Official Declaration On Grace
Official Declaration On Grace
Introduction
The following pages are a composite of all the principal declarations of the Church on the
subject of divine grace. Arranged in chronological order, these documents give us not only
a purview of Catholic theology on the subject but place into our hands a synopsis of the
Church’s authentic teaching, on which speculative theology builds and to which every
theory should conform.
Each set of declarations is preceded by a short introductory note, explaining the council or
circumstances in which the declaration occurred. It is of some importance to know the
historical context for a document, in order properly to evaluate its theological meaning.
At least three bene ts may be derived from a judicious study of the Church’s teaching on
the theology of grace: it serves to synthesize a eld that is more complex and wide than
perhaps any other phase of doctrine; it gives, in epitome form, the authoritative foundation
on which further explanation and speculation are based; it o ers, in concise formulas, the
statements of doctrine which a teacher especially needs for instructing others.
The numeration is not arbitrary for the sequence of doctrinal statements, but follows
(without exactly corresponding to) the numbers in Denzinger’s Enchiridion Symbolorum.
Translation of texts and introduction are from The Church Teaches, published by Herder &
Co. and edited by St. Mary's College, St. Mary's, Kansas.
Grace, original justice, and justi cations are so related that errors about one inevitably lead
to a false understanding of the others. When the assembly of bishops at Carthage, 418,
condemned the Pelagian teaching on original justice, many of the canons they drew up
dealt speci cally with grace. Pope St. Zosimus (417-18) con rmed the canons.
(3). They have likewise decreed: Whoever says that God's grace, which justi es mankind
through our Lord Jesus Christ, has the power only for the remission of those sins already
committed, and is not also a help to prevent sins from being committed: let him be
anathema.
(4). They have likewise decreed: Whoever says that God's grace through Jesus Christ our
Lord helps us avoid sin solely because it gives us a very clear knowledge and
understanding of the positive and negative commandments, but denies that through this
grace there is given to us an ability and a love of doing what we know should be done: let
him be anathema. For since the Apostle says: “Knowledge pu s up, but charity edi es” (I
Cor. 8:1), it would be very wrong to believe that we have Christ's grace for knowledge,
which pu s up, and not for charity which edi es. Knowledge of what we ought to do and
love of doing it are both gifts of God. Thus knowledge working with charity cannot make us
pu ed up. For it is written of God: “He that teacheth man knowledge” (Ps. 93:10); but it is
also written: “Love is from God" (I John 4:7).
(6). They have likewise decreed: Whoever thinks St. John the Apostle's statement -- "If we
say that we have no sin, we deceive ourself, and truth is not in us” (I John 1:8) -- is to be
taken in the sense that he is saying we have sin because humility demands us to say so,
not because we actually do have sin: let him be anathema. For the Apostle continues: "”If
we acknowledge our sins, He is faithful and just to forgive us our sins and cleanse us from
all iniquity" (I John 1:9). Hence it is quite clear that this is said not only from humility but
truthfully. For the Apostle could have said: "If we say we have no sin we exalt ourselves,
and humility is not in us." But since he says: "We deceive ourselves, and truth is not in us,"
he clearly shows that the person who says he has no sin is not speaking the truth.
(7). They have likewise decreed: Whoever says that the reason why the saints say "forgive
us our debts” (Matthew 6:12) in the Our Father is not that they are requesting this for
themselves -- for such a request is not necessary for them -- but that they are requesting it
for others of their people who are debtors; and whoever says that the reason why each of
the saints does not say, "forgive me my debts," but "forgive us our debts," is that the just
man is understood to make this request for others rather than for himself: let him be
anathema.
The Apostle James was a holy and a just man when he said, "For in many things we all
o end" (James 3:2). Why was the word "all" added? Was it not added to express the same
idea as is found in the Psalm: "And enter not into judgment with thy servant: for in thy sight
no man living shall be justi ed" (Psalm 142:2)? The same idea is found in the prayer of
Solomon the wise man: "For there is no man who sinneth not" (III Kings 8:46). And we read
in the book of Job: "He sealeth up the hand of all men, that everyone may know his works"
(Job 37:7).
Even the holy and just Daniel used the plural form in his prayer when he said, "We have
sinned, we have committed iniquity," and when he says the other things that he truly and
humbly confesses (Daniel 9: 5-15). And lest anyone should think, as some do, that he was
not speaking of his own sins, but of those of his people, he said further on: "While…I was
praying and confessing my sins and the sins of my people" to the Lord my God (Daniel
9:20). He was unwilling to say "our sins;" therefore he said, "my sins and the sins of my
people," since he foresaw as a prophet there would be some who would misunderstand
him.
(8). They have likewise decreed: Whoever says that, when the saints pray the Our Father,
they say "forgive our debts" (Matthew 6:12) humbly rather than truthfully: let him be
anathema. For who will tolerate the thought of a man praying and lying not to men but to
the Lord himself, since he says with his lips that he wishes to have his debts forgiven, but
denies in his heart that he has anything to be forgiven?
INTRODUCTION
Some who pride themselves on having the name of Catholics are, either through malice or
inexperience; spending their time on the condemned propositions of the heretics, and they
have the presumption to contradict very faithful writers. Although these men do not hesitate
to heap anathemas upon Pelagius and Coelestius, still they nd fault with their own
teachers being extremists. They say that they follow and approve only what, through the
ministry of its bishops, the Holy See of the Apostle St. Peter has taught and approved
against the enemies of the grace of God. For this reason it has been necessary to make a
diligent investigation as to what judgment the rulers of the Roman Church made about
heresy that arose during their time, and what opinion they thought should be held about the
grace of God against the dangerous upholders of “free will”.
We are also attaching some statements of the councils of Africa, which the apostolic
bishops certainly adapted as their own when they gave them their approval. Therefore, to
instruct more fully those who are doubtful about some point, we promulgate the doctrine of
the Holy Fathers in this brief catalogue. Thus if a person is not too contentious, he may see
that the conclusion of all of these disputes is contained in the following brief summary, and
that there is no ground left him for asserting the contrary if only he believes and professes
his faith with the Catholics as follows:
The Chapter 2. Unless he who alone is good grants a participation in his being, no one has
goodness in himself. This truth is proclaimed by that ponti (St. Innocent I) in the following
sentence of the same letter. “For the future, can we expect anything good from those
whose mentality is such that they think they are the cause of their goodness and do not
take into account him whose grace they obtain each day, and who hope to accomplish so
much without him?”
Chapter 3. No one, not even he who has been renewed by the grace of baptism, has
su cient strength to overcome the snares of the devil, and to vanquish the concupiscence
of the esh, unless he obtains help from God each day to persevere in a good life. And the
letter cited above: “For although he redeemed man from his past sins, still, since he knew
man could sin again, he had at hand many things whereby he could restore man and set
him straight even after sinned, o ering those daily remedies upon which we must rely and
trust in our struggle; for by no other means would we be able to overcome our human
mistakes.”
