HRM 203 Answers
HRM 203 Answers
HRM 203 Answers
Importance of HRM:
Features of HRM
2. Universal Existence
4. Action-oriented
Instead of record-keeping, written processes or regulations, the focus of Human
Resource Management is “activity.” Employee issues are resolved by sensible
policies.
6. Integrating mechanism
Among the most essential purposes of HRM is to identify the best way to
achieve shared goals. It also helps to establish friendly relationships among
employees at all levels of a business.
7. Development-oriented
8. Continuous processes
9. Comprehensive function
HRM can never be an isolated process since it involves all employees. No one
is exempt from the periphery of HRM, regardless of his or her status,
remuneration or kind of job.
Objectives of HRM:
One of the foremost functions of HRM is job design and job analysis. Job
design involves the process of describing duties, responsibilities and operations
of the job. To hire the right employees based on rationality and research, it is
imperative to identify the traits of an ideal candidate who would be suitable for
the job. This can be accomplished by describing the skills and character traits of
your top-performing employee. Doing so will help you determine the kind of
candidate you want for the job. You will be able to identify your key minimum
requirements in the candidate to qualify for the job.
Job analysis involves describing the job requirements, such as skills,
qualification and work experience. The vital day-to-day functions need to be
identified and described in detail, as they will decide the future course of action
while recruiting.
An HRM helps to source and identify the ideal candidates for interview and
selection. The candidates are then subjected to a comprehensive screening
process to filter out the most suitable candidates from the pool of applicants.
The screened candidates are then taken through different interview rounds to
test and analyse their skills, knowledge and work experience required for the
job position.
Once the primary functions of HRM in recruitment are completed, and the
candidate gets selected after rounds of interviews, they are then provided with
the job offer in the respective job positions. This process is important because
these selected employees will, after all, help the company realise its goals and
objectives.
Imparting proper training and ensuring the right development of the selected
candidates is a crucial function of HR. After all, the success of the organisation
depends on how well the employees are trained for the job and what are their
growth and development opportunities within the organisation.
The role of HR should be to ensure that the new employees acquire the
company-specific knowledge and skills to perform their task efficiently. It
boosts the overall efficiency and productivity of the workforce, which
ultimately results in better business for the company.
HRM plays a very crucial role in preparing employees for bigger tasks and
responsibilities, which leads to the holistic development of employees at work.
And an organisation which provides ample growth and development
opportunities to its employees is considered to be a healthy organisation.
Therefore, one of the core HR department functions is to lay down clear policies
and guidelines about employee compensation and their available benefits. One
of the functions of HR manager is to ensure the effective implementation of
these policies and guidelines. This creates equality and builds transparency
among the employees and the management within the organisation. After all,
the level of employee satisfaction at work is directly proportional to the
compensation and benefits they receive.
1. Job description
2. Job specification
The information collected under job analysis is:
1. Job analysis helps the personnel manager at the time of recruitment and
selection of right man on right job.
2. It helps him to understand extent and scope of training required in that
field.
3. It helps in evaluating the job in which the worth of the job has to be
evaluated.
4. In those instances where smooth work force is required in concern.
5. When he has to avoid overlapping of authority- responsibility relationship
so that distortion in chain of command doesn’t exist.
6. It also helps to chalk out the compensation plans for the employees.
7. It also helps the personnel manager to undertake performance appraisal
effectively in a concern.
a. Job description
b. Job specification
From the above advantages, we can justify the importance of job analysis and
it’s related products.
Both job description as well as job specification are important for personnel
manager in personnel management function. Therefore, job analysis is
considered to be the primary tool of personnel management.
Q:4 Job Rotation and Job Enlargement
Job Rotation
Job Rotation is a management approach where employees are shifted between
two or more assignments or jobs at regular intervals of time in order to expose
them to all verticals of an organization. It is a pre-planned approach with an
objective to test the employee skills and competencies in order to place him or
her at the right place. In addition to it, it reduces the monotony of the job and
gives them a wider experience and helps them gain more insights.
Job rotation is a well planned management approach that is beneficial both for
employees and management.
• Job enrichment
• Overall development
• Intrinsic motivation to perform caused by newer challenges
• Career development
• Where as for an organization, the benefits could include some or all of the
following:
• Leadership development
• Aligning competencies with organizational requirements
• Lower attrition rates
• Performance improvement driven by unique view points of new people
Job rotations for workers must include aspects related to work environment,
also along with other individual attributes already explained, so that it adds to
his satisfaction derived from balanced distribution of work load, working
conditions and learning opportunities.
