0% found this document useful (0 votes)
48 views12 pages

Correcionamsn

The document discusses the density of states and entropy of a perfect 3D atomic gas. It derives an expression for the entropy of the gas as a function of energy, volume, and number of particles. It then expresses the entropy in terms of a distance and momentum and relates it to Boltzmann's statement about phase space cells. Finally, it calculates the microcanonical temperature and pressure of the gas.

Uploaded by

huyền Trần
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
48 views12 pages

Correcionamsn

The document discusses the density of states and entropy of a perfect 3D atomic gas. It derives an expression for the entropy of the gas as a function of energy, volume, and number of particles. It then expresses the entropy in terms of a distance and momentum and relates it to Boltzmann's statement about phase space cells. Finally, it calculates the microcanonical temperature and pressure of the gas.

Uploaded by

huyền Trần
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 12

USTH Master 1 AMSN

Thermodynamics for physics and chemistry


Exam of March 2023 (2 h - inspired from U.Paris Saclay )

1. (a) The density of states of a perfect 3D atomic gas in a container of volume V for N atoms
has been proven in the course to be

V 3√
dn = (2m) 2 E dE
4π2 ℏ3
where m is the mass of the atoms
The integrated density of states is then

2 V 3 3
n(E) = (2m) 2 E 2
3 4π2 ℏ3

V 3 3
n(E) = 2 3
(2m) 2 E 2
6π ℏ
so we have the correct power law from the given formula and correct homogeneity but
we lack some terms. We need to use

S = kB ln Zm
.
where the total density of states is the total accessible volume in the phase space for a
given energy divided semi-classically by the quantum of action h :

1
Z
Zm (E) = 3N d 3 x1 d 3 p1 . . . d 3 xN d 3 pN δ(E − H(⃗x1 ,⃗p1 , . . . ,⃗xN ,⃗pN ))
h R6N

the Hamiltonian for the perfect gas is

N
⃗pi2
H(⃗x1 ,⃗p1 , . . . ,⃗xN ,⃗pN ) = ∑
i=1 2m

thus
!
N
1 ⃗p 2
Z Z
Zm (E) = d 3 x1 . . . d 3 xN d 3 p1 . . . d 3 pN δ E − ∑ i
(2πℏ)3N | R3N {z } R3N i=1 2m
VN

For the impulsions we have an 3N dimensional sphere with radius


N
p = (∑i=1 ⃗pi2 )1/2

The surface element for impulsion is d p times p3N−1 times the volume element dΩ3N ,
hence

VN
Z Z ∞
Zm (E) = dΩ3N d p p3N−1 δ(E − p2 /2m)
(2πℏ)3N 0

1
The integral over
dΩ3N
is the surface of a 3N dimensional sphere
3N 3N
2π 2 2π 2
S3N−1 = 3N = 3N
Γ( 2 ) ( 2 − 1)!
The Delta-Function gives after accounting
√ for the two possible signs in the square and
a change of variables since p = 2mE
m h √ √ i
δ(E − p2 /2m) = √ δ( 2mE − p) + δ( 2mE + p)
2mE

3N h √
VN 2π 2 m
Z ∞
3N−1
√ i
Zm (E) = √ d p p δ( 2mE − p) + δ( 2mE + p)
(2πℏ)3N ( 3N
2 − 1)! 2mE | 0 {z }
√ 3N−1
2mE


taking the value of the Dirac peak at 2mE the integral disappears and we get
3N
VN (2πmE) 2 3N
Zm (E) =
N!(2πℏ)3N
( 3N
2 )!
2E
with the Stirling approximation and dividing by N! in order to account (in an imperfect
quantum way) for the indiscernibility of particles

N! ≈ N N e−N 2πN

3N
VN (2πmE) 2 3N
Zm (E) = √ 3N 3N √
N N e−N ( 2πN2πℏ)3N ( 3N 2 − 2
2 ) e 3πN 2E
collecting terms
 N   3N2
V 4πmE 5N 3
Zm (E) = 2
e2 √
N 3N(2πℏ) 2 6πE
The entropy becomes

