Dorval 2009
Dorval 2009
doi:10.1016/j.jfms.2008.06.003
Department of Veterinary Clinical        Information regarding the use and success of peritoneal dialysis (PD) in the
Sciences, Veterinary Teaching            management of acute renal failure (ARF) in cats is lacking. The purpose of this
Hospital, Faculty of Veterinary          retrospective study is to describe the indications, efficacy, complications and
Medicine, University of Montreal,        outcome of cats undergoing PD for ARF. Six cats that underwent PD for
1525 Rue des Veterinaires, Saint-        treatment of ARF of various etiologies were included. PD effectively replaced
Hyacinthe, CP 5000, Quebec,              renal function in all cats and allowed renal recovery in 5/6 cats. Five cats were
Canada J2S 7C6                           discharged and one cat died. Complications were reported in all cats and
                                         included subcutaneous edema (n ¼ 5), hyperglycemia (n ¼ 4), dialysate retention
                                         (n ¼ 3), and hypoalbuminemia (n ¼ 3). A novel technique consisting of a Blake
                                         surgical drain and an intermittent closed suction system was used, which
                                         appears to be a viable option for PD in cats. Although complications are
                                         common, PD is an effective renal replacement therapy for ARF in cats and
                                         carries a reasonable prognosis in selected cases.
Date accepted: 11 June 2008                       Ó 2008 ESFM and AAFP. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
A
          dvancements in veterinary medicine                     only accessible method to replace renal function
          have introduced a number of renal re-                  and prevent systemic imbalances from occurring
          placement therapies including continu-                 during the period of renal recovery.
ous renal replacement therapy (CRRT),                               PD has been used to treat ARF in humans since
intermittent hemodialysis (IHD) and peritoneal                   1923.4 It involves the exchange of solutes and fluid
dialysis (PD). These therapies use principles of                 between the peritoneal capillary blood and the
diffusion, ultrafiltration and convection to re-                 dialysis solution across the peritoneal membrane.
move metabolic waste products from the blood-                    Waste products in higher concentration in the
stream and to re-establish acidebase, electrolyte                blood diffuse across the peritoneum into the dial-
and fluid imbalances that have resulted from                     ysate and are removed with each fluid exchange.
renal dysfunction. To date, only IHD, and more                   Although the veterinary literature describes the
recently, CRRT, have been reported with success                  use of PD for many conditions, information is
in the treatment of acute renal failure (ARF) in                 lacking concerning its use in the management of
cats.1e3 These techniques require specialized                    naturally occurring ARF in cats.4e6 One retrospec-
equipment and trained personnel, and therefore,                  tive study mentions the use of PD in the treatment
tend to be limited to referral and academic veter-               of ARF in two cats but fails to show its efficacy in
inary hospitals. PD, however, tends to be less                   replacing renal function in the two cases. More-
technologically demanding, and because most                      over, no explanation was apparent for the failure
veterinary hospitals already have the equipment                  of PD in either case.7
necessary to perform PD, it often remains the                       The objectives of this retrospective study are to
                                                                 describe the application, efficacy and clinical fea-
                                                                 tures of cats treated with PD for ARF of different
*Corresponding author. E-mail: patricia.dorval@umontreal.ca      etiologies.
