Adaptive Behavior vs. IQ in Flint Preschoolers
Adaptive Behavior vs. IQ in Flint Preschoolers
Reviewed by: Intelligence quotient (IQ) is commonly measured in child development studies, while
James Patton,
adaptive behavior is less frequently considered. Given its associations with functional
University of Texas at Austin,
United States outcomes in children with neurodevelopmental disabilities, adaptive behavior may
Erica Neri, be a useful outcome in general population samples, as well. This study aimed to
University of Bologna, Italy
compare social and environmental correlates of adaptive behavior vs. IQ in a sample
*Correspondence:
Shuting Zheng
of preschoolers exposed to the Flint water crisis (N = 184). Mother–child dyads were
shuting.zheng@ucsf.edu recruited from the community and administered a comprehensive battery to obtain
information about child neurodevelopmental functioning, including direct assessment
Specialty section:
This article was submitted to
of IQ via the Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence and assessment of
Developmental Psychology, parent-reported adaptive functioning via the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales. Multiple
a section of the journal social environmental factors were explored as potential correlates of child outcomes (i.e.,
Frontiers in Psychology
IQ and adaptive behavior), and robust correlates were identified using a data-driven
Received: 08 April 2021
Accepted: 09 July 2021 approach [i.e., least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression].
Published: 11 August 2021 We then examined associations between the LASSO-selected predictors and IQ and
Citation: adaptive behavior while controlling for child age, child sex, and maternal age. Children in
Zheng S, LeWinn K, Ceja T,
this sample showed relative strength in adaptive behaviors, with scores in the adequate
Hanna-Attisha M, O’Connell L and
Bishop S (2021) Adaptive Behavior as range, while average IQs fell in the low-average range. Adaptive behavior was significantly
an Alternative Outcome to Intelligence associated with maternal nurturance practices, while IQ was associated with the maternal
Quotient in Studies of Children at Risk:
A Study of Preschool-Aged Children in education level. Implications for the use of adaptive behavior as an outcome measure in
Flint, MI, USA. studies of children at an increased risk for neurodevelopmental problems are discussed.
Front. Psychol. 12:692330.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.692330 Keywords: adaptive behavior, IQ, nurturance, maternal education, modifiable predictors
and environmental exposures (e.g., racism, poverty, and lead) and Human Services and Hurley Medical Center approved the
during the first few years of life. Comprehensive assessments affiliated recruitment protocol. Informed consent was obtained
were conducted to assess the neurodevelopmental functioning from mothers and verbal assent was obtained from children
of children across multiple domains, with previous analyses by before the beginning of participation.
our group showing highly variable developmental profiles within
the sample at the age of 4 years (Zheng et al., 2021). Building Measures
on this work, we employed a data-driven approach to explore The two main child outcomes of interest for this study
associations between a broad range of social and environmental were measured with widely used standardized measures.
predictors and two main child outcomes of interests, namely, IQ IQ was measured using the Wechsler Preschool and
and adaptive behavior. This study was motivated by an interest in Primary Scale of Intelligence–Fourth Edition (WPPSI–IV),
identifying potentially modifiable correlates of IQ and adaptive a commonly used intelligence test designed for children
behavior, with a particular goal of understanding the utility of aged 2 years, between 6 months and 7 years, and 7 months
measuring adaptive behavior as an alternative outcome in high- (Wechsler, 2012). The current analysis used the norm-
risk samples like those of ours. referenced standard scores corresponding to full-scale IQ
(FSIQ) with a mean of 100 and an standard deviation (SD)
METHOD of 15.
The Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales (Sparrow et al.,
Participants 2005, 2016; Vineland 3; Vineland-II) was used to measure the
Mother–child dyads were invited to participate if the child was adaptive behavior skills. Adaptive behavior measures, such as the
born between March 1, 2012 and April 24, 2014 (before the Vineland, involve clinical interviews or checklists completed by
water source change) and if the child resided in the City of informants who have regular opportunities to directly observe
Flint and received water from the Flint water distribution system adaptive behaviors performed within the everyday environment
between April 25, 2014 and October 15, 2015. Children who fit of an individual (Reschly et al., 2002b; Tassé et al., 2012; Harrison
these inclusion criteria would have been exposed to the water and Oakland, 2015). Given that this study focused on preschool-
within the first 2 years of life and were old enough to complete aged children who typically spend the majority of time with
direct assessments of developmental domains of interest at the primary caregivers, mothers served as the informant about the
in-person visit. adaptive behavior skills of children. Because of protocol changes
Families who expressed interest in participation were screened that occurred mid-study, some mothers completed the Vineland-
for eligibility. Children were excluded if they were wards of II comprehensive interview form (N = 40) and others completed
the state, if their birth weight was <1,500 g, if their gestational the Vineland-3 online parent-report form (N = 117). Both
age was <32 weeks, or if they had a known genetic syndrome. versions yield an adaptive behavior composite (ABC) score
Mother–child dyads were only included if the caregiver of the representing the overall level of adaptive functioning, which was
eligible child was their biological mother, spoke English, and used in the current analysis.
reside with and consistently care for the child. To ensure that they Social environmental exposures of interest were collected
could validly complete the tests included in the direct assessment from parents via interviews and questionnaires. These variables
battery, children were also excluded if they were currently non- were selected given demonstrated associations with child
verbal or had significant hearing or visual impairments. A total of neurodevelopmental outcomes and because they could be
390 mother–child dyads participated in screening, of whom 284 considered modifiable by programs, practices, or policies (the
dyads were determined to be eligible and 272 agreed to enroll. A detailed descriptions of each measure and example citations
total of 184 families attended an in-person assessment, of whom showing their associations with child outcomes are shown in
157 completed the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scale and 174 Table 2).
completed the IQ test. The characteristics of the full sample are Maternal characteristics included depressive symptoms
shown in Table 1. measured by the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression
Scale (Radloff, 1977), stress measured by the Perceived Stress
Procedure Scale (Cohen et al., 1983), potential problems with substance
Once eligibility was established, mothers completed online and use was measured by the CAGE Adapted to Include Drugs
in-person surveys, and children completed direct in-person screener (Brown and Rounds, 1995), and dispositional optimism
assessments. For mothers who expressed any difficulty with measured by the Life Orientation Test-Revised (Scheier et al.,
reading or seemed to struggle to understand the questions, 1994). Maternal perceived social support was measured by the
trained research staff were available to read the questions and Social Support Questionnaire (Sarason et al., 1983), and domestic
record their responses (on the phone or in person) to ensure the violence was measured using the 4-item HARK (Sohal et al.,
validity of their report and minimize barriers to participating. 2007).
