Bosch Jaipur Attrition Insights
Bosch Jaipur Attrition Insights
Assistant Professor, Department of Business Administration, S.S. Jain Subodh P.G.College,
Jaipur
2 Inspira- Journal of Modern Management & Entrepreneurship : January, 2013
units from 14.8 million units in 2010). The Indian automotive aftermarket is
currently estimated at Rs 33,000 crores and provides direct and indirect
employment to over 13 million people. Overall automobile exports registered
a growth rate of 28.97 per cent during April-December 20112. In Indian auto
component industry, there is around 575 organized players account for the 77
percent of the value added in the sector. Unorganized players constitutes of
replacement market players or tier 3 or 4 component manufacturers. The
Indian auto component industry is well positioned to capitalize on the growth
in outsourcing to low cost countries. Exports would lead the growth in the
component industry, which is expected to be around US$ 33-40 billion by
2015, from the current size of roughly US$ 15 billion.
The Bosch Group is a leading global player of technology in
automotive, industrial technology, building technology and consumer goods.
The Bosch Group comprises some 350 subsidiary companies and regional
companies in some 60 countries worldwide3. If its sales and service partners
are included, then Bosch is represented in roughly 150 countries. Founded in
1951, Bosch Limited is India’s largest auto component manufacturer and also
one of the largest Indo – German companies in India. The company earned
revenue of over Rs. 8000 crores in 2011. The Bosch Group holds 71.18% stake
in Bosch Limited. Bosch Limited has a strong nationwide service network
which spans across 1,000 towns and cities with over 5,000 authorized
representations to ensure widespread availability of both products and
services.
Problem Statement
According to the information shared by the company, it was traced
that at Bosch Limited the attrition rate has been quite substantial in the recent
years, comparatively higher than the average attrition rate for the automobile
sector which is 10.20% and close to that for the manufacturing sector, which is
20%. Some of the impact of attrition is mainly related to the various costs e.g.-
training costs, recruitment costs, new hire cost, low productivity costs, etc. It is
necessary to sense the causes responsible for attrition and to take measures on
time. Feedback from exit interviews was used for carrying out attrition
analysis in Bosch Ltd., which is based on their revelations. The organization
takes into account problems of existing employees, thereby curbing attrition.
Bosch Jaipur Plant considers manpower as its vital strength. There are
two categories of employees –Managerial and Superintendent Staff (M&SS)
Attrition Analysis at Bosch Ltd. Jaipur 3
recruitment expenses, training and orientation resources and the time. The
report also reveals that the industry wastes close to half a million pounds
every month as a result of its average 24% staff attrition rate. Recruiters
explicate that high attrition rates significantly increase the investment made
on employees (Prakash and Chowdhury 2004). Significant investments in time
and money need to be made for acquiring employees in any organization.
These can never be converted into profit when attrition is high. The high
attrition rate also hampers the productivity of the organization. Bliss (2007)
and Sutherland (2004) put forward that organizations lose productivity, social
capital and suffer customer defection when a productive employee quits.
When an employee leaves an organization, it can have a variety of effects that
not only impact on the organization, but also the individual employee and the
society7. Therefore, it is critically imperative to control attrition not only on the
front of an individual organization but also at a macro level for the industry as
a whole.
Objectives of the Study
Following are the objectives of this study:
To find out the major causes for attrition.
To analyze the factors in context of the organization.
To design suggestions to curb attrition.
Methodology
Research is exploratory in nature. Feedback of attrite from exit
interview forms -approved by the Bosch corporate office served as primary
data for carrying out this research. Secondary data was collected from
websites, magazines, books and journals. Hypothesis testing is done by using
chi square test. The sample size for study is 93.
Limitations
Analysis was carried out of the exit interview forms of Bosch from the
year 2006, this might had lead to slight variation in the analysis.
Sometime, attrite does not give an honest feedback.
Due to the confidentiality problem policies are not disclosed.
EXIT INTERVIEW: Tool to track Attrition
This Exit interview is conducted in two phases.
Phase I
Tendering resignation letter: Its objective is to ascertain reasons as to
why employees leave the organization. If the employee is really worth
retaining, company is making all efforts to retain dissatisfies in the
Attrition Analysis at Bosch Ltd. Jaipur 5
organization. The decision has to be taken very judiciously else the employees
will use this as a tool to push their demands via tendering resignation letter.
