CHAPTER IV
RESULT AND DISCUSSION
Species Composition and Distribution of Vascular Epiphytes
       In this study, a total of 21 species of epiphytes belonging to 9 families were collected
along the riparian area of Arabunog River. Vascular species found along the riparian areas of
Arabunog River are presented in Table 1. Families of Araceae had the highest number of
genera and species, which was represented by seven genera and seven species. Followed by
four genera and four species collected under the family of Polypodiaceae and three genera
and three species collected under the family of Orchidaceae. and two genera and species
under the family of lygodiaceae.
       Aspleniaceae, Bleachnaceae, Dryopteridaceae, Lindsaeceae, and Lomaripsidaceae are
the least represented family with only one genus and one species.
Table 1. Lists of vascular epiphytes species found along the riparian areas of Arabunog River,
       Barugo Leyte (2022).
Family Name                   Scientific Name                      Common Name
Araceae               Epipremmum pinnatum (L.) Engle.              Dragon-tail plant
                      Pothos scandens (L.)                         Climbing Aroid
                      Epipremnum aureum (Linden &Andre)            Climbing Golden pothos
                      Scindapsus pictus (Norman)                   Satin pothos
                      Philodendron hederaceum (Edward F.)          Climbing Heartleaf
                      Syngonium angustatum. Schott (F.)            Three fingers plant
                      Rhaphidophora decursiva (Roxb.) Schott       Giant climber plant
Aspleniaceae          Asplenium nidus (L.)                         Berd’s nest fern
Blechnaceae           Stenochlaena palustris (Burm. F.)            Hagnaya
Dryopteridaceae       Dryopteris sparsa (D.Don)                    Wood fern
Lygodiaceae           Lygodium palmatum (Bernh.) Sw.               American climbing fern
                      Lygodium circinnatum (Burn. F.)              Nitong puti
Lindsaeaceae          Lindsae brachypoda (Bak)                     Short-footed screw fern
Lomaripsidaceae       Nephroplepis exaltata (L.)                   Boston fern
Orchidaceae           Epidendrum magnoliae (L.)                    Green-Fly Orchid
                      Vanilla planifolia. (Jack)                   Bourbon vanilla plant
                      Epidendrum rigidum. (Jacq)                   No information
Polypodiaceae         Niphidium crassifolium (L.)                  Graceful fern
                      Drynaria quercifolia (L.)                    Oak-leaf fern
                      Pyrrossia piloselloides (L.) M.G             Dragon’s scale
                      Campyloneurum angustifolium (Swartz)         Narrow-leaf strap fern
       In the Philippines, Molina R.A and Echem, R. (2018) reported a total of 13 vascular
epiphytes. These Vascular epiphytes were classified as A. asparagoides, A. drepanophyllum,
A. nidus, D. sparsisora, D. sparsa, E. aureum, E. pinnatum, F. pumila, N. exaltata, P.
scandense oxycardium, P.scandens, P. lingua, and P. nummularifolia. Some of the species
like A. nidus, E. pinnatum, N. exaltata, P. scandens were also documented in the study.
       Table 2 present the absence and presence of vascular epiphytes species per plot across
all the stations of Arabunog River. Base on the table presented. Niphidium crassifolium (L.)
are only species that was present in all sampling stations and Epipremnum aureum (Linden
&Andre), Scindapsus pictus (Norman), Asplenium nidus (L.), Lygodium palmatum (Bernh.)
Sw., Lygodium circinnatum (Burn. F.), Epidendrum magnoliae (L.) and Epidendrum
rigidum. (Jacq) was only observed in Secondary forest             (station 2). while Pyrrossia
piloselloides (L.) M.G was present in all plots in pasture area (station 1).
Conservation Status of Vascular Epiphytes
       Table 3 shows the conservation status of vascular epiphytes based on the threatened
plants of the Philippines (2008) and follow the criteria used of the IUCN (2021, ver.).
       Fernando et al. (2008) revealed that 53 species belonging to the family of orchidaceae
are one of the main families of plants that contributes to the threatened plant list. Among this
number of species, Asplenium nidus (L.) is categorized as critically endangered. Followed by
Campyloneurum angustifolium (Swartz), Nephroplepis exaltata (L.), Philodendron
hederaceum (Edward F.), Vanilla planifolia. (Jack), and Epidendrum magnoliae (L.). That
are under category of near threatened and threatened, two of these species belonging to the
family of Orchidaceae. Plant (2013) sated that orchid species are cultivated for their various
economic uses particularly in floriculture. Orchids are grown primarily as a ornamental and
many are used as a herbal medicines, foods and other cultural value by many different
cultures and tribes in the different parts of the world (Khasim and Rao, 1999). in terms of
species nativity Campyloneurum angustifolium (Swartz), Epidendrum rigidum. (Jacq),
Epipremmum pinnatum (L.) Engle., Scindapsus pictus (Norman), and Stenochlaena palustris
(Burm. F.). is categorized as native in the Philippines. Two of these species is belonging to
the family of Araceae.
Table 3. Conservation status of vascular epiphytes found along the riparian areas of
      Arabunog, River, Barugo, Leyte (2022).
