Writing Book by Abdurazzoq
Writing Book by Abdurazzoq
1
Abdurazzoq Khanov
Foreword
Welcome to this comprehensive guide on how to excel in the IELTS
Writing Task 2. As a teacher of English language for several years, I have
seen many students struggle with this task. It can be challenging to
write a cohesive and persuasive essay within a limited timeframe and
word count.
This guide is designed to provide you with the tools and strategies
necessary to succeed in the IELTS Writing Task 2. It includes detailed
explanations of each aspect of the task, from understanding the
question and planning your essay to using effective writing strategies
and techniques.
My name is Abdurazzoq Khanov, and I have worked with students from
all over the world who have successfully achieved their desired scores
in the IELTS Writing Task 2. Through my experience, I have come to
understand the specific needs and challenges that students face while
attempting this task.
This guide is based on my personal experiences as well as the
experiences of my students. It provides practical tips and examples that
will help you to understand the requirements of the IELTS Writing Task
2 and improve your writing skills.
Whether you are a beginner or an advanced writer, this guide will help
you to develop the necessary skills to write high-quality essays that will
impress the examiners and achieve the score you need.
I hope this guide will be a valuable resource for you as you prepare for
the IELTS Writing Task 2, and I wish you all the best in your English
language journey.
2
Abdurazzoq Khanov
I. Introduction
3
Abdurazzoq Khanov
Effective paragraphing
Using topic sentences and supporting sentences
Using linking words and transition phrases
VIII. Conclusion
5
Abdurazzoq Khanov
6
Abdurazzoq Khanov
the type of question, analyze the prompt, and identify key words and phrases
before you start writing.
For example, your outline for the prompt above could look like this:
Introduction
Background information on social media
Thesis statement: I agree that social media has had a negative impact on
society.
Body Paragraph 1
Argument: Social media has increased social isolation and decreased face-
to-face communication.
Evidence: Studies have shown that people who use social media
excessively are more likely to feel lonely and isolated.
Example: A friend of mine became addicted to social media and stopped
interacting with her friends and family in person.
Body Paragraph 2
Argument: Social media has contributed to the spread of fake news and
misinformation.
Evidence: Social media platforms do not have strict guidelines for fact-
checking and regulating information.
Example: During the COVID-19 pandemic, false information about the virus
spread rapidly on social media, causing panic and confusion.
Body Paragraph 3
Argument: Social media has facilitated cyberbullying and hate speech.
Evidence: Social media provides anonymity and a platform for people to
express negative opinions without consequences.
Example: A teenager in my community was cyberbullied on social media
and had to change schools as a result.
Conclusion
8
Abdurazzoq Khanov
For example, here's how your essay could be structured based on the
outline above:
Introduction
Social media has become an integral part of our daily lives, with millions of
people using platforms such as Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter to
connect with friends and family. However, the impact of social media on
society has been a topic of debate in recent years. While some argue that
social media has had a positive impact, I agree that social media has had a
negative impact on society.
Body Paragraph 1
One of the negative impacts of social media is that it has increased social
isolation and decreased face-to-face communication. Studies have shown
that people who use social media excessively are more likely to feel lonely
and isolated. For example, a friend of mine became addicted to social
media and stopped interacting with her friends and family in person. She
spent most of her time scrolling through her newsfeed and messaging
people online instead of having real conversations.
Body Paragraph 2
Another negative impact of social media is that it has contributed to the
spread of fake news and misinformation. Social media platforms do not
have strict guidelines for fact-checking and regulating information. This has
led to the circulation of false information, causing panic and confusion. For
instance, during the COVID-19 pandemic, false information about the virus
9
Abdurazzoq Khanov
Body Paragraph 3
Lastly, social media has facilitated cyberbullying and hate speech. Social
media provides anonymity and a platform for people to express negative
opinions without consequences. This has led to an increase in online
harassment and hate speech. For example, a teenager in my community
was cyberbullied on social media and had to change schools as a result.
She received hateful messages and comments from anonymous users,
which affected her mental health and well-being.
Conclusion
In conclusion, social media has had a negative impact on society in several
ways. It has increased social isolation, contributed to the spread of fake
news and misinformation, and facilitated cyberbullying and hate speech.
While social media has its benefits, such as connecting people from
different parts of the world, we must also recognize its negative
consequences. As individuals, we can take steps to limit our social media
use and be more mindful of the information we consume and share online.
10
Abdurazzoq Khanov
Sample answer: Your first body paragraph could start with a topic
sentence such as, "One argument in favor of a university education is that
11
Abdurazzoq Khanov
12
Abdurazzoq Khanov
13
Abdurazzoq Khanov
14
Abdurazzoq Khanov
responsibility of individuals and their families. Discuss both views and give
your own opinion."
Sample answer: To manage your time effectively on this prompt, make
sure you take the time to plan your essay before you start writing. You
could use a technique such as mind mapping to generate ideas and
organize them into a clear and coherent structure. Once you have a plan,
you can start writing your introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion,
making sure to leave enough time to revise and edit your work.
How to write concisely and effectively: The IELTS Writing Task 2 is not
a test of your vocabulary or your ability to use complex sentence structures.
Rather, it is a test of your ability to express your ideas clearly and
persuasively in a concise and effective manner. To do this, use simple and
direct language, avoid repetition, and make sure each sentence and
paragraph serves a clear and specific purpose.
Sample question: "Some people think that it is important to take breaks
from work and spend time doing activities that you enjoy. Others believe
that it is more important to focus on work and achieve your goals. Discuss
both views and give your own opinion."
Sample answer: To write concisely and effectively on this prompt, make
sure you use clear and simple language to express your ideas. You could
start your first body paragraph with a topic sentence such as, "One
argument in favor of taking breaks from work is that it can help reduce
stress and improve overall well-being." This paragraph could then provide
specific examples and evidence to support this argument. Your second
body paragraph could start with a topic sentence such as, "However,
others argue that it is more important to focus on work and achieve your
goals, as this can lead to greater success and fulfillment."
This paragraph could also provide specific examples and evidence to
support this argument. Finally, in your conclusion, you could summarize the
main points of your essay and provide your own opinion on the topic.
In conclusion, by understanding common mistakes and employing effective
writing strategies, you can improve your chances of achieving a high score
on the IELTS Writing Task 2. Remember to carefully read and understand
the prompt, plan and organize your essay, use effective paragraphing and
linking words, avoid common mistakes, manage your time effectively, and
write concisely and effectively. By practicing these skills, you can develop
your writing proficiency and achieve your goals on the IELTS Writing Task
2.
16
Abdurazzoq Khanov
17
Abdurazzoq Khanov
Conclusion: The conclusion summarizes the main points and restates the
writer's opinion.
Overall analysis: The essay is well-organized and coherent, with each
paragraph focusing on one main idea. The writer uses a variety of sentence
structures and linking words to connect ideas and create coherence. The
essay also includes specific examples to support the main points, and the
writer's opinion is clearly stated and supported throughout the essay.
By practicing each section of the IELTS Writing Task 2 separately and
reviewing sample essays with explanations and analysis, you can improve
your writing skills and increase your chances of achieving a high score on
the exam.
18
Abdurazzoq Khanov
VIII. Conclusion
The conclusion is the final part of your IELTS Writing Task 2 essay. It is
important to end your essay on a strong note by summarizing the key
points you have made and offering some final tips for success.
Final tips for success: In addition to summarizing your key points, you
can also offer some final tips for success in your conclusion. This could
include advice on time management, planning and organizing your essay,
and using effective writing strategies.
Next chapter you get is by far the most useful one in this book. So use it
wisely and get the desired score in the IELTS writing task 2 exam.
Good luck!
20
Abdurazzoq Khanov
TOPIC: ART
Sample 1
The government's investment in arts, music and theatre is a waste of money.
Governments should invest these funds in public services instead. To what extent
do you agree with this statement?
In recent years, the debate regarding the allocation of government funds to the arts,
music, and theatre has become a contentious issue. Some argue that this investment is
a waste of money, and public services should be the priority. In my opinion, although
public services are crucial, investing in the arts, music, and theatre is equally important
as it provides a range of benefits that cannot be obtained through public services alone.
On the one hand, it is true that public services are crucial for the well-being of society.
These services include healthcare, education, and infrastructure, which directly impact
people's lives. Adequate funding of public services ensures that they are well-
maintained and accessible to all citizens. However, it is also essential to recognize that
investment in the arts, music, and theatre is equally important. These fields promote
cultural awareness and appreciation, and provide people with opportunities for
entertainment, emotional expression, and personal growth.
Moreover, investing in the arts, music, and theatre can also have positive economic
effects. These fields generate jobs and contribute to the growth of the creative
industries, which are becoming increasingly important in the modern economy. Cultural
events and attractions can also draw in tourism and stimulate local economies,
providing a source of income for the government and the community.
Furthermore, the arts, music, and theatre can also have therapeutic effects. Studies
have shown that participation in creative activities can improve mental health, reduce
stress, and increase overall well-being. This is especially important in today's society,
where mental health issues are becoming increasingly prevalent.
In conclusion, while public services are essential for society, investing in the arts, music,
and theatre is also crucial. These fields provide cultural, economic, and therapeutic
benefits that cannot be obtained through public services alone. Therefore, the
government should continue to invest in both public services and the arts, music, and
theatre, to ensure a well-rounded and thriving society.
21
Abdurazzoq Khanov
Sample 2
Studying art in school improves students' performance in other subjects, because
it is easier for multi-skilled students to learn new things. That's why art should be
obligatory in schools. Do you agree or disagree?
In recent years, there has been an ongoing debate about the importance of art in the
school curriculum. Some argue that art should be compulsory in schools as it enhances
students' learning capabilities in other subjects. This essay will argue in favor of this
view by providing reasons and examples to support the notion that studying art in
school can improve students' performance in other subjects.
To begin with, art education fosters creativity and critical thinking skills, which can
translate into academic success. In art classes, students are encouraged to think
outside the box and to develop unique solutions to problems. This mindset can carry
over into other subjects such as math and science, where problem-solving skills are
essential. For example, a student who is taught to think creatively in art class may be
more likely to come up with innovative solutions to complex math problems.
Moreover, art education can help students develop visual and spatial awareness, which
is essential for many fields, including engineering, architecture, and medicine. In art
classes, students learn to observe and analyze the world around them, which can help
them to understand complex spatial relationships. This skill can be particularly useful in
science and math classes, where students must be able to visualize and manipulate
abstract concepts.
In addition, art education has been shown to improve students' overall academic
performance. Studies have found that students who study art in school perform better
on standardized tests and have higher GPAs than students who do not study art. This
may be because art education promotes a growth mindset, encouraging students to
view mistakes as opportunities for learning and improvement.
Opponents of art education argue that it is not a necessary component of a well-
rounded education. They argue that time and resources would be better spent on core
academic subjects, such as math and science. However, this view fails to recognize the
broader benefits of art education, both in terms of academic performance and personal
development.
In conclusion, this essay has argued that studying art in school can improve students'
performance in other subjects. Art education promotes creativity, critical thinking, and
visual-spatial awareness, which are all essential skills for academic success.
Additionally, art education has been shown to improve overall academic performance.
For these reasons, it is my belief that art should be compulsory in schools.
( 388 words, band 8+ )
22
Abdurazzoq Khanov
Sample 3
For a long time art has been considered an essential part of all cultures in the
world. However, nowadays people’s values have changed, and we tend to consider
science, technology and business more important than arts.
In today's world, science, technology, and business are deemed more important than art,
which has traditionally been considered an essential part of all cultures. This essay will
discuss the causes of this shift in values and suggest some measures to attract people's
attention to the arts.
There are several reasons why people tend to value science, technology, and business
more than art. First, these fields have made significant contributions to the advancement
of society, while the benefits of art may not be as apparent. For example, science has led
to numerous breakthroughs in medicine, while technology has transformed the way we
communicate and do business. Second, the job market has placed a higher value on skills
related to science, technology, and business, as they are seen as more practical and
necessary for economic growth. Finally, some individuals simply find science, technology,
and business more interesting and engaging than art.
To attract people's attention to the arts, several measures can be taken. One option is to
promote the educational value of art. By emphasizing the cognitive benefits of art
education, such as improved critical thinking and creativity, schools can help students
appreciate the value of art. Another approach is to increase the visibility of art in public
spaces. For example, cities can install public art installations or offer free concerts and
exhibitions to increase public exposure to the arts. Finally, promoting the economic value
of the arts, such as the role of the arts in driving tourism and economic growth, can help
individuals understand the significance of the arts beyond their intrinsic value.
In conclusion, while the value placed on science, technology, and business may have
increased, it is essential not to overlook the importance of art in society. The causes of this
shift in values are multi-faceted, including societal changes, practicality, and personal
preferences. However, by promoting the educational, public, and economic value of art, we
can help draw people's attention to the arts and appreciate their role in enriching our
lives.
23
Abdurazzoq Khanov
Sample 4
Recent research has shown that business meetings and training are increasingly taking place
online.
What are the advantages and disadvantages of this?
Many businesses today choose to hold meetings and do training online, rather than in
person. While this has certain drawbacks related to interpersonal relationships, I still
feel this is a positive trend because of its positive impact on employees with families. In
this essay, I will discuss both sides in detail.
Conducting the majority of business meetings online has a potentially negative effect on
the social dynamics of a company. The preference for online communication sacrifices
essential elements of human interaction in the name of a more efficient, utilitarian
process. When people sit in a room together, for training or a meeting, they are more
likely to form strong interpersonal bonds. They will be able to see each other’s body
language better and there is a good chance they may socialise in person afterwards.
For example, employees might go for drinks or even just have a private chat about the
meeting or training while still at work. This is much less likely to happen when people
are working from home or a remote location and using online tools like Skype to
communicate.
Companies that choose to do more training and have more meetings online are making
life more convenient for their employees with families. At some point in their lives, most
people must face the challenge of working and having a family. If both the mother and
father work, then one of them might have to give up their job to stay home or they will
have to hire an expensive caretaker to look after their child during the day. If more
meetings and training took place online, this could free up time for people in certain
jobs, such as IT workers, to work entirely from home and look after their children during
the day. They will still have to make time for the training and meetings but at least they
won’t waste valuable time commuting to the office.
The move towards increased online training and meetings may sacrifice some of the
social aspects of work but this is more than made up for by the convenience it allows
working families. In many families today, both the mother and father have to work to
make ends meet and we should support any efforts to relieve their financial and
physical burdens.
24
Abdurazzoq Khanov
Sample 5
Some people think that good teamwork makes a company successful, others think
that good leadership is the reason behind the success of a company. Discuss both
sides and give your opinion.
In today's business world, the factors contributing to the success of a company are often
debated. While some people believe that good teamwork is the key to success, others
argue that strong leadership is what makes a company thrive. This essay will explore both
viewpoints and provide a personal opinion on the matter.
On one hand, teamwork plays a critical role in the success of a company. When a team of
individuals work together, they can pool their knowledge and expertise to create better
solutions. In addition, teamwork can foster a supportive and collaborative work
environment, where employees feel valued and motivated. This can lead to increased
productivity and better results.
On the other hand, it could be argued that leadership is the primary factor in a company's
success. A strong leader can inspire and motivate employees to perform their best, and can
provide clear direction and guidance to help achieve goals. Good leadership can also
create a positive company culture and foster innovation and creativity, which can lead to
long-term success.
In my opinion, while both teamwork and leadership are important, I believe that strong
leadership is ultimately the key to success in a company. This is because a good leader can
effectively manage a team and ensure that everyone is working towards the same goals. A
leader can also create a positive work environment and foster a culture of innovation and
creativity, which is crucial for a company's long-term success.
In conclusion, the debate over whether good teamwork or good leadership is the most
important factor in a company's success will likely continue. While both are important, I
believe that strong leadership is ultimately the key to success. A good leader can inspire
and motivate employees, create a positive work environment, and foster a culture of
innovation and creativity.
25
Abdurazzoq Khanov
Sample 6
Some people believe that nowadays too much money is being spent on weddings
and birthdays. Why do you think it is happening? What can be done to improve
the situation?
In recent years, there has been a growing concern that too much money is being spent on
weddings and birthdays. While some argue that these celebrations are an essential part of
life, others believe that excessive spending on such events is wasteful and unnecessary.
This essay will discuss the reasons for this trend and suggest some measures to address it.