Chapter 5. All the e orts, and all the works and merits of the Saints must be attributed to
the praise and glory of God, because no one can please God with anything that is not His
very own gift. It is the directive authority of Pope Zosimus of happy memory that leads us to
this conclusion; for when writing to the bishops of the whole world, he says: “But We
inspired by God (for all good things must be attributed to the source from which they
proceed), have committed the entire matter to the consideration of our brothers and co-
bishops.”
Chapter 6. God so works in the hearts of men and in free will itself that the holy thought, the
gentle counsel, and every movement of a good will is from God, because it is through him
that we can do any good, and without him we can do nothing (John 15: 5). The same
teacher Zosimus instructed us to acknowledge this truth when, speaking to the bishops of
the world about the assistance of divine grace, he said: “Is there ever a time when we do
not need his help?
Therefore, in every action and situation, in every thought and movement, we must pray to
him as to our helper and protector. For whatever human nature presumes to do by itself
manifests pride, since the Apostle warns: ‘Our wrestling is not against esh and blood, but
against the spiritual forces of wickedness on high’ (Eph. 6:12). And as he says on another
occasion: ‘Unhappy man that I am! Who will deliver me from the body of this death? The
grace of God through Jesus Christ our Lord’ (Romans 7: 24f). And again: ‘By the grace of
God I am what I am, and his grace in me has not been fruitless; in fact I have labored more
than any of them, yet not I, but the grace of God with me’” (I Cor. 15:10).
Chapter 7. We likewise uphold and the personal teaching of the Apostolic See what was set
down in the decrees of the Council of Carthage and de ned in the third chapter: “Whoever
says that God’s grace, which justi es mankind through our Lord Jesus Christ, has the
power only for the remission of those sins already committed, and is not also a help to
prevent sins from being committed: let him be anathema.
We uphold also what was de ned in the fourth chapter: “Whoever says that God's grace
through Jesus Christ our Lord helps us avoid sin solely because it gives us a very clear
knowledge and understanding of the positive and negative commandments, but denies that
through this grace there is given to us an ability and a love of doing what we know should
be done: let him be anathema. For since the Apostle says: 'Knowledge pu s up, but charity
edi es' (I Cor., 8:1), it would be very wrong to believe that we have Christ's grace for
knowledge, which pu s up, and not for charity, which edi es. Knowledge of what we ought
to do and love of doing it are both gifts of God, Thus knowledge working with charity
cannot make us pu ed up. For it is written of God; 'He that teacheth man knowledge'
(Psalm 93:10); but it is also written: 'Love is from God’” (I John 1:7).
We uphold also what was de ned in the fth chapter: "Whoever says that the grace of
justi cation was given us so that grace could facilitate our ful lling what our free will is
ordered to do, as if to say that, if grace were not given, would be possible but not easy to
obey God's commandments without that grace: let him be anathema. For the Lord was
speaking of the observance of the commandments when he said: 'Without me you can do
nothing' (John 15:5), He did not say: '’Without me it will be more di cult for you to do
anything.’”
Chapter 8. The preceding chapters are the inviolable decrees of the most holy and
Apostolic See, the decrees by which our reverend Fathers, suppressing the spread of a
dangerous novelty, taught us to attribute to the grace of Christ both the initial impulses of a
good will and the increase of praiseworthy e orts as well as nal perseverance in them.
Besides these decrees, let us also examine the sacred words of the prayers the priests say.
Let us examine these sacred words which were handed down from the Apostles throughout
the world and which are uniformly used in every Catholic Church, and thus nd in the
prayers of the liturgy con rmation for the law of our faith. For when the leaders of the holy
people perform the functions of the o ce entrusted to them they plead the cause of the
human race before the tribunal of divine mercy. And with the whole Church earnestly
praying along with them, they beg and they entreat that the faith be given to in dels, that
idolators be freed from the errors of their ungodliness, that the veil be removed from the
hearts of the Jews so that the light of truth may shine upon them, that heretics may come to
their senses and accept the Catholic faith, that schismatics may receive the spirit of charity
that restores life, that sinners be given the healing powers of repentance, and, nally, that
catechumens may be brought to the sacrament of regeneration and that the heavenly court
of mercy may be opened to them.
That these requests from the Lord are not just a matter of form shown by the actual course
of events. For God, indeed, deigns to draw many men from errors of every description --
men whom he has rescued from the power of darkness and transferred into the kingdom of
his beloved Son (Col. 1:13), and whom he has changed from vessels of wrath into vessels
of mercy (Romans 9:22f). And this is felt to be so exclusively a divine operation, that
thanksgiving and praise are being constantly given to God, who brings about the
enlightenment and correction of such persons.
Chapter 9. By those ecclesiastical norms and these documents derived from divine
authority, we are so strengthened with the help of the Lord, that we profess that God is the
author of all good desires and deeds, of all e orts and virtues, with which from the
beginning of faith man tends to God. And we do not doubt that his grace anticipates every
one of man’s merits, and that it is through him that we begin both the will and the
performance (Phil. 2:13) of any good work. To be sure, free will is not destroyed by this help
and strength from God but it is freed; so that from darkness it is brought to light, from evil to
good, from sickness to health, from ignorance to prudence.
For such is God’s goodness to men that he wills that his gifts be our merits, and that he will
grant us an eternal reward for what he has given us. Indeed, God so acts in us that we both
will and do what he wills; he does not allow to lie idle in us what he bestowed upon us to be
employed, not neglected. And he acts in this manner in us so that we are cooperators with
his grace. And if we notice that there is some weakness in us because of our own
negligence, we should with all care hasten to him who heals all our diseases and redeems
our lives from destruction (Ps. 102:3f), and to whom we say each day, "Lead us not into
temptation but deliver us from evil" (Matthew 6:13).
One of the most important councils of the sixth century was the Second Council of Orange,
held in southern Gaul. The presiding prelate was Archbishop Caesarius of Arles. The
following numbers contain the canons on grace which the prelated signed on July 3, 529,
against the Semi-Pelagians, especially against their denial of the necessity of grace for the
beginning of faith. On January 25, 531, Pope Boniface II (530-32) con rmed the Second
(3). If anyone says that the grace of God can be conferred because of human prayer, but
that it is not grace that prompts us to pray, he contradicts the Prophet Isaias of the Apostle
who says the sane thing: "I was found by those who did not seek me; I appeared openly to
those who made no inquiry of me” (Romans 10:20; Isaias 65:1).
(4). If anyone argues that God awaits our will before cleansing us from sin, but does not
profess that even the desire to be cleansed is accomplished through the infusion and the
interior working of the Holy Spirit, he opposes the Holy Spirit speaking through Solomon:
“The will is prepared by the Lord" (Proverbs 8:35, Septuagint). And he opposes the
Apostle's salutary message: "It is God who of his good pleasure works in you both the will
and the performance” (Phil. 2:13).
