A Study On Working Capital Management OF Nepalese Listed Banks
A Study On Working Capital Management OF Nepalese Listed Banks
WORKING CAPITAL
MANAGEMENT
OF
NEPALESE LISTED BANKS
By:
Ekta Shrestha
Post Graduate Campus
Faculty of Management
T.U. Registration No.: 30522-94
RECOMMENDATION
Entitled
A STUDY ON WORKING CAPITAL MANAGEMENT
OF
NEPALESE LISTED BANKS
……………………….. ………………………..
Campus Chief
2
TRIBHUVAN UNIVERSITY
POST GRADUATE CAMPUS
Biratnagar (Nepal)
Ph: 021-526327, 522204 , 528205
VIVA-VOCE SHEET
We have conducted the viva-voce examination of the thesis presented
by
Ekta Shrestha
Entitled
A STUDY ON WORKING CAPITAL MANAGEMENT
OF
NEPALESE LISTED BANKS
and found the thesis to be the original work of the student and written
according to the prescribed format. We recommend the thesis to be
accepted as partial fulfillment of the requirement for
Masters Degree In Business Studies (M.B.S.)
Viva-Voce Committee
Date: -..............................
3
DECLARATION
…………………
Ekta Shrestha
(Researcher)
T.U. Registration
no.30522-94
Campus Roll No. 113
4
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
5
ABBREVIATION USED IN THIS STUDY
FY : Fiscal Year
JVBs : Joint Venture Banks
HBL : Himalayan Bank Limited
SCBNL : Standard Chartered Bank Nepal Limited
NABIL : Nepal Arab Bank Limited
ATM : Automated Teller Machine
Pvt. : Private
Co. : Company
No. : Number
i.e. : That Is
Ltd. : Limited
C.V : Coefficient Of Variation
S. No. : Serial Number
Rs. : Rupees
% : Percentage
Amt : Amount
CA : Current assets
FA : Fixed assets
QA : Quick assets
CL : Current Liabilities
W/C : Working Capital
WCM : Working Capital Management
r : Correlation coefficient
PE : Probable error
C&B : Cash And Bank Balance
6
CHAPTER-ONE
INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background
The Kingdom of Nepal covers an area of 147,181 square kilometers, and
stretches 145-241 kilometers north to south and 850 kilometers west to east.
"Nepal is one of the least developed countries in the world with a per capita
income of less than $ 200 per annum. Geographically, Nepal is a landlocked
country sandwiched between China and India and has a very small economy
compared with that of these two neighbouring countries. Measured in terms of
the size of GDP, the Chinese or Indian economies are respectively 115 times
and 85 times larger than the Nepalese economy." 1
In context to Nepal, today, banking sector has become one of the major
sectors. However, only few Nepalese knows the significance of bank and
banking activities. People are unaware of the fact that in any plan of economic
development, banking occupies a position of strategic importance. Banking
services are extremely important in a free market economy. They generally
serve two primary purposes. First, by supplying customers with the basic
medium of exchange (cash, checking accounts, and credit cards), bank play a
key role in the way goods and services are purchased. Without these familiar
methods of payment, goods previously have to be exchanged by barter (trading
one goods for another), which is extremely time-consuming and inefficient.
Second, by accepting money deposits from the savers and then lending the
money to borrowers, banks encourage the flow of money to productive uses
and investments. This in turn allows the economy to grow. Without this flow,
savings would sit idle in someone's safe or pocket, money would not be
1
Yubaraj Khatiwada, Some Aspects of Monetary Policy in Nepal, South Asian Publishers Pvt. Limited,
NewDelhi, 1994, p. 1.
7
available to be borrowed by anyone, people would not be able to purchase cars
or houses, and businesses would not blossoms as they do now. Thus, bank
makes a better use of money and mobilizes the people savings in productive
sector. It helps in every aspect to the government. In fact, banks are the nerve
center of the economy and the barometer of economic prosperity.
"A bank is an institution whose debts (bank deposits) are widely accepted in
settlement of their people's debts to each other."2
Once these people got the banking services, they were expecting
improvement and efficiency. However, excess political and bureaucratic
interference and absence of modern managerial concept in these institutions
was hurdle in this regard. Banking service to the satisfaction of customers was
a far cry. These factors led the government to encourage joint venture in
2
R.S Sayers, Modern Banking, Oxford Clearendon Press, India, 1967, p. 3.
3
Gunanidhi Sharma, Monetary Structure of the Nepalese Economy, South Asian Publishers, New Delhi,
1987, p. 52.
8
banking sectors. The government’s policy of allowing foreign joint venture
banks to operate in Nepal is basically targeted to encourage local traditional run
commercial banks to enhance their banking capacity through competition,
efficiency, modernization via, computerization and promote customer services.
"The name commercial bank was first used to indicate that the loans extended
were short term loans to business, though loans later were extended to
consumers, governments and other non-business institution as well. In general,
the assets of commercial banks tend to be more liquid and carry less than the
assets held by other financial intermediaries."5
There were many JVBs established after 2040 B.S. The inception of
“Nepal Arab Bank Limited” 6 (renamed as Nabil Bank Limited since 1st January
2002) in 2041.03.29 (12th July 1984) as a first Joint Venture Bank proved to be
a milestone in the history of banking. Nabil Bank Limited gave a new ray of
hope to the sluggish financial sector. The second JVBs “Nepal Indosuez Bank
Limited”7 were established in 2043 B.S. after the incorporation of NIBL, a new
Joint Venture Bank under the name of “Nepal Grindlays Bank Limited” 8 was
established in 10th Magh 2043 B.S. It is the third JVBs of Nepal.” After the
establishment of NGBL, More JVBs were come into existence after the
initiation of government's policy of economic liberalization and privatizations
in 2049 B.S.”9 They are Himalayan Bank Limited (2049), Nepal SBI Bank
Limited (2050), Nepal Bangladesh Bank Limited (2051), Everest Bank Limited
(2051), Bank of Kathmandu (2052) and so on. These JVBs came into existence
to develop the economic conditions of the nation.
6
Annual Report, Nepal Arab Bank Limited.
7
Annual Report, Nepal Investment Bank Limited.
8
Annual Report, Nepal Grindlays Bank Limited.
9
Gorkhapatra, Nepal National Daily, Ashad 3rd, 2053.
10
About the bank: Nabil Bank Limited
Nabil bank was regulated with the authorized capital of Rs. 500 million,
an issued capital of Rs. 492 million and Rs. 492 million as paid up capital.
Today Nabil bank is a leader in the financial sector in Nepal. With a network
that has 19 points of representation spread across the kingdom; complimented
by a network of ATMs and now Nabilnet and NabilTele the ease of access of
accounts and information for the convenient of their customers.
They are a full service bank providing an entire range of products and
services, starting with deposit accounts in local and foreign currency, Visa and
MasterCard denominated in rupees and dollars, Visa Electron debit cards,
Personal Lending products for Auto, Home and Personal loans, Trade Finance
products, Treasury services and Corporate Financing. The main aim of the bank
is to be able to meet the entire gamut of financial requirements that is why they
pride themselves in being 'Your Bank at Your Service'.
11
At the launch period, HBL had authorized capital of Rs. 240 million,
issued capital of Rs. 120 million and paid up capital of Rs. 60 million. HBL has
always been committed to providing a quality service to its valued customers,
with a personal touch. The Bank, wherever possible, offers tailor made
facilities to its clients, based on the unique needs and requirements of different
clients. To further extend the reliable and efficient services to its valued
customers, Himalayan Bank has adopted the latest banking technology. This
has not only helped the Bank to constantly improve its service level but has
also prepared the Bank for future adaptation to new technology. The Bank
already offers unique services such as SMS Banking and Internet Banking to
customers and will be introducing more services like these in the near future.
HBL is pioneer to bring products like credit cards, ATM and tele-
banking, cheques that are hard to counterfeit and so forth. It also provides a full
range of banking products and services such as current, savings, call and term
deposit accounts, fund transfer services, safe deposit lockers, priority banking,
home banking, auto loan, home loan, foreign exchange services, personal loan,
corporate employee accounts, letters of credit, commercial lending, etc.;
catering to a wide range of customers from individuals, to mid-market local
corporate to multinationals and large public sector companies, as well as
embassies, aid agencies, airlines, hotels and government corporations.
Standard Chartered Bank Nepal Limited enjoys the status the largest
bank currently operating in Nepal .it has been in operation in Nepal since 1987
when it was initially registered as a joint-venture operation. Today the bank is
an integral part of standard Chartered group who has 75% ownership in the
company with 25% shares owned by the Nepalese public. The Bank has been
the pioneer in introducing 'customer focused' products and services in the
country and aspires to continue to be a leader in introducing new products and
highest level of service delivery. It is the first Bank in Nepal that has
implemented the Anti-Money Laundering policy and applied the 'Know Your
12
Customer' procedure on all the customer accounts.
SCBNL was regulated with the authorized capital of Rs 100 Million, an
issued capital of Rs. 50 million and Rs. 30 million paid up capital. An integral
part of the only international banking Group currently operating in Nepal, the
Bank enjoys an impeccable reputation of a leading financial institution in the
country. With 11 points of representation (7 Branches) and 9 ATMs across the
Kingdom and with over 300 local staff, Standard Chartered Bank Nepal Ltd. is
in a position to service its customers through a large domestic network. In
addition to which the global network of Standard Chartered Group gives the
Bank the unique opportunity to provide truly international banking in Nepal.
Working capital is the oil that lubricates the wheels of business. Without
adequate oil, machines grind to a halt and a business with inadequate working
capitates will do like-wise. There might not be many business firms in the
world where, besides investment in fixed assets, funds would not be needed for
carrying on day to day operations of the business. Probably, the daily cash
receipts may be adequate to meet the day to day expenses of the dealings in
some business concerns. But in most of them it is essentials that a certain
proportion of funds are kept invested in the form of different current assets like
inventories, receivables, cash and marketable securities. Liquidity and
profitability are two important and major aspects of corporate business life. No
firm can survive, if it has no liquidity. A firm may exist without making profits
but cannot without liquidity. A firm not making profits may be treated as sick
but, one having no liquidity may soon meet its downfall and ultimately die.
Working capital management has thus become a basic and broad measure of
judging the performance of a business firm.
10
J.C. Van Horne, Financial Management & Policy, Prentice Hall of India Private Limited, 1973, p. 384.
14
return if storage and spoilage costs are high. And, of course, firms must use
capital to buy assets such as inventory; this capital has a cost, and this increase
the downward drag from excessive holding of inventories (or receivables or
even cash). So there is pressure to hold the amount of working capital to the
minimum consistent with running the business without interruption.
11
P.K. Kulmany, Financial Management, Himalaya Publishing House Mumbai, 1983, p. 385.
15
management. However, Nepalese enterprises and firms are still facing the
problem of working capital management.
Banks are one of the apex entities of economy in any nation for
promoting different business activities such as trade, industry and commerce.
Hence, necessity of these institutions has been realized the most. Earlier only
two banks were in operation namely Nepal Bank Limited and Rastriya Banijya
Bank before the inception of JVBs. The government liberal policy as well as
economic growth resulted in the introduction of many banks from the private
sector. Although, JVBs are operationally more efficient, having better
performance while comparing with local banks, but they are still facing many
problems. The main locus of the statement of the problem is stressed towards
the comparative study of working capital management of the selected JVBs viz.
NABIL, HBL, and SCBNL. All the three mentioned JVBs have been
competing in the same economic environment and financial market. Similarly,
all the three banks are operating fully under computerized system to meet the
growing competition in banking system.
How far the three JVBs Nabil, HBL, SCBNL are being able to utilize its
different assets?
Has the se JVBs followed a scientific and systematic management or
not?
What factors have been taken by these JVBs in estimating the working
capital need of a company?
How far these JVBs been able to utilize the working capital for
generating adequate profitability?
How far have JVBs been able to convert the mobilized resources into
investment?
Is there proper investment in each types of working capital in these
JVBs?
Is the positive composition between current assets and current liability?
Which of the current assets are more problematic for these JVBs?
16
What type of opportunities and threats these bank faces?
What are the major strength and weakness of these banks?
Based on the above questions, which bank has faced more financial risk?
The selection of the topic has been made with a view to evaluating,
analyzing and examining the working capital management of the Himalayan
Bank Limited, Standard Chartered Bank Nepal Limited and Nabil Bank
Limited in Nepal. It is true that these JVBs have a high capital employment
ratio but unfortunately due to certain causes its development has not met the
desired needs of the country. Therefore, it is assumed that the leading factor
which has been obstructions and preventing the growth of these JVBs is mainly
improper and inefficient management of working capital. If the working capital
funds could have been managed properly, the JVBs would have been put back
upon a better financial footing.
17
1.7 Objectives of the Study
The primary objectives of the study is to identify the existing problems
of the working capital management of selected different joint venture banks
more over, following are the specific objectives of the study:
To analyze the current assets and current liabilities of the selected banks
understudy during the seven years period of 1998/1999 to 2004/2005.
To evaluate and analyze the net profit of the selected joint venture banks.
To examine the working capital with the help of trend analysis.
To identify various working capital aspects of the selected banks.
To provide constructive solutions for solving working capital
management problems.
a) To the Shareholders:
Shareholders are the true owners of the company. As they are taking a
major risk by investing their large capital, so they deserve to get each and every
informations they seek for regarding the firm. This study will be useful to them
for acquiring the answers to the following questions:
b) To the Management:
This study will be helpful to go deeply into the various matters as to why
the performance of their bank is better or worse than other joint venture banks.
The management will be able to find out the loose areas and gaps, which can be
corrected in near future.
18
c) To the Policy-Makers:
d) To the Reader:
It will also provide a helping hand to those who are interested to study or
conduct research about working capital management.
19
Chapter-1 Introduction
Chapter-2 Review of Literature
Chapter-3 Research Methodology
Chapter-4 Presentation and Analysis of Data
Chapter-5 Summary, Conclusion and Recommendation
The contents of each of the chapter of this study are briefly mentioned
here:
The first chapter is the introductory, which deals with background, focus
of the study, statement of the problems, research questions, hypothesis of the
study, objectives of the study, need and significance of the study, limitation of
the study and organization of the study.
The fourth chapter deals with the empirical analysis of the study. It deals
in presentation and major findings of the study of working capital management.
