Sustainable Investments
Muhammad Aafaq Nabi
Student ID: 31815588
Introduction
The 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) adopted by the United Nations General
Assembly in 2015 represent a comprehensive framework for achieving a more just and
sustainable future. These goals encompass a broad range of interconnected issues, including
poverty, hunger, inequality, climate change, and peace.
Goal 8, Decent Work and Economic Growth, occupies a central position within this
framework. It recognizes the crucial role that economic development plays in poverty reduction
and improving living standards. However, the goal transcends a simplistic focus on economic
growth. The SDG 8 focuses on sustainable economic growth of at least 7% for least developed
countries and with this, focus to reduce unemployment by introducing policies to improve
employment, achieving higher productivity through innovation and promoting equality, decent
work while combatting child labour and trafficking. Universal access to banking and insurance is
another common objective.
This growing trend within the investment landscape, in which clients have become more
inclined towards recognizing the interconnectedness of economic prosperity and social justice,
means that SDG 8 is the right choice for my client, a wealthy UK-based investor, as it addresses
these concerns by promoting sustainable economic practices that foster decent work
opportunities and inclusive growth. For an investor who is values-driven, this sustainable
development goal presents a unique opportunity to achieve a synergy between financial
objectives and positive societal impact.
To be more specific, monetary returns are mostly going to be positive because in search
of economic growth, the investor is likely to invest in SME’s, invest in sustainable infrastructure
and sectors like renewable energy, EV’s and housing. The investor might even invest in skills
and development programs and can act as a VC to encourage new skills and business which will
not only give employment opportunities but with that, improve economic growth which can lead
to great returns; both financially and for the community as a whole, which is the end-goal of the
investor. For instance, even the Rise Fund by TPG Capital focuses on SDG 8 by investing in
skills, education, entrepreneurship, healthcare and financial services and has consistently
delivered positive returns on the way to achieving their goal. Another example that exists in the
current market is that of Omidyar Network, which was created by the co-founder of eBay. They
are acting in another similar initiative which focuses on economic growth and employment.
Investment Approach
A growing number of investors seek to align their wealth with their personal values and
convictions. My client can do this as well using several ESG investment strategies, one of which
includes Impact Investing. Impact investing is unique in that it specifically targets businesses or
capital sources that can be shown to contribute to Goal 8. Businesses that support fair labor
practices, initiatives for financial inclusion, or skill development programs could all be
considered investments. Since investments directly support the creation of decent jobs and
economic growth, this strategy perfectly satisfies the client’s desire for positive impact. Impact
investing firms and organizations, such as Acumen, Bridges Fund Management, and Omidyar
Network, specialize in deploying capital towards projects that advance economic growth and
social inclusion.
Another strategy is Environmental, Social, and Governance, or ESG Integration. Using
this approach, businesses are examined in terms of all ESG factors, including social factors that
are closely related to Goal 8: Decent Work and Economic Growth. This could entail evaluating
employee well-being programs, diversity and inclusion policies, and labor standards. My client
can invest in businesses with strong social practices by incorporating ESG considerations with
financial analysis. This could lead to improved long-term performance and the promotion of
decent work. While effectively evaluating companies through ESG analysis requires expertise in
this domain, it will remain beneficial in the long run. Asset managers like BlackRock and
Vanguard have integrated ESG factors into their investment processes and offer ESG-focused
investment products to clients.
A separate ESG strategy that can be used by my client is Corporate Engagement and
Shareholder Advocacy. Through this approach, the client is able to leverage their shareholder
power to pressure businesses to adopt more socially responsible business practices that support
Goal 8, such as improving employment, achieving higher productivity through innovation and
promoting equality, decent work while combatting child labour and trafficking. This could entail
promoting diversity goals, better working conditions, or equitable pay. Shareholder resolutions,
dialogues with company management, and proxy voting are among the strategies employed by
investors to address labor-related issues and encourage companies to adopt responsible business
practices. This strategy obliquely contributes to Goal 8 by enabling the client to use their
investment voice to effect positive change within the businesses they invest in, making it an
active form of prioritizing the Sustainable Development Goals. Institutional investors like
CalPERS and PRI (Principles for Responsible Investment) engage with companies on labor
rights and workforce development issues as part of their ESG and sustainability efforts.
Finally, another investment strategy that is best used when aiming for the goals in
relation to Decent Work and Economic Growth is Gender Lens Investing. One important
component of Goal 8 is gender equality, and Gender Lens Investing focuses on businesses that
support it. Investing in companies with strong female leadership, equal pay policies, and
initiatives promoting women's economic empowerment are a few ways to achieve this. Gender
Lens Investing supports equal opportunities for economic growth and participation, which is
consistent with the spirit of Goal 8. Additionally, studies indicate that businesses with a high
degree of gender diversity perform better and may even have higher return potential. It is
imperative to have a clear understanding of how gender equality metrics are incorporated into the
investment strategy in order to make a meaningful change. Gender lens investing firms and
organizations, such as Criterion Institute and Women’s World Banking, specialize in deploying
capital towards investments that support women’s economic participation and empowerment.