1098-612X/08/020107+09 $34.00/0                   Ó 2008 ESFM and AAFP. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
108                                     P Dorval and SR Boysen
 Table 1. Duration of PD, and renal parameters at base-line, start of PD (following at least 24 h of medical
 management for ARF), at 12, 48 and 72 h after starting PD, and at the time of discharge
                               Base-line*    Start of PD     12 h     24 h      48 h     72 h    Discharge       PD
                                               (>24 h                                                          duration,
                                               medical                                                            h
                                              therapy)
 Cat 1                                                                                                             64
 BUN (mg/dl)                     120            325         277      114       53       30          17.3
 Creat (mg/dl)                   13.7           27.7        24.7     9.7       5.0      3.3         2.0
 Kþ (mEq/l)                                     8.2                  4.2       3.6      3.9
 Urine output (ml/kg/h)                         0.5         0.3      4.0       7.8      4.4
 Cat 2                                                                                                             72
 BUN (mg/dl)                     164            164         N/A      111       140      105         98.1
 Creat (mg/dl)                   17.5           17.7        N/A      12.7      12.2     10.2        6.7
 Kþ (mEq/l)                      3.7            4.2                  4.2       3.9      4.0
 Urine output (ml/kg/h)                         3.0         2.7      4.8       7.2      6.8
 Cat 3                                                                                                             78
 BUN (mg/dl)                     64             202         N/A      127       99       44.8        22.3
 Creat (mg/dl)                   6.5            18.0        N/A      14.7      10.5     3.8         1.7
 Kþ (mEq/l)                                     10.9                 8.8       4.5      3.9
 Urine output (ml/kg/h)                         0           0        0         2.5      6.3
 Cat 4                                                                                                             96
 BUN (mg/dl)                     49             121         59       38        28       N/A         28
 Creat (mg/dl)                   3.0            6.2         3.4      N/A       1.6      N/A         1.5
 Kþ (mEq/l)                      4.57           6.11        3.7      3.7       4.0                  3.2
 Urine output (ml/kg/h)                         4.0         3.0      2.0       N/A      N/A
 Cat 5                                                                                                             80
 BUN (mg/dl)                     N/A            303         N/A      189       168      127         25.9
 Creat (mg/dl)                   20.1           24.0        N/A      19.5      17.0     14.6        2.3
 Kþ (mEq/l)                      4.7            6.2                  6.1       4.4      4.4
 Urine output (ml/kg/h)                         0           0        0         0        1.0
 Cat 6                                                                                                             53
 BUN (mg/dl)                     89             268         149      101       107      Died        Died
 Creat (mg/dl)                   21.9           26.5        16.2     N/A       12.0
 Kþ (mEq/l)                      7.2            8.11                 5.9       4.6
 Urine output (ml/kg/h)                         0.7         N/A      1.7       1.2
 Creat ¼ creatinine, N/A ¼ not available, Kþ ¼ potassium. Reference ranges: BUN 12e30 mg/dl, Creat
 0.6e2.0 mg/dl, Kþ 3.6e5.3 mEq/l.
 *Base-line values were taken prior to or during medical management, and medical management was continued for
 at least 24 h following these values (with the exception of cat 6 that received only 14 h of therapy prior to initiating
 PD).
pelvises (n ¼ 4), increased renal cortical echoge-                 One dialysis drain was placed in each cat us-
nicity (n ¼ 4), renomegaly (n ¼ 3), nephrolithiasis             ing sterile technique and general anesthesia. As
(n ¼ 2), perirenal effusion (n ¼ 2), abdominal ef-              previously described, a ventral abdominal inci-
fusion (n ¼ 2) and renal mineralization (n ¼ 1).                sion 2e3 cm caudal to the umbilicus and just
No cat showed echographic abnormalities com-                    off the midline was used to place the drains.4 A
patible with chronic kidney disease. An ante-                   Blake silicon drain, Sil-Med, attached to a closed
mortem diagnosis for the ARF was determined                     intermittent negative pressure system (J-Vac;
in three cats, suspected in one cat and not deter-              Ethicon) was used for all cats. The Blake drains
mined in two cats. Suspected or definitive diag-                were connected to warmed dialysate solution
nosis, and indications for PD for each cat are                  and a closed suction system using a Y-connector,
reported in Table 2.                                            similar to what has been previously described.5
110                                        P Dorval and SR Boysen
      Traumatic ARF following bilateral      Progressive azotemia despite medical    Subcutaneous edema
      pyelectomies                           therapy                                 Hyperglycemia
      Nephroliths                            Overhydration                           Hypoalbuminemia
                                                                                     Progression of pleural
                                                                                     effusion
 Cat 5
Omentectomies were not performed. The time              depending on the volume status of the patient
required to place the drains was available for          when PD was initiated. Bicarbonate 8.4% was
3/6 cats and ranged from 35 to 60 min.                  added to the dialysate solution of two cats. Hep-
  The initial dialysate solution for all cats was       arin (250e1000 UI/l) was added to the dialysate
lactate Ringer’s solution mixed with a variable         of all cats. Three cats received 10 ml/kg, two re-
dextrose concentration (1.25, 2.5 or 4.5%),             ceived 17 ml/kg and one cat received 40 ml/kg
                                   Management of ARF in cats using PD                                   111
of dialysate solution during the initial exchanges.    to pleural effusion and pulmonary edema
The frequency of dialysate exchanges and dwell         showed clinical (improved respiratory effort
times were adjusted for each animal’s individual       and improved breath sounds on auscultation of
needs. Initial exchanges were performed hourly         the thorax) and radiographic improvement
with a dwell time of 45 min for every cat. Fre-        within 24 and 48 h of PD, respectively. Progres-
quency of exchanges were gradually decreased           sion of pleural effusion occurred during PD in
in four cats and stopped acutely in two. Subcuta-      one cat. One cat with normal thoracic radio-
neous leakage occurred while tapering PD in one        graphs prior to PD developed pleural effusion
cat, which necessitated premature stoppage of          during dialysis. Subcutaneous edema developed
PD. In two cats PD was acutely stopped due to          (n ¼ 2), remained unchanged (n ¼ 1) or pro-
cardiopulmonary arrest. Median duration of the         gressed (n ¼ 3) during PD.
