Haile, 2019
Haile, 2019
Article
Isolation, Identification, and Characterization of
Pectinolytic Yeasts for Starter Culture in
Coffee Fermentation
Mesfin Haile       and Won Hee Kang *
 Department of Horticulture, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon 24341, Korea; mesfinhaile97@gmail.com
 * Correspondence: whkang@kangwon.ac.kr
                                                                                                  
 Received: 26 August 2019; Accepted: 27 September 2019; Published: 28 September 2019              
 Abstract: This experiment was carried out to identify and select pectinolytic yeasts that have potential
 use as a starter culture for coffee fermentation during wet processing. The coffee fruit was fermented
 for 48 h at 28 ◦ C and a sample was taken from the fermented solution and spread onto yeast
 extract-peptone-dextrose agar (YPDA) media and incubated at 28 ◦ C. A total of 28 yeasts were
 isolated, eight of which had the ability to produce pectinase enzymes. The species of those eight
 yeasts were molecularly identified and confirmed. These yeasts are Wickerhamomyces anomalus (strain
 KNU18Y3), Saccharomycopsis fibuligera (strain KNU18Y4), Papiliotrema flavescens (strain KNU18Y5
 and KNU18Y6), Pichia kudriavzevii (strain KNU18Y7 and KNU18Y8), and Saccharomyces cerevisiae
 (strain KNU18Y12 and KNU18Y13). The pectin degradation index of S. fibuligera (strain KNU18Y4),
 W. anomalus (strain KNU18Y3), and P. flavescens (strain KNU18Y6) were higher compared to the others,
 at 178%, 160%, and 152%, respectively. The pectinase enzyme assays were made on two growth
 media: coffee pulp media (CPM) and synthetic pectin media (SPM). S. fibuligera (strain KNU18Y4)
 and W. anomalus (strain KNU18Y3) had great potential in producing polygalacturonase (PG) and
 pectin lyase (PL) compared to others in both media. However, S. cerevisiae strains (KNU18Y12 and
 KNU18Y13) produced higher pectin methylesterase (PME). Using MEGA 6 software, the phylogenetic
 trees were constructed to determine the evolutionary relationship of newly identified yeasts from our
 experiment and previously published yeast species. The sequences of the yeasts were deposited in
 the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) database.
Keywords: coffee; enzymes; polygalacturonase; pectin lyase; pectin methylesterase; starter culture
1. Introduction
      Coffee is one of the essential worldwide commodities, next to crude oil. Coffee is the major export
commodity of around 60 tropical and subtropical countries [1,2]. Ethiopia is the origin of arabica
coffee, and as such, has a long tradition of roasting and drinking this deeply cultural non-alcoholic
beverage. Brazil ranks as the leading producer and exporter of arabica coffee, followed by Indonesia,
Ethiopia, Philippines, Mexico, Vietnam, and 40 other countries [3]. After harvesting, the coffee fruit is
processed using various methods: wet processing, dry processing, and semi-dry processing. During
the wet-processing method, the pulp is mechanically separated from fully ripe coffee cherries. Then
the fruit is collected and naturally fermented following the process of removal of mucilage by placing
it in a fermentation tank and submerging in water for at least 6–24 h [4]
      The ultimate goal of fermentation is to remove the mucilage layer, which is made up of complex
compounds. Mucilage is a sticky substance and adheres to the coffee pulp, and it comprised around
5% of the coffee cherries in dry matter basis [5]. At the time of maturity of the coffee cherry, calcium
pectates found in the middle lamella and protopectin transformed into pectin from the cellular wall [6].
The mesocarp of the coffee cherry is a translucent and gelatinous sweet substance which comprised
sugar, minerals and pectin [5]. Silva [7] explained that the microorganisms are responsible for the
degradation of the pulp and mucilage (polysaccharides) of the coffee fruit during fermentation. In
addition, the production of pectinolytic enzymes and formation of alcohols and acids (butyric acetic,
lactic, and other long-chained carboxylic acids) are associated with the microbes [7]. The fermentation
processes depend on the growth and metabolic activities of various groups of microorganisms such
as yeasts, Gram-negative bacteria, bacilli, filamentous fungi and, lactic acid bacteria and acetic acid
bacteria [8]. However, the presence of the microorganism during the fermentation of coffee cherries is
relying on the plant variety, processing method, moisture content, the colonizing species enzymatic
capacity, the competition of substrates, environmental factors and the microorganism’s antimicrobial
activity [9].