The fifth and final chapter is devoted to summary of the four earlier
chapters. This chapter tries to fetch out a conclusions of the study and attempts
to offer various suggestions and recommendations for the improvement of the
future performance of the three JVBs under review.
Finally bibliography and appendices have also been included in the last
part of the study.
20
CHAPTER-TWO
REVIEW OF LITERATURE
12
W.H.Laugh, Business Finance, Ronald Press, New York, 1917, p. 355.
21
of many leading companies today-including American Standard, Campbell
Soup, General Electric, Quaker Oats, and Whirlpool-is zero working capital.
Proponents of the zero working capital concept claims that a movement toward
this goal not only generates cash but also speeds up production and helps
businesses make more timely deliveries and operate more efficiently. The
concept has its own definition of regarding working capital: Inventories +
Receivables - Payables. The rationale here is (1) that inventories and
receivables are the keys to making sales, but (2) that inventories can be
financed by suppliers through accounts payable.
Working capital, thus, has a volatile nature. This nature present some
problems and contents in financing working capital need. The volatile nature of
working capital refers to the change in total current assets. Thus, the nature of
working capital is not static; it is changeable as per transactions of goods.
In fact, there are two concepts of working capital: gross concept and net
concept which is highlighted below:
A. Gross Concept
"The term working capital refers to the gross working capital and it represents
the amount of funds invested in total current assets; thus the gross working
capital is the capital invested in total current assets of an enterprise".13
13
R.K Sharma and S.K.Gupta, Management Accountancy Principles And Practices, 7th edition 1996, p. 21.
23
a) Cash in hand
b) Cash at bank
c) Bills receivable
d) Debtors
e) Marketable securities
f) Prepaid Expenses or paid in advance
g) Accrued or Outstanding income
h) Short term loan and advances
i) Short term investment
j) Inventories
Raw materials
Finished goods
Work in progress
Supplies
B. Net Concept
The net working capital concept focus attention on two aspects which
are listed below-
The need for the net concept arises due to the fact that the gross concept
fails to consider current liabilities. Current liabilities are those liabilities which
are intended to be paid in ordinary course of business within a short period of
normally one accounting year. It includes:
a) Sundry creditors
b) Bills payables
c) Notes payables
d) Account payables
e) Bank overdraft
f) Short term loan
g) Provision for taxation
14
L.J.Gitman, Principles of Managerial Finance, 1976, p. 150.
24
h) Outstanding expenses
i) Advance income
j) Accrued income
k) Accrued interest on loan and debentures
l) Long term loan to mature within a year
Working capital has two concepts- the total of current assets (gross
concept) and the excess of current assets over current liabilities (net concepts).
Both these concepts of working capital have their own significance. "If the
objective is to measure the size and extent to which current assets are being
used, 'gross concept' is useful; whereas in evaluating the liquidity position of an
undertaking 'net concept' becomes pertinent and preferable".15
15
R.K.Mishra and S.Ravishanker, Current Perspectives in Public Enterprise Management, Ajanta
Publication, New Delhi, 1985, p. 316.
25
particularly cash, receivables and inventory which are needed during the more
active business season of the year. It is temporarily invested in current asset and
its main features are:
It is not always gainfully utilized, though it may change from one asset to
another as fixed working capital does.
26
There are many aspects of working capital management which make it
an important function of the financial manager among them some are
mentioned below:
There are different sources of finance, for each source has a different
cost of capital. It should be kept in mind that the cost of capital is in inverse
proportion to risk.
28
2.1.1.7 Determinants of Working Capital
The firm should maintain a sound working capital position. It should
have adequate capital to run its business operations. Both excessive as well as
inadequate working capital positions are dangerous from the firm's point of
view. Excessive working capital means idle fund which earns no profit for the
firm. Paucity of working capital not only impairs firm's profitability but also
results in production interruptions and inefficiencies.
a) Manufacturing Cycle
b) Nature and Size of Business
c) Business Cycle Fluctuations
d) Credit Policy
e) Growth and Expansion Activities
f) Availability of Credit
g) Price Level Change
h) Technological Development
i) Profit Level
j) Level of Tax
k) Transportation and Communication Facilities
a) It makes difficult for the firm to undertake profitable projects for non
availability of the working capital funds and thus results in stagnates of
growth.
b) The rate of return on investment slumps because fixed assets cannot be
efficiently utilized for the lack of working capital funds.
c) It makes impossible to utilize production facilities fully due to
unavailability of buying sufficient raw materials.
d) It becomes difficult to implement operating plans and achieve the firm's
profit target.
e) Paucity of working capital funds renders the firm unable to avail
attractive credit opportunities.
f) It may not be able to make regular repair and maintenance of plant,
machineries and tools to boost up production and reduce the unit cost of
production.
g) The firm may loose its reputation when it is not in a position to honour
its short term obligations. As a result, the firm faces tight credit terms.
31
Structural health of the various components of the working capital
should be considered. It is very vital to have a sound structural relationship
among all the components which includes in the working capital from the view-
point of liquidity.
32
iii. Circulation
iv. Liquidity
a) Matching Approach
Under this approach, the firm can adopt a financing approach which
involves the matching of expected life of assets with the expected life of the
source of funds raised to finance assets. In simple sense, the firm finances its
short term needs with short term funds and long term needs with long term
funds.
33
The concept of matching approach can be made clear with the figure
demonstrated below:
Short
Term
Temporary Current Assets Financing
Amount
Long
Permanent Current Assets Term
Financing
Fixed Assets
time Time
In the above figure, X-axis denotes time and Y-axis denotes amount. The
figure clearly shows that under the matching approach only the short term
variation shown at the top will be financed with a short term debt. Fixed assets
would be financed with long term sources of funds.
b) Conservative Approach
34
The concept of conservation approach can be made clear with the figure
demonstrated below:
Short
Temporary Current Assets Term
Financing
Long
Permanent Current Assets Term
Amount
Financing
Fixed Assets
time Time
In the above figure, X-axis denotes time and Y-axis denotes amount. The
figure clearly shows that under conservative approach of financing long term
funds are used to finance fixed assets permanent current assets and a part of
temporary current assets.
c) Aggressive Approach
Under this approach, the firm finances a part of its permanent current
assets with short- term sources of funds. Some extremely aggressive concerns
may even finance a part of their fixed assets with short term sources of funds.
Thus, when the firm uses more short term financing, it is assumed to follow
aggressive approach.
35
The concept of aggressive can be made clear with the figure
demonstrated below:
Short
Temporary Current Assets Term
Financing
Long
Permanent Current Assets Term
Amount
Financing
Fixed Assets
time Time
In the above figure, X-axis denotes time and Y-axis denotes amount. The
figure clearly shows that under aggressive approach a major part of the total
current assets and a part of long term investment is also financed short term
sources.
Thus, from the above study, we can make the following generalization:
36
37
2.1.2 Cash Management
The financial strength of companies is critical in an uncertain
environment. Cash serves as insurance against a declining economy, and it also
provides opportunities to firms. It is said that approximately 1.5 percent of the
average industrial firm's assets are held in the form of cash, which is defined as
the total of bank demand deposits plus currency. Many overleveraged
companies are accumulating cash to pay off their debts. However, some firms
may have too much cash, thus making them vulnerable to corporate raiding-a
trend that we have seen a lot of lately.
Cash is regarded as both the beginning and the end of the working
capital cycle-cash, inventories, receivables and cash. In fact, it is considered as
the most important current assets for the operations of the business. Cash is the
money which the firm can disburse immediately without any restriction. The
term cash includes coins, currency and cheques held by the firm, and balances
in its bank accounts. Cash is the basic input needed to keep the business
running on a continuous basis; it is also the ultimate output expected to be
realized by selling the service or product manufactured by the firm. Managing
it efficiently and effectively is the key determinant of appropriate working
capital management. Thus, a major function of the financial manager is to
maintain a sound cash position.
"Cash, like the blood stream in the human body, gives vitality and strength to a
business enterprise. The steady and healthy circulation of cash throughout the
entire business operation is the basis of business solvency." 16
"It is the cash which keeps a business going. Hence, every enterprise has to
hold necessary cash for its existence." 17
16
B.B.Havard and M.Upton, Introduction to Business Finance, McGraw Hill Book Co., New York, 1953,
p. 188.
17
J.M.Keynes, The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money, Harcourt Brac., New York,
1936, p.170.
38
"Holding of cash balance has an implicit cost in the form of its opportunity
cost."18
Cash balances are very vital in operating any kind of business activities.
The principal motive for holding cash is to enable the firm to conduct its
ordinary business-making purchases and sales. The firm requires cash primarily
to make payments for purchase, operating expenses, wages, dividends, taxes,
etc. Thus, the transactions motive mainly refers to holding cash to meet
18
K. Brandt, Louis, Analysis for Financial Management, Prentice Hall Inc, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey,
1971, p. 225.
39
anticipated payments whose timing is not perfectly matched with cash receipts.
40
The Precautionary Motive
Cash Planning
Cash plans are very vital in developing the overall operating plans of the
firm. Cash planning is a technique to plan for and control the use of cash. It
protects the financial condition of the firm by developing a projected cash
41
statement from a forecast of expected cash inflows and outflows for a given
period. The forecasts may be based on the present or the anticipated future
operations. Cash planning may be done on daily, weekly or monthly basis
depending upon the size of the firm and philosophy of management.
Once the cash budget has been prepared and appropriate net cash flow
established, the financial manager should ensure that a significant deviation
between projected cash flows and actual cash flows does not exist. In order to
achieve this target, cash management efficiency will have to be improved
through the proper control of cash collection and disbursement. The twin
objectives in managing the cash flows should be to accelerate cash collections
as much as possible and to decelerate or delay cash disbursements as much as
possible.
19
D.M.Joy, Introduction to Financial Management, Irvin, Hnne Wood, 1977, p. 456
43
The receivables arising out of the credit includes three characteristics
which are discussed below-
Expansion of Sales
Increase in Profits
It is a known fact that the profit level will increase with the increase in
sales level. This is ordinarily so because the marginal contribution-affected by
an increase in sales is higher than the additional costs associated with such an
increase.
Maintaining Liquidity
The objective of receivables management is, "to promote sales and profit
until that point is reached where the return on investment in further funding of
receivables is less than the cost of funds raised to finance that additional credit
(i.e., cost of capital)." 20
20
S.E.Bolten, Managerial Finance, Houghton Mittin Co., Boston, 1976, p. 446.
45
capital employed by a firm. Firms generally maintain some inventory in stock
to achieve a desired level of sale. The major goal of inventory management is
to determine and maintain the optimum level of inventory management. Thus
purchasing economically, using appropriately and preserving carefully is the
main objective of inventory management. In other words, optimum investment
in inventory is the essence of inventory management.
How many units of each inventory item should the firm hold in stock?
How many units should be ordered (or produced) at a given time?
At what point should inventory be ordered (or purchased)?
"The proper management and control of inventory not only solves the acute
problems of liquidity but also increases annual profits and causes substantial
reduction in the working capital of a firm". 21
21
L.R.Howard, Working Capital - Its Management and Control, Mac Donald and Vent Ltd., London,
1971, p. 92.
46
D.Scholl Lawrence and W.Haley Charles rightly remark, "Managing the level
of investment in inventory is like maintaining the level of water in a bath-tub
with an open drain. The water is flowing out continuously. If water is let in too
slowly, the tub is soon empty. If water is let in too fast, the tub overflows. Like
the water in the tub, the particular items of inventories keep changing, but the
level may stay the same. The basic financial problems are to determine the
proper level of investment in inventories and to decide how much inventory
must be acquired during each period to maintain that level”. 22
22
D. Scholl Lawrence and W. Haley Charles, Introduction to Financial Management, McGraw-Hill,
Inc., New York, 1963, p. 500.
47
2.1.4.3 Motive to Hold Inventories
There are generally three motives of holding inventories which are
discussed below-
48
2.2.1 Review of Books
This section includes review of various books and working capital
management which has been studied for the purpose of making the research
easier.
Sarita and Bhuvan Dahal have written a book named "A Handbook to
Banking" which gives general overview of banking sector. It has been designed
for students, bankers, businessman and others as an introductory course. It
includes introduction of banking, its gradual development in Nepal as a
separate non-manufacturing sector, its current operation and position, financial
and managerial strength and weakness of banking business in context to Nepal.
"The term working capital originated with the old Yankee peddles, who
would load up his wagon with goods and then go off on his route to peddle his
wares. The merchant was called working capital because it was what he
actually sold, or “turned over,” to produce his profits. The wagon and horse
were his fixed assets. He generally owned the horse and wagon, so they were
financed with “equity” capital, but he borrowed the funds to buy the
merchandise. These borrowings were called working capital loans, and they
had to be repaid after each trip to demonstrate to the bank that the credit was
sound. If the peddler was able to repay the loan, then the bank would make
another loan, and banks that followed this procedure were said to be employing
Sound Banking Practices”.23
23
J.Fred Weston and E.F.Brigham, Essentials of Managerial Finance, The Dryden Press, New York,
1975, p. 345.
24
J.C.Van Horne, Financial Management and Policy, Prentice hall of India (P) Ltd., New Delhi, 1973, p.
384.
49
"Working capital has two concepts-the total of current assets (gross concept)
and the excess of current assets over current liabilities (net concept).Both these
concepts of working capital have their own significance. If the objective is to
measure the size and extent to which current assets are being used, 'gross
concept' is useful; whereas in evaluating the liquidity position of an
undertaking, 'net concept' becomes pertinent and preferable".25
We can also get much informative knowledge from the book written by
S.C. Bardia named "Working Capital Management" which was quite
resourceful for this study and for others who would conduct the research study
on working capital management. He has described various aspects of working
capital management into seven chapters. The first chapter introduces the
subject. The second chapter focuses on the working capital trends. The third,
fourth and fifth chapters, respectively provides a detailed study of various
components of the working capital, viz., inventory, receivables and cash. The
sixth chapter examines in detail the sources of financing the third, fourth and
fifth chapters respectively. It also analyses the funds flow statement. The last
chapter summarizes the findings of the study and offers suitable suggestions for
the improvement of efficiency and effectiveness of management of the working
capital.