(5). He is an adversary of the apostolic teaching who says that the increase of faith as well
as the beginning of faith and the very desire of faith -- by which we believe in Him who
justi es the unjusti ed and by which we come to the regeneration of sacred baptism --
inheres in us naturally and not by a gift of grace. This grace is the inspiration of the Holy
Spirit, guiding our will away from in delity to faith, from godlessness to piety. For St. Paul
says: "We are convinced of this, that he who has begun a good work in you will bring it to
perfection until the day of Christ Jesus" (Phil. 1:6). And he says: "You have been given the
favor on Christ's behalf – not only to believe in him but also to su er for him" (Phi. 1:29).
And again: "By grace you have been saved through faith; and that not from yourselves, for
it is the gift of God" (Eph. 2:8). For those who say that it is a natural faith by which we
believe in God teach that all those who are separated from the Church of Christ are, in a
certain sense, believers.
(6). If anyone says that mercy is divinely conferred upon us when, without God's grace, we
believe, will, desire, strive, labor, pray, keep watch, study, beg, seek, knock for entrance,
but does not profess that it is through the interior infusion and inspiration of the Holy Spirit
that we believe, will, or are able to do all these things in the way we ought; or if anyone
grants that the help of grace is dependent upon humility or human obedience, and does not
grant that it is the very gift of grace that makes us obedient and humble, he contradicts the
words of the Apostle: "What hast thou that thou hast not received?" (I Cor. 4:7); and: "By
the grace of God, I am what I am" (I Cor. 15:10).
(15). "From the man that God had formed, Adam was changed through his own iniquity, and
the change was for the worse. From the man that iniquity had formed, the man of faith is
changed through the grace of God, and the change is for the better. The former was the
change of the rst sinner; the latter, as the Psalmist says, is the change of the hand of the
Most High" (Psalm 76:11).
And thus, according to the passages of Holy Scripture and according to the explanations of
the ancient Fathers quoted above, we, with God's help, must believe and preach the
following: The free will of man was made so weak and unsteady through the sin of the rst
man that, after the Fall, no one could love God as was required, or believe in God, or
perform good works for God unless the grace of divine mercy anticipated him. Therefore,
we believe that the renowned faith which was given to the just Abel, to Noe, to Abraham, to
Isaac and Jacob, and to that vast number of the saints of old, was given through the grace
of God and not through natural goodness, which had rst been given to Adam.
According to Catholic faith we also believe that after grace has been received through
baptism, all the baptized, if they are willing to labor faithfully, can and ought to accomplish
with Christ's help and cooperation what pertains to the salvation of their souls. We do not
believe that some are predestined to evil by the divine power; and, furthermore, if there are
those who wish to believe in such an enormity, with great abhorrence we anathematize
them.
We also believe and profess for our salvation that in every good work it is not that we make
a beginning and afterwards are helped through God's mercy, but rather, that without any
previous good merits on our part, God himself rst inspires us with faith in him and love of
him so that we may faithfully seek the sacrament of baptism and so that after baptism, with
his help, we may be able to accomplish what is pleasing to him. Therefore, we evidently
must believe that the remarkable faith of the thief whom the Lord called to his home in
paradise (Luke 23:43), the faith of Cornelius the centurion to whom an angel of the Lord
was sent (Acts 10:3), and the faith of Zacchaeus who merited to receive the Lord himself
(Luke 19:6), was not a gift of nature but of Gods generosity.
Beginning from his open attack on the practice of indulgences in the Church in 1517, Luther
had gone on to expound certain fundamental doctrinal errors. He held that nature, entirely
corrupted and deprived of moral liberty by sin, is forced to sin. Justi cation is something
completely entrinsic to man and consists in this that sin is no longer imputed to the sinner
but instead the merits of Christ, laid hold of by the faith of con dence alone, are imputed to
him. After patient waiting and lengthy consideration, Pope Leo X (1513-21) nally issued the
bull Exsurge Domine in June, 1520, condemning forty-one errors of Luther. They were taken
from Luther’s own writings and related to free will, original sin, the sacraments in general,
faith, grace, sin, penance, confession, the primacy, etc. As presented in the bull, the
individual errors are not given a precise censure.
(1). It is a heretical, though common, opinion that the sacraments of the New Law give
justifying grace to those who place no obstacle in the way.
(2). To deny that sin remains in a child after baptism is to despise both Paul and Christ alike.
(36). After sin, free will is a term without meaning; and when it does what is in its power, it
sins mortally.
One of the most important sessions of the Council of Trent was the sixth, which lasted from
June 21, 1546, until January 13, 1547. After long debate, much discussion, drafting and
redrafting, the decree on justi cation was nally published.
DECREE ON JUSTIFICATION
Preface
Since at this time a certain erroneous teaching about justi cation is being broadcast with
the consequent loss of many souls and serious damage to Church unity, this holy,
ecumenical, and general Council of Trent has been lawfully convoked in the Holy Spirit for
the praise and glory of the omnipotent God, for the tranquillity of the Church, and the
salvation of souls. Presiding over the council in the name of our most holy father and lord in
Christ, Paul III by divine providence pope, are the very reverend lords, John Mary del
Monte, bishop of Praeneste; Marcellus, titular priest of Santa Croce in Jerusalem; cardinals
of the holy Roman Church, and apostolic legates de latere. Under their guidance, this
council intends to set forth for all the faithful of Christ the true, sound doctrine of
justi cation, which the “Sun of justice” (Mal. 4:2) Jesus Christ, the author and nisher of our
faith (Heb. 12:2), has taught, which the apostles have handed down, and which the Catholic
Church, under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit, has always preserved. The council gives
strict orders that hereafter no one is to presume to believe, preach, or teach anything
contrary to what is de ned and declared in this decree.
Chapter 1. The Insu ciency of Nature and the Law to Justify Man
First, the holy council declares that, for an honest, unprejudiced understanding of the
doctrine of justi cation, it is necessary to admit that all men had lost innocence in the sin of
Adam (Rom. 5:12; I Cor. 15:22; 368). They became unclean (Isa. 64:6). And (according to
the word of the Apostle) they "were by nature children of wrath" (Eph, 2:3), as the council
taught in its decree on original sin. So completely were they slaves of sin (Rom. 6:20) and
under the power of the devil and of death, that neither the power of nature for the Gentiles
nor the very letter of the Law of Moses for the Jews could bring liberation from that
condition. And yet their free will, though weakened and unsteady, was by no means
destroyed.
And so it came about that, when the glorious fullness of time had come (Eph. 1:4, Gal. 4:4),
the heavenly Father, “the Father of mercies and the God of all comfort” (II Cor. 1:3), sent
Jesus Christ his Son to men. Christ had been announced and promised to many holy
Fathers before the Law and during the time of the Law (Gen. 49:10, 18). He was sent that
the Jews, who were under the Law, might be redeemed, and that the Gentiles, who were
not pursuing justice, might secure justice (Rom. 9:30), and that all might receive the
But even though Christ did die for all (II Cor. 5:15), still all do not receive the bene t of his
death, but only those with whom the merit of his Passion is shared. Truly, men would not
have been born without justice except that they were born children of Adam's seed. For it is
because of their descent from him that in their conception they contract injustice as their
own. So likewise they would never have been justi ed except through rebirth in Christ, for
this rebirth bestows on them through the merit of his Passion the grace by which they are
justi ed. For this bene t the Apostle exhorts us to give thanks always to the Father “who
has made us worthy to share the lot of the saints in light” (Co1. 1:12), and who has rescued
us from the power of darkness and transferred us into the kingdom of his beloved Son, in
whom we have redemption and remission of sins (Col, 1:13f).