All research assistants involved in the assessments received Parenting measures included the Child Rearing Practices
training and supervision in the administration of study measures Report (CRPR) nurturance and conflict subscales (Rickel
from a licensed clinical psychologist. The institutional review and Biasatti, 1982), the Knowledge of Effective Parenting
board at the institutions of authors reviewed and approved Scale (Winter et al., 2012), the Network of Relationship
the study protocol, and the Michigan Department of Health Inventory-Criticism Scale (revised parent version; Furman and
Variables Categories N %
N M (SD) Range
a Given
the small numbers in each of the below categories, we collapsed multiple categories into one: $45,001–$55,000, $55,001–$65,000, $65,001–$75,000, $75,001–$100,000,
$100,001–$150,000, $150,001–$200,000, $200,001, or more.
Buhrmester, 1985), and the stimulation questionnaire (StimQ- (including unemployed and retired). Since most of the mothers
Parent; Mendelson et al., 2016; Read Scale and Parent Verbal were either high school graduates or had completed some college
Responsivity Scale). education (Table 1), we coded maternal education level as high
Early childhood experiences were measured using the National school graduate and below vs. some college and above. Regarding
Survey of Children’s Health adverse childhood experiences household income, we adopted the Organization for Economic
questions (Bethell et al., 2017). Co-operation and Development (OECD)-modified equivalence
Sociodemographic characteristics, including highest maternal scale to adjust the income level based on the household sizes:
education, maternal relationship status, maternal employment first, the household size was determined by assigning a value of
status, and annual household income and household size, were 1 to the household head, 0.5 to each additional adult member,
collected through surveys completed by mothers. Specifically, and 0.3 to each child (Organisation for Economic Co-operation
maternal relationship status was coded as single vs. partnered/in Development, 2021); then, we took the medians of the income
a relationship, and maternal employment status was coded as categories (e.g., for category $15,001–$25,000, median $17,500
working (including full-time and part-time) vs. not working was used, $5,000 was used for the “<$10,000” category, and
Center for Epidemiological The CES-D consists of 20 self-report items assessing for depression. Standardized CES-D Murray et al., 1996; Barker
Studies-Depression Scale Each item is rated on a four-point scale from “Rarely or none of the summary score et al., 2011; Huang et al.,
(CES-D) Radloff (1977) time (<1 day)” to “Most or all of the time (5–7 days)” over the past 2014; Bush et al., 2020
week. Higher scores on the CES-D indicate higher levels of depressive
symptoms, with a cut-off of 16 denoting clinically significant depressive
symptoms Lewinsohn et al. (1997).
Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) The PSS includes ten items on a five-point scale form “Never” to “Very Standardized PSS total Weinraub and Wolf, 1983;
Cohen et al. (1983) often,” measuring perceived stress during the last month. Total scores score Keim et al., 2011; Huang
on PSS were calculated for analysis, with higher scores indicating et al., 2014; LeWinn et al.,
higher stress. 2020
The CAGE Adapted to Include The CAGE–AID is used to screen the respondent for problems Standardized CAGE-AID Blanchard et al., 2005
Drugs (CAGE-AID) Brown and associated with drug abuse. The assessment is self–completed and total score
Rounds (1995) consists of four yes/no questions. The participant is asked about
cutting down (or feeling they should cut back on drug use), annoyance
(whether others have been annoyed with the participant’s drug use),
feeling guilty (about drug use), and the use of “eye–openers” (feeling
the need to use drugs upon waking in the morning).
Life Orientation Test-Revised The Life Orientation test is used to assess the dispositional optimism Standardized LOT total Baker et al., 2005
(LOT-R) Scheier et al. (1994) (the general expectancy of positive outcomes) and psychological score
resilience of the respondent. It is a self–reported test containing 10
items. Three of these items are positively worded, three are negatively
worded, and the remaining four are fillers. Each item is rated on a
four–point scale (0 = strongly disagree, 1 = disagree, 2 = neutral,
3 = agree, and 4 = strongly agree). The negative items are reverse
scored, and the fillers are left unscored.
Social Support Questionnaire This questionnaire is used to measure the respondent’s perceived level Standardized SSQ support Weinraub and Wolf, 1983;
(SSQ) Sarason et al. (1983) of social support and to measure their satisfaction with this support. level score and satisfaction Burchinal et al., 1996;
For each item, the respondent must list all of those who fit the score Huang et al., 2014
description of the question, describe their relation to the person listed,
then rate how satisfied they are with these relationships on a six–point
scale (1 = very dissatisfied, 6 = very satisfied). The version adapted by
the study contains 6 items, asking the respondent who in their lives
they find dependable, helps them relax, accepts them fully, cares about
them, helps them feel better, and consoles them.
HARK 4 item Sohal et al. (2007) The HARK questions are used to identify victims of intimate partner Standardized HARK sum Harding et al., 2013; Vu
violence (IPV). HARK is an acronym for Humiliation, Afraid, Rape, Kick, total score et al., 2016
and each of the four items in the test pertains to one of these
categories (humiliation, intimidation, sexual assualt, and physical
abuse). The questions are in yes/no format and one point is given for
every “yes” answer. Studies show the test to accurately identify women
experiencing IPV.
Child Rearing Practices Report The CPRP evaluates the goals, values, and attitudes of parents in Standardized CRPR Farah et al., 2008; Rochelle
(CRPR): nurturance and conflict regards to raising a child. The Nurturance subscale of the test adapted Nurturance summary total and Cheng, 2016; Bush
subscale Rickel and Biasatti by the study specifically evaluates the respondent’s level of affection, score et al., 2020; LeWinn et al.,
(1982) attention, and nurturance that they provide to their child. This subscale Principal Component Score 2020
contains 18 items. The conflict subscale is used to assess the level of of the three conflict items
conflict between the respondent and their child. This subscale contains
3 items.
Both subscales are parent–completed and each question is rated on a
six–point scale (1 = Not at all descriptive of me, 6 = highly descriptive
of me). The CPRP is shown to reliably predict children’s future
adaptation Gerhardt et al. (2003)
(Continued)
TABLE 2 | Continued
Knowledge of Effective Parenting The KEPS is used to measure the respondent’s knowledge of effective Standardized KEPS score Winter et al., 2012; Rochelle
Scale (KEPS) Winter et al. (2012) parenting strategies for parents of children aged 2–10. The test and Cheng, 2016
adapted by the study contains 17 items, all of which are
multiple–choice format. These items address four main areas of
parental knowledge: promotion of development, principles of effective
parenting, use of assertive discipline, and causes of behavior problems
Winter et al. (2012). One point is given to the respondent for each
question answered correctly. Previous studies have shown that the test
has good content validity, satisfactory test–retest reliability, and internal
consistency Winter et al. (2012).
Network of Relationship The adapted NRI is used to evaluate the frequency of criticism and Standardized NRI average Harris and Howard, 1984;
Inventory (NRI)—Criticism Scale harsh feedback that the respondent gives to their child. The survey is score across items Jacquez et al., 2004;
(revised parent version) Furman parent–completed and contains three items measured on a five–point Wolford et al., 2019
and Buhrmester (1985) scale (Little or none, Somewhat, Very much, Extremely much, The
most).
