Scribd
Upload
2K views1 page

FRn's Are Fiat Money

Federal Reserve Notes are considered obligations of the United States according to federal law, but are not considered legal tender or good payment. Several court cases have established that Federal Reserve Notes only represent a promise to pay and do not constitute actual payment unless agreed upon by both parties. Additionally, one case ruled that Federal Reserve Notes were fiat money but not legal tender.

Uploaded by

api-3744408
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
2K views1 page

FRn's Are Fiat Money

Federal Reserve Notes are considered obligations of the United States according to federal law, but are not considered legal tender or good payment. Several court cases have established that Federal Reserve Notes only represent a promise to pay and do not constitute actual payment unless agreed upon by both parties. Additionally, one case ruled that Federal Reserve Notes were fiat money but not legal tender.

Uploaded by

api-3744408
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

Section 16 of the current Federal Reserve Act, which is codified at 12 USC 411, declares

that "Federal Reserve Notes" are "obligations of the United States".

However, as to ‘notes’, more specifically:

The “giving of a (federal reserve) note does not constitute payment.” (See: Echart v
Commissioners C.C.A., 42 Fd2d 158).

The use of a (federal reserve) ‘Note’ is only a promise to pay. (See: Fidelty Savings v
Grimes,
131 P2d 894).

That; Legal Tender (federal reserve) Notes are not good and lawful money of the United
States.
(See: Rains v State, 226 S.W. 189).

That; Federal Reserve Notes are valueless. (See: IRS Codes Section 1.1001-1 (4657)
C.C.H.)

That; (federal reserve) ‘Notes do not operate as payment in the absence of an agreement
that they
shall constitute payment.’ (See: Blachshear Mfg. Co. v Harrell, 12 S.E. 2d 766).

That; Jerome Daly vs. First National Bank of Montgomery, Minn., Justice Martin V.
Mahony, Credit River Township, December 7-9, 1968; Ruled that Federal Reserve
Notes were fiat money and not legal tender.

You might also like