Species                             Conservation Status             Nativity
Asplenium nidus (L.)                      Critically Endangered     Non-native
Campyloneurum angustifolium (Swartz)      Near threatened           Native
Dryopteris sparsa (D.Don)                 Vulnerable                Non-native
Drynaria quercifolia (L.)                 Least Concern             Non-native
Epidendrum rigidum. (Jacq)                Vulnerable                Native
Epidendrum magnoliae (L.)                 Threatened                Non-native
Epipremnum aureum (Linden &Andre)         Least Concern             Non-native
Epipremmum pinnatum (L.) Engle.           Decreasing                Native
Lygodium palmatum (Bernh.) Sw.            Least Concern             Non-native
Lygodium circinnatum (Burn. F.)           Decreasing                Non-native
Lindsae brachypoda (Bak)                  Least Concern             Non-native
Nephroplepis exaltata (L.)                Near threatened           Non-native
Niphidium crassifolium (L.)               Least Concern             Non-native
Pyrrossia piloselloides (L.) M.G          Least Concern             Non-native
Philodendron hederaceum (Edward F.)       Near threatened           Non-native
Pothos scandens (L.)                      Least Concern             Non-native
Rhaphidophora decursiva (Roxb.)           Least concern             non-native
Scindapsus pictus (Norman)                Least Concern             Native
Stenochlaena palustris (Burm. F.)         Vulnerable                Native
Syngonium angustatum. Schott (F)          Vulnerable                Non-native
Vanilla planifolia. (Jack)                threatened                Non-native
Species Richness, Abundance, Dominance, and Evenness
       A total of 148 individuals of 21 species belonging to 9 families of vascular epiphytes
species was recorded in all station sites. Based on the table 4 the highest number of species
present were observed in secondary forest (Station 2). The lowest species richness were
found at farm area (station 1). Lubos et al, (2015) stated that the species richness differs in
sampling sites depending on the quality and type of the riparian vegetation and land use.
According to Sanger (2016) the strong patterns found in the species richness and composition
of epiphytes over the host tree and elevation gradients suggest that moisture, temperature and
light may be one of the major influences on epiphyte distribution in the ecosystem.
Table 4. Species richness of vascular epiphytes species along the three areas in Arabunog
       River, Barugo Leyte (2022).
       The result for relative abundance of vascular epiphytes per plot is presented at table 5.
it revealed that the plot 2 in secondary forest (station 2) had the highest relative abundance
having 73 individuals present among all other station, followed by plot 1 in Pasture area
(station 1) having 57 individuals recorded while plot 3 in farm area (station 3) has the least
relative abundance having 18 individuals were identified. A.Asplenium nidus (L) determine
the value for relative abundance since it has the highest number of individuals observed
among all stations. According to Prassana and Anuradha (2016), A. Asplenium nidus (L) are
adaptive since they are mostly found in the crowns of the forest trees, in an open forest,
rainforest, dry rain forest, and often also on roadside and village trees.
Table 5 species abundance of vascular epiphytes found along the three areas in Arabunog
       River, Barugo, Leyte (2022)
         In table 6 dominance presented. It shows that in the pasture area (station 1)has the
highest species dominance (0.3838) due to the presence of Niphidium crassifolium (L.) was
the most dominant species since it occurs in all sampling plot in the riparian area in Arabunog
River.
Table 6. Species dominance of all vascular epiphytes found along the three station site in
Arabunog River, Barugo, Leyte (2022)
        In table 7. Shows that farm area (station 3) has the highest value (0.8094) in terms of
species evenness among the three stations. The species in this station was evenly distributed
compared to the other station. And the lowest value (0.3995) in terms of evenness were
pasture area (station 1). Which were affected by the dominance of Niphidium crassifolium
(L.).
Table 7. Species evenness of all vascular epiphytes found along the three station sites in
       Arabunog River, Barugo, Leyte (2022)
Diversity Indices (‘H)
       Diversity Index for the three sampling station showed that the secondary forest
(station 2) has the highest community diversity (H’=2.215) followed by farm area (station 2)
(H’=2.091) and the least diversity value was the pasture area (station 1) (H’=1.48).
According to Stirling and Wisley (2010) species diversity is the function of species richness.
In table 6 shows the overall value for species richness, abundance, dominance, and evenness
across all the stations of Arabunog River. For species richness secondary forest (station 2)
has the highest value compared to the other station, a total of 18 species were observed in the
station. In terms of relatives abundance secondary forest (station 2) also has the highest value
with about 73 individuals has been recorded in the secondary forest alone while in the species
dominance pasture area (station 1) had the highest value among the three this may be due to
the presence
        Of species that dominated across the three station sites and in the evenness farm area
(station 3) has the highest value which means that species in the site were evenly distributed.
Table 8. Values for species richness, abundance, dominance, and evenness across the three
       areas in Arabunog, River, Barugo, Leyte (2022)
Diversity Indices      Pasture area           Secondary forest              Farm area
Richness               11                     18                            10
Abundance              57                     73                            18
Dominance              0.3838                 0.2149                        0.1491
Evenness               0.3995                 0.5087                        0.8094
Shannon-weiner (H’) 1.48                      2.215                         2.091
        In terms of height zones. Table 9 shows
Table 9. Shannon-Weiner Diversity Index per height zones across all station sites (2022)
Shannon-Weiner (H’)                   Pasture          Secondary forest              Farm
Base
Trunk
Canopy
        Table 10. Shows the overall values for species richness, abundance, dominance,
evenness, and diversity across the three station of Arabunog River, Barugo, Leyte. For
species richness a total of
Table 10. Overall values for species richness, abundance, dominance, evenness, and diversity
across the three stations of Arabunog River Barugo, Leyte (2022)
Diversity Indices                                   Overall
Richness
Abundance
Dominance
Evenness
Shannon-Weiner (‘H)
        Analysis of Variance was used to determine the significance differences across the
three station. It revealed that