     
V 3N 4πmE 5N 3
S = kB ln Zm (E) = kB N ln + kB ln + kB + kB ln √
N 2 3N(2πℏ)2 2 2 6πE

Neglecting the last term we find


"  3/2 !#
5 V mE
S(E,V, N) = NkB + ln
2 N 3πℏ2 N

(b) Show that S can be written as S = 3NkB ln(a∆x∆p/h) , where ∆x is a distance and ∆p
a momentum. Comment.

A momentum ∆p is homogeneous to mE. So getting this in the equation we have

2
"  3  3/2 !#
5 V (2π∆p) 1
S(E,V, N) = NkB + ln
2 N h 3πN

Writing V = ∆x3 we get


" 3  3/2 !#
∆x3

5 2π∆p 1
S(E,V, N) = NkB + ln
2 N h 3πN

and
" 1/2 !#
4π2
 
5 ∆x ∆p
S(E,V, N) = NkB + 3 ln
2 N h 3πN

giving the desired result with


 1/2
51 4π
a=
6N 3N
We find Boltzmann’s statement about cutting phase space in cells of size h.
(c) Calculate the micro-canonical temperature T and pressure P. Derive an expression of
the entropy as a function of the number density n = N/V and the de Broglie wavelength
h
Λ = √2πmk T
.
B
The temperature by definition of the entropy in the second principle of thermodynamics
is

1 ∂S
=
T ∂E
here

∂S 3N 3nR 1
= kB = =
∂E 2E 2E T

2E
T=
3nR
with R the perfect gas constant and nm the number of moles (N = nm NA with NA equal
to Avogadro’s number)
We had already met this result for perfect gases.
The pressure is the derivative of the entropy as

∂S
P=T
∂V
here
1
P = T kB N
V
and
PV = nm RT

with the number density


n = N/V

3
and the expression of the energy as a function of temperature E = 32 NkB T we get from
"  3/2 !#
5 V mE
S(E,V, N) = NkB + ln
2 N 3πℏ2 N
  !3/2 
5 1 m 23 kB T
S(E,V, N) = nV kB  + ln  
2 n 3πℏ2

(2πℏ)2
with de Broglie’s wavelength kB T = 2πmΛ2
we get
 
(ℏ)2
!3/2 
5 1 Λ2
S(E,V, N) = nV kB  + ln  
2 n ℏ2

and simplifying
"  3/2 !#
5 1 1
S(E,V, N) = nV kB + ln
2 n Λ2
  
5 1
S(E,V, N) = nV kB + ln
2 nΛ3
2. (a) Formulate the extensivity property that must be satisfied by the micro-canonical en-
tropy S(E,V, N) of the gas.
When the size of the system doubles, the entropy should double.
(b) We consider two identical volumes of the same gas separated by a wall. Calculate the
difference between the entropy of this system and the entropy of the system with the
wall removed.

∆S = S(2E, 2V, 2N) − 2S(E,V, N)

Why do we say that this result is paradoxical ?


Let’s go back to our calculation for the entropy above but without the N! factor. We
had
3N
V N (2πmE) 2 3N
Zm (E) =
(2πℏ)3N ( 3N
2 )!
2E

S = kB ln Zm (E)

thus

∆S = S(2E, 2V, 2N) − 2S(E,V, N)


3N
neglegting 2E as above
3N
(2V )2N (4πmE)3N V N (2πmE) 2
= kB ln − 2k B ln
(2πℏ)6N (3N!) (2πℏ)3N ( 3N
2 )!