One reason why people spend a significant amount of money on weddings and birthdays
is the desire to show off their wealth and social status. Many individuals perceive these
occasions as an opportunity to flaunt their affluence and impress their guests with
extravagant decorations, lavish food, and expensive gifts. Additionally, social media has
also contributed to this trend, as people feel compelled to showcase their celebrations
online and compete with others.
To address this issue, several measures can be taken. First, there should be a greater
awareness of the negative impacts of excessive spending on weddings and birthdays.
People need to understand that celebrating these events does not necessarily mean they
have to spend a lot of money, and that a simple celebration can be just as meaningful and
enjoyable. This can be achieved through educational campaigns and social media
awareness programs.
Second, the government could introduce regulations and guidelines to limit spending on
weddings and birthdays. For instance, the government could impose a maximum spending
limit on weddings and birthdays, and require that people report their expenses to the
authorities. This would encourage people to be more conscious of their spending and
reduce unnecessary expenditure.
Sample 7
Some people think that success is measured by how much money a person has. To
what extent do you agree or disagree?
In today's world, success is often associated with material possessions and financial
wealth. While some argue that money is the ultimate measure of success, I firmly believe
that success is measured by one's achievements, personal growth, and impact on society.
This essay will argue that success cannot be solely defined by monetary gains and that it
should encompass a broader set of factors.
Moreover, success is also defined by the impact one has on society. People who contribute
to their communities by volunteering, supporting charities, or making a positive impact on
the environment are considered successful, regardless of their financial status. These
individuals are making a difference in the world and inspiring others to do the same,
which is a significant achievement.
On the other hand, focusing solely on financial gains can lead to a narrow-minded and
materialistic approach to success. The accumulation of wealth can be a motivating factor,
but it should not be the only measure of success. It can also lead to a lack of fulfillment, as
individuals may realize that their material possessions do not provide them with genuine
happiness or a sense of purpose.
In conclusion, while some argue that financial wealth is the ultimate measure of success, I
believe that success should be evaluated by a broader set of factors. Accomplishments in
various aspects of life, personal growth, and the impact one has on society are all essential
components of success. Therefore, individuals should strive to achieve these goals and not
solely focus on monetary gains.
27
Abdurazzoq Khanov
Sample 8
As well as making money, businesses have social responsibilities. Do you agree or
disagree?
In today's society, businesses are expected to not only generate profits but also take
responsibility for their impact on the wider community. Some people argue that businesses
should prioritize social responsibilities alongside financial success, while others believe
that their primary objective should be making money. In this essay, I will argue that
businesses have social responsibilities beyond just making money and that these
responsibilities are becoming increasingly important.
On the one hand, those who argue that businesses should focus solely on making money
assert that the primary goal of any company is to maximize profits. They argue that
businesses have no moral obligation to society and that their only responsibility is to their
shareholders. In this view, social responsibilities are a distraction from the company's core
objective of generating wealth.
On the other hand, I strongly believe that businesses have social responsibilities that go
beyond just making money. In today's interconnected world, businesses cannot operate in
isolation from society. They depend on the community in which they operate for their
workforce, customers, and suppliers. Therefore, it is only fair that businesses take
responsibility for their impact on the wider community. For example, companies should
ensure that their products and services are safe, environmentally friendly, and beneficial to
society. They should also contribute to social causes and give back to the community
through charity and other initiatives. This not only enhances the company's reputation but
also creates a sense of social responsibility and accountability.
Furthermore, businesses that take their social responsibilities seriously tend to have more
loyal customers and a better reputation. In a world where consumers are increasingly
conscious of the social and environmental impact of their purchases, companies that
demonstrate a commitment to social responsibility are likely to be more successful.
Therefore, prioritizing social responsibility can ultimately lead to greater long-term
financial success.
In conclusion, I firmly believe that businesses have social responsibilities beyond just
making money. While the primary goal of any company is to maximize profits, businesses
must also take into account their impact on the wider community. By fulfilling their social
responsibilities, companies can enhance their reputation, create loyal customers, and
ultimately achieve greater financial success. It is therefore in the best interest of businesses
to prioritize social responsibility alongside financial success.
28
Abdurazzoq Khanov
Sample 9
Communication technology has changed the way we interact with each other. Do you think
this has had a positive or negative impact on social interaction?
In the modern era, communication technology has revolutionized the way we interact with each
other. Some people believe that this has a negative effect on social interaction, while others
argue that it has a positive impact. In this essay, I will discuss both sides and provide my opinion
on this issue.
On the one hand, it can be argued that communication technology has led to a decline in face-
to-face interactions. People spend more time on their smartphones, tablets, and computers,
communicating through social media, email, and instant messaging. As a result, there is less
time for people to interact with each other in person, which can lead to a lack of social skills and
a sense of isolation. Additionally, the rise of social media has led to an increase in cyberbullying
and online harassment, which can have a negative impact on mental health.
On the other hand, communication technology has brought people closer together in many
ways. People can communicate with family and friends who live far away, and they can easily
connect with new people who share their interests. This can lead to a sense of community and
belonging. Communication technology has also revolutionized the way we work, allowing
people to collaborate with others from around the world and to work remotely. This has led to
greater flexibility and efficiency in the workplace.
In my opinion, the impact of communication technology on social interaction is mixed. While it
has brought people together in many ways, it has also led to a decline in face-to-face
interactions and an increase in online harassment. However, the benefits of communication
technology outweigh the drawbacks, as it has made it easier for people to connect with others,
both socially and professionally. It is important, however, for individuals to strike a balance
between online and offline interactions and to use communication technology responsibly.
In conclusion, communication technology has had both positive and negative impacts on social
interaction. While it has made it easier for people to connect with each other, it has also led to a
decline in face-to-face interactions and an increase in online harassment. Nonetheless, the
benefits of communication technology outweigh the drawbacks, and it is up to individuals to use
it responsibly and to strike a balance between online and offline interactions.
29
Abdurazzoq Khanov
Sample 10
Nowadays, communication between different countries has become easier and
more frequent than before. Do you think this is a positive or negative
development? Give reasons for your answer and include relevant examples from
your own knowledge or experience.
In recent years, advancements in technology have made communication between
different countries much easier and frequent than ever before. While some people
believe that this development has negative consequences, I would argue that it is
overwhelmingly positive due to its impact on personal, economic, and cultural spheres.
To begin with, easier communication enables people from different countries to form
closer personal relationships. With the advent of social media, people can now interact
with others across borders and share their daily lives. This enables them to learn about
different cultures, customs, and lifestyles and ultimately creates greater understanding
and empathy between people from different countries. Moreover, modern
communication tools like video conferencing and instant messaging make it possible for
family members and friends who live far apart to keep in touch regularly and feel a sense
of closeness despite the distance.
In addition to personal benefits, increased communication also facilitates economic
growth and development. Businesses can now collaborate with partners from different
countries with greater ease, resulting in new trade opportunities and improved
international relations. This opens up new markets and creates jobs, ultimately
contributing to the economic prosperity of all countries involved.
Furthermore, the ease of communication has also contributed significantly to the
cultural exchange between countries. Thanks to the internet, people from different
cultures can now access and consume a wide range of media, such as movies, music, and
books from other countries. This exposure to different cultures has led to the fusion of
ideas and practices, resulting in a richer and more diverse global culture.
In conclusion, while some might argue that the easier and more frequent communication
between different countries has negative impacts, I firmly believe that its benefits are
overwhelmingly positive. It promotes personal relationships, facilitates economic
growth, and contributes to the exchange of ideas and culture. Therefore, it is imperative
that we continue to make strides in this area to ensure that our world becomes more
interconnected and understanding.
(324 words, band 8+)
30
Abdurazzoq Khanov
Sample 11
Some people believe that personality is primarily determined by genetics, while
others argue that environmental factors play a more significant role. Discuss both
views and give your opinion.
31
Abdurazzoq Khanov
Sample 12
While recruiting a new employee, the employer should pay more
attention to their personal qualities, rather than qualifications and
experience. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In today's competitive job market, the selection of a suitable candidate for a particular
position has become a challenging task for employers. Some people believe that while
recruiting a new employee, personal qualities should be given more weightage than
qualifications and experience. In this essay, I will argue that both personal qualities and
qualifications and experience should be considered equally.
On the one hand, personal qualities such as communication skills, team spirit, problem-
solving ability, adaptability, and work ethics are important for any job. These qualities
are essential to building a good working relationship, which is necessary for the success
of an organization. For instance, an employee with excellent communication skills can
convey their ideas and opinions effectively, and this can help to improve the teamwork
and productivity of the organization.
On the other hand, qualifications and experience are equally important for any job. A
qualified candidate possesses the necessary knowledge and skills required for the job.
Experience, on the other hand, provides a candidate with practical exposure and makes
them aware of the work environment. For example, if an employer is looking for a
software developer, then the candidate's technical knowledge and experience will be
more important than their personal qualities.
Moreover, the importance of personal qualities and qualifications and experience varies
depending on the type of job. For some jobs, personal qualities such as creativity and
leadership may be more important, whereas for others, qualifications and experience
may be the priority. Therefore, it is essential to evaluate both personal qualities and
qualifications and experience when selecting a suitable candidate for a particular job.
In conclusion, while recruiting a new employee, it is essential to consider both personal
qualities and qualifications and experience. A candidate with excellent personal qualities
but lacking the necessary qualifications and experience may not be able to perform well
in the job. Therefore, it is crucial to strike a balance between these two factors to ensure
that the organization has the best possible candidate for the job.
( 331 words, band 8+)
32
Abdurazzoq Khanov
SAMPLE 13
Crime is a big problem in the world; many believe that nothing can be done to
prevent it. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give your own opinion .
It is true that crime is unquestionably one of the most prevailing and worrying aspects in
any society, and its prevention should be taken seriously. Crime prevention can be
executed in various ways, firstly through a sustained honest presence in the community
and secondly through international cooperation.
A local presence by incorruptible law enforcement authorities may be costly, however,
the long-term investment would pay dividends in the future. A safer region would
encourage trade, investment and set an invaluable example for younger generations.
For example, crime levels have dramatically been reduced in the Favelas around Rio de
Janiero in Brazil. This was achieved largely through the government committing large
funds of money to stationing police headquarters in and around the slums. These
financial expenditures greatly benefited the community.
Secondly, due to the large-scale severity and the global impact that crime has in some
areas of the world, global cooperation is critical. Operating in a different way would
incur significant financial losses and render any expenditure futile.
For example, Somalian pirates in Africa have reigned terror amongst many ocean
transport companies in the area. Only through large-scale international cooperation was
policing the area possible. Therefore, crime reduction can be attributed to a joint effort
between countries.
To conclude, illegal activities are a costly and dangerous fact in the present global
economy; however, through large-scale government investment prevention is an
attainable goal. Also, spreading the expense through international cooperation the
resources invested can be significantly more effective in reducing criminals’ effectiveness
abroad.
( 250 words, band 9)
33
Abdurazzoq Khanov
Sample 14
Many offenders commit more crimes after serving their first punishment. Why
is this happening, and what measures can be taken to tackle this problem?
It is not uncommon to see many criminals committing crimes after facing their first
punishment. Although the reasons for this are lenient punishments and psychological
problems they may have, steps such as harshening the penal system and running
rehabilitation programs can be taken.
One of the main factors behind committing further crimes after the first one is connected
to less strict punishments. For example, if the criminal robs a person, he will be liable to
a fine which does not cost a lot so that it seems to the robber that they can do it again if
they are not punished costly or harshly. Another reason is that convicts are likely to
develop psychological problems after their first punishment. They might think that it was
not their fault to commit a crime, but they had to do it because of poverty,
unemployment, or lack of basic needs. This, in turn, might lead them to assume that life
is hard on them and others have unfair advantages which they deserve as well, thus
getting addicted to commiting crimes in the future.
However, there are solutions to address these problems. Firstly, the government should
enact new laws and impose harsher punishments for even engaging in small criminal
activity. Though it would affect criminals very badly at first, these punishments would
serve as an eye-opening experience for them, thereby preventing potential future crimes.
Moreover, rehabilitation programs combined with assistance of psychologists should be
prioritized. During the years of prison, the inmates must change their attitude towards
life and think about it positively. If they can start feeling good about life, the crime wave
will be mitigated because after this treatment they might not want to re-offend.
In conclusion, while the reasons for crime addiction are lenient punishments and poor
psychological support, this issue can be tackled with the introduction of draconian
punishments and satisfactory rehabilitation of offenders.
(314 words, band 7)
34
Abdurazzoq Khanov
Sample 15
It is a fact that the majority of people who are sent to prison commit further
crime after their release.
What is causing this?
What can be done to change this?
In most cases it is true that people who have been in prison are more likely to commit
crimes even after leaving prisons. Although the reasons are countless, I think that the
main and serious ones are stringent rules in detention or being jobless when they
become a free person. However, I believe we can take steps to tackle it in the near
future.
To begin with reasons, citizens do commit a crime after prisons because of two main
issues. For one thing, they confront many draconian punishments in jail, which can have
a severe influence on the behaviour of prisoners. This in turn affects the way they treat
ordinary people — if they have one simple problem, they just lose their mind and go
wrong. For another, prisoners may not be able to make their life satisfactory again. They
try to find a job but they get rejections as lots of employers do not want to have a
"criminal" worker. As a result, what will they do? Of course, they will commit petty
crimes such as shoplifting or pickpocketing to make a living for their family.
However, governments can deal with the crime wave. First and foremost, governments
and certain organizations should introduce less strict penalties. In other words, they
need to change the way they treat prisoners. For example, instead of beating prisoners
every day, they might choose to make them work here. Another possible solution is all
about job opportunities. Prisoners — as human beings should be provided with a job
when they are separated from a prison. Possibly, there will be no reason to commit a
crime again if they can satisfy their basic needs. Both of these solutions are important
and need to be used in practice as soon as possible.
To sum up, despite the harmful causes, we have enough solutions like offering a job and
changing the harsh penal system to reduce future crime levels.
(320 words, band 7.5)
35
Abdurazzoq Khanov
TOPIC: ECONOMY
Sample 16
Some people believe that the government should be responsible for the
economy, while others argue that it should be left to the market. Discuss both
views and give your opinion.
The economy is one of the most critical aspects of a country's development and
prosperity. There is a great debate about whether the government or the market should
be responsible for managing the economy. While some people believe that the
government should be responsible, others argue that the market should be left to
manage the economy. This essay will examine both views and provide a conclusion.
On the one hand, those who believe that the government should manage the economy
argue that the government has a responsibility to protect the interests of the citizens.
They contend that market forces can lead to unfairness and inequality, with the rich
getting richer and the poor getting poorer. In this view, the government must ensure
that everyone benefits from economic growth and that the economy is stable.
On the other hand, those who argue that the market should manage the economy claim
that the government's involvement can lead to inefficiencies and mismanagement. They
argue that the market is the best determinant of what products and services are in
demand and that prices should be set by supply and demand. In this view, government
intervention can distort the market and lead to sub-optimal outcomes.
In my opinion, the best approach is a combination of the two views. The government
should set the framework for the economy, but the market should be left to manage it.
This means that the government should set the rules for businesses, such as taxation,
regulations, and environmental policies. However, the market should be free to operate
within these rules, with prices determined by supply and demand.
In conclusion, while there are strong arguments for both the government and the market
managing the economy, a hybrid approach is the best solution. This approach will allow
the government to set the framework for the economy, while the market can operate
freely within that framework. By doing so, the economy will be stable and efficient,
ensuring that everyone benefits from economic growth.
( 330 words, band 8+)
36
Abdurazzoq Khanov
Sample 17
Some people believe that governments should only invest in their own country's
economy, while others argue that they should contribute to the development of
poorer nations. Discuss both views and give your opinion
In today's interconnected world, the question of whether governments should prioritize
investment in their own economy or contribute to poorer nations' development has
become increasingly pertinent. While some argue that a government's primary
responsibility is to its own citizens, others contend that a global approach is necessary to
ensure long-term stability and growth. In this essay, I will explore both sides of the
debate before giving my own opinion.
On the one hand, those who argue that governments should prioritize investment in
their own economy often point to the need to provide their citizens with jobs and
prosperity. They argue that a strong domestic economy will ultimately benefit poorer
nations, as it will create demand for goods and services from around the world. In
addition, some argue that investing in foreign countries can lead to corruption and
waste, as funds may be diverted into the hands of corrupt officials rather than being
used for their intended purpose.
On the other hand, those who advocate for governments to contribute to poorer nations'
development argue that doing so is not only a moral imperative but also essential for
long-term stability and prosperity. They point to the fact that many poorer nations lack
the infrastructure, education, and healthcare necessary to support a vibrant economy,
and that investing in these areas can help create the conditions necessary for economic
growth. Furthermore, they argue that by helping to build up the economies of other
nations, governments can create new markets for their own goods and services.
In my opinion, while governments should certainly prioritize investment in their own
economy, they also have a responsibility to contribute to the development of poorer
nations. By doing so, they can help to create a more stable and prosperous global
economy, which ultimately benefits everyone. However, it is important that any
investments are made in a transparent and accountable manner, to ensure that they are
used effectively and efficiently.
In conclusion, the question of whether governments should invest in their own economy
or contribute to poorer nations' development is a complex one. While both arguments
have their merits, I believe that a balanced approach is necessary, with a focus on both
domestic investment and global cooperation. By working together to create a more
stable and prosperous world, we can ensure a better future for ourselves and for
generations to come.
TOPIC: EDUCATION
SAMPLE 18
Some people believe that education should be free for all, while others think
that it should be the responsibility of individuals to pay for their own education.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Education is undoubtedly one of the most important aspects of a person's life. However,
there are divergent opinions about who should be responsible for the cost of education.
While some people argue that education should be free for all, others contend that
individuals should be accountable for their own education expenses. In this essay, I will
discuss both views and provide my opinion.
On the one hand, those who advocate free education for all believe that education is a
fundamental right, and everyone should have access to it regardless of their financial
status. Education is a tool that can help break the cycle of poverty and provide
individuals with opportunities to improve their lives. Additionally, free education can
help reduce the economic gap between the rich and the poor, creating a more equitable
society. For example, in countries like Sweden, Norway and Germany, free education is
provided to all citizens, and this has significantly improved social mobility and reduced
income inequality.
On the other hand, proponents of individual responsibility for education argue that
individuals should bear the cost of their own education. They believe that free education
can lead to wastage of resources, and individuals will not value their education if they
get it for free. Moreover, education is an investment, and those who invest in themselves
are more likely to take their education seriously and benefit from it in the long run. For
example, countries like the United States have a student loan system, where students
can borrow money to pay for their education and pay it back once they start working.
In my opinion, education should be free for all. Education is a fundamental right, and it is
crucial for individuals to have access to it, regardless of their financial status. Moreover,
education is a public good, and investing in education can lead to long-term benefits for
the society as a whole. It can help reduce poverty, improve economic growth, and create
a more equitable society. However, to avoid wastage of resources, it is essential to
ensure that education is of high quality and relevant to the needs of the society.
In conclusion, while there are arguments on both sides of the debate, I believe that
education should be free for all. It is the responsibility of the government to ensure that
everyone has access to education and to invest in education for the betterment of
society as a whole.
( 402 words, band 8+)
38
Abdurazzoq Khanov
Sample 19
Students perform better in school when they are rewarded rather than
punished. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is often said that positive reinforcement is more effective than punishment when
it comes to enhancing students' academic performance. While some people may
argue that punishment is necessary to discipline students, I strongly believe that
rewarding them is the key to their success. In this essay, I will discuss the reasons
why I support this view.
To begin with, students tend to respond better to rewards than punishments.
When students are motivated by rewards, they are more likely to be engaged in
the learning process, which in turn improves their performance. For instance, if a
teacher offers a prize to the top-performing student in a class, it motivates the
students to study harder to win the prize. On the other hand, if a student is
punished for not performing well, they may feel demotivated and disengaged
from the learning process, which can lead to poor academic performance.
Furthermore, rewards promote positive behavior and attitudes among students.
When students are praised for their good behavior, they tend to repeat it. This
creates a positive classroom environment, which is essential for effective learning.
In contrast, punishment can lead to negative emotions such as fear, anger, and
resentment. These emotions can interfere with the learning process and create a
hostile classroom environment.
Moreover, rewarding students can improve their self-esteem and confidence.
When students are recognized for their achievements, they feel valued and
appreciated. This can boost their self-esteem and confidence, which can lead to
better academic performance. On the other hand, punishment can have a
negative impact on a student's self-esteem and confidence, which can lead to a
lack of motivation and poor academic performance.
In conclusion, I firmly believe that rewarding students is more effective than
punishing them when it comes to improving their academic performance. Rewards
motivate students, promote positive behavior and attitudes, and improve their
self-esteem and confidence. Therefore, teachers and parents should focus on
rewarding students rather than punishing them, to create a positive learning
environment and enhance their academic success.
(333 words, band 8+)
39
Abdurazzoq Khanov
Sample 20
Some people think that a person improves intellectual skills better
when doing group activities. To what extent do you agree?
40
Abdurazzoq Khanov
TOPIC: ENVIRONMENT
Sample 21
Some people say that the main environmental problem of our time is the
loss of particular species of plants and animals. Other say that there are
more important environmental problems. Discuss both these views and give
your own opinion.
Environmental issues are a global concern and have been a hot topic for years. While some
people believe that the extinction of certain species is the main environmental problem of our
time, others argue that there are more pressing issues to tackle. In this essay, I will discuss both
views and provide my own opinion.
On the one hand, many people consider the extinction of certain species to be the primary
environmental issue. It is widely acknowledged that the world has lost an enormous number of
species over the past few decades, and many more are at risk of becoming extinct. The loss of a
single species can have far-reaching ecological and economic consequences. For example, the
extinction of bees, which are crucial pollinators, would have a profound impact on the food
chain and could lead to the collapse of entire ecosystems. Therefore, it is understandable why
some people consider the loss of particular plants and animals to be the main environmental
problem of our time.
On the other hand, others argue that there are more pressing environmental issues to address.
Climate change, for instance, is one of the most significant challenges facing the planet today.
The rising temperatures, melting ice caps, and extreme weather events have the potential to
cause devastating consequences for all living beings on Earth. Additionally, deforestation,
pollution, and overconsumption are also critical issues that require urgent attention. Therefore,
some people believe that focusing solely on the extinction of certain species may distract us
from addressing more pressing environmental concerns.
In my opinion, while the loss of certain species is undoubtedly a significant problem, it is not the
only environmental issue we need to address. Climate change, pollution, and deforestation are
all interconnected, and addressing one issue can have a positive impact on the others.
Therefore, we need to take a holistic approach to environmental issues and develop solutions
that tackle multiple problems simultaneously.
In conclusion, while some people believe that the extinction of certain species is the primary
environmental problem of our time, others argue that there are more pressing issues to address.
In my opinion, we need to take a holistic approach to environmental issues and prioritize
solutions that address multiple problems simultaneously. By doing so, we can ensure the long-
term sustainability of our planet and protect the diverse range of species that call it home.|
(392 words, band 9)
41
Abdurazzoq Khanov
Sample 22
Scientists have been warning for many years about protecting the
environment, and we must limit the use of energy in our daily lives.
Despite warnings, many people do not do this. What are the reasons
for that, and how many people can be encouraged to take on invest in
protecting the environment?
In today's world, scientists have been warning us for many years about the dire need to
protect the environment, but despite their constant warnings, many people continue to
disregard the issue. In this essay, we will discuss the reasons behind people's apathy
towards protecting the environment and how we can encourage people to take up
environmental protection as a priority.
One of the main reasons why people do not take environmental protection seriously is
due to a lack of education and awareness. Many people are not aware of the harmful
effects of their actions on the environment, and therefore, they do not feel a sense of
responsibility towards protecting it. Governments and educational institutions need to
take up the responsibility of creating awareness about environmental protection among
the general public, starting from schools. This can be done by introducing environmental
protection as a mandatory subject in schools, organizing seminars, and conducting
awareness programs in local communities.
Another significant reason behind people's disregard towards the environment is their
belief that it is too expensive to implement environmentally-friendly practices in their
daily lives. However, this is far from the truth. Small changes, such as using energy-
efficient light bulbs or taking public transportation instead of driving a car, can go a long
way in reducing carbon emissions and protecting the environment. Moreover, the cost of
these eco-friendly options is now decreasing, making it accessible to a wider audience.
Therefore, it is essential to educate people about the long-term benefits of investing in
eco-friendly practices, both for the environment and for their own well-being.
Lastly, many people do not take environmental protection seriously because they do not
see the immediate effects of their actions. This is where the media can play a crucial role
in highlighting the consequences of our actions on the environment. Governments and
NGOs can organize environmental awareness campaigns through various media
channels to encourage people to take up environmental protection seriously.
In conclusion, protecting the environment is a shared responsibility that requires a
collective effort from individuals, governments, and organizations. By increasing
awareness, educating people, and highlighting the benefits of eco-friendly practices, we
can encourage people to take up environmental protection as a priority. It is time to take
action and make a conscious effort to protect our planet for future generations.
(382 words, band 9)
42
Abdurazzoq Khanov
Sample 23
Many people believe that we should take better care of the environment in order to prevent
climate change and protect the planet. However, others argue that economic growth should
be the top priority, even if it means harming the environment. Discuss both views and give
your own opinion.
In recent years, the issue of whether we should prioritize economic growth or environmental
protection has become a highly debated topic. While some people argue that economic growth
is the key to improving people's lives, others believe that we must take better care of the
environment in order to prevent climate change and protect the planet. In this essay, I will
discuss both views and give my own opinion on this important issue.
On the one hand, those who advocate for economic growth argue that it is essential for
improving people's lives. They argue that a strong economy can create jobs, raise living
standards, and provide people with more opportunities to live fulfilling lives. Furthermore, they
claim that the benefits of economic growth can be used to fund environmental protection
initiatives, such as developing new technologies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
On the other hand, many people argue that we must take better care of the environment in
order to prevent climate change and protect the planet. They point to the damage that human
activities have caused to the environment, including deforestation, air pollution, and the
depletion of natural resources. They argue that these problems are not only harmful to the
environment but also to human health and well-being. They also argue that climate change is a
serious threat to the planet and that urgent action is needed to reduce greenhouse gas
emissions and prevent the worst effects of global warming.
In conclusion, while some people argue that economic growth should be the top priority, even if
it means harming the environment, I believe that we must prioritize environmental protection
and sustainable economic growth. By adopting a more responsible and sustainable approach to
economic development, we can ensure that future generations will inherit a healthy and thriving
plane. (463 words, band 8+)
43
Abdurazzoq Khanov
Sample 24
Some people think that the most effective way to tackle environmental
problems is to increase the cost of fuel. To what extent do you agree or
disagree?
44
Abdurazzoq Khanov
Sample 25
Some people believe that the family is the most important influence on young
adults. Other people think that friends are the most important influence.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
There has been an ongoing debate on whether family or friends have a greater impact
on the development of young adults. While some people believe that family plays the
most important role, others think that friends are more influential. In this essay, I will
explore both sides of the argument and provide my opinion on this issue.
On the one hand, those who believe that family is the most important influence argue
that the family is the first social unit that a person belongs to. Parents, in particular,
have a great responsibility in shaping their children's attitudes, values, and behaviors.
Family members can provide emotional support, guidance, and love, which are essential
for a young adult's wellbeing. Moreover, parents can act as role models and teach their
children about responsibility, respect, and honesty, which can shape their future
relationships.
On the other hand, some people argue that friends are the most important influence on
young adults. Friends play a crucial role in shaping a person's identity, social skills, and
behaviors. Young adults may be more likely to share their thoughts and feelings with
their friends than with their family, especially when it comes to sensitive topics such as
sexuality or mental health. Moreover, friends can introduce young adults to new
experiences, interests, and perspectives, which can broaden their horizons and enrich
their lives.
In my opinion, both family and friends are important influences on young adults, but the
family has a greater impact. While friends can provide emotional support and a sense of
belonging, family members are the ones who have known a person the longest and can
offer unconditional love and support. Parents, in particular, have a unique responsibility
to guide their children and teach them important values that will shape their future
relationships.
In conclusion, the question of whether family or friends are the most important influence
on young adults is a complex one. While some people believe that friends play a greater
role, others argue that family has a stronger impact. In my opinion, both are important,
but family is the most important influence on a young adult's development. Parents have
a unique responsibility to guide their children and teach them important values that will
shape their future relationships.
(372 words, band 9)
45
Abdurazzoq Khanov
Sample 26
In many countries, the traditional family structure has been replaced by other
types of family, such as single-parent families and couples without children.
What do you think are the reasons for this? Do you think it is a positive or
negative development?
In recent decades, the traditional family structure, consisting of a married couple
and their children, has been increasingly replaced by other types of families,
including single-parent families and couples without children. There are several
reasons why this has happened, and in this essay, I will explore the causes and
implications of this trend.
One of the primary reasons why the traditional family structure is changing is due
to the rise of individualism and the pursuit of personal goals. In today's society,
people have more options and opportunities than ever before, and they are more
likely to prioritize their own ambitions over traditional family values. This can be
seen in the increasing number of people who choose not to have children, as they
prefer to focus on their careers or personal interests instead.
Another factor contributing to this change is the rise of divorce rates and single
parenthood. Divorce rates have been steadily increasing in many countries,
leading to a rise in single-parent families. Moreover, there are many women who
choose to have children without being in a committed relationship, resulting in
single-parent families.
While some may view the decline of the traditional family structure as a negative
development, there are also positive aspects to consider. For one, it allows
individuals greater freedom to pursue their own interests and goals without
feeling constrained by traditional family roles. Additionally, non-traditional family
structures can provide a supportive environment for children, with single-parent
families often forming strong bonds between parent and child.
In conclusion, the replacement of the traditional family structure with other forms
of family is a complex issue with multiple contributing factors. While there are
both positive and negative implications to this trend, it is ultimately up to
individuals to decide what type of family structure is best suited for their own
needs and goals. As society continues to evolve, it is likely that the definition of
"family" will continue to change as well.
( 322 words, band 8+)
46
Abdurazzoq Khanov
Sample 27
Some people believe that children should be banned from using their phones
during the school day. Others, however, believe that children should be allowed
to use their phones.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion
In recent years, using phones in schools has become popular in many parts of the
world. While some argue that mobile phones should be prohibited for children
during school lessons because phones might be a distraction or cause health
issues, others claim that children’s phones can be beneficial to them. I personally
favor the latter point of view.
On the one hand, the main reason why students should not use phones during the
school day has to do with its detrimental effects. Children might lose their focus if
they use their phones because they are highly likely to come across various
distractions, particularly in the form of viral videos and photos on social media.
Also, there are health concerns associated with using phones. There is a risk of
consuming a high amount of radiation from phones, which might result in severe
health problems in the future, such as impaired eyesight, according to recent
studies. From this perspective, some do not agree on letting children use mobile
phones in schools.
On the other hand, phones can come in handy for children in many ways. First, as
we are living in the 21st century, there are numerous updates on various
information, such as scientific discoveries and historical facts. In this regard,
children can use their smartphones to check new data. In addition, during school
breaks they may use their devices for pleasure purposes. This way pupils can
become refreshed after doing some classwork and move on to the next lesson with
energy and motivation, which are the main factors for better learning. Such
benefits of mobile phones, of course, should not be overlooked.
In conclusion, people have different opinions on the usage of phones during the
school day. Altogether, I believe that phones can play a vital role as a source of
learning and entertainment.
(303 words, band 7.5)
47
Abdurazzoq Khanov
SAMPLE 28
Some people believe that watching TV is bad for children, while others claim it
has positive effects for children as they grow up.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Watching television has become extremely popular among children in recent
years. While some think TV has detrimental effects on children, others say TV is
useful for children because it provides educational value and can be a source of
entertainment. I personally agree with the latter point of view.
The opponents of TV allowance for children claim that TV is a bad influence on
kids. There are health concerns associated with TV, for example. According to
recent studies, too much screen time can lead to health problems, such as obesity,
eyesight impairment and mental instability, which, in turn, might result in poor
academic performance at school. Also, it is true that TV addiction among children,
particularly related to cartoons and TV shows can be a huge distraction. This is
because excessive use of TV can take away from reading, studying, learning skills
and exercise, all of which are vital for child development. From this perspective, TV
is seen as nothing but a waste of time.