Done this way job rotation gets aligned with career development, leadership
development and employee satisfaction which would finally result in higher
levels of intrinsic motivation among the employees and hence may contribute in
retaining talent.
Job enlargement
Job enlargement is a job design technique wherein there is an increase in the
number of tasks associated with a certain job. In other words, it means
increasing the scope of one’s duties and responsibilities. The increase in scope
is quantitative in nature and not qualitative and at the same level.
Many believe that since the enlargement is horizontal in nature there is not a
great need for training! Contrary to this, job enlargement requires appropriate
training especially on time and people management. Task related training is not
required much since the person is already aware of the same or doing it for
some time.
With job enlargement, the employee rarely needs to acquire new skills to carry
out the additional task, and the motivational benefits of job enrichment are not
usually experienced.
Job Enrichment
Job enrichment means a vertical expansion of a job. It is different from job
enlargement. Job enlargement means a horizontal expansion of a job.
Job enrichment makes the job more meaningful, enjoyable and satisfying. It
gives the workers more autonomy for planning and controlling the job. It also
gives the workers more responsibility. Job enrichment gives the workers
opportunities for achievement, recognition, advancement and growth. So, the
workers are motivated to work harder.
Nature of Job: Job enrichment is a vertical expansion of the job. The workers
are given jobs, which require higher-level knowledge, skills and responsibilities.
Job enrichment improves the quality of the job.
Objective: The objective of Job enrichment is to make the job more lively and
challenging. So, the job is a source of motivation for the workers.
Positive Results: Job enrichment gives positive results if the workers are highly
skilled. This is because workers are given opportunities to show initiative and
innovation while doing their job.
• In many cases, job enrichment does not give the expected results.
• It makes many changes in the job. So many workers oppose it.
• It has limited use for highly skilled managers and professionals. This is
because their jobs are already challenging.
• The consent of workers is not taken before implementing job enrichment.
• Managers force the workers to accept job enrichment, which is not good.
Job enrichment is a type of job redesign intended to reverse the effects of tasks
that are repetitive requiring little autonomy. Some of these effects are boredom,
lack of flexibility, and employee dissatisfaction (Leach & Wall, 2004). The
underlying principle is to expand the scope of the job with a greater variety of
tasks, vertical in nature, that require self-sufficiency. Since the goal is to give
the individual exposure to tasks normally reserved for differently focused or
higher positions, merely adding more of the same responsibilities related to an
employee’s current position is not considered job enrichment.
Job enrichment depends upon job enlargement for success and the reverse in not
true.
Job enrichment has been found to have greater impact in terms of motivation
when compared to job enlargement. Since enrichment gives employee greater
insights in managerial functioning and a better work profile, it is looked upon as
an indicator of growth and development. The same is not true in case of job
enlargement which is seen as an employer tactic to increase the workload.
Planning is one of the important aspects of human life, which implies thinking
beforehand, what is to be done in future. At the individual level, career planning
is quite common, which implies establishing the goals and timelines, within
which the individual has to achieve them. It analyses a person’s skills, abilities
and interest, to lay down long-term goals of a person.
The main difference between career planning and succession planning lies in
the fact that who performs it. Check out the article to know more on the two
topics.
Content: Career Planning Vs Succession Planning
1. Comparison Chart
2. Definition
3. Key Differences
4. Conclusion
Comparison Chart
BASIS FOR
CAREER PLANNING SUCCESSION PLANNING
COMPARISON
In this process, the employees are scanned and trained to occupy the major
leadership position, when the existing incumbents are no longer in the
employment of the organisation, due to reasons such as resignation,
superannuation, promotion, transfer, etc.
Succession Planning enables the managers and executives to assess and develop
a talent pool of employees, who has the ability and willingness to fill the
positions, vacant in the organisation.
The difference between career planning and succession planning can be drawn
clearly on the following grounds:
1. A process through which an employee chooses the goals of his work life
and look for the ways to reach the goals is known as career planning. On
the contrary, succession planning is all about recognising and developing
the employees who can take the critical positions in the organisation,
when they become vacant.
2. While career planning is a part of career management, succession
planning is a step of succession management.
3. Career planning is nothing but the planning process performed by an
individual for his/her career. As against, the succession planning is an
organisational strategy adopted to keep the business going, by replacing
the key incumbents, with the best-selected employee for that position.
