Merchandise Management
Merchandise Management
DOI: 10.5772/56836
∂ 2013 Iannone et al.; licensee InTech. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative
Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use,
distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
www.intechopen.com                                    Raffaele Iannone, Angela Ingenito, Giada Martino, Salvatore Miranda, Int.Claudia
                                                                                                                                j. eng. Pepe and Stefano
                                                                                                                                        bus. manag.,       Riemma:
                                                                                                                                                       2013, Vol. 5,   1
                                                                                      Merchandise and Replenishment     Planning Optimisation
                                                                                                         Special Issue Innovations                for Fashion
                                                                                                                                      in Fashion Industry,    Retail
                                                                                                                                                           26:2013
    Based on these considerations, this current work proposes        Chain means, literally, the route followed by the product
    an innovative Demand Planning algorithm. From a logical          in the production and distribution process, starting
    point of view, the model incorporates the most effective         from its raw material and ending with the finished
    characteristics of systems already developed (for example,       product available on the market. Furthermore, the chain
    historic data and deviation analysis) and introduces             includes coordination and integration activities between
    functionality and methodologies that are completely new,         production and distribution stages. The actors involved
    allowing us to overcome some critical aspects not yet            are [4]:
    solved. The model was applied to the case of a fashion           • suppliers of materials and components;
    retail company whose core business is the production of
                                                                     • other actors that perform one phase of the supply chain,
    a specific group of products as well as the fulfilment of
                                                                       such as sub-contractors ("façonisti");
    complete customer satisfaction, with all that it implies in
    productive, distributive and communication terms.                • third-party suppliers, that provide the company with
                                                                       clothes already sewn or semi-finished;
    After an overview of the retail sector, with particular
    attention to issues of retail distribution and selling           • Logistics providers;
    arrangements through a dense network of stores, and on           • Points of Sale (POS).
    fast-fashion, we will describe in detail the model and
    its application to the real case of an important Italian         In this sense, a fashion dress is much more than the
    fashion company, owner of a well-known franchising               creative effort of the designer. It is the result of using
    brand situated all around the country. Following, after a        innovative fibres, woven with equipment specialised in
    first phase of customisation for introduction of the model       fabrics, sewn in forms and colours that the fashion system
    to a particular business context, we will describe the           proposes through fairs and specialised operators. Last but
    strategical advantages that derive from its use and, in          not least, distribution significantly contributes because it
    particular, the possibility of turning from the traditional      selects the offer and manages the demand through direct
    push strategy of planning to take advantage of the more          contact with the end consumer [2].
    efficient pull strategy. To highlight the real effectiveness
    of the proposed model, we also present the process of            Compared to management of the typical variables
    validation and comparison between business planning              concerning this business, increasingly critical to market
    results obtained with or without the proposed model.             success are monitoring the degree of consumer satisfaction
                                                                     with reference to the quality-price-styling mix of products
    1.1. Fashion Retail                                              commercialised, overseeing of distribution channels,
                                                                     development of effective and innovative communication
    The fashion retail industry registered a slow recovery           strategies and, finally, the integration among the different
    in 2010, after hard knocks suffered in recent years due          Supply Chain’s actors. In particular, for companies in the
    to the economic crisis. In particular, pre-sales data            fashion system, time management (fabric procurement,
    concerning turnover of 2010 indicates a growth of 6.5%           production and delivery of finished items) has taken a
    over 2009, mainly driven by exports to emerging countries        crucial role in competitive comparison over the years.