PD was 75 h (range 53e96 h). The cat that was             Complications associated with PD are re-
unsuccessfully resuscitated had 53 h of PD prior       ported in Table 2. Cardiopulmonary arrest oc-
to cardiac arrest. Additional therapies instituted     curred in two cats; one that was anuric and one
during PD were based on preferences of the             that was oliguric. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation
attending clinician and included antibiotics,          (CPR) was successful in the anuric patient whom
calcium gluconate, famotidine (Famotidine;             eventually left the hospital while CPR was un-
Omega), Continuous rate infusion (CRI) of insu-        successful in the oliguric cat. A CRI of regular in-
lin (HumulinR; Eli Lilly), butorphanol (Torbuge-       sulin was used in two cats to treat persistent
sic; Wyeth), metoclopramide (Metoclopramide;           hyperglycemia (glucose > 17 mmol/l (305 mg/dl))
Sandoz), odensetron (Zofran; GlaxoSmithKline)          that developed during PD. One cat responded
and supplemental oxygen.                               to the CRI of insulin, which was adjusted to
   There was a statistically significant decrease in   maintain a glucose concentration between 8
the mean pre- and post-dialysis values for BUN         and 13 mmol/l (144 and 234 mg/dl), while the
and creatinine (P < 0.03). The hyperkalemia            other cat showed no response to insulin therapy.
noted in five cats resolved within 48 h of PD. Ad-     Hyperglycemia in a third cat returned to normal
juvant therapy (dextrose  regular insulin) for        with a decrease in the frequency of dialysate
hyperkalemia was administered to four cats.            exchanges.
Urine output was measured in all cats. Median             Five cats were discharged from hospital and
urine output before PD was 0.6 ml/kg/h (range          one died. Median duration of hospitalization
0e4 ml/kg/h). Two cats had urine out-                  was 11.5 days (range 3e15). All cats were contin-
put > 2 ml/kg/h prior to PD while two were an-         ued on intravenous fluids for at least 24 h (me-
uric and two were oliguric. The two anuric cats        dian 2 days, range 1e9 days) following PD.
became acutely polyuric (urine output > 2 ml/          Renal parameters of three cats were normal at
kg/h) 48 h (cat 3) and 85 h (cat 5) after the initi-   discharge (see Table 1). Two cats were dis-
ation of PD. One of the two oliguric cats became       charged with supplemental fluid therapy
polyuric within 17 h of PD (cat 1) while the urine     (40 ml/kg sid SQ and 6 ml/kg sid SQ, respec-
production decreased progressively for the sec-        tively). The renal profiles of these two cats re-
ond oliguric cat that eventually arrested (cat 6).     turned to normal 1 week and 6 months
   Nutritional support was provided to five cats       following discharge, respectively. The former
during PD. A nasoesophagostomy tube was                was on a tapering dose of subcutaneous fluids
placed in two cats, an esophagostomy tube was          (12 ml/kg q48 h) and had normal renal parame-
placed in one cat, and force-feeding was used          ters at the time this paper was written (3 months
in one cat. Partial parenteral nutrition (PPN)         following discharge), while the latter was no lon-
was provided for 72 h in one cat, which was sub-       ger receiving subcutaneous fluids. Four cats
sequently switched to total parenteral nutrition       were available for 1-year follow-up: no cat re-
(TPN) for an additional 2 days. One cat arrested       quired medical therapy for renal disease, all
before institution of nutritional support. Median      had normal renal profiles and none were receiv-
time before institution of nutritional support was     ing subcutaneous fluids.
