Front Matter
Front Matter
RECONSTRUCTION
SECOND EDITION
LUCIEN C. HAAG
Forensic Science Services, Inc.
Carefree, Arizona
Printed in China
11 12 13 14 15 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
Also, to Luke and Sandi for a much-appreciated boost into a career I love, and to
my wife, whose unswerving support in this wild profession has been
a source of unbelievable strength.
Michael Haag
For Sandi, Matt, and Mike for whom nearly every picnic or outing
in our beautiful Arizona desert ended in gunfire.
And to the memory of Gene Wolberg.
Lucien Haag
Introduction xi
Introduction to First Edition 5. Some Useful Reagents
by Lucien C. (Luke) Haag xv and Their Application 67
Introduction 67
1. Case Approach, Philosophy, and Testing for Copper, Lead, and Nickel 67
Objectives 1 The Dithiooxamide Test for Copper Residues 70
The Sodium Rhodizonate Test for Lead Residues 75
Why This Book? 1 Direct-Application Methods for Testing 77
Reconstruction: The Ultimate Goal of Criminalistics 2 “Lifting,” or Transfer, Methods for Testing 79
Basic Skills and Approach to Casework 2 The Dimethylglyoxime Test for Nickel Residues 81
General Philosophy 5 Summary and Concluding Comments 84
The Scientific Method 6
Specific Considerations 7 6. Distance and Orientation
Summary and Concluding Comments 10
Derived from Gunshot
Residue Patterns 87
2. Working Shooting Scenes 13
Introduction 87
Introduction 13
Target Materials 93
The Team 14
Interpretation and Reporting of Results 93
At the Scene 15
GSR and Revolvers 95
Investigation Teams and Laboratory Work 27
The Modified Griess Test for Nitrite Residues 97
New Techniques in Shooting Scene
Primer Residues 100
Investigations 27
Summary and Concluding Comments 102
Summary and Concluding Comments 31
7. Projectile Penetration
3. The Reconstructive Aspects and Perforation 105
of Class Characteristics and
a Limited Universe 35 Introduction 105
Sheetrock/Wallboard 106
Bullet Design and Construction 35 Wood 110
Class Characteristics and Fired Cartridge Casings 38 Sheet Metal 112
Class Characteristics and Fired Bullets 41 Rubber and Elastics 118
Revolvers and the Limited Universe 47 Plastics 123
The Worth of Weight 48 Summary and Concluding Comments 123
Summary and Concluding Comments 53
8. Projectiles and Glass 125
4. Is It a Bullet Hole? 55 Introduction 125
The Question of Holes 55 Evidence of Glass Impact on Bullets 125
Bullet Holes in Typical Materials 62 Types of Glass 129
Summary and Concluding Comments 65 Summary and Concluding Comments 141
vii
As I write this second edition of Shooting Take comfort in that, and know that while
Incident Reconstruction, I reflect on my expe- we should always keep an open mind to
riences with firearms and my professional criticisms and new ideas, we are not driven
experiences with investigations of shooting to any conclusion to please a lawyer, police
incidents. I was extremely fortunate to have investigator, plaintiff, defendant, judge, or
grown up with two fantastic parents who supervisor. Most carefully, we should guard
encouraged inquisitiveness, thoughtfulness, against any belief that what we conclude
and a sense of excitement for the unknown. is relevant to any sort of sense of justice. At
Such characteristics are common in the indi- the end of the day, we must all report only
viduals who have inspired me personally what we believe the evidence is telling us.
and professionally. This may mean a simple “I don’t know” or
Of the volumes of information I have col- “Inconclusive”; that is, the result is the best
lected from my dad, there is one quote that we can glean from the available informa-
I commonly find comforting when dealing tion. The scientists who do their job correctly
with lawyers, investigators, and peers. It are at peace with this, knowing that we are
sums up a very pure thought and intention interpreters, and a voice, for otherwise mute
that should be a foundational belief of any- physical evidence. We are not avenging
one in this profession: “We aren’t in the hap- angels, servants of a higher power, or pup-
piness business.” No matter what we find, pets to simply repeat or publish what an
someone will be unhappy. Unlike the many attorney or police official would like to hear.
“CSI” programs that populate television From my earliest years, I remember see-
these days, it is a fact of real life in foren- ing both the positive and the negative effects
sics. One side or the other will want to find of people’s use of firearms. Many of my
something to criticize in our work, and that weekends from grade school on were spent
is the nature of an adversarial legal system. in the beautiful Arizona deserts and forests
In the end, this is a good thing. It ensures conducting experimental research or case
that we are always on our toes as we attempt investigations relating to firearms. These
to improve the quality of our work. It also endeavors were often spawned from some
means that we should be open to new ideas horrific event created by one human being’s
and concepts because the way we investi- actions toward another, but the more impor-
gate events is always changing (hopefully tant aspect of these times were the life les-
for the better). In an era in which ASCLD- sons I learned from my parents with regard
ISO literature governing the accreditation to personal use of firearms and respect for
of crime laboratories in the United States them.