Phase II
Conducting exit interview: Exit interview is conducted after the
employee has been separated, paid all his dues and accounts cleared. This
ensures that the separated employees provide candid and unbiased feedback
about the organization’s procedures, policies and problem areas.
Analysis of Interpretation of Data
Researcher did the analysis and interpretation of exit forms filled by
the respondents which is followed by conclusion and suggestions. The study
reveals that there had been a significant number of resignations and the
situation calls for a sound intervention. Bosch Ltd. Jaipur, is divided in two
parts: Plant Technical (PT) and Plant Commercial (PC). In every year number
of resignations were more in PT range and the trend continues. During the
process of the study the researcher conducted a comprehensive survey based
investigation and recorded the responses duly presented in the tables
appended as Annexures. The responses about the positive aspect of the
company is shown in Table 1.
Table 1
Positive Factors About the Company
S.No. Positive Factors Number of Responses
1 System driven professional approach 58
2 Good working environment 48
3 Goodwill 47
4 Good policies and practices 42
5 Ample opportunities for learning and 38
growth
6 Customer oriented 21
7 Employee welfare taken care of 15
8 Good infrastructure and resource 14
availability
9 Management easily approachable 7
10 Other factors* 17
11 No response 1
* Other factors includes job stability, employee involvement,use of superior technology,
young workforce, cultural diversity and good training and development activities.
6 Inspira- Journal of Modern Management & Entrepreneurship : January, 2013
The five most rated positive aspects came up to be that the company
has system driven professional approach (58 responses), good working
environment (48 responses), reputed MNC (47 responses), good policies and
practices (42 responses) and providing its employees with ample
opportunities for learning and growth (38 responses). Despite of the fact, that
the company is adopting a system driven professional approach as well as
good working environment, still the attrition rate is high. The negative aspects
of the organisation noticed by the researcher on the basis of responses from
the respondents have been shown in Table 2.
Table 2
Negative aspects of the Company
S. No. Factors Responses
1 Emoluments not competitive 54
2 Lack of career planning activities 33
3 Long work hours 27
4 Delay in planning and implementation 24
5 Lack of interdepartmental coordination and 19
communication
6 Lack of employee welfare activities 19
7 Lack of transparency 15
8 Conservative structure 16
9 Grievance handling mechanism not proper 2
10 Other factors* 27
11 No response 14
Other factors includes no transport facilities avilable for M&SS, lack of social
initiatives, incentives not provide, mess facility not proper and slow growth.
Table 3
Things Liked About Job
S.No. Factors Number of Responses
1 Provides learning opportunity 55
2 Challenging work profile 49
3 Opportunity to work with people from 39
various fields
4 Responsibility with authority 30
5 Employee involvement and decision making 27
6 Team work 22
7 Clarity of goals 17
8 Support from seniors 14
9 Innovative ideas are valued 8
10 Other factors* 21
11 No response 3
The five aspects that the employees liked about their job are that it
provides learning opportunity (55 responses), challenging work profile (49
responses), provides opportunity to work with people from various fields
(39 responses), employees are given responsibility with authority (30
responses) and employee involvement and decision making (27 responses).
On the contrary, respondents were also asked about the things disliked by
them about the job. The disliking about the job is shown in Table 4.
Table 4
Things disliked about job
S.No. Factors Number of Responses
1 Work repetitive in nature 24
2 Lack of guidance and support 9
3 High work load 39
4 Lack of recognition 14
5 Lack of team spirit 5
6 Lack of interdepartmental cooperation 15
7 Rules and systems not followed 18
8 Inspira- Journal of Modern Management & Entrepreneurship : January, 2013
8 Information lag 6
9 Too much follow up required 17
10 Other factors* 20
11 No response 22
* Other factors includes duplication of work, slow growth, lack of learning opportunity,
profile not up to the mark and job responsibilities not clearly defined.
The five prominent dislikings about the job came out to be that the
work is repetitive in nature (24 responses); lack of guidance and support (9
responses), high work load (39 responses), lack of recognition (14 responses)
and lack of team spirit (5 responses).
Researcher asked to respondents reasons to leave the job and the
responses of them are shown in Table 5.