4. In career planning, one person holds various positions in his work life.
Conversely, in succession planning, a single position is held by different
persons in an organisation.
5. Career planning is helpful to get success in one’s career. On the other
extreme, succession planning ensures consistency in leadership, for the
key roles in the organisation.
• Lower turnover
• Lower hiring costs
• Increased employee productivity
• Higher employee satisfaction
• Stronger work relationships
• Less work-related stress
• Less burnout
This means that creating a retention strategy isn’t just a good idea if you’re
experiencing higher-than-average turnover; it’s a good idea for any organization
that wants to improve its culture, employee experience, business outcomes, and
more.
employees feel like their hard work and great results aren’t being
recognized at your organization, they will be more likely to leave.
Nowadays, training has become the core needs of the organization to develop
specific skills in their existing and prospective employees. There are two
methods for imparting training in workers are on-the-job training and off-the-
job training. As their name suggests, the former refers to the training imparted
at the actual job location involving ‘hands-on’ training, whereas the latter
method involves giving training to the employees at a place other than the real
job location.
Check out the article presented to you, to learn the differences between on-the-
job-training and off-the-job-training.
1. Comparison Chart
2. Definition
3. Key Differences
4. Conclusion
Comparison Chart
BASIS FOR OFF-THE-JOB
ON-THE-JOB TRAINING
COMPARISON TRAINING
Active Yes No
participation
Work disruption No, because trainees produce Yes, because first training is
the products during learning. provided which is followed
by a performance.
As the name suggests, “on the job” training (OJT) is a method of imparting
training to the employees when they are on the job at the workplace. The aim of
training is to make the employees familiar with the normal working situation,
i.e. during the training period, the employees will get the first-hand experience
of using machinery, equipment, tools, materials, etc. It also helps the employees
to learn how to face the challenges that occur during the performance of the job.
The main theme of this training method is learning by doing where the
supervisor or the experienced employees demonstrate the trainees how to
perform a particular task. The trainees follow the instructions of the supervisor
and perform the task.
Due to the simplicity, this method highly used by the firms to train the current
or future employees.
The trainees are free to express their views and opinions during the training
session. Moreover, they can explore new and innovative ideas.
The basic differences between on-the-job and off-the-job training are indicated
below:
The Training Needs Analysis (TNA) helps organizations to find out the gap in
terms of skills and training in their existing employees to perform the current and
upcoming Jobs efficiently. The Training Manager uses the Analysis very
carefully to design the right Training program to meet the skill and training
requirements of the employees to enhance productively and ultimately achieve
the goals and objectives set by the organization.
What is Training Needs Analysis Definition in HRM
The term training needs analysis is often referred to as learning needs analysis in
the human resource department. The training needs to reflect that there are lots of
ways to perform a job and thus a huge opportunity of learning to work. The
analysis is all about the gap in the skills and knowledge and how the HRM
department can help to bridge the gap.
HRM department always puts focuses on the idea that a constant learning process
is good for employees. It keeps their skills updated and improves their
performance. The training needs analysis implies the analysis of skill
improvement required to perform the current or future job with great excellence.
Role of Training Needs Analysis
The method of training needs analysis is selected based on the job type of the
employee and the analysis that has to be carried out to understand the skill gaps.
Here are a few popular training need analysis methods used in the corporate
world:
There are different stages of training needs analysis that are used by the
organization based on the job profile of the employees. However, there is a fixed
process that is followed in all types of training needs analysis. Here is 4 steps
process of training needs analysis:
Step 1- Performance Gap Analysis: Here the current and desired operation
results of the employee performance are compared to identify the performance
gaps. These performance gaps can also be termed as the difference between
the required and actual productivity of the organization.
Step 2- Root Cause Analysis: Root cause analysis is a way to determine the
basic issue behind the performance gaps. The issues are classified into 5
categories as skill, resources, incentives, motivation, and information such as
feedback. Using rood cause analysis it is identified which area is leading to a
lack of performance and which area needs improvement.
Step 3- Needs Analysis: A detailed analysis is carried out to design and
implement the appropriate intervention to resolve the performance issues.
Based on the categories identified in the root cause analysis a specific need
for improvement is addressed in this step. This analysis includes analysis of
the audience of training, job analysis, task analysis, environment analysis, and
cost-benefit analysis.