4
3N 3N
∆S = kB (2N ln(2V )−6N ln 2πℏ+3N ln 4πmE −ln (3N)!−2(N lnV −3N ln 2πℏ+ ln(2πmE)−ln ( )!))
2 2

3N
∆S = kB (2N ln(2) − ln (3N)! − 2 ln ( )!))
2
taking Stirling’s approximation again

N! ≈ N N e−N 2πN

we get

3N 3N 3N 3N 3N
∆S = kB (2N ln(2) − 3N ln 3N − 3N + − 2(− ln − + ))
2 2 2 2 4

3N
∆S = kB (2N ln(2) − 3N ln 3N + 3N ln ))
2

∆S = kB N ln(2)

which is obviously not zero


the differences in factorials is indeed (taking only the two first terms of Stirling’s ap-
proximation)

ln(2N!) − 2 ln N! ≈ 2N ln 2N − 2N − 2N ln N + 2N = N ln 2

(c) Indistinguishability.– Compare S(E,V, N) to the Sackur-Tetrode formula Discuss the


extensivity in the two cases. Verify that if we calculate the entropy of mixing using the
indiscernibility factor N! we have ∆S = 0
With the Sackur-Tetrode formula we have
"  3/2 !#
5 V mE
S(E,V, N) = NkB + ln
2 N 3πℏ2 N

∆S = S(2E, 2V, 2N) − 2S(E,V, N)

and
 
5 2V 2mE 3/2 5 V mE 3/2
∆S = 2NkB ( + ln( ( 2
) )) − 2NkB ( + ln( ) )
2 2N 3πℏ 2N 2 N 3πℏ2 N

∆S = 0

so Sackur-Tetrode gives us extensivity thanks to the factorial.


3. Grand Canonical ensemble (Systems in contact with a particle reservoir)
We consider an ideal gas at thermodynamic equilibrium in a volume V . We fix the tempe-
rature T and chemical potential µ

5
(a) Show that the grand potential may be written as J(T, µ,V ) = V j(T, µ). Discuss the
physical interpretation of the "volumetric density of the grand potential" j.
The grand potential is defined by J(T, µ,V ) = −kB T ln Ξ where Ξ is the grand partition
function itself coming from the canonical partition function as

Ξ= ∑ eβµN QN
N=0

with QN = zN and z = ∑i e−βεi


The grand partition function is extensive, therefore the volume can be factorized out,
giving a quantity with the same homogeneity than pressure.
(b) We consider a dilute gas of monoatomic classical particles, for which we may assume
that the Maxwell-Boltzmann approximation is justified. For this question no supple-
mentary hypothesis (the number of the degrees of freedom, their relativistic or non-
relativistic nature, their dynamics, etc.) will be needed. We introduce z, the single par-
ticle partition fonction. Justify that z α V . Show that the grand canonical partition
fonction is

Ξ = exp(eβµ z)
.
Deduce the average number of particles N̄ and the pressure p . Show that, under this
minimal hypothesis, it is possible to derive the equation of state of the ideal gas, pV =
NkB T
We have

Ξ= ∑ eβµN QN
N=0


Ξ= ∑ eβµN zN
N=0


Ξ= ∑ (eβµ z)N
N=0

From the previous question and the course material we have


 
∂J
p=−
∂V T

then
!
∂ ∑∞ βµN zN
N=0 e
p=−
∂V
T

since the single particle partition function is extensive z = cV with c a constant


!

βµN N N−1
p=− ∑e c NV
N=0 T

also from the course we have the average number of particles

6
∂J ∂ ∑∞ eβµN (cV )N
N̄ = − = − N=0
∂µ ∂µ

N̄ = − ∑ βNeβµN (cV )N
N=0


N̄ = −β ∑ NeβµN (cV )N
N=0

N̄ = βV p

N̄kB T = V p

and we find the law of perfect gases.