    (Brazil, Russia, India, China, etc.) [1]. Over the last three    Between final demand, expressed by consumers who
    years, Italian companies in this sector made dozens of           purchase clothing and accessories, and orders that
    acquisitions of other firms, both in Italy and the rest of       distributors forward to producers, there are distorting
    the world. Today, in fact, the fashion industry is far from      effects (such as increases in volume and time shifts), that
    being insignificant in terms of economic size. Moreover,         complicate the sales forecasting process more and more as
    in this scenario, Italy occupies a place of prestige, together   it moves upstream in the manufacturing SC [5].
    with France: Italian companies have, in fact, a turnover
    of 15 billion Euro on a worldwide total of 53 billion.           The Pre-Season stage of collection planning is far from
    The market share, then, is near to 30% and consists of           the effective product sell and the planning activity covers
    both large companies producing luxury goods and of a             a large time range. To this critical issue is added the
    multitude of medium and small enterprises [2].                   presence of numerous articles in the collection that have
                                                                     different life-cycles or maturity degrees and positions with
    In particular, changes have occurred in recent years             customers. Given these characteristics, it is necessary that
    in the competitive system, leading many companies to             a fashion product reach the consumer as soon as possible,
    undertake initiatives to streamline operational processes,       before the product is out of fashion. In the past, in fact,
    essentially aiming to improve the responsiveness to              the objectives of differentiation led to an uncontrolled
    market demands, both in terms of adequacy of commercial          expansion of variety, thereby neglecting production
    proposals and product quality; all without neglecting, at        costs and times as well as the level of service offered
    the same time, the need to take steps to improve efficiency      the client. At present, however, even for the apparel
    and speed of the entire Supply Chain [3].                        sector, it is necessary to rationalise and accelerate the
                                                                     productive and logistic cycle, while respecting marketing
    The discussion often tends to focus only on finished             needs. Essentially, a competitive advantage is no longer
    products offered by the fashion system, but they are             developed by classic actions taken to leverage on price or
    actually the result of a long, complex chain of phases           quality, instead it arises from experience matured in time
    and activities, and the success that the product has in the      management [3]. From the above-mentioned reasons,
    market depends greatly on their interactions. The term           therefore, emerges the centrality of the operation’s
www.intechopen.com                          Raffaele Iannone, Angela Ingenito, Giada Martino, Salvatore Miranda, Claudia Pepe and Stefano Riemma:    3
                                                                            Merchandise and Replenishment Planning Optimisation for Fashion Retail
                                                                    sales period. Input data come from the POS and from other
                                                                    business functions in charge of preparing sales forecasts or
                                                                    product catalogues to launch into the market. In particular,
                                                                    data obtained from POS are:
    consider a generic Time Bucket (TB) for which we want to        All these inputs constitute the parameters on the basis
    elaborate the different operational plans.                      of which the system generates the rules Ri for the
                                                                    computation of quantities.       The different rules, and
    At the beginning of TB (i.e.: TB3) it is necessary to know      thus the upstream parameters, through an appropriate
    the quantities to sell and distribute, so we must develop       modulation of the switch a, can contribute to both the
    forecasts during the previous TB (i.e.: TB2). The model,        computation of Base Quantities (Q B ) of products to send to
    then, uses data coming from the nearest closed TB, about        POS and the definition of the Corrective Factors (QC ) used
    which all definitive data are available, as input data for      for the optimisation of the base quantities.
    plan’s elaboration. These data are processed by the model       In particular, for base quantities, each rule suggests
    during the phase called Pre Season. Once all activities are     a value: to consider all the rules according to the
    planned, it will be necessary to control, during next period,   importance given by the user, the value is multiplied by
    that actual sales results are consistent with those expected.   the corresponding weight and, finally, the model calculates
    During In Season phases, then, the model activates an           the sum of all these products.
    algorithm of monitoring and control, weekly or monthly
    repeated during the current period. Moreover, data during                                    4
    previous TB that are analysed for in season phases, for                              QB =    ∑ Qi ∗ pi ∗ ai                    (1)
    the rolling effect, will become input data for pre season                                   i =1
that are total product quantities the market can absorb                            We could also indicate, within this document, the
during the whole sales period.                                                     delivery date and time, delivery lead time, the name
                                                                                   of the POS responsible and other information useful to
                                4                                                  coordination amongst different logistic operators. At this
                QC = Q B ∗     ∑ Fi ∗ pi ∗ (1 − ai )                     (2)       point, it is necessary to perform a continuous monitoring
                               i =1                                                of sales that may significantly differ from forecasts input
where Fi is the value of the corrective factor calculated                          to the system, both in excess and in defect. The continuous
with rule Ri .                                                                     monitoring of sales helps the retail’s demand planner
                                                                                   recalibrate, work in progress, purchase orders to send to
Example. Let’s assume that for the definition of the                               network logistic warehouses, for example increasing them
quantities we expect to sell for item 001 we make the                              in case of initial under forecast of quantities. Therefore,
choice reported in table 1.                                                        while as input in the first Pre Season phase we give annual
                                                                                   sales forecasts, at this point we should limit the time
The quantities of item 001 are computed as follows:                                horizon and consider only monthly forecast. This step is
                                                                                   crucial for those products with a strong seasonality feature
                                                                                   in their demand trend.