      The microbial enzymes (pectinases) are responsible for the breaking down of pectin substances.
Pectinases are enzymes, which degrade pectin substances and have great importance in the food
industry. Reports indicate that microbial pectinases comprised the global food enzymes market by
25% [10]. They hold the first position among the commercially produced industrial enzymes. These
enzymes are environmentally friendly and sustainable with potentially wide applications in many
industrial activities, such as tea and coffee fermentation, oil extraction, clarification of juice and wines
etc. [11]. The main enzymes involved in coffee fermentation are polygalacturonase (PG), pectin lyase
(PL), and pectin methylesterase (PME) [12]. These three enzymes have a potential of the complete
digestion of pectin to produce galacturonic acid and its oligomers [13,14]. The selection of potential
starter culture for coffee fermentation includes production of these enzymes by the microorganisms.
The microorganisms used in the production of fermented foods and beverages partly determine their
quality. Some of the yeasts that isolated and identified in our study were evaluated for their effect on
the coffee quality parameters after fermenting the green coffee beans and found positive results [15].
      The search for microbial diversity during coffee processing is required to select microorganisms
for starter cultures for the fermentation processes. The isolation and selection of microorganisms for
coffee fermentation have significant scope in identifying additional source organisms. The ultimate
objectives of this experiment were to isolate, identify, and characterize pectinolytic yeasts. We also
evaluated their efficiencies in producing PG, PL, and PME using the synthetic pectin media (SPM) and
the coffee pulp-culture media (CPM).
after autoclaving when the solution cooled to 50 ◦ C. All chemicals for this experiment were purchased
from Sigma Aldrich LLC (St. Louis, MO, USA).
2.5. Synthetic Pectin Media and Coffee Pulp Media Preparation for Enzymatic Assays
      The SPM was prepared with the following formulation: 10% citric pectin, 0.1% glucose, 0.5%
MgSO4 , 1.0% KH2 PO4 , 1.0% (NH4 )2 SO4 , and 0.5% CaCl2 . The CPM was prepared by measuring 400 g
of coffee pulp, including mucilage (Coffea arabica L.), and 0.5% glucose. The pulp was boiled using
water for 10 min and adjusted to 1 L [17]. Active yeast cells that were grown for 48 h were added with
1.0 × 10 4 cells mL −1 (4.0 Log colony forming unit (CFU) mL −1 ). The cultures were incubated at 28 ◦ C
for 96 h at 120 rpm and periodically sampled at 24, 48, 72, and 96 h. The supernatants were collected
for PG, PL, and PME activity from both SPM and CPM growing conditions.
      In addition, the fermentation characteristics of the CPM culture, such as yeast cells, pH, and
◦ Brix, were regularly measured at 24-h intervals. Serial dilutions were prepared from the fermented
solution and plated onto YPDA media. The living yeast colonies were counted using the Neubauer
hemocytometer slide (Electron Microscopy Sciences, PA, USA) and expressed in Log CFU value.
Microorganisms 2019, 7, 401                                                                      4 of 16
A pH meter was used to measure the pH of the fermented solution. A refractometer (ATAGO Pocket
Refractometer, Tokyo, Japan) was used to estimate the ◦ Brix of the media. All the above measurements
were made in three replications regularly at 24-h intervals.
     The protein content of the coffee pulp used to make the CPM was analyzed using the protocol
mentioned by Bradford [18], and bovine serum albumin (BSA) was used as a standard. The total
sugars [19] and soluble pectin [20] were determined.
3. Results
Among the isolated yeasts, eight of them showed pectinolytic activity after testing them on YPDA
media enriched with citrus pectin. The isolated yeasts colonies were morphologically characterized
according to their shape, color, elevation surface, and margin (Table 2).