Chapter 4. A Summary Description of the Justi cation of a Sinner and the Manner of
Justi cation Under the Dispensation of Grace
In the preceding words a description is given of the justi cation of the unjust. Justi cation is
a passing from the state in which man is born a son of the rst Adam, to the state of grace
and adoption as sons of God (Rom. 8:15) through the second Adam, Jesus Christ our
Savior. Since the gospel was promulgated, this passing cannot take place without the water
of regeneration or the desire for it, as it is written: "Unless a man be born again of water and
the Holy Spirit, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God" (John 3:5).
Chapter 5. The Necessity for Adults to Prepare Themselves for Justi cation and the
Origin of this Justi cation
Moreover, the holy council declares that in the case of adults justi cation must begin with
God's prevenient grace through Jesus Christ. That is, it must begin with God's call, a call
which they do not merit. The purpose of this call is that they who are turned away from God
by sin may, awakened and assisted by his grace, be disposed to turn to their own
justi cation by freely assenting to and cooperating with that grace. The result is that, when
God touches the heart of man who accepts that inspiration certainly does something,
since-he could reject it; on the other hand, by his own free will, without God's grace, he
could not take one step towards justice in God's sight. Hence, when it is said in Sacred
Scripture, "Turn ye to me, and I will turn to you". (Zach 1:3), we are reminded of our
freedom; when we answer, "Convert us O Lord, to thee, and we shall be converted” (Lam.
5:21), we acknowledge that God's grace prepares us.
Adults are disposed for justi cation in this way: Awakened and assisted by divine grace,
they conceive faith from hearing (Rom. 10:17), and they are freely led by God. They believe
that the divine revelation and promises are true, especially that the unjusti ed man is
justi ed by God's grace "through the redemption which is in Christ Jesus" (Rom. 3:24).
Next, they know that they are sinners; and by turning from a salutary fear of divine justice to
a consideration of God's mercy, they are encouraged to hope, con dent that God will be
propitious to them for Christ's sake. They begin to love God as the source of all justice and
are thereby moved by a sort of hatred and detestation for sin, that is, by the penance that
must be done before baptism. Finally, they determine to receive baptism, begin a now live,
and keep the divine commandments.
This disposition is described in Holy Scripture: "He who comes to God must believe that
God exists and is a rewarder to those who seek him" (Heb. 11:6); and: "Take courage, son,
Justi cation itself follows upon this disposition or preparation, and justi cation is not only
the remission of sin, but sancti cation and renovation of the interior man through the
voluntary reception of grace and gifts, whereby a man becomes just instead of unjust and a
friend instead of an enemy, that he may be an heir in the hope of life everlasting (Titus 3:7).
The causes of this justi cation are the fallowing: The nal cause is the glory of God and of
Christ, and life everlasting. The e cient cause is the merciful God, who freely washes and
sancti es (I Cor. 6:11} sealing and anointing with the Holy Spirit of the promise, who is the
pledge of our inheritance (Eph.1:13f). The meritorious cause is the beloved only-begotten
Son of God' our Lord Jesus Christ, who, when we were enemies (Rom. 5:10), by reason of
his very great love wherewith he has loved us (Eph. 2:4), merited justi cation for us by his
own most holy Passion on the wood of the cross, and made satisfaction for us to God the
Father. The instrumental cause is the sacrament of baptism, which is the “sacrament of
faith," without which no one has ever been justi ed. Finally the only formal cause is the
"justice of God, not the justice by which he is himself just, but the justice by which he
makes us just," namely, the justice which we have as a gift from him and by which we are
renewed in the spirit of our mind. And not only are we considered just, but are truly said to
be just, and we are just, each one of us receiving within himself his own justice, according
to the measure the Holy Spirit imparts to each one as he wishes (I Cor. 12:11), and
according to the disposition and cooperation of each one.
For although no one can be just unless he is granted a share in the merits of the Passion of
our Lord Jesus Christ; still, in the justi cation of the unjusti ed that is precisely what
happens when, by the merit of the same most holy Passion, the charity of God is poured
forth by the Holy Spirit into the hearts (Rom. 5:5) of those who are justi ed and remains in
them. Whence in the very act of being justi ed, at the same time that his sins are remitted, a
man receives through Jesus Christ, to whom he is joined, the infused gifts of faith, hope,
and charity. For faith without hope and charity neither perfectly unites a man with Christ nor
makes him a living member of his body.
Therefore it is said most truly that faith without works is dead (James 2:17 ) and unless,
and that in Christ Jesus neither circumcision is of any avail, nor uncircumcision, but faith
which works through charity (Gal. 5:6; 6:15). This is the faith that, according to apostolic
tradition the catechumens ask of the Church before the reception of the sacrament of
baptism when they petition for "the faith that gives eternal life." But faith, without hope and
charity, cannot give eternal life. Next the catechumens immediately listen to Christ's words,
"If thou wilt enter into life, keep the commandments" (Matt. 19:17). Accordingly, as soon as
they are baptized, the catechumens are commanded to keep brilliant and spotless the true
Christian justice they have received, as being the best robe (Luke 15:22) that has been
given them by Christ Jesus to replace the one Adam lost for himself and for us by his
disobedience, so that they may wear it before the tribunal of our Lord Jesus Christ and
have life everlasting.
Chapter 8. The Correct Meaning of the Statement: The Sinner Is Gratuitously Justi ed
by Faith
But when the Apostle says that man is justi ed “through faith" and "freely" (Rom. 3:22, 24),
those words must be understood in the sense that the Catholic Church has always
It is necessary to believe that sins are not remitted and have never been remitted except
freely by the divine mercy for Christ's sake. Nevertheless, it must not be said that sins are
forgiven or have ever been forgiven to anyone who boasts a con dence and a certain
knowledge of the forgiveness of his sins and who relies upon this con dence alone. This
empty, ungodly con dence may exist among heretics and schismatics and actually does
exist in our times and is preached against the Catholic Church with bitter arguments.
Furthermore, it should not be asserted that they who are truly justi ed must unhesitatingly
determine within themselves that they are justi ed; and that no one is absolved from his
sins and justi ed except one who believes with certainty that he is absolved and justi ed.
Moreover, it should not be asserted that absolution and justi cation are brought about by
this faith alone, as if to say that whoever lacks this faith doubts God's promises and the
e cacy of Christ's death and resurrection. For no devout man should entertain doubts
about God's mercy, Christ's merits, and the power and e cacy of the sacraments.
Similarly, whoever re ects upon himself, his personal weakness, and his defective
disposition may fear and tremble about his own grace, since no one can know with the
certitude of faith, which cannot admit any error, that he has obtained Gods grace.