                                                 4
                                      QB =      ∑ Qi ∗ pi ∗ ai =                   The model analyses the deviation between actual sales
                                                i =1
                                                                         (3)       and forecast in the same period. The ∆ or deviation is
        = (1 ∗ 0.3 ∗ 1) + (3 ∗ 0.7 ∗ 1) + (1 ∗ 0.6 ∗ 0)+                           computed as follows:
                                 +(0.6 ∗ 0.5 ∗ 0) = 2.4
                                                                                                              actual − forecast
                                                                                                        ∆=                      ∗ 100                     (5)
                                                                                                                  forecast
                                          4
                       QC = Q B ∗        ∑ Fi ∗ pi ∗ (1 − ai ) =                   Quantities are corrected (increased or reduced) of a value
                                         i =1                                      proportional to the error committed:
                                                                         (4)
   = 2.4 ∗ [(1 ∗ 0.3 ∗ 0) + (3 ∗ 0.7 ∗ 0) + (1 ∗ 0.4 ∗ 1)+
                            +(0.6 ∗ 0.5 ∗ 1)] = 2.16 = ∼2
                                                                                                             Q c = Q i ∗ (1 + ∆ )                         (6)
The output of this first part is the Merchandise Plan,                             where: QC : corrected quantity during In Season phases;
obtained by disaggregating sales forecasts and indicating                          Qi : initial quantity obtained during Pre Season forecasting
the quantities for each POS that we expect to sell during                          phase;
the period considered.                                                             ∆: data deviation.
2.2. Replenishment Plan                                                            This operation is then repeated for each POS and each
In common practice, suppliers deliver products to central                          item. The document that we obtain is the RP, that is the
warehouses in different moments within the time range                              POS’ re-assortment plan issued once again to logistic and
considered. In the same way, goods are delivered to a POS                          distribution function (figure 2). As mentioned, suppliers
in several phases as provided in the MP. In particular, at                         deliver ordered goods in two or more phases, thus stock
the beginning of the time bucket, only goods available at                          that arrives in the network central warehouses from
www.intechopen.com                                      Raffaele Iannone, Angela Ingenito, Giada Martino, Salvatore Miranda, Claudia Pepe and Stefano Riemma:    5
                                                                                        Merchandise and Replenishment Planning Optimisation for Fashion Retail
               TURNOVER RANGES                 DIMENSION RANGES                                  % HISTORIC SALES
              low          0       100 000      small         0    100                         very low       0%    40%
            medium      100 000    300 000     medium        101   200                       medium-low       41%   60%
              high      300 000    500 000       large       201   500                           low          61%   70%
                                                                                                 high         71%   80%
3.1. Introduction Table 4. Division of POS for position and geographical area
The choice of this level of information detail was primary                  The corrective factors were defined in a similar manner
dictated by the need for reliable forecasts.                                (table 7).