attempts to have the scientist act in a fashion While I was becoming familiar with the
that is oriented toward “customer” service, reconstructive aspects of firearms and of
the correct forensic scientist will step back ammunition, as well as terminal and external
and repeat the mantra, “I am not in the happi- ballistics, I was almost subconsciously learn-
ness business.” ing about the great responsibilities that should
xi
be associated with the ownership of fire- Following the receipt of his Bachelor
arms. These lessons of conscientiousness and of Science degree from the University
responsibility should be, and are, common of California at Berkeley, Luke took sev-
sense to most law-abiding owners of firearms. eral courses in criminalistics at California
But there is a strange dichotomy in my life in State College at Long Beach, where he first
that my work and passion—shooting incident became aware that firearms identification
reconstruction—is fueled by the antithesis of was a part of this profession. A career in
these tenents. criminalistics and a position in a crime labo-
The first edition of this book was written ratory would be a way to apply his training
by my father as a result of a life-long interest in chemistry, math, and physics to tests and
in and enjoyment of firearms: their power, experiments with firearms.
their mystique, their ability to defend a life, This ideal arrangement was realized
to save a life, and to take a life. We are both when he obtained a position as a criminalist
passionate about the Second Amendment— for the City of Phoenix in June of 1965. His
in fact, all of the amendments to the U.S. arrival there made the Phoenix Police Crime
Constitution—and are always very troubled Laboratory a two-man organization. It was a
by those who would pervert it, abolish it, or classic case of being in the right place at the
deny law-abiding citizens the ability to keep right time.
and bear arms in the defense of themselves During the next decade, he worked in
and others. all sections of this growing crime labora-
For Luke also, an interest in firearms tory, including the new firearms section.
started when he was a boy. He grew up Sometime during the 1970s he became the
outside of Springfield, Illinois, where he supervising criminalist of the Phoenix lab.
received his first BB gun, a Red Ryder 500- All the while, the firearms-friendly State
shot lever-action blue-steel beauty that still of Arizona provided many locations and
today resides somewhere among the many opportunities to carry out applied research,
firearms he has come to own. and he began writing and publishing papers
During his high-school years in Lynwood, in the forensic literature.
California, Luke became an avid hand In 1982 Luke left the Phoenix laboratory to
loader for several centerfire rifles and hand- start his own consulting company specializ-
guns, joined the high school rifle team, and ing in the investigation of shooting incidents.
often spent his weekends in the Mohave He then continued to experiment, to pub-
Desert camping and enjoying informal tar- lish, and to give training seminars related to
get shooting. It was during these outings firearms evidence and shooting scene recon-
that he came to be more and more interested struction. These seminars and workshops
in the technical and scientific aspects of fire- ultimately became the book Shooting Incident
arms. He began to ponder questions such as Reconstruction, first published in 2005.
“How far do bullets travel?” “How far do The dedication in the first edition has a
ricocheted bullets travel?” “What do such somewhat tongue-in-cheek apology to my
bullets look like after they have ricocheted mother, my older brother Matt, and me for
off a variety of surfaces?” “What do a bullet “subjecting” us to experiments that were
and a gunshot sound like when heard from nearly always a part of any outing in the
a substantial distance downrange?” “How desert or mountains of our state. My memo-
deeply do bullets penetrate into a variety of ries of my youth often involved some sort
materials?” of experimenting. Soon I was helping my
At the time this introduction was writ- also pressure us to extend ourselves beyond
ten, the author had been employed as a where we should go in the furtherance of
criminalist and forensic firearm examiner their cause. Our employer’s cause must not
for more than 39 years, 17 of these with the become our cause. Our only advocacy must
Phoenix Arizona Police Department as a be for our analysis of the evidence carried
criminalist and later as technical director of out by scientifically sound means.
that laboratory, followed by another 22 as a As well, the reader should remember that
private consultant working for prosecutors; it is often our cross-examiner’s mission to
private attorneys; educational institutions; make us look like biased witnesses, fools,
insurance companies; law firms; firearms lackeys, mountebanks, or incompetents. The
manufacturers; and, on occasion, private witness stand is a decidedly uncomfortable
individuals. I had always found the work environment for most scientists, and one
interesting and challenging and still do. best observed in the movies or on television
The concept of how science might aid the rather than from the actual site. It is, and
court and jury in determining what did and should be, a stressful place, but it is one that
did not happen in the matter at trial is still I have become used to and have even come
an exciting one for me. Although many of to enjoy for the reasons stated earlier.
us in the field of forensic science frequently At the risk of seeming a bit immodest,
disparage lawyers and the legal process, it it occurred to me that some readers might
is the anomalous trial outcome that gains be interested in how I became gainfully
our attention and generates our scorn. Most employed (indeed, well paid) shooting guns
of the time juries are able to grasp the evi- and shooting things for a living.
