0% found this document useful (0 votes)
219 views34 pages

FMEA

The document outlines the alignment of the AIAG and VDA FMEA methods. It describes a 7 step approach to conducting a joint AIAG-VDA FMEA, including planning, structure analysis, function analysis, failure analysis, risk analysis, optimization, and documentation. It also details changes to the various tables and processes between the traditional AIAG and VDA methods.

Uploaded by

Ratnadeep Ghosh
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
219 views34 pages

FMEA

The document outlines the alignment of the AIAG and VDA FMEA methods. It describes a 7 step approach to conducting a joint AIAG-VDA FMEA, including planning, structure analysis, function analysis, failure analysis, risk analysis, optimization, and documentation. It also details changes to the various tables and processes between the traditional AIAG and VDA methods.

Uploaded by

Ratnadeep Ghosh
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 34

FMEA Alignment of AIAG & VDA

© 2019
FMEA Alignment of AIAG & VDA

• Automotive suppliers to both North American and German


OEMs were required to assess their failure modes and
effects differently
• Differences between the Severity, Occurrence, and Detection rating
tables in the AIAG and VDA FMEA Manuals
• Caused confusion and added complexity to product
development and process improvement activities
• Alignment was needed in order to create a common set of
requirements so suppliers can have a single FMEA business
process meeting needs and expectations of any of their
automotive customers
3

© 2019
7 Step Approach

© 2019
5

© 2019
Step 1: Planning & Preparation
Five T’s Questions to Answer
InTent • Have all Core Team Members received training on FMEAs?
• Have all Core Team Members allocated time to fully participate?
Timing • What APQP Phase or VDA Maturity Level is the project in?
• What is the FMEA Start Date and Target Completion Date?
Team • Have the team members been assigned with clearly defined roles
and responsibilities (Leader, Facilitator, Champion, Core Team
Member, Extended Team Member)?
Task • Is the scope of the study clear?
• Has the documentation/reporting methodology been clarified?
• Will the FMEA Report be shared with customers?
• Will the FMEA results be audited?
Tools • Will a spreadsheet or specific software program be used to
document the results?

© 2019
Step 2: Structure Analysis
DFMEA PFMEA
• Identification of design • Identification of process
interfaces, interactions, steps and sub-steps
close clearance • Tools:
• Tools: • Structure tree
• Structure tree • Process flow diagram
• Block diagram
• Boundary diagram

© 2019
Step 3: Function Analysis
DFMEA PFMEA
• Association of • Association of
requirements to functions characteristics to functions
• Tools: • Tools:
• Function analysis tree • Function analysis tree
• Parameter diagram • Parameter diagram

© 2019
Step 4: Failure Analysis
DFMEA PFMEA
• Potential Failure Effects, • Potential Failure Effects,
Failure Modes, Failure Failure Modes, Failure
Causes for each product Causes for each process
function function
• Tools: • Tools:
• Parameter diagram • Fishbone diagram (4M)

© 2019
Step 5: Risk Analysis
DFMEA PFMEA
• Assignment of Prevention • Assignment of Prevention
Controls to Risk Causes Controls to Risk Causes
• Risk Ratings (Sev, Occ, Det) • Risk Ratings (Sev, Occ, Det)
• Evaluation of Action Priority • Evaluation of Action Priority

10

© 2019
Step 6: Optimization
DFMEA PFMEA
• Assignment of • Assignment of
responsibilities and due responsibilities and due
dates dates
• Implementation of actions • Implementation of actions

11

© 2019
Step 7: Results Documentation

• Communicate results and conclusions of the


analysis
• Within organization
• With customers and/or suppliers (as appropriate)
• Document actions taken including effectiveness

12

© 2019
Revised Rating Tables

13

© 2019
DFMEA Severity Table

14

© 2019
DFMEA Occurrence Table

15

© 2019
DFMEA Occurrence Table (contd.)

16

© 2019
DFMEA Detection Table

17

© 2019
PFMEA Severity Table

18

© 2019
PFMEA Severity Table (contd.)

19

© 2019
PFMEA Occurrence Table

20

© 2019
PFMEA Detection Table

21

© 2019
PFMEA Detection Table (contd.)

22

© 2019
Action Priority

• High (H):
• Required to identify appropriate action to improve Prevention
and/or Detection Controls; OR justify and document why current
controls are adequate
• Priority Medium (M):
• Should identify appropriate actions to improve prevention and/or
detection controls; OR, at the discretion of management, justify and
document why current controls are adequate
• Priority Low (L):
• Could identify actions to improve prevention or detection controls

23

© 2019
FMEA Action Priority Table

24

© 2019
FMEA Action Priority Table (contd)

25

© 2019
Key Changes

26

© 2019
DFMEA Structure Analysis

AIAG 4th Ed FMEA New AIAG-VDA 1st Ed FMEA

Item &
Function

27

© 2019
DFMEA Function Analysis

AIAG 4th Ed FMEA New AIAG-VDA 1st Ed FMEA

Item &
Function

28

© 2019
DFMEA Failure Analysis

AIAG 4th Ed FMEA New AIAG-VDA 1st Ed FMEA

Classification Potential
Potential Potential
Severity

Cause(s)/
Failure Effect(s) of
Mechanism(s)
Mode Failure
of Failure

29

© 2019
PFMEA Structure Analysis

30

© 2019
PFMEA Function Analysis

31

© 2019
PFMEA Failure Analysis

AIAG 4th Ed FMEA New AIAG-VDA 1st Ed FMEA

C
S l Potential
Pote ntia l Potentia l Failure E a Ca use
Failure Mode Effe cts V s s(s)
s of
Failur
e

32

© 2019
Optimization

33

© 2019
Transition Strategy
(Automotive Suppliers)
• Existing FMEAs developed per the AIAG 4th Edition can
remain
• Plan the transition
• From current FMEA processes and methods to the new AIAG VDA
FMEA process and tools
• Use existing FMEAs for a starting point
• Consider: Minor or major change, New rating scales, Analytical
methods and format
• New projects
• Consider:
• Company leadership mandates, Customer Specific Requirements
Transition date and milestones
34

© 2019
Тhank you!

35

© 2019

You might also like