On the other hand, TV can come in handy for children in many ways. First, there
are numerous educational TV programs that can help children enhance their
knowledge and skills. Take an example of National Geographic, which focuses on
science. Other than that, news, current events and historical programming can
help make kids aware of their cultures and people. On top of that, Television can
be watched for pleasure purposes by children. Since in many households both
parents work full time, their children are highly likely to grow bored easily, and a
possible solution for this problem is definitely TV. Therefore, not only do children
learn new things through TV, but also they can entertain themselves by watching
TV thanks to interesting content like cartoons and comedy TV shows.
In conclusion, people have different views on the usage of Television by kids.
However, I believe that watching TV has more benefits than drawbacks to
children.
(319 words, band 7.5)
48
Abdurazzoq Khanov
TOPIC: FOOD
Sample 29
In some countries, people spend a lot of time and money on preparing and cooking
food, while in others, people rely more on fast food and convenience meals. Discuss
the advantages and disadvantages of both approaches to food.
In recent years, there has been a growing trend of people in some countries spending
significant amounts of time and money on preparing and cooking food, while in others,
people rely heavily on fast food and convenience meals. This essay will discuss the
advantages and disadvantages of both approaches to food.
On the one hand, spending time and money on preparing and cooking food has several
benefits. Firstly, it allows people to have greater control over the quality and nutritional
value of their food. By preparing their meals at home, individuals can choose fresh
ingredients, control portion sizes, and limit the amount of salt, sugar, and unhealthy fats
in their food. Additionally, cooking at home can be a social activity, allowing family and
friends to spend time together and bond over shared meals. Finally, cooking at home can
be a creative outlet, allowing individuals to experiment with new ingredients and flavors.
On the other hand, relying on fast food and convenience meals has its own set of
advantages. Firstly, it saves time and effort, which is especially important for individuals
with busy schedules or limited cooking skills. Fast food and convenience meals are quick
and easy to prepare, and they can be a lifesaver for people who don't have the time or
energy to cook a full meal from scratch. Additionally, fast food and convenience meals
are often affordable, making them an accessible option for people on a tight budget.
However, there are also significant disadvantages to relying on fast food and
convenience meals. Firstly, these types of foods are often high in calories, unhealthy fats,
sugar, and salt, which can lead to obesity, heart disease, and other health problems.
Additionally, fast food and convenience meals are often lacking in essential nutrients like
fiber, vitamins, and minerals. Finally, relying on fast food and convenience meals can
contribute to the decline of traditional cooking skills and cultural food practices, which
are an important part of many communities.
In conclusion, both approaches to food have their advantages and disadvantages. While
cooking at home can provide greater control over the quality and nutritional value of
food, it can be time-consuming and require significant effort. Conversely, relying on fast
food and convenience meals can save time and effort, but can contribute to poor health
outcomes and the loss of important cultural practices. Therefore, individuals should
strive to find a balance between these two approaches, incorporating both home-cooked
meals and fast food or convenience meals in a way that meets their nutritional needs
and lifestyle. (420 words, band 8+)
49
Abdurazzoq Khanov
Sample 30
Unhealthy eating has a negative effect on both individuals and the society in
which they live. Some people think that the government should tax unhealthy
foods while others believe that a “fat tax” is unfair and unnecessary. Discuss both
these views and give your opinion.
In modern society, unhealthy eating has become a major concern due to its negative
impact on people's health and the society in which they live. Some individuals believe
that the government should impose a tax on unhealthy foods, while others argue that
such a "fat tax" is unjust and unnecessary. In this essay, I will discuss both views and
explain why I believe that a tax on unhealthy foods is a necessary measure.
On the one hand, some people argue that the government should not tax unhealthy
foods as it would be unfair to individuals who choose to eat such foods. Moreover, they
argue that a fat tax would not be effective in reducing obesity rates, as it would not
necessarily discourage individuals from consuming unhealthy foods. They believe that
the government should instead focus on educating people about healthy eating habits
and promoting physical activity to combat obesity.
On the other hand, others believe that a tax on unhealthy foods is necessary to
discourage people from consuming them. They argue that the government should treat
unhealthy foods like cigarettes, which are heavily taxed due to their negative impact on
health. By imposing a tax on unhealthy foods, the government could generate revenue
and also encourage people to opt for healthier alternatives.
In my opinion, a tax on unhealthy foods is a necessary measure to combat the negative
impact of unhealthy eating habits on individuals and society as a whole. While education
and promotion of healthy habits are important, they may not be sufficient to encourage
people to make healthier choices. By imposing a tax on unhealthy foods, the government
can send a strong message about the negative impact of such foods on health and
society. Moreover, the revenue generated from this tax could be used to fund public
health initiatives and programs aimed at promoting healthy eating habits and physical
activity.
In conclusion, while some people believe that a tax on unhealthy foods is unnecessary
and unfair, I believe that it is a necessary measure to combat the negative impact of
unhealthy eating habits. By discouraging people from consuming unhealthy foods and
generating revenue to fund public health initiatives, such a tax could have a positive
impact on individuals and society as a whole.
(375 words, band 8+)
50
Abdurazzoq Khanov
Sample 31
Many people today buy ready-made food rather than spend time cooking. What
do you think are the reason for this Do you think the advantages of this
development outright the disadvantages?
In recent times, an increasing number of individuals tend to purchase ready-made
food instead of cooking from scratch. This essay aims to analyze the causes behind
this trend and weigh its advantages and disadvantages.
One of the main reasons for this phenomenon is the fast-paced lifestyle that many
people lead. In today's society, people have less time to spend on cooking due to
busy work schedules and other commitments. Therefore, the convenience of
readily available meals has become a crucial factor in their decision-making
process.
Another contributing factor is the growing popularity of food delivery services and
fast-food chains. These establishments provide affordable and easy-to-access food
options that require no cooking skills, making them a convenient choice for people
who are always on the go.
However, despite the advantages of ready-made food, there are also significant
drawbacks. One of these is the high level of preservatives and unhealthy
ingredients used in processed foods. These can be harmful to the body in the long
run and may cause health issues such as obesity and heart disease.
Another disadvantage is the lack of personalization in ready-made food. While
some people may prefer a particular type of cuisine or have dietary restrictions,
the options available in pre-packaged meals are limited, leading to monotony and
repetition in their diets.
In conclusion, the convenience of ready-made food is the primary reason why
people opt for it over cooking. However, this trend has its drawbacks, such as the
unhealthy ingredients and lack of personalization. In my opinion, it is crucial to
strike a balance between the two and be mindful of the nutritional value and
ingredients of the food we consume. Therefore, the advantages of ready-made
food do not outweigh the disadvantages.
(286 words, band 8+)
51
Abdurazzoq Khanov
Sample 32
Nowadays people waste a lot of food that was bought from shops and
restaurants. Why do you think people waste food? What can be done to reduce
the amount of food they throw away?
In today's world, food wastage has become a significant problem. It is a common sight
to see people throwing away perfectly good food that they have bought from shops and
restaurants. In this essay, I will discuss the reasons behind this wastage and suggest
some measures that can be taken to reduce it.
One of the primary reasons for food wastage is the way we have become accustomed to
our shopping and dining habits. People tend to buy more than they need, and
restaurants serve larger portions than necessary. This leads to a lot of food being wasted
because it goes bad before it can be consumed. Another reason is that people often
discard food that has reached its expiry date, even though it is still perfectly safe to eat.
To address this issue, we must take several measures. Firstly, individuals should be
encouraged to plan their meals carefully and buy only the required amount of food. They
should also be mindful of the portion sizes they order at restaurants and avoid
overordering. Secondly, shops and restaurants should consider introducing smaller
portion sizes, reducing the amount of food waste. Additionally, shops can also donate
unsold food to food banks or shelters, where it can be used to feed the less fortunate.
Furthermore, awareness campaigns should be launched to educate people on the
importance of reducing food waste. Schools, universities and workplaces can be ideal
places to start such campaigns, as they offer a captive audience. The media can also play
a vital role in raising awareness of this issue.
Finally, the government can take an active role in reducing food waste. They can
introduce policies and incentives to encourage businesses and individuals to adopt
sustainable practices. For instance, restaurants could be offered tax incentives for
reducing food waste, and individuals could be given tax breaks for donating to food
banks.
In conclusion, food wastage is a significant issue that needs to be addressed urgently. By
taking steps to educate individuals, change our shopping and dining habits, and
encourage businesses to adopt sustainable practices, we can make a real difference in
reducing food waste. By working together, we can ensure that food is not wasted, and
those in need have access to it.
(372 words, band 8+)
52
Abdurazzoq Khanov
TOPIC: HEALTH
Sample 33
Some people claim that the government should provide free health care. Others think that
the government will not provide the most innovative methods of treatment and it’s better to
invest those funds in education and culture. What is your opinion?
In recent years, the provision of free healthcare has become a controversial issue, with
some arguing that the government should offer free healthcare to all citizens, while
others believe that such funding would be better spent on education and culture. In my
opinion, the government has a responsibility to provide free healthcare to all citizens, as
it is a basic human right that should not be denied due to financial constraints.
Firstly, access to healthcare is a fundamental right of every individual. Health is a crucial
aspect of a person's life, and no one should be deprived of it due to their financial
circumstances. Providing free healthcare will not only ensure that everyone has access to
essential medical care, but it will also improve the overall health of the population,
leading to increased productivity and economic growth.
Secondly, the government has a moral obligation to provide healthcare to its citizens. As
elected representatives of the people, the government is responsible for ensuring that
the basic needs of its citizens are met. Providing healthcare to everyone is one way in
which the government can fulfill its duty to the people it serves.
Furthermore, the argument that funding should be redirected from healthcare to
education and culture is flawed. While it is true that education and culture are important
for the development of a nation, it is not a zero-sum game where funds for one must
come at the expense of the other. The government has a responsibility to provide
adequate funding for all essential services, including healthcare, education, and culture.
Moreover, providing free healthcare can actually save money in the long run. When
people have access to preventive healthcare, they are less likely to require expensive
treatments later on. This can reduce the burden on the healthcare system and ultimately
save the government money.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that the government should provide free healthcare to
all citizens. This is a basic human right that should not be denied to anyone due to
financial constraints. While education and culture are also important, it is not a zero-
sum game, and the government has a responsibility to provide funding for all essential
services. Providing free healthcare not only ensures that everyone has access to essential
medical care, but it can also save money in the long run.
(385 words, band 8+)
53
Abdurazzoq Khanov
Sample 34
Many think that in today’s world it is very difficult for people to maintain a
healthy lifestyle. Others, however, feel that it is easy for people to be healthy
and fit if they want to be.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Living a healthy lifestyle has become an increasingly important topic as what
researchers know about nutrition has evolved. In my opinion, despite some
obvious hurdles it is easier than ever for people to be healthy and fit today.
The main hurdles related to fitness today revolve around technology. A few
decades ago people led much more active lives that involved more exercising and
comparatively less time in front of screens. The advent of computer technology
generally and the smartphone in particular has precipitated more passive lifestyles
globally. Smartphones are the chief culprit. People become easily addicted to the
small dopamine rushes that phones provide and their availability means they are
tailor-made to be everyone’s worst habit. This prevents many people from
developing healthy exercise patterns and, in cases where people binge watch
shows on Netflix or YouTube, can also cause over-eating.
Despite the above mentioned challenges, it is easy to be healthy today because of
the amount of information on nutrition available. Doctors a hundred years ago
recommended smoking cigarettes and the many sources of heart disease were
only documented decades ago. Today everywhere you look there are articles and
people on television laying out hard evidence related to nutrition as well as the
importance of eating vegetables and limiting meats and fatty foods. There is
healthy debate and the consensus on specific foods might fluctuate but the
general trend is greater awareness of which foods are healthy and which ones will
shorten your life and undermine your fitness goals.
In conclusion, although there are good excuses today to be unfit, people can learn
enough about nutrition to lead a healthy life with a degree of ease. Schools should
make greater efforts in the future to teach students about nutrition and set them
up with the knowledge they need to combat passivity.
(By How to do IELTS, 302 words, band 8+)
54
Abdurazzoq Khanov
Sample 35
In many countries, people are becoming increasingly concerned about their
health. What do you think are the reasons for this? What solutions can you
suggest?
In recent years, there has been a growing concern about health in many countries
around the world. This essay will explore the reasons behind this trend and suggest some
possible solutions to address the issue.
One of the main reasons for the increased concern about health is the rising prevalence
of chronic diseases such as diabetes, heart disease, and cancer. These conditions can be
debilitating and often require lifelong treatment, placing a significant burden on
individuals and healthcare systems. As people become more aware of the risks
associated with these diseases, they are taking proactive steps to prevent them.
Another reason for the increased focus on health is the growing body of research linking
lifestyle choices to health outcomes. Studies have shown that factors such as diet,
exercise, and sleep have a profound impact on physical and mental health. As a result,
people are paying more attention to these areas of their lives and making changes to
improve their overall health.
There are several solutions that can be implemented to address the issue of growing
health concerns. First, governments can invest in public health campaigns to raise
awareness about the risks of chronic diseases and promote healthy lifestyle choices. For
example, campaigns could focus on the benefits of regular exercise and the dangers of
smoking.
Second, schools can play a critical role in promoting healthy habits among young people.
By providing education on nutrition and physical activity, schools can help to instill
healthy habits that can last a lifetime.
Finally, employers can also take steps to promote health in the workplace. This can
include offering wellness programs that provide resources and support for employees to
adopt healthy habits. Employers can also consider providing healthy food options in the
workplace and encouraging physical activity during the workday.
In conclusion, there are several reasons for the increased concern about health in many
countries around the world. However, there are also many solutions that can be
implemented to address this issue, including public health campaigns, education in
schools, and workplace initiatives. By working together to promote healthy habits, we
can create a healthier future for ourselves and future generations.
(356 words, band 8+)
55
Abdurazzoq Khanov
Sample 36
In many countries, the healthcare system is overburdened, and there are long
waiting times for patients to access medical services. What are the causes of
this problem, and what can be done to solve it?
In today's world, the healthcare system is facing numerous challenges due to the
growing population, increased life expectancy, and the prevalence of chronic diseases. In
many countries, patients have to endure long waiting times before they can access
medical services, which has become a serious concern. This essay will explore the
reasons for this issue and propose solutions to alleviate it.
The first reason for the overburdened healthcare system is the increase in the aging
population. As people grow old, they require more medical attention and care, which
puts pressure on the healthcare system. The second reason is the rise of chronic diseases,
such as diabetes, hypertension, and obesity, which require long-term care and
management. As a result, patients with acute conditions have to wait for extended
periods to receive medical attention, which is not acceptable.
Another contributing factor is the lack of investment in healthcare by governments.
Many countries do not allocate sufficient resources to their healthcare systems, which
results in inadequate facilities, insufficient medical personnel, and low-quality care. In
addition, the shortage of qualified medical personnel has led to a significant increase in
waiting times for patients.
To tackle this issue, several solutions can be implemented. First, governments must
allocate more resources to healthcare to improve the quality of care and provide
sufficient facilities and medical personnel. This will help reduce waiting times and ensure
that patients receive timely medical attention. Second, there should be an emphasis on
preventive measures, such as regular health check-ups and promoting a healthy lifestyle,
to reduce the incidence of chronic diseases. By doing so, the number of patients
requiring long-term care will decrease, and the pressure on the healthcare system will be
alleviated.
In conclusion, the overburdened healthcare system is a complex issue that requires
immediate attention. The aging population, the rise of chronic diseases, and the lack of
investment in healthcare are the main reasons for long waiting times for patients.
Governments must take the necessary steps to address these challenges and improve
the quality of care to ensure that patients receive timely medical attention. Furthermore,
preventive measures can be implemented to reduce the incidence of chronic diseases
and alleviate the pressure on the healthcare system.
( 365 words, ban 8+)
56
Abdurazzoq Khanov
TOPIC: LANGUAGE
Sample 37
Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause
serious social problems, as well as practical problems. To what extent do you
agree or disagree with this statement?
One of the biggest social and practical challenges that people living abroad face is the
language barrier. I believe that this can lead to very serious social problems in many
countries but technology has made the practical issues less relevant over the last several
decades.