     Table 3. Pectin degradation index after 5 days incubation on YPDA media that supplemented a
     citrus pectin.
                                                Yeasts                        PDI %
                                       W. anomalus KNU18Y3                 160b ± 1.73
                                       S. fibuligera KNU18Y4               178a ± 4.04
                                       P. flavescens KNU18Y5               129c ± 4.62
                                       P. flavescens KNU18Y6               152b ± 4.04
                                      P. kudriavzevii KNU18Y7              110d ± 2.89
                                      P. kudriavzevii KNU18Y9              125c ± 4.04
                                       S. cerevisiae KNU18Y12              121cd ± 2.31
                                       S. cerevisiae KNU18Y13              118cd ± 4.62
      Results are presented as mean ± standard deviation (n = 5). Means denoted with different letters within column are
      significantly different.
                    Table 4. The accession number of the identified yeasts species and strain code.
                   Table 4. The accession number of the identified yeasts species and strain code.
                   Accession Number               Yeast Species Name                 Strain Code
                    Accession Number
                       MH483547                    Yeast Species Name
                                                Wickerhamomyces     anomalus        Strain Code
                                                                                      KNU18Y3
                       MH483929
                        MH483547                Saccharomycopsis    fibuligera
                                                Wickerhamomyces anomalus             KNU18Y4
                                                                                    KNU18Y3
                        MH483929
                       MH484046                 Saccharomycopsis   fibuligera
                                                  Papiliotrema flavescens           KNU18Y4
                                                                                     KNU18Y5
                        MH484046
                       MH485393                   Papiliotrema flavescens
                                                  Papiliotrema  flavescens          KNU18Y5
                                                                                     KNU18Y6
                        MH485393                  Papiliotrema flavescens           KNU18Y6
                       MH488970                     Pichia kudriavzevii              KNU18Y7
                        MH488970                    Pichia kudriavzevii             KNU18Y7
                       MH487468
                        MH487468
                                                    Pichia kudriavzevii
                                                    Pichia kudriavzevii
                                                                                     KNU18Y9
                                                                                    KNU18Y9
                       MH491423
                        MH491423                 Saccharomyces    cerevisiae
                                                 Saccharomyces cerevisiae            KNU18Y12
                                                                                    KNU18Y12
                       MH488975
                        MH488975                 Saccharomyces    cerevisiae
                                                 Saccharomyces cerevisiae            KNU18Y13
                                                                                    KNU18Y13
                                                   Figure 1. Cont.
Microorganisms 2019, 7, 401                                                                                              7 of 16
 Microorganisms 2019, 7, 401                                                                                       7 of 19
      Figure
       Figure 1.  Phylogeneticrelationship
               1. Phylogenetic    relationship   between
                                               between   thethe  identified
                                                             identified      yeasts
                                                                         yeasts      and other
                                                                                and other        26S rRNA
                                                                                           26S rRNA           sequences
                                                                                                       sequences   of
      ofpublished
         published    strains.
                   strains. A: (A)  Wickerhamomyces
                               Wickerhamomyces          anomalus
                                                   anomalus   strainstrain KNU18Y3,
                                                                      KNU18Y3,         (B) Saccharomycopsis
                                                                                 Saccharomycopsis               fibuligera
                                                                                                    fibuligera strain
      strain KNU18Y4,
       KNU18Y4,           (C) Papiliotrema
                    Papiliotrema            flavescens
                                 flavescens (strain    (strain KNU18Y5,
                                                    KNU18Y5,     KNU18Y6),  KNU18Y6),    (D) Pichia
                                                                              Pichia kudriavzevii    kudriavzevii
                                                                                                  (strain KNU18Y7  (strain
      KNU18Y7     and KNU18Y9)
       and KNU18Y9)      and Saccharomyces    Saccharomyces
                                     and (E)cerevisiae (straincerevisiae
                                                               KNU18Y12  (strain KNU18Y12 and KNU18Y13).
                                                                            and KNU18Y13).