Chapter 10. The Increase of Justi cation In One Who Has Been Justi ed
Therefore, in this way the justi ed become both friends of God and members of his
household (John 15:15; Eph. 2:19), advancing from virtue to virtue, renewed (as the Apostle
says) day by day (II Cor. 4:16), that is, by mortifying the members of their esh (Col. 3:5) and
showing then as weapons of justice (Rom. 5:13, 19) unto sancti cation by observing the
commandments of God and of the Church, When faith works along with their works (James
2:22), the justi ed increase in the very justice which they have received through the grace of
Christ and are justi ed the more, as it is written: "He who is just, let him be just still" (Apoc.
22:11), and again: "Fear not to be justi ed even to death (Ecclus. 18:22), and again: "You
see that by works a man is justi ed, and not by faith only" (James 2:24). Indeed, the holy
Church begs this increase of justice when she prays; "0 Lord, give us an increase of faith,
hope, and charity."
Chapter 11. The Observance of the Commandments: Its Necessity and Possibility
No one, even though he is justi ed, should consider himself exempt from keeping the
commandments. And no one should say that it is impossible for the just man to keep the
commandments of God, for that is a rash statement censured with anathema by the
Fathers. "For God does not command the impossible; but when he commands, he cautions
you to do what you can, and also to pray for what you cannot do," and he helps you so that
you can do it. His commandments are not burdensome (John 5:3), his yoke is easy and his
burden light (Matt. 11:30).
For those who are sons of God love Christ; and those who love him (as he himself testi es)
keep his words (John 14:23), and this they can certainly do with God's help. For granted
that in this mortal life, however just and holy men be, they sometimes commit at least slight
daily sins, which are also called venial sins; still they do not on that account cease to be
Therefore, no one should take pride in faith alone, thinking that faith alone makes him an
heir and that he will come into the inheritance, even if he does not su er with Christ that he
may also be glori ed with him (Rom. 8:17). For even Christ himself (as the Apostle says),
"Son though he was, learned obedience from the things that he su ered; and when
perfected, he became to all who obey him the cause of eternal salvation" (Heb. 5:8f),
Therefore the Apostle himself admonished the just when he says: “Do you not know that
those who run in a race, all indeed run, but one receives the prize? So run as to obtain it …
I therefore so run, as not without a purpose; I so ght, as not beating the air; but I chastise
my body and bring it into subjection, lest perhaps after preaching to others I myself should
be rejected" (I Cor. 9 : 24 ).
Moreover, Peter, the Prince of the Apostles, says: "Strive even more by good works to make
your calling and election sure. For if you do this, you will not fall into sin at any time" (II
Peter 1:10). Hence, it is clear that they are against the correct doctrine of religion when they
say that the just man commits a venial sin in everything he does, or (what is more
intolerable) say that he merits eternal punishment. They also are incorrect who state that
the just sin in all their works if, in those works, in order to overcome their sloth and
encourage themselves to run the race, they look for an everlasting reward in addition to
their primary intention of glorifying God. For it is written: "I have inclined my heart to do thy
justi cations forever, for the reward" (Psalm 118:112), and in speaking of Moses, the
Apostle says that he was looking to the reward (Heb. 11:26).
And no one, so long as he lives in this mortal life, ought to be so presumptuous about the
deep mystery of divine predestination as to decide with certainty that he is de nitely among
the number of the predestined, as though it were true that, because he is justi ed, either he
cannot sin again, or, if he does sin, he should promise himself certain repentance. For it is
impossible, without a special revelation to know whom God has chosen as his own.
The same is to be said of the gift of perseverance, about which it is written, "He who has
persevered to the end will be saved" (Matt. 10:22; 24:13). This gift can be had only from him
who has the power to determine that he who does stand shall stand with perseverance
(Rom, 14:4), and who can lift up him who falls. Let no one feel assured of this gift with an
absolute certitude, although all ought to have most secure hope in the help of God. For
unless men are unfaithful to his grace, God will bring the good work to perfection, just as he
began it, working both the will and the performance (Phil. 2:13). Yet let them who think they
stand take heed lest they fall (I Cor.10:12), and let then work out their salvation with fear and
trembling (Phil.2:12) in labors, in sleepless nights, in alms-giving, in prayers and o erings, in
fastings, and in chastity (II Cor. 6:3 ).
Knowing that they are reborn unto the hope of glory (Peter 1:3) and not yet unto glory itself,
they should be in dread about the battle they must wage with the esh, the world, and the
devil. For in this battle they cannot be the victors unless, with God's grace they obey the
Apostle who says: "We are debtors, not to the esh, that we should live according to the
esh. For if you live according to the esh you will die; but if by the spirit you put to death
the deeds of the esh, you will live" (Rom, 8:12f).
Those who have received the grace of justi cation but have lost it through sin can be
justi ed again when, awakened by God, they make the e ort to regain through the
sacrament of penance and by the merit of Christ the grace they have lost. For this is the
manner of justi cation by which those who have fallen into sin are restored. The holy
Fathers aptly called this restoration the "second plank after the ship has been wrecked and
grace has been lost." For it was for those who had fallen into sin after baptism that Jesus
Christ instituted the sacrament of penance with the words: "Receive the Holy Spirit; whose
sins you shall retain, they are retained' (John 20:22f).
Hence, it must be taught that the repentance of a Christian who has fallen into sin is quite
di erent from repentance at the time of baptism. Repentance after falling into sin includes
not only giving up these sins and detesting them or having "a contrite and humbled heart”
(Psalm 50:19), but it also includes sacramental confession of those sins; or at least the
desire to confess when a suitable occasion o ers, and the absolution of a priest. It also
includes satisfaction by fasts, almsgiving, prayer, and other devout exercises of the spiritual
life. These exercises certainly do not make satisfaction for the eternal punishment, for it is
remitted together with the guilt by the sacrament or by the desire of the sacrament. Rather
they make satisfaction for the temporal punishment which (as Sacred Scripture teaches), is
not always entirely – as is the case in baptism – done away with for those who, ungrateful
for the grace of God they have received, have grieved the Holy Spirit (Eph. 4:30), and. have
not feared to destroy the temple of God (I Cor. 3:17).
The following has been written about this type of repentance: "Remember therefore whence
thou hast fallen, and repent and do the former works" (Apoc. 2:5); and again: "The sorrow
that is according to God produces repentance that surely tends to salvation" (II Cor. 7:10);
and again: "Repent" (Matt. 3:2; 4:17); and: "Bring forth therefore fruit be tting repentance"
(Matt. 3:8).
Chapter 15. Grace, But Not Faith, Is Lost by Every Mortal Sin
We must also assert, in opposition to some clever men who "by smooth words and attery
deceive the hearts of the simple" (Rom. 16:18), that the grace of justi cation, once received,
is lost not only by unbelief, which causes the loss of faith, but also by any other mortal sin,
even though faith is not lost. This assertion defends the teaching of divine law that excludes
from the kingdom of God not only those without faith, but also those with faith who are
fornicators, adulterers, e eminate, sodomites, thieves, covetous, drunkards, evil-tongued,
greedy (I Cor. 6:9), and all others who commit mortal sins. These sins separate men from
the grace of Christ, and they can be avoided with the help of divine grace.
