0% found this document useful (0 votes)
24 views7 pages

Engpedia - Ir: Multiple Stress Creep Recovery (MSCR) Test of Asphalt Binder Using A Dynamic Shear Rheometer (DSR)

This document describes a test method called Multiple Stress Creep Recovery (MSCR) used to determine the percent recovery and nonrecoverable creep compliance of asphalt binders. The test is conducted using a Dynamic Shear Rheometer at a specified temperature. It subjects asphalt binder samples to two different stress levels, measuring the amount of recovery after each cycle of applied stress. This provides information about the elastic response and stress dependence of both modified and unmodified asphalt binders.

Uploaded by

newsha javadi
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
24 views7 pages

Engpedia - Ir: Multiple Stress Creep Recovery (MSCR) Test of Asphalt Binder Using A Dynamic Shear Rheometer (DSR)

This document describes a test method called Multiple Stress Creep Recovery (MSCR) used to determine the percent recovery and nonrecoverable creep compliance of asphalt binders. The test is conducted using a Dynamic Shear Rheometer at a specified temperature. It subjects asphalt binder samples to two different stress levels, measuring the amount of recovery after each cycle of applied stress. This provides information about the elastic response and stress dependence of both modified and unmodified asphalt binders.

Uploaded by

newsha javadi
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 7

Standard Method of Test for

Multiple Stress Creep Recovery


(MSCR) Test of Asphalt Binder
Using a Dynamic Shear
Rheometer (DSR)

AASHTO Designation: T 350-141

.ir
ia
ed
gP
En
--`````,```,,`,,`,,,```,,,````-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---

American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials


444 North Capitol Street N.W., Suite 249
Washington, D.C. 20001

Copyright American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials


Provided by IHS under license with AASHTO Licensee=University of Texas Revised Sub Account/5620001114
No reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS Not for Resale, 08/10/2015 21:27:47 MDT
Standard Method of Test for

Multiple Stress Creep Recovery


(MSCR) Test of Asphalt Binder Using
a Dynamic Shear Rheometer (DSR)

AASHTO Designation: T 350-141

1. SCOPE
1.1. This test method covers the determination of percent recovery and nonrecoverable creep
compliance of asphalt binders by means of the Multiple Stress Creep Recovery (MSCR) test. The
MSCR test is conducted using the Dynamic Shear Rheometer (DSR) at a specified temperature. It
is intended for use with residue from T 240 (Rolling Thin-Film Oven Test (RTFOT)).

.ir
1.2. The percent recovery value is intended to provide a means for determining the elastic response and

1.3.
ia
stress dependence of polymer modified and unmodified asphalt binders.

The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as the standard.


ed
1.4. This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use.
It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health
practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.
gP

2. REFERENCED DOCUMENTS
En

2.1. AASHTO Standards:


 M 320, Performance-Graded Asphalt Binder
 M 332, Performance-Graded Asphalt Binder Using Multiple Stress Creep Recovery (MSCR)
Test
 R 28, Accelerated Aging of Asphalt Binder Using a Pressurized Aging Vessel (PAV)
 T 240, Effect of Heat and Air on a Moving Film of Asphalt Binder (Rolling Thin-Film
Oven Test)
 T 315, Determining the Rheological Properties of Asphalt Binder Using a Dynamic Shear
Rheometer (DSR)

2.2. ASTM Standard:


 D8, Standard Terminology Relating to Materials for Roads and Pavements

3. TERMINOLOGY
3.1. Definitions:

3.1.1. Definitions of terms used in this practice may be found in ASTM D8, determined from common
English usage, or combinations of both.

TS-2b T 350-1 --`````,```,,`,,`,,,```,,,````-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`--- AASHTO


© 2015 by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.
Copyright American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials
Provided by IHS under license with AASHTO
No reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS
All rights reserved. Duplication Licensee=University
is a violation of applicable law.
of Texas Revised Sub Account/5620001114
Not for Resale, 08/10/2015 21:27:47 MDT
3.2. Definitions of Terms Specific to This Standard:

3.2.1. creep and recovery—a standard rheological test protocol whereby a specimen is subjected to a
constant load for a fixed time period and then allowed to recover at a constant zero load for a fixed
time period.