Microorganisms 2019, 7, 401                                                                                         8 of 16
Table 5. The living cells of yeast species at different fermentation hours (24, 48, 72, and 96) in CPM.
      The protein content, the total sugar, and total pectin in the coffee pulp that was used to make the
CPM were measured as dry matter, accounting for 14.30%, 12.45%, and 6.70%, respectively. The pH
of fermented solutions was regularly monitored and recorded. The initial (0 h) pH of the CPM
was adjusted at 5.72. The pH of the CPM continuously dropped starting from the initial hours of
fermentation until 72 h and began increasing at 96 h in all yeasts except the S. fibuligera KNU18Y4
inoculated media. Comparatively, the pH of the CPM with the S. fibuligera KNU18Y4 continuously
declined from the 24-h period to 96 h at a slow rate. In the P. flavescens KNU18Y5 inoculated treatment,
the pH decreased from the initial fermentation until 48 h and began increasing at 72 and 96 h. During
the first 24-h fermentation, the pH decreased at a higher rate compared to other fermentation hours.
      The ◦ Brix of the CPM was measured from beginning to end of the fermentation process. The initial
◦ Brix of the CPM was 5.4. There were significant differences among yeasts in reducing the ◦ Brix
contents during each fermentation period. The ◦ Brix was continuously dropped in all fermentation
treatments (Table 6). During the first 24 h of fermentation, the ◦ Brix decreased at a higher rate compared
to the other fermentation periods. The W. anomalus KNU18Y3, S. fibuligera KNU18Y4, P. flavescens
KNU18Y6, and S. cerevisiae (KNU18Y12 and KNU18Y13) strains inoculated CPM ◦ Brix was declined
below 1% at the end of 96 h fermentation. After 96 h fermentation, the ◦ Brix of CPM was changed
from 5.4 to nearly 1.0% in P. flavescens KNU18Y5 and P. kudriavzevii strains (KNU18Y7 and KNU18Y9).
The lowest ◦ Brix was recorded from W. anomalus KNU18Y3 inoculated CPM (0.40%) at the same time
the pH was lower (4.75) compared to other treatments after 96 h fermentation.
Microorganisms 2019, 7, 401                                                                                                                                                             9 of 16
Table 6. The pH and Brix of fermented coffee pulp media by different yeast species.
                                                                   pH                                                                             Brix◦
           Strains Code
                                     24 h                48 h                72 h                96 h                24 h                48 h                72 h           96 h
            KNU18Y3             4.93b ± 0.21        4.62g ± 0.14        4.60e  ± 0.23       4.75h ± 0.41        2.13b ± 0.11         0.9d ± 0.04          0.46d ± 0.02   0.40b ± 0.01
            KNU18Y4             5.23a ± 0.42        5.01a ± 0.11        4.86c  ± 0.27       4.83f ± 0.35        2.93a ± 0.23        1.77a ± 0.12          1.75a ± 0.04   0.96a ± 0.02
            KNU18Y5             5.04ab ± 0.12       4.97b ± 0.13        5.28b ± 0.17        5.86c ± 0.23        2.10b ± 0.14        1.66ab ± 0.08         1.15b ± 0.03   1.03a ± 0.05
            KNU18Y6             4.94b ± 0.13        4.77e ± 0.21        4.75cd ± 0.31       4.80g ± 0.24        2.06b ± 0.19        1.16cd ± 0.01         0.55c ± 0.06   0.46b ± 0.04
            KNU18Y7             4.95b ± 0.14        4.73f ± 0.23        5.68a ± 0.30        5.91b ± 0.41        1.80c ± 0.09        1.70ab ± 0.10         1.15b ± 0.07   1.01a ± 0.03
            KNU18Y9             4.99b ± 0.15        4.95c ±0.25         5.65a ± 0.24        5.96a ± 0.21        1.90c ± 0.18        1.77a ± 0.08          1.10b ± 0.07   1.01a ± 0.04
            KNU18Y12            4.86b ± 0.15        4.85d ± 0.15         4.82c ± 0.18       5.13d ± 0.17        1.30d ± 0.17        1.03d ± 0.06          0.65c ± 0.04   0.60b ± 0.05
            KNU18Y13            4.90b ± 0.17        4.85d ± 0.14        4.64de ± 0.19       5.08e ± 0.12        1.20d ± 0.13        1.40bc ± 0.10         0.60c ± 0.08   0.36b ± 0.04
                              Results are presented as mean ± standard error (n = 5). Means denoted with different letters in each column are significantly different.