48 h (range 24e72 h).
   Evidence of overhydration prior to PD was
present in four cats and included subcutaneous         Discussion
edema (n ¼ 4) pleural effusion (n ¼ 3), pulmo-         PD effectively replaced renal function in all cats
nary edema (n ¼ 2) and ascites (n ¼ 2). Two cats       of this study, and allowed renal recovery in
that presented with respiratory signs secondary        83% of cases (5/6). Retrospectively, the rapid
112                                     P Dorval and SR Boysen
development of polyuria and the reversible na-        developed in two cats within 48 h of starting
ture of the underlying diseases likely explain        PD likely contributed to the resolution of fluid
the high success rate of patients treated with        overload, electrolyte, and acidebase disorders,
PD in our study. These results are more encour-       however, the same improvements were observed
aging than what has historically been reported        in two cats that did not develop polyuria and re-
for PD in the veterinary literature. In a study of    mained anuric or oliguric during the same pe-
25 dogs and two cats treated with PD for ARF          riod of time. Our results suggest that signs
or azotemia, only 6/27 patients (22%) survived        compatible with ARF (or exclusion of signs com-
to discharge.7 However, a more recent study           patible with chronic disease), in association with
showed 4/5 dogs (80%) treated with PD for             other indications for renal replacement therapy,
ARF secondary to leptospirosis survived to dis-       might be sufficient to support the decision of
charge, suggesting that patients with leptospiro-     initiating PD even if the inciting cause cannot
sis may have a better prognosis.9 Unfortunately,      be confirmed.
data specific to feline ARF treated with PD is lim-      The complication rate associated with PD in
ited to experimental studies and a retrospective      cats using the current technique is high (100%).
study that evaluated only two cats.7,10 The two       Previous reports of PD in small animals have
cats in the latter study had an unsuccessful out-     also reported frequent complications including
come, and it is unclear if PD decreased renal pa-     hypoalbuminemia, hypochloremia, hypokale-
rameters in these two cases. Although the             mia, catheter obstruction, dialysate retention,
number of cases in the current study is small,        peritonitis, subcutaneous leakage of dialysate
the results are more in line with the success of      and limb edema.7,9,10 Comparison between PD
cats treated with IHD for ARF of various etiolo-      and IHD is difficult because of the limited num-
gies (60%) and suggest that PD remains a viable       ber of veterinary studies and the small number of
option in the treatment of selected cats with         cats in the present study. In one study, 69% of
ARF.1e3                                               cats treated with IHD had one or more dialysis-
   PD was initiated despite the absence of            related complications. IHD-related events in-
a definitive diagnosis in half of the patients of     cluded hypotension, dialysis dysequilibrium,
this study (3/6). A potentially reversible under-     clotting and bleeding.1 Anemia, dyspnea, throm-
lying disease and signs suggestive of ARF influ-      bosis in the right atrium, respiratory and cardio-
enced the decision to perform PD. Transient           pulmonary arrest are among other significant
ureteral inflammation associated with surgical        complications reported to occur with IHD.1,5,11
trauma, pyelnonephritis and possible transient        Significant hypothermia and hypocalcemia
ureteral obstruction, which are all reversible con-   were the two major complications encountered
ditions, were identified or suspected to be the       in an ARF cat treated with CRRT.3
cause of ARF in most of the cats of this study.          Subcutaneous edema was the most frequent
It remains speculative if these cats might have       complication encountered in this study (83%)
become polyuric and survived with continued           and likely resulted from a combination of dialy-
medical therapy if PD had not been initiated.         sate leakage, hypoalbuminemia and overhydra-
However, given the progressive nature of the          tion. Intermittent wrapping of the limbs, as
azotemia despite more than 24 h of medical ther-      previously described, helped to promote mobili-
apy prior to initiating PD, and/or the persistence    zation of the edema.8 Dialysate leakage was evi-
of oliguria/anuria with signs of overhydration,       dent in one case that resulted in progressive
PD was considered necessary to help re-establish      subcutaneous edema and a decrease in the effi-
homeostasis and manage azotemia until renal           cacy of the PD. Increased intra-abdominal pres-
function improved. It is anticipated that cases       sure associated with the volume of dialysate
that have more intractable underlying renal dis-      used may have contributed to dialysate leakage.