(c) Let us call ε̄ the average energy per particle. Show that the average total energy is

Ē = N̄ ε̄

The average total energy is gotten from the grand partition function as

βµN zN
∑∞
N=0 Ee
Ē =
Ξ

1 ∂J
Ē = −
β ∂β


Ē = − ln ∑ eβµN zN
∂β N=0
N−1
∞ βµN zN + N ∂z
1 µN ln ∑N=0 e ∂β
Ē = − βµN zN
β ∑∞N=0 e

∂zN−1 ∂(∑∞ −βεi )N−1


i=0 e
=
∂β ∂β
∂zN−1 ∞
= −(N − 1)εi ( ∑ e−βεi )N−2
∂β i=0

Assuming that N is close to N − 1 or N − 2 we recognize the expression for the average


energy per particle
(d) Using
 
∂ µ ∂
Var(E) = − + Ē
∂β β ∂µ
show that

Var(E) = N̄ ε¯2

Compare with the variance of the energy in the canonical ensemble.

7
 
∂ µ ∂ 1 ∂J
Var(E) = − + (− )
∂β β ∂µ β ∂β

1 ∂2 J µ ∂2 J
Var(E) = − −
β ∂β2 β2 ∂µ∂β
(e) Show that the entropy is
 
∂ ln z
S = N̄kB 1 − − µβ
∂ ln β
The entropy is given by probabilities pi of each state with

S = −kB ∑ pN,i ln pN,i


N,i

eβ(Nµ−ei )
S = −kB ∑ pN,i ln
N,i Ξ

S = −kB ∑ pN,i (− ln Ξ + βNµ − βei )


N,i

S = −kB (∑ pN,i − ln Ξ + βNµ ∑ pN,i − ∑ pN,i βei )


N,i N,i N,i

Remind that ∑N,i pN,i = 1 and recognize the average energy to get

S = −kB (ln Ξ + βN̄µ − βĒ)

so we have one part of the desired result. on the other hand

∂ ln z ∂ ln z dβ
=
∂ ln β ∂β d ln β
but


d ln β
so
∂ ln z ∂ ln z

∂ ln β ∂β
and

∂ ln z ∂
= ln e−β−ei
∂β ∂β ∑ i

e−βei
= ∑ −βei
i z

= −βĒ

We will get the energy E from the free energy F and the entropy S by F = E − T S.
Those quantities read
F = J + µN

8
 
∂J
S=−
∂T V,µ

therefore
 
∂J
E = F + T S = J + µN − T
∂T V,µ

∂J dβ
E = J + µN − T
∂β dT

∂J 1
E = J + µN +
∂β kB T

∂J
E = J + µN + β
∂β
(f) Justify that z α V . With z(T,V ) = V /Λ3 express Λ (up to a dimensionlesss factor) for
non relativistic particles (ε = p2 /(2m)) and ultra-relativist particles (ε = pc). Recover
the expression of µ(T, N). Deduce that the entropy coincides with the Sackur-Tétrode
formula.
We have already seen in the course and above for the perfect classical gas that

V
z(T,V ) =
Λ3
with

h
Λ= √
2πmkB T
We should divide by the indiscernibility factor N!

zN βNµ
Ξ=∑ e
N N!

( ΛV3 )N βNµ
Ξ=∑ e
N N!
using the factorial we recognize the Taylor series of an exponential
 