Step 4- Recommendations: In this step, an appropriate training solution is
proposed. It identifies the right kind of training program that an organization
should run to improve the overall work productivity.
What are the Objectives and Components of Training Needs Analysis?
The performance appraisal process has been used as a deciding factor for
career development, and in most cases, the promotions and salary raise are
directly dependent on it.
In case an employee gets lower ratings, the organization can then help him to
improve his performance by offering him training to improve his skills and
knowledge.
More and more organizations are leaning in favor of conducting a performance
appraisal process because it will help them to accomplish the business goals at a
faster pace.
The performance appraisal process should be calculated over some time so that
both the employer and employee can have a better idea about his performance on
an annual basis.
This is undertaken to improve current skills and knowledge and offer further
opportunities for improvement, development, and growth.
Facts
Limitations
• The critical appraisal method harps more on negative aspects than the
positive ones
• It involves close supervision which the employee may not feel
comfortable with
• Recording all the incidents diligently of every employee is a chore
that the manager may find tedious and boring
• It is a time-consuming process
Facts
• It is easy to choose the necessary option when priorities are not clear
• This method is generally used when you do not have objective data
at your fingertips
Limitations
• The method is not fully accurate
Facts
Limitations
Facts
• It is a non-quantitative technique
• It is less structured
• It is an open-ended and flexible process
Limitations
• It is difficult to implement
• The Essay evaluation method is considered a time-consuming process
• The evaluation is subjective and prone to bias and errors
• It is considered uneconomical
In Graphic rating scales method, it is the duty of the management to check on the
performance level of an employee simply.
Facts
Limitations
Facts
• The emphasis is on the future and not on the past, and thus the
performance appraisal process is all about the constructive end
• Emphasis is on short-term goals
• It is assumed that the employee is the best person to know about
himself
Limitations
Facts
Limitations
• It is difficult to develop
8. 360-degree performance appraisal method
This type of performance appraisal process includes allowing co-workers, peers,
clients, supervisors, and customers to fill out a questionnaire which offers detail
about that particular employee.
Facts
• Improves credibility
• Is a correct assessment
Limitations
• Is time-consuming
Facts
Limitations
Facts
• The process identifies the most and least talented employee in the
group
• The onus is on sustaining and improving the performance of a team
Limitations
Management by Objectives
Peter Drucker was the first one to officially propose the goal setting approach
which he stated as “Management by Objectives and Self Control”.
Douglas McGregor further supported and improved on the concept of Peter
Drucker.
McGregor felt that most traditional systems of appraisal involved rating of traits
and personal qualities (subjective factors) which could not be measured
accurately.
Further, there were two problems with using the traditional system:
1. The managers felt uncomfortable using traditional approaches and did
it resentfully.
2. Moreover, it had a detrimental effect on employees and their
motivation to perform.
The main feature of this method was the mutual establishment of goals or targets
by the managers and employees. It ensured that employees had an actual realistic
target they could actually achieve.
The goal setting approach of performance appraisal involves the constitutes of the
following steps:
1. The employer and the employee discuss and mutually decide the role
and key result areas for the employee.
2. The employee prepares a list of objectives for a period of six months
to one year.
3. He discusses his plans with the manager and they decide on the final
plan.
4. The manager periodically checks up on the progress of the employee.
5. At the end of the stipulated time period, to discuss the results and see
whether targets have been met.
6. A further action plan is developed based on the outcome of the
appraisal.
The goal setting method reduces the role of the manager’s involvement and
ensures the employees are fairly evaluated solely based on their performance.
Employees feel highly satisfied and the coordination between the workers and
managers improves. This approach is much better than the traditional approach as
it gives concrete verifiable results.
(source – businesstopia)
Behaviourally Anchored Rating Scales
There is a predetermined behaviour that has shown the most effective and efficient
work performance. Thus, the employees’ behaviour is measured by comparing
them to the predetermined behaviour and how much they deviate from this
behaviour.
Because the employees are the exact changes to be made, thus implementing these
changes becomes very easy for them. Because of how specific and accurate this
method is, BARS generally it is often considered the best method of performance
appraisal.
1. The employer and the employee discuss and then mutually decide the
role and key result areas for the employee.
2. The employee prepares a list of objectives for a period of six months
to one year.
3. He discusses his plans with the manager and they decide on the final
plan.
4. The manager periodically checks up on the progress of the employee,
so as to ensure they are not falling behind.
5. After the end of the stipulated time period, to discuss the results and
see whether targets have been met.