dence we present, and that should be all I grew up in the Midwest in the late 1940s
that matters. What they do with that infor- and early 1950s. Guns—some of which were
mation may be, at times, disappointing to always loaded—were in almost every home
us personally but their decision is not ours and farmhouse I visited. My childhood
to make and it may often be made on some friends all had access to firearms, and after
other basis than observations and opinions school we could often be found in a field with
derived from the physical evidence. a rifle or shotgun. This was with our parents’
Working within the legal system is also permission but without them necessarily
fascinating. I suspect nearly all of us enjoy a being present. It was an age of trust on their
good courtroom drama. A trial can be high part and personal responsibility on our part.
exciting, involving verbal and mental chess At the age of 6 or 7 I received my first
on the part of lawyers and witnesses. Lives, Red Ryder BB gun from my father, and this
careers, futures, personal freedom, and, in is when my marksmanship training began.
civil cases, large amounts of money are often Neither I nor my friends ever considered
at stake. The side that calls us as expert wit- using a gun to commit a crime or to endanger
nesses will usually praise our work, but may someone or damage property. We certainly
xv
never discussed shooting at one of our class- our special knowledge and proficiency with
mates, our school, or our teachers. firearms is why we are citizens and not sub-
My fondest memories of my father are of jects. It is why we rightfully honor men such
getting up before daybreak, having break- as Alvin York and Audie Murphy—those
fast at some roadside truck stop, and then who grew up with firearms and used them
getting into the frosty woods at dawn with for hunting, sport, and recreation and later
the sound of crunching autumn leaves used them so effectively in the defense of
underfoot and with my rifle or my shotgun freedom.
in hand. It didn’t much matter whether we In their day and in my youth, firearms
got any squirrels or rabbits or whatever were more accessible and readily available
was the quarry of the day. We walked and with little or no restrictions (other than
talked, and I learned of nature. those imposed by our parents) than they are
My father taught me firearms safety and today. And there were no school shootings,
personal responsibility. I saw firsthand that gang shootings, drive-by shootings, or any
firearms, even my diminutive .22 rifle, were of the other senseless acts of violence com-
capable of inflicting serious and fatal wounds. mitted with firearms such as we see today.
Guns were not toys or something to be han- As Hugh Downs (a well-known television
dled carelessly. And my father trusted me commentator) once pointed out in reference
with guns. That meant a lot. I wish he were to the present-day misuse of firearms, “It’s a
here to read this now. His lessons were ones software problem, not a hardware problem.”
that I have carried with me all of my life and But what of my life-long interest in fire-
have since passed on to my sons. arms and how it relates to this book and its
The use of guns in films of that time was subject matter? I did bring home my share
typically portrayed as on the side of good. of rabbits and squirrels from the fields and
The Lone Ranger, Red Ryder, Roy Rogers, woods of central Illinois, but hunting was
Gene Autry, and all the other lesser-known never a burning passion with me. I was more
heroes of the Saturday matinee seldom had interested in how far and how accurately a
to shoot anyone because they were so com- bullet could be fired; what it looked like after
petent and proficient in the use of their Colt it hit or penetrated something. Why did bul-
single-action revolver or their Winchester lets make that fascinating whining sound
rifle. They usually either shot the gun out when I straddled a railroad track and rico-
of the bad guy’s hand or simply got “the cheted bullets off the iron rail after an impact
drop” on them through their superiority in at a low incident angle? I shot up a box of
firearms handling. These were classic moral- cartridges just to hear the sound that the
ity plays of good over evil in which fire- departing bullets made. I even heard some
arms were an integral part. But today the of these bullets impact the ground some dis-
blood-soaked films from Hollywood show tance downrange and subsequently searched
guns creating unimaginable death, destruc- many times, in vain, in an effort to find one
tion, and mayhem in the shortest time pos- just to see if its “new” shape corresponded
sible. They are typically possessed by the to the gray elliptical smear of lead at the
psychologically flawed and unfit. It is dif- impact site on the rail. (These characteristic
ficult to think of a film in the past 20 years impact marks are discussed and can be seen
that depicts a gun on the side of right and in Chapter 6.)
in the hands of an honest person of char- While shooting at sticks floating down a
acter. It seems that we have forgotten that slow-moving stream from an old covered
It is the author’s hope that this book not The gun is a witness that speaks but once
only will acquaint the reader with the many and tells its story with forceful truth to the inter-
preter who can understand the language.
reconstructive aspects of firearms evidence Everything that has a basis in physics is
but will also inspire and reorient the foren- capable of being explained. All we have to do is
sic scientists who examine such evidence. to find the explanation.
Firearms, expended cartridge cases, fired
bullets, the wounds they inflict, the damage Lucien C. (Luke) Haag
they produce, and the damage they sustain
all tell a story. This book is intended to serve Reference and Further Reading
as a guide to understanding their language.
Kelly, G.G., 1963. The Gun in the Case. Whitcombe &
A couple of abbreviated quotes from G.G. Tombs, Ltd., Christschurch, NZ.
Kelly, the first arms and ballistics officer for
the New Zealand Police, say it all: