 39.72 – 40.16
Ferro – Carbonatite 0.70566 – 70581 (5) +17.5 to +26.0 0.51248 – 0.51253 –0.6 to –1.6 18.94 – 19.28 15.66 – 15.81 39.55 – 40.05
2. Amba Dongar 7 0.70545 – 0.70565 (2) +14.6 to +17.6 0.512503 – 0.512526 –1.55 19.02 – 19.26 15.61 – 15.64 39.51 – 42.80
3. Sirivasan7 0.70580 – 0.70595 +19.6 to +21.8 0.512490 – 0.512491 –1.82 19.02 – 19.26 15.60 – 16.19 39.38 – 42.80
4. Sevathur2 0.70500 – 0.70529 (5) 0.51179 – 0.511327 –5.4 to –8.3 17.20 – 68.0 (8) 15.55 – 32.11 (8) 37.39 – 38.53
5. Sevathur3 0.70508 – 0.70523 (5) +21.2 to +23.0 0.511815 – 0.511871 –5.1 to –5.9
6. Sevathur3a 0.704887 – 0.705504 (6) 0.511125 – 0.511141 –3.9 to –7.0 16.57 – 16.97 15.51 – 15.64 36.97 – 37.88
7. Joggipatti2 0.70513 – 0.70514 (3) 0.51121 – 0.511345 –5.1 to 7.76 37.55 – 37.94 15.36 – 15.53 16.63 – 16.84
8. Samalpatti2 0.70537 – 0.70554 (2) 0.511394 (1) –4.15 36.67 – 37.75 15.39 – 15.66 17.20 – 21,26
9. Samalpatti3 0.705294 -0.712914 (6) 0.511506 – 512174 –5.3 to –14.4 16.50 – 17.57 15.37 – 15.68 36.81 – 38.38
10. Pakkanadu2 0.70503 (1) 0.511257 –6.83 37.96 – 92.73 15.52 – 16.30 17.45 – 24.80
11. Hogenakal3 0.70169 – 0.70236 (4) 0.511239 – 0.511317 –1.1 to –1.3
12. Hogenakal8 0.70161 -0.70174 (2) 0.511136 – 0.511238
13. Newania4 0.702117 – 0.702052 (2) 0.511533 –5.3
14. Sung valley5 0.70442 – 0.70456 (4) 0.511254 – 0. 511256 +0.7 to +1.5 39.14 – 39.682 15.06 – 15.713 19.451 – 19.540
15. Sung Valley6 0.70471 – 0.70489 (8) + 5.3 to +6.9 0.51264 – 0. 51266 +1.7 to +2.3 19.40 – 93.19 15.68 – 19.24 40.43 – 88.29
16. Sung Valley9 0.704710 – 0.704830 (7) + 4.68 to +6.98 0.512538 – 0.512594 +0.68 to +1.78
17. Samchampi 5 0.70471 – 0.70471 (3) 0.511252 – 0.511256 +0.3 to +1.2 19.450 – 19.462 15.648 – 15.726 19.793 – 41.254
Index to sources as indicated by numbers in superscript after the name of the complex: 1. Simmonetti et al., 1995; 2. Schleicher et al., 1998; 3. Anil Kumar et al., 1998; 3a. Akerman et al.,
2016; 4. Ray et al., 2013; 5. Arundhuti and Basu, 2013; 6. Veena Krishna et al., 1998; 7. Veena Krishna (2000); Saha et al., 2017, 8. Pandit et al., 2002; 9. Srivastava et al., 2005; Number
of samples given in parentheses in the 87Sr/86 Sr column. Isotopic data is age corrected/initial values as given by the authors.