The main reason that having to speak a foreign language can cause social problems is
through the breakdown in understanding between people of different cultures. The most
salient example of this is in the United States where there has been an influx of Hispanic
immigrants, especially along the Southern border. These immigrants are typically able to
integrate well if they learn English but those that have not learned have provoked social
problems and even violent reactions. Many English speaking residents resent the
immigrants failure to integrate and this has resulted in discriminatory practices and
widespread racism towards Hispanics. This in turn has caused many Hispanics to develop
an antipathy towards other residents and segregate themselves in homogeneous
neighborhoods.
There are comparatively fewer practical problems caused by not knowing the language
of the country where you live because of the development of technology in general and
smartphones in particular. Computers have made it much easier to look up directions,
find important information and get quick translations. Smartphones have made this
even easier. If someone doesn’t know the language of the country where they live, they
can still find restaurants to their liking on Facebook and get simple directions through
Google Maps. They can even order food online without having to use another language
at all. If they need to communicate with someone who does not speak their language
they can simply take out their phone and use Google translate to slowly, but effectively,
convey a message. The problems that not knowing the language of the country where
you live causes are therefore minimal and easily overcome.
In conclusion, I only partly agree with the statement in question. Not knowing a
language when living abroad can cause social unrest but pragmatic concerns have been
mitigated by recent technology. In the future, it will become even less important to know
the language of the country where you live although there is great potential for
increased social unrest and heightened tensions in many parts of the world.
(By an IELTS examiner, 378 words)
57
Abdurazzoq Khanov
Sample 38
Every year several languages die out. Some people think this is not important
because life will be easier if there are fewer languages. To what extent do you
agree or disagree with this opinion?
In today's globalized world, the issue of language extinction has become a hotly debated
topic. While some argue that it is not a significant concern since it can simplify
communication, I strongly disagree with this view. I believe that language diversity is
vital for preserving cultural heritage and maintaining healthy communication, and in this
essay, I will elaborate on my stance.
To begin with, languages are not just tools for communication, but they are also an
integral part of a society's culture and history. Every language has unique nuances,
expressions, and meanings that reflect the traditions, values, and beliefs of the people
who speak it. As such, losing a language means losing a vital aspect of a community's
identity and cultural heritage. Moreover, language can shape how we think and perceive
the world, and losing a language could lead to a loss of diversity in thought and
understanding.
Furthermore, language extinction can have significant social and economic
consequences. When a language disappears, so does the knowledge and wisdom of the
community that spoke it. This can hinder the transfer of knowledge from one generation
to another, resulting in the loss of traditional practices, medicinal knowledge, and other
cultural practices. Additionally, having fewer languages can also lead to linguistic
imperialism, where dominant languages overpower smaller, less influential languages,
leading to a concentration of power and influence in the hands of the few.
Lastly, language diversity is essential for maintaining healthy communication in our
interconnected world. With globalization, the need for intercultural communication has
never been more critical. Different languages allow for a variety of perspectives and
approaches to problem-solving, which can lead to more creative solutions. By limiting
our languages, we are also limiting our ability to connect with people from different
cultures and countries, which can hinder progress in many areas.
In conclusion, while some may argue that language extinction is not a significant issue, I
strongly believe that language diversity is critical for preserving cultural heritage,
maintaining healthy communication, and promoting diversity in thought and
understanding. Therefore, it is imperative that we recognize the importance of language
diversity and work towards preserving it for future generations.
(357 words, band 8+)
58
Abdurazzoq Khanov
Sample 39
Studying the English language in an English-speaking country is the best but not
the only way to learn the language. Do you agree or disagree with this
statement?
In today's globalized world, learning the English language has become a necessity
for many individuals. While studying in an English-speaking country is considered
the ideal way to acquire the language, it is not the only effective approach. In this
essay, I will discuss both sides of this argument and provide my perspective.
On the one hand, studying the English language in an English-speaking country
offers numerous advantages. Firstly, being surrounded by the language and using
it in daily interactions with native speakers can significantly improve one's fluency
and confidence. Moreover, studying in an English-speaking country exposes
individuals to various dialects and accents, which can help them develop a better
understanding of the language's nuances. Additionally, living and studying in an
English-speaking country can provide students with an immersive cultural
experience, allowing them to learn more about the customs, traditions, and
history of the country.
On the other hand, studying English in non-English speaking countries has several
benefits. Firstly, it is more affordable, and students can save on travel and living
expenses. Secondly, they have access to the same high-quality resources, such as
textbooks, online courses, and language exchange programs. Furthermore,
language schools outside of English-speaking countries often employ native
English speakers as teachers, which ensures the quality of the language
instruction.
In my opinion, while studying in an English-speaking country offers several
benefits, it is not the only way to learn the language. The internet has made it
possible for students to access high-quality English language resources, regardless
of their location. Additionally, language exchange programs, online classes, and
private tutoring can provide students with opportunities to practice their language
skills with native speakers.
In conclusion, studying English in an English-speaking country is an excellent way
to learn the language, but it is not the only way. As long as students have access
to quality resources and opportunities to practice their language skills, they can
acquire the language proficiency they need to achieve their goals.
(324 words, band8+)
59
Abdurazzoq Khanov
Sample 40
Some people believe that the media has too much power and influence over
people's lives, while others think that the media is just reflecting the society we
live in. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
In today's digital age, the media plays a crucial role in shaping our lives. While some
people argue that the media has excessive power and influence over us, others believe
that it merely reflects the society we live in. In this essay, I will discuss both views and
provide my own opinion.
On the one hand, those who believe that the media has too much power and influence
over our lives argue that it can manipulate our thoughts, feelings, and behaviors. For
instance, media outlets can shape public opinion and sway political elections by
selectively reporting news that supports their agenda. Moreover, advertisers can use the
media to create unrealistic standards of beauty, causing people to feel inadequate and
lowering their self-esteem. Finally, some critics argue that the media's obsession with
violence and crime can desensitize people to these issues and increase aggression in
society.
On the other hand, supporters of the media argue that it is merely a reflection of our
society. They believe that the media does not create social problems but rather reflects
them. For instance, news outlets report on crime and violence because they are
prevalent issues in society. Furthermore, advertisers use models that conform to societal
standards of beauty because that is what consumers respond to. Finally, the media
reports on political and social issues because people are interested in these topics.
In my opinion, the truth lies somewhere in between these two views. While it is true that
the media can shape our attitudes and behaviors, it is also true that it reflects the values
and beliefs of our society. It is important to recognize that the media has a responsibility
to report on issues that are important to society and to do so in an ethical and
responsible manner. However, it is equally important for individuals to be critical
consumers of the media and to recognize when they are being manipulated.
In conclusion, the media plays a significant role in our lives, but its impact is not
absolute. While some argue that it has too much power and influence, others believe
that it merely reflects our society. In my view, the truth lies somewhere in between, and
it is our responsibility to be critical consumers of the media and to use it wisely.
( 380 words, band 8+)
60
Abdurazzoq Khanov
Sample 41
Some people think that newspapers are the best way to learn news. However,
others believe that they can learn news better through other media. Discuss
both views and give your opinion.
Newspapers have been considered the most reliable news source for more than a
century but in recent decades newer forms of media have supplanted their
influence. Some feel that these new sources of news are better but in my opinion,
newspapers are by far better because of the amount of time and research that
writers put into their articles.
The main reason that many people prefer newer media outlets is that they deliver
news more quickly across a variety of convenient platforms. The most notable
example of this is online news. The vast majority of people get their news from
Facebook and other social media websites which aggregate articles from various
online publishers, including the online version of print newspapers in some cases.
The problem here is that websites are solely concerned with increasing traffic and
getting news up as fast as possible. It is a common occurrence for a website to
publish news quickly in order to beat others to the scoop before it has been
properly verified or even thoughtfully analysed. The result is hordes of people
clicking on links to amuse themselves for a minute without casting a critical eye
over the veracity of the news. These articles are then shared online or by word of
mouth and false information spreads rapidly.
Despite the conveniences of online media, the news that is printed in newspapers
has been better researched and verified in most cases. Newspapers frequently
devote entire departments to long-term investigative journalism. A standout
example of this would be the Boston Globe’s years long investigation into sexual
abuse by the Catholic church. They carefully interviewed victims and put together
a convincing case which led to long-lasting reforms and convictions of some
individuals. They also published stories on the topic for over a year which allowed
for detailed and thoughtful analysis of the problem, suggestions for solutions, and
articles on wider societal implications. This type of reporting is anathema to the
fervent pace of online media.
In conclusion, even though newspapers are a dying industry I think they are more
informative and trustworthy than the largely online institutions that are replacing
them. This trend is irreversible and will have consequences for the future of
democracies around the world as people become less informed.
( By a real examiner, 376 words)
61
Abdurazzoq Khanov
Sample 42
Some people say that advertising is extremely successful at persuading us to
buy things. Other people think that advertising has little effect and that we are
not influenced by it. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Advertising has become an integral part of modern society, and its influence can be seen
everywhere from billboards and television commercials to social media and online
advertisements. While some people argue that advertising is incredibly effective in
persuading us to buy things, others believe that it has little effect on our purchasing
decisions. In this essay, I will examine both perspectives and provide my own opinion on
the matter.
On the one hand, it is clear that advertising is a powerful tool that can influence our
buying decisions. Companies invest millions of dollars in advertising campaigns to
capture our attention and persuade us to purchase their products. For example, a well-
crafted advertisement that appeals to our emotions or aspirations can create a desire
within us to own the product being advertised. Furthermore, repetition of a message can
also have a significant impact on our subconscious, making us more likely to remember
and consider buying the product.
On the other hand, there are those who argue that advertising has little effect on our
purchasing decisions. They claim that we are not easily swayed by advertisements and
that we make our buying decisions based on personal needs and preferences. This
perspective suggests that consumers are rational beings who weigh the pros and cons of
a product before making a purchase. Additionally, many people today are becoming
more aware of the manipulative tactics used in advertising and are choosing to ignore or
even boycott certain products and brands.
In my opinion, both of these views hold some truth, but I believe that advertising has a
significant impact on our purchasing decisions. While we may like to think of ourselves
as rational consumers who make informed choices, the truth is that we are often
influenced by our emotions and the messages we see in advertising. Advertisers know
this and use various tactics to target our emotions and create a desire for their products.
In conclusion, advertising is a powerful tool that can influence our buying decisions.
While some may argue that we are not easily swayed by advertisements, I believe that
we are more susceptible to their influence than we realize. As consumers, it is important
that we remain aware of the persuasive nature of advertising and make informed
decisions about the products we choose to buy.
( 383 words, band 8+)
62
Abdurazzoq Khanov
Sample 43
Some believe that people will purchase a product based on their needs and
advertising is not needed.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Many have argued that advertisement serves no real purpose as necessity
motivates all purchases. I disagree with this completely because ads give
consumers a minimum guarantee of quality and also develop wants into needs.
First of all, advertising is the most direct way to inform customers of a given
product’s quality. The content of the ad is less important than the fact they were
able to produce, distribute and, oftentimes, get a celebrity endorsement. For
example, KFC typically signs the most famous football players to massive
sponsorship deals, thereby evidencing the continued relevance and quality of their
food. When a lesser known company premiers an advertisement this is evidence
that they are generating enough revenue to validate whatever product they sell or
service they provide.
Secondly, advertising does not simply meet needs; it creates them. Most people
could live more fulfilling lives with fewer products but advertising stimulates
desires by appealing to consumer psychology and those initial wants eventually
become habitual. A good example of this would be the rise of Apple products in
the last two decades and the role of advertising in making them popular. Apple
phones and computers are famed not only for their quality but also the sense of
being part of a community of users. Stylish ads like the ‘think different’ campaign
helped foster their dominance. Now the desire to become part of the Apple
community and appear cool has become a basic need for many users hooked into
the Apple ecosystem of high-quality consumer electronics.
In conclusion, advertising serves an important role in society. This does not mean
that it should not be regulated, simply that consumers and officials should be
mindful of the full contribution of advertisers.
( By a real examiner, 284 words)
63
Abdurazzoq Khanov
TOPIC: SOCIETY
Sample 44
People are spending a large amount of money to look younger. Why is this the
case?
Do you think it is a positive or negative development?
It is true that nowadays people are not satisfied with their looks and trying to look
younger than they are by splurging a great deal of money. While there are several
reasons for this, including the influence of social media and the appearance of
celebrities, I believe that it brings about many negatives to people.
There are various reasons for the desire to look younger. First of all, most people
are influenced by social networking sites, such as Instagram and Facebook, where
millions of young and beautiful looks of people are shared on a daily basis. As a
result, the users of these sites tend to compare themselves with that people in
photos with regards to looks and beauty, thus aching to look as young as them,
regardless of what it requires. Another reason is connected to the physical
appearance of popular people on TV. As they are in the spotlight, they are likely to
try to look as young and attractive as they can, but most fans consider them as
role models and therefore feel obliged to imitate them.
Nevertheless, in my view, there are many disadvantages to following this trend,
the most obvious of which is the detrimental effect on health. If people want to
look younger, they often must undergo surgeries, such as face-lift and anaplasty,
which will probably cause different health problems. A recent study, for example,
has shown that plastic surgery might decrease one’s life expectancy, or have
damaging effects on the way different parts of the body function. Moreover, this
trend can cause people to fail to appreciate natural beauty. This is because if
everyone tries to look younger artificially, then it is likely that they will stop being
grateful for the things given to them by nature, which, in turn, might result in
unhappiness.
In conclusion, the main factors behind the urge to look younger are linked to the
influence of social media and well-known people. However, in my opinion, this is
disadvantageous for both people’s well-being and satisfaction from life.
( 338 words, band 7.5)
64
Abdurazzoq Khanov
Sample 45
People have historically attempted to achieve a perfect society. However, it is
difficult to decide what a perfect society would be like. What would be the most
important element of an ideal society? What can normal people do to make
society more perfect?
The best way to improve our society is a topic of understandable concern for all
governments and citizens. In my opinion, the key to this is increased tolerance of
difference and people can take the individual step of examining their own beliefs
in order to not pass ingrained prejudices on to the next generation.
The most momentous shifts in society in the last centuries have involved progress
related to tolerance of different types of people. The original pilgrims left England
to found new colonies in order to have religious freedom to worship as they wish.
Racism and slavery in the 19th century is a direct result of considering one group
of people separate. The most recent example is the movement to be more
accepting of a variety of sexualities. These have all made society more perfect and
their evolution and nascent spread throughout the world will allow the greatest
number of people to enjoy a full range of freedom and opportunity.
To achieve the more open society mentioned above, individuals can closely
evaluate their beliefs and try to impart more tolerant values to the younger
generation. A good example of this can be seen in the embrace of gay marriage by
many in the last decade. In the 20th century, it was political suicide to support gay
marriage. However, people began to question the rationale for denying this basic
human right. Now most schools and parents teach their children about alternative
lifestyles and it is much more common to see LGBT couples in popular culture. This
is one step towards a utopian, inclusive society free of prejudice.
In conclusion, the movement to accept more diverse elements of society is already
underway. With continued effort, it is reasonable to expect a generally positive
attitude towards all people in the coming years, though this progressivism will
vary widely from country to country.
(By a real examiner, 310 words)
65
Abdurazzoq Khanov
Sample 46
In some societies, the elderly are highly valued and respected, while in others,
they are seen as a burden on society. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
In many societies, the elderly are considered to be a valuable asset due to their wisdom,
experience and contributions to society. However, in some other cultures, the elderly are
not given the same level of respect and are instead perceived as a burden on society. In
this essay, I will discuss both viewpoints and provide my opinion on the matter.
On one hand, there are societies that place a great deal of value on their elderly
population. These societies see the elderly as a valuable resource and appreciate the
contributions they have made to society over their lifetimes. In these cultures, the elderly
are often looked up to as role models and leaders due to their wealth of knowledge and
experience. They are also given a high level of care and respect, with many families
taking on the responsibility of caring for their elderly relatives in their old age.
On the other hand, there are societies that view the elderly as a burden on society. These
societies often place a higher value on youth and productivity, and view the elderly as no
longer being able to contribute to society in the same way as younger individuals. As a
result, the elderly in these societies are often marginalized, with limited access to
healthcare, social services, and economic opportunities. This can lead to feelings of
isolation, loneliness, and depression, which can have a negative impact on their overall
well-being.
In my opinion, it is crucial for societies to recognize and value the contributions of their
elderly population. The elderly have much to offer in terms of wisdom, experience, and
historical knowledge, and their contributions should be recognized and appreciated.
Moreover, societies should work to ensure that the elderly have access to the resources
and support they need to live fulfilling lives in their old age. This could include increased
access to healthcare, social services, and economic opportunities, as well as programs
aimed at reducing feelings of isolation and loneliness among the elderly.
In conclusion, while some societies place a high value on their elderly population, others
view them as a burden on society. In my opinion, it is essential for societies to recognize
and value the contributions of their elderly population, and to provide the support and
resources needed to ensure they can live fulfilling lives in their old age. By doing so,
societies can benefit from the wealth of knowledge and experience that the elderly have
to offer, while also ensuring that they are able to lead happy and healthy lives in their
later years.
( 424 words, band 8+)
66
Abdurazzoq Khanov
Sample 47
In some societies, it is common for people to live with extended family
members, while in others, people tend to live independently. Discuss both
views and give your opinion.
Living arrangements are an essential aspect of society, and different cultures have
distinct norms when it comes to living with family members. In some societies, it is
customary for people to live with extended family members, while in others, people tend
to live independently. In this essay, I will explore both viewpoints and provide my opinion
on this matter.
On the one hand, societies that value living with extended family members often view
family ties as essential. In these societies, it is not uncommon for people to live in multi-
generational households, with grandparents, parents, and children living together under
the same roof. This arrangement can have many benefits, such as increased support for
childcare and elderly care, shared household expenses, and a stronger sense of family
cohesion and connection.
On the other hand, there are societies that value individualism and independence, where
people tend to live alone or with just their immediate family. In these societies, people
value privacy and personal space, and may see living with extended family members as
intrusive or impractical. In such cultures, people are expected to be self-sufficient, and
there is often less emphasis on the importance of family ties.
In my opinion, while both arrangements have their benefits, living with extended family
members is a more beneficial arrangement. Living with extended family members can
provide a supportive and nurturing environment that fosters strong family bonds. It also
provides a way to share the workload of caring for children and the elderly, allowing for
greater flexibility in work and family responsibilities.
Moreover, living with extended family members can provide a sense of security and
stability, especially during times of crisis. This has become particularly relevant in recent
times, with the COVID-19 pandemic highlighting the importance of having a supportive
and caring network of family and friends.
In conclusion, while some societies prioritize living independently, others value living
with extended family members. In my opinion, living with extended family members has
many benefits and can help to create a supportive and nurturing environment that
fosters strong family bonds. As such, societies should work to create policies and support
systems that encourage and facilitate this type of living arrangement. By doing so, we
can help to create strong and resilient communities that support the well-being of all its
members.
( 382 words, band 8+)
67
Abdurazzoq Khanov
Sample 48
The first man to walk on the moon claimed it was a step forward for mankind.
However, it has made little difference in most people’s lives.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
There are many who feel that research into space exploration has not made
sufficient impact in the average individual’s life to justify its expense. In my
opinion, there are valid reasons to ask this question but overall the cultural and
scientific effect is all-encompassing.
Those who decry the wasted resources directed towards space programs point out
the lack of readily apparent benefits. Sending a man to the moon and maintaining
expensive telescopes and space stations do nothing for the average person
struggling to pay their bills and vulnerable to sudden economic downturns. Most
may casually watch the moon landing or the occasional NASA video on YouTube
but that is hardly justification for billions of dollars over decades that could have
made a real difference if diverted towards medicine, education, infrastructure,
and a vibrant employment sector.
Nonetheless, the effects pertain deeply to culture and science. Firstly, putting a
man on the moon was a moment that transcends mundane utilitarian concerns. It
not only was an exercise in the power and majesty of the human race but also
inspired countless individuals across a wide variety of industries to push for great
achievements and have pride in mankind. Secondly, the advances made while
researching space have led to concrete, beneficial discoveries. For example, there
are now satellites in space making possible phone calls and internet access nearly
everywhere on Earth. Countless other large and small innovations from microchips
to increased fuel efficiency are also to some degree indebted to the national
funding of space exploration.
In conclusion, far from being a waste of valuable resources, space exploration has
been the driving force behind the continued progress of humanity. It should
therefore continue to receive support.
68
Abdurazzoq Khanov
Sample 49
Some people believe that space exploration is a waste of money and resources,
while others think it is essential for mankind's survival. Discuss both sides and
give your own opinion.
In recent decades, space exploration has become a hot topic for debate, with
some arguing that it is a wasteful endeavor while others maintain that it is critical
for our survival. This essay will explore both sides of the issue and provide an
opinion on the matter.
On the one hand, opponents of space exploration argue that the money and
resources invested in space exploration could be better spent addressing pressing
issues on Earth. For example, hunger, poverty, and climate change are major
problems that need immediate attention. In addition, critics claim that the
benefits of space exploration are intangible and uncertain, and that the risks
involved are too great.
On the other hand, supporters of space exploration argue that it is essential for
the future of mankind. By exploring space, we can gain a better understanding of
our universe, and perhaps even discover new planets that could support life. In
addition, space exploration has led to numerous technological advancements that
have improved our lives on Earth. For example, GPS technology, developed for
space exploration, is now used in everyday life for navigation.
In my opinion, while I can understand the arguments of both sides, I believe that
space exploration is essential for our survival as a species. By exploring space, we
can gain a deeper understanding of the universe and our place in it, which could
lead to new scientific discoveries and advancements that could benefit humanity
in ways we cannot currently imagine. Additionally, the technology developed for
space exploration has already provided numerous benefits to our lives on Earth,
and will likely continue to do so in the future.
In conclusion, while some may argue that space exploration is a wasteful
endeavor, I believe that it is a critical investment for the future of humanity. By
continuing to explore space, we can gain a better understanding of our universe
and improve our lives on Earth through technological advancements. Therefore, I
believe that we should continue to invest in space exploration while also
addressing pressing issues on Earth.
(339 words band 8+)
69
Abdurazzoq Khanov
Sample 50
Some people argue that humans have done more harm than good to the
oceans, while others believe that humans have made significant positive
contributions to ocean conservation. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
In recent years, the oceans have become a topic of heated debate. While some argue
that humans have caused significant damage to these bodies of water, others believe
that our actions have been more positive than negative. In this essay, I will examine both
viewpoints and present my own opinion on this matter.
On the one hand, it is undeniable that humans have had a detrimental impact on the
oceans. One of the most significant ways in which we have harmed the oceans is
through pollution. Every year, millions of tons of plastic waste, oil spills, and other forms
of pollution are dumped into the oceans. This has led to devastating consequences for
marine life, including the death of countless animals and the destruction of entire
ecosystems. Additionally, overfishing has become a widespread problem, with many
species of fish on the brink of extinction due to overfishing.
On the other hand, there are those who argue that humans have made significant
positive contributions to ocean conservation. For example, many governments have
established protected marine areas to conserve and protect marine life. In addition,
technological advancements have enabled us to clean up oil spills and other forms of
pollution more efficiently, reducing their impact on the environment. Furthermore, there
has been a growing movement towards sustainable fishing practices, which aim to
protect marine life while ensuring that we can continue to harvest seafood.
In my opinion, while humans have undoubtedly caused significant harm to the oceans,
we have also made important contributions to ocean conservation. However, I believe
that we need to do much more to protect these vital bodies of water. Governments and
individuals alike must take action to reduce pollution and overfishing, and we must
continue to develop new technologies and sustainable practices to ensure that we can
continue to enjoy the many benefits that the oceans provide.
In conclusion, the debate about whether humans have done more harm than good to the
oceans is complex and multifaceted. While it is clear that we have caused significant
damage to these vital ecosystems, we have also made important contributions to ocean
conservation. Moving forward, it is essential that we continue to work towards
protecting and conserving our oceans, not only for the sake of marine life but also for the
well-being of our planet as a whole.
( 387 words, band 8+)
70
Abdurazzoq Khanov
Sample 51
In recent years, there has been a growing interest in the possibility of life on other planets.
Some people believe that the discovery of extraterrestrial life would be the greatest scientific
achievement of all time, while others argue that it would be a threat to human existence.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
In the quest for knowledge and exploration, humans have always been fascinated with
the concept of extraterrestrial life. Some argue that discovering life on other planets
would be the most significant scientific accomplishment ever achieved, while others
believe that such a discovery could have catastrophic consequences for humanity. This
essay will examine both perspectives and provide my opinion on the matter.
On the one hand, discovering life on other planets would undoubtedly be a remarkable
scientific achievement. It would challenge our understanding of life and the universe,
and open up new avenues for research and exploration. The discovery of extraterrestrial
life could answer some of the most fundamental questions that humans have always
asked, such as whether life is unique to Earth, or if there is intelligent life elsewhere in
the universe. Moreover, it could potentially lead to the development of new technologies
and provide solutions to some of the world's most pressing problems, such as
overpopulation, climate change, and energy depletion.
On the other hand, discovering life on other planets could also pose a significant threat
to human existence. It is possible that alien life forms could be hostile and view us as a
threat, resulting in an invasion or attack. Additionally, the discovery of extraterrestrial
life could cause panic and chaos among humans, leading to societal breakdown and
instability. Finally, it is possible that the mere existence of other life forms could
challenge humanity's sense of uniqueness and purpose, leading to psychological and
existential crises.
In my opinion, the discovery of life on other planets would be an extraordinary
accomplishment that could lead to numerous benefits for humanity. However, we must
approach the issue with caution and consider the potential risks involved. We should
take the necessary precautions to ensure that any interaction with extraterrestrial life is
peaceful and beneficial to both parties. Additionally, we must consider the impact that
such a discovery would have on our society and take steps to mitigate any negative
effects.
In conclusion, the possibility of life on other planets raises significant questions and
challenges for humanity. While the discovery of extraterrestrial life could be a
tremendous achievement, it could also pose a threat to our existence. Therefore, we
must approach the issue with caution, taking into account both the potential benefits
and risks involved.
(382 words, band 8+)
71
Abdurazzoq Khanov
TOPIC: SPORTS
Sample 52
Many companies sponsor sports as a way of advertising themselves. Some
people think this is good for the world of sports, while others think it is
negative.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion?
Sports sponsorship by companies is a common practice in the world of sports. While
some individuals believe that this is a positive aspect, others argue that it has a negative
impact. This essay will explore both sides of the argument and provide a personal
viewpoint.
On one hand, there are those who support sports sponsorship as a means of advertising.
Firstly, sponsorship provides financial support for sports, which can help to develop and
promote them. This can be seen in the examples of major events such as the Olympics,
where the sponsorship of large companies has helped to make the event a success.
Secondly, sports sponsorship helps to increase the profile of companies, which can lead
to an increase in sales and revenue. As a result, companies are more likely to invest in
sports events and teams.
On the other hand, there are those who argue that sports sponsorship has a negative
impact on the world of sports. One of the main concerns is that sponsorship can lead to a
focus on profits rather than the development of sports. This can result in teams and
events being manipulated to suit the interests of sponsors, rather than the interests of
athletes and fans. Additionally, sponsorship can lead to the commercialization of sports,
which can undermine their traditional values and principles. This can be seen in the
increasing prevalence of advertisements and product placements within sports events.
In my opinion, sports sponsorship can have both positive and negative effects. While it
can provide financial support and increase the profile of companies, it can also lead to a
focus on profits and the commercialization of sports. However, I believe that these
negative impacts can be mitigated by ensuring that the interests of athletes and fans are
prioritized over those of sponsors. This can be achieved by regulating the role of
sponsors in sports events and ensuring that their influence is limited.
In conclusion, sports sponsorship has both positive and negative effects on the world of
sports. While it can provide financial support and increase the profile of companies, it
can also lead to a focus on profits and the commercialization of sports. However, by
regulating the role of sponsors in sports events, the negative impacts can be minimized,
and the positive impacts can be maximized.
(382 words, band 8+)
72
Abdurazzoq Khanov
Sample 53
Some people see sports as no more than leisure activity, others,however,
believe that it is important for society.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion?
Sports play a significant role in our society, with some people viewing it as a form
of entertainment, while others consider it to be an essential component of a
healthy society. In this essay, I will examine both perspectives and offer my own
opinion on the matter.
On the one hand, there are those who argue that sports are nothing more than a
leisure activity, providing enjoyment and entertainment for the participants and
spectators alike. This view is supported by the fact that sports are not directly
linked to any economic or political benefits, and many people view sports as
merely a way to pass the time.
On the other hand, some people believe that sports are vital for society, citing
numerous benefits such as promoting physical and mental well-being, instilling
values such as teamwork and fair play, and providing a sense of community and
belonging. Sports can also be used as a tool for social integration, particularly in
areas with high levels of social and economic inequality.
In my opinion, while sports can certainly be a leisure activity for some, it is clear
that they have a much broader impact on society. In addition to promoting
physical and mental health, sports can teach valuable life skills such as leadership,
teamwork, and perseverance. Furthermore, sports have the power to bring people
from different backgrounds and cultures together, promoting social cohesion and
understanding.
In conclusion, while some may view sports as nothing more than a form of
entertainment, it is clear that they have a much deeper impact on society. Sports
provide numerous benefits to individuals and communities, from promoting
physical and mental well-being to fostering social cohesion and understanding.
Therefore, I strongly believe that sports are an important and valuable aspect of
society that should be promoted and supported.
( 299 words, band 8+)
73
Abdurazzoq Khanov
Sample 54
Some people think that it is a waste of money for countries to host big sporting
events like the World Cup and the money would be better spent on other
things.However, others think that hosting large sporting events has a clear,
positive impact on a country.
Discuss both views and give your own opinions?
In recent years, the issue of whether it is worthwhile for countries to host big sporting
events like the World Cup has become increasingly contentious. While some argue that
such events are a waste of money and resources, others maintain that they have
numerous benefits for the host country. This essay will examine both viewpoints and
offer my own perspective.
On the one hand, there are compelling arguments for the idea that hosting large
sporting events is a waste of resources. Firstly, the costs of organizing such events can be
astronomical, with billions of dollars being spent on everything from building
infrastructure to hiring security personnel. This money could be better spent on areas
such as education, healthcare, and poverty alleviation. Secondly, the benefits of hosting
these events are often overstated, with little evidence that they lead to lasting economic
growth or increased tourism. Indeed, some countries have been left with expensive,
underused stadiums and other facilities after hosting major sporting events.
On the other hand, there are also strong arguments in favor of hosting large sporting
events. Firstly, such events can bring a sense of national pride and unity to a country,
with citizens rallying behind their team and feeling a sense of common purpose.
Secondly, they can boost the local economy by bringing in tourists and creating jobs in
sectors such as hospitality and transportation. Finally, hosting such events can raise a
country's profile on the world stage and improve its international reputation, potentially
leading to increased investment and trade.
In my view, while the costs of hosting large sporting events are undoubtedly high, the
benefits are also significant. However, it is crucial that countries carefully consider the
long-term implications of hosting such events, rather than being swayed by the short-
term boost they may provide. For example, they should focus on building sustainable
infrastructure that can be used long after the event is over, rather than simply building
flashy stadiums that will sit empty after the games are done.
In conclusion, the question of whether it is worthwhile for countries to host big sporting
events like the World Cup is a complex one. While there are valid arguments on both
sides, my own opinion is that the benefits outweigh the costs, provided that countries
plan carefully and focus on creating lasting benefits for their citizens.
( 387 words, band 8+)
74
Abdurazzoq Khanov
Sample 55
Some people believe that governments should ban dangerous sports even
though others claim they should have the freedom to choose a sport to their
liking. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give specific reasons and
examples to support your opinion.
It is a matter of ongoing debate whether governments should prohibit dangerous
sports or not. While some people argue that individuals should be free to choose
their preferred sports, others believe that governments should ban certain sports
for the safety of individuals. In my opinion, although people should have the
freedom to choose their sports, governments should regulate and restrict certain
sports that pose a significant risk to people's safety.
On the one hand, it is undeniable that sports are a source of enjoyment,
entertainment, and physical fitness for many people. Different people have
different preferences when it comes to sports, and they should be free to choose
the sports they like. Moreover, some people might argue that banning sports will
limit people's freedom to pursue their interests and hobbies. For example, extreme
sports such as rock climbing, skydiving, and bungee jumping offer a thrilling
experience that some people might enjoy.
On the other hand, the government has a responsibility to ensure the safety and
wellbeing of its citizens. Some sports are inherently dangerous and pose a
significant risk to people's lives. For instance, sports like boxing, mixed martial
arts, and bullfighting can cause serious physical injuries, brain damage, and even
death. In such cases, governments should intervene and regulate these sports to
protect their citizens' health and safety. Furthermore, these sports not only
endanger the athletes but also pose a risk to the spectators and participants.