The last parameter to be considered amongst inputs                          As the model shows, Rule 1 depends on turnover and
is forecast by geographical area. This parameter indicates                  dimension and is expressed by the matrix in table 6.
sales estimates in different geographical areas for the
whole season: it typically requires a collaboration between
the Sales and the Design functions. The complexity of                       For the definition of Rule 2 (table 7) we must indicate,
the fashion system and, as a consequence, of the business                   corresponding to the value of historic sales, the quantity to
reality generates the presence of two nuclei together in the                add or remove from the coefficient that indicates the base
company: first, the creative one, oriented to the creation of               quantity as defined by Rule 1.
a permanent stylistic identity, as well as the identification
of seasonal stylistic themes and of consequent collections,
                                                                            The initial analysis of the data coming from all the POS
and, second, the managerial one, which must be able
                                                                            also highlighted that, based on the position, they register
to impose a brand identity on the market, through
                                                                            different sales for the three product’s macro-families.
appropriate product strategies and a correct sales plan.
                                                                            Accessories, for example, are sold in greater quantities in
                                                                            airports because the purchasing activity is very quick; in
3.2.2. Elaboration of the model and definition of the rules                 shopping centres and on the street, they register very low
In a preliminary phase, in agreement with the company                       success. A different trend is reserved for Clothing to Try
and with its management policies, we chose which factors                    On, while Clothing that does not need to be tried in the
to involve in the computation of the base quantity (Q B )                   dressing room is sold in an equal percentage in all the POS.
www.intechopen.com                               Raffaele Iannone, Angela Ingenito, Giada Martino, Salvatore Miranda, Claudia Pepe and Stefano Riemma:    7
                                                                                 Merchandise and Replenishment Planning Optimisation for Fashion Retail
                            Weight R2                   0.7                   Weight R4           0
                    % HISTORICAL SALES            CORR. FACT.                         % SALES FORECAST (CLOTHING)
                             very low                    -1                   Subdept.     North      Centre      South
                            medium-low                  -0.6                  001          0.0        -0.6        -0.3
                                low                     -0.3                  002          0.0        -0.6        -0.3
                               high                      0                    003          0.0        -0.6        -0.3
                            medium-high                 0.6                   004          0.0        -0.6        -0.3
                             very high                   1                    005          0.0        -0.6        -0.3
                                                                              006          0.0        -0.6        -0.3
    Table 7. Definition of Rule 2                                             007          0.0        -0.6        -0.3
    correspondence to each predictive input value. The basic                  053          0.0        -1.0        -0.6
    idea is that, if we are supposed to sell 90% of dresses                   054          -0.6       -0.6        -1.0
    (cod.008), it is good to deliver to the POS a great quantity,             055          -0.6       -0.6        -1.0
    even if its turnover and dimension are small and impose a
                                                                              056          -0.6       0.0         0.6
    coefficient 1X.
                                                                              057          -0.6       0.0         0.6
    The last three rules, associated to the computation of the                058          -0.6       0.0         0.6
    corrective factors, were assigned a weight pi so that (p2 +
                                                                              059          -0.6       0.0         0.6
    p3 + p4 = 1), and that can vary during simulation phases.
    This choice should be made only once, when the model is                   060          -0.6       0.0         0.6
    introduced in the company, even if the parameters could                   061          -0.6       0.0         0.6
    change at any moment depending on needs.                                  062          -0.6       0.0         0.6
                                                                              063          -0.6       0.0         0.6
    3.2.3. Output Data                                                        064          -0.6       -0.6        -0.3
    Ultimately, thanks to inputs that come from the sales                     065          -0.6       -0.6        -0.3
    network or other business functions, the model is able                    066          -0.6       -0.6        -0.3
    to elaborate an aggregate sales forecast concerning the
    whole season. In particular, for each product category and
                                                                      Table 9. Definition of Rule 4
    for the three different price ranges, the model calculates
    quantities that we are supposed to sell and that, therefore,      • Clothing to try on.
    we must purchase from the suppliers. This information
    is forwarded to producers in the form of Operation Plan;          In addition to being a simple sales plan, it fully performs
    suppliers, from their point of view, know in detail the           the functions of a Distribution Plan because it guides
    product category as well as the bill of material for each         the company in the distribution planning during the first
    clothing item; thus they are able to elaborate the principal      season’s phases.
    production plans starting from the forecast.
                                                                      Table 10 shows an example of the MP.