Chapter 16. The Merit of Good Works As a Result of Justi cation, and the Nature of
Merit
Therefore, with this in mind, justi ed men, whether they have continuously kept grace once
they have received it, or whether they have lost it and recovered it again, should consider
these words of the Apostle: "Abound in every good work knowing that your labor is not in
vain in the Lord" (I Cor. 15:58); "for God is not unjust, that he should forget your work and
the love that you have shown in his name" (Heb, 6:10); and “Do not lose your con dence,
which has a great reward" (Heb. 10:35).
And eternal life should therefore be set before those who persevere in good works to the
end (Matt. 10:22) and who hope in God. It should be set before them as being the grace
that God , through Jesus Christ, has mercifully promised his sons, and “as the reward”
which, according to the promise of God h i m s e l f m u s t assuredly be given them for
their good works and merits. For this is that crown of justice which the Apostle says is laid
up for him after the ght and the race; the crown that will be given him by the just Judge,
Since this is true, it is necessary to believe that the justi ed have everything necessary for
them to be regarded as having completely satis ed the divine law for this life by their works,
at least those which they have performed in God. And they may be regarded as having
likewise truly merited the eternal life they will certainly attain in due time (if they but die in
the state of grace) (Apoc. 14:13) because Christ our Savior says: "He who drinks of the
water that I will give him shall never thirst, but it will become in him a fountain of water,
springing up into life everlasting” (John 4:13f). Thus, it is not personal e ort that makes
justice our own, and God's justice is not disregarded or rejected (Rom, 10:3); for, the justice
that is said to be ours because it inheres in us is likewise God's justice because he has put
it in us through the merit of Christ.
Christ promises even to the person who gives a drink of cold water to one of his least ones
that he shall not be without his reward (Matt. 10:42), and the Apostle says that our present
light a iction, which is for the moment, prepares for us an eternal weight of glory that is
beyond all measure (II Cor. 4:17). Although in Holy Scripture such high value is placed on
good works, nevertheless, a Christian should have no inclination either to rely on himself or
the glory in himself instead of in the Lord (I Cor. 1:31; II Cor. 10:17), whose goodness
towards all men is such that he wants his gifts to be their merits. And since “in many things
we all o end" (James 3:2) , each one ought to keep severity and judgment in view as well
as mercy and goodness.
No one can be justi ed unless he faithfully and unhesitatingly accepts the Catholic doctrine
on justi cation. Finally, this holy council has decreed to list the following canons so that all
may know not only what they should believe and put into practice, but also what they
should shun and avoid.
(1). If anyone says that, without divine grace through Jesus Christ, man can be justi ed
before God by his own works, whether they were done by his natural powers or by the light
of the teaching of the (Mosaic) Law: let him be anathema.
(2). If anyone says that divine grace is given through Jesus Christ merely to facilitate man's
living justly and meriting everlasting life, as if he could accomplish both, although with great
di culty, by his free will without grace: let him be anathema.
3). If anyone says that without the Holy Spirit's prevenient inspiration and without his help
man can believe, hope, and love or be repentant as is required if the grace of justi cation is
to be given to him: let him be anathema.
(4). If anyone says that the free will of man, moved and awakened by God, in no way
cooperates with the awakening call of God by an assent by which man disposes and
prepares himself to get the grace of justi cation; and that man cannot dissent, if he wishes,
but, like an object without life, he does nothing at all and is merely passive: let him be
anathema.
(6). If anyone says that it is not in man's power to make his ways evil, but that God performs
the evil works just as he performs the good, not only permissively but also properly and
directly, so that Judas' betrayal no less than Paul's vocation was God's own work: let him
be anathema.
(7). If anyone says that all works performed before justi cation, regardless of how they were
performed, are truly sins or merit God’s hatred; or that the more zealously a person strives
to dispose himself for grace, the more grievously he sins: let him be anathema.
(8). If anyone says that the fear of hell, which makes us turn to the mercy of God in sorrow
for sins of which makes us avoid sin, is itself a sin or that it makes sinners worse: let him be
anathema.
(9). If anyone says that a sinful man is justi ed by faith alone, meaning that no other
cooperation is required to obtain the grace of justi cation, and that it is not at all necessary
that he be prepared and disposed by the action of his will: let him be anathema.
(10). If anyone says that men are justi ed without Christ's justice by which he gained merit
for us, or are formally just by the justice of Christ: let him be anathema.
(11). If anyone says that men are justi ed either through the imputation of Christ's justice
alone, or through the remission of sins alone, excluding grace and charity which is poured
forth in their hearts by the Holy Spirit and inheres in then, or also that the grace which
justi es us is only the good will of Gods: let him be anathema.
(12). If anyone says that justifying faith is nothing else than con dence that divine Mercy
remits sins for Christ's sake, or that it is con dence alone which justi es us: let him be
anathema.
(13). If anyone says that, to attain the remission of sins, everyone must believe with
certainty and without any misgiving because of his own weakness and defective
disposition, that his sins are remitted: let him be anathema.
(14). If anyone says that man is absolved from his sins and justi ed because he believes
with certainty that he is absolved and justi ed; or that no one is truly justi ed except he who
believes he is justi ed, and that absolution and justi cation are e ected by this faith alone:
let him be anathema.
(15). If anyone says that a man who has been reborn and justi ed is bound by faith to
believe that he is certainly in the number of the predestined: let him be anathema.
(16). If anyone says that he has absolute and infallible certitude that he will certainly have
the great gift of nal perseverance, without having learned this from a special revelation: let
him be anathema.
(17). If anyone says that only those who are predestined to life have the grace of
justi cation, and that all the others who are called, are indeed called, but do not receive
grace, inasmuch as they are predestined to evil by the divine power: let him be anathema.
(18). If anyone says that the commandments of God are impossible to observe even for a
man who is justi ed and in the state of grace: let him be anathema.
(20). If anyone says that a justi ed man, however perfect he might be, is not-bound to
observe the commandments of God and of the Church, but is bound only to believe, as if
the gospel, apart from the observance of the commandments, were an unconditional and
absolute promise of eternal life: let him be anathema.
(21). If anyone says that God has given Jesus Christ to men as a redeemer in whom they
are to trust, but not as a law-giver whom they are to obey: let him be anathema.
(22). If anyone says that without God's special help it is possible for a justi ed man to
persevere in the justice he has received, or says that with God's special help it is
impossible: let him be anathema.
(23). If anyone says that a man once justi ed cannot sin again, and cannot lose grace, and
that therefore the man who falls and sins was never truly justi ed; or, contrariwise, says that
a man once justi ed can avoid all sins, even venial sins, throughout his entire life without a
special privilege of God, as the Church holds in regard to the Blessed Virgin: let him be
anathema.
(24). If anyone says that justice which has been received is not preserved and even
increased before God through good works, but that such works are merely the outgrowth
and the signs of the reception of justi cation, not the cause of its increase as well: let him
be anathema.