In conclusion, while people should have the freedom to choose their sports,
governments should restrict and regulate certain sports that pose a significant risk
to people's safety. It is essential for governments to balance individual freedom
and safety concerns to ensure the wellbeing of their citizens. Therefore, I believe
that governments should regulate and restrict dangerous sports for the benefit of
society as a whole.
(302 words, band 8+)
75
Abdurazzoq Khanov
TOPIC: READING
Sample 56
In recent years, reading habits have changed drastically due to the influence of digital media.
Some people argue that reading books is a thing of the past, while others believe that reading
books is still important. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
In today's fast-paced digital era, traditional reading habits are being replaced by online
reading habits. Some individuals believe that reading books is a dying art and is no
longer essential in the modern era, while others argue that reading books is still an
important aspect of personal development. In this essay, both perspectives will be
explored, and a personal view will be presented.
On the one hand, supporters of the notion that reading books is obsolete believe that
digital media offers a faster and more convenient alternative to traditional books. For
instance, electronic books can be accessed instantly, which eliminates the need for a
physical copy. Moreover, online articles, blogs, and news portals can be accessed from
anywhere, anytime. Consequently, the belief is that traditional books are losing
relevance, and the reading habits of future generations will revolve around digital
media.
On the other hand, supporters of traditional books argue that reading books is still an
important aspect of personal development. Firstly, traditional books provide a tangible
experience that digital media cannot replicate. The act of turning pages, the smell of ink
and paper, and the overall sensory experience of holding a book in hand is a unique
pleasure that cannot be replaced by electronic devices. Secondly, books offer a deeper
and more immersive experience that digital media cannot match. Books are a source of
knowledge, imagination, and intellectual stimulation, which are essential to personal
growth and development.
In my opinion, while digital media offers an undeniable level of convenience, traditional
books are still crucial to personal growth and development. The tangible experience of
reading a book is unparalleled, and the sensory pleasure derived from holding a book
cannot be replicated by digital devices. Moreover, books offer a deeper and more
immersive experience that digital media cannot match. Although digital media offers a
more convenient option, traditional books should not be discarded, and the two forms
should be seen as complementary rather than exclusive.
In conclusion, reading habits have undergone a significant shift in the digital era, and
while some individuals argue that traditional books are no longer essential, others
believe that books are still crucial for personal development. In my view, traditional
books are still vital, and while digital media offers undeniable convenience, both forms
of reading should be seen as complementary rather than exclusive.
(386 words, band 8+)
76
Abdurazzoq Khanov
Sample 57
Some people think books are losing importance as a source of information and
entertainment. To what extend you agree or disagree?
In today's modern world, where technology has advanced significantly, books are often
overshadowed by the latest gadgets that offer instant entertainment and information.
While some argue that books are losing importance as a source of information and
entertainment, I firmly believe that books remain an essential tool for both.
On the one hand, technological advancements have revolutionized the way we access
information and entertainment. With smartphones, tablets, and laptops, people have
access to various online resources that can provide instant information and
entertainment at their fingertips. In addition, various online streaming services offer a
plethora of entertainment options that people can access anytime, anywhere.
Consequently, some may argue that books are losing their relevance as a source of
information and entertainment.
On the other hand, books have been a valuable source of information and entertainment
for centuries and will remain so for the foreseeable future. Unlike online resources,
books offer in-depth knowledge that cannot be found elsewhere. For instance, history
books provide a detailed account of significant events that occurred in the past, while
scientific books offer an extensive explanation of complex theories and concepts. In
addition, reading a book can improve one's critical thinking skills and expand their
imagination and creativity.
Moreover, books offer an escape from reality, providing a sense of comfort and
relaxation that cannot be found in other forms of entertainment. Unlike movies or TV
shows, books allow readers to visualize and interpret the story in their own unique way,
enhancing their overall experience. Additionally, books can help individuals reduce their
stress levels, as they can be a great way to unwind after a long day.
In conclusion, while some may argue that books are losing importance as a source of
information and entertainment, I believe that books will always hold a significant place
in our lives. They offer a unique experience that cannot be found in other forms of
entertainment, and their ability to provide in-depth knowledge and expand one's
creativity and imagination makes them an essential tool for personal growth and
development. Therefore, I strongly disagree with the statement that books are losing
importance.
( 350 words, band 8+)
77
Abdurazzoq Khanov
Sample 58
Children who start reading earlier in life, perform better later on in their school
studies
How important are early reading skills in a child`s academic performance?
what other preschool factors influence a child’s later academic achievements?
Reading is an essential skill that plays a crucial role in a child's academic performance. It
is widely believed that children who start reading earlier in life perform better in their
later school studies. This essay will examine the significance of early reading skills in a
child's academic performance and explore other preschool factors that influence a child's
later academic achievements.
First and foremost, early reading skills are crucial in a child's academic performance.
Reading is a fundamental skill that helps children develop their cognitive abilities,
language skills, and critical thinking abilities. Early readers have better word recognition
skills, larger vocabularies, and better comprehension skills than non-readers. As a result,
they are better equipped to succeed in their later school studies. Moreover, early reading
skills enhance a child's ability to absorb information, solve problems, and think critically,
making them better equipped to excel in all academic subjects.
In addition to early reading skills, several other preschool factors influence a child's later
academic achievements. For example, parental involvement in a child's education is
critical. Parents who are involved in their child's education, read to them, and encourage
them to read are more likely to raise academically successful children. Furthermore,
preschool programs that promote socialization, problem-solving, and early literacy skills
also play a significant role in a child's later academic achievements. Children who attend
high-quality preschools with well-trained teachers and stimulating environments are
more likely to succeed academically.
Another essential factor is the child's motivation and desire to learn. Children who are
motivated to learn and have a positive attitude towards school are more likely to
succeed academically. Parents and educators must encourage children to develop a love
for learning and provide them with opportunities to explore their interests and passions.
In conclusion, early reading skills are crucial in a child's academic performance. Children
who start reading earlier in life have better word recognition, larger vocabularies, and
better comprehension skills, making them better equipped to succeed in their later
school studies. Other preschool factors, such as parental involvement, high-quality
preschool programs, and a child's motivation and desire to learn, also play a significant
role in a child's later academic achievements. Therefore, parents and educators must
prioritize these factors to help children reach their full academic potential.
( 374 words, band 8+)
78
Abdurazzoq Khanov
Sample 59
Public services will soon no longer be housed in a building as all facilities and
books will be available online for all to access.
Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of public libraries only existing
online.
In today's digital age, the internet has made it possible to access virtually everything online.
With the rise of e-books and online resources, the concept of traditional public libraries is
gradually changing. Some people believe that public libraries should be available only online as
it would be more convenient and cost-effective. However, others argue that physical libraries
should not be replaced by virtual ones. This essay will discuss the advantages and disadvantages
of public libraries only existing online.
On the one hand, moving public libraries online has several benefits. Firstly, online libraries
provide easy access to a vast range of resources, regardless of location or time. People can
access books, journals, and other educational materials from anywhere in the world, provided
they have an internet connection. This convenience could be especially helpful for students who
might not have access to physical libraries or for people who live in remote areas.
Secondly, virtual libraries reduce costs significantly, compared to physical libraries. With online
resources, there are no expenses for building rent, maintenance, or utility bills, and fewer staff
are needed. This reduced expenditure could lead to more funding for libraries, allowing them to
purchase a wider range of materials and resources, making them more accessible to everyone.
On the other hand, online libraries do have some significant drawbacks. Firstly, not everyone
has access to the internet or the necessary devices, such as computers or smartphones, required
to access online resources. This could lead to an unequal distribution of educational resources
and limit the opportunities for some individuals, especially those from lower socio-economic
backgrounds.
Secondly, physical libraries provide more than just books and resources; they offer a communal
space for learning and development. Students and researchers can discuss and exchange ideas
with others, creating a social environment for learning. Additionally, libraries often provide
workshops, lectures, and other events that contribute to the development of individuals, making
them a vital part of local communities.
In conclusion, while the idea of public libraries existing online may seem appealing, it is
important to consider both the advantages and disadvantages. Although virtual libraries
provide easy access to resources and are cost-effective, they could limit opportunities for those
without internet access and remove the valuable social and communal aspects of physical
libraries. Therefore, it is recommended that physical libraries should not be replaced entirely,
but rather be supplemented by online resources to provide a more comprehensive and inclusive
learning environment.
( 403 words, band 8+)
79
Abdurazzoq Khanov
TOPIC: TECHNOLOGY
Sample 60
Some believe technology has made our lives too complex and the solution is to
lead a simpler life without technology.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Many are of the opinion that technology has done more harm than good and we
ought to simplify in order to lead more fulfilling lives. I agree that technology has
its drawbacks but I think turning away from technology is impractical.
The main reason that technology has complicated life for people today is that it
has made people perpetually available. In the past, a worker might work a 9 to 5
then come home to spend time with their family, have dinner and enjoy their
private life. That simplicity is largely no longer the case. Once work ends, you can
still get email notifications and phone calls from managers or co-workers. The end
result is that you can never be fully present in the moment because work always
threatens to pull you back.
Although life has become more complicated and this is a negative development,
shutting yourself off from technology would only serve to isolate people from the
world. If you want to stay in touch with friends and know about events in your
area, it is essential to have a phone. You can use Facebook Messenger to cheaply
chat with individuals or make group plans. Email is an indispensable element of
nearly every job. Without it, you are filtering out quality jobs and predetermining
manual work as your vocation.
In conclusion, although technology has hurt people, turning away from it is not
feasible today without making drastic sacrifices. Instead, people ought to seek
ways to compartmentalise technology in order to live happier, more satisfying
lives.
( 256 words, by a real examiner )
80
Abdurazzoq Khanov
Sample 61
People now have the freedom to work and live anywhere in the world
due to the development of communication technology and
transportation. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this
trend?
In today's world, thanks to the advancements in communication technology and
transportation, individuals have the ability to work and live in any part of the globe.
While this trend offers various benefits, it also comes with a few drawbacks. This essay
will discuss both the advantages and disadvantages of this development.
On the positive side, the freedom to work and live anywhere in the world allows
individuals to explore new opportunities and experiences. This can lead to personal and
professional growth, as they get the chance to learn about new cultures and ways of life.
Moreover, individuals can escape from their mundane daily routines and seek adventure
by traveling to new places. In addition, remote work arrangements have become
increasingly popular in recent times, and they provide a level of flexibility that is
beneficial to employees who value a good work-life balance.
On the other hand, this trend also has its disadvantages. The first drawback is that
individuals may experience a sense of isolation or loneliness when they move away from
their familiar surroundings. Moreover, people who work in a remote environment may
find it difficult to form personal connections with their colleagues, which can lead to
feelings of detachment from their work. Furthermore, living and working in different
time zones can also pose a challenge, as it can affect one's sleep patterns and general
well-being.
In conclusion, while the freedom to work and live anywhere in the world may provide
new and exciting opportunities, it also comes with certain challenges. Despite the
potential for isolation and detachment, the benefits of exploring new cultures and
having a flexible work schedule cannot be ignored. Overall, it is up to individuals to
weigh the pros and cons of this trend and make a decision that is best for their personal
and professional goals.
( 301 words, band 8+)
81
Abdurazzoq Khanov
Sample 62
In what ways has technology changed the way we communicate with each
other? Is this a positive or negative development?
In the past few decades, technology has revolutionized the way we communicate with
one another. With the rise of the internet, smartphones, and social media, we can now
communicate instantly and effortlessly with people from all over the world. In this essay,
we will explore the positive and negative impacts of technology on our communication.
On the positive side, technology has made it much easier and more convenient for us to
communicate. We can now send messages, make calls, and video chat with people from
anywhere in the world at any time of day. This has made it possible for us to stay in
touch with friends and family who live far away, and has also made it easier for us to
collaborate with colleagues and classmates. In addition, technology has enabled us to
share our thoughts, ideas, and experiences with a wider audience through social media
platforms, blogs, and vlogs.
However, there are also some negative impacts of technology on our communication.
One major issue is that technology can create a sense of disconnection and isolation.
When we communicate primarily through screens, we miss out on the nuances of face-
to-face communication such as body language, tone of voice, and facial expressions. This
can lead to misunderstandings and misinterpretations, and can also make us feel more
disconnected from one another.
Another negative impact of technology on communication is the potential for addiction
and distraction. With so many apps, notifications, and updates vying for our attention, it
can be difficult to focus on one conversation or task for an extended period of time. This
can lead to a decrease in productivity and can also make us feel more anxious and
stressed.
In conclusion, technology has undoubtedly changed the way we communicate with one
another, and there are both positive and negative impacts of this change. While
technology has made communication more convenient and has enabled us to connect
with people from all over the world, it has also created some negative consequences
such as disconnection and distraction. As we continue to embrace new technologies, it is
important to be mindful of these impacts and to use technology in a way that enhances,
rather than detracts from, our ability to communicate effectively.
( 370 words, band 8+)
82
Abdurazzoq Khanov
Sample 63
In some countries, few young people go to musical concerts or performances at
theatres. Why is this the case? Should young people be encouraged to
participate in musicals and other types of performance?
It is true that fewer and fewer youngsters take part in musical concerts or performances
at theaters in many parts of the world. While the main reasons for this are education
pressure and modern technology, I think that the young should be encouraged to go to
such live performances to both entertain and socialize more.
This new trend is rooted in two main reasons. First of all, education is the main factor
because many qualifications are required from the youth to get into a good university.
They must spend most of their time reading books, learning a foreign language, and
even preparing for tests, such as SAT and IELTS, thus having less time to go to concerts,
festivals and theatres. The second reason is connected to advanced technology. Young
people, for example, now can download music, albums, songs, and even playlists at their
comfort zone, or can follow artists, singers on social networking sites like Instagram and
Facebook, whereas two decades ago in order to see star musicians and listen to them,
fans had to go to the concert itself.
However, I am of the view that the young generation still need to take part in such
musical and theatrical performances. Firstly, it would be a creative outlet for them. Not
only would they be able to entertain, but also help themselves learn better, since studies
have shown that we learn well when we take breaks frequently instead of refusing
positive distractions while learning. Moreover, young people would have more
opportunities to socialize. In other words, just putting on a CD is not as socially beneficial
as being in the real concert atmosphere. In live performances, they would be able to
enjoy having fun with other people, dancing, making new friends, all of which, in turn,
contribute to levels of happiness.
In conclusion, the number of young participants in concerts and performances at
theatres is small because of the academic pressure and cutting-edge technology.
However, I do believe that they would benefit from going to live performances.
83
Abdurazzoq Khanov
Sample 64
Some people argue that technology has brought more harm than good to
society. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
In the past few decades, technology has made a significant impact on the world,
transforming the way we live, work and communicate. While some individuals
believe that technology has done more harm than good, I disagree with this
statement as the advantages of technology far outweigh its disadvantages.
To begin with, technology has made our lives easier and more convenient. With
the invention of smartphones and other mobile devices, we can access
information, connect with people and carry out tasks from virtually anywhere. For
example, students can take online courses and learn at their own pace, while
professionals can work remotely and collaborate with colleagues from different
parts of the world. Moreover, technology has revolutionized healthcare, enabling
doctors and scientists to develop new treatments and cures for diseases that were
once considered incurable.
Furthermore, technology has also boosted the economy and created jobs. The rise
of e-commerce and digital marketing has opened up new opportunities for
entrepreneurs and small businesses to reach a global audience. This has led to the
creation of new jobs in areas such as digital marketing, software development,
and data analysis. In addition, technology has made manufacturing and
production more efficient and cost-effective, leading to lower prices for
consumers.
However, some people argue that technology has had negative effects on society,
such as increasing social isolation and addiction to technology. While it is true that
technology can be addictive and may lead to decreased face-to-face interactions,
this is not necessarily a direct result of technology itself, but rather how individuals
choose to use it. It is up to us to use technology in a responsible and balanced
way, taking breaks from screens and maintaining real-life connections with family
and friends.