StimQ-Parent (StimQ-P) read This test evaluates cognitive stimulation in the home environment for Standardized StimQ-P total Rodriguez and
scale and parent verbal children aged 36–60 months. The questionnaire is parent–completed score Tamis-LeMonda, 2011;
responsivity scale Mendelson and consists of mostly “yes or no” questions. The StimQ—P2 contains Baker, 2013; Malhi et al.,
et al. (2016) four subscales: Availability of Learning Materials, Reading (“reflecting 2018; LeWinn et al., 2020
access to books, frequency of shared reading, variety of books read,
and interactivity/quality of reading”), Parental Involvement in
Developmental Advance, and Parental Verbal Responsivity. The version
adapted for the study solely includes questions regarding book reading
quantity, book reading quality, and parental responsivity (during
everyday routines, during play, and during activities that promote
regulation).
National Survey of Children’s This 8-item questionnaire assesses the health and well–being of Standardized total number Crouch et al., 2019
Health ACE questions Bethell children aged 0–17 based on the amount of reported Adverse of ACEs reported
et al. (2017) Childhood Experiences (ACEs). These questions assess whether the
child has witnessed and/or experienced parental divorce, death of a
parent, parental incarceration, domestic abuse, neighborhood violence,
household mental illness, household substance abuse, and racial
discrimination. Studies consistently show that an increasing number of
ACEs has a strong relationship with poorer health outcomes. However,
the ACE assessment is not recommended to be used as a diagnostic
tool, but to open dialogue and to indicate a need for further evaluation
Bethell et al. (2017).
Demographics survey The purpose of this questionnaire is to gather information about the Maternal education level Duncan et al., 1994; Noble
background and living arrangements of the respondent and their child. Maternal relationship status et al., 2005; Bush et al.,
Specifically, the child’s and mother’s age, sex, and race. The survey Maternal employment status 2020; LeWinn et al., 2020
then addresses information specifically regarding the parent’s Household income level
background, such as educational history, employment status, and Number of children in
marriage status, household income levels, and number of children in the household
the household.
* Previous studies showing associations of the measured construct/exposure with child outcomes.
$200,000 used for “$200,000 and more”) to be divided by the analysis, summary scores of the measures were used. When
household sizes to generate the OECD-modified income level; a summary score was not available (i.e., the child-rearing
finally, the number of children in the household was included as practices–conflict subscale), the principal component analysis
a categorical variable with four classes, namely, 1, 2, 3, and ≥4. was conducted to generate a single score to be included in the
A priori identified confounders included child age, child sex at regression models.
birth, and maternal age.
Predictor Selection
Analysis Plan We applied the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator
Descriptive statistics (i.e., mean and SD) for the primary child (LASSO) method to select predictors from the full list of
outcomes, predictors, and confounding variables of interest target exposures (N = 18) to be included in the regression
were generated (see Table 1 for demographic variables and models predicting adaptive behavior skills and IQ levels (see
Supplementary Table 1 for descriptive statistics on maternal Table 2 for variables entered in LASSO regression). The LASSO
characteristics and parenting measures). For the regression method offers the advantage of selecting stable predictors and
TABLE 3 | Results from LASSO models with adaptive behavior and IQ as outcomes with different sample partitioning.
AIC, Akaike information criterion; PRESS, predicted residual sum of square; ASE, average squared error.
TABLE 4 | Results from adjusted model of LASSO-selected predictors for IQ with standardized scores.
With regard to predictors of adaptive behavior, scores on the contrast, other LASSO-selected predictors (i.e., social support
CRPR nurturance subscale, which is designed to capture positive satisfaction and stimulating home environment) did not show
parenting strategies and parent–child relationships (Rickel and significant associations with adaptive behavior scores in the
Biasatti, 1982), emerged as a significant positive predictor with linear regressions. Taken together, these findings suggest that
a medium effect size after accounting for a priori confounders. (1) positive mother–child relationships and interactions matter
This is consistent with previous findings showing that parenting for the development of adaptive behaviors of children, and
styles and behaviors impact the adaptive behavior of children (2) mothers with less satisfying social support or limited
(Altman and Mills, 1990; Rinaldi and Howe, 2012). Previous resources and skills could still foster adequate adaptive skills in
studies of young children suggest that caregivers with higher their children.
responsivity are more likely to develop positive relationships Different from the predictors of adaptive behavior, the
with their children and to facilitate gains in adaptive behaviors predictors identified by the LASSO regression for IQ included
within a nurturing environment (Bradley et al., 1995; Glaser maternal education and household income level, with maternal
et al., 2003; Fenning and Baker, 2012; Warren et al., 2017). In education level showing a significant association in the linear
TABLE 5 | Results from the adjusted model of LASSO-selected predictors for adaptive behavior with standardized scores.
LASSO selected CRPR nurturance 0.25 (0.07, 0.42) 0.007 0.05 0.25 (0.07, 0.44) 0.008 0.06
SSQ satisfaction 0.07 (−0.10, 0.24) 0.443 0.00 0.09 (−0.09, 0.27) 0.307 0.01
Stimulating environment 0.10 (−0.07, 0.27) 0.254 0.01
A priori confounders Child sex Male [Reference] – – [Reference] – –
Female 0.27 (−0.05, 0.59) 0.103 0.02 0.24 (−0.10, 0.58) 0.160 0.02
Child age –0.23 (–0.39, –0.07) 0.004 0.06 –0.26 (–0.41, –0.10) 0.002 0.09
Maternal age –0.21 (0.38, –0.04) 0.015 0.04 −0.11 (−0.30, 0.07) 0.220 0.01
regression. This is consistent with previous studies showing that associated with adaptive behavior scores, suggesting that children
maternal education levels are a core factor in predicting child may fall further behind the pace of the normative sample due to
cognitive development (Harding et al., 2015; Jackson et al., 2017; a cumulative effect of environmental disadvantages (Garcia Coll
Reardon, 2018). While income levels and maternal education et al., 1998; Darbeda et al., 2018). The longitudinal data will be
are often correlated (in the current sample, mothers with more required to determine whether the relative strength in adaptive
than high school education had higher household incomes, t = behavior for this sample persists as they grow into school age
−2.79, p < 0.01), both are commonly found to be independently and beyond.
associated with child cognitive development (Tong et al., 2007; There are several limitations to be considered when
Hackman and Farah, 2009; Patra et al., 2016). The effect of interpreting the current findings. The sample size was relatively
SES on child intelligence has been attributed to better access small, and all children were exposed to the Flint water crisis
to a stimulating and resourceful learning environment (e.g., and multiple socioeconomic adversities. Therefore, replication
books, toys, and learning activities) (Duncan and Brooks-Gunn, in other samples is needed to determine the generalizability
2000; Tong et al., 2007; Christensen et al., 2014). It is likely of these results. Our small sample size may also have resulted
mothers with higher educational levels are better equipped to in limited power with which to detect statistically meaningful
provide an environment for promoting cognitive development effects in the regression models. That is, candidate exposures
(Dichtelmiller et al., 1992; Benasich and Brooks-Gunn, 1996; that were not selected by the LASSO or were not significant
Winter et al., 2012). in the linear regression should be interpreted with caution
The emergence of nurturance as a significant predictor of and not discounted in future research of IQ and adaptive
adaptive behavior suggests that interventions could potentially behaviors. Moreover, given that the variances explained in the
target nurturing practices among parents to improve the adaptive adaptive behavior and IQ models were small (R2 : 0.12–0.21),
functioning of children (O’Connell et al., 2015; Roby et al., more studies with longitudinal data and larger samples are
2021). In fact, programs such as Reach Out and Read and the needed to corroborate and extend our understanding of how
Video Interaction Project (Cates et al., 2016; Weisleder et al., adaptive behaviors and IQ change as a result of modifiable
2019; Canfield et al., 2020) have been put in place to provide social environmental variables. Additionally, with the goal of
Flint parents with resources and training to promote positive reducing the burden of participants, we implemented a protocol
parenting practices. Possible targets for improving the cognitive change during the study resulting in the use of different
performance are less clear since SES factors are often a result versions of the Vineland scales with different data collection
of societal and structural challenges, and substantial long-term modalities (Vineland-II comprehensive interview vs. Vineland-
investment and intervention are often needed to bridge the 3 parent-report survey). Although the ABC scores of high
cognitive performance gaps (Currie and Thomas, 1993; Campbell concurrent validity between Vineland-II and Vineland-3 has
et al., 2002; Anderson et al., 2003; Love et al., 2005; Dobbie and been reported (Sparrow et al., 2016), and we observed similar
Fryer, 2011). ABC score distributions (Supplementary Figure 1) and patterns
We also observed associations between IQ and adaptive (Supplementary Table 3) on the two versions in this study, the
behavior and child sex and child age. Our findings on the use of different forms to measure adaptive behavior is still
advantage of females in IQ among Flint children are consistent a limitation. Another limitation is that our models included
with previous findings showing that males are at greater risk only binary maternal education levels. It is possible that more
for neurodevelopmental disorders (Boyle et al., 2011) and more nuanced effects of maternal education levels could be detected
susceptible to environmental exposures (Jedrychowski et al., if more levels of maternal education were considered in a
2009; Chiu et al., 2017; DiPietro and Voegtline, 2017; Torres- larger sample. However, this study was the first to employ
Rojas and Jones, 2018). In addition, child age was negatively LASSO regression to select and then examine the correlates
of adaptive behaviors in comparison to IQ. Our findings and KL led the data collection. All authors contributed to the
underscore the value of measuring adaptive behaviors in addition article and approved the submitted version.
to IQ in studies of young children at heightened risk for
neurodevelopmental difficulties.
FUNDING
DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT This study was supported by the Robert Wood Johnson
Foundation (Grant Nos. 74129 and 77131) and Metabolic Studio,
The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be the direct charitable activity of the Annenberg Foundation (Grant
made available by the authors, without undue reservation. No. 18-414) to Michigan State University.
ETHICS STATEMENT
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The studies involving human participants were reviewed and
approved by Michigan State University, University of California, We are thankful to Adam Flood, Katlin Harwood-Schelb,
San Francisco. Written informed consent to participate in this Christopher Valvano, and Quiana Wheeler for their research
study was provided by the participants’ legal guardian/next of kin. assistance for the project. We would also like to thank all the
families who generously participated in this study and supported
our research effort.
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
SZ, SB, and KL conceptualized the study. SZ conducted the SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL
statistical analysis. SZ and SB drafted the original manuscript.
SB and KL provided major revisions to the drafts. TC, MH-A, The Supplementary Material for this article can be found
and LO’C provided feedbacks and edits to the final manuscript. online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.
MH-A and KL secured the funding for the study. TC, SB, MH-A, 2021.692330/full#supplementary-material
REFERENCES Bethell, C. D., Carle, A., Hudziak, J., Gombojav, N., Powers, K., Wade, R., et al.
(2017). Methods to assess adverse childhood experiences of children and
Alexander, R. M., and Reynolds, M. R. (2020). Intelligence and families: toward approaches to promote child well-being in policy and practice.
adaptive behavior: a meta-analysis. School Psych. Rev. 49, 85–110. Acad. Pediatrics 17(7, Suppl.), S51–S69. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2017.04.161
doi: 10.1080/2372966X.2020.1717374 Bishop-Fitzpatrick, L., Hong, J., Smith, L. E., Makuch, R. A., Greenberg, J. S., and
Altman, J. S., and Mills, B. C. (1990). Caregiver behaviours and adaptive behavior Mailick, M. R. (2016). Characterizing objective quality of life and normative
development of very young children in home care and daycare. Early Child Dev. outcomes in adults with autism spectrum disorder: an exploratory latent class
Care 62, 87–96. doi: 10.1080/0300443900620106 analysis. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 46, 2707–2719. doi: 10.1007/s10803-016-2816-3
American Psychiatry Association (2013). Diagnostic and Statistical Blanchard, K. A., Sexton, C. C., Morgenstern, J., McVeigh, K. H., McCrady, B. S.,
Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition. Arlington, VA: American Morgan, T. J., et al. (2005). Children of substance abusing women on federal
Psychiatry Publishing. welfare. J. Human Behav. Soc. Environ. 12, 89–110. doi: 10.1300/J137v12n02_05
Anderson, L. M., Shinn, C., Fullilove, M. T., Scrimshaw, S. C., Fielding, J. E., Boyle, C. A., Boulet, S., Schieve, L. A., Cohen, R. A., Blumberg, S.
Normand, J., et al. (2003). The effectiveness of early childhood development J., Yeargin-Allsopp, M., et al. (2011). Trends in the prevalence of
programs: a systematic review. Am. J. Preventive Med. 24(3, Suppl.), 32–46. developmental disabilities in US Children, 1997–2008. Pediatrics 127,
doi: 10.1016/S0749-3797(02)00655-4 1034–1042. doi: 10.1542/peds.2010-2989
Baker, B. L., Blacher, J., and Olsson, M. B. (2005). Preschool children with and Bradley, R. H., Whiteside, L., Mundfrom, D. J., Blevins-Knabe, B., Casey,
without developmental delay: Behaviour problems, parents’ optimism and P. H., Caldwell, B. M., et al. (1995). Home environment and adaptive
well-being. J. Intel. Disabil. Res. 49, 575–590. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2005.0 social behavior among premature, low birth weight children: alternative
0691.x models of environmental action. J. Pediatr. Psychol. 20, 347–362.
Baker, C. E. (2013). Fathers’ and mothers’ home literacy involvement and children’s doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/20.3.347
cognitive and social emotional development: implications for family literacy Brown, R. L., and Rounds, L. A. (1995). Conjoint screening questionnaires for
programs. Appl. Dev. Sci. 17, 184–197. doi: 10.1080/10888691.2013.836034 alcohol and other drug abuse: criterion validity in a primary care practice. Wis.
Bal, V. H., Kim, S.-H., Cheong, D., and Lord, C. (2015). Daily living skills in Med. J. 94, 135–140.
individuals with autism spectrum disorder from 2 to 21 years of age. Autism Burchinal, M. R., Follmer, A., and Bryant, D. M. (1996). The relations of maternal
19, 774–784. doi: 10.1177/1362361315575840 social support and family structure with maternal responsiveness and child
Barker, E. D., Jaffee, S. R., Uher, R., and Maughan, B. (2011). The contribution of outcomes among African American families. Dev. Psychol. 32, 1073–1083.
prenatal and postnatal maternal anxiety and depression to child maladjustment. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.32.6.1073
Depress. Anxiety 28, 696–702. doi: 10.1002/da.20856 Bush, N. R., Wakschlag, L. S., LeWinn, K. Z., Hertz-Picciotto, I., Nozadi, S.
Benasich, A. A., and Brooks-Gunn, J. (1996). Maternal attitudes and knowledge S., Pieper, S., et al. (2020). Family environment, neurodevelopmental risk,
of child-rearing: associations with family and child outcomes. Child Dev. 67, and the Environmental Influences on Child Health Outcomes (ECHO)
1186–1205. doi: 10.2307/1131887 initiative: looking back and moving forward. Front. Psychiatry 11:547.
Bertollo, J. R., Strang, J. F., Anthony, L. G., Kenworthy, L., Wallace, G. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00547
L., and Yerys, B. E. (2020). Adaptive behavior in youth with autism Calvin, C. M., Batty, G. D., Der, G., Brett, C. E., Taylor, A., Pattie, A., et al. (2017).
spectrum disorder: the role of flexibility. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 50, 42–50. Childhood intelligence in relation to major causes of death in 68 year follow-up:
doi: 10.1007/s10803-019-04220-9 Prospective population study. BMJ 357:j2708. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j2708
Campbell, F. A., Ramey, C. T., Pungello, E., Sparling, J., and Miller-Johnson, S. Fagan, J. F., and Holland, C. R. (2007). Racial equality in intelligence:
(2002). Early childhood education: young adult outcomes from the abecedarian predictions from a theory of intelligence as processing. Intelligence 35, 319–334.
project. Appl. Dev. Sci. 6, 42–57. doi: 10.1207/S1532480XADS0601_05 doi: 10.1016/j.intell.2006.08.009
Canfield, C. F., Miller, E. B., Shaw, D. S., Morris, P., Alonso, A., and Mendelsohn, Farah, M. J., Betancourt, L., Shera, D. M., Savage, J. H., Giannetta, J.
A. L. (2020). Beyond language: Impacts of shared reading on parenting M., Brodsky, N. L., et al. (2008). Environmental stimulation, parental
stress and early parent-child relational health. Dev. Psychol. 56, 1305–1315. nurturance and cognitive development in humans. Dev. Sci. 11, 793–801.
doi: 10.1037/dev0000940 doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00688.x
Cates, C. B., Weisleder, A., and Mendelsohn, A. L. (2016). Mitigating the Farley, M. A., McMahon, W. M., Fombonne, E., Jenson, W. R., Miller, J., Gardner,
effects of family poverty on early child development through parenting M., et al. (2009). Twenty-year outcome for individuals with autism and average
interventions in primary care. Acad. Pediatrics 16(3, Suppl.), S112–S120. or near-average cognitive abilities. Autism Res. 2, 109–118. doi: 10.1002/aur.69
doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2015.12.015 Fenning, R. M., and Baker, J. K. (2012). Mother-child interaction and resilience
Chiu, Y.-H. M., Claus Henn, B., Hsu, H.-H. L., Pendo, M. P., Coull, B. A., Austin, in children with early developmental risk. J. Family Psychol. 26, 411–420.
C., et al. (2017). Sex differences in sensitivity to prenatal and early childhood doi: 10.1037/a0028287
manganese exposure on neuromotor function in adolescents. Environ. Res. 159, Furman, W., and Buhrmester, D. (1985). Children’s perceptions of the qualities of
458–465. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2017.08.035 sibling relationships. Child Dev. 56, 448–461. doi: 10.2307/1129733
Christensen, D. L., Schieve, L. A., Devine, O., and Drews-Botsch, C. (2014). Garcia Coll, C., Buckner, J. C., Brooks, M. G., Weinreb, L. F., and Bassuk, E.
Socioeconomic status, child enrichment factors, and cognitive performance L. (1998). The developmental status and adaptive behavior of homeless and
among preschool-age children: results from the Follow-Up of Growth low-income housed infants and toddlers. Am. J. Public Health 88, 1371–1374.
and Development Experiences study. Res. Dev. Disabil. 35, 1789–1801. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.88.9.1371
doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2014.02.003 Gardiner, E., and Iarocci, G. (2018). Everyday executive function predicts adaptive
Cohen, S., Kamarck, T., and Mermelstein, R. (1983). A global measure of perceived and internalizing behavior among children with and without autism spectrum
stress. J. Health Soc. Behav. 24, 385–396. JSTOR. doi: 10.2307/2136404 disorder. Autism Res. 11, 284–295. doi: 10.1002/aur.1877
Croizet, J.-C., and Dutrévis, M. (2004). Socioeconomic status and intelligence: why Gerhardt, C. A., Vannatta, K., McKellop, J. M., Taylor, J., Passo, M., Reiter-Purtill,
test scores do not equal merit. J. Poverty 8, 91–107. doi: 10.1300/J134v08n03_05 J., et al. (2003). Brief report: child-rearing practices of caregivers with and
Crouch, E., Probst, J. C., Radcliff, E., Bennett, K. J., and McKinney, S. H. (2019). without a child with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis: perspectives of caregivers
Prevalence of adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) among US children. Child and professionals. J. Pediatr. Psychol. 28, 275–279. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/j
Abuse Negl. 92, 209–218. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2019.04.010 sg015
Currie, J., and Thomas, D. (1993). Does Head Start Make a Difference? (Working Glaser, B., Hessl, D., Dyer-Friedman, J., Johnston, C., Wisbeck, J., Taylor,
Paper No. 4406; Working Paper Series). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of A., et al. (2003). Biological and environmental contributions to adaptive
Economic Research. doi: 10.3386/w4406 behavior in fragile X syndrome. Am. J. Med. Genetics A 117A, 21–29.
Darbeda, S., Falissard, B., Orri, M., Barry, C., Melchior, M., Chauvin, doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.10549
P., et al. (2018). Adaptive behavior of sheltered homeless children Hackman, D. A., and Farah, M. J. (2009). Socioeconomic status and the developing
in the French ENFAMS survey. Am. J. Public Health 108, 503–510. brain. Trends Cogn. Sci. 13, 65–73. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2008.11.003
doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2017.304255 Halle, T., Forry, N., Hair, E., Perper, K., Wandner, L., Wessel, J., et al.
Dell’Armo, K. A., and Tassé, M. J. (2019). The role of adaptive behavior (2009). Disparities in early learning and development: lessons from the Early
and parent expectations in predicting post-school outcomes for young Childhood Longitudinal Study - Birth Cohort (ECLS-B). Washington, DC:
adults with intellectual disability. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 49, 1638–1651. Child Trends.
doi: 10.1007/s10803-018-3857-6 Hanna-Attisha, M., LaChance, J., Sadler, R. C., and Champney Schnepp, A. (2015).
Dichtelmiller, M., Meisels, S. J., Plunkett, J. W., Bozytnski, M. E. A., Claflin, C., Elevated blood lead levels in children associated with the flint drinking water
and Mangelsdorf, S. C. (1992). The relationship of parental knowledge to the crisis: a spatial analysis of risk and public health response. Am. J. Public Health
development of extremely low birth weight infants. J. Early Interv. 16, 210–220. 106, 283–290. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2015.303003
doi: 10.1177/105381519201600302 Harding, H. G., Morelen, D., Thomassin, K., Bradbury, L., and Shaffer, A.
DiPietro, J. A., and Voegtline, K. M. (2017). The gestational foundation of (2013). Exposure to maternal- and paternal-perpetrated intimate partner
sex differences in development and vulnerability. Neuroscience 342, 4–20. violence, emotion regulation, and child outcomes. J. Fam. Violence 28, 63–72.
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2015.07.068 doi: 10.1007/s10896-012-9487-4
Ditterline, J., Banner, D., Oakland, T., and Becton, D. (2008). Adaptive behavior Harding, J. F., Morris, P. A., and Hughes, D. (2015). The relationship
profiles of students with disabilities. J. Appl. School Psychol. 24, 191–208. between maternal education and children’s academic outcomes: a theoretical
doi: 10.1080/15377900802089973 framework. J. Marriage Family 77, 60–76. doi: 10.1111/jomf.12156
Dobbie, W., and Fryer, R. G. Jr. (2011). Are high-quality schools enough to increase Harris, I. D., and Howard, K. I. (1984). Parental criticism and the adolescent
achievement among the poor? Evidence from the Harlem Children’s zone. Am. experience. J. Youth Adolesc. 13, 113–121. doi: 10.1007/BF02089105
Econ. J. 3, 158–187. doi: 10.1257/app.3.3.158 Harrison, P. L., and Oakland, T. (2015). Adaptive Behavior Assessment System
Duckworth, A. L., Quinn, P. D., Lynam, D. R., Loeber, R., and Stouthamer-Loeber, Third Edition. San Antonio, TX: Western Psychological Services.
M. (2011). Role of test motivation in intelligence testing. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. Helms, J. E. (1992). Why is there no study of cultural equivalence in
U.S.A. 108, 7716–7720. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1018601108 standardized cognitive ability testing? Am. Psychol. 47, 1083–1101.
Duncan, A., Ruble, L. A., Meinzen-Derr, J., Thomas, C., and Stark, L. J. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.47.9.1083
(2018). Preliminary efficacy of a daily living skills intervention for adolescents Huang, C. Y., Costeines, J., Kaufman, J. S., and Ayala, C. (2014). Parenting
with high-functioning autism spectrum disorder. Autism 22, 983–994. stress, social support, and depression for ethnic minority adolescent
doi: 10.1177/1362361317716606 mothers: impact on child development. J. Child Fam. Stud. 23, 255–262.
Duncan, A. W., and Bishop, S. L. (2013). Understanding the gap between cognitive doi: 10.1007/s10826-013-9807-1
abilities and daily living skills in adolescents with autism spectrum disorders Jackson, M. I., Kiernan, K., and McLanahan, S. (2017). Maternal education,
with average intelligence. Autism 19, 64–72. doi: 10.1177/13623613135 changing family circumstances, and children’s skill development in the
10068 United States and UK. Ann. Am. Acad. Pol. Soc. Sci. 674, 59–84.
Duncan, G. J., and Brooks-Gunn, J. (2000). Family poverty, welfare reform, and doi: 10.1177/0002716217729471
child development. Child Dev. 71, 188–196. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00133 Jacquez, F., Cole, D. A., and Searle, B. (2004). Self-perceived
Duncan, G. J., Brooks-Gunn, J., and Klebanov, P. K. (1994). Economic deprivation competence as a mediator between maternal feedback and depressive
and early childhood development. Child Dev. 65(2 Spec No), 296–318. symptoms in adolescents. J. Abnorm. Child Psychol. 32, 355–367.
doi: 10.2307/1131385 doi: 10.1023/B:JACP.0000030290.68929.ef
Jedrychowski, W., Perera, F., Jankowski, J., Mrozek-Budzyn, D., Mroz, E., Flak, children’s cognitive and social development from birth through third grade.
E., et al. (2009). Gender specific differences in neurodevelopmental effects of Child Dev. 76, 795–810. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2005.00878.x
prenatal exposure to very low-lead levels: the prospective cohort study in three- National Research Council (US) Committee on Disability Determination for
year olds. Early Hum. Dev. 85, 503–510. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2009.04.006 Mental Retardation, Reschly, D. J., Myers, T. G., and Hartel, C. R. (2002).
Jensen, A. (1980). Précis of bias in mental testing. Behav. Brain Sci. 3, 325–333. Mental Retardation: Determining Eligibility for Social Security Benefits.
doi: 10.1017/S0140525X00005161 Washington, DC: National Academies Press (US).
Kanne, S. M., Gerber, A. J., Quirmbach, L. M., Sparrow, S. S., Cicchetti, D. V., Neisser, U., Boodoo, G., Bouchard, T. J., Boykin, A. W., Brody, N., Ceci, S. J.,
and Saulnier, C. A. (2011). The role of adaptive behavior in autism spectrum et al. (1996). Intelligence: knowns and unknowns. Am. Psychol. 51, 77–101.
disorders: implications for functional outcome. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 41, doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.51.2.77
1007–1018. doi: 10.1007/s10803-010-1126-4 Nelson, C. A., Zeanah, C. H., Fox, N. A., Marshall, P. J., Smyke, A. T.,
Keim, S. A., Daniels, J. L., Dole, N., Herring, A. H., Siega-Riz, A. M., and Scheidt, and Guthrie, D. (2007). Cognitive recovery in socially deprived young
P. C. (2011). A prospective study of maternal anxiety, perceived stress, and children: the bucharest early intervention project. Science 318, 1937–1940.
depressive symptoms in relation to infant cognitive development. Early Hum. doi: 10.1126/science.1143921
Dev. 87, 373–380. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2011.02.004 Noble, K. G., Norman, M. F., and Farah, M. J. (2005). Neurocognitive
Keith, T. Z., Fehrmann, P. G., Harrison, P. L., and Pottebaum, S. M. (1987). correlates of socioeconomic status in kindergarten children. Dev. Sci. 8, 74–87.