25
R.K.Mishra, and S.Ravishanker, Current Perspectives in Public Enterprise Management, Ajanta
Publication, New Delhi, 1985, p. 316.
50
e) It has showed the lack of farsighted liquidity adjustment strategy in must
of the PEs.
f) Large blocking of capital inventories and low capacity utilization. All
these were due to inefficient management of W/C in those public
enterprises."26
26
M.K.Shrestha, Working Capital Management in Selected Public Enterprises, A Pad Management
Journal, 1992.
27
A.K.Mukherjee, Management of Working Capital, Vohra Pub. And Distributors, Allahabad, 1988, p. 9.
51
a) "Inventory occupies a large portion in working capital in NTDC.
b) The turnover of inventory, receivable and current assets of NTDC were
lower than average of PEs selected.
c) Insufficient working capital has led to sell its product at a rate far below
than its BEP as revealed by BEP analysis.
d) A close liaison should be maintained between the production units of
different states and the central materials management department.
e) The growth of working capital and inventory is correlated negatively as
disclosed from the overall adequacy of inventory in NTDC.
f) Receivable as compared to sales volume has a rapid growth."28
Dr. Madhav Bahadur Shrestha has also done research on working capital
management of Cement Industry in Nepal with special reference to Udaypur
Cement Industry Limited (UCIL) and Hetauda Cement Industry Limited
(HCIL). The study covers the period 1993/94 to 2000/01.
Some of the major outcomes of the research study conducted by him are
highlighted below-
28
Dr.K.Acharya, The Management of Working Capital Management in PEs of Nepal with Special
Reference to Tea Industry, University of Allahabad, 1985.
29
J.N.Sapkota, A Study on Management in Himal Cement Company Limited , unpublished dissertation,
T.U.
52
e) Inefficient management of W/C has led to gradual loss year after year in
HCIL and UCIL."30
30
M.B.Shrestha, Working Capital Management of Cement Company in Nepal with special Reference
Udaypur Cement Industry Ltd. And Hetauda Cement Industry Ltd., unpublished thesis submitted in
MDS University, Ajmer, Rajasthan, 2004.
53
CHAPTER THREE
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
3.1 Introduction
In the modern world Research has become an indispensable in all
spheres of human activity. Research is essentially a systematic inquiry seeking
facts through objectives verifiable methods in order to discover the relationship
among them and to deduce from them broad principles or laws. It is really a
method of critically thinking by defining and redefining problems, formulating
hypothesis or suggested solution, collecting, organizing and evaluating data,
making deductions and making conclusions to determine whether they fit the
formulated hypothesis.
"A systematic research study needs to follow proper methodology to active the
pre-mentioned objective. Research methodology is a sequential procedure and
method to be adopted in a systematic study". 32
31
C.R. Kothari, Research Methodology Methods and Techniques, Villey Eastery Limited New Delhi, 1989,
p. 38.
32
C.R.Kothari, Quantitative Techniques, Vikash Publishing House Pvt. LTd., New Delhi, 1994, p. 19.
54
variance. It is essential for the whole study and helps in finding out deficiency
in expectation of the starting of work. The research design is the outline of a
plan to test the hypothesis and should include all the procedures that follow. It
is said that the formidable problem that follows in task of defining the
research is the preparation of design of the research project, popularly
known as research design. Basically, the research design has two purposes.
The first purpose is to answer the research question or test the research
hypothesis. The second purpose of research design is to control variance.
"A research design is the arrangement of conditions for collection and analysis
of data in a manner that aims to combine relevance to the research purpose with
economy in procedure".33
Thus, a research design is a plan for the collection and analysis of data.
Research design is the main part of a thesis or any research work. It presents a
series of guide posts to enable the researcher to progress in the right direction in
order to achieve the goal. This study tries to evaluate the working capital
management of the selected JVBs banks. To accomplish the objectives it has
adopted the descriptive cum analytical type of research design. It tries to
describe and analyze all these facts that have been collected for the purpose of
the study. Some statistical and accounting tools have also been applied to
examine the facts and descriptive techniques have been adopted to evaluate the
structure of selected nature of operations.
Thus, in statistics population means whole and the sample means the part
of the whole. This study is directly concerned in the population and treated in
the population and sampling data. In Nepal 115 companies are listed in NSE
whose stocks are traded in stock market. Out of 115 listed companies, the three
JVBs are HBL, NABIL & SCBNL have been selected as samples for the study.
33
Claire Selltiz Others, Research Methods in Social Science, 1962, as quoted in C.R. Kothari,
Quantitative Techniques, Vikash Publishing house Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi, p. 22.
55
The financial statements of the total number of commercial bank in Nepal from
the date of their establishment till today constitute the population for the
present study.
56
3.4 Sources of Data
Analysis of data means to study the tabulated material in order to
determine inherent facts or meanings. It involves breaking down the existing
complex factors in to simpler parts and putting them together in new
arrangements for interpretation. A plan of analysis should be prepared in
advance before the actual collection of the material. A preliminary analysis
plan for investigation process requires detailed information about similarities,
differences, trends, outstanding factors etc.
This research would include both Primary and Secondary data. Data
collected by the researcher or through agent for the first time from related field
and possessing original character are known as primary data. Primary data are
also called field source. On the other hand, data collected by some one else,
used already and are made available to others in the form of published statistics
are known as secondary data. Once primary data have been used, it loses its
primary characteristics and becomes secondary. The difference between
primary and secondary data is a matter of relativity. Primary data are generally
used in those cases where the secondary data do not provide an adequate basis
for analysis. In certain cases both data may be employed.
Firstly, the financial statements i.e. Profit and Loss Account and Balance
Sheet of the three JVBs were downloaded from the Nepal Stock Exchange to
the computer disk and printed later on. Lastly, financial statement published by
the banks from time to time, Auditor General's Reports, some previous study
made regarding in this field, newspaper, journals, booklets and articles related
to this study, Publications of Ministry of Finance, Ministry of Industry, Central
Bureau of Statistics, National Planning Commission and similar reports
submitted to various meeting, seminar and official accounting were collected.
57
3.6 Data Analysis Tools
There are different analytical tools and technique used in these research
studies which are highlighted below:
3.6.2 Average
The term "average" is referred as a measure of central tendency. The
average is the measures, which condense a huge data in to a single value, which
represents the entire data and generally located at the central part. There are
different types of averages but only Arithmetic Mean is used for this research
work. Arithmetic Mean is most popular and frequently used measure of central
tendency. It is the ratio of the sum of all observations to the number of
observations. It is calculated from ungrouped data and frequency distributions.
34
Webster's New Collegiate Dictionary, 8th Edition, Springfield, Mass: G & C, Merrian, 1975, p. 958.
35
Robert N. Anthony, Management Accounting, Third Edition, Homewood, Illinois, 1964, p. 297.
58
by:
X1 X 2 .. Xn x
X = =
n n
where,
x = the sum of the observations and
n = no. of years
X X 2
Thus, index numbers are indicators to measure the relative change in the
value of the variable in any given period called the "current period" with
respect to its values in some fixed period called "base period". Index numbers
are also called economic barometer because each phenomenon like import,
export, price, quantity at two periods are compared by using Index numbers.
The index number of current period is compared by assuming the value at base
period (i.e. free from natural calamities like flood, draught, war, strike etc) and
is not varying distant with the current year.
59
3.6.5 Correlation Analysis
Correlation is the measure of relationship between two or more
characteristics of a population or a sample. It simply measures the changes
between the phenomenon. If two quantities vary in a related manner so that a
movement- an increase or decrease on one tends to accompanied by a
movement in the same or opposite direction in the other, they are called
correlated. Correlation analysis is one of the most widely used tools in practical
cases.
“Correlation is the statistical tool that we can use to describe the degree to
which one variable is linearly related to another”. 37
36
Sunity Shrestha and Dhruba Prasad, Statistical Method in Management, Taleju Prakashan, Kathmandu, 2nd
Edition, 2057, p. 315.
37
Levin Richard and David Rubin, Statistics for Management, Prentice Hall of India, Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi,
1991, p. 505.
60
C.V. 100%
X
1 r2
P.E. .6745
N
61
CHAPTER-FOUR
PRESENTATION AND ANALYSIS OF DATA
4.1 Introduction
The chapter entitled "Presentation and Analysis of Data" is a crucial
chapter and has been organized to present the result and analyze them
accordingly. The basic objective of this study is to observe and comparatively
analyze the working capital position of the three JVBs named as Nepal Arab
Bank Limited, Himalayan Bank Limited and Standard Chartered Bank Nepal
Limited. The presentation and analysis of data in this study have been done to
evaluate the working capital position through the financial data available in the
website of Nepal Stock.com.
"The ratio analysis provides guides and clues especially in spotting trends
towards better or poorer performance, and in finding out significant deviation
from any average or relatively applicable standard." 38
38
Erich A. Helfert, Techniques of Financial Analysis, Homewood, Illinois, 1957, p.57.
62
of time), and its performance relative to that of competitor banks (cross-
sectional analysis of ratios across a group of firms).
In this study, only those ratios have been covered which is related
to working capital management of the selected banks.
The cash and bank balance to current assets ratio is also one measure of
liquidity. The cash and bank balance is the most liquid form of the current
assets. It provides liquidity to the firm and is a major and important resource of
working capital. Only this item can meet the current bills and current
obligations of the firm when they are due. In fact, it plays a crucial role to
achieve efficient and effective management of working capital in all types of
business organization whether manufacturing or non-manufacturing
organization. The ratio shows the percentage of readily available fund within
the banks over total current assets. It helps in examining the cash and bank
balance out of bank's current assets. It gives the bank management the clear
idea of cash and bank balance in its current assets account. Thus, this ratio
measures the proportion of cash and bank balance held by NABIL, HBL and
SCBNL out of its total current assets. It can be calculated as-
Cash and Bank Balance
Cash and Bank Balance to Current Assets =
Current Assets
The low ratio indicates sound management and high ratio indicates weak
management policy.
63
The following table shows the ratio of cash & bank balance to current
assets of NABIL, HBL and SCBNL from F/Y 2000/01 to F/Y 2006/2007.
Table No.: 1
(Rs. In Million)
Standard Chartered Bank Nepal
Nabil Bank Limited Himalayan Bank Ltd.
Ltd.
1
2 3 2/3=4 5 6 5/6=7 8 9 8/9=10
Year
Cash & CA Ratio Cash & CA Ratio Cash & CA Ratio
Bank (%) Bank (%) Bank (%)
Balance Balance Balance
2000/2001 630.94 11961.95 5.27 802.21 10988.05 7.30 826.15 12862.22 6.42
2001/2002 910.07 14788.91 6.15 901.91 15605.42 5.78 1020.46 16650.32 6.13
2002/2003 812.91 13161.68 6.18 1435.17 17359.84 8.27 961.05 19224.18 5.00
2003/2004 1051.82 13312.39 7.90 1264.67 14165.33 8.93 825.23 18330.82 4.50
2004/2005 1144.77 13868.31 8.25 1979.21 16881.45 11.72 1512.3 20797.6 7.27
2005/2006 970.49 14243.92 6.81 2001.18 18657.35 10.73 2023.16 23225.83 8.71
2006/2007 559.38 14969.38 3.74 2014.47 21326.26 9.45 1111.12 21447.16 5.18
Total 6080.38 96306.54 44.30 10398.82 114983.7 62.18 8279.47 132538.13 43.21
Avg.(mean) 868.63 13758.08 6.33 1485.55 16426.24 8.88 1182.78 18934.02 6.17
s.d. 1.43 1.86 1.36
c.v. 22.59 20.95 22.04
Source: Comparative Balance Sheet and Profit And Loss Account of
NABIL, HBL and SCBNL as given in WWW. Nepal Stock.com
The table highlights the proportion of cash and bank balance to current
assets of three JVBs from 2000/2001 to 2006/07. The proportion of cash and
bank balance to current assets for 7 successive years of NABIL is 5.27%,
6.15%, 6.18%, 7.90%, 8.25%, 6.81% and 3.74% respectively whereas of HBL
is 7.30%, 5.78%, 8.27%, 8.93%, 11.72%, 10.72% and 9.45% respectively and
that of SCBNL is 6.42%, 6.13%, 5.00%, 4.50%, 7.27%, 8.71% and 5.18%
respectively. The proportion of cash and bank balance to current assets is
highest in the year 2004/2005 i.e. 8.25% and lowest in the year 2004/2005 i.e.
3.74% for NABIL, highest in the year 2004/2005 i.e. 11.72% and lowest in the
year 2003/2004 i.e. 5.78% for HBL and highest in the year 2005/2006 i.e.
8.71% and lowest in the year 2003/2004 i.e. 4.50% for SCBNL. The average
proportion of cash and bank balance to current assets of NABIL, HBL and
SCBNL are 6.33%, 8.88% and 6.17% respectively. The average proportion of
HBL i.e. .8.88% is greater in comparision to the three JVBs. Therefore liquidity
position on the basis of cash and bank balance to current assets ratio maintained
by HBL is better among the three JVBs. Higher proportion of cash and bank
balance to current assets indicates higher amount of cash and bank balance
maintained by the bank which shows that the bank has been able to maintained
enough liquidity to fulfill its current obligations but the bank should keep in
64
consideration that enough cash and bank balance results in idle money which
incurs opportunity cost. Hence from the utilization perspective, this may not be
desirable solution.
The C.V. of cash and bank balance to current assets for 7 successive
years of NABIL is 22.59% whereas of HBL is 20.95% and that of SCBNL is
22.04%. Thus, as regard to the consistency maintained by the three JVBs, HBL
is more consistent or uniform among the three JVBs because the C.V. of HBL
(i.e. 20.95%) is lower than that of the NABIL and SCBNL. In other words,
there is more fluctuation in cash and bank balance to current assets ratio of
NABIL and SCBNL than the HBL.
The low ratio indicates the decrease in risk and profitability and the high
ratio indicates the increase in the working capital.
65
The following table shows the ratio of cash & bank balance to total
assets of NABIL, HBL and SCBNL from F/Y 2000/2001 to F/Y 2006/2007.
Table No.: 2
(Rs. In Million)
Standard Chartered Bank Nepal
Nabil Bank Limited Himalayan Bank Ltd.
Ltd.