Table 5
Reasons to Leave the Job
S. Plant Plant Total
Factors
No Technical (PT) Commercial (PC) (O)
1 Better job opportunity 29 23 52
2 Career change 2 3 5
3 Family circumstances 22 11 33
4 No growth opportunity 8 5 13
5 Conflict with supervisor 0 0 0
Leadership – manager/
6 5 6 11
supervisor
7 Salary structure 35 21 56
8 Work conditions 3 1 4
9 Commuting distance 1 1 2
10 Self Employment 0 0 0
Returning to studies
11 8 3 11
moving out of area
12 Disliked job duties 3 5 8
Conflict with other
13 0 0 0
employees
14 Lack of Recognition 5 13 18
Dissatisfied with
15 14 6 20
benefits
16 Company culture 2 0 2
17 Others 0 7 7
Total 242
Attrition Analysis at Bosch Ltd. Jaipur 9
and other employees and self employment do not affect the number of
resignations at all.
Job Switchover
Researcher asked the respondents about the stability of job in their
career. 69% of the total respondents did not make any comment on this
question. Only 31% of the total respondents replied about the frequent change
of job as is evident from Table 6.
Table 6
Job Switchovering
Number of job Number of Resignee in %
First Job 5 5
Second Job 12 13
Third Job 8 9
Fourth Job 2 2
Fifth Job 2 2
No Response 64 69
Total 93 100
Fig. 1
Parameter1-will the respondent like to work in the same profile.
Parameter2-will the respondent like to work in the same department.
Parameter 3-will the respondent likes to work under the same supervisor.
Attrition Analysis at Bosch Ltd. Jaipur 11
Figure 1 shows that 25% respondents are ready to join the concern
on the same profile. 23 % respondents want to work in the same
department and 22% respondents show their interest to work under the
same supervisor. Over all for all three parameters, 62% respondents don’t
give any response, which proves that employees don’t want to disclose
their opinion. It is the negativity of the company that employees are not
feeling freedom to express their views.
Table-7
Calculation of Chi Square Value
Commercial
Observed
Technical
Expected
(E-O)2 /2
Factors
(E-O)2
S. No
(E-O)
Plant
Plant
Total
(PC)
(PT)
(O)
Family
3 22 11 33 93 60 3600 38.70968
circumstances
No growth
4 8 5 13 93 80 6400 68.8172
opportunity
Conflict with
5 0 0 0 93 93 8649 93
supervisor
Leadership –
6 manager/super 5 6 11 93 82 6724 72.30108
visor
7 Salary structure 35 21 56 93 37 1369 14.72043
Work
8 3 1 4 93 89 7921 85.17204
conditions
Commuting
9 1 1 2 93 91 8281 89.04301
distance
Self
10 0 0 0 93 93 8649 93
employment
Returning to
11 studies moving 8 3 11 93 82 6724 72.30108
out of area
Disliked job
12 3 5 8 93 85 7225 77.68817
duties
Conflict with
13 other 0 0 0 93 93 8649 93
employees
Lack of
14 5 13 18 93 75 5625 60.48387
recognition
12 Inspira- Journal of Modern Management & Entrepreneurship : January, 2013
Dissatisfied
15 14 6 20 93 73 5329 57.30108
with benefits
Company
16 2 0 2 93 91 8281 89.04301
culture
17 Others 0 7 7 93 86 7396 79.52688
Total
242 1185.452
References
1. www.automobileindia.com (A complete automobile consumer guide)
2. Economic Survey, Govt. of India, New Delhi, 2010-11
3. www.boschindia.com
4. Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J., Commitment in the Workplace: Theory, Research and
Application. New York: Sage Publications, 1997
5. Van Vianen, A. E. M., Feij, J. A., Krausz, M., & Taris, R., Personality Factors and
Adult Attachment Affecting Job Employability. International Journal of Selection
and Assessment, 2004, 11, pp-253-264.
14 Inspira- Journal of Modern Management & Entrepreneurship : January, 2013
6. Mobley, W.H.: Intermediate Linkages in the Reationship Between Job Satisfaction
and Employee Turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1977, 62: 238.
7. Rankin, N.: Benchmarking Labour Turnover. IRS Employment Review. No 842, 3
March; 2006, pp. 42-48.
8. Lazear, E.: Performance Pay and Productivity. American Economic Review, 2000,
90:1346-61
9. Ongori, H.; A Review of the Literature on Employee Turnover, African Journal of
Business Management, June 2007, pp. 049-054,
10. Mobley, W.H.: Employee Turnover: Causes, Consequences and Control. Addison-
Wesley Reading, 1982