6. On the outcome of the appraisal, further actions are taken.
It was developed further by Donald and his son, James; and then by James and
his wife, Wendy Kayser Kirkpatrick. And in 2016, James and Wendy revised
and clarified the original theory, and introduced the "New World Kirkpatrick
Model" in their book, "Four Levels of Training Evaluation." [2] One of the
main additions is an emphasis on the importance of making training relevant to
people's everyday jobs.
Let's look at each level in greater detail, and explore how to apply it.
You want people to feel that training was valuable. Measuring how engaged
they were, how actively they contributed, and how they reacted to the training
helps you to understand how well they received it.
• Did you feel that the training was worth your time?
• Did you think that it was successful?
• What were the biggest strengths and weaknesses of the training?
• Did you like the venue and presentation style?
• Did the training session accommodate your personal needs ?
• Were the training activities engaging?
• What are the three most important things that you learned from this
training?
• From what you learned, what do you plan to apply in your job?
• What support might you need to apply what you learned?
Identify how you want to measure people's reactions. Many people
use employee satisfaction surveys to do this, but you can also watch
trainees' body language during the session, or ask for verbal feedback.
Analyse the feedback, and consider the changes that you could make in
response.
Level 2 focuses on measuring what your trainees have and haven't learned. In
the New World version of the tool, Level 2 also measures what they think
they'll be able to do differently as a result, how confident they are that they can
do it, and how motivated they are to make changes.
This demonstrates how the training has developed their skills, attitudes and
knowledge, as well as their confidence and commitment.
To measure how much your trainees have learned, start by identifying what you
want to evaluate. Training sessions should have specific learning objectives ,
so make those your starting point.
You can measure learning in different ways, depending on the objectives. But
it's helpful to measure these areas both before and after training.
Before the training begins, test your trainees to determine their knowledge, skill
levels and attitudes. Then, when the training is finished, test your trainees a
second time to measure what they've learned, or measure their learning with
interviews or verbal assessments.
Note:
As a manager, you need to hold people accountable for improving their skills,
and to offer them the support they need to do so.
This level helps you to understand how well people apply their training. It can
also reveal where people might need help. But behavior can only change when
conditions are favorable.
Imagine that you're assessing your team members after a training session. You
can see little change, and you conclude that they learned nothing, and that the
training was ineffective.
It's possible, however, that they actually learned a lot, but that the organizational
or team culture obstructs behavioral change. Perhaps existing processes mean
that there's little scope to apply new thinking, for example.
As a result, your people don't feel confident in applying new knowledge, or see
few opportunities to do so. Or, they may not have had enough time to put it into
practice.
Tip:
Managers need to be closely involved at this stage, assessing
and coaching their team members in making behavior changes.
At this level, you analyze the final results of your training. This includes
outcomes that you or your organization have decided are good for business and
good for your team members, and which demonstrate a good return on
investment (ROI). (Some adapted versions of the model actually have a Level 5,
dedicated to working out ROI.)
Level 4 will likely be the most costly and time consuming. Your biggest
challenge will be to identify which outcomes, benefits, or final results are most
closely linked to the training, and to come up with an effective way to measure
these outcomes in the long term.
Modern trainers often use the Kirkpatrick model backward, by first stating
the results that they want to see, and then developing the training that's most
likely to deliver them. This helps to prioritize the goals of the training and make
it more effective.
Limitations of Kirkpatrick's Model
Kirkpatrick's model remains popular, but it should be used with care. The basic
structure is now more than 60 years old (despite its many updates), and the
ways that people learn and organizations operate have changed radically in this
time. Even the term "training" has been largely replaced by "learning and
development."
Today, other, non-formal methods of workplace training are often more popular
and effective (as shown by the 70:20:10 model). And, with the rise of
personalized, user-directed learning, formal training is becoming less
prominent. Kirkpatrick's model is not necessarily suited to this new approach to
learning.
Another drawback is that Levels 3 and 4, which arguably yield the most useful
information for the business, are time consuming, resource intensive, and
expensive to implement. So the model may not be practical for all
organizations, especially if you don't have a dedicated training or HR
department to conduct the analysis. And it's not ideal for all situations, such as
one-off training.
Most importantly, organizations change in many ways, and these changes affect
behaviors and results, as well as training. For example, measurable
improvements in retention and productivity could result from the arrival of a
new boss, or from a new computer system, rather than from training. Or it could
be a combination of these.