V βµ
Ξ = exp e
Λ3
From this we get the grand potential

J = −kB T ln Ξ

the average particle number

∂J V βµ
N̂ = − = e
∂µ Λ3
from which we get the chemical potential

9
Λ3
µ = kB T ln N̂
V
and the entropy
 
∂J
S=−
∂T V,µ
 

S=− − kb T ln Ξ
∂T

∂ V βµ
S = kb T e
∂T Λ3
we have three terms depending on T
 
1 βµ 3 µ
S = kBVe 1+ −
Λ3 2 kB T 2

J 5
S= ( − βµ)
T 2
now since
Λ3
µ = kB T ln N̂
V
and

V βµ
N̂ = e = −βJ
Λ3
we recover the Sackur -Tetrode formula

5 Λ3
S = kB N̂( + ln N̂ )
2 V
4. We consider a container of volume V filled with a monatomic ideal gas of indistinguishable
atoms. This gas is in contact with a solid interface that may adsorb (trap) the gas atoms.
We model the interface as an ensemble of A adsorption sites. Each site can adsorb only one
atom, which then has an energy −εo
The system is in equilibrium at a temperature T and we model the adsorbed atoms, i.e.
the adsorbed phase, as a system with a fluctuating number of particles at fixed chemical
potential µ and temperature T . The gas acts as a reservoir.
(a) Derive the grand-canonical partition function ξ for a single adsorption site. Deduce the
grand-canonical partition function Ξ(T, A, µ) for all atoms adsorbed on the surface.

ξ= ∑ eβµN zN
N=0

The canonical partition function is



z = ∑ e−βεi
i=0

We have only two possibilities : zero atom or one atom so that

10
z = 1 + e+βε0

and

ξ= ∑ eβµN zN
N=0

ξ = 1 + eβµ z
since we have only two possibilities on each site : no atom or 1 atom.
for all atoms on the surface if we account for indiscernability

A A
zN 1 βµN
Ξ= ∑ eβµN = ∑ e (1 + eβε0 )N
N=0 N! N=0 N!
we recognize the expansion of the Taylor series of an exponential of argument r =
eβµ (1 + eβε0 ) so we have

Ξ = er

(b) We will now explore an alternative route. Derive the canonical partition function Z(T, A, N)
of a collection of N adsorbed atoms (Note : the number of adsorbed atoms N is much
smaller than the number of sites A). Recover the results for Ξ(T, A, µ) obtained in the
previous question.
by definition

Z(T, A, N) = ∑ e−βε i

i=0

so since the energy for not absorbed atoms is zero giving a 1 in the exponential ; for N
atoms the energy is −Nε0 ; thus

Z(T, A, N) = (1 + eNβε0 )

A
1 βµN
Ξ= ∑ e Z
N=0 N!

A
1 βµN
Ξ= ∑ e (1 + eNβε0 ).
N=0 N!
We have once again the expansion of the Taylor series of an exponential of argument

r = eβµ (1 + eβε0 )

by making the approximation that N is much smaller than A and recognizing the ex-
pansion of a power series in (1 + x)N ≈ 1 + Nx

11
(c) Calculate the average number of adsorbed atoms N as a function of εo , µ, A, T . From
this, derive the occupation probability θ = N/A of an adsorption site.
by the course

∂ ∂
N̄ = kb T ln Ξ = kb T eβµ (1 + eβε0 )
∂µ ∂µ

N̄ = kB T βeβµ (1 + eβε0 )

N̄ = eβµ (1 + eβε0 )
(d) The chemical potential µ is fixed by the ideal gas. This may be used to deduce an
expression for the site occupation probability θ as a function of the gas pressure P and
temperature T (note that the number of atoms N is much smaller than the number of
gas atoms).
we had found for the perfect gas with NA gas atoms

Λ3
µ = kB T ln NA
V
as a function of pressure

PΛ3
µ = kB T ln NA
NA kB T
injecting this in the above equation for N̄

N̄ = eβµ (1 + eβε0 )
we get
3
ln NA NPΛk (1+eβε0 )
N̄ = e A BT

N̄ = PΛ3 kB T (1 + eβε0 )
(e) We define a parameter
  32  
2πmkB T ε0
P0 (T ) = kB T exp −
h2 kB T
Express θ as a function of P and P0 (T )
 
P ε0
N̄ = exp (1 + eβε0 )
P0 kB T
 
P ε0
N̄ = (exp + 1)
P0 kB T
P
θ = N̄/A = (1 + e−βε0 )
AP0
(f) How does the curve θ(P) behave for different temperatures ?
When the temperature increases β goes to zero so that the exponential goes to 1 ,but P0
goes to infinity so that θ goes to zero.
5 5
For low temperatures β goes to infinity, P0 behaves as T 2 , so that θ behaves as T − 2
and increases.

12

You might also like