What
What
1
Chapter
What Is Spirituality?
M odern interest in spirituality is big and growing. One needs only to enter
a major bookstore to f ind a plethora of books devoted to the subject.
These include works on religious doctrine, the new age movement, mysticism,
self -help books, and many other subjects. Many are practical, dealing with
such topics as how to pray, how to inf use marriage with religious meaning,
or how to develop a twelve-step spirituality. Others are more exotic, promis-
ing wisdom f rom indigenous traditions or esoteric teachings f rom the East.
Still others use the term “spirituality” quite loosely, applying it to such things
as optimal golf games or wholesome business strategies. What seems clear
from such titles and themes is that the term itself is very unclear. Even trained
scholars struggle to agree on a def inition. The f amous Anglican theologian
John Macquarrie considers that spirituality “has to do with becoming a person
in the fullest sense.” Leading Protestant spirituality scholar Gordon Wakefield
says that it “describes those attitudes, beliefs, and practices which animate peo-
ple’s lives and help them to reach out towards super-sensible realities.” And
f inally, f ormer Archbishop of Canterbury Rowan Williams speaks of “each
believer making his or her own that engagement with the questioning at the
heart of faith.”1
Each of these def initions has problems. Macquarrie’s is a bit vague and
assumes a modern bias toward f lourishing in all dimensions of human lif e,
whereas a number of traditional spiritualities would not see biological health
as a necessary component. Regarding Wakefield’s definition, many spiritualities,
such as Buddhist, might quarrel with the idea that spirituality must involve the
pursuit of super-sensible realities. Even Williams’s definition can be faulted on
the grounds that some persons’ “questioning” might be rather superficial.
1. John Macquarrie, Paths in Spirituality (New York: Harper & Row, 1972), 40; Gordon Wake-
field, “Spirituality,” in Westminster Dictionary of Christian Spirituality, ed. G. Wakefield (Philadelphia:
Westminster, 1983), 361; Rowan Williams, Christian Spirituality: A Theological History from the New
Testament to Luther and St. John of the Cross (Atlanta: John Knox, 1979), 1. See Sandra Schneiders,
“Theology and Spirituality: Strangers, Rivals, or Partners?” Horizons 13, no 2 (1986): 265–66.
7
8 Christian Spirituality: Lived Expressions in the Life of the Church
Ewert Cousins, the general editor of the monumental series, World Spir-
ituality: An Encyclopedic History of the Religious Quest, af ter wrestling with the
problem, finally settled on this definition: Spirituality is “that inner dimension of
the person called by certain traditions ‘the spirit.’ This spiritual core is the deep-
est center of the person. It is here that the person is open to the transcendent
dimension; it is here that the person experiences ultimate reality.”2 Cousins’s
def inition could be f aulted f or characterizing spirituality as something solely
personal, with little attention to spiritual movements that focus on such goals as
social justice or environmental responsibility.
Sandra Schneiders, a leader in the field of spirituality, argues that every spir-
ituality has six analyzable components:
Many scholars find this framework useful, both for exploring a particular
spirituality and f or comparing dif f erent spiritualities. In my doctoral disser-
tation, I used Schneiders’s strategy f ruitf ully to compare the spiritualities of
sixteenth century mystic John of the Cross and fifth century Buddhist scholar
Buddhaghosa. Each of Schneiders’s categories helped me comprehensively
map their respective understandings of the human person, the respective nature
of union with God and Nirvana, how to proceed to that ultimate horizon, what
one would typically expect as one proceeded along the path, the kinds of spir-
itual healing that corresponded to different stages of spiritual growth, and the
key values one would have to maintain progress.
Schneiders’s account also helpfully exposes the limitations of some spir-
itualities. For example, twelve-step spiritualities, such as one might f ind
in Alcoholics Anonymous and similar recovery models, of ten prove helpf ul in
addressing addiction, but off er no real sense of who or what God is. Rather,
2. Ewert Cousins, “Pref ace,” in Christian Spirituality, ed. Bernard McGinn, John Meyendorf f ,
and Jean Leclercq (New York: Continuum, 1988), 1:xiii.
What Is Spirituality? 9
they imagine God only as “a higher power.” They also pursue no ultimate goal
beyond recovering from addiction and assuming personal responsibility for one’s
past behavior. Their understanding of the human condition is limited to the
recognition of one’s powerlessness to resist addiction. In light of the six com-
ponents, twelve-step recovery programs don’t embody a full-fledged spirituality,
which involves the whole person in a comprehensive way or contains a clear
agenda for pursuing transcendence.
Schneiders’s account, however, also has its limitations. Some spiritualities
simply do not fit this model very well. Native American spiritualities, for exam-
ple, do not lay out a clear path with well-defined stages of growth. Daoist and
Shinto spiritualities do not have an ultimate horizon. And even the Ignatian
spirituality from the Roman Catholic tradition does not seem to fit Scheiders’s
account well, as explained in chapter 10.
Another helpf ul f raming of the study of spirituality comes f rom Michael
Buckley, who, together with Schneiders, started the first comprehensive doctoral
program for spirituality in the United States. Buckley says that every spiritual-
ity deals with a theology of God, an understanding about what it means to be
human, and ways or means to union with the Divine. To these three concerns, he
adds questions related to religious experience:
1. What types of experience gave rise to and foster this spiritual perspective?
2. How were these experiences originally expressed?
10 Christian Spirituality: Lived Expressions in the Life of the Church
3. Michael Buckley, “Seventeenth Century French Spirituality: Three Figures,” in Christian Spir-
ituality, ed. Louis Dupré and Don Saliers (New York: Crossroad, 1991), 3:31–32.
What Is Spirituality? 11
Scholar as Insider
A scholar of spirituality is typically something of an insider, that
is, someone who has a personal knowledge of the subject. While
it would be inappropriate for the scholar to be essentially work-
ing autobiographically, it has become obvious in the field that
the most creative and insightful work is done by those who have
a participative knowledge of spirituality. Sandra Schneiders writes,
“The researcher must know the spiritual quest by personal experi-
ence if he or she is able to understand the phenomena of spiritual-
ity. . . . A purely disinterested phenomenological approach seems
inappropriate if not impossible for spirituality.”4 Schneiders com-
pares spirituality to other fields where participation is critical: “Like
psychology, spirituality deals with material that cannot be under-
stood except through analogy with personal experience. It is diffi-
cult to imagine that one could understand mysticism, discernment
of spirits, or spiritual direction without some personal participation
in a spiritual life in which these phenomena or their analogues
were experienced.”5
4. Sandra Schneiders, “Theology and Spirituality,” Horizons 13, no. 2 (1986): 268.
5. Sandra Schneiders, “Spirituality and the Academy,” Theological Studies 50, no. 4 (1989): 694–95.
12 Christian Spirituality: Lived Expressions in the Life of the Church
the Bible, Saint Jerome used the term “spiritual” (spiritualis) twenty-two times as a
translation of pneumatikos. The noun form of the term appeared in a fifth-century
letter ascribed to Jerome: “Age ut in spiritualite perfecias” (Act in order to grow in
spirituality).6 This is the way the early
church typically used the term, and
there was no real change in its usage
through the f irst half of the Middle
Ages.
In the twelf th century, Saint
Thomas Aquinas continued to use
spiritualitas to mean something like
pneumatikos, but he also used the term
to ref er to that which distinguishes
humans from other animals. For Aqui-
nas, humans have a “rational soul,” that
is they have the ability to ref lect, pur-
sue morality, and direct their lives to
God. Thus they are “spiritual” beings.
In contrast, other animals are irrational
and have no soul or spirit. In his six-
teenth-century Vocabulary of Theology,
Johannes Altenstaig noted that the
adjective “spiritual” ref erred to ways
of acting religiously. It also referenced
the kinds of spiritual exercises, such
Prado, Madrid, Spain / Bridgeman Images
6. As cited in Bernard McGinn, “The Letter and the Spirit: Spirituality as an Academic Dis-
cipline,” in Minding the Spirit: The Study of Christian Spirituality, ed. Elizabeth Dreyer and Mark
Burrows (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2005), 25–41, at 26.
What Is Spirituality? 13
term “spirituality” return to standard, widespread use. Later that century, jour-
nals took up the term. The journal Révue d’ascétique et de mystique renamed itself
Révue d’histoire de la spiritualité in 1972, and in 1978 Cross and Crown became
Spirituality Today.7
7. Ibid., 28.
8. Grace is a theological theme that investigates God’s favor and saving presence.
14 Christian Spirituality: Lived Expressions in the Life of the Church
greatly f rom the contemporary one, so a critical dialog between cultures will
comprise a necessary part of any historical study.
Working with historical models tends to involve three major aspects. First,
historical studies call for a thick description of everything relevant to the spiritu-
ality and the culture out of which it emerged—what could be called the “what
is it?” phase of the study. Second, critical analysis seeks to make sense of it all,
including problems and biases of the time that one would not want to export
to today. One could call this the “what does it mean?” phase of the study. Third,
constructive interpretation entails extrapolating the insights and genius of such a
spirituality and finding ways to make these relevant to today, or the “what can it
mean for us?” phase of the study.
spirituality. In Jesus’ final prayer, he prays, “So that they may all be one, as you,
Father, are in me and I in you, that they also may be in us. . . . I in them and
you in me” ( John 17:21–23).
This Christocentric principle also involves incorporating the fundamental
mysteries of Christ. For Christians, the Incarnation of Christ not only creates
the condition whereby God and humanity are united in him, it also provides
a model for taking on the divine life within oneself. As Saint Augustine said,
“God became human that humanity might become God.”10 Here Augustine
is not suggesting that humans actually exchange their human nature f or the
divine nature, but rather that the incarnation allows humanity to participate in
God’s life radically. The very nature of human existence becomes infused with
divine possibilities.
Another f undamental mystery of the Christian f aith is the cross. Every
Christian spirituality in some way embraces the cross or a kind of personal dying
to self. The cross represents God’s solidarity with suffering humanity. According
to Christian theology, God in Christ literally became united to the very broken-
ness of the human condition and entered into that darkness with healing love.
In Philippians, Paul pleads with community members to take on the mind of
Christ, who emptied himself for humanity (Phil. 2:5–8). God’s love is revealed
here as self-donation. For Christians, the cross can represent a kind of dying to
one’s sinful self, the self that separates one from God and others. Paradoxically,
the very dying to oneself and living for God becomes the condition of finding
oneself in God’s love.
The cross intrinsically connects to the Resurrection, and authentic Chris-
tian spirituality upholds this essential component. Paul proclaims, “If Christ
has not been raised, then empty too is our preaching; empty, too, your faith” (1
Cor. 15:14). For Christianity the victory of the Resurrection already empowers
believers to new life (Phil. 3:10; 1 Pet. 1:3).
11. Lumen Gentium, no. 9, The Documents of Vatican II, general ed. Walter Abbott, trans. Joseph
Gallagher (New York: Guild Press, 1966).
18 Christian Spirituality: Lived Expressions in the Life of the Church
12. Origen, On Prayer 22.5. Translation from Origen: An Exhortation to Martyrdom, Prayer and
Selected Works, trans. Rowan Greer (New York: Paulist Press, 1979), 125.
What Is Spirituality? 19
literal, metaphysical change from human nature to the divine nature, but refers
to living God’s life as God lives God’s life. Paul considered discipleship as living
the very life of Christ within, bearing Christ’s likeness and glory, becoming the
very holiness of God and being filled with God.13 The profound goal that Paul
foresees is “that God may be all in all” (1 Cor. 15:28).
The First Letter of John also suggests a divinization, where on the last
day all will be “like him” (3:2) and become “as he is” (4:17). Perhaps the most
explicit description comes from the Second Letter of Peter: “His divine power
has bestowed on us everything that makes for life and devotion. . . . Through
these, he has bestowed on us the precious and very great promises, so that
through them you may come to share in the divine nature” (1:3–4).
The spiritual tradition is replete with descriptions of this radical divine
union. Christians do not imagine heaven merely as some place to go where one
will be in the proximity of God. Rather, it is a full union with God where one
lives in and through the Divine. As explored in later chapters, Christians believe
that it is possible to experience in this lif e a kind of union that dramatically
anticipates this future state.
13. See Rom. 8:14–17; 1 Cor. 15:49; 2 Cor. 5:21; Gal. 2:19–20.
20 Christian Spirituality: Lived Expressions in the Life of the Church
The Way
A common theme in the Christian spiritual tradition is that Christianity poses a
new way of life, one that is daunting, but ultimate. One of the oldest designations
for Christians was that they were followers of “the way.”14 Jesus referred to this
new way as utterly challenging and yet life-giving: “Enter through the narrow gate;
for the gate is wide and road broad that leads to destruction, and those who enter
through it are many. How narrow the gate and constricted the road that leads to
life. And those who find it are few” (Matt. 7:13–14). Early Christian texts echo
this. The Didache or Teaching of the Twelve Apostles (ca. 90 CE) begins, “There
are two ways, one of lif e and the other of death, and there is a great dif f erence
between these two ways.”15 The Epistle of Barnabas (ca. 100 CE) concludes part
of an exhortation, “This, therefore, is the way of light.” The epistle then contrasts
it with “the way of the black one,” which is “crooked and completely cursed.”16
One insight in taking the image of “the way” is that the Christian lif e is
something decidedly dif f erent f rom the ordinary road people travel. It is sup-
posed to mean something truly decisive and unique. To be Christian is to think,
look, and be different. A second insight is that the way is a road on which one
advances. No one should expect to become holy in a day. As one progresses
along the path, there will be setbacks, failures, and the realization that spiritual
transformation comes slowly. It’s a process.
Discipleship
Discipleship emerges as another common theme. The term “disciple” literally
means “one who learns,” and it refers to a follower. One of the most interesting
dynamics in the Gospels is just how much the disciples had to learn from Jesus,
and indeed how slow they often were to understand him. Similar to the idea that
Christian spirituality is a way on which one progresses, discipleship is an ongoing
learning process. Many Christians have reported that meditating on the scriptures
or other religious texts through their adult lives gives them ever more to con-
sider and incorporate in their lives. While Christian f aith includes learning the
doctrines and practices within one’s Christian tradition, above all it requires learn-
ing in terms of being a follower of Christ. Dietrich Bonhoeffer (1906–1945), in
his seminal work The Cost of Discipleship, offers a telling insight into discipleship:
What Bonhoeffer means here is that discipleship has to be more than just agree-
ing with doctrines; it must focus on profoundly knowing and following Christ,
and at great cost.
A Path
Many Christian spiritualities describe the spiritual journey in terms of a spe-
cif ic set of stages. While the three-f old pattern listed above of f ers a path of
sorts, many spiritualities articulate a more detailed series of stages that repre-
sent a spiritual course with defined markers. They frame one’s ascent to union
with God as a step-by-step process. The most famous patristic text describing
such a path is Saint John Climacus’s (525–606) The Ladder of Divine Ascent, in
which he describes thirty specific steps to spiritual purification. The first three
17. Dietrich Bonhoef f er, The Cost of Discipleship, trans. R. H. Fuller (New York: Touchstone,
1995), 59.
22 Christian Spirituality: Lived Expressions in the Life of the Church
ref erence a skillf ul decision to embrace the monastic lif e. The next f our have
to do with the kinds of virtues a new monk has to cultivate. The ensuing six-
teen involve practices one should embrace as a means to undermine inordinate
passions, such as anger or lust. The three that f ollow involve particularly sen-
sitive interior virtues that condition deep contemplative prayer. And the f inal
four reference ever-deepening expressions of prayer, with the final step involv-
ing outright union with God. Devotees to this program did not slavishly follow
each step with no concern about issues in more advanced steps. Still, Climacus
insisted that one has to crawl before one can walk, walk before on can run, and
run before one can fly. There is an ordered progression.
Many other expressions of spiritual advancement lay out a relatively stable
path. Saint Bernard of Clairvaux (1090–1153) expressed an ever deepening reli-
gious life through the metaphor of types of spiritual kisses. Saint Catherine of
Sienna (1347–1380) imagined levels of spiritual tears representing the soul’s
progress. Richard of Saint Victor (d. 1173) described the path of spirituality
as involving twelve steps corresponding to the spiritual meaning of the twelve
patriarchs in the Old Testament, and John Rusbroeck (1293–1381) describes a
Ladder of Spiritual Love. The modern period offers no clearer example than Saint
Teresa of Ávila’s (1515–1582) Interior Castle, where she describes seven man-
sions, each representing more sensitive moral intuitions and a deeper knowledge
of God’s presence in the soul.
In all these presentations, the spiritual guides posit a series of stages of
ascent to union with God that are marked by particular experiences and condi-
tioned by various spiritual practices and virtues. Not all Christian spiritualities
have such markings or stages, but many do. Such presentations help spiritual
directors and those they guide to recognize particular challenges and possibili-
ties as they progress.
Conclusion
Spirituality is such a widely used term that one might wonder whether it confers
much specif ic meaning. Even in academic circles it can ref er to a great many
different things and be approached quite variously. Fundamentally, in both pop-
ular and academic settings, the term designates something essential—even most
essential—about being human. It touches on how humans make sense of them-
selves in relation to things transcendental. The genius of artists and poets lies
in their ability to tap into the heart and soul in ways that elevate human beings
beyond conceiving of themselves and their relationships merely in materialistic or
utilitarian terms. There is a realm of meaning and truth, a realm of the spirit that
cannot be reduced to science or banal cultural exchanges of commerce or politics.
Christian Spirituality as a field of study identifies that realm through his-
tory, theology, scripture, and, above all, experience, in ways that both highlight
What Is Spirituality? 23
the Christian life and show skillful paths to engage it. The study of spirituality
requires a breadth of knowledge in all these f ields as well as allied disciplines
in the academy. Utilizing this breadth, the study of spirituality provides deep,
penetrating insight into Christian understandings of the life of grace and ways
to become holy.
Bibliography
Cunningham, Lawrence, and Keith Egan. Christian Spirituality: Themes from the
Tradition. New York: Paulist Press: 1996.
This book of f ers ref lections on particular themes in Christian spirituality,
including prayer, solitude, and community life.
Downey, Michael, ed. The New Dictionary of Spirituality. Collegeville, MN:
Michael Glazier, 1993.
This collection of articles provides a shorthand expression of a broad range
of relevant topics in Christian spirituality.
Dreyer, Elizabeth, and Mark Burrows, eds. Minding the Spirit: The Study of
Christian Spirituality. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press, 2005.
24 Christian Spirituality: Lived Expressions in the Life of the Church
Dupré, Louis, and Don Saliers, eds. Christian Spirituality: Post-Reformation and
Modern. Vol. 18 of World Spirituality. New York: Crossroad, 1991.
Feldmeier, Peter. The Developing Christian: Spiritual Growth through the Lif e
Cycle. New York: Paulist Press, 2007
This book addresses various human development models in the social sci-
ences and correlates them with spiritual growth throughout individual chal-
lenges in the life cycle.
Holmes, Urban. Spirituality for Ministry. San Francisco: Harper & Row, 1982.
This text details how a rightly appropriated understanding of spirituality
serves as a necessary resource for pastoral ministry.
Lescher, Bruce, and Elizabeth Liebert, eds. Exploring Christian Spirituality: Essays
in Honor of Sandra M. Schneiders, IHM. Mahwah, NJ: Paulist Press, 2006.
Locklin, Reid. Spiritual but Not Religious: An Oar Stroke Closer to the Farther
Shore. Collegeville, MN: Liturgical Press, 2005.
Schneiders, Sandra. “Spirituality in the Academy,” Theological Studies 50, no. 4
(1989): 676–97.
Schneiders, Sandra. “Theology and Spirituality: Strangers, Rivals or Partners?”
Horizons 13, no. 2 (1986): 253–74.
Sheldrake, Philip. Spirituality and History: Questions of Interpretation and Method.
New York: Crossroad, 1992.
This text examines the historical approach to Christian spirituality and how
one might extrapolate modern insights from classic spiritual expressions in
ways that respect the differences in time and culture.
Vatican II. The Documents of Vatican II. Edited by Walter Abbott. Translated by
Joseph Gallagher. New York: Guild Press, 1966.
Internet Resources
Films