Microorganisms 2019, 7, 401                                                                      10 of 16
Table 7. Pectin lyase (PL) activity of the yeasts after fermentation in CPM and SPM (24, 48, 72, and 96 h).
Table 8. Polygalactrunase (PG) activity of the yeasts after fermentation in CPM and SPM (24, 48, 72, and 96 h).
Table 9. Pectin methylesterase (PME) activity of the yeasts after fermentation in CPM and SPM (24, 48, 72, and 96 h).
4. Discussion
      Fermentation is an important step during coffee processing to remove the mucilage (sticky
polysaccharide substance) form the parchment coffee. However, fermentation in wet processing is
critical because it creates a diverse aroma and flavor beyond its natural flavor and taste. Pectinase
enzyme accelerates tea fermentation by breaking down the pectin substance which presents in the
tea leaves [25]. Pectinase enzyme-producing yeasts are responsible for speeding up the fermentation
process and removing the pectin substances during coffee processing. For these reasons, isolation,
identification, and characterization of yeasts that can produce pectinase enzymes (pectin lyase,
polygalacturonase, and pectin methyl esterase) are essential. This process needs frequent study to
develop starter cultures for coffee fermentation. A microbiological culture that facilitates fermentation
activities is called starter culture. Starter cultures are widely used in the food industry to prepare such
products as yogurt, wine, and beer [26]. In controlled coffee fermentation, starter culture may improve
the quality of coffee and increase its economic value, thereby enhancing the incomes of farmers [27].
Yeast populations increased as the fermentation duration increased from 0 to 96 h. However, the rate
of yeast growth showed a sharper increase during the first 48 h, a result supported by Kamassah et
al. [28]. The growth of the yeasts decreased and approximately leveled out to a steady growth at 72 and
96 h compared to the first 48 h. The decrease after 48 h might be associated with pH changes (Table 6)
and depletion of the substrates, such as the total soluble solid content (Table 6). The change in pH
occurred during fermentation of CPM with different yeasts. The decreases in pH during fermentation
are associated with the production of acids. It was found that the production of organic acid and
absorption of amino acids have significant effects. Pectinolysis enabled reduction in demucilization
time which was evident with reduction in pH value [29]. As the yeasts grew in the CPM for 96 h, the
◦ Brix was substantially reduced. However, the ability to decrease the ◦ Brix content was significantly
was reduced as the incubation time extended more than 48 h. The pectinase enzyme production among
yeasts was different. This indicated that the ability of the microorganism producing the pectinase
enzyme varied among yeasts species and strains. We have identified a pectinase enzyme-producing
S. cerevisiae (KNU18Y12 and KNU18Y13) during coffee fermentation by wet processing. Furthermore,
we have identified two pectinolytic P. kudriavzevii yeast strains. Koffi et al. [33] isolated and identified
S. cerevisiae YB14 and P. kudriavzevii YP13 yeasts that were able to produce the pectinase enzyme during
cacao fermentation. However, pectinolytic P. kudriavzevii yeast was examined and showed a potential
ability in producing PG enzymes during cacao mucilage fermentation [34]. In this experiment, a
potential pectinase enzyme-producing yeast, W. anomalus, was identified during a wet-processing
method. The PL and PG activity W. anomalus in our experiment was significantly higher than other
examined yeasts following S. fibuligera KNU18Y4. Martos et al. [35] reported a potential pectinase
enzyme-producing W. anomalus from citrus peel. They also mentioned its maximal PG activity was at
pH 4.5. However, in our experiment, we did not adjust the pH of the medium during fermentation
activity, rather the pH and the enzyme activity was measured at 24 h interval. The pH was 4.93 after
24-h fermentation in W. anomalus inoculated media and the PG activity was higher compared to the
rest other fermentation durations (48, 72, and 96). The PG activity of yeasts produced in an optimum
pH in the acidic region between 3.5 and 5.5 [35]. The W. anomalus is grouped as a biosafety level 1
organism that can grow under severe environmental stress conditions, such as high and low pH, high
osmotic pressure, anaerobic conditions, and low water activity [36]. A study showed that as the pH
increased from 3 to 4, the Aspergilus niger pectinase enzyme production also increased [37].