The relation between adaptive behavior and intelligence: testing alternative doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2005.00394.x
explanations. J. Sch. Psychol. 25, 31–43. doi: 10.1016/0022-4405(87)90058-6 Oakland, T., and Harrison, P. L. (2008). “Chapter 1 - adaptive behaviors
Kendler, K. S., Turkheimer, E., Ohlsson, H., Sundquist, J., and Sundquist, K. and skills: an introduction,” in Adaptive Behavior Assessment System-II, eds
(2015). Family environment and the malleability of cognitive ability: A Swedish T. Oakland and P. L. Harrison (Cambridge, MA: Academic Press), 1–20.
national home-reared and adopted-away cosibling control study. Proc. Nat. doi: 10.1016/B978-012373586-7.00001-1
Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 112, 4612–4617. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1417106112 O’Connell, L. K., Davis, M. M., and Bauer, N. S. (2015). Assessing parenting
Klin, A., Saulnier, C. A., Sparrow, S. S., Cicchetti, D. V., Volkmar, F. R., and behaviors to improve child outcomes. Pediatrics 135, e286–e288.
Lord, C. (2007). Social and communication abilities and disabilities in higher doi: 10.1542/peds.2014-2497
functioning individuals with autism spectrum disorders: the Vineland and the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2021). Adjusting
ADOS. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 37, 748–759. doi: 10.1007/s10803-006-0229-4 household incomes: Equivalence scales. Organisation for Economic Co-Operation
Kraper, C. K., Kenworthy, L., Popal, H., Martin, A., and Wallace, G. L. (2017). The and Development. Retrieved from: http://www.oecd.org/economy/growth/
gap between adaptive behavior and intelligence in autism persists into young OECD-Note-EquivalenceScales.pdf (accessed March 10, 2021).
adulthood and is linked to psychiatric co-morbidities. J. Autism Dev. Disord. Patra, K., Greene, M. M., Patel, A. L., and Meier, P. (2016). Maternal education
47, 3007–3017. doi: 10.1007/s10803-017-3213-2 level predicts cognitive, language, and motor outcome in preterm infants in the
LeWinn, K. Z., Bush, N. R., Batra, A., Tylavsky, F., and Rehkopf, D. second year of life. Am. J. Perinatol. 33, 738–744. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1572532
(2020). Identification of modifiable social and behavioral factors associated Pugliese, C. E., Anthony, L., Strang, J. F., Dudley, K., Wallace, G.
with childhood cognitive performance. JAMA Pediatr. 174, 1063–1072. L., and Kenworthy, L. (2015). Increasing adaptive behavior skill
doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2020.2904 deficits from childhood to adolescence in autism spectrum disorder:
Lewinsohn, P. M., Seeley, J. R., Roberts, R. E., and Allen, N. B. (1997). Center for role of executive function. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 45, 1579–1587.
Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) as a screening instrument doi: 10.1007/s10803-014-2309-1
for depression among community-residing older adults. Psychol Aging 12, Radloff, L. S. (1977). The CES-D scale: a self-report depression scale for
277–287. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.12.2.277 research in the general population. Appl. Psychol. Meas. 1, 385–401.
Love, J. M., Kisker, E. E., Ross, C., Raikes, H., Constantine, J., Boller, K., et al. doi: 10.1177/014662167700100306
(2005). The effectiveness of early head start for 3-year-old children and Reardon, S. F. (2018). “The widening academic achievement gap between the rich
their parents: lessons for policy and programs. Dev. Psychol. 41, 885–901. and the poor,” in Inequality in the 21st Century 1st ed, D. B. Grusky and J. Hill
doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.41.6.885 (New York, NY: Routledge), 177–189. doi: 10.4324/9780429499821-33
Luckasson, R., Borthwick-Duffy, S., Buntinx, W. H. E., Coulter, D. L., Craig, E. M., Reschly, D. J., Myers, T. G., and Hartel, C. R. (2002a). Disability Determination for
(Pat)., Reeve, A., et al. (2002). Mental Retardation: Definition, Classification, and Mental Retardation. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Systems of Supports, 10th Edition (Washington, DC: American Association on Reschly, D. J., Myers, T. G., and Hartel, C. R. (2002b). “The role of adaptive
Mental Retardation), xiii, 238. behavior assessment,” in Mental Retardation: Determining Eligibility for Social
Malhi, P., Menon, J., Bharti, B., and Sidhu, M. (2018). Cognitive development of Security Benefits (National Academies Press). Available online at: https://www.
toddlers: does parental stimulation matter? Indian J. Pediatrics 85, 498–503. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK207541/ (accessed October 13, 2020).
doi: 10.1007/s12098-018-2613-4 Rickel, A. U., and Biasatti, L. L. (1982). modification of the
Matson, J. L., Hattier, M. A., and Belva, B. (2012). Treating adaptive living skills block child rearing practices report. J. Clin. Psychol. 38,
of persons with autism using applied behavior analysis: a review. Res. Autism 129–134. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(198201)38:1<129::AID-
Spectr. Disord. 6, 271–276. doi: 10.1016/j.rasd.2011.05.008 JCLP2270380120>3.0.CO;2-3
Mayes, S. D., Calhoun, S. L., Bixler, E. O., and Zimmerman, D. N. (2009). IQ and Rinaldi, C. M., and Howe, N. (2012). Mothers’ and fathers’ parenting styles and
neuropsychological predictors of academic achievement. Learn. Individ. Differ. associations with toddlers’ externalizing, internalizing, and adaptive behaviors.
19, 238–241. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2008.09.001 Early Child. Res. Q. 27, 266–273. doi: 10.1016/j.ecresq.2011.08.001
Mendelson, J. L., Gates, J. A., and Lerner, M. D. (2016). Friendship in Ritchie, S. J., and Tucker-Drob, E. M. (2018). How much does education
school-age boys with autism spectrum disorders: a meta-analytic summary improve intelligence? a meta-analysis. Psychol. Sci. 29, 1358–1369.
and developmental, process-based model. Psychol. Bull. 142, 601–622. doi: 10.1177/0956797618774253
doi: 10.1037/bul0000041 Roby, E., Miller, E. B., Shaw, D. S., Morris, P., Gill, A., Bogen, D. L.,
Meyer, A. T., Powell, P. S., Butera, N., Klinger, M. R., and Klinger, L. G. et al. (2021). Improving parent-child interactions in pediatric health
(2018). Brief report: developmental trajectories of adaptive behavior in care: a two-site randomized controlled trial. Pediatrics 147:e20201799.
children and adolescents with ASD. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 48, 2870–2878. doi: 10.1542/peds.2020-1799
doi: 10.1007/s10803-018-3538-5 Rochelle, T. L., and Cheng, H. T. (2016). Parenting practices and child
Murray, L., Hipwell, A., Hooper, R., Stein, A., and Cooper, P. (1996). The cognitive behaviour problems in Hong Kong: knowledge of effective parenting strategies,
development of 5-year-old children of postnatally depressed mothers. J. Child parenting stress, and child-rearing ideologies. Child Indic. Res. 9, 155–171.