Utilizing ESG Integration as the foundation ensures all investments consider social
factors relevant to Goal 8. Additionally, engaging with companies where the client has
significant holdings and advocating for Goal 8-aligned practices further strengthens the
approach. By combining the aforementioned approaches, the client can achieve their primary
objective of accounting for the challenges and opportunities presented by the goal, while
potentially achieving their secondary objective of positive impact through targeted investments
and active ownership.
To further implement the aforementioned strategies, the client will be advised to focus on
a combination of asset classes that cater to their financial goals and impact objectives.
Strong ESG policies should be given priority, especially by businesses that show a
dedication to diversity and inclusion, fair wages, and decent work. These businesses will
probably be in a strong position to grow over the long run in an inclusive and sustainable
economy. Furthermore, after investigating thematic stock selections in industries like clean
technology, sustainable infrastructure, and renewable energy that directly support SDG 8, such
as Siemens, and even Tesla, the client can be guided in making a more appropriate decision
regarding investment.
Additionally, green bonds are fixed-income securities with proceeds designated for
projects that promote environmental sustainability. Green bonds can support sustainable
economic practices and help create good jobs in the clean energy industry, and do directly
address several aspects of SDG 8. These bonds are in line with the client’s values because they
have the potential to yield steady returns while also having a positive environmental impact.
The client can create a diversified and significant portfolio with this mix of asset classes
and investing techniques. They will be exposed to businesses that are positioned for long-term
success in an inclusive and sustainable economy through ESG integration. The specific
allocation across these strategies and asset classes will be tailored to the client’s tolerance and
desired impact level, ensuring a balance between achieving their financial goals and contributing
to a more sustainable future.
Alternative Approaches
While several ESG approaches, among the ones mentioned previously, can effectively
align my client’s investor portfolio with Decent Work and Economic Growth, some strategies
might not be the most suitable choices given the client’s goals and aims.
It goes without saying that the traditional form of investing is off the table. The
traditional approach without considering Environmental, Social, and Governance Integration,
focuses solely on financial returns, which is what my client is trying to avoid. Companies with
poor labor standards, limited diversity, or disregard for employee well-being might offer
attractive returns in the short term, but could face reputational risks, regulatory challenges, and
ultimately, hinder long-term growth. Additionally, these companies do not contribute positively
to achieving Goal 8.
For instance, Negative Screening is one. This strategy entails eliminating entire sectors or
businesses from the pool of potential investments based on predetermined standards that might
go against the values of Goal 8. The client may decide, for example, to omit any businesses
involved in the fossil fuel industry. This tactic can be overly simplistic when focusing on the
goal my client has in mind. Taking entire industries out of the picture could leave out businesses
that are actively moving toward more sustainable practices and encouraging decent work. For
example, a fossil fuel company may be making significant investments in employee retraining
programs and renewable energy sources, which is in line with Goal 8.
Not only would negative screening miss any positive developments that could happen in
the future, but it also shrinks the investable universe for the client. This can make it challenging
to achieve a well-diversified portfolio, potentially increasing risk. A diversified portfolio is
crucial for managing overall investment risk.
Similarly, another strategy that would not be suitable for my client is Portfolio Tilt.
Portfolio Tilt’s primary mechanism is influencing broader market trends. The client's desire for a
positive social impact goes beyond influencing market trends. Portfolio Tilt's indirect approach,
relying on companies within overweighted sectors to improve their social practices, offers
limited control. This could be frustrating for a client seeking a more demonstrably impactful
approach.
Furthermore, Portfolio Tilt can be susceptible to “greenwashing”. If ESG Integration is
not used in conjunction with overweighting a sector linked to Goal 8, organizations with subpar
social practices may inadvertently be included in the client’s roster. Significant overweighs can
also raise the risk of portfolio concentration, which a client who is risk averse might not want.
Alternative approaches can better address the client’s goals, such as the ones mentioned
above.
ESG Data
Effectively implementing an ESG integration strategy with a specific focus on
Sustainable Development goal of Decent Work and Economic Growth requires a comprehensive
understanding of the necessary data and inputs.
The cornerstone of ESG integration lies in Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG)
ratings. Reputable providers like Sustainalytics, MSCI ESG, and ISS ESG offer these ratings,
which assess a company's performance across various ESG factors. When focusing on SDG 8,
relevant factors include labor practices (e.g., child labor, forced labor, worker safety), decent
work conditions (e.g., living wages, employee benefits, employee relations), diversity and
inclusion, and responsible supply chain management. These ratings become crucial for
evaluating a company's contribution to SDG 8. Integrating ESG ratings with financial data
allows for a risk-adjusted return analysis, ensuring that companies with strong SDG 8
performance are not solely prioritized at the expense of sound financial standing.
Developing a well-defined investment strategy is paramount for successful ESG
integration. Risk tolerance is another crucial consideration. As mentioned earlier, negative
screening, for instance, might limit the investable universe and potentially impact returns.