3.2.2. nonrecoverable creep compliance (Jnr)—the residual strain in a specimen after a creep and
recovery cycle divided by the stress applied, kPa–1.

4. SUMMARY OF TEST METHOD


4.1. This test method is used to determine the presence of elastic response in an asphalt binder under
shear creep and recovery at two stress levels at a specified temperature. For performance-graded
(PG) asphalt binders, the specified temperature will typically be the PG high temperature as
determined in accordance with M 332, Section 4. Refer to Note 3 in M 332 for additional
guidance.

4.2. Asphalt binder is first conditioned using T 240 (RTFOT). A sample of the RTFO-conditioned
asphalt is tested using T 315 (DSR). The 25-mm parallel plate geometry is used with a 1-mm gap

.ir
setting. The sample is tested in creep at two stress levels followed by recovery at each stress level.
The stress levels used are 0.1 kPa and 3.2 kPa. The creep portion of the test lasts for 1 s, which is
followed by a 9-s recovery. Ten creep and recovery cycles are tested at each stress level.

5. SIGNIFICANCE AND USE


ia
ed
5.1. This method is designed to identify the presence of elastic response in a binder and the change in
elastic response at two different stress levels while being subjected to ten cycles of creep stress
gP

and recovery. Nonrecoverable creep compliance has been shown to be an indicator of the
resistance of an asphalt binder to permanent deformation under repeated load.

6. APPARATUS
En

6.1. Use the apparatus as specified in T 315.

7. PROCEDURE
7.1. Conditioning—Condition the asphalt binder in accordance with T 240 (RTFOT).

7.2. Sample preparation—The sample for the MSCR test is prepared the same as samples for T 315
using 25-mm plates. The temperature control will also follow the T 315 requirements.

7.2.1. This test may be performed on the same sample that was previously used to determine the DSR
properties of the RTFO residue as specified in M 320. When using the previously tested sample to
perform this test, a 1-min relaxation period between the tests is required before running this test.
When using a new sample to perform this test, the 1-min relaxation period is not required.

7.3. Test protocol—Perform the test at the selected temperature using a constant stress creep of 1.0-s
--`````,```,,`,,`,,,```,,,````-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---

duration followed by a zero stress recovery of 9.0-s duration. Perform the test at 0.1 kPa and
3.2 kPa. Run 20 cycles at the 0.1-kPa stress level followed by 10 cycles at the 3.2-kPa stress level
for a total of 30 cycles. Use the first 10 cycles at 0.1 kPa for conditioning the specimen. There are
no rest periods between creep and recovery cycles or changes in stress level. The total time
required to complete the two-step creep and recovery test is 300 s.

TS-2b T 350-2 AASHTO


Copyright American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials © 2015 by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.
Provided by IHS under license with AASHTO
No reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS
All rights reserved. Duplication Licensee=University
is a violation of applicable law.
of Texas Revised Sub Account/5620001114
Not for Resale, 08/10/2015 21:27:47 MDT
Record the stress and strain at least every 0.1 s for the creep cycle and at least every 0.45 s for the
recovery cycle on an accumulated basis. Record the data points at the peak strain at 1.0 s and the
recovered strain at 10.0 s for each cycle’s local time. Extrapolate prior data to determine the strain
value at 1.00 s and 10.00 s if the DSR does not record the peak and recovered strain as specified.
Extrapolated data shall include a measured data point no more than 0.1 s prior to the required time
for a creep cycle and no more than 0.5 s prior to the required time for a recovery cycle.

7.4. Equipment Control—Achieve the full stress for each creep cycle within 0.03 s from the start of the
creep cycle as certified by the equipment manufacturer.

7.5. Analysis—Analyze and record the creep and recovered percent strain for the 0.1-kPa and 3.2-kPa
creep stress levels as follows:

7.5.1. For each of the last 10 cycles at the 0.1-kPa stress level and the ten cycles at the 3.2-kPa stress
level, record the following:

7.5.1.1. The initial strain value at the beginning of the creep portion of each cycle. This strain shall be
denoted as ∈0.

7.5.1.2. The strain value at the end of the creep portion (i.e., after 1.0 s) of each cycle. This strain shall be

.ir
denoted as ∈c.

7.5.1.3.
is calculated as follows:
∈1 = ∈c – ∈0
ia
The adjusted strain value at the end of the creep portion (i.e., after 1.0 s) of each cycle (∈1), which
ed
7.5.1.4. The strain value at the end of the recovery portion (i.e., after 10.0 s) of each cycle. This strain shall
be denoted as ∈r.
gP

7.5.1.5. The adjusted strain value at the end of the recovery portion (i.e., after 10.0 s) of each cycle (∈10),
which is calculated as follows:
∈10 = ∈r – ∈0
En

7.5.2. For each of the last 10 cycles, calculate the following at the creep stress level of 0.1 kPa:

7.5.2.1. Percent recovery ∈r (0.1, N) for N = 1 to 10:


(∈1 − ∈10 ) × 100
∈r ( 0.1, N ) =
∈1

7.5.3. For each of the 10 cycles, calculate the following at the creep stress level of 3.2 kPa:

7.5.3.1. Percent recovery ∈r (3.2, N) for N = 1 to 10:


--`````,```,,`,,`,,,```,,,````-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---

(∈1 − ∈10 ) × 100


∈r ( 3.2, N ) =
∈1

8. CALCULATION
8.1. Using the results obtained in Sections 7.5.2.1 and 7.5.3.1, determine the average percent recovery
for the asphalt binder at creep stress levels of 0.1 kPa and 3.2 kPa as shown in the following
equations:

TS-2b T 350-3 AASHTO


Copyright American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials © 2015 by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.
Provided by IHS under license with AASHTO
No reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS
All rights reserved. Duplication Licensee=University
is a violation of applicable law.
of Texas Revised Sub Account/5620001114
Not for Resale, 08/10/2015 21:27:47 MDT
8.1.1. Calculate average percent recovery at 0.1 kPa:
SUM ∈r ( 0.1, N ) 
=R0.1 = for >   111 to 1020
10

8.1.2. Calculate average percent recovery at 3.2 kPa:


SUM ∈r ( 3.2, N ) 
=R3.2 = for > 1 to 10
10

8.2. Using the results obtained in Sections 7.5.2.1 and 7.5.3.1, determine the nonrecoverable creep
compliance between 0.1 kPa and 3.2 kPa as shown in the following equations:

8.2.1. For each of the 10 cycles at a creep stress of 0.1 kPa, calculate the nonrecoverable creep
compliance using the last 10 cycles, Jnr (0.1, N), kPa–1, as strain/stress:
∈10
J nr ( 0.1, N ) =
0.1

8.2.2. For each of the 10 cycles at a creep stress of 3.2 kPa, calculate the nonrecoverable creep

.ir
compliance, Jnr (3.2, N), kPa–1, as strain/stress:
∈10
J nr ( 3.2, N ) =
3.2 ia
ed
8.2.3. Calculate the average nonrecoverable creep compliance at 0.1 kPa, J nr , kPa–1:
0.1

SUM  J nr ( 0.1, N ) 
J nr0.1 = for N = 11 to 20
10
gP

--`````,```,,`,,`,,,```,,,````-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
8.2.4. Calculate the average nonrecoverable creep compliance at 3.2 kPa, J nr , kPa–1:
3.2

SUM  J nr ( 3.2, N ) 
En

J nr3.2 = for N = 1 to 10
10

8.2.5. Calculate the percent difference in nonrecoverable creep compliance between 0.1 kPa and 3.2 kPa,
J nrdiff :
 J nr − J nr  × 100
J nrdiff = 
3.2 0.1 

J nr0.1

9. REPORT
9.1. Report the following information:

9.1.1. Sample identification;

9.1.2. PG grade and test temperature, to the nearest 0.1°C;

9.1.3. Average percent recovery at 0.1 kPa, R0.1;

9.1.4. Average percent recovery at 3.2 kPa, R3.2;

TS-2b T 350-4 AASHTO


© 2015 by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.
Copyright American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials
Provided by IHS under license with AASHTO
No reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS
All rights reserved. Duplication Licensee=University
is a violation of applicable law.
of Texas Revised Sub Account/5620001114
Not for Resale, 08/10/2015 21:27:47 MDT
9.1.5. Nonrecoverable creep compliance at 0.1 kPa, Jnr0.1, to two significant digits, kPa–1;

9.1.6. Nonrecoverable creep compliance at 3.2 kPa, Jnr3.2, to two significant digits, kPa–1; and

9.1.7. Percent difference between nonrecoverable creep compliance at 0.1 kPa and 3.2 kPa, Jnrdiff, to the
nearest 0.1 percent.

10. PRECISION AND BIAS


10.1. Precision—The research required to develop precision estimates has not been conducted.

10.2. Bias—The research required to establish the bias has not been conducted.

11. KEYWORDS
11.1. Asphalt binders; creep and recovery; creep compliance; Dynamic Shear Rheometer (DSR);
elastomer identification; Multiple Stress Creep and Recovery (MSCR) Test; percent recovery;

.ir
polymer modification.

APPENDIXES ia
(Nonmandatory Information)
ed
X1. SAMPLE CALCULATIONS
gP

X1.1. A typical test data plot consisting of 10 cycles of creep and recovery at 0.1-kPa creep stress is
shown in Figure X1.1. The plot for 3.2-kPa creep stress is similar to Figure X1.1 and will not be
shown here. Test data from cycle number 9 are plotted in Figure X1.2 for further clarification.
En

Figure X1.1—Test Data Plot Showing Typical 10 Cycles of Creep and Recovery
at Creep Stress of 0.1 kPa

TS-2b T 350-5 AASHTO


--`````,```,,`,,`,,,```,,,````-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---

© 2015 by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.


Copyright American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials
Provided by IHS under license with AASHTO
No reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS
All rights reserved. Duplication Licensee=University
is a violation of applicable law.
of Texas Revised Sub Account/5620001114
Not for Resale, 08/10/2015 21:27:47 MDT
X1.2. Sample Calculations:

X1.2.1. Calculation of percent recovery for cycle number 9 (see Figure X1.2):
1. Determine strain at the start (initial strain): ∈0 = 183%
2. Determine strain at 1-s creep end time point: ∈c = 212%
3. Determine adjusted creep end strain at 1-s point: ∈1 = (∈c – ∈0) = (212 – 183) % = 29%
4. Determine strain at 10-s recovery end time point: ∈r = 206.0%
5. Determine adjusted recovery end strain at 10-s point: ∈10 = (∈r – ∈0) = (206 – 183) % = 23%
6. Determine percent recovery for cycle number 9 at 0.1-kPa creep stress, ∈r (0.1, 9):
(∈1 − ∈10 ) × 100
∈r ( 0.1, N ) =
∈1

X1.2.2. For cycle number 9 at a creep stress level of 0.1 kPa, the percent recovery will be:
(29 − 23) × 100
= 21%
29.0

.ir
ia
ed
gP
En

Figure X1.2—Test Cycle No. 9 Data Plot Showing Creep and Recovery at Creep Stress of 0.1 kPa

X1.3. Follow the above example to calculate percent recoveries for all 10 cycles for both creep stress
levels of 0.1 kPa and 3.2 kPa.

1
Formerly AASHTO Provisional Standard TP 70. First published as a full standard in 2014.

TS-2b --`````,```,,`,,`,,,```,,,````-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
T 350-6 AASHTO
© 2015 by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.
Copyright American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials
Provided by IHS under license with AASHTO
No reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS
All rights reserved. Duplication Licensee=University
is a violation of applicable law.
of Texas Revised Sub Account/5620001114
Not for Resale, 08/10/2015 21:27:47 MDT

You might also like