    Disaggregating the quantities forecast, that is detailing
    them for each POS, we obtain the MP which, for                    For each family or product category (001, 002, etc.)
    operational needs, is divided into three groups:                  and for each price range, the model calculates the
                                                                      appropriate coefficient for the definition of the quantities.
    • Accessories;                                                    Those corrected quantities (Qr ) are computed using the
    • Clothing;                                                       weighted average technique.
www.intechopen.com                                             Raffaele Iannone, Angela Ingenito, Giada Martino, Salvatore Miranda, Claudia Pepe and Stefano Riemma:    9
                                                                                               Merchandise and Replenishment Planning Optimisation for Fashion Retail
        • ∆2 <0: not only the POS sells more than what we           • if the stock, at week s, i positive (Gs > 0) then
          expected but also more than the company average,
                                                                                                   s
          then we increase the quantity:                                                  QVs =   ∑ Ci − Gs
                                                                                                  i =1
                                 Q C = Q B ∗ (1 + ∆1 )
                                                                    • if the stock, at week s, is negative (Gs < 0) then it means
        • ∆2 >0: the POS sells less than the company average,         that the POS sold more than was available during Week
          then the initial quantity is not changed :                  s − 1, while during Week s, the stock is actually null, so:
                                        QC = Q B
                                                                                       QVs = QV(s−1) + G(s−1)
    The RP is the POS reassortment plan issued by the logistic
                                                                    In figure 6 the demand profile corresponds to the demand
    and distribution function. This plan is obtained by
                                                                    accurately registered every week of the season S/S 1; in the
    correcting the initial MP according to the results of the
                                                                    same way the delivery profile was built using real delivery
    deviation analysis.
                                                                    data of the same reference period.
    In addition, it is possible to activate, corresponding
    to the POS’ dimension, a threshold that indicates the           The simulator accepts as input these profiles and simulates
    maximum goods quantity that a store can contain. The            the behaviour of the entire season in terms of POS demand
    aim is to prevent small POS from receiving, during the          and stock. Data we obtained are considered historical sales
    reassortment, more product than what they can actually          data and are used as inputs in the model, which is then
    hold.                                                           able to develop the MP for season S/S 2 that guides
                                                                    deliveries only of the goods available at the beginning
    4. Validation and analysis of the results                       of the period.At this point, it starts the simulation of the
                                                                    in season periods of season S/S 2 that, from time to time,
    The last step of the process, the validation, consists of       are analysed by the model for the periodic elaboration of
    verifying that the model is:                                    optimised distribution and replenishment plans. Using
                                                                    as input data the same historical demand profile and the
    • sufficiently accurate for the applications of interest;       deliveries suggested by the model for the first week, we
    • able to reproduce and manage a real system and its            start a new simulation that generates the sales quantities
      limits.                                                       for the first month (Week 12-15); the model checks data
                                                                    referred to in this period and generates a first RP which
    In particular, this validation phase consists of a              suggests deliveries to be made during Week 16. In the end,
    comparison between the behaviour of the system                  delivery profile 2 is updated by inserting a new record
    governed by the current strategies (push) and the one           corresponding to Week 16. We repeat cyclically what we
    governed by the strategies suggested by the model               did in the previous step, in other words the simulator
    (push-pull). This comparison was performed thanks               generates the results for the second month of the season 2
    to a simulation tool developed with Arena Simulation            (Week 16-19) starting from which the model can elaborate
    Software®.                                                      the second RP for Week 20. This process of simulation and
                                                                    elaboration of the replenishment plans continues until we
    The simulator accepts as input a dataset, that is composed      cover all weeks of the season. In this case, at the beginning
    by the demand and deliveries profiles built on the basis        we decided to make one delivery a month; however it
    of past data, given as output the POS’ demand and               is possible to distribute goods once every 15 days, thus
    stocks day by day. Figure 6 shows the simulation process        controlling sold quantities not at the fourth week but once
    performed for the planning of the season Spring/Summer          every two weeks.