(25). If anyone says that a just man sins at least venially in every good work, or (what is
more intolerable) says that he sins mortally, and therefore merits eternal punishment, and
that the sole reason why he is not dammed is that God does not impute those works unto
damnation: let him be anathema.
(26). If anyone says that, for good works performed in God the just ought not to expect and
hope for eternal reward from God through his mercy and through the merit of Jesus Christ if
they persevere to the end in doing good and in observing the divine commandments: let
him be anathema.
(27). If anyone says that unbelief is the only sin that is mortal, or that grace once received
can be lost by, no other sin, regardless of its gravity and enormity, except unbelief: let him
be anathema.
(28). If anyone says that, when grace is lost through sin, faith is always lost at the same
time, or that the faith which does remain is not true faith, granted it is not a living faith; or
says that the man who has faith without charity is not a Christian: let him be anathema.
(29). If anyone says that the man who falls after baptism cannot rise through God's grace;
or that he can indeed recover the justice that has been lost, but by faith alone without the
sacrament of penance, according to what the holy Roman and universal Church, instructed
by Christ the Lord and his Apostles, has always professed, observed, and taught: let him be
anathema.
(30). If anyone says that, after receiving the grace of justi cation, the guilt of any repentant
sinner is remitted and the debt of eternal punishment is blotted out in such away that no
debt of temporal punishment remains to be paid, either in this life or in purgatory, before the
gate to the kingdom of heaven can be opened: let him be anathema.
(32). If anyone says that the good works of a justi ed man are gifts of God to such an extent
that they are not also the good merits of the justi ed man himself; or that, by the good
works he performs through the grace of God and the merits of Jesus Christ (of whom he is
a living member), the justi ed man does not truly merit an increase of grace, life everlasting,
and provided that he dies in the state of grace, the attainment of that life everlasting, and
even an increase of glory: let him be anathema.
(33). If anyone says that this Catholic teaching about justi cation, stated by the holy council
in this present decree, detracts in any degree from the glory of God or from the merits of
Jesus our Lord, and does not rather shed light upon the truth of our faith, and ultimately
show forth the glory of God and of Jesus Christ: let him be anathema.
Michel de Bay (Baius, cir. 1513-89), professor of theology at Louvain, began to propose
false doctrines in 1551. Fierce opposition was not slow in coming, and in 1560, some
theses of de Bay were sent to the faculty at Paris and were condemned. When de Bay and
his followers raised strenuous protest, Pope Pius IV imposed silence on de Bay. De Bay
failed to obey and Pope St. Pius V (1566-72), in the bull Ex omnibus a ictionibus, which
was not, however, published at that time (1567), put various censures on the theses of de
Bay, without mentioning de Bay’s name. Then de Bay sent a defense of his teaching to the
pope. When the pope had read the defense, he repeated his original condemnation.
Although de Bay pretended to submit, he continued spreading his errors. It was then that
Pius V’s condemnation of de Bay and the bull Ex omnibus a ictionibus was published by
Gregory XIII in the bull Provisionis nostrae, January 29, 1579, and again by Urban VIII in the
bull In eminenti Ecclesiae militantis in 1641. As presented in St. Pius’ bull, the individual
errors are not given a precise doctrinal censure.
Against the Protestants Trent had taught that justi cation is had through gifts of God that
become intrinsic to the recipient, but it did not give a precise statement on the
supernaturalness of those gifts. When de Bay denied that grace was supernatural and said
that it was gratuitous only because the sinner was unworthy of it, St. Pius V, in condemning
de Bay's errors, gave the rst declarations of the Church on the supernaturalness of grace;
that is, on the fact that grace is not due to the exigencies of created nature.
(1)(21). The exalting of human nature to a participation of the divine nature was due to the
integrity of man in his rst state and for that reason should be called natural, not
supernatural.
(55). God could not from the beginning have created man in the condition in which he is
now born.
(78). The immortality of the rst man was not a gift of grace, but his natural state.
(13). Good works performed by the sons of adoption are meritorious, not because they are
performed by the spirit of adoption dwelling in the hearts of the sons of God, but only
because they conform to the law and manifest obedience to the law.
SIN
(20). No sin is of its nature venial, but every sin merits eternal punishment.
(50). Evil desires to which reason does not consent and which a man experiences against
his will, are forbidden by the commandment: “Thou shalt not covet" (Exod. 20:17).
54). The proposition that God commands nothing that is impossible to man is falsely
attributed to Augustine, since it belongs to Pelagius.
(67). In that which a man does from necessity, he sins, even so as to deserve damnation.
(68). Purely negative unbelief is a sin in those to whom Christ has not been preached.
(74). Concupiscence in baptized persons who have fallen back into mortal sin and in whom
concupiscence now holds sway, is a sin just as are other bad habits.
(25). All the actions of in dels are sins, and the virtues of philosophers are vices.
(27). Without the help of God’s grace, free will can do nothing but sin.
(28). It is a Pelagian error to say that free will can avoid any sin.
(39). A voluntary action, even if done from necessity, is still a free action.
(41). In the Scriptures, freedom does not mean freedom from necessity but only freedom
from sin.
(34). It is meaningless ction and mockery devised against the Scriptures and the abundant
testimonies of the old authors to distinguish a twofold love of God; namely, a natural love
whose object is God the author of nature; and a gratuitous love, whose object is God the
author of happiness.
(38). All love of a rational creature is either vicious cupidity which has the world as its object,
and is forbidden by John, or is the praiseworthy charity which, poured forth in the heart by
the Holy Spirit has God as its object.
Some attempts were made to prevent the printing of the manuscript, but the friends of the
dead Jansen were successful in their e orts to bring the famous Augustinus to the press.
The Augustinus met with great success, but the Holy O ce condemned the work and
prohibited its reading. Urban VIII (1623-44) renewed the condemnation and interdiction in
his bull In eminenti Ecclesiae militantis. Despite this bull, the work of Jansen continued to
spread. Finally, ve propositions extracted from the book were submitted to Pope Innocent
X (1644-55). After a two years' examination by a commission of cardinals and consultors, in
the constitution Cum occasione, May 31, 1653 the pope condemned the rst four of the
following errors as heretical; the fth error was also condemned if understood to mean that
Christ died for the salvation of the elect only.
(1). There are some of God's commandments that just men cannot observe with the powers
they have in their present state, even if they wish and strive to observe them; nor do men
have the grace which would make their observance possible.
(3). To merit or demerit in the state of fallen nature it is not necessary for a man to have
freedom from necessity, but only freedom from constraint.
(4). The Semi-Pelagians admitted the necessity of internal, preparatory grace for individual
acts, even for the beginning of faith; they were heretics for this reason that they wished this
grace to be such that the human will could resist it or obey it.
(5). It is Semi-Pelagian to say that Christ died shed his blood for all men without exception.
The theological errors of Quesnel (1634-1719) are fundamentally only a synthesis of the
systems of deBay and Jansen. His essential theses are based on a confusion between the
natural and supernatural orders. The dogmatic constitution Unigenitus, September 8, 1713,
in which the errors of Quesnel were condemned, was con rmed by Clement XI (1700-1921)
himself in a subsequent bull, Pastoralis o cii, August 28, 1718, against those who had not
accepted it.