1
2 3 2/3=4 5 6 5/6=7 8 9 8/9=10
Year
Cash & TA Ratio Cash & TA Ratio Cash & TA Ratio
Bank (%) Bank (%) Bank (%)
Balance Balance Balance
2000/2001 630.94 12184.05 5.18 802.21 11244.10 7.13 826.15 13016.98 6.35
2001/2002 910.07 15024.20 6.06 901.91 15863.74 5.68 1020.46 16832.23 6.06
2002/2003 812.91 17770.65 4.57 1435.17 19500.57 7.36 961.05 19357.18 4.96
2003/2004 1051.82 17629.25 5.97 1264.67 21315.85 5.93 825.23 18443.10 4.47
2004/2005 1144.77 16562.62 6.91 1979.21 24197.97 8.18 1512.30 21000.50 7.20
2005/2006 970.49 16745.49 5.80 2001.18 25729.79 7.78 2023.16 23642.06 8.56
2006/2007 559.38 17186.33 3.25 2014.47 28871.34 6.98 1111.12 21893.58 5.08
Total 6080.38 113102.59 37.74 10398.82 146723.36 49.04 8279.47 134185.63 42.68
Avg.(mean) 868.63 16157.51 5.39 1485.55 20960.48 7.01 1182.78 19169.38 6.10
s.d. 1.11 .85 1.33
c.v. 20.59 12.12 21.80
Source: Comparative Balance Sheet and Profit And Loss Account of
NABIL, HBL and SCBNL as given in WWW. Nepal Stock.com
The above table highlights the proportion of cash and bank balance to
total assets of three JVBs from 2000/2001 to 2006/07. The proportion of cash
and bank balance to total assets for 7 successive years of NABIL is 5.18%,
6.06%, 4.57%, 5.97%, 6.91%, 5.80% and 3.25% respectively whereas of HBL
is 7.13%, 5.68%, 7.36%, 5.93%, 8.18%, 7.78% and 6.98% respectively and that
of SCBNL is 6.35%, 6.06%, 4.96%, 4.47%, 7.20%, 8.56% and 5.08%
respectively. The proportion of cash and bank balance to total assets is highest
in the year 2004/2005 i.e. 6.91% and lowest in the year 2006/2007 i.e. 3.25%
for NABIL, highest in the year 2004/2005 i.e. 8.18% and lowest in the year
2001/2002 i.e. 5.68% for HBL and highest in the year 2005/2006 i.e. 8.56%
and lowest in the year 2003/2004 i.e. 4.47% for SCBNL. The average
proportion of cash and bank balance to total assets of NABIL, HBL and
SCBNL are 5.39%, 7.01% and 6.10% respectively. The average proportion of
HBL i.e. 7.01% is greater in comparision to the three JVBs. Therefore liquidity
position on the basis of cash and bank balance to total assets ratio maintained
by HBL is better among the three JVBs. Higher ratio indicates higher amount
of cash and bank balance maintained by the bank which shows that the bank
has been able to maintained enough liquidity to fulfill its current obligations but
66
the bank should keep in consideration that enough cash and bank balance
results in idle money which incurs opportunity cost. Hence from the utilization
perspective, this may not be desirable solution.
The C.V. of cash and bank balance to total assets for 7 successive years
of NABIL is 20.59% whereas of HBL is 12.12% and that of SCBNL is 21.80%.
Thus, as regard to the consistency maintained by the three JVBs, HBL is more
consistent or uniform among the three JVBs because the C.V. of HBL (i.e.
12.12%) is lower than that of the NABIL and SCBNL. In other words, there is
more fluctuation in cash and bank balance to total assets of NABIL and
SCBNL than the HBL.
Higher the ratio, higher the risk and profitability and lower the
ratio, lower the risk and profitability.
67
The following table shows the ratio of current assets to total assets of
NABIL, HBL and SCBNL from F/Y 2000/2001 to F/Y 2006/2007.
Table No.: 3
(Rs. In Million)
Standard Chartered Bank Nepal
Nabil Bank Limited Himalayan Bank Ltd.
Ltd.
1
2 3 2/3=4 5 6 5/6=7 8 9 8/9=10
Year
CA TA Ratio CA TA Ratio CA TA Ratio
(%) (%) (%)
2000/2001 11961.95 12184.05 98.18 10988.05 11244.10 97.72 12862.22 13016.98 98.81
2001/2002 14788.91 15024.20 98.43 15605.42 15863.74 98.37 16650.32 16832.23 98.92
2002/2003 13161.68 17770.65 74.06 17359.84 19500.57 89.02 19224.18 19357.18 99.31
2003/2004 13312.39 17629.25 75.51 14165.33 21315.85 66.45 18330.82 18443.10 99.39
2004/2005 13868.31 16562.62 83.73 16881.45 24197.97 69.76 20797.60 21000.50 99.03
2005/2006 14243.92 16745.49 85.06 18657.35 25729.79 72.51 23225.83 23642.06 98.24
2006/2007 14969.38 17186.33 87.10 21326.26 28871.34 73.87 21447.16 21893.58 97.96
Total 96306.54 113102.59 602.08 114983.7 146723.36 567.71 132538.13 134185.63 691.67
Avg.(mean) 13758.08 16157.51 86.01 16426.2429 20960.48 82.31 18934.02 19169.38 98.81
s.d. 8.97 12.57 0.49
c.v. 10.43 15.27 0.50
Source: Comparative Balance Sheet and Profit And Loss Account of
NABIL, HBL and SCBNL as given in WWW. Nepal Stock.com
The above table highlights the proportion of current assets to total assets
of three JVBs from 2000/01 to 2006/07. The proportion of current assets to
total assets for 7 successive years of NABIL is 98.18%, 98.43%, 74.06%,
75.51%, 83.73%, 85.06% and 87.10% respectively whereas of HBL is 97.72%,
98.37%, 89.02%, 66.45%, 69.76%, 72.51% and 73.87% respectively and that
of SCBNL is 98.81%, 98.92%, 99.31%, 99.39%, 99.03%, 98.24% and 97.96%
respectively. The proportion of current assets to total assets is highest in the
year 2001/2002 i.e. 98.43% and lowest in the year 2002/2003 i.e. 74.06% for
NABIL, highest in the year 2001/2002 i.e. 98.375 and lowest in the year
2003/2004 i.e. 66.45% for HBL and highest in the year 2003/2004 i.e. 99.39%
and lowest in the year 2006/2007 i.e. 97.96% for SCBNL. The average
proportion of current assets to total assets of NABIL, HBL and SCBNL are
86.01%, 82.31%, and 98.81% respectively. The average proportion of current
assets to total assets of SCBNL is greater in comparision to the three JVBs.
Therefore, on the basis of current assets to total assets ratio maintained by
SCBNL, it can be concluded that SCBNL has been in both profitable and
riskier position during the seven years study period among the three JVBs.
However, SCBNL should concentrate on its current assets management
because high level of current assets denotes good liquidity position but it
adversely affects the profitability of the bank because idle money earns
68
nothing.
It should be kept in mind that for operating efficiently and effectively for
any firm, it requires both reasonable amount of current assets and fixed assets.
It is one of the vital aspects of the firm and plays a key role for the success or
failure of the firm. The ratio of current assets to fixed assets indicates the
relationship between current assets and fixed assets. It is calculated as-
Current Assets
Current Assets to Fixed Assets =
Fixed Assets
69
The following table shows the ratio of current assets to fixed assets of
NABIL, HBL and SCBNL from F/Y 2000/2001 to F/Y 2006/2007.
Table No.: 4
(Rs. In Million)
Standard Chartered Bank Nepal
Nabil Bank Limited Himalayan Bank Ltd.
Ltd.
1
2 3 2/3=4 5 6 5/6=7 8 9 8/9=10
Year
CA FA Ratio CA FA Ratio CA FA Ratio
(in (in (in
times) times) times)
2000/2001 11961.95 205.59 58.18 10988.05 171.31 64.14 12862.22 143.57 89.59
2001/2002 14788.91 219.17 67.48 15605.42 193.05 80.83 16650.32 170.72 97.53
2002/2003 13161.68 248.67 52.93 17359.84 201.68 86.07 19224.18 121.81 157.82
2003/2004 13312.39 237.64 56.01 14165.33 318.84 44.43 18330.82 101.07 181.37
2004/2005 13868.31 251.91 55.05 16881.45 229.87 73.44 20797.60 191.71 108.48
2005/2006 14243.92 338.13 42.13 18657.35 299.64 62.27 23225.83 136.23 170.49
2006/2007 14969.38 361.23 41.44 21326.26 295.82 72.09 21447.16 71.41 300.34
Total 96306.54 1862.34 373.22 114983.7 1710.21 483.27 132538.13 936.52 1105.62
Avg.(mean) 13758.08 266.05 53.31 16426.2429 244.32 69.03 18934.02 133.79 157.95
s.d. 8.46 12.72 67.35
c.v. 15.87 18.43 42.60
Source: Comparative Balance Sheet and Profit And Loss Account of
NABIL, HBL and SCBNL as given in WWW. Nepal Stock.com
The above table highlights the proportion of current assets to fixed assets
of three JVBs from 2000/2001 to 2006/07. The proportion of current assets to
fixed assets for 7 successive years of NABIL is 58.18 times, 67.48 times, 52.93
times, 56.01 times, 55.05 times, 42.13 times and 41.44 times respectively
whereas of HBL is 64.14 times, 80.83 times, 86.07 times, 44.43 times, 73.44
times, 62.27 times and 72.09 times respectively and that of SCBNL is 89.59
times, 97.53 times, 157.82 times, 181.37 times, 108.48 times, 170.49 times and
300.34 times respectively. The proportion of current assets to fixed assets is
highest in the year 2000/2001 i.e. 67.48 times and lowest in the year 2006/2007
i.e. 41.44 times for NABIL, highest in the year 2002/2003 i.e. 86.07 times and
lowest in the year 2003/2004 i.e. 44.43 times for HBL and highest in the year
2006/2007 i.e. 300.34 times and lowest in the year 2000/2001 i.e. 89.59 times
for SCBNL. The average proportion of current assets to fixed assets of NABIL,
HBL and SCBNL are 53.31 times, 69.03 times, 157.95 times respectively. The
average proportion of SCBNL is greater in comparision to the three JVBs. As
higher ratio indicates higher amount of current assets maintained by the bank in
comparision to the fixed assets, so the higher ratio accompanied by the profit
of SCBNL indicates that the business of SCBNL is expanding. The
70
decrease in the ratio of NABIL and HBL as compared to SCBNL indicates
that business is slack or more mechanism has been put through.
71
The following table shows the ratio of net working capital to current
assets of NABIL, HBL and SCBNL from F/Y 2000/2001 to F/Y 2006/2007.
Table No.: 5
(Rs. In Million)
72
working capital to current assets for 7 successive years of NABIL is 5.95%,
5.49%, -30.88%, -23.08%, -9.14%, -6.10% and -2.78% respectively whereas of
HBL is 2.63%, 1.89%, -7.96%, -37.19%, -29.73%, -19.66% and -21.15%
respectively and that of SCBNL is 7.2%, 5.00%, 5.09%, 6.13%, 5.61%, 4.65%
and 5.30% respectively. The proportion of net working capital to current assets
is highest in the year 2000/2001 i.e. 5.95% and lowest in the year 2002/2003
i.e. -30.88% for NABIL, highest in the year 2000/2001 i.e. 2.63% and lowest in
the year 2003/2004 i.e. -37.19% for HBL and highest in the year 2000/2001 i.e.
7.20% and lowest in the year 4.65% for SCBNL. The average proportion of net
working capital to current assets of NABIL, HBL and SCBNL are -8.65%, -
15.88%, 5.57% respectively. The average proportion of SCBNL is greater in
comparision to the three JVBs.
The C.V. of net working capital to current assets for 7 successive years
of NABIL is 148.55% whereas of HBL is 89.36% and that of SCBNL is
14.36%. Thus, as regard to the consistency maintained by the three JVBs,
SCBNL is more consistent or uniform among the three JVBs because the C.V.
of SCBNL (i.e. 14.36%) is lower than that of the NABIL and HBL. In other
words, there is more fluctuation in net working capital to current assets of
NABIL and HBL than the SCBNL.
74
The following table shows the ratio of current assets to current liabilities
of NABIL, HBL and SCBNL from F/Y 2000/01 to F/Y 2006/2007.
Table No.: 6
(Rs. In Million)
Standard Chartered Bank Nepal
Nabil Bank Limited Himalayan Bank Ltd.
Ltd.
1
2 3 2/3=4 5 6 5/6=7 8 9 8/9=10
Year
CA CL Ratio CA CL Ratio CA CL Ratio
(%) (%) (%)
2000/2001 11961.95 11249.94 106.33 10988.05 10698.75 102.70 12862.22 11903.72 108.05
2001/2002 14788.91 13977.29 105.81 15605.42 15311.04 101.92 16650.32 15781.19 105.51
2002/2003 13161.68 17226.21 76.40 17359.84 18742.46 92.62 19224.18 18196.01 105.65
2003/2004 13312.39 16384.73 81.25 14165.33 19433.25 72.89 18330.82 17150.05 106.88
2004/2005 13868.31 15135.42 91.63 16881.45 21899.93 77.08 20797.60 19559.38 106.33
2005/2006 14243.92 15112.45 94.25 18657.35 22325.47 83.57 23225.83 22090.48 105.14
2006/2007 14969.38 15385.33 97.30 21326.26 25837.29 82.54 21447.16 20235.75 105.99
Total 96306.54 104471.37 652.97 114983.70 134248.19 613.34 132538.13 124916.58 743.55
Avg.(mean) 13758.08 14924.48 93.28 16426.24 19178.313 87.62 18934.02 17845.23 106.22
s.d. 10.53 10.87 0.91
c.v. 11.29 12.41 0.86
Source: Comparative Balance Sheet and Profit And Loss Account of
NABIL, HBL and SCBNL as given in WWW. Nepal Stock.com
75
The C.V. of current assets to current liabilities ratios for 7 successive
years of NABIL is 11.29% whereas of HBL is 12.41% and that of SCBNL is
0.86%. Thus, as regard to the consistency maintained by the three JVBs,
SCBNL is more consistent or uniform among the three JVBs because the C.V.
of SCBNL (i.e. 0.86%) is lower than that of the NABIL and HBL. In other
words, there is more fluctuation in proportion of current assets to current
liabilities of NABIL and HBL than the SCBNL.
The assets which can be cashed within an accounting period are known
as current assets. It includes cash and near cash elements. Return is the main
factor for the existence of any firm. The return on current assets measures the
profit with respect to its total current assets. It gives the utilization of CA
effectiveness.
NPAT
Return on Current Assets =
Current Assets
Table No.: 7
(Rs. In Million)
Standard Chartered Bank Nepal
Nabil Bank Limited Himalayan Bank Ltd.
Ltd.
1
2 3 2/3=4 5 6 5/6=7 8 9 8/9=10
Year
NPAT CA Ratio NPAT CA Ratio NPAT CA Ratio
(%) (%) (%)
2000/2001 266.48 11961.95 2.23 165.25 10988.05 1.50 359.46 12862.22 2.79
2001/2002 329.12 14788.91 2.23 199.25 15605.42 1.28 392.69 16650.32 2.36
2002/2003 291.38 13161.68 2.21 277.04 17359.84 1.60 430.86 19224.18 2.24
2003/2004 271.64 13312.39 2.04 235.02 14165.33 1.66 479.21 18330.82 2.61
2004/2005 416.24 13868.31 3.00 212.13 16881.45 1.26 506.93 20797.60 2.44
2005/2006 455.31 14243.92 3.20 263.05 18657.35 1.41 537.80 23225.83 2.32
2006/2007 518.64 14969.38 3.46 308.28 21326.26 1.45 539.20 21447.16 2.51
Total 2548.81 96306.54 18.37 1660.15 114983.7 10.15 3246.15 132538.13 17.28
Avg.(mean) 364.12 13758.08 2.62 237.16 16426.2429 1.45 463.74 18934.02 2.47
s.d. 0.53 0.14 0.17
c.v. 20.23 9.65 6.88
Source: Comparative Balance Sheet and Profit And Loss Account of
NABIL, HBL and SCBNL as given in WWW. Nepal Stock.com
The above table highlights the proportion of net profit after tax to current
76
assets of three JVBs from 2000/2001 to 2006/2007. The proportion of net profit
after tax to current assets for 7 successive years of NABIL is 2.23%, 2.23%,
2.21%, 2.04%, 3.00%, 3.20%, 3.46% and respectively whereas of HBL is
1.50%, 1.28%, 1.60%, 1.66%, 1.26%, 1.41% and 1.45% respectively and that
of SCBNL is 2.79%, 2.36%, 2.24%, 2.61%, 2.44%, 2.32% and 2.51%
respectively. The proportion of net profit after tax to current assets is highest in
the year 2006/2007 i.e. 3.46% and lowest in the year 2003/2004 i.e. 2.04% for
NABIL, highest in the year 2003/2004 i.e. 1.66% and lowest in the year
2004/2005 1.26% for HBL and highest in the year 2000/2001 i.e. 2.79% and
lowest in the year 2002/2003 i.e. 2.24% for SCBNL. The average proportion of
net profit after tax to current assets of NABIL, HBL and SCBNL are 2.62%,
1.45%, 2.47% respectively. The average proportion of NABIL is greater in
comparision to the three JVBs. It reveals that NABIL has been able to utilize it
current assets more effectively than HBL and SCBNL.
The C.V. of net profit after tax to current assets for 7 successive years of
NABIL is 20.23% whereas of HBL is 9.65% and that of SCBNL is 6.88%.
Thus, as regard to the consistency maintained by the three JVBs, SCBNL is
more consistent or uniform among the three JVBs because the C.V. of SCBNL
(i.e. 6.88) is lower than that of the NABIL and HBL.
As higher ratio indicates that the overall efficiency of the bank to utilize
their entire resources, which implies that the bank has lower proportion of non-
performing assets. So higher the ratio, the better it is for the firm and the share
and vice-versa.
77
The following table shows the return on total assets of NABIL, HBL and
SCBNL from F/Y 2000/2001 to F/Y 2006/2007
Table No.: 8
(Rs. In Million)
Standard Chartered Bank Nepal
Nabil Bank Limited Himalayan Bank Ltd.
Ltd.
1
2 3 2/3=4 5 6 5/6=7 8 9 8/9=10
Year
NPAT TA Ratio NPAT TA Ratio NPAT TA Ratio
(%) (%) (%)
2000/2001 266.48 12184.05 2.19 165.25 11244.10 1.47 359.46 13016.98 2.76
2001/2002 329.12 15024.20 2.19 199.25 15863.74 1.26 392.69 16832.23 2.33
2002/2003 291.38 17770.65 1.64 277.04 19500.57 1.42 430.86 19357.18 2.23
2003/2004 271.64 17629.25 1.54 235.02 21315.85 1.10 479.21 18443.10 2.60
2004/2005 416.24 16562.62 2.51 212.13 24197.97 0.88 506.93 21000.50 2.41
2005/2006 455.31 16745.49 2.72 263.05 25729.79 1.02 537.80 23642.06 2.27
2006/2007 518.64 17186.33 3.02 308.28 28871.34 1.07 539.20 21893.58 2.46
Total 2548.81 113102.59 15.81 1660.15 146723.36 8.22 3246.15 134185.63 17.07
Avg.(mean) 364.12 16157.51 2.26 237.16 20960.48 1.17 463.74 19169.38 2.44
s.d. 0.50 0.20 0.17
c.v. 22.12 17.09 6.97
Source: Comparative Balance Sheet and Profit And Loss Account of
NABIL, HBL and SCBNL as given in WWW. Nepal Stock.com
The table highlights the proportion of net profit after tax to total assets of
three JVBs from 2000/2001 to 2006/2007. The proportion of net profit after tax
to total assets for 7 successive years of NABIL is 2.19%, 2.19%, 1.64%,
1.54%, 2.51%, 2.72% and 3.02% respectively whereas of HBL is 1.47%,
1.26%, 1.42%, 1.10%, 0.88%, 1.02% and 1.07% respectively and that of
SCBNL is 2.76%, 2.33%, 2.23%, 2.60%, 2.41%, 2.27% and 2.46%
respectively. The proportion of net profit after tax to total assets is highest in
the year 2006/2007 i.e. 3.02% and lowest in the year 2003/2004 i.e. 1.54% for
NABIL, highest in the year 2000/2001 i.e. 1.47% and lowest in the year
2004/2005 i.e. 0.88% for HBL and highest in the year 2000/2001 i.e. 2.76%
and lowest in the year 2002/2003 i.e. 2.23% for SCBNL. The average
proportion of net profit after tax to total assets of NABIL, HBL and SCBNL are
2.26%, 1.17%, and 2.44% respectively. The average proportion of SCBNL is
greater in comparision to the three JVBs. It reveals that SCBNL provides
greater rate of return to its total assets thereby indicating that the bank has been
able to utilize its available resources more effectively and efficiently in
comparision to other two JVBs.
The C.V. of net profit after tax to total assets for 7 successive years of
NABIL is 22.12% whereas of HBL is 17.09% respectively and that of SCBNL
78
is 6.97%. Thus, as regard to the consistency maintained by the three JVBs,
SCBNL is more consistent or uniform among the three JVBs because the C.V.
of SCBNL (i.e. 6.97%) is lower than that of the NABIL and HBL. In other
words, there is more fluctuation in net profit after tax to total assets ratio of
NABIL and HBL than the SCBNL.
Table No.: 9
(Rs. In Million)
Standard Chartered Bank Nepal
Nabil Bank Limited Himalayan Bank Ltd.
Ltd.
1
2 3 2/3=4 5 6 5/6=7 8 9 8/9=10
Year
R TA Ratio R TA Ratio R TA Ratio
(%) (%) (%)
2000/2001 231.65 12184.05 1.90 173.26 11244.10 1.54 97.69 13016.98 0.75
2001/2002 373.01 15024.20 2.48 386.56 15863.74 2.44 154.70 16832.23 0.92
2002/2003 372.35 17770.65 2.10 335.75 19500.57 1.72 139.03 19357.18 0.72
2003/2004 171.09 17629.25 0.97 385.38 21315.85 1.81 215.98 18443.10 1.17
2004/2005 230.07 16562.62 1.39 466.53 24197.97 1.93 174.48 21000.50 0.83
2005/2006 225.44 16745.49 1.35 564.36 25729.79 2.19 290.73 23642.06 1.23
2006/2007 208.67 17186.33 1.21 578.37 28871.34 2.00 266.63 21893.58 1.22
Total 1812.28 113102.59 11.40 2,890.21 146723.36 13.63 1339.24 134185.63 6.84
Avg.(mean) 258.90 16157.51 1.63 412.89 20960.48 1.95 191.32 19169.38 0.98
s.d. 0.50 0.28 0.21
c.v. 30.67 14.36 21.43
79
Source: Comparative Balance Sheet and Profit And Loss Account of
NABIL, HBL and SCBNL as given in WWW. Nepal Stock.com
The high ratio indicates an unfavorable condition for the business and
low ratio indicates the favorable condition for the business.
80
The following table shows the ratio of receivable on current assets of
NABIL, HBL and SCBNL from F/Y 2000/2001 to F/Y 2006/2007.
Table No.: 10
(Rs. In Million)
Standard Chartered Bank Nepal
Nabil Bank Limited Himalayan Bank Ltd.
Ltd.
1
2 3 2/3=4 5 6 5/6=7 8 9 8/9=10
Year
R CA Ratio R CA Ratio R CA Ratio
(%) (%) (%)
2000/2001 231.65 11961.95 1.94 173.26 10988.05 1.58 97.69 12862.22 0.76
2001/2002 373.01 14788.91 2.52 386.56 15605.42 2.48 154.70 16650.32 0.93
2002/2003 372.35 13161.68 2.83 335.75 17359.84 1.93 139.03 19224.18 0.72
2003/2004 171.09 13312.39 1.29 385.38 14165.33 2.72 215.98 18330.82 1.18
2004/2005 230.07 13868.31 1.66 466.53 16881.45 2.76 174.48 20797.60 0.84
2005/2006 225.44 14243.92 1.58 564.36 18657.35 3.02 290.73 23225.83 1.25
2006/2007 208.67 14969.38 1.39 578.37 21326.26 2.71 266.63 21447.16 1.24
Total 1812.28 96306.54 13.21 2,890.21 114983.70 17.21 1339.24 132538.13 6.92
Avg.(mean) 258.90 13758.08 1.89 412.89 16426.24 2.46 191.32 18934.02 0.99
s.d. 0.54 0.48 0.21
c.v. 28.57 19.51 21.21
Source: Comparative Balance Sheet and Profit And Loss Account of
NABIL, HBL and SCBNL as given in WWW. Nepal Stock.com
Those assets which can be easily converted into cash within a year are
termed as quick assets. The quick, or acid test, ratio indicates the company's
ability to convert its current assets quickly into cash to meets its current
liability. It is calculated by deducting inventories from current assets and then
dividing the remainder by current liabilities. The quick ratio removes
inventories from current assets because they are the least liquid asset.
Therefore, the quick ratio is an "acid test" of a company's ability to meets its
current obligations.
Quick Assets
Quick Assets to Current Liabilities =
Current Liabilitie s
It tries to test the ability of the firm to meet its current obligations i.e.
payment of current liability. The standard ratio is considered as 1:1 as a firm
can easily meet all its current liability. Both the high and low ratio is not
favorable for the business.
The following table shows the ratio of quick assets to current liabilities
of NABIL, HBL and SCBNL from F/Y 2000/2001 to F/Y 2006/2007.
Table No.: 11
(Rs. In Million)
Standard Chartered Bank Nepal
Nabil Bank Limited Himalayan Bank Ltd.
Ltd.
1
2 3 2/3=4 5 6 5/6=7 8 9 8/9=10
Year
QA CL Ratio QA CL Ratio QA CL Ratio
(%) (%) (%)
2000/2001 11961.95 11249.94 106.33 10988.05 10698.75 102.70 12862.22 11903.72 108.05
2001/2002 14788.91 13977.29 105.81 15605.42 15311.04 101.92 16650.32 15781.19 105.51
2002/2003 13161.68 17226.21 76.40 17359.84 18742.46 92.62 19224.18 18196.01 105.65
82
2003/2004 13312.39 16384.73 81.25 14165.33 19433.25 72.89 18330.82 17150.05 106.88
2004/2005 13868.31 15135.42 91.63 16881.45 21899.93 77.08 20797.60 19559.38 106.33
2005/2006 14243.92 15112.45 94.25 18657.35 22325.47 83.57 23225.83 22090.48 105.14
2006/2007 14969.38 15385.33 97.30 21326.26 25837.29 82.54 21447.16 20235.75 105.99
Total 96306.54 104471.37 652.97 114983.7 134248.19 613.34 132538.13 124916.58 743.55
Avg.(mean) 13758.08 14924.48 93.28 16426.2429 19178.313 87.62 18934.02 17845.23 106.22
s.d. 10.53 10.87 0.91
c.v. 11.29 12.41 0.86
Source: Comparative Balance Sheet and Profit And Loss Account of
NABIL, HBL and SCBNL as given in WWW. Nepal Stock.com
84
The following table shows the ratio of cash and bank balance to current
liabilities of NABIL, HBL and SCBNL from F/Y 2000/01 to F/Y 2006/2007.
Table No.: 12
(Rs. In Million)
Standard Chartered Bank Nepal
Nabil Bank Limited Himalayan Bank Ltd.
Ltd.