    2 (S/S 2) starting from the previous, S/S 1. In particular,
    the time range under examination is the one that goes           It is now possible to compare the actual results achieved
    from Week 12 to Week 34, from which we are interested           during season S/S 2 and those that we would obtain if,
    in knowing sales data for five products, found to be            being equal the market demand, the company had used
    representative of the entire collection:                        the model. In particular, the simulator generated a dataset
                                                                    for a store with a medium dimension and turnover ,
    1. bags (Accessories);                                          chosen as representative of the company network. The
    2. t-shirts (Clothing to Try On);                               first diagram in figure 7 shows the percentage of sold
                                                                    quantity over delivered one recorded every week: blue
    3. dresses (Clothing to Try On );
                                                                    lines always reach a greater height than the red ones,
    4. shawls (Clothing);                                           reflecting the fact that the quantity of goods the model
    5. jackets (Clothing).                                          suggests to deliver are in line with real requirements. In
                                                                    fact, observing the second diagram, the value of the stock
    The simulator, as mentioned, processes the values of            obtained using the actual strategy is always higher than
    demand and daily stock and starting from them, it is            the one provided by the model, then bearing both capital
    necessary to go back to the sold quantities. Therefore, after   costs for stocks and costs for the withdrawal of unsold
    having merged data on a weekly basis, the sold quantities       goods at the end of the season.
    until week s (QVs ) are computed as follows:
                  001           002           003       004       005                At the end of the season the delivery plan computed
              C         I   C         I   I         E   C     I         E            by the model is better distributed over the time, in stark
       Curr. 77% 82% 87% 76% 96% 77% 56% 52% 57%                                     contrast to the chaos that currently governs consignments
                                                                                     from the central warehouse to POS. The main problem
       Mod. 91% 78% 100% 100% 100% 100% 78% 81% 80%
                                                                                     is that today the company is unable to react quickly to
                                                                                     sudden demands of customers for unavailable goods.
Table 13. Advantages of the model in terms of stock                                  On many occasions the company reacts with ad hoc
                                                                                     shipments of single items or by moving product from one
As a consequence, the model is able to achieve the                                   store to another (these episodes are witnessed by the red
business target of a percentage of sold quantities equal to                          spheres of smaller dimensions in figure 8).
80% and quite uniform for all items (see table 13). Thanks
to an optimised allocation of the goods, we are able to                              The inventory turnover(IT )is, instead, a key parameter
make available on shelves the right quantities of the right                          for the evaluation of the company’s logistic management
products.                                                                            (equation 11).
www.intechopen.com                                        Raffaele Iannone, Angela Ingenito, Giada Martino, Salvatore Miranda, Claudia Pepe and Stefano Riemma:    11
                                                                                          Merchandise and Replenishment Planning Optimisation for Fashion Retail
                                                                                         We should, however, point out that, to make analysed
                                                                                         data more respondent to reality, demand profiles were
                                                                                         constructed considering real sales of past seasons and
                                                                                         the demand is, therefore, referring to what was available
                                                                                         to sell in the store. However, we do not consider the
                                                                                         possibility of selling other products that our analysis
                                                                                         suggests are highly required in one POS more than
                                                                                         another (for example in airports more than in shopping
                                                                                         centres). In other words, we should consider that the
                                                                                         customers’ purchasing behaviour is different if they can
                                                                                         choose among several items: then, against a lower level
                                                                                         of service at the end of the season, we should consider
                                                                                         an hypothetical increase in profitability ensured by the
                                                                                         model.
    Figure 8. Deliveries during season S/S 2
                                                                                         To test the utility of the model, in addition to the
                       001             002           003       004       005             simulator, we also used a less complex and more
                                                                                         immediate technique to underline the advantages in
                  C     I    E     C         I   I         E   C     I         E   Avg
                                                                                         economic terms for the purchases at the beginning of the
          Curr. 2.07 1.82 1.77 1.96 2.01 2.32 1.50 0.93 0.87 1.00 1.62
                                                                                         season.