(1). What is left in the soul that has losy God and his except sin and its e ects, proud
poverty, barren need, that is, the general inability to work, to pray, or to do any good work?
(38). Without the grace of the Savior the sinner is free for nothing but evil.
(41). All knowledge of God, even natural knowledge, even among heathen philosophers,
can come from God alone; and without grace such knowledge breeds only presumption,
vanity, and opposition to God himself instead of adoration, gratitude and love.
(59). The prayer of the wicked is new sin, and what God grants them is a new judgment
against them.
(44). There are only two loves that are the sources of desires and deeds. There is the love of
God that does everything for God and which God rewards; and there is the love we have for
ourselves and for the world, and this love is evil because it does not give God his due.
(45). When the love of God no longer reigns in the hearts of sinners, it is inevitable that
carnal desire is dominant and vitiates every action.
(46). Covetousness or charity determines whether the use of the senses is good or evil.
(47). Obedience to the law ought to ow from a source, and this source is charity. When the
love of God is the interior principle of obedience to the law, and the glory of God is its end,
then its external observance is pure; otherwise, it is nothing but hypocrisy and false justice.
(10). Grace is the work of the hand of the omnipotent God, which nothing can hinder or
retard.
(11). Grace is nothing more than God's omnipotent will commanding and doing what he
commands.
(23). God himself has given us the concept of the omnipotent operation of his grace,
showing it to us in the operation that produces creatures from nothing and restores life to
the dead.
The second part of the schema of the Dogmatic Constitution on Catholic Doctrine dealt
with the principal mysteries of the faith. This chapter on grace, with its corresponding
canons, is presented as a valuable, though not authoritative, summary of the Catholic
doctrine on grace.
Therefore, the Father gave us this charity that, being born of God, we might receive the
name of sons of God and be sons of God. By this adoption as sons, participation in the
divine nature was restored to us; it begins now through grace, and will be completed
hereafter in glory. We are anointed and made holy by the Son’s Spirit whom God has sent
into our hearts, and we are made a temple of the divine Majesty in which the most holy
Trinity deigns to dwell and to communicate itself to the faithful soul, as Christ our Lord says:
"If anyone love me, he will keep my word, and my Father will love him, and we will come to
him and make our abode with him” (John 14:23).
Therefore, it is to be held and professed by all the faithful of Christ that sanctifying grace, by
which we are joined to God, does not consist only in an external favor of God nor is it to be
found only in passing acts; but it is a permanent supernatural gift that is infused by God
into the soul and inheres there; it is in adults who are made justi ed, and in infants reborn in
baptism. This renovation of man by the Incarnate Word is the mystery hidden from the
world. It is the means by which God has more wonderfully restored in the second Adam
what he had wonderfully made in the rst Adam.
It is regrettable that there are men so blind as to think that the religion of Christ diminishes
the dignity of human nature because it is supernatural or that it is prejudicial to liberty or
happiness. This divine institution is far from repressing man; rather it elevates him
wonderfully. For it frees him from the slavery of sin and prepares him for heavenly glory,
adorning and perfecting the properties of nature as it does so.
Equally to be avoided is the error of those who, resisting the supernatural ordination of God,
argue that man is free to stop within the bounds of nature and to seek for nothing beyond
the good of this order. Thus they destroy the necessary connection that the will of God has
placed between the two orders, the order which is in nature and that which is above nature.
For after the divine Mercy had decreed that man was to be brought to the heavenly
kingdom, it made Jesus Christ the way to this kingdom; and there now is no salvation in
anyone else. He who does not believe in Christ or who does not keep his commandments
will be cast with sinners into darkness where there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth.
Hence it follows that the so-called good life, in which the Commandments of God are
somehow observed (at least as regards the substance of the words) is far di erent from the
justice and sanctity which lead the one who does these works to the kingdom of heaven.
For there is in nature the power for a rational soul to think and do lawful things and this is
not blameworthy, but justly and rightly praised. Nevertheless, since these things are done
without faith and without grace, none of them has any connection with the godliness that
brings a man to eternal life. For what is true of the life of the blessed, namely, that since it is
above nature it is a gratuitous gift of God's mercy, is also true of the disposition for that life.
Natural powers are not su cient for any salutary act either in the just to increase their
justice or in sinners to dispose them for justi cation. As our Lord says: "Without me you can
do nothing" (John 15:5). And the Apostle con rms it: “Not that we are su cient of ourselves
to think anything, as from ourselves, but our su ciency is from God” (II Cor. 3:5). Therefore,
it is most truly said that by grace we are not only given the ability to do more easily what we
could with di culty do by our natural powers, but, the ability to will and to accomplish what
These good works which are done with prevenient grace, accompanying grace, and
following grace do not merit eternal life without the gift of sanctity by which the just are
joined with Christ as members with the head and are associated as sons of God by grace
with the natural Son of God. Our Lord tells us: "As the branch cannot bear fruit of itself
unless it remain on the vine, so neither can you unless you abide in me" (John 15:4). The
Apostle says: "But if we are sons, we are heirs with Christ" (Rom. 8:17).
Those who die in this grace will, with certainty, obtain eternal life, the crown of justice, and
just as certainly, they who die deprived of this grace will never arrive at eternal life. For
death is the end of our pilgrimage, and shortly after death we stand before the judgment
seat of God "so that each one may receive what he has won through the body according to
his works, 'whether good or evil" (II Core 5:10). And after this mortal life there is no place
left for repentance for justi cation.
Therefore, all who die in actual mortal sin are excluded from the kingdom of God and will
su er forever the torments of hell where there is no redemption. Also those who die with
only original sin will never have the holy vision of God. The souls of those who die in the
charity of God before they have done su cient penance for their sins of commission or
omission, are puri ed after death with the punishment of purgatory.
Finally, the souls of those who have not incurred any stain of sin after their baptism, or who
have committed a sin and have been puri ed either while they were in the body or after
death, are soon taken into heaven and there they clearly see the Triune God and enjoy the
divine essence for all eternity.
Therefore, we are warned to do good works while we still have time because "the night is
coming, when no one can work" (John 9:4).
Canons of Chapter 5.
(1). If anyone denies that the order of supernatural grace was restored by Christ the
Redeemer: let him be anathema.
(2). If anyone says that justi cation is nothing but the remission of sins; or that sanctifying
grace is nothing but the favor with which God received man as pleasing and is prepared to
give him the helps of actual grace: let him be anathema.
(3). If anyone says that sanctifying grace is not a permanent supernatural gift, inhering in the
soul: let him be anathema.
(4). If anyone says that a man without grace and faith can be justi ed before God merely by
observing the divine commandments: let him be anathema.
(5). If anyone says that the rational nature, without divine grace through Christ Jesus, is
capable of doing any good work that disposes for Christian justice and eternal life: let him
be anathema.
(6). If anyone says that a man can be justi ed even after death; or if he says that the
punishments of the damned in hell will not last forever: let him be anathema;
Copyright © 1998 by Inter Miri ca