Understanding your risk tolerance allows for a more balanced approach that integrates both
financial and SDG 8 objectives.
Obtaining data specifically focused on a company's contribution to SDG 8 presents a
greater challenge compared to general ESG ratings. However, valuable resources exist to bridge
this gap. The UN Global Compact offers resources and reports on companies' progress towards
SDGs, providing valuable insights. The Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB)
offers industry-specific sustainability accounting standards, which might include SDG 8 related
metrics. National government reports on SDG progress can also be a source of relevant data.
Recognizing that availability and quality of data can differ greatly between locations and
industries is crucial. To get a complete picture, it is necessary to combine data from different
sources. The total strategy should also account for the cost of obtaining ESG data, particularly
for more detailed SDG-specific data.
Reporting
In order to evaluate our strategies, from a financial stand point, conventional financial
measures are still vital resources for determining the return on investments. Important
information is provided by the Internal Rate of Return (IRR), Net Present Value (NPV), and
Return on Investment (ROI). These metrics provide a clear picture of financial returns by
analyzing variables such as the initial investment, cash flows, and discount rate.
Additionally, we have to take into account adding risk-adjusted return measures such as
the Treynor or Sharpe ratios. These measures take into consideration the inherent risk in
obtaining those kinds of returns. A higher ratio denotes a more advantageous situation in which
the level of risk assumed in your investments has resulted in strong returns.
When it comes to non-financial performance evaluation, the objective is to assess the
progress of companies within the portfolio towards achieving specific SDG 8 targets. Metrics
that track changes in unemployment rates within a company's supply chain, implementation of
fair labor practices, or progress towards establishing living wages, are important to the data set.
A number of well-known impact measurement frameworks created especially for SDG
investing can be beneficial resources. These kinds of frameworks, which offer methods to
measure the social and environmental impact of investments, are provided by the Global Impact
Investing Network (GIIN). NGOs and industry experts are also good sources of qualitative
information about the non-financial components of the performance of the portfolio. Their
viewpoints can provide additional insight into the social and environmental effects of the
investments than the information found in reports.
Realizing a comprehensive understanding of the overall performance of the investments
is the ultimate goal. Investigating impact-weighted return metrics will help accomplish this.
These metrics incorporate the investments’ social and environmental impact in addition to
traditional financial returns. Impact-weighted returns standardized methodologies are still in the
early stages of development, but they present a promising way forward for thorough assessment.
Using multi-criteria decision-making frameworks is an additional strategy. Using these
frameworks, we can prioritize the client’s investments by allocating weights to various financial
and non-financial criteria (e.g., financial return vs. social impact). Through the application of
these weighted criteria, we can assess the performance of the portfolio and obtain a
comprehensive understanding of the overall performance of the client’s investments. By
implementing a combination of financial and non-financial evaluation methods, you can gain a
comprehensive understanding of your ESG investments' success, ensuring they deliver not only
financial returns but also contribute meaningfully to a more sustainable future.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the client has a special chance to build a portfolio that benefits from both
monetary gain and constructive social influence. The ideal framework for accomplishing this is
provided by SDG 8, which is centered on decent work and economic growth. The client can give
priority to businesses that uphold strong social practices, such as equitable pay, diversity, and
favorable working conditions, by strategically incorporating ESG considerations. This reduces
the long-term risks connected to subpar labor standards in addition to being consistent with the
client's values.
Moreover, approaches such as gender lens investing guarantee equitable financial
prospects, thereby directly supporting SDG 8. Impact-weighted returns also offer a
comprehensive picture of the performance of the portfolio by taking into account both monetary
gains and social good accomplished. It’s critical to stay away from strategies that restrict options,
like portfolio tilting and negative screening. It is also necessary to avoid greenwashing. Rather,
ESG integration provides a thorough method of assessing businesses, guaranteeing that every
investment makes a positive impact on a sustainable and equitable future. The client can
prioritize financial returns and social progress in their decision-making process by integrating
impact metrics and ESG data with traditional financial analysis. This enables them to leave a
beneficial legacy and develop a well-diversified portfolio with significant growth potential.
References
Coram, P. J., Mock, T. J., & Monroe, G. S. (2011). Financial analysts’ evaluation of enhanced
disclosure of non-financial performance indicators. The British Accounting Review,
43(2), 87–101.
Cote, C. (2022, September 15). 7 ESG Investment Strategies to consider: HBS Online. Business
Insights Blog. https://online.hbs.edu/blog/post/esg-investment-strategies
SASB Standards. IFRS. (2014). https://www.ifrs.org/issued-standards/sasb-standards/
Schramade, W. (2017). Investing in the UN Sustainable Development Goals: Opportunities for
Companies and Investors. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 29(2), 87–99.
Skvarciany, V., & Vidziunaite, S. (2022). Decent work and economic growth: the case study of
the BRICS countries. Forum Scientiae Oeconomia, 10(2), 73–89.
Sustainable development goals. UNDP. (2015). https://www.undp.org/sustainable-development-
goals/decent-work-and-economic-growth