          Mod. 7.43 1.86 12.78 5.70 9.47 4.91 4.26 2.02 3.33 2.32 5.41
                                                                                         We entered as input to the model sales data of season S/S
    Table 14. Inventory turnover
                                                                                         2011 and the model returned as output the quantities to
                                                                                         be delivered to POS in the following season, that is S/S
                                                                                         2012. In particular we found that, the purchased items for
                               MO                                                        season 2012, were too many, resulting in a high inventory
                                    IT =              (11)
                               GM                                                        level in the POS. If we had used the model, the company
    where MO and G M are delivered material and mean level                               would have had access to a purchasing plan computed
    of stocks, respectively.                                                             on the basis of data of the year 2012 and, thereby, much
                                                                                         closer to real sales results. Figure 10 shows the quantities
    Table 14 shows that, at present, the company records                                 actually purchased by the company and the ones that the
    rather low values for this index, which means that the                               model, if used for the same season, would suggest.
    resources invested for purchasing goods have been
    immobilised for a long period, giving rise to financial                              5. Conclusions
    problems. On the contrary, the model, following real
    market demands, records much higher inventory turnover                               The main advantage offered by this model is to consider
    values, ensuring a fast return on investment. For example,                           each POS as an independent reality which serves a
    stocks of cheap bags (code 001 Cheap) were renewed                                   clientèle with different behaviours and characteristics.
    seven times during season, against the only two times                                Each POS receives a suitable product mix, chosen
    recorded without use of the model for planning.                                      principally by considering what was sold in the previous
                                                                                         season and the socio-economic characteristics that
                                                                                         influence purchasing behaviour, as well as several other
    Assuming, instead, that in season S/S 2, a demand profile                            parameters chosen by the user: the company is, then, sure
    (blue in figure 9) was different from the one in season S/S                          to deliver the right product to the right place at the right
    1 (in red), the model effectively appears to be very reactive                        moment. This reduces the risks associated to the forecast
    and, in fact, in Week 20 suggests delivery of more goods to                          reliability which are translated in stock-outs or overstocks.
    compensate for the increase of sales.                                                In particular, this significantly reduces the probability of
                                                                                         occurrence of the two following errors, characteristic of a
    At this point, it is worth highlighting one of the limitations                       bad demand forecast:
    of the model in these conditions: the level of service.
    Today, this index always reaches values equal to 100%                                • Under-forecast of the final demand: it results in
    because the company delivers to POS more products than                                 the reduction of the level of service guaranteed
    necessary, as shown in the first diagrams. Table 15 shows,                             to customers, because of the unavailability of the
    instead, values of the level of service obtained using the                             required product (stock-out), the need to increase
    model: cells with the string no indicate, for that particular                          product stocks at the intermediate storages of the
    week, that there were no requests for the product in the                               logistic/distribution network (safety stock), the need
    column; underlined there are cases in which we registered                              to issue urgent production and distribution orders
    a low level of service, resulting in lost sales. Especially                            (altering the structure of the optimised plan previously
    during the last weeks of a season, after having reached the                            formulated), or the loss of image for the company
    peak of sales, by using the model we risk having no more                               (detected as unreliable and not precise in the deliveries
    items to sell because of the search of a minimum level of                              to customers);
    stock.                                                                               • Over-forecast of the final demand: it results in
                                                                                           excessive stock levels and connected management and
   holding costs for the products at the warehouses                            Thus, thanks to an optimised product allocation, we
   (both central and internal to POS), excessive and                           reduce several cost items connected specifically to logistics
   incorrect allocation of the production capacity, risk of                    and to stocks at the end of the period. In season planning,
   physical deterioration or technological obsolescence of                     in fact, guarantees the minimum transport cost for the
   products.                                                                   replenishment of stores and the delivery of products to
www.intechopen.com                              Raffaele Iannone, Angela Ingenito, Giada Martino, Salvatore Miranda, Claudia Pepe and Stefano Riemma:    13
                                                                                Merchandise and Replenishment Planning Optimisation for Fashion Retail
    Figure 10. Difference between the actually purchased quantities for S/S 2012 and the ones computed by the model for clothes to try on
    each POS with a grater chance of sale. Furthermore,                   [9] Cecilia Maria Castelli; Alessandro Brun. An empirical
    the model is designed and developed to ensure a perfect                   study of italian fashion retailers. International Journal
    integration between the different SC actors within such a                 of Retail & Distribution Management, 38(1):22–24, 2010.