ease would have developed more complications          Starting the initial exchange volumes at or below
as a result of longer-term PD and the prognosis       10 ml/kg, or decreasing the amount of fluid in-
would not be as favorable. In all cases the azote-    fused throughout dialysis may prevent leakage,
mia, electrolyte and acidebase disorders im-          although smaller volumes of dialysate could
proved within 24 h of PD. This improvement is         also decrease the efficacy of PD. The use of Da-
likely the result of PD as urine output did not       cron cuffs for longer-term dialysis, minimizing
change significantly during the first 24 h of dial-   manipulations of the PD catheter, optimal surgi-
ysis, with the exception of one cat that developed    cal technique and good postoperative care may
polyuria after 17 h of PD. Polyuria that              also decrease the risk of dialysate leakage.8,12
                                  Management of ARF in cats using PD                                  113
decrease abdominal dialysate retention by ac-        that the rapid absorption of dextrose from the
tively removing fluid from the peritoneal cavity     peritoneum into the vascular system may limit
during the egress phase. It may also allow           the effectiveness of dextrose solutions in achiev-
more complete dialysate exchanges over a shorter     ing ultrafiltration and prevent PD from optimiz-
period of time, thereby improving the efficacy of    ing volume control.13
PD.18 However, there were complications associ-        This is the first study to describe and report
ated with the J-Vac, which included loss of nega-    positive outcomes in cats treated with PD for
tive pressure due to breakdown of the reservoir      ARF. PD represents an effective renal replace-
material. This was easily corrected by replacing     ment therapy for ARF in cats non-responsive to
the negative pressure collection system.             medical therapy and carries a reasonable prog-
   Dialysate retention has been described as the     nosis in selected cases. Although short-term
failure to recover 90% of the dialysate volume in-   complications are common, they can usually be
fused and occurred in three cats of the current      managed and are rarely fatal. Despite the small
study.8 Subcutaneous dialysate leakage and/or        number of cases, our results suggest complete re-
abdominal absorption of dialysate solution           nal recovery is possible following PD, and that
were believed to be the causes of dialysate reten-   long-term complications associated with its use
tion. The significance of dialysate retention de-    are uncommon. The Blake surgical drain and
pends upon the hydration status of the patient,      an intermittent closed suction system appear to
the location where the positive fluid balance ac-    be a reasonable choice for PD in cats. Although
cumulates, the quantity of dialysate retained,       morbidity associated with PD in our study was
the underlying renal function and the patient’s      high it remains a viable alternative to veterinar-
ability to excrete excess fluids, and concurrent     ians in private practice that may not have access
underlying disease conditions such as heart fail-    to IHD or CRRT.
ure. In two cats that showed signs of overhydra-
tion during PD, dialysate retention was also
present, suggesting it may have contributed to       References
the state of overhydration. Promoting ultrafiltra-
                                                      1. Langston CE, Cowgill LD, Spano JA. Applications and
tion by using higher dextrose concentrations             outcome of hemodialysis in cats: a review of 29 cases. J
(3.0e4.25%) in the dialysate may be necessary            Vet Intern Med 1997; 11(6): 348e55.
to prevent abdominal absorption of dialysate.         2. Langston CE. Acute renal failure caused by lily ingestion
   PD may have corrected pre-existing overhy-            in six cats. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2002; 220(1): 49e52, 36.
dration in two cats (decreased pleural effusion       3. Landerville AJ, Seshadri R. Utilization of continuous re-
                                                         nal replacement therapy in a case of feline acute renal
with no increase in urine ouput); however, it            failure. J Vet Emerg Critic Care 2004; 14(4): 278e86.