Psychol. Psychiatry 37, 927–935. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.1996.tb01490.x doi: 10.1007/s12187-015-9311-9
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Early Child Care Rodriguez, E. T., and Tamis-LeMonda, C. S. (2011). Trajectories of the home
Research Network. (2005). Duration and developmental timing of poverty and learning environment across the first 5 years: associations with children’s
vocabulary and literacy skills at prekindergarten. Child Dev. 82, 1058–1075. Vu, N. L., Jouriles, E. N., McDonald, R., and Rosenfield, D. (2016). Children’s
doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01614.x exposure to intimate partner violence: a meta-analysis of longitudinal
Ruckart, P. Z., Ettinger, A. S., Hanna-Attisha, M., Jones, N., Davis, S. I., and Breysse, associations with child adjustment problems. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 46, 25–33.
P. N. (2019). The flint water crisis: a coordinated public health emergency doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2016.04.003
response and recovery initiative. J. Public Health Manage. Practice 25, S84–S90. Ware, A. L., Crocker, N., O’Brien, J. W., Deweese, B. N., Roesch, S. C., Coles, C.
doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000000871 D., et al. (2012). Executive function predicts adaptive behavior in children with
Rushton, J. P., and Jensen, A. R. (2005). Thirty years of research on race histories of heavy prenatal alcohol exposure and attention-deficit/hyperactivity
differences in cognitive ability. Psychol. Public Policy Law 11, 235–294. disorder. Alcoholism 36, 1431–1441. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2011.0
doi: 10.1037/1076-8971.11.2.235 1718.x
Sarason, I. G., Levine, H. M., Basham, R. B., and Sarason, B. R. (1983). Assessing Warren, S. F., Brady, N., Fleming, K. K., and Hahn, L. J. (2017). The
social support: the social support questionnaire. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 44, longitudinal effects of parenting on adaptive behavior in children with fragile
127–139. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.127 X syndrome. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 47, 768–784. doi: 10.1007/s10803-016-
Schalock, R. L., Luckasson, R., and Tassé, M. J. (2021). Intellectual Disability: 2999-7
Definition, Diagnosis, Classification, and Systems of Supports, 12th Edition. Wechsler, D. (2012). Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence—
Silver Spring, MD: American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Fourth Edition. San Antonio, TX.
Disabilities [AAIDD]. Weinraub, M., and Wolf, B. M. (1983). Effects of stress and social supports on
Scheier, M. F., Carver, C. S., and Bridges, M. W. (1994). Distinguishing mother-child interactions in single- and two-parent families. Child Dev. 54,
optimism from neuroticism (and trait anxiety, self-mastery, and self-esteem): 1297–1311. doi: 10.2307/1129683
A reevaluation of the life orientation test. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 67, 1063–1078. Weisleder, A., Cates, C. B., Harding, J. F., Johnson, S. B., Canfield, C. F., Seery, A.
doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.67.6.1063 M., et al. (2019). Links between shared reading and play, parent psychosocial
Sohal, H., Eldridge, S., and Feder, G. (2007). The sensitivity and specificity of four functioning, and child behavior: evidence from a randomized controlled trial.
questions (HARK) to identify intimate partner violence: a diagnostic accuracy J. Pediatr. 213, 187–195.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2019.06.037
study in general practice. BMC Fam. Pract. 8:49. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-8-49 Winter, L., Morawska, A., and Sanders, M. (2012). The Knowledge of
Sparrow, S., Cicchetti, D. V., and Balla, D. A. (2005). Vineland Adaptive Behavior Effective Parenting Scale (KEPS): a tool for public health approaches
Scales-II. Bloomington, MN: Pearson. doi: 10.1037/t15164-000 to universal parenting programs. J. Primary Prevent. 33, 85–97.
Sparrow, S. S., and Cicchetti, D. V. (1985). Diagnostic uses of the vineland adaptive doi: 10.1007/s10935-012-0268-x
behavior scales. J. Pediatr. Psychol. 10, 215–225. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/10.2.215 Wolford, S. N., Cooper, A. N., and McWey, L. M. (2019). Maternal depression,
Sparrow, S. S., Cicchetti, D. V., and Saulnier, C. A. (2016). Vineland Adaptive maltreatment history, and child outcomes: the role of harsh parenting. Am. J.
Behavior Scales, Third Edition (Vineland-3). San Antonio, TX: Pearson. Orthopsychiatry 89, 181–191. doi: 10.1037/ort0000365
Sternberg, R. J., Grigorenko, E. L., and Kidd, K. K. (2005). Intelligence, race, and Woolf, S., Woolf, C. M., and Oakland, T. (2010). Adaptive behavior among adults
genetics. Am. Psychol. 60, 46–59. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.60.1.46 with intellectual disabilities and its relationship to community independence.
Tassé, M. J., Schalock, R. L., Balboni, G., Bersani, H., Borthwick-Duffy, S. A., Spreat, Intellect. Dev. Disabil. 48, 209–215. doi: 10.1352/1944-7558-48.3.209
S., et al. (2012). The construct of adaptive behavior: its conceptualization, Zheng, S., Bishop, S. L., Ceja, T., Hanna-Attisha, M., and LeWinn, K. (2021).
measurement, and use in the field of intellectual disability. Am. J. Intellect. Dev. Neurodevelopmental profiles of preschool-age children in flint, Michigan: A
Disabil. 117, 291–303. doi: 10.1352/1944-7558-117.4.291 latent profile analysis. J. Neurodevelopmental Disord.
Taylor, J. L., Henninger, N. A., and Mailick, M. R. (2015). Longitudinal
patterns of employment and postsecondary education for adults with Conflict of Interest: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the
autism and average-range IQ. Autism 19, 785–793. doi: 10.1177/13623613155 absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a
85643 potential conflict of interest.
Taylor, J. L., and Mailick, M. R. (2014). A longitudinal examination of 10-year
change in vocational and educational activities for adults with autism spectrum Publisher’s Note: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors
disorders. Dev. Psychol. 50, 699–708. doi: 10.1037/a0034297 and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of
Test, D. W., Mazzotti, V. L., Mustian, A. L., Fowler, C. H., Kortering, L.,
the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in
and Kohler, P. (2009). Evidence-based secondary transition predictors for
this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or
improving postschool outcomes for students with disabilities. Career Dev.
Except. Individ. 32, 160–181. doi: 10.1177/0885728809346960 endorsed by the publisher.
Tong, S., Baghurst, P., Vimpani, G., and McMichael, A. (2007). Socioeconomic
position, maternal IQ, home environment, and cognitive development. J. Copyright © 2021 Zheng, LeWinn, Ceja, Hanna-Attisha, O’Connell and Bishop.
Pediatrics 151, 284–288.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2007.03.020 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons
Torres-Rojas, C., and Jones, B. C. (2018). Sex differences in neurotoxicogenetics. Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums
Front. Genet. 9:196. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2018.00196 is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited
Tucker-Drob, E. M., Briley, D. A., and Harden, K. P. (2013). Genetic and and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted
environmental influences on cognition across development and context. Curr. academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not
Dir. Psychol. Sci. 22, 349–355. doi: 10.1177/0963721413485087 comply with these terms.