    complex sector as the retail one. In this sense, the model           [10] Bernhard Swoboda; Nicolae Al. Pop; Dan Cristian
    helps different planners to intervene in an intelligent way               Dabija.      Vertical alliances between retail and
    on the wide dataset held by the companies. In fact, it is a               manufacturer companies in the fashion industry.
    real solution of Business Intelligence (BI), contributing to              Amfiteatru Economice, XII(28):634–649, 2010.
    the profitability and to the business development with all           [11] Claudia Battista; Massimiliano M. Schiraldi. The
    the characteristics discussed in this paper. In particular, the           logistic maturity model: Application to a fashion
    model, as a BI tool, is able to optimise the performances of              company. International Journal of Engineering Business
    the core company’s processes, contributing to reduction of                Management, 2013.
    costs and increase of revenue. Concerning cost reduction,            [12] Fabio De Felice; Antonella Petrillo; Claudio Autorino.
    the main advantages are achieved thanks to performance                    Key success factors for organizational innovation
    control, monitoring of key performance indicators (KPI)                   in the fashion industry.        International Journal of
    and, last but not least, to optimisation of the SC.                       Engineering Business Management, 2013.
                                                                         [13] Maria Elena Nenni; Luca Giustiniano; Luca Pirolo.
    6. References                                                             Demand forecasting in the fashion industry: a
                                                                              review. International Journal of Engineering Business
      [1] Osservatorio ICT and business innovation,                           Management, 2013.
          editors.     ICT nel fashion retail quali evoluzioni in        [14] Kin-Fan Au; Tsan-Ming Choi; Yong Yu. Fashion
          un contesto globale? School of Management-POLIMI-                   retail forecasting by evolutionary neural networks.
          Dipartimento di Ingegneria Gestionale, 2011.                        Internationl Journal of production Economics,
      [2] Silvio Modina. Il negozio di moda: strategia, valutazione           114:615–630, 2008.
          e gestione economico-finanziaria. Franco Angeli, 2012.         [15] Min Xia; Yingchao Zhang; Liguo Wenga; Xiaoling
      [3] Alessadro Coraggia. La supply chain management                      Ye. Fashion retailing forecasting based on extreme
          come strumento di marketing. il caso inditex-zara.                  learning machine with adaptive metrics of inputs.
          Master’s thesis, Universitá Luiss Guido Carli, 2009.                Knowledge Based Systems, 2012.
      [4] S. Saviolo; S. Testa. Le imprese del Sistema moda. Il          [16] Zhan-Li Sun; Tsan-Ming Choi; Kin-Fan Au; Yong
          management al servizio della creativitá. ETAS LIBRI,                Yu. Sales forecasting using extreme learning machine
          2005.                                                               with applications in fashion retailing.         Decision
      [5] Damiano Milanato; Fabrizio Dallari. Metodologie di                  Support Systems, 46:411–419, 2008.
          sales forecasting nel fashion retail. Logistica, page 28,      [17] Andrea Fumi; Arianna Pepe; Laura Scarabotti;
          Settembre 2011.                                                     Massimiliano M. Schiraldi.        Fourier analysis for
      [6] ICT4 Executive. L’ict nel fashion retail, una leva per il           demand forecasting in fashion company. International
          successo, 2011.                                                     Journal of Engineering Business Management, 2013.
      [7] F. De Carlo; M. A. Arleo; M. Tucci; O. Borgia. Layout
          design for a low capacity manufacturing line: a case
          study. International Journal of Engineering Business
          Management, 2013.
      [8] F. De Carlo; M. Tucci; O. Borgia. Bucket brigades
          to increase productivity in a luxury assembly
          line.    International Journal of Engineering Business
          Management, 2013.