1
2 3 2/3=4 5 6 5/6=7 8 9 8/9=10
Year
Cash & CL Ratio Cash & CL Ratio Cash & CL Ratio
Bank (%) Bank (%) Bank (%)
Balance Balance Balance
2000/2001 630.94 11249.94 5.61 802.21 10698.75 7.50 826.15 11903.72 6.94
2001/2002 910.07 13977.29 6.51 901.91 15311.04 5.89 1020.46 15781.19 6.47
2002/2003 812.91 17226.21 4.72 1435.17 18742.46 7.66 961.05 18196.01 5.28
2003/2004 1051.82 16384.73 6.42 1264.67 19433.25 6.51 825.23 17150.05 4.81
2004/2005 1144.77 15135.42 7.56 1979.21 21899.93 9.04 1512.30 19559.38 7.73
2005/2006 970.49 15112.45 6.42 2001.18 22325.47 8.96 2023.16 22090.48 9.16
2006/2007 559.38 15385.33 3.64 2014.47 25837.29 7.80 1111.12 20235.75 5.49
Total 6080.38 104471.37 37.24 10398.82 134248.19 53.35 8279.47 124916.58 45.88
Avg.(mean) 868.63 14924.48 5.84 1485.55 19178.313 7.62 1182.78 17845.23 6.55
s.d. 1.21 1.07 1.42
c.v. 20.72 14.04 21.68
Source: Comparative Balance Sheet and Profit And Loss Account of
NABIL, HBL and SCBNL as given in WWW. Nepal Stock.com
The table highlights the proportion of cash and bank balance to current
liabilities of three JVBs from 2000/2001 to 2006/2007. The proportion of cash
and bank balance to current liabilities for 7 successive years of NABIL is
5.61%, 6.51%, 4.72%, 6.42%, 7.56%, 6.42% and 3.64% respectively whereas
of HBL is 7.50%, 5.89%, 7.66%, 6.51%, 9.04%, 8.96% and 7.80% respectively
and that of SCBNL is 6.94%, 6.47%, 5.28%, 4.81%, 7.73%, 9.16% and 5.49%
respectively. The proportion of cash and bank balance to current liabilities is
highest in the year 2004/2005 i.e. 7.56% and lowest in the year 2006/2007 i.e.
3.64% for NABIL, highest in the year 2004/2005 i.e. 9.04% and lowest in the
year 2001/2002 i.e. 5.89% for HBL and highest in the year 2005/2006 i.e.
9.16% and lowest in the year 2003/2004 i.e. 4.81% for SCBNL. The average
proportion of cash and bank balance to current liabilities of NABIL, HBL and
SCBNL are 5.84%, 7.62%, 6.55% respectively. The average proportion of HBL
is greater in comparision to the three JVBs. Therefore liquidity position on the
basis of cash and bank balance to current liabilities ratio maintained by HBL is
better among the three JVBs. Higher ratio indicates higher amount of cash and
bank balance maintained by the bank which shows that the bank has been able
to maintained enough liquidity to fulfill its current obligations but the bank
should keep in consideration that enough cash and bank balance results in idle
85
money which incurs opportunity cost. Hence from the utilization perspective,
this may not be desirable solution.
The C.V. of cash and bank balance to current liabilities for 7 successive
years of NABIL is 20.72% whereas of HBL is 14.04% and that of SCBNL is
21.68%. Thus, as regard to the consistency maintained by the three JVBs, HBL
is more consistent or uniform among the three JVBs because the C.V. of HBL
(i.e. 14.04%) is lower than that of the NABIL and SCBNL. In other words,
there is more fluctuation in cash and bank balance to current liabilities of
NABIL and SCBNL than the HBL.
Debt to equity ratio shows the relationship between the borrowed fund
and owner's fund. It helps in the firm prediction of relative claims of outsiders
and owners against firm's total resources. The ratio is calculated by dividing
total debt by shareholders equity.
Debt
Debt to Equity Ratio =
Equity
The following table shows the ratio of quick assets to current liabilities
of NABIL, HBL and SCBNL from F/Y 2000/01 to F/Y 2006/2007.
Table No.: 13
(Rs. In Million)
Standard Chartered Bank Nepal
Nabil Bank Limited Himalayan Bank Ltd.
Ltd.
1
2 3 2/3=4 5 6 5/6=7 8 9 8/9=10
Year
Total Debt Sharehol Ratio Total Debt Sharehol Ratio Total Debt Sharehold Ratio
der (times) der (times) er Equity (times)
Equity Equity
2000/2001 11306.31 877.33 12.89 10792.91 451.18 23.92 11936.55 1080.41 11.05
2001/2002 14040.13 984.07 14.27 15337.69 526.05 29.16 15817.40 1014.85 15.59
2002/2003 16707.80 1062.85 15.72 18779.96 720.59 26.06 18245.18 1112.02 16.41
2003/2004 16482.82 1146.43 14.38 20457.73 858.11 23.84 17207.62 1235.48 13.93
2004/2005 15248.44 1314.19 11.60 23134.84 1063.13 21.76 19631.6 1368.91 14.34
2005/2006 15263.80 1481.68 10.30 24375.62 1324.17 18.41 22146.32 1495.74 14.81
2006/2007 15528.69 1657.64 9.37 27329.6 1541.75 17.73 20311.16 1582.41 12.84
Total 104577.99 8524.19 88.52 140,208.35 6,484.98 160.88 125295.83 8889.82 86.12
Avg.(mean) 14939.71 1217.74 12.65 20,029.76 926.43 22.98 17899.40 1269.97 14.14
s.d. 2.15 3.77 1.65
c.v. 16.70 16.40 11.67
Source: Comparative Balance Sheet and Profit And Loss Account of
86
NABIL, HBL and SCBNL as given in WWW. Nepal Stock.com
The table highlights the proportion of debt to equity of three JVBs from
2000/2001 to 2006/07. The proportion of debt to equity for 7 successive years
of NABIL is 12.89, 14.27, 15.72, 14.38, 11.60, 10.30 and 9.37 times
respectively whereas of HBL is 23.92, 29.16, 26.06, 23.84, 21.76, 18.41 and
17.73 times respectively and that of SCBNL is 11.05, 15.59, 16.41, 13.93,
14.34, 14.81 and 12.84 times respectively. The proportion of debt to equity is
highest in the year 2002/2003 i.e. 15.72 times and lowest in the year 2006/2007
i.e. 9.37 times for NABIL, highest in the year 2001/2002 i.e. 29.16 times and
lowest in the year 2006/2007 i.e. 17.73 times for HBL and highest in the year
2002/2003 i.e. 16.41 and lowest in the year 2000/2001 i.e. 11.05 times for
SCBNL. The average proportion of debt to equity of NABIL, HBL and SCBNL
are 12.65 times, 22.98 times, 14.14 times respectively. The average proportion
of HBL is greater in comparision to the three JVBs. Therefore from the
shareholders point of view, investment in the share of HBL is considered to be
satisfactory than NABIL and SCBNL because of low cost of outsider's fund
were used to acquire assets to generate higher return. In contrary, from the
creditor's point of view, a lower debt-equity is generally viewed as favourable
so NABIL and SCBNL are favorable as they provide safe investment.
Net worth plays a vital role in supporting its daily operations and
ensuring the long run viability of the banking system. This ratio shows the
relationship between the net worth and the total assets of the firm. It examines
the percentage of the net worth in total assets.
Net Worth
Net Worth to Total Assets =
Total Assets
The high ratio indicates the higher existence of net worth in total assets
which is favourable condition for the firm.
87
The following table shows the ratio of net worth to total assets of
NABIL, HBL and SCBNL from F/Y 2000/2001 to F/Y 2006/2007.
Table No.: 14
(Rs. In Million)
Standard Chartered Bank Nepal
Nabil Bank Limited Himalayan Bank Ltd.
Ltd.
1
2 3 2/3=4 5 6 5/6=7 8 9 8/9=10
Year
Net TA Ratio Net TA Ratio Net Worth TA Ratio
Worth (%) Worth (%) (%)
2000/2001 877.33 12184.05 7.20 451.18 11244.10 4.01 1080.41 13016.98 8.30
2001/2002 984.07 15024.20 6.55 526.05 15863.74 3.32 1014.85 16832.23 6.03
2002/2003 1062.85 17770.65 5.98 720.59 19500.57 3.70 1112.02 19357.18 5.74
2003/2004 1146.43 17629.25 6.50 858.11 21315.85 4.03 1235.48 18443.10 6.70
2004/2005 1314.19 16562.62 7.93 1063.13 24197.97 4.39 1368.91 21000.50 6.52
2005/2006 1481.68 16745.49 8.85 1324.17 25729.79 5.15 1495.74 23642.06 6.33
2006/2007 1657.64 17186.33 9.65 1541.75 28871.34 5.34 1582.41 21893.58 7.23
Total 8524.19 113102.59 52.66 6,484.98 146723.36 29.93 8889.82 134185.63 46.85
Avg.(mean) 1217.74 16157.51 7.52 926.43 20960.48 4.28 1269.97 19169.38 6.69
s.d. 1.25 0.69 0.79
c.v. 16.62 16.12 11.81
Source: Comparative Balance Sheet and Profit And Loss Account of
NABIL, HBL and SCBNL as given in WWW. Nepal Stock.com
The table highlights the proportion of net worth to total assets of three
JVBs from 2000/2001 to 2006/07. The proportion of net worth to total assets
for 7 successive years of NABIL is 7.20%, 6.55%, 5.98%, 6.50%, 7.93%,
8.85% and 9.65% respectively whereas of HBL is 4.01%, 3.32%, 3.70%,
4.03%, 4.39%, 5.15% and 5.34% respectively and that of SCBNL is 8.30%,
6.03%, 5.74%, 6.70%, 6.52%, 6.33% and 7.23% respectively. The proportion
of net worth to total assets is highest in the year 2006/2007 i.e. 9.65% and
lowest in the year 2002/2003 i.e. 5.98% for NABIL, highest in the year
2006/2007 i.e. 5.34% and lowest in the year 2001/2002 i.e. 3.32% for HBL and
highest in the year 2000/2001 i.e. 8.30% and lowest in the year 2002/2003 i.e.
5.74% for SCBNL. The average proportion of net worth to total assets of
NABIL, HBL and SCBNL are 7.52%, 4.28%, and 6.69% respectively. The
average proportion of NABIL is greater in comparison to the three JVBs. It
reveals that average proportion of net worth to total assets favors NABIL more
than the rest of the JVBs.
The C.V. of net worth to total assets for 7 successive years of NABIL is
16.62% whereas of HBL is 16.12% and that of SCBNL is 11.81%. Thus, as
regard to the consistency maintained by the three JVBs, SCBNL is more
88
consistent or uniform among the three JVBs because the C.V. of SCBNL (i.e.
11.81%) is lower than that of the NABIL and HBL. In other words, there is
more fluctuation in net worth to total assets of NABIL and HBL than the
SCBNL.
The high ratio indicates that that the shareholders equity i.e. their
funds are being effectively and efficiently utilized in t he profit generating
purposes.
Table No.: 15
(Rs. In Million)
Standard Chartered Bank
Nabil Bank Limited Himalayan Bank Ltd.
Nepal Ltd.
1
2 3 2/3=4 5 6 5/6=7 8 9 8/9=10
Year
NPAT Owner Ratio NPAT Owner Ratio NPAT Owner Ratio
Equity (%) Equity (%) Equity (%)
2000/2001 266.48 877.33 30.37 165.25 451.18 36.63 359.46 1080.41 33.27
2001/2002 329.12 984.07 33.44 199.25 526.05 37.88 392.69 1014.85 38.69
2002/2003 291.38 1062.85 27.41 277.04 720.59 38.45 430.86 1112.02 38.75
2003/2004 271.64 1146.43 23.69 235.02 858.11 27.39 479.21 1235.48 38.79
2004/2005 416.24 1314.19 31.67 212.13 1063.13 19.95 506.93 1368.91 37.03
2005/2006 455.31 1481.68 30.73 263.05 1324.17 19.87 537.80 1495.74 35.96
2006/2007 518.64 1657.64 31.29 308.28 1541.75 20.00 539.20 1582.41 34.07
Total 2548.81 8524.19 208.62 1660.15 6,484.98 200.15 3246.15 8889.82 256.56
Avg.(mean) 364.12 1217.74 29.80 237.16 1,621.25 28.59 463.74 1269.97 36.65
s.d. 3.00 8.23 2.13
89
c.v. 10.07 28.79 5.82
Source: Comparative Balance Sheet and Profit And Loss Account of
NABIL, HBL and SCBNL as given in WWW. Nepal Stock.com
90
The table highlights the proportion of return on owner's equity of three
JVBs from 2000/2001 to 2006/07. The proportion of return on owner's equity
for 7 successive years of NABIL is 30.37%, 33.44%, 27.41%, 23.69%, 31.67%,
30.73% and 31.29% respectively whereas of HBL is 36.63%, 37.88%, 38.45%,
27.39%, 19.95%, 19.87% and 20.00%, respectively and that of SCBNL is
33.27%, 38.69%, 38.75%, 38.79%, 37.03%, 35.96% and 34.07% respectively.
The proportion of return on owner's equity is highest in the year 2001/2002 i.e.
33.44% and lowest in the year 2003/2004 i.e. 23.69% for NABIL, highest in
the year 2002/2003 i.e. 38.45% and lowest in the year 2005/2006 i.e. 19.87%
for HBL and highest in the year 2003/2004 i.e. 38.79% and lowest in the year
2000/2001 i.e. 33.27% for SCBNL. The average proportion of return on
owner's equity of NABIL, HBL and SCBNL are 29.80%, 28.59%, 36.65%
respectively. The average proportion of SCBNL is greater in comparision to the
three JVBs. It reveals that SCBNL provides greater rate of return to their
shareholder's equity than the remaining two JVBs.
Trend Ratios
Graphs and Diagrams
Here, graphs and diagrams have been used to express the trends of
91
different items of the three JVBs.
Graph no.: 1
CURRENT ASSETS
300
250
200 194 NABIL
Trend Index
181
170 167
150 158
149 162
154 HBL
142
129 142
129
124 110 111 116 119 125
100 100 SCBNL
(%)
50
0
2000/01 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 2004/05 2005/06 2006/07
Fiscal Year
Source: Appendix-A
The graph highlights the current assets trends of three JVBs from
2000/2001 to 2006/07. The growth of current assets in comparision to the base
year (i.e. 100%) for 7 successive years of NABIL is 124%, 110%, 111%,
116%, 119%, 119%, 125% respectively whereas of HBL is 142%, 158%,
129%, 154%, 170%, 194% respectively and that of SCBNL is 129%, 149%,
142%, 162%, 181%, 167% respectively. The current assets of NABIL shows
the fluctuating trend throughout the period understudy as there is rise and fall in
successive years. The current assets of HBL marked an increasing trend
throughout the period understudy except in 2003/04. The current assets of the
SCBNL also marked an increasing trend throughout the period understudy
except in 2003/2004 and 2006/07. This indicates that the current assets
management of HBL and SCBNL is better in comparision to the NABIL.