      To the best of our knowledge, the other three yeasts S. fibuligera KNU18Y4 and two P. flavescens
(KNU18Y5 and KNU18Y6) are being reported for the first time as pectinase enzyme-producing yeasts
that are identified during coffee fermentation in the wet-processing method. The production of
pectinase enzymes varies among the identified yeasts in our experiment. These variations might be
associated with the difference of microorganism population (Table 5) and pH condition (Table 6) during
the fermentation period. Pectinase production by fungi varies according to the type of strain and
cultivation conditions (initial pH, inoculum size, and incubation period) [38]. Regarding the pectin
lyase activity, the first 24-h fermentation period produced a greater amount in all tested yeasts in
both media types. Besides the yeasts’ ability to produce the pectinase enzyme, we have evaluated the
impact of some of these yeasts by fermenting green coffee beans to improve the antioxidant activity,
total polyphenol, flavonoid, and tannin contents [15]. They showed positive results in improving the
flavonoid, polyphenol, and antioxidant activity [15].
5. Conclusions
     In this study, we have isolated, identified, and characterized eight pectinase enzyme-producing
yeasts during wet-processing methods of fermenting coffee. Out of the identified yeast, S. fibuligera
KNU18Y4 and W. anomalus KNU18Y3 have the prominent capability of producing the PG and PL
enzymes in both the coffee pulp media and synthetic pectin media. The two S. cerevisiae strains
(KNU18Y12 and KNU18Y13) produce a higher PME. We have also identified two strains of P. flavescens
(KNU18Y5 and KNU18Y6) and S. fibuligera KNU18Y4 that have not previously been reported as
pectinase enzyme-producing yeast. Regarding the fermentation duration, the 24 and 48 h cultivation
of the tested yeasts produced a higher PL enzyme in both media types. Comparatively, the PG and
PME activity of all yeasts was high at 24 and 48 compared to 72 and 96 h fermentation. Generally, these
yeasts have the potential to be used as a starter culture during fermentation of coffee. Additionally,
these yeasts can also be used in the food industry for pectinase enzyme production. Isolation and
identification of yeasts to develop starter cultures for coffee fermentation are relevant and should be
continued in the future.
Author Contributions: Conceptualization, W.H.K., M.H.; Data curation, M.H.; formal analysis, M.H.;
investigation, W.H.K.; methodology, M.H.; resources, W.H.K.; software, M.H.; supervision, W.H.K.; validation,
Microorganisms 2019, 7, 401                                                                                     15 of 16
W.H.K.; writing—original draft preparation, M.H.; writing—review and editing, W.H.K., M.H.; project
administration, W.H.K.
Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
1.    FAO. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Available online: http://www.fao.org/
      faostat/en/#data/QC (accessed on 4 November 2016).
2.    Sakiyama, N.S.; Ferrao, M.A.G. Botany and production of coffee. In Cocoa and Coffee Fermentations; Schwan, R.F.,
      Fleet, G.H., Eds.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2015; pp. 341–365.
3.    International Coffee Organization (ICO). Monthly Coffee Market. Report (2017/18); International Coffee
      Organization (ICO): London, UK, 2017.
4.    De Bruyn, F.; Zhang, S.J.; Pothakos, V.; Torres, J.; Lambot, C.; Moroni, A.V.; De Vuyst, L. Exploring the impacts
      of postharvest processing on the microbiota and metabolite profiles during green coffee bean production.
      Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2017, 83, e02398.
5.    Murthy, P.S.; Naidu, M.M. Sustainable management of coffee industry by-products and value addition—A
      review. Resour. Conserv. Recy. 2012, 66, 45–58. [CrossRef]
6.    Rattan, S.; Parande, A.K.; Nagaraju, V.D.; Ghiwari, G.K. A comprehensive review on utilization of wastewater
      from coffee processing. Environ. Sci. Pollut. R 2015, 22, 6461–6472. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
7.    Silva, C. Microbial activity during coffee fermentation. Cocoa Coffee Ferment. 2014, 368–423.
8.    Huch, M.; Franz, C.M.A.P. Coffee. In Advances in Fermented Foods and Beverages; Woodhead Publishing:
      Sawston, UK, 2015; pp. 501–513.
9.    Vilela, D.M.; Pereira, G.V.M.; Ferreira Silva, C.; Batista, L.R.; Schwan, R.F. Molecular ecology and polyphasic
      characterization of the microbiota associated with semi-dry processed coffee (Coffea arabica L.). Food Microbiol.
      2010, 27, 1128–1135. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
10.   Ruiz, H.A.; Rodríguez-Jasso, R.M.; Rodríguez, R.; Contreras-Esquivel, J.C.; Aguilar, C.N. Pectinase production
      from lemon peel pomace as support and carbon source in solid-state fermentation column-tray bioreactor.
      Biochem. Eng. J. 2012, 65, 90–95. [CrossRef]
11.   Amin, F.; Bhatti, H.N.; Bilal, M. Recent advances in the production strategies of microbial pectinases—A
      review. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
12.   Haile, M.; Kang, W.H. The role of microbes in coffee fermentation and their impact on coffee quality.
      J. Food Qual. 2019. [CrossRef]
13.   Combo, A.M.M.; Aguedo, M.; Goffin, D.; Wathelet, B.; Paquot, M. Enzymatic production of pectic
      oligosaccharides from polygalacturonic acid with commercial pectinase preparations. Food Bioprod. Process.
      2012, 90, 588–596. [CrossRef]
14.   Patidar, M.K.; Nighojkar, S.; Kumar, A.; Nighojkar, A. Pectinolytic enzymes-solid state fermentation, assay
      methods and applications in fruit juice industries: A review. Biotech 2018, 8, 199. [CrossRef]
15.   Haile, M.; Kang, W.H. Antioxidant Activity, Total Polyphenol, Flavonoid and Tannin Contents of Fermented
      Green Coffee Beans with Selected Yeasts. Fermentation 2019, 5, 29. [CrossRef]
16.   Schwan, R.F.; Cooper, R.; Wheals, A.E. Endo polyglacturonase secretion by Kluyveromyces marxianus.
      Enzym. Microb. Tech. 1997, 4, 247–256.
17.   Silva, C.F.; Vilela, D.M.; de Souza Cordeiro, C.; Duarte, W.F.; Dias, D.R.; Schwan, R.F. Evaluation of a potential
      starter culture for enhance quality of coffee fermentation. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2013, 29, 235–247.
      [CrossRef]
18.   Bradford, M.M. A rapid and sensitive method for quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilize
      principle of protein byebinding. Anal. Biochem. 1976, 72, 248–251. [CrossRef]
19.   AOAC. Official Methods of Analyses of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists, 7th ed.; Association of
      Official Analytical Chemists: Gaithersburg, MD, USA, 2000; pp. 915–922.
20.   Bitter, V.; Muir, H.M. Modifical uronic acid carbazole reaction. Anal. Biochem. 1962, 4, 330–334. [CrossRef]
21.   Pitt, O. Pectic lyase from Rhoma medicabinis var. pinodella. Methods Enzymol. 1988, 161, 350–365.
22.   Kashyap, D.R.; Chandra, S.; Kaul, A.; Tewari, R. Production, purification and characterization of pectinase
      from a Bacillus sp. DT7. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2000, 16, 277–282. [CrossRef]
Microorganisms 2019, 7, 401                                                                                  16 of 16
23.   Miller, G.L. Use of dinitrosalicilic acid reagent for determination of reducing sugar. Anal. Biochem. 1959, 31,
      426–428.