In conclusion, while some may argue that technology has brought more harm
than good to society, I believe that the benefits of technology are far greater than
its drawbacks. Technology has made our lives easier, boosted the economy, and
has the potential to solve some of the world's biggest problems. It is up to us to
use technology responsibly and make the most of its potential for the betterment
of society. (355 words, band 8+)
84
Abdurazzoq Khanov
TOPIC: TRANSPORT
Sample 65
In recent years, the popularity of cycling as a mode of transportation has significantly
increased, leading to the presence of more cyclists and cars sharing the same road.
While this trend has many benefits, it also poses some challenges that must be
addressed. In this essay, I will explore the problems that arise from cyclists and car
drivers sharing the same road and suggest potential solutions.
One of the main problems with cyclists and car drivers sharing the same road is the risk
of accidents. Cars and bicycles travel at different speeds and have different sizes, making
it difficult for drivers to spot cyclists, particularly in areas with poor visibility.
Furthermore, some cyclists may not follow traffic rules, such as stopping at red lights or
yielding to pedestrians, which increases the likelihood of accidents. As a result, the safety
of both cyclists and car drivers is compromised.
Another issue is the lack of infrastructure for cyclists. In many cities, cycling lanes are not
available, and cyclists are forced to share the same road with cars, which can be
dangerous. This can lead to congestion, delays, and frustration for both cyclists and car
drivers.
To address these problems, several solutions could be implemented. Firstly, cities should
invest in better infrastructure for cyclists, such as building separate bike lanes, installing
bike-friendly traffic signals, and creating designated bike parking areas. This would
improve the safety of cyclists and make it easier for them to navigate through traffic.
Secondly, education campaigns should be conducted to raise awareness about the rules
of the road for both cyclists and car drivers. This would help reduce the number of
accidents caused by cyclists who do not follow traffic rules and increase the visibility of
cyclists on the road.
Lastly, stricter enforcement of traffic laws and regulations should be implemented to
ensure that both cyclists and car drivers adhere to the rules of the road. This would help
improve safety for everyone and reduce the likelihood of accidents caused by reckless
driving or cycling.
In conclusion, the growing trend of cyclists and car drivers sharing the same road poses
many challenges, including the risk of accidents and the lack of infrastructure for cyclists.
However, by investing in better infrastructure, raising awareness through education
campaigns, and enforcing traffic laws and regulations, we can improve the safety of all
road users and create a more sustainable and efficient transport system.
( 400 words, band 8.0)
85
Abdurazzoq Khanov
Sample 66
In some countries, people prefer to use bicycles or walk to travel short distances
instead of using cars or public transport. What are the advantages and
disadvantages of this trend?
In recent years, there has been a growing trend in some countries towards using bicycles
or walking for short distance travel instead of relying on cars or public transport. While
this shift can have both positive and negative consequences, I believe that the benefits of
choosing active modes of transportation outweigh the drawbacks.
One significant advantage of using bicycles or walking for short distances is the positive
impact it can have on an individual's health. These active modes of transport require
physical exertion and provide an opportunity for people to engage in regular exercise.
This can help to reduce the risk of obesity and related health problems such as diabetes
and heart disease. Furthermore, using bicycles or walking instead of cars can help to
reduce air pollution, which can have a positive impact on overall public health.
Another advantage of using bicycles or walking for short distances is the potential cost
savings. Cars can be expensive to purchase, maintain, and fuel, while public transport
costs can add up over time. By using bicycles or walking, people can save money on
transportation costs and potentially redirect those funds towards other priorities, such
as housing or education.
However, there are also some disadvantages to using bicycles or walking for short
distances. One challenge is that it can take longer to travel by these modes of transport
than by car or public transport. This can be a drawback for people who have tight
schedules or limited time. Additionally, in some areas, walking or cycling may not be
feasible due to safety concerns, such as lack of dedicated bike lanes or high levels of
traffic.
Despite these drawbacks, I believe that the benefits of using bicycles or walking for short
distances outweigh the disadvantages. By choosing active modes of transportation,
individuals can improve their health and reduce their environmental impact, while also
potentially saving money. Furthermore, governments can support this trend by investing
in infrastructure such as bike lanes and pedestrian walkways, which can help to make
these modes of transport safer and more accessible for everyone.
In conclusion, while there are both advantages and disadvantages to using
bicycles or walking for short distances instead of cars or public transport, I believe
that the benefits outweigh the drawbacks. By promoting and supporting active
modes of transport, we can improve our health, reduce pollution, and potentially
save money in the process.
( 396 words, band 8+)
86
Abdurazzoq Khanov
Sample 67
Some people think that governments should invest mainly in making public
transportation faster while other think there are more important priorities
(cost, the environment). Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
While many are of the opinion that the most important factor in public transport
is speed, others value areas such as cost and the environment. In my opinion,
although there are a number of key considerations, speed is by far the most
important.
Two of the most commonly addressed areas of public transport are cost and the
environment. In Vietnam, the quality of the public transport buses is very low and
they produce a lot of air pollution. However, they are very cheap and this allows
the residents who need them the most, typically students and low-wage earners,
to afford them. In an ideal world the government would have cheap buses that
produce little exhaust, but cost and environmental concerns will always be in
conflict. In developing countries, it makes sense to emphasise the expense of
tickets while developed countries have the wealth and responsibility to try to
better balance these competing policy influences.
Although these are worthwhile considerations, speed of transport should be the
main rationale as it has a trickle down effect on the economy and quality of life of
a country. For example, Japan has a famously fast and efficient system of railways
both inside cities and connecting provinces within the country. If someone has a
family, faster transport allows them to spend more time with their family both
before and after work. This can enhance the quality of life of working class people.
It also means that they will get to work faster, get more work done during the day
and have more time to recuperate for the next day. Over years and decades this
has hastened Japan’s development into one of the world’s leading economies.
In my opinion, cost and the environment are crucial for ordinary people and the
future of our planet but speed has a greater effect on people in both the short and
long-term. Governments that focus on faster public transport will reap the
rewards for decades and be able to reinvest that money in areas like the
environment, education, and healthcare.
( 340 words, by a real examiner)
87
Abdurazzoq Khanov
Topic: Travel
Sample 68
Some people believe that traveling to other countries can enhance their
personal development and widen their knowledge. However, others argue that
tourism is a negative trend, causing harm to local communities and the
environment. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Traveling to different countries is an enriching experience that can broaden a person's
perspective and bring them closer to understanding diverse cultures. Nonetheless, there
is a rising concern that tourism can also have detrimental impacts on local communities
and the environment. In this essay, I will explore both sides of the argument and offer
my opinion on the topic.
On the one hand, advocates of international travel argue that it provides invaluable
opportunities for self-improvement and personal development. When individuals
immerse themselves in foreign cultures and lifestyles, they are forced to confront their
own biases and preconceptions. This process of self-reflection can promote personal
growth, empathy, and a more nuanced worldview. Additionally, exposure to unfamiliar
environments and ways of life can stimulate creativity, critical thinking, and problem-
solving skills.
On the other hand, critics of tourism claim that it can create adverse consequences for
local communities and ecosystems. The influx of foreign visitors can put a strain on
resources, infrastructure, and public services, leading to overcrowding, pollution, and
cultural commodification. In some cases, tourism can also exacerbate existing social and
economic inequalities, as local businesses and residents are marginalized in favor of
multinational corporations and chain hotels.
In my opinion, the benefits of travel far outweigh the potential drawbacks. While it is
true that tourism can have negative impacts on local communities and the environment,
these problems can often be mitigated through responsible travel practices. For
instance, tourists can choose to support local businesses and sustainable tourism
initiatives, avoid over-touristed destinations, and minimize their carbon footprint by
using public transportation and reducing waste. By doing so, travelers can ensure that
their experiences abroad are not only personally enriching but also socially and
environmentally responsible.
In conclusion, the impact of tourism on personal development and local communities is a
complex issue with both positive and negative aspects. While it is important to
acknowledge the potential drawbacks of travel, I believe that responsible tourism can
offer unparalleled opportunities for learning, growth, and cross-cultural exchange.
( 331 words, band8+)
88
Abdurazzoq Khanov
Sample 69
Many people today are choosing to travel to other countries.
Why is this happening?
Is this a positive or negative development?
More and more people today are choosing to travel internationally. This positive
development is mainly because of a rise in middle class income coupled with
advances in aviation.
People today can afford to travel as it has become more convenient. The last half
century has seen wages in both developed and developing companies climb with
the concomitant expansion of the global middle class. Workers have the
disposable income to travel that they lacked in the past. This has been
complemented with safer airplanes so individuals are not afraid to fly. Airfares
have also become cheaper as companies like Boeing produce more efficient
planes, competition intensifies between competing airlines, and the supply more
than meets demand for flights. These factors combined have spawned a golden
age of international travel.
Looking at the opportunity in perspective, it is hard to see the advent of
international travel as anything less than one of mankind’s greatest
achievements. For the entirety of human history, most people lived and died near
to where they were born. Anyone who wanted to travel to another country had to
possess enourmous wealth, time, and courage. Today, the average employee can
save up and travel to see the wonders of the Rennaissance in Southern Europe, the
vast monuments to history and modernity in China, or explore any other corner of
Earth that has piqued their interest. This is an unprecedented opportunity
unavailable to past generations.
In conclusion, international travel is a byproduct of the modern age and we should
all be grateful for its possibility. There are clear environmental drawbacks but
those should not blind people to its benefits taken as a whole.
(273 words, by a real examiner )
89
Abdurazzoq Khanov
Sample 70
Some people believe that traveling to foreign countries is a waste of time and
money, and that it is better to spend that time and money on other things. To
what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
It is true that some people consider traveling to foreign countries as an
unnecessary expense, and that the time and money could be better utilized
elsewhere. However, I strongly disagree with this viewpoint, as traveling to
foreign countries provides numerous benefits that cannot be obtained from other
activities.
First and foremost, traveling is a fantastic way to learn about different cultures
and traditions. By immersing oneself in a foreign country's customs, beliefs, and
practices, one can develop a deeper appreciation and understanding of the world
around us. For instance, when I visited Japan, I was amazed by the country's
unique cultural heritage and learned a lot about the country's history, art, and
cuisine. This experience was not only enriching but also gave me a broader
perspective on life.
Secondly, traveling is an excellent way to broaden one's horizons and gain new
insights into oneself. When one travels to a foreign country, one is often faced
with unfamiliar situations that require adaptability, creativity, and problem-
solving skills. These challenges, in turn, foster personal growth and development
and can help us become more confident and independent individuals.
Finally, traveling is an excellent way to escape from the monotony of daily life and
reduce stress. After working tirelessly for months, it is essential to take a break
and rejuvenate oneself by visiting new places, meeting new people, and indulging
in new experiences. For instance, when I visited Bali, I was struck by the island's
natural beauty and tranquility, which helped me relax and recharge my batteries.
In conclusion, traveling to foreign countries is a valuable and enriching experience
that offers numerous benefits. Therefore, I firmly believe that it is worth the time
and money spent, and that people should make an effort to travel more often.
(292 words, band 8+)
90
Abdurazzoq Khanov
TOPIC: WORK
Sample 71
Many people try to balance work and other parts of their life. However, this is
very difficult to do. What are the problems associated with this? What is the
best way to achieve a better balance?
People today are increasingly concerned with individual happiness and work-life
balance. The main problem for most people is that work takes up too much time and
causes mental health issues and the best way to achieve this balance is to work more
efficiently.
The primary issues associated with work-life balance are the amount of time people
must spend working and how this impacts their mental health. Since the global financial
crisis of 2008, the job market around the world has become increasingly competitive.
This means that old workers may get pushed out of their jobs by younger graduates
willing to work for less and that new graduates have to put in enormous extra hours to
catch up. The end result is more work, which eats away at a person’s private life. Once
your free time becomes restricted there are a variety of related mental health problems
that can appear. For example, someone who is overworked can suffer from excessive
stress, some forms of depression, and obesity because of the lack of time available to
exercise. That is why there has been a sharp rise in the last decade in these problems.
The best way for people to combat being overworked and get more time for their
personal life is to work more efficiently. In an ideal world, there would be ways to
alleviate the burden that put less stress on individuals but making the most of your time
is a more pragmatic solution. For example, smartphones allow people to get a lot of
work done in what were previously wasted hours in the past. You can send emails, make
phone calls, and use productivity applications when waiting for the bus, train, or
standing in line. People will have to make the choice not to scroll through Facebook or
read the news but that is a small sacrifice to have some extra time at the end of the day
to do their hobbies or spend time with a loved one.
In conclusion, the problems associated with poor work-life balance are especially
apparent because of the current economic climate and the best solution is to find ways
to maximise efficiency. If more people changed their daily habits related to social media
and using the internet, then they might be able to find more worthwhile passions and
not feel as though their life is passing them by.
( 394 words, by a real examiner)
91
Abdurazzoq Khanov
Sample 72
Some people believe that the key to a successful career is to specialize in a
particular field, while others think that it is better to have a broad range of
skills. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
In today's society, the nature of work is changing rapidly. With advancements in
technology and globalization, the job market has become more competitive and
complex. As a result, some people believe that to achieve a successful career, one needs
to specialize in a particular field. However, others argue that having a broad range of
skills is more advantageous. In this essay, I will discuss both views and provide my own
opinion.
On one hand, those who support specialization argue that it is the most effective way to
develop expertise in a particular field. By focusing on a specific area, individuals can
acquire in-depth knowledge, hone their skills, and become highly proficient in their
chosen profession. This, in turn, can lead to increased job opportunities, higher pay, and
greater job satisfaction. For instance, doctors who specialize in a particular area of
medicine, such as cardiology or neurology, are often highly sought after and can
command higher salaries than general practitioners.
On the other hand, those who advocate for a broad range of skills argue that it is
essential in today's fast-changing job market. With the rise of automation and AI, many
jobs that were once done by humans are being replaced by machines. Therefore,
individuals who have a range of skills are more adaptable and can easily switch between
jobs and industries. This flexibility not only makes them more employable but also
provides them with a sense of security in an uncertain job market. Moreover, having a
broad range of skills can also lead to a more diverse range of job opportunities and the
possibility of pursuing multiple career paths.
In my opinion, both views have their merits. While specialization is important for
developing expertise in a particular field, having a broad range of skills is essential in
today's ever-changing job market. Therefore, it is crucial to strike a balance between the
two. Individuals should aim to develop expertise in a particular area while also acquiring
a diverse set of skills that can be applied to a variety of roles and industries. By doing so,
they can remain competitive in the job market and achieve long-term success in their
careers.
In conclusion, the debate over whether specialization or a broad range of skills is better
for a successful career is ongoing. While both approaches have their advantages, it is
crucial to find a balance between the two. Individuals should strive to develop expertise
in a particular area while also acquiring a diverse range of skills that can be applied to
various jobs and industries. Ultimately, success in one's career depends on a combination
of factors, including expertise, adaptability, and a willingness to learn and grow.
( 444 words, band 8+)
92
Abdurazzoq Khanov
Sample 73
Some people believe that working from home is more beneficial than working in
an office. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In recent years, there has been a growing trend of people working from home
instead of going to an office. While some people believe that working from home
is more advantageous than working in an office, others argue that it is not. In my
opinion, I believe that working from home offers numerous benefits that outweigh
the disadvantages.
Firstly, working from home provides a more flexible schedule, allowing individuals
to manage their time more efficiently. This flexibility can be especially
advantageous for parents who have to take care of their children or individuals
who have other commitments outside of work. Moreover, it eliminates the stress
of commuting to work, which can be time-consuming and tiring, especially in
urban areas where traffic congestion is a major issue.
Secondly, working from home offers a more comfortable and relaxed working
environment, which can boost productivity and creativity. In an office, employees
are often subject to distractions, such as noise, interruptions, and even socializing
with colleagues, which can hinder their performance. However, working from
home allows individuals to create a work environment that is tailored to their
specific needs, preferences, and comfort level.
On the other hand, some argue that working from home can be isolating, leading
to feelings of loneliness and disconnection from colleagues and the organization
as a whole. While this may be true for some individuals, technology has made it
easier to stay connected with colleagues, managers, and clients through video
conferencing, instant messaging, and other communication tools.
In conclusion, while working from home may not be suitable for everyone, I
believe that it offers more benefits than drawbacks. The flexibility, comfort, and
efficiency it provides can lead to increased job satisfaction and productivity,
ultimately benefiting both the individual and the organization. As such, companies
should consider offering remote work options to their employees to take
advantage of these benefits.
(309 words, band 8+ )
93