92
4.3.2 Trend of Current Liabilities:
Graph no.: 2
CURRENT LIABILITIES
300
250 241
200 205 209
NABIL
Trend Index
50
0
2000/01 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 2004/05 2005/06 2006/07
Fiscal Year
Source: Appendix-A
The above graph highlights the current liabilities trends of three JVBs
from 2000/2001 to 2006/07. The growth of current liabilities in comparision to
the base year (i.e. 100%) for 7 successive years of NABIL is 124%, 153%,
146%, 135%, 134%, 137% respectively whereas of HBL is 143%, 175%,
182%, 205%, 209%, 241% respectively and that of SCBNL is 133%,
153%,144%, 164%, 186%, 170% respectively. The current liabilities of NABIL
shows the fluctuating trend throughout the period understudy as there is rise
and fall in successive years. The current liabilities marked an increasing trend
throughout the period understudy. The current assets of the SCBNL marked an
increasing trend throughout the period understudy except in 2003/2004 and
2006/07. This indicates that the current liabilities of HBL and SCBNL are
greater in comparision to the NABIL.
93
4.3.3 Trend of Cash and Bank Balances:
Graph no.: 3
CASH AND BANK BALANCES
300
250 247 249
245 251
Trend Index
200 NABIL
179 167 183
181
150 144 158 154 HBL
123 129 134
100 100 112 116 100 SCBNL
89
(%)
50
0
2000/01 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 2004/05 2005/06 2006/07
Fiscal Year
Source: Appendix-A
The above graph highlights the cash and bank balance trends of three
JVBs from 2000/2001 to 2006/07. The cash and bank balance in comparision to
the base year (i.e. 100%) for 7 successive years of NABIL is 144%, 129%,
167%, 181%, 1545%, 89% respectively whereas of HBL is 112%, 179%,
158%, 247%, 249%, 251%, respectively and that of SCBNL is 123%, 116%,
100%, 183%, 245%, 134% respectively. The cash and bank balance of NABIL
indicates highly fluctuating trend throughout the period understudy. The cash
and bank balance of HBL marked an increasing trend throughout the period
understudy except in 2003/04 and 2006/07. The cash and bank balance of the
SCBNL marked a fluctuating trend throughout the period understudy. This
indicates that the cash and bank balance of NABIL and SCBNL is lower in
comparision to the HBL which may be termed as both good and worst as
greater cash and bank balances is good for the banks because it will increase
there working capital and they can perform their operations smoothly whereas
it is worst because greater cash balance may indicate idle cash which incurs
cost.
94
4.3.4 Trend of Total Assets:
Graph no.: 4
TOTAL ASSETS
300
250 257
215 229
200 NABIL
Trend Index
50
(%)
0
2000/01 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 2004/05 2005/06 2006/07
Fiscal Year
Source: Appendix-A
The above graph highlights the total assets trends of three JVBs from
2000/2001 to 2006/07. The growth of total assets in comparision to the base
year (i.e. 100%) for 7 successive years of NABIL is 123%, 146%, 145%,
140%, 137%, 141% respectively whereas of HBL is 141%, 173%, 190%,
215%, 229%, 257% respectively and that of SCBNL is 129%, 149%, 142%,
161%, 182%, 168% respectively. The total assets of NABIL show the
increasing trend in the year 2001/020, 2002/03 and 2006/07 and decreasing
trend in the remaining years. The total assets of HBL marked an increasing
trend throughout the period understudy. The total assets of SCBNL marked an
increasing trend throughout the period understudy except in 2003/2004 and
2006/07. This indicates that the total assets management of HBL and SCBNL is
better in comparision to the NABIL.
95
4.3.5 Trend of Receivables:
Graph no.: 5
RECEIVABLES
350 333
326
300 298
269 273
250 NABIL
Trend Index
0
2000/01 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 2004/05 2005/06 2006/07
Fiscal Year
Source: Appendix-A
The above graph highlights the receivable trends of three JVBs from
2000/2001 to 2006/07. The growth of receivable in comparision to the base
year (i.e. 100%) for 7 successive years of NABIL is 161%, 160%, 74%, 99%,
97%, 90% respectively whereas of HBL is 223%, 194%, 222%, 269%, 326%,
333% respectively and that of SCBNL is 158%, 142%, 221%, 179%, 298%,
273% respectively. The receivable of NABIL shows the decreasing trend
throughout the period understudy as there is constant fall in successive years
except in the year 2001/02. The receivable of HBL marked a fluctuating trend
throughout the period understudy. The receivable of the SCBNL also marked a
fluctuating trend throughout the period. This indicates that the receivable of
HBL and SCBNL is poor in comparision to the NABIL.
96
4.3.6 Trend of Owner Equity:
Graph no.: 6
OWNER EQUITY
350 342
300 293
250 236 NABIL
Trend Index
50
0
2000/01 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 2004/05 2005/06 2006/07
Fiscal Year
Source: Appendix-A
The above graph highlights the owner equity trends of three JVBs from
2000/2001 to 2006/07. The growth of owner equity in comparision to the base
year (i.e. 100%) for 7 successive years of NABIL is 112%, 121%, 131%,
150%, 169%, 189% respectively whereas of HBL is 117%, 160%, 190%,
236%, 293%, 342% respectively and that of SCBNL is 94%, 103%, 114%,
127%, 138%, 146% respectively. The owner equity of NABIL, HBL and
SCBNL all the three marked an increasing trend throughout the period
understudy but there is slow increase in NABIL and SCBNL as compared to
the high increase in the HBL.
97
4.3.7 Trend of Net Profit after Tax:
Graph no.: 7
NET PROFIT AFTER TAX
300
250
200 195 NABIL
Trend Index
171 186
168 156 159
149 150 HBL
150 142
133 141
123
121
109 120 128
100 100
100 109 102 SCBNL
50
(%)
0
2000/01 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 2004/05 2005/06 2006/07
Fiscal Year
Source: Appendix-A
The above graph highlights the net profit after tax trends of three JVBs
from 2000/2001 to 2006/07. The growth of net profit after tax in comparision to
the base year (i.e. 100%) for 7 successive years of NABIL is 123%, 109%,
102%, 156%, 171%, 195% respectively whereas of HBL is 121%, 168%,
142%, 128%, 159%, 186% respectively and that of SCBNL is 109%, 120%,
133%, 141%, 149%, 150% respectively. The net profit after tax of NABIL
shows the increasing trend in the year 2001/02, 2004/05, 2005/06 and 2006/07
and decreasing trend in the remaining years. The net profit after tax of HBL
marked an increasing trend throughout the period understudy except in the year
2003/04 and 2004/05. The net profit after tax of SCBNL marked an increasing
trend throughout the period understudy as there is gradual increase in the
successive years. This indicates that the net profit after tax of SCBNL is the
best among the rest and is able to give higher return to the shareholders,
creditors and is satisfying them.
98
formula, is known as correlation." 39
Table no.: 16
Correlation
Banks P.E. 6×P.E. Correlation
(r)
NABIL 0.0939 0.2527 1.5161 r < 6 P.E. ; not significant
HBL 0.8295 0.0795 0.4771 r > 6 P.E. ; significant
SCBNL 0.7458 0.1131 0.6788 r > 6 P.E. ; significant
The above table highlights the seven years Karl Pearson's correlation
coefficient (r) and probable error (P.E.) in between cash and bank balance and
current assets of NABIL, HBL and SCBNL which are 0.0939 and 0.2527,
0.8295 and 0.0795, 0.7458 and 0.1131 respectively. We can conclude that the
highest degree of correlation in between cash and bank balance and current
assets is 0.8295 of HBL and the lowest is 0.0939 of NABIL among the three
JVBs. In the above figure, there is moderate degree positive correlation
coefficient in between cash and bank balance and current assets of NABIL but
since it is not 6 times more than P.E., it is not considered as significant and the
change in cash and bank balance does not affect the volume of current assets to
the great extent. On the other hand, there is high degree positive correlation
39
Croxton and Cowden, as quoted by S.P. Gupta, An easy approach to Statistics, 6th edition , S. Chand and
Company Ltd., Ram Nagar, New Delhi-110055, p.155.
99
coefficient in between cash and bank balance and current assets of HBL and
SCBNL and as it is 6 times greater than P.E., it is considered as significant and
thereby changes in cash and bank balance affects volume of current assets.
Table no.: 17
Correlation
Banks P.E. 6×P.E. Correlation
(r)
NABIL 0.3654 0.2209 1.3254 r < 6 P.E. ; not significant
HBL 0.9407 0.0293 0.1760 r > 6 P.E. ; significant
SCBNL 0.7508 0.1112 0.6674 r > 6 P.E. ; significant
The above table highlights the seven years Karl Pearson's correlation
coefficient (r) and probable error (P.E.) in between cash and bank balance and
total assets of NABIL, HBL and SCBNL which are 0.3654 and 0..2209, 0.9407
and 0.0293, 0.7508 and 0.1112 respectively. We can conclude that the highest
degree of correlation in between cash and bank balance and total assets is
0.9407 of HBL and the lowest is 0.3654 of NABIL among the three JVBs. In
the above figure, there is moderate degree positive correlation coefficient in
between cash and bank balance and total assets of NABIL but since it is not 6
times more than P.E., it is not considered as significant and the change in cash
and bank balance does not affect the volume of total assets to the great extent.
On the other hand, there is high degree positive correlation coefficient in
between cash and bank balance and total assets of HBL and SCBNL and as it is
6 times greater than P.E., it is considered as significant and thereby changes in
cash and bank balance affects volume of total assets.
Table no.: 18
Correlation
Banks P.E. 6×P.E. Correlation
(r)
NABIL 0.4783 0.1966 1.1796 r < 6 P.E.; not significant
HBL 0.8844 0.0555 0.3332 r > 6 P.E. ; significant
SCBNL 0.9996 0.0002 0.0012 r > 6 P.E. ; significant
100
The table highlights the seven years Karl Pearson's correlation coefficient
(r) and probable error (P.E.) in between current assets and total assets of
NABIL, HBL and SCBNL which are 0.4783 and 0.1966, 0.8844 and 0.0555,
0.9996 and 0.0002 respectively. We can conclude that the highest degree of
correlation in between current assets and total assets is 0.9996 of SCBNL and
the lowest is 0.4783 of NABIL among the three JVBs. In the above figure,
there is moderate degree positive correlation coefficient in between current
assets and total assets of NABIL but since it is not 6 times more than P.E., it is
not considered as significant and the change in current assets does not affect the
volume of total assets to the great extent. On the other hand, there is high
degree positive correlation coefficient in between current assets and total assets
of HBL and SCBNL and as it is 6 times greater than P.E., it is considered as
significant and thereby changes in current assets affects volume of total assets.
Table no.: 19
Correlation
Banks P.E. 6×P.E. Correlation
(r)
NABIL 0.3547 0.2229 1.3374 r < 6 P.E. ; not significant
HBL 0.9041 0.0465 0.2793 r > 6 P.E. ; significant
SCBNL 0.9996 0.0002 0.0012 r > 6 P.E. ; significant
The above table highlights the seven years Karl Pearson's correlation
coefficient (r) and probable error (P.E.) in between current assets and current
liabilities of NABIL, HBL and SCBNL which are 0.3547 and 0.2229, 0.9041
and 0.0465, 0.9996 and 0.0002 respectively. We can conclude that the highest
degree of correlation in between current assets and current liabilities is 0.9996
of SCBNL and the lowest is 0.3547 of NABIL among the three JVBs .In the
above figure, the correlation coefficient in between current assets and current
liabilities of NABIL is positive but since it is not 6 times more than P.E., so it is
not considered as significant and the change in between current assets does not
affect the volume of current liabilities to the great extent. On the other hand, the
correlation coefficient in between cash and bank balance and current assets of
HBL and SCBNL is positive as well as 6 times greater than P.E., so it is
considered as significant and thereby changes in current assets affects volume
of current liabilities.
101
4.4.5 Karl Pearson's correlation coefficient and probable error of Return
and Current Assets of the three JVBs are tabulated below-
Table no.: 20
Correlation
Banks P.E. 6×P.E. Correlation
(r)
NABIL 0.7381 0.1160 0.6963 r > 6 P.E. ; significant
HBL 0.8803 0.0574 0.3443 r > 6 P.E.; significant
SCBNL 0.9322 0.0334 0.2004 r > 6 P.E. ; significant
The above table highlights the seven years Karl Pearson's correlation
coefficient (r) and probable error (P.E.) in between return and current assets of
NABIL, HBL and SCBNL which are 0.7381 and 0.1160, 0.8803 and 0.0574,
0.9322 and 0.0334 respectively. We can conclude that the highest degree of
correlation in between return and current assets is 0.9322 of SCBNL and the
lowest is 0.7381 of NABIL among the three JVBs. In the above figure, there is
high degree of positive correlation coefficient in between return and current
assets of NABIL, HBL and SCBNL. Since the correlation coefficient in
between return and current assets of NABIL, HBL and SCBNL is 6 times
greater than P.E., so it is considered as significant and thereby changes in return
affects the volume of current assets.
The following null hypothesis has been tested by the help of applying the
f-test on the basis of Current Assets of three JVBs.
102
Computation of test statistic:
Table no.: 21
T= ∑ X1+∑ X2+∑ X3
= 96306.54 + 114983.70 + 132538.13
= 343828.37
From above:
Decision:
The following null hypothesis has been tested by the help of applying the
f-test on the basis of Current Liabilities of three JVBs.
104
Computation of test statistic:
Table no. 22
T= ∑ X1+∑ X2+∑ X3
= 104471.37+ 134248.19 + 124916.58
= 363636.14
From above:
Decision:
Since computed value of F is less than its tabulated value, H0 is accepted
i.e. there is no significant difference in current liabilities of the three JVBs.
The following null hypothesis has been tested by the help of applying the
f-test on the basis of Current Assets of three JVBs.
106
Computation of test statistic:
Table no.: 23
T= ∑ X1+∑ X2+∑ X3
= 6080.38 + 10398.82 + 8279.47
= 24758.67
From above:
Decision:
Since computed value of F is greater than its tabulated value, H0 is
rejected i.e. there is a significant difference in cash and bank balance of the
three JVBs.
The following null hypothesis has been tested by the help of applying the
f-test on the basis of Current Assets of three JVBs.
108
Computation of test statistic:
Table no.: 24
T= ∑ X1+∑ X2+∑ X3
= 2548.81 + 1660.15 + 3246.15
= 7455.11
109
Sum of Squares Within Sample Banks (SSW)
= TSS - SSB
= 284837.12 - 180542.65
= 104294.47
From above:
Decision:
Since computed value of F is greater than its tabulated value, H0 is
rejected i.e. there is a significant difference in net profit of the three JVBs.
The following null hypothesis has been tested by the help of applying the
f-test on the basis of Current Assets of three JVBs.
110
Computation of test statistic:
Table no. 25
T= ∑ X1+∑ X2+∑ X3
= 1812.28+ 2890.21 + 1339.24
= 6041.73
111
Sum of Squares Within Sample Banks (SSW)
= TSS - SSB
= 366667.38 - 180533.71
= 186133.67
From above:
Decision:
The following null hypothesis has been tested by the help of applying the
f-test on the basis of Current Assets of three JVBs.
112
Computation of test statistic:
Table no.: 26
T= ∑ X1+∑ X2+∑ X3
= (-8,164.83) + (-19,264.49) + 7,242.30
= -13887.02
From above:
Decision:
114
CHAPTER-FIVE
5.1 Summary
The first chapter is the introductory and deals with the background, focus
of the study, statement of the problems, research questions, hypothesis of the
study, objectives of the study, need and significance of the study, limitation of
the study and organization of the study.
The third chapter discusses briefly the research methodology, which has
been used to evaluate the working capital management of the banks under
consideration. It discusses the research design, population and sample, sources
of data, data collection and data analysis tools used.
The fourth chapter is the main part of the study which deals with the
empirical analysis of the study. It deals in presentation and major findings of
the study of working capital management.
The fifth and final chapter is devoted to summary of the four earlier
chapters. This chapter tries to fetch out a conclusions of the study and attempts
to offer various suggestions and recommendations for the improvement of the
future performance of the three JVBs under review.
In order to carryout this study, data have been mainly obtained from
secondary sources such as annual reports and financial statement, official
records, periodicals, journals and bulletins of selected companies, various
published reports, etc. Besides, personal contacts with the respondents of
selected companies have also been made. This is the last chapter in which
summary, conclusion and recommendations are included.
5.2 Conclusion
This study is based on the different aspect of working capital
management. The major findings or conclusions derived from study of analysis
of ratios, trend analysis, correlation analysis and probable error, and the
hypothesis testing are summarized below-
116
5.2.1 Analysis of Ratios
The major findings or conclusions derived from the study of analysis of
ratios are summarized below-
After the study of cash and bank balance to current assets ratio of the
three JVBs , it has been found that both the banks NABIL and SCBNL have
been able to maintain quite similar and HBL slightly higher mean cash and
bank balance to current assets ratio. Again on the basis of C.V. of the ratio
during the study period, there is higher fluctuation in the ratio of NABIL and
SCBNL than the HBL.
After the study of cash and bank balance to total assets ratio of the three
JVBs, it has been found that both the banks NABIL and SCBNL have been
able to maintain quite similar and HBL slightly higher mean cash and bank
balance to total assets ratio. Again on the basis of C.V. of the ratio during the
study period, there is higher fluctuation in the ratio of NABIL and SCBNL than
the HBL.
After the study of current assets to total assets ratio of the three JVBs, it
has been found that SCBNL have been able to maintain higher mean current
assets to total assets ratio in comparison to the three JVBs. Again on the basis
of C.V. of the ratio during the study period, there is higher fluctuation in the
ratio of NABIL and HBL than the SCBNL.
After the study of current assets to fixed assets ratio of the three JVBs, it
has been found that SCBNL have been able to maintain higher mean current
assets to fixed assets ratio in comparison to the three JVBs. Again on the basis
of C.V. of the ratio during the study period, there is higher fluctuation in the
ratio of HBL and SCBNL than the NABIL.
After the study of net working capital to current assets ratio of the three
JVBs, it has been found that SCBNL have been able to maintain positive and
NABIL and HBL have been maintaining negative mean net working capital to
current assets ratio. Again on the basis of C.V. of the ratio during the study
period, there is higher fluctuation in the ratio of NABIL and HBL than the
SCBNL.
After the study of current assets to current liabilities ratio of the three
JVBs, it has been found that SCBNL have been able to maintain higher mean
current assets to current liabilities ratio in comparison to the three JVBs. Again
on the basis of C.V. of the ratio during the study period, there is higher
117
fluctuation in the ratio of NABIL and HBL than the SCBNL.
After the study of net profit after tax to current assets ratio of the three
JVBs, it has been found that NABIL have been able to maintain higher mean
net profit after tax to current assets ratio in comparison to the three JVBs.
Again on the basis of C.V. of the ratio during the study period, there is higher
fluctuation in the ratio of NABIL and HBL than the SCBNL.
After the study of net profit after tax to total assets ratio of the three
JVBs, it has been found that SCBNL have been able to maintain higher mean
net profit after tax to total assets ratio in comparison to the three JVBs. Again
on the basis of C.V. of the ratio during the study period, there is higher
fluctuation in the ratio of NABIL and HBL than the SCBNL.
After the study of receivables on total assets ratio of the three JVBs, it
has been found that HBL have been able to maintain higher mean receivables
on total assets ratio in comparison to the three JVBs. Again on the basis of C.V.
of the ratio during the study period, there is higher fluctuation in the ratio of
NABIL and SCBNL than the HBL.
After the study of receivables on current assets ratio of the three JVBs, it
has been found that HBL have been able to maintain higher mean receivables
on current assets ratio in comparison to the three JVBs. Again on the basis of
C.V. of the ratio during the study period, there is higher fluctuation in the ratio
of NABIL and SCBNL than the HBL.
After the study of quick assets to current liabilities ratio of the three
JVBs, it has been found that SCBNL have been able to maintain higher mean
quick assets to current liabilities ratio in comparison to the three JVBs. Again
on the basis of C.V. of the ratio during the study period, there is higher
fluctuation in the ratio of NABIL and HBL than the SCBNL.
After the study of cash and bank balance to current liabilities ratio of the
three JVBs, it has been found that HBL have been able to maintain higher mean
cash and bank balance to current liabilities ratio in comparison to the three
JVBs. Again on the basis of C.V. of the ratio during the study period, there is
higher fluctuation in the ratio of NABIL and SCBNL than the HBL.
After the study of debt to equity ratio of the three JVBs, it has been
found that HBL have been able to maintain higher mean debt to equity ratio in
comparison to the three JVBs. Again on the basis of C.V. of the ratio during the
study period, there is higher fluctuation in the ratio of NABIL and HBL than
the SCBNL.
118
After the study of net worth to total assets ratio of the three JVBs, it has
been found that NABIL have been able to maintain higher mean net worth to
total assets ratio in comparison to the three JVBs. Again on the basis of C.V. of
the ratio during the study period, there is higher fluctuation in the ratio of
NABIL and HBL than the SCBNL.
After the study of return on owner's equity ratio of the three JVBs, it has
been found that SCBNL have been able to maintain higher mean return on
owner's equity ratio in comparison to the three JVBs. Again on the basis of
C.V. of the ratio during the study period, there is higher fluctuation in the ratio
of NABIL and HBL than the SCBNL.
After the study of current assets trends of three JVBs from 2000/2001 to
2006/07, it has been revealed that the current assets of NABIL shows the
fluctuating trend throughout the period understudy as there is rise and fall in
successive years. The current assets of HBL marked an increasing trend
throughout the period understudy except in 2003/04. The current assets of the
SCBNL also marked an increasing trend throughout the period understudy
except in 2003/2004 and 2006/07. This indicates that the current assets
management of HBL and SCBNL is better in comparison to the NABIL.
After the study of current liabilities trends of three JVBs from 2000/2001
to 2006/07, the current liabilities of NABIL shows the fluctuating trend
throughout the period understudy as there is rise and fall in successive years.
The current liabilities marked an increasing trend throughout the period
understudy. The current assets of the SCBNL marked an increasing trend
throughout the period understudy except in 2003/2004 and 2006/07. This
indicates that the current liabilities of HBL and SCBNL are greater in
comparison to the NABIL.
After the study of cash and bank balance trends of three JVBs from
2000/2001 to 2006/07, the cash and bank balance of NABIL indicates highly
fluctuating trend throughout the period understudy. The cash and bank balance
of HBL marked an increasing trend throughout the period understudy except in
2003/04 and 2006/07. The cash and bank balance of the SCBNL marked a
fluctuating trend throughout the period understudy. This indicates that the cash
and bank balance of NABIL and SCBNL is lower in comparison to the HBL
which may be termed as both good and worst as greater cash and bank balances
119
is good for the banks because it will increase there working capital and they can
perform their operations smoothly whereas it is worst because greater cash
balance may indicate idle cash which incurs cost.
After the study of total assets trends of three JVBs from 2000/2001 to
2006/07, the total assets of NABIL show the increasing trend in the year
2000/01, 2002/03 and 2006/07 and decreasing trend in the remaining years.
The total assets of HBL marked an increasing trend throughout the period
understudy. The total assets of SCBNL marked an increasing trend throughout
the period understudy except in 2003/2004 and 2006/07. This indicates that the
total assets management of HBL and SCBNL is better in comparision to the
NABIL.
After the study of the owner equity trends of three JVBs from 2000/2001
to 2006/07, the owner equity of NABIL, HBL and SCBNL all the three marked
an increasing trend throughout the period understudy but there is slow increase
in NABIL and SCBNL as compared to the high increase in the HBL.
After the study of the net profit after tax trends of three JVBs from
2000/2001 to 2006/07, the net profit after tax of NABIL shows the increasing
trend in the year 2001/02, 2004/05, 2005/06 and 2006/07 and decreasing trend
in the remaining years. The net profit after tax of HBL marked an increasing
trend throughout the period understudy except in the year 2003/04 and 2004/05.
The net profit after tax of SCBNL marked an increasing trend throughout the
period understudy as there is gradual increase in the successive years. This
indicates that the net profit after tax of SCBNL is the best among the rest and
is able to give higher return to the shareholders, creditors and is satisfying
them.
121
NABIL is positive but since it is not 6 times more than P.E., so it is not
considered as significant and the change in between current assets does not
affect the volume of current liabilities to the great extent. On the other hand, the
correlation coefficient in between cash and bank balance and current assets of
HBL and SCBNL is positive as well as 6 times greater than P.E., so it is
considered as significant and thereby changes in current assets affects volume
of current liabilities.
After the testing of Hypothesis on the basis of cash and bank balance, it
was found that the computed value of F i.e. 3.90 was greater than its tabulated
value i.e. 3.55. Therefore, null hypothesis (H0) is rejected and alternative
hypothesis (H1) is accepted i.e. there is a significant difference in cash and bank
balance of the three JVBs.
After the testing of Hypothesis on the basis of net profit, it was found
122
that the computed value of F i.e. 15.58 was greater than its tabulated value i.e.
3.55. Therefore, null hypothesis (H0) is rejected and alternative hypothesis (H1)
is accepted i.e. there is a significant difference in net profit of the three JVBs.
After the testing of Hypothesis on the basis of net working capital, it was
found that the computed value of F i.e. 8.52 was greater than its tabulated value
i.e. 3.55. Therefore, null hypothesis (H0) is rejected and alternative hypothesis
(H1) is accepted i.e. there is a significant difference in net working capital of
the three JVBs.
5.3 Recommendation
Many countries of the world after the end of world war have come under
economic liberalization and open market systems. In Nepal also, the elected
democratic government has endeavoured to enhance the pace of country's
economic development with its new economic policies, various reforms and
programmes like the declaration of new industry policy, foreign investment
under the one window policy, and so on. In this contest, it has been thought
irrelevant to influence business units by dictating their activities in certain lines.
Thus, any industry, business or financial unit operating because of HMG’s
liberal, benevolent policies and programmes require their responsibility and
commitment towards the society as well. The Nepalese companies cannot
overlook this necessary precondition of economic welfare. So time itself
demands some changes and alterations in the preconceived policies and
programmes no matter how well they were furnished. A few timely
recommendations for these companies have been prescribed below.
Based on the analysis and the findings of the study of the three JVBs,
following recommendations can be advanced to overcome weakness and
inefficiency and continue with the proper, systematic and smooth operation of
the bank-
1. The study is based on secondary data and includes only three JVBs and
seven years data due to time constraint. So research based on primary
data including more number of JVBs and maximum number of years
may be a good option to choose for.
2. All these three JVBs should have a regular check on current assets to
identify the adequate and inadequate amount of current assets as both
hampers the smooth operation of the banks as well as avoids risk in
management of working capital.
123
3. The average net working capital of NABIL and HBL are negative so
these banks should try to increase these values.
5. To generate more profit all these three JVBs should concentrate more on
safer loans and advances.
6. The fixed assets of all these three JVBs should be valued properly as per
the current market value and depreciate them accordingly.
7. The three JVBs should retain more of its profit, as they are doing during
the study, to reinvest and to increase net worth.
8. Since the average net profit of HBL is comparatively lower than the
NABIL and SCBNL, so HBL is suggested to improve its average net
profit in order to remain competent in the market. This objective can be
accomplished by increasing income sources as well as decreasing cost or
expenditures.
9. Since all these three JVBs are maintaining higher liquidity than the
directives of NRB, it is suggested that idle fund should not be
maintained as it incurs opportunity cost. They should provide short term
loan that matures within short span of time and can easily be
rediscounted instead of maintaining higher cash balances to remain
liquidity.
10. Since the average net worth of HBL is comparatively lower than the
NABIL and SCBNL, so HBL is suggested to improve its average net
worth. This objective can be accomplished by retaining earnings or
maintaining lower dividend pay out ratio.
11. It is well known that new players are entering the banking sector every
now and then with very modern technologies and innovative products
and services, creating immense competition within this sector. These
may allow them to attract more customers resulting in shifting from one
bank to another. So, all these three JVBs should keep on upgrading its
system in order to be competitive.
13. Finally, since all these three JVBs are profit-oriented, they should also
not forget their social responsibilities. Today, thinking about how to
make the banking system friendlier to the small and medium businesses
and the poor Nepalese more generally is what social responsibility
demands.
125