24.   Baracat, M.C.; Valentin, C.; Muchovej, J.J.; Silva, D.O. Selection of pectinolytic fungi for degumming of
      natural fibers. Biotechnol. Lett. 1989, 11, 899–902. [CrossRef]
25.   Garg, G.; Singh, A.; Kaur, A.; Singh, R.; Kaur, J.; Mahajan, R. Microbial pectinases: An ecofriendly tool of
      nature for industries. Biotech. 2016, 6, 47. [CrossRef]
26.   Schwan, R.F.; Pereira, G.V.M.; Fleet, G.H. Microbial activities during cocoa fermentation. In Cocoa and Coffee
      Fermentations; Schwan, R.F., Fleet, G.H., Eds.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2014; pp. 129–192.
27.   Vinícius de Melo Pereira, G.; Soccol, V.T.; Brar, S.K.; Neto, E.; Soccol, C.R. Microbial ecology and starter
      culture technology in coffee processing. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2017, 57, 2775–2788. [CrossRef]
28.   Kamassah, A.K.; Saalia, F.K.; Osei-Fosu, P.; Mensah-Brown, H.; Sinayobye, E.; Tano-Debrah, K. Fermentation
      capacity of yeasts using mango (Mangifera indica Linn.) as substrate. Food Sci. Qual. Manag. 2013, 22, 69–78.
29.   Murthy, P.S.; Naidu, M.M. Improvement of robusta coffee fermentation with microbial enzymes. Eur. J.
      Appl. Sci. 2011, 3, 130–139.
30.   Kohli, P.; Kalia, M.; Gupta, R. Pectin Methylesterases: A Review. J. Bioproc. Biotech. 2015, 5, 1–7.
31.   Carrasco, M.; Rozas, J.M.; Alcaíno, J.; Cifuentes, V.; Baeza, M. Pectinase secreted by psychrotolerant fungi:
      Identification, molecular characterization and heterologous expression of a cold-active polygalacturonase
      from Tetracladium sp. Microb. Cell Factor. 2019, 18, 45. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
32.   Oumer, O.J.; Abate, D. Comparative Studies of Pectinase Production by Bacillus subtilis strain Btk 27 in
      Submerged and Solid-State Fermentations. Biomed. Res. Int. 2018. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
33.   Koffi, O.; Samagaci, L.; Goualie, B.; Niamke, S. Screening of potential yeast starters with high ethanol
      production for a small-scale cocoa fermentation in Ivory Coast. Food Environ. Safety J. 2018, 17.
34.   Romero Cortes, T.; Cuervo-Parra, J.A.; Jose Robles-Olvera, V.; Rangel Cortes, E.; Lopez Perez, P.A.
      Experimental and kinetic production of ethanol using mucilage juice residues from cocoa processing.
      Int. J. Chem. React. Eng. 2018, 16. [CrossRef]
35.   Martos, M.A.; Zubreski, E.R.; Garro, O.A.; Hours, R.A. Production of Pectinolytic enzymes by the yeast
      Wickerhanomyces anomalus isolated from citrus fruits peels. Biotechnol. Res. Int. 2013. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
36.   De Hoog, G.S. Risk assessment of fungi reported from humans and animals. Mycoses 1996, 39, 407–417.
      [CrossRef] [PubMed]
37.   Dhembare, A.J.; Kakad, S.L.; Rajani, R. Effect of pH, temperature and kinetics of pectinase enzyme using
      Aspergillus niger by solid-state of fermentation. Der. Pharm. Sin. 2015, 6, 1–5.
38.   Azzaz, H.H.; Murad, H.A.; Kholif, A.M.; Morsy, T.A.; Mansour, A.M.; El-Sayed, H.M. Pectinase production
      optimization and its application in banana fiber degradation. Egypt. J. Nutr. Foods 2013, 16, 117–125.
                          © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access
                          article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution
                          (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).