likely contributed to the development or pro-         4. Labato MA. Peritoneal dialysis in emergency and critical
gression of pleural effusion in two other cats. In       care medicine. Clin Tech Small Anim Pract 2000; 15(3):
the latter two cases, a combination of hypoalbu-         126e35.
minemia, dialysate retention, overhydration, and      5. Cowgill LD. Application of peritoneal dialysis and he-
                                                         modialysis in the management of renal failure. In:
the passage of dialysate from the peritoneal to          Osborne A, Finco DR, eds. Canine and feline nephrology
the pleural space via diaphragmatic lymphatics           and urology. Baltimore: Lee and Febiger 1995: 573e95.
may have contributed to the development or            6. Dzyban LA, Labato MA, Ross LA, Murtaugh RJ. Perito-
progression of pleural effusion during PD. The           neal dialysis: a tool in veterinary critical care. J Vet Emerg
dialysate is believed to pass through diaphrag-          Critic Care 2000; 10(2): 91e102.
                                                      7. Crisp MS, Chew DJ, DiBartola SP, Birchard SJ. Peritoneal
matic lymphatics in response to pressure gradi-          dialysis in dogs and cats: 27 cases (1976e1987). J Am Vet
ents that develop across the diaphragm as                Med Assoc 1989; 195(9): 1262e6.
a result of adding fluid to the peritoneal space.5    8. Ross LA, Labato MA. Peritoneal dialysis. In:
Given the small number of patients, and the var-         DiBartola SP, ed. Fluid, Electrolyte, and Acid-Base
iation in signs regarding improvement versus             Disorders. Philadelphia: Saunders 2006: 635e49.
                                                      9. Beckel NF, O’Toole TE, Rozanski EA, Labato MA. Perito-
progression of overhydration, it is difficult to         neal dialysis in the management of acute renal failure in
draw conclusion concerning the efficacy of PD            5 dogs with leptospirosis. J Vet Emerg Critic Care 2005;
to correct overhydration in the cats of our study,       15(3): 201e5.
and further studies would be required to answer      10. Kalinbacak A, Kirmizigul AH, Atalay O, et al. Peritoneal
this question. When overhydration occurs, ultra-         dialysis in cats with complete ureteral obstruction. Indian
                                                         Vet J 2005; 82: 731e4.
filtration, through the use of more hyperosmolar     11. Berg RIM, Francey T, Francey T, Segev G. Resolution of acute
dialysate solutions, may be more effective in cor-       kidney injury in a cat after lily (Lilium lancifolium) intoxica-
recting the problem. However, it should be noted         tion. J Vet Intern Med 2007; 21: 857e9.
                                         Management of ARF in cats using PD                                               115
12. McCormick BB, Bargman JM. Non-infectious complica-               40 cases (1991e2003). J Vet Emerg Critic Care 2006; 16:
    tion of peritoneal dialysis: implications for patient and        S21e6.
    technique survival. J Am Soc Nephrol 2007; 18: 3023e5.       16. Szeto CC, Chow KM, Kwan BC, et al. New-onset hy-
13. Burkart J. Metabolic consequences of peritoneal dialysis.        perglycemia in non-diabetic Chinese patients started
    Semin Dial 2004; 17(6): 498e504.                                 on peritoneal dialysis. Am J Kidney Dis 2007; 49(4):
14. Jones MR, Gehr T, Burkart JM, et al. Replacement of amino        524e32.
    acid and protein losses with 1.1% amino acid and protein     17. Brouns R, DeDeyn PP. Neurological complications in re-
    losses with 1.1% amino acid peritoneal dialysis solution.        nal failure: a review. Clin Neuro Neurosurg 2004; 107(1):
    Perit Dial Intern 1998; 18: 210e6.                               1e16.
15. Crabb SE, Freeman LM, Chan DL, Labato MA. Retro-             18. Alloatti S. 1966: an automatic peritoneal dialysis ma-
    spective evaluation of total parenteral nutrition in cats:       chine. G Ital Nefrol